Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 - February (staff reports incl)Lloyd Yavener, Chair Washington County Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich . Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND AGENDA February 4, 2026 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MINUTES 1. Minutes of the December 3, 2025, meeting * NEW BUSINESS 1. Residential New Construction Permit (2025-05908). 21245 Mount Lena Road -(WA-II-166, Mount Lena Rural Village) - (Discussion/Approval) - 2,520 sq. ft. one story pole building on concrete slab to rear of dwelling to be used as a garage, (7) overhead doors, metal roof and sides, pre-engineered roof trusses 2. Non -Residential Addition -Alteration Permit (2025-05780). 8505 Fahrne Church Road - (WA -II -055. San Mar Orahanaae and Mechanical Institute) - (DEMOLITION PORTION ONLY- Discussion/Support) - Demolition of exterior balconies and front covered porch, gutting all interior levels of structure to create individual suites, associated rooms, and community use rooms for the purpose of young adult housing and staffing, 975 sq. ft. three story addition to be used as a stairway with elevator and elevator lobby on all floors, 666 sq. ft. ramp, 174 sq. ft. covered front porch, 22 sq. ft. stoop, Zoning Certification for "San Mar Children's Home" to convert space from an orphanage to a young adult housing facility San Mar family & Community Services, Findley Building * 3. Residential Demolition Permit (2026-00212), 13511 Maugansville Road - (WA -I-252, Martin Farm) - (Discussion/Support) - Demolition of 3,256 sq. ft. dwelling and foundation 4. HTC-25-004, 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown (WA -HAG -146. Oak Hill Historic District) - (Information) - Part 1 and Part 2 application equivalent documentation for tax credits at the Seifarth House for roof repair * 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET OTHER BUSINESS 1. Certified Local Government Annual Report Federal Fiscal Year 2025 - (Discussion/Comment) The completed draft report is attached. * 2. Correspondence a. Reauest for Comments - Smithsbura Hiah School Telecommunications Tower - Proposed Telecommunications Project - Trileaf #766917 * i. Note: Updated documentation attached for comment b. Request for Comment - AP2025-034, 20659 National Pike - Special exception for banquet/reception facility use and variance from the pavement requirement for off-street parking * i. Note: Staff submitted comments c. Invitation to Comment - Proposed Telecommunications Project - Trileaf #746609 - 5404 Mondell Road, Sharpsburg* i. Note: staff submitted standard comment/request to consult; Section 106 still in progress d. Request for Comment AP2025-031, 5404 Mondell Road - special exception for communication tower * i. Note: staff submitted comments and attended meeting - Special exception was denied e. Invitation to Comment - Proposed Telecommunications Project - Trileaf #778831, Mt. Briar, 4220 Chestnut Grove Road * i. Note: Staff requested standard information 1/13/2026 f. Request for Comment AP2025-030, 4220 Chestnut Grove (no attachments) i. Note: Staff did not comment on this tower as part of local appeal process; Appeal was granted g. Request for Comment - Telecommunications Tower - 10944 White Hall Road Smithsburg, MD - Trileaf #770617 * i. Note: Staff requested standard information 12/22/2025 h. Request for Comment - Proposed Telecommunications Tower - 3417/3413 Rohrersville Rd., Rohrersville, MD - Trileaf #771285 (no attachments) i. Note: Staff submitted comments provided by HDC at 12/4/2025 meeting; No Section 106 update after new comments; SP -25-029, related local site plan, in progress, AP2025-004, Granted i. Request for Comment- Proposed Telecommunications Tower - Bakersville, 7116 Houser Road, Trileaf #775393 (no attachments) i. Note: Staff requested standard information 10/14/2025; consultant work in progress to compile as of 1/14/2026; No local applications at this time j. Section 106 Consultation: 1-70 Bridges over Licking Creek - M DOT * i. Note: no comments submitted by staff k. Consultation Request- New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility- 16220 Wright Road, Williamsport, MD * 3. Staff Report a. Staff Reviews * b. Update on Town adoption of MOU's for Tax Credit i. Boonsboro and Sharpsburg completed ii. Smithsburg finished their process; awaiting copies to take to BOCC iii. Funkstown is still outstanding c. Grant Program for Historic Structures - Draft - Status with CA update d. Reminder to submit Financial Disclosures to staff before April 30, 2026 e. Preservation Month 2026 planned/potential topics/events (discussion) i. May 30th Campaign for Historic Trades Window Workshop ii. Emphasize Ordinary Maintenance iii. Highlight Salvage Positives 1. 20313 Locust Grove iv. Emphasize sustainability of historic Preservation and deconstruction v. Adaptive Reuse (saving places article from Ann) vi. Interview Bikles for historic tax credit highlight ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETING 1. Wednesday, March 4, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. *attachments MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY December 3, 2025 The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, December 3, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, Maryland CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Vice -Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commission members present were: Justin Bedard, Vice -Chairman, Ann Aldrich, Tyler Milam, Greg Smith, and Brianna Candelaria. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member. Also in attendance were Theodore and Sharon Lapkoff (20313 Locust Grove Road). MIMI ITFC Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 5, 2025 regular meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Milam and unanimously approved. NEW BUSINESS Residential Demo Permit (2025-05388) - 20313 Locust Grove Road Ms. Jenkins presented a demolition permit application for the deconstruction of a 3,900 sq. ft. single- family dwelling and a detached garage. She noted there are several exterior elements that have contributed to the deterioration of the structure. The configuration of the structure is generally intact with a log front and frame structure to the rear. The property owners have tried to rehabilitate the dwelling over the years. Ms. Jenkins noted that due to topographic constraints on this property such as the location of the septic system and the forest conservation easement area, the owners would like to demolish the existing structure and use the same site to construct their new home. Deconstruction of the existing structure will be performed by Second Chances and the applicants intend to reuse some of the stone and timbers, if possible. Ms. Jenkins explained that the applicants intend to keep the bank barn (which has been restored) as well as the summer kitchen and the well house located on the property. Staff recommends support of the demolition application in consideration of the alternative analysis provided by the applicants and details of the staff report and photographs provided. Motion and Vote: Mr. Smith made a motion to support the demolition permit in accordance with Staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS Residential Demo Permit (2025-04522) —11416 Hanging Rock Road, Clear Spring Ms. Jenkins reminded members that this demolition permit application was tabled at the November 5th meeting pending staff working with other reviewing agencies to determine if the structure could be reused. Following the meeting, the applicant withdrew the demolition application because they intend to save the structure and remove whatever elements are required by the Health Department in order to use the space either for storage or as a workshop. OTHER BUSINESS Correspondence a. Smithsburg High School Tower Update — Ms. Jenkins provided comments on this project that included information that the proposed cell tower site is located in a forest conservation area. The Board of Education intends to replant any trees that are cleared for the project. Members would like the consultant to provide an archaeological report, a historic structures assessment of the viewshed area, and visualizations (GIS viewshed and photo simulations) of the proposed tower, b. Rohrersville Telecommunications Tower — Mr. Bedard explained that the report covered the standard level of effort; however, the effects of the historic properties in Rohrersville is insufficient. The summary provided does not address key elements or issues to determine if location of this cell tower would have any adverse effects on the historic properties. The assessment does not address any of the following concerns: a) if the proposed cell tower is visible from the historic resources; b) the extent or magnitude of the visibility and its effect on the setting of the resources; or c) an adequate assessment of whether or not the proposed cell tower will alter the characteristics of these historic properties that qualify them for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The summary does not state under which criteria the properties are eligible nor does it discuss if the location of the tower would diminish the integrity of each property's location, sign, setting, materials, workmanship feeling or association. Members recommended that Mr. Bedard's comments be sent directly to the consultant. Staff Report • A written report was provided to members in the agenda packet. • Legislative Priorities Update — The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the grant and to their knowledge the grant program can be enacted without further legislation. The implementation information has been updated by the County Attorney's Office and will be brought back to the Commission for review. We are trying to get the funding source added to the upcoming fiscal year's budget. • Update of Town adoption of MOUs for Tax Credits o The MOUs for the Towns of Boonsboro and Sharpsburg will be presented to the County Commissioners on December 9th for their approval and signature. o Ms. Jenkins will be attending the Funkstown Town Council meeting on December Stn to make a presentation. • Discussion of Demolition Resources — Members discussed the visibility of the HDC's demolition resources that are currently on the County's website. Discussions were focused on becoming part of the Permitting Department's outreach, including information in the County's Solid Waste Management Plan regarding deconstruction and reuse, and discuss ordinary maintenance of historic resources during Preservation month. • Discussion of ruins and their rehabilitation/reuse — Ms. Jenkins noted she was having difficulty finding any information on this subject. Members believe this could be a cultural issue. Motion and Vote: Mr. Smith made a motion to adjourn to Closed Session. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved. CLOSED SESSION To discuss the appointment, re -appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion, compensation, removal, resignation, or performance evaluation of appointees, employees, or officials over whom this public body has jurisdiction; or any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals. The Vice -Chairman reconvened the meeting in Open Session at 7:15pm. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Motion and Vote: Mr. Smith made a motion to elect Lloyd Yavener as the Chairman for a second term. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved. Motion and Vote: Ms. Candelaria made a motion to elect Justin Bedard as the Vice -Chairman for a second term. The motion was seconded by Mr. Milam and unanimously approved. UPCOMING MEETING The next meeting of the Historic District Commission is scheduled for Wednesday, January 7, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Aldrich made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:20 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr. Smith, unanimously approved and so ordered by the Vice -Chairman. Respectfully submitted, Justin Bedard, Vice -Chairman ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: January 22, 2026 Subj: Residential New Construction Permit/Garage-Carport, 2025-05908 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: DORSEY HAROLD V, DORSEY WANDA L Applicant: Randy Dick Location: 21245 MOUNT LENA Road Tax Account ID: 16010138 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 64/13/27/ Legal Description: 1.26 AC21245 MT LENA RD Zoning: Rural Village Rural Village: Mount Lena (MHT) Historic Rural Village Project Description: 2,520 sq. ft. one story pole building on concrete slab to rear of dwelling to be used as a garage, (7) overhead doors, metal roof and sides, pre-engineered roof trusses licable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include: 1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. 2. Building Size and Orientation 3. Landscaping 4. Signage 5. Lighting 6. Setbacks 7. Accessory structures Policy HDC-2021-01:Review of Pole Buildings 2. Permit applications for construction of pole buildings that will require HDC review: b. Construction of a pole building, associated with a residential use, on a property or portion of property which DOES contribute to Historic Rural Village. Desian Guidelines for Historic Structures — New Construction and Accessory Buildinas — n. 71 1. New construction should be sited to avoid demolition of contributing structures. 2. The design of new construction or new accessory buildings should be compatible with the form, height, scale, proportions, materials and details of the adjacent contributing structures or landscapes. 3. Consideration of the ratio of built versus open space of the site or the adjacent landscape should be given. 4. Existing setbacks, landscaping or site grading of adjacent historic resources should be preserved when siting new construction if those characteristics contribute to the historic site or its landscape. This includes circulation routes, fences, walls, and yards, etc. 5. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that the existing significant visual and special characteristics of the property are maintained. 6. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that significant viewsheds are maintained or enhanced. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation (p.45 of County Design Guidelines) 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Staff Report: The subject property is located in Mount Lena Historic Rural Village which has a long period of significance spanning ca.1790-1946. The village was most recently documented in 2008 with initial documentation completed in 1978. Most recent documentation and evaluation was completed for Criteria A as an example of a rural village that developed along a primary route crossing South Mountain. The route included both the road and electric rail. Eventually the village would be bypassed by US Route 40 with construction slowing at the start of World War II. The rural village consists of 42 contributing vernacular structures on the north and south sides of Mount Lena Road. There are 36 non- contributing structures. It is important to note that the most recent documentation did not evaluate outbuildings. The contributing residential structure to which this application would be accessory, was constructed during one of several major building periods identified in the rural village around 1930 and it is noted as a vernacular cottage. The property is located at the corner of Lum's Lane and the southside of Mount Lena Road. It is at the end of the adjacent Mason Dixon Dragway. This location makes it the northernmost property in the surveyed rural village except for the Mount Lena Methodist Church which is along the north side of Mount Lena Road. The proposed pole building is to be 2,520 square feet and one story on concrete slab. The structure is to be located to the rear of the residence with its primary facade being along Lum's Lane. There was a structure previously in place of this proposed structure, however it was much smaller in size and of a different construction type. The proposed structure will be primarily white metal siding and black trim details to match existing structures on the site. The purpose of the building is to house existing automobile projects for the property owner. The property owner has indicated that existing temporary storage will be replaced by this structure including sea containers and enclosed auto trailers. To place the building to the rear of the existing contributing structure and not disturb existing accessory structures, the property owner incurred the expense of moving the existing power lines on the property. Staff Analysis: As this rural village has a mixture of construction materials, the metal sided pole building will be compatible with existing design materials in the village. While color is not something that is typically evaluated, it is part of the design and in the case of this application, the owner is using primarily white siding with black trim for compatibility with existing structures on the site. The scale of this structure and its proportion to the other structures on site will be incongruous. However, there are a variety of sizes in accessory structures in this village compared to their primary structures. The variety of scale in proportion structures and site is not unusual for the village itself. The proposed structure will be visible 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION as you enter the rural village but not highly visible from a majority of the village as this property is located at the northernmost point in the village. It is also sited to the rear of the property for minimal visibility from Mount Lena Road. It is unlikely to detract anymore than other accessory structures existing in the village and those buildings on the property currently. It will result in the removal of multiple temporary storage methods. This proposed new construction is a pole building type which results in minimal disturbance of the site and would be removable without loss of integrity to the site should it be necessary in the future. For these reasons the Residential New Construction Permit/Garage-Carport appears to be consistent with the review criteria of Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and the applicable County Design Guidelines and Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation listed. Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of the Residential New Construction Permit/Garage-Carport 2025-05908, in Mount Lena Historic Rural Village for the reasons stated in the staff analysis. Respectfully Submitted, Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Staff • Permit Submission Packet 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET M A R Y L A N D 1776 I;!J'!L. .- MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 2: Front Facade, Facing Northwest 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 3: Side of structure with accessory structures, Facing southeast 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 4: Existing Detached garage to rear of dwelling (to remain), facing southeast 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET JIMARYL R Y L AND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 5: Rear of existing detached garage/dwelling and proposed site of pole building, facing northeast 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 6: Existing detached garage rear elevation, existing on site temporary storage and corner of graded area for proposed pole building 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 7: Existing shed (to remain), relocated powerline along the southeast side of the property, was bisecting 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Contract # 693704-005 Eave #2 x _ # D LL S] (p cJ Eave #1: Front OO 0 �o EAVE #1 GABLE #2 GABLE #1 r A % ,r- 11n BUILDING SIZE: 36X 7OX 1 4 ' V 11 7 2025 DRAWN BY: Job Number: HEIDI KLOCK SHEET CHECKED BY: DORSEY-1 Elevations O U) JOB SITE ADDRESS: CUSTOMER ADDRESS: P P B. n Inc. SAME HAROLD V. DORSEY > WANDA L. DORSEY Pioneer Pole Buildings, Inc. 7 I C South Rt. 183 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 Schuylkill Haven, FA 1 7972 240-527-7212 (H) 1 -888-448-2505 Toll Free 301-992-0205 (M) Al I RIC,HTc, RFciFRVFD 5Y PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COFIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN FEKMI55ION Contract # 693704-005 Eave #2' is C7 U, Eave #1: Front HOUSE i 1 MOUNT LENA RD 1,-n„ F' -fl" R. -n., R 0„ K-0, T-0" 9,-0„ 8,_0" 8,-0„ 8'-0" 1'-0" wimnnw k fl(( (H S(:HF nl n F Y.. i TYPE OF WINDOW / DOOR NOMIN. R.O. Ocnr, Mx' J OA:[T!ee'cc'-C - , Ood.nicao COO. r'; - O--.. ' u . 70'-0" LUMS LN BUILDING SIZE 36x70x14'-4" DATE: 11 -7-2025 DRAWN BY, Job Number: SHEET HEIDI KLOCK CHECKED BY: DORSEY-1 Pole Plan (n P P B. I n C. . JOB SITE ADDRESS: SAME Pioneer Pole Buildings. Inc. 7 16 South Kt. 83 CUSTOMER ADDRESS: HAROLD V. DORSEY WANDA L. DORSEY 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD ol cr cr Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972 BOONSBORO, MD 21713 240-527-7212 (H) I -888-448-2505 Toll Free 301-992-0205 (M) ALL RIGHT5 RESERVED BY PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS, INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION Contract # 693704-005 TYP. CROSS SECTION BUILDING SIZE: 36x7Ox14'-411 DATE: r� 11-7-2025 O DRAWN BY: HEIQI KLOCK Job Number: DORSEY-1 SHEET' TYP Cross Section CHECKED BY: PPB. B. Inc. Pioneer Pole Buildings. Inc. 7 I G South Rt. 183 Schuylkill haven, PA 17972 I -888-448-2505 Toll Free JOB SITE ADDRESS: SAME CUSTOMER ADDRESS: HAROLD V. DORSEY WANDA L. DORSEY 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 240-527-7212 (H) 301-992-0205 (M) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FD FOOTER DETAIL 1 - POST -BEYOND METAL SIDING 2x6 HEADER OVERHEAD DOOR TRIM '-' T-0 UNDISTURBED BASE SOIL EARTH BACK FILL (2) UPLIFT PLATES PER POST CONCRETE COLLAR ADDED AFTER POST IS SET IN PLACE 8" x 24" CONCRETE FOOTER (3 -BAGS) TRUSS (8) 12d NAILS TO FASTEN FS TRUSS TO TIE -PLATE qB..Q c 2X6 TRUSS TIE DOWN BLOCK ATTACHED TO CARRIER 4'-0" D/c WITH (16) NAILS (8 PER SIDE) NAIL BLOCKS (NAIL BLOCKS ARE NOT USED WHEN LVL's 14" DEEP OR GREATER ARE USED) 2x6 DOOR LINER & SPRING PAD RUN TO BOTTOM OF TRUSS 2x6 BLOCKING CONT. 2x6 HEADER OVERHEAD DOOR DOOR SEAUMOLDING 2X4 PURLINS AT 24" ON CENTER METAL ROOFING OVER- HANGS FASCIA BY 1Y2" 2X6 SUB FASCIA ATTACHED w! (3) NAILS AT EACH TRUSS & (1) 4" LEDGER-LOK EVERY OTHER TRUSS METAL FASCIA TRIM VENTED SOFFIT F & J TRIM ATTACH CARRIERS TO POST IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL HA -1 POST s� 28 GA, PRE- PAINTED STEEL SIDING PANELS - TYPICAL RE STEEL ROOF EDGE DETAIL %YR nnnR I INFR (3) 12D RING SHANK GUN NAILS OD O.H. DOOR HEADER DETAIL 1 2x6 DOOR LINER POST OVERHEAD DOOR 2x4 FILLER 2x4 GIRT DOOR SEAL/MOLDING OVERHEAD DOOR TRIM METAL SIDING OD O.H. DOOR JAMB DETAIL 2 PER CONNECTION TO TRUS 28 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS - TYPICAL GABLE END TRUSS TYPICAL 2"X 4" PURLIN AT 24" O/C RAKE & CORNER TRIM 2"X 6" S.P.F. END RAKE WITH METAL FASCIA COVER VENTED SOFFIT PANELS F -J -CHANNEL 28 GA, PRE- PAINTED STEEL SIDING PANELS - TYPICAL GD TYPICAL GABLE OVERHANG DETAIL 1 Contract # 693704-005 -- NOTCH POLE - (4) 4" STRUCTURAL SCREWS I°°SI I�°..I __ ++I° I I I I ° I I° I 1° I I al ° (12) 12d NAILS (8) 12d NAILS - / :1 2x4x12" NAIL BLOCK CONTINUOUS SPLICED 2X12 MSR OR BETTER HEADER ATTACHMENT BOLT REPLACEMENT SEE SHEET 2.20 UNIVERSAL RIDGE CAP ATTACHED TO EACH RIB / w/ 1Y2" ROOFING SCREWS OUTSIDE FILLER - TYP. TYPICAL 2X4 PURLINS AT 24" ON CENTER METAL ROOFING � ss� �Pv4a, olc SR STEEL ROOF RIDGE DETAIL 1 BUILDING SIZE: 36X7OX 141-411 DATE. DRAWN BY: Job Number: 11-7-2025 HEIDI KLOCK SHEET CHECKED BYDORSEY-1 Detail A oH JOB SITE ADDRESS: CUSTOMER ADDRESS. PP B. I n C. SAME HAROLD V. DORSEY N Pioneer Pole Buildings. Inc. WANDA L. DORSEY 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD 7 16 South Kt. 53 BOONSBORO, MD 21713 Schuylkill Naven, PA 17972 240-527-7212 (H) I -888-448-2505 Toll Free 301-992-0205 (M) ALL KIGHT5 RESERVED BY PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OK KEPKODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION TYP. SCREW PLACEMENT - USE 1" QUICK SEAL WOOD BINDERS (4) PER SHEET METAL SIDING REMOVE THIS SECTION OF GIRTS AFTER ATTACHING TO JACK STUDS Li 2x4 GIRT SS� SIDING SCREW PATTERN DETAIL 2x4 TOP NAILER (SPF) ________ CARRIERS POST 2x4 GIRTS 2x6 TREATED SPLASH BRD. NOTCHED FOR DOOR W/BARRIER TAPE 5\ SERVICE DOOR FRAMING DETAIL 2x4 PURLINS 2' O.C.-USE (3) 12dx3 1;4"Lg. (.120 SHANK DIA.) NAILS TO FASTEN ROOF PURLIN TO TRUSS AT EACH PURLIN-TO-TRUSS INTERSECTION POINT ,- TRUSSES 4' O.C PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES (3) MSR HEADERS 2x4x12" NAIL BLOCKS II II I POST ji II 2x4 GIRTS 2' O.C. 2x6 TREATED SKIRT BOARD —, WITH BARRIER TAPE - TYP. it II ul r"I USE (3) 12dx3-1/4" Lg. (.131" SHANK DIA.) HOT DIPPED GALV. NAILS TO FASTEN WALL GIRTS TO POSTS AT EACH GIRT - TO POST INTERSECTION POINT GF GENERAL GABLE VIEW DETAIL 1 (I) C_ 0 0 cc SHIM DOOR AT KNOBS & 6" FROM TOP & BOTTOM OF DOOR ATTACHED TO POLES W/ 3" SCREWS 2x4 FILLER 2x4 GIRT METAL SIDING METAL J TRIM PRE -HUNG DOOR & FRAME SD SERVICE DOOR JAMB DETAIL 2 HURRICANE TIE POLE TH TRIPLE HEADER @ O.H.D. DETAIL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 5Y PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN FERM155ION BUILDING SIZE: 36x70x 1 4'-4" DRAWN BY: I Job Number. HEIDI KLOCK CHECKED BY I DORSEY-1 PPB. Inc. Pioneer Pole buildings. Inc. 7 1 IS South Rt. 183 Schuylkill Haven, PA 1 7972 I -888-448-2505 Toll Free POST Contract # 693704-005 METAL SIDING 2x6 TREATED SKIRT BOARD WITH BARRIER TAPE - TYP. BASE TRIM ± 2 3/a" EXPOSED �� SPLASH BOARD gT BASE TRIM DETAIL POLE SHIM DOOR AT EA. HINGE & INSTALL (1)3' SCREW PER HINGE 2x4 ROOF DIAGONAL BRACES (ADD. TRUSS BRACING AS PER MAN. SPECS MAY BE NEEDED) POST FRAME CARRIERS SHALL BE TWO -SPAN CONTINOUOUS r BEAMS STAGGER CARRIER BUTT JOINTS SO THAT BUTT JOINT OF BOTH SPANS DO NOT OCCUR AT SAME POST. EF GENERAL EAVE VIEW DETAIL JOB SITE ADDRESS SAME DATE: 11-7-2025 SHEET. Detail B CUSTOMER ADDRESS: HAROLD V. DORSEY WANDA L. DORSEY 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 240-527-7212 (H) 301-992-0205 (M) TRUSSES 4' O.C. 2x4 PURLINS 2' O.C. CARRIERS 2x4 GIRTS 2' O.C. POST 8O.C. 2x6 TREATED SPLASH BRD, W/BARRIER TAPE Contract # 693704-005 (2) 16d Nai (2) 16d Nai Double X Brac Use When Length Will Not reach from to 16d Nails 16d Nails WB WALL BRACE DETAIL tracing [ USE 12dx2-3/8" Lg. (.131" SHANK DIA.) HOT DIPPED GALV. NAILS EVERY 6" TO FASTEN SHEATHING TO WALL GIRTS & BLOCKING 2x4 NAIL BLOCK BETWEEN GIRTS TO NAIL SHEATHING TO %, OSB OR BETTER SHEATHING INSTALLED TIGHT BETWEEN POLES RUN FROM FLOOR TO TOP OF HEADER .J _____ ''' I PORTAL WALL DETAIL 2X6 TRACK BACKER #2 SPF FASTEN TO BOTTOM CHORD OF GABLE TRUSS W/ METAL. SIDING (2) 12D (3.25"LX.131.0) NAILS AT 12" O/C ABOVE TRACK TRACK MOUNTING BRACKET, FASTEN 2X4 NAILER ABOVE TO 2X6 TRACK BACKER WI LH (2) 16D BOTTOM CHORD NAILS AT EACI I MOUNTING BRACKET INSTALLED 2' ON CENTER 2X6 TRUSS BOTTOM CHORD SLIDING DOOR TRACK 2X6 SLIDING DOOR TOP GIRT SLIDING DOOR ASS - TROLLEY HANGER (HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE) EMBLY (SEE SD/t) METAL DOOR SIDING SD GABLE SLIDING DOOR 3 MOUNTING HARDWARE DETAIL BUILDING SIZE: 36x70x 1 4'-4" DRAWN BY HEIDI KLOCK I Job Number_ (1) O CHECKED BY: DORSEY-1 PPB. Inc. Pioneer Pole Buildings. Inc. 7 16 South Rt. 183 Schuylkill Haven, PA 1 7972 I -885-448-2505 Toll Free ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMI55ION DOOR 2x6 TOP GIRT ALUM. SIDE RAIL 2x4 DOOR GIRTS 2O.C. INSERT IN ALUM. SIDE RAILS 2x6 TREATED SPLASH BRD. W/BARRIER TAPE > SD SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLY 1 POST 2x6 #2SPF DOOR JAMB FASTEN TO SIDE DOOR POST W/(2) 2x4 WALL. GIRT` 12d EVERY FT OF POST LENGTH METAL SIDING Il ( L JAMB LATCH 2x4 DOOR GIRT METAL SIDING J CHANNEL SLDING DOOR ASSEMBLY #14 JAMB TRIM ALUM. SIDE RAIL SD SLIDING DOOR JAMB 2 rvP FOR GABLE OR EAVE LDCA1IONf JOB SITE ADDRESS: SAME DATE 11-7-2025 S!,EE1 Detail C I CUSTOMER ADDRESS: HAROLD V. DORSEY WANDA L. DORSEY 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 240-527-7212 (H) 301-992-0205 (M) General Notes: Poundations: A. Bottom of all exterior footings shall be minimum of 3'-0" below finished grade. Minimum size 8" high x 24" round or as noted. B. Assumed design sod bearing pressure = 2.000 PSF U.N.O. C. Minimum concrete footing strength to be 3,500 P51 at 28 days. Concrete Floor: A. The floor thickness shall be a minimum of 4", or per plans B. A minimum of 4,000 PSI concrete W1 Fibermesh reinforcement or equivalent reinforcement C. Expansion and control joints as needed D. G -mill poly vapor barrier shall be installed between the floor slab and base material, joints lapped G' minimum D. I. The vapor barrier is not required in R-3 detached unheated buildings, or for exposed exterior flat work Metal Cladding: A. Steel siding and roofing panels shall be fabricated from 27 a 26 gauge, grade e 180 K51 structural quality steel conforming to A5TM A -44G with a hot dipped galvanized coating conforming to A5TM A-525 or with an aluminum -zinc alloy coating conforming to ASTM A-792 (plain products only). B. Paint Finish: All panels when required shall receive a factory applied polyester coating conforming to the manufacturer's specifications. C. Flashings: All flashings shall be shop fabricated from material that is the same gauge and finish as the walVroof panels to which they are attached. D. Closures: Shall be pre -molded neoprene to match the configuration of the walVroof panel and shall be in lengtns as supplied by the panel manufacturer. E. Fasteners: All screw fasteners shall have a combination steel and neoprene washer, Nails shall have a Fabnseal washer or equivalent. Fastener selection and installation shall be as recommended by the cladding manufacturer. Wood Trusses: A. Trusses are to be designed and fabricated in accordance with the published standards of the National Forest Products Association and the Truss Plate Institute's "Design Specifications for Light. Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses" (TPI-XX) Latest Edition, B. The web configuration plate sizes, chord saes and lateral bracing shall be designed by a licensed professional engineer. The truss manufacturer shall provide the contractor with shop drawings of each truss design bearing the engineers seal. Shop drawings shall be approved by the contractor before fabrication. C. All trusses shall be designed for the loading, spacing and geometry shown on the plan. U. The contractor shall install the bracing of the wood trusses in accordance with the manufacturer's design. Minimum lateral bracing of web and bottom chord members shall be as required by truss design. Lumber: A. Ali lumber shall comply to the requirements of the American Institute of Timber Construction and the National Forest Products Association's "National Design Specification for Wood Construction". B. All lumber for posts and beams shall be #2 or better southern yellow pine grade stamped by a SP15 approved mill, surfaced at a maximum moisture content of 19% treated .G pcf CCA. .23 pcf MCA, or equal. C All lumber for headers shall be SYP # I or Better, grade stamped by a SPIB approved mill, surfaced at a maximum moisture content of 19%a. D. All lumber exposed to ground contact or insect infestation shall be treated according to the American Wood preservers' Association Standards, . 15 pcf MCA or equal. Connections: A. All wood connection to be made according to the "National Design Specification for Wood Construction". The minimum connection to be two 12 penny nails. Other connection as per plan or as controlled by standard construction practices. B. It is acceptable for 2x4 wind girt spacing to vary from 18" to 30", when the span of the girt is 10' or less. Horizontal spacing of fasteners for the metal wall panels shall be in accordance with the panel manufacturer's instructions. The wind girt spacing up to 30" conforms to the rigid diaphragm design for post frame walls. 0 cc ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION Contract # 693704-005 Cautionary Notes: I . Structural components such as posts, beams, trusses or fasteners and attachment brackets should NOT be modified. notched or cut in any manner without proper review and approval of the building design professional. 2. Rainwater and melt water should be directed away from post foundation locations. 3- On enclosed buildings with large doors (that is buildings designed as completely enclosed) the doors should be closed during periods high wind and/or stormy weather to reduce uplift forces on the building. 4. Do NOT lean heavy materials against posts or girts unless the building has been designed for those types of loads. Do NOT store loose material against walls unless building has been designed for side thrust loads and any moisture contained in the loose materials. 5. Do NOT use the roof trusses for storing material unless the building and roof trusses have been designed for those loads. G. Concentrated loads such as ceiling -mounted furnaces, wet sprinkler systems, ventilation hoods, etc. SHALL NOT be attached to the roof trusses without the prior review and written approval of Pioneer Pole Buildings. Inc. and the building design professional. 7. Do NOT install hardware that would maintain snow cover on the roof of buildings without the prior review and written approval of Pioneer Pole Buildings, Inc. and the building design professional. 8. Do NOT attach additional buildings or lean-to enclosed areas to pole barn buildings unless the building has been designed for the additional loads created by these building additions and needs the written approval of Pioneer Pole buildings, Inc. and the building design professional. 9. Door openings should NOT be added to the building walls after the building has been constructed without review and approval of the building design professional. M15c. Notes: these plans are designed in accordance with the 202 1 IBC Construction Class VS TKU55 CARRIERS USED TO BE EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN 2x 12 M5R 2400f - 2.Oe (3) 2x 12 M5K TRIJ55 CARRIERS U5ED OVER I 2'W OPENINGS BOLT HEADERS USING (8) 4" # 1 4 STRUCTURAL SCREWS HURRICANE TIES USED = RT I GA (LISP CONNECTORS) TWO-TONE SIDING ON 4 -WALLS UNIVERSAL RIDGE VENT IBC USE GROUP UTILITY BUILDING SIZE, 36x70x 1 4'-4" DRAWN BY: I Job Number: HEIDI KLOCK CHECKED BY I DORSEY-1 PPB. Inc. Pioneer Pole bulldings. Inc. 7 1 G South Kt. 183 Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972 I -888-448-2505 Toll Free JOB SITE ADDRESS: SAME DATE 11-7-2025 SHEET: Notes CUSTOMER ADDRESS: HAROLD V. DORSEY WANDA L. DORSEY 21245 MOUNT LENA ROAD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 240-527-7212 (H) 301-992-0205 (M) DESIGN CRITERIA: Ground Snow Loads: Ground Snow Load (psf) = 40 Wind Speed: Wind Speed = 115 mph Truss Loads: Top Chord Live (psf) = 30 rop Chord Dead (psi) = 5 Bottom Chord Live (psf) = 0 Bottom Chord Dead (psf) = 5 CONTINUOUS HEADER (NO SPLICE Header w/ (2) z" 0 Carriage Bolts Outside Building View Inside Building View Top Down View Direct Replacement/Substation Notice This document is to demonstrate how the 4" Ledger-Lok screws will directly replace applications requiring z" 0 Bolted Headers/ Header w/ (8) 4" L-Lok. (4) Ea. Side Outside Building View *(2) "' Carriage Bolts Replaced with (8) 4" L-Loks* r\ Authority for replacement of prior requirements is per ICC acceptance of ESR 1078 permitting the prescriptive use of FastenMaster Lok Series Structural Wood Screws. PpviRinnR' Inside Building View Top Down View p EM,q = 1 4 TAlE OF : Cr ; ilg ONAL E��` coA+1`Go2-SS-S Da Header With Splice At Post Header w/ (4) 2" 0 Carriage Bolts Outside Building View Inside Building View Top Down View PPB. Inc. Pioneer Pole Buildings, Inc. 7 1 G 5outh Kt:. 1 83 5chuylklll f1aven. PA 1 7972 1 -888-448-2505 Toll Free Header w/ (8) 4" L-Lok. (4) Ea. Side "(4) z" Carriage Bolts Replaced with (8) 4" L-Loks' JAMEr P NHAVER ENGINEER �� W PE035J4�E ��P4,` VNS Y L.J f f Outside Building View Inside Building View Top Down View \,i\1 I 1 f r7 I•., N.' 0-102t152QU1 James A. Koppenhaver. P.E. DATE 3-° L 3/2021 Wyom:—g. PAt991C C&:-79:-9949 SHEET: �nro�'kopp•nhnverpe.com Stanra•ds BUILDING SIZE* Bolt Replacemant DRAWN BY: Job Numbe•: CHECKED BY 12.20 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY PIONEER POLE BUILDINGS. INC. NOT TO BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMI5SION Harold & Wanda Dorsey 21245 Mount Lena Rd Boonsboro Md 21713 Site Plan Proposed Pole Barn Drawn By RMD Lums Lane JJ 1 Radius Well Driveway Existing Septic nnnnnnnnnnni I iiiiiiiiuiuuuuuuuiiiiui Proposed 36' x 70' Garage ...... Pole Barn Driveway 40' � House Shed ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: January 22, 2026 Subj: Non -Residential Addition -Alteration Permit/Institutional, 2025-05780 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: SAN MAR CHILDRENS HOME INC, Applicant: Hannah Weikel Location: 8505 FAHRNEY CHURCH Road Tax Account ID: 06024963 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 63/24/117/ Legal Description: 36.17 ACRES REM8503,8504,8505,8508FAHRNEY CHURCH RD Zoning: Agricultural, Rural Zoning Overlay: Rural Business Overlay MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): 110055 Project Description: Demolition of exterior balconies and front covered porch, gutting all interior levels of structure to create individual suites, associated rooms, and community use rooms for the purpose of young adult housing and staffing, 975 sq. ft. three story addition to be used as a stairway with elevator and elevator lobby on all floors, 666 sq. ft. ramp, 174 sq. ft. covered front porch, 22 sq. ft. stoop, Zoning Certification for "San Mar Children's Home" to convert space from an orphanage to a young adult housing facility San Mar family & Community Services, Findley Building Applicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures Demolition Permit Application Requirements 1. Written description and history of the building or structure to be demolished. 2. Detail drawings, such as construction or trim details. 3. Floor plan for each floor level, drawn to approximate scale or fully dimensioned. 4. Applicant's plan for the recycling of waste generated 5. A report or narrative analyzing the following alternatives (listed in descending order of preference) as to the feasibility. The report shall consist of thorough, deliberative analyses of each of the alternatives, explaining why each alternative is or is not feasible and additional photographs should be provided in support of the analysis. In cases where a permit may involve multiple structures, each structure must have its alternatives documented. (a) Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structure or its setting; (b) Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project; (c) Converting the structure into another use (adaptive reuse); (d) Relocating the structure on the property; (e) Relocating the structure to another property; (f) Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials; (g) Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 6. A site plan illustrating any proposed development or introduction of plantings following demolition (if applicable) Staff Report: This structure is on the Washington County Historic Sites Inventory/MIHP as San Mar Orphanage and Mechanical Institute WA -II -055, with original documentation completed in 1974. Updated determination of eligibility (DOI) documentation was completed in August of 2025. The subject structure of this permit is the Findlay building, the original main building of the San Mar Children's Home. It's located on the n/s of Fahrney Church Road at its intersection with Mapleville Road and faces east. The building is an L-shaped, colonial revival building that is two -and -a -half stories in its rectangular main block with a rear addition also two -and -a -half stories. Please see attached updated documentation for full description of the building. The permit application involves the remodel and repurposing of the site to meet the current needs of the San Mar Children's Home regarding transitional housing. There is also an associated site plan SP -25-045 for the building renovations and parking lot expansion currently in review. The property owner is seeking state funding for portions of this project and therefore Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) has reviewed the project. Staff did attend a virtual meeting regarding the project and reiterated that the County's Design Guidelines do encourage retention of features on the primary facade and that this property is not in an area for approval/denial of review. During this meeting the owner and applicant also stated the purpose of the change in dormers is to meet code requirements for habitable space so that the top floor can be usable space for programming and housing moving forward. The removal of the front porch entry and balconies was due to concerns regarding security of the facility. The owners want to avoid and limit unauthorized access to the building. The owner also indicated that the change in front entry will align with the open and inviting feeling they are trying to encourage through the overall building renovations. There is a draft Memorandum of Agreement for MHT for this property as of 1/22/2026 but no final agreement has been made available for staff to share. Staff sent a standard letter to the applicant detailing the demolition permit requirements for Historic District Commission review. The consultant has made the updated DOI documentation available for this review. The extent of Historic District Commission (HDC) permit review extends only to the areas proposed for demolition including the dormers, front entrance porch and first floor balconies. Staff Analysis: The applicant has provided the updated DOI for documentation of the structure. There are also plans included for minor changes to the site surroundings including parking and site circulation documented through the site plan process. The owner and applicant did provide a narrative regarding the reasoning for this demolition during the MHT project review meeting. Mainly that these site changes will ensure the building continues to be used for San Mar's mission. There was no plan submitted for the waste generated during this renovation. The majority of the demolition permit application requirements have been met or exceeded. Staff Recommendation: Recommend support of the Non -Residential Addition -Alteration Permit/Institutional, 2025-05780, for the reasons stated in Staff Analysis with the following recommendation to the applicant/owner: 1. When completing the interior and exterior renovations of the building, please ensure salvage of as much material as feasible. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Respectfully Submitted, 1_ oyJ Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos (from updated documentation provided by consultant) • Permit Submission Packet 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET EHT HTRACERIES H I S T❑ R! C PRESERVATION August 12, 2025 Elizabeth Hughes Director / State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Department of Planning 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032 440 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 (202) 393-11991 www.traceries.com REF: San Mar Children's Home Findlay Building Rehabilitation Project Assessment of Effects Dear Ms. Hughes: San Mar Family and Community Services, Inc. is proposing to renovate and modernize the Findlay Building at the historic San Mar Children's Home in Boonsboro, Washington County, Maryland. The proposed undertaking would utilize the existing historic fabric while providing an updated and expanded space that satisfies the required programs for contemporary youth housing. As part of this effort, a three- story rear addition will be constructed creating an additional stair and elevator core to satisfy code requirements. The historic character and layout of the building will be preserved where possible; however, providing the necessary square footage and amenities for fifteen studio apartment units within the current building footprint will require the reinterpretation of some architectural features. The Findlay Building, addressed 8505 Fahrney Church Road, sits in the center of a 36 -acre property, operated by the San Mar Children's Home since its facilities opened in 1927. The property, located to the north of Boonsboro 's Main Street within the San Mar community, stretches along the major thoroughfare of Mapleville Road (Maryland Route 66) to the east and is divided into two parcels by Fahmey Church Road, which runs east to west from Mapleville Road. The entire site is rural in nature, and the property is bound by farmland to the north, south, and west. Several accessory buildings surround the Findlay Building, including a two-story brick farmhouse and stone springhouse to the northeast that date from the mid -nineteenth century when the land was owned and farmed by the Fahmey family. Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 800) "Protection of Historic Properties" (Section 106), San Mar Family and Community Services, Inc. initiated the Section 106 process and the Maryland Historic Trust (MHT) Act Section 5A-325 and 5A-326 in March 2025. Since that time, the San Mar organization has defined the undertaking and has assessed potential effects to historic resources by enlisting EHT Traceries, Inc. to complete a DOE Form for the Findlay Building as requested by MHT. This letter is being transmitted to seek concurrence from your office with the findings presented in the DOE Form, which can be found in Attachment A, while the project drawings can be found in Attachment B. Description of Undertaking San Mar Family and Community Services, Inc. proposes to renovate and modernize the interior and exterior of the Findlay Building and to construct a three-story rear addition that will provide an additional stair and elevator core, satisfying code requirements. The Findlay Building, constructed between 1925 and 1927, is an L-shaped, two -and -a -half -story brick mansion designed in the Colonial Revival style. The Findlay Building originally functioned as the main building of the San Mar Children's Home, previously Findlay Building Rehabilitation Assessment of Effects Letter Page 2 of 6 August 12, 2025 the Washington County Home for Orphaned and Friendless Children. The property is included in the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties as the San Mar Orphanage (WA -II -55). In the late nineteenth century, the building footprint was expanded by a small, two-story rear addition. The interior has been extensively altered during modernization efforts over the years; however, the historic layout remains intact. The building currently houses offices and conference rooms used by the San Mar organization. The intent of this project is to rehabilitate the exterior of the building in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and completely modernize the interiors. As needed, materials and finishes will be replaced in -kind. Exterior alterations will include the construction of an addition at the west (rear) elevation, removal of the main entrance pavilion, modifications to the door opening of the main entrance, conversion of Juliet balcony doors on the facade into windows, removal of the metal Juliet balconies on the facade, and the replacement of eight roof dormers with four larger roof dormers. In addition, the project will include parking lot upgrades and new landscaping. The interior of the existing building, which retains little historic fabric, will undergo an extensive renovation to update all utilities and living quarters, mitigate environmental concerns, and provide programmatic elements that will support community development. Interior alterations will include modifications to floor plans and construction of bathrooms to create fifteen studio units, along with the removal of the main central staircase. An innkeeper's suite will also be added to the program. Beyond this, the building's overall interior configuration will be retained as the original north -south circulation axis will remain, along with the larger gathering spaces and kitchen facilities towards the northwest corner of the first floor. In February of 2024, San Mar hosted Cindy Stone of DHCD and MHT Preservation Officer Elizabeth Hughes to review the proposed project and received positive feedback on the direction of the rehabilitation efforts. Ms. Hughes shared that it was her belief that minor mitigation measures would allow the organization to protect the legacy of the services provided on the campus. As the continuous owner over the past 98 years, San Mar Family and Community Services, Inc. plans to renovate the facilities to offer a related service in housing young adults in transition from foster care. There was not much concern for the loss of the legacy, as the legacy will continue. The San Mar organization has since assessed potential effects to historic resources by enlisting EHT Traceries, Inc. to complete a DOE Form for the Findlay Building as requested by MHT. The resource is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) based on the findings presented by the DOE Form. The Findlay Building at 8505 Fahrney Church Road in Boonsboro, Maryland demonstrates sufficient historical and architectural significance to support eligibility under National Register Criterion A in the area of Social History and Criterion C in the area of Architecture. The DOE Form recommends a Period of Significance of 1925-1927. This period extends from the start of construction in 1925 to the completion of the building in 1927 when approximately forty children were moved in. Assessment of Effects The facilities, while available for use, are not conducive in their current layout to address housing insecurity as they were designed as an early twentieth century group home. The San Mar organization has no desire or plan to step backwards towards that traditional model; their wish is to revitalize the Findlay Building's historic use and footprint to create an environment for women aging out of foster care that results in optimism, calmness, and respect, supporting each resident's dignity and sense of self. The design approach for the renovation is rooted in key trauma -informed design principles: Beauty and joy, community and collaboration, safety and trust, and choice and empowerment. Findlay Building Rehabilitation Page 3 of 6 Assessment of Effects Letter August 12, 2025 As previously described, the masonry circulation tower to be added to the rear elevation is necessary to meet contemporary code requirements for a building with fifteen studio apartment units. A ramp along the rear elevation will access this addition. The dormer expansion will then create the appropriate amount of viable living space in the new loft apartments, previously used as attic space. San Mar is committed to keeping the dormer component of the roof, however, connecting pairs of dormers in their original locations allows for the most efficient use of space for apartments for vulnerable young women transitioning from foster care to adulthood. The altered dormers will be clad in modern materials to differentiate them and highlight them as altered features. The organization believes that the needs of the residents of the apartments should come before the dormer integrity, and enlarging the dormers will ensure spaces are not cramped with low head heights or barriers to freely moving about the room, in turn providing a sense of empowerment and openness. The redesign of the main entrance access is important for many different reasons. The removal of the pavilion structure on the facade will increase safety and security between the ground level and second floor. Within its organizational history, San Mar has experienced how this element of the facade could be problematic on some occasions with unauthorized entry and exit from the second -floor window openings. Removing the pavilion will also allow for more natural light to infiltrate the entry area. This focus on light extends to the restoration of the original wood fanlight in the center of the facade, along with the two wood oculi at the north and south elevations. Natural light is crucial to the building's functionality as such architectural elements can significantly heighten or calm a resident's response to stressors, contributing to a sense of calmness and well-being. Please, note, the wood oculi and wood fanlight are called out to be replaced in the drawings found in Attachment B, but they will instead be salvaged, restored and reused. The organization has gone to great lengths to preserve important elements of the historic fabric within the design for the new home; however, they believe that aspects of the building that retain their institutional feel will do a disservice to future residents who may be reminded of former homes where conditions were unsatisfactory. San Mar hopes to design a building that will be a place of healing and support; the invitingness of the main entrance is a critical component to sending the message to residents, day in and day out, that they are in a safe, vibrant, and opportunity -rich environment. San Mar proposes to retain the original rectangular double -leaf door opening of the entry, but recessing the opening to shelter residents from inclement weather as the pavilion once did. The visual cues and amount of space available to residents are critical components of the trauma informed design process. As the sole organization operating and managing services on the Boonsboro site for nearly a century, San Mar is committed to mitigating historical impact by continuing to lift up not only the history of the organization, but that of the broader area in Boonsboro. San Mar Family & Community Services, Inc. is undoubtedly a willing and interested partner in preserving this history and supporting MHT's mission to educate residents of the state about the legacy of Maryland's past. The organization believes that creating a space for young people on this site that never makes them feel like they are in an undesirable institutional space, which will be produced from the marriage of many unique historical elements with the overall modernization of the facilities, can be achieved while supporting broader preservation goals. Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. Interpretation. In order to educate visitors, employees, and residents about the history of the Findlay Building and the larger Fahrney/Gray farm site, interpretive signage will be created for the lobby and/or the main entrance to the building. 2. Digital Capture. Digital capture of photos and client information will be carried out to protect the legacy of services provided on the campus. Findlay Building Rehabilitation Assessment of Effects Letter Page 4 of 6 August 12, 2025 3. Design Review. As the design is further refined, consultation will continue with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and MHT to meet the expected historic preservation guidelines. The interior and exterior renovations will provide long-term preservation of the historic building while making use of the former living quarters existing on the San Mar organization's property, returning the building to its original use. The rehabilitation of the Findlay Building's exterior in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the modernization of the interiors allows for continued and improved use of the historic resource. The proposed undertaking will retain exterior character -defining features of the Colonial Revival style of the building while providing modernized efficient interior floorplans that provide maximum utility for tenants. Sincerely, Kim Dailaeder Principal/Director of Technical Preservation EHT Traceries Included: Attachment A: Determination of Eligibility Attachment B: Project Drawings Cc: Matthew Bray, matthew.j.bray(a,hud.gov Becky Roman, becky.roman(c�ma . lry and.gov Jerica Washington, jwashin tg ongsnamarhope org Keith Fanjoy, kfanjoy&sanmarhope org Attachment A: Determination of Eligibility MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR Eligible: yes X DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM no Property Name: San Mar Orphanage & Mechanical Institute (San Mar) Inventory Number: Address: 8505 Fahrney Church Road City: Boonsboro, MD Zip Code: County: Washington County Owner: San Mar Children's Home Inc. Tax Parcel Number: 0117 Project: WA -II -055 21713 USGS Topographic Map: USGS Funkstown quadrangle Is the property being evaluated a district? yes •Tax Map Number: 0063 Tax Account ID Number: 024963 Site visit by MHT Staff: no yes Name: Is the property located within a historic district? yes x no Agency: Date: If the property is within a district District Inventory Number: NR -listed district yes Eligible district yes District Name: Preparer's Recommendation: Contributing resource _yes no Non-contributing but eligible in another context If the property is not within a district (or the property is a district) Preparer's Recommendation: Eligible yes x no Criteria: x A B x C D Considerations: A B C D E F G x None Documentation on the property/district is presented in: Description of Property and Eligibility Determination: (Use continuation sheet if necessary and attach map and photo) Description Summary The Findlay Building, the original main building of the San Mar Children's Home, is located at 8505 Fahrney Church Road in Boonsboro, Maryland. The L-shaped, Colonial Revival building consists of a two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block with a two -and -a -half -story rear wing to the north. The exterior is clad in red brick and features slightly projecting bays, overlaid hipped roofs, and dormers, in addition to neoclassical -inspired elements such as a large pediment and fanlight in the center of the facade, decorative molding, and overall symmetry of the elevations. The building was designed by local Hagerstown architect Amos J. Klinkhart in 1925 and construction was completed in 1927. The Findlay Building functioned as the living quarters for the children of the San Mar Orphanage, which opened in 1927 in the community of San Mar following the merger of the Washington County Home for Children and the Peter Gray Orphans Home and Mechanical Institute, along with the latter's move from its original facilities in downtown Hagerstown. The orphanage was built on the acreage of the Gray Farm, which Peter Gray had stipulated in his will be used for such a purpose after his and his wife's passing. The home was rededicated in 1981 and the name changed to that of the San Mar Children's Home. Shortly after, the main building was given the official name of the Findlay Building in honor of longstanding board member Anna K. Findlay who laid the cornerstone back in 1925. The building exterior maintains much of its original historic character and fabric. Although the interior has seen multiple renovations over time, its historic layout, circulation pattern, and program have also remained largely intact. A two-story addition was added to the west elevation of the rear wing between 1958-1979. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 1 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Site The Findlay Building sits in the center of a thirty -six -acre property operated by the San Mar Children's Home since its facilities opened in 1927. The property, located to the north of Boonsboro's Main Street within the San Mar community, stretches along the major thoroughfare of Mapleville Road (Maryland Route 66) to the east and is divided into two parcels by Fahrney Church Road, which runs east to west from Mapleville Road. The entire site is rural in nature, and the property is bound by farmland to the north, south, and west. The Findlay Building is sited close to the intersection of Mapleville Road and Fahrney Church Road with an east facing facade. The building is surrounded by a paved access road and swaths of parking spaces, and a circle with a small garden in the center creates a drop-off zone in front of the main entrance. These paved elements were installed before 1958. Mature trees shield the building from the highway and are dotted across the site. Several accessory buildings surround the Findlay Building, some predating the opening of the orphanage that are associated with the farmhouse. The two- story brick farmhouse to the northeast of the main building was constructed in the mid -nineteenth century when the land was owned and farmed by the Fahrney family. The springhouse, located further north along a small stream running from Little Beaver Creek, is thought to be from the same time period. A brick smokehouse, immediately north of the main building, is a one-story structure that was built shortly after the opening of the orphanage to enhance its operations. The farmhouse was also converted into an administration building for the home, along with the Superintendent's quarters. The hipped -roof wood pavilion to the west (rear) of the main building was originally located at the home's Hagerstown property; however, it was moved along with the children to the new facilities in 1927. A few contemporary sheds can be seen to the northwest. Other noteworthy features of the site include a 1927 barn closer to the west edge of the property, a volleyball court, the tomb of Peter and Annie Gray along Mapleville Road, and the upping block of a former medical office next to the tomb. Exterior The L-shaped building consists of a two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block with a two -and -a -half -story rear wing to the north. A two-story addition was added to the west elevation of the rear wing between 1958-1979 based on historic aerials. The exterior is clad in red brick laid in a stretcher bond with projecting quoins and is topped by a cross -hipped roof, truncated on the main block, covered in asphalt shingles. The roof form is augmented by hipped dormers above the facade and west (rear) elevation, along with hipped and gable projections across all elevations. The building rests on a cut stone foundation and features a full partially exposed basement, highlighted on the exterior by a stone water table wrapping around all elevations. The rear wing is located on the west elevation, extending the north elevation by a single bay. A large brick chimney pierces the hipped roof of the wing to the northeast. The addition to the west elevation features a secondary entrance on the south elevation, which is above ground level and accessed by a large concrete platform. The addition is clad in the same style of brick as the original building, with an enclosed porch on the second story covered in white vinyl siding. It is topped by a low hipped roof. East Elevation (Facade) The facade of the two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block measures eleven bays wide and features four dormer windows at the truncated hipped roof (Photo 1). The outer bays are slightly extruded and feature wider proportions. These bays are further delineated by brick quoins and decorative flashing creating a triangular shape at the roofline. A thick band of molding comprised of a cornice and frieze sits just below the roofline and spans the entire width of the facade and all other elevations. The main entrance is located in the center bay, which is also slightly extruded with brick quoins. A projecting pediment emphasizes the bay at the roofline. The double -leaf door opening of the main entrance is located beneath a rectangular pavilion and holds two single -light metal doors. The pavilion consists of a low hipped roof supported by six fluted columns, all connected by railings and posts, and a cornice. The pavilion and door opening are raised above ground level on a stone platform and can be accessed by several concrete steps. Above the main entrance, there is a single window opening at the second story which holds paired six -over -one, MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 2 MIHP No: WA -II -055 double -hung, vinyl windows. The opening is lined with a stone sill and decorated lintel. There is an additional half round opening at the attic level, within the pediment, that holds an original wood fanlight. The opening is lined with stone blocks and has a keystone detail. The four bays on both the north and south side of the center bay feature single window openings at the first and second stories; these openings all hold six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows. The first -story openings feature stone sills and lintels, while the second -story openings only have stone sills; the top of each opening meets the cornice and frieze. Each bay also features single window openings at the basement level, highlighted by a stone water table. These openings hold three -over -three, double -hung, vinyl windows. The outer bays feature two window openings at this level. The outer bays are symmetrical; there is a large rectangular opening at the first and second stories on both sides. The first -story opening in each bay holds tripartite ten -light fixed windows. An inoperable screen door shields the center window. Three, four -light transoms sit above the windows. The opening is lined with a stone sill and lintel and also features a decorative iron balcony. The second -story opening in each bay holds tripartite six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows and is lined with a stone sill. Four hipped dormers protrude from the roof; each features two openings that hold three -over -one, double -hung vinyl windows. All windows on this elevation, except for the half round window at the attic level, are contemporary double -hung, vinyl windows. Some window openings contain air conditioning units. Snnth Flevation The south elevation of the two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block measures five bays wide (Photo 2). The center bay projects outwards and rises above the roofline. A gable roof supports the tower part of the bay. The top of the tower features a gable -shaped parapet with stone coping and shoulders. A secondary entrance is located at the first story in the center bay and consists of a double -leaf door opening which holds two single -light metal doors. The brick shoulders are slightly wider than the tower's face and are accented with corbeling. Above the secondary entrance, A large opening holds paired six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows. The opening is lined with a stone sill and lintel. An original eight -light oculus with four stone keystones is located on the tower's face at the roofline. The two bays opposite the projection feature the same fenestration pattern and elements as the facade. The south elevations of the two -and -a -half -story rear wing and two-story addition are also visible to the west (Photo 3). The rear wing measures one bay wide and features single window openings at the first and second stories. These openings hold paired six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows. The south elevation of the two-story addition to the west of the rear wing features a stone water table and brick cladding that matches the original exterior finishes (Photo 4). The second story is wrapped in white vinyl siding, highlighting the enclosed porch at this level. A single window opening which holds the standard six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl window is inset into the siding at the second story. A secondary entrance is located at the first story above ground level and consists of a single -leaf door opening with a storm door. The opening is shielded by a flat, projecting, aluminum -covered wood roof. The entrance can be accessed by a stepped concrete block platform with wood steps built from the ground plane up to the first tier of the platform, and two free-standing wood steps from the second tier of the platform up to the door opening. Metal railings line the steps at the ground level and the upper tier of the platform by the entrance. West Elevation The west elevation consists of the two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block and the two-story addition off of the rear wing (Photo 5). The west elevation of the main block features a center projecting bay with an overlaid hipped roof. A secondary entrance is centered on the projection at the basement level and consists of a single -leaf opening holding a single -light metal door and a three -light transom. The opening is topped with a stone lintel and has been partially filled in with vinyl siding, indicating that it may have originally accommodated a larger door. Single window openings at the first story flank the entrance and hold the standard six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows. The same sill and lintel patterns are also replicated across the elevation. At the second story, an opening holding paired MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 3 MIHP No: WA -II -055 six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows is centered over the entrance. The portion of the main block to the south of the projection is three bays wide and features an irregular fenestration pattern, including an array of openings holding single, paired, and tripartite vinyl windows. The window openings at the basement level have been covered or infilled with glass blocks and a single light. Immediately adjacent to the projection is a second -story porch with a low hipped roof. This porch is accessed by a single -leaf door opening which holds a four -light wood door, a two - light storm door, and a three -light transom. Below the porch, a small contemporary gable -roof shed has been added, enclosing a single -leaf door opening with basement access; it has an asphalt shingle roof and is clad in vinyl siding (Photos 6 and 7). The portion of the main block to the north is two bays wide and also features irregular fenestration, including openings holding paired and tripartite windows of various sizes. There is a single basement -level opening in the bay adjacent to the projection which holds paired single -light, vinyl windows. The rest of the basement level is covered by a raised concrete platform that accesses the addition to the north. The platform is lined with metal railings. The west elevation of the 1958-1979 addition projects outwards on the north side of the main block and is two bays wide. There is a single window opening in both bays at the first and second stories. The openings at the second story are inset into white vinyl siding, highlighting an enclosed porch. Access to a crawl space can be seen in the south bay at the ground level; a small square door opening is framed with vinyl siding. All windows on this elevation at the first and second stories have been replaced with contemporary six -over -one, double -hung, aluminum windows. Some openings contain air conditioning units. Four hipped dormers protrude from the roof on the main block; each features two openings that hold three -over -one, double -hung vinyl windows. North Elevation The north elevation consists of the two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block and the two -story -and -a -half -story rear wing with the two-story addition (Photo 8). The north elevation of the two -and -a -half -story rectangular main block mirrors that of the south elevation (Photo 9). The north elevation of the rear wing extends that of the main block. It measures one bay wide and is visually separated from the main block by a line of projecting brick quoins. It features single openings at the first and second stories which hold paired six -over -one, double -hung, vinyl windows. A single opening can be seen at the basement level holding a three -over -three, double -hung, vinyl window, similar to the bays on the main block. A large brick chimney is pushed to the east, piercing the hipped roof. The north elevation of the two-story addition to the west of the rear wing is unfenestrated; it features a stone water table and brick cladding that matches the original exterior finishes and vinyl siding at the second story. Interior The main entrance opens onto a small entry vestibule (Photo 10). The vestibule accesses a double -loaded central corridor that organizes all of the rooms in the main block. The spaces that comprise the rear wing in the northwest corner of the first floor, creating the buildings L-shaped footprint, can be accessed directly from the perpendicular corridor. The corridor runs through the foyer, which is delineated by contemporary moulded openings with wide transoms (Photo 11). Stairwells accessing all levels including the basement, first floor, second floor, and attic, are located at the north and south ends of the corridor in the main block (Photo 12). The secondary entrances on the north and south elevations access these stairwells and provide means of egress. The grand central stair is located on the west side of the corridor, aligned with the entry vestibule in the center of the main block (Photo 13). It is comprised of a wide stair -run that reaches a small mezzanine level before branching into two sets of steps up to the second floor. The mezzanine is occupied by an office that is accessed by two contemporary single -leaf door openings with large three -light transoms that align with the mirrored steps to the second floor (Photos 14 and 15). The metal stair -runs, posts, and wood railings of the grand stair are original; the treads have been covered with carpet. The grand stair accesses the basement as well through an enclosed stair -run beneath the open stair -run to the mezzanine. Adjacent to the entrance to the stair down to the basement is a small set of steps to the exterior door at ground level in the center MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 4 MIHP No: WA -II -055 of the west (rear) elevation. The opening to the vestibule accessing this exterior door is original and features a four - light transom (Photo 16). The large living spaces that flank the grand stair to the west on the first floor can be accessed from a short service corridor between the basement and rear stairs. The spaces that line the central corridor on the first floor vary in size, with those on the east side featuring smaller footprints and generally functioning as offices and storage spaces. Restrooms are located to the north and south on the west side, adjacent to the stairwells. Some of the original panelled doors and transoms have been preserved; otherwise, little historic fabric remains due to several late twentieth century renovations, the most extensive occurring in 1987. The rear wing in the northeast corner of the building can be accessed through door openings on the north edge of the rooms abutting the corridor in the main block. These rooms originally functioned as large living spaces but were renovated to expand the kitchen and dining room footprints over time. The rear wing is still occupied by the kitchen as it was originally designed; however, most of the historic finishes have been lost. The kitchen was first expanded when the two-story addition was built on the west elevation between 1958 and 1979. This addition enlarged the space's footprint and provided exterior access to the south (Photo 17). The second -floor spaces of the main block are organized around the central corridor in the same manner as those on the first floor; however, additional hallways and vestibules branch off to access clusters of smaller rooms than those seen on the first floor. The majority of the rooms on the second floor function as offices. The restrooms on this floor are larger and more centrally located, opposite the grand stair. No historic fabric remains as the restrooms were completely gutted and updated during the 1987 renovation. The rear wing holds additional office space and is accessed by a narrow hallway connected to the west side of the central corridor (Photo 18). The 1958-1979 addition added an enclosed porch to the second floor beyond the rear wing, the original wood flooring of which has been preserved (Photo 19). Similar to the first floor, the original paneled doors and transoms have been preserved, stripped of paint and resealed in 1987, but little historic fabric remains throughout the rest of the floor due to the late twentieth century renovations. Evidence of historic finishes and character can be seen at the half -story attic level, accessed by both the north and south stairwells. Inside these stairwells, which occupy the interiors of the projecting bays on the side elevations, the original metal stair runs remain along with their metal posts and wood railings (Photo 20). The treads have been covered with contemporary vinyl flooring. The historic moulded surrounds of the double -leaf doors accessing the stairwells at each level remain, although it appears that some of their lights have been infilled. The fixed eight -light wood oculi adorning the tops of both stairwells are original (Photos 21 and 22). The attic features an exposed wood structure and concrete floor, both of which are original (Photo 23). Although all of the dormer windows have been replaced, the original fixed wood fanlight in the center of the facade remains (Photo 24). Little historic fabric remains at the basement level which features dropped ceilings, drywall partitions, and a combination of carpeted and vinyl tile floors. The central corridor has been carried down to this level as well, and the arrangement of spaces more closely mirrors the first floor with larger rooms appearing to the west and smaller rooms to the east (Photo 25). The 1958-1979 addition did not expand the basement's footprint. Historic Context Boonsboro, Maryland The town of Boonsboro was founded in 1792 at the foot of South Mountain between Hagerstown and Fredrick in Washington County by brothers George and William Boone. The Boones laid out forty-four half -acre lots total, twenty-two on either side of a secondary wagon road that would become the town's Main Street. Boonsboro's growth accelerated at the beginning of the nineteenth century due to the construction of the Bank Road, a turnpike connecting Baltimore to the west, later known as the National Road. In 1823, a new process called "macadam" was used to finish an unpaved section of the turnpike from Boonsboro to Hagerstown. This was the first time the road building process was used in the United States. The town was incorporated in 1831, and its first election was held. During the Civil War, the town's churches and public buildings were used as makeshift hospitals due to the town's proximity to the 4 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 5 MIHP No: WA -II -055 battles at South Mountain and Antietam. The parcels surrounding Main Street were farmed, and in the twentieth century, agricultural products and fruit were the principal source of income for the rural area around Boonsboro. One of the major communities that made up this rural bubble was San Mar which is located south of U.S. Route 40 at the western edge of Greenbrier State Park. The facilities for the Washington County Home For Orphans and Friendless Children were constructed from 1925-1927 on the west side of the community along Mapleville Road (Maryland Route 66). The orphanage was built on a portion of the approximately sixty -acre Gray Farm, owned by Peter Gray and his wife in the early twentieth century. The land had been farmed by the Fahrney family since the mid -nineteenth century prior to Gray's ownership.' Washington County Home for Orphans and Friendless Children The origins of children's homes in the U.S. can be traced back to the Civil War, when many children were orphaned as a result of the conflict. Before the creation of the children's home, orphaned children either became indentured servants, were taken in by relatives, or were sent to live at Alms Houses, which were county -funded homes for the elderly, homeless, sick, and mentally ill. These homes were notorious for their improper living conditions and were widely considered to be unsuitable places for young children to inhabit. One of the first children's homes, "The Sheltering Arms," was established in New York City in 1876, following the state's passing of a law to remove children from Alms Houses. The state of Maryland, however, was slow to adopt this type of law, resulting in an alarming number of children still occupying Alms Houses in the following decade.' The Children of Washington County were sent to what was known as the "County Home" in downtown Hagerstown, which was first constructed in 1799 before being replaced by larger facilities a bit further from downtown in 1880.3 As early as 1880, a movement had begun amongst citizens of Hagerstown and the surrounding areas to fund a proper children's home in Washington County. The Orphan's Home of Washington County was successfully incorporated in 1883, with the majority of the endowment for the home being donated by Benjamin F. Newcomer. In 1885, the organization officially changed its name to the Washington County Home For Orphans and Friendless Children, as the operators responded to the demand to house all kinds of children who required aid, not just orphans. W. Walter Esmer, Superintendent of the home from 1915-1952, noted in his 1918 report to the Board of Managers that the home was "the first successful attempt in the state of Maryland of the people of a county, without outside financial assistance, to care for their county's dependent children."4 The first children were admitted from the Alms House to the home's new facilities at 355 South Potomac Street in Hagerstown on November 8, 1883. The home operated from this building until the organization's move to San Mar in 1927. The first superintendent of the home was David Emmett, a professor who had helped to establish Juniata College in Huntington, Pennsylvania, just a few years prior. Emmert came to Hagerstown in 1883 and immediately began working with the incorporators to found the children's home after witnessing the poor conditions at the Alms House. Emmert presided over the home for its first ten years.5 San Mar Children's Home Construction On August 15, 1910, the will of Peter Gray was admitted to probate, revealing a legacy of $50,000 for the establishment of an orphanage on his farm at San Mar.6 On July 13, 1911, the Peter Gray Orphans Home and 1 "History of Boonsboro," Boonsboro Historical Society, accessed August 2025, https://boonsborohistoricalsociety.org/history/. 2 J. R. Stauffer, "History of San Mar," January 1988, 1-2; R. Brenner, ed., Children and Youth in America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1971). 3 J. R. Stauffer, "History of San Mar," January 1988, 4. 4 J. R. Stauffer, "History of San Mar," January 1988, 3-7; W. Walter Esmer, Annual Report to Board of Managers, 1918, 73. 5 J. R. Stauffer, "History of San Mar," January 1988, 3-7; "Orphans' Home Has Open House on Anniversary," Herald Mail, September 19, 1929, 2. 6 "Do You Remember?" Herald Mail, August 15, 1975, 4. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 6 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Mechanical Institute was incorporated.' A mutually beneficial partnership between the Gray estate trustees and the Washington County Home For Orphans and Friendless Children was formed in the following years when the Washington County Home began looking to relocate after W. Walter Esmer became Superintendent. Esmer was interested in moving the home because the facilities at 355 South Potomac Street were in constant need of repair and had become inadequate for their operations. An agreement between the boards of both organizations was signed in 1925 that would result in the pooling of their funding to construct a state-of-the-art facility to be managed by the Washington County Home that would honor Peter Gray's vision for his property.' On July 11, 1925, specifications for the building plans for the joining of the Washington County Home For Orphans and Friendless Children and the Peter Gray Orphans Home and Mechanical Institute were approved by the directors of both.9 The plans were designed by architect Amos J. Klinkhart, who had a well -established practice in neighboring Hagerstown. Klinkhart also agreed to supervise construction for a two percent fee. The contract for construction was awarded to local contractor William L. Middlekauff, who was also a member of the Gray Board.10 Several months later, the cornerstone for the new building in San Mar, that was to replace the facilities in Hagerstown, was laid during a small ceremony on November 11, 1925. Members of the Washington County Home Board and the Gray Board were in attendance, and C. Harry Keller, the president of the Washington County Home, presided over the ceremonies.'1 The cornerstone was laid by Anna K. Findlay, the longest serving board member, whom the building was later named after.12 Both boards expressed the goal of having the building ready for occupancy by the summer of the following year.13 Construction ended up taking an additional year, lasting from late 1925 to June 1927. Klinkhart's plans called for a two -and -a -half -story brick building set on a cut stone foundation with neoclassical elements. The building was topped by a hipped slate roof, its form augmented by dormers and a projecting pediment above a central entrance pavilion. The program included fourteen bedrooms total which would allow for the accommodation of about sixty children. On the first floor there was a center hall, six large bedrooms, and two baths in the front of the house, and a kitchen, dining rooms, and living rooms towards the rear. The building also featured a full basement and concrete -floored attic; two bathrooms were located in the basement.14 Gray had specified in his will that one room in the main building ' The Peter Gray Orphans Home and Mechanical Institute was incorporated by J. Frank Beck, C. Harry Keller, William H. Bowers, H. A. McComas, Albert Danzer, Francis H. Miller, J. G. Bower, William L. Middlekauff, and Joseph C. Roulette. "Do You Remember?" Herald Mail, July 13, 1961, 8. s J. R. Stauffer, "San Mar Property — The Buildings," November 1987, 3. The Washington County Home for Orphans and Friendless Children will be shortened to the Washington County Home, and the Peter Gray Orphans Home will be shortened to the Gray Home, for the sake of brevity. Their respective boards will be referred to as the Washington County Home Board and the Gray Board. The San Mar facilities continued to be known as the Washington County Home for Orphans and Friendless Children until its name was changed to the San Mar Children's Home in 1981. "20 Years Ago Today," Daily Mail, July 11, 1945, 4. to The building committee representing the Washington County Home included Charles A. Weagley (chairman), Mrs. William H. Howard, Mrs. George M. Bushey, Albert Danzer, and Walter Esmer. Albert Danzer later replaced Weagley as the chairman. The building committee representing the Gray Home included John Hollyday (chairman), William L. Middlekauff, and J. Frank S. Beck. "Lay Cornerstone For New Home of Washington County Orphans," Herald Mail, November 12, 1925, 3; J. R. Stauffer, "San Mar Property — The Buildings," November 1987, 4. 11 Members of the Washington County Home Board included C. Harry Keller, Mrs. James Findlay, Clarence M. Stickell, Franklin M. Thomas, George T. Prather, Mrs. Wolfgang M. Newcomer, Mrs. R. D. McKee, and Miss Mary A. Harter. "Lay Cornerstone For New Home of Washington County Orphans," Herald Mail, November 12, 1925, 3. 12 Anna K. Findlay was elected to the Washington County Home Board in 1884. She passed in 1941. J. R. Stauffer, "San Mar Property — The Buildings," November 1987, 4. 13 "Work on Second Story," Herald Mail, December 19, 1925, 11. 14 It is unknown how the remaining eight bedrooms were divided among the second floor, attic, and basement as the original 1925 drawings could not be located. "Work on Second Story," Herald Mail, December 19, 1925, 11. 6 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 7 MIHP No: WA -II -055 be set aside as the Peter Gray Room to display furnishings from his home on N Jonathan Street, specifically his inlaid tool chest as an example of workmanship.15 In May 1926, plans for the remodeling and modernizing of the farmhouse were approved and work was to be started immediately.16 Towards the end of the month, construction was impacted by a severe hail storm, which resulted in twenty windows being broken out of the nearly finished main building, along with many others in the accessory buildings. All gardens and shrubbery were destroyed.17 On September 13, 1926, the new building was declared finished with the exception of the installation of three metal stairways, delivery of which had been much delayed. The Superintendent's residence was also nearly complete at this time; however, site work including grading, road building, plumbing, and removal of an old barn structure still needed to be done so the home would not be relocated for several more months. 18 On July 1, 1927, the home was officially opened and approximately forty children were moved in. A newspaper article from that date notes that the new home was "without question one of the finest in Maryland." 19 The first few decades of the home's operation at San Mar saw a steady increase in the number of children being boarded, with an all-time high of seventy children recorded in 1935 at the height of the Great Depression. The increase in legislation promoting social welfare and government regulation towards the mid-century aided the home in acquiring additional funding for its expanding operations; growth that would not begin to slow down until the 1960s when the home began to specialize in the needs of children aged six to twelve, a fraction of the population it originally served.20 The Findlay Building had experienced minor updates since its completion in 1927, including the construction of the two-story addition on the west elevation between 1958-1979; however, many of the facilities and finishes on the interior had become outdated by the 1980s. A sum of $100,000 was authorized by the Board in November 1986 for the most extensive remodel to date. The second floor saw the most updating, as the large communal bathrooms were completely demolished and reinstalled and the lockers lining the central corridor were removed. The majority of the original floors and ceilings throughout the building were replaced. New interior finishes consisted of dropped ceilings, carpeting, and vinyl flooring. All new lighting was installed throughout and the kitchen was expanded, receiving new appliances and tile flooring. All of the asbestos in the building was also removed during this campaign.21 Since the turn of the century, the facilities have housed a variety of programs committed to serving children and youth, including The Edward and Pauline Anderson Home, The Jack E. Barr Home, The Henry and Florence Graff Shelter for Girls, The Allegany Girls' Therapeutic Group Home, The Jone Bowman Home, Treatment Foster Care, and Regular Foster Care. This mission remains in effect today under the continued ownership of the San Mar Children's Home. Architect Amos John (A. J.) Klinkhart (1875-1954) was born in Canajoharie, New York and was a graduate of Cornell University. He initially worked for the federal government before moving between a number of private architectural firms in New York, Michigan, Illinois, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Klinkhart established a practice in Hagerstown in 1907, and over the course of his career designed many of the largest buildings in the city and vicinity such as the City Hall, the Washington County Hospital, and the State Reformatory for Males.22 is Gray was a skilled carpenter. J. R. Stauffer, "San Mar Property — The Buildings," November 1987, 6. 16 "Orphans' Home Board Hears the Report of the San Mar Project," Daily Mail, May 11, 1926, 5. 17 "Heavy Damage By Hail Storm," Daily Mail, May 20, 1926, 5. 18 "San Mar Home For Orphans is Completed," Daily Mail, September 13, 1926, 11. 19 "Orphans' Home to Move Today," Daily Mail, July 1, 1927, 18. 20 J. R. Stauffer, "History of San Mar," January 1988, 18-21. 21 J. R. Stauffer, "San Mar Property — The Buildings," November 1987, 5. 22 "A. J. Klinkhart Dies Friday," Daily Mail, October 30, 1954, 20. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 8 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Klinkhart designed numerous public schools in Washington County in addition to the Washington Street School and also prepared the plans for several school additions. Klinkhart designed schools at Halfway (1919), Highfield (1924), Indian Spring (1928), Huyett (1930), and Sharpsburg (1936). He designed additions to schools at Mt. Lena and Sandy Hook in 1936.23 In 1930, he prepared plans for the North End Junior High School at Woodland and Hillcrest Avenues (today Harvest Baptist Church). He designed an addition to South Potomac High School in 1938, and one for the North Street Colored School between 1945 and 1947.24 A. J. Klinkhart undertook a number of municipal and civic projects in the Hagerstown area. He prepared plans for two additions to the Washington County Courthouse in 1933 and again in 1936.25 In 1934, he designed a new Washington County Hospital in association with Buckler & Fenhagen.26 In 1939, Klinkhart collaborated with Baltimore architects Taylor & Fisher on the design of the Hagerstown City Hall (WA -HAG -004) at 1 E. Franklin Street.27 The Colonial Revival -Style building is a contributing resource in the Hagerstown and Hagerstown Commercial Core Historic Districts. In 1937, Klinkhart oversaw the restoration of the Old Dunkard Church at Antietam Battlefield. The Washington County Historical Society sponsored the restoration, and labor was provided by the Works Progress Administration.28 In 1938, Klinkhart designed a new wing at The Pines, an institute for the treatment of paralyzed children in Berkeley Springs.29 Klinkhart designed a number of residences for wealthy clients in the Hagerstown area. In 1930, he designed a Colonial Revival -Style dwelling at 1121 Oak Hill Avenue for F. Merrill Hayes. The Morning Herald described it as "one of the most attractive residences being erected in Hagerstown this year."30 He designed a house of "early American style" for Francis Moore of Funkstown in 1932.31 Klinkhart was on the board of directors of the Washington County Building and Loan Association. In 1937, he designed a model home at 1409 Hamilton Boulevard, promoted by the Lions Club as the "Modern All Gas Home." The club organized tours of the home, with the proceeds from the ticket sales donated to the Babies Milk Fund.32 In 1940, Klinkhart won first prize in an architectural competition for low- cost house designs that was sponsored by the Maryland Society of Architects.33 A. J. Klinkhart was member of the American Institute of Architects from 1939 until his death in 1954.34 He was also an active member of the Maryland Society of Architects, and he sat on the Maryland State Registration Board for Architects between 1935 and 1943. Integrity The Findlay Building of the San Mar Children's Home retains sufficient integrity to convey its historical and architectural significance. The building maintains its historic location on the west side of Mapleville Road (Maryland Route 66) in the community of San Mar, north of Boonsboro's Main Street (Alt. Route 40) and south of the larger city of Hagerstown. Design integrity is relatively strong, and the building still exhibits most of its historic Colonial 23 "Plans for School Mapped by Board," Morning Herald, May 14, 1936, 1. 24 "Board Opens School Bids," Daily Mail, April 1, 1938, 2; "School Board Seeks Bids on New School," Morning Herald, April 18, 1947, 1. 25 "Civil Works Projects," Daily Mail, November 24, 1933, 14. 26 "Board Asking for Bids on Hospital," Daily Mail, July 19, 1934, 3. 27 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties, City Hall, Hagerstown, Washington County, MIHP #WA -HAG -004. 28 "Restoring of Old Church Wins Praise," Daily Mail, April 2, 1937, 7. 29 "The Pines at Berkeley Springs May Soon Be Noted as Warm Springs," Daily Mail, December 16, 1938, 2. 3° "Attractive Home is Being Erected," Morning Herald, October 2, 1930, 8. 31 "Erecting Houses," Daily Mail, August 18, 1932, 2. 32 "Lions Club Sponsors Modem All Gas Home for Babies Milk Fund," Daily Mail, July 20, 1937, 2. 33 "A. J. Klinkhart Dies Friday," Daily Mail, October 30, 1954, 20. 34 American Institute of Architects, AIA Historical Directory, "Amos John Klinkhart," https://aiahistoricaldirectory .atlassian.net/wikilspaces/AHDAA/pages/36944357/and1024294. 35 "A. J. Klinkhart Dies Friday," Daily Mail, October 30, 1954, 20. 8 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 9 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Revival elements, such as its symmetry, projecting pediment, decorative molding, and overlaid hipped roofs. All of the window openings on the main block are original, although the majority of the original windows have been replaced. The fanlight within the pediment on the facade and the two oculi in the stairwells are original; all are fixed wood windows. While interior spaces have been renovated and altered over the years, some historic finishes and features remain in the corridors and stairwells. Nearly all original structural elements remain, reinforcing the historic layout and program on all levels. The building's setting on the Gray Farm, approximately thirty acres of which remain, still includes many accessory buildings that allowed the home to function when it was opened in the early twentieth century, along with the original two-story farmhouse and springhouse, built in the mid nineteenth century when the Fahrney family owned the land. Integrity of materials and workmanship remain strong with the retention of the historic windowsills, lintels, quoins, and the stone water table. Several historic materials and details have survived on the interior as well, such as the wood paneled doors, transoms, sills and surrounds, and the metal stair treads, risers, posts, and wood railings. Collectively, retention of these aspects of integrity allows the building to evoke the feeling of an early -twentieth-century institutional building and its association with the expansion of social welfare resources that occurred in the mid-century as a result of the Great Depression. Statement of Significance The Findlay Building at 8505 Fahrney Church Road in Boonsboro, Maryland demonstrates sufficient historical significance to support eligibility under National Register Criterion A in the area of Social History. The Findlay Building has housed the San Mar Children's Home and its predecessors since its completion in 1927 and remains in operation today, continuing to fulfill the same socially conscious mission. The origins of children's homes in the U.S. can be traced back to the Civil War when the orphan population dramatically increased, resulting in a critical need for safe housing for dependent children. States slowly began introducing legislation to improve the living conditions these children were subject to in the late 1870s, specifically mandating their removal from Alms Houses. Although the state of Maryland lagged behind other states like New York, where the first children's home opened in 1876, in adopting such policies, the citizens of Hagerstown and its outlying areas were early to push for funding for a proper children's home for Washington County. In 1883, the Orphan's Home of Washington County, which would eventually become the San Mar Children's Home, was incorporated. This organization was the first of its kind in the state that was funded entirely by charitable donation, demonstrating county residents' commitment to caring for the dependent children of their community. The Findlay Building also demonstrates significance under Criterion C in the area of Architecture. Executed in the Colonial Revival style by local architect Amos J. Klinkhart, the children's home was reported to be one of the finest buildings in Maryland upon its completion in 1927. The two -and -a -half -story brick building was constructed from 1925-1927 to house the county's dependent children following the merging of the Washington County Home For Orphans and Friendless Children, which had operated out of Hagerstown since 1883, and the Peter Gray Orphans Home and Mechanical Institute, established in 1911 after the passing of Peter Gray. The alliance between these two organizations enabled them to combine their resources in order to upgrade the Washington County Home's facilities and board additional children in need. With a long resume that included many of the county's public buildings and schools, Klinkhart's design for the home satisfied the institutional typology required by the program while bringing additional sophistication and abundance to enrich the lives of its young inhabitants. The building's red brick exterior is simply adorned and yet offers visual interest through the push and pull of its projecting bays, all while demonstrating the symmetry characteristic of the Colonial Revival style. Overlaid hipped roofs augmented with wide eaves and dormers shield the exterior, and additional neoclassical -inspired elements such as the large pediment and fanlight in the center of the facade, the cornice and frieze carried across the roofline, and regular fenestration both comfort and instill a sense of pride amidst the vast rural landscape. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 10 Period of Significance MIHP No: WA -II -055 The Period of Significance corresponds to the length of time when a property made a significant historical contribution or attained the architectural character for which it is noteworthy. Under Criterion A, the period is defined as that during which the property contributed significantly to the broad patterns of American history, within its respective historic context. Under Criterion C, the period typically corresponds to the date of construction. For the Findlay Building, the Period of Significance is 1925-1927. This period extends from the start of construction in 1925 to the completion of the building in 1927 and approximately forty children were moved in. 10 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 11 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Bibliography "A. J. Klinkhart Dies Friday." Daily Mail, October 30, 1954, 20. American Institute of Architects. "Amos John Klinkhart." AIA Historical Directory. Accessed August 2025, https://aiahistoricaldirectory. atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AHDAA/pages/36944357/and 1024294. "Attractive Home is Being Erected." Morning Herald, October 2, 1930, 8. "Board Asking for Bids on Hospital." Daily Mail, July 19, 1934, 3. "Board Opens School Bids." Daily Mail, April 1, 1938, 2. Brenner, R. ed. Children and Youth in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1971. "Civil Works Projects." Daily Mail, November 24, 1933, 14. "Do You Remember?" Herald Mail, July 13, 1961, 8. "Do You Remember?" Herald Mail, August 15, 1975, 4. "Erecting Houses." Daily Mail, August 18, 1932, 2. Esmer, W. Walter. Annual Report to Board of Managers. 1918. "Heavy Damage By Hail Storm." Daily Mail, May 20, 1926, 5. "History of Boonsboro." Boonsboro Historical Society. Accessed August 2025, https://boonsborohistoricalsociety.org/history/. istgry/. "Lay Cornerstone For New Home of Washington County Orphans." Herald Mail, November 12, 1925, 3. "Lions Club Sponsors Modern All Gas Home for Babies Milk Fund." Daily Mail, July 20, 1937, 2. Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties. City Hall. Hagerstown, Washington County. MIHP #WA -HAG -004. "Orphans' Home Board Hears the Report of the San Mar Project." Daily Mail, May 11, 1926, 5. "Orphans' Home Has Open House on Anniversary." Herald Mail, September 19, 1929, 2. "Orphans' Home to Move Today." Daily Mail, July 1, 1927, 18. "Plans for School Mapped by Board." Morning Herald, May 14, 1936, 1. "Restoring of Old Church Wins Praise." Daily Mail, April 2, 1937, 7. "San Mar Home For Orphans is Completed." Daily Mail, September 13, 1926, 11. "School Board Seeks Bids on New School." Morning Herald, April 18, 1947, 1. Stauffer, J. R. "History of San Mar." January 1988. Provided by San Mar Children's Home. 11 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 12 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Stauffer, J. R. "San Mar Property — The Buildings." November 1987. Provided by San Mar Children's Home. "The Pines at Berkeley Springs May Soon Be Noted as Warm Springs." Daily Mail, December 16, 1938, 2. "Work on Second Story." Herald Mail, December 19, 1925, 11. "20 Years Ago Today." Daily Mail, July 11, 1945, 4. Repositories Consulted Boonsboro Historical Society Digital Maryland, Enoch Pratt Free Library Maryland Center for History and Culture Maryland State Archives Washington County Historical Society Washington County Planning and Zoning Western Maryland Room, Washington County Free Library 12 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 13 Photos and Maps MIHP No: WA -II -055 v t .( / 2i It ' fry°tia / RD /' o ) I( \—k Mount Lena Unii Jv Brethren Chu I Gravey � s - LfMUE1 Lv I qYe _ /Hi:'f C k ti -i �p ` TQS Eq Lj aver Creek yoo j ��� o �� ° tle6e �t L O yQ Mount ❑ a� \ I lb ,) ion Cem e Kline BENEVOLA CHURCH RD =a2 San Mr P� MlilJ H l o Benevola '1 -H H —� _ Mapleville 8505 Fahrney Church Road N Shr Boonsboro, Washington County, Maryland Hi Scale 1:24,000 V Mount pl asant USGS 7.5 -minute Topographic Quadrangle, Funkstown, MD (2023) 1 0 0.23 0.45 0.9 Miles Figure 1: Detail from USGS Funkstown quadrangle, showing the location of the San Mar Children's Home. 13 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 14 rG-fee erL Mount. Zion Cerra 'HURCH RD San Mar R.D 0 8505 Fahrney Church Road Boonsboro, Washington County, Maryland N Scale 1:10,000 USGS 7.5 -minute Topographic Quadrangle, Funkstown, MD (2023) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles 1 I I I I I I MIHP No: WA -II -055 Y H!- Figure 2: Detail from USGS Funkstown quadrangle, showing the location of the San Mar Children's Home. 14 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 15 \151\ \,,)\R26/ / \ \ ,2" \ 1: \. !c"\ 1\ P.327 R 323 i/ t P.117 � ss P MIHP No: WA -II -055 P.2 4 S � #_ M1 'R { ,Q4 Figure 3: Tax Map (north pointing up). Maryland Department of Natural Resources. 15 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 16 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 4: Aerial view of San Mar Children's Home (north pointing up), 2025. Google Maps. 16 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 17 MIHP No: WA -II -055 n CountyOrphanage'the �ashl�gto yam[ 1Y , Y:L\!.�ty}� �. Jp�\�: •�,l'r•��Y�',611:M, • �Yy�j�':�' r ��, r �. �� )` �rrJ •r . ..lY.• `S X Y{.rG" 4�1�.N1 xj(S+�� '�' :�J(.¢ J�A .W lT ,. •••� Y. AL r. } t. r`.. ` :,'}�,�,. ,4S��P � -` M' •� y�• .�. ' ,a :i�e�.� �fii''ii'[• . ,}' S! '�4•.1{•'Z':y`�`,�o, � ; �`v'$�'rb.. �&'4 ���i�i:�q'�'w; •�'r� .bY: +YR , w� •.:; :di; Sd: hX $ ,@,. v: {. :`^�:$ i�EiS:32R` ' :E6,a419A Sia!+ :t° ., �f"#. y 94f.• 4' y°Qyt, '.":<+6VF i 4�'3� °of: $�S'$Ff . 'vw-,MZ.. .+ v3�• ' a;4 '•.' :i�• a '�.••':4}' •` ti •l '"'"�`. gyp .!.- . d.�p 'i iS. • JX$S^ 10�.,..}.;' .,.; :,v - .., r.. R;;�::dQ!GY.,j .�1. ` :W. �.•n'i:•r►?OC JG..+Q70P77P: __ :4;: : __I: ?.. • •,:�:�Q• •.�.•'��•�y.; •.,r.-; ,��.•' ;�..;�a:•�s:�:S�: yam.-.; '.$�idbii,: `.;-n:��l: ?�cr••:�/�¢��.Yi:�:�6 - ��.•%...��Y.�-��... •�•'•�i.� .l�ti ••:X .,. .r• r,ti ,y Figure 5: Findlay Building of San Mar Children's Home, October 18, 1929. Herald Mail. 17 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 18 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 6: Facade (east) and south elevation of Findlay Building, undated. San Mar Children's Home. 18 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 19 MIHP No: WA -II -055 1 . 14 • ~ ' `f ` .2+ !' Jam,' r f �t1►. �•� ice. « -rf ` fir.r�1 _ t� _ -� i •a f(w•• �':•'� r Iiiil '•1 ►' ifffr� !02, _ — - —.. ..-..ItIu.II = Figure 7: View of Findlay Building from Mapleville Road, undated. San Mar Children's Home. 19 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 20 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 8: Aerial photo, 1958. Historic Aerials. 20 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 21 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 9: East elevation (facade) of Findlay Building, c. 1966. Washington County Historical Society. 21 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 22 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 10: Aerial photo, 1979. Vintage Aerial. 22 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 23 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 11: Aerial photo, 1979. Vintage Aerial. 23 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 24 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 12: Aerial photo, 1988. Vintage Aerial. 24 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 25 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 13: East and south elevations, September 23, 1992. Daily Mail article via Washington County Historical Society. 25 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 26 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Figure 14: Aerial photo, 1994. Vintage Aerial. 26 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 27 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 1: East elevation (facade), looking west. EHT Traceries. 27 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 28 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 2: South elevation, looking north. EHT Traceries. 28 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 29 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 3: South and west elevations, looking northeast. EHT Traceries. 29 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 30 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 4: South elevation of rear wing and 1958-1979 addition, looking north. EHT Traceries. 30 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 31 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 5: West (rear) elevation, looking east. EHT Traceries. 31 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 32 MIHP No: WA -II -055 _ - 4 44 I hil'dl'L 4 lUll iII I II Photo 6: West (rear) elevation, looking northeast. EHT Traceries. 32 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 33 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 7: Secondary entrances on west elevation, looking east. EHT Traceries. 33 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 34 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 8: North elevation, looking south. EHT Traceries. 34 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 35 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 9: Detail of projecting bay on north elevation, looking south. EHT Traceries. 35 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 36 MIHP No: WA -II -055 U. r • _j _ f rt_____ r - I a_ r —�rr.rr�w�>• �, a II �� I 4 1 E: - Ia�rrrr��■ X, Photo 10: Main entrance on facade, looking west. EHT Traceries. M MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 37 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 11: Central corridor and foyer, first floor. EHT Traceries. 37 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 38 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 12: Doors accessing south stairwell from central corridor, first floor. EHT Traceries. W MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 39 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 13: Grand central stair opposite foyer and entry vestibule, first floor. EHT Traceries. 39 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 40 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 14: Mezzanine level from grand stair. EHT Traceries. 40 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 41 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 15: Second floor access from grand stair. EHT Traceries. 41 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 42 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 16: Service corridor and exterior access, first floor. EHT Traceries. 42 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 43 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 17: Kitchen in rear wing, expanded by 1958-1979 addition. EHT Traceries. 43 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 44 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 18: Rear wing and addition, second floor. EHT Traceries. 44 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 45 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 19: Detail of wood floor in 1958-1979 addition, second floor. EHT Traceries. 45 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 46 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 20: South stairwell, attic level. EHT Traceries. 46 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 47 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 21: Detail of original wood oculus window. EHT Traceries. 47 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 48 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 22: Access to attic from south stairwell and deterioration at ceiling. EHT Traceries. 48 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 49 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 23: Attic level with exposed wood structure and dormer windows. EHT Traceries. 49 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 50 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 24: Detail of original wood fanlight. EHT Traceries. 50 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 51 MIHP No: WA -II -055 Photo 25: Central corridor, basement level. EHT Traceries. 51 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIBILITY REVIEW FORM Continuation Sheet No. 52 Prepared by: Nicole Starego, Architectural Historian EHT Traceries MIHP No: WA -II -055 Date Prepared: August 2025 ty recommended Eligibility not recommended A B C D Considerations: A B C D E F G None nts: Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Date Reviewer, NR Date 52 Attachment B: Project Drawings SAN MAR FINDLAY BUILDING 8505 FAHRNEY CHURCH ROAD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 r __ _ _ _ r -mss - -= - -_ - =[ r1 9 ry ____ :::: --�`_ - II = __=-= -i I - i L i. LE __ - -- •• __-- - _ _ �- - .y -i, __ _ =_ s=___= I _ __ _____ Ji ___ Ii ___ ill' ______ fl _____ J 1 -_ mow- . _ • _ � ' /_ Foy SAN MAR 8504 MAPLEVILLE RD, BOONSBORO, MD 21713, TELE: (301) 733-9067 ZA+D ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE+DESIGN, LLC 21 BYTE COURT SUITE I, FREDERICK, MD 21702, TELE: (301) 698-0020 ADTEK ENGINEERS, INC. 150 EAST STREET, SUITE 201, FREDERICK, MD 21701, TELE: (301) 662-4408 BOWMAN 300 E JOPPA RD, SUITE 501, TOWSON, MARYLAND, 21286, TELE: (410) 494-1 1 1 1 TRIAD ENGINEERING 1075 D SHERMAN AVE, HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND, 21740, TELE: (301) 797-6400 OWNER ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL M/P/E CIVIL DRAWING LIST SHEET CURRENT NUMBER SHEET NAME REVISION DESCRIPTION T-001 TITLE SHEET 3 65% PROGRESS SET C-1 Unnamed A-001 ABBREVIATIONS / SYMBOLS / UNIT MATRIX 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-002 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-010 CODE ANALYSIS / LIFE SAFETY PLANS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-01 1 CODE ANALYSIS / LIFE SAFETY PLANS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-020 ASSEMBLY DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-021 FIRESTOP DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-051 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN & DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-052 SITE DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-090 BASEMENT FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-091 FIRST FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-092 SECOND FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-093 THIRD FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-094 ROOF PLAN - EXISTING & DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-100 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - NEW 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-101 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - NEW 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-102 SECOND FLOOR PLAN - NEW 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-103 THIRD FLOOR PLAN - NEW 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-150 RCP - BASEMENT FLOOR RCP 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-151 RCP - FIRST FLOOR RCP 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-152 RCP - SECOND FLOOR RCP 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-153 THIRD FLOOR RCP 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-190 ROOF PLAN - NEW 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-191 ROOF DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - EXISTING & DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NEW CONSTRUCTION 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-350 WALL SECTIONS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-390 VERTICAL CIRCULATION 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-391 VERTICAL CIRCULATION DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-400 ENLARGED PLAN INFORMATION 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-401 ENLARGED PLANS - SUITES 1-9 2 35% PROGRESS SET A-402 ENLARGED PLANS - SUITES 10-15 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-403 ENLARGED PLANS - COMMON AREAS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-450 TYPICAL MILLWORK DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-451 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-452 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-600 FINISH SCHEDULE 3 65% PROGRESS SET A-650 DOOR SCHEDULE & DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-001 STRUCTURAL NOTES 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-002 STRUCTURAL NOTES 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-003 STRUCTURAL NOTES 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-004 STRUCTURAL NOTES 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-091 BASEMENT PLAN DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-092 1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-093 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET PROJECT VICINITY Benevola DRAWING LIST SHEET CURRENT NUMBER SHEET NAME REVISION DESCRIPTION S-094 ATTIC FLOOR FRAMING PLAN DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-095 ROOF FRAMING PLAN DEMO 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-101 BASEMENT FOUNDATION PLAN 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-102 1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-103 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-104 ATTIC FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-105 ROOF FRAMING PLAN 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-201 WALL SECTIONS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-202 SECTIONS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-301 FOUNDATION DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-302 FOUNDATION DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-303 FOUNDATION DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-304 SLAB ON GRADE DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-31 1 FOUNDATION SECTIONS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-401 MASONRY WALL DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-402 MASONRY WALL DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-403 MASONRY WALL DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-501 WOOD FRAMING DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET S-502 WOOD FRAMING DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-001 MECHANICAL COVER SHEET 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-002 MECHANICAL COVER SHEET 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-101 BASEMENT - DEMOLITION HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-102 FIRST FLOOR - DEMOLITION HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-103 SECOND FLOOR - DEMOLITION HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-104 THIRD FLOOR - DEMOLITION HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-105 ROOF - DEMOLITION HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-201 BASEMENT FLOOR - NEW WORK HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-202 FIRST FLOOR - NEW WORK HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-203 SECOND FLOOR - NEW WORK HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-204 THIRD FLOOR - NEW WORK HVAC 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-301 BASEMENT - NEW WORK - PIPING 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-302 FIRST FLOOR - NEW WORK - PIPING 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-303 SECOND FLOOR - NEW WORK - PIPING 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-304 THIRD FLOOR - NEW WORK - PIPING 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-701 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-702 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-703 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-801 SCHEDULES 3 65% PROGRESS SET M-802 SCHEDULES 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-001 PLUMBING COVER SHEET 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-002 FIRE PROTECTION - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-101 BASEMENT - DEMOLITION - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-102 FIRST FLOOR - DEMOLITION - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-103 SECOND FLOOR - DEMOLITION - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-201 SUB SLAB - NEW WORK - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-202 BASEMENT - NEW WORK - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-203 FIRST FLOOR - NEW WORK - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-204 SECOND FLOOR - NEW WORK - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-205 THIRD FLOOR - NEW WORK - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-206 ROOF - NEW WORK - PLUMBING 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-601 RISER - DOMESTIC WATER 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-701 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-702 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-703 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-704 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-705 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-706 DETAILS 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-801 SCHEDULES 3 65% PROGRESS SET P-802 SCHEDULES 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-002 ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-101 BASEMENT - DEMOLITION ELECTRICAL 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-102 FIRST FLOOR - DEMOLITION ELECTRICAL 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-201 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - NEW WORK - POWER 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-202 BASEMENT - NEW WORK - LIGHTING 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-203 FIRST FLOOR - NEW WORK - POWER 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-204 FIRST FLOOR - NEW WORK - LIGHTING 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-205 SECOND FLOOR - NEW WORK - POWER 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-206 SECOND FLOOR - NEW WORK - LIGHTING 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-207 THIRD FLOOR - NEW WORK - POWER 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-208 THIRD FLOOR - NEW WORK - LIGHTING 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-209 ROOF - NEW WORK - POWER 3 65% PROGRESS SET E-210 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES 3 65% PROGRESS SET PROJECT LOCATION TRUE NORTH design n teriors U passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 I PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 1 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All f)IMFNSIONS SHAI I RE VFRIFIFf) IN THE FIFI f) RY THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 O ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY CHURCH RD 46 BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: San Mar Rd TITLE SHEET � c G � a G c Fahrney Church Rd { -- $pcsm JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: efy� y T-OO1 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 7O2 ee P-3O1-698-OO2O www.za-d.com ALUMINUM BRICK STEEL MASONRY WALL PARTITION iIKIII WOOD -ROUGH ( SEALANT (CONTINUOUS) WOOD -ROUGH BATT INSULATION (NON -CONTINUOUS) PLYWOOD RIGID INSULATION WOOD FINISH D GYPSUM BOARD OEARTH ACOUSTICAL TILE G.M.U. (SOLID) CONCRETE G.M.U. GRANULAR FILL EXISTING WALL 8 DOOR ��� TO REMAIN NEW WALL I DOOR GENERAL SYMBOLS LEGEND ° EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED 2 ELEVATION REVISION SEQUENCE TAG AREA OF REVISION OKEYED NOTE J12 DOOR NUMBER WINDOW TYPE O TOILET/KITCHEN ACCESSORIES A101 DETAIL CALLOUT LEVEL LINE A-1 PARTITION TYPE DESIGNATION Room ROOM NAME name ROOM NUMBER 150 SF INDICATES DIRECTION OF ELEVATION / SECTION SIM DETAIL NUMBER SIMILAR/OPPOSITE OF A1O1 INDICATED DETAIL SHEET WHERE DRAWN 51M DETAIL NUMBER 1 SIMILAR/OPPOSITE OF A101 INDICATED DETAIL SHEET WHERE DRAWN INDICATES REFERENCE OF INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAIL NUMBER Al 1 A SHEET WHERE DRAWN A A, AMP A.B. ABV A/C A.G.B.M. ACC ACP ADA ADAAG ADJ. A.F.F. A.F.G. ALUM ALT APPROX ARCH ATT. AUTO Q BD j� BLDG BLK BLKG BM BOT BRG BSMT BTWN B.U. GGAB GEM CH. B. G.I.P. C.JT. GLG CLKG GLO GLR G.M.U. G.O. COL GONG CONT CORR G.T. DBL DEPT PET D.F. PIA DIM DN DR P.S. PW DWG EEA E.B. EF E.I.F.S. EXP.JT. EL ELEC ELEV EM ENCL ENG EST ETR EQ EQP E.W. E.W.G. EXH EXP EXT F F.A. F.B. F.B.O. F.D. FDN F.E. F.E.G. F.G. F.H. F.H.G. F.H.M.S. F.H.W.5. FIN F.O. F.O.F. F.O.M. FRP FRTW. FT. FURR G. GA GAL GALV G.B. G.G. G.D. G.F.I. GL G.M. GND G.S.F. GYP. BD HH H.B. H.D. HR H.M. HORIZ HR HT HVAC MODIFIED EQUIPMENT NEV"( CONSTRUCTION OR EQUIPMENT EXISTING CONSTRUCTION OR EQUIPMENT SURPLUS EQUIPMENT RELOCATED EQUIPMENT AT CENTERLINE DIAMETER OR ROUND AMPERE ANCHOR BOLT ABOVE AIR CONDITIONING ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIAL ACCESSIBLE ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANEL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES ADJUSTABLE ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ABOVE FINISH GRADE ALUMINUM ALTERNATIVE APPROXIMATE ARCHITECTURAL ATTACHED AUTOMATIC BOARD BUILDING BLOCK BLOCKING BEAM BOTTOM BEARING BASEMENT BETWEEN BUILT-UP CABINET CEMENT CHALKBOARD CAST IN PLACE CONTROL JOINT CEILING CAULKING CLOSET CLEAR CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CLEAN -OUT COLUMN CONCRETE CONTINUOUS CORRIDOR CERAMIC TILE DEEP DOUBLE DEPARTMENT DETAIL DRINKING FOUNTAIN DIAMETER DIMENSION DOWN DOOR DOWNSPOUT DISHWASHER DRAWING EACH EXPANSION BOLT EXHAUST FAN EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM EXPANSION JOINT ELEVATION ELECTRIC ELEVATOR ELECTRIC METER ENCLOSURE ENGINEER ESTIMATE EXISTING TO REMAIN EQUAL EQUIPMENT EACH WAY ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXHAUST EXPANSION EXTERIOR FIRE ALARM FLAT BAR FURNISHED BY OTHERS FLOOR DRAIN FOUNDATION FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FINISH GRADE FIRE HYDRANT FIRE H05E CABINET FLAT HEAD METAL SCREW FLAT HEAD WOOD SCREW FINISHED) FACE OF FACE OF FINISH FACE OF MASONRY FIBER REINFORCED PANEL FIRE -RETARDANT TREATED WOOD FOOT OR FEET FURRING NATURAL GAS, GAUGE GALLON GALVANIZED GRAB BAR GENERAL CONTRACTOR GARBAGE DISPOSAL GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER GLASS GAS METER GROUND GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE GYPSUM BOARD HIGH HOSE BIBB HIGH DENSITY HEADER HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOUR HEIGHT HEATING VENTILATION $ AIR CONDITIONING ABBREVIATIONS I.G.F. I.D. IN INSUL INT INV JJ JT KIT K.O. LL LAB LAM LAV LBS L.G. L.F. L.P. MMAX M.G. MEGH MTL MFR M.H. MIN MIR MISC M.O. MTD MTL MICRO MWK N N. NE. N.I.G. NO. OR # NOM. N.T.S. NW. O O.G. O.D. O/H OPG OPP OPT O.S.A. O.S.B. FPH P/L PL P.LAM. PLUMB PLYWD PNL PR PROP P.S.F. P.5.1. PTD P.T. PVC PVMT Q.T. R R.A. RCP R.D. RE: REF REFR REINF REQ'D R.O.W. RM. R.O. REV S S.A. S.B. S.G. SGHEP S.P. SEAL SECT S.F. SE SH WR SHT SHEATH SIM SPECS SQ 55 5T STA 5TB STD STL STOR STRUGT 5U5P 5W SYM T T. T.B. T45 T4G T.D. TEL TEMP THK THRESH T.O. T.O.D. T.O.F. T.O.J. T.O.M. T.O.S. T.O.W. T.P.D. T.S. TYP INSULATED CONCRETE FORMS I I UG INSIDE DIAMETER LJ U.N.O. INCH INSULATION \ / V INTERIOR, INTERCOM Y VENT INVERT VERT VEST JUNCTION BOX VHI JOINT V.I.F. V.G.T. KITCHEN V.R. KNOCKOUT V.T.R. V.W.C LENGTH, LONG LABORATORY I.AJ W. LAMINATE l " W/ LAVATORY W.G. POUNDS W/O LOAD CENTER WD LINEAR FEET WIN LOW POINT WG WH MAXIMUM WP MEDICINE CABINET WT MECHANICAL WV. METAL W.W.F. MANUFACTURER W.W.M MANHOLE MINIMUM YD MIRROR I Y.D. MISCELLANEOUS MASONRY OPENING MOUNTED MATERIAL (S) MICROWAVE OVEN MILLWORK NORTH NORTHEAST NOT IN CONTRACT NUMBER NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE NORTHWEST ON CENTER(S) OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVERHEAD OPENING OPPOSITE OPTIONAL OUTSIDE AIR ORIENTED STRAND BOARD PHASE PROPERTY LINE PLATE PLASTIC LAMINATE PLUMBING PLYWOOD PANEL PAIR PROPOSED POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT POUNDS, PER SQUARE INCH PAINTED PRESSURE TREATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PAVEMENT QUARRY TILE RADIUS RETURN AIR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ROOF DRAIN REFERENCE REFRIGERATOR REFRIGERATION REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY ROOM ROUGH OPENING REVERSED SOUTH AND SLOPE SUPPLY AIR SPLASH BLOCK SOLID GORE SCHEDULE SMOKE DETECTOR, SOAP DISPENSER, STORM DRAIN SEALANT SECTION SQUARE FOOT/FEET SOUTHEAST SHOWER SHEET SHEATHING SIMILAR SPECIFICATIONS SQUARE STAINLESS STEEL, SANITARY SEWER STREET STATION SETBACK STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STRUCTURAL SUSPENDED SOUTHWEST SYMMETRICAL THERMOSTAT TOWEL BAR TOP AND BOTTOM TONGUE & GROOVE TOP OF DRAIN TELEPHONE TEMPERED, TEMPORARY THICK THRESHOLD TOP OF TOP OF DECK TOP OF FRAMING TOP OF JOIST TOP OF MASONRY TOP OF SLAB TOP OF WALL TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TUBE STEEL, TEMPERATURE SENSOR TYPICAL UNDERGROUND UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VOLTS VENTILATION VERTICAL VESTIBULE VISUAL AND HEARING IMPAIRED VERIFY IN FIELD VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VENT RISER VENT THRU ROOF VINYL WALL COVERING WEST, WATER, WIDTH, WIDE WITH WATER CLOSET WITHOUT WOOD WINDOW WIRE GLASS WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WEIGHT WATER VALVE WELDED WIRE FABRIC WELDED WIRE MESH YARD YARD DRAIN design interiors U1UJ passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 I3 165% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 Al I 0IMFNSIONS SHAI I RF VERIFIED IN THE FIFI fl RY THF CONTRACTOR THF CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 O ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: ABBREVIATIONS / SYMBOLS / UNIT MATRIX JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-OO1 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE I FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www.za-d.com TYP. SIDEWALK, WALKING SURFACES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1:20. GROSS SLOPE OF WALKING G 5URFAGES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1:45 2" SMOOTH 5-O" ' MIN TOWLED EDGE TYP. RAMP ____ o -I' (`1 RAMP EXPANSION JOINT (TYP.) ________________ OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO OO OOOOOOOOO O SLOPED CURB FLUSH CURB SLOPED CURB I: I I" t A. sTYP. SIDEWALK DETAIL A-051) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 12:1 MAX. L COMBINATION CURB DETEGTALE WARNING 8 GUTTER AREA (TYP.) NOTE: 1/2" EXPANSION (MAX HEIGHT W/ BEVEL NOT EXCEEDING 1:2, UNBEVELED LEVEL CHANGES DO NOT EXCEED 1/4" IN HEIGHT) JOINT MATERIAL AT 20'-0" TO 3O' -O"- VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT 1 3 FRONT STOOP SECTION A-051 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" Leve 1 1 r 0' -O" - - - - - MAPLEVILLE ROAD - - � - - - - �— - - � a aQ ARCHITECTURAL SITE SITE PLAN N ( FRONT STOOP SECTION 2 2��, NEW FRONT STOOP ENLARGED PLAN Level 1 design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN & DETAILS JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-051 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE I FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.3O1 .698.0020 www-za-d-corn SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" A-051) SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" A-051 / SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" AI 1=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11= III III III III III III III III III III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2 TYP. PATIO/RAMP SECTION A-052 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" ',I/ OO I\//V CCAI/C "4NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP & PATIO A-0522 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" STEEL ;H $ LOCK ENTRY design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 Al I DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: SITE DETAILS JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-052 1 TYP. MECHANICAL SCREEN ELEVATION A-052) SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" �5SECTION @ FIRE PUMP ENTRY A-052% SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.3O1 .698.0020 www_za-d _com KEYED NOTES D-1 REMOVE EXISTING PLUMBING FIXTURES, CAP PLUMBING PER PLUMBING DRAWINGS AND CODE D-2 REMOVE EXISTING TOILET PARTITIONS D-3 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND FRAME AS SHOWN D-4 REMOVE WALL TO THE EXTENT SHOWN D-5 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB AS SHOWN FOR NEW PERIMETER SUB -SLAB (PASSIVE) RADON PIPE SYSTEM D-6 REMOVE ALL EXISTING CEILING TILE, LIGHTS, DUCTWORK, BULKHEADS, PIPES AND CONDUIT STEMMING FROM EXISTING HEATING SYSTEM - REFER TO MEP - TYPICAL D-1 REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISH, ADHESIVE AND WALL BASE, TYPICAL D -S REMOVE EXISTING VINYL STAIR TREADS D-9 REMOVE EXISTING CASED OPENING TRIM D-10 REMOVE EXISTING STAIR AND RAILING D-11 REMOVE EXISTING FURNACE, WATER HEATERS AND ASSOCIATED PIPES AND DUCTWORK PER MEP (CAP PER CODE) D-12 REMOVE EXISTING LAUNDRY SINK. RETAIN EXISTING LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT FOR FUTURE USE D-13 NEW DOOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING DOOR OPENING, ENLARGE OPENING PER DOOR SCHEDULE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW OPENING 51ZE D-14 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING WALL FOR NEW CASED OPENING OR DOOR, REFER TO DIMENSION ON PLAN - NEW HEAD HEIGHT, REFER TO "NEW" PRAAING5 (REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR NEW HEADER) D-15 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW WINDOW - TYPICAL, U.N.O. RETAIN EXISTING INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM. D-16 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WALL IN -FILL IN LIKE KIND, PER DETAILS D-17 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEV( MECHANICAL LOUVER, REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS D -1S REMOVE EXISTING DOOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW WINDOW, PER DETAILS f')_1Q QFt..ir)\/C FVIC.TI1Jr RAGFKA 1JT I /FI I=VIT CNr.I r)GI IQF A-200 4 1. GC SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONCEALED CONDITIONS UNCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION THAT IMPEDES THE EXECUTION OF THE DESIGN AS INDICATED ON THE DOCUMENTS OR POSES ANY HEALTH AND/OR LIFE -SAFETY HAZARDS. 2. GC SHALL MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO FINISHES ADJACENT TO DEMOLITION AREAS, GC SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ALL FINISHES AFFECTED BY THEIR WORK. 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING COMPONENTS FOR DEMOLITION OF SUCH MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT $ SYSTEMS. 4. DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS BY ARCHITECT. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN DIMENSIONS THAT CONFLICT WITH DESIGN AS DRAWN MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER IN WRITING 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON ANY PROJECT PHASE OR PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT WILL IN ANY WAY IMPACT THE LANDLORD/OWNER (SUCH AS CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY BARRICADES, TEMPORARY UTILITY SHUT DOWNS). DO NOT PROCEED WITH SUCH WORK IF THE LANDLORD/OWNER DOES NOT GRANT PERMISSION. S. PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND PERMITS, NOT LIMITED TO THOSE REFERENCED HEREIN. 7. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH DEMOLITION GC TO REVIEW HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TESTING REPORT. GC MUST NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER AND ARCHITECT WHEN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT ARE DISCOVERED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH REMOVAL ACCORDING TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS. S. VERIFY EXTENT OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IN FIELD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 9. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXPOSED BUILDING, INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FINISHES SUBJECT TO WEATHER; WATER AND MOISTURE, EXTREME TEMPERATURES DURING THE TERM OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS FOR SPECIFICS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS OF A PROTECTION PLAN. 1O. PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREIN OR OTHERWISE, GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ENGINEERED MEANS FOR TEMPORARY SHORING. Th GENERAL NOTES: DEMOLITION design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS - DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I 2�A ZOO I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: BASEMENT FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: 24211 1A-090 A-200) BASEMENT LEVEL - EXISTING & DEMO 21 BYTE CURT, SUITE OUR, I F R T, 7 0 2 A-090/ SCALE: 3/16' = 1-0 P.3O1 .698.0020 i www-zcl-d-com KEYED NOTES P-1 REMOVE EXISTING PLUMBING FIXTURES, CAP PLUMBING PER PLUMBING DRAWINGS AND CODE P-3 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND FRAME A5 SHOWN D-4 REMOVE WALL TO THE EXTENT SHOWN D-6 REMOVE ALL EXISTING CEILING TILE, LIGHTS, DUCTWORK, BULKHEADS, PIPES AND CONDUIT STEMMING FROM EXISTING HEATING SYSTEM - REFER TO MEP - TYPICAL D-1 REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISH, ADHESIVE AND WALL BASE, TYPICAL P -S REMOVE EXISTING VINYL STAIR TREADS P-10 REMOVE EXISTING STAIR AND RAILING P-13 NEW DOOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING DOOR OPENING, ENLARGE OPENING PER DOOR SCHEDULE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW OPENING 51ZE D-14 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING WALL FOR NEW CASED OPENING OR DOOR, REFER TO DIMENSION ON PLAN - NEW HEAD HEIGHT, REFER TO 'NEW'I DRAWINGS (REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR NEW HEADER) P-15 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW WINDOW - TYPICAL, U.N.O. RETAIN EXISTING INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM. P-16 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WALL IN -FILL IN LIKE KIND, PER DETAILS P -1S REMOVE EXISTING DOOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW WINDOW, PER DETAILS D-19 REMOVE EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL EXIT ENCLOSURE P-20 REMOVE EXISTING ACCORDION PARTITION P-21 REMOVE EXISTING KITCHEN EQUIPMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY D-22 REMOVE EXISTING CASEWORK IN ITS ENTIRETY P-23 REMOVE EXISTING WALK-IN COOLER/FREEZER P-24 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE STOOP/STEPS AND ASSOCIATED RAILING P-25 REMOVE EXISTING STEEL BALCONY D-26 REMOVE EXISTING CAST IRON RADIATOR HEATING SYSTEM IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ASSOCIATED PIPING PER MEP DRAWINGS, TYPICAL. PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING STRUCTURE P-21 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW DOOR PER DOOR SCHEDULE D-25 REMOVE EXISTING PORTION OF EXISTING WALL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW INTERIOR WINDOW D-29 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW DOOR PER DOOR SCHEDULE P-40 REMOVE EXISTING THRU-WALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT D-41 REMOVE EXISTING CHIMNEY IN ITS ENTIRETY, TO BELOW FINISHED FLOOR IN BASEMENT. INFILL WITH NEW CONCRETE PER DETAIL 2/A-100 4'-101/2" 5'-'1" II II I� �I D-4 A-200 4 D -S 3' - 5" - 5" D-3 i _i - �- II fi II D4 -7 7- -2 II L = _j ' `� \ II D-4 II II c\\ �� D3 D-1 I I I I I I II I I I I \\ D 3 II A\ II I t\1RI U LiI I I I � _2 I II D-3 I II -1 II I � D-6 A-200 FRIST LEVEL - EXISTING & DEMO SCALE: 3/16" = 1'—O" 1. GC SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONGEALED CONDITIONS UNCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION THAT IMPEDES THE EXECUTION OF THE DESIGN AS INDICATED ON THE DOCUMENTS OR P05E5 ANY HEALTH AND/OR LIFE -SAFETY HAZARDS. 2. GC SHALL MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO FIN15HE5 ADJACENT TO DEMOLITION AREAS, GC SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ALL FINISHES AFFECTED BY THEIR WORK. 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING COMPONENTS FOR DEMOLITION OF SUCH MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT $ SYSTEMS. 4. DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS BY ARCHITECT. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN DIMENSIONS THAT CONFLICT WITH DESIGN AS DRAWN MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER IN WRITING -12 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON ANY PROJECT PHASE OR PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT WILL IN ANY WAY IMPACT THE LANDLORD/OWNER (SUCH AS CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY BARRICADES, TEMPORARY UTILITY SHUT DOWNS). DO NOT PROCEED WITH SUCH WORK IF THE LANDLORD/OWNER DOES NOT GRANT PERMISSION. S. PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND PERMITS, NOT LIMITED TO THOSE REFERENCED HEREIN. 1. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH DEMOLITION GC TO REVIEW HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TESTING REPORT. GC MUST NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER AND ARCHITECT WHEN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT ARE DISCOVERED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH REMOVAL ACCORDING TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS. S. VERIFY EXTENT OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IN FIELD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 1. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXPOSED BUILDING, INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FIN15HE5 SUBJECT TO WEATHER; WATER AND MOISTURE, EXTREME TEMPERATURES DURING THE TERM OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS FOR SPECIFICS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS OF A PROTECTION PLAN. 10. PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREIN OR OTHERWISE, GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ENGINEERED MEANS FOR TEMPORARY SHORING. GENERAL NOTES: DEMOLITION ----------------- I _ I L I J I I I I I I HH I 1 I I I I 3' — 5" —41-1r = = __ II I I / -14 II11 111111 —16 411,'Il 2 A-200 -5" II \\ II \ II -4 -5" 3'-5,, i II \\ / II _�HHL � __ __ ifF=-� 4' \ 0" II _� II L�1 I I I D-3 I I II II II I I II II II I I II II I I I II u -- // \ _ design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All flIMFNSIC)NS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFIl IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: FIRST FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO I I / / JOB NUMBER: 24211 -2 DRAWING NUMBER: A-091 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE I FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _corn KEYED NOTES P-1 REMOVE EXISTING PLUMBING FIXTURES, GAP PLUMBING PER PLUMBING PRAAIN65 ANP COPE P-3 REMOVE EXISTING POOR AND FRAME AS SHOWN P-4 REMOVE HALL TO THE EXTENT SHOWN P-6 REMOVE ALL EXISTING CEILING TILE, LIGHTS, PUCTAORK, BULKHEADS, PIPES AND CONDUIT STEMMING FROM EXISTING HEATING SYSTEM - REFER TO MEP - TYPICAL P-7 REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISH, ADHESIVE AND HALL BASE, TYPICAL P -S REMOVE EXISTING VINYL STAIR TREADS P-10 REMOVE EXISTING STAIR ANP RAILING P-13 NEW DOOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING POOR OPENING, ENLARGE OPENING PER POOR SCHEDULE TO ACCOMMODATE NEW OPENING 51ZE P-14 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING WALL FOR NEW CASED OPENING OR POOR, REFER TO PIMEN5ION ON PLAN - NEV HEAP HEIGHT, REFER TO "NEW" DRAWINGS (REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR NEW HEADER) P-15 REMOVE EXISTING WINPOA FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEA WINPOA - TYPICAL, U.N.O. RETAIN EXISTING INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM. P-26 REMOVE EXISTING CAST IRON RADIATOR HEATING SYSTEM IN ITS ENTIRETY ANP ASSOCIATED PIPING PER MEP DRAWINGS, TYPICAL. PATCH ANP REPAIR EXISTING STRUCTURE P-30 REMOVE EXISTING BALCONY IN ITS ENTIRETY P-31 REMOVE EXISTING COVERED PORCH IN ITS ENTIRETY P-32 REMOVE EXISTING SIDING AS NOTED, FOR THE RECEIPT OF NEW FIBER CEMENT SIDING PER EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND D-33 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WALL IN -FILL IN LIKE KIND, PER DETAILS P-34 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW CASED OPENING. SIZE PER PLANS CA -200) 1. GC SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONGEALED CONDITIONS UNCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION THAT IMPEDES THE EXECUTION OF THE DESIGN AS INDICATED ON THE DOCUMENTS OR POSES ANY HEALTH AND/OR LIFE -SAFETY HAZARDS. 2. GC SHALL MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO FINISHES ADJACENT TO DEMOLITION AREAS, GC SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ALL FINISHES AFFECTED BY THEIR WORK. 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING COMPONENTS FOR DEMOLITION OF SUCH MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT $ SYSTEMS. 4. DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS BY ARCHITECT. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN DIMENSIONS THAT CONFLICT WITH DESIGN AS DRAWN MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER IN WRITING -12 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON ANY PROJECT PHASE OR PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT WILL IN ANY WAY IMPACT THE LANDLORD/OWNER (SUCH AS CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY BARRICADES, TEMPORARY UTILITY SHUT DOWNS). DO NOT PROCEED WITH SUCH WORK IF THE LANDLORD/OWNER DOES NOT GRANT PERMISSION. 6. PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND PERMITS, NOT LIMITED TO THOSE REFERENCED HEREIN. 7. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH DEMOLITION GC TO REVIEW HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TESTING REPORT. GC MUST NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER AND ARCHITECT WHEN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT ARE DISCOVERED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH REMOVAL ACCORDING TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS. 8. VERIFY EXTENT OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IN FIELD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. q. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXPOSED BUILDING, INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FINISHES SUBJECT TO WEATHER; WATER AND MOISTURE, EXTREME TEMPERATURES DURING THE TERM OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS FOR SPECIFICS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS OF A PROTECTION PLAN. 10. PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREIN OR OTHERWISE, GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ENGINEERED MEANS FOR TEMPORARY SHORING. GENERAL NOTES: DEMOLITION design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS - DD REVIEWER INITIALS _ CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 BZ DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: SECOND FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: A-092 24211 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _com r 1 A-200 KEYED NOTES P -S REMOVE EXISTING VINYL STAIR TREADS P-15 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW WINDOW - TYPICAL, U.N.O. RETAIN EXISTING INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM. D-27 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW DOOR PER DOOR SCHEDULE D-30 REMOVE EXISTING BALCONY IN ITS ENTIRETY P-35 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING ROOF FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW ROOF STRUCTURE, REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS P-36 REMOVE EXISTING DORMERS IN THEIR ENTIRETY, INCLUDING WALLS, WINDOWS AND ROOF P-37 REMOVE EXISTING VERTICAL DUCTWORK IN ITS ENTIRETY, REFER TO MECHANICAL PRAMING5 P-41 REMOVE EXISTING CHIMNEY IN ITS ENTIRETY, TO BELOW FINISHED FLOOR IN BASEMENT. INFILL WITH NEW CONCRETE PER DETAIL 2/A-100 1. GC SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONGEALED CONDITIONS UNCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION THAT IMPEDES THE EXECUTION OF THE DESIGN AS INDICATED ON THE DOCUMENTS OR POSES ANY HEALTH AND/OR LIFE -SAFETY HAZARDS. 