HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_1999_AnnualReportBoard of County Commissioners
for Washington County, Maryland
100 West Washington Street
Hagerstown, MD 21740
Dear Commissioners:
This report submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 66B of the Annotated
Code, summarized the activities of the Commission from July 1, 1998 through June 30,
1999.
In addition to the routine review and approval of subdivisions and site plans, the
Commission continued to implement the Comprehensive Plan that was adopted in 1981. The
various elements of the Plan worked on by the Commission in Fiscal Year 1999 are
described in this report along with the numerous other tasks undertaken during this fiscal
year.
As in the past, the new Work Program that has been formally adopted by the Planning
Commission lists all those tasks the Commission plans to address.
Sincerely,
Robert C. Arch,
Planning Director
RCA/dsk/bds
RECYCLED PAPER
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Implementation of policies associated with the Comprehensive Plan continued
through FY 1999. Items, which are outlined in greater detail in other sections of this
report, are directly related or reflect some aspect of the implementation of the policy
and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. During FY 1999 the Planning Commission
worked to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan through adoption of
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Water and Sewer
Plan.
Work also has continued on the update of the Comprehensive Plan in
accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act of 1992. Information received
from public informational meetings held in FY 1988 was used as basis for development
of goals and objectives. A detailed analysis of current land use patterns and trends in
the County was completed. A number of maps for inclusion in Comprehensive Plan
update began being compiled and supporting text developed. Work on the
Comprehensive Plan update was anticipated to continue throughout the next fiscal
year.
In compliance with State growth management initiatives a priority funding areas
map was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and forwarded to the State
Office of Planning.
Since the Comprehensive Plan adoption in 1981, the Planning Commission and
the Planning Staff have worked continuously to implement its strategies for growth
management in Washington County. The attached work program for FY 2000 is
designed to continue that effort.
1
w
5
0
P4
P4
G4
0
ril
H
U
W
h
0
a
a
a
H
U
W
P4
w
vl 0 W
cn zz o H
w w qzw a a
7 W 0 H N W V H 0
- - U z N rPPr�4i
a Q H H e" fL S H v) fk N
a a H z l+ >C H w a Ll
z E :� Q ips7 H E z m uEA pi F
o U xwH>y o�tuz as
:7 H a 0 9 m m 4z.1 z 'Wj Wir7-
WErl 7 3 W z a w a H z H a 0 ''ST H-�i 7 H z 0
NW P'. w> H to a U r W Ea a R H H W U
W U W H - - H a ,7 H r7 H U4 H O r7
W Dd W z N 0 H H 94 H z 8 a U H a a m a
P: f>'..- m N O '�'�ra CA W ix7y]i N RHi � 9 `p.A z O 0 9 w I 0 P4 N 9 9 E
mi SIA a > 4 .3'� R: \ a n'i a'T'. U U] C/l N ,'F. 1-4 4 a � ry' U W .3:
pH 54 N 0 tH1l
W H O F a
r.1 E 1]
U1% C4 14 04v) f4 R a Z .
14 m x U' 0 U U
2
AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM
Washington County's efforts to preserve valuable farmland via the Maryland
Agricultural Land Preservation Program (MALPP) began in April 1978 and has
continued to date. The Program was established and is regulated by Agricultural
Article, Sections 2-541 through 2-515 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. It is
administered through a Planning Commission staff member, by the Washington County
Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board, the County Commissioners, and the
Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) of the Maryland
Department of Agriculture.
The program encourages landowners to voluntarily enter into an Agricultural
Land Preservation District in which it is agreed that the land will not be developed for a
period of at least five years (to receive County tax credits, the landowner is required to
commit his property to agricultural use only, for a period of ten years). In return for the
restriction, the landowner receives protection from nuisance complaints and becomes
eligible to sell a Development Rights Easement. A landowner may exercise the option
of selling a Development Rights Easement to the Agricultural Land Preservation
Foundation provided that his offer to sell is recommended by the County's Advisory
Board and the County Commissioners. At the local level, the Agricultural Advisory
Board reviews and ranks easement applications, assigning point value to such items as
farm size, soil quality and development pressure indicators on its easement checklist. If
purchased by the State of Maryland, the easement will remain effective in perpetuity.
During FY 1999, total acreage in the program increased to 26,334 acres with a
total of 194 agricultural districts.
3
Under the MALPP easement purchase program, contracts were issued during
FY 1999 for eight (8) additional farms, bringing total easement properties in the
program to 34 equaling 6,348 acres. In addition, ongoing Federal, State and private
conservation easements around Antietam Battlefield effectively preserve an additional
5,451 acres of agricultural land in perpetuity. The Battlefield figure includes properties
from the newly funded Rural Legacy Program (RLP). In FY 1999 option contracts were
written under RLP for 626 acres.
4
AGRICULTURAL SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT
1980 TO JUNE 30, 1999
Total Developed Total Converted
TOTAL 21,172.2 8,298 4,771.7 1,230 22.4
22.4% of the land developed between 1980 and June 30,1999 has been converted
from agriculturally significant land.
*Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning Commission's
Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal year.
5
ACREAGE
LOTS
ACREAGE
LOTS
%CONVERTED
1980
1,359.6
365
487.8
95
36.0
1981
1,137.1
332
251.3
59
22.0
1982
964.9
150
194.4
33
20.1
1983
895.3
220
305.6
127
34.1
1984
1,092.3
235
409.6
68
37.5
1985
1,144.6
231
439.8
65
38.4
1986
946.9
250
138.8
60
14.6
1987`
2,254.6
995
363.1
94
16.1
1989
1,714.8
770
301.3
86
17.5
1990
1,769A
820
318.6
102
18.0
1991
1,115.4
339
321.6
104
28.8
1992
1,246.9
565
203.5
46
16.3
1993
793.5
1,005
156.8
45
19.8
1994
833.2
312
121.0
42
14.5
1995
598.6
342
208.6
76
34.8
1996
995.9
506
191.8
37
19.3
1997
760.8
224
174.0
39
22.9
1998
754.8
395
151.0
40
20.0
1999
793.9
242
33.1
12
4.2
TOTAL 21,172.2 8,298 4,771.7 1,230 22.4
22.4% of the land developed between 1980 and June 30,1999 has been converted
from agriculturally significant land.
*Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning Commission's
Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal year.
