The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04 - April Lloyd Yavener, Chair Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240- 313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting. WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1 AGENDA April 1, 2026, 6:00 p.m. Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MINUTES 1. Minutes of the February 4, 2026, meeting * NEW BUSINESS 1. HTC-25-003, 102 West Irvin Avenue, Hagerstown (WA-HAG-148 and WA-HAG- 146) – (Discussion/Approval) – Part 3 application for tax credits at the Bikle House for chimney repair * 2. HTC-26-001, 403 N. Prospect, Hagerstown (WA-HAG-148 and WA-HAG-179) – (Discussion/Comment) – Part 1 and Part 2 documentation for tax credits at the Moller Organ Works building * a. Note: This project is pursuing both Federal and State Tax Credits as well. Staff has only included the necessary pages of Part 2 State Tax Credit documentation as equivalent for this review with other documents available upon request. 3. RZ-26-001 – Text Amendment | Durning – (Information) - The applicant, Ms. Durning proposes a text amendment for Small Box Variety Stores – Table 3.3(1), Chapter 28A Definitions * a. Note: Staff responded with memo; no HDC member comments provided OLD BUSINESS 1. Historic Properties Grant – (Discussion/Consensus) – review of draft for a Historic Properties Grant program after County Attorney review for legal sufficiency and the recent updates to the Historic Structures Tax Credit * 2. Design Guidelines for Historic Structures Updates or Separate Guidance for Ruins - (Discussion/Consensus) – In December 2025 Ann Aldrich requested review of the guidance to citizens regarding ruins and their potential reuse on property. Resources were shared with members via email 12/5/2025 to review * OTHER BUSINESS 1. Correspondence a. Programmatic Agreement Update – SHA (Information)* i. Note: No member comments received on this correspondence b. CLG Legislative Items from MHT * c. Request for Comment AP2026-009, 17423 Da Wrong Lane* i. Note: Staff submitted comments; BZA hearing 4/1/2026 d. Request for Comment- Proposed Telecommunications Tower – Bakersville, 7116 Houser Road, Trileaf #775393 * i. Note: Photo sims have been provided; C&O Canal has reviewed with no adverse effects; Antietam National Battlefield has reviewed with the only concern after photo sims being the view from the tower but they declined to request additional photo sims e. Invitation to Comment – Proposed Telecommunications Project – Trileaf #746609 – 5404 Mondell Road, Sharpsburg i. Note: this has been withdrawn from Section 106 review f. Request for Comment – Proposed Telecommunications Tower – 3417/3413 Rohrersville Rd., Rohrersville, MD - Trileaf #771285 i. Note: Staff submitted comments provided by HDC at 12/4/2025 meeting; SP-25-029, related local site plan, in progress, AP2025- 004, Granted; As of March 11, 2026, Trileaf is pending a response from the client as to whether they wish to relocate or cancel the project, or whether they wish to begin the required consulting parties engagement and meeting(s). K. Belzner; AP2026-004, appeal for updated setbacks, same location to be on 4/1/26 BZA agenda g. Consultation Request – New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility – 16220 Wright Road, Williamsport, MD * i. Note: MHT requested additional information from DHS to determine if a larger APE was needed for the undertaking on 2/10/26; Updated packet is included from 3/19/2026 2. Staff Report a. Staff Reviews * b. HP Yearly Letter Draft * c. CLG Report was submitted 2/17/2026 d. Survey funding updates e. National Alliance of Preservation Commission Membership renewed, and member contact info verified f. Preservation Month 2026 Updates i. May 14th @6:00 p.m. Architecture: Maryland Style by Christiana Limniatis with Preservation Maryland at 100 S. Potomac Street (Hagerstown Library) ii. May 21st @5:30 p.m. John Frye Preservation Awards at Hub City Vinyl at 28 E. Baltimore Street, Hagerstown iii. Members #Washcolovehistoric blurb and photos due April 24th ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETING 1. Wednesday, May 6, 2026, 6:00 p.m. *attachments MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY February 4, 2026 The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, February 4, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, Maryland CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commission members present were: Lloyd Yavener, Chairman; Justin Bedard, Ann Aldrich, Tyler Milam, Greg Smith, Brianna Candelaria and Ex-officio County Commissioner Randy Leatherman. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member and Debra Eckard, Office Manager. Also in attendance was Harold Dorsey (21245 Mount Lena Road). MINUTES Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 3, 2025 regular meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved. NEW BUSINESS Residential Construction Permit (2025-05908) – 21245 Mount Lena Road (WA-II-166) Ms. Jenkins presented a permit application for the construction of a 2,520 sq. ft. one-story pole building on a concrete slab to the rear of the dwelling to be used as a garage. The applicant is proposing to use white siding with black trim for compatibility with the existing structures on the site. The proposed structure will be visible as you enter the Rural Village on the northernmost edge, but not highly visible from a majority of the Village. Therefore, staff believes the proposed structure will not detract any more than other accessory structures within the Village. There will be minimal disturbance of the site and the proposed pole building would be removable without loss of integrity to the site if necessary in the future. Staff believes this application is consistent with Section 5D.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and applicable County Design Guidelines and Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Staff recommends approval of the permit application for the reasons outlined above. Discussion and Comment: Mr. Dorsey explained that he wants to remove multiple temporary storage containers on the property to make the property look better. Motion and Vote: Mr. Smith made a motion to recommend approval of the permit as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bedard and unanimously approved. Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit (2025-05780) – 8505 Fahrney Church Road (WA-II-055) Ms. Jenkins presented a permit application for the San Mar Children’s Home and Mechanical Institute located at 8505 Fahrney Church Road. The HDC will be reviewing only the demolition portion of the permit at this time. The permit application involves building renovations, expansion of the parking lot and updated site circulation. The applicant has provided updated DOI documentation of the structure and a narrative regarding the reasoning for the demolition. The majority of the demolition permit application requirements have been met or exceeded; therefore, staff are recommending support of the application with the following recommendation to the applicant: 1) When completing the interior and exterior renovations of the building, materials should be salvaged as much as possible. Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to support approval of the demolition portion of the permit as presented with staff’s recommendation to salvage as many materials as possible. The motion was seconded by Ms. Candelaria and unanimously approved. Residential Demolition Permit (2026-00212) – 13511 Maugansville Road (WA-I-252) Ms. Jenkins presented a demolition permit application for property located at 13511 Maugansville Road. The applicant is proposing to demolish a 3,256 sq. ft. dwelling and foundation. The applicant believes the property is unsafe for habitation. Ms. Jenkins noted there are issues that are visible on the exterior of the structure that would be costly to repair. One wall is bowing and separating from the interior walls and there are multiple points of failing brickwork. The roof appears to be prone to failure as configured due to aged, mixed materials. The structure does not appear to have historical, cultural, architectural or design significance as detailed in Section 20.5 of the County’s Zoning Ordinance. The owner is open to the salvage of materials; however, in terms of exterior materials, these would be limited. Staff recommends support of the demolition permit as presented. Motion and Vote: Ms. Candelaria made a motion to support approval of the demolition permit as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Milam and unanimously approved. HTC-25-004, 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown Ms. Jenkins presented a tax credit application for the replacement and repair of roof tiles on a historic dwelling located at 900 The Terrace. She reminded members that Parts I and II were previously distributed to them via email. MHT has reviewed and approved Parts I and II. Ms. Jenkins will present Part III after MHT has reviewed and approved. OTHER BUSINESS Certified Local Government Annual Report Federal Fiscal Year 2025 Ms. Jenkins reminded members that each year the HDC is asked to provide the Certified Local Government program with a report based on questions required by the Federal government. A draft of the report was provided to members in the agenda packet for review. Members did not have any substantive comments; however, Ms. Aldrich and Mr. Milam will review their trainings to see if any of those qualify under the CLG program and were completed within the Federal fiscal timeline. Correspondence a. Smithsburg High School Telecommunications Tower Updated documentation was provided to members. MHT has determined there are no adverse effects on historic structures. The Commission had no further comments and concurred with MHT’s determination. b. AP2025-034, 206659 National Pike This was a request for comment from the Board of Zoning Appeals for a special exception application for a banquet/reception facility use and variance from the pavement requirement for off-street parking. Staff submitted comments on this appeal case. There are no changes proposed to the historic structures and the proposed facility will provide a viable use of the historic property. c. Invitation to Comment – 5404 Mondell Road Proposed Telecommunications Tower Staff submitted standard comments during the Section 106 review process. d. AP2025-031 – 5404 Mondell Road Telecommunications Tower Staff submitted written comments and attended the public hearing before the Board of Zoning Appeals for the special exception request. The request was denied by the BZA. No further communication has been received since that denial. e. Invitation to Comment – 4220 Chestnut Grove Road Telecommunications Tower The standard request for information for this type of project was made on January 13th by staff. No reply has been received. f. AP2025-030 – 4220 Chestnut Grove Road Telecommunications Tower Staff did not submit comments regarding this proposed tower because it is located against a ridge and will not be highly visible from the road. This appeal was approved by the BZA. g. Request for Comment – 10944 White Hall Road Telecommunications Tower Staff have requested the standard information for this type of project; no reply has been received. h. Request for Comment – 3413 and 3417 Rohrersville Road Telecommunications Tower Staff submitted comments on December 4th. No updates have been provided. There is a site plan in progress. An appeal was granted for this project by the Board of Zoning Appeals. i. Request for Comment – 7116 Houser Road Telecommunications Tower Staff requested the standard information in October 2025. The consultant indicated there was work in progress as of January 14th. No site plans or appeals have been filed with Washington County. j. Section 106 Consultation: I-70 Bridges over Licking Creek Staff did not submit any additional comments. There would be very minimal areas of potential effects. k. Consultation Request – 16220 Wright Road – New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility Documentation has been provided by the Department of Homeland Security. DHS is seeking comments or changes to the APE. Staff noted this is an existing building that has undergone the County’s site plan review process. DHS’s opinion is there are no adverse effects to historic resources. MHT has performed its review and concurs there is no adverse effect on historic resources. Discussion and Comments: Ms. Jenkins noted that this structure, when constructed, would not have come before the HDC for review because it is in the urban area, not a typical area that the HDC would review or make comments on. Mr. Bedard asked if a Section 106 review was completed for the construction of the warehouse when it was built. Ms. Jenkins stated that the warehouse was constructed by a private developer; no Federal or State permits were required. The property is currently zoned IG (Industrial General) which allows for the warehouse use as well as correction/detention facilities. Mr. Bedard noted that any adverse effects should have been cited when the modern warehouse was constructed. Ms. Jenkins stated that the existing structures across the street on Wright Road were documented. This structure is currently imploding on itself. The springhouse still exists; however, there does not appear to be any significance to the structure that would make it qualify for the National Register of Historic Places. Ms. Jenkins noted that the other resources mentioned in DHS’s letter cannot be seen from the existing warehouse. Mr. Milam made an inquiry regarding the lighting and fencing for the warehouse and its visibility from Williamsport. Ms. Jenkins stated that visibility from Williamsport was not mentioned in the documentation. Lighting would most likely be downward facing. She also explained that since the Federal government has purchased the property, no local ordinances will apply. The HDC is not charged with looking at the use of the property; this is for the typical Section 106 review of historic structures. The HDC concurs with DHS’s and MHT’s review of the property that there are no adverse effects on any historic resources. Staff Report · A written report was provided to members in the agenda packet. · Update of Town adoption of MOUs for Tax Credits o The MOUs for the Towns of Boonsboro and Sharpsburg are completed. o Smithsburg has finished its process; approval is needed from the BOCC. o Funkstown did not have a quorum at the meeting at which the MOU was presented. We are waiting for them to approve at another meeting. o There has been no response from Hancock or Clear Spring. · Grant Program for Historic Structures – The County Attorney is currently reviewing the draft. · Financial Disclosures – All financial disclosures have been returned to staff. · Preservation Month 2026 – coming up in May; posts with pictures did very well; following are a few ideas previously discussed to highlight this year: o May 30th is the Campaign for Historic Trades Window Workshop; 8 am to 4 pm; $20 per person, maximum is 15 people; held at the Saylor House o Emphasize ordinary maintenance during Preservation Month. Members need to decide what should be included as ordinance maintenance. o Highlight salvage positives such as 20313 Locust Grove – deconstruction of a resource instead of demolition. o Emphasize sustainability and deconstruction o Adaptive reuse of historic resources o Photos and videos of the members’ favorite historic resource o Interview Bikles for historic tax credit highlight ADJOURNMENT Ms. Aldrich made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bedard, unanimously approved and so ordered by the Vice-Chairman. UPCOMING MEETING The next meeting of the Historic District Commission is scheduled for Wednesday, March 4, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ______________________________________ Lloyd Yavener, Chairman v.07/26/2024 Page 1 | Part III – Request for Certification of Completed Work Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit ORDINANCE 2024-23 Part III – Request for Certification of Completed Work HTC Number (from Part I Application):__HTC-25-003_ Instructions: Fill out this form at project completion for review of the rehabilitation costs and determination of project results consistent with Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Name Street Address City Zip APPLICANT INFORMATION Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant) Name Company Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROJECT DATA Project Start Date Project Completion Date Total Rehabilitation Costs Total Ineligible Expenses - Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (QRE) = Nida and Philip Bikle 1933 House 102 W Irvin Avenue Hagerstown 21742 Nida Bikle 102 W Irvin Avenue Hagerstown Maryland 21742 Chimney Sweeps of Sherwood Forest 13030 Old National Pike Mt Airy Maryland 21771 (888) 244-6349 sherwoodbilling@gmail.com 11/10/25 2/1/26 $ 30,757.00 $ 0.00 $ 30,757.00 Property Address: 102 W Irvin Avenue Part 3 Itemized Expense Sheet FOR HDC USE ONLY HTC Number:__HTC-25-003 COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 COLUMN COLUMN 5 COLUMN 6 COLUMN 7 COLUMN 8 Date of Payment Your page #(s) of invoice / receipt / check Payee for Item (name of contractor, company, etc.) Part 2 Work Item # Description of Expenditure Expenditure Amount Eligible Expense Ineligible Expense 12/28/2025 Pg. 1 IW-3091288 Chimney Sweeps of Sherwood Forest 2 Remove damaged flue tiles and install insulated stainless steel liner system $1,500.00 $1,500.00 2 Install the insultated stainless steel liner with a terra cotta thimble replacement $2,575.00 $2,575.00 2 Scaffolding set up to do repairs $1,500.00 $1,500.00 2 City of Hagerstown Permit $200.00 $200.00 2 Install two flue tiles -Form and Pour Cast Concrete Crown with Drip edge $3,100.00 $3,100.00 1 Masonry repointing $750.00 $750.00 1 Brick Wash and Water Repellant $450.00 $450.00 12/28/2025 Pg. 1 IW-3534759 Chimney Sweeps of Sherwood Forest 2 Demo flue tiles $1,500.00 $1,500.00 2 Install a flue liner system with Ahres Fire Refractory Restoration System and top sealing damper $13,500.00 $13,500.00 2 Parge smoke chamber $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1 Chimney Pots with rain guards $3,182.00 $3,182.00 $30,757.00 $30,757.00 $0.00 $30,757.00 SUBTOTALS (will auto-calculate): Part 3 Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures as submitted: From:Chimney Sweeps of Sherwood Forest To: Cc:Jenkins, Meghan Subject:Bikle Residence - 102 West Irvin Ave Date:Thursday, February 12, 2026 1:05:36 PM Attachments:image.pngimage.pngimage.pngimage.pngimage.png WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to thisemail. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. -- Chimney Sweeps of Sherwood Forest, Inc.(301) 829-3588 (office)(301) 829-8258 (fax) Chimney Sweeps Of Sherwood Forest • Financing Available Chimney Cleaning- Gas Service -Pellet Service -Dryer Vent Trusted Advisors Since 1982 National Presence Local Expertise TO: Kate Jaffe, MHT FROM: Nick Kraus CC: Delaware Valley Development Co. DATE: August 29, 2025 RE: Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building – MD Competitive Commercial Certificate Application - Part 2 Application MHT Project #2025-062 TRANSMITTING: (1) digital copy State Part 2 Application VIA: Virtual Portal NOTES: Enclosed please find the federal Part 2 application for the Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building located at 403 N. Prospect St. in Hagerstown. This application includes: Part 2 application, Additional Narrative, Owner’s Letter, Pre-Rehab Photos, Pre-Rehab Photo Key, Drawings, Fire Rating Memo, and Structural Report. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 215.248.1260 or email nkraus@heritage- consulting.com. Revised MHT Project Number (MHT office use only) Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature MHT conditions or comments attached Maryland Historical Trust Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. This page must bear the applicant’s signature and must be dated. The Maryland Historical Trust's certification decision is based on the descriptions in this application form. In the event of any discrepancy between the application form and other, supplementary materials submitted with it (such as architectural plans, drawings and specifications), application form shall take precedence. (if different from applicant) The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the – Part 2 for the above-named property and has determined that the proposed rehabilitation described herein: is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation if the attached conditions are met. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. Name Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address Company Name Signature Date Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address Maryland Historical Trust / 100 Community Place / Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov County Organization I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) I am the fee-simple owner of the above-described property or (2) if I am not the fee-simple owner of the above-described property, the fee-simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article, §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland. state or local funding, insurance reimbursements or ineligible expenses including new construction, site work, appliances, etc. /sq ft Completion date (estimated) Floor area before / after rehabilitation Use before/ after rehab Start date (estimated) Yes No Unknown FINAL TOTAL ALLOWABLE QUALIFIED REHABILITATION EXPENDITURES CANNOT EXCEED THIS AMOUNT Check if you are applying for the additional 5% LEED Gold or equivalent certification MHT Easement property? A Federal Part 2 Application (Description of Rehabilitation) has been certified for this project Date of certification Page of Property address Property name Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Photo numbers Drawing numbers Photo numbers Drawing numbers Page of This worksheet must accompany the Part 2 of the competitive commercial application. Some of the entries require attachments, including letters, statements and maps. Attachments must be . Failure to complete the worksheet or failure to include the appropriate documentation may result in the entire application being returned to the applicant for re-submittal Property Address Maryland Historical Trust Owner Name Property Name Address Contact Name Telephone Email Address Existing or historic use of structure: Proposed use of structure (list any innovative or unique aspects): Notable or unique history of existing structure: Notable design aspects of existing structure: Property ownership (list any innovative or unique ownership/partnerships, existing and/or proposed): Project financing: Page of In the box below, provide a description of Page of Page of Page of Estimated Qualified Rehab Expenditures MDAT Value of Improvements X 100 = n %$750,000.00 $138,920.00 X 100 = 539 % X 100 =% Attach letters of commitment from financial institutions, investors and any other financial contributors that verify the commitment of funding for the rehabilitation project for which tax credits are being sought. Attach a copy of the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation (MDAT) Real Property Data Search for your property. Go to http :/dat./and and attach directly behind this page Divide the Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures by the assessed value (as shown on the MDAT report) to determine the percentage by which expenditures exceed the assessed value. See the equation below: Page of After completing your Part 1 and Part 2 applications, print and fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation required for MHT staff review. Name Signature Date Real Property Data Search ( ) Search Result for WASHINGTON COUNTY View Map No Ground Rent Redemption on File No Ground Rent Registration on File Special Tax Recapture: None Account Number:District - 25 Account Identifier - 017226 Owner Information Owner Name:MOLLER PROPERTIES LLC Use: Principal Residence: INDUSTRIAL NO Mailing Address:307 UPPER COLLEGE TER FREDERICK MD 21701-4818 Deed Reference:/03494/ 00429 Location & Structure Information Premises Address:403 N PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN 21740-0000 Legal Description:2.794 ACRES 403 N PROSPECT ST Map:Grid:Parcel:Neighborhood:Subdivision:Section:Block:Lot:Assessment Year:Plat No:10023 0308 0000 0543 20000.22 0000 2026 Plat Ref: Town: HAGERSTOWN Primary Structure Built Above Grade Living Area Finished Basement Area Property Land Area County Use 1890 64,203 SF 2.7940 AC Stories Basement Type Exterior Quality Full/Half Bath Garage Last Notice of Major Improvements STORAGE WAREHOUSE /C1 Value Information Base Value Value Phase-in Assessments As of 01/01/2023 As of 07/01/2025 As of 07/01/2026 Land:97,700 97,700 Improvements 28,800 28,800 Total:126,500 126,500 126,500 Preferential Land:0 Transfer Information Seller: GROH VINCENT R Date: 05/08/2008 Price: $600,000 Type: ARMS LENGTH IMPROVED Deed1: /03494/ 00429 Deed2: Seller: MOLLER M P INC Date: 02/19/1993 Price: $90,000 Type:Deed1: /01080/ 00843 Deed2: Seller: MOLLER M P INC Date: 09/24/1990 Price: $0 Type: NON-ARMS LENGTH OTHER Deed1: /00970/ 00302 Deed2: Exemption Information Partial Exempt Assessments:Class 07/01/2025 07/01/2026 County:000 0.00 State:000 0.00 Municipal:000 0.00|0.00| Special Tax Recapture: None Homestead Application Information Homestead Application Status: No Application Homeowners' Tax Credit Application Information Homeowners' Tax Credit Application Status: No Application Date: Gi Y e F e e G E a c N HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 43 ITEM 1 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building – Project Information DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building, constructed in 1895, is a two- and three-story masonry industrial structure configured in a modified H-shaped plan with four wings connected by a central hyphen. The primary façade fronts N. Prospect Street and displays a higher level of architectural articulation compared to the rear elevations, which are utilitarian in character and oriented toward adjacent rail infrastructure. The south section of the southwest wing was demolished under a previous owner, resulting in a truncated footprint that slightly alters the original plan configuration. The building is constructed of load-bearing brick masonry with a combination of gabled, flat and hipped roofs, and features regularly spaced window openings indicative of its industrial function. Street-facing elevations have painted brick and windows throughout are non-historic. The central hyphen, which connects the front and rear wings is defined by an open- span interior volume. This space is illuminated by a large arched window on the main elevation and a skylight at the roof, providing ample natural light. The remainder of the building is more utilitarian in design, reflecting its historical use for manufacturing. Interior spaces retain an open-plan layout with exposed brick walls, wood floors, and visible structural framing, consistent with late 19th-century industrial construction methods. Areas of the building contain remnants of flat plaster walls and formerly had flat plaster ceilings. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 43 WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: The building will be rehabilitated for use as affordable housing, with a design approach that preserves its historic industrial character. The proposed building will contain (65) dwelling units, with a mix of (42) one bedroom and (23) two-bedroom units. 55 of these units are affordable housing units and the remaining ten are market-rate. Additional spaces will include a bi-level entry lobby and community space, fitness center, management suite, central laundry room, as well as maintenance and mechanical spaces. The central hyphen will continue to serve as the primary entrance, functioning as the building’s lobby space and housing management offices and resident services. The remaining portions of the building will be converted into residential apartment units, with designated mechanical, maintenance, and storage areas. As part of the rehabilitation, the previously demolished section of the southwest wing will be reconstructed, utilizing compatible, modern materials, restoring the original H-shaped plan configuration and reinforcing the building’s architectural coherence. The project will balance modern housing requirements with a commitment to preserving character-defining features. The rehabilitation will be undertaken in two phases. As detailed in this application, Phase 1 will include the exterior scope of work and Phase 2 will include the interior scope of work. The applicant intends to utilize the IRS 60-month measuring period for the purpose of substantial rehabilitation. It is anticipated that the project will be Southwest Wing Southeast Wing Northwest Wing Northeast Wing Central Hyphen HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 43 undertaken over a 60-month phased rehabilitation. The scope of work for both phases is detailed in this application. PHOTOS: See Pre-Rehab Photo Set DRAWINGS: See attached drawing set HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 43 ITEM 2 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Site DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building is located on a 2.74-acre lot with the building occupying the vast majority of the site allowing for limited site features. Existing site features include: • Along N. Prospect St. (east), a narrow grass area separates the main elevation from the concreate sidewalk. Concrete walkways provide access from the sidewalk to three entrance doors on the N. Prospect St. elevation. A modern concrete loading area is roughly centered on the elevation and accesses a small steel loading dock. adjacent to N. Prospect St. • To the north of the building is an asphalt parking area. • To the west of building (rear) is a small asphalt parking area and road that accesses the adjacent property under separate ownership. Portions of the rear lot are covered with grass and low vegetation. The areas formerly populated by the southwest building section which was previously demolished are overgrown and filled with rubble. • To the south of the building, an adjacent commercial operation under separate ownership immediately abuts the subject building’s lot line. • A courtyard exists between the wings of the building and is partially paved and partially covered in vegetation. There are no character defining site features in this courtyard. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the proposed rehabilitation: • Along N. Prospect St. (east), the grass area and sidewalks will be retained. The two concrete walkways providing access from the sidewalk to the doors in the entrance section will be retained; one concrete walkway to the north will be HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 43 removed. The modern steel loading dock will be removed. Landscaped beds will be located along the east elevation. • To the north of the building, the concrete slab behind the central hyphen will be demolished and the asphalt parking area will be repaved and striped with landscaped planting beds. • To the west of building (rear), the asphalt parking area will be expanded and repaved to provide adequate parking for building residents. Small sections of grass will be retained and a walking path constructed. The tall concrete foundation that originally supported historic one-story additions will be demolished to allow for parking circulation. New plantings will be installed along the west elevation. A shared bicycle path leading from the parking lot to N. Prospect Street will be constructed along the south side of the building in-between 315 N. Potomac Street and the subject property. A landscaped planting bed will be located adjacent to the south elevation with sidewalks providing access to the entrances. • A courtyard between the wings of the building will be retained and enclosed by new construction. Secure access will be provided for building residents. This courtyard will remain open with no roof. The courtyard will be landscaped with plantings and will have paved walkways. All courtyard landscaping will be concealed within the volume of the building and will not be visible from the public rights-of-way. PHOTOS: 5, 11, 19, 23, 26, 34, 37, 39, 40-41 DRAWINGS: C-101 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 43 ITEM 3 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Exterior Materials DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: • The building is constructed of red brick, which survives in generally good condition. The north and east elevations of the building, as well as the west elevation of the southeast wing were previously painted. The east elevation of the building facing N. Prospect Street has been painted, with a multi-color paint scheme. In areas there is non-historic metal siding that was installed when previous sections were demolished. • The southern portion of the southwest wing was demolished by a previous owner in circa 2020. The end wall of that wing is currently a fire wall that retains ghost scarring showing the floor levels from the now demolished section. Ghost scarring can also be seen on the west elevation of the central hyphen from a two-story addition that was demolished in circa 2020. These exposed walls were historically interior walls. • A painted sign is located on the west elevation of the southwest wing reading “Moller Pipe.” WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the proposed rehabilitation: • The brick will be retained throughout. Where painted, the paint will remain as- is or will be repainted in a compatible color scheme. The brick will remain unpainted where that is the current condition. • The southern portion of the southwest wing, which was previously demolished, will be reconstructed to return the building to its historic form. The exterior walls will be brick at the base with corrugated metal siding above which will be finished in a historically compatible color. As shown in the drawings, there will be two styles of siding used to provide architectural definition. Corrugated metal was selected for its industrial character and it will be readily distinguished from the historic brick. The reconstruction aims to more closely HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7 of 43 match the building’s historic footprint, but does not aim to rebuild the addition to exactly match the historic, as this would create a false sense of history. • The painted sign on the west elevation of the southwest wing will remain and will be repainted “Moller Pipe” to match the existing appearance. • Where the brick is unpainted it will be cleaned using the gentlest means possible to avoid damaging historic masonry. Cleaning will begin with low pressure (100-400 psi) water first and progress to more aggressive methods (mild chemicals only). Testing will occur in an inconspicuous area to ensure the color and texture of the masonry and mortar are not damaged before progressing on larger, more conspicuous areas. Abrasive methods will not be used. Masonry cleaning will be accomplished in accordance with Preservation Briefs 1 and 6. • Brick will be spot pointed as necessary. Missing, damaged, or loose mortar will be raked from the joints, avoiding damaging surrounding masonry. Mortar will be removed to a depth of 2½ times the width of the joint to sound mortar. New mortar will be installed in the joints that match the texture, color, composition, and joint profile of the historic mortar. • Missing or damaged bricks/masonry units will be replaced using bricks to match the historic brick. • Bituminous dampproofing will be fluid-applied and will be installed to the foundation walls of the building for moisture mitigation. PHOTOS: 1-41 DRAWINGS: G006, A201-204, A221 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 43 ITEM 4 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Entrances/Doors DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: • The primary N. Prospect St. (east) elevation contains a number of entrances: o The hyphen section, contains two entrance doors. The south door is a non-historic modern single-leaf steel door within a non-historic frame enclosure set within the historic masonry opening, and the north door is a double-leaf wood panel door that is deteriorated beyond repair. o At the 13th bay from the south end of the elevation is a non-historic modern utilitarian metal double-leaf door. o Nine bays to the north is a modern wood overhead door accessed by the modern steel loading dock. o Five bays to the north is a non-historic modern single-leaf metal door with a boarded transom with metal security screen. o Centered on the 2-story section at the north end is a modern double- leaf aluminum glazed door with transom set within a projecting, non- historic concrete entrance enclosure that appears to have been added at some point in the later 20th century. • North elevation: One entrance is located on the north elevation at the rear section and contains a modern steel single-leaf door with boarded transom. • West (rear) elevation: There are multiple entrances on the west elevation: o On the northwest wing there is a large utilitarian basement entrance that has been covered in plywood and capped by a brick segmental arch. An additional historic sliding fire door is located on the wing’s south elevation, on an opening that was formerly an interior pass-though. o On the central hyphen’s west elevation there are multiple openings at the first, second, and third story. On the first story at the north end of the elevation there is a raised loading entrance that has been covered with non-historic pressed metal brick cladding. At the southern end of the first story is a large sliding metal fire door. At the second story there is a central opening that has been enclosed with concrete block, and a HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 43 sliding fire door at the southern end of the elevation. At the third story’s north end, there is a metal sliding fire door mounted on the interior side of the wall. These openings were historically interior passage doors that were retained after this section of the building was demolished. While appearing as entrances now, these were not exterior entrances historically. o On the southwest wing’s south section there is a basement entrance at the southern end of the elevation that is heavily deteriorated and retains no door. • South elevation: On the central hyphen section of the building, there is a sliding metal fire door located within a large brick-in arched opening. This was historically an interior passage. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation: • On the primary N. Prospect St. (east) elevation: o At the central hyphen section, denoted by the large arched window, the two existing double-leaf doors will be replaced with double-leaf aluminum-framed glazed doors. Both doors will fill the historic masonry opening. A simple metal canopy will be installed above the north door. o At the 13th bay from the south end of the elevation, the modern utilitarian metal double-leaf door will be removed as it is not believed to be historic based on historic imagery. Windows will be installed at this location to match the historic condition. The lintels will be flat to distinguish these windows from the adjacent windows. o Nine bays to the north, the modern wood overhead door will be removed and windows will be installed to match the historic imagery. The lintels will be flat to distinguish these windows from the adjacent windows. o Five bays to the north, the modern single-leaf metal door with a boarded transom will be removed and a window installed at this location to match the historic imagery. The lintel will be flat to distinguish this window from the adjacent windows. o Centered on the 2-story section at the north end, the non-historic double-leaf aluminum glazed door with transom set and the non-historic projecting entrance enclosure will be removed and windows will be installed as historic imagery does not depict doors on this section. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10 of 43 • North elevation: The entrance located on the north elevation at the rear section with the modern steel single-leaf door with boarded transom will be removed and a window installed. A new utilitarian single-leaf metal door will be installed in the recessed section of this elevation, within the new corrugated metal clad hyphen. • West (rear) elevation: One double-leaf metal door will be installed on the north end of the west elevation. On the south end of this elevation, within the section to be reconstructed, one single-leaf metal door will be installed. One double- leaf aluminum-framed glazed door will be installed with a simple enclosure with standing seam metal roof. Openings on the central hyphen, which were historically interior pass-throughs, will be infilled with brick or compatible windows. As this is the rear elevation, this elevation is not visible from the public right-of-way. • South elevation: The formerly interior sliding metal door on the central hyphen will be removed and the connector bumped out with a corrugated metal clad connector. This will be located within the courtyard and will have a simple single-leaf door that will provide access to the courtyard. A new single-leaf and double-leaf door will be installed on the reconstructed hyphen near the south end of the property. Facing north into the courtyard will also be an entrance on this hyphen. This reconstructed hyphen will be clad in corrugated metal to match the industrial character of the building. PHOTOS: 3-4, 6-7, 12, 14, 21, 24, 29, 30, 31-33 DRAWINGS: A102, A201-204, A221 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 43 ITEM 5 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Windows DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The building features the following window types: • Industrial steel: The central hyphen of the N. Prospect St. (east) elevation contains a massive arched industrial steel window divided into nine sections by horizontal and vertical mullions. This window contains single-pane glazing. Flanking this window at the 3rd story are 25-light steel clerestory windows which contain single-pane glazing. The central hyphen roof skylight contains two-light steel frame glazing. • 9/9 hung windows: The southeast elevation contains vinyl replacement 9/9 double-hung windows installed by the previous owner. Historically, the southwest and southeast elevations contained wood 6/6 double-hung windows, though only two remain while the rest have been removed by the previous owner. • Paired single light sliding windows: The northeast and northwest wing contain paired single-light sliding vinyl windows that were installed by the previous owner. Historically, these windows were grouped 1/1 double-hung wood windows. • Awning windows: On the southwest wing’s first story there are historic six-light wood awning windows in deteriorating condition. • A significant number of windows were removed by a prior owner and the openings remain open to the elements, and many window openings have been infilled over time as additions were constructed in certain areas and removed later on. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation: • Industrial steel: The industrial steel windows on the entrance section of the N. Prospect St. (east) elevation, the clerestory windows on the north elevation, HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 43 and the skylight windows, will be retained and new clear glazing will be installed. The metal frames will be repaired and repainted. • 9/9 hung windows: The modern vinyl 9/9 hung windows will be replaced with new 6/6 windows to match the historic configuration based on the street views that pre-date the installation of the modern 9/9 windows (see photo below). The replacements on the street-facing elevation will be aluminum per the recommendation of the Maryland Historical Trust. On non-street-facing elevations, dark-framed vinyl 6/6 windows will be installed as they will not be visible from the public right-of-way. Replacement window drawings will be submitted as an amendment once a manufacturer is identified. • Paired single light sliding windows: The modern single-light windows on the northeast wing will be removed and replaced with new 1/1 hung windows to match the historic configuration based on photographs that pre-date the installation of the extant windows (see photo below). The replacement windows will be aluminum per the recommendation of the Maryland Historical Trust. Replacement window drawings will be submitted as an amendment once a manufacturer is identified. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 43 • Awning windows: The wood six-light awning windows on the southwest elevation will be replaced with nine-light fixed dark-colored vinyl frame windows. • 1/1 windows: On the west elevation of the northwest wing, 1/1 dark-colored vinyl frame windows will be installed in existing historic openings. • Infilled windows openings on the central hyphen’s west elevation will be reused for nine-light aluminum frame awning windows which will be repeated in new openings at the second story. PHOTOS: 2, 8-9, 13, 18, 20, 22, 28, 35, 40 DRAWINGS: A105-A204, A221 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 14 of 43 ITEM 6 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Roof DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: • The roof of the building is a combination of gabled, hipped, and flat forms, covered in membrane and corrugated metal; the majority of which is painted in a blue color. The central hyphen, southeast and southwest wings have gabled roofs with raised brick firebreaks. The northeast section has a flat roof. The northwest section has a hipped roof. • The central hyphen section of the building contains a large steel-framed glazed skylight. • There are modern gutters and downspouts on the wings of the building, added sometime in the last ten years. • The northwest section of the building contains a hipped roof that survives in a state of significant deterioration. The roof structure is deteriorated beyond repair and does not meet load requirements as outlined below and illustrated in the snip from the Carroll Engineering Inc report below. The roof framing is a double hip system with wood decking over wood joists, spanning between a series of large wood trusses (Photo 7). The trusses clear-span between the exterior walls, with a random placement of columns added to support the truss bottom chords, The columns appear to align with the floor columns below. There are skylights at the ridge, and a dormer located on the east side. It appears that the dormer to the west was demolished and infilled sometime in the past. The roof framing was observed to be in poor condition with excessive deflection and signs of distress to the truss members. The east dormer framing was in poor condition with damage from exposure to moisture (Photo 8). It is our opinion that the roof framing is not adequate to support the anticipated snow loads and should be demolished and replaced with new framing using pre-engineered wood trusses. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 15 of 43 Carroll Engineering Inc Initial Structural Report, May 2, 2025 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 16 of 43 WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation: • The existing gabled and flat roof structures will be retained and the standing seam metal will be removed during demo to allow work at the substrate level. o New waterproofing membranes will be installed in the roof assembly to improve moisture mitigation. o The pitched roofs will be insulated with R-49 blown cellulose or continuous exterior-facing rigid insulation while the flat roof will be insulated with a combination of continuous rigid insulation installed above the roof deck and spray foam underneath the deck. o New asphalt shingle roofing will be installed on the gable roofs, replacing the standing seam metal. o New metal gutters and downspouts will be installed and connected to stormwater management systems. • The hipped roof of the northwest wing is structurally deficient as outlined in the Carroll Engineering Inc letter and cannot be retained. It will be rebuilt utilizing pre-engineered wood trusses. The exterior will be reconstructed to match the historic hipped appearance with dormers reconstructed to match their historic appearance. The hipped roof will be insulated and finished with asphalt shingles. PHOTOS: 5, 11, 16, 26, 34, 37 DRAWINGS: AD104A, AD105A-105B, A104-A105, A201-204, A221 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 17 of 43 ITEM 7 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Central Hyphen Wing - Interior DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The interior of the Moller Organ Factory is divided by wing, all interconnected by the central hyphen. The interior reflects the utilitarian functionality of the factory as an organ manufacturing and assembly plant, which is characterized by open floor plans, exposed floors, walls, and ceiling, exposed ceiling and roof structures, internal fire doors and metal catwalks. The central hyphen was constructed in circa 1895 as evidenced by an interior date stone. Unless otherwise noted, the features and finishes in the central hyphen are historic. The central hyphen, historically known as the erecting room, was the organ assembly area (see image below). The area is characterized by its three-story open floor plan with catwalks to allow for organ assembly and access to the other wings. Accessible through two double-leaf doors on either end of the wing’s east elevation, the first floor is an open space with a poured concrete floor, except in the rear (west) end of the room where there is a small section of wood plank. The walls of the hyphen are painted brick with areas of infilled brick and concrete block for previous window openings and entrances. Dentillated brick corbeling is located below the north clerestory windows, and the wall directly below is slightly recessed. Due to the historic existence of an addition in the center of the south side of the hyphen, the wall in this area is clad in non-historic stamped metal made to resemble brick. A historic metal framed catwalk borders the perimeter of the east, south, and west sides of the hyphen at the second and third floor. The catwalk is finished with a wood plank floor and bordered by a non-compliant metal tube railing. Access to the second and third floor are provided by non-compliant, utilitarian open wood stairs located in the southeast corner of the hyphen. In the southwest corner of the hyphen there is a non-historic freight elevator added later on in the building’s history that provides access to each floor. It is supported by later steel framing. The roof of the hyphen is exposed and consists of wood rafters supported by metal beams and trusses. A historic metal assembly track is hung from the trusses, as well as non-historic commercial lights installed in the late twentieth century. Entrances to the other four wings are located on either end of the north and HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 18 of 43 south elevations. The northwest and northeast wing’s entrances are divided by rolling metal fire doors. A circa 1930s photograph of the erecting room. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation, the hyphen will become the main lobby, reception area and management offices for the apartments located in the four wings. In the rehabilitation: • The historic painted brick walls will be retained and repaired as needed. The non-historic metal siding will be replaced with compatible brick. The metal columns located on the walls will be repainted. • The exposed ceiling structure will be retained and repaired as needed. • The historic poured concrete floor will be retained and polished, while the small area of wood plank will be removed and replaced with poured concrete to match the rest of the floor area. • The north entrance on the east elevation will be enclosed with an aluminum frame storefront system consist of a Kawneer 451T or equivalent design to provide an interior air lock. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 19 of 43 • A new concrete ramp will be installed to provide barrier-free access to the northeast wing. • The second-floor catwalk’s west section will be slightly extended towards the center of the hyphen to allow for the installation of new partitions to create a reception area, management offices, conference room, and public bathrooms on the first floor. This bump-out of the catwalk will not alter the space’s overall volume or industrial character. o New steel columns will be added to support the extended catwalk. o The partitions within the first floor enclosed areas will consist of wood studs finished with gypsum board walls. • The second-floor catwalk will be retained and wood-grain LVT will be installed to replace the deteriorated wood plank flooring. The catwalk structure will be replaced and reinforced as necessary to meet live load requirements. The industrial pipe railing will be replaced with a code-compliant metal railing that will be compatible with the industrial character of the building. • The third-floor catwalk’s wood floor will be removed and made inaccessible due to code requirements for height clearance as the overhead truss beams do not currently meet modern safety standards. The metal beams will be retained to represent the historic existence of the catwalk. • The wood stairs that connect the catwalks will be removed due to their level of deterioration and lack of egress code adherence. The non-historic elevator will also be removed. PHOTOS: 42-46, 68-75, 103-107, 124-131, 156-163 DRAWINGS: AD102A, AD103A, AD104A, A102, A103, A104 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 20 of 43 ITEM 8 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Southeast Wing - Interior DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The southeast wing is composed of three blocks which are identical in design (north, central, and south blocks), separated by brick firewalls with openings at each level. Sliding fire doors are located at each firewall pass-through. The southeast wing is accessible through the exterior and interior of the building. On the exterior, the southeast wing is accessible through the non-historic single-leaf metal door, the wood overhead door, and the double-leaf metal door located on the wing’s east elevation. On the interior, the wing is accessed at the first, second, and third floor through historic openings in the southeast corner of the central hyphen, covered by historic sliding fire doors at the second and third floor. The layout of the three blocks consists of open floors supported by historic fire rated painted wood chamfered columns and exposed painted wood joist floors. The construction is Type 3 and is not considered to be heavy timber. The walls are painted brick throughout the wing and windows have simple brick surrounds without trim. The first floor of the southeast wing contains a concrete slab floor throughout. Along the west elevation there is one sliding fire door in the north block of the wing that provides access to the courtyard, and many of the window openings along the west elevation have been boarded with plywood. Additionally, historic openings throughout the west elevation have been infilled with brick and concrete block at some point during the building’s occupancy. Modern fluorescent lighting fixtures hang from the painted wood joists. The center block’s floor has been exposed in certain areas, showing the ground underneath. In the south block, a concrete stairwell along the northwest corner leads to an infilled entrance facing the courtyard. The second and third floor are mostly identical in layout and design to the first floor. The second floor is finished with wood plank flooring throughout, and open wood stairs are located along the north side of the central and south blocks, which provide access to the third floor. These stairs are non-code-compliant. The third floor features exposed painted wood trusses that support the gable roof above. The floor is finished in deteriorated wood plank. Evidence of a later, non-historic top finish is visible in certain areas of the third floor (see below). HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 21 of 43 WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation the southeast wing will be converted into apartment units, connected to the southwest wing via two three-story hyphens. In the proposed rehabilitation: • Portions of the dividing brick firewalls between blocks will be removed at the west end of the wing as well as at the north and south ends of the west elevation of the wing. This is to provide access to the hyphen additions and to allow for a continuous corridor that accesses the apartment units, as the floors will have a single-loaded corridor along the west elevation. o A new opening will be created in the south block’s west elevation to allow access to the courtyard at the first floor. The entrance will consist of a Kawneer 451T or equivalent storefront system with a single-leaf glazed door. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 22 of 43 o The corridor and exterior-facing walls will be insulated and furred with 5/8” gypsum board to meet energy star requirements and LIHTC energy requirements. The perimeter walls will be furred out 4”. Windows will have simple painted trim. o Demising walls and doors will have simple painted trim throughout. o Due to the existing wood floor structure’s Type 3 construction, it is not considered heavy timber. As such, in order to meet fire rating requirements, it must be fully enclosed above and below. Due to this type of construction, fire rating cannot be limited to either above or below the structure, as it must be rated for a fire from either direction. As such, the existing floor assemblies will be structurally upgraded to meet live load requirements and will be enclosed with painted gypsum board at the ceiling. At the floor, the existing flooring will receive a gypcrete topping to meet fire rating and to provide a level floor. Ceilings will be located above window heads around the perimeter of each floor and lowered within interior rooms to conceal MEPs. Details regarding the code-requirements to enclose the floor structure are outlined in the enclosed fire rating memo. o The finished floor in the hallways will be 6”x48” wood-grain LVT as the existing floors are wood. They will be laid atop the fire-rated gypcrete.  The concrete floor on the first floor will be removed and repoured with a 4” thick reinforced concrete slab with 6x6-w1.4x1.4wwf over 4” crushed stone on a compacted sub-grade.  A 3/4” gypsum cement underlayment with acoustic sound matting will be laid. • A fitness room will be added to the first floor of the southeast wing in the south block. The room will be enclosed with a Kawneer 450 or equivalent aluminum storefront system and entrance. The space will have a resilient rubber floor per gym requirements. • The existing utilitarian wood stairs will be removed and the floor decked over as they do not meet egress code requirements. • On the third floor a laundry room will be added to the south block’s south wall. o The flooring will consist of 6”x48” wood grained LVP. o The ceiling will be painted gypsum board. • Apartment units will be placed along the east side of the wing, and will consist of a bedroom, a kitchen, a living room, and a bathroom. o The units will be divided by 5/8” gypsum board partitions. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 23 of 43 o The ceilings in units will be finished with ½” gypsum board to allow for insulation to meet energy star requirements. They will be located above window heads at the perimeter and lowered at the interior of the apartment to conceal MEPs. o The wood chamfered columns will be retained and will remain exposed and painted. o The floors in units will consist of 6”x48”resilient plank wood-grain LVP as the floors were historically wood. o Bathrooms will have glazed 12”x12”x5/16” glazed porcelain tile and mosaic tile at roll-in shower locations. Wall tile will consist of 6”x6”x5/16” glazed tile. o Unit access doors will consist of solid wood side-hinged doors. Interior unit doors will consist of hollow core wood doors. All doors will have a 1-3/4” thickness. o Wood baseboard with shoe molding will be added to the base of the walls. o Wood sills will be installed and louvered blinds will be added to all windows in units. o New wood casework and plastic laminate countertops will be installed in the kitchen. o New plumbing fixtures will be installed in the kitchen and bathroom. PHOTOS: 76-90, 132-147, 164-176 DRAWINGS: AD102B-104B, A102-104 OTHER: WRT Fire Rating Memo HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 24 of 43 ITEM 9 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Southwest Wing - Interior DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The southwest wing is three stories. Originally consisting of two blocks, the south block was demolished in circa 2020 by previous owners following a serious fire. The currently exposed south wall was historically an interior fire wall. The southwest wing is accessible through the interior at the first, second, and third floor through historic openings in the southwest corner of the central hyphen, covered by sliding fire doors at each floor. The layout of the two blocks consists of open floors supported by historic fire rated painted wood chamfered columns and exposed painted wood joist floors. These floors are Type 3 construction and are therefore not considered to be heavy timber. The walls are painted brick throughout the wing. The first floor contains wood plank flooring of different eras, set on top of a wood subfloor. Window openings along the west elevation have been boarded with plywood. Evidence of later structural and mechanical systems are noticeable by the steel beams that intersect the historic wood chamfered columns of the floor. Access to the basement is provided by a deteriorating open wood stairwell at the south end of the wing. Additionally an open wood stair also provides access to the second floor above. A freight elevator, likely installed later in the building’s occupancy, is located in the southwest corner of the wing and extends through the three stories. The second and third floor are mostly identical to the first floor in terms of construction, finish, and arrangement. The second-floor ceiling indicates notable load failure as evidenced by the bowing structural columns, beams, and joist system. The floor of the second floor is also deteriorating with areas of rot and bowing present (see below). Similar to the first floor, an open wood stairwell leads up to the third floor at the southern end of the wing. The third floor is characterized by an exposed wood truss system with two metal frame utilitarian skylights. The floor is finished with wood plank flooring. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 25 of 43 WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation, a new three-story wing will be added to the south side of the existing wing to double the footprint and connect to the new three-story hyphen between the southeast and southwest wings (see New Construction item). This new wing will be on the footprint of the south portion of the west wing, which was previously demolished. The southwest wing, similar to the southeast wing, will be used as one and two- bedroom apartment units on all three floors. In the proposed rehabilitation: • In the existing portion of the wing, the original dividing fire doors will be removed and infilled with compatible brick, and new openings will be made at the southeast corner of the south end of the wing to allow for a continuous hallway between the existing wing and the new addition. o The corridor and exterior-facing walls will be insulated and furred with 5/8” gypsum board to meet energy star requirements and LIHTC energy requirements. The perimeter walls will be furred out 4”. Windows will have simple painted trim. o Demising walls and doors will have simple painted trim throughout. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 26 of 43 o Due to the existing wood floor structure’s Type 3 construction, it is not considered heavy timber. As such, in order to meet fire rating requirements, it must be fully enclosed above and below. Due to this type of construction, fire rating cannot be limited to either above or below the structure, as it must be rated for a fire from either direction. As such, the existing floor assemblies will be structurally upgraded to meet live load requirements and will be enclosed with painted gypsum board at the ceiling. At the floor, the existing flooring will receive a gypcrete topping to meet fire rating and to provide a level surface. Ceilings will be located above window heads around the perimeter of each floor and lowered within interior rooms to conceal MEPs. Details regarding the code-requirements to enclose the floor structure are outlined in the enclosed fire rating memo. o The finished floor in the hallways will be 6”x48” wood-grain LVT as the existing floors are wood. They will be laid atop the fire-rated gypcrete.  The concrete floor on the first floor will be removed and repoured with a 4” thick reinforced concrete slab with 6x6-w1.4x1.4wwf over 4” crushed stone on a compacted sub-grade.  A 3/4” gypsum cement underlayment with acoustic sound matting will be laid. • The existing utilitarian wood stairs will be removed and the floor decked over as they do not meet egress code requirements. • Apartment units will consist of a bedroom, a kitchen, a living room, and a bathroom. o The units will be divided by 5/8” gypsum board partitions. o The ceilings in units will be finished with ½” gypsum board to allow for insulation to meet energy star requirements. They will be located above window heads at the perimeter and lowered at the interior of the apartment to conceal MEPs. o The wood chamfered columns will be retained and will remain exposed and painted. o The floors in units will consist of 6”x48”resilient plank wood-grain LVP as the floors were historically wood. o Bathrooms will have glazed 12”x12”x5/16” glazed porcelain tile and mosaic tile at roll-in shower locations. Wall tile will consist of 6”x6”x5/16” glazed tile. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 27 of 43 o Unit access doors will consist of solid wood side-hinged doors. Interior unit doors will consist of hollow core wood doors. All doors will have a 1-3/4” thickness. o Wood baseboard with shoe molding will be added to the base of the walls. o Wood sills will be installed and louvered blinds will be added to all windows in units. o New wood casework and plastic laminate countertops will be installed in the kitchen. o New plumbing fixtures will be installed in the kitchen and bathroom. PHOTOS: 91-102, 149-155, 177-183 DRAWINGS: AD102B-104B, A102-104 OTHER: WRT Fire Rating Memo HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 28 of 43 ITEM 10 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Northeast Wing DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The northeast wing is two stories and accessible from the exterior and interior of the building. On the exterior, access is provided by a set of double-leaf glazed aluminum frame commercial doors sheltered by a poured concrete portal, as previously discussed. On the interior, a sliding metal fire door at the northeast corner of the central hyphen provides access to the wing. This wing was historically used as offices and assembly spaces as evidenced by historical imagery and signage (see below). Like the other wings, the interior configuration is open on both floors. Contemporary structural framing has been added by the prior owner likely due to deterioration from vacancy. As illustrated, the northeast wing historically had flat plaster perimeter walls and ceilings. A 1957 photograph of the 50th anniversary dinner of the company, courtesy of the Washington County Historical Society. Note the walls and ceilings are finished. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 29 of 43 The first floor consists of an open room with the only remaining finishes consisting of plaster walls which are in a state of disrepair. On the west side of the room, multiple openings have been enclosed with concrete block. One opening is exposed to the exterior courtyard on the north side of the building. The ceiling consists of steel frame members with spanning wood joists. The use of steel framing and window configuration alludes to this being a later addition to the building. The second floor is mostly identical to the first floor. New substrate flooring and joists are noticeable, likely added in the last five years. The brick walls are exposed on the second floor with remnants of flat plaster, and the west wall openings, which consist of arched windows and a center entrance, are boarded plywood. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation, the northeast wing will be converted to house two two-bedroom units on either floor. • In the existing portion of the wing, an existing utilitarian pass-through in the brick wall will be infilled with compatible brick. o The corridor and exterior-facing walls will be furred out 4” with 5/8” gypsum board and insulated to meet energy star requirements. Walls and windows will have simple, compatible trim. o The ceiling will be located above window heads around the perimeter of the building and lowered to the interior to conceal MEPs. Finished ceilings will be painted gypsum board. As the ceilings and walls were historically flat plaster, this treatment is consistent with the historic character of the space. o The floor in the hallways will be finished with 6”x48” wood-grain LVP installed over gypcrete which is required to provide fire rating atop the existing floor structure. o The two southern openings in the west wall on the first and second floor will be infilled with compatible masonry while the northern four openings will feature new compatible aluminum frame windows as previously discussed. • Apartment units will be placed along the east and north side of the existing wing, and will consist of bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room, and a bathroom. o The units will be divided by 5/8” gypsum board partitions. o The ceilings in units will be located above window heads around the perimeter and lowered at interior spaces to conceal MEPs. All ceilings will be finished with ½” gypsum board to allow for insulation to meet energy star requirements and to meet fire separation requirements. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 30 of 43 o Any exposed columns will remain exposed and will be repainted. o The floors in units will consist of 6”x48”resilient plank wood-grain LVP installed over gypcrete. The gypcrete will be poured atop the existing floor in order to meet fire separation requirements. o Bathrooms will have glazed 12”x12”x5/16” glazed porcelain tile and mosaic tile at roll-in shower locations. Wall tile will consist of 6”x6”x5/16” glazed tile. o Unit access doors will consist of solid wood side-hinged doors. Interior unit doors will consist of hollow core wood doors. All doors will have a 1-3/4” thickness. o Wood baseboard with shoe molding will be added to the base of the walls. o Wood sills will be installed and louvered blinds will be added to all windows in units. o New wood casework and plastic laminate countertops will be installed in the kitchen. o New plumbing fixtures will be installed in the kitchen and bathroom. PHOTOS: 47-54, 108-114 DRAWINGS: AD102B-104B, A102-104 OTHER: WRT Fire Rating Memo HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 31 of 43 ITEM 11 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Northwest Wing DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The northwest wing is two stories and accessible from the interior of the building. On the interior, a masonry pass-through with a sliding metal door at the northwest corner of the central hyphen provides access to the wing. The footprint of the northwest wing is square, unlike the other three wings and features a hipped roof with four skylights and an east-facing dormer window opening. Like the other wings, the interior configuration is open on both floors. The first floor consists of an open room with the only remaining finishes consisting of plaster walls at the perimeter which are in a state of disrepair and the wood plank flooring which also survives in disrepair. New substrate flooring is noticeable in certain areas. Historic fire rated chamfered wood columns support wood beams and the joists of the floor above. The windows on the first floor are boarded with plywood. Openings are noticeable on the east elevation which have been infilled with brick and concrete block. A utilitarian open wood stair along a projecting brick wall on the south wall leads up to the second floor. This stair is not code-compliant and cannot be reused. The second floor is open like the first floor with the wood roof truss structure exposed, supported by fire rated wood columns and beams. The remaining finishes are remnants of plaster walls at the perimeter and deteriorated wood plank floors. The skylight glazing and metal framing is still intact, however the east-facing dormer window is missing. Window openings facing the east are similarly infilled with concrete block. As previously outlined in the roof section, the roof truss system survives in a state of disrepair and does not meet live load requirements. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation, the northwest wing will be converted to house one and two-bedroom units on either floor. • The existing masonry pass-through will be retained with the non-functional sliding fire door removed. At the southeast corner of the east elevation a small section of brick will be removed to create a pass-through connection into the HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 32 of 43 two-story hyphen, north addition, and the utilitarian wood stairwell and projecting brick wall will be removed from the south side of the room. o The corridor and exterior-facing walls within the northwest section will be furred out 4” with 5/8” gypsum board and insulated to meet energy star requirements. These walls and windows will have compatible, simple trim. o Due to the existing wood floor structure’s Type 3 construction, it is not considered heavy timber. As such, in order to meet fire rating requirements, it must be fully enclosed above and below. Due to this type of construction, fire rating cannot be limited to either above or below the structure, as it must be rated for a fire from either direction. As such, the existing floor assemblies will be structurally upgraded to meet live load requirements and will be enclosed with painted gypsum board at the ceiling. At the floor, the existing flooring will receive a gypcrete topping to meet fire rating and to provide a level surface. Ceilings will be located above window heads around the perimeter of each floor and lowered within interior rooms to conceal MEPs. The replacement roof structure, which will be constructed of modern trusses, will be concealed above the fire-rated ceiling at the second floor. Details regarding the code-requirements to enclose the floor structure are outlined in the enclosed fire rating memo. o The ceilings around the perimeter will be located above the window heads with lowered ceilings at the interior to conceal MEPs. Ceilings will be finished with ½” gypsum board and insulated to meet energy star requirements. o The floor in the hallways will be finished with 6”x48” wood-grain LVP laid atop the gypcrete topping. o The east wall openings on the first and second floor will be reestablished as previously described in the window scope. • Apartment units will be placed along the east and north side of the existing wing, and will consist of bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room, and a bathroom. o The units will be divided by 5/8” gypsum board partitions. o The ceilings in units will be finished with ½” gypsum board to allow for insulation to meet energy star requirements and to meet fire separation requirements as outlined above. o The wood chamfered columns will be retained, repainted and exposed. o The floors in units will consist of 6”x48”resilient plank wood LVP installed over the fire rated floor topping. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 33 of 43 o Bathrooms will have glazed 12”x12”x5/16” glazed porcelain tile and mosaic tile at roll-in shower locations. Wall tile will consist of 6”x6”x5/16” glazed tile. o Unit access doors will consist of solid wood side-hinged doors. Interior unit doors will consist of hollow core wood doors. All doors will have a 1-3/4” thickness. o Wood baseboard with shoe molding will be added to the base of the walls. o Wood sills will be installed and louvered blinds will be added to all windows in units. o New wood casework and plastic laminate countertops will be installed in the kitchen. o New plumbing fixtures will be installed in the kitchen and bathroom. PHOTOS: 55-67, 115-123 DRAWINGS: AD102B-104B, A102-104 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 34 of 43 ITEM 12 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Basement DATE OF FEATURE: 1895 and subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The basement is located in the northwest and southwest wings of the building only. The northwest wing’s basement is accessible through a large arched opening on the west elevation and a masonry pass-through located on the wing’s south-facing elevation, while the southwest wing’s basement is accessible through a deteriorated wood staircase abutting the south wall of the wing. The basement was inaccessible due to the level of deterioration. It is understood that both basements are utilitarian in character with exposed concrete floors, painted brick perimeter walls and exposed wood ceiling structure. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation, the northwest wing’s basement will be used as a large utility space with a room for maintenance, mechanical systems, and a bike storage room. The southwest wing’s basement will be utilized for resident storage. • The exterior entrance for the northwest wing will be infilled with compatible brick. o The exterior-facing walls will remain exposed according to current plans. Floor will be concrete. o Due to the existing wood floor structure’s Type 3 construction, it is not considered heavy timber. As such, in order to meet fire rating requirements, it must be fully enclosed above and below. Due to this type of construction, fire rating cannot be limited to either above or below the structure, as it must be rated for a fire from either direction. As such, the existing floor assembly above will be structurally upgraded to meet live load requirements and will be enclosed with painted gypsum board at the ceiling. Details regarding the code-requirements to enclose the floor structure are outlined in the enclosed fire rating memo. o Partitions between the maintenance, mechanical, and bike storage room with consist of 5/8” gypsum board. o The interior doors will consist of double-leaf hollow core metal doors. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 35 of 43 In the southwest wing, cages for tenant storage will be installed. The walls will remain exposed, painted masonry and the floor will be concrete. PHOTOS: N/A DRAWINGS: AD101, A401A-401B OTHER: WRT Fire Rating Memo HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 36 of 43 ITEM 13 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: New Construction DATE OF FEATURE: N/A EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: As part of the rehabilitation of the Moller Pipe Organ Factory, new compatible additions to the building will be constructed to add code compliant egress passages and to restore the footprint of the demolished portion of the southwest wing to provide more apartment units. The construction of these additions is based off historic imagery that indicates the location of preexisting hyphens between the northern and southern wings, as shown below: A circa 1920 image of the Moller Pipe Organ Factory. The red squares show the former hyphens. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation: The new three-story addition on the southwest wing will contain two-bedroom and one-bedroom units on each floor and will be located in the approximate footprint of the previously demolished portion extending from the exposed former interior wall at Demolished wing HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 37 of 43 the south end of the wing. The exterior of the addition will be industrial in appearance to be compatible with the historic building, but does not aim to exactly match the historic section so as to not create a false historic appearance. • The exterior will be clad with increased rib metal with a pane height of 15/16” to reflect the industrial character of the building (ATAS, Centria, or equivalent). A factory finished PVDF coating system will protect the exterior metal for deterioration. Two different types (type 1 and 2) of rib metal spacing will separate the cohesion of the first and second story from the third story. o Windows will follow a similar rhythmic arrangement as the southwest wing to create an aesthetic compatibility between the new and historic portions of the building. The windows will consist of dark-framed 6/6 vinyl windows to reflect the historic rhythm and appearance. o The basement level of the addition will be constructed of brick on the exterior facing elevations, compatible in design with the existing brick of the building. Secondary elevations will have a brick water table. • The interior finishes will consist of 5/8” gypsum board along exterior walls with simple compatible trim and 1/2” thick gypsum board ceilings. • The floor in the corridors will be finished with 6”x48” wood-grain LVP. • At the basement level, an aluminum storefront system with double-leaf doors and capped with a standing seam metal aluminum canopy allows access to the basement units and amenity spaces. A separate double- leaf metal door provides exterior access from the compactor room. • Apartment units will be placed along the east and north side of the existing wing, and will consist of bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room, and a bathroom. o The units will be divided by 5/8” gypsum board partitions. o The ceilings in units will be finished with painted gypsum board. o The floors in units will consist of 6”x48” resilient plank wood-grain LVP. o Bathrooms will have glazed 12”x12”x5/16” glazed porcelain tile and mosaic tile at roll-in shower locations. Wall tile will consist of 6”x6”x5/16” glazed tile. o Unit access doors will consist of solid wood side-hinged doors. Interior unit doors will consist of solid core wood doors. All doors will have a 1- 3/8” thickness. o Wood baseboard with shoe molding will be added to the base of the walls. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 38 of 43 o Wood sills will be installed and louvered blinds will be added to all windows in units. o New wood casework and plastic laminate countertops will be installed in the kitchen. o New plumbing fixtures will be installed in the kitchen and bathroom. On the south side of the building between the southeast and southwest wing, one three-story hyphen (north) and one four-story hyphen (south) will be constructed to allow for egress and connectivity between the two wings. These heights will be consistent with the existing buildings. These wings will contain entrance areas and the vertical circulation for the southwest and southeast sections of the building including a stair and elevator. The south hyphen will enclose the courtyard as was the historic condition. The north hyphen will abut the central hyphen’s south elevation, abutting the formerly interior south wall, as confirmed by the scarring on the wall; there was formerly an additional bump-out at this location. The south hyphen will be located at the south block of the southeast wing and the new addition. Double-leaf doors separate the hyphen from the southeast and southwest wings of the building. These hyphens are located back within the volume of the building and will not be visible from the public right-of-way. • The exterior of these hyphen additions will be clad in a type 3 creased rib metal with a pane height of 15/16” to reflect the industrial character of the building (ATAS, Centria, or equivalent). A factory finished PVDF coating system will protect the exterior metal for deterioration. o The basement level of the additions will have a brick water table that will be compatible in design with the existing brick of the building. o Windows on the hyphens face the courtyard and will consist of a Kawneer 451T or equivalent aluminum frame window system. • The hyphen will be capped with a flat roof sheathed in TPO. Elevator overruns will extend from the hyphens. • At the first floor, egress exits consisting of a set of double-leaf metal doors from the elevator lobby and a single-leaf door from the stairwell lead to the site. • The interior finishes will consist of 5/8” gypsum board along exterior walls and 1/2” thick gypsum board ceilings. • The floor in the corridors will be finished with 6”x48” wood-grain LVP. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 39 of 43 On the north side of the central hyphen, a two-story hyphen will be constructed to connect the northeast and northwest wings and provide egress for the associated apartment units. This will be constructed in the footprint of a previous hyphen that was demolished. The interior consists of an egress stairwell for fire safety. • The exterior will be clad in a type 3 creased rib metal with a pane height of 15/16” to reflect the industrial character of the building (ATAS, Centria, or equivalent). A factory finished PVDF coating system will protect the exterior metal for deterioration. o The basement level of the addition will have a brick water table that will be compatible in design with the existing brick of the building. • The hyphen will be capped with a flat roof sheathed in TPO. • At the first floor, an egress exit consisting of a single-leaf metal door from the stairwell lead to the exterior. • The interior finishes will consist of 5/8” gypsum board along exterior walls and 1/2” thick gypsum board ceilings. • The floor in the corridors will be finished with 6”x48” wood-grain LVP. PHOTOS: N/A DRAWINGS: A102-105, A201-204, A401A-404B, A410-412 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 40 of 43 ITEM 14 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: Vertical Circulation - Elevators/Stairs DATE OF FEATURE: 1895, subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: • Vertical access throughout the building can be accessed in each wing, and consists of a combination of utilitarian stairs and freight elevators. These stairs and elevators are not character defining and they survive in poor condition. o In the central hyphen, wood stairs with simple wood tread and stringers allow access to the second and third floor catwalks. A large metal freight elevator in the southwest corner of the hyphen similarly provides access to all floors. The use of steel framing for the elevator shaft indicates that it likely was added later in the building history. o In the southeast wing, simple wood stairs with wood tread are located on the dividing walls between the central and south block. Wood plank trap doors close off the stairs on the upper floors. o In the southwest wing, a simple wood stair with wood tread along the south wall provides access to the basement, while another stair provides access to the second and third floor. A smaller metal freight elevator located in the southwest corner of the wing, likely added later in the building’s occupancy, provides access to each floor. o In the northwest wing, a simple wood stair with wood tread is located along a projecting brick wall on the south side of the wing which creates access to the second floor. • The condition of these stairs and elevators currently do not meet the requirements for current code standards and they are heavily deteriorated or out of service. None of the existing vertical access can be reused. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation: • The stairs throughout and freight elevators will be removed and replaced by the hyphen addition stairwells and elevators which will provide code-compliant vertical access throughout the building. This will prevent any further demolition within the historic sections of the building, as new stairs and HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 41 of 43 elevators are required to make the building habitable. The existing vertical access is slapdash and cannot be feasible retrofit for modern use. PHOTOS: 42, 66, 74, 101-103, 127, 136, 142, 153, 155, 169, 171,182 DRAWINGS: AD102A-104B, A101-104 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 42 of 43 ITEM 15 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE: MEP-FP DATE OF FEATURE: Mid-to-late twentieth century, subsequent changes EXISTING FEATURE AND CONDITION: The Moller Pipe Organ Factory has no evidence of existing HVAC systems anywhere in the building. Remnants of plumbing and electrical systems remain but these are not functional and cannot be made functional due to their age and deterioration. WORK AND IMPACT ON FEATURE: As part of the rehabilitation: • New mechanical systems will be installed to meet the needs for a residential building. • Within the central hyphen where structure can remain exposed, ductwork will be exposed as is consistent with the space’s industrial character. • In the southeast, southwest, northeast and northwest wings, all ductwork and piping will be concealed within walls and above ceilings. Gypsum board soffits will be constructed to conceal ducts as needed. Any ceilings that require lowering will be held back from the windows a minimum of 5’-0”. Ceilings around the perimeter will be held above the window heads. • The electrical systems will be replaced and brought up to current code standards. The new work will consist of providing distribution/branch circuit panels for outlets, equipment, lighting, and controls. New electrical will be located within new partition walls and above finished ceilings. In the central hyphen where the masonry walls are to remain exposed, the proposed electrical will be surface mounted and painted to match the walls. • All existing plumbing pipes and fixtures will be removed. The plumbing systems will be brought up to current code standards. New work will consist of replacing water heaters, sump pumps, fixtures, and the water main. All plumbing lines and drops will be concealed above dropped ceilings. Gypsum board soffits will be constructed to conceal pipes as needed. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Moller Pipe Organ Co. Building NPS Project Number 49434 Property address 403 N. Prospect St., Hagerstown, MD _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 43 of 43 • A full fire sprinkler system will be installed throughout the building. Piping will be concealed above ceilings within the wings. Piping will be exposed within the central hyphen. No piping will impact the character defining historic spaces. • On the exterior, MEP systems will be installed on the flat portions of the building’s new hyphens and the flat portions of the existing northeast and southwest wings. The new systems will not be visible from public right-of-way and will not impede the historic character of the building’s exterior. There will not be any MEP equipment adjacent to the main elevation or located on the pitched roofs. Additional condensers will be located at grade adjacent to the secondary north and west elevations and within the courtyard. MEP drawings will be submitted in a later amendment. PHOTOS: N/A DRAWINGS: N/A The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Exterior Photos 1-41 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 23 The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Interior, First Floor - North Photos 42-75 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 43 44 45 49 50 53 42 57 58 59 66 70 71 63 The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Interior, First Floor - South Photos 76-102 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 77 79 82 88 9395 97 10 0 101 102 The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Interior, Second Floor - North Photos 103-131 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 10 5 106 10 7 110 111 12 1 103 12 8 12 9 13 0 The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Interior, Second Floor - South Photos 132-155 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 136 14 8 15 1153 155 The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Interior, Third Floor - North Photos 156-163 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 160 The Moller 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Interior, Third Floor - South Photos 164-183 Yellow arrow indicates starting point 16 6 16 8 17 0 171 17 2 174 17 9 The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 1 of 123 1. Exterior, East Elevation, view looking north. 2. Exterior, East Elevation, Window Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 2 of 123 3. Exterior, East Elevation, Door Detail, view looking northwest. 4. Exterior, East Elevation, Loading Dock, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 3 of 123 5. Exterior, East Elevation, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 4 of 123 6. Exterior, East Elevation, Door Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 5 of 123 7. Exterior, East Elevation, Door Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 6 of 123 8. Exterior, East Elevation, Window, view looking northwest. 9. Exterior, East Elevation, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 7 of 123 10. Exterior, East Elevation, view looking northwest. 11. Exterior, East and North Elevation, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 8 of 123 12. Exterior, East Elevation, Door Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 9 of 123 13. Exterior, East Elevation, Windows, view looking northwest. 14. Exterior, East Elevation, Entrance, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 10 of 123 15. Exterior, East Elevation, view looking northwest. 16. Exterior, North Elevation, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 11 of 123 17. Exterior, North Elevation, view looking southwest. 