2. GC SHALL MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO FINISHES ADJACENT TO DEMOLITION AREAS, GC SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ALL FINISHES AFFECTED BY THEIR WORK. 3. REFER TO MEGHANIGAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING COMPONENTS FOR DEMOLITION OF SUCH MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT $ SYSTEMS. 4. DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS BY ARGHITEGT. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN DIMENSIONS THAT CONFLICT WITH DESIGN AS DRAWN MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER IN WRITING 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON ANY PROJECT PHASE OR PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT WILL IN ANY WAY IMPACT THE LANDLORD/OWNER (SUCH AS CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY BARRICADES, TEMPORARY UTILITY SHUT DOWNS). DO NOT PROCEED WITH 5UGH WORK IF THE LANDLORD/OWNER DOES NOT GRANT PERMISSION. G. PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND PERMITS, NOT LIMITED TO THOSE REFERENCED HEREIN. 7. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH DEMOLITION GC TO REVIEW HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TESTING REPORT. GC MUST NOTIFY LANDLORD/OWNER AND ARCHITECT WHEN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT ARE DISCOVERED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH REMOVAL ACCORDING TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS. 5. VERIFY EXTENT OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IN FIELD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. q. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXPOSED BUILDING, INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FINISHES SUBJECT TO WEATHER; WATER AND MOISTURE, EXTREME TEMPERATURES DURING THE TERM OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS FOR SPECIFICS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS OF A PROTECTION PLAN. 1O. PRIOR TO STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREIN OR OTHERWISE, GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ENGINEERED MEANS FOR TEMPORARY SHORING. GENERAL NOTES: DEMOLITION �1 2 design interiors U p assiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All 0IMFNSIONS THAI I RF VFRIFIFO IN THE FIFI n RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 O ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: THIRD FLOOR - EXISTING & DEMO JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: 24211 THIRD LEVEL - EXISTING & DEMO SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www.za-d.com KEYED NOTES D-35 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING ROOF FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW ROOF STRUCTURE, REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS D-35 REMOVE ALL EXISTING SHINGLES, UNDERLAYMENT GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS - TYPICAL (SHEATHING TO REMAIN UNLESS DEEMED COMPROMISED AFTER SHINGLES ARE REMOVED) D-39 REMOVE PORTION OF ROOF FROM EXTERIOR 51DE OF EXISTING DORMER WALL TO OPPOSITE DORMER WALL D-41 REMOVE EXISTING CHIMNEY IN ITS ENTIRETY, TO BELOW FINISHED FLOOR IN BASEMENT. INFILL WITH NEV CONCRETE PER DETAIL 2/A-1OO D-44 REMOVE EXISTING FLAT ROOF MATERIAL IN ITS ENTIRETY ROOF PLAN - EXISTING & DEMO 1. ALL NEW AND EXISTING TO REMAIN ROOF AND DECK PENETRATIONS RELATED TO MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL TO BE COORDINATED BY GC. 2. NEW CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROOF SYSTEM SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL ALL PERTINENT SUBMITTALS ARE PROVIDED AND DEEMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXPOSED BUILDING, INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FINISHES SUBJECT TO WEATHER; WATER AND MOISTURE, EXTREME TEMPERATURES DURING THE TERM OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS FOR SPECIFICS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS OF A PROTECTION PLAN. 4. UPON COMPLETION OF NEW ROOFING SYSTEM INSTALLATION, GC SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT FOR A DETAILED INSPECTION. IT SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE SYSTEM PERFORMS POSITIVE DRAINAGE ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS OF WARRANTY, U.N.O. 5. ARROWS INDICATED ON PLAN REFER TO DIRECTION OF SLOPE OF ROOF SYSTEM TO ALLOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE. GENERAL NOTES: ROOF 2 A-200 design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All flIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS _ DD REVIEWER INITIALS - CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 BZ DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: ROOF PLAN - EXISTING & DEMO JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: 24211 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _com SCALE: 3/16' = 1 '-0" DOWEL SLEEVE, DOWEL INT- EXISTING SLAB W/ #6 18" LONG @ 1 3/5" EXPANSION JOIP SOIL -GAS RETARDER MEMBRANI OF 10 MIL POLYETHYLENE SHE OR EQUIVALENT. OVERLAP SEA' 2TYPICAL SLAB REPAIR DETAIL A-100 SCALE: 1" = 1-0" NEW SLAB ON GRADE REINF W/ 6X6 W2.9XW2.9 (MATCH THICKNESS W/ EXISTING SLAB) EXISTING SLAB DRILL, CLEAN $ ADHESIVE GROUT W/ HILTI HY200 MIN 4" THICK LAYER OF GAS PERMEABLE MATERIAL, GENERAL NOTE #4 4" PERFORATED RADON PIPE (WHERE APPLICABLE) GENERAL NOTES: 1. RADON VENTS SHALL NOT PENETRATE THE ROOF ASSEMBLY THROUGH VALLEYS OR FIRE RETARDANT PLYWOOD. SHIFT IN ATTIC SPACE TO CLEAR SUCH ASSEMBLIES. 2. ALL CONCRETE SLABS THAT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SHALL BE LAID OVER A GAS PERMEABLE MATERIAL MADE OF EITHER A MINIMUM 4" THICK LAYER OF SAND, OVERLAIN BY A LAYER OR STRIPS OF MATTING DESIGNED TO ALLOW THE LATERAL FLOW OF 501L CASES. 3. ALL CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODES. ADDITIONAL REFS: AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE PUBLICATIONS, "AG13o2.1R" $ "AC1332 R" OR THE POST TENSIONING INSTITUTE MANUAL, "DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF P05TTENSIONED SLABS ON GROUND". 4. VENT PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 THAT ANY RAINWATER OR CONDENSATION DRAINS DOWNWARD INTO GROUND BENEATH THE SLAB OR SOIL -GAS -RETARDER MEMBRANE 5. ALL CONCRETE SLABS THAT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SHALL BE LAID OVER A GAS PERMEABLE MATERIAL MADE UP OF EITHER A MINIMUM 4" THICK UNIFORM LAYER OF CLEAN AGGREGATE, TO ALLOW LATERAL FLOW OF 501L GASES. 6. ALL OPENINGS, GAPS AND JOINTS IN FLOOR AND WALL ASSEMBLIES IN CONTACT 501L OR GAPS AROUND PIPES, TOILETS, BATHTUBS OR DRAINS PENETRATING THESE ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE FILLED OR CLOSED WITH MATERIALS THAT PROVIDE A PERMANENT AIR -TIGHT SEAL. SEAL LARGE OPENINGS WITH NON -SHRINK MORTAR, GROUTS OR EXPANDING FOAM MATERIALS AND SMALLER GAPS WITH AN ELASTOMERIC JOINT SEALANT, AS DEFINED IN A5TM C920-81. 1. VENT PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 THAT ANY RAINWATER OR CONDENSATION DRAINS DOWNWARD INTO THE GROUND BENEATH THE SLAB OR SOIL -GAS -RETARDER MEMBRANE. 3 RADON GENERAL NOTES A-1 00/ SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" CA -_202 2 38 3 4 (N 44 38 O0 O O O KEYED NOTES 1 IN -FILL EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS 2 PROVIDE NEW PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM, 4" RADON PIPE, TURN UP TO ROOF - REFER TO PLUMBING PRAWINGS 3 4" PERFORATED RADON PIPE 4 IN -FILL CONCRETE SLAB PER DETAIL 2/A-100 5 NEW CASED OPENING, PROVIDE 4" PAINTED 1X TRIM SURROUND WITH PAINTED WOOD 1X JAMB. HEIGHT, 7-0" A.F.F. REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR LINTEL DETAILS 1 IN -FILL EXISTING DOOR OR CASED OPENING TO MATCH EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS 8 NEW MOP SINK WITH FRP PANEL SURROUND 9 NEW WINDOW IN EXISTING DOOR LOCATION, REFER TO DETAILS 10 5' WIDE PLASTIC LAMINATE FOLDING COUNTER WITH BRACKETS AND CONTINUOUS LEDGER 36 GC TO EVALUATE SLAB CONDITION AFTER STAIRS ARE REMOVED, POSSIBLE PATCH AND REPAIR 38 SEAL ALL EXISTING BASEMENT EXTERIOR WALLS FROM THE INTERIOR, WITH PRYLOK MASONRY SEALANT OR EQUAL 40 NEW MECHANICAL LOUVER IN EXISTING WINDOW OPENING, COORD. W/ MECHANICAL 41 PLASTIC LAMINATE COUNTER, FULL LENGTH OF THE ROOM, WITH BRACKETS AND CONTINUOUS LEDGER - PROVIDE GROMMETS EVERY 24" O.G., COORD. W/ OWNER 44 EXISTING STAIR WALLS TO BE REPAINTED 'PNT-2', CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED ' PNT-5'. ALL OTHER ELEMENTS TO REMAIN A5 15: RAILING, TREADS $ RISERS 5 IM1t PER DETAIL TO ACCOMODATE DRYER VENTS 46 3/4" P.T. PLYV'1OO4 FASTENED TO WALLS FOR WALL MOUNTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT EXTERIOR GRADE AIR 1 - 6„ UP 8' 4 3/8" - J 05 LOBBY 004 1 a a - O - - 5 _1,---------ooT tT7 --- - 4'-0" 5'-6" , [ IIII — — — _ _� LAUNDRY -------00 ---- _ o_ ----- __ _-- —_� J� LOUNGE L STAFF 4 CLOSET 001 CONFERENCE RM. 003 I.T. 002 5 EQ 5-5' EQ NEW OPENING 002 004 020 B. >- CORRIDOR 5 012 1 011 016 3'-6" 1 P III 54" IIII 16 11 OOMv , 15 A-403 019 FITNESS //COMPUTER `I 19 ROOM LAB 018 \ 011 j �-- IIII W-3 KITCHENETTE 41 III 19 I /' - 018 O �I� -J = -- ----------------------- --- A-403 S BASEMENT LEVEL - NEW CONSTRUCTION A-201 �tl OO SCALE: 3/16" = 1,-U,, 38 CA-20)2�3 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT UNIFORM BUILDING AND FIRE CODES AND APPLICABLE STATE LAWS AND ORDINANCES AS ADOPTED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION AT THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. 2. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FIN15H U.N.O. IN THE EVENT OF A DIMENSION DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THESE DOCUMENTS AND FIELD DIMENSIONS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 3. ALL NEW DOOR FRAMES TO BE SET 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, U.N.O. 4. GC TO PATCH AND REPAIR ALL WALLS THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION. 5. DRYWALL FINISH SHALL BE LEVEL 4, U.N.O. 6. ALL ACCESSIBLE UNITS AND COMMON SPACES, ALL ELECTRICAL CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: CENTER OF TOGGLE SWITCHES SHALL BE 42", TOP OF THE HIGHEST SWITCHING DEVICES, CONTROLS OR DISCONNECTS SHALL BE 45" AFF. 1. REFER TO MILLWORK DETAILS FOR ELECTRICAL OUTLET LOCATIONS IN ACCESSIBLE KITCHENS AND KITCHENETTES GENERAL NOTES: FLOOR PLANS IIII IIII I I II I III 46 IIII I I II � III ELECTRICAL 38 009 I III IIII 11N I VIII I III ,I I I I 00 O 0 O JI LAUNDRY 006 MOP SINK 008 1 40 10 00 IIII W-2 1'-0" L_HI - - - MECHANICAL 010 W -a � SALON/ 17 w 00 A-403 014 z SOCIAL/GAME Z ROOM I 0O 016 0 Lu z z I SHAFT LOCATION ABOVE ' 010 19' - 1 3/4" 1 B. CORRIDOR 2 011 1 G f �I II L A-403 15 013 L SOCIAL/GAME ROOM 015 STAFF KITCHENETTE q' — 10" 013 /' rTi(403/18 r la L ------ __--- / __,� iii TiTiTiTiTiuiiiiiiii STAFF ;STROC 01 1 design interiors passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1: PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 : 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 - AI- I DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFI7 IN THE FIFI I) RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE ,PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION ONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. ' C,OPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 2'4'A201 38 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - NEW JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-lOU 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _com KEYED NOTES 1 IN -FILL EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS 2 PROVIDE NEW PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM, 4" RADON PIPE, TURN UP TO ROOF - REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS 5 NEW CASED OPENING, PROVIDE 4" PAINTED 1X TRIM SURROUND WITH PAINTED WOOD 1X JAMB. HEIGHT, T-0" A.F.F. REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR LINTEL DETAILS 6 NEW 4" CONCRETE PAD OVER COMPACTED GRAVEL FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 7 IN -FILL EXISTING DOOR OR CASED OPENING TO MATCH EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS S NEW MOP SINK WITH FRP PANEL SURROUND 11 IN -FILL EXISTING FLOOR PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 12 NEW 42" STEEL GUARD RAIL WITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS 13 NE A CONCRETE PATIO, PER DETAILS RETE NENCRETE RAMP WITH STEEL RAILINGS AITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS A CONC 15 15" WIDE LOCKABLE FULL HEIGHT PANTRY CABINETS 16 FULL HEIGHT SHELVING, WITH CONT. LEDGER AND BRACKETS PER DETAILS 17 A CONCRETE STOOP AND STEPS AITH STEEL RAILINGS AITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS 15 NEW INTERIOR FIXED WINDOW PER INTERIOR ELEVATION 24 IN -FILL WALL WHERE THRU-WALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED, TO MATCH EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS SIMILAR TO WINDOW IN -FILL 30 NEW OPEN AIR VESTIBULE, REFER TO SECTION WITH NEA 2X6 WALLS AITH FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING ('5-2') 34 NEW 6 HIGH PVC FENCE/SCREEN FOR OUTDOOR MECHANICAL UNITS 44 EXISTING STAIR WALLS TO BE REPAINTED 'PNT-2', CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED ' PNT-5'. ALL OTHER ELEMENTS TO REMAIN A5 15: RAILING, TREADS $ RISERS 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT UNIFORM BUILDING AND FIRE CODES AND APPLICABLE STATE LAWS AND ORDINANCES AS ADOPTED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION AT THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. 2. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FINISH U.N.O. IN THE EVENT OF A DIMENSION DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THESE DOCUMENTS AND FIELD DIMENSIONS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 3. ALL NEW DOOR FRAMES TO BE SET 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, U.N.O. 4. GC TO PATCH AND REPAIR ALL WALLS THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION. 5. DRYWALL FINISH SHALL BE LEVEL 4, U.N.O. S. ALL ACCESSIBLE UNITS AND COMMON SPACES, ALL ELECTRICAL CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: CENTER OF TOGGLE SWITCHES SHALL BE 42", TOP OF THE HIGHEST SWITCHING DEVICES, CONTROLS OR DISCONNECTS SHALL BE 45" AFF. 7. REFER TO MILLWORK DETAILS FOR ELECTRICAL OUTLET LOCATIONS IN ACCESSIBLE KITCHENS AND KITCHENETTES :1) GENERAL NOTES: FLOOR PLANS 4 -O5 design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS _ DD REVIEWER INITIALS - CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: FIRST FLOOR PLAN - NEW JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-101 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE I FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _corn KEYED NOTES 2 PROVIDE NEW PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM, 4" RADON PIPE, TURN UP TO ROOF - REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS ____ 5 NEW CASED OPENING, PROVIDE 4" PAINTED 1X TRIM SURROUND WITH PAINTED WOOD 1X JAMB. HEIGHT, 1-O" A.F.F. REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR LINTEL DETAILS 7 IN -FILL EXISTING DOOR OR CASED OPENING TO MATCH EXISTING HALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS 11 IN -FILL EXISTING FLOOR PER STRUCTURAL PRANING5 19 NEW GWB FAUX COLUMNS, REFER TO DETAILS/ELEVATIONS 2O POWDER COATED STEEL VENTILATED MESH PANEL RESIDENT STORAGE GAGES, 36"W X 45" D, ULINE OR EQUAL - GC TO FIELD VERIFY FIT PRIOR TO ORDERING 44 EXISTING STAIR WALLS TO BE REPAINTED 'PNT-2', CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED PNT-5'. ALL OTHER ELEMENTS TO REMAIN A5 15: RAILING, TREADS 8 RISERS (----------------------------� 1 SECOND LEVEL - NEW CONSTRUCTION A-102 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT UNIFORM BUILDING AND FIRE CODES AND APPLICABLE STATE LAWS AND ORDINANCES AS ADOPTED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION AT THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. 2. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FINISH U.N.O. IN THE EVENT OF A DIMENSION DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THESE DOCUMENTS AND FIELD DIMENSIONS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. S. ALL NEW DOOR FRAMES TO BE SET 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, U.N.O. 4. GC TO PATCH AND REPAIR ALL WALLS THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION. 5. DRYWALL FINISH SHALL BE LEVEL 4, U.N.O. 6. ALL ACCESSIBLE UNITS AND COMMON SPACES, ALL ELECTRICAL CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: CENTER OF TOGGLE SWITCHES SHALL BE 42", TOP OF THE HIGHEST SWITCHING DEVICES, CONTROLS OR DISCONNECTS SHALL BE 48" AFF. 7. REFER TO MILLWORK DETAILS FOR ELECTRICAL OUTLET LOCATIONS IN ACCESSIBLE KITCHENS AND KITCHENETTES GENERAL NOTES: FLOOR PLANS 2 A-201 design Interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: SECOND FLOOR PLAN - NEW JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-102 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.3O1 .698.0020 www_za-d _com EQ EG CV (V (A (V ___ __ _____ _ 2 SECTION 1 AT NEW DORMERS A 10 SCALE: 3/16' = 1'-0" 3 SECTION 2 AT SLOPED ROOF A10 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" CA -_20' 2 2 SECTION 3 AT SLOPED ROOF SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" r L 7. r L D KEYED NOTES 2 PROVIDE NEW PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM, 4" RADON PIPE, TURN UP TO ROOF - REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS 2O POWDER COATED STEEL VENTILATED MESH PANEL RESIDENT STORAGE CAGES, 36"W X 45" D, ULINE OR EQUAL - GC TO FIELD VERIFY FIT PRIOR TO ORDERING 21 NEW STICK BUILT DORMERS, WALLS OF NEW DORMERS TO ALIGN WITH OUTER WALLS OF EXISTING DORMERS - VERIFY IN FIELD. REFER TO STRUCTURAL 44 EXISTING STAIR WALLS TO BE REPAINTED 'PNT-2', CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED' PNT-5'. ALL OTHER ELEMENTS TO REMAIN A5 15: RAILING, TREADS 4 RISERS TEMPERED GLAZING __________-- >< iiiiii STAIR 1 3O5 ELEV.( (�} LOBBY 3O1 , 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT UNIFORM BUILDING AND FIRE CODES AND APPLICABLE STATE LAWS AND ORDINANCES AS ADOPTED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION AT THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. 2. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACIE OF FINISH U.N.O. IN THE EVENT OF A DIMENSION DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THESE DOCUMENTS AND FIELD DIMENSIONS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 3. ALL NEW DOOR FRAMES TO BE SET 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, U.N.O. 4. GC TO PATCH AND REPAIR ALL WALLS THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION. 5. DRYWALL FINISH SHALL BE LEVEL 4, U.N.O. S. ALL ACCESSIBLE UNITS AND COMMON SPACES, ALL ELECTRICAL CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: CENTER OF TOGGLE SWITCHES SHALL BE 42", TOP OF THE HIGHEST SWITCHING DEVICES, CONTROLS OR DISCONNECTS SHALL BE 45" AFF. -7. REFER TO MILLWORK DETAILS FOR ELECTRICAL OUTLET LOCATIONS IN ACCESSIBLE KITCHENS AND KITCHENETTES GENERAL NOTES: FLOOR PLANS design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 AlAll DIMFNSIONS SHAI I RF VFRIFIFr) IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS - DD REVIEWER INITIALS - CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: THIRD FLOOR PLAN - NEW JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: -1O THIRD LEVEL NEW CONSTRUCTION A-201 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE - FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.3O1 .698.0020 A-1 O3 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" Www_za-d-com CEILING SYMBOLS LEGEND 1. DRYWALL BULKHEAD TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION TO BE GYP. BD. ON 3-5/8" MTL STUDS (OR 2X 4 WD STUDS) @ 16" O.G. A/. KICKERS EVERY THIRD STUD MINIMUM A/ 5/5" GYP. E. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF EXISTING FINISH TO FACE OF NEW FINISH, U.N.O. 3. PATCH CRACKS, NAIL POPS, AND HOLES IN EXISTING DRYAALL CEILINGS. FINISH PER FINISH SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRESS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 5. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. 6. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 1. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. S. IF GC FINDS DI5REPENCIE5 WITH NEW SPRNKLER HEADS AND ANY FIXTURE LOCATIONS ON RCP, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY Th GENERAL NOTES - RCP SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION 1 @ BASEMENT CEILING SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1-8" ...... .................... .................. ........ 3 SEC1 A-150 SCALE: 3/4' - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL OO - SLIM RECESSED CAN - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL Sic - SLIM 2X2 LAY -IN LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL - CO/SMOKE DETECTOR PER ELECTRICAL O - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELECTICAL - BATHROOM FAN PER MECHANICAL - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELECTICAL - PENDANT PER ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES - SUITE BATHROOM VANITY LIGHT PER ELECTRICAL * NOT ALL FIXTURES APPLY TO EACH SHEET * REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION 1. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FINISH, U.O.N. 2. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAAING5 FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRESS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PRAAING5 FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. 4. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 5. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. S. COORDINATE SPRINKLER HEADS AND PIPING WITH NEW CEILING SYSTEM AND LIGHTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT UPON FINDING CONFLICTS 7. ALL DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION Dr`D I k111 design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All 0IMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFO IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: RCP - BASEMENT FLOOR RCP JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-150 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _com 1. DRYWALL BULKHEAD TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION TO BE GYP. BD. ON 3-5/8" MTL STUDS (OR 2 X 4WD STUDS) @ 16" O.G. W/. KICKERS EVERY THIRD STUD MINIMUM W/ 5/8" GYP. BD. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF EXISTING FINISH TO FACE OF NEW FINISH, U.N.O. 3. PATCH CRACKS, NAIL POPS, AND HOLES IN EXISTING DRYWALL CEILINGS. FINISH PER FINISH SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRESS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 5. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. 6. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 7. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. 8. IF GC FINDS DI5REPENGIES WITH NEW SPRNKLER HEADS AND ANY FIXTURE LOCATIONS ON RCP, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY GENERAL NOTES - RCP H SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" ul .r `I -J, GWB> lfl.` t� 8 91/8" =,_' GY✓8 _" a, 91/8", ' _ cs i \T/ea _ a 4 ILl• _•� , - M`+� _ _ _ - Iu, I _ ILI CEILING SYMBOLS LEGEND O - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL O - SLIM RECESSED CAN o - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL SD Occ - CO/SMOKE DETECTOR PER ELECTRICAL - SLIM 2X2 LAY -IN LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL O - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELEGTIGAL - BATHROOM FAN PER MECHANICAL - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELECTICAL 0 - PENDANT PER ELECTRICAL II - SUITE BATHROOM VANITY LIGHT PER ELECTRICAL * NOT ALL FIXTURES APPLY TO EACH SHEET * REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FINISH, U.O.N. 2. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRA?4ING5 FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRESS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. 4. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 5. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. S. COORDINATE SPRINKLER HEADS AND PIPING WITH NEW CEILING SYSTEM AND LIGHTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT UPON FINDING CONFLICTS 7. ALL DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION RCP LEGEND SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LIGHTS TO BE ON DIMMER O • � I I I I IO I I I I I • 0) (O) (0) (0 O 8 •' -10° � O I l l l o l l l I l o (0) (0) (0) (0) 01 O o O O I I I I 2 I I I I I 4 4' — 1__k Cs W - - --> I.'-. i, y t 11 ®- ,c - y-` - (3 W EQ EQ W 9' -11 1/2" :3 LJ9' -11 1/2" W .E ,E r - - - - O 0 ' 0O - e - O Q1. O GWB 11 O• 1'-0 1 ,,� -11 Y 111=• O - ` W. O14E'=-;In a GWB., c_ r( ' 8' 91/8" :'E' �Xi' )r' - I i -ji---4; . rjI _________ _________ _________ _________ - a 6WB T - rrSScc �` 1- (J5 - - - - 91/8"; - - - - .'. ` �. - O ''t_L II 2I E V` QC -H () _ GWB ,.0 8' 91/8"= H 4-b h - 11.L' design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 Al I DIMFNSIONS SHAI I RF VFRIFIF0 IN THE FIFI h RY THF CONTRACTOR THF CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B N B R21 713 S00 MD SHEET NAME: RCP - FIRST FLOOR RCP JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: A-151 24211 I ` FIRST FLOOR RCP - NEW A-151/ SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE I FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.3O1 .698.0020 www_za-d _corn 1. DRYWALL BULKHEAD TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION TO BE GYP. BD. ON 3-5/5" MTL STUDS (OR 2 X 4 WD STUDS) @ 16" O.G. W. KICKERS EVERY THIRD STUD MINIMUM W/ 5/5" GYP. BP. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF EXISTING FINISH TO FACE OF NEW FINISH, U.N.O. 3. PATCH CRACKS, NAIL POPS, AND HOLES IN EXISTING DRYWALL CEILINGS. FINISH PER FINISH SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRE55 ANP EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 5. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. S. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 7. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. 8. IF GC FINDS DI5REPENCIE5 WITH NEW 5PRNKLER HEAPS AND ANY FIXTURE LOCATIONS ON RCP, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY GENERAL NOTES - RCP SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" CEILING SYMBOLS LEGEND O - SURFACE MTV. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL O - SLIM RECESSED CAN - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL SID GO/SMOKE DETECTOR PER ELECTRICAL - SLIM 2X2 LAY -IN LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL - O - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELEGTIGAL BATHROOM FAN PER MECHANICAL I - SUITE BATHROOM VANITY LIGHT PER ELECTRICAL CI - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELEGTIGAL O - PENDANT PER ELECTRICAL * NOT ALL FIXTURES APPLY TO EACH SHEET REFER TO ELEGTRIGAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FINISH, U.O.N. 2. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS ANP FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, ANP EGRESS ANP EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE ANP TECHNICAL INFORMATION. 4. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 5. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL ANP ELEGTRIGAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION S. COORDINATE SPRINKLER HEADS AND PIPING WITH NEW CEILING SYSTEM AND LIGHTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT UPON FINDING CONFLICTS 7. ALL DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE ANP CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION ORCP LEGEND SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" H" GWB LU ...,,-_.,.._:_._.,.,-,.',-,.,.,,, , GYVE GWB `rte - - - - - - -�a - - - - 1' 11 V8" - - _'8' 111/8 - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - •fit' - :' O O �` O GV�B - 8' 11 V8';` O O O O II ) - y.- o ; n - = _ Q. Q: rtEQ 7-11.1/5" EQ Q;= EQ•.• f;2 , GV4B - .-.7-11.1/S".-,)-.'-'.'. LU .. _ _ ,_. . ; , - r M__ _-L <tr, V. •1a r>�a. design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All OIMFNSIC)NS SHAII RF VFRIFIFIl IN THE FIFI B RY THE CC)NTRACTCR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS DD REVIEWER INITIALS CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ BZ 3/13/25 DATE: DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980 EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: RCP - SECOND FLOOR RCP C JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-152 SECOND FLOOR RCP - NEW SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www.za-d.com 1. DRYWALL BULKHEAD TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION TO BE GYP. BD. ON 3-5/8" MTL STUDS (OR 2 X 4 WD STUDS) @ 16" O.G. W/. KICKERS EVERY THIRD STUD MINIMUM W/ 5/5" GYP. BD. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF EXISTING FIN15H TO FACE OF NEW FINISH, U.N.O. 3. PATCH CRACKS, NAIL POPS, AND HOLES IN EXISTING DRYWALL CEILINGS. FIN15H PER FINISH SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRESS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 5. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. S. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 7. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. S. IF GC FINDS DISREPENCIE5 WITH NEW 5PRNKLER HEADS AND ANY FIXTURE LOCATIONS ON RCP, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY GENERAL NOTES - RCP SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" P H CEILING SYMBOLS LEGEND - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELEGTRIGAL O - SLIM RECESSED CAN o a - SURFACE MTD. LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL 81) - SLIM 2X2 LAY -IN LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL - GO/SMOKE DETECTOR PER ELECTRICAL O - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELECTICAL - BATHROOM FAN PER MECHANICAL ______ - SUITE BATHROOM VANITY LIGHT PER ELECTRICAL - SURFACE MOUNTED ROUND LIGHT PER ELECTICAL O - PENDANT PER ELECTRICAL * NOT ALL FIXTURES APPLY TO EACH SHEET REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM FACE OF FINISH TO FACE OF FINISH, U.O.N. 2. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE TYPES OF SMOKE DETECTORS, EXIT SIGNS, AND EGRESS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING. 3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION. 4. LOCATIONS OF LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM THE REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. 5. UPON FINDING A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION. 6. COORDINATE SPRINKLER HEADS AND PIPING WITH NEW CEILING SYSTEM AND LIGHTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT UPON FINDING CONFLICTS 7. ALL DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTION RCP LEGEND SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H o � I I I design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 Al I OIMFNSIC)NS SHAI I RF VFRIFIFIl IN THF FIFI F) RY THE CC)NTRACT()R THF CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS - DD REVIEWER INITIALS - CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: THIRD FLOOR RCP JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: A-153 24211 THIRD FLOOR RCP - NEW SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www.za-d.com NEW HALF ROUND GUTTERS EXISTING FASCIA AND SOFFIT TO REMAIN, GC TO NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF SALVAGING THE EXISTING FASCIA/SOFFIT CAN NOT BE ARCHIVED WITH THE NEW GUTTER AND ROOF SYSTEM. ROOF PLAN - NEW CONSTRUCTION ALL NEW AND EXISTING TO REMAIN ROOF AND DECK PENETRATIONS RELATED TO MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL TO BE COORDINATED BY GC. NEW CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROOF SYSTEM SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL ALL PERTINENT SUBMITTALS ARE PROVIDED AND DEEMED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF THE EXPOSED BUILDING, INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FINISHES SUBJECT TO WEATHER; WATER AND MOISTURE, EXTREME TEMPERATURES DURING THE TERM OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS FOR SPECIFICS. GC 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS OF A PROTECTION PLAN. UPON COMPLETION OF NEW ROOFING SYSTEM INSTALLATION, GC SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT FOR A DETAILED INSPECTION. IT SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE SYSTEM PERFORMS POSITIVE DRAINAGE ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS OF WARRANTY, U.N.O. ARROWS INDICATED ON PLAN REFER TO DIRECTION OF SLOPE OF ROOF SYSTEM TO ALLOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE. design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFII IN THE FIFI D RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: ROOF PLAN - NEW JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: 24211 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _com KEYED NOTES tiI\hii IIL ]II[ Fl / ]IIilJ± jII\ HI IIiI II iI ill ri L"1 EHE EAST ELEVATION - EXISTING & DEMO A-200, SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" D-15 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW WINDOW - TYPICAL, U.N.O. RETAIN EXISTING INTERIOR WINDOW TRIM. D-16 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF HALL IN -FILL IN LIKE KIND, PER DETAILS D -1q REMOVE EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL EXIT ENCLOSURE D-24 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE STOOP/STEPS AND ASSOCIATED RAILING D-25 REMOVE EXISTING STEEL BALCONY D-30 REMOVE EXISTING BALCONY IN ITS ENTIRETY D-31 REMOVE EXISTING COVERED PORCH IN ITS ENTIRETY D-32 REMOVE EXISTING SIDING A5 NOTED, FOR THE RECEIPT OF NEW FIBER CEMENT SIDING PER EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND D-35 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING ROOF FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW ROOF STRUCTURE, REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAAING5 D-36 REMOVE EXISTING DORMERS IN THEIR ENTIRETY, INCLUDING HALLS, AINDOW5 AND ROOF D-36 REMOVE ALL EXISTING SHINGLES, UNDERLAYMENT GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS - TYPICAL (SHEATHING TO REMAIN UNLESS DEEMED COMPROMISED AFTER SHINGLES ARE REMOVED) D-3 REMOVE PORTION OF ROOF FROM EXTERIOR SIDE OF EXISTING DORMER WALL TO OPPOSITE DORMER WALL D-40 REMOVE EXISTING THRU-HALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT D-41 REMOVE EXISTING CHIMNEY IN ITS ENTIRETY, TO BELOW FINISHED FLOOR IN BASEMENT. INFILL WITH NEW CONCRETE PER DETAIL 2/A-100 D-42 REMOVE EXISTING ACCESS DOOR IN ITS ENTIRETY D-44 REMOVE EXISTING FLAT ROOF MATERIAL IN ITS ENTIRETY II N4 I [rl] F11 1 III III III III III III III III II I -- I-2 NORTH ELEVATION - EXISTING & DEMO A-200 / SCALE: 1/8" = 1-0" - Level 3 j design interiors passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. Leve THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY ORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION 11' 2" AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. Level 1 Th COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. t_Lff_jttil[fLevel O j QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 3/13/25 q 4 DD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ DATE: 4/14/25 CD REVIEWER INITIALS DATE: I CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. LICENSE NUMBER 5980, EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-26 HflHHHEEEH -Level O A-200 3 WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING & DEMO A-200) SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING & A-200 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DEMO 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 7O2 P.3O1 .698.OO2O www_za-d _com x 3-0" 'HL EXISTING WINDO^S TO BE REPLACE, FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS -21/2" 3'-01/2" 3'-01/2" HL HHL IL cV cVTiP (V J 3' - 1 3/4" 2'-9" FIXED TRIM PANEL WINDOkN SCHEDULE MARK FUNCTION MATERIAL NOTES A FIXED VINYL B CASEMENT VINYL REFER TO STOP NOTE BELOW C SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS D SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS E SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS F SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS G FIXED VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS. PROVIDE FROSTED FILM ON RE5TROOM WINDOWS H FIXED VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS J FIXED VINYL K SINGLE HUNG VINYL L FIXED VINYL LOCATION OF WINDOW 15 IN BASEMENT CONF. ROOM. FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS 1. PROVIDE 1" ALUMINUM MINI BLINDS, CHORD FREE, MANUAL LIFT. TYPICAL OF ALL WINDOWS 2. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH SELECTED MFGR. 3. PROVIDE BUG SCREENS, TYPICAL OF ALL WINDOWS AND APPLICABLE DWELLING UNIT SLIDING DOORS, CASEMENT TO BE INTERNAL 4. PROVIDE ALL WINDOWS WITH LIMIT STOPS, 50 THAT OPERABLE OPENING WILL NOT ALLOW A 4" DIA SPHERE TO PASS THROUGH OPENING. 5. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE COMPLIANT LOOKING HARDWARE AT ALL WINDOWS IN ACCESSIBLE UNITS. INCLUDING THAT THE LOCK 15 MOUNTED NO MORE THAN 48" A.F.F. THE LOCK REQUIRES NO PINCHING, TWISTING, OR GRASPING TO OPERATE AND THE LOCK REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 5 LBS OF FORGE TO OPERATE 6. " * " DENOTES TEMPERED GLAZING 7. RETAIN EXISTING WINDOW TRIM, MATCH NEA WHERE EXISTING CANNOT BE SALVAGED WINDOW LEGEND & SCHEDULE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-201 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND KEY MATERIAL PRODUCT STYLE COLOR NOTES 5-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING JAMES HARDIE OR EQUAL 6" HORIZONTAL LAP TBD 5-2 � H = FIBER CEMENT PANEL JAMES HARDIE OR EQUAL PANEL A/ 4" TRIM ARCTIC, WHITE M-1 NEV' BRICK - 1 CONTINENTAL BRICK CO. - OR EQUAL COLOR TBD M-2 ____ EXISTING MASONRY PAINT W/ POTASSIUM SILICATE PAINT FOR MASONRY COLOR TBD R-1 STANDING SEAM PAC -CLAD OR EQUAL COLOR TBD R-2 ASPHALT SHINGLES PLYGEM OR EQUAL COLOR TBD NOTES: ALL TRIM TO BE FIBER CEMENT - ARCTIC WHITE 6" TRIM AT MATERIAL HORIZONTAL TERMINATIONS/TRANSITIONS - ARCTIC, WHITE PROVIDE 6" TRIM AT ALL CORNERS THAT RECEIVE FIBER CEMENT SIDING 4" AT WINDOWS - ARCTIC WHITE EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION - NEW CONSTRUCTION A-201 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1 '-0" KEYED NOTES 1 IN -FILL EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING TO MATCH SURROUNDING 1^IALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS 2 PROVIDE NEW PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM, 4" RADON PIPE, TURN UP TO ROOF - REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS 14 NEV'( CONCRETE RAMP WITH STEEL RAILINGS WITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS 17 NEV'( CONCRETE STOOP AND STEPS WITH STEEL RAILINGS WITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS 21 NEW STICK BUILT DORMERS, WALLS OF NEW DORMERS TO ALIGN WITH OUTER WALLS OF EXISTING DORMERS - VERIFY IN FIELD. REFER TO STRUCTURAL 22 NEW ENERGY STAR RATED MIN. 30 YEAR WARRANTED FIBERGLASS ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES WITH NEW ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT, PROVIDE RIDGE VENT 23 PROVIDE NEW HALF -ROUND STYLE PREFINI5HED ALUMINUM GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS - TIED TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND 5WM, REFER TO CIVIL. MATCH EXISTING 51ZE 25 NEW PRE -FINISHED ALUMINUM STANDING SEAM ROOF OVER NEW ROOF SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL 28 EXISTING TRIM TO REMAIN, REPAINT. WHERE NEEDED, SCRAPE AND PATCH WOOD TO PREP FOR NEW PAINT 30 NEW OPEN AIR VESTIBULE, REFER TO SECTION WITH NEW 2X6 WALLS WITH FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING ('5-2') 31 NEW 10" PIN MOUNTED METAL BUILDING NUMBERS 32 NEW SIDING PER EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND 34 NEW 6' HIGH PVC FENCE/SCREEN FOR OUTDOOR MECHANICAL UNITS 3q NEW HALF ROUND GALVANIZED HALF ROUND WINDOW WELL, GC TO CONFIRM 51ZE IN FIELD. REMOVE EXISTING WELL ROOF 33' - 0" �J design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 PROGRESS SET 01/17/25 2 35% PROGRESS SET 03/14/25 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 All DIMFNSIONS SHAT I RF VFRIFIFII IN THE FIFI h RY THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. Level 3 RCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW 21' - 6"' COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. Level 2 Level 1 O' - 011 Level " COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS - DD REVIEWER INITIALS - CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: SAN MAR - THE FINDLAY DLAY BLDG. PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD BOONSBORO, MD 21713 SHEET NAME: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NEW CONSTRUCTION JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: A-201 24211 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE I FRED ERIE1K, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _corn 3-0" EXISTING WINDOYVS TO BE REPLACE, FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS 3-21/2 3' - 0 1/2" HHL HHL 1flP(V TiP (V (V in in ❑e 3'-01/2" ❑ H -13/4" 3'-81/2" H❑❑ N r ❑❑ ❑ FIXED TRIM PANEL 2'-q" w _ JNINDOIN SCHEDULE MARK FUNCTION MATERIAL NOTES A FIXED VINYL B CASEMENT VINYL REFER TO STOP NOTE BELOW C SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS D SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS E SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS F SINGLE HUNG VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS G FIXED VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS. PROVIDE FROSTED FILM ON RE5TROOM WINDOWS H FIXED VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS J FIXED VINYL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS K SINGLE HUNG VINYL L FIXED VINYL LOCATION OF WINDOW 15 IN BASEMENT CONF. ROOM. FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMS 1. PROVIDE 1" ALUMINUM MINI BLINDS, CHORD FREE, MANUAL LIFT. TYPICAL OF ALL WINDOWS 2. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH SELECTED MFGR. 3. PROVIDE BUG SCREENS, TYPICAL OF ALL WINDOWS AND APPLICABLE DWELLING UNIT SLIDING DOORS, CASEMENT TO BE INTERNAL 4. PROVIDE ALL NINPOY45 WITH LIMIT STOPS, 50 THAT OPERABLE OPENING WILL NOT ALLOW A 4" DIA SPHERE TO PASS THROUGH OPENING. 5. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE COMPLIANT LOCKING HARDWARE AT ALL WINDOWS IN ACCESSIBLE UNITS. INCLUDING THAT THE LOCK 15 MOUNTED NO MORE THAN 48" A.F.F. THE LOCK REQUIRES NO PINCHING, TWISTING, OR GRASPING TO OPERATE AND THE LOCK REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 5 LB5 OF FORCE TO OPERATE " DENOTES TEMPERED GLAZING 7. RETAIN EXISTING WINDOW TRIM, MATCH NEW WHERE EXISTING CANNOT BE SALVAGED WINDOW LEGEND & SCHEDULE SCALE: 1/4" = 1,-a,' EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND KEY MATERIAL PRODUCT STYLE COLOR NOTES 5-1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING JAMES HARDIE OR EQUAL 6" HORIZONTAL LAP TBD 5-2 H H H FIBER CEMENT PANEL JAMES HARDIE OR EQUAL PANEL W/ 4" TRIM ARCTIC WHITE M-1 NEW BRICK - 1 CONTINENTAL BRICK CO. - OR EQUAL COLOR TBD M-2 1 EXISTING MASONRY PAINT W/ POTASSIUM SILICATE PAINT FOR MASONRY COLOR TBD R-1 STANDING SEAM PAC -CLAD OR EQUAL COLOR TBD R-2 ASPHALT SHINGLES PLYGEM OR EQUAL COLOR TBD NOTES: ALL TRIM TO BE FIBER CEMENT - ARCTIC WHITE 6" TRIM AT MATERIAL HORIZONTAL TERMINATION5/TRANSITIONS - ARCTIC WHITE PROVIDE 6" TRIM AT ALL CORNERS THAT RECEIVE FIBER CEMENT SIDING 4" AT WINDOWS - ARCTIC WHITE EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" STRUCTION 2 SOUTH ELEVATION - NEW CON A-202 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" KEYED NOTES 1 IN -FILL EXISTING WINDOW OR OPENING TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL CONSTRUCTION, REFER TO DETAILS 2 PROVIDE NEW PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM, 4" RADON PIPE, TURN UP TO ROOF - REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS 14 NEW CONCRETE RAMP WITH STEEL RAILINGS WITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS 17 NEW CONCRETE STOOP AND STEPS WITH STEEL RAILINGS WITH POWDER COATED FINISH, PER DETAILS 21 NEW STICK BUILT DORMERS, WALLS OF NEW DORMERS TO ALIGN WITH OUTER WALLS OF EXISTING DORMERS - VERIFY IN FIELD. REFER TO STRUCTURAL 22 NEW ENERGY STAR RATED MIN. 30 YEAR WARRANTED FIBERGLASS ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES WITH NEW ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT, PROVIDE RIDGE VENT 23 PROVIDE NEW HALF -ROUND STYLE PREFINI5HED ALUMINUM GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS - TIED TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND 5WM, REFER TO CIVIL. MATCH EXISTING 51ZE 25 NEW PRE -FINISHED ALUMINUM STANDING SEAM ROOF OVER NEW ROOF SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL 28 EXISTING TRIM TO REMAIN, REPAINT. WHERE NEEDED, SCRAPE AND PATCH WOOD TO PREP FOR NEW PAINT 32 NEW SIDING PER EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND 33 NEW VERTICAL CIRCULATION TOWER 34 NEW 6' HIGH PVC FENCE/SCREEN FOR OUTDOOR MECHANICAL UNITS 35 NEW FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM INLAID IN BRICK, FUTURE ART OPPORTUNITY, REFER TO SECTION 3q NEW HALF ROUND GALVANIZED HALF ROUND WINDOW WELL, GC TO CONFIRM 51ZE IN FIELD. REMOVE EXISTING WELL Ti design interiors i passiv Redefining the Building Potential PRINTS ISSUED NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 3 65% PROGRESS SET 04/21/25 CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS. ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. ARCHITECT HEREBY EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING SAID WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT. COPYRIGHT 2025 © ZAVOS ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN, LLC. QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW SD REVIEWER INITIALS - DD REVIEWER INITIALS - CD REVIEWER INITIALS BZ BZ DATE: 3/13/25 DATE: 4/14/25 DATE: Root SAN MAR - THE F I N D LAY 33' - o„ BLDG . PROJECT ADDRESS: 8505 FAHRNEY R N EY CHURCH RD Level3 B00NSB0R0, MD 21713 Level 2 SHEET NAME: 11'-21' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - Level 1 Level NEW CONSTRUCTION JOB NUMBER: 24211 DRAWING NUMBER: A-202 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 - NEW CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION - NEW CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 21 BYTE COURT, SUITE FREDERICK, MD 21 702 P.301 .698.0020 www_za-d _com ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: January 22, 2026 Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/Grandview 13511, 2026-00212 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: GRANDVIEW ACRES LLC, Applicant: Douglas Martin Location: 13511 MAUGANSVILLE Road Tax Account ID: 13025355 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 24/15/1131/ Legal Description: 7.33 ACRES; 13511 MAUGANSVILLE ROAD Zoning: Residential, Urban MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): 1252 Project Description: Demolition of 3,256 sq. ft. dwelling and foundation licable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section SD.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures Demolition Permit Application Requirements 1. Written description and history of the building or structure to be demolished. 2. Detail drawings, such as construction or trim details. 3. Floor plan for each floor level, drawn to approximate scale or fully dimensioned. 