5
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
During FY 1999, the Hagerstown/Eastern Panhandle Metropolitan Planning
Organization continued to move forward. The Organization is composed of
representatives from Washington County, Maryland; Berkley County, West Virginia;
Jefferson County, West Virginia; and Franklin County, Pennsylvania. The
organization's home base is in the Washington County Planning Department. During
the fiscal year, special studies were completed on several projects. These included: an
impact analysis of the new 1-70 & MD 632 Interchange on Hagerstown intersections,
identification of four optional alignments for the Funkstown Bypass, development of
three optional alignments for hiker/biker trails from Harper's Ferry to Charles Town in
West Virginia, and completion of Civil War Route map for the years 1862-1864. One
change order to the studies was exercised and that was an extension of the Civil War
Route Mapping project to include the years for 1861 and 1865.
A new Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the years 2000 - 2002 was
adopted and a UPWP work program was adopted that identified several new special
studies. These include: realignment of Rench Road with MD 65 and Battlecreek
Boulevard intersection; alignment for Eastern Boulevard extension to Marsh Pike;
alignment of a potential bicycle pedestrian trail between Hagerstown and Williamsport,
a study to evaluate the feasibility of a downtown Hagerstown trolley system, and a study
to look at ways of promoting the telecommuting center in downtown Hagerstown in
order to reduce commuter trips.
The MPO's presence as a transportation planning agency continued to evolve
with letters of support requested from various local communities applying for Federal
Transportation Enhancement Funds. These included downtown pedestrian facility
rehabilitation projects in Hagerstown, Maryland and Charles Town, West Virginia.
C
TOWN PLANNER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Town Planner Assistance Program is nearing its eight-year of service and
assistance to municipal governments in Washington County. The Town of Boonsboro
remained the most active participant in the program with the Town of Smithsburg also
participating. The Towns have found the program to be a viable option to employing a
full-time staff person.
The Town Planner organizes the monthly agenda, anaylzes and coordinates the
review of development proposals and assists in long term or comprehensive planning
goals of the Town. The position also provides assistance with other issues such as
annexations, forest conservation application, utility planning and transportation
planning.
During the fiscal year the Town of Boonsboro primarily focused on minor updates
to the Zoning Ordinance and a major rewrite of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Town
of Smithsburg remains emphasis this year was on development of a new Zoning
Ordinance for the town.
7
FOREST CONSERVATION PROGRAM
Washington County continues to implement the local version of Maryland's Forest
Conservation law. Through the inventory of existing forest on development sites and the
calculation of minimum forest cover, based on existing forest and proposed development,
the law is designed to slow the loss of valuable forest land in the State of Maryland.
Several options for meeting obligations under the Ordinance are available. The first
preferences are to prevent the disturbance of existing forest or to plant new forest on the
development site. Planting new forest and placing easements on existing forest off site are
also available. Payment of a fee in lieu of planting or retention is also allowable.
In the past fiscal year the Washington County Planning Department processed 217
subdivision and site plan applications covering 4,459.18 acres of land. 159 or 73% of
those applications were exempt from the requirements of the Forest Conservation
Ordinance (FCO), approximately equal to the previous year's exemptions. The chart
below indicates the number and type of exemptions granted in the past fiscal year.
A. < 40,000 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL
2
B. SIMPLIFIED PLAT
49
C. APPLICATION BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE
2
D. OWNERIIMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER DWELLING
41
E. EXISTING LOT OF RECORD
9
F. PUD BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE
6
G. AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY
0
H. REAL ESTATE TRANSFER
12
I. REPLATS
337
J. MINING
I
TOTAL SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN
REVIEW EXEMPTIONS 159
0
58 plans remain that must comply with the Ordinance in some other manner.
Payment of the fee in lieu of planting is chosen most often. Of the 58 plans that
were not exempt, 21 used the fee in lieu of planting choice, a 32% decrease from the
previous fiscal year. The approved payments will generate over $144,000 for the Forest
Conservation Fund although only $ 118,579.19 in actual payments were collected during
the fiscal year. The collected fees are equivalent to 27.22 acres of forest that were not
required to be planted on development sites. Instead, these funds are used in a program
developed and administered cooperatively with the Soil Conservation District to expend fee
in lieu of funds to create new forest or permanently protect existing forest on private
properties. Use of the fund is restricted by Maryland law to these efforts.
This year's activities saw an additional 26.31 acres of new forest planted and 1.88
acres of forested stream buffer permanently protected by easements at a total cost of
$103,676.36 or approximately $3,677.77 per acre. The amount of new forest or
permanently protected existing forest has risen to 181.47 acres. Expenditures from the
Forest Conservation Fund now total $394,168.56. Since adoption of the Forest
Conservation Ordinance in February 1993, the fee in lieu of option has generated over $
550,000.00 for the Forest Conservation Fund.
A portion of the Forest Conservation Fund is earmarked for reforestation of the West
Woods at Antietam National Battlefield, an arrangement that was approved by the Planning
Commission and the Board of County Commissioners in November 1994. There were no
disbursements for planting at the Battlefield in this fiscal year.
17 plans required no fees or planting because there was sufficient forest on the
development site or another one under developer control to allow some clearing with no
mitigation or no clearing was proposed or necessary.
9
An additional 17 plans met forest conservation obligations in a previous phase of
the development or plan review. New planting, a final method of compliance was used
three times in the past fiscal year and produced 30.62 acres of new forest planted in
environmentally sensitive or priority areas.
All methods of compliance generate a plan review fee. There is no fee when a plan
is exempt. The Planning Department collected $ 5,723.25 in Forest Conservation Plan
review fees during the past fiscal year.
An additional 16 exemptions from the Forest Conservation Ordinance were granted
for timber harvest activities which are not considered development activities.
Lug
WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN
There were no applications for amendments to the Water & Sewerage Plan
received during FY 1999.
Work on the State mandated update of the Water and Sewerage Plan which
began in FY 1997 and suspended in FY 1998 remained suspended pending the
drafting of a new Comprehensive Plan for Washington County.
11
PARK AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Park and environmental planning during FY 1999, as in previous years, including
a diverse series of projects and activities. A greenway concept plan for the Hopewell
Valley development area was produced. A site plan sketch of the Pinesburg Ballfield
Complex was provided to the Parks department to aid in a Zoning appeal case, as well as
a landscaping and cost estimate plan for perennial flowers and ground cover in Marty
Snook Park.
Plans for stream access ramps at Devils Backbone and Wilson Bridge Park, along
with the necessary WRA permit applications were prepared for the Parks Department.
Several Forest Ordinance related project were completed in FY 1999; forest
sampling and preparation of a detailed FSD and report for the Kemps Mill Park Site, as well
as for a parcel at the County Water & Sewer Department, Forest Stand Delineation/Forest
Conservation Plan review was completed for the Hunter's Green development in the
Hopewell Valley area, and for the Hagerstown Washington County Industrial Foundation
comprehensive FCP. Updating and streamlining of the Forest Conservation Ordinance
was started with the objective of including appropriate amendments allowed by state
legislation. Any amendments will require a public review process before final adoption.