18. Exterior, North Elevation, Window and Brick Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 12 of 123 19. Exterior, North Elevation, Space between two buildings, view looking south. 20. Exterior, North Elevation, view looking south. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 13 of 123 21. Exterior, North Elevation, Window Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 14 of 123 22. Exterior, North Elevation, view looking southwest. 23. Exterior, North and West Elevation, view looking south. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 15 of 123 24. Exterior, West Elevation, Window Detail, view looking southeast. 25. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 16 of 123 26. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking southeast. 27. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 17 of 123 28. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking east. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 18 of 123 29. Exterior, West Elevation, Door Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 19 of 123 30. Exterior, West Elevation, Door Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 20 of 123 31. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking northeast. 32. Exterior, West Elevation, Corner Detail, view looking east. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 21 of 123 33. Exterior, West Elevation, Door Detail, view looking east. 34. Exterior, South Elevation, Courtyard, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 22 of 123 35. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 23 of 123 36. Exterior, West and South Elevation, view looking northeast. 37. Exterior, West Elevation, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 24 of 123 38. Exterior, West Elevation, Brick Detail, view looking northeast. 39. Exterior, West and South Elevation, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 25 of 123 40. Exterior, West and South Elevation, view looking northeast. 41. Exterior, West and South Elevation, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 26 of 123 42. Interior, First Floor - North, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 27 of 123 43. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northwest. 44. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 28 of 123 45. Interior, First Floor - North, Wall Detail, view looking northeast. 46. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 29 of 123 47. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northeast. 48.Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 30 of 123 49. Interior, First Floor - North, Opening Detail, view looking northwest. 50. Interior, First Floor - North,Window Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 31 of 123 51. Interior, First Floor - North, Window and Ceiling Detail, view looking southeast. 52. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 32 of 123 53. Interior, First Floor - North, Ceiling Detail, view looking southwest. 54. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 33 of 123 55. Interior, First Floor - North, Wall Detail, view looking northwest. 56. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 34 of 123 57. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 35 of 123 58. Interior, First Floor - North, Door Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 36 of 123 59. Interior, First Floor - North, Wall Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 37 of 123 60. Interior, First Floor - North, Floor Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 38 of 123 61. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southwest. 62. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 39 of 123 63. Interior, First Floor - North, Wall and Floor Detail, view looking northeast. 64. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 40 of 123 65. Interior, First Floor - North, Ceiling Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 41 of 123 66. Interior, First Floor - North, Stairs, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 42 of 123 67. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northwest. 68. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 43 of 123 69. Interior, First Floor - North, Wall and Door Detail, view looking north. 70. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 44 of 123 71. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 45 of 123 72. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking east. 73. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 46 of 123 74. Interior, First Floor - North, view looking southwest. 75. Interior, First Floor - North, Wall Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 47 of 123 76. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 48 of 123 77. Interior, First Floor - South, Brickwork Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 49 of 123 78. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southwest. 79. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 50 of 123 80. Interior, First Floor - South, Brick Arch, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 51 of 123 81. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 52 of 123 82. Interior, First Floor - South, Ceiling Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 53 of 123 83. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southeast. 84. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 54 of 123 85. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. 86. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 55 of 123 87. Interior, First Floor - South, Window Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 56 of 123 88. Interior, First Floor - South, Ceiling Detail, view looking northwest. 89. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 57 of 123 90. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 58 of 123 91. Interior, First Floor - South, Brickwork Detail, view looking north. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 59 of 123 92. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southwest. 93. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 60 of 123 94. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 61 of 123 95. Interior, First Floor - South, Floor Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 62 of 123 96. Interior, First Floor - South, Window Detail, view looking west. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 63 of 123 97. Interior, First Floor - South, Window Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 64 of 123 98. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. 99. Interior, First Floor - South, Ceiling Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 65 of 123 100. Interior, First Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 66 of 123 101. Interior, First Floor - South, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 67 of 123 102. Interior, First Floor - South, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 68 of 123 103. Interior, Second Floor - North, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 69 of 123 104. Interior, Second Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 70 of 123 105. Interior, Second Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 71 of 123 106. Interior, Second Floor - North, Skylight and Ceiling Detail, view looking nortwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 72 of 123 107. Interior, Second Floor - North, Floor Detail, view looking northeast. 108. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 73 of 123 109. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking northeast. 110. Interior, Second Floor - North, Door and Brickwork Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 74 of 123 111. Interior, Second Floor - North, Window and Brickwork Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 75 of 123 112. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking southwest. 113. Interior, Second Floor - North, Ceiling Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 76 of 123 114. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking southeast. 115. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 77 of 123 116. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking northwest. 117. Interior, Second Floor - North, Wall Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 78 of 123 118. Interior, Second Floor - North, Ceiling Detail, view looking northwest. 119. Interior, Second Floor - North, Window Detail, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 79 of 123 120. Interior, Second Floor - North, Skylight and Ceiling Detail, view looking west. 121. Interior, Second Floor - North, Floor and Wall Detail, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 80 of 123 122. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking southeast. 123. Interior, Second Floor - North, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 81 of 123 124. Interior, Second Floor - North, Balcony, view looking east. 125. Interior, Second Floor - North, Elevator, view looking south. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 82 of 123 126. Interior, Second Floor - North, Balcony, view looking east. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 83 of 123 127. Interior, Second Floor - North, Elevator, view looking west. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 84 of 123 128. Interior, Second Floor - Embossed Signage, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 85 of 123 129. Interior, Second Floor - North, Wall Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 86 of 123 130. Interior, Second Floor - North, Doorway, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 87 of 123 131. Interior, Second Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northwest. 132. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 88 of 123 133. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 89 of 123 134. Interior, Second Floor - South, Window Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 90 of 123 135. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 91 of 123 136. Interior, Second Floor - South, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 92 of 123 137. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southwest. 138. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 93 of 123 139. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northwest. 140. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 94 of 123 141. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 95 of 123 142. Interior, Second Floor - South, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 96 of 123 143. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southeast. 144. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 97 of 123 145. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northwest. 146. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 98 of 123 147. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 99 of 123 148. Interior, Second Floor - South, Doorway, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 100 of 123 149. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southwest. 150. Interior, Second Floor - South, Ceiling and Windows Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 101 of 123 151. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southwest. 152. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 102 of 123 153. Interior, Second Floor - South, Elevator, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 103 of 123 154. Interior, Second Floor - South, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 104 of 123 155. Interior, Second Floor - South, Stairs, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 105 of 123 156. Interior, Third Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northwest. 157. Interior, Third Floor - North, Balcony, view looking north. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 106 of 123 158. Interior, Third Floor - North, Skylight and Ceiling Detail, view looking northwest. 159. Interior, Third Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 107 of 123 160. Interior, Third Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 108 of 123 161. Interior, Third Floor - North, Balcony, view looking northeast. 162. Interior, Third Floor - North, Floor and Wall Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 109 of 123 163. Interior, Third Floor - North, Doorway, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 110 of 123 164. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking northwest. 165. Interior, Third Floor - South, Ceiling and Brickwork Detailing, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 111 of 123 166. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking southwest. 167. Interior, Third Floor - South, Door Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 112 of 123 168. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 113 of 123 169. Interior, Third Floor - South, Stairs, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 114 of 123 170. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 115 of 123 171. Interior, Third Floor - South, Floor Door Detail, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 116 of 123 172. Interior, Third Floor - South, Doorway and Brickwork Detail, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 117 of 123 173. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking northwest. 174. Interior, Third Floor - South, Floor Detail, view looking northwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 118 of 123 175. Interior, Third Floor - South, Ceiling Detail, view looking southeast. 176. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking southeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 119 of 123 177. Interior, Third Floor - South, Doorway Detail, view looking southwest. 178. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 120 of 123 179. Interior, Third Floor - South, Wall and Window Detail, view looking northeast. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 121 of 123 180. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking southeast. 181. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking east. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 122 of 123 182. Interior, Third Floor - South, Stairs and Elevator, view looking southwest. The Moller - Pre-Rehabilitation Photographs 403 N. Prospect St. Hagerstown, MD August 2025 Page 123 of 123 183. Interior, Third Floor - South, view looking northwest. ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 wrtdesign.com CO-OWNER THE MOLLER 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 302.235.2500 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 CENTERLINE W1 WINDOW TAG PARTITION TAG A101 1 REF A101 1 1 1 1 A101 1 1 1 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCE INTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCE ROOM IDENTIFICATION DETAIL REFERENCE DETAIL SECTION REFERENCE 1 A101 REF WALL SECTION REFERENCE 1 A101 REF 1 A101 REF BUILDING SECTION REFERENCE 1 A101 REF 101 DOOR IDENTIFICATION BREAKLINE GRIDLINE Name ELEVATION ELEVATION MARKER # NORTH ARROW TRUE NORTH PROJECT NORTH SPOT ELEVATION /1 A101 VIEW REFERENCE VIEW NUMBER 1/2" / 1'-0" SPOT SLOPE SLOPE DIRECTION SLOPE DRAWING NUMBER SHEET NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CEILING TAG CEILING TYPE HEIGHT ABOVE FINISH FLOOR 1 REVISION TAG SHEET NUMBER FLOOR TAG ROOF TAG 1 VIEW NAME 1/8" = 1'-0" VIEW TITLE VIEW NUMBER VIEW SCALE P1 ACT-1 1' - 0" SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT TAG ROOM NAME 101 R1 F1 B1 ALIGN ALUMINUM STEEL WOOD -FINISH PLYWOOD GYPSUM WALL BOARD RIGID INSULATION MINERAL WOOL INSULATION SPRAY FOAM INSULATION CMU BRICK CONCRETE STONE EARTH GRAVEL WOOD FRAMING (CONTINUOUS) WOOD BLOCKING / SHIM (DISCONTINUOUS) EXTERIOR SHEATHING BATT INSULATION MORTAR NET MORTAR / GROUT GRASS ABBREVIATIONS VICINITY MAP (NTS) GENERAL NOTES DRAWING INDEX PROJECT SYMBOLS PROJECT MATERIALS WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 6 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 12" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 G-001 05.16.2025 VICINITY MAP & DRAWING INDEX TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA/JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 ACM ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL ACOUS ACOUSTICAL ACT ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADDL ADDITIONAL AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM ANOD ANODIZED APPLIC APPLICABLE ARCH ARCHITECT BD BOARD BLDG BUILDING BLKG BLOCKING BLW BELOW BOT BOTTOM BRG BEARING CB CARPET BASE CC CENTER TO CENTER CG CORNER GUARD CIP CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLG CEILING CLR CLEAR CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN COMP COMPOSITION CONC CONCRETE CONT CONTINUOUS CPT CARPET TILE CS COURSE CT CERAMIC TILE CU CONDENSER UNIT CW CURTAIN WALL DIM DIMENSION / DIMENSIONAL DN DOWN DS DOWNSPOUT DTL DETAIL DWG(S) DRAWING(S) EA EACH EF EXHAUST FAN EIFS EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRICAL ELEV ELEVATOR EOS EDGE OF SLAB EQ EQUAL EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXIST EXISTING EXT EXTERIOR FD FLOOR DRAIN FEB FIRE EXTINGUISHER ON BRACKET FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN CABINET FF FINISH FLOOR FLSHG FLASHING FNDT FOUNDATION FO FRONT OF FOW FACE OF WALL FP FIREPROOFING FR FIRE RESISTIVE FT FOOT FTNG FOOTING GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GL GLASS GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD GYP GYPSUM H / HGT HEIGHT HC HOLLOW CORE HD HAND DRYER HDW HARDWARE HM HOLLOW METAL HO HOLD OPEN HOR HORIZONTAL HR HOUR INCL INCLUDED INS / INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR JAN JANITOR JBOX JUNCTION BOX JT JOINT LA LANDSCAPE LAM LAMINATE LAV LAVATORY LB LOAD BEARING LBS POUNDS LVP LUXURY VINYL PLANK MAINT MAINTENANCE MAT MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MECH MECHANICAL MFR MANUFACTURE MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS MMB MEMBRANE MO MASONRY OPENING MTL METAL NA NOT APPLICABLE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NRC NOISE REDUCTION COEFFICIENT NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER OCC OCCUPANCY OH OPPOSITE HAND OPNG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE ORD OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN PC PRECAST PCC PRECAST CONCRETE PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PLUMB PLUMBING PLY PLYWOOD PT PORCELAIN TILE PTD PAINTED RD ROOF DRAIN RDC REDUCER REF REFER / REFERENCE REINF REINFORCEMENT REQD REQUIRED RES RESILIENT REV REVERSE RL ROOF LEADER RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING RTN RETURN RTU ROOF TOP UNIT RV ROOF VENT RWB RUBBER WALL BASE RWC RAIN WATER CONDUCTOR SA SELF ADHESIVE SAN SANITARY SB SPLASH BLOCK SC SOLID CORE SCHED SCHEDULE SCONC SEALED CONCRETE SCWD SOLID CORE WOOD DOOR SHTNG SHEATHING SIM SIMILAR SQ SQUARE SSD SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SSTL STAINLESS STEEL STC SOUND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE STRUCT STRUCTURAL TBD TO BE DETERMINED TBS TO BE SELECTED TELE TELEPHONE TG TEMPERED GLASS TOS TOP OF STEEL TYP TYPICAL UC UNDERCUT UL SAFETY ORGANIZATION UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE V VENT VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VENT VENTILATION VERT VERTICAL VOL VOLUME VWB VINYL WALL BASE VWC VINYL WALL COVERING W/WITH W/O WITHOUT WD WOOD WH WALL HYDRANT WPF WATERPROOFING WWM WELDED WIRE MESH SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME GENERAL G-000 COVER SHEET G-001 VICINITY MAP & DRAWING INDEX G-006 AIR SEALING DETAILS G-007 EEBA Details G-008 EEBA Details CIVIL C-101 SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL AD-101 LOWER LEVEL DEMO PLAN AD-102A 1ST FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH AD-102B 1ST FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH AD-103A 2ND FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH AD-103B 2ND FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH AD-104A 3RD FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH AD-104B 3RD FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH AD-105A ROOF DEMO PLAN - NORTH AD-105B ROOF DEMO PLAN - SOUTH A-101 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-102 1ST FLOOR PLAN A-103 2ND FLOOR PLAN A-104 THIRD FLOOR PLAN A-105 ROOF PLAN A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - EAST A-202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - WEST A-203 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - N/S A-204 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COURTYARD A-401A LOWER LEVEL ENLARGED PLAN - NORTH A-401B LOWER LEVEL ENLARGED PLAN - SOUTH A-402A 1ST FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN - NORTH A-402B 1ST FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN - SOUTH A-403A 2ND FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN - NORTH A-403B 2ND FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN - SOUTH A-404A 3RD FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN - NORTH A-404B 3RD FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN - SOUTH A-410 UNIT PLANS A-411 UNIT PLANS A-412 UNIT PLANS 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY ALL DRAWING AND SITE DIMENSIONS AND NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL, GEOTECHNICAL, STRUCTURAL, LANDSCAPE, CIVIL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL WORK. THIS INCLUDES REVIEWING THE REQUIREMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS BEFORE THE ORDERING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY WORK. VERIFY ANY CHANGES PRIOR TO DEVIATING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 3. ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR CONFLICTS FOUND IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. DETAILS SHOWN ARE TYPICAL U.N.O. SIMILAR DETAILS APPLY IN SIMILAR CONDITIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLYING FOR AND OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS TO CONFORM WITH ALL STATE & LOCAL BUILDING AND FIRE CODES. 6. INSTALL ALL FIXTURES, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS PER MANUFACTURERS' RECOMMENDATIONS AND TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. ALL APPLIANCES, FIXTURES, AND EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE LISTED BY A NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED AND APPROVED AGENCY. 7. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS & ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS FOR FINISH FLOOR SLAB ELEVATIONS. 8. GROSS SQUARE FOOT (GSF) AREA TABULATIONS ARE MEASURED TO OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR SHEATHING AND TO THE CENTERLINE OF FIRE-SEPARATION WALLS. NET SQUARE FOOT (NSF) AREA TABULATIONS FOR DWELLING UNITS ARE MEASURED FROM INTERIOR SURFACE OF DRYWALL AND INCLUDE ALL INTERIOR WALLS AND MECHANICAL SPACES WITHIN THE UNIT THAT SERVE THAT UNIT. GSF TOTALS ARE INTENDED FOR REVIEW AND PERMITTING OF PROJECT. CONTRACTORS SHALL MAKE THEIR OWN TAKE-OFFS FOR MATERIALS. DIMENSIONS: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD (OR FACE OF STRUCTURE), UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. MASONRY OPENINGS (MO'S) AND ROUGH OPENINGS (RO'S) ARE NOMINAL. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION WITH INSTALLED PRODUCTS. ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED TO THE CENTER OF THE UNIT. 2. MASONRY OPENINGS AT ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE COORDINATED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS GOVERN. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON UNIT ARE TYPICAL FOR SIMILAR UNIT TYPE IN BUILDING. 5. CLEAR DIMENSIONS SHALL NOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT. FOUNDATIONS 1. GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDING--SEE CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS, FOUNDATION DEPTHS, AND ADJACENT GRADES. 2. THE EXTENT OF FACE BRICK IS INDICATED ON THE UNIT FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. THE TYPICAL DETAIL INDICATES BRICK 8" BELOW ANY ADJACENT GRADE OR TO THE NEAREST COURSE. 3. INSTALL FOAM SILL SEAL AND SEALANT AT FRAMING TO FOUNDATION CONDITIONS. FRAMING AND FINISHING 1. FRAMING CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING SIZES AND ALIGNMENT WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. MISALIGNED FRAMING TO BE CORRECTED AT FRAMING CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2. PROVIDE AND INSTALL 2X SOLID WOOD BLOCKING FOR ALL WALL MOUNTED COMPONENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BATH ACCESSORIES, HANDRAILS, SHELVES, TOWEL BARS, WALL MOUNTED FIXTURES, GRAB BARS AND ANY OTHER ITEMS ATTACHED TO WALLS. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CLEARANCES FOR FLUES, VENTS, CHASES, SOFFITS, ETC., BEFORE THE ORDERING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY SUCH ITEMS. 4. GYPSUM WALL BOARD TYPES: A. INTERIOR GWB SHALL BE 5/8" THICK AT WALLS AND CEILINGS. B. PROVIDE TILE BACKER BOARD WHERE REQUIRED FOR CERAMIC TILE INSTALLATION. C. PROVIDE FIRE CODE GWB AT ALL RATED FIRE SEPARATION ASSEMBLIES. D. PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GWB AT ALL WALLS IN BATHROOMS. PAPER FACED GYPSUM BOARD IS NOT PERMITTED AT TUB/SHOWER SURROUNDS. 5. WHERE A PORTION OF A CONTINUOUS WALL HAS A DIFFERENT FIRE RATING OR SHEAR WALL REQUIREMENT THAN THE REST OF THE WALL, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AS PART OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT FOR ADDING THE NECESSARY LAYERS OF GWB AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT THE FINISH WALL SURFACE IS FLUSH AND CONTINUOUS. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL FIRE STOPPING MATERIALS IN ALL VOIDS AND CAVITIES IN INTERIOR SEPARATION WALLS. 7. FOR INTERIOR DOOR LOCATIONS, SET JAMBS 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL FACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. SEE DOOR SCHEDULE A-603. 8. STUD WALLS: LOADBEARING -U.N.O. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 2X6 FRAMING AND ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE 2X6 FRAMING. NON-LOADBEARING -U.N.O. ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE 2X4 FRAMING. 9. PRODUCT LABELS: EXPOSED LABELS, STICKERS OR MANUFACTURERS' BRANDING IS NOT ALLOWED. REMOVE LABELS OR INSTALL PRODUCTS SO THAT MANUFACTURER'S LABELS ARE NOT VISIBLE. MANUFACTURERS' INSIGNIA ON APPLIANCES IS ALLOWED. 10. AT ALL ACCESSIBLE UNITS, PROVIDE TWO-PIECE CORNERGUARDS (2" X 2" X 48" H) ABOVE BASEBOARD AT ALL G.W.B. OUTSIDE CORNERS. 11. FINISH COLOR/PRODUCT SELECTIONS WILL BE ISSUED UPON OWNER APPROVAL. SEE SPECIFICATION (DIVISION 9) FOR SPECIFIC PRODUCT INFORMATION. FLASHING, INSULATION, VAPOR/MOISTURE/AIR BARRIERS 1. INSULATE ALL ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED AREAS. 2. R-VALUES: SEE LIFE SAFETY & CODE ANALYSIS 3. FLASHING AT BASE OF EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL EXTEND BEYOND FOUNDATIONS, BE NAILED THROUGH SHEATHING TO WOOD FRAME AND LAPPED BEHIND WALL SHEATHING. 4. SEE FOUNDATION NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 5. SEALANTS:WHEN CREATING ASSEMBLIES THAT INCLUDE TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES AND JOISTS (INC. BLOCKING); ADHESIVES, SEALANT AND GASKETS MUST BE USED AS FOLLOWS. A. BETWEEN TOP OF RIM JOIST AND SUBFLOORING USE ADHESIVE TO MAINTAIN ASSEMBLY. B. AT INTERIOR CORNER WHERE JOIST, OR BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS, SITS ON A TOP PLATE USE SEALANT TO PREVENT AIR AND MOISTURE PASSAGE. C. WHERE EXTERIOR SHEATHING, INTERIOR WALL BOARD OR RIGID INSULATION MEETS A TOP OR BOTTOM PLATE USE SEALANT, ADHESIVE OR GASKET TO MAINTAIN ASSEMBLY. D. AT INTERIOR CORNER OF BOTTOM PLATE AND SUBFLOOR USE SEALANT TO PREVENT AIR AND MOISTURE PASSAGE. E. BETWEEN BOTTOM PLATE AND FOUNDATION USE GASKET TO PREVENT AIR AND MOISTURE PASSAGE. F. FOAM CAULKING SEALANT AT PERIMETER OF EACH STUD BAY. -SEE DETAILS G-006. 6. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS WITH SPRAY FOAM, TYP. MECHANICAL 1. VERIFY MECHANICAL ROOM CLEARANCES AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING REQUIREMENTS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION. STORM WATER RUN-OFF MANAGEMENT 1. GRADE MUST SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING 6" WITHIN THE FIRST 10' OF FOUNDATION. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR RAIN LEADER LOCATIONS. COORDINATE WTIH CIVIL DRAWINGS 3. INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. PROVIDE BOOT & UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE PIPE TO CONNECT DOWNSPOUTS AT BUILDING PERIMETER U.N.O. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIZE, ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF DRAINAGE PIPE & OUTLET. 4. EXTERIOR FLOORS & ROOF SLOPES ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/4" PER 1'-0", UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. UNIT COUNT MATRIX BEDS 1 BATH 1 LOWER LEVEL 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR TOTAL 1A 4 4 4 16 UNIT 4 42 1B 1C* 1C 1D 1E 1F 4 4 50 1 1 20 1 1 00 2 2 00 1 1 00 0 1 00 13 4 2 4 2 1 2A*0 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G 0 0 0 0 0 0 2H 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 12 2 2 2 111 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 4 3 3 1 6 23 TOTAL 4 162223 65 UNIT AREA MATRIX QUANTITY NSF GSF 1A16 UNIT 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 823777 660638 810778 813780 852822 980940 13 6 4 2 1 2A 982 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G 1186 1144 988 1172 934 1239 2H 1047 1034 1018 1215 1183 1212 962 1058 1270 2 2 2 4 3 3 1 6 AREA PER FLOOR LOWER LEVEL 14,778 SF 34,495 SF1ST FLOOR 31,384 SF2ND FLOOR 19,931 SF3RD FLOOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AREA 28,615 SFNEW 100,588 SFTOTAL 73,931 SFEXISTING NOTES: 1. REFER TO BUILDING PLANS FOR UNIT TYPE LOCATIONS. 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR SPECIFIC LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS OF UNIT TYPES 3. * DESIGNATES TYPE A UNITS. THESE ARE DESIGNED TO MEET ANSI A117.1 2017 TYPE A, UFAS, AND FAIR HOUSING. ALL OTHER UNITS ARE TYPE B, DESIGNED TO MEET ANSI A117.1 2017 TYPE B AND FAIR HOUSING. 4. NSF IS CALCULATED FROM INTERIOR FINISH FACE OF WALLS. 5. GSF IS CALCULATED FROM EXTERIOR OF FACE OF SHEATHING OF EXTERIOR WALLS TO MIDDLE OF FRAMING OF INTERIOR WALLS. 100,588 SFTOTAL 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION 1. AIR BARRIER ASSEMBLIES SHOWN ARE DIAGRAMATIC AND SHOULD BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ILLUSTRATING AIR SEAL LOCATIONS 2. APPLY AIR SEALING TO CORRESPONDING PLANS, SECTIONS & DETAILS AS INDICATED HERE. 3. CONTINUOUS SEALS WHERE NOTED ON DETAILS SHOULD CONSIST OF SEALANT, GASKET OR ADHESIVE. ALIGN ALL AIR BARRIERS. ALL CONNECTIONS AND MATERIAL TRANSITIONS MUST BE SEALED WITHOUT INTERRUPTIONS. 4. GC TO REVIEW ALL AIR BARRIER ASSEMBLIES AND CONFIRM CONNECTIONS ARE CORRECTLY AIR SEALED PRIOR TO CLOSING UP ASSEMBLY. 5. LAP ALL SEAMS OF VAPOR RETARDER MINIMUM 12”OR PER MANUFACTURER’S INSTRUCTIONS AND TAPE SEALED CONTINUOUS END TO END WITH MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED TAPE. 6. ENSURE THAT THE VAPOR RETARDER , INCLUDING EXCESS, IS NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXCESS VAPOR RETARDER MUST BE SEALED TO THE WALL AIR BARRIER AS SPECIFIED. 7. GROUP MULTIPLE PENETRATIONS THROUGH CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB INTO ONE LARGER PENETRATION. ENCOMPASS THE GROUP WITH THE VAPOR RETARDER TURNED UP AND THE GROUPING ENCASED IN A PITCH POCKET TYPE OF LIQUID FILLED TERMINATION WITH THE VAPOR RETARDER TURNED UPWARDS TOWARDS THE TOP OF THE SLAB TO WHERE IT CAN BE SEALED AFTER THE SLAB POUR. 8. WHERE WALLS ARE ANCHORED TO SLAB, SEAL PENETRATION OF ANY GASKET AND / OR VAPOR BARRIER WHEN INSTALLED. DRILL HOLES AND SEAL WITH SEALANT BEFORE TIGHTENING. 9. EXTERIOR WALL TOP PLATE OUTSIDE FACES NEED TO BE SEALED CONTINUOUS TO THE TOP PORTION OF THE SHEATHING WALL PANEL AIR BARRIER. 10. SEAL FROM THE INTERIOR AT THE AIR BARRIER PENETRATIONS. 11. PERFORM TESTING (BLOWER DOOR TEST) AND VERIFY BUILDING OR DWELLING UNIT TO HAVE AN AIR LEAKAGE RATE OF NOT EXCEEDING THE REQUIRED AIR CHANGES PER HOUR PER APPLICABLE CODES. 12. THIS PROJECT SHALL PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. 13. ALL GAPS IN EXTERIOR SHEATHING, SUCH AS SEAMS BETWEEN ADJACENT SHEETS, SHALL BE SEALED. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH SHEATHING, RIM BOARDS, TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES SUCH AS HOLES DRILLED FOR CONDENSATE LINES, PIPING, CONDUIT, WIRING AND UTILITY BOXES, SHALL BE TAPED AND SEALED. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH INSULATED CEILINGS, INCLUDING EXHAUSTS AND SECURITY WIRING SHALL BE SEALED. PENETRATIONS FOR FLUES AND OTHER HEAT-PRODUCING ITEMS SHALL BE SEALED WITH NONCOMBUSTIBLE SHEET MATERIALS AND HIGH TEMPERATURE SEALANT. GENERAL NOTES -AIR SEALING WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 5 5 : 3 9 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ L K r o l l @ w r t d e s i g n . c o m . r v t As indicated DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 G-006 05.16.2025 AIR SEALING DETAILS TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION LK 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION 3" = 1'-0"1 BRICK INFILL AT EXISTING MASONRY WALL OPENING - SILL 3" = 1'-0"2 BRICK INFILL AT EXISTING MASONRY WALL OPENING - HEAD 3" = 1'-0"3 BRICK INFILL AT EXISTING MASONRY WALL OPENING - JAMB 3" = 1'-0"4 WINDOW SILL DETAIL AT EXISTING MASONRY WALL 3" = 1'-0"5 WINDOW HEAD DETAIL AT EXISTING MASONRY WALL 3" = 1'-0"6 WINDOW JAMB DETAIL AT EXISTING MASONRY WALL3" = 1'-0"7 EXISTING BASEMENT SECTION DETAIL 3" = 1'-0"8 PIPE BELOW EXISTING SLAB DETAIL 3" = 1'-0"9 EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION SECTION DETAIL 3" = 1'-0"10 EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION PLAN DETAIL AT OPENING 3" = 1'-0"11 EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION PLAN DETAIL 3" = 1'-0"12 TYPICAL DOOR DETAIL IN EXISTING MASONRY WALL ) I4ESJECN SEFF JR TILOEC +&URYCY(Y ,TE1V AIIPS OJ M.3B) RC 1ICJIT OCD -) WTRL IDNI RW RPICECN 2RTE-RCJOFF#Y M.3B) 5ITJE1OFF#Y SIFW3OD2ITECN WFI4E,FI WFOS2ECN JR -) O,R5I ,RJJRL RW RPICECN OCD R&J JR WO1I RW ,TE1VY 1RCJEC&R&S AOJITPTRRW LIL,TOCI CIA ,TE1V 5ICIITY ,TE1V JR LOJ12 OD0O1ICJ I4ESJECN ,TE1V AOFFY OT12EJI1J JR SIFI1J WRT 1RFRTY LRTJOT JR LOJ12 OD0O1ICJ I4ESJECN LRTJOTY OT12EJI1J JR SIFI1J WRT 1RFRTY EXISTING LINTEL BRICK VENT AT 4'-0" ON CENTER AND 8" FROM EDGE OF OPENING. AND MASONRY WALL 2" 2" WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SELF-ADHERING FLEXIBLE FLASHING AT FACE OF BACK-UP WALL AND TURNED UP AT SIDES OF OPENINGS. EXTERIOR INT. FINISH PER SCHED. WINDOW AS SCHEDULED WI N D O W H E I G H T INTERIOR WI N D O W R O U G H OP E N I N G PTD WD WINDOW SILL PTD 1X3 WD TRIM 1X4 BACKDAM 2X WD BLOCKING CONT. SEALANT, SEAL ZIP TAPE TO MASONRY LOW EXPANSION CELL SPRAY FOAM, CONT. ZIP TAPE OVER OVER WD BACKDAM, INTO INSIDE FACE OF WINDOW 100% SILICONE OR LOW EXPANSION FOAM CONNECTING CONT. SEALANT, SEAL WINDOW TO ZIP TAPE. DO NOT FILL ENTIRE CAVITY. CONT. BENT METAL TRIM WITH DRIP EDGE, INSTALLED INTO WINDOW ACCESSORY EXTERIOR INT. FINISH PER SCHED. GWB RETURN, TYP. WINDOW AS SCHEDULED WI N D O W H E I G H T LOW EXPANSION CELL SPRAY FOAM, CONT. CONT. SEALANT, SEAL BRICK TO METAL TRIM INTERIOR 100% SILICONE OR LOW EXPANSION FOAM CONNECTING CONT. SEALANT, SEAL WINDOW TO ZIP TAPE. DO NOT FILL ENTIRE CAVITY.WI N D O W R O U G H OP E N I N G 2X WD BLOCKING BENT METAL TRIM WITH DROP EDGE, INSTALLED INTO WINDOW ACCESSORY GROOVE ZIP TAPE OVER WD BLOCKING INTO INSIDE OF ROUGH OPENING INTERIOR INT. FINISH PER SCHED. PTD WOOD SILL BELOW GWB RETURN, TYP. CONT. PAINTABLE SEALANT WINDOW AS SCHEDULED CAST STONE SILL BELOW WINDOW WIDTH WINDOW ROUGH OPENING 100% SILICONE OR LOW EXPANSION FOAM CONNECTING CONT. SEALANT, SEAL WINDOW TO ZIP TAPE. DO NOT FILL ENTIRE CAVITY. 2X WD BLOCKING ZIP TAPE OVER WD BLOCKING INTO INSIDE OF ROUGH OPENING LOW EXPANSION CELL SPRAY FOAM, CONT. CONT. SEALANT, SEAL BRICK TO ZIP TAPE CONT. SEALANT, SEAL BRICK TO METAL TRIM BENT METAL TRIM TO BE INSTALLED INTO WINDOW ACCESSORY W 0 FINISH FLOOR 50' -5 1/2" CRUSHED STONE - NO FINES SCHEDULE 40 PERFORATED PVC PIPE - SEE MEP DWG 4" REINF CONC INFILL SLAB GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WRAP AT PIPE EXISTING CONC SLAB -VIF THICKNESS 1' - 4" SELF LEVELING UNDERLAYMENT CONTINUOUS 2" CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 1" R5 XPS INSULATION W/ DRAINAGE GROOVES VIF 1' - 0" +/- 1" FURRING JAMB NEW H.M. DOOR FRAME EX I S T I N G NEW CONCRETE CAP BELOW INFILL W/ 8" CMU EXISTING BRICK WALL GWB NEW 40" WIDE DOOR SEALANT SEALANT GROUT 312" EXTERIOR NEW CONCRETE SLAB SLOPED AWAY FROM BUILDING 2% NEW H.M. DOOR GWB WALL RETURN BEYOND CORNER GUARD 1/4" / FT. SLOPE EXIST. BRICK WALL RETURN BEYOND INTERIOR ALUMINUM THRESHOLD ANCHORED TO CONCRETE WITH EXPANSION ANCHORS AND SET IN 2 CONT. BEDS OF SEALANT AS REQ'D 14" 12" 12" M. O . 0' -0" -8' -6" 2" CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM ADHERED TO BRICK ENCLOSE STUD COMPLETELY IN SPRAY FOAM CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM IN JOIST BAY; EMBED DIMPLED MAT AND XPS 2" THERMAX; EXTEND INTO RIM JOIST BAY FOAM TO SLAB NEW 4" CONCRETE SLAB PERFORATED PIPE SURROUNDED BY FILTER FABRIC, CONNECT TO SUMP PIT EXISTING GRADE & SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL PLANS DIMPLED DRAINAGE MAT TO EXTEND BELOW SLAB AND OVER INTERIOR DRAIN TILE SUB-SLAB 10 MIL VAPOR BARRIER , TAPE TO DIMPLED DRAINAGE MAT EXISTING MASONRY WALL FLOOR LEVEL FLOOR LEVEL NEW 2" CLOSED CELL SPRAYFOAM, R-7 1/2" AIR SPACE NEW 5/8" GYPSUM WALL BOARD NEW 2x3 WD STUDS EXISTING BRICK WALL TO BE REFINISHED EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL (BRICK CONSTRUCTION)6" OR 8" CMU ROUGHCAST COLORED MORTAR TO MACH BRICK EXTERIOR G EXTERIOR WALL INFILL INTERIOR EXIST. BRICK M.O. 1 LAYER 5/8" G.W.B.2" SPRAY FOAM INSULATION1 5 8" MTL STUD AT 16" O.C. 1 LAYER 5/8" G.W.B. 2" SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 1 58" MTL STUD AT 16" O.C. EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL (BRICK CONSTRUCTION) WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 6 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 G-007 05.16.2025 EEBA Details TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION LK 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 7 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 G-008 05.16.2025 EEBA Details TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION LK 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 7 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 C-101 05.16.2025 SITE PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION Author 8834.03 Checker 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION UP OUTLINE OF EXG BUILDING TO REMAIN ABOVE DEMO EXG STAIRS DEMO EXG WALLS DEMO EXG PIPES AND DEBRIS DEMO EXG DOOR DEMO EXG CONCRETE PAD DEMO EXG RAMP DEMO EXG SHAFT SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 7 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-101 05.16.2025 LOWER LEVEL DEMO PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL DEMO PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION UP UP REMOVE AND RETAIN EXG DOOR AS DIMENSIONAL REFERENCE REMOVE AND RETAIN EXG WINDOWS AS DIMENSIONAL REFERENCE DEMO EXISTING DOORS DEMO EXISTING WALLS AND CANOPYDEMO EXISTING DOORS DEMO EXG SHAFT DEMO EXG DOORS DEMO EXISTING DOORS SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 7 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-102A 05.16.2025 1ST FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1ST FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION UP DN DEMO EXG STAIRS DEMO EXG SHAFT DEMO EXG PORTION OF WALL SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 8 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-102B 05.16.2025 1ST FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1ST FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DN REMOVE AND RETAIN EXG WINDOW AS DIMENSIONAL REFERENCE DEMO EXG STAIR DEMO EXG PORTION OF WALL DEMO EXG SUBFLOOR, STEEL STRUCTURE TO REMAIN DEMO EXG SHAFT SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 8 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-103A 05.16.2025 2ND FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DN UP UP REMOVE ALL EXG WINDOWS, TYP UNO DEMO ALL EXG STAIRS, TYP UNO DEMO EXG ROOF AND FACADE MATERIALS ON WALL SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 8 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-103B 05.16.2025 2ND FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DEMO EXG SUBFLOOR, STEEL STRUCTURE TO REMAIN DEMO EXG STAIR DEMO EXG ROOFING AND ROOF STRUCTURE DEMO ROOFING DOWN TO SUBSTRATE SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 9 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-104A 05.16.2025 3RD FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR DEMO PLAN - NORTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DN DN DEMO EXG ROOF AND FACADE MATERIALS ON WALL REMOVE ALL EXG WINDOWS, TYP UNO DEMO ALL EXG STAIRS, TYP UNO SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 9 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-104B 05.16.2025 3RD FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR DEMO PLAN - SOUTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DEMO SKYLIGHT GLAZING, FRAME TO REMAIN DEMO EXG ROOFING AND ROOF STRUCTURE SHAFT OVERRUN TO REMAIN DEMO ROOFING DOWN TO SUBSTRATE DEMO ROOFING DOWN TO SUBSTRATE SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 2 9 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-105A 05.16.2025 ROOF DEMO PLAN -NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF DEMO PLAN - NORTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DEMO ROOFING DOWN TO SUBSTRATE DEMO ROOFING DOWN TO SUBSTRATE SELECTIVE REMOVALS NOTES INDICATES MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED. COORD WITH STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEMOLITION ENGINEER. INDICATES EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. REMOVALS ARE NOT LIMITED SOLELY TO WORK SHOWN. REMOVALS ARE SHOWN AS SCHEMATIC ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVALS TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN INTENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY DEMOLITION ENGINEER. 2. ALL MATERIALS TO REMAIN OR BE SALVAGED ARE TO BE PROTECTED AGAINST DAMAGE BY DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL EXISTING SLIDING DOORS TO BE SALVAGED AND STORED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION. WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 3 0 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 AD-105B 05.16.2025 ROOF DEMO PLAN -SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION SA 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF DEMO PLAN - SOUTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 3 1 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/16" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-101 05.16.2025 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION EV EV A-202 2 A-204 4 A-2032 A-203 1 A-202 1 A-401A 1 A-401B 1 UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A COMPACTOR STAIR 1 ELEV LOBBY RESIDENT STORAGE BIKE ROOM MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL TRASH LOBBY 140' - 8 3/8"118' - 4"53' - 0"75' - 8" 39 ' - 0 1 / 8 " 38 ' - 4 7 / 8 " 20' - 11 1/8"117' - 0" 1/16" = 1'-0"1 PLAN_LOWER LEVEL DN DN EV EVEVEV A-202 2 A-201 2 A-204 4 A-2032 A-203 1 A-201 1 A-202 1 A-402B 1 3 A-205 2 1 UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 2A UNIT 2B UNIT 2C UNIT 2B FITNESS UNIT 2B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1B UNIT 1C STAIR 2 STAIR 3 UNIT 1B STAIR 1 UNIT 1D UNIT 1D UNIT 1E UNIT 2FUNIT 2E UNIT 2G UNIT 2H MAIL LOBBY 2 1 UNIT 1B A-402A 1 MANAGEMENT SUITE 53' - 0"75' - 8" 38 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 6 " 265' - 5"53' - 0"76' - 2" 37 ' - 1 " 18 ' - 6 " 74 ' - 0 " 12 9 ' - 7 " 394' - 7" 10 8 ' - 4 3 / 8 " 387' - 8 3/8" WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 3 2 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/16" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-102 05.16.2025 1ST FLOOR PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/16" = 1'-0"1 1ST FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DN UPDNUPDN A-202 2 A-201 2 A-204 4 A-2032 A-203 1 A-201 1 A-202 1 3 A-205 2 1 A-403A 1 A-403B 1 2 1 UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 2A TRASH UNIT 2B UNIT 2C UNIT 2B COMMUNITY LOUNGE STAIR 2 UNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 2DUNIT 2D STAIR 1 STAIR 3 UNIT 1D UNIT 1D UNIT 1E UNIT 2FUNIT 2E UNIT 2H UNIT 1F OPEN TO BELOW COURTYARD BELOW 259' - 1 3/8"53' - 0"75' - 8" 38 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 6 " 265' - 5"53' - 0"76' - 2" 37 ' - 1 " 18 ' - 6 " 74 ' - 0 " 12 9 ' - 7 " 394' - 7" 10 8 ' - 4 3 / 8 " 387' - 8 3/8" WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 3 4 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/16" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-103 05.16.2025 2ND FLOOR PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/16" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION A-202 2 A-201 2 A-204 4 A-2032 A-203 1 A-201 1 A-202 1 3 A-205 2 1 A-404A 1 A-404B 1 2 1 UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 2A UNIT 2B UNIT 2C UNIT 2B STAIR 1 LAUNDRY UNIT 1B UNIT 2D UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1B STAIR 2 OPEN TO BELOW COURTYARD BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW 259' - 1 3/8"53' - 0" 38 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 6 " 265' - 5"53' - 0" WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 3 4 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/16" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-104 05.16.2025 THIRD FLOOR PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/16" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION A-202 2 A-201 2 A-204 4 A-2032 A-203 1 A-201 1 A-202 1 3 A-205 2 1 2 1 NEW ROOFING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW ROOFING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW ROOFING AND TRUSSES TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING SKYLIGHT FRAME WITH NEW GLAZING NEW TPO ROOF 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUN SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING NEW ROOFING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW ROOFING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW TPO ROOF 1/ 4 " = 1 ' -0" NEW TPO ROOF ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1/4" = 1'-0" SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 3 5 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/16" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-105 05.16.2025 ROOF PLAN TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/16" = 1'-0"1 PLAN_ROOF 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS EXISTING BRICK FACADE NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING BRICK AND ALUMINUM WINDOW INFILL AT DEMO'D GARAGE DOOR NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS WITH BRICK HEADER NEW BRICK AND ALUMINUM WINDOW INFILL S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" ALUMINUM CANOPY STOREFRONT ENTRY DOORS EXISTING WINDOW FRAMES WITH NEW GLAZING EXISTING BRICK FACADE NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS AND BRICK INFILL AT DEMO'D DOOR AND CANOPY NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS METAL PANEL INFILL AT ARCH, TYPICAL 1. EXISTING FACADES ARE SHOWN IN GRAY, NEW COMPONENTS ARE SHOWN IN BLACK. 