4. Applicant's plan for the recycling of waste generated 5. A report or narrative analyzing the following alternatives (listed in descending order of preference) as to the feasibility. The report shall consist of thorough, deliberative analyses of each of the alternatives, explaining why each alternative is or is not feasible and additional photographs should be provided in support of the analysis. In cases where a permit may involve multiple structures, each structure must have its alternatives documented. (a) Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structure or its setting; (b) Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project; (c) Converting the structure into another use (adaptive reuse); (d) Relocating the structure on the property; (e) Relocating the structure to another property; (f) Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building materials; (g) Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs, drawings, and/or text 6. A site plan illustrating any proposed development or introduction of plantings following demolition (if applicable) Staff Report: This structure is on the Washington County Historic Sites Inventory/MIHP as the Martin Farm, WA -I- 252, with original documentation completed in February 1977. The structure is on the east side of Maugansville Road south of Maugansville Rural Village. The structure is associated with the Martin family, however, the association has not been fully researched in the existing documentation. The house is two story, 3 bay, brick clad vernacular structure. The foundation is fieldstone. All brick is painted white and mostly laid in common bond with some areas of irregular brick pattern. The foundation is fieldstone painted gray. The paint used likely has led to significant brick deterioration visible on the west facade clearly and around the lower portions of the structure on all sides near the 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION foundation. The rear addition mentioned in the 1977 documentation appears to have been replaced by a larger addition spanning the entire length of the rear of the structure and being one story. That addition also includes a two car attached carport. The addition is constructed of concrete block foundation, frame walls with vinyl siding. All windows except those in the attic area appear to be replacement single pane double hung windows. Arches over the windows are varied with some being flat arches with no ornamentation and others being flat with a vertical brick pattern. The front entrance is a gable roofed porch with a wood door including a narrow transom. The door has a single pane of glass in the top half. There is a modern storm door in place as well. There is an entrance into the addition on the east elevation which is covered by a shed style roof. The north elevation of the addition also has an entrance covered by the carport. The roof of the structure is mixed. The front portion remains metal clad while the rear and the addition are black asphalt shingles. There are two chimneys in the main house at the gable ends. The structure again, is vernacular in construction and does not appear to have any details which make its construction stand out. It has been modified over time on the exterior and retains little character other than its setting. There are also various outbuildings which will remain. This property was previously rented out. The current owner purchased the property in 2019 and does not feel it is safe to live in at this time. While routine maintenance has been completed over the years of ownership, the property owner has indicated the cost to repair the existing structure exceeds what they want to spend. The owner said this site would remain open space planted in grass with no plans to construct another dwelling at this time. The owner noted there are issues with the interior walls separating from the brick exterior walls. Staff did note there were several places where the brick was failing, and the exterior wall was bowed out in the area of the first -floor west elevation. The owner also noted that the roof continues to leak in the main part of the house. The owner is open to saving anything valuable during the demolition process. Staff did not see any historic exterior elements other than the front door and attic windows (condition unknown). The brick is not likely to be salvageable. Any other elements for salvage would be more modern. No interior elements were assessed. Staff Analysis: The owner had no additional history to provide outside of what was provided in the initial documentation for the structure. They have provided basic information requested as part of this demolition permit review including the plans for the property which is to remain open space. The owner feels the property is unsafe for habitation which has prompted this permit. Staff noted that there are condition issues that are visible on the exterior of the structure that would be costly to repair. These include the bowing wall which is separating from the interior walls and multiple points of failing brickwork. The roof of the structure does appear to be prone to failure as configured due to its aged mixed materials as confirmed by the owner's statement. The owner is open to salvage of materials, however, in terms of exterior materials, these would be limited. This structure does not appear to have historical, cultural, architectural or design significance as detailed in Section 20.5 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County. Staff Recommendation: Recommend support of Residential Demolition Permit/Grandview 13511, 2026-00212 for the reasons stated in the staff analysis. 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET ;MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Respectfully Submitted, 1_ 9nJ Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Staff • Permit Submission Packet 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET JIMARYL R Y L AND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 1: Front facade, facing north 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET AND !iMARYL HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 8 Photo 2: right facade, facing west 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION s ; i y r c y �r _d„c Photo 3: right facade, facing west, addition/carport Photo 4: Rear elevation, addition/carport, facing south 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET MARYLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 5: left elevation, facing east 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET AND !iMARYL HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION — - . fr -, --- --—- 1 ...,.—.+a � tom: pv, , r w _ r '►.. Photo 6: brick condition detail, left elevation 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET JIMARYL R Y L AND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Photo 7: wall condition detail (bow), left elevation 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET AND !iMARYL HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 1' Photo 8: Front door detail WV 747 Northern Avenue I Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 1 P:240.313.2430 I F:240.313.2431 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET Untitled Map Write a description for your map. with Web AppBuilder for ArcGf5 : ••/ ;/ __ /ii/4 ___ \\/ / ,, /7 :-s `\1 Maryland Historical Trust e.maryland Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Revised 10125/2023 DEPARTMENT OP PLANNING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST PART 1 - EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE MHT Project Number (MHT office use only) Instructions: Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. No certification determination will be made until this form is complete. Please note that it is not necessary for owners of individually listed National Register properties to complete a Part 1 Application. 1. Property Name Street 900 The Terrace city Hagerstown Zip 21742 County Washington MHT Easement property? ❑ yes ❑ No J� Unknown Check all designations that apply: O National Register historic district or National Register individual listing 0 Local historic district or Local individual listing M Pending National Register or local designation (must submit documentation justifying historic district or individual listing) 0 Eligible curatorship property owned by DNR (must submit DOE justifying eligibility) O Eligible property within a Certified Maryland Heritage Area (must submit documentation from the Maryland Heritage Area Authority justifying eligibility) Name of Historic Oak Hill District or Heritage Area (if applicable) 2. Natu re of request (check only one box) O Certification that the building contributes to the significance of the above -named historic district or heritage area o Certification that the structure has been individually designated under local law and is eligible for the National Register (designation documentation required). o Preliminary determination that the structure will be a certified historic structure pending the official National Register or local designation. o Certification that a building owned by DNR is eligible for listing on the National Register. 3. Project Contact (if different from applicant) Name Street Zip Telephone 4. Applicant Company City Email Address State I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland. a political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) D I am the fee -simple owner of the above -described property or (2) 0 if I am not the fee -simple owner of the above -described property, the fee -simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article, gg 13-703 and 13-1O02(b), Annotated Code of Maryland. Bryan Seifarth 00th 011 09.E B"�" 10/14/25 Name signature Date Street 900 The Terrace city Hagerstown Zip 21742 Telephone Email Address state MD MHT Official Use Only The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax CreditApplfcatron- Part I for the above -named property and has determined that the property: o Is a "certified historic structure." O Appears to meet "certified historic structure" criteria, pending official National Register or local designation. o Is not a "certified historic structure" because it is not individually listed in the National Register or designated under local law; does not contribute to the significance of the above -named historic district or heritage area; is a structure pending National Register or local designation that does not appear to meet "certified historic structure" criteria; or is not determined eligible for listing in the National Register. o Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed_ Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature ❑ MHT comments attached Maryland Historical Trust 1100 Community Place, Crownsville, MD 210321 mht.maryland.gov HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 1 - EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Property Name StreetAddress 900 The Terrace. Hagerstown. MD 21742 5. Description of physical appearance This Colonial Revival two-story, slate shingled, gambrel -roof with three dormers on front, two in back, unpainted brick house, rectangular (originally) in shape with chimneys on each end, was constructed in 1910. It features regularly spaced window openings on the first and second floors, and a columned entry portico. On the interior, the first floor is divided by a hall and foyer with a staircase and living and dining rooms on either side. Beyond the staircase is a den to the left and family room at the back of house. The family room and garage below was added in the 1950s. At the east end of house off the dining room is a porch that was enclosed as a sunroom in about the 1980's. The kitchen is located in the rear right with a bathroom nearby. The second floor contains four bedrooms and two bathrooms. The original second floor porch at the back of the house above the family room was enclosed as an additional conditioned space about the time the family room and garage addition was built. Dale(s) m bulldteg(s) 1910 sham adate(s) maryland.gov/RealProperty type or construction Datetstmalmalknts7 1950s, 1980s (brick, woo frame. etc[ brick/frame Has building been moved? 0 no ❑ yes, specify date 6. Statement of significance Fred J. Mack (1878-1957) and Charles E. Kountz formed a partnership in 1907. The firm designed the Colonial Revival brick house at 900 The Terrace about 1907. The design of this building is very similar to that of Reynolds Tavern, an eighteenth century building on Church Circle in Annapolis, Maryland. For about six years, Mack resided at 945 Forest Drive, a brick Colonial Revival structure. The Oak Hill Historic District is an early -to -mid -twentieth century residential neighborhood in northern Hagerstown that is significant for historical and cultural reasons. Historically, the district is associated with a period, c. 1900-1941, in which Hagerstown, the seat of Washington County, experienced industrial and population growths unprecedented in the city's history. By 1914 Hagerstown emerged as the second manufacturing city in Maryland in terms of value of product, a distinction retained for a number of years. The city's population more than doubled in the first four decades of the twentieth century. The district also achieves significance from association with persons significant in local history. Oak Hill was home to many if not most of the city's industrial, commercial, social, and cultural leaders of this period. Here resided many of the owners and officers of the businesses and industries that gave Hagerstown its commercial and industrial status as well as the citizens most influential in city and county governmental and social matters. From the point of community planning, the Oak Hill area is important as the first and only significant section of Hagerstown to be developed along the lines of the garden city movement that began in the country in the mid -nineteenth century. The district is characterized by large lots, open spaces, deep set -backs, curving streets, tree lined boulevards, and deed restrictions affecting the cost, use, type, and placement of structures. Architecturally, the houses that line the streets of the district represent examples of the major architectural styles popular for residential construction the first third of the century, principally the Colonial and Spanish revivals. The buildings include some of the finest examples of these styles found in Hagerstown and collectively exhibit a range of architectural expression, craftsmanship and technique of the period. 7. Photographs and maps. sudntt lntenorvw eNerlu pnotogmpns in accada'ce with the photogmpblcguiddlnes. If orated win a local baton dlshlct attach the official historic dated Incendiary map with the Marion orthe pnpary decry Marked Page 2 of HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART I — EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST Property Address 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown, MD 21742 Instructions: After completing your Part 1 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each line carefully; the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted. Q APPLICATION FORM- I have filled in all applicable fields. I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information on my behalf; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned to me for completion. 0 SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part I application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHTs signature guidelines. 0 OWNERSHIP- If I am not the fee -simple owner of the property, I have provided a written statement from the fee -simple owner indicating that he or she is aware of the application and has no objection to the request for certification. 0 DESIGNATION JUSTIFICATION - I have attached the required documentation if applicable. EZI HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP- If located within a local historic district, I have attached the official historic district boundary map and clearly marked the property's location within the district. 0 PHOTOGRAPHS - I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines. ElMOVED BUILDINGS- My property was moved (or I plan to move it) and therefore I am submitting additional information in accordance with the Homeowner Application Instructions. ElMULTIPLE BUILDINGS- My property contains multiple structures (such as garage, barn, shed, etc.) and therefore I am submitting additional information in accordance the Homeowner Application Instructions. 0 DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and IZI Instructions. Bryan Seifarth 4f � P �rry E)igitalIysgnedbySe4asth,Brian 10/14/25 Dae- Name Signature Date:1411dC154938 Date Page 3 at 3 Maryland Historical Trust e.maryland Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Revised 10125/2023 ❑EPAPTMENT OF PLANNING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST PART 2— DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION MHT Project Number (MHT office use only) Instructions: Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. This page must bear the applicant's electronic signature and must be dated. The Maryland Historical Trust's certification decision is based on the descriptions in this application form. In the event of any discrepancy between the application form and other supplementary material submitted with it (such as architectural plans, drawings and specifications), the application form shall take precedence. '4. Property Name Street 900 The Terrace City Hagerstown Zip 21742 County Washington MHT Easement Property? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Unknown Q A Part I — Evaluation of Significance was submitted Date submitted Date of certification {if applicable] 2. Project Data 0 Primary/secondary residence Q Mixed -use residential/commercial Q Owner -occupied residential co-op unit Date of building construction 1910 Floor area before I after rehabilitation 3,724 ! 3,724 sq ft start date (estimated) November 2025 Completion date (estimated) January 2026 CHECK IF YOU ANTICIPATE RECEIVING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT o Insurance claim reimbursement funds ❑ Other kical and/or state funding (i.egrants or loans) Specify funding source 'Estimated qualified rehabilitation expenditures are capped at $250,000 and should not include additional state/local funding, insurance reimbursements or 'Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures 5.600.00 ineligible expenses including new construction, site work, appliances, etc. 3. Project Contact (if different from applicant) Name Company Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address 4. Applicant I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) 0 I am the fee -simple owner of the above -described property or (2) 0 if I am not the fee -simple owner of the above -described property, the fee -simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article, §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland. Name Bryan Seifarth Signature r„ M 4f5(59 Date 10/14/25 street 900 The Terrace City Hagerstown State MD Zip 21742 Telephone Email Address MHT Official Use Only The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application — Part 2 far the above -named property and has determined that the proposed rehabilitation described herein: o is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation tithe attached conditions are met A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does riot comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied. Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed. Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature MHT conditions or comments attached Maryland Historical Trust i 100 Community Place I Crownsville, MD 210321 mhtmaryland.gov HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Property address 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown, MD 21742 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number 01 Feature Slate roof Date of Feature 1910 Describe existing feature and its condition Nails are coming through slates due to age of slate. Many slates show cracks, holes, and even crumbling. Slate are also slanted and sliding. Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature 150-200 slates will be replaced/repaired to ensure slates are secure, sound, and eliminate roof leaks. Number 02 Feature Soffltt Date of Feature 1910 Describe existing feature and its condition Two holes found on the fascia wood on front of house needs to be replaced and painted. Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Gutter will be removed and replaced to replace the wood fascia sections and paint. The hole repairs will prevent rodents and weather from entering holes and prevent further damage. Page 2 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Property address 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown, MD 21742 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Page 3 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Property address 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown, MD 21742 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Page 4 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property name Property address 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown, MD 21742 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Describe work and impact on feature Drawing numbers Page 5 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2- DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST Property Address 900 The Terrace, Hagerstown, MD 21742 Instructions: After completing your Part 2 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each line carefully; the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted. APPLICATION FORM- I filled in all applicable fields. I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information on behalf of me; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned. � SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 2 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHTs signature guidelines. �■ DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK- I have described ALL proposed work planned for the next 24 months to the interior and exterior of my property, including ineligible work items that I do not anticipate receiving a tax credit for. I understand that all work must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and be reviewed and approved by MHT. �■ SUPPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS- If applicable to my project, I have attached site plans, demolition plans, architectural plans, HVAC plans, replacement window/door drawings and/or product specifications. Q PHOTOGRAPHS- I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines. �■ REVIEW FEE - I will pay a $10 Part 2 review fee when sent an electronic invoice by the Maryland Historical Trust. I understand that payment must be made within ten (10) days of receiving the invoice. R DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records. 0 I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and Instructions. Bryan Seifarth Name Digitally signed by la-urJL.s -e.4.ciruk Seifarth, Bryan 10f14125 Signature Date- 10/14/25 09:59 Date Page 6 of 6 a f � ::: sroP 5 - �•� .. . Y.` /t -PUL:-- .4 t Y r - •-- Ni - �b __� J!'^'tip. i �� 'l,r �._ Ab S q -SST T'� ��_`� b "" - 1. �� s '� Y - �� — 1. INVOICE CRAMPION HOME IMPROVEMENTS. LLC Champion Home Improvements, Ilc. 4920 Niagara Rd #207 College Park, Md 20740 Phone: (301) 277-7200 Email: championremodeler@gmail.com Fax: (240) 206-0628 Web: www.mychampionhome.com Description Bill To Seifarth, Bryan 900 The Terrace Hagerstown, MD 21742 Payment Due upon receipt terms Seifarth - Slate roof repairs Invoice # keep copper Date 09/23/2025 Business / MHIC 44848 Tax # Quantity Total Slate Roofing 1 Champion will furnish all labor and materials to repair slate roof. Option 3 : - repair existing leaking slate tiles no warranty due to age of existing slate...... $5600 Multiple leaks showing inside attic. Multiple sings of water, stained wood. Customer has placed buckets were he was identified water leaks. Found multiple leaks After inspecting roof from the outside. Nails are coming through slates due to age of slate. Many slates show cracks, holes, and some are crumbling. Found slate that are slanted (close to falling) Repair existing copper ridge. 150-200 slates would need to be replaced/repaired. Two holes found on fascia that needs to be replaced and painted. (Gutter needs to be removed in order to repair. Flashing metal on chimneys needs to be sealed. 90 Day repair warranty Pick up and haul away all work related debris Price includes all labor, materials, delivery and taxes. $5,600.00 Page 1 of 6 Any undetected rotted wood is $10 per In ft. Having a yearly inspection of your roof and gutter system by a trained slate roofer will help ensure that your roof continues to do its job and can help prevent major repair bills. Annual inspection $250 includes gutter cleaning Financing available - With approved credit 1 $0.00 Payments start as low as $160 per month. with no money down financing. Contact us today to pre -qualify for a loan that fits your budget. *** Apples to Apples Price Match Assurance *** Licensed - Bonded - Insured Over 30 years experience COVID-1 9 NOTICE: Due to the pandemic some materials are being delayed or temporarily discontinued by the manufacturer. We appreciate your patience during these extraordinary days. We will keep you informed if your project is affected. AHS 1 $0.00 $1125 payment shown as a discount. Subtotal Discount Total Thank you for your patronage. We appreciate our customers. $5,600.00 $1,125.00 $4,475.00 Page 2 of 6 Page 3 of 6 Page 4 of 6 By signing this document, the customer agrees to the services and conditions outlined in this document. All home improvement contractors and subcontractors must be licensed. If you have any questions, contact the MHIC, DPOR or DCRA. You the buyer have 5 business days from the date of signing to cancel this agreement. MHIC #44848 Licensed and bonded in MD, DC #8414 & VA 2705039107 (,qi. H Signed on: 09/30/2025 Seifarth, Bryan Page 6 of 6 Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report As the state historic preservation office, the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) monitors and evaluates Certified Local Government (CLG) performance. This annual report - a requirement for participation in the CLG Program - provides useful data to help develop training and support for CLGs, while charting the success of the program. In addition to the annual report, MHT conducts in-depth evaluations of each CLG every four years. For this annual report, please report only on activities for the 2025 federal fiscal year (October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025). The FFY25 annual report is due on February 27, 2026. Questions? Contact Nell Ziehl, Chief of MHT's Office of Planning, Education, and Outreach at nell.ziehl@maryland.gov. mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account * Indicates required question Email * mjenkins@washco-md.net Certified Local Government Name: * Washington County, MD Historic District Comn Contact First Name: * Meghan a Contact Last Name: * Jenkins Contact Telephone: * MADIRISIMIR1I Contact Email: * mjenkins@washco-md.net Next O This form was created inside of State of Maryland. - Contact form owner Does this form look suspicious? Report Google Forms Clear form Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account * Indicates required question Part 1: Program Changes Has the Commission changed its designation criteria or adopted new criteria for designation? O Yes ®No If you answered "Yes" to the previous question, please describe the change(s) here. You may cut and paste language directly from the ordinance. Your answer Has the Commission limited or expanded its ability to review archaeological sites, cultural landscapes, or other non -architectural features? O Yes ®No If you answered "Yes" to the previous question, please describe the change(s) here. You may cut and paste language directly from your ordinance. Your answer Has the Commission adopted or made substantial revisions to its design guidelines? O Yes ®No If you answered "Yes" to the previous question, please describe the change(s) here and include a link to your design guidelines. Your answer Has the Commission created or made substantial changes to its local tax credit program or other local financial incentives? O Yes ®No If you answered "Yes" to the previous question, please describe the change(s) here and include a link to your program information. Your answer Has the Commission changed its member make-up or qualifications? * O Yes ®No If you answered "Yes" to the previous question, please describe the change(s) to the Commission requirements here. Your answer Has the Commission made any other changes to its ordinance, program or procedures? Please describe. No Back Next Clear form This form was created inside of State of Maryland. - Contact form owner Does this form look suspicious? Report Google Forms O Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account Part 2: Summary of Activities/Design and Development Review How many staff does your Commission have? 2 staffperson and 1 admin for meetings a Please enter the number of cases approved for 1) alterations, 2) demolitions, and 3) new construction by your Commission. (Please do not include approvals given due to expiration of time.) alterations: 3; demolitions: 2 (for support, not approval); new construction: 3 Please enter the number of cases denied for 1) alterations, 2) demolitions, and 3) new construction denied by your Commission. 0 Please enter the number of appeals against decisions on 1) alterations, 2) demolitions, and 3) new construction by your Commission. 0 If you conduct reviews for archaeological resources, please list the number of cases that were 1) approved, 2) that required Phase 1 archaeology, and 3) that required Phase 2 archaeology. not applicable How many alterations, demolitions, or new construction projects were approved at the staff level? 0 How many cases were automatically approved through expiration of time for review? 0 Back Next Clear form This form was created inside of State of Maryland. - Contact form owner Does this form look suspicious? Report Google Forms O Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account Part 3: Summary of Activities/Survey and Designation How many National Register nominations did your Commission review? 0 How many new or revised Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP). Architecture Forms did your Commission submit to MHT? 1 (photo addendum only) Were all the MIHP Architecture Forms submitted by your Commission approved by MHT? O Yes O No © N/A Clear selection How many new or revised MIHP Archaeology Site Forms did your Commission submit to MHT? 0 Were all the MIHP Archaeology Site Forms submitted by your Commission approved by MHT? O Yes O No © N/A Clear selection Please list any new local designations made during this fiscal year. In your answer, please include the name of each designated site, property, or district; the relevant MIHP number; and the number of resources included in each designation. none Have you conducted survey or inventory work that did not result in MIHP forms? If so, please describe. none What are your top three priorities for survey and/or designation in the coming year? 1) Expand and update the survey to capture properties at least 50 years or older since last major survey date including updated photos of existing survey properties 2) Continue to update incentives to include grants and yearly credit 3) identify and explore implementation of program for historic landscapes Back Next Clear form This form was created inside of State of Maryland. - Contact form owner Does this form look suspicious? Report Google Forms O Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account * Indicates required question Part 4: Summary of Activities/Special Programs How many historic properties were assisted through the local tax credit program? (If you do not have a local tax credit, write "N/A.") 0 How many projects involving historic properties were reviewed as a result of local government undertakings (i.e. a "local Section 106" review)? (If you are not required to review local government undertakings, write "N/A.") 0 How many historic properties were assisted through local grant or loan programs? (If you do not have local grant or loan programs, write "N/A.") 0 How many historic properties were acquired, in whole or in part, by the local government? 0 Back Next Clear form This form was created inside of State of Maryland. - Contact form owner Does this form look suspicious? Report Google Forms O Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account * Indicates required question Part 5: Commission Qualifications and Procedures Please describe your Commission by listing each member (Last Name, First Name) and documented area of interest. If applicable, please also indicate if a member meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards by noting, for example, "SOI-Historic Architecture" or "SOI-Architectural History." Yavener, Lloyd, Chair, AOl: Preservation of historic structures Profession: Licensed Attorney; Bedard, Justin, Vice Chair, AOl: Archaeological resources and their protections 501: Archaeology; Smith, Gregory, AOl: Architectural history, preservation of historic structures including adaptive reuse; Aldrich, Ann, AOl: Historic preservation of buildings and landscapes, Degree: Masters in Sustainable landscape design; Lushbaugh, Michael, AOl: Historic Preservation of buildings and structures; Candelaria, Briana, AOl: Historic Preservation, S01: Architectural History; Milam, Tyler, AOl: History and Preservation, Degree: BA in History, BS in Architecture, Master of Architecture and Master of Architectural Design and Urbanism If you have vacancies, please list the type of vacancy (qualified or not) and the duration. none Please list the trainings and/or educational sessions attend by each member (Last Name, First Name) in this fiscal year. Aldrich, Ann and Lushbaugh, Michael: NAPC's Deconstruction vs. Demolition: Protecting Heritage and the Environment; Lushbaugh, Michael: NAPC Understanding Historic Windows: Evolution, Assessment & Repair; Lushbaugh, Michael: NAPC Through the Pane Pt. 2: Managing Window Replacement: Lessons from Local Preservation Programs Number of meetings held: * 7 How are regular meetings advertised? * County Website How are special meetings advertised? * County website & newspaper How are meeting minutes made available to the public? * County website and upon request How are the Commission's rules and procedures made available to the public? * County website and upon request Certified Local Government FFY25 Annual Report mjenkins@washco-md.net Switch account Part 6: General Feedback Please describe any great projects you completed or successes you achieved during this federal fiscal year. Preservation Month 2025 was another successful "Love Historic" initiative; Please describe any major new projects or plans anticipated for the coming year. Continuing to pursue a grant program; expansion of the survey particularly to a not yet surveyed rural village; Continue outreach and collaborations with Towns through MOU for tax credits; continue to encourage retention of historic resources through outreach to the public to reduce demolition without permits; outreach to local groups including homebuilders and craftsperson; co -host preservation and workshop Do you have any training or educational needs that are not met by existing offerings from the Maryland Association of Historic District Commissions or the Maryland Historical Trust? Training on the State and local review of Section 106 in Maryland Please share any concerns, issues, or additional comments you may have about the Certified Local Government Program or preservation in your jurisdiction. No additional comments regarding the CLG Program Back Next Clear form This form was created inside of State of Maryland. - Contact form owner Does this form look suspicious? Report Google Forms O 5 - Color Legend Facility Location 2640 Foot Radius Statistics: PROJ_DE5C=Geographic (Lat/Long) / WG584 /arc degrees PROJ_DATUM=WG584 PROJ_UNITSn arc degrees PIXEL WIDTH=0.0000013 arc degrees (+1- £6ft) PIXEL HEIGHT=0.4000014 arc degrees(+/-.6ft1 RADIUS (FT)= 1/2 Mile TRAN5MITTER_HE[GHT {Ft-AGL)= 195.0 RECEIVER_HEIGHT (Ft-AGL)= 5 Ft PERCENT_V I SI B LE {%1= 24.6% Notes: map compiled hyGDJ, LLC on : 12/17/25 Tower locatlon{latllong NAD 83):39.659805 -77.572867 Smit rg Gould Digital Imaging Viewshed Analysis output maps contained herein best where proposed fscublicly may potentially be va the based w on the G f D ■ best and newest data puhlic o available a the lima the data was Collected. I L ver i Z�Df11 Gould Digitallmaging does not claim to depict all locations from where the DIGITAL IMAGING facility may potentially be visible and calculated output Should be confirmed via site testing as needed. 4c.TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trileaf.com November 26, 2025 Maryland Historical Trust Attn: Dr. Dixie Henry 100 Community Place, Third Floor Crownsville, MD 21032-2023 Phone: 410-697-9553 Email: dixie.henry@mary1and.gov lry and.gov RE: Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School / Trileaf Project #766917 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Washington County, Smithsburg Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 39' 35.298" N, Longitude: 77° 34' 22.321" W Dear Dr. Henry: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 195 -foot -tall monopole communications tower, with an overall height of 199 feet including attachments, and associated ground -based equipment, within a new 60 -foot by 40 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound. The project also includes a proposed 12 -foot -wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150 feet generally southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. The site is currently manicured grass - covered lawn. The antennas will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission, dated September 2004, a cultural resource investigation has been conducted. Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on, or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Summary reports of this investigation, maps, photographs and other information are provided in the attached Form 620. As noted in Attachment 5, there are No Historic Properties in the APE for Direct Effects and No Adverse Effects to the Historic Properties in the APE for Visual Effects. Therefore, it is recommended that the proposed undertaking proceed without further archaeological review. We appreciate your cooperation in this regard and anticipate your concurrence with these findings. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 ext. 902 or email e.boone@trileaf.com if you need any additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager FCC Form 620 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Notification Date: 7AM EST 11/28/2025 New Tower (NT )'Submission Packet File Number: 0011799314 General Information Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates 1) (Select only one) ( NE ) NE — New UA — Update of Application WD — Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application File Number: currently on file. licant Information 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0005523832 4) Name: Milestone Towers Contact Name 5) First Name: Matt 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Penning 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Contact Information 10) P.O. Box: /And 11) Street Address: 12110 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 100 12) City: Reston 13) State: VA 14) Zip Code: 20140 15) Telephone Number: (703)944-4332 16) Fax Number: 17) E-mail Address: matt@milestonetowers.com Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0011724176 19) Name: Trileaf Corporation Principal Investigator 20) First Name: Michael 21) MI: 22) Last Name: Hart 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Senior Historian/Architectural Historian Principal Investiaator Contact Information 25) P.O. Box: r/And 26) Street Address: 303 International Circle Suite 150 27) City: Hunt Valley 28) State: MD 29) Zip Code: 21030 30) Telephone Number: (410)853-7128 31) Fax Number: 32) E-mail Address: e.boone@trileaf.com 1 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Professional Qualification 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards? I (X ) Yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( X ) Architectural Historian ( X ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) Additional Staff 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( X ) Yes ( ) No If "YES," complete the following: 36) First Name: Scott 37) MI: 38) Last Name: Emory 39) Suffix: 40) Title: Senior Project Archaeologist 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( X ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) 2 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Site Information ewer Construction Notification System 1) TCNS Notification Number: 301839 Site Information 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 3) Site Name: Smithsburg High School 4) Site Address: 66 North Main Street 5) Detailed Description of Project: New 199ft-tall monopole communications tower, and associated equipment, within a new 60ft x 40ft fenced compound, and a new 12ft-wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150ft southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. 6) City: Smithsburg 7) State: MD 8) Zip Code: 21783 9) County/Borough/Parish: WASHINGTON 10) Nearest Crossroads: E School Lane and N Main Street 11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 39-39-35.3 ( X ) Nor ( ) S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 077-34-22.3 ( ) E or ( X ) W Tower Information 13) Tower height above ground level (include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 60.7 14) Tower Type (Select One): ( ) Guyed lattice tower ( ) Self-supporting lattice ( X ) Monopole ( ) Other (Describe): -rojeci aiaius 15) Current Project Status (Select One): ( X ) Construction has not yet commenced ( ) Construction has commenced, but is not completed Construction commenced on: ( ) Construction has been completed Construction commenced on: Construction completed on: ( ) Feet ( X ) Meters 3 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Determination of Effect 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 4 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 301839 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 7 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 I I IVC/I'll 1v L W11LQLILCLA 1111 VU 11 1 VIJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians act Name 5) First Name: Lawrence 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Plucinski 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/24/2025 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 111ue/1Yr7V %,U11LQL.LCU IIIIVU 11 IVIYJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Delaware Nation act Name 5) First Name: Billie 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Anderson 8) Suffix: 9) Title: TCNS Coordinator uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/24/2025 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 5 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 301839 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 7 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 I I IUC/I'll 1v L U11LQLILCLA 1111 VU 11 1 VIJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma act Name 5) First Name: Lora 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Nuckolls 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Director uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/25/2025 11) Date Replied 09/25/2025 ( ) No Reply ( X ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 111UV11Yr7V %,U11LQL.LCU IIIIVU 11 IVIYJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Seneca -Cayuga Nation act Name 5) First Name: William 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Tarrant 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/25/2025 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 6 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 301839 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 7 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 I I IVC/I'll 1v L W11LQLILCLA 1111 VU 11 1 VIJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Shawnee Tribe act Name 5) First Name: Tonya 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Tipton 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/24/2025 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 111ue/1Yr7V %,U11LQL.LCU IIIIVU 11 IVIYJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Tuscarora Nation act Name 5) First Name: Bryan 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Printup 8) Suffix: 9) Title: TCNS Rep uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/24/2025 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 7 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 301839 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 7 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 I I IMC/1\1 IV llJI ILQLrLGLA I III VLI I I I VIJ 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Wyandotte Nation Contact Name 5) First Name: Sherri 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Clemons 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 09/24/2025 11) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 8 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tribe/NHO Information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: TA Ord 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted 18) Date Replied ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 9 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Historic Properties Properties Identified 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( ) Yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? "Yes", ( ) Yes ( X )No— If you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. listoric Property 4) Property Name: SHA Small Structure 21065X0 5) SHPO Site Number: WA -IV -273 Property Address 6) Street Address: MD 66 over Tributary to Beaver Creek 7) City: Smithsburg 8) State: MD 9) Zip Code: 21783 10) County/Borough/Parish: WASHINGTON Status & Eliaibility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( )Yes ( )( ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: MEDUSA (x )Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 10 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Historic Properties Properties Identified 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of ( ) Yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? "Yes", ( ) Yes ( X )No— If you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. listoric Property 4) Property Name: Smithsburg Historic District 5) SHPO Site Number: WA -IV -259 Property Address 6) Street Address: Water and Main Streets 7) City: Smithsburg 8) State: MD 9) Zip Code: 21783 10) County/Borough/Parish: WASHINGTON Status & Eliaibility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: ( )Yes ( )( ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: MEDUSA (x )Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 11 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Local Government Involvement -ocal (.iovernment 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Washington County Historic District Contact Name 3) First Name: Meghan 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Jenkins 6) Suffix: 7) Title: GIS Coordinator Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: /AOnd 9) Street Address: 100 West Washington Street Suite 2600 10) City: Hagerstown 11) State: MD 12) Zip Code: 21740 13) Telephone Number: (240)313-2430 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: mjenkins@washco-md.net 16) Preferred means of communication: ( X ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both iates & 17) Date Contacted 09/23/2025 18) Date Replied 10/01/2025 ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( X ) Replied/Other Ms. Jenkins responded via email stating that the proposed tower location is in an area of tree planting that was done in agreement with the Washington County Public Schools and County Water Quality Department. Additional Information 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): 12 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Other Consulting Parties ether Consulting Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? ( X ) Yes ( ) No ;onsulti 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Washington County Historical Society Contact Name 4) First Name: To Whom It 5) MI: 6) Last Name: May Concern 7) Suffix: 8) Title: Contact Information 9) P.O. Box: AO d 10) Street Address: 135 West Washington Street 11) City: Hagerstown 12) State: MD 13) Zip Code: 21740 14) Telephone Number: (301)797-8782 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: info@washcohistory.org 17) Preferred means of communication: ( X ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both jotao a MwNvIwc 18) Date Contacted 09/23/2025 19) Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Additional Information 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 13 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Designation of SHPO/THPO 1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower. SHPO/THPO Name: Maryland Historical Trust 2) You may also designate up to three additional SHPOs/THPOs if the APEs include multiple states. If the APEs include other countries, enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency. SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: Certification I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: Elsie MI: Last Name: Boone Suffix: Signature: Elsie Boone Date: 11/26/2025 FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 14 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Attachments : Type Other Resumes/Vitae Photographs Map Documents Other Area of Potential Effects Tribal/NHO Involvement Historic Properties for Direct Effects Historic Properties for Visual Effects Local Government Involvement Public Involvement State -Specific Forms Description Date Entered Cover Letter 11/26/2025 Resumes 11/26/2025 Photos 11/26/2025 Maps 11/26/2025 CDs 11/26/2025 APE 11/26/2025 Tribal 11/26/2025 Direct APE 11/26/2025 Visual APE 11/26/2025 Local Government 11/26/2025 Public Involvement 11/26/2025 State -Specific 11/26/2025 15 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 1. Consultant Information Provide a current copy of the resume or curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in this filing. A current copy of the resume for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing, or conclusions presented in this filing. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates £TRILEAF Professional Resume B.S. Anthropology Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA Ms. Hitt has six years of experience as an archaeological technician and crew chief. She has NCPTT training in GRP, and training with Advanced Metal Detecting for the Archaeologist (AMDA). She has Phase L II, and III experience, lab experience, is skilled in ArcGIS mapping, and has completed historical and archival research. Environmental service expertise includes: Archaeological and Architectural Impacts Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Land Use History NCPTT GPR Training, Marksville, LA 2018 AIVIDA Training, Pensacola, FL 2016 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates £TRILEAF f'1ulessiVil:tl RCyliruc History/Anthropology. B.A. Social Science Education, M.S. Florida State University / Tallahassee. FI. Mr. Hart operates as the primary processional point -of -contact regarding History, Architectural History, and Historic Preservation. Mr, Hart is a Secretary of the Interior (5O1) qualified Architectural Historian and Historian with fourteen years of professional experience in Historic Preservation. Architectural History and I-Iistoric Preservation service expertise include Architectural Impacts Form 620/621 Submittals National RegisterNominations Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Historical Marker Applications Local Government Consultation Historic Resource Reports and Forms Native American Consultation SHPO Consultation Section 11)6 Compliance Field Reconnaissance I Iistoric Sites Specialistll-Iistoric Preservationist for Florida Division oft-Iistorical Resources, Tallahassee, FL, 2008-2022 Adjunct Instructor, Tallahassee Community College. Tallahassee, FL, 2010 -Present Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates &TRILEAF P ru l,css i nnal l ,esu i, u M.A. Maritime History 1 Nautical Archaeology Fast Carolina University / Greenville, NC` B.A. Anthropology University of Delaware 1 Newark, DE. Mr. Emory is a Sol -qualified professional archaeologist with over 20 years of experience in terrestrial and submerged cultural resources management in the Mid -Atlantic region. He has directed Phase I - III archaeological projects of varying complexity, conducted archaeological assessments. Area of Potential Effects (APE) coordination, environmental impact statements. historic context development, and public outreach activities. He has completed historical and archival research_. artifact conservation, identification and cataloging; report preparation; and environmental assessment of sites. Mr. Emory speciali?es in the archaeological investigation of shipyard sites and waterfront settings; 181h and 19th century trades; and industrial archaeological sites. He also has a strong interest in environmental reeonstr,ictipn studies in the Mid -Atlantic region and Native American ceremonial practices. Enviromnental service expertise includes' Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Historical City Directories Archaeological and Architectural impacts Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance Form 620!621 Submittals Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imager Local Government Consultation Land Use History Section 106 Essentials — Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 2008 Metal Detecting for Archaeologists, 2013 Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA).. member since 2007 Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology (CNLiI-IA), member since 2008 Archaeological Society of Delaware (ASD), member since 2003 Archaeological Society of Maryland (ASM), member since 2008 Early American industries Association (UAIA), member since 20I6 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 TRILEAF Professional Resume Environmental Science, B.S. University of Maryland, Baltimore County / Baltimore, MD Ms. Boone has experience performing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for wireless telecommunications projects. Ms. Boone also has experience performing site inspections and conducting environmental due diligence pursuant to EPA All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) and the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) for commercial real estate and lending projects, assisting in wetland delineation and permitting, performing Migratory Bird Evaluations, and assisting in rare, threatened, and endangered species monitoring surveys for bamboovine, swamp pink, and rough wood -aster in the Cecil County, Maryland area. Environmental service expertise includes: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Indoor Air Quality Assessments Information Section 7 Consultation National Wetland Inventory Maps Flood Insurance Rate Maps Critical Habitat Maps Environmental Evaluation Summaries Archaeological and Architectural Impacts Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance NEPA Environmental Assessments Migratory Bird Evaluations Form 620/621 Submittals Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Local Government Consultation Native American Consultation Land Use History Preliminary Risk Assessments Joint Permit Applications Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Species Surveys Geographic Information Systems Certification — UMBC Certified Asbestos Inspector (MD) — (License #250000099) 40 -Hour OSHA HAZWOPER Adult/Infant CPR & First Aid Certified Environmental Professional (EP) as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-21 (AAI) NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 2. Site Information — Photographs You are required to provide photographs and maps as part of this filing. Additional site information can be provided in an optional attachment. Photograph Requirements: Except in cases where no Historic Properties were identified within the Areas of Potential Effects, submit photographs as described below. Photographs should be in color, marked so as to identify the project, keyed to the relevant map or text, and dated; the focal length of the lens and the height of the camera should be noted. The source of any photograph included but not taken by the Applicant or its consultant (including copies of historic images) should be identified on the photograph. Photographs taken from the site should show views from the proposed location in all directions. The direction (e.g., north, south, etc.) should be indicated on each photograph, and, as a group, the photographs should present a complete (360 degree) view of the area around the proposed site. Please reference the following directional photographs of the project area, which were taken by Scott Emory on September 22, 2025, unless otherwise noted. b. Photographs of all listed in and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects. Please reference the following photographs of all NRHP-listed and eligible properties within the APE-VE for the project area, which were taken by Scott Emory on September 22, 2025, unless otherwise noted. If any listed or eligible properties are visible from the proposed site, photographs looking at the site from each historic property. The approximate distance in feet (meters) between the site and the historic property should be included. If any listed or eligible properties are within the APE, photos looking at each historic property should be included. Please reference the following photographs from all visible NRHP-listed and eligible properties, looking in the direction of the project area, which were taken by Scott Emory on September 22, 2025, unless otherwise noted. Aerial photographs of the site were obtained via Google Earth and Esri, Imagery, and are dated to 2023 and 2024, respectively. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 1 — Looking north at the project lease area, Photograph 2 — Looking east at the project lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School c TRILEAF 66 North Main Street envi, nrr nrel arch 1 r re engineering Smithsburg, Washington County. MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 3— Looking south at the project lease area Photograph 4— Looking west at the project lease area. II Project Photographs Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School ,TRILEAF 66 North Main Street hilt —.re .,gi...,,n� Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 5 — Looking north away from the project lease area. Photograph 6 — Looking east away from the project lease area_ II Project Photographs Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School CTRILEAF 66 North Main Street Ar.......I-hitBCtYfe Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 7— Looking south away from the project lease area. Photograph B — Looking west away from the project lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School ITRILEAF 66 North Main Street nruonmeara, architecture er9rneerin9 Srnithsburg, Washington County, MC] 21783 September22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 9 — Looking south at the access easement from the lease area. Photograph 10 — Looking north at the access easement towards the lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers—Smithsburg High School &TRILEAF 66 North Main Street nv„anmen,a, a,ehitectare eninee��ri9 Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 11 — Looking east at the access easement from the lease area. Photograph 12 — Looking west at the access easement from the asphalt sports complex driveway. Project Photographs Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School CTRILEAF 66 North Main Street envlronmanta, aronItetture e,,y re y Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 13— Looking south at a bedrock outcrop leading into the tower Icasc area. Photograph 14 — Looking west at the bedrock outcrop in the adjacent stream bed. Project Photographs Milestone Towers —Smithsburg High School,TRILEAF 66 North Main Street Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 15 — Looking west at a fiber marker and handhole in the access easement. .•ter.: � a� ,� r = K a tq T __ Photograph 16 - STP 1 profile. Project Photographs Milestone Towers—Smithsburg High School , ,TRILEAF 66 North Main Street envuonmenraI arr. h,t— P engineering Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg School School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 17 — STP 2 profile with exposed bedrock. Photograph 18— Looking southeast the NRHP-eligible Smithsburg Historic District (WA -IV -259). Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School h £T1LEAF 66 North Main Street 1 1 Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 envi.anmenra arch rP- P engineering September 22, 2025 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Photograph 19 — Looking north from the NRHP-eligible Smithsburg Historic District (WA -IV -259) at the project location, approximately 1,130 feet (344.3 meters) away. Photograph 20 — Looking south at the NRHP-eligible SHA Small Structure 21065X0 (WA -IV -273). Project Photographs I 7� Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School e TRILEtiF 66 North Main Street IenvIronmentai architecture enpineeiIny Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2026 Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 Site Location & Surrounding Properties Site Location - - - - Easement Aerial Photographs (2023) Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School Sr TRILEAF 66 North Main Street environmental architecture engineering Smithsburg, MD 21783 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 3. Site Information — Map Requirements Include one or more 7.5 -minute quad USGS topographical maps that: a. Identify the Areas of Potential Effects for both Direct and Visual Effects. If a map is copied from the original, include a key with the name of quad and date. b. Show the location of the proposed site and any access roads or other easements including excavations. c. Show the locations of each property listed. d. Include keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. e. Submit color maps whenever possible. The following maps have been attached to this report: Site Vicinity Map — Smithsburg Quadrangle (2023) 7.5 -min Topographic Quad Map with Project Location Aerial Imagery with Project Location and APE Modern Soil Map with Project Location Map of Architectural Resources within the APE-VE Historical Map of Project Location Map of Shovel Test Pit Locations and Project Boundary Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 Smithsburg Quadrangle, Maryland (2023) Contour Interval = 20 Feet Scale 1 Inch = -2,000 Feet Latitude: 39° 39' 35.298" N, Longitude: 77° 34' 232.321" W North ✓ J {� I# Gre I f rg I a C t 1 Site Location Paul, Site Vicinity Map Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School &TRILEAF 66 North Main Street environmental architecture engineering Smithsburg, MD 21783 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Smithsburg Quadrangle. Maryland (2023) Scale =1:24000 Latitude: 39° 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" 1:\ H \/' Greer rg • 51'.FEPY I JJJ / / )fdg vat '� _ Pauly Gre eya LEATHERS Ra. p��O 41 rov Project Location`tP STEUENs N.qa \'/ C' - n r s a yy. G T w Reservar II. aP .[ Lulh nChur h II "_n . elarih - . .tLR'S 4 1/2 -Mile APE-VE n G0.OYE _ . MAPIfc AYEH AO I Fla rsrown Reserboir Ii Of G 8 FPO CAVETPWN CH1J G RO ` + ' .. / yn„ ra. N gLyp �./ r JEFFERS FFaFAAi lDO u7b Ir J. _--- C Save _ USGS'lopographic Map - Project Location and APE-VE Milestone Toners — Smithshurg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithburg, MD2I73 Trilcaf Project #756917 TRILAF n 3,rKlo = �KII� nl•F•, hfiicc [1 q,$ ] environmental grchltecture engrnee r,nI Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Soils Map - Washington County, Maryland (2024) Latitude: 39° 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" Proposed Area of Direct Effect on Modern Soils Map (MRCS) Milestone Towers — Smitltsburg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Tri leaf Project #766917 a 40 so 0.03 3.00 TRILEAF •nviron' ,i el architecture engineery Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Historic Washington County Maps (1859-1877) Latitude: 39° 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" Project Location ca. 1859 (Taggart Downin) ti.\I I I fl SlH ' I� Approximate Project Location — —I. �y N. f' .t •� .fin ti Project Location ca. 1877 (Lake - Smithshurg) 'roject Location ca. 1859-1877 dileslone 7•owers — Smiths burg High School ( North Main Street. Stnithsburg, MD 21783 TRIIJEAF 'riieaf Project #766917 environmental architecture engineering, ppiicanrs iName: Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates N Hagerstown Quadrangle, Maryland (1912) Scale =1:62500 Latitude: 39° 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" 4 itg I�{ e� / ��� �� v _� fl 'v � 1 O3 '� Ct ' Project Location ti 7 /1// /, I — ff .1 ..' .' /1' R `` f r J d })_ $ 1 USGS'fopographic Map- 1'rojec! Location ca. 1912 Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MI) 21783 Trilcaf Project #766917 TRILEAF n I,nsm 2 -non Miles 0 0.5 1 environmental grchi,ecture engineenng Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Smithsburg Quadrangle, Maryland (1953) Scale = 1:24000 Latitude: 39 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" USGS Topographic Map - Project Location ca. 1953 (1972 ed) Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School 66 North Main Strect, Smithsburg. MD 21783 Trilcaf Project #76f917 TRILEAF n l,naa �.nr,o Miic: [I 11,5 a pv i,nnrnrn lad : r01 i!rc riir„ - .. %:rn Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Aerial Photography (1981) Latitude: 39' 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77' 34 22.32'° i Historic Aerials -Area of Direct E'Fred ct. 1981 11ilestone Toners — Smithsburg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Trileaf Project #766917 u :s Miics 0 A r TRILEAF environmental architer.tnre eng�neer,•m Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates N Aerial Photography (1988) Latitude: 39' 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77' 3A 22.32" p. .-' 1. : % �►rr .15 Google Earth - Project location ca. 19H8 Milestone 'Powers — Sm ithsbu rg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Trilea£Prajcct #766917 TRILEAF II I'-5 ?5D deleTa Miles 0 [i[17 11.15 envlrunmental 9rchltecture enprneerrng Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: SmithsburgHigh School School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates 5 Aerial Photography (2022) Latitude: 39° 39' 35-29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" 1 L'd 0 Negative 0 Not Excavated Q APE -DE Shovel Test Pit Locutions within the Area of Direct Effect Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Trileaf Project #766917 TRILEAF 0 Feel C Sll Bill '_UU enrirunnienlel erehiteulure engirneer, Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 4. Site Information —Additional Site Information Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site. The proposed project is for a monopole telecommunications tower site in Smithsburg, Washington County, MD. Smithsburg High School (39° 39' 35.30" N, 77° 34' 22.32" W) is located within a grassy manicured field located east of the Smithsburg High School at 66 North Main Street. With this project, Milestone Towers proposes to construct a 199 -foot -tall monopole communications tower with an overall height of 199 feet, including attachments, and associated ground -based equipment, within a new 60 -foot by 40 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound. The project also includes a proposed 12 -foot -wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150 feet generally southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. The site is currently manicured grass -covered lawn. Total acreage of the project area is approximately 0.22 acre (0.09 hectare). The construction drawings provided by Milestone Towers are included in this attachment. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 Milestone Towers SITE INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK: 1. INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. 2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD TO COMPOUND. 4. CLEAR AND GRADE SITE TO FINAL SUBGRADE ELEVATION. 5. INSTALL MONOPOLE FOUNDATION AND MONOPOLE. 6. INSTALL GROUNDING, TELCO PULL BOXES, UTILITY WIREWAY. 7. INSTALL VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT SLAB AND CARRIER EQUIPMENT. 8. INSTALL ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT AND HAND HOLES. 9. INSTALL FENCE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 10. INSTALL VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, CABLES, RRHS AND EQUIPMENT. PROPERTY INFORMATION: JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SMITHSBURG PARCEL: 0040/0007/0019 PARCEL AREA: 69.58 A.C. PARCEL OWNER: BOARD OF EDUCATION PREMISES ADDRESS: 66 N MAIN ST, SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 10435 DOWNSVILLE PIKE, HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 07-023111 NEIGHBORHOOD: 10000.22 ZONING: TOWN RESIDENTIAL (TR) STRUCTURE TYPE: NEW MONOPOLE GROUND ELEVATION: 719.2' NAVD88 LATITUDE: N 39' 39' 35.298" (N 39.659756') LONGITUDE: W 77° 34' 22.321" (W 77.572830°) NOTE: MONOPOLES AND COMMUNICATION TOWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ANSI/EIA/TIA-222, STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR STEEL ANTENNA TOWERS AND ANTENNA SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. PROJECT TEAM MILESTONE TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -V APPLICANT: 12110 SUNSET HILLS RD, SUITE 600, RESTON, VA 20190 MR. LEN FORKAS (703) 620-2555 ENTREX COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD, SUITE 430, ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 CAMILLE SHABSHAB (202) 408-0960 SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG MD 21783 NEW 199' MONOPOLE VICINITY MAP EDGEMONT SITE d q�' `o k`a t �o 66 Main St C' VinesNew York Pizza • Smithsburg Veterinary C1fnl+ Sunnycrest Farm HOLIDAY & Home Center ACRES Total Lube Center China 88 MAGNETIC NORTH TRUE NORTH SCALE: 1" = 2,000' 10.53' W CODE COMPLIANCE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. - 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE - 2021 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE - 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE - 2021 NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE - AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE - AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION - ANSI/TIA-222-H SHEET INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET Z-1 SITE PLAN Z -1A SITE LOCATION PLAN WITH ARIAL IMAGE Z-2 PROPERTY ADJOINERS Z-3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN Z-4 COMPOUND PLAN Z-5 MONOPOLE ELEVATION Z-6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS Z-7 SITE DETAILS Z-8 SIGNAGE DETAILS L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS OWNER REPRESENTATIVE SITE AQUISITION CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ZONING RF ENGINEER DRAWING APPROVALS SIGNATURE DATE CALL UTILITIES NOTIFICATION MISS UTILITY 1-800-257-7777 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING __. Can ,___ I N �rou thy, \I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: • � T � Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: C.S. ENGINEER: M.A. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T-1 e.3r`venson Rd. Colitan ct 2. Sr • av E Smithshurg, MD W SITE VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1,000' TRUE NORTH SITE INFORMATION & NOTES JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SMITHSBURG, MARYLAND ZONING: TOWN RESIDENTIAL (TR) TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 07-023111 MAP/GRID PARCEL: 0040/0007/0019 PARCEL AREA: 69.5800 ACRES PARCEL OWNER: BOARD OF EDUCATION OWNER ADDRESS: 10435 DOWNSVILLE PIKE, HAGERSTOWN MD 21740 GROUND ELEVATION: 719.3' NAVD88 LATITUDE: N 39° 39' 35.298" LONGITUDE: W 77° 34' 22.321" LEGEND O FOUND PROPERTY CORNER UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR LIGHT POLE CULVERT LINE TYPES BOUNDARY LINE - SUBJECT PARCEL UNSURVEYED LINE - BOUNDARY OF ADJOINERS EASEMENT BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT EDGE OF GRAVEL FENCE LINE - CHAIN -x--x--x--x--x--x--x--x--x--x- OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE I7HUL- TREE OR VEGETATION LINE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 150' Z-1 TRUE NORTH I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-1 SITE LOCATION PLAN WITH ARIAL IMAGE SCALE: 1" = 20' (11±):) TRUE NORTH \I/ entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE LOCATION PLAN WITH ARIAL IMAGE SHEET NUMBER: Z -1A SUBJECT PARCEL ACCOUNT NO: 07-023111 N/F BOARD OF EDUCATION MAILING ADDRESS: 10435 DOWNSVILLE PIKE HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 PARCEL ADDRESS: 66 N MAIN ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 69.58 AC PRESENT USE: SCHOOL ZONING INSTITUTIONAL ADJOINERS ACCOUNT NO: 07-021992 ACCOUNT NO: 07-037031 ACCOUNT NO: 07-005911 ACCOUNT NO: 07-015615 ACCOUNT NO: 07-011067 ACCOUNT NO: 07-023367 ACCOUNT NO: 07-09909 ACCOUNT NO: 07-023138 N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F COGLIANO, JOSEPH & KANDIS REYNOLDS, RICHARD & HELEN SPICHER, SABINA G TRUSTES ET AL DWYER, JACOB & AMBER A&L PROPERTIES LLC FIRE CO SMITHSBURG COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER CEPHAS RIDGE ENTERPRISES I LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION MAILING ADDRESS: 14 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 22823 STEVENSON RD GRIMM, LAWRENCE A III TRUSTEE MAILING ADDRESS: 12539 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 13630 POPLAR GROVE RD MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 32 MAILING ADDRESS: 49 E WATER ST MAILING ADDRESS: 10435 DOWNSVILLE PIKE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 16307 SHINHAM RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 HAGERSTOWN, MD 20740 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 12520 BRADBURY AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: PENNSYLVANIA AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: N MAIN ST PARCEL ADDRESS: 67 N MAIN ST AREA: 40,511 SF AREA: 0.3300 AC PARCEL ADDRESS: 12630 BRADBURY AVE AREA: 6,000 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 10,000 SF AREA: 1.6700 AC AREA: 10,890 SF AREA: 10.9400 AC AREA: 0.5320 AC PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021925 ACCOUNT NO: 07-022018 ACCOUNT NO: 07-014031 ACCOUNT NO: 07-025831 ACCOUNT NO: 07-001029 ACCOUNT NO: 07-015836 ACCOUNT NO: 07-023340 ACCOUNT NO: 07-022085 ACCOUNT NO: 07-028768 N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F HAWKINS KEVIN & HILLARY BAILE BARCLAY, CAMPBELL JENNIFER REYNOLDS RENTALS LLC MADDOCK, DAVID & CHRISTA KINT, PAMELA S TRACEY, EARL L FIRE CO SMITHSBURG COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER BENNETT, DOROTHY NEE, BRAD & MARY MAILING ADDRESS:2 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 16 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 22823 STEVENSON RD MAILING ADDRESS: 12604 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12535 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12518 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 32 MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 192 MAILING ADDRESS: 100 VOYDS CT SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 22 N MAIN ST PARCEL ADDRESS: 8 E SCHOOL LN PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 1.3600 AC AREA: 41,818 SF AREA: 14.9000 AC AREA: 12,371 SF AREA: 6,534 SF AREA: 10,800 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 22,959 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 0.9200 AC AREA: 5,873 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL 2 9 16 23 30 37 44 51 58 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021933 ACCOUNT NO: 07-022026 ACCOUNT NO: 07-014007 ACCOUNT NO: 07-0258578 ACCOUNT NO: 07-007469 ACCOUNT NO: 07-008333 ACCOUNT NO: 07-023367 ACCOUNT NO: 07-008554 ACCOUNT NO: 07-028776 N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F PALIYENKO SHERMAN DONNELY JOSEPH & CHRISTINA REYNOLDS RENTALS LLC LOWE, AMANDA L STEVENSON, JEFFREY & POLLY DAVIS, JASEN FIRE CO SMITHSBURG COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER CLARK, DALE & JUDY LYONS, JOHN & CYNTHIA MAILING ADDRESS: 4 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 18 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 22823 STEVENSON RD MAILING ADDRESS: 12602 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12533 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12516 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 32 MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 474 MAILING ADDRESS: 102 VOYDS CT SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: PENNSYLVANIA AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: 42 N MAIN ST PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 1.1300 AC AREA: 42,253 SF AREA: 1.0000 AC AREA: 10,454 SF AREA: 11,761 SF AREA: 11,000 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 29,611 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 1.6700 AC AREA: 21,780 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: EXEMPT COMMERCIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL 3 10 17 24 31 38 45 52 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021941 ACCOUNT NO: 07-022034 ACCOUNT NO: 07-016522 ACCOUNT NO: 07-004621 ACCOUNT NO: 07-010265 ACCOUNT NO: 07-015631 ACCOUNT NO: 07-014198 ACCOUNT NO: 07-037392 N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F FELENT, ALTAN & CHERYL LACHAPELLE, JERRY & KELLY TRUSTEES ROBERTS, GERALD W DAVIS, DENNIS L MILLER, DAVID & JESSICA RIFFLE, JAMES E GATZ, JAMES & BAKER, BENJAMIN SEEDERS, DONALD & APRIL MAILING ADDRESS: 6 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 20 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 12630 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 45 MAILING ADDRESS: 12528 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12514 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 548 MAILING ADDRESS: 46 N MAIN ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SHEPHERDSTOWN, WV 25443 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 12601 BRADBURY AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 26 N MAIN ST PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 41,818 SF AREA: 41,818 SF AREA: 2.6900 AC SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 15,708 SF AREA: 114,196 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 11,761 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 10,454 PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 10,624 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL 4 11 18 25 32 39 46 53 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021968 ACCOUNT NO: 07-022042 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021267 ACCOUNT NO: 07-003471 ACCOUNT NO: 07-020511 ACCOUNT NO: 07-011490 ACCOUNT NO: 07-008171 ACCOUNT NO: 07-014643 N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F SMITH, ROBERT & MICHELLE SHAY, JOHN & HUMM, JENNIFER SNIVELY, TIMOTHY & LORI DENNIS FUNERAL HOME TIBBENS, ALEXANDER & WINEBRENNER, KENNETH REDER, KYLE EDWARD GROVE, RICHARD & JOYCE SIGGLER, LLOYD MAILING ADDRESS: 8 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 22 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 12620 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 45 MAILING ADDRESS: 12526 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 7615 ERIE ST MAILING ADDRESS: 70 MAPLE GROVE CT MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 173 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 ANNANDALE, VA 22003 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 12551 BRADBURY AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 12512 BRADBURY AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: 28 N MAIN ST PARCEL ADDRESS: 50 N MAIN ST AREA: 35,264 SF AREA: 1.200 AC AREA: 36,670 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 10,175 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 11.2400 AC PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 8,861 SF AREA: 10,824 SF AREA: 21,829 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL 5 12 19 26 33 40 47 54 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021976 ACCOUNT NO: 07-022069 ACCOUNT NO: 07-019716 ACCOUNT NO: 07-003501 ACCOUNT NO: 07-000677 ACCOUNT NO: 07-004532 ACCOUNT NO: 07-010354 ACCOUNT NO: 07-007310 N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F N/F KENNEDY, JERRY JOSEPH SMITH EARLEEN K GOODRICH, CASEY & COLLINS, CLAIRE GEISER CURTIS DICK, STEVEN MICHAEL BALL, KYLE & CARLY A&L PROPERTIES LLC HESSONG, PAUL & BEATRICE MAILING ADDRESS: 10 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 24 GROVE CREEK CIR MAILING ADDRESS: 12616 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12547 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 12524 BRADBURY AVE MAILING ADDRESS: 11324 PLEASANT WALK RD MAILING ADDRESS: 13630 POPLAR GROVE RD MAILING ADDRESS: 57 E WATER ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MEYERSVILLE MD, 21773 HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME ADDRESS: 12510 BRADBURY AVE PARCEL ADDRESS: 30 N MAIN ST PARCEL ADDRESS: 52A N MAIN ST AREA: 37,0268 SF AREA: 2.8300 AC AREA: 25,531 AREA: 13,808 SF AREA: 10,150 SF SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL AREA: 4,988 SF AREA: 10,890 SF AREA: 22,960 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL 6 13 20 27 34 41 48 55 ACCOUNT NO: 07-021984 N/F MILES DEANNE NANCY MAILING ADDRESS: 12 GROVE CREEK CIR SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 38,768 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-014015 N/F JERNIGAN, TROY & ELIZABETH MAILING ADDRESS: 22725 STEVENSON RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 14.9000 AC PRESENT USE: AGRICULTURAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-016905 N/F SHAFER, REBECCA MAILING ADDRESS: 12612 BRADBURY AVE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 21,511 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-014074 N/F BABYLON, MICHAEL & MECHELL MAILING ADDRESS: 12543 BRADBURY AVE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 2.5000 AC PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-000502 N/F QUICK, CHRISTOPHER & LISA MAILING ADDRESS: 12522 BRADBURY AVE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 10,000 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-007531 N/F EUDY, ELIZABETH ANN MAILING ADDRESS: 12508 BRADBURY AVE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: SAME AREA: 14,790 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-09917 N/F CEPHAS RIDGE ENTERPRISES I LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 49 E WATER ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 PARCEL ADDRESS: 34 N MAIN ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 21,780 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT NO: 07-010591 N/F MOATS, DALE & BETTY JANE MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 194 SMITHSBURG, MD 20783 PARCEL ADDRESS: 58 N MAIN ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 AREA: 21,145 SF PRESENT USE: RESIDENTIAL • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: PROPERTY ADJOINERS SHEET NUMBER: Z-2 LINE TYPES 1:11•1uJ II7A ff■III .11uJ:J1go•(si i I INCI IP\/ YI n I II\IP_ — PfI INnAPY nl OnInINRc EASEMENT BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT EDGE OF GRAVEL CURB FENCE LINE - CHAIN x x x x x 1' CONTOUR LINE 5' CONTOUR LINE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE ❑HUL- SWALE TREE OR VEGETATION LINE I0:Z.11 l.`l9IN99Zel=.ls_[.`12:._101 PROPOSED EDGE OF CONCRETE ❑HUL- PROPOSED EDGE OF GRAVEL FENCE LINE - CHAIN -x--x--x--x--x--x--x--x--x--x- PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE HID L❑D L❑D HID SILT FENCE SF SF SF SF LOD/ SILT FENCE L❑D/Sr L❑D/Sr L❑D/Sr L❑D/Sr TREE PROTECTION FENCE TPF TPF TPF TPF ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' Z-3 TRUE NORTH • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-3 \I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 I 0 0 0 MILESTONE TOWERS METER CENTER FRAME MILESTONE TOWERS TRANSFORMER ON PAD WITH BOLLARDS o 0 MILESTONE TOWERS 12' GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE WITH TURN AROUND COMPOUND PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Z-4 TRUE NORTH MILESTONE TOWERS 12'-0" WIDE GATE MILESTONE TOWERS 2'x2' TELCO VAULTS N C Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-4 L. ±OL3.0 VIEW LOOKING NORTH MONOPOLE ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/8"=l' -O" Z-5 \I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: MONOPOLE ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: Z-5 DETAIL 31 - TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 22 - SILT FENCE DETAIL 24 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I SHRUBS \l _ SNOW FENCE IL ` x TEMPORARY MEASURES FINAL GRADE FILL NOTE: ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE TREE DRIPLINE EXCESSIVE CUT AND FILL WILL KILL THIS TREE NOTE: ALL PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE TREE DRIPLINE FENCING TEMPORARY AND PPPMAMPMT MPAcI IPPC FINAL GRADE�� " ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE IMPROPER PROCEDURE PROPER PROCEDURE TAINING WALL USSOILDEPARTMENT CONSERVATIONOF AGRICULTURE G - PAGE 3 IMARYLAND MANAGEMENTDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT ADMINISTRATION ION TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 10' MAXIMUM CENTER TO CENTER FLOW FLOW PERSPECTIVE VIEW 36" MINIMUM LENGTH FENCE POST, DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16" INTO GROUND 16' MINIMUM HEIGHT OF GEOTEXTILE CLASS F 8' MINIMUM DEPTH IN GROUND 36' MINIMUM FENCE POST LENGTH FILTER CLOTH FENCE POST SECTION MINIMUM 20' ABOVE FLOW GROUND UNDISTURBED GROUND EMBED ZTj -GEOTEXTILE CLASS F TOP VIEW A MINIMUM OF 8' VERTICALLY FENCE POST DRIVEN A INTO THE GROUND MINIMUM OF 16" INTO POSTS SECTION B SECTION A STAPLE STAPLE' JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT FENCE SECTIONS THE GROUND CROSS SECTION STANDARD SYMBOL SF Construction Specifications 1. Fence posts shall be a minimum of 36' long driven 16" minimum into the ground. Wood posts shall be 11/2' x 11/2' square (minimum) cut, or 13/4' diameter (minimum) round and shall be of sound quality hardwood. Steel posts will be standard T or U section weighting not less than 1.00 pond per linear foot. 2. Geotextile shall be fastened securely to each fence post with wire ties or staples at top and mid -section and shall meet the following requirements for Geotextile Class F: Tensile Strength 50 lbs/in (min.) Test: MSMT 509 Tensile Modulus 20 lbs/in (min.) Test: MSMT 509 Flow Rate 0.3 gal ft2/ minute (max.) Test: MSMT 322 Filtering Efficiency 75% (min.) Test: MSMT 322 3. Where ends of geotextile fabric come together, they shall be overlapped, folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass. 4. Silt Fence shall be inspected after each rainfall event and maintained when bulges occur or when sediment accumulation reached 50% of the fabric height. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE E - 15 - 3 WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION SILT FENCE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. Z-6 3' MOUNTABLE BERM (6' MIN. 50' MINIMUM EXISTING PAVEMENT EARTH FILL GEOTEXTILE CLASS 'C' -PIPE AS NECESSARY OR BETTER MINIMUM 6' OF 2'-3' AGGREGATE OVER LENGTH AND WIDTH OF EXISTING GROUND STRUCTURE PROFILE 50' MINIMUM LENGTH T 1(V MIN. i \ �_1,1 i _ e od0., UUU� STANDARD SYMBOL PLAN VIEW 1QJ' MIN. ___ 1 Construction Specification 1. Length - minimum of 50' (w30' for single residence lot). 2. Width - 10' minimum, should be flared at the existing road to provide a turning radius. 3. Geotextile fabric (filter cloth) shall be placed over the existing ground prior to placing stone, wwThe plan approval authority may not require single family residences to use geotextile, 4. Stone - crushed aggregate (2' to 3') or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent shall be placed at least 6' deep over the length and width of the entrance, 5. Surface Water - all surface water flowing to or diverted toward construction entrances shall be piped through the entrance, maintaining positive drainage. Pipe installed through the stabilized construction entrance shall be protected with a mountable berm with 5:1 slopes and a minimum of 6' of stone over the pipe. Pipe has to be sized according to the drainage. When the SCE is located at a high spot and has no drainage to convey a pipe will not be necessary. Pipe should be sized according to the amount of runoff to be conveyed. A 6' minimum will be required. 6. Location - A stabilized construction entrance shall be located at every point where construction traffic enters or leaves a construction site. Vehicles leaving the site must travel over the entire length of the stabilized construction entrance. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE F - 17 - 3 WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: Z-6 NEW 3"O SCH 40 PIPE (GALV) I WITH PIPE CAP, TYPICAL I w I w COMPOUND FENCE, - - - - - - - SEE PLAN 6" OF CRUSHER (0 RUN /ABC I -H I6" 10'-O" ACCESS ROAD NEW P1000 STEEL UNISTRUT, LIMIT OF (TYP.) 11'-0" LONG W/ 1/2"0 GALV. #57 STONE SURFACING STEEL U -BOLTS AND LOCK EXISTING /[ MATCH EXISTING WASHERS (TYP.) GRADE c0 \\ NEW PIER, TYPICALCONCRETE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI FINISH GRADE MIRAFI 50OX COMPACT SUBGRADE AND 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL SURFACING TO 95% MAX. COMPACTED SUBGRADE I I DRY DENSITY TO PRODUCE SEE NOTES II AN UNYIELDING SURFACE _I i I i II III it II I I ACCESS ROAD: FILL, UNDERCUT AND COMPACT TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD UP I I I TO 6" BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLACE MIRAFI, 50OX STABILIZATION I i I i I NOTE: COMPOUND AREA SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. REMOVE UNSUITABLE LOOSE OR SOFT SOIL, FABRIC ON SUBGRADE. PULL TIGHT AND STAKE IN PLACE. PLACE AND COMPACT 6" DEPTH OF CRUSHER RUN/ABC TO FINISH GRADE ORGANIC MATERIAL OR RUBBLE TO FIRM GRADE. FILL UNDERCUT AND COMPACT UP TO 6" L J L_ J L J BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLACE A MIRAFI 50OX SOIL STABILIZATION FABRIC ON SUBGRADE. FILL WITH 6" OF AASHTO 57 STONE TO FINISH GRADE. COMPACTION NOTES: j I II 1. SURFACE COURSE AND BASE COURSE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DRY DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR. 2. SUBGRADE SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAX. DRY DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR. 1'-6"� TYP. FRONT ELEVATION UTILITY FRAME DETAIL COMPOUND SURFACING DETAIL GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL 1 2 3 SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" Z-7 SCALE: 1"=l' -O" Z-7 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-7 77.51" SECURE GENERATOR WITH 1/2" DIAMETER STAINLESS STEEL HILTI KWIK BOLT EXPANSION ANCHORS IN CONCRETE MIN. 4" EMBEDMENT, TYP. (4) LOCATIONS AT TANK BOTTOM FLANGE MOUNT (BELOW) - SEE SIDE AND END VIEWS. 12 T@18' 14 11 15 O -O" MAX. 12'-0" 8'-0" MAX. ENGINE EXHAUST AIR DISCHARGE M KOHLER GENERATOR MODEL 30REZK GENERATOR WEIGHT WITH 203 GALLON TANK = 2,114 LBS FUEL WEIGHT= 1,421 LBS TOTAL WEIGHT = 3,535 LBS INN_00 8 2 0 0 0 00 00 TOP VIEW 4 10 13 g ENGINE EXHAUST 32.53' 56 GRADE GRADE Cq ¢ II II - Q L` I o L,I °I / a N I L GATE CENTER STOP `V 11 ' 1 I> , L I I° .� I' I` L, I' I` •I / K0HLER. 10" <I Power Systems I <I' , 12" ELEVATION 2500 PSI ` CONCRETE 12" N 24" SERVICE PANEL AIR INTAKE REFERENCE NOTES: OCORNER, END OR PULL POST: 3" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. STRETCHER BAR. GENERAL NOTES: GATE POSTS: 4" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. O LINE POST: 2" SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. 3/8" DIAGONAL ROD WITH GALVANIZED STEEL 1. INSTALL FENCING PER ASTM F-567 PIPE POSTS PER ASTM-F1083. N o POSTS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AT MAXIMUM 8'-0" O.C. TURNBUCKLE OR DIAGONAL THREADED ROD. 2. INSTALL SWING GATES PER ASTM F- 900 TOP RAIL & BRACE RAIL: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. 10 FENCE CORNER POST BRACE: 1 5/8" DIA. 3 POST & GATE PIPE SIZES ARE INDUSTRY 0 0 EACH CORNER EACH WAY. STANDARDS. ALL PIPE TO BE 1 1/2" GALV. OFABRIC: 9 GA CORE WIRE SIZE 2" MESH, CONFORMING TO 11 GATE FRAME: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. (HALOLTGAIP, ASTM TE FRAMES I SHALLADE "A" BE WELDED.STEEL). ASTM-A392.SLATS TO BE ADDED (COLOR BY OWNER). TIE WIRE: MINIMUM 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND 12 STYME MULTI -LOCKING DEVICE 4. ALL OPEN POSTS SHALL HAVE END -CAPS. 5. ALL WELDING SHALL BE COATED WITH (3) o RAILS A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE COATS OF COLD GALV. (OR EQUAL). BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX. 24" INTERVALS. 13 GATE FRAME BRACE: 1 5/8" DIAMETER. 6. PROVIDE ALL HARDWARE TO SECURE GATES IN OPEN AND CLOSED POSITION. TENSION WIRE: 9 GA. GALVANIZED STEEL. 14 GATE CENTER STOP O] E POST NOMINALSCHEDULE40 PIPE. WITH DIA, CONC. PIER, TYPULE 6j BLACK SLATS1 ANCHOR ANCHOR TOP OF CONCRETE ANCHOR ANCHOR 13.41 44.45 SLAB GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATE DETAIL TOP CONCRETE LB L 4 76.18" 2894 SCALE: N.T.S. RIGHT SIDE VIEW END VIEW GENERATOR DETAILS 5 SCALE: 3/4"=l' -O" Z-7 I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: Z-7 SITE SIGNAGE DETAILS • entrex communication services, inc. A Milestone Towers N CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: XXX-XXX-XXXX SITE: XXXXXX FCC NO. XXXXXXX LEASING: XXX-XXX-XXXX MARKETING I ID SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 WHITE BACKGROUND N O W/ RED LETTERING 18"H X 24"W TRESPASSING VIOLATORS WILL BE PROSECUTED NO TRESPASSING SIGN 2 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 WHITE BACK GROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING GENERATOR SIGNAGE DETAILS #6 #7 #9 TC ^ BOTTOM ®®TOP BOTTOM SIGN KEY PLAN SCALE: N.T.S. POSED NEW GENERATOR CRETE PAD #6 ®TOP #8 BOTTOM #6 #7 #9 TOP BOTTOM BLUE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 0 DANGER DIESEL FUEL NO SMOKING NO OPEN FLAMES SIGN DIMENSIONS: 4" WIDE X 14" HIGH N*dlw tro wncarfl * br]'cd IIbI_ EMI i7 rta*Fd thr FGC guueril pJblI rxpnrrM I'rrdi aby am •.d ql.r- nni ■nn rw mr rr . hrr MNlrrr' rise Irr�nrrv� BLUE BACKGROUND W/ WHITE LETTERING WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 12'W X 18"H W/ BLACK LETTERING LOCATE ON FRONT OF GATE RF NOTICE SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 Ax NOTICE 0 EQ ALL PERSONNEL SHOULD HAVE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) AWARENESS TRAINING. k ALL PERSONNEL ENTERING THIS SITE SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED. OBEY ALL POSTED SIGNS. ASSUME ALL ANTENNAS ARE ACTIVE a& BEFORE WORKING ON ANTENNAS, NOTIFY OWNERS AND DISABLE APPROPRIATE TRANSMITTERS. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 3 FEET CLEARANCE FROM ALL ANTENNAS. DO NOT STOP IN FRONT OF ANTENNAS. k USE PERSONAL RF MONITORS WHILE WORKING NEAR ANTENNAS. NEVER OPERATE TRANSMITTERS WITHOUT SHIELDS DURING NORMAL OPERATION. A DO NOT OPERATE BASE STATION ANTENNAS IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. RF NOTICE SIGN 2 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 RED BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING YELLOW BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING DANGER - DIESEL FUEL - SIGN #1 6 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 DIESEL FUEL 240 GALLONS GREEN W/ WHITE LETTERING SIGN DIMENSIONS: 30" WIDE X 12" HIGH FUEL TANK - SIGN #3 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 AWARNING-1 Beyond this point. Radio frequency tic Ids at this site exceed the FCC rules for hurnanexposure. _ t.W to.o.,■ ywaO Npw.M.AIpM.IY.. 10, NdJ,g b ratlO luUMuel J_Ya41M1 NP n -It •.wMw I.MF ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 12'W X 18"H LOCATE AT BASE OF TOWER RF WARNING SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 12"W X 18"H IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL: 800-611-5868 (NON -SPILL RELATED) SITE XXXXXXXX SIGN DIMENSIONS: 20" WIDE X 14" HIGH SITE ID -SIGN #2 SCALE: N.T.S.ED EMERGENCY CALL T -MOBILE 24 -HOUR HOTLINE 1.800.579-2872 SIGN DIMENSIONS: 8" WIDE X 4" HIGH WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING 2" HIGH BLACK LETTERS ON WHITE BACKGROUND (STICKERS) WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING EMERGENCY RESPONSE - SIGN #4 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-8 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 Milestone Towers SMITHSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 66 N MAIN STREET SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WASHINGTON COUNTY SEAL: Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 03-31-2025 ZONING REVIEW A 04-29-2025 ZONING REVIEW B 08-20-2025 RELOCATE COMPOUND C 09-03-2025 ADD ACCESS ROAD & ARIAL 0 PROJECT NO: 1050.463 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SIGNAGE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: Z-8 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 5. Area of Potential Effects You are required to provide two attachments regarding the Determination of Effect: Areas of Potential Effect and Mitigation of Effect (if applicable). Areas of Potential Effect Guidelines: a. Describe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined. Under the NPA for FCC Projects, the Direct APE (APE -DE) "is defined as the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the undertaking" (FCC 2004). On November 24, 2008, the FCC further clarified that the APE -DE is limited to the tower or non -tower structure on which the collocation will be mounted as well as the lease area including the access route and utility corridor. The APE -DE for this project consists of the 40 -foot by 60 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound, 10 -foot -wide landscaping buffer surrounding the lease area, 12 -foot -wide gravel turnaround, and 12 -foot -wide by 225 -foot -long gravel access drive that will extend south then east connecting with an existing asphalt drive. b. Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined. Per the NPA, the Visual APE (APE-VE) is the "geographic area in which the project has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character -defining feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)" (FCC 2004). The presumed APE-VE for construction of new facilities is the area from where the tower will be visible: a. Within a Y2 mile from the tower site if the proposed tower is 200 feet or less in height; b. Within % of a mile from the tower site if the proposed tower is more than 200 but no more than 400 feet in overall height; or c. Within 1% miles from the tower site if the proposed tower is more than 400 feet in overall height. Taking into consideration the maximum height of the proposed undertaking (199 feet), the scale of the installation, and nearby historic properties, Trileaf determined that the APE for visual effects, according to the above definition, would encompass a 34 -mile radius from the subject property. Mitigation of Effect Guidelines: In the case of where an Adverse Visual Effect or Adverse Direct Effect has been determined you must provide the following: Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 5. Continued a. Copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communication with the SHPO/THPO and any consulting parties. N/A b. Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant's conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative. N/A For each property identified as a Historic Property in the online e-106 form: a. Indicate whether the Applicant believes the proposed undertaking would have a) no effect; b) no adverse effect; or, c) an adverse effect. Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary. Trileaf Senior Project Archaeologist IV, Scott Emory, performed this survey in response to the planned use of the above -described parcel and the potential impacts that such use might present to any archaeological and architectural cultural resources within the project area. Mr. Emory meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology and is currently certified by the Register of Professional Archaeologists. The records search for this project included a review of the Maryland Historical Trust's online cultural resources database (MEDUSA) for any known historic properties within the project's APE for Direct Effects and a %-mile radius for the APE for Visual Effects. The records search was expanded to include any previously recorded archaeological resources within a 1 -mile buffer of the current project location. Based on a review of these records, the project is not located within the boundaries of any NRHP-listed or NRHP-eligible resources. One (1) NRHP-eligible Historic Site and one (1) NRHP-eligible Historic District were identified within the project's %2 -mile APE for Visual Effects. No archaeological studies or sites have been recorded within the APE -DE. A total of six (6) archaeological studies and six (6) archaeological sites were previously recorded within a 1 -mile radius of the project site. Based on the findings of this survey, it is recommended that there are No Historic Properties in the APE -DE and No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in the APE-VE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area. Please see the attached Cultural Resources Survey Report for additional information. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 Smithsburg High School Trileaf Project #766917 Client #Smithburg High School 66 North Main Street Smithsburg, MD 21783 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY Prepared For: Milestone Towers Milestone Tower LP -III Reston, VA 20190 Trileaf Corporation 303 International Circle Suite 150 Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 Scott Emory, M.A., RPA Sr. Project Archaeologist IV 410-853-7128 s.emory@trileaf.com Michael Hart, M.A. Assistant Project Manager/Architectural Historian and Kaitlen Hitt Field Archaeologist Trileaf Project # 766917 Lead Agency Federal Communications Commission (FCC) September 2025 In June and September 2025, Trileaf Corporation (Trileaf) performed a cultural resource inventory survey for a proposed monopole telecommunications tower located in Smithsburg, Washington County, MD. The proposed project is located within a grassy lawn area. Milestone Towers proposes to construct a 195 -foot -tall monopole communications tower with an overall height of 199 feet, and associated ground -based equipment, within a new 40 -foot by 60 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound. The project also includes a proposed 12 -foot -wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 45 feet south then 180 feet east and connect with an existing asphalt drive. The site is currently manicured grass -covered lawn. Total acreage of the new construction area is approximately 0.22 acre (0.09 hectare). Trileaf Senior Project Archaeologist IV, Scott Emory, M.A., RPA, performed the present cultural resources survey to identify and evaluate the potential impacts that the above -described Project might present to Historic Properties within both the Direct and Visual Areas of Potential Effects. As such, the present survey was designed to discover all NRHP-eligible or listed archaeological and above ground cultural resources present within the Project area. The field survey of the project area, which included a visual inspection and shovel testing, yielded no evidence for the presence of archaeological or architectural properties within the Direct APE for the current project. In addition, one (1) NRHP-eligible historic district and one (1) NRHP-eligible historic property were identified within the proposed project's Visual APE (0.5 -mile radius). Based on these findings, Trileaf recommends No Historic Properties in the APE DE and No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in the APE-VE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area relative to those resources. ABSTRACT AND MANAGEMENT SUMMARY.................................................................................................i FIGURES.................................................................................................................................................................... iii TABLES...................................................................................................................................................................... iii SECTION1.0 - INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Area of Potential Effects (APE)....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Plans and Photographs....................................................................................................................3 SECTION 2.0 - PROJECT SETTING.......................................................................................................................3 2.1 Soils.................................................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Elevations.......................................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Environmental Setting..................................................................................................................................3 2.4 Cultural Setting.............................................................................................................................................6 SECTION3.0 — RESEARCH......................................................................................................................................8 3.1 Background Research...................................................................................................................................8 3.2 Research Design...........................................................................................................................................18 3.3 Site Probability............................................................................................................................................18 SECTION 4.0 - FIELD METHODS AND RESULTS............................................................................................18 4.1 Archaeology..................................................................................................................................................18 4.2 Above Ground Cultural Resources............................................................................................................21 SECTION 5.0 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................22 5.1 Conclusions..................................................................................................................................................22 5.2 Recommendations.......................................................................................................................................22 REFERENCESCITED............................................................................................................................................23 APPENDIX A: PROJECT LOCATION PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................................26 APPENDIXB: RESUMES.......................................................................................................................................37 Figure 1: General Location of Proposed Cell Tower Installation..................................................................................2 Figure 2: Detailed View of Proposed Cell Tower Location and Installation (Milestone Towers 2025) ........................4 Figure 3: Detailed View of Proposed Cell Tower Location and Installation (Milestone Towers 2025) ........................4 Figure 4: Location of Proposed Cell Tower Location on Modem Soil Map (USDA, NRCS 2024) .............................5 Figure 5: Project Location ca. 1858 and 1877 (Taggert 1859; Lake, Griffing and Stevenson 1877)..........................11 Figure 6: Project Location ca. 1912 (United States Geological Survey [USGS] 1912) ..............................................12 Figure 7: Project Location ca. 1972 (USGS 1953 [rev 1972])....................................................................................13 Figure 8: Project Location ca. 1981 (Google Earth 2025)...........................................................................................14 Figure 9: Project Location ca. 1988 (Google Earth 2025)...........................................................................................15 Figure 10: Architectural Resources within the Y2 -mile APE-VE.................................................................................17 Figure 11: Shovel Test Pit Location and Project Boundary Man (Google Earth 2025) ...............................................20 Table 1: Archaeological Surveys within 1 -mile of the Project Location.....................................................................16 Table 2: Archaeological Resources within 1 -mile of the Project Location.................................................................16 Table 3: Shovel Test Pit Descriptions..........................................................................................................................19 Table 4: Description of the Subject Property ...............................................................................................................21 Table 5: Description of Historic Resources within the Y2 -mile APE-VE for the Project Location..............................21 The FCC requires licensees and their representatives to consider the effects of their actions on historic properties, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (Federal Communications Commission 1996). The NHPA (54 U.S.C. § 300308) defines a historic property as any "prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion on, the National Register of Historic Places, including artifacts, records, and material remains related to such a property or resource." Applicants are required to assess and report all potential effects to Historic Properties as part of the Section 106 process prior to construction. Trileaf Senior Project Archaeologist IV, Scott Emory, M.A., RPA, performed the present cultural resources survey to identify and evaluate the potential impacts that the above -described Project might present to Historic Properties within both the Direct and Visual Areas of Potential Effects. As such, the present survey was designed to discover all NRHP-eligible or listed archaeological and above ground cultural resources present within the Project area. Archival research prior to field investigations was conducted by Senior Project Archaeologist IV Scott Emory (B.A. Anthropology, University of Delaware and M.A. Maritime History/Underwater Archaeology, East Carolina University) and Assistant Project Manager/Architectural Historian Michael Hart (B.A. History/Anthropology and M.S. Social Science Education, Florida State University). Fieldwork was conducted by Senior Project Archaeologist IV Scott Emory. Photography and final report production was conducted by Senior Project Archaeologist IV Scott Emory. Mr. Emory meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology and is currently certified by the Register of Professional Archaeologists. Mr. Hart has been certified as meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural Historian. Maps and graphics were produced by Trileaf Field Archaeologist Kaitlen Hitt (B.S. Anthropology, Kennesaw State University). All work on the current project was completed between June 25-26 and September 18-29, 2025. Under the NPA for FCC Projects, the Direct APE (APE -DE) "is defined as the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the undertaking" (FCC 2004). On November 24, 2008, the FCC further clarified that the APE -DE is limited to the tower or non -tower structure on which the collocation will be mounted as well as the lease area including the access route and utility corridor. The APE -DE for this project consists of the 40 -foot by 60 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound, 10 -foot -wide landscaping buffer surrounding the lease area, 12 -foot -wide gravel turnaround, and 12 -foot -wide by 225 -foot -long gravel access drive that will extend south then east connecting with an existing asphalt drive. Per the NPA, the Visual APE (APE-VE) is the "geographic area in which the project has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character -defining feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)" (FCC 2004). The presumed APE-VE for construction of new facilities is the area from where the tower will be visible: a. Within a %2 mile from the tower location if the proposed tower is 200 feet or less in height; b. Within 3/4 of a mile from the tower location if the proposed tower is more than 200 but no more than 400 feet in overall height; or c. Within 1'/2 miles from the tower location if the proposed tower is more than 400 feet in overall height. Taking into consideration the maximum height of the proposed undertaking (199 feet) and the scale of the installation, Trileaf determined that the current project's APE for visual effects will encompass a '/2 -mile radius from the subject property (Figure 1). Smithsburg Quadrangle. Ylaryland (2023] Scale =1:24400 Latitude: 39° 39 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" ry �E� Greensburg ge ot H/\7°? c90 FN__ Rauh'3 eyai LFR' kRS RO I F 64 crep / 1 Project Location � h9t b6 3 G] Q' C E$gemorlt - yw eservcnr.�:; • Ta t y culhe n Chu h s ;I GEC I Q -•'rPGGG _ LRI Bar Sr!>i• — �,. 112 -Mile APE VE OVE - M APL'. v- GYf y� Rp A 7 _— Ha rstawn Reserilo[r I �.. X64, ' CL GFQR eroF y O. CAVETIXNM CHLJRCH RI] - - X771 D IEFFER5Q � FEDERAL L0 Out- ¢D _ ft Be4 �I• L. Yc USGS Topographic Nlap - Project location and APE-VE Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithsbu g, MD 21783 Trileaf'Project #7b5917 n I_nnn �-nrxl TRILEAF A7cicrc II [i= i envIronmental architecture engineering Figure 1: General Location of Proposed Cell Tower Installation. 2 Please reference Figures 2 and 3 to review the construction drawing provided by Milestone Towers. Also, please reference Appendix A to review photographs of the project area, which were taken by Scott Emory on September 22, 2025, unless otherwise noted. According to the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Washington County, Maryland, the northern 90 percent of the proposed lease area and eastern one-half of the access easement is underlain by Deposit gravelly loam (Dk). Deposit gravelly loam soils occur on floodplains from gravelly alluvium derived from sandstone and shale and/or quartzite, are somewhat poorly drained, with moderately high to high permeability. They rarely flood, never pond, and consist of a gravelly loam Ap-horizon from 0 to 11 inches, followed by a gravelly loam Bw-horizon from 11 to 24 inches, a very gravelly clay loam C -horizon from 24 to 44 inches, a very gravelly sandy clay loam Agb-horizon from 44 to 48 inches, and an extremely gravelly sandy clay loam C -horizon from 48 to 79 inches, subsurface. The western half of the access easement is underlain by Murrill gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (MsB). Murrill soils occur on low terraces and floodplains from gravelly alluvium derived from sandstone and shale and/or quartzite, are well drained, with moderately high to high permeability. They do not flood or pond and consist of a gravelly loam Ap-horizon from 0 to 6 inches, followed by two (2) layers of gravelly clay loam Bt -horizon from 6 to 39 inches and 39 to 57 inches, and a silty clay loam 2BC-horizon from 57 to 72 inches, subsurface (Figure 4; USDA, NRCS 2025). Elevations range between 680-840 feet (207.3-256 meters) above mean sea level (AMSL) in the surrounding area, with the project area elevation at approximately 722 feet (220.1 meters) AMSL. Located in the headwaters of the Antietam Creek watershed, the project setting generally drains to the north into a tributary that empties into Little Grove Creek which then flows west for roughly 3.5 miles (mi) (5.6 kilometer [km]) before emptying into Antietam Creek just south of Leitersburg. The project site is located within the Northern Blue Ridge section of the East and Central Farming and Forest Region. This physiography in this section exhibits rugged mountains with steep slopes, sharp crests, and narrow valleys, flanking narrow to broad valleys and basins. Stream dissection is deep and intricate, flowing through gorges and gaps in the mountains. The total average annual precipitation is 36 to 45 inches (in) (915 to 1,145 millimeters [mm]) evenly occurring throughout the year. The average annual temperature is 49 to 56 degrees F (9 to 14 degrees C). Forest vegetation is composed largely of hardwood trees such as oak, black cherry, yellow poplar, and maple, with areas of pine, red spruce, birch, and hemlock found on the higher elevations. Combined with areas of grasslands and field crops, this setting provides a wide range of resources for animal and human exploitation, including food (e.g., nuts, berries, fruit, and roots), shelter, and fuel (USDA, NRCS 2006). T TJTI ci:: T ____ A. F> N '- 1 axiva®aa�rrw (entrex MII.snon. To.lr`f OTtN�.NJR6 NIPIE 4OL Btr{LLMMEE' �f1XPRNO1 ft2i ""NFTON COUNTY EPLAr4ED SWWE PLa L-3 Figure 2: Detailed View of Proposed Cell Tower Location and Installation (Milestone Towers 2025). iI r+�pou ner�nuN Figure 3: Detailed View of Proposed Cell Tower Location and Installation (Milestone Towers 2025). Figure 4: Location of Proposed Cell Tower Location on Modern Soil Map (USDA, NRCS 2024). The prehistoric traditions of the Middle Atlantic region have been briefly summarized below. These traditions apply, in varying degrees, throughout the State. They are considered the cultural context in which the interpretation of cultural information is assessed, specifically in terms of NRHP eligibility. These dates should be accepted as broad, chronological reference points for Maryland's archaeological record that set the background for regional variations. The Paleoindian period (ca. 13,000-8,000 B.C.) characterizes the beginning of human habitation in the Mid - Atlantic Region. Paleoindian finds in West Virginia and Maryland are poorly represented, with a few intact sites, including the Higgins Site, and over a hundred isolated stone tools found (Dent 1995; Ebright 1992). Archeological investigations of Paleoindian sites in the Mid -Atlantic Region, such as the Shawnee- Minisink Site along the Delaware River (McNett 1985) and the Thunderbird Site in the Shenandoah Valley (Gardner 1974), have offered new evidence toward our understanding of Paleoindian subsistence, technology, and settlement in Maryland. Traditional theories suggest that Paleoindians hunted late Pleistocene megafauna, such as mastodon and elk, based on the finds of large fluted stone points at megafaunal kill sites (Willey 1966). Evidence from archeological excavations of Mid -Atlantic Region Paleoindian sites, however, indicates that aboriginal diets may have included game like deer, hare, turkey and fish, and plant foods such as wild grape, black walnut and blackberry (Dent 1985, 1995; Ebright 1992; Gardner 1980:19-20; McNett 1985). Paleoindian tool kits reflected hunting activities as the major focus of the diet, including diagnostic Clovis, Mid-Paleo, and Dalton point styles, as well as scrapers, burins, gravers, utilized flakes, knives, and hammerstones (Gardner 1980; Custer 1984; Funk 1972). Paleoindian sites can be divided into several types based on artifact assemblage and stone tool/debitage distribution. Based on the Flint Run complex sites in the Shenandoah Valley, the Paleoindian settlement systems during the Pleistocene were based on the distribution of cryptocrystalline lithic material sources and a delimited territory which was located within approximately 20 miles of a central base camp. A model of five functionally related site types was developed by Gardner (1977): 1) Quarries, procurement of lithic materials for inclusion in tool kits consisting of bifacial knives, scrapers, wedges, cores, and flake tools (Stewart 1980); 2) Quarry reduction areas, where lithic materials would be worked down into more easily transported forms (Wall 1976); 3) Quarry related base camps, macro band settlements where intra-band social and economic activities were carried out (Gardner 1979); 4) Base camp maintenance stations, micro band units at resource procurement/exploitation areas such as floodplain swamps were additional lithic maintenance activities would be carried out (Gardner 1977). An example of a base camp is the Thunderbird site in Virginia; 5) Outlying hunting sites, short-term hunting camps either within the core settlement area or beyond. The model was based on a selective mobility within a territory based on access to cryptocrystalline materials as opposed to models depicting highly mobile populations constantly in search of game. Smaller, specialized sites, such as quarries and reduction sites, were utilized for brief periods by smaller groups than those at base camps (Dent 1995). The Higgins Site Paleoindian occupation represents a small, short-term campsite occupied by a highly mobile small band (Ebright 1992). The documentation of Paleoindian sites is rare in northeastern West Virginia and western Maryland and so far is typically confined to isolated projectile points. The paucity of Paleoindian sites in the region may be partially explained or related to both a lack of research and the lack of known available cryptocrystalline lithic sources in the region. The Archaic Period (8,000 - 1,000 B.C.) is often divided into early, middle, and late periods, and is noted for drastic environmental changes that effect settlement patterns and substance practices. However, the subsistent settlement patterns that existed during the Paleoindian period did not change drastically during the Early Archaic period (8000 B.C. - 6500 B.C.). This is evident by the continued re -occupation of the same locales previously utilized during the Paleoindian period indicating the continuation of a quarry -based subsistence pattern (Gardner 1974). One of the few changes was the projectile point form which evolved from fluted and non -fluted triangle forms to notched points possibly reflecting a change from hand-held spears to the use of a atlatl (Gardner 1976). Toolkits of the Early Archaic included ground stone tools and chipped -stone axes in addition to what would have been found in Paleoindian toolkits (Geier 1990:70; Dent 1995:170; Gardner 1989). Early Archaic people began to exploit a greater variety of habitats as well as a wider variety of lithic resources (Gardner 1976). By the end of the Early Archaic period sites are found in habitats far removed from the traditional Paleo-environments and are exploiting a wider range of food and lithic resources (Wall 1981). The settlement patterns that developed during the latter part of the Early Archaic carried over into the Middle Archaic period (6500 B.C. - 3000 B.C.) as adaptations to a deciduous forest environment. The populations became more sedentary with the stability and availability of various resources, fostering a sense of territoriality based on the given resources located within a physiographic province or drainage basin (Custer 1986). The Middle Archaic subsistent pattern evolved from the specialized hunting pattern of the previous two periods to a generalized foraging adaptation influenced by seasonally available resources (Wall 1981). The tool kit of the Middle Archaic reflected this adaption, with multipurpose tools made from an assortment of lithic materials, drills, stone axes and ground stone tools (Gardner 1980). Grinding tools, such as mortars and pestles, indicate the increased reliance on plants in the diet. The Higgins Site produced fragments of mortars and pestles within its Middle Archaic component (Ebright 1992). Drills and other wood -working tools, such as adzes and celts, were also found in a Middle Archaic tool kit (Dent 1995: 176). Diagnostic tool forms include LeCroy, Kanawha, Stanly, Morrow Mountain, Guilford, Halifax, other bifurcate/ notched -base, contracting -stem, and side notched point types. The Late/Terminal Archaic Period (3000 B.C. -1200 B.C.) settlement pattern continued with a generalized foraging adaptation, fusion -fission patterns, and an increase of a sedentary lifestyle. Settlement patterns tended to focus more along interior drainages of first order streams, with larger social groupings and increased sedentary lifestyles (Mouer 1991; Wall 1981; Kavanagh 1982). The tool kit of the Late Archaic people grew to include soapstone bowls, net -sinkers, bi-pitted mullers and ground and polished axes, reflecting technology designed for maximum exploitation in a broader spectrum of the environment (Stewart 1980), such as riverine base camps and smaller transient camps into the uplands and mountain zones. Evidence of territory development occurred within the region during the Late Archaic period through the development of stylistic and territorial zones of diagnostic lithic artifacts. Diagnostic artifacts found in the Late Archaic period include Broadspear variants, such as Savannah River and the Holmes projectile points, Notched Broadspear, Perkiomen, Dry Brook, and Dry Brook Orient projectile points. The Woodland Period (1200 B.C. - A.D. 1600) was marked by increased sedentism and a gradual shift to the exploitation of domesticated cultigens. The Early Woodland Period (1200 B.C. - 500 B.C.) represents an increased sedentary lifestyle for aboriginal peoples, with larger, long-term sites being serviced by outlying extraction sites (Mouer 1991). Climate evolved into a more stable, moister condition, which allowed for more stable living conditions. Domesticated cultigens, such as corn, beans, and squash, were gradually incorporated into the daily diet. Wild grasses, such as amaranth, and wild plants like polygonum, mustard, and grape, provided additional sources of sustenance (McLearen 1991). Settlement patterning during this period in Western Maryland may have continued to rely on seasonal procurement strategies as horticulture was likely limited within the region (Wall 1981). Regional trade networks that began during the Late Archaic more fully developed during the Early Woodland period. The advent of ceramics and elaborate burial ceremonialism characterize the Early Woodland period in eastern West Virginia and western Maryland. While located on the periphery of cultural development in the Ohio Valley to the west and the eastern coastal region, the region appeared to remain somewhat isolated from these influences due to the natural barriers of the Appalachian Plateau and Ridge and Valley physiographic region (Wall 1981). Nonetheless, manifestations of trade can be seen in the archeological record and are traceable to the Adena culture in the Ohio Valley. Among the items traded included exotic chert projectile points and cache blades, copper items, polished celts, gorgets, and tubular pipes. Additional trade items such as marine shell allude to possible eastern coastal trade networks (Wall 1981). The Middle Woodland period (500 B.C. - A.D. 1000) is marked by a continuation of sedentism and long- distance trade, with movement from large aggregate base camps to smaller seasonal encampments. Throughout eastern Maryland and much of the east coast a shell tempered ware (Mockley) became a clear signature of a Middle Woodland occupation. Wall (1981) noted that in western Maryland the Middle Woodland period is less clearly understood due to the paucity of identified components and a lack of definitive ceramic and projectile point information, but that clarification of the point and ceramic types associated with the Middle Woodland may potentially lead to more sites being recognized and a better understanding formulated. To the west in the Ohio Valley the Hopewell proceeded to further elaborate upon their predecessors the Adena, building larger earthen works, increasing domesticate crops, and intensifying trading networks. The Late Woodland period (1000 A.D. - 1600 A.D.) is characterized by sedentism and the rise of semi- permanent villages. Village sites would typically be situated near a fresh water source with access to arable land to produce crops. The cultivation of domesticated plants was wide -spread by this period but exploitation of game and wild plants were still supplemented with forages of locally available resources. Hunting and foraging sites were found in far fewer environments and in lower numbers during this period demonstrating a possible greater reliance on horticulture (Wall 1981). Floodplain locations represented favorable locales for village sites, likely based on the availability of fertile bottomland soils for agricultural practices and the ease of clearing the land in these areas. Stockade fortifications have been found at some Late Woodland Period village sites, possibly indicating defensive measures used to protect from attacking parties (Griffin 1967). Evidence of stockade settlements began around 1300 A.D. to 1400 A.D. In western Maryland and northeastern West Virginia, several village sites dating to the Late Woodland period have been identified primarily along or near the Potomac River. Most likely due to the physical topography of the region and the limited availability of broad floodplain settings, many of the sites also contained evidence of occupations that pre -date the Late Woodland settlements. A major cultural manifestation documented within the region is the Monongahela Woodland complex which flourished from A.D. 1000 - A.D. 1635. The ringed villages and hamlets are typically located in two environmental settings; high bottomlands and hilltops/saddles overlooking rivers (Womsley 1974). The core of Monongahela settlement is located within southwestern Pennsylvania near the Monongahela and Youghiogheny River confluence, although sites have been documented in western Maryland in both Garrett and Allegany Counties, primarily along the Potomac River (Wall 1981). Background research, including a review of archival sources, was conducted for the current project location prior to the initiation of field investigations. The aim of this research was to determine the likelihood of encountering sensitive historic properties within the current project area. To assess the potential for encountering prehistoric archaeological resources within the project area, a review of previously recorded archaeological sites and surveys was conducted using the site files and holdings of the MD SHPO. To assess the potential for historic period archaeological and architectural resources within the project area, various documents were reviewed, including historic maps and the databases of both the MD SHPO and NRHP. The vast forests and mountainous terrain of the Washington County region proved to be a formidable challenge to Europeans during the initial exploration and settlement of Maryland's western frontier in the mid -eighteenth -century. The first settlers into the region included Scots -Irish and German settlers migrating from Pennsylvania. Glowing reports of the land's fertility and abundance of natural resources brought back by the early explorers prompted an intense interest in land speculation and fur trade. Daniel Dulany, an agent for Lord Baltimore, purchased large tracts of land within the Frederick area in the early 1730s and had his agent, Thomas Cresap, onsite to sell the surveyed tracts to Pennsylvania Germans migrating into the area (Stegmaier et al 1976:13). Cresap, at the bequest of Dulany, surveyed additional tracts of land further west at the confluence of the North and South Branches of the Potomac, eventually establishing a combined home and trading post at the confluence in 1742, eventually designated as Oldtown (Stegmaier et all976:15). Unlike Dulany, the Ohio Company of Virginia, organized in 1747 by a number of prominent Virginians, saw western Maryland as a vantage point to access the Indian fur trade in the Ohio Valley. In 1749, Christopher Gist, an agent for the Ohio Company, arrived at the south side of the Potomac River directly across from Wills Creek, a few miles west of Cresap's Oldtown, and set about constructing a trading post (Stegmaier et al 1976:15; Feldstein 2006:9). Cresap and a local Native American, Nemacolin, were hired by the Company to survey a potential route from the trading post to the confluence of the Monongahela and Allegany Rivers, roughly 138 kilometers (86 mi) to the northwest (Stegmaier et al 1976:20). While the Coastal and Piedmont areas of Maryland witnessed the growth of agriculture, the mountainous western Maryland region was not so fortunate. In response to the French threat, Fort Mount Pleasant was constructed in 1754-55 on the west bank of Wills Creek to protect the settlers. The fortification was enlarged in 1755 and renamed Fort Cumberland by General Edward Braddock after the Duke of Cumberland (Feldstein 2006:9). Braddock's desire to return to Fort Cumberland and prepare the assault on Fort Duquesne was hampered by the shortage of wagons, munitions, and troop supplies, but eventually he obtained the necessary provisions and returned to the fort on May 10, 1755. On June 10, the main body of the army, consisting of 1,300 soldiers in the 44th and 48th Regiments, 260 men in independent companies, 350 Virginians, 60 Marylanders, and 80 North Carolinians, 10 Pennsylvania Indian scouts, started out for Fort Duquesne. Part of Braddock's troops followed the earlier path surveyed by Cresap and Nemacolin across the steep passes to the south, which became known as Braddock's Road, while a second group of soldiers traveled through the Narrows, a natural cut through the Wills and Haystack Mountains to the north (Feldstein 2006:72). By July 8 Braddock's army was a few miles from Fort Duquesne, having suffered numerous attacks from Indian scouting parties and small parties of French soldiers in the last 20 miles of the journey (Stegmaier et al 1976:42). With the defeat of Braddock's troops at the Monongahela, western Maryland was left open to attacks from the French and Indian forces, and the Ohio Company with few options to sustain its financial interests in the fur trade. The conclusion of the American Revolution witnessed an increase in population within Washington County. Originally part of Frederick County, Washington County, named after George Washington, was established on September 6, 1776 (Maryland State Archives 2025). Elizabethtown, laid out in 1762 by early immigrant and pioneer Jonathan Hagar, was selected as the site of the new county courthouse. Elizabethtown was eventually renamed Hagerstown after the founder and formally incorporated in 1813 (Maryland State Archives 2025). Population growth in nearby Cumberland and the outlying villages precipitated a sense of separation from Washington County, and in 1789 Allegany County was separated from the western part of Washington County (Lowdermilk 1971:267). The county's 1790 population of 15,800 increased to 18,659 by 1800 (Salvatore 1997). Transportation improvements within Washington County opened the region to expanded commerce and development. In 1806, the Cumberland (National) Road was authorized by Congress to connect the populated region of the eastern seaboard to the Ohio River. Construction of the road from Cumberland to the Ohio River in Wheeling, West Virginia, commenced in 1811 and was completed by 1818 (Stegmaier et al 1976:102). Locally, the Bank Road segment of the turnpike, constructed from the Conococheague to Cumberland, was completed by 1822, providing a continuous paved road from Hagerstown to the Ohio river (Williams 1906:151). The effort was monumental, requiring grubbing, clearing and grading of the alignment, removal of stone from the alignment, transport of stone by wagon to the site, and grading and sorting of stone into various sizes, all by hand. Fueled by the financial opportunities, a variety of road improvement projects were promoted by various charter companies, such as the Hagerstown and Boonsborough Turnpike Company (1819) and the Baltimore, Liberty and Hagerstown Turnpike Company (1815), and often financed by local banks (Williams 1906:152). The nineteenth century witnessed an increase in transportation projects within county, as well as a focus on the mineral resources buried beneath the terrain. The potential significance of the mineral wealth in the upper region of the Potomac River was noted as early as the 1736 survey of Lord Fairfax's holdings, where a "Coal mine" was recorded near George's Creek (Stegmaier et al 1976:17). In addition, the discovery of marble north of Rohrersville in the Pleasant Valley region provided a source of raw material for buildings and headstones and employment for the local residents (Salvatore 1997). Coal, timber and other goods exported from the upper reaches of the Potomac River were generally transported by flat boats to the markets at Harpers Ferry and Georgetown during spring freshets. To address the deficiencies in waterway transportation, an artificial waterway system was proposed to be constructed along the Potomac River. In May 1828, Congress appropriated $1,000,000 of the projected $4,500,000 cost to construct the Chesapeake and Ohio canal from Georgetown to Cumberland (Stegmaier et al 1976:122). Concurrent with the construction of the canal, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad sought to establish its foothold in the region. By 1831 the rail line reached Frederick, and on November 1, 1842, the first locomotive on the line arrived in Cumberland (Stegmaier et al 1976:130). The growth of overland transportation routes facilitated the expansion of agricultural production and development of rural communities. The village of Smithsburg, established in 1814 by Christopher Smith who purchased a large tract called Shadrach's Lot, grew rapidly during the mid- to late 19"' century as a center for commerce and public interaction with the surrounding farms. Incorporated in 1841, by 1860, the town included 460 white residents (224 males, 236 females) and 13 free black residents (6 males, 7 females) (Figure 5). Occupations included a milliner, a confectioner, a hotel keeper, a Lutheran minister, a butcher, a physician, coach and carriage makers, a post mistress, and a laundress (Mueller 1991). The opening of the Western Maryland Railroad through the project area in 1873, connecting the community to Baltimore and Hagerstown and on to the C&O Canal at Williamsport, further encouraged commercial and population growth in the region. While grain crops provided the primary cash crops for early farmers, the late 19' century witnessed a transition from grains to fruit crops, mainly peaches and apples. While the project site itself consisted of undeveloped land, a robust community of businesses, residences, churches and other buildings were centered on Smithsburg just to the south (Figure 5). Despite the population growth in the larger cities such as Hagerstown, much of Washington County remained rural and agricultural into the 20th century. The 1912 topographic map of the project area shows the tower lease area in an open setting on the west side of Bradbury Avenue adjacent to a small tributary of Grove Creek (Figures 6). By the early 1970's Smithsburg High School had been constructed in the project area just west of the APE -DE, with Smithsburg Elementary School built on the southwest side of North Main Street (Figure 7). Interestingly, the topographic map shows a small pond just east of the project site. The 1981 aerial photograph of the project setting confirms the presence of a small pond or borrow pit in a wooded setting east of the tower lease area with the access easement extending along the south side of the pond (Figure 8). By 1988, however, the pond has been infilled and the woods cleared away, creating an open grassy setting flanking the stream (Figure 9). The setting remained unchanged from the conditions depicted on the 1988 image, other than new trees planted across portions of the proposed tower lease area. In addition, a fiber line has been installed along the extant dirt lane leading west from a handhole at the driveway apron to the high school facility. There are no archaeological sites or surveys within the Direct APE. However, six (6) surveys were previously recorded within 1 -mile of the project area. A summary of these archaeological surveys follows. 10 Historic Washington County Maps (1859-1877) Latitude: 39° 39' 35,29" Longitude: -77° 34 22.32" ProjccL LocalIot ca. 1859 (Taggart Downin) SNI F 'l l ti li l Ai Approximate »• Project Location �r4M, lY--b /,� �:�'� �a•�'\ - + is Project Location ca. 1877 (Lake - Smithshurg) Project Location ca. 1859-1877 Milestone Towers — Smithshurg 1 f igh School 66 North Main Street, Smithshurg, MD 21783 TRILI Trileaf Project #766917 Figure 5: Project Location ca. 1858 and 1877 (Taggert 1859; Lake, Griffing and Stevenson 1877). 11 N Hagerstown Quadrangle, Maryland (1912) Scale =1:62500 Latitude: 39° 39 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" ry Qom. 'Lr '+' r ` \ , ♦ '_ti •: 1�. 4 / r-'? /i 1�---1 �':• .: !f �", 4 ,' u - --�W Project Location __ - - - � r �` • � � � �' . ` r "".h y_j.���i - c Tc /4v j'L>J$ USGS Topographic Map - Project Location ca. 1912 Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School b6 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Trileaf Project #766917 TRILEA� 0 1_nnn �-ncxl [+7ctcrs 'miles 0 i}3 1 environmental architecture engIneering Figure 6: Project Location ca. 1912 (United States Geological Survey [USGS] 1912). 12 Smithsburg Quadrangle. %laryInnd (1953) Scale =1:24000 Latitude: 39° 39 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" O — Nj Project Location Cye - L T/ J e m o iJa=__ .Ca�inw USGS Topographic Map - Project Location ca. 1953 (1972 ed) Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School bb North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Trileaf'Project #7b6917 TR.ILEAF 2-ncxl [7cicrc N{ilex 0 i}-5 I environmental architecture engineering Figure 7: Project Location ca. 1972 (USGS 1953 [rev 19721). 13 aerial Photograph-,• (198! ) Latitude: 39° 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77' 34' 22.32" . ; m vwr Historic Aerials - Area oIl7irect Effect ca. 1981 Milestone Towers — Sinithshurg High School 66 North Main Street, Smithshurg, MD 21783 Trileaf Project #766917 Met:r• hMile, 4 Figure 8: Project Location ca. 1981 (Google Earth 2025). 14 N Aerial Photography (1988) Latitude: 39 39' 35.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22- _____ -- { s ` x w, 7 I. 11/ • - •1 V1 _ _ ■ r • _ r •. ... __ 1pMh j Google Earth - Project Location ca. 1988 Milestone Towers— Srnithsburg High School 66 North Main Street, Srnithsburg. MD 21783 Trileaf Project #766917 TRILEAF u ins si��•�«� Miles 0 0.07 1) 15 environmental architecture engineering Figure 9: Project Location ca. 1988 (Google Earth 2025). 15 CR 58 2011 Phase I Archaeological Survey, Monocacy-Ringgold-Carroll Glenn, Jonathan, David L. 138-230kV Conversion Project, Carroll, Frederick, and Cremeens, and Michael P. Washington Counties, Maryland. Keimeally WA 190 2019 Phase I archaeological investigation: The Potomac Edison Petyk, Richard C. Company (a FirstEnergy Company) Ringgold -Catoctin rebuild project, Washington and Frederick Counties, Maryland. FR 254 2009 Phase I Archaeological Survey, USA Storage Project - PL -1 Dugas, Lisa M Pipeline Retest Stations, Frederick and Washington Counties, Maryland. WA 38 1991 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Allegheny Power System Ballweber, Hettie L. Ringgold -Liberty 138KV Electric Transmission Line, Washington and Frederick Counties, Maryland, Franklin and Adams Counties, Pennsylvania MD 1 v. 4 1981 The M/DOT Archaeological Resources Survey, Volume 4: Wesler, Kit W., Dennis J. Western Maryland Pogue, Aileen F. Button, Robert J. Hurry, Gordon J. Fine, Patricia A. Sternheimer, and E. Glyn Fur on FR 11 1977 Archeological Reconnaissance of the Loudon to Leidy Geasey, Spencer O. Pipeline Table 1: Archaeological Surveys within 1 -mile of the Project Location. In addition, six (6) archaeological resources have been previously recorded within a 1 -mile radius of the project site. A summary of these archaeological resources follows. 18WA32 1975 Unknown; Prehistoric, possibly Archaic Unevaluated 1.52 reported burials 18WA447 1991 Short-term Archaic; early 191h century Unevaluated 1.24 camp; artifact concentration 18WA31 1975 Short-term Archaic Unevaluated 1.58 camp or base camp 18WA448 2018 Short-term Prehistoric Unevaluated 1.14 camp 18WA30 1975 Base camp Archaic Unevaluated 0.97 18WA93 2018 Possible short- Late Woodland Unevaluated 1.06 term cam Table 2: Archaeological Resources within 1 -mile of the Project Location. A review of the Maryland Historical Trust's (MHT) online database, MEDUSA, and the National Register Information System website (http://www.nr.nps.gov/) was conducted for the project area on June 25, 2025, by Scott Emory, Trileaf Senior Project Archaeologist IV. Based on this review, no NRHP-listed, NRHP- eligible or potentially eligible historic properties were recorded within the APE for Direct Effects. One (1) NRHP-listed Historic District and one (1) NRHP-eligible Historic Property were identified within the project's %2 -mile APE for Visual Effects (Figure 10). The National Park Service Historic Trails Interactive GIS map was also reviewed. A National Historic Trail is recognized by the National Park Service as carrying the same significance as being listed in the NRHP and is therefore considered a Historic Property. No known portion of a National Historic Trail intersects with the project or is located within a %2 -mile of the project location. Figure 10: Architectural Resources within the %-mile APE-VE. 17 Trileaf designed the Phase I archaeological survey to locate and identify all archaeological and above ground cultural resources within the Direct APE, defined as the 60 -foot by 80 -foot lease area including the 40 -foot by 60 -foot fenced compound and 10 -foot -wide landscape buffer, plus a 25 -foot buffer, the 12 -foot - wide gravel turnaround, and 12 -foot -wide access drive that will extend approximately 45 feet south then 180 feet east and connect with an existing asphalt drive, and to evaluate the potential significance of any newly identified archaeological sites. A cultural resource is gauged to be significant if it meets at least one of four criteria for eligibility for listing in the NRHP: A. Associated with significant events in the broad patterns of national history, B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past, C. Representative of a type, period, or method of construction, or the work of a master, D. Capable of yielding important information about the past. Criterion D typically applies to archaeological sites. In order to be capable of yielding important information about the past, generally a site must possess artifacts, soil strata, structural remains, or other cultural features that make it possible to test historical hypotheses, corroborate and amplify currently available information, or reconstruct the sequence of the local archaeological record. To be considered significant, archaeological sites must demonstrate sufficient integrity to answer important research questions. These questions are developed in association with temporally, regionally, and thematically defined historic contexts or study units (U.S. Department of the Interior 1997). In general, most predictive site location models include distance to a permanent water source as a major factor in determining the existence and probable density of archaeological sites. There is a higher probability of encountering precontact archaeological sites closer to a source of fresh water, although distance will vary from location to location depending on an area's topography and accessibility. There is a greater likelihood of encountering precontact sites on and around landforms located near rivers, streams, and natural freshwater lakes. In contrast, historic period sites, can be found more equally distributed across the uplands and valleys due to the ability to access water by excavating wells. Based on the topography of the project area, historic aerial photographs, distance to a permanent water source, and taking into consideration current land use, historic and recent commercial and residential development in the region, we believe there is a low probability for encountering undisturbed archaeological artifacts or features within the proposed project's APE for direct effects. The field investigation at this location was conducted by Scott Emory on September 22, 2025. Standard archaeological field equipment included shovels, trowels, and a quarter -inch wire mesh sifting screen. Based on the Maryland Historical Trust's Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Investigations in Maryland, the field survey techniques utilized were a combination visual inspection of the project setting and shovel -testing at 49.2 ft (15-m) intervals, with a standard shovel test unit consisting of a hand -excavated hole, approximately 17.7 in (45 cm) in diameter and/or deep enough to reach culturally sterile subsoils. As shown in Table 3, the tower lease area, access easement, and utility easement consisted of a truncated subsoil occasionally capped with fill associated with the infilling of the pond. STP 2 depicts the typical soil profile consisting of a 4.7 -inch -thick (in) (12 centimeter [cm]) yellowish brown (I0YR 5/4) silt loam A- 18 horizon containing 50 percent gravels and some cobbles overlying an 11 -in -thick (28 cm) yellowish brown (IOYR 5/6) mottled with brown (IOYR 4/3) and light gray (IOYR 7/2) silt loam fill containing 20% gravels and some cobbles, followed by a brown to light brown (7.5YR 5/3-6/3) silty clay B -horizon containing 40 percent gravels and some cobbles (Table 3; Figure 11; Appendix A, Photograph 17). No artifacts or cultural features were recorded in the test pits or elsewhere in the APE -DE. Total archaeological field time: 1 person, 4 hours. NJ ti11II1FTImi 1 NW corner A: 0-30 10YR5/4 SiLo; 50% gravels, some N/A 39°39'35.57"N / 77°34'22.58"W cobbles B: 30-59 7.5YR6/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles 2 NE corner A: 0-12 10YR5/4 SiLo; 50% gravels, some N/A 39°39'35.47"N / 77°34'21.96"W cobbles Fill: 12-40 10YR5/6 mottled w/ 10YR4/3 and 7/2 N/A SiLo; compact; 20% gravels, some cobbles B: 40-60 7.5YR5/3-6/3 SiCl; 40% gravels, some N/A cobbles; bedrock at 43 cmbs in east half of STP, slopes downward to west 3 Tower center A: 0-20 10YR5/4 SiLo; 50% gravels, some N/A 39°39'35.28"N / 77°34'22.32"W cobbles B: 20-30 7.5YR5/6 SiClLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles 4 SW corner A: 0-18 10YR5/4 SiLo; 40% gravels, some N/A 39°39'35.08"N / 77°34'22.70"W cobbles Fill: 18-44 10YR6/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles B: 44-54 7.5YR5/6 SiClLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles 5 SE corner A: 0-15 10YR5/3 SiLo; 20% gravels, some N/A 39°39'34.98"N / 77°34'22.08"W cobbles Fill: 15-33 10YR5/4 mottled w/ 10YR5/6 SiLo; 60% N/A gravels, some cobbles B: 33-40 7.5YR5/3-6/3 SiCl; 50% gravels, some N/A cobbles 40+ Bedrock 6 Access A: 0-13 10YR5/3 SiLo; 40% gravels, some N/A 39°39'34.79"N / 77°34'22.45"W easement cobbles Fill: 13-34 10YR5/6 mottled w/ 10YR5/4 and 7/2 N/A SiLo; 60% gravels, some cobbles B: 34-56 10YR4/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles 56+ Cobble impasse 7 Access A: 0-20 10YR4/4 SiLo; 40% gravels, some N/A 39°39'34.49"N /77°34'22.21"W easement cobbles B: 20-37 7.5YR5/6 SiCl; 60% gravels, some N/A cobbles 8 Access A: 0-20 10YR4/4 SiLo; 40% gravels, some N/A 39°39'34.40"N / 77°34'21.57"W easement cobbles Fill: 20-47 10YR5/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles B: 47-58 7.5YR5/6 SiClLo; 70% gravels, some N/A cobbles 9 Access Fill: 0-30 7.5YR5/4 SaClLo; 40% gravels, some N/A 39°39'34.31"N / 77°34'20.94"W easement cobbles, asphalt chunks, road gravels 30+ Cobble impasse 10 Access Not excavated — in driveway apron 39°39'34.14"N / 77°34'20.35"W easement Table 3: Shovel Test Pit Descriptions. 