Presentations to each of the town councils requesting endorsement of the joint
application with Frederick and Carroll County for a Civil War Heritage theme Heritage Area
was completed early in 1999. The Resolutions of Endorsement were included in the
application to the Maryland Heritage Preservation and Tourism Area Program, as the first
step in the process of achieving State certification.
Revision and updating of sections of the County Comprehensive Plan was begun.
Chapters discussing Environmental Resource Management and Community Facilities were
selected for revisions.
12
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
The Washington County Historic District Commission continues to pursue its
responsibilities and concerns regarding historic preservation through a variety of
permits, applications and assignments from individuals and agencies. The Commission
and the County can influence and encourage preservation through several different
levels of review, incentives and education.
Property tax credits are available for restoration, preservation or improvements
to structures located in the County's Historic Preservation or Antietam Overlay zoning
designations. Proposals must be designed according to adopted standards and
approved by the Commission. Although no new tax credit applications were submitted
or approved during the fiscal year, three property owners were able to use Historic
Preservation property tax credits left over from the previous year.
Following a policy adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 1989, the
Historic District Commission reviewed ten proposed demolition applications with varying
outcomes. Upon further study, two of the applications were determined to not be
subject to the policy. On one occasion the Commission presented no opposition to the
application because the subject building was to be dismantled and reconstructed in a
safer location. Three applications involved structures at the site of the Kammerer
house, a late 18th century stone dwelling attributed to an early German immigrant and
generated strong opinions in favor of and opposed to the demolition. Three additional
applications concerned a complex of buildings consisting of a spring Douse, smoke
house and stone dwelling which the Commission did not oppose due to the severe
deterioration of the structures. Finally, the Commission reviewed, after the fact, a
demolition application for a large log house believed to date from the early 19th century
on Mt Aetna Road. The building had been demolished prior to Commission review.
13
The Commission completed only one design review application and approved an
addition to a modern dwelling located in the Antietam Overlay zone.
Among the many responsibilities accompanying the Commission's Certified
Local Government (CLG) status is participation in the National Register of Historic
Places nomination process. Six additional properties were evaluated and
recommended for listing including Cedar Grove, the Clagett Farm, St. Mark's Episcopal
Church, the Johann Ludwig Kammerer house, the Piper House and the Goad -Hartle
Farm. The Board of County Commissioners concurred with the HDC in recommending
all for listing in the National Register. Other CLG activities included conducting Phase
Il of the Rural Community Survey, a detailed historic sites survey and documentation of
Pen Mar, Highfield, Cascade, Fairplay and Tilghmanton.
The Commission's participation in the development review process remained
level over this past fiscal year. It reviewed Preliminary Consultations, subdivisions and
site plans and occasionally made recommendations to protect existing structures listed
in the Historic Sites Survey.
14
Community Development
The Division of Community Development provides direct assistance to individuals, organizations and
municipalities in providing housing opportunities for low and moderate income families, community
infrastructure and facilities, and assists in the economic development of the county where federal and
state funds are utilized. These programs and activities provide a general framework for combating
neighborhood and community deterioration through sound redevelopment efforts.
Housing Repair Loan Programs
Housing Preservation Grant
Maryland Housing Rehabilitation Program
Washington County Revolving Loan Program
Emergency Grant Repair Program
These loan programs have been effective tools for providing essential home repairs and stabilizing the
housing stock in neighborhoods and small communities. Rehabilitation expands the community's tax
base, extends the economic value of the housing stock and stimulates additional construction activities.
Housing Preservation Grant:
This program of the Rural Development Administration, provides assistance to low and very low income
homeowners in the County. Funds are mostly reserved for use by the County's elderly population who
have a fixed income and no affordability to support conventional loan terms. Loans are available to help
with property repairs which are primarily health and safety related issues.
Maryland Housing Rehabilitation Program
The Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development, offers this program for the
rehabilitation of homes and rental properties that serve income eligible occupants. Health, safety,
structural and code violations receive first priority.
Revolving Loan Fund
Utilizing the repayments from previous loans, we can continue to assist eligible households with
rehabilitation efforts. This program is more flexible in the use of its funds and can be used for residential,
business, and public renovations.
Emergency Grant Repair Program
Washington County has an emergency repair grants program available to qualified homeowners. An
"emergency repair" is a life threatening situation which prohibits someone from living in a safe, decent or
sanitary condtions.
15
Elderly Rental Housing Development
The department promotes the production of affordable rental housing for the elderly and non elderly
disabled which may be unavailable through the private sector due to income limitations. Our
developments provide coordinated supportive services to allow the elderly population to maintain their
independence and avoid costly alternatives. The department is proactive in project oversight throughout
the development process.
Community Development Block Grant Program
This federal program provides grants and loans to counties and municipalities for the development or
expansion of economic opportunities, public facilities and various housing activities. Local government can
apply directly or undertake in joint projects on behalf of a larger application. The department can provide
assistance with application preparation, project development, financial packaging and project
management.
Technical Assistance
The department is available to assist public, private, not for profit groups and individuals who may be
interested in gaining access or better understanding of the state and federal programs. Assistance is
available to examine the feasibility of projects, funding avenues and regulatory requirements.
16
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Development proposals were reviewed by the Planning Commission in both
concept and final form. The Commission reviewed and approved 93 residential,
commercial, industrial or institutional subdivision plats involving 242 lots representing
379 dwelling units on 793.9 acres. In addition, the Planning Commission approved 29
site plans and Feld 9 preliminary consultations. Some of the conceptual forms have not
resulted in a firm design while others have proceeded through final approval.
There were several subdivisions or development plats of significance (final
approval of twenty or more lots or dwelling units) approved during FY 1999. They
include: Cross Creek South, Lakeside Park Motel Home Park, The Village at
Robinwood, and Sterling Oaks Phase Ill.
Site Plans representing significant private investment within the County were
approved for: RPS Distribution, Microtel Motel, Waffle House (two sites), Phoenix Color,
Kiplinger Automotive, DOT Foods, Prime Outlets, Saint James Square, Sharpsburg
Pike Inn, Cracker Barrel, and Crosspoint Shopping Center.
Site Plan reflecting significant public investment were approved for the
Washington County Water and Sewer Department, Hagerstown Regional Airport, Clear
Spring Elementary School, and Kemps Mill Park.