2. EXISTING BRICK TO REMAIN. EXISTING BRICK TO BE RE-POINTED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. 3. OPENINGS IN BRICK WALLS TO BE PATCHED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW LEGEND WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 8/2 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 0 : 3 0 : 3 6 A M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ L K r o l l @ w r t d e s i g n . c o m . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-201 08.29.2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - EAST HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1 2 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - NORTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION 8/29/2025 HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" LOWER LEVEL -10' -10" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" VINYL WINDOWS, TYPICAL METAL PANEL INFILL AT ARCH, TYPICAL NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING OPENINGS IN BRICK TO BE INFILLED WITH BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADE S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" LOWER LEVEL -10' -10" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" PAINTED LETTERS ON BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 2, VERTICAL CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 1, VERTICAL ALUMINUM CANOPY WITH STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM BRICK TYPE 1 NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING VINYL WINDOWS, TYPICAL METAL PANEL INFILL AT ARCH, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADE ALUMINUM COPING DIAGONAL BRACING 1. EXISTING FACADES ARE SHOWN IN GRAY, NEW COMPONENTS ARE SHOWN IN BLACK. 2. EXISTING BRICK TO REMAIN. EXISTING BRICK TO BE RE-POINTED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. 3. OPENINGS IN BRICK WALLS TO BE PATCHED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW LEGEND WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 8/2 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 0 : 3 0 : 3 8 A M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ L K r o l l @ w r t d e s i g n . c o m . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-202 08.29.2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - WEST HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1 2 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION - NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION - SOUTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION 8/29/2025 HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" LOWER LEVEL -10' -10" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS METAL PANEL INFILL AT ARCH, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADE EXISTING WINDOW FRAMES WITH NEW GLAZING EXISTING SKYLIGHT FRAME WITH NEW GLAZING CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 1, HORIZONTAL BRICK TYPE 1 ALUMINUM COPING NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" LOWER LEVEL -10' -10" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" EXISTING BRICK FACADECORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 1, VERTICAL CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 2, VERTICAL CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 3, HORIZONTAL EXISTING SKYLIGHT FRAME WITH NEW GLAZING OPENINGS IN BRICK TO BE INFILLED WITH BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADE BRICK TYPE 1 ALUMINUM COPING 1. EXISTING FACADES ARE SHOWN IN GRAY, NEW COMPONENTS ARE SHOWN IN BLACK. 2. EXISTING BRICK TO REMAIN. EXISTING BRICK TO BE RE-POINTED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. 3. OPENINGS IN BRICK WALLS TO BE PATCHED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW LEGEND WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 8/2 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 0 : 3 0 : 4 0 A M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ L K r o l l @ w r t d e s i g n . c o m . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-203 08.29.2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -N/S HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1 2 1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION 8/29/2025 HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 2, VERTICAL CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 1, VERTICAL NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING NEW VINYL WINDOWS, TYPICAL METAL PANEL INFILL AT ARCH, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADEBRICK TYPE 1BRICK ROWLOCK ALUMINUM COPING S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING NEW VINYL WINDOWS, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM OPENINGS IN BRICK TO BE INFILLED WITH BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING, TYPICAL 1. EXISTING FACADES ARE SHOWN IN GRAY, NEW COMPONENTS ARE SHOWN IN BLACK. 2. EXISTING BRICK TO REMAIN. EXISTING BRICK TO BE RE-POINTED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. 3. OPENINGS IN BRICK WALLS TO BE PATCHED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW LEGEND WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 8/2 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 0 : 3 0 : 4 2 A M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ L K r o l l @ w r t d e s i g n . c o m . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-204 08.29.2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COURTYARD HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION WRT 8834.03 WRT 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 12 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - COURTYARD 1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION - COURTYARD 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION 8/29/2025 HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" NEW VINYL WINDOWS, TYPICAL CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 1, HORIZONTAL BRICK TYPE 1 EXISTING BRICK FACADE S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" NEW ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING NEW VINYL WINDOWS, TYPICAL EXISTING BRICK FACADE NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS 1. EXISTING FACADES ARE SHOWN IN GRAY, NEW COMPONENTS ARE SHOWN IN BLACK. 2. EXISTING BRICK TO REMAIN. EXISTING BRICK TO BE RE-POINTED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. 3. OPENINGS IN BRICK WALLS TO BE PATCHED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW LEGEND S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 3, HORIZONTAL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ALUMINUM COPING S. 1ST FLOOR 0' -0" 2ND FLOOR 14' -6" 3RD FLOOR 26' -6" ROOF 37' -6" N. 1ST FLOOR 1' -1" LOW ROOF PARAPET 29' -6" HIGH ROOF 43' -6" CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPE 3, HORIZONTAL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ALUMINUM COPING 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - N COURTYARD 1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION - N COURTYARD WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 8/2 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 0 : 3 0 : 4 4 A M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ L K r o l l @ w r t d e s i g n . c o m . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-205 08.29.2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COURTYARD HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1 2 34 1/8" = 1'-0"3 NORTH ELEVATION - COURTYARD 1/8" = 1'-0"4 SOUTH ELEVATION - COURTYARD 8/29/2025 HISTORIC TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION :57352-(&7 ,668('$7( '5$:1%<&+(&.('%< 6&$/( &23<5,*+7:DOODFH5REHUWV 7RGG//&$//5,*+765(6(59(' $OOLGHDVGHVLJQVDUUDQJHPHQWVDQGSODQVLQGLFDWHGRUUHSUHVHQWHGE\WKLVGUDZLQJDQGZULWWHQPDWHULDODSSHDULQJKHUHLQFRQVWLWXWHWKHRULJLQDODQGXQSXEOLVKHGZRUNRI:DOODFH5REHUWV 7RGG//&DQGWKHVDPHPD\QRWEHGXSOLFDWHGXVHGRUGLVFORVHGWRDQ\SHUVRQILUPRUFRUSRUDWLRQIRUDQ\SXUSRVHZKDWVRHYHUZLWKRXWWKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRIWKHDUFKLWHFW 6($/127)25&216758&7,21'(6&5,37,215(9'$7( .(<3/$1 &22:1(5 $5&+,7(&7 :$//$&(52%(576 72''//& 6287+%52$'675((768,7(3+,/$'(/3+,$3$:57'(6,*1&20 $ 0 (?5 H Y L W ? B 0 R O O H U % X L O G L Q J B $ U F K B : 5 7 B 5 B / . U R O O # Z U W G H V L J Q FRP U Y W '(/$:$5(9$//(<'(9(/230(17 &203$1< 6758&785$/(1*,1((5 &$552//(1*,1((5,1*,1& 6&+,//,1*&,5&/(68,7(+8179$//(<0' 0(3(1*,1((5 $//(16+$5,)) $//(*+(1<&(17(5129$72:(568,7(3,776%85*+3$ &,9,/(1*,1((52:1(5 6&2168/7$17 )5('(5,&.6(,%(57 $662&,$7(6,1& 6287+32720$&675((7+$*(5672:10' &22:1(5 +$*(5672:1+286,1*$87+25,7< :%$/7,025(675((7+$*(5672:10' .(11(773,.(:,/0,1*721'( $ (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216 (;,67,1* +,6725,&7$;&5(',7 68%0,66,21 $XWKRU &KHFNHU 135263(&767+$*(5672:10' 7+(02//(5 ($67(/(9$7,21 6287+$($67(/(9$7,21 6287+% ($67(/(9$7,21 &(175$/($67(/(9$7,21 1257+ 1257+(/(9$7,21 ($67 1257+(/(9$7,21 :(67 :(67(/(9$7,21 1257+:(67(/(9$7,21 6287+ 6287+(/(9$7,21:(67 6287+(/(9$7,21 &2857<$5' :(67(/(9$7,21 &2857<$5'($67:(67(/(9$7,21 6,'(<$5' (;,67,1*:$//352-(&7,216$1'&$123<72%('(02/,6+(' :,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+6,1*/(+81*$/80,180:,1'2:6 (;,67,1*:,1'2:)5$0(6725(0$,1*/$=,1*72%(5(3/$&(',1.,1' '225672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+$/80,1806725()5217'2256 67((/&$123<72%(,167$//('$%29((175<'225 '225672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+1(:$/80,180:,1'2:6$1'%5,&. /2$',1*'2&.72%('(02/,6+(' :,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+$/80,180:,1'2:6 522),1*72%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(',1.,1':,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+$/80,180:,1'2:6 '22572%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+1(:$/80,180:,1'2:6$1'%5,&. :,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+6,1*/(+81*$/80,180:,1'2:6 522),1*72%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(',1.,1' 522),1*72%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(',1.,1' :,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+6,1*/(+81*$/80,180:,1'2:6 :,1'2:)5$0(672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+6,1*/(+81*9,1</:,1'2:6 :,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+6,1*/(+81*9,1</:,1'2:6 :,1'2:672%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+6,1*/(+81*9,1</:,1'2:6 &0872%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+1(:$/80,180:,1'2:6 '225$1'%5,&.,1),//$7(;,67,1*23(1,1**877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' '2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' (;,67,1*'22523(1,1*672%(,1),//(':,7+%5,&.:,1'2:23(1,1*672%(,1),//(':,7+1(:9,1</:,1'2:6 /(77(5672%(5(3$,17(' (;,67,1*'22523(1,1*672%(,1),//(':,7+%5,&.720$7&+(;,67,1* (;,67,1*23(1,1*672%(,1),//(':,7+%5,&.720$7&+(;,67,1* /(77(5672%(5(3$,17(' :,1'2:23(1,1*672%(,1),//(':,7+1(:9,1</:,1'2:6 *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' *877(56$1''2:163287672%('(02/,6+('$1'5(3/$&(' 23(1,1*6,1:$//72%(,1),//('720((75(48,5('),5(5$7,1*)25'(0,6,1*:$//6 23(1,1*72%(&87,1:$//)251(:&255,'25 1(:67$,5$1'(/(9$72572%(&216758&7(' :,1'2:23(1,1*672%(,1),//(':,7+1(:9,1</:,1'2:6 6.</,*+7)5$0(725(0$,1*/$=,1*72%(5(3/$&(' 1(:67$,5$1'(/(9$72572%(&216758&7(' &0872%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+1(:$/80,180:,1'2:69,6,%/()520675((7 1(:67$,572:(572%(&21758&7(' +,6725,&7$;&5(',768%0,66,21 &0872%('(02/,6+('$1',1),//(':,7+1(:9,1</:,1'2:6 WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 3 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-401A 05.16.2025 LOWER LEVEL ENLARGED PLAN -NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION AaLUL L -AImTEmAmCE DIMEORSS- -ECHAmICA5 W3+OaOG#W3+OaOU#23+OaOU# LU + O a O 0 # 22 + O a O 2 # U + O a O U # CDO LALCGP0 C#MWIbMURTmLMTETMbIUmV) WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 3 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-401B 05.16.2025 LOWER LEVEL ENLARGED PLAN -SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION Author 8834.03 Checker 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION &4 EY EY AaLU W AaLUL W &mITOWA &mITOWA &mITOWA &mITOWA CS-4ACTSR E5EYO5SDD8 BTAIROW REBI,EmTOBTSRAVE JW Aa2WU JW Aa2WU JW Aa2WU JW Aa2WU TRABH 5SDD8 -ECHJE5EC XAmITSR L(+OaO3OWJ2#L(+OaOL#L(+OaOL#L(+OaOL#W2+OaO2OWJG#LW+OaO(# G + O a O L O W J W ( # CDO LALCGP0 C#MWIbMURTmLMTETMbSUHV) DN UP A-202 2 A-201 2 A-205 2 1 UNIT 1D UNIT 1D UNIT 2E UNIT 1E UNIT 2F UNIT 2G UNIT 2H KITCHEN OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2 STORAGE PACKAGE MAIL RESTROOM RESTROOM RECEPTION STORAGE CONFERENCE CLO LOBBY STAIR 3 /4 A-410 /4 A-410 /5 A-410 /1 A-412/5 A-411 /2 A-412 /3 A-412 A-2032 26' - 1 1/4"25' - 11 3/4"21' - 7"54' - 0" 38 ' - 6 " 33 ' - 6 " 54' - 0"44' - 0"30' - 2" 35 ' - 1 " 11 ' - 2 " 9' - 4 " 22' - 10 7/8"45' - 6" 40' - 2 3/8"27' - 10 1/2" 127' - 8" 12 7 ' - 7 " 128' - 2" VESTIBULE NEW COLUMNS TO SUPPORT FLOOR ABOVE EXISTING COLUMNS, NEW PAINT FINISH, TYP WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 4 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-402A 05.16.2025 1ST FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN -NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION Author 8834.03 Checker 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PLAN_1ST FLOOR_NORTH 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION UP DN UP EV EVEVEV A-204 4 A-203 1 A-202 1 3 UNIT 1B TRASH UNIT 1C UNIT 1BUNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 2B FITNESS STAIR 1 ELEVATOR LOBBY UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 2A UNIT 2B UNIT 2C UNIT 2B ELEVATOR LOBBY STAIR 2 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-411 /2 A-411 /3 A-411 /2 A-411 /2 A-410/3 A-410/2 A-410/2 A-410/3 A-410/2 A-410/2 A-411 2 1 JANITOR H/V H/V 26' - 2"26' - 2"26' - 2"35' - 10 1/8"40' - 1 1/2"38' - 1"40' - 1 1/2" 38 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 6 " 43' - 6 1/2"43' - 2 1/2"27' - 5 1/8"33' - 7 3/4"27' - 5 1/8"28' - 4 1/8"33' - 6 3/4"28' - 3 1/8" WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 6 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-402B 05.16.2025 1ST FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN -SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION Author 8834.03 Checker 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1ST FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION UP DN A-202 2 A-201 2 A-205 2 1 STAIR 3 UNIT 1F UNIT 2H UNIT 2F UNIT 1D UNIT 1D UNIT 1E UNIT 2E COMMUNITY LOUNGE /4 A-410 /4 A-410 /5 A-410 /1 A-412 /5 A-411 /6 A-410 /3 A-412 26' - 1 1/4"25' - 11 3/4"22' - 1"54' - 0" 39 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 0 " 53' - 0"10' - 11 7/8"34' - 0 1/8"30' - 2" 35 ' - 1 " 11 ' - 2 " 8' - 1 0 " 23' - 0 7/8"45' - 6" 40' - 2 3/8"27' - 10 1/2" 128' - 2" 12 8 ' - 1 " 128' - 2" OPEN TO BELOW NEW FLOOR INFILL ABOVE MANAGEMENT SUITE EXISTING COLUMNS, NEW PAINT FINISH, TYP NEW PAINT FINISH AT EXISTING STEEL, TYP NEW RAILING AT PERIMETER OF LANDING WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 6 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-403A 05.16.2025 2ND FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN -NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION UPDN UP DN A-204 4 A-203 1 A-202 1 3 UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 2A TRASH UNIT 2B UNIT 2C UNIT 2B STAIR 2 ELEVATOR LOBBY UNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 2DUNIT 2D ELEVATOR LOBBY STAIR 1 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-411 /2 A-411 /3 A-411 /2 A-411 /2 A-410/3 A-410/2 A-410/2 A-410/3 A-410/2 A-410/4 A-411/4 A-411 2 1 26' - 5 1/4"26' - 2"26' - 2"26' - 2"35' - 10 1/8"40' - 1 1/2"38' - 1"40' - 1 1/2" 38 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 6 " 43' - 6 1/2"43' - 2 1/2"27' - 5 1/8"33' - 7 3/4"27' - 5 1/8"28' - 4 1/8"33' - 6 3/4"28' - 3 1/8" COURTYARD BELOW MECH/ELEC JAN CL WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 7 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-403B 05.16.2025 2ND FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN -SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION A-202 2 A-201 2 A-205 2 1 OPEN TO BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW NEW PAINT FINISH AT EXISTING STEEL, TYP WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 8 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-404A 05.16.2025 3RD FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN -NORTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DNDN A-204 4 A-203 1 A-201 1 A-202 1 3 UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 1A UNIT 2A TRASH UNIT 2B UNIT 2C UNIT 2B STAIR 2 ELEVATOR LOBBY UNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 1BUNIT 1CUNIT 1BUNIT 2DUNIT 1B LAUNDRY ELEVATOR LOBBY STAIR 1 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-410 /1 A-411 /2 A-411 /3 A-411 /2 A-411 /2 A-410/2 A-410/2 A-410/3 A-410/2 A-410/4 A-411 /3 A-410/2 A-410 2 1 26' - 5 1/4"26' - 2"26' - 2"26' - 2"35' - 10 1/8"40' - 1 1/2"38' - 1"40' - 1 1/2" 38 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 9 5 / 8 " 31 ' - 6 " 43' - 6 1/2"43' - 2 1/2"27' - 5 1/8"33' - 7 3/4"27' - 5 1/8"28' - 4 1/8"33' - 6 3/4"28' - 3 1/8" MECH/ELEC COURTYARD BELOW JAN CL WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 4 9 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-404B 05.16.2025 3RD FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN -SOUTH TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DW REF DW REF DW REF DW REF RE F DW DW REF KITCHEN 12'-0" X 16'-8" LIVING ROOM 12'-3" X 14'-0"BEDROOM 12'-10" X 13'-6" BATHROOM 9'-11" X 8'-4" COAT LIN MECH CLOUTILITY PAN LIVING ROOM 14'-4" X 11'-4" KITCHEN 14'-4" X 12'-0" BEDROOM 10'-0" X 14'-4" BATHROOM 8'-11" X 8'-7" UTILITY LIN COAT CLO MECH PAN 15'-3" X 11'-4" LIVING ROOM 15'-3" X 12'-0" KITCHEN 12'-0" X 15'-3" BEDROOM 8'-6" X 10'-5" BATHROOM CLO LIN UTILITY MECH COAT PAN 12'-0" X 17'-4" LIVING ROOM 12'-0" X 12'-0" KITCHEN 13'-0" X 13'-6" BEDROOM 9'-7" X 8'-4" BATHROOM LIN COAT UTILITYCLO PAN MECH BEDROOM 10'-0" X 21'-0" LIVING ROOM 15'-4" X 12'-0" KITCHEN 12'-2" X 14'-3" BATHROOM 10'-6" X 8'-6" CLO LIN MECH UTILITY COAT PAN 16'-8" X 12'-8" KITCHEN 16'-8" X 15'-5" LIVING ROOM 16'-3" X 15'-5" BEDROOM 13'-4" X 8'-4" BATHROOM UTILITY MECH LIN COAT CLO PAN WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 5 0 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/4" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-410 05.16.2025 UNIT PLANS TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT 1A PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 1B PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT 1C (TYPE A) 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 1D PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"5 UNIT 1E PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"6 UNIT 1F PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DW RE F REF DWDW RE F REF DW REF DW LIVING ROOM 12'-2" X 14'-4" KITCHEN 12'-2" X 16'-4" BATHROOM 9'-2" X 11'-3" BEDROOM 1 10'-0" X 13'-0" BEDROOM 2 10'-0" X 13'-0" MECH UTILITY LIN COAT PAN CLO CLO 15'-8" X 13'-1" KITCHEN 15'-8" X 17'-2" LIVING ROOM 10'-0" X 16'-10" BEDROOM 1 10'-0" X 16'-10" BEDROOM 2 10'-2" X 0'-0" BATHROOM UTILITY LIN CLO MECH COAT CLO CLO PAN KITCHEN 14'-2" X 7'-6" LIVING ROOM 14'-2" X 17'-6" BEDROOM 2 11'-4" X 17'-6" BEDROOM 1 11'-4" X 17'-6" BATHROOM 7'-6" X 13'-3" CLO LIN CLO CLO UTILITY MECH COAT PAN 16'-0" X 13'-0" KITCHEN 15'-0" X 10'-4" LIVING ROOM 11'-6" X 10'-4" BEDROOM 2 10'-0" X 14'-6" BEDROOM 1 12'-3" X 8'-4" BATHROOM MECH COAT UTILITY CLO CLO PAN LIN KITCHEN 17'-2" X 13'-8" LIVING ROOM 17'-2" X 17'-6"BATHROOM 2 10'-6" X 14'-8" BATHROOM 1 11'-6" X 14'-8" BATHROOM 10'-10" X 8'-6" MECH UTILITY COAT CLO CLO LIN PAN WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 5 1 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/4" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-411 05.16.2025 UNIT PLANS TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 2 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT 2A (TYPE A) PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 2B PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT 2C PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 2D PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"5 UNIT 2E PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION DW REF DW REF REF DW RE F DW 14'-2" X 12'-3" LIVING ROOM 14'-2" X 9'-4" KITCHEN 12'-7" X 12'-3" BEDROOM 2 14'-2" X 11'-0" BEDROOM 1 11'-10" X 9'-4" BATHROOM LIN CLO CLO CLO UTILITY COAT MECH PAN KITCHEN 15'-5" X 13'-2" LIVING ROOM 15'-5" X 15'-0" BEDROOM 2 14'-0" X 14'-7" BEDROOM 1 13'-6" X 17'-0" BATHROOM 13'-6" X 10'-6" PAN UTILITY COAT MECH LIN CLO CLO 9'-0" X 20'-3" KITCHEN 12'-0" X 20'-3" LIVING ROOM 12'-10" X 13'-5" BEDROOM 2 12'-10" X 11'-7" BEDROOM 1 7'-6" X 8'-10" BATHROOM PAN COAT MECH LIN CLO UTILITY CLO WRT PROJECT # ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE COPYRIGHT © 2024 -Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing herein constitute the original and unpublished work of Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to any person, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect. SEALNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESCRIPTIONREV #DATE KEYPLAN CO-OWNER ARCHITECT WALLACE ROBERTS & TODD, LLC 123 SOUTH BROAD STREET, SUITE 1450 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19109 215.732.5215 WRTDESIGN.COM 5/1 5 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 0 : 5 2 P M E: \ R e v i t \ 8 8 3 4 - 0 3 _ M o l l e r B u i l d i n g _ A r c h _ W R T _ R 2 5 _ J N o v i t s k i 9 3 4 X G . r v t 1/4" = 1'-0" DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CARROLL ENGINEERING, INC. 215 SCHILLING CIRCLE, SUITE 102 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21031 410.785.7423 MEP ENGINEER ALLEN + SHARIFF 2 ALLEGHENY CENTER, NOVA TOWER 2, SUITE 1001 PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 412.322.9280 CIVIL ENGINEER (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) FREDERICK, SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 128 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.791.3650 CO-OWNER HAGERSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY 35 W. BALTIMORE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 301.733.6911 5718 KENNETT PIKE WILMINGTON, DE 19807 A-412 05.16.2025 UNIT PLANS TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION JN 8834.03 LK 403 N. PROSPECT ST HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THE MOLLER 302.235.2500 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT 2F PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 2G PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT 2H PLAN 5/16/2025 TAX CREDIT SUBMISSION WRT, LLC | 123 S. Broad Street, Suite 1450 | Philadelphia, PA 19109 wrtdesign.com | 215.732.5215 L:\8500\8834.03 Moller Building\04-Documents\00-Deliverables\2025-08-26_Historic TC App\2025-08-29_The Moller_Fire Rating Memo.docx August 29, 2025 Glenn Worgan President Delaware Valley Development Company 5718 Kennett Pike Wilmington, DE 19807 Re: The Moller Adaptive Re-Use and Addition – Fire-Rating Memo WRT #: 8834.03 Dear Glenn: At your request we are providing a summary of the fire-rating requirements for the existing Moller Building. This summary is based on construction type III-B for an R-2 residential occupancy. All code references refer to 2021 Maryland International Building Code. Primary Structural Frame The primary structural frame and supporting construction members are not required to be fire-rated (Table 601). This would allow the existing wood columns to remain exposed. Bearing Walls Exterior bearing walls are required to have a 2-hour fire-resistance rating (Table 601). Given the existing exterior walls consist of three wythes of brick, the existing walls will meet the rating requirement as is, with patching as required. Demising Walls Demising/separation walls that separate dwelling units or separate dwelling units from other occupancies are required to be constructed as fire partitions (420.2). The fire partitions are required to have a minimum fire-resistance rating of 1 hour (708.3). The demising walls will either be the existing brick fire walls, patched and painted as needed, or constructed as new fire partitions with drywall finish. Corridor Walls Corridor walls are required to have a fire-resistance rating of 1/2 hour (T1020.2). The corridor walls will be constructed as new fire partitions with drywall finish. Floor/Ceiling Assemblies Floor assemblies that separate dwelling units or separate dwelling units from other occupancies shall be constructed as horizontal assemblies (420.3). The horizontal assemblies are required to have a minimum fire-resistance rating of not less than 1 hour (711.2.4.3). The floor/ceiling assemblies will be constructed as new horizontal assemblies with drywall finish that is continuous below the existing floor structure. Page | 2 Tuesday, August 26, 2025 Due to the rough, uneven nature of the existing wood subfloor and decking, a layer of gypcrete over new subfloor will be installed to create a level surface to meet accessibility and maintenance requirements throughout the building. New luxury vinyl plank tiles will be installed as the floor finish. Roof/Ceiling Assemblies The roof/ceiling assembly is required to have a fire-resistance rating of not less than 1/2 hour to meet the fire partition continuity requirements (708.4). The roof/ceiling assemblies will be constructed as new horizontal assemblies with drywall finish that is continuous below the existing roof structure. Shafts & Stair Enclosures Enclosures for shafts and interior exit stairways shall be constructed as fire barriers with a fire- resistance rating of not less than 2 hours where connecting four stories and not less than 1 hour where connecting less than four stories (713.4 & 1023.2). Shafts will be constructed as fire barriers with drywall finish. Stairway enclosures will be constructed of CMU with either painted CMU or drywall finish. Sincerely, Lauren Kroll, AIA, CPHC Julie A. Disston, AIA, LEED AP Project Manager Principal 215 Schilling Circle, Suite 102 • Hunt Valley, Maryland 21031 410.785.7423 •410.771.1313 Moller Building 403 N. Prospect St, Hagerstown, MD Structural Narrative May 2, 2025 Background The proposed project involves the adaptive re-use of an existing pipe organ factory for multi- family housing located in Hagerstown, MD. The building was originally constructed in the late 1800s with numerous additions up until the factory closed in 1992. The existing factory complex consists of a central building with several wings which will be identified in this report as follows: · Central Building: Large open space to the roof, with existing catwalk system on two (2) levels. This space is to be used as a community space. · Northeast Wing: Two (2)-story building with ground floor on grade, to be used for residential. Rectangular footprint with a flat roof. · Northwest Wing: Two (2)-story building with full basement, to be used for residential. Square footprint with pitched hip-roof. · Southeast Wing: Three (3)-story building with ground floor on grade, to be used for residential. Rectangular footprint with a pitched gable roof. · Southwest Wing: Three (3)-story building with a partial basement, to be used for residential. Rectangular footprint with a pitched gable roof. The renovations include a four (4) story addition from the Southwest Wing, which combined will provide a total of 65 residential units. There will also be three (3) narrow link additions that will connect each of the four wings and provide for vertical circulation via elevators and stairs. Design Criteria Codes & Standards: The following structural design criteria, codes, standards, and regulations will be observed in the design: · Washington County Building Code · IBC 2021 - International Building Code · IEBC 2021 – International Existing Building Code · ACI 318-19 - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete · AISC – 360-12 - 14th Edition - Manual of Steel Construction · ASCE 7-16 - Minimum Design Loads for Buildings & other Structures · ANSI/AWC 2012 National Design Specification (NDS) for Wood Construction Moller Building . Page 2 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative · ACI 530 / TMS 402 - 13- Building Code Requirements and Specification for Masonry Structures. Design Loads: Live Loads: The buildings will be designed to resist all applicable dead loads as well as the following live loads: Slab on Grade 100 psf Residential 40 psf Amenities Areas 100 psf Corridors same as occupancy served Stairs 100 psf Roof 30 psf plus drifts Snow Loads: Snow loading shall be based on the following. Snow loads produced by drift shall be considered in addition to the loads indicated. Ground Snow Load 40 psf Building Occupancy Category II Exposure B Exposure Factor 1.00 Thermal Factor 1.00 Importance Factor 1.00 Flat-Roof Snow Load 21 psf Wind Loads: Wind loading for the main-wind-force-resisting systems shall be based on the following: Basic Wind Speed 115 mph Building Occupancy Category II Exposure B Topographical Factor 1.00 Directionality Factor 0.85 Earthquake / Seismic Loads: Seismic loading shall be based on the following: Site Classification D (assumed / pending geotechnical report) Moller Building . Page 3 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative SS 0.139 S1 0.043 SDS 0.149 SD1 0.069 Seismic Use Group II Importance Factor 1.00 Seismic Design Category B Material Requirements: Steel wide flange sections: ASTM A992 Steel tube sections: ASTM A500 Gr C All Other Steel: ASTM A36 Foundation Concrete: f’c = 3500 PSI, Normal Weight Slab Welded Wire Fabric: ASTM A1064 Rebar: ASTM A615, Grade 60 Structural Wood Framing: Spruce/Pine/Fir No.1/No.2 Wood Bearing Wall Top Plates: Southern Pine No.1 Gravity Load Resisting Structural Systems: Foundations: The existing foundations were not visible during our visit. The exterior foundation walls consist of multi-wythe brick and/or stone. There was nominal cracking observed in the face of the exterior walls, suggesting that foundation settlement is not a structural concern at this time. Generally, the existing slabs-on-grade were observed to be in adequate condition with surface spalls and cracking which is typical for a building of this age and used for manufacturing. Portions of the existing slab-on-grade have been demolished at various locations throughout the facility with minor excavations for unknown reasons. These areas will need to be infilled with stone backfill and a new slab-on-grade, tied into the existing with reinforcing dowels. The Northeast Wing ground floor has a wood sleeper system with cinder fill on top of the slab. This system was used to allow for a hardwood floor to be installed. The hardwood and wood sleepers has since been removed (Photo 1), This portion of the floor will require a concrete topping slab to infill the voids from the sleepers and cinder fill. Moller Building . Page 4 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Noticeable outward bowing of the foundation wall was observed on the west side of the Southwest Wing (Photo 2). This appears to be the result of inadequate bracing of the wall at the first-floor framing. We recommend that the wall be braced to the floor framing with steel tie-anchors (star anchor system) and repointed as required. The Southwest Wing Addition foundations are anticipated to be shallow cast-in-place concrete footings poured on suitable soil with an allowable bearing capacity as determined by the geotechnical engineer for the project. Columns and posts will be supported by isolated square spread footings, interior wood bearing walls will be supported by continuous thickened slabs, and exterior walls will be supported by either continuous grade-beams / turndowns or continuous walls footings as is appropriate for the site grading conditions. Due to site grades, it is anticipated that a portion of the ground level will be below grade with reinforced CMU retaining walls. The new slab-on-grade will consist of a 4” thick conventionally reinforced cast-in-place concrete slab. The slab on grade will be reinforced with welded wire fabric and rebar at thickened slabs & turndown as required by the design. All slabs-on-grade will be supported on suitable fill as determined by the geotechnical engineer. Central Building Framing: The Central Building consists of a column-free volume space, open to the roof framing above(Photo 3). A catwalk system wraps around the perimeter of the open space along three sides. The catwalks are located at the second and third levels with connections to the four (4) adjacent wings (Photo 4). The catwalk framing consists of wood decking over wood joists spanning between a steel framed superstructure that is suspended from the clear-span steel roof trusses. The wood decking and joists were generally observed to be in poor condition. The steel framing was in adequate condition with minor surface rust from exposure to moisture. We recommend that the wood decking and joists be demolished and replaced with new framing, either wood or steel, as required to meet the live load requirements. A detailed analysis of the steel superstructure framing will be required to determine its adequacy to be used as part of the proposed community space. Reinforcement of the existing steel may be required. The roof framing consists of wood decking over sloped wood joists, which span between steel purlins running east-west. The steel purlins span between clear-span steel trusses with a center ridge. The trusses are supported from steel columns at extend the full height of the building down to the ground floor. There is a skylight that runs the entire length of the building at the ridge. The roof framing appeared to be in adequate condition. The roof trusses will require a detailed analysis to determine their ability to support the anticipated catwalk loads, or new steel columns can be added to Moller Building . Page 5 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative support the catwalks from below. The new columns would be supported from new foundations at the ground level. Northeast Wing Framing: The Northeast Wing is a two (2)-story wood and steel framed structure with brick exterior walls. The second-level framing consists of wood decking over wood joists, spanning between clear-span steel wide-flanged beams. The beams bear on the exterior brick walls. The roof framing was recently demolished and replaced with new framing (Photo 5). The new framing consists of plywood sheathing over wood I-joists (Boise-Cascade), spanning between clear-span steel wide-flanged beams. The beams bear on the exterior brick walls. Both the floor and roof framing appeared to be in adequate condition. It is our opinion that the framing is adequate to support the proposed live loads for residential use. Northwest Wing Framing: The Northwest Wing is a two (2)-story wood framed structure with brick exterior walls and a full basement. The first and second level framing consists of wood decking over wood joists, spanning between multi-ply wood beams (Photo 6). The beams bear on a regular grid of interior wood columns and on the exterior brick walls. The floor framing appeared to be in adequate condition with some visible surface damage, checking and warping which is typical for structures of this age and use. It is our opinion that the framing is adequate to support the proposed live loads for residential use. Minor repairs/reinforcing may be required for areas with localized damage. The roof framing is a double hip system with wood decking over wood joists, spanning between a series of large wood trusses (Photo 7). The trusses clear-span between the exterior walls, with a random placement of columns added to support the truss bottom chords, The columns appear to align with the floor columns below. There are skylights at the ridge, and a dormer located on the east side. It appears that the dormer to the west was demolished and infilled sometime in the past. The roof framing was observed to be in poor condition with excessive deflection and signs of distress to the truss members. The east dormer framing was in poor condition with damage from exposure to moisture (Photo 8). It is our opinion that the roof framing is not adequate to support the anticipated snow loads and should be demolished and replaced with new framing using pre-engineered wood trusses. Moller Building . Page 6 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Southeast Wing Framing: The Southeast Wing is a three (3)-story wood framed structure with brick exterior walls. Two (2) multi-wythe brick firewalls divide the wing into three (3) sections. There is visible evidence that the structure was originally constructed as a two (2)-story building, and the third level was added at a later date. The second and third level framing consists of wood decking over wood joists, spanning between the exterior brick walls and a center row of multi-ply wood beams and wood columns. Along the west elevation, the third-level joists were re-positioned from a sloped condition to flat, as evidenced by the old joist pockets which were infilled with brick (Photo 9). This was done when the old roof was converted to the floor. The joists are not adequately tied into the west wall, which has resulted in the wall pulling away from the floor. There is a gap between the wall and the floor decking (Photo 10), and the wall was observed to be bowing outward. We recommend that the wall be braced to the floor framing with steel tie-anchors (star anchor system) and repointed as required. The floor framing appeared to be in adequate condition with some visible surface damage, checking and warping which is typical for structures of this age and use. It is our opinion that the framing is adequate to support the proposed live loads for residential use. Minor repairs/reinforcing may be required for areas with localized damage. The roof framing consists of wood decking over wood joists, spanning between wood gable trusses (Photo 11). The trusses clear-span between the exterior brick walls. The roof framing appeared to be in adequate condition with some visible surface damage, checking and warping which is typical for structures of this age and use. There was some localized damage to the roof decking, which appeared to have been repaired during a prior re-roofing. Southwest Wing Framing: The Southwest Wing is a three (3)-story wood framed structure with brick exterior walls and a partial basement. Similar to the Southeast Wing, there is visible evidence that the structure was originally constructed as a two (2)-story building, and the third level was added at a later date. The first and second level framing consists of wood decking over wood joists, spanning between the exterior brick walls and two (2) rows of multi-ply wood beams and wood columns. The framing appeared to be in adequate condition with some visible surface damage, checking and warping which is typical for structures of this age and use. It is our opinion that the framing is adequate to support the proposed live loads for residential use. Minor repairs/reinforcing may be required for areas with localized damage. Moller Building . Page 7 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative The third-level framing is similar to the second level, however the joists and beams when observed from below are sloped, since was a previous roof (Photo 12). When the third floor was added, rather than re-position and/or replace the framing per the Southeast Wing, the framing was left in place and the new floor was built on top of the roof framing to create a flat floor. While the framing appeared to be in adequate condition it is our opinion that the framing is not adequate to support the anticipated live loads for residential use. We recommend that the floor be reinforced and/or replaced with new wood framing. The roof framing consists of wood decking over wood joists, spanning between wood gable trusses. The trusses clear-span between the exterior brick walls. The roof framing appeared to be in adequate condition with some visible surface damage, checking and warping which is typical for structures of this age and use. There was some localized damage to the roof decking (Photo 13), which appeared to have been repaired during a prior re-roofing. Proposed Southwest Wing Addition and Connecting Links: The floor framing in the typical four (4)-story stacked framing condition at each floor shall consist of the following construction: · Floor construction will consist of ¾” to 1” thick gypcrete cementitious topping poured over ¾” tongue and groove exposure I APA rated structural floor sheathing. · Floor construction will primarily be supported by open-web wood trusses spaced at 24” on center maximum. Wood truss designs will be performed by a delegated contractor’s engineer during the construction phase of the project. o Floor trusses will typically span to bear on exterior walls and interior corridor walls. · Roof sheathing will consist of ¾” tongue and groove exposure I APA rated structural sheathing. · Roof framing consist of gable wood trusses spaced at 24” on center maximum. Wood truss designs will be performed by a delegated contractor’s engineer during the construction phase of the project. o Roof trusses will typically span to bear on the exterior walls. · Bearing walls will consist of 2x4 or 2x6 wood framed walls with a double top- plate. Stud size and spacing will be determined based on loading conditions and building geometry. o All plumbing stacks shall be located within 2x6 walls. · Headers above openings within bearing walls will consist of 2x wood beams or structural engineered lumber (LVLs/PSLs) to match wall thickness. Headers will be supported by built-up studs at jambs as required. · Corridor floor trusses are anticipated to be top-chord bearing, and be of depth as required for mechanical equipment. Moller Building . Page 8 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative The elevator and stair shafts will be constructed of 8” thick reinforced CMU. Stair construction is anticipated to be wood framed. Lateral Load Resisting Systems: Existing Building: Lateral load resistance for wind and seismic forces will be provided by the existing multi- wythe brick exterior walls. Southwest Wing Addition and Connecting Links: Lateral load resistance for wind and seismic forces will be provided by a combination of unit demising walls, corridor walls, exterior walls, and stair shaft walls. · Interior shear walls will utilize gypsum sheathing for shear resistance. Nailing and/or screw patterns will be determined based on project specific loading. · Exterior shear walls will utilize plywood / OSB/ Zip-R sheathing. Thickness of sheathing and nailing patterns will be determined based on project specific loading. · For shear wall tension-chord stability of shear walls, CEI recommends steel straps and hold-downs. · CMU elevator and stair walls will be 8” thick intermediate reinforced CMU shear walls. Mild Steel reinforcement will be provided at wall corners and at intermediate spacing not to exceed 48” on center. Moller Building . Page 9 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 1: Northeast Wing showing damaged Slab-on-Grade Photo 2: Southwest Wing showing bowed exterior wall along West side. Moller Building . Page 10 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 3: Central Building showing Roof Trusses. Photo 4: Central Building showing suspended Catwalk Framing. Moller Building . Page 11 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 5: Northeast Wing showing recently installed Roof Framing. Photo 6: Northwest Wing showing typical Floor Framing. Moller Building . Page 12 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 7: Northwest Wing showing Roof Framing. Photo 8: Northwest Wing showing Damaged Dormer Framing. Moller Building . Page 13 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 9: Southeast Wing showing Third Level Joist Bearing Modifications. Photo 10: Southeast Wing showing gap between Exterior Wall and Floor Framing. Moller Building . Page 14 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 11: Southeast Wing showing Roof Framing. Photo 12: Southwest Wing showing Sloped Framing at Third Level Soffit Moller Building . Page 15 May 2, 2025 Structural Narrative Photo 13: Southwest Wing showing localized Roof Deck Damage. WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT REQUIRED APPLICATION MATERIALS CHECKLIST All materials must be clearly labeled Original plus 1 copy and one digital copy sent to askplanning@washco-md.net of complete application package 1.Application Form: A completed and signed application form. A copy of the proposed changes to the existing language must accompany the application. 2.Fee Worksheet and Application Fee: A completed Fee Worksheet must be submitted at the time application is made. If paying by check, please make checks payable to the “Washington County Treasurer”. If paying by credit card, the application must be accepted for completeness and initialized by the Department prior to accepting payment. An invoice will be e-mailed to the applicant and must be paid prior to the deadline specified in the e- mail. The rezoning process will not begin until payment has been received. 3.Justification Statement: A written explanation of the reasons why the amendment is being requested, setting forth in sufficient detail to properly advise County officials as to the justification for the amendment. The justification statement must include the following: i.Describe how the request is consistent with the County’s most recent adopted Comprehensive Plan; AND ii.Provide a statement describing how the request is logical and appropriate. 4.Any other material facts that support the amendment. 