17
REZONING CASES AND ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
Between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999, the Planning Commission acted on
applications. Joint hearings with the Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners were held regularly on a quarterly cycle or special hearings were held as
necessary to provide for efficiency in the hearing process. The Commission rendered
recommendations on map amendments and text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
2 text amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance and 1 map and text amendment to the
Water and Sewer Plan. A listing of the Planning Commission's recommendations and
the Board's actions for the cases heard in FY 1999 are as follows:
CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD
AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION
RZ-98-10
Planning
Map
10.59 acre
PI to A
App'd
App'd
Commission
RZ-98-11
Planning
Text
Cellular Towers
WITHDRAWN
Commission
HI -2 and RU
RZ-98-12
Triad Properties
Map
41,382 sq.ft.
A to BT
App'd
App'd
RZ-98-13
Hickory Corner
Map
.640 acres
BS to BL
App'd
App'd
RZ-98-14
Gerald & Carolyn
Map
2.022 acres
RS to BT
App'd
App'd
Cump
RZ-98-15
County
Map/Text
Add Sec. 19C
Commissioners
C to SED
App'd
App'd
RZ-98-16
Sharpsburg Pike LLC Map
9.62 acres
Hl -2 to HI -1
App'd
App'd
0.44 acres
RZ-98-17
H.B. Mellot
Map
79 acres
C to IM
App'd
App'd
RZ-98-18
Marcella Klinger
Text
Section 22.51
Denied
Denied
18
CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD
AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION
RZ-99-01 Board of County Text Cellular Towers App'd App'd
Commissioners
RZ-99-02 Board of County Text Art. 22, Div. IX App'd App'd
Commissioners
RZ-99-03 Board of County Text Sec. 5.1a;5.3b;6.3g; 7.1a; 7.3f;
Commissioners 13.1 b; 15.1 a and 4.13 App'd App'd
RZ-99-04 Planning Commission Text Sec. 22.21 App'd App'd
SO -99-01 Planning Commission Text Art. IV Sec.
405.1116.1 App'd App'd
SO -99-02 Planning Commission Text Sec. 318 App'd App'd
WS -98-1 City of Hagerstown Map & Text Centre of Hagerstown App'd App'd
ILI
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS STATISTICS
FISCAL YEAR 1998199
GRANTED
VARIANCES 115
6*ywxill_1l
EXCEPTIONS
51
EXPANSION OF
0
NON -CONFORMING USE
1
CHANGE OF
0
NON -CONFORMING USE
7
ADMINISTRATIVE
0
ERROR
2
APPEAL FROM
4
PLANNING COMMISSION
5
APPEAL FROM ADEQUATE
7
PUBLIC FACILITIES
0
APPEAL FOR FLOOD PLAIN
0
APPEAL SPECIAL CONDITION
0
TOTAL
181
FISCAL YEAR 1996.1997
159
DENIED DENIEDWP WITHDRAWN VOID TOTAL
7 1 2 6 131
5
0
3
0
59
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
4
0
1
0
7
3
0
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
1
7
6
214
18
4
9
5
195
20
WASHINGTON COUNTY MD
AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT
FOR PERIOD 07/01/98 THRU 06/30/99
PLANNING ELECTION AGRICULTURAL NEW USE
SECTOR DISTRICT ACREAGE LOST LOTS (TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT)
2
6 2.7 1 SF
19 10.1 1 LL
TOTAL 12.7 2
3
4
5
8 3.0 1 SF
TOTAL 3.0 1
7 6.3 4 SF
TOTAL 6.3 4
4 7.0 3 SF
23 4.1 2 SF
TOTAL 11.1 6
GRAND TOTAL 33.1 12
21
WASHINGTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS
DISTRICT NO DISTRICT NAME
FARM TYPE ACRES RECORDED TYPE
EASEMENT DATE
AD -80-001
FORD
CROP
178.59
07/11/80
10
02/24/83
AD -80-002
CARR
DAIRY
245.64
07/11/80
10
12/21/82
AD -80-004
ST JAMES SCHOOL INC
CROP
279.14
04/21/80
5
AD -80-006
HARSHMAN
CROP
232.44
08/07/80
10
04/16/96
AD -80-007
LOHMAN
CROP
146.00
08/15/80
10
06/01/00
AD -81-002
MARTIN
CROP
140.00
08/28/81
10
05/15/84
AD -82-003
ANKENEY
CROP
460.00
05/11/83
10
02/18/86
AD -83-002
WEISENBAUGH
BEEF
314.00
06/28/83
10
12/19/86
AD -83-002
WEISENBAUGH
BEEF
314.00
06/28/83
10
12/19/86
AD -83-003
HAYES
BEEF
200.55
03/19/84
10
09/06/85
AD -84-002
ROBBINS
BEEF
448.00
05/14/85
10
12/31/86
AD -85-001
WOLFINGER
BEEF
149.63
04/07/86
10
AD -86-001
ROSENBERRY
CROP
127.51
08/12/86
10
AD -88-001
MAIN
CROP
142.26
06/16/88
10
06/30/89
AD -88-002
ROWLAND
FOREST
700.04
03/09/89
10
03/07/91
AD -88-003
CORCORAN
CROP
158.42
03/22/89
10
051/01197
AD -88-004
RITCHIE
DAIRY
237.99
04/12/89
10
09/24/90
AD -89-001
GOLDEN
ORCHARD
457.67
06/20/89
5
AD -89-002
STRITE
DAIRY
192.43
03/18/91
10
AD -89-003
BYERS
DAIRY
164.61
09/13/89
10
02/15/91
AD -89-005
HERBST
DAIRY
183.99
04/16/91
10
04/01/00
AD -89-005A
HERBST
DAIRY
172.12
04/16/91
10
07/26/95
AD -90-001
EMSWILER
CROP
100.00
09/20/90
10
05/01/97
AD -90-002
CORCORAN
CROP
150.14
09/20/90
10
08/30/93
AD -90-005
SCHOOLEY
FOREST
101.05
03/20/91
10
AD -90-006
HARP
CROP
924.70
09/20/90
10
06/29/92
AD -90-007
HARP
CROP
150.51
09/20/90
10
06/30/92
AD -90-008
WILES
CROP
190.88
03/20/91
10
AD -90-009
SCHOOLEY
FOREST
21.60
03/20/91
10
AD -90-010
ENGSTROM
CROP
38.59
04/16/91
10
AD -90-011
BURTNER
DAIRY
108.81
04/16/91
10
AD -90-012
DURBIN
CROP
100.38
03/20/91
10
01/13/95
AD -90-013
WEAVER
DAIRY
174.05
08/05/91
10
AD -90-014
WEAVER
BEEF
82.34
11/20/90
10
AD -90-015
CLINE
CROP
145.25
08/05/91
10
AD -90-017
PRICE
CROP
149.64
11/20/90
10
AD -90-018
LONG
DAIRY
163.88
04/16/91
10
AD -90-019
STRITE
DAIRY
140.04
11/20/90
5
AD -90-020
TRUMPOWER
DAIRY
125.00
11/20/90
10
08/16/94
AD -90-021
SHIFLER
CROP
157.00
05/29/91
10
04/30/98
AD -90-022
HEIMER
CROP
67.00
08/05/91
10
AD -90-023
LITTON
DAIRY
145.00
03/20/91
10
AD -90-024
HOWELL
FOREST
146.81
03/20/91
10
AD -90-025
CHURCHEY
CROP
186.32
05/29/91
10
05/01/96
AD -90-026
FLETCHER
CROP
104.80
03/20/91
10
AD -90-027
NIEMYER
CROP
44.38
03/20/91
10
AD -90-027A
BARR
CROP
30.00
03/20/91
10
AD -90-028
BAKER
BEEF
17.06
03/20/91
10
AD -90-031
BARR
ORCHARD
70.72
05/29/91
10
AD -90-032
BARR
ORCHARD
115.62
05/29/91
10
AD -90-033
STONE
DAIRY
165.00
05/29/91
10
AD -90-034
SECREST
CROP
117.42
05/29/91
10
AD -90-036
HENDERSHOT
CROP
168.83.
05/29/91
10
AD -90-037
HENDERSHOT
CROP
116.00
08/02/91
10
AD -90-038
ROTH
DAIRY
124.27
05/29/91
10
AD -90-039
STOCKSLAGER
CROP
144.33
03/20/91
10
AD -90-041
MARTIN
DAIRY
120.00
03/20/94
10
AD -90-042
FAITH
FOREST
132.63
03/20/91
10
04/30/98
AD -90-043
FAITH
BEEF
129.62
03/20/91
10
AD -90-044
FAITH
FOREST
17.00
03/20/91
10
AD -90-045
MANUEL
CROP
63.63
03/20/91
10
AD -90-046
MANUEL
CROP
41.20
03/20/91
10
AD -90-050
RITONDO
FOREST
135.00
05/29/91
10
AD -90-051
STONE
CROP
109.50
05/29/91
10
AD -90-052
STONE
DAIRY
99.50
05/29/91
10
AD -90-053
STONE
DAIRY
104.78
05/29/91
10
22
DISTRICT NO DISTRICT NAME
FARM TYPE ACRES RECORDED TYPE
EASEMENT DATE
AD -90-054
STONE
CROP
93.15
05/29/91
10
AD -90-055
STONE
CROP
129.13
05/29/91
10
AD -90-056
HULL
FOREST
107.21
05/29/91
10
AD -90-057
HOSE
CROP
26.00
07/02/91
10
AD -90-060
LOHMAN
CROP
270.91
05/29/91
10
AD -90-062
LOUDENSLAGER
CROP
145.04
05/29/91
10
10/01/99
AD -90-063
MARTIN
DAIRY
100.61
05/29/91
10
AD -90-064
BOWERS
CROP
118.90
08/05/91
10
AD -90-065
BOWERS
DAIRY
141.31
08/05/91
10
AD -90-066
OSWALD
DAIRY
75.75
08/05/91
10
AD -90-067
GROSS
DAIRY
53.44
09/16/91
10
AD -90-069
GROVE
CROP
185.00
10/19/91
10
AD -90-070
STIVERS
BEEF
135.00
08/05/91
10
AD -90-073
SCHULTZ
BEEF
189.55
08/05/91
10
06/01/00
AD -90-074
OSWALD
DAIRY
58.90
08/05/91
10
AD -90-075
OSWALD
DAIRY
34.65
08/05/91
10
AD -90-077
SNYDER
DAIRY
100.00
08/05/91
10
AD -90-078
KRETZER
DAIRY
171.65
08/05/91
10
AD -90-079
WINDERS
BEEF
225.00
08/05/91
10
AD -90-084
BURGER
CROP
301.00
08/05/91
10
AD -90-086
BURGER
FOREST
182.42
08/05/91
10
AD -90-087
BURGER
BEEF
119.00
08/05/91
10
AD -91-001
PRICE
CROP
274.00
09/16/91
10
AD -91-004
SHOCKEY
CROP
72.21
08/05/91
10
AD -91-005
BRITNER
CROP
193.20
09/16/91
10
AD -91-006
PRYOR
DAIRY
108.51
09/16/91
10
AD -91-007
MARTIN
DAIRY
156.84
09/16/91
10
AD -91-008
DEBAUGH
DAIRY
122.22
09/16/91
10
AD -91-009
DEBAUGH
DAIRY
48.25
09/16/91
10
AD -91-010
OATES
CROP
62.98
09/16/91
10
AD -91-011
BUHRMAN
HOG
180.46
05/05/92
10
AD -91-012
MCALLISTER
BEEF
83.43
03/26/92
10
AD -91-013
WORTHINGTON
DAIRY
108.92
09/16/91
10
AD -91-014
NEWCOMER
DAIRY
113.28
10/11/91
10
AD -91-015
NEWCOMER
CROP
21.94
10/11/91
10
AD -91-016
NEWCOMER
CROP
72.22
10/11/91
10
AD -91-016A
NEWCOMER
CROP
25.76
10/11/91
10
AD -91-017
NEWCOMER
DAIRY
55.50
10/11/91
10
AD -91-019
POFFENBERGER
CROP
78.00.