2022 Petition; 2025 Petition ZONING CODE TABLE NO. 3.3(1) TABLE OF LAND USE REGULATIONS (RURAL AREA USES) (Zoning Ordinance page 11) LAND USES A(R) EC P RV RB IM Intensity of Use P. Retail and Wholesale Trade Printing, blue printing, photocopying, and similar reproduction services N N N SE P N LOW Small Box Variety Store within 1,000 feet of property with a historic designation or subject to a historic trust easement. N N N N P N HIGH Temporary or Seasonal Retail - provided that the area devoted to the use be limited to less than 2,500 sq. ft. and that the use on the premises occurs for at least 30 days and does not exceed 6 months within a calendar year SE E SE SE P N LOW ZONING CODE CHAPTER 28A (DEFINITIONS) (Zoning Ordinance pages 341 – 342) Signs: A name, identification, description, display, illustration or device which is affixed or represented directly or indirectly upon a building, structure or land and which directs attention to a product, place, activity, person, institution, or business. All signs must be located on the premises of the development so identified. * * * F. Sign Area: The cumulative area of all faces of a sign, including the advertising surface and any framing, trim, or molding; but not including the supporting structure. G. Sign Face: The area or display surface of any sign upon, against, or through which the message is displayed or illustrated on said sign. Small Box Variety Store: A store with 16,000 square feet or less gross square footage which sells assorted physical goods, merchandise and food and non-food products directly to consumers at an average retail cost of $15.00 or less. A small box variety store does not include a grocery store or convenience store. Small Wind Energy System: Means a single-towered wind energy system that: A. is used to generate electricity; B. has a rated nameplate capacity of (50) kilowatts or less; and C. has a total height of one hundred fifty (150) feet or less. 1 of 7 January 20, 2026 Mr. John F. Barr, President, Board of County Commissioners Mr. Jeffrey A. Cline, Vice-President Mr. Randall E. Wagner, Commissioner Mr. Derek Harvey, Commissioner Mr. Randal Leatherman, Commissioner RE: Request for Zoning Text Amendment Small Box Stores: Cascade Maryland JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT Dear President Barr and Commissioners: I am a resident of Cascade, where I live with my husband and two young children. For more than three years now, we have been fighting to keep a Dollar General from being built at 14403 McAfee Hill Road. The Board of Zoning Appeals approved a special exception for this use, concluding it is “functionally similar” to a grocery store. We seek your approval of a proposed Zoning Text Amendment (“ZTA”): (1) as a logical and appropriate clarification of the purpose and scope of the Rural Village zone; and (2) as consistent with, and in furtherance of, the goals of the County’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan for Washington County, adopted on August 26, 2025. Multiple public officials have told me that they are unable to take up this ZTA while a pending court appeal is underway. As clearly explained in the legal analysis filed as Attachment One to this Justification Statement, the Commissioners have clear authority to consider and approve the requested ZTA while any court proceedings are pending. Failure to act would be a political choice by the Commissioners to reject my request for help – not a legal requirement. I remain highly concerned that the Commissioners’ continued reliance on this misplaced “legal argument” is a carry-over from legal advice offered previously by County Attorney Zacchary Kieffer. The Requested Zoning Text Amendment Is A Logical and Appropriate Clarification of the Purpose And Scope Of The Rural Village District. The proposed Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) would prohibit a “small box variety store” on property in the Rural Village zone located within 1,000 feet of a historic district or a property protected by a historic trust easement (“Protected Area”). This is a narrowly written text amendment designed specifically to protect property within the Rural Village zone if it is proximate to historically designated or protected resources. While a Dollar-General-type store is not allowed in the Rural Village zone, the proposed amendment will eliminate any potential ambiguity by expressly protection While it is clear to me that Dollar-General-type stores are not allowed in the Rural Village zone, the proposed amendment will address any potential ambiguity, and clearly protect historic resources and the properties around them. The ZTA is intended to support the purpose clause of the Rural Village zone. The proposed use is entirely inconsistent with the purpose of the zone, as we have explained to the Board of Appeals and the Circuit Court. The purpose of the Rural Village zone is “to preserve the unique historic or rural 2 of 7 character” of our community. Cascade has a unique historic character and a rural character deserving of protection, and we have been fighting for too long to ensure that those protection goals are enforced. My property, and the neighboring Dollar General site, are zoned Rural Village. We are across the street from the historic – and now revitalizing – Fort Ritchie. We provided the Board with a study confirming that Dollar General stores are highly likely to damage the business interests of existing grocery stores like Sanders Market - our local “mom and pop” grocery store - which has served Cascade for decades. By extension, a Dollar General would threaten the local grocery and other business ventures that have recently opened at revitalizing Fort Ritchie, including a small general store, a bakery, an apothecary, and soon a butcher and pick-your-own flower shop, and by extension eroding the financial viability of Fort Ritchie. There are already three Dollar General stores within 5 miles of my home. We do not need another one. If built, the Dollar General would be directly across the street from Lake Royer and a highly visible eyesore from the Fort Ritchie property, especially from Lakeside Hall where weddings are routinely held and a recently announced boutique hotel that will support the Fort’s wedding events (and revenue. Like the rural, historic nature of Cascade, Fort Ritchie is a treasured historic resource deserving of protection). The hotel represents a significant additional investment in the local economy and merits protection. A Dollar General at the proposed location would be a deterrent to wedding parties seeking a truly historic, rural setting, further eroding the financial viability of Fort Ritchie. In addition to the damage to the rural historic nature of Cascade and the historic setting associated with Fort Ritchie that the proposed Dollar General would cause, it also would significantly devalue my home. During the Board of Appeals hearings, we presented an appraisal and expert testimony confirming that our house would lose in the neighborhood of $30,000 in value (as would my closest neighbor). This is because a Dollar General has the same negative effect on home values as convenience stores and liquor stores (both not allowed in the Rural Village zone). The Board agreed with our appraiser, and made a finding that the Dollar General, if built, would have this adverse impact on our home values. The adverse financial impact is undisputed. We appealed the Board’s approval to the Circuit Court for Washington County, which remanded the case to the Board. After the Board approved the Dollar General a second time and we appealed a second time, the Circuit Court again remanded the case to the Board. We and Outdoor Contractors, the special exception applicant on behalf of Dollar General, both appealed to the Appellate Court of Maryland, where the case is now pending. As is clear from the multiple court decisions, the Zoning Code needs clarification. Adopting the proposed ZTA will assist the courts, not confuse them. The Proposed ZTA Is Consistent With And Will Further The Goals Of The County’s Most Recent Comprehensive Plan This proposed amendment is consistent with and supportive of the Goals and Objectives set forth in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for Washington County adopted on August 26, 2025 (the Plan), and, by extension, the purposes of the Rural Village zone as stated in Section 5D.0 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. The Plan is a comprehensive document intended to guide growth and development, and the general 3 of 7 policy guidelines it describes are meant to inform various land use regulations, including zoning regulations. See Plan Page 2-3 (“This policy document in turn serves as the foundational basis for implementing various land use regulations such as zoning which carries out the plan’s recommendations across rural and urban areas alike.”); Plan Page 15-1 (“The Comprehensive Plan is not a stand-alone document, but is supported by (and, in turn supports) related planning program documents including the [Zoning Ordinance].”). Among the stated purposes of the Plan are to “[g]uide and accomplish the coordinated, adjusted, and harmonious development of the local jurisdictions and their environs;” and “[t]o promote good civic design and arrangement . . .” Plan Page 2-3 (emphasis added). The Plan proposes to accomplish these purposes by establishing certain Goals and Objectives. Plan Page 3-3. In this case, the proposed ZTA would directly further Items 2, 6, and 8 of the Plan’s Goals and Objectives by imposing a very reasonable restriction on the precise location of small box stores when situated in the Rural Village zone. 1. Item 2: Promote a balanced and diversified economy. The proposed text amendment serves to protect the highly local, diverse economies in rural villages. In discussing the economic development strategies for the County, the Plan recognizes the “need to sustain and expand existing businesses and industries . . .” and places emphasis on, among other factors: “[i]ncreasing efforts to retain and expand existing businesses;” “[p]romoting recreational and heritage tourism;” and “[e]ncouraging redevelopment, revitalization, or rehabilitation of existing developed areas or sites where appropriate.” Plan Page 9-18; see also Plan Page 15-3 (reflecting the general concern of attracting and retaining businesses)(italics added). The proposed ZTA would aid in accomplishing these goals by protecting existing local businesses in the County’s rural villages. The local economies in Rural Village communities largely consist of a collection of diverse small businesses and “mom-and-pop” stores. Due to the depth and breadth of their product offerings, small box stores are highly likely to damage existing business interests that are focused on recreational and heritage tourism by eroding the aesthetic of those areas, and in particular impeding the revitalization and rehabilitation of business interests on historic properties. Opening one “cookie cutter” nationally- based business at the expense of highly localized business interests does not “[p]romote a balanced and diversified economy.” This is especially true for local businesses that reinvest in their village through community-based service activities. Imposing a minimum distance restriction on the placement of small box stores from historic resources, often foundational to revitalization and rehabilitation efforts, would limit the area of impact of these negative consequences on historical resources and the Rural Villages in which they are situated. In some Rural Villages, heritage tourism comprises part of the local economy. For example, historic and scenic venues may be hired for social gatherings like weddings. These venues are often sought out for the immersion in a truly historic, rural setting that they can provide. A box store built within the viewshed of these highly unique settings threatens the quality of the historic and rural sight lines from these tourism venues, potentially limiting customers’ interest in that venue. They also are the backdrop for historic tours. Eroding the business revenue that support these resources is detrimental to the continued financial viability of the village economy. While the Rural Village zone prohibits these uses altogether, the proposed ZTA would protect these heritage tourism activities in the Rural Villages by eliminating all ambiguity with respect to Protected Areas. In addition to adversely affecting local businesses and tourism revenue, small box stores – just like convenience stores and liquor stores – tend to materially devalue the neighboring properties, which is also detrimental to the local economy. The proposed ZTA is consistent with and supportive of the Comprehensive Plan Goal and Objective of promoting a balanced and diversified economy in the 4 of 7 County. 2. Item 6: Enhance the County’s rich historic and cultural heritage through land preservation and historic preservation efforts. The proposed ZTA would serve the Plan’s Goals and Objectives pertaining to the protection of historic resources. Chapter 5: Historic Element of the Plan recounts Washington County’s rich history and the efforts the County has taken thus far to identify and preserve its approximately 120 historic resources and districts included on the National Register of Historic Places. Plan Pages 5-8– 5-9. It is suspected that over 22,000 more historic resources have not yet been evaluated. Plan Page 5-13. Of the 63 Rural Villages listed in Table 5.4 of the Plan, only 25 have been surveyed for the Washington County Historic Sites Inventory. See Plan Pages 5-23–5-24. The Plan advocates for the remaining Rural Villages to be surveyed in order that the Historic District Commission be able to “continue review of changes to identified contributing resources and new construction which may adversely affect those resources.” Plan Page 5-22; see also Plan Page 5-32 (listing a Historic Element Recommendation to “[e]xpand and update the Washington County Historic Sites Inventory . . .”); Plan Page 15-13 (incorporating the foregoing recommendation as a long-term goal in the Plan’s implementation). See Attachment Two: 38 Rural Villages Pending Historic Sites Inventory Survey. While they await formal study, the historical character of the 38 Rural Villages not yet surveyed should not be eroded by context inappropriate development, a consequence of allowing the development of small box stores in close proximity to a Rural Village’s historical resources. The proposed ZTA would ensure that the character of all of these potential historical resources is protected and preserved until all surveys have been completed. In so doing, the ZTA would also serve the Historic Element Recommendations to “[m]inimize factors which negatively impact historic and cultural resources by balancing growth . . .” and to “[i]dentify and protect additional scenic corridors and areas with a high integrity of historic context through land use policies.” Plan Page 5-32. Additionally, the proposed ZTA is also in harmony with the Historic Element Recommendation to “[c]ollaborate with historic resource interest groups and connect with new audiences by promoting historic resources and improving cooperative relationships with historic resource interested parties.” Plan Page 5-32. See also Plan Pages 15-12–15-13 (incorporating each of these recommendations as medium- or long-term goals in the Plan’s implementation); Plan Page 2-3 (“Above all, a comprehensive plan offers the opportunity for the communities to develop a shared vision for their future.”). While the proposed ZTA is narrowly tailored, this type of amendment is clearly within the envisioned scope of regulatory change contemplated by the Plan. The Plan recommends impactful changes to the Zoning Ordinance and stricter protections for historical resources. See, e.g., Plan Page 15-9 (recommending as a medium-term goal “[u]pdat[ing] and revis[ing] the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance regulations to incorporate appropriate zoning districts and development standards recommended in [the Growth Management & Land Use Element] chapter”); Plan Page 5- 32 (including a Historic Element Recommendation to “[m]odernize and create a separate Historic Preservation Ordinance that consolidates terminology for review areas to reduce confusion and also addresses topics specific to Historic Preservation such as demolition and demolition by neglect of historic resources”); Plan Page 15-12 (incorporating the same as a short-term goal in the Plan’s implementation). Pending adoption of a Historic Preservation Ordinance, the proposed ZTA will ensure that the historically designated Protected Areas will receive continued aesthetic and financial protection. 5 of 7 The proposed ZTA is thus consistent with and supportive of the Goal and Objective of enhancing the County’s rich historic and cultural heritage through land preservation and historic preservation efforts. 3. Item 8: Encourage infill development and revitalization of existing communities using context sensitive development strategies to maintain and enhance community character. The proposed ZTA would protect the rural and historical character of the Rural Villages by restricting the placement of small box stores within the very limited 1,000-foot radius of a historic Protected Area. Rural Villages are “definable on the landscape and contribute to the unique character of Washington County.” Plan Page 14-26. They are what one pictures when thinking of the quintessential small town: “a small core of a residential neighborhood associated with a retail establishment or an institution such as a post office, elementary school, church or fire station.” Plan Page 14-26. Retail stores in these rural areas and historic setting tend to be smaller, more product- specific specialty stores (bakeries, candy stores, clothing stores, jewelers, mom-and-pop grocery and general stores, apothecaries, etc.) or service-specific businesses (auction houses, flea markets, upholstery stores, etc.), explicitly allowed under the Rural Village zone, usually against a natural landscape backdrop of ponds or lakes teeming with wildlife, lush green fields, and breathtaking forested mountain views. Washington County has long focused its efforts on preserving the boundary between these types of rural areas and their more developed urban counterparts. See, e.g., Plan Page 11-14; Plan Page 6-17 (noting in the context of housing that “Washington County has long pursued a strategy of seeking to attract development where it is desirable (in planned growth areas where infrastructure needed to serve development already exists), while limiting its spillover effects in areas where it is less desired (in rural areas where agriculture is the primary land use and sensitive environmental resources are found in greater abundance)” (emphasis added)); Plan Page 15-6 (recognizing the need for “context sensitive design” in Rural Villages in the realm of transportation to “preserve community character”). The Plan clearly indicates that in identifying sites for commercial uses, among the factors for consideration are the following: “[t]he ability to mitigate developmental impacts on sensitive environmental, historical or cultural features;” “[a]voidance of areas where there is a high probability of incompatibility with existing residential development;” “[l]ocat[ing] retail commercial sites where they best serve the market niche being targeted whether regional, community, or neighborhood based;” and “[w]hen feasible, associat[ing] development with an approved or proposed incentive area such as Enterprise Zones or Foreign Trade Zones.” Plan Page 9-17. The County has used “a variety of regulatory tools” to “avoid conflicts from incompatible land uses.” Plan Page 6-18. For instance, the general policy guidelines that undergird the Plan are meant to inform various land use regulations, including zoning regulations. Plan Pages 2-3, 15-1. The Zoning Ordinance recognizes some of the Plan’s policy goals in Section 5D.0, which elaborates the purposes for which the Rural Village zone was established. The underlying purpose of the Rural Village designation is to “preserve the unique historic or rural character of existing villages by encouraging compatible development within a defined village boundary.” To be permitted in this zone, development must be “generally of a similar density, scale and use type and mixture as that which exists in the village,” and is expected to be primarily residential, with only “a limited amount of mixed rural services.” These limitations “prevent large amounts or inappropriately scaled development or uses that would detract from the existing rural or historic character of the village.” Accord Plan Page 14-24 (“The challenge of the Land Use Plan dealing with the Rural Area, is to preserve the rural character through policies that will not promote significant development but will 6 of 7 maintain a productive environment for the existing industries located there.”); Plan Page 14-26 (recognizing that attention must be paid to “design criteria thereby preserving the historical nature of the area in terms of scale and compatibility” and recommending that “[d]evelopment should be limited to infill development in accordance with the defined boundaries for the Rural Village”); Plan Page 14-27 (“Non-agricultural commercial uses in the rural areas should be limited to uses that serve the needs of the rural residential population, provide for recreation and tourism opportunities, and that support, complement, and promote the farming, forestry, and heritage tourism industries.”). See also Plan Page 14-28 (specifying Land Use and Growth Recommendations to “[r]eview and update definitions of rural business zoning to incorporate an emphasis on retaining scale and compatibility with surrounding properties” and “[r]eview and potentially reduce the number of commercial land uses permitted by right in the Rural Business floating zone to ensure they are meeting the intended purpose of the district [and particularly] intensity of use, appearance in context of the rural area, and potential design standards”). The proposed ZTA simultaneously promotes the overall spirit and the Goals and Objectives of the Plan with regard to protecting and enhancing community character, as well as the purpose and intent of the Rural Village zone. In contrast to the bucolic setting invoked by the description of the typical Rural Village, the highly commercialized “cookie cutter” design, intrusive lighting, and conspicuous signage of the typical small box stores make it an eminently visible eyesore in close proximity to historical resources. This type of commercial development is terribly out of character with the style and scale of the historic, rural surroundings and the small, local-business oriented economy. Issues such as increased tractor-trailer traffic for deliveries, magnified noise and congestion from additional consumer vehicular traffic 7 days a week, community safety concerns associated with all of this increased traffic, uncharacteristic nighttime lighting, and odor and vermin associated with the presence of dumpsters all significantly detract from the existing unique historic and rural aesthetic of the Rural Villages. The proposed ZTA is thus consistent with and supportive of the Goal and Objective of encouraging infill development and revitalization of existing communities using context sensitive development strategies to maintain and enhance community character. Conclusion The broader Cascade community has rallied behind my family to appear at Board of Appeals hearings, to raise money for a zoning lawyer to represent us before the Board and in Court, and to attend Court hearings to show support for us. A petition filed in the first Board hearing had nearly 500 signatures in opposition to this proposal, and a more recent petition has added several hundred more. I am enclosing those petitions in support of this request. We should not have to spend years, and tens of thousands of dollars – as we have done - to protect our community from a use that does not belong here because it violates the purpose and intent of the Rural Village zone. Please accept the ZTA Amendment package which I have filed concurrently with this Statement of Justification. I also would ask that you expedite your review, to the extent legally possible under the notice and hearing requirements. As you know, my prior two requests were rejected out-of-hand, the first time by the County Administrator and the second time by Commissioner Cline. Both rejections were based on legal advice from County Attorney Zachary Kieffer, who represented Outdoor Contractors at the first Board of Appeals hearing, in part because he raised concerns that a legislative change would cause “confusion.” I want to be perfectly clear once again: The purpose of the proposed ZTA is to eliminate the 7 of 7 confusion surrounding the Zoning Ordinance that has thus far resulted in two Board of Appeals decisions, two Circuit Court decisions, and has led to a pending appellate court hearing pending which we believe will result in a near-certain remand to the Board of Appeals for a third hearing. The proposed ZTA is a logical, narrowly tailored amendment specifically proposed to clarify the purpose and scope of the Rural Village zone. Moreover, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that it shows clear support for three of the Plan’s Goals and Objectives, and is at least neutral to the remaining five. Plan Page 2-6 (“’A consistent regulation or decision may show clear support for the Plan. It may also be neutral – but it should never undermine the Plan.’” (quoting Managing Maryland’s Growth: Models and Guidelines – Achieving “Consistency” Under The Planning Act of 1992; Maryland Office of Planning; April, 1994; Publication #94-03; page 2)). Please respect the concerns raised by the hundreds of residents of Cascade and surrounding Washington County communities that are looking for your support, as our elected representatives, in protecting our mountain community by adopting the requested ZTA. Sincerely, Danielle Marie Durning 25212 Cascade Road Cascade MD 21719 301-992-4661 danielleeyler@gmail.com /s/ Danielle Marie Durning 1 Research Court, Suite 450 | Rockville MD 20850 | 301-204-0913 | michele@marylandpropertylaw.com January 20, 2026 Mr. John F. Barr, President, Board of County Commissioners Mr. Jeffrey A. Cline, Vice-President Mr. Randall E. Wagner, Commissioner Mr. Derek Harvey, Commissioner Mr. Randal Leatherman, Commissioner RE: Legislative Zoning Amendments While Litigation Is Ongoing Dear Commissioners: At the request of my client, Danielle Durning, I am providing you with a summary of long- established Maryland court decisions that (1) confirm a local legislature’s legal authority to amend zoning laws while litigation is underway; and (2) will apply the amendment during a pending court case, even if doing so would have the effect of reversing an earlier agency or court decision. This legal analysis confirms that while the Commissioners may choose not to act on the zoning text amendment application filed by Ms. Durning, which seeks to clarify the Rural Village zone, the Commissioners are not precluded from doing so. In other words, declining to adopt the proposed zoning text amendment would be a political choice, not a legal choice. The legislature’s right to amend zoning laws pending litigation was established fifty years ago in Yorkdale Corp. v. Powell, 237 Md. 121, 124, 205 A.2d 269 (1964), when the Supreme Court of Maryland held as follows: “Maryland consistently has followed the rule that ‘an appellate court is bound to decide a case according to existing laws, even though a judgment rightful when rendered by the court below should be reversed as a consequence,’ . . . [and] a change in the [zoning] law after a decision below and before final decision by the appellate Court will be applied by that Court unless vested or accrued substantive rights would be disturbed or unless the legislature shows a contrary intent. Id.. “Vested rights” only accrue if a property owner has begun construction pursuant to a validly issued building permit.1 1 The vested rights principle has been clearly explained as follows: “[W]hen a property owner (1) obtains a lawful building permit, (2) commences to build in good faith, and (3) completes substantial construction on the property, his right to complete and use that structure cannot be affected by any subsequent change of the applicable building or zoning regulations.” Town of Sykesville v. W. Shore Commc’ns, 110 Md. App. 300, 329 (1996). No vested rights are implicated in connection with the proposed text amendment. Attachment One 2 1 Research Court Suite 450 | Rockville MD 20850 | 301-204-0913 | michele@marylandpropertylaw.com The Yorkdale principle has been consistently and repeatedly affirmed by the courts. See In re Northpoint Realty Partners, LLC, 265 Md. App. 270, 291 (2025)(confirming Yorkdale held a statutory change "after a decision below and before final decision by the appellate Court" applies retroactively "unless vested or accrued substantive rights would be disturbed or unless the legislature shows a contrary intent"); McHale v. DCW Dutchship Island LLC, 415 Md. 145, 160 (2010) (noting Yorkdale held that in zoning and land use cases a court would apply a substantive change to a statute during the course of litigation”); Layton v. Howard Cnty. Bd. of Appeals, 399 Md. 36, 70 (2007) (stating “we reaffirm the Yorkdale rule that a substantive change in relevant statutory law that takes place during the course of the litigation of a land use or zoning issue shall be retrospectively applied by appellate courts”). I trust this summary of Maryland law clarifies that the Commissioners have legal authority to adopt the zoning text amendment requested by Ms. Durning. Respectfully Submitted, Michele McDaniel Rosenfeld Cc: Danielle Eyler Durning 5 -24 Table 5-4: Rural Villages Historic Survey Status (cont.) Rural Villages Remaining for Survey I Bagtown Charlton Huyett** Mount Briar Beaver Creek Chewsville Indian Springs Pecktonville Big Pool Dargan Jugtown Pinesburg Big Spring Eakles Mill Kemps** Pondsville Bostetter** Edgemont Reid Kemps Mill - Breathedsville Ernstville Lappans St. James (Lydia) Bridgeport** Fairview Mapleville Trego/Rohrersville Station Cascade Fidd lersbu rg/Secu rity** Mercersville Yarrowsburg Cearfoss Garretts Mill Middleburg** Cedar Lawn** Greensburg Mount Aetna *Not Rural Village zoning, however, individual contributing resources to a survey area are included and those resources are now incorporated into the Washington County Historic Sites Inventory by this plan **Urban Rural Villages of which their contributing resources only are reviewed for Design Review or demolition, not new construction Attachment Two: 38 Un-surveyed Rural Villages (2040 Comprehensive Plan for Washington County) 2022 Petition Signatures Opposing Cascade Dollar General 2025 Petition Against Cascade Dollar General Lloyd Yavener, Chair Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1 DATE: March 5, 2026 TO: Planning Commission c/o Travis Allen 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 FROM: Washington County Historic District Commission (HDC) SUBJ: RZ-26-001, Text Amendment - Small Box Variety Stores - Table 3.3(1), Chapter 28A Definitions The proposed text amendment requests the addition of language to table 3.3(1) describing uses in the rural area that “small box variety stores within 1,000 feet of property with a historic designation or subject to a historic trust easement” not be permitted with the exception of the rural business overlay. It also notes the intensity of this use as “HIGH”. The request also includes updates to Chapter 28A Definitions to include a “Small Box Variety Store: A store with 16,000 square feet or less gross square footage which sells assorted physical goods, merchandise and food and non-food products directly to consumers at an average retail cost of $15.00 or less. A small box variety store does not include a grocery store or convenience store.” The Historic District Commission (HDC) will focus their comments on the update to table 3.3(1) specifically regarding language “within 1,000 feet of property with a historic designation or subject to a historic trust easement”. Historic resources do not appear in Table 3.3(1) in any land use. The Zoning Ordinance for Washington County (the Ordinance) instead includes Article 20: “HP” Historic Preservation District, Article 20A: “AO” Antietam Overlay, Section 5D.5 Architectural Review and a definition of historic resources in Chapter 28A. The HP, AO and Rural Village zoning categories reviewed by the HDC have limits to their extent which are justified by documentation or study of historic resources. These categories have outlined activities that are subject to the approval or recommendations of the HDC. Activities are reviewed based on the guidelines included in Article 20 and the adopted Design Guidelines for Historic Properties which both reference the Secretary of Interior (SOI) Standards for Rehabilitation. The guidelines in place for review do not limit the use of property but rather the compatibility of new construction with the documented historic resources. The applicant’s justification letter states that the proposed language “is a narrowly written text amendment designed specifically to protect property within the Rural Village zone if it is proximate to historically designated or protected resources.” (Justification Statement 1/20/26, p.1) The Ordinance already provides mechanisms for review by the HDC in specific zoning categories as well as involvement in the review of applications such as special exceptions or rezoning applications county-wide. In the Ordinance the terminology most frequently referenced regarding historic resources includes the National Register of Historic Places (NR), the Maryland Historical Trust’s (MHT) Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP), Washington County Historic Sites Inventory and Historic Preservation Overlay (HP). These are referenced in the Ordinance where the County has determined impact to historic resources should be reviewed by the HDC. The term “historic trust easement” in the proposed amendment is assumed to be an MHT Preservation Easement. MHT easements are an agreement between a property owner and MHT and it is not advisable to then extend a regulatory buffer to adjacent property owners. The term “historic designation” is ambiguous. It is not consistent with naming conventions utilized in the Ordinance. The HDC does not recommend this language nor does it recommend impacting adjacent property owners when they are not included in the documentation of the historic resources. The applicant has included a 1,000 foot buffer in the proposed amendment. For historic resource protection, it is not advisable to include buffers without documentation studying any impacts to the integrity of the setting of the historic resources to support the buffer. For example, the Ordinance does include the AO around Antietam National Battlefield to protect the context of that site. That land management regulation was a result of analyses including viewshed around the battlefield. There has been no analysis provided indicating the reason a 1,000 buffer was chosen specific to the associated land use. It appears arbitrary in both distance and the inconsistent use of terminology regarding historic resources. It is important to note that the table language requested would still allow applications for the Small Box Variety Stores in all rural zoning categories that are able to successfully obtain a Rural Business Overlay, including the Rural Village. The proposed language merely removes the Special Exception process. Both rezoning and special exceptions include the potential for the HDC’s review and comment, and both still include a public notification process. There appears to be no additional historic resource protection resulting in the restriction of the use to the Rural Business Overlay. The applicant also provides support for their application stating that Comprehensive Plan 2040 (CP2040) notes a need for remaining rural villages in the County to be surveyed. While true that there are rural villages remaining to be surveyed, the rural village mentioned repeatedly in the application “Cascade” has had several surveys completed in 1999, 2001 and 2012 and is considered adequately documented at this time with design review by the HDC in place. CP2040 Historic Element goals encourage a holistic approach to historic resource protection rather than narrowly written amendments. This includes identification of additional historic resources, study of scenic corridors and a modernization of historic policies and ordinances currently in place. In summary, the HDC reviews activities and applications in areas designated for their review as well as commenting on applications for special exception or rezonings where historic resources may be impacted. The proposed amendment is ambiguous in its terminology regarding historic resources, and it does not include any analysis to support a 1,000 foot buffer. While the HDC supports the expansion of historic resource protections, there is no current recommendation in the CP2040 that proposes limiting individual land uses. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this application. Sincerely, Meghan Jenkins, GISP HDC Staff ATT: 1, Statistics HDC staff offers the following statistics for consideration during this text amendment review to determine impact to property owners. There are ~20,200 parcels in the rural area. It is important to note that the count of parcels involved that follows is not cumulative as some of these designations overlap. There are ~715 (4% of total rural) parcels within 1,000 feet of the County’s Historic Preservation Zoning (HP) properties. There are ~3,980 (20% of total rural) parcels within 1,000 feet of National Register of Historic Places (NR) properties. The term “historic trust easement” is assumed to be an MHT Preservation Easement. There are ~425 (2% of total rural) tax parcels in the County rural area which are within 1,000 feet of a MHT Preservation Easement. There are 10 MHT Preservation Easements in the rural area of the County. These include: • Kennedy House, 2406 Chestnut Grove Road, Sharpsburg (Current Zoning EC w/ HP Overlay) • Plumb Grove Mansion, 12654 Broadfording Road, Clear Spring (Current Zoning EC) • Rohrer House, 12346 Hopscotch Lane, Hagerstown (Current Zoning AR) • Baker Farm, 19522 Shepherdstown Pike, Keedysville (Current Zoning P) • Wilson's Bridge, 15033 Wilson Bridge Park Lane (Current Zoning RV) • Moore Farm, 14404 Cearfoss Pike, Hagerstown (Current Zoning AR) • Antietam Railroad Station, 17230 Shepherdstown Pike, Sharpsburg (Current Zoning P w/ AO2) • Snively Farm/Felfoot Parcel, 5660 Mount Briar Road, Keedysville (Current Zoning P) • Wiles Tract at Williamsport Battlefield, 14926 Falling Water Road, Williamsport (Current Zoning EC) • Fort Ritchie, 25036 Pen Mar Road, Cascade (Current Zoning SED) The applicant’s justification statement, again, stated this amendment was intended “to protect property within the Rural Village zone if it is proximate to historically designated or protected resources.” For that reason, the numbers provided by staff cover the entirety of the County’s rural area. For context, the HDC currently reviews applications for ~500 parcels within adopted/surveyed rural villages, and an additional ~250 parcels through Antietam Overlay or Historic Preservation Overlay. There are ~1100 Washington County Historic Sites Survey properties that are flagged for potential review depending on their proposed activities. There is significant variation in potential impacts due to the ambiguous language used. 1. HISTORIC PROPERTY GRANT PROGRAM 1.01 Establishment of the Historic Property Grant Program 1.01a There is a Historic Property Grant Program established to assist in the protection, preservation, and enhancement of Washington County’s rural historic properties as authorized by Md. Code § 8-205 of the Land Use Article . 1.01b The rehabilitation activities referred to in this Ordinance shall be in conformance with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation and subsequent revisions and with the Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures and subsequent revisions. 1.02 Grant Funding Source for the Historic Property Grant Program 1.02a The funding source and yearly allocated amount for this grant program shall be: i) Any listed below or combination thereof: (1) Recordation Tax (2) Ag Transfer Tax (3) General Fund ii) The yearly allocated amount for this grant program shall be a minimum of $150,000 or greater as determined by the County. 1.03 Grant Amounts for a Historic Property Grant 1.03a An individual grant shall be a minimum of $5,000. 1.03b An individual grant cannot exceed $50,000. 1.04 Eligibility for a Historic Property Grant From: Jared Green with American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) Date: December 5, 2025 at 10:33 Subject: Re: info/references on the use of building ruins Ten x ten also adapts historic sites: https://www.asla.org/2025awards/12012.html Hi Ann, Great to hear from you and hope you are doing well. I can't think of any specific regulations or design guidelines for ruins. I would think some of the native American sites managed by the NPS out west would have these. This is a great contemporary ruin in Bethlehem, PA: https://www.asla.org/2017awards/320207.html And an interesting fabricated ruin in Manhattan: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review- g60763-d2641447-Reviews-Irish_Hunger_Memorial-New_York_City_New_York.html In the DC area, the firm Quinn Evans does work on historic buildings and landscapes. They restored the mill building in Rock Creek Park. https://www.quinnevans.com/ Jared AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION IMPLEMENTING SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT FOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDERTAKINGS IN MARYLAND WHEREAS, the Maryland Division of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administers the Federal-Aid Highway Program in Maryland authorized by 23 U.S.C. 101 et seq. through the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) and the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) (23 U.S.C. 315); and WHEREAS, the FHWA Division Administrator is the “Agency Official” responsible for ensuring that the Federal-Aid Highway Program in the state of Maryland complies with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (54 U.S.C. § 306108), as amended, and codified in its implementing regulations, “Protection of Historic Properties” 36 C.F.R. Part 800; and WHEREAS, FHWA has determined that FHWA undertakings, as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(y), may have an effect, as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(i), on historic properties as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(l); and WHEREAS, FHWA has determined that certain types of minor projects typically have no effect upon historic properties, and has consulted with the Maryland State Historic Preservation Officer (MD SHPO) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.14(b) of the regulations implementing Section 106, and this Programmatic Agreement (PA) is adopted pursuant to those regulations; and WHEREAS, FHWA, MD SHPO, and ACHP are signatories to this PA; and WHEREAS, FHWA has invited MDOT SHA and MDTA to be invited signatories to this PA; and WHEREAS, FHWA, MD SHPO, ACHP, MDOT SHA, and MDTA are collectively referred to as signatories in this PA; and WHEREAS, FHWA has provided a draft of this PA to and invited the participation of the following tribal nations: Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Cayuga Nation, Chickahominy Indian Tribe, Chickahominy Indian Tribe – Eastern Division, Delaware Nation, Delaware Tribe, Eastern Shawnee Tribe, Monacan Indian Nation, Nansemond Indian Tribe, Oneida Indian Nation, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Onondaga Nation, Pamunkey Indian Tribe, Rappahannock Tribe, Seneca-Cayuga Nation, Seneca Nation of Indians, Shawnee Tribe, St. Regis Mohawk, Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians, Tonawanda Seneca Nation, Tuscarora Nation, and the Upper Mattaponi Tribe; and WHEREAS, the Delaware Nation has provided comments on the draft PA and FHWA has invited the Delaware Nation to concur in the PA; and Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 2 of 24 WHEREAS, FHWA has invited the participation of all counties, Certified Local Governments in Maryland, and Maryland Certified Heritage Areas. The following organizations responded and have been identified as consulting parties, as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.2(c), for the development of this PA: Baltimore City; the City of Annapolis; the City of Frederick; Frederick County; Frederick County Landmarks Foundation; Frederick Preservation Trust; the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs; Maryland-National Capital Parks and Planning Commission; the Piscataway Conoy Tribe (Choptico Band of Indians); the Valleys Planning Council; and the Washington County Division of Engineering; and WHEREAS, MDOT SHA and MDTA offered the public an opportunity to participate in this PA via an announcement on their respective websites; and WHEREAS, FHWA, MD SHPO, ACHP, and MDOT SHA entered into a PA regarding MDOT SHA’s Historic Highway Bridges (HHBPA) in Maryland on July 19, 2013, establishing a Section 106 review process for approximately 160 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible highway bridges; and WHEREAS, this PA supersedes any and all prior letters or agreements related to Section 106 compliance for local public agency programs in Maryland funded by FHWA and administered by MDOT SHA; and WHEREAS, the MDOT SHA has a staff of cultural resources professionals and contracts with consultant firms who meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards published in 48 FR 44738-44739 in the fields of archaeology, architectural history, and history to carry out its historic preservation programs and responsibilities (hereafter referred to as “cultural resources professionals”); and MDTA uses the services of these same cultural resources professionals in carrying out the terms of this PA; and WHEREAS, MDOT SHA and MDTA are both transportation agencies of the State of Maryland, with responsibility to FHWA under the Federal-Aid Highway Program, and desire to share resources and standardize Section 106 review for their actions; and WHEREAS, the FHWA, ACHP, MD SHPO, and MDOT SHA originally executed a PA for Minor Highway Projects on July 26, 1993 and subsequently amended it on February 22, 2001, June 30, 2008, and December 19, 2017, and the parties to the original and amended agreements have consulted and agreed to amend the PA, pursuant to Stipulation XIII of the 2017 agreement, and this PA herein supersedes the earlier PAs; and NOW, THEREFORE, FHWA, ACHP, and MD SHPO agree that FHWA undertakings in Maryland shall be carried out in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effects of these undertakings on historic properties in Maryland and that these stipulations shall govern compliance of these undertakings with Section 106 of the NHPA until this PA expires or is terminated. Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 3 of 24 STIPULATIONS FHWA, with the assistance of MDOT SHA and MDTA, will ensure that the following measures are carried out: I. Purpose and Applicability A. This PA sets forth the process by which the FHWA will meet its responsibilities under Section 106 of the NHPA, with the assistance of the MDOT SHA and MDTA, for FHWA undertakings in Maryland. This PA establishes the basis for the MDOT SHA’s and MDTA’s internal review of individual projects and establishes how the FHWA and the MD SHPO will be involved in any review. B. This PA may apply to undertakings for projects involving other Federal agencies where FHWA has assumed Lead Agency responsibility under Section 106. C. This PA applies to FHWA undertakings where MDOT SHA and/or MDTA administer FHWA funds, such as local public agency programs and projects where another entity is the primary project proponent. Covered programs may include but are not limited to: Safe Routes to Schools, Recreational Trails Program, Transportation Enhancements and other applicable programs that may be instituted during the implementation of the PA. D. Undertakings that have no potential to cause effects to historic properties, pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.3(a)(1), are defined as those actions that by their nature will not result in effects to historic properties. FHWA defines these as only non-construction related activities. For example, purchasing equipment, planning, and design all fall under this portion of the regulation and do not require any further obligations under Section 106. All other construction with a federal nexus, including any maintenance, new construction, and all construction related actions, must comply with 36 C.F.R. Part 800. II. Responsibilities A. FHWA Responsibilities: In compliance with its responsibilities under the NHPA and as a condition of its award of any assistance for undertakings that may affect historic properties under the Federal-Aid Highway Program, the FHWA shall require the MDOT SHA to carry out certain requirements of 36 C.F.R. Part 800, consistent with applicable ACHP standards and guidelines. 