10/11/91
10
AD -91-020
BELZ
DAIRY
247.63
10/11/91
10
AD -91-021
COHILL
CROP
78.68
10/11/91
10
AD -91-022
CUSHWA
CROP
138.90
12/03/91
10
AD -91-023
TRITAPOE
CROP
73.86
12/03/91
10
AD -91-024
TRITAPOE
CROP
81.00
12/03/91
10
AD -91-026
CLINE
BEEF
65.00
12/03/91
10
AD -91-027
DOWNS
CROP
145.00
12/03/91
10
AD -91-028
DOWNS
CROP
130.00
12/03/91
10
AD -91-029
DOWNS
CROP
118.00
12/03/91
10
AD -91-030
FLOOK
DAIRY
280.76
12/03/91
10
AD -91-031
FLOOK
DAIRY
126.25
12/03/91
10
AD -91-032
WARNER
CROP
79.30
12/16/91
10
AD -91-033
ERNST
HOG
143.68
12/03/91
10
AD -91-034
HALLER
CROP
23.00
01/08/92
10
AD -91-035
CONOCOCHEAGUE SPORTSMENS
FOREST
126.54
02/03/92
10
AD -91-036
MORGAN
CROP
134.17
12/16/91
10
AD -91-037
MORGAN
FOREST
160.55
12/16191
10
AD -91-038
MORGAN
CROP
152.66
12/16/91
10
AD -91-039
SCOTT
DAIRY
227.27
12/03/91
10
AD -91-040
MATHESON
BEEF
161.95
01/08/92
10
AD -91-042
BELZ
CROP
135.15
01/08/92
10
04/30/98
AD -91-044
BOWMAN
DAIRY
175.25
02/28/92
10
AD -91-046
SHANK
BEEF
114.33
01/08/92
10
AD -91-047
MURPHY
DAIRY
309.50
02/12/92
10
AD -91-048
GREEN
CROP
145.10
07/07/92
10
AD -91-048A
GREEN
CROP
49.73
07/07/92
10
AD -91-048B
GREEN
CROP
10.45
07/07/92
10
AD -91-049
CHARLES
CROP
59.93
03/26/92
10
AD -91-050
WOLFORD
DAIRY
119.59
04/06/92
10
AD -91-052
BARNHART
CROP
166.77
02/21/92
10
23
DISTRICT NO DISTRICT NAME
FARM TYPE ACRES RECORDED TYPE
EASEMENT DATE
AD -91-053
KEFAUVER
DAIRY
167.52
03/26/92
-TO--
AD-91-054
KEFAUVER
CROP
114.00
03/26/92
10
AD -91-055
CAVANAUGH
DAIRY
237.76
07/03/92
10
AD -917056
HALL
FOREST
30.29
11/16/92
10
AD -91-057
BOWMAN
CROP
39.80
07/07/92
10
AD -92-001
LUDLUM
FOREST
40.00
12/15/93
10
AD -92-002
WINTERS
DAIRY
175.00
09/21/92
10
AD -92-003
WINTERS
DAIRY
57.09
09/21/92
10
AD -92-004
SHANK
DAIRY
165.00
09/21/92
10
AD -92-005
SHANK
CROP
115.90
09/29/92
10
AD -92-006
SHANK
CROP
32.10
09/21/92
10
AD -92-007
KENDLE
CROP
85.00
12/01/92
10
AD -92-009
WILLIAMS
DAIRY
100.75
06/29/93
10
AD -92-010
LEATHER
CROP
178.91
03/03/93
10
AD -92-011
ROHRER
DAIRY
123.80
06/22/93
10
06/01/00
AD -93-001
CASTLE
CROP
56.21
07/12/94
10
AD -94-003
AUSHERMAN
DAIRY
176.00
08/10/94
10
AD -94-004
BERGER
FOREST
64.02
12/19/94
10
AD -94-005
EBY
HOG
120.16
12/19/94
10
AD -94-006
TAULTON
DAIRY
130.00
12/19/94
10
10/17/99
AD -94-007
HORNBAKER
CROP
107.09
12/19/94
10
AD -94-008
RINEHART
DAIRY
145.39
05/19/95
10
AD -94-008A
RINEHART
DAIRY
96.51
06/28/95
10
AD -94-009
RINEHART
BEEF
120.41
05/19/95
10
AD -95-001
REEDER
DAIRY
180.61
12/08/95
10
AD -95-006
CARBAUGH
CROP
190.30
07/24/96
10
AD -95-007
CARBAUGH
CROP
199.51
07/24/96
10
AD -96-002
HERSHEY
CROP
100.95
03/06/97
10
AD -96-003
GARDENHOUR
ORCHARD 153.20
01/07/97
10
AD -96-004
MYERS
CROP
142.00
03/06/97
10
AD -96-005
YOUNG
CROP
43.00
08/19/97
10
AD -96-006
FISHER
CROP
57.00
08/19/97
10
AD -97-001
MORGAN
FOREST
24.20
08/19/97
10
AD -97-002
MORGAN
FOREST
6.04
08/19/97
10
AD -97-003
CLARK
DAIRY
101.00
08/11/97
10
AD -97-004
ARENA
CROP
130.20
08/11/97
10
AD -97-005
NORRIS
CROP
48.31
08/11/97
10
AD -97-006
MARTIN
DAIRY
128.04
12/22/97
10
AD -97-007
SHRIVER
DAIRY
100.41
12/22/97
10
AD -97-008
HARDING
CROP
123.56
12/22/97
10
AD -97-009
CLINE
BEEF
253.90
02/25/98
10
AD -97-010
HULL
FOREST
175.89
02/25/98
10
AD -97-012
SHRIVER
BEEF
177.18
02/25/98
10
AD -98-001
KENDLE
CROP
129.00
09/28/98
5
06/01/00
AD -98-003
STRITE
DAIRY
111.96
07/29/98
10
AD -98-004
MARTIN
ORCHARD
75.71
07/29/98
10
AD -98-005
MARTIN
ORCHARD
55.66
07/29/98
10
AD -98-006
SHANK
CROP
101.00
07129/98
10
AD -98-007
PENNINGTON
BEEF
56.15
12/22/98
10
AD -98-011
RIDENOUR
CROP
104.00
12/22/98
10
AD -98-012
ALEXANDER FAMILY PARTNER
DAIRY
155.00
12/22/98
10
AD -98-013
MARTIN
DAIRY
124.21
12/22/98
10
AD -99-002
STITZEL
CROP
264.13
06/28/99
5
AD -99-003
STUMPF
BEEF
116.16
06/28/99
10
AD -99-006
MYERS
CROP
151.08
06/28/99
10
AD -99-007
BECKLEYIFORSYTHE
CROP
162.65
06/28199
5
AD -99-008
ZEPP/STOLES
CROP
201.41
06/28/99
10
Records printed:
192 10/20/00
TOTAL 26128.78
fife:
P:VPOLIGYIAGRRAGPRF,3TATD8F
24
PLANNNG DEPARTMENT
Activities Processed
Fiscal Year 1999
(Juiy 1, 1998 thru June 30, 1999)
93 Development Plats ( Preliminary/Final and Final Plat ) Approved
44
Replats
Approved
49
Simplified Plat
Approved
4
Preliminary Plat
Approved
2
Preliminary Plat / Site Plan
Approved
25
Site Plan
Approved
11
Preliminary Consultation (Concept Plan)
Processed
1
Development Plan (PUD)
Processed
19 Variance (Subdivision Ordinance) Processed
36
Forest Stand Delineation
Processed
6
Forest Conservation Plan (non -subdivision)
Processed
16
Forest Conservation Exemption (non -subdivision)
Processed
1
Forest Bond
Processed
16
Forest Payment -in -Lieu
Processed
173
Agricultural Preservation Tax Credit
Processed
77 Receipt for Material (ordinances, maps, postage, copies) Processed
Not Shown: Ag Districts, RL Districts, Forest Conservation Plan (as part of subdivision)
25
SECTOR/
TYPE
SECTOR 1
cm
DX
IL
IN
LL
SF
TH
SECTOR 2
LL
SF
SECTOR 3
SF
SECTOR 4
LL
SF
SECTOR 5
SF
SECTOR 6
SF
TOTALS
SUBDIVISIONS BY
PLANNING SECTOR
FOR PERIOD 07/01/98 THRU 06/30/99
DEVELOPMENT PLATS
PLATS
TOTAL URBAN
RURAL
5
5
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
3
3
0
2
1
1
22
6
16
2
2
0
5
0
5
16
0
16
10
0
10
1
0
1
5
2
3
17
1
16
3
0
3
LOTS
TOTAL URBAN
RURAL
7
7
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
3
3
0
3
1
2
114
62
52
22
22
0
8
0
8
24
0
24
18
0
18
1
0
1
9
2
7
27
1
26
4
D
4
ACREAGE
TOTAL
URBAN
RURAL
73.8
73.8
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.0
29.4
29.4
0.0
80.6
80.6
0.0
43.6
20.0
23.6
133.9
42.5
91.4
4.2
4.2
0.0
208.7
0.0
208.7
78.2
0.0
78.2
42.7
0.0
42.7
11.3
0.0
11.3
13.5
2.3
11.2
62.9
1.2
61.8
10.4
0.0
10.4
93 22 71 242 100 142 793.9 254.6 539.3
TYPE BREAKDOWN
CM
DX
IL
IN
LL
SF
TH
5 5 0
1 1 0
1 1 0
3 3 0
i
8 1 7
73 9 64
2 2 0
7
7
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
3
3
0
12
1
11
196
65
131
22
22
0
73.8
73.8
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.0
29.4
29.4
0.0
80.6
8D.6
0.0
263.6
20.0
243.6
341.6
45.9
295.7
4.2
4.2
0.0
TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PLATS
CM
COMMERCIAL
DX
DUPLEX
LL
INSTITUTIONAL
IN
INDUSTRIAL
LL
LARGE LOT
SF
SINGLE FAMILY
TH
TOWNHOUSE
AVERAGE LOT SIZE
URBAN RURAL
10.55
0.59
29.39
26.88
20.00 11.80
0.68 1.76
0.19
I
r 26.09
3.26
2.37
11.33
1.16 1.60
1.15 2.38
2.60
2.55 3.80
10.55
0.59
29.39
26.88
20.00 22.15
0.71 2.26
a.19
SUBDIVISION FILE BY PLANNING SECTOR
FOR PERIOD 07/01/98 THRU 06130/99
ELEC ZONE TYPE OF URBAN/ DWELL GROSS APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION NAME DIST DIST DEVELOP RURAL LOTS UNITS ACRES DATE
PLANNING SECTOR 1
ABRAHAM STUART PARCEL A DEV PLAT
18
A
IN
UG
1
1
1.9
01/27/99
ANTIETAM ACRES LOTS 30 & 40-43
10
A
SF
RA
5
5
6.8
10/23/98
AUSTIN HILLS 14 LOTS
9
A
SF
RA
14
14
41.5
07/16/98
BITNER SUBDIVISION LOTS 1 & 2
13
C
SF
SP
2
2
8.9
11/16/98
BOWERS ANNA F GALE LOT 2
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
5.0
09/30/98
BOWMAN GL.AYDS B LOT 1
18
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.0
10/29/98
COUNTRYSIDE SEC B LOT 41
13
RR
DX
UG
1
2
0.6
08/19/98
CROSS CREEK SOUTH
10
HI -1
SF
UG
23
23
11.3
08/07/98
CROSS CREEK SOUTH II LOTS 24-37
10
HI -1
SF
RA
14
14
2.2
11/17/98
CROSSPOINT SHOPPING CENTER LOT 1
26
HI -1
CM
UG
1
0
8.9
06/01/99
FULTON PROPERTIES INC
27
A
CM
UG
1
1
51.6
05/19/99
GHATTAS ENTERPRISES LOT 2
27
HI
CM
UG
1
0
0.8
07/06/98
GORDON ROBERT J & DORIS
2
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
02/10/99
GOSSARD MILL ROAD SUBDIVISION
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.1
01/28/99
HAG WASH CO IND FOUND LOT 1
27
HI
SF
UG
1
1
0.9
01/27/99
HUNTER'S GREEN BUSINESS PK LOT 3
2
HI
IN
UG
1
0
6.0
05/20/99
HUNTER'S GREEN LOT 2 & PARCEL A
24
HI -1
IN
UG
1
0
72.8
12/22/98
KENT ESTATES LOTS 5A & 5B
13
A
SF
RA
2
2
2.8
12/07/98
KLICK STANLEY LOT 1
18
RS
SF
UG
1
1
1.6
09/10/98
MARTIN DAVID LOT 1
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.3
02/03/99
MARTIN DAVID LOTS 2 & 3
13
A
LL
RA
2
2
23.6
04/16/99
MCCLAIN RICHARD & YEATER FRED
10
A
LL
UG
1
1
20.0
10/06/98
MELD CHRIS LOT 1
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.1
09/01/98
PINE GLEN, INC.