1. FHWA delegates MDOT SHA the responsibility to establish the undertaking and initiate Section 106 review and consultation process in accordance with this PA. 2. FHWA shall ensure that federally recognized Indian Tribes are identified and consulted in accordance with the requirements of Section 101(d)(6) of the NHPA and 36 C.F.R. Part 800. This PA recognizes the guidance titled “Limitations on the Delegation of Authority by Federal Agencies to Initiate Tribal Consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act” published by ACHP on July 1, 2011. Nothing in this PA abrogates FHWA’s responsibility for government-to-government consultation with federally recognized Indian Tribes at their request. Upon receipt of a written request from any Indian tribe, or officially designated representative of an Indian tribe, to consult with FHWA in lieu of or in addition to MDOT SHA and/or MDTA, FHWA shall consult with that Indian tribe for the particular undertaking or program. Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 4 of 24 3. Upon notification by the MDOT SHA that a project may result in an adverse effect to historic properties, FHWA will ensure the Section 106 review process is completed, including notification of ACHP, in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.6(a). B. MDOT SHA Responsibilities 1. MDOT SHA will determine and document the Area of Potential Effect(s) (APE), as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(d); identify consulting parties for the specific undertaking (or “project”), including federally recognized Indian Tribes that may ascribe religious and cultural significance to properties in a project’s APE pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.3(f)(2), and local public agencies with jurisdiction; identify historic properties and prepare documentation; and assess effects to historic properties in consultation with MD SHPO, consulting parties for the project, and in accordance with the principles and processes described at 36 C.F.R. §§ 800.3 – 6. 2. When MDOT SHA determines an undertaking will have an adverse effect on historic properties, it will notify the FHWA and initiate further consultation with MD SHPO and identified consulting parties for the project to resolve the adverse effects in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.6, including alternatives to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties resulting from the undertaking. Such alternatives or mitigation will be documented in a Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement or PA executed by FHWA, MD SHPO, and MDOT SHA or MDTA, and ACHP if participating in consultation. 3. If MDOT SHA finds that an undertaking that does not meet the exemptions in Stipulations IV and V will have no adverse effect to historic properties, or historic properties are not affected, MDOT SHA will follow Stipulation VII of this PA. 4. MDOT SHA shall immediately notify FHWA of any request for government-to- government consultation conveyed by a federally recognized Indian tribe. 5. The MDOT SHA shall employ cultural resources professionals meeting Professional Qualifications Standards established by the Secretary of Interior in the fields of history, archaeology and/or architectural history. These MDOT SHA cultural resources professionals shall oversee project review for MDOT SHA and perform all actions where “MDOT SHA” is specified in this PA. 6. Local public agency programs. On behalf of FHWA, MDOT SHA shall initiate Section 106 consultation for FHWA undertakings for local public agency programs, inclusive of those projects in which a local public agency, as defined in 23 C.F.R. § 635.102, is the primary project proponent and recipient of federal aid, either through MDOT SHA or MDTA. MDOT SHA shall provide Section 106 training and technical guidance, as necessary, to local public agencies for these undertakings, including direction on type and quality of documentation and/or field efforts the local public agency, as the project proponent, must provide to complete review. MDOT SHA shall complete review of these projects per the stipulations of this PA. Attachment 1 describes the general expected procedure for local public agency programs. Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 5 of 24 7. For MDTA projects, MDOT SHA cultural resources professionals will implement all steps on behalf of FHWA for MDTA as described in Stipulation II.B. and all subsequent stipulations of this PA including Appendices and Attachments, excepting where MDTA is specified. C. MDTA Responsibilities 1. MDTA, as a collaborating State of Maryland partner, will provide MDOT SHA with sufficient information and adequate resources (pursuant to an Interagency Memorandum of Understanding executed between MDOT SHA and MDTA) for MDOT SHA to identify historic properties and assess projects' effects on historic properties, and meet other requirements of this PA. D. MD SHPO Responsibilities 1. The MD SHPO shall review MDOT SHA and FHWA determinations of the APE, NRHP eligibility determinations, effect findings and other submittals and respond within the timeframes specified in this PA, or as specified in 36 C.F.R. Part 800. 2. As requested by MDOT SHA, FHWA, or MDTA, MD SHPO staff shall be reasonably available as a resource and for consultation through site visits, meetings, written requests, telephone conversations or electronic media. 3. The MD SHPO shall coordinate with MDOT SHA and FHWA to identify consulting parties for each project, including any communities, organizations, or individuals that may have an interest in a specific undertaking and its effects on historic properties. E. ACHP Responsibilities 1. The ACHP will be notified of findings of adverse effect by FHWA and will be invited to participate in resolving the adverse effect of an undertaking in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.6(a)(1). 2. The ACHP will participate, in accordance with Stipulation XII, in the resolution of disputes that may occur through the implementation of this PA. F. MDOT SHA, MDTA, and FHWA shall withhold from disclosure to the public information about the location, character, or ownership of historic properties in accordance with the requirements and limitations of Section 304 of the NHPA. G. If a signatory requests that any individual undertaking be reviewed using the standard Section 106 process, MDOT SHA shall comply, either initiating and carrying out the steps of the process on behalf of FHWA as described in Stipulation II and Stipulation VII, in accordance with 36 C.F.R. Part 800 and the NHPA where applicable, or a full standard review conducted by FHWA per 36 C.F.R. Part 800, depending on the signatory’s request. III. Guidelines, Standards and Regulations Guidelines, standards and regulations relevant to this PA and its purposes include: Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 6 of 24 • 36 C.F.R. Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties (2004); • Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation: Identification (1983); • Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Investigations in Maryland (Shaffer and Cole 1994); • Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland (Maryland Historical Trust Revised 2019); • Program Comment for Actions Affecting Post-1945 Concrete Steel Bridges (77 FR 68790); and • Exemption Regarding Historic Preservation Review Process for Effects to the Interstate Highway System (70 FR 11928). It is the intention of the signatories to interpret this PA in accordance with any standards, revisions of standards, or applicable Program Comments promulgated by the Secretary of Interior, ACHP, or MD SHPO as then in force during the course of this PA. The signatories also intend this PA to be construed in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act in matters of interpretation. IV. Projects with Minimal Potential to Cause Effects (Appendix 1 Projects) A. Project types: The signatories to this PA agree that the projects limited to the activities listed in Appendix 1, by their nature and definition, constitute undertakings that have minimal potential to cause effects to historic properties. Therefore, projects limited to the activities listed in Appendix 1 are categorically exempt from further review, provided the projects are limited to the activities listed and not part of a larger undertaking. Qualified MDOT SHA cultural resources professionals will determine whether a particular project meets the exemption categories listed in Appendix 1. B. Notification and Coordination: For projects which are limited to the activities listed in Appendix 1, the MDOT SHA shall document its finding that the action is exempt from further review and maintain the documentation in its files. Projects reviewed under Appendix 1 will be documented with information that includes at a minimum, the project name, route/limits, county, use of federal funds, a description of the proposed work, and the qualified cultural resources professionals reviewing the action. The MDOT SHA shall document all projects exempted from additional review under Appendix 1 in its annual report to the MD SHPO, as specified in Stipulation XI. The MDOT SHA will provide project review documentation to the MD SHPO for particular actions upon request. Beyond the documentation noted above, the MDOT SHA is not required to take any further action in the Section 106 process for projects exempt from review. C. Additions to or Modification of Appendix 1 Project Types: If deemed appropriate through consultation and mutual agreement between the MDOT SHA and MD SHPO, other types of minor actions may be exempted from review as having minimal potential to cause effects. MDOT SHA shall provide for a comment opportunity on proposed changes through email notification and/or posting the proposed additions or modifications on MDOT SHA’s website. MDOT SHA will also notify FHWA and ACHP of proposed additions or modifications to Appendix 1. If no consulting party to this PA has objected in writing to the proposed change, upon expiration of the comment period, which will be no less than 30 days, the addition(s) or modification shall become effective. Additions to or modifications of Appendix 1 using this process do not require formal amendment of this PA. In the event of an objection, the signatories shall consult to consider the objection and determine whether the addition or modification is appropriate, document the result of the consultation, and Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 7 of 24 determine whether the addition or modification shall be made. The MDOT SHA shall maintain a list of all such categories and actions approved by this process and update Appendix 1 as part of the annual report to the MD SHPO under Stipulation XI. V. Minor Projects (Appendix 2 Activities) A. Project Types: For the purposes of this PA, “Minor Projects” are broadly defined as those projects with limited APEs unlikely to contain historic properties (with the exception of previously evaluated historic bridges as noted in Stipulation VI), that occur largely at grade within existing rights-of-way or within minimal new rights-of-way, do not introduce new structural or visual elements, and do not require substantial ground disturbance or that occur within previously disturbed soils, and are therefore unlikely to affect historic properties. MDOT SHA will review and document minor projects without further review by the FHWA or MD SHPO, provided: • the projects are limited to the activities listed in Appendix 2; • the projects are not part of a larger undertaking; • MDOT SHA bases its review upon information adequate to identify properties and assess projects' effects on historic properties, as specified in Stipulation V.B. and consistent with 36 C.F.R. Part 800; • MDOT SHA decisions are consistent with the guidelines, standards and regulations identified in Stipulation III; • MDOT SHA consults with the MD SHPO pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.4(c) prior to making determinations of eligibility of properties for the NRHP; and • MDOT SHA finds that either there are no historic properties present or there are historic properties present but the undertaking will have no effect upon them. B. MDOT SHA Review Process: 1. Internal Review: For undertakings limited to activities listed in Appendix 2, qualified MDOT SHA cultural resources professionals will implement the following internal review process to document that the undertaking qualifies for an Appendix 2 exemption, as appropriate to the project: • determine the APE; • review existing information (including but not limited to MDOT SHA’s Geographic Information System (GIS) Cultural Resources Database, MD SHPO’s databases, street view imagery, State Department of Assessment and Taxation information, etc.) on properties in the APE; • assess the likelihood that unidentified historic properties exist in the APE; • determine the degree of existing disturbance within the APE and, where warranted, perform a field inspection; Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 8 of 24 • conduct a field survey in conformance with the applicable standards in Stipulation III, where warranted; • determine whether historic properties are in the APE; and • determine whether the undertaking will result in no historic properties affected, as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.4(d)(1). 2. Eligibility Evaluations and Assessments of Effect: The MDOT SHA will consult with the MD SHPO pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.4(c) prior to making any determination of eligibility of properties for the NRHP. If MDOT SHA’s internal review suggests that a project may affect historic properties, the MDOT SHA will seek coordination on the project in accordance with Stipulation VII of this PA, 36 C.F.R. § 800.4 through 36 C.F.R. § 800.6 and in consultation with the MD SHPO. 3. Notification and Coordination with MD SHPO: For projects that meet the criteria included in Stipulation V.A and do not include properties within the APE, the MDOT SHA shall document and file the finding in accordance with Stipulation V.B.5. The MDOT SHA may request written concurrence from the MD SHPO on a determination of no historic properties affected for any project defined under this PA. The MDOT SHA shall notify the MD SHPO of its Appendix 2 exemptions and provide a list of all projects limited to the activities defined in Appendix 2 that were reviewed under the provisions of Stipulation V in its annual report to the MD SHPO, as specified in Stipulation XI. The MDOT SHA does not need to provide the MD SHPO with copies of the Appendix 2 documentation, unless the MD SHPO specifically requests a copy of the documentation for a particular action. 4. Notification and Coordination with other Parties: MDOT SHA will provide for tribal, public and local public agency notification by providing an electronic quarterly report of all MDOT SHA and MDTA projects exempted under the provisions of this stipulation to Indian tribal nations, local public agencies, the interested public, or other parties upon request. MDOT SHA will notify tribal and local public agency contacts of the ability to subscribe to the quarterly report through direct e-mail and will provide for any member of the public to subscribe to the quarterly report through MDOT SHA’s website. Subject to any applicable restrictions, MDOT SHA will provide documentation of project exemptions upon request. In the event of an objection from tribal nations, the public, or local public agencies on use of Appendix 2 in project review, MDOT SHA will provide a copy of the documentation to the MD SHPO and consult with all relevant parties to resolve the issue or conduct further consultation as described in Stipulation XII. 5. Documentation: For all undertakings reviewed under this PA, the MDOT SHA and MDTA will maintain records, including Appendix 2 documentation, photographs and field notes, if any. MDOT SHA and MDTA will make the documentation accessible, consistent with MDOT SHA, MDTA, and FHWA’s records retention schedules and this PA. Pertinent records for each project covered under this PA should include: • a description of the project and its APE; Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 9 of 24 • the location of the project area on USGS 7.5 minute topographic maps and/or project mapping; or on mapping generated from the MDOT SHA GIS at a scale of 1:90,000 or less for project location and 1:24,000 or less for cultural resources information; • the type, extent, and degree of existing disturbance within the APE; • the assessment by qualified MDOT SHA cultural resource professionals of the potential for properties within the APE, including justification, a listing of inventoried properties, and new or updated Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties forms, as warranted; • justification for the determination of no historic properties affected (as appropriate); and • associated notes and correspondence. C. Additions to or Modification of Appendix 2 Project Types: If deemed appropriate through consultation and mutual agreement between the MDOT SHA and MD SHPO, other types of projects or actions may be classified as minor projects. MDOT SHA shall provide for a comment opportunity on proposed changes through email notification and/or posting the proposed additions or modifications on MDOT SHA’s website. MDOT SHA will also notify FHWA and ACHP of proposed additions or modifications to Appendix 2. If no consulting party has objected in writing to the proposed addition, upon expiration of the comment period, which will be no less than 30 days, the addition(s) or modification shall become effective. Additions to or modification of Appendix 2 using this process do not require formal amendment of this PA. In the event of an objection, the signatories shall consult to consider the objection and determine whether the addition or modification is appropriate, document the result of the consultation, and determine whether the addition or modification shall be made. The MDOT SHA shall maintain a list of all such categories and actions approved by this process and update Appendix 2 as part of the annual report to the MD SHPO under Stipulation XI. VI. Historic Bridge Projects (HHBPA) Undertakings that may incidentally include Eligible Historic Bridges and Non-Priority Historic Level Bridges (listed in HHBPA Attachments B and C) within their APE may be reviewed by MDOT SHA under the provisions of Stipulation V of this PA provided the other provisions of Stipulation V are met and the primary purpose of the undertaking is not maintenance or modification of the bridge or bridges. VII. Project Reviews – All Other Undertakings MDOT SHA, FHWA and the MD SHPO shall complete review of all remaining undertakings, with the exception of those that meet the provisions in Stipulations IV and V, in accordance with 36 C.F.R. Part 800 and the NHPA where applicable. MDOT SHA may initiate and carry out the steps of the process on behalf of FHWA as described in Stipulation II. For these undertakings, MDOT SHA may make findings of No Adverse Effect, or No Properties Affected, without further involvement from FHWA. In the event of a disagreement with or failure to concur by MD SHPO on findings of Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 10 of 24 No Adverse Effect or No Properties Affected, FHWA will participate in further consultation to resolve the effect finding. VIII. Post-Review Undertaking Changes For projects that have completed review under Stipulations IV, V, VI, or VII of this PA, MDOT SHA shall review proposed changes for effects to historic properties. Provided the change in scope is limited to the types of activities described in Appendix 1 and/or Appendix 2, MDOT SHA will document the change in a format consistent with the requirements of Stipulation V. B. 5. Should the proposed change result in potential new effects to historic properties, MDOT SHA will consult in accordance with Stipulation VII. IX. Post Review Discoveries Including Human Remains For all projects requiring ground disturbing activities, whether documented through exemptions under Appendix 2 or reviewed under Stipulation VII of this PA, MDOT SHA and MDTA will require use of an Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) during construction. The IDP is included as Appendix 3 of this PA and documents the process by which MDOT SHA, in coordination with MDTA for MDTA projects, will make notifications and consult in the event of discovery of archaeological human remains, potential historic properties, or inadvertent adverse effects to historic properties (including damage to known archaeological sites) resulting from construction. For local public agency programs, MDOT SHA will provide local public agencies a template IDP (Attachment 2) which requires contacting MDOT SHA in the event of a post review discovery. MDOT SHA may make minor non-procedural modifications (such as inclusion/correction of contact or project information) to the IDP without requiring amendment of this PA. Project-specific IDPs may be developed for individual projects reviewed under Stipulation VII where the standard format is not desirable. X. Emergency Situations For the purposes of this PA, emergencies are defined as occurrences that require emergency highway system and facility repairs that are necessary to 1) protect the life, safety, or health of the public; 2) minimize the extent of damage to the highway system and facilities; 3) protect remaining highway facilities; or 4) restore essential traffic. The following stipulations apply to emergency situations: A. Repairs to address emergency situations as defined above can occur regardless of funding category, and regardless of declarations made by federal, state, or local public agencies. B. If the emergency repair project could affect historic properties, MDOT SHA shall notify MD SHPO, the FHWA, federally recognized Indian Tribes that may attach significance to properties likely to be affected, and other appropriate parties as soon as is practicable. MDOT SHA will consult with MD SHPO and any federally recognized Indian Tribe or Tribes that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected, on the nature of the emergency and any available options to avoid or minimize effects to historic properties. MDOT SHA will make a reasonable and good faith effort to provide for sufficient response time, but the comment period may be accelerated depending on the nature of the emergency. C. For projects where the repair must be made within the first 30 days of the occurrence of the event that caused the emergency or the declaration of the emergency by an appropriate Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 11 of 24 authority, the processing of environmental documentation will happen concurrently or after the fact. In these cases, MDOT SHA will comply with the procedures in Stipulation VII of this PA to the extent possible, but the reviews will likely be conducted after the emergency work is completed. D. When sufficient lead time prior to implementing repairs is possible, MDOT SHA will comply with the procedures in Stipulation VII. E. Written notification of an emergency action shall be provided to MD SHPO. The notice shall be clearly and prominently marked as an emergency notification, and shall include an explanation of how the action meets the requirements for emergency as defined herein. The notice shall also include a brief description of the eligibility and/or significance of the resource(s) involved, the nature, effect, and/or anticipated effect of the emergency action on the resource(s), and the anticipated time frame available for comment. F. Should the emergency action subsequently be defined to meet the requirements described in Stipulations IV or V, MDOT SHA will notify MD SHPO that review was completed under these provisions and provide the associated documentation upon request. XI. Review and Monitoring FHWA, ACHP, MDOT SHA, MDTA, and the MD SHPO will consult regularly to review implementation of the terms of the PA, including at a minimum one annual meeting with FHWA and MDTA in attendance. The MDOT SHA shall maintain a list of all Appendix 1 and 2 projects covered under the PA for a 12-month period from January 1 through December 31. The MDOT SHA shall provide the MD SHPO, MDTA, ACHP, and FHWA with a copy of this report by January 31 of each following year. The MD SHPO will review the report and assess the implementation of the PA for the year under review. If deemed appropriate by the MD SHPO, MDTA or MDOT SHA, all parties shall meet to discuss and address any issues raised as a result of the review. The FHWA, ACHP and MD SHPO may monitor activities carried out pursuant to this PA. The MDOT SHA and MDTA will cooperate with these parties in carrying out their monitoring efforts. XII. Dispute Resolution A. Objections related to review of individual actions or projects: Should any signatory, consulting party to the project, or member of the public object to any documentation submitted or actions taken pursuant to a project review under Stipulations IV, V, VII, or other portions of this PA related to a specific review action, the FHWA will ensure that the MDOT SHA consults with the objecting party to resolve the objection in coordination with MDTA where relevant, provided the objection is made in writing to FHWA, MDOT SHA, or MDTA within 30 days of the action under dispute. 1. If the objection is resolved through consultation, FHWA may authorize the disputed action to proceed in accordance with the terms of such resolution. 2. If after initiating such consultation, FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved through consultation, FHWA shall forward all documentation relevant to the objection to the ACHP and other signatories, including FHWA's proposed response Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 12 of 24 to the objection. Within 30 days after receipt of all pertinent documentation, ACHP shall exercise one of the following options: a. Advise FHWA that ACHP concurs in FHWA's proposed response to the objection, whereupon FHWA will respond to the objection accordingly; or b. Provide FHWA with recommendations, which FHWA shall take into account in reaching a final decision regarding its response to the objection; or c. Notify FHWA that the objection will be referred for comment pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.7(a)(4) and proceed to refer the objection and comment. In this event, FHWA shall ensure that the Agency Official is prepared to take the resulting comments into account in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.7(c)(4). 3. Should ACHP not exercise one of the foregoing options within 30 days after receipt of all pertinent documentation, FHWA may assume ACHP’s concurrence in its proposed response to the objection. 4. FHWA shall take into account any ACHP recommendation or comment and any comments from the other signatories to this PA in reaching a final decision regarding the objection. FHWA’s responsibility to carry out all actions under this PA that are not the subjects of the objection shall remain unchanged. 5. FHWA shall provide all other signatories to this PA with a written copy of its final decision regarding any objection addressed pursuant to this Stipulation. 6. FHWA may authorize any action subject to objection under this Stipulation to proceed, provided the objection has been resolved in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation. B. Objections related to NRHP eligibility: Any signatory may object in writing within 30 days to an MDOT SHA or FHWA determination of eligibility. If MDOT SHA and FHWA are unwilling to revise the determination in response to the objection or other relevant information, FHWA (or MDOT SHA on its behalf) will submit the determination to the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places for a determination pursuant to 36 C.F.R. Part 63. C. Objections to implementation or compliance with the PA, or issues unrelated to individual project review actions: 1. Should any signatory object in writing to FHWA regarding the manner in which the terms of this PA are carried out, or if FHWA has an objection related to other signatories, FHWA will immediately notify the other signatories of the objection and proceed to consult with the objecting party to resolve the objection. FHWA will honor the request of any signatory to participate in the consultation and will take any comments provided by such parties into account. The FHWA shall establish a reasonable time frame for such consultations. 2. If consultation among the signatories results in agreement on specific actions, definitions, modifications of procedures or other mechanisms that will resolve the Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 13 of 24 objection without formal amendment of this agreement, FHWA will document the resolution and provide such documentation to all signatories. 3. If signatories agree that resolution of the objection requires amendment of this PA, the parties will follow procedures set forth in Stipulation XIII. 4. If the objection cannot be resolved through consultation, informal action or amendment, the parties may consider termination of the agreement per Stipulation XIV. XIII. Amendment Any signatory to this PA may request that it be amended, whereupon the signatories will consult in accordance with 36 C.F.R. § 800.14 to consider such an amendment. This PA may be amended only upon execution of an amendment signed by all signatories. XIV. Termination Any signatory to this PA may terminate it by providing 30 calendar days’ notice in writing to the other parties, provided that the parties will consult during the period prior to termination to seek agreement on amendments and other actions that would avoid termination. In the event of termination, the FHWA will comply with 36 C.F.R. Part 800 with regard to individual undertakings covered by this PA. XV. Duration This PA shall continue in full force and effect until five (5) years from the date of execution of the PA. At any time in the six-month period prior to this date, the signatories will consult to consider an extension or amendment of the PA. At such time, the signatories may consider an amendment to extend the PA unmodified for an additional five (5) year duration, or consult to amend the PA in accordance with Stipulation XIII. No extension or amendment will be effective unless all parties to the PA have agreed to it in writing by amending the PA. Execution and implementation of this PA evidences that FHWA has delegated certain Section 106 responsibilities to MDOT SHA and MDTA, and has afforded ACHP a reasonable opportunity to comment on the Federal-Aid Highway Program and its individual undertakings in Maryland; that FHWA has taken into account the effects of the program and its individual undertakings on historic properties, and that FHWA has complied with Section 106 of the NHPA and 36 C.F.R. Part 800 for the program and its individual undertakings. Appendices and Attachments Appendix 1: Projects with Minimal Potential to Cause Effects to Historic Properties Appendix 2: Minor Projects Appendix 3: Inadvertent Discovery Plan Attachment 1: MDOT SHA Local Programs Cultural Resources and Section 106 Flowchart Attachment 2: Inadvertent Discovery Plan Template for Local Public Agencies Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 15 of 24 SIGNATORY PAGE AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION IMPLEMENTING SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT FOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDERTAKINGS IN MARYLAND ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION By: Date: _________________________ Jordan E. Tannenbaum, Vice Chairman August 19, 2021 Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL -XQH 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 16 of 24 SIGNATORY PAGE AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION IMPLEMENTING SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT FOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDERTAKINGS IN MARYLAND MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER By: Date: _________________________ Elizabeth Hughes, State Historic Preservation Officer Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 17 of 24 SIGNATORY PAGE AMENDED PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION IMPLEMENTING SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT FOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDERTAKINGS IN MARYLAND MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION By: Date: _________________________ Tim Smith, P.E., Administrator for 07/19/2021 Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 19 of 24 APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 1: Projects with Minimal Potential to Cause Effects to Historic Properties. Qualified MDOT SHA cultural resources professionals will determine whether a particular project meets the following exemption categories: 1. mowing, seeding/reseeding, planting of annual and perennial flowers, in-kind replacement of trees and shrubs, and other ground cover maintenance activities; 2. installation or replacement/repair of fixed static signs, trail signage/waysides, interconnection devices, surveillance cameras, closed circuit TV, co-location of antennae, and other minor incident and traffic management devices (not including variable message signs), accessible pedestrian signals, railroad warning devices, and improved rail crossing surfaces; 3. in-kind replacement, reconstruction, ADA retrofit or ordinary repair or modification of existing lighting, guardrails, modern fencing, traffic and pedestrian signals, curbs and gutters, sidewalks and ramps, variable message signs or other similar structures; 4. (This number is no longer used per replacement by Stipulation I.D. defining undertakings with no potential to cause effects, but retained here as reference for actions reviewed under prior versions of the PA.) 5. overlay, milling, grooving, repairing, striping, or resurfacing of existing ramp, roadway, parking lot, or similar surfaces where there will be no expansion of wearing surface; or addition of rumble strips, pavement markings (normal and raised), bus pads, bumper stops, bike racks, and snow and ice detectors to the same; or maintenance of existing trail surfaces; 6. routine bridge and structure maintenance and repair actions, including and limited to: cleaning of the bridge; in-kind painting of bridge; in-kind replacement of bridge decking and expansion joints and compression seals; deck overlay with the same or similar materials; overlay of existing approach roads for all bridges, where there will be no expansion of the wearing surface; cleaning scuppers or other drainage conveyances; modifications of expansion joints; deck patching with in-kind material; repair of guardrails which are already attached to parapets; in-kind replacement or repair of existing modern fencing; in-kind replacement or repair of steel beam plates and/or bridge bearings; placement of grout bags; repair of cracks in superstructure and substructure with mortar; in-kind replacement of rip rap, steel caps, protective jackets, and dolphins; and other similar routine actions; 7. repairs to an existing concrete box culvert; or concrete rigid frame small structure (less than 20 feet), or pipe, so long as the remedial work is aesthetically and functionally in-kind and in the same footprint (no new elements or expansion); minor repairs to cross-road pipes, including the installation of replacement liners; in-kind replacement of roadside or driveway pipes, including access to these facilities, temporary dewatering, in-kind replacement of rip-rap, and associated ditch repair, provided the work does not include expansion or extension of these facilities. This includes use of temporary crossing over channels or streams using spanning structures; 8. retrofitting, redesign, routine cleaning, maintenance and repair of existing ditches, drainage, stormwater management, and water quality facilities and devices, installation of traversable Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 20 of 24 grates, and conversion of drop inlets to traversable designs. This does not include projects that seek to expand or extend such facilities. Activities may include stream diversion, temporary access, in-kind replacement of rip-rap, placement of construction matting, temporary crossing over channels or streams using spanning structures and other similar activities; 9. removal of salt, contaminated soil, and materials from median and shoulder; 10. routine building maintenance and infrastructure upgrades and maintenance of MDOT SHA owned facilities where no new ground disturbance is involved. Such projects activities may include, but are not limited to: mechanical, electrical and plumbing system upgrades including HVAC systems, fire protection/suppression systems, surveillance systems and in-kind septic systems; building upgrades including replacement of interior/exterior doors, replacement of garage doors, replacement of windows, replacement of gutters and roof alterations/replacement; replacement of restroom and kitchen fixtures; cleaning and painting including the debris removal and the removal of graffiti; and the replacement of hydraulic lifts (may include removal of contaminated soil under the lift) and other indoor industrial machinery; and 11. debris removal provided the efforts do not involve stabilization, excavation, or alterations to structures. Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 21 of 24 APPENDIX 2 APPENDIX 2: Minor Projects. Qualified MDOT SHA cultural resources professionals will determine whether a particular project meets the following exemption categories: 1. minor bridge and small structure rehabilitation, deck replacement, bridge rails, or substructure alterations where the work is confined to the bridge itself, and a) bridges are no older than 50 years at the date of MDOT SHA’s project review, or b) the bridge has been determined ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places; 2. construction of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, trails, paths and facilities and amenities; 3. landscaping not specified in Appendix 1; 4. water quality activities including but not limited to: stream stabilization and restoration (including removal of natural waterway obstructing debris or sediment), and installation of stormwater management facilities, bioretention facilities, infiltration trenches, and fish weirs; 5. construction of or improvements to rest areas, truck weigh stations, park and ride lots, composting facilities, and other highway related maintenance, storage, and office facilities; or park/recreational facility-related amenities, 6. modernization of an existing highway by widening less than a travel lane or adding lanes, provided such widening does not extend beyond the limits of existing improved right-of-way; 7. correcting substandard roadway geometrics and intersections (i.e., spot improvements and roundabouts), provided such corrections do not extend beyond the limits of existing improved right-of-way; 8. minor safety related drainage improvements, including but not limited to: installation, replacement or removal of culverts and headwalls; installation, replacement and extensions of pipes; addition of pipe end sections; and installation, replacement, or repairs of storm drains and inlets; 9. fencing installation and repair, including safety fencing on bridges; 10. repair or construction of erosion control and protection measures including but not limited to: slope stabilization, slide repair, rip rap, or retaining walls; 11. noise barrier installation; 12. installation of new lighting, traffic barriers, guardrails, traffic signals, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, hazard identification beacons, and variable message signs; 13. the disposal of excess properties that do not contain structures more than 50 years of age, or have previously been determined not eligible, are not within an historic district, and have no previously determined NRHP eligible archaeological resources and/or limited potential to contain NRHP eligible archaeological resources; Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 22 of 24 14. installation, repair, or replacement of underground cable not specified in Appendix 1; 15. reforestation activities; 16. wetland mitigation and/or enhancement activities; 17. invasive preliminary engineering activities: a) soil borings/investigations b) utility test pitting/identification c) geotechnical investigations d) field surveys for preliminary engineering and right of way plat development Should these preliminary engineering activities be linked with or result in a subsequent defined undertaking requiring additional consultation, MDOT SHA will include documentation of the preliminary review in any subsequent consultation. 18. sidewalk retrofit activities when the following conditions are met: a) project area does not contain NRHP listed or eligible structures, districts, or archaeological resources and has limited potential to contain NRHP eligible archaeological resources; and b) activities will not impact existing historic streetscape materials and/or features (such as brick walkways, stone curbs, markers, mounting blocks, etc.). Work items may include placement of concrete sidewalks and/or replacement of existing concrete sidewalks; curb ramp placement and replacement; concrete curb and gutter placement and replacement; concrete and asphalt entrances and/or driveways; and upgrading existing pedestrian signals to accessible pedestrian signals. Existing sidewalks may be widened from three feet to five feet to meet ADA requirements. 19. full-delivery projects, defined as those projects where MDOT SHA or MDTA expends federal or state funds to purchase completed projects or implement completely designed projects from a third party proponent; provided effects to historic properties have already undergone review with MD SHPO under Section 106 of the NHPA or the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985 as amended, State Finance and Procurement Article §§5A- 325 and 5A-326 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, and no changes potentially affecting historic properties have been made to the full-delivery project subsequent to previous review. Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 23 of 24 APPENDIX 3 Inadvertent Discovery Plan A. Unanticipated Impacts to Standing Structure Historic Properties: if the undertaking causes unanticipated impacts to any National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligible, listed, or contributing buildings, sites, structures, or objects of the built environment, the contractor must notify the engineer and immediately cease any activity causing ongoing damage until consultation occurs. The MDOT SHA, and MDTA where applicable, shall, in consultation with the MD SHPO, determine if adverse effects have occurred to the property/properties and develop a plan for the protection of the historic property, and minimization or mitigation of impacts. If mitigation is identified, FHWA, MDOT SHA, MD SHPO, and other signatories as necessary will execute a Memorandum of Agreement or amend an existing Memorandum of Agreement for the project to record the identified mitigation. MDOT SHA may hold its contractor liable for any or all costs resulting from this process following appropriate processes identified in its contract instruments. B. Unanticipated Damage to Known Archaeological Resources: if unauthorized excavation occurs outside the approved limits of disturbance or other approved boundaries designed to protect archaeological resources and thereby causes impacts to known, NRHP-eligible archaeological resources, MDOT SHA and/or MDTA will require its contractor to cease any activity causing ongoing damage until consultation occurs. MDOT SHA and/or MDTA shall conduct a damage assessment consistent with the model used for such assessments under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (https://www.nps.gov/archeology/pubs/techbr/tchBrf20.pdf). MDOT SHA will use the results of the assessment in consultation with the MD SHPO to determine if the resource has been adversely affected and determine appropriate mitigation. If the resource is of known or suspected Native American affiliation, MDOT SHA and/or FHWA shall consult with federally recognized Indian Tribes as appropriate. If mitigation is identified, FHWA, MDOT SHA, MD SHPO, and other signatories as necessary will execute a Memorandum of Agreement or amend an existing Memorandum of Agreement for the project to record the identified mitigation. MDOT SHA and/or MDTA may hold its contractor liable for any or all costs resulting from this process following appropriate processes identified in its contract instruments. C. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains: Should any burials, interments, or human remains (hereafter, “remains”) be encountered during construction, all applicable construction work in the vicinity of the remains will be immediately stopped to prevent damage to the remains, or to any additional remains that might be present in the vicinity. A minimum 100-foot buffer around identified remains should be established free of disturbance, to be adjusted as appropriate for the site conditions. Construction may occur outside the buffer unless evidence of additional remains is found. If remains are suspected to be human but not confirmed, MDOT SHA will ensure that such confirmation is made by a qualified professional. Human remains will at all times be treated respectfully and access and visibility limited to the site of discovery to authorized personnel only. Pursuant to State of Maryland Criminal Code § 10-402, the State’s Attorney must authorize movement or removal of any remains until determined to be archaeological. If the remains are determined to be archaeological, MDOT SHA and MD SHPO will consult to determine treatment of the remains and any other necessary treatment such as work needed to define extent of remains in the most expeditious manner feasible. If the remains are determined archaeological and suspected to be of Native American origin, MDOT SHA, in coordination with FHWA, shall provide notification to tribal governments in accordance with any expressed tribal consultation preferences within 24 hours or as soon as practicable. MDOT Amended Programmatic Agreement – FINAL June 2021 Implementing Section 106 for Undertakings in Maryland Page 24 of 24 SHA and/or FHWA will consult with affected federally recognized Indian Tribes, the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs and relevant Maryland Indian groups as appropriate regarding treatment of the remains. MDOT SHA and/or MDTA will accommodate tribal cultural preferences to the extent practicable during such an event. In consultation with the MD SHPO, Federally Recognized Indian Tribes, and FHWA as appropriate, the MDOT SHA shall develop a plan for the treatment or disposition of the remains. The MDOT SHA and/or MDTA shall implement the provisions of the agreed Treatment Plan. Should the remains be associated with, or constitute an intact archaeological resource, provision D below is also applicable. D. Unanticipated Discovery of Archaeological Resources: If previously unidentified archaeological features, artifacts, or other materials (hereafter, “resource”) are discovered during construction, all ground-disturbing work in the vicinity of the resource shall be temporarily suspended or modified to prevent further damage to the resource, and provide a reasonable buffer for extent of the resource that may not be exposed. The MDOT SHA archaeologist shall perform a preliminary inspection to identify the resource and evaluate its NRHP eligibility. Following this inspection, construction may resume in the vicinity of but outside the boundary of the archaeological resource as defined by the MDOT SHA archaeologist. If the resource is potentially eligible for the NRHP, MDOT SHA will consult with MD SHPO on an eligibility determination and, if determined eligible for the NRHP, every effort shall be made to minimize impacts through redesign or modification of construction methods. If the resource is of known or suspected Native American affiliation, MDOT SHA and/or FHWA shall consult with federally recognized Indian Tribes as appropriate. In consultation with the MD SHPO, the MDOT SHA archaeologist shall develop a plan for the treatment of any resource determined eligible. MDOT SHA shall describe actions proposed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects, and request the MD SHPO and tribal comments as appropriate within two (2) working days. MDOT SHA, and/or MDTA as appropriate, shall then implement the provisions of the agreed-upon plan. Attachment 1: MDOT SHA Local Programs Cultural Resources and Section 106 Flowchart MDOT SHA Approves Evaluation/Report? All signatories sign the Agreement Document MHT Concurs with Effect? No Properties Affected or No Adverse Effect? Adverse Effect requires Agreement Document Section 106 Process is Complete NO YES YES NO LA Revises Report and MDOT SHA continues consultation MDOT SHA works with LA and MHT to develop Agreement Document *For smaller projects, APE and Cultural Resources Evaluation may be combined where appropriate. Local Agency (LA) sends project info to MDOT SHA MDOT SHA defines APE and sends to MHT and Consulting Parties* APE LA completes Cultural Resources Survey/Evaluation and submits report to MDOT SHA MDOT SHA Submits to MHT and Consulting Parties NO NO NO YES YES MDOT SHA makes Effect Determination APPENDIX 1/APPENDIX 2 Include in Annual Report for Local Programs to MHT Notification of Project Received Exempt Project? YES MDOT SHA Cultural Resources Professional Reviews Project ATTACHMENT 2 Inadvertent Discovery Plan For the (Local Agency Name) (Project Name) The (Local Agency) plans to construct the (Project) project, located in (County), Maryland. The purpose of this project is to (Purpose). Approval and funding of this project is conditioned on review of effects to historic properties under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and/or the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985 (MHT Act). As a condition of this approval, in the event of inadvertent discovery of previously unknown and potentially significant cultural resources, or unforeseen effects to historic properties, the following procedure must be implemented. --Failure to follow the Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) risks violation of state and federal law and loss of project funding-- If an inadvertent discovery is determined by the MDOT SHA to require further evaluation and consultation, MDOT SHA and FHWA will assume responsibility to consult to resolve the discovery and determine whether construction activities will have adverse effects on the resource, in accordance with the terms outlined in the Amended Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration, the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration, Maryland Transportation Authority, the Maryland State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for Federal Highway Administration Undertakings in Maryland (PA). Further detail for all inadvertent discoveries is included in Appendix 3 of the PA, and can be found at this link: https://www.roads.maryland.gov/mdotsha/pages/Index.aspx?PageId=729. A. Recognizing Cultural Resources: A cultural resource discovery could involve precontact (Native American) or historic period discoveries. These can include: • Discovery of buried bone, concentrations of oyster shells, arrowheads, old bottles, or dark brown soil containing this type of material. • Discovery of stone or brick walls, building foundations, cellars, cisterns, privies, wells, etc. • Accidental damage to a known archaeological site (if indicated on plans as a restricted area) or to a historic building or structure. B. On-Site Responsibilities: STEP 1: STOP WORK. If at any point in the project a (Local Agency) employee, contractor, or subcontractor believes that they have uncovered any human skeletal remains, potential archaeological materials, or identifies damage to a standing structure, building, or known archaeological resource, heavy equipment operation is required to immediately STOP in the discovery area and a surrounding buffer (minimum 100 feet) must be established to protect the find. Any reasonable suspicion that a discovery may be archaeological requires implementation of this procedure. No media, agency (other than MDOT SHA), or other external contacts should be made until an archaeologist evaluates the discovery and provides additional direction. STEP 2: NOTIFY ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITOR. If an archaeological monitor is present at the project, notify them immediately. If there is a monitoring plan in place, the monitor will follow its provisions. STEP 3. NOTIFY PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MDOT SHA. Contact the (Local Agency) Project Manager and the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead. Contact information is provided at the end of this document. MDOT SHA will follow procedures identified in its statewide Programmatic Agreement or a project-specific agreement if applicable. MDOT SHA will work with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Maryland Historical Trust, and other parties as required. The MDOT SHA Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead or other designate will serve as liaison to keep the (Local Agency) informed of the process and resolution. C. (Local Agency) Project Manager’s Responsibilities: • Protect the Discovery. The Project Manager is responsible for taking appropriate measures to protect and secure the discovery site. All work at the location of the discovery must immediately stop, including a 100 foot buffer around the location of the discovery that allows the location to be secure, protected, and intact. Vehicles, equipment, and unauthorized personnel may not traverse the discovery site. Work in the immediate area of the discovery will not resume until treatment of Attachment 2: Inadvertent Discovery Plan Template for Local Public Agencies the discovery has been completed as set forth in this document. If additional discoveries are made outside the initial buffer zone, this procedure applies to each new discovery location. • Known Resources. If the inadvertent discovery involves damage to a known resource (structure, building or archaeological site), the Project Manager must immediately stop any activity causing damage and take any appropriate immediate steps to stabilize or minimize further damage. • Direct Construction Elsewhere On-site. The project manager may direct construction activities to other areas outside the buffer or affected resource, so that work may continue. • Contact MDOT SHA Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead. If the MDOT SHA Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead has not yet been contacted, the Project Manager must do so. D. MDOT SHA Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead Responsibilities: • Verify the Discovery. The Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead will ensure that a qualified archaeologist is available immediately to provide guidance and ensure any work delays are minimized. The qualified archaeologist will identify and evaluate the discovery. If the MDOT SHA staff or designated qualified personnel determines the discovery requires no further evaluation or consultation, construction may immediately proceed. • Consultation. If the MDOT SHA determines further consultation is required, the Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead will continue with the process of notification and resolution per MDOT SHA’s PA requirements and continue to serve as liaison with the (Local Agency). • Human Remains. If the discovery appears to be human remains or funerary objects, the Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead will ensure that a qualified individual examines the discovery to confirm if remains are human and assist with notifications required by law. • Communication. MDOT SHA will conduct all required notifications and consultation pursuant to state and federal law, including tribal notifications. (Local Agency) may follow any county or local requirements that are not obligations of MDOT SHA. The Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead will keep the (Local Agency) informed of next steps during this process. E. Proceeding with Construction Project construction outside the discovery site, affected resource and/or the buffer zone(s) may continue while inadvertent discoveries are being addressed. Construction at the discovery site or affected resource may continue after the inadvertent discovery and effects have been resolved in accordance with the terms of the PA, and MDOT SHA and FHWA have determined that compliance with state and federal laws is complete. MDOT SHA will provide written notice of this compliance to the (Local Agency). Attachment 2: Inadvertent Discovery Plan Template for Local Public Agencies (Local Agency) Contact Information (Local Agency) Project Manager (Name) (Phone Number); (Email) Alternate Contact: (Title) (Name) (Phone Number); (Email) MDOT SHA Contact Information Call down list until connecting directly with MDOT SHA personnel to complete notification requirements. Email should only be used as a secondary means of notification. Cultural Resources Local Programs Lead Office (Phone Number); Cell (Phone Number) (Email) Cultural Resources Team Leader Office (Phone Number); Cell (Phone Number) (Email) Assistant Division Chief and Chief Archaeologist Office (Phone Number); Cell (Phone Number); (Email) From:Nell Ziehl -MDP- To:Nell Ziehl -MDP- Subject:bills of possible interest in the General Assembly Date:Friday, February 13, 2026 5:57:35 PM WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. CLGs, We wanted to make you aware of some legislation moving through the General Assembly which may impact localplanning and cultural resource protection. We will try to keep you posted as these bills progress but encourage youto track those of interest. Note: the "Maryland Register of Historic Properties" is a statutory term that means "properties listed in theNational Register of Historic Places or determined eligible for listing by the MHT Director." At this time there isno official list or map of all properties included in the "Maryland Register." Feel free to message me if you have questions. Best,Nell HB778https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2026RS/bills/hb/hb0778F.pdf This bill requires local governments to create opportunities for housing and to evaluate the suitability of vacant,unused, or underutilized commercial or industrial land for housing. The bill prohibits local governments fromimposing unreasonable limitations affecting the creation of middle housing (defined in the bill) but stipulates thatthis does not apply to a restriction on use on historic property that is listed in or determined eligible for inclusion inthe "Maryland Register of Historic Properties." HB1236https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2026RS/bills/hb/hb1236F.pdf This bill permits a prohibition on accessory dwelling units on historic property listed in or determined eligible forthe "Maryland Register" or on property located within a locally designated historic district. SB829/HB1137https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2026RS/bills/sb/sb0829F.pdf These bills are intended to encourage the creation of multi-family and mixed use developments by prohibiting localgovernments from placing restrictions on this type of use. However, the bill permits restrictions on this type of useon historic property that is listed in or determined eligible for the "Maryland Register." SB836https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2026RS/bills/sb/sb0836F.pdf Breaks Carroll County in various zoning districts with their own planning commissions. SB0952https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2026RS/bills/sb/sb0952f.pdf This bill would create a Waldorf Urban Redevelopment Corridor Authority in Charles County and exempt itsactions from various reviews, including under the Maryland Historical Trust Act.-- Nell Ziehl Chief, Office of Planning, Education and Outreach Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Department of Planning (410) 697-9592 she, her, hers mht.maryland.gov Planning.Maryland.gov MD TWO FIFTY: Maryland's Story is America's Story Lloyd Yavener, Chair Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1 DATE: March 17, 2026 TO: Board of Zoning Appeals c/o Katie Rathvon 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 FROM: Meghan Jenkins, HDC Staff SUBJ: AP2026-009, 17423 Da Wrong Lane The subject property does contain resources identified in the Washington County Historic Sites Survey/Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties #WA-I-424, Kathyrn Kershner House. The main house is a 2-story brick structure on fieldstone foundation dated to 1893. The site survey includes mention of the barn to the east of the main house and the smokehouse to the west of the main house. The continued use of the property as a residence with supporting structures is consistent with its use historically. The requested change in setbacks will ensure the existing resources are minimally impacted by having the garage subordinate to the main house. The applicant should note that the Historic District Commission would strongly recommend reviewing the Design Guidelines for Historic Structures for Washington County prior to exterior work or property grading to ensure any work will not negatively impact the resources. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. Sincerely, Meghan Jenkins Att: 1, WA-I-424 documentation WA-I-424 Kathryn Kershner House Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 03-12-2004 ~roperty Name: MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM Kathryn Kershner House Inventory Number: WA-I-424 Address: Downsville Pike (east side, north of St. James College) Historic district: yes X no City: Hagerstown vicinity Zip Code: County: ' v -, ~ USGS Quadrangle(s): Williamsport. Property Owner: Tax Account ID Number: Tax Map Parcel Number(s): Tax Map Number: Project: Agency: Agency Prepared By: Richard Willson/HUD/CD Preparer's Name: Date Prepared: 8/14/1981 Documentation is presented in: MHT Files WA-I-424 Preparer's Eligibility Recommendation: x Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B c D Considerations: A B c D E F G Complete if the property is a contributing or non-contributing resource to a NR district/property: Name of the District/Property: Inventory Number: Eligible: yes Listed: yes ~ite visit by MHT Staff yes X no Name: Date: Description of Property and Justification: (Please attach map and photo) This turn of the century complex provides a little-altered picture of farm construction of the period. The house, a brick structure dated 1893, displays typical late 19th century and early 20th century characteristics popular to the Cumberland Valley. The house is a two-story, three-bay brick structure with a small frame addition. A one-story, three sided projecting bay also of brick protrudes from the south end wall. The house rest on fieldstone foundations. The bricks forming its walls are laid in common bond at all elevations with five courses of headers between stretcher rows. Segmental arches of upright bricks are present above windows and doors. All windows have two over two pane double hung sashes. A porch with a low hipped roof supported by turned posts extends along the front elevation. Brick chimneys are located inside each gable end. Immediately west of the house is a brick smoke house. The barn, a large frame structure with a crude wooden cupola, stands southwest of the house. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended X Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B c D Considerations: A B c D E F MHT Comments: The Kathryn Kershner House was Federally nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Susan Minogue ... , ····~······. Reviewer, National Register Program Date Wednesday, August 19, 1981 -.~~•V"NAv,.,_o_.~. ""~'~· • '" 0 '> Date G ABSTRACT WA-I-424 1893 Late 19th Century Brick House Hagerstown Vicinity private This turn of the century complex provides a little-altered picture of farm construction of the period. The house, a brick structure dated 1893, displays typical late 19th and early 20th century characteristics popular in the Cumberland Vlllley. I MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST WA-I-424 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY DNAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Kershner, Kathryn House IJLOCATION STREET & NUMBER East of Downsville Pike, North of St. James College CITY.l'OWN .!... VICINITY OF Hagerstown CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 6 STATE Maryland DcLAss1F1CA TION CATEGORY X-DISTRICT _BUILDING(Sl _STRUCTURE _SITE _OBJECT OWNERSHIP rPUBLIC _PRIVATE _BOTH PUBLIC ACQUISITION _JN PROCESS _BEING CONSIDERED DOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Katherine L. Kershner STREET & NUMBEl;lJ 142_A Rou te1F , Box X STATUS _OCCUPIED _UNOCCUPIED _WORK IN PROGRESS ACCESSIBLE _YES: RESTRICTED X-YES UNRESTRICTED _NO CITY. TOWN Hagerstown, _ VICINITY OF llLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC Washington County Court House STREET & NUMBER West Washington Street CITY. TOWN Hagerstown, 0REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS COUNTY Washington x PRESENT USE _AGRICULTURE _MUSC:UM _COMMERCIAL _PA~K _EDUCATIONAL x_PRIVATE RESIDENCE _ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC _INDUSTRIAL _MILITARY _TRANSPORTATION _OTHER Telephone #: 582-2362 Liber #: 690 Folio #: 681 STATE Maryland 21740 TITLE Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant -Washington County Historical Sites Survey DATE December 1977 DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN Planning Department Hagerstown _FEDERAL -5TATE X_COUNTY -lOCAL .STATi; Maryland B DESCRIPTION _EXCELLENT X....GOOD _ FAIR CONDITION _DETERIORATED _RUINS _UNEXPOSED CHECK ONE _UNALTERED ~LTERED 50% CHECK ONE X ORIGINAL SITE -MOVED DATE ___ _ DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE --Thiis farm group is located at the end of a long private lane which leads in an easterly direc- -__ tion from Maryland Route 632, the Downsville Pike, in Washington County. The buildings are ;-_<:_,:~;,:~,,,~situated on a relatively level area of farmland north of St. James and face south. ·-~·~~~~~ ' -_, The1 house -is a two story, three bay brick structure with a small fram addition. A one story, three sided projecting bay also of brick protrudes from the south end wall. Dated 1893, the house rests on fieldstone foundations. The bricks forming its walls are laid in common bond at all elevations with five courses of headers between stretcher rows. Segmental arches of upright bricks are present above windows and doors. All windows have two over two pane doubl&hung sashes. Hinge pins for shutters remain in the frames. Wooden rounded segments between the upper sashes and the brick arches have applied wooden trim. Doors are located in the first and second bay from the south end of the front elevation. Both are treated similarly with framing and trim matching that of the windows. The center door has a three light transom while the other has a single pane transom. Both doors have two lower panels below single large panes of glass. A porch with a low hipped roof supported by turned posts extends along the froreelevation. The roof is sheathed with corrugated sheet metal and terminates several inches beyond the c11d walls. Brick chimneys are located inside each gable end. Found on the house was the date 1893. The name Slifer and date 1915 was also found. Immediately west of the house is a brick smoke house. a crude wooden cupola, stands southwest of the house. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY The barn, a large frame sturcture with The property contains 59.84 acres. -. __ -,_ II SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC _1400-1499 _1500-1599 _1600-1699 -.J 700-1799 __:'! 800-1 899 _1900- -ARCHEOLOGY-PREHISTORIC _COMMUNITY PLANNING -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC _CONSERVATION bGRICULTUR!; _ECONOMICS XARCHITECTURE _EDUCATION -ART _ENGINEERING _COMMERCE _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _COMMUNICATIONS _INDUSTRY _INVENTION _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _LAW _LITERATURE _MILITARY _MUSIC _PHILOSOPHY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE wA-1-1/dlf _RELIGION _SCIENCE _SCULPTURE _SOCIAUHUMANITARIAN -THEATER _TRANSPORTATION _OTHER !SPECIFY) This turn of the century complex provides a little-altered picture of farm construction of the period. The house, a brick structure dated 1893, displays typical late 19th and early 20th century characteristics popular in the Cumberland Valley. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY . •,I -, ~MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES NONE KNOWN CONTINUE ON SEFARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY U!JGEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 59. 84 acres VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION See attached map showing present boundary of Kershner property outlined in Red as derived from property assessment maps superimposed on the Williamsport quadrangle map. LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY mFORM PREPARED BY NAME/ TITLE Richard Willson, Rehab Specialist ORGANIZATION DATE Washington County Commissioners, Housing & Community Development 7/23/81 STREET & NUMBER 33 W. Washington, Rm. 212 CITY OR TOWN Hagerstown, MD 21740 TELEPHONE STATE The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, · 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 ( 301) 267-1438 D5. l 'IQ8 Copy II MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST WA-I-424 District 2 Map 57 Parcel 2 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY MAGI I 2206475635 UNAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Late 19th Century Brick House fJLOCATION STREET & NUMBER East of Downsville Pike, North of St. .James College CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ...x. VICINITY OF Hagerstown 6 STATE M!ryland IJCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS _DISTRICT _PUBLIC :lLocCUPIED ,,--:x_BUILDINGIS) K_PRIVATE _UNOCCUPIED _STRUCTURE _BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _OBJECT _IN PROCESS _YES: RESTRICTED _BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED JlNO DOWNER OF PROPER1'Y NAME Marvin R. Kershner STREET & NUMBER Route I 3, Box 142-A CITY. TOWN Hagerstown -VICINITY OF llLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. Washington County Court House STREET & NUMBER 'West 'Washington Street CITY. TOWN Hagerstown II REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE COUNTY 'Washington PRESENT USE X.AGRICULTURE _MUSEUM _COMMERCIAL _PA~K _EDUCATIONAL X_PRIVATE RESIDENCE _ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC _INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION _MILITARY _OTHER Telephone #: STATE ' Zl.p code Maryland 21740 Liber #: 630 Folio #: 400 STATE M&ryland 21740 _FEDERAL -STATE -COUNTY -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY.TOWN STATE ----·------- ' II DESCRIPTION _EXCELLENT JLGooD _FAIR CONDITION _DETERIORATED _ RUINS _UNEXPOSED CHECK ONE _UNALTERED LLTERED < 50'% CHECK ONE X ORIGINAL SITE -MOVED DATE. __ _ DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This farm group is located at the end of a long private lane which leads in an easterly direc- tion from Maryland Route 632, the Downsville Pike, in Washington County. 'l'he buildings are situated on a relatively level area of farmland north of St. James and face south. The house is a two story, three bay brick structure with a small frame addition. A one story, three sided projecting bay also of brick protrudes from the south end wall. Dated 1893, the house rests on fieldstone foundations. 'l'he bricks forming the walls are laid in conmon bond at all elevations with five courses of headers between stretcher rows. Segmental arches of upright bricks are present above windows and doors. All windows have two over two pane double htmg sashes. Hinge pins for shutters remain in the frames. Wooden rounded segments between the upper sashes and the brick arches have applied wooden trim. Doors are located in the first and second bay from the south end of the front elevation. Both are treated similarly with framing and trim matching that of the windows. The center door has a three light transom while the other has a single pane transom. Both doors have two lower panels below single large panes of glass. A porch with a low hippped 'Of supported by turned posts extends along the front elevation. nre roof is sheathed with corrugated sheet metal and terminates several inches beyond the end walls. Brick chimneys are located inside each gable end. Found on the house was the date 1893. The name Slifer and the date 1915 was also fotmd. lmnediately weat of the house is a brick smoke house. a crude wooden cupola, stands southwest of the house. The barn, a large frame structure with 'l'he property contains 59.84 acres. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY _g SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC _1400-1499 _1500-1599 _1600-1699 _1700-1799 ~1800-1899 _1900- -ARCHEOLOGY-PREHISTORIC _COMMUNITY PLANNING _CONSERVATION _ECONOMICS _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _LAW -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC ~GRICULTURI; ~RCHITECTURE -ART _COMMERCE _COMMUNICATIONS SPECIFIC DATES 1893 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE _EDUCATION _ENGINEERING _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _INDUSTRY _INVENTION _LITERATURE _MILITARY _MUSIC _PHILOSOPHY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT BUILDER/ARCHITECT _RELIGION _SCIENCE _SCULPTURE _SOCIAUHUMANITARIAN _THEATER _TRANSPORTATION _OTHER !SPECIFY) 'Ibis turn of the century complex provides a little-altered picture of a farm construction of the period. 'lbe house, a brick structure dated 1893, displays typical late 19th and early 20th century characteristics popular in the Cumberland Valley. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY l]MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SE~~TE SHEET IF NECESSARY II!JGEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 59 .84 acres VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY mFORM PREPARED BY NAME I TITLE Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant ORGANIZATION Washington County Historical Sites Survey STREET & NUMBER County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street CITY OR TOWN Hagerstown DATE December 1977 TELEPHONE 791-3065 STATE Maryland 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS· t IOI • ' &3? / \ ·1 -- J" ··- _, -1-017 _,..,..,/" ,...,.0 -WA-1-391 G1 -~~ LJ "" .. ·., ~ .,/ "· ~.;:.:.--:; .· / . '0 WA-1-402 ' ""' ., WA-11-392 WILLIAMSPORT QUADRANGLE MARYLAND-WEST VIRGIN!/·- 7. 5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRA1 ,C:.) SE,4 WILUAMSPORT 15' QUADRANGLE ·-'. 410 000 FEET : (W.VA.) 35' "/ I ! Late 19th Century Brick House E. of Downsville Pk. NQ of St. Hagerstown Vicinity James PAUlA STONER DICKEY CONSULPNT. WASHINGTON CO HISTORICAL St rES SURVEY I Late 19th Century Brick House E. of Downsville Pk. N. of St. Jama HagerstO'Wll Vicinity PAULA STONER DICKEY CONSULTANT, 1'11'.'lHI' ~ ~1 ' H•~rn 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trileaf.com October 13, 2025 Washington County Historic District Commission 747 Northern Ave Hagerstown, MD 21742 Phone: 240-313-2430 Email: askplanning@washco-md.net RE: Milestone Towers – Bakersville / Trileaf Project # 775393 7116 Houser Road, Sharpsburg, MD 21782 Washington County, Williamsport Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 30’ 32.47” N, Longitude: 77° 46’ 18.14” W To whom it may concern: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 146-foot monopole communications tower with an overall height of 147 feet, including attachments. Associated equipment will be located within a 77-foot by 30-foot (2,310 square feet) fenced compound. The project includes a 10-foot wide gravel access drive, parking and turn around extending west away from the compound approximately 157 feet to Houser Road. The proposed location is vegetated land. The antennas will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower’s potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the NEPA review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 or email m.grasham@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, McKayla Ordak Senior Project Scientist Site Location & Surrounding Properties Site Location Aerial Photographs (2025) Milestone Towers – Bakersville 7116 Houser Road Sharpsburg, MD 21782 Easement Williamsport Quadrangle, Maryland (2023) Contour Interval = 20 Feet Scale 1 Inch = ~1,500 Feet Latitude: 39° 30’ 32.47” N, Longitude: 77° 46’ 18.14” W  North Site Vicinity Map Milestone Towers – Bakersville 7116 Houser Road Sharpsburg, MD 21782 Site Location SITE T-1 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 SITE 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 LEGEND LINE TYPES Z-1 SITE INFORMATION & NOTES CLOSEST HOUSE SIDE YARD (SOUTH) SIDE YARD (NORTH) REAR YARD (EAST) MONOPOLE SETBACKS PROPOSEDREQUIRED 800.6' 1,534.6' 881.5' 458.4' (WEST) FRONT YARD R.O.W. (WEST)145.0'145.0' CLOSEST HOUSE COMPOUND SETBACKS PROPOSEDREQUIRED 793.1' 1,510.2' 874.0' 398.6' WEST 50.0'73.9' 50.0' 50.0' 50.0' 50.0' SIDE YARD (SOUTH) SIDE YARD (NORTH) REAR YARD (EAST) FRONT YARD R.O.W. (WEST) 1 2 3 4 5678 9 145.0' 145.0' 145.0' 290.0' Z-2 SUBJECT PARCEL 1 ADJOINERS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 Z-3 Z-4 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 Z-5 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 Z-6 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 PROPOSED NEW GENERATORCONCRETE PAD WHITE BACKGROUND W/BLACK LETTERING 2 BLUE BACKGROUND W/BLACK LETTERING 0 0 DANGER SITE X X X X X X X X DIESEL FUEL NO SMOKING NO OPEN FLAMES WHITE BACKGROUND W/BLACK LETTERING RED BACKGROUND W/BLACK LETTERING YELLOW BACKGROUNDW/ BLACK LETTERING IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: XXX (NON-SPILL RELATED) 2" HIGH BLACK LETTERS ONWHITE BACKGROUND(STICKERS) DIESEL FUEL 240 GALLONS GREEN W/ WHITE LETTERING EMERGENCY XXX CALL 24-HOUR HOTLINE SPILL RESPONSE AND RECOVERY WHITE BACKGROUND W/BLACK LETTERING TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM Z-7 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 SUITE 430 From:Jenkins, Meghan To:"m.grasham@trileaf.com" Subject:RE: Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) Date:Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:17:00 PM Attachments:image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image007.png image008.png Hello McKayla, The Historic District Commission does wish to participate in this process. Staff has noted that this proposed tower is outside of our local Antietam zoning overlay area however it is within 2 miles of the Antietam National Battlefield property, and it is important to ensure that its visibility from the battlefield is minimal to none. Please consider both the battlefields property ownership extent as well as the observation tower on the battlefield for whether this tower (77°44'10"W 39°28'10"N ) will be visible from either. The C&O Canal is also nearby and should be evaluated for viewshed impacts. The below is a list of existing NR properties we are aware of. We area also aware of several properties on the MIHP within a visible distance of this site and would encourage their inclusion in any analysis. WA-II-0502 Y 18 BUILDING HOGMIRE-BERRYMAN FARM HOGMIRE-BERRYMAN FARM WA-II-0446 Y 18 BUILDING WILLIAM HAGERMAN FARMSTEAD WILLIAM HAGERMAN FARMSTEAD WA-II-0130 Y 19 BUILDING MARSH MILL SPEILMAN MILL COMPLEX WA-II-0350 Y 19 BUILDING <Null> MUMMA FARM Thank you. Meghan Meghan Jenkins, GISP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator | Historic District Commission (HDC) 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 P: (240) 313-2439 | F: (240) 313-2431 www.washco-md.net (Pronouns: she/her/hers) Get Connected and See Updates NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are You don't often get email from m.grasham@trileaf.com. Learn why this is important not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. Book time to meet with me From: Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:37 AM To: Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net> Subject: FW: Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) Meghan Jenkins, GISP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator | Historic District Commission (HDC) 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 P: (240) 313-2439 | F: (240) 313-2431 www.washco-md.net (Pronouns: she/her/hers) Get Connected and See Updates NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. Book time to meet with me From: McKayla Grasham <m.grasham@trileaf.com> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 2:16 PM To: Planning Email <askplanning@washco-md.net> Subject: Request for Comment- Telecommunications Project- Sharpsburg, MD (Trileaf#775393) WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. Hello, Please see the attached documents pertaining to the proposed telecommunications project in Sharpsburg, MD. As part of our property consultation, we invite a local government association to comment, if desired, on the potential effects the project may have on historic properties. Let me know if you have any questions. McKayla Ordak Assistant Project Manager 303 International Circle, Suite 150 Hunt Valley, MD 21030 Office: (410) 853-7128, ext. 909 Mobile: (410) 303-4058 001_Milestone_Bakersville 002_Milestone_Bakersville 003_Milestone_Bakersville 004_Milestone_Bakersville 005_Milestone_Bakersville 006_Milestone_Bakersville 007_Milestone_Bakersville 008_Milestone_Bakersville 009_Milestone_Bakersville 010_Milestone_Bakersville 011_Milestone_Bakersville Date:January 29, 2026 To:Alexis Price DHS Project Name:ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown County:Washington County Agency:Department of Homeland Security Second Agency: Not noted MHT Log #:202600142 MHT Response: Thank you for providing the Maryland Historical Trust the opportunity to comment on the abovereferenced undertaking using the MHT e106 system. The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the submitted project for its effects on historic and archeological resources, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and/or the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985. We offer the following comments and/or concurrence with the agency’s findings: The undertaking will have no effect on historic properties. Additional consultation with our office may be required if there are any significant changes in project scope or location. Thank you for your cooperation in this review process. Since the MHT response is now complete, this response will appear in the Completed section of your project dashboard. No hard copy of this response or attachments will be sent. If you have questions, please contact the following MHT project reviewers: Liz Casso liz.casso@maryland.gov Brian Snyder brian.snyder@maryland.gov Maryland Historical Trust Project Review and Compliance 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032 mht.section106@maryland.gov MHT.Maryland.gov Planning.Maryland.gov Lloyd Yavener, Chair Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1 TO: Department of Homeland Security c/o Alexis Price PH: 443.635.4661 Email: alexis.t.price@associates.ice.dhs.gov FROM: Meghan Jenkins, GISP GIS Coordinator/Historic District Commission Staff Department of Planning and Zoning 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 DATE: February 5, 2026 SUBJ: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Thank you for providing the Washington County Historic District Commission (HDC) the opportunity to comment on the referenced undertaking. The HDC reviewed the documentation provided at their February 4, 2026 meeting for its effects on historic and archaeological resources, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The HDC concurs that the undertaking will have no effect on historic properties. If any significant changes in project scope or location occur, additional consultation may be needed. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Maryland Historical Trust • 100 Community Place • Crownsville • Maryland • 21032 Tel: 410.697.9591 • toll free 877.767.6272 • TTY users: Maryland Relay • MHT.Maryland.gov Wes Moore, Governor Aruna Miller, Lt. Governor Rebecca L. Flora, AICP, LEED ND / BD+C, Secretary Elizabeth Hughes, MHT Director and State Historic Preservation Officer February 10, 2026 Ms. Alexis Price Solv 8201 Greensboro Drive, Suite 700 McLean, VA 22102 Sent via email to: Alexis.T.Price@associates.ice.dhs.gov Re: MHT Review of Proposed ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Rd, Hagerstown Washington County, Maryland Dear Ms. Price: Thank you for providing the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) with information regarding the above-referenced project on behalf of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). MHT received the project submittal for review on January 14, 2026. In response to your request, MHT’s Project Review & Compliance unit reviewed the proposed work to assess potential effects on historic properties in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Following our review of the project’s Area of Potential Effects (APE) as defined by the DHS in Figure 5 of the project submittal, MHT concurred that the proposed rehabilitation of the existing 53.74-acre warehouse would have no effect on historic properties. Our “no effect” recommendation was provided to you via our online e106 system on January 29, 2026. As we noted in our concurrence, that recommendation was based on the information you provided and that “[a]dditional consultation with our office may be required if there are any significant changes in project scope or location.” Beginning on February 3, 2026, MHT was contacted by several Washington County residents who provided additional information about the undertaking’s potential impacts on historic properties. These communications suggest that MHT has not been provided with complete information about the project, that the APE may be larger than the area that was shown in the original project submittal, and that the APE should include the proposed impact areas associated with the Wright Road Relocation project. Following our review of the information provided with these public comments, we are requesting additional information from the DHS to determine if we need to consider a larger APE for this undertaking. Specifically, we request information as to how the Wright Road Relocation project relates to the ICE Baltimore Processing Facility. If the Wright Road Relocation project is, in fact, an ancillary activity that is part of, or functionally related to, the ICE Baltimore Processing Facility project, then DHS should provide detailed site plans illustrating the location and boundaries of all proposed ground disturbing activities and impact areas associated with the road’s relocation (including access roads and staging areas) so that we may assess the project’s potential impacts on historic properties - including potential archaeologically sensitive areas. The plans should clearly indicate where grading and other ground-disturbing activities will be taking place and to what depth these areas will be graded. It would Alexis Price MHT Review of Proposed ICE Baltimore Processing Facility February 10, 2026 Page 2 also be helpful if you could provide information regarding the level of any past ground disturbance that has taken place within the study area for the road-relocation. Upon our review of this additional information, we will be able to provide informed and updated findings regarding the complete project’s effects on historic properties and what, if any, cultural resources investigations may be necessary prior to construction. If the Wright Road Relocation project is not an ancillary activity associated with the ICE Baltimore Processing Facility project, then please provide MHT with clear information to that effect so that we may include it in our project file. We look forward to receiving the information requested above and to further coordination as project planning proceeds. If you have any questions or we may be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at dixie.henry@maryland.gov. Thank you again for providing us with an opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Dixie Henry (signed electronically) Dr. Dixie Henry Administrator, Project Review and Compliance DLH/ 202600142 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Chief Readiness Support Officer Springfield, VA 20598-0075 March 17, 2026 Mr. Lloyd Yavener, Chairperson Historic District Commission Washington County Planning and Zoning Department 747 Northern Ave. Hagerstown, MD 21742 Phone: (240) 313-2430 Email: askplanning@washco-md.net Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740; Continued Consultation and Finding of No Historic Properties Affected Dear Mr. Yavener: This letter is provided to continue consultation regarding a proposed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) undertaking subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in Hagerstown, Maryland (Figures 1–4). To summarize the scope of our undertaking from previous correspondence, ICE is proposing to purchase, occupy, and rehabilitate a 53.74-acre warehouse property in support of ICE operations. The property is located at 10900 Hopewell Road and is legally described by the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation as Map: 48, Grid: 21, Parcel: 57, Neighborhood 30000.22. As part of ICE’s undertaking, proposed site improvements may include, but are not limited to, installing, upgrading, or rehabilitating existing parking areas, fencing, site lighting, landscaping, utilities, drainage/stormwater, recreation areas, and security cameras (Attachment C, Figure 1 - Site Concept Plan). A prefabricated guard shack will also be installed, consisting of a small, modular, security structure. No site improvements are expected to be taller than the existing warehouse structure or expand beyond the current site boundaries, and all work and construction staging will occur within the previously developed parcel (Figure 4). ICE will also conduct exterior and interior modifications to the existing warehouse facility. Exterior upgrades may include, but are not limited to, painting or sealing the exterior of the structure; installing, removing, or modifying bays (e.g., truck bays, window bays, or doors); repairing or replacing the existing roof or cladding materials; adding security equipment; or adding exterior personnel/guest access controls. The interior of the structure may be renovated or rebuilt to support ICE operational requirements, which may include, but is not limited to, construction of holding and processing spaces, office space, public-facing visitor spaces, and installation of amenities, such as cafeterias, bathrooms, and health care spaces. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 In response to consulting party requests for additional information regarding ground disturbing activities associated with the proposed undertaking, ICE’s contractor has developed detail sheets for proposed ground disturbance. Detailed site plans and civil engineering specifications representing the current project design are provided Attachments A, B, and C, respectively. We have included plan sheets for each element in Attachment C (Civil Utility Design) of this submittal package and referenced corresponding figures throughout this letter. As part of the proposed undertaking, ground disturbance will occur for waterline, sanitary sewer, and utility improvements, fiber-optic and telecommunication cabling, installation of new freestanding light poles, installation of a new generator, pier installation for recreational area awnings and basketball hoops, perimeter security fence installation, and installation of a prefabricated guard shack. Modifications related to the water main construction will prioritize structural stability, protection from contamination, and long-term serviceability during trenching operations. Trenches will be excavated to provide uniform, stable bedding that supports the full length of the pipe barrel, preventing point loading and settlement. Bedding materials utilized will be suitable for site soil conditions and properly compacted to avoid differential settlement or pipe deflection. Adequate horizontal and vertical separation will be maintained from sewers, drains, and other potential contamination sources during trenching, with special construction controls in place at crossings. In the case where hydraulic forces could cause pipe movement (such as at bends, tees, hydrants, and dead ends), blocking, anchoring, and thrust restraints will be utilized. Proper backfill and compaction procedures will be followed to preserve trench integrity and protect adjacent infrastructure. Please see Attachment C, Figure 2 (Waterline/Utility Details). Ground disturbance associated with sewer improvements for the undertaking would be temporary, localized, and linear in nature, consisting of trenching for the in-kind replacement of the existing line in the same location or for minor connection upgrades. Installation activities are not expected to result in changes to land use, long-term drainage patterns, or water quality. Please see Attachment C, Figure 2 (Waterline/Utility Details). ICE will design and implement sewer improvements in a manner that complies with applicable floodplain management requirements and does not increase flood risk within the 100‑year floodplain. Upon completion of construction, all disturbed areas would be backfilled and restored to pre-construction conditions. Accommodating frost conditions will also be considered in the construction of interior and exterior modifications to the existing warehouse facility. Water mains will be installed with sufficient earth cover to protect against frost penetration, with burial depth determined by the local frost conditions and regulatory authority requirements. In situations where achieving adequate depth is impractical (such as at stream crossings, utility conflicts, and/or shallow bedrock), alternative methods including but not limited to insulation, rerouting, or encasement will be submitted for approval by the reviewing authority. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 The Project would require the installation of new fiber-optic and communications cabling to serve the building and support facility operations. New telecommunications lines would be extended from existing off-site or on-site service points and routed into the building using available utility corridors where practicable. Ground disturbance associated with the installation would be limited, localized, and linear in nature, and would occur within previously disturbed areas or existing rights-of-way. Please see Attachment C, Figure 3 (Electrical/Telecommunications Data Trench Detail). Five new light poles will be installed as part of this undertaking, and each new light pole will be consistent in size with the existing light poles on-site (see Figures 12 and 13, below). Installation of lighting fixtures, camera mounts, and associated electrical and data connections would require only minor ground disturbance, such as limited trenching (Attachment C, Figure 3 (Electrical/Telecommunications Data Trench Detail) or small equipment footings (Attachment C, Figure 4 (Support Concrete Pier Detail), within previously disturbed areas. Any new or repair work will be backfilled, and ground or pavement returned to pre-construction conditions. The existing generator on site will need to be replaced to support ICE operations. The existing generator and concrete slab will be removed, and a new slab will be poured. Work associated with generator replacement would be limited to equipment removal and installation, minor electrical and mechanical connections, and foundation or pad modifications, if required. Ground disturbance associated with generator replacement would be minimal and localized and would occur within previously disturbed areas (Figure 6). Please see Attachment C, Figure 5 (Generator Support Pad Detail). No expansion of the facility footprint or changes to land use are anticipated. As part of the undertaking, six recreation courts will be installed on site in existing truck loading bays (see Figure 4 and Figure 6). Each court would be approximately 80 feet by 60 feet and will be placed within the existing asphalt parking area. Improvement activities would be limited to surface preparation, installation of court features (basketball hoops, etc.), shade awnings, and line striping. Excavation or disturbance of the existing paved areas would be limited to the installation of concrete piers to support an awning system and basketball hoop. Each pier would be approximately 10 inches in diameter and installed to a depth of four feet below grade. Ground disturbance associated with the piers would be localized and limited to the immediate footprint of each pier. All disturbed areas would be backfilled and restored upon completion. Please see Attachment C, Figure 4 (Support Concrete Pier Detail). Ground disturbance associated with this undertaking will also include fencing upgrades. ICE will install approximately 5,800 linear feet of replacement perimeter fencing. Perimeter fencing is anticipated to be roughly 10-12 feet tall and metal. Footers for fencing sections will be laid every eight feet, with a 40-inch wide and 36-48-inch-deep area of disturbance. Please see Attachment C, Figure 6 (Fence Support Post Detail). Ground disturbance related to fencing system installation would be localized and linear. This disturbance would be limited to post footings associated with new fencing areas along the existing fence line. Ground disturbance related Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 to fencing system installation would be localized and linear. This disturbance would be limited to post footings associated with new fencing areas along the existing fence line. In addition to new fencing, gate sections of the same size with the same method and size of ground disturbance will be installed for access control measures, as will other physical security measures, such as card readers, etc. Similar to other site improvements, once footers are laid, the areas will be backfilled and returned to their pre-existing condition post installation. A small 150-square foot guard building will be installed by the gate area, which may also require limited ground disturbance not to exceed two feet in depth. Please see Attachment C, Figure 7 (Guard Building Footer). As noted in our earlier correspondence, as part of the previous development of the property, the ground has been extensively disturbed to accommodate utilities, parking, and warehouse size requirements. Potential ground disturbing work will be consistent in depth and method of disturbance with past modifications to the site. Maximum ground disturbance to construct piers and fence posts are anticipated to be no more than four feet in depth. Due to the substantial past disturbance, ICE finds the potential for encountering intact archaeological resources is low, and ICE does not recommend any further archaeological investigations at the property. ICE has determined that the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for this undertaking consists of the subject property and adjacent resources with a potential viewshed of the proposed undertaking (Figure 5). The APE includes the geographic areas or areas within which the undertaking may directly or indirectly affect historic properties, presuming such properties are present. As part of our effort to establish the APE, ICE has weighed the undertakings potential to cause direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, and has included any effects to the larger area associated with a potential increase in noise, potential for connected actions, and potential vehicular impacts to historic properties in the larger area. Based on ICE’s environmental analyses conducted concurrently with Section 106 consultation, ICE has determined that there will be no perceivable increase in noise as a result of this undertaking. Similarly, because the warehouse was originally constructed to be a distribution center, there will not be an increase in traffic from its original constructed use as a distribution center. Nor will the proposed undertaking introduce any connected actions with reasonably foreseeable effects that would occur later in time or be farther removed in distance that would impact historic properties. Structures within the APE consist of the subject property, a modern industrial warehouse constructed in 2022, and adjacent buildings within the northern portion of the APE, which consists primarily of similar industrial resources constructed in the 1990s and early 2000s (see Figures 5, 12, and 13, below). The subject property and adjacent modern industrial resources do not rise to the level of exceptional importance under Criteria Consideration G, per National Register Bulletin 15, and are recommended Ineligible for the National Register of Historic Place (NRHP) under all criteria. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.4, ICE has made a reasonable and good faith effort to identify historic properties within the APE. Resources to the east and south of the subject property consist of several mid-twentieth century residences (see Figure 5). Based on aerial photographs, these resources along Rauch and Hopewell Roads appear to have been built primarily between 1952 and 1974. None of the structures have been evaluated for inclusion on the NRHP. Historic property identification is located in Appendix D. ICE has evaluated the 11 resources along Hopewell and Wright Roads for inclusion on the NRHP, both individually and as a group. Excluding WA-I-368 and WA-I-022, these resources are all common examples of their shape or form, and most resources lack elements of integrity. None of the resources represent a planned group, nor present common architectural trends, a shared history, or other architectural/historic elements that would be requisite elements of a historic district. Based on the results of the survey, ICE has determined that the properties at 10841-11028 Hopewell Road, excluding 10901, 10903, and11019 Hopewell Road, do not meet the criteria for inclusion on the NRHP. Due to access limitations, ICE has left 10901, 10903, and 11019 Hopewell Road NRHP eligibility as undetermined. Regardless of eligibility, the proposed undertaking will not affect these resources’ integrity or ability to be included on the NRHP. The remaining resources within the APE are WA-I-368/16246 Wright Road, a two-story residence and associated farm complex that was originally surveyed in 1967 and resurveyed in 1975 (Figure 14; see below), WA-I-022, the Milestone Farm, and a segment of the Virginia Path/Warrior Path (see below), which passes northwest of the Project site. Three other previously recorded above-ground resources are situated near but outside the designated APE, including, WA-I-356/Hopewell Hereford Farm/11159 Hopewell Road, WA-I-357/Sprecher’s Mill House/11119 Hopewell Road, WA-I-364/Salisbury Mill Site and House/11120 Hopewell Road, and the Seneca Path. In order to assess potential alterations to the viewsheds of these properties that might be caused by the proposed development of the project site, a viewshed analysis was conducted using ESRI’s ArcPro 3.6 Desktop software (Figure 15). The modeling performed to produce this viewshed utilized NOAA’s LiDAR 1-meter national elevation data, as well as the height of the proposed structure. The purpose of this viewshed is to act as a representation of how visible the structure would be to the surrounding landforms. Data from Maryland’s SHPO GIS database, called “Medusa”, was used to digitize these properties. The maximum viewshed extent was set at one mile from the warehouse structure (Figure 15). The results of the viewshed study reveal that there will be little to no impact on most of these properties, except for WA-I-368/16246 Wright Road. That resource is closest to the project site, and since the area has previously been cleared of trees, it falls directly within the line of sight for the warehouse. The southwestern portion of WA-I-022/Milestone Farm/10702 Hopewell Road is also visible from the warehouse, and a small segment of the Virginia Path/Warrior Path may be visible as well. The other previously recorded resources along Hopewell Road (WA-I- 356/Hopewell Hereford Farm/11159 Hopewell Road, WA-I-357/Sprecher’s Mill House, and Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 WA-I-364/Salisbury Mill Site and House) and further to the east (Seneca Path) will not have visibility to the proposed undertaking (see Figure 15). WA-I-368/16246 Wright Road. As examined in 1975, WA-I-368/16246 Wright Road was a tripartite house, two stories high and totally sheathed with asbestos shingles (Figure 16). WA-I- 368 likely originally consisted of a log frame building before expanding into its current tripartite form. Its original survey form notes that the structure was constructed no later than 1820 when its owner, Matthew Van Lear, passed and left it to his family. Research indicates that the Van Lear family, owner of nearby Mount Tammany, a NRHP-listed Georgian residence built in 1780, had extensive influence in this region. It is possible that the log, and later, encapsulated log and frame structure was built in the 1790s during the farming boom, catapulting Williamsport to national importance. Though owned by Matthew Van Lear, it is also possible the house served as a residence for a sibling or child, given Matthew Van Lear’s ownership of Mount Tammany during this period. Expanded over the years, the structure retains many of its original ornamentation elements, including its 6/6 windows, orientation, and general symmetry of design, which date the structure to no later than roughly 1790–1810. Also present on the lot are the foundation of a barn and a well-preserved springhouse (Figure 17), both of which date to c. 1887. Though the auxiliary springhouse remains in good condition (Figure 18), the roof of the residence has partially burned and completely collapsed, as has one of its porches and the rear of the structure (Figures 19–21). Due to the severe structural condition and development of the adjacent area, the residence has lost integrity of design, workmanship, setting, feeling, and association. ICE has evaluated the current condition and integrity of WA-I-368 and determined that the main residence of WA-I-368 is Ineligible for the NRHP under Criterions A-C. ICE has withheld commenting on the extant stone foundation and stone springhouse due to a lack of information on the structures. It is possible that, were the springhouse evaluated as part of a multiple property documentation form survey of masonry auxiliary resources in the county or Williamsport, the springhouse could be determined Contributing under Criterions A or C. Further research would be necessary to determine the information potential of the stone foundation. It is beyond the scope of this undertaking to conduct an archaeological survey on a site not physically impacted by the proposed undertaking, and similarly, it is beyond the scope of the undertaking to conduct a multiple property survey of stone auxiliary resources in Williamsport or in Washington County. ICE notes that, regardless of the eligibility of part or all of WA-I-368, the proposed undertaking will not impact any aspects of integrity that remain, and no effects to WA-I-368 will occur. WA-I-022/Milestone Farm/10702 Hopewell Road. As recorded in 2019, Milestone Farm is a single-family residence and farm complex bounded by Hopewell Road to the south, Interstate 81 to the east, Greencastle Pike to the west, and Wright Road to the north (Figure 22). The principal structure is a two-story, five-bay dwelling (Figure 23). The main block of the house was likely constructed between 1830 and 1850, while bays to the east and the west were constructed ca. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 1900 and ca. 1985, respectively. Outbuildings on the property include a rental house (ca. 1950), a one-bay horse barn (ca. 1950), “Garage A” (ca. 1950), “Workshop A” (ca. 1950), a ca. 1850 multi-bay stone horse barn (Figure 24), “Garage B” (ca. 1980), “Workshop B” (ca. 1980), “Garage C” (ca. 1950), and “Workshop C” (ca. 1995). The farm complex totals 116.28 acres. As of 2019, WA-I-022 has been recommended Ineligible for the NRHP by the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT). ICE concurs with the MHT’s recommendation that WA-I-022/Milestone Farm is not eligible for the NRHP. In addition, ICE notes that those small portions of WA-I-022 that have potential sight lines to the Project site are generally situated to the west of the structure complex on the property. Although minor changes to the setting of this property will occur, the setting was already altered when the existing warehouse was constructed. The proposed undertaking is not anticipated to impact the complexes use or integrity of design, location, association, workmanship, feeling, or materials, nor impact the resource’s ability to be included on the NRHP. Regardless of eligibility, the proposed undertaking will not impact WA-I-022. Virginia Path. The Virginia Path/Warrior Path is a portion of a Native American trail that ran from the vicinity of present-day Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, through Williamsport, Maryland, to Winchester, Virginia. According to a 2021 summary (Crowl et al. 2024:88), it was likely used primarily by Iroquoian Indians to reach areas to the south. The path generally follows the route of present-day Greencastle Pike (MD 63) and crosses the APE northwest of the project site. This path is not known to have been formally recorded with the MHT or assessed for NRHP eligibility. Although a small portion of the approximate route of the Virginia Path/Warrior Path may be within view of the Project site (Figure 16), in this vicinity the sightlines from the route of the path (which has not been precisely mapped or identified on the ground) are extremely fragmented due to modern landscape changes and construction. Although minor changes to the setting of this property may occur, the setting was already altered by other landscape changes when the existing warehouse was constructed. The proposed undertaking is not anticipated to impact the integrity of design, location, association, workmanship, feeling, or materials of this structure, nor impact the resource’s ability to be included on the NRHP. Regardless of eligibility, the proposed undertaking will not impact the Virginia Path/Warrior Path. Based on these determinations, and pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5(b), ICE has determined that the undertaking will result in a finding of No Historic Properties Affected. In accordance with 36 CFR 800.3, ICE has identified parties with a potential demonstrated interest in the proposed undertaking and invited a member of the public, the Hagerstown Planning Department, the Washington County Historic Preservation Commission, and the Piscataway Conoy Tribe, and Piscataway Indian Nation, both Maryland state-recognized tribes, to participate in consultation for this undertaking. ICE has also invited the Delaware Nation, Oklahoma; Absentee-Shawnee of Oklahoma; Eastern Shawnee; Shawnee; Delaware Tribe of Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Indians; Stockbridge-Munsee; Cayuga; Oneida Indian Nation; Oneida Nation; Onondaga; Saint Regis Mohawk; and the Seneca-Cayuga Nation to participate in consultation. ICE has received comments from the consulting parties and one Tribe requesting additional information on the proposed undertaking. This submittal addresses comments received during continued consultation. Please provide any comments on the undertaking and ICE’s finding within 30 calendar days of the date of receipt of this letter. ICE will be reaching out in the near future to schedule a consulting party meeting. Questions and written correspondence for this undertaking may be submitted to ICE Environmental staff via e-mail at ICESustainability@ice.dhs.gov. Thank you for your cooperation on this undertaking. Sincerely, Gabrielle Fernandez Environmental Protection Specialist Office of the Chief Readiness Support Officer Department of Homeland Security Gabrielle.Fernandez@hq.dhs.gov Encl: Attachment A: Site Architectural Detail Attachment B: Site ALTA Survey Attachment C: Civil Utility Design Attachment D: Historic Property Identification Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 1. Project site location map. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 2. Project site on USGS topographic map. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 3. Aerial view of project site. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 4. Proposed project site plan. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 5. Area of Potential Effects (APE) for cultural resources. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 6. North elevation. 6 Figure 7. East elevation. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 8. West elevation. Figure 9. South elevation. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 10. Interior of office space. Figure 11. Interior of warehouse. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 12. North adjoining property. Figure 13. North adjoining property. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 14. Southwest adjoining property, depicting Resource WA-I-368. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 15. Viewshed Analysis. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 16. Resource WA-I-368 as it appeared in 1975, facing east. Figure 17. Springhouse at Resource WA-I-368 as it appeared in 1975, facing northeast. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 18. Google Earth Streetview of springhouse at Resource WA-I-368 in 2025, facing northeast. Figure 19. GoogleEarth Streetview of western portion of residence at Resource WA-I-368 from Wright Road in 2025, facing northeast. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 20. GoogleEarth Streetview of eastern portion of residence at Resource WA-I-368 from (Old) Wright Road in 2025, facing northeast. Figure 21 GoogleEarth Streetview of western portion of residence at Resource WA-I-368 from (Old) Wright Road in 2025, facing southwest. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 22. Layout of Milestone Farm (WA-I-022) as of 2016. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 23. Principal Residence at Milestone Farm (WA-I-022) as of 2016. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 24. Stone Barn at Milestone Farm (WA-I-022) as of 2016. Attachment A: Site Architectural Detail RR LEGEND ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. PROPERTY LINE. FULLY EQUIPPED DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR GRADE LEVEL TRUCK DOOR KNOCKOUT (FUTURE DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR) DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR W/FUTURE LEVELER SEE SHEET G-0.02 FOR GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS NOTES PROPOSED BUILDING 825,620 GSF 41 FULLY EQUIPPED DOCK DOORS 41 DOCK DOORS WITH FUTURE LEVELERS 84 FUTURE DOCK DOORS 4 DRIVE-IN DOORS TYP 105 A-1.10 1 TYP 102 TYP 103 W R I G H T R O A D FIRE PUMP ROOM ELECTRICAL ROOM A-1.10 2 N N SHEET NO. DESIGN/BUILD ARCO SHEET TITLE PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY SUBMITTALS SEAL PROJECT TITLE DESIGNER / BUILDER KEY PLAN CIVIL ENGINEER TRUE NORTH ARCHITECT ADBI / DESIGN SERVICES LLC 44 SOUTH BROADWAY, SUITE 1003 WHITE PLAINS, NY 10601 5950 SYMPHONY WOODS ROAD, SUITE 609 COLUMBIA, MD 21044 INDUSTRIAL P: 443.917.4900 F: 443.917.4901 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL ENGINEER ELECTRICAL ENGINEER PLUMBING ENGINEER FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER JOSEPH V. DIGIORGIO |MD: 20253 ADBI DESIGNSERVICES PR I N T E D A R C H E 1 3 0 " x 4 2 " PROJECT NORTH 9/ 9 / 2 0 2 1 1 : 0 9 : 0 0 P M ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN KSAS239-21 | MA123 TAYLOR FARM LOGISTICS CENTER A-1.00 16220 WRIGHT RD, WILLIAMSPORT, MD 21795 FREDERICK, SIEBERT & ASSOCIATES 128 S POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 SMITH, ROBERTS & ASSOCIATES 6501 BLUFF ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46217 NATIONAL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES 11840 BORMAN DRIVE MARYLAND HEIGHTS, M0 63146 CHERAN INC 3552 GETTYSBURG ROAD, SUITE 101 CAMP HILL, PA 17011 MCCARTHY ENGINEERING 555 VAN REED ROAD WYOMISSING, PA 19610 FE MORAN, INC 9204 BOND STREET OVERLAND PARK, KS 66214 SITE NOTES -CONTRACTORS TO VERIFY GRADE ELEVATIONS COMPLY WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS. -PAINTED PARKING AND ADDITIONAL STRIPING TO BE PER CITY STANDARDS, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS -ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILED SITE PLAN SCOPE. 102 PROPERTY LINE, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 103 EASEMENT LINE, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 105 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"0 40' 80'160'400' 1"=80'NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 06.11.2021 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 1 09.08.2021 REVISION 1 (INTERNAL USE) Attachment B: Site ALTA Survey · · · · · · · · © © © “ ” ENGINEERING, INC. DA T E : RE V . # SCALE: DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E 10 7 5 - D S H E R M A N A V E N U E HA G E R S T O W N , M D 2 1 7 4 0 PH : 3 0 1 . 7 9 7 . 6 4 0 0 F A X : 3 0 1 . 7 9 7 . 2 4 2 4 OF F I C E L O C A T I O N S MA R Y L A N D ○ O H I O ○ P E N N S Y L V A N I A ○ V I R G I N I A ○ W E S T V I R G I N I A www.triadeng.com TR I A D E N G I N E E R I N G , I N C . DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : BY JOB NO.: OF SHEET NUMBER: Y: \ E A S T _ H G _ 0 3 \ 2 0 2 5 \ _ 4 _ _ \ 0 3 - 2 5 - 0 4 8 6 A L T A - H A G E R S T O W N C R O S S R O A D S \ C A D \ 0 3 2 5 0 4 8 6 \ P R O D U C T I O N D R A W I N G S \ 0 3 2 5 0 4 8 6 - A L T A . D W G C. W . J , R. D . B . 06 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 5 1"=100' 03-25-0486 2 22 FI R S T A M E R I C A N T I T L E I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y C O M M I T M E N T N o . N T S - 2 0 4 2 3 9 - M D - 1 Attachment C: Civil Utility Design PROPOSED PREFABRICATEDMODULAR GUARD SHACK SUBJECT PARCEL GIS REMOVE AND REPLACEEMERGENCY GENERATOR PROPOSED SECURITY FENCE PROPOSED EXTERIOR COURTS RECREATION PROPOSED BUILDING PERIMETER LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHT POLE S S S S S S S W W W W W W T T T T T TPROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SEWER SERVICE DEPTH OF EXCAVATION MINIMUM 3FT AND MAXIMUM 10FT PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WATER SERVICE DEPTH OF EXCAVATION MINIMUM 3.5 FT AND MAXIMUM 10 FT PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING FIBER-OPTIC AND COMMUNICATIONS CABLING DEPTH OF EXCAVATION MINIMUM 3FT AND MAXIMUM 5FT 0 SCALE: 100' 200' 1'' = 200' SHEET: PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION N 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD,HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND GENERAL NOTES 1. THE PROPERTY LINESHOWN IS FROM GEOGRAPHICALINFORMATION SYSTEM(GIS). 2. AERIAL BACKGROUNDFROM 2025 MICROSOFTONLINE BING AERIAL. 3. THIS FIGURE IS TOSUPPORT SITE LAYOUT INTENT THROUGH PERMITTING PROCESS. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. REFER TO CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS FOR TRENCHEXCAVATION DETAILS IN ACCORDANCE WITHLOCAL REGULATIONS. Attachment C -FIGURE 1. Site Concept Plan SITE UTILITYLAYOUT MAP PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: SHEET: Attachment C - FIGURE 2. WATERLINE/UTILITY DETAILS UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. REFER TO CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS FOR TRENCHEXCAVATION DETAILS IN ACCORDANCE WITHLOCAL REGULATIONS. 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD, HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND SHEET: PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: Attachment C - FIGURE 3. ELECTRICAL / TELECOMMUNICATIONS DATA TRENCH DETAIL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.FROST DEPTH VARIESMINIMUM OF 2FT TO MAXIMUM OF 4FT. 2.REFER TO CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS FOR TRENCHEXCAVATION DETAILS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS.. 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD,HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND SHEET: PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: Attachment C - FIGURE 4. SUPPORT CONCRETE PIER DETAIL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.CONCRETE SUPPORT PIERSWILL BE USED FOR LIGHTING, RECREATION YARD AWNINGSUPPORTS, BASKETBALL HOOPSUPPORT 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD,HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND SHEET: PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: Attachment C - FIGURE 5. GENERATOR SUPPORT PAD DETAIL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD, HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND tT-6' I 00 I -------------7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A I I I I I I I I ~ !o ~ !i, e ..... .,=. 8' ~-'! 8' -.._ !o ---~ -------- t ~ PERIMETER GAAOE SEMI 1-112"CliAMfERAU EXPOSED CORNERS COHCRETE PAI/BIEITT i---"'--+ ______ ±r_:_.LA_N _______ ~ I .•. . ... #4 REBAR@ 12' C.C£.W. '4 REBAR@l'!C.C.E.W. SECTION A-A CONCRETE PAD DETAIL SCALE : NOT TO SCALE A SHEET: PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: Attachment C - FIGURE 6. FENCE SUPPORT POST DETAIL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD,HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND SHEET: PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: Attachment C -FIGURE 7. Guard BuildingFooter UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONFIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 10900 HOPEWELL ROAD,HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND 1. FROST DEPTHVARIES MINIMUM OF 2FT TO MAXIMUM OF 4FT. 2. ANY OTHER FOUNDAITON TYPE WILL NOT EXCEED 4FT DEEP EXACAVATION. Attachment D: Historic Property Identification Attachment D. Historic Property Identification Address Description Assessment Photo 10833 Hopewell Road Single-family early 20th century vernacular residence constructed in 1913. The structure contains a recessed front porch, a stuccoed first story, and American Foursquare form. Three outbuildings are scattered on the property. The structure is a common vernacular version of American Foursquare architecture and features three distinct additions – one to the cantilevered front porch and two to the rear of the property. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. 10841 Hopewell Road A modern single-story residence with an integrated garage constructed in 1995 10841 Hopewell Road is a common residence constructed less than 50 years ago. It does not contain exceptional significance nor meet Criteria Consideration G. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. 10901 Hopewell Road A single-family residence that was constructed in 1986 that is not visible from the right-of-way. Due to the inability to assess this resource from the right-of-way, ICE has left the NRHP eligibility of this resource as Undetermined. Not visible from the right-of-way 10903 Hopewell Road A single-family residence that was constructed in 1966 that is not visible from the right-of-way. Due to the inability to assess this resource from the right-of-way, ICE has left the NRHP eligibility of this resource as Undetermined. Not visible from the right-of-way. 10911 Hopewell Road A single-story brick veneer ranch that was constructed in 1962 with a side elevation greenhouse addition. A small outbuilding is located at the rear of the property. 10911 Hopewell Road is a common ranch residence with alterations that has diminished integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. 10931 Hopewell Road A single-story brick veneer ranch that was constructed in 1956. Based on historic aerials, the original ranch has been heavily modified on its side elevations to facilitate an expansion. Two small outbuildings are located at the rear of the property. 10931 Hopewell Road is a common ranch residence with no integrity of design, materials, or workmanship due to alterations. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. 11003 Hopewell Road A late single-story brick veneer residence constructed in 1982. 11003 Hopewell Road is a common ranch residence constructed less than 50 years ago. It does not contain exceptional significance nor meet Criteria Consideration G. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. 11009 Hopewell Road Based on historic aerials, the subject property is a heavily modified single-story residence constructed in 1943. The subject property may have originally been an American Small House or other vernacular midcentury residence but is unclear from the right-of-way. A small outbuilding is located at the rear of the property. 11009 Hopewell Road is a common midcentury residence with no clear original shape or form. It appears heavily modified and does not retain integrity of design, materials, or workmanship. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. 11019 Hopewell Road A single-family residence that was constructed in 1956 that is not visible from the right-of-way. Due to the inability to assess this resource from the right- of-way, ICE has left the NRHP eligibility of this resource as Undetermined. Not visible from the right-of-way. 11028 Hopewell Road A single-story colonial revival residence that was constructed in 1966. Historic aerials show the property was drastically expanded in the early 2000s. A large garage is situated at the rear of the property. 11028 Hopewell Road is a common midcentury residence that roughly doubled in size in the early 2000s, destroying integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. ICE has determined it is Ineligible for the NRHP. Record #Type MIHP#Record Status Task Name Comments Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review HDC reviewed at the 2/4 meeting and supported the demo permit but requested the owner salvage any feasible materials during the process. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review Not in a review area Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review HDC Reviewed at their 2/4 meeting and voted for approval. Staff report is attached to the record. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review resource flagged was demo'd a long time ago. no review required. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historic District Commission requested addition of Maugansville district note Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review HDC Reviewed at their 2/4 meeting and supported permit approval. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historic District Commission Comment letter attached in documents Task Name Comments Historical Review Partial reconstruction due to damage by car collision. Repair will be with modern materials to meet code. Appearance from the road will be unchanged. No HDC review required. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 29-Jan-26 LOR 7902 SHARPSBURG PIKE REPAIR FRONT RIGHT OF DWELLING INCLUDE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF LOG CABIN DUE TO CAR COLLIDING WITH DWELLING Folder Status Status Date Note 02-Feb-26 Passed - Info 02-Feb-26 Days in Review:4 2026-00353 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit Approved 29-Jan-26 03-Feb-26 TEXT AMENDMENT - SMALL BOX VARIETY STORES - TABLE 3.3(1), CHAPTER 28A DEFINITIIONS Folder Status Status Date Comments Received 17-Mar-26 Days in Review:42 RZ-26-001 Zoning Ordinance Amendment In Review 22-Jan-26 17-Mar-26 13535 BROADFORDING CHURCH ROAD HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 SIMPLIFIED PLAT ADDING PARCEL B FROM MELMARK INC. DBA ANITA LYNNE HOME INC UNTO BROADFORDING BIBLE BRETHREN CHURCH. Folder Status Status Date Revisions Required 02-Feb-26 Approved 17-Mar-26 Days in Review:48 SI-26-001 Simplified Plat I318 Fees Due 21-Jan-26 21-Jan-26 LOR 13511 MAUGANSVILLE ROAD DEMOLITION OF 3,256 SQ. FT. DWELLING AND FOUNDATION Folder Status Status Date Note 05-Feb-26 Approved 05-Feb-26 Days in Review:15 2026-00212 Residential Demolition Permit I252 Approved 20-Jan-26 05-Feb-26 13705 RAILROAD STREET MAUGANSVILLE, MD 21767 PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION Folder Status Status Date Note 17-Feb-26 Revisions Required 17-Feb-26 Days in Review:12 SP-26-001 Site Plan In Review 07-Jan-26 29-Jan-26 SP-16-023 19813 LETIERSBURG PIKE INSTALLATION OF (91) ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR PANELS, SYSTEM SIZE 39.26 KW DC; 34.6 KW AC, (2) NEW INVERTERS AND ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC WORK TO TIE INTO EXISTING ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR PANELS VALLEY STORAGE COMPANY Folder Status Status Date Note 02-Feb-26 Passed - Info 02-Feb-26 Days in Review:4 2026-00054 Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit I477 Approved 07-Jan-26 30-Dec-25 LOR 21245 MOUNT LEAN ROAD 2,520 SQ. FT. ONE STORY POLE BUILDING ON CONCRETE SLAB TO REAR OF DWELLING TO BE USED AS A GARAGE, (7) OVERHEAD DOORS, METAL ROOF AND SIDES, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES Folder Status Status Date Note 05-Feb-26 Approved 05-Feb-26 Days in Review:37 2025-05908 Residential New Construction Permit Approved 21-Dec-25 27-Jan-26 LOR 18634 AMANDA LANE 138 SQ. FT. METAL ROOF OVER EXISTING FREESTANDING DECK AND PORCH TO LEFT OF DWELLING AND 42 SQ. FT. COVERED DETACHED DECK, (2) SETS OF STAIRS TO GRADE TO RIGHT OF DWELLING, PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER DECKING AND RAILING, ROOF RAFTERS Folder Status Status Date Note 02-Feb-26 Passed - Info 02-Feb-26 Days in Review:6 2025-05881 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit Approved 18-Dec-25 09-Jan-26 SP-25-045 8505 FAHRNEY CHURCH ROAD DEMOLITION OF EXTERIOR BALCONIES AND FRONT COVERED PORCH, GUTTING ALL INTERIOR LEVELS OF STRUCTURE TO CREATE INDIVIDUAL SUITES, ASSOCIATED ROOMS, AND COMMUNITY USE ROOMS FOR THE PURPOSE OF YOUNG ADULT HOUSING AND STAFFING, 975 SQ. FT. THREE STORY ADDITION TO BE Folder Status Status Date Note 05-Feb-26 Approved 05-Feb-26 Days in Review:27 2025-05780 Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit II0055 Review 10-Dec-25 11-Mar-26 1055 VALLEY ROAD KNOXVILLE, MD 21758 MINOR SITE PLAN FOR A ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION EDUCATION AND BANQUET/RECEPTION FACILITY Folder Status Status Date Approved 17-Mar-26 Days in Review:6 SP-25-013 Site Plan III026 In Review 17-Apr-25 Historic Review Activity 01/22/2026 thru 03/30/2026 Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Record #Type MIHP#Record Status Historic Review Activity 01/22/2026 thru 03/30/2026 Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Task Name Comments Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review nearby resource previously demo'd. new construction and not in a design review area Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review Not a review area no resources remaining on property Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review previously reviewed by hdc at site plan stage. no additional comments on permit. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review No tax credit; not a review area for HDC Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review HDC does not review in the town Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historic District Commission No historic resources on site. w/in Heritage Area but no outreach necessary for this use. Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historic District Commission w/in Heritage Area but no notification for this site use. No known resources on site. Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review not in a review area. sent no review contact letter. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 10-Mar-26 LOR 5419 CREEK ROAD 2,368 SQ. FT. ROOF REPLACEMENT TO INCLUDE, 19 SQUARES OF METAL SHINGLES, 8 SQUARES OF LOW-SLOPE MOD-BIT ROOFING, AND 17 SQUARES OF DECKING W/OSB ON SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Folder Status Status Date Note 11-Mar-26 Passed - Info 11-Mar-26 2026-00861 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit VI014 Review 05-Mar-26 06-Mar-26 14880 COLONEL HENRY K DOUGLAS DRIVE HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THIS MINOR SITE PLAN IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE TRAILER AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AREA. Folder Status Status Date Note 11-Mar-26 Approved 11-Mar-26 Days in Review:5 SP-26-006 Site Plan In Review 04-Mar-26 06-Mar-26 20142 NATIONAL PIKE HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE SITE PLAN FROM AN HVAC BUSINESS TO A PRIVATE SCHOOL (NURSING ACADEMY). THIS PLAN ALSO PROPOSES A BUILDING ADDITION AND PARKING LOT ADJUSTMENT. Folder Status Status Date Note 11-Mar-26 Approved 11-Mar-26 Days in Review:5 SP-26-005 Site Plan In Review 03-Mar-26 11-Mar-26 122 W. POTOMAC STREET 1,673 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO DWELLING USED FOR NPS STAFF TO INCLUDE CREATING NEW KITCHEN AND LAUNDRY AREA NEAR MUDROOM, ADD ADA FULL BATHROOM AND BEDROOM ON THE FIRST FLOOR, REPLACE STAIRS FROM BASEMENT TO FIRST FLOOR AND FROM FIRST FLOOR TO SECOND FLOOR, ADD Folder Status Status Date Note 17-Mar-26 Passed - Info 17-Mar-26 Days in Review:6 WI2026-0002 Town of Williamsport Residential Building Permit WIL186; WIL187; WIL072; WIL188; WIL189; WIL185 Review 26-Feb-26 23-Feb-26 15229 NATIONAL PIKE HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 CREATE ONE (3) ACRE LOT FOR AN IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER Folder Status Status Date Revisions Required 02-Mar-26 Days in Review:6 S-26-008 Preliminary-Final Plat V005 Revisions Required 18-Feb-26 11-Feb-26 LOR 12 WEST WATER STREET 1020 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE-STORY REPLACEMENT DWELLING ON FULL UNFINISHED BASEMENT WITH AREAWAY EXIT AND ROUGH-IN FOR FUTURE BATH, COVERED FRONT PORCH, REAR BACK STOOP, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES Folder Status Status Date Note 17-Feb-26 Passed - Info 17-Feb-26 Days in Review:6 SM2026-0001 Town of Smithsburg Residential Building Permit IV099 Approved 10-Feb-26 11-Mar-26 SP-23-011.R01 17137 BLACK STALLION LANE INSTALLATION OF 2.80 MW SOLAR ENERGY GENERATING SYSTEM (SEGS) TO INCLUDE (2,072) LONGI 535W MODULES AND (3,136) ZNSHINE 540W MODULES, (14) SMA SUNNY HIGHPOWER PEAK3 150-US INVERTERS, (1) 242 SQ. FT. CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD, (1) 780 SQ. FT. CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD, INSTALLATION Folder Status Status Date Note 11-Mar-26 Passed - Info 11-Mar-26 Days in Review:0 2026-00470 Non-Residential New Construction Permit I392 Review 06-Feb-26 06-Feb-26 LOR 18619 AMANDA LANE 104 SQ. FT. OPEN FREESTANDING COMPOSITE DECK WITH STEPS TO GRADE ON EACH SIDE TO RIGHT OF DWELLING, PRESSURE TREATED RAILING INSTALL A NEW 104 SQ. FT. FREESTANDING Folder Status Status Date Note 17-Feb-26 Passed - Info 17-Feb-26 Days in Review:11 2026-00469 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit Approved 06-Feb-26 10-Feb-26 S-25-005 21604 JEFFERSON BOULEVARD, LOT 1 3,755 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON FULL UNFINISHED WALKOUT BASEMENT WITH ROUGH IN FOR FUTURE BATH, (504 SQ. FT.) POTATO STORAGE UNDER FRONT PORCH, PELLET STOVE IN FAMILY ROOM, (1,328 SQ. FT.) UNFINISHED SECOND FLOOR TO BE USED AS STORAGE, COVERED FRONT PORCH, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF Folder Status Status Date Note 17-Feb-26 Passed - Info 17-Feb-26 Passed - Info 06-Mar-26 Days in Review:24 2026-00413 Residential New Construction Permit I078 Review 03-Feb-26 04-Feb-26 17506 BROADFORDING ROAD HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 .21 ACRE LOT BEING CREATED FOR AN UNDERGROUND SEWER PUMP STATION. Folder Status Status Date Revisions Required 17-Feb-26 Days in Review:12 S-26-004 Preliminary-Final Plat I331 Revisions Required 29-Jan-26 Record #Type MIHP#Record Status Historic Review Activity 01/22/2026 thru 03/30/2026 Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Task Name Comments Historical Review Reviewed the description of this property against the requested demolition. The proposed demo area is a later addition and in very poor condition and under 400 sq.ft. Based on size, condition, visibility from the road and not being included in property description, not taking this to HDC. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review Not in a review area for new construction. Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Task Name Comments Historical Review Not a review property for HDC Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Activity Count:23 Comments Received Note Passed - Info 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 2 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 18 12Total7 4 23 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Total 0 0 1 Town of Williamsport Residential Building Permit Total 0 0 2 Town of Smithsburg Residential Building Permit Total 0 0 1 Total 3 1 4Site Plan 3 Simplified Plat Total 1 1 1 Residential New Construction Permit Total 1 0 Residential Demolition Permit Total 1 0 2 Total 0 0 4Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Preliminary-Final Plat Total 0 2 2 Non-Residential New Construction Permit Total 0 0 1 Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 1 0 2 Review Activities Summary Application Type Application Number Approved Revisions Required Total 18-Mar-26 LOR 139 W. POTOMAC STREET 1,080 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO FIRST FLOOR TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF NON-LOAD BEARING WALL, REPAIRS TO STAIRS AND RAILINGS, REPAIR HALF BATH/CLOSET WALLS AND ENLARGE DOOR, RENOVATIONS TO ATTIC TO INCLUDE REMOVING FULL BATH EQUIPMENT AND WALLS, MAKE REPAIRS TO Folder Status Status Date Note 19-Mar-26 Passed - Info 19-Mar-26 Days in Review:1 WI2026-0005 Town of Williamsport Residential Building Permit WIL035 Review 17-Mar-26 16-Mar-26 S-22-031 WOODSTOCK LANE, LOT 2 1,900 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON PARTIALLY FINISHED WALKOUT BASEMENT (1,186 SQ. FT.) TO BE USED AS (2) BEDROOMS, (1) FULL BATHROOM, AND RECREATION ROOM WITH WET BAR, GAS FIREPLACE IN LIVING ROOM, ATTACHED THREE CAR GARAGE, COVERED Folder Status Status Date Note 17-Mar-26 Passed - Info 17-Mar-26 Days in Review:1 2026-00986 Residential New Construction Permit Review 13-Mar-26 10-Mar-26 LOR 16503 SPIELMAN ROAD PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF 354 SQ. FT. ENCLOSED REAR PORCH TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF WALLS, KEEPING FOUNDATION, POSTS, AND ROOF, COMPLETE DEMOLITION OF 208 SQ. FT. SHED, NO EXISTING FOUNDATION Folder Status Status Date Note 11-Mar-26 Passed - Info 11-Mar-26 Days in Review:1 2026-00911 Residential Demolition Permit Approved 09-Mar-26 FAMILY DWELLING Days in Review:1 Lloyd Yavener, Chair Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1 Property Owner Address 1 Address 2 City, State, Zip Dear Property Owner, Your property(PROPERTY INFORMATION) (PROPERTY INFORMATION) (PROPERTY INFORMATION) has a zoning overlay in addition to your underlying zoning called the Historic Preservation Overlay. This overlay offers the benefit of the ability to apply for County Property Tax Credits for qualifying exterior work completed on the structures within the overlay. In exchange, any required building permits which affect the exterior of the structures are subject to the review of the Historic District Commission (HDC). The HDC uses the Secretary of Interior (SOI) Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation and the County’s Design Guidelines for Historic Structures when reviewing projects to ensure the property’s unique features are retained. The HDC wanted to reach out to all property owners with a current HP overlay to ensure updates are shared with HP overlay owners and contact with the HDC is open. The HDC’s website includes the adopted Design Guidelines for Historic Structures (June 2022) as well as the Historic Properties Tax Credit Ordinance (May 2024) for reference. Additional information can be found on the customer resource page, as well as access to HDC Agendas, Minutes and Certified Local Government Annual Reporting. Since your property contains a resource within the HP Overlay, the HDC also wanted to determine if there were any additional programs or assistance that could be provided to help with the retention of the resource. Please reach out with any suggestions or considerations that the HDC should undertake. Thank you for your stewardship of a historic resource in Washington County. The HDC looks forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, Meghan Jenkins Historic District Commission Staff