9
A
SF
RA
2
2
5.7
09/03/98
PORTNER CHARLES LOT 1
26
RS
SF
UG
1
1
1.7
10/19/98
RIDENOUR HAROLD E & NANCY LOT 1
18
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.7
04/13/99
RITCHEY PAUL & DULCE LOTS 1-3
13
A
SF
RA
3
3
4.1
01/04/99
ROBINWOOD MEDICAL CAMPUS LOT 3
18
RS
IL
UG
1
140
29.4
10/08/98
SHARPSBURG PIKE INN LLC
10
HI -1
CM
UG
3
3
5.6
06/03/99
SOUTH POINTE PUD PHASE 11 BK Cl
10
RS -P
TH
UG
14
14
2.2
06/17/99
SOUTH POINTE PUD PII BLK B4
10
PD
TH
UG
8
8
2.0
07/09/98
ST JAMES VILLAGE N COMMERICAL
10
RR
CM
UG
1
1
7.0
12/03/98
STERLING OAKS PHASE III
26
RR
SF
UG
34
34
18.1
11/18/98
SWEENEY PIA A & GEOFFREY L LOT 5
18
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
07/21/98
WILES ROBERT ET AL LOTS 1, 2,3
2
A
SF
RA
3
3
7.1
10/21/98
WIN -BERRY SUBDIVISION LOT 1
18
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.0
10/06/98
36 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 1
151
287
366.1
PLANNING SECTOR 2
ARTZ JAMES EDWARD LOT 3
12
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.5
11/19/98
BROWN'S FARM
19
A
SF
RA
1
1
5.1
10/21/98
EASTERDAY TODD ET AL LOTS 1-4
16
C
SF
RA
4
4
17.9
08/03/98
GOBER CHARLES & EVA LOT 1
1
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.2
07/14/98
GOTTERT JAMES H LOT 4
1
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.4
09/03/98
GROVE/FOLTZ LOTS 1,2,2A & 2B
6
A
LL
RA
4
4
79.7
02/03/99
HOFFMAN PAUL W LOT D
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.6
04/30/99
KOONTZ MARY JANE LOT 1
16
C
SF
RA
1
1
6.0
10/01/98
LEGGETT RONALD AND BETTY
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.8
11/06/98
LEMKUHL TAYLOR LOT 1
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
4.8
01/25/99
MILLER MONTE GENE LOT 1
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.7
05/04/99
PASHEN ELIZABETH LOTS 3 & 4
12
A
SF
RA
2
2
4.6
03/07/99
PORTERSTOWN MEADOWS LOTS 1-4
19
A
SF
RA
4
4
14.0
12/07/98
ROBINSON BRIAN LOT 2
12
A
LL
RA
1
1
80.0
01/15/99
SHAULL JAMES LOTS 4,5 & PARA
12
A
SF
RA
2
2
5.5
01/13/99
STONER JAMES ESTATE LOT 1
20
A
LL
RA
1
1
25.0
04/09/99
THOMAS KENT & WENDY
16
A
LL
RA
1
1
14.0
05/11/99
THOMAS TRACY & BRENDA LOT 7
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.7
03/11/99
WARD HARRY L & JUDY M LOT 1
19
C
LL
RA
1
1
10.1
12/04/98
27
ELEC
ZONE
TYPE OF
URBAN/
DWELL
GROSS
APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION NAME
DIST
DIST
DEVELOP
RURAL
LOTS
UNITS
ACRES
DATE
WILLIAMSPORT ASSEMBLY OF GOD
20
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.5
03/31/99
WINDERS KATHLEEN V LOT 1
16
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.0
07/30/98
21 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 2
32
32
287.0
PLANNING SECTOR 3
BEALER GEORGE LOT 3
8
C
SF
RA
1
1
4.7
08/27/98
JONES HERMAN E & RALPH L JONES
8
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.3
05/06/99
MORGAN BONNARD J LOT 2
8
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.3
06/09/99
MORGAN BONNARD LOT 1
8
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.0
03/11/99
MULLENDOR DENTON K LOT 3
8
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.0
02/18/99
NEWMAN WILLIAM A TRUST LOTS 1&2
11
C
SF
RA
2
2
7.9
01122/99
WHITE OAKS LOT 20
11
C
SF
RA
1
1
2.0
09/08/98
WHITE OAKS LOTS 1,6,10 & 11
11
C
SF
RA
4
4
7.9
10/05/98
WHITE OAKS LOTS 12, 15, 17, & 19
11
C
SF
RA
4
4
6.3
10/05/98
WHITE OAKS LOTS 21 & 23
11
C
SF
RA
2
2
3.3
09/28/98
10 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 3
18
18
42.7
PLANNING SECTOR 4
BAIR JEFFREY & CHERYL LOT 1
7
A
SF
SM
1
1
1.0
05/05/99
BIKLE SUSANNE ET AL LOT 4
7
A
LL
RA
1
1
11.3
10/23/98
CAVE HILL ESTATES LOTS 1-4
7
A
SF
RA
4
4
6.3
06/07/99
CLINE CHARLES LOT 3
7
RR
SF
SM
1
1
1.3
10/14/98
GARDENOUR ORCHARDS INC LOT 1
7
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.7
07/15/98
WIVELL WILL & HUDSON
7
RR
SF
RA
2
2
2.2
04/09/99
6 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 4
10
10
24.8
PLANNING SECTOR 5
BOWERS SONNY GUY NORMAN & DONNA
4
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.7
01/15/99
CLOPPER MADELEINE
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.0
01/12/99
COWGILL DARWIN & REGINA LOT 1
23
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
12/04/98
DIVELBISS LOLITA LOT 11
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
0.9
01/15/99
DIVELBISS RAYMOND LOTS 6-10
4
A
SF
RA
5
5
7.6
07/06/98
GRIMM KENNETH
23
A
SF
RA
2
2
7.0
10/07/98
HAMBY GREG LOTS 1 & 2
15
C
SF
RA
2
2
5.5
09/25/98
MARTIN LEONARD & ESTHER LOTS1&2
4
HI
SF
RA
2
2
4.4
12103/98
MICHAEL ANDREW & CONNIE LOTS 1 &2
15
C
SF
RA
2
2
6.7
05/28/99
MILLYVILLE
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.5
06/15/99
PETRE MERLE & PEGGY LOT1
23
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.3
08/12/98
REED DANIEL SUB
4
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.1
07/16/98
RIVERWOOD LOTS 10 & 11
23
A
SF
RA
2
2
4.1
12/28/98
ROHRER CABOT & CAROL LOT 1A
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
4.0
01/25199
SEIBERT VIRGINIA LOT 5
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
4.7
10/06/98
SMITH VINCENT LOT 5
23
C
SF
UG
1
1
1.2
04/06/99
TRU MPOWER MARY LOTS 10 & 11
4
A
SF
RA
2
2
2.2
09/22/98
17 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 5
27
27
62.9
PLANNING SECTOR 6
FLOWERS NADINE Y
5
C
SF
RA
1
1
1.1
10/21/98
HOCKENBERRY ROLAND & JUDITH
5
C
SF
RA
2
2
6.2
04/09/99
YOUNG GARY L & MOLLY LOT 1
5
C
SF
RA
1
2
3.1
12/08/98
3 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 6
4
5
10.4
93 GRAND TOTAL
242
379
793.9
29
rn
ro
rn
I �
�.G
i 0
__
QI
6�
kms;
CO
C
0
N
>
4
CCD
Q
E
CD
CD
w
03LO
I�
>
I
4
�
5
E
0
U
_..,
Cl)
rn
■
rn
L
N
_
0CD
3
C)
O
N
Sleld
29
30
I
r
rn
m
m
r
0
tOD
_
O
rn
CD
cm
N
cm
7
Q.
rn
«5
0
c
A
rn
I
r
�
!�U
I L
C
i
10
N
O
m
O OO
O Q
O 00.
co
30
31
m
s
�
r
m
I�
m
rn
CL
m
iC
N
�
C
LO
I O
rn
OO
O O O O O Cl
00 N
N CD V
saaay
31