19 Figure 11: Shovel Test Pit Location and Project Boundary Map (Google Earth 2025). 20 As noted above, a review of the MD SHPO databases and the National Register Information System website (http://www.nr.nps.gov/) was conducted on June 25, 2025, by Scott Emory, Senior Project Archaeologist IV with Trileaf. The results of that review indicated that the project's 3/4 -mile APE-VE contains one (1) NRHP-eligible historic district and one (1) NRHP-eligible historic property. Trileaf Assistant Project Manager/Architectural Historian, Michael Hart, meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History and has reviewed those resources identified within the APE for the current project in Tables 4 and 5, below. Table 4: Description of the Subject Property. _ I I WA -IV -273 SHA Small Structure. This resource was determined No Adverse Effect 21065X0 to be eligible for listing on the Eligible NRHP in 2015 under The proposed project is the MD 66 over Tributary Criterion C construction of a 199 -foot -tall to Beaver Creek — - (Design/Architecture) by the monopole telecommunications MD SHPO. (MEDUSA 2025) tower. The project will have an overall height of 199 feet. Due to distance, vegetation (including tree coverage around the parent parcel) and other modern intrusions in the form of utility lines, the proposed project will have no adverse effect on any character -defining features WA -IV -259 Smithsburg Historic This resource was determined No Adverse Effect District to be eligible for listing on the Eligible NRHP in 2004 under The proposed project is the Water and Main Streets ! l Criterion A (Event) and construction of a 199 -foot -tall l Criterion C monopole telecommunications ki r (Design/Architecture) by the tower. The project will have an MD SHPO. (MEDUSA 2025) overall height of 199 feet. Due to distance, vegetation (including tree coverage around the parent parcel) and other modern intrusions in the form of utility lines, the proposed project will have no adverse effect on any character -defining features Table 5: Description of Historic Resources within the'/ -mile APE-VE for the Project Location. 21 The field survey of the project area, which included a visual inspection and shovel test pits, yielded no evidence for the presence of archaeological properties within the current project area or 25 -foot (8.3 meter) boundary of the APE -DE. There have been six (6) previous archaeological surveys conducted within a mile of the current project area, and six (6) previously recorded archaeological sites. No NRHP-listed or eligible properties have been previously recorded within the project area's APE -DE; however, one (1) NRHP-eligible historic district and one (1) NRHP-eligible historic property have been recorded within the project's'/2-mile APE-VE. The National Park Service Historic Trails Interactive GIS map was also reviewed. A National Historic Trail is recognized by the National Park Service as carrying the same significance as being listed in the NRHP and is therefore considered a Historic Property. No known portion of a National Historic Trail intersects with the project or is located within a '/2 -mile of the project location. Based on these findings, Trileaf recommends No Historic Properties in the APE DE and No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in the APE-VE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area relative to those resources. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are uncovered through the course of construction, work is to immediately cease, and proper area authorities notified. 22 Custer, Jay F. 1984 Delaware Prehistory Archeology: An Ecological Approach. University of Delaware Press, Newark, Delaware. 1986 Late Woodland Cultures of the Middle Atlantic Region. University of Delaware Press, Newark, Delaware. Dent, Richard J. 1985 Amerind Society and the Environment: Evidence from the Upper Delaware valley. In Shawnee Minisink, Charles McNett, editor. Academic Press, New York, New York. 1995 Chesapeake Prehistory: Old Traditions, New Directions. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archeology series. Plenum Press, New York, New York. Ebright, Carol 1992 Early Native American Prehistory on the Maryland Western Shore: Archaeological Investigation at the Higgins Site. Report prepared for the Maryland State Railroad Administration. Maryland State Highway Administration Project Planning Division, Environmental Evaluation Section, Archaeological Report Number 1. Federal Communications Commission 2004 Appendix B — Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission. Feldstein, Albert L. 2006 Allegany County. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston, South Carolina. Funk, Robert G. 1972 Early Man in the Northeast and the Late Glacial Environment. Man in the Northeast 4:7-39. Gardner, William M. 1974 The Flint Run Paleoindian Complex: A Preliminary Report 1971-73 Seasons. Occasional Publication No. 1. Archeology Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 1976 Paleo-Indian to Early Archaic: Continuity and Change in Eastern North America during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences. 1977 Flint Run Paleoindian Complex and Its Implications for Eastern North American Prehistory. In Amerinds and their Paleoenvironmetns in Northeastern North America. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 288: 257-263 1979 Paleoindian Settlement Patterns and Site Distribution in the Middle Atlantic. Paper presented to the Anthropological Society of Washington. Washington, D.C. 1980 Settlement -Subsistence Strategies in the Middle and South Atlantic Portions of the Eastern United States during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meetings, Washington, D.C. 23 1989 An Examination of Cultural Change in the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene (circa 9200 to 6800 B.C.). In Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, J. Mark Wittkofski and Theodore R. Reinhart, editors, pp. 5-51. Archeological Society of Virginia, Special Publication No. 19. The Dietz Press, Richmond, Virginia. Geier, Clarence R. 1990 The Early and Middle Archaic Periods: Material Culture and Technology. In Early and Middle Archaic Research in Virginia: A Synthesis. Theodore R. Reinhart and Mary Ellen N. Hodges, editors, pp. 81-98. Archeological Society of Virginia, Special Publication No. 22. The Dietz Press, Richmond, Virginia. Google Earth 2025 Aerial photograph, 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD. Griffin, James B. 1967 Eastern North American Archeology: A Summary. Science 156:175-191. Kavanagh, Maureen 1982 Archeological Resources of the Monocacy River Region, Frederick and Carroll Counties, Maryland. Submitted to the Maryland Historical Trust, Frederick County Planning Commission, Carroll County Planning and Zoning Commission. Lake, Griffing & Stevenson 1877 An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland. Philadelphia: Lake, Griffing & Stevenson. Lowdermilk, Will H. 1971 History of Cumberland. Reprint of the 1878 edition. Regional Publishing Company, Baltimore, Maryland. Maryland Historical Trust - MEDUSA 2025 Archives Search for 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD. Webpage, https://mht.maryland.gov/secure/medusa/, accessed June 25, 2025. Maryland State Archives 2025 Washington County, Maryland — Historical Chronology. Webpage, https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/361oc/wa/chron/html/wachron.html, accessed September 25, 2025. McNett, Charles W., ed. 1985 Shawnee-Minisink. Academic Press, New York, New York. Mouer, Daniel 1991 The Formative Transition in Virginia. In Paleolndian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, edited by T.R. Reinhardt and M.E. Hodges, pp. 1-88. Council of Virginia Archeologists, Richmond, Virginia. Mueller, Julianne 1991 Smithsburg Historic District, Maryland Inventory of Historic Places form. One file at the Maryland Historical Trust, Crownsville, MD. National Park Service 2025 National Register ofHistoric Places Website. www.nps.gov/nr/, accessed September 2025. 24 Salvatore, Susan 1997 Rohrersville Historic District, Maryland Inventory of Historic Places form. One file at the Maryland Historical Trust, Crownsville, MD. Stegmaier, Harry I., Jr., David M. Dean, Gordon E. Kershaw, and John B. Wiseman 1976 Allegany County: A History. McClain Printing Company, Parsons, West Virginia. Stewart, Michael 1980 Prehistoric Settlement and Subsistence Patterns and the Testing of Prehistoric Site Location Models in the Great Valley of Maryland. Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. Taggert, Thomas 1859 A Map of Washington County. Hagerstown, MD: F.M. Kee and C.G. Robertson. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA, NRCS) 2006 Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. 2025 United States Department of Agriculture Website. www.nrcs.usda.gov/, accessed June 25, 2025. U.S. Department of the Interior 1997 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, National Register Bulletin. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15 web508.pdf, accessed September 2025. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1912 Hagerstown, MD 15-minuite quadrangle map. Washington, D.C. 1953 Smithsburg, MD 7.5 -minute quadrangle map. Revised 1972. Washington, D.C. 2023 Smithsburg, MD 7.5 -minute quadrangle map. Washington, D.C. Wall, Robert D. 1976 The Lockhart Site: Functional Analysis in a Paleo-Indian Complex. M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 1984 An Archaeological Study of the Proposed Crellin Sewage Treatment Facility, Garrett County, Maryland. On file at the Maryland Historical Trust, Crownsville, Maryland. Willey, Gordon R. 1966 An Introduction to American Archeology Vol. I: North and Middle America. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Williams, Thomas J. C. 1906 A History of Washington County, Maryland. Chambersburg, Pa.: J.M. Runk & L.R. Titsworth. Womsley, William D. 1974 The Monongahela Culture: A Study of Marginality. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Dept. of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, State College. 07 26 Photograph 1 —Looking north at the project lease area. Photograph 2— Looking east at the project lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School �TRILEAF 66 North Main Street envlronmeni&l ercritecture eogineerIng Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 27 Photograph 3 - Looking south at the project lease area. MW Photograph 4 - Looking west at the project lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers -- Smith sburg High School &TRILEAF 66 North Main Street envi ronmentsl archliecture nngin ce•:• Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 28 Photograph 5 — Looking north away from the project }ease area. Photograph 6 — Looking east away from the project lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School &TRILEAF 66 North Main Street environmental archisecture engineartng Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 W] Photograph 7— Looking south away from the project lease area. Photograph 8 — Looking wrest away from the project lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School (TRILEAF 66 North Main Street envy ronmentaI architecture E.ni mael nG Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 30 Photograph 9 — Looking south at the access easement from the lease area. Photograph 10 — Looking north at the access easement towards the lease area. Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School 65 North Main Street Smithsburg. Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 £TRILEAF environmental architecture engineer 31 Photograph 11 — Looking east at the access easement from the lease area. Photograph 12 - Looking west at the access easement from the asphalt sports complex driveway Project Photographs Milestone Towers - Smithsburg High School;.TRILEAF 66 North Main Street anrlronmenlai a chltecture eng•n eerinp Srnithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 32 Photograph 14 — Looking west at the bedrock outcrop in the adjacentstream bed ••uL Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High SchoolTRILEAF 66 North Main Street envl ronmea tai . .a ecWre a yy Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 33 Photograph 15 — Looking west at a fiber marker and handhole in the access easement. Photograph 16- STP 1 profile. Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School &TRILEAF 66 North Main Street environmental 9rChILe Ct ure englnr-=r": Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 34 SI ■ Photograph 17 — STP 2 profile with exposed bedrock. Photograph 18 — Looking southeast the NRH P -eligible Smithsburg Historic District (VVA-IV-259) Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School TRILEAF 66 North Main Street v, -rm_rt „.-h p p Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 35 Photograph 19 —Looking north from the N RHP-eligible Smithsburg Historic District (WA -IV -259) at the project location, approximately 1,130 feet (344.3 meters) away. Photograph 20 — Looking south at the N RHP-eligible SHA Small Structure 21065X0 (WA -IV -273). Project Photographs Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School c ITRILEAF 66 North Main Street envIronmental architecture engineeiIng Smithsburg, Washington County, MD 21783 September 22, 2025 37 £TRILEAF Professional Resume B.S. Anthropology Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA Ms. Hilt has six years of experience as an archaeological technician and crew chief. She has NCPTT training in GRP, and training with Advanced Metal Detecting for the Archaeologist (AMDA). She has Phase L II, and III experience, lab experience, is skilled in ArcG1S mapping, and has completed historical and archival research. Environmental service expertise includes: Archaeological and Architectural Impacts Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Land Use History NCPTT GPR Training, Marksville, LA 2018 AMDA Training, Pensacola, FL 2016 38 £TRILEAF Professional Resume History/Anthropology. B.A. Social Science Education, M,S. Florida State University / Tallahassee, FL Mr. Hart operates as the primary professional point -of -contact regarding History, Architectural History, and Historic Preservation_ Mr. Hart is a Secretary of the Interior (Sal) qualified Architectural Historian and Historian with fourteen years of professional experience in Historic Preservation. Architectural History and Historic Preservation service expertise include: Architectural Impacts Form 6201621 Submittals National Register Nominations Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Historical Marker Applications Local Government Consultation Historic Resource Reports and Forms Native American Consultation SHPO Consultation Section 106 Compliance Field Reconnaissance Historic Sites Special istiHistoric Preservationist for Florida Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee, FL, 2008-2022 Adjunct Instructor, Tallahassee Community College, Tallahassee, FL, 2010 -Present &TRILEAF Professional Resume M.A. Maritime History / Nautical Archaeology East Carolina University / Greenville. NC B.A. Anthropology University of Delaware / Newark, DE Mr. Emory is a SOT -qualified professional archaeologist with over 20 years of experience in terrestrial and submerged cultural resources management in the Mid -Atlantic region, He has directed Phase I - ill archaeological projects of varying complexity, conducted archaeological assessments. Area of Potential Effects (APE) coordination, environmental impact statements, historic context development, and public outreach activities. He has completed historical and archival research; artifact conservation, identification and cataloging; report preparation-, and environmental assessment of sites. Mr. Emory specializes in the archaeological investigation of shipyard sites and waterfront settings: 1 8th and 19th century trades; and industrial archaeological sites. He also has a strong interest in environmental reconstruction studies in the Mid -Atlantic region and Native American ceremonial practices. Environmental service expertise includes: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Historical Cit) Directories Archaeological and Architectural Impacts Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance Form 620/621 Submittals Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Local Government Consultation Land Use History Section 106 Essentials — Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 2008 Metal Detecting for Archaeologists, 2013 Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA), member since 2007 Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology (CNE]-IA), member since 2008 Archaeological Society of Delaware (ASS), member since 2003 Archaeological Society of Maryland (ASM), member since 2008 Early American Industries Association (EAIA), member since 2016 40 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 6. Tribal and NHO Involvement At an early stage in the planning process, the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to gather information from appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations ("NHOs") to assist in the identification of Historic Properties of religious and cultural significance to them. Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to Historic Properties that may be affected by the construction within the Areas of Potential Effects ("APE") for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. Trileaf Corporation completed the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on September 23, 2025, and received the notification of interested tribes on September 26, 2025. The attached FCC Notification email lists the Tribes identified through the TCNS process. A second notice will be sent to all interested tribes/organizations, after a period of 30 days and the consultation process will continue per the FCC's guidelines. Any relevant comments from Tribes received by Trileaf will be forwarded to your office. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 Michael Romanoski From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 2:02 AM To: Tribal Cc: tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #9332596 Categories: Mike CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally - recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. TCNS Coordinator Billie Anderson - Delaware Nation - 31064 State Highway 281 (PO Box: 825) Anadarko, OK - tcns@delawarenation-nsn.gov - 405-247-2448 (ext: 1403) - electronic mail Exclusions: The Delaware Nation of Oklahoma Historic Preservation Office has developed the following consultation procedures for all TCNS projects identified as undertakings by the Federal Communications Commission. In the email subject line, please specify whetherthe project is for a tower, small cell, or collocation. Our response can be given faster with this information. 2. TCNS Rep Bryan Printup - Tuscarora Nation - 5226 Walmore Rd Via: Lewiston, NY - bprintup@hetf.org - 716-264- 6011 (ext: 103) - electronic mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 3. THPO Lawrence Plucinski - Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians - (PO Box: 39) Odanah, WI - thpo@badriver-nsn.gov; deputyTHPO@badriver-nsn.gov - 715-682-7123 - electronic mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. THPO William Tarrant - Seneca -Cayuga Nation - 23701 S 655 Road (PO Box: 453220) Grove, OK - wtarrant@sctribe.com- 918-787-5452 (ext: 344) - electronic mail and regular mail Exclusions: Please refrain from sending review information via email. We request all information to be sent via mail to PO Box 453220, Grove, OK 74345. 5. Director Lora Nuckolls - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70400 East HWY 60 Wyandotte, OK - celltower@estoo.net- 918-238-5151 (ext: 1840) - regular mail Exclusions: Submit one printed color copy by US postal mail or other parcel carrier of all documentation to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe Attn: Cell Tower Program 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 Provide a 1 -page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number Company Name Project Name, City, County, State Project type Project coordinates Contact information The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is available and highly recommended for guidance; send an email to celltower@estoo.net requesting our most current copy. If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre - construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 6. THPO Sherri Clemons - Wyandotte Nation - 8 Turtle Drive Wyandotte, OK - sclemons@wyandotte-nation.org - 918- 678-6344 - electronic mail Exclusions: Please refrain from sending information via mail. We ONLY accept information via email to: sclemons@wyandotte-nation.org. We will advise if we require additional information. 7. THPO Tonya Tipton - Shawnee Tribe - 29 South 69A Highway Miami, OK - tcns@shawnee-tribe.com - 918-542- 2441 (ext: 103) - electronic mail Exclusions: In the case of projects with NO ground disturbance such as antennae on the sides of buildings or existing poles, the Shawnee Tribe concurs that no known historic properties will be negatively impacted by the project. The Shawnee Tribe DOES NOT wish to consult on those projects with NO ground disturbance. If the project DOES involve ground disturbance at all, the Shawnee Tribe would like to ACCEPT your invitation for consultation and will provide a review. If you have any questions, you may contactthe Shawnee Tribe via email at TCNS@shawnee-tribe.com Thank you for the opportunity to comment. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. 8. SHPO Elizabeth Hughes - Maryland Historical Trust - 100 Community Place Third Floor Crownsville, MD - mht.section106@maryland.gov- 410-697-9541 - electronic mail 9. Historic Preservation Supervisor Barbara Frederick - Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office - Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission 400 North St, 2nd Floor Harrisburg, PA - bafrederic@pa.gov- 717-772-0921 - electronic mail 10. Deputy SHPO Susan M Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - 1900 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston, WV - susan.pierce@wvculture.org- 304-558-0240 - electronic mail 11. Deputy SHPO Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - 1901 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston, WV-susan.pierce@wvculture.org- -- - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 09/23/2025 Notification ID: 301839 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Milestone Towers Consultant Name: Michael Romanoski Street Address: 1515 Des Peres Rd. Ste 200 Suite 200 City: St. Louis State: MISSOURI Zip Code: 63131 Phone: 314-997-6111 Email: tribal@trileaf.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 39 min 35.3 sec N Longitude: 77 deg 34 min 22.3 sec W Location Description: 66 North Main Street City: Smithsburg State: MARYLAND County: WASHINGTON Detailed Description of Project: New 199ft-tall monopole communications tower, and associated equipment, within a new 60ft x 40ft fenced compound, and a new 12ft-wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150ft southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. Ground Elevation: 219.2 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 279.9 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A_www.fcc.gov_wireIess_avaiIable-2Dsupport- 2Dservices&d=Dwl FaQ&c=euGZstcaTDl lvi m EN8b7jXrwgOf- v5A_Cd pgnVfi i M M&r=tVy9dfE6fJ U kHc15_Itk39 M NoGtgWe lvmeedh3_FbFk&m=hG- JCSMvkhhvGefDXDWwa2cfvhClVZng4gl_gZaIN0NtOgTCcB3tEGKcEptjavkq&s=6Gm-h4i- olOi3CYmfuyif88FNTF954Fd5Csh_f5xE7M&e= You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Visit the following link to report this email as spam: https://usl.proofpointessentials.com/app/report_spam.php?mod_id=ll&mod_option=logitem&report=l&type=easysp am&k=k1&payload=53616c7465645f5f175555ee05534f4fe9761312a3416a64509ac384db18f02427874874fc1084ef01e2 0132af60e21714c316ef7280f3f008b17e7b8938bd84bd080ee6fa0d254de0760c1cb78d0e05167045fa89bb1be46b5bb80 a8b4e6b511ef97bbf962c469672e09fdf3f38049edc0d47f458d840ebd231a5ab111260c0da8d3c4a5673ba4141093b8223 d16bf0476cefc9aa6605cd65e793f47ce4d lea NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 7. Historic Properties Direct Effects a. List all properties within the APE for direct effects. Project # and Project Name/ Address of Photograph of Subject Property Description of Subject Property Summary of Status of Subject Property Effects on Subject Subject Property Property (Monopole) 766917 Smithsburg High School The Subject Property is not an No Effect individually listed historic The proposed Not Eligible 66 North Main Street, structure. Further, it is not a design is minor and or Smithsburg, MD 21783 designated National Historic necessary for the Contributing Landmark nor is it a property community. This 39.65975611111111 - listed in, or eligible for listing on will have no effect -77.57283027777777 the NRHP. on the Subject Property. b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for direct effects, not listed in part "a" (above), that the Applicant considers to be eligible for listing in the National Register as a result of the Applicant's research. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). For each property that was specifically considered and determined not to be eligible, describe why it does not satisfy the criteria of eligibility. There are no additional properties in the APE for direct effects not listed in part "a." c. Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects.' If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicates that cultural resource -bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth.' 1 Pursuant to Section VI.D.2.a. of the Nationwide Agreement, Applicants shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify above ground and archeological Historic Properties, including buildings, structures, and historic districts, that lie within the APE for direct effects. Such reasonable and good faith efforts may include a field survey where appropriate. 2 Under Section VI.D.2.d. of the Nationwide Agreement, an archeological field survey is required even if none of these conditions applies, if an Indian tribe or NHO provides evidence that supports a high probability of the presence of intact archeological Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 7. Continued The field investigation at this location was conducted by Scott Emory on September 22, 2025. Standard archaeological field equipment included shovels, trowels, and a quarter -inch wire mesh sifting screen. Based on the Maryland Historical Trust's Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Investigations in Maryland, the field survey techniques utilized were a combination visual inspection of the project setting and shovel -testing at 49.2 ft (15-m) intervals, with a standard shovel test unit consisting of a hand -excavated hole, approximately 17.7 in (45 cm) in diameter and/or deep enough to reach culturally sterile subsoils. As shown in Table 3, the tower lease area, access easement, and utility easement consisted of a truncated subsoil occasionally capped with fill associated with the infilling of the pond. STP 2 depicts the typical soil profile consisting of a 4.7 -inch -thick (in) (12 centimeter [cm]) yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) silt loam A -horizon containing 50 percent gravels and some cobbles overlying an 11 -in -thick (28 cm) yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) mottled with brown (10YR 4/3) and light gray (10YR 7/2) silt loam fill containing 20% gravels and some cobbles, followed by a brown to light brown (7.5YR 5/3-6/3) silty clay B -horizon containing 40 percent gravels and some cobbles. No artifacts or cultural features were recorded in the test pits or elsewhere in the APE -DE. Total archaeological field time: 1 person, 4 hours. Based on the findings of this survey, Trileaf recommends that there are No Historic Properties in the Direct APE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area relative to those resources. Please refer to the Cultural Resources Report provided in Attachment 5 for additional information. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates STP No. STP Location Depth (cm below surface) Soil Description Artifacts Recovered Latitude/ Longitude 1 NW corner A: 0-30 10YR5/4 SiLo; 50% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'35.57"N / 77°34'22.58"W B: 30-59 7.5YR6/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A 2 NE corner A: 0-12 10YR5/4 SiLo; 50% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'35.47"N / 77°34'21.96"W Fill: 12-40 10YR5/6 mottled w/ 10YR4/3 and 7/2 SiLo; compact; 20% gravels, some cobbles N/A B: 40-60 7.5YR5/3-6/3 SiCI; 40% gravels, some cobbles; bedrock at 43 cmbs in east half of STP, slopes downward to west N/A 3 Tower center A: 0-20 10YR5/4 SiLo; 50% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'35.28"N / 77°34'22.32"W B: 20-30 7.5YR5/6 SiCILo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A 4 SW corner A: 0-18 10YR5/4 SiLo; 40% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'35.08"N / 77°34'22.70"W Fill: 18-44 10YR6/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A B: 44-54 7.5YR5/6 SiCILo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A 5 SE corner A: 0-15 10YR5/3 SiLo; 20% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'34.98"N / 77`34'22.08"W Fill: 15-33 10YR5/4 mottled w/ 10YR5/6 SiLo; 60% gravels, some cobbles N/A B: 33-40 7.5YR5/3-6/3 SiCI; 50% gravels, some cobbles N/A 40+ Bedrock 6 Access easement A: 0-13 10YR5/3 SiLo; 40% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'34.79"N / 77°34'22.45"W Fill: 13-34 10YR5/6 mottled w/ 10YR5/4 and 7/2 SiLo; 60% gravels, some cobbles N/A B: 34-56 10YR4/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A 56+ Cobble impasse 7 Access easement A: 0-20 10YR4/4 SiLo; 40% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'34.49"N / 77°34'22.21"W B: 20-37 7.5YR5/6 SiCI; 60% gravels, some cobbles N/A 8 Access easement A: 0-20 10YR4/4 SiLo; 40% gravels, some cobbles N/A 39°39'34.40"N / 77°34'21.57"W Fill: 20-47 10YR5/4 SiLo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A B: 47-58 7.5YR5/6 SiCILo; 70% gravels, some cobbles N/A 9 Access easement Fill: 0-30 7.5YR5/4 SaCILo; 40% gravels, some cobbles, asphalt chunks, road gravels N/A 39°39'34.31"N / 77°34'20.94"W 30+ Cobble impasse 10 Access easement Not excavated — in driveway apron 39°39'34.14"N / 77°34'20.35"W Table 1: Shovel Test Pit Descriptions Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Aerial Photography (2022) Latitude: 39° 3935.29" Longitude: -77° 34' 22.32" 4, N A C•] Negative 0 Not Excavated 0 APE -DE T Shovel Test Pit Locations within the ,1rca el Direct I:LIcc1 \4ilestorre Towers— Smithshurg High School 66 North Main Street; Srnithsburg, MD 21783 Trileaf Project #766917 TR I LEAF n is 3o rn Meters heel i1 i, Iqn 200 e nviron menial erchiin ,are engineering Figure 1: Map of Shovel Test Pit Location (Google Earth 2022). Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 8. Historic Properties Visual Effects Historic Properties Identified for Visual Effects Guidelines a. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for visual effects that is listed in the National Register, has been formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register, or is identified as considered eligible for listing in the records of the SHPO/THPO, pursuant to Section VI.D.I.a. of the Nationwide Agreement. Listed or Formally Eligible Historic Resource Name and/or Address of Historic Resource in Smithsburg, MD 21783 Photograph of Historic Resource Summary of Criteria and/or Description of Historic Resource Summary of Effects on Historic Resource WA -IV -273 SHA Small Structure = "" This resource was No Adverse Effect 21065X0 determined to be eligible Eligible for listing on the NRHP in The proposed project is the MD 66 over Tributary 2015 under Criterion C construction of a 199 -foot- to Beaver Creek (Design/Architecture) by tall monopole the MD SHPO. (MEDUSA telecommunications tower. 2025) The project will have an overall height of 199 feet. Due to distance, vegetation (including tree coverage around the parent parcel) and other modern intrusions in the form of utility lines, the proposed project will have no adverse effect on any character -defining features WA -IV -259 Smithsburg Historic This resource was No Adverse Effect District '; determined to be eligible Eligible I M t for listing on the NRHP in The proposed project is the Water and Main 2004 under Criterion A construction of a 199 -foot- Streets 1r: (Event) and Criterion C tall monopole •L.-(Design/Architecture) by telecommunications tower. A the MD SHPO. (MEDUSA The project will have an 2025) overall height of 199 feet. , Due to distance, vegetation (including tree coverage around the parent parcel) and other modern intrusions in the form of utility lines, the proposed project will have no adverse effect on any character -defining features Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 8. Continued b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each Historic Property in the APE for visual effects, not listed in part "a", identified through the comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual or group whose comments led to the inclusion of a Historic Property in this attachment. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). As of the date of this report, Trileaf Corporation has not received comments from Indian Tribes, NHOs or members of the public that identify Historic Properties in the APE for visual effects. c. For any properties listed in the above Historic Properties list, that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion in the National Register, explain the basis for this recommendation. N/A Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 9. Local Government a. If any local government has been contacted and invited to become a consulting party pursuant to Section V.A. of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, list the local government agencies contacted. Provide a summary of contacts and copies of any relevant documents (e.g., correspondence or notices). On September 23, 2025, Ms. Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator for the Washington County Historic District, was notified of the proposed project. They have been invited to comment on the proposed project's potential effect on Historic Properties and to indicate whether they are interested in consulting further on the proposed project. On October 1, 2025, Ms. Jenkins responded via email stating that the proposed tower location is in an area of tree planting that was done in agreement with the Washington County Public Schools and County Water Quality Department. On November 20, 2025, Ms. Jenkins was forwarded correspondence with the County regarding the intent to replace any trees that are removed to another location on campus. At this time, Ms. Jenkins has not yet expressed any desire to be a consulting party regarding effects on historic properties. If any further correspondence should be received, it will be submitted as an addendum to this submission. A copy of Trileaf Corporation's correspondence is attached. b. If a local government agency will be contacted but has not been to date, explain why and when such contact will take place. N/A Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 4c.TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trileaf.com September 23, 2025 Washington County Historic District Attn: Meghan Jenkins — Senior Planner 100 West Washington Street, Suite 2600 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Phone: (240) 313-2430 Email: mjenkins@washco-md.net RE: Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School / Trileaf Project #766917 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Washington County, Smithsburg Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 39' 35.298" N, Longitude: 77° 34' 22.321" W Greetings: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a Section 106 Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 195 -foot -tall monopole communications tower, with an overall height of 199 feet including attachments, and associated ground -based equipment, within a new 60 -foot by 40 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound. The project also includes a proposed 12 -foot -wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150 feet generally southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. The site is currently manicured grass - covered lawn. The antennas will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 ext. 902 or email e.boone@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager From: Elsie Boone To: Jenkins. Meghan Subject: RE: Invitation to Comment - Proposed Telecommunications Project - Trileaf #766917 Date: Thursday, November 20, 2025 9:26:00 AM Attachments: Re Smithsbura High School - Washington County comment.mso imaae008.ono imaae009.ono image010.onng imaae0ll.ono imaae012.ona imaae013.ona imaae014.ona imaaeol5.ono Hi Meghan, Please see attached email correspondence between our client and the County regarding the tree planting areas that may be disrupted during construction of the proposed tower. It sounds like the plan would be to work on replacing any trees that need removed to another location on campus. Please let me know if you have any questions or additional comments/concerns. Please also let me know if you have any comment on the tower's potential effects on historic properties in the area in particular. Thank you, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager £TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150 Hunt Valley, MD 21030 Office: (410) 853-7128 ext. 902 Mobile: (443) 966-4013 From: Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2025 3:52 PM To: Elsie Boone <e.boone@trileaf.com> Subject: RE: Invitation to Comment - Proposed Telecommunications Project - Trileaf #766917 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Elsie, The location of your proposed telecommunications tower is an area of tree planting that was done in agreement with the Washington County Public Schools and the County Water Quality Department. Is your organization aware that the area is a formal tree reforestation area? The HDC would like to be involved in this process however I don't know if can provide further comment knowing there is a potential issue with the site as proposed on your documentation. You can view those on our web application here: https://washcomd.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/b1 d24a5239bb4ea8af8dal a88b472964 Thank you. Washington County Meghan Jenkins, GISP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator I Historic District Commission (HDC) 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 P: (240) 313-2439 1 F: (240) 313-2431 www.washco-md. net (Pronouns: she/her/hers) Get Connected and See Updates M90®X NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. NBook time to meet with me From: Elsie Boone <e.boone(@trileaf.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 10:05 AM To: Jenkins, Meghan <mienkins(c�washco-md.net> Subject: Invitation to Comment - Proposed Telecommunications Project - Trileaf #766917 WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. Good morning, Please see the attached in reference to a second proposed telecommunications project on an existing communications facility in Smithsburg, MD. As part of our property consultation, we invite a local government contact to comment, if desired, on the potential effects the project may have on historic properties. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager £TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150 Hunt Valley, MD 21030 Office: (410) 853-7128 ext. 902 Mobile: (443) 966-4013 From: Reed. Alexander To: Proulx. Jeffrey; Matthew Penning Cc: Matt Forkas; Rollins. Robert; Swauger, John Subject: Re: Smithsburg High School - Washington County comment Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 1:23:03 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona imaoe002.ona image003.ona imaae004.nno imaae005.ona imaae006.ona image007.ona image008.ona Outlook-2t5uawei. onp Outlook-cid imaae0.ona Outlook-cid imaae0.ona Outlook-cid imaae0.ona Outlook-cid imaae0.Dna Good afternoon! Thank you for reaching out. We understand that the cell tower is going to be located in one of our tree plantings and we would love to work with you all to replace any trees that are removed to another location on campus. The trees are counted towards the impervious acreage treatment goals that EPA has given to the County (of which WCPS properties are included) so we have zero objections to replacing the trees somewhere else on campus. My cell is 240-203-0431 if you would like to speak more about any of this. All the best, Alex Reed Watershed Specialist 16232 Elliott Parkway Williamsport, MD 21795-4083 P: 240-313-2677 1 C: 240-203-0431 www.washco-md.net Get Connected and See Updates L_LJLJI! NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. From: Proulx, Jeffrey <ProulJef@wcps.kl2.md.us> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 1:12 PM To: Matthew Penning <matt@ milestonetowers.com>; Reed, Alexander <areed@washco-md.net> Cc: Matt Forkas <matthew@milestonetowers.com>; Rollins, Robert <RolliRob@wcps.kl2.md.us> Subject: RE: Smithsburg High School - Washington County comment WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. Alex, By way of this email, I am connecting you with staff of Milestone Communications. We have been working on plans to install a cellular communications tower adjacent to the Smithsburg HS stadium. I recall from the planning we did a few years ago, that WCPS was told the tree planting that were done could be taken out if we needed to develop property that was idle at the time. We have come to that point in Smithsburg. What are our options? Would we need to replant the trees that are taken out? I appreciate your thoughts and comments on this matter. Jeff Jeffrey M. Proulx I Chief Operating Officer Cultivating learning communities that spark curiosity, ignite creativity, and inspire success 301.766.2827 (office) 240.983.5039 (mobile) Washington County Public Schools I www.wcpsmd.com 10435 Downsville Pike, Hagerstown, MD 21740 From: Matthew Penning <matt@milestonetowers.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 9:36 AM To: Proulx, Jeffrey <ProulJef@wcps.kl2.md.us> Cc: Matt Forkas <matthew@milestonetowers.com> Subject: Re: Smithsburg High School - Washington County comment Hi Jeff, Good morning - it'll probably be faster if we work with this through Alex Reed or whoever is familiar with the project. Meghan is the coordinator for the HDC and most likely just looking at the GIS at potential issues before she works with the HDC on their review / comment on our project. Let me know if you'd like me to reach out to Alex (and contact information, if you have it) - Thanks, Matt Penning Director of Development matff8 mi lestonetowers.com 703.865.4697 (office) 1801 Old Reston Ave, #101 Reston, VA 20190 milestonetowers.com From: Proulx, Jeffrey <ProulJefna wcps.k12.md.us> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 8:15 AM To: Matthew Penning <matt(8 milestonetowers.com> Cc: Matt Forkas <matthew(8 milestonetowers.com> Subject: RE: Smithsburg High School - Washington County comment Matt, We were under the understanding that if the trees needed to come out, we could take them out at a later date. Do they want them replanted in another area on the campus? Alex Reed, is the person we worked with on establishing the planting areas. Jeff From: Matthew Penning <matt(@milestonetowers.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 5:05 PM To: Proulx, Jeffrey <ProulJef(@wcps.kl2.md.us> Cc: Matt Forkas <matthew(�milestonetowers.com> Subject: Fw: Smithsburg High School - Washington County comment Hi Jeff - Good afternoon sir - we received the below comment from Washington County HDC in regards to tower location at Smithsburg HS. They are engaged as part of our NEPA / Historic Review process. I believe we discussed the tree reforestation on -site as not being a major concern. Is there anyone at the County you recommend we speak with? The project is slated to go before Smithsburg BZA on Dec 3, tentatively. Let me know your thoughts or if you want to discuss further. Thanks, Matt Penning Director of Development NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 10. Other Consulting Parties and Public Notice List additional consulting parties that were invited to participate by the Applicant, or independently requested to participate. Provide any relevant correspondence or other documents. On September 23, 2025, the Washington County Historical Society was notified of the proposed project. They were invited to comment on the proposed project's potential effect on Historic Properties and to indicate whether they are interested in consulting further on the proposed project. A copy of Trileaf's correspondence with the Historical Society is attached. As of this date, no response has been received from the Historical Society. Should a response be received, a copy will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this packet. You are required to provide a Public Notice Attachment. Attached, please find a copy of a legal notice regarding the proposed telecommunications tower construction that was posted in the Herald -Mail on September 26, 2025. As of the date of this submission packet, no comments regarding this notice have been received by Trileaf Corporation. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this submission packet. Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 4c.TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trileaf.com September 23, 2025 Washington County Historical Society 135 West Washington Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Phone: (301) 797-8782 Email: info@washcohistory.org RE: Milestone Towers — Smithsburg High School / Trileaf Project #766917 66 North Main Street, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Washington County, Smithsburg Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 39' 35.298" N, Longitude: 77° 34' 22.321" W To Whom It May Concern: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a Section 106 Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 195 -foot -tall monopole communications tower, with an overall height of 199 feet including attachments, and associated ground -based equipment, within a new 60 -foot by 40 -foot (2,400 square feet) fenced compound. The project also includes a proposed 12 -foot -wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150 feet generally southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. The site is currently manicured grass - covered lawn. The antennas will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 ext. 902 or email e.boone@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager LOCAL'1*O PO Box 630519 Cincinnati, OH 45263-0519 The Herald -Mail AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Trileaf Corporation 1515 Des Peres RD # 301 Saint Louis MO 63131-1959 STATE OF MARYLAND, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON The Herald -Mail is a daily newspaper of general circulation, printed in the English language and published in the City of Hagerstown in said County and State, and that annexed hereto is a copy of a certain order taken from said newspaper in which the order was published. Published in the issue dated: 09126/2025 Sworn to and subscribed before on 09/26/2025 Legal Clerk Notary, State of WIf Brown My commission expires Publication Cost: $69.52 Tax Amount: $0.00 Payment Cost: $69.52 Order No: 11693825 # of Copies: Customer No: 1055744 0 PO #: LHAG0376497 THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! Please do not rose this form for pa)ntrenl remittance. KONGMENG YANG Notary Public State of Wisconsin Page 1 of 2 Milestone Towers proposes to construct a 199 - monopole commun tower at the approx. of 66 North Main St, burg, Washington MD 21783, Lat: 35.298], Long: 22.321]. Public oot-ta ications vicinity Smiths - County, [39 -39- [ -77 -34 - comments regarding potential effects from this site on historic properties may be submit- ted within 30 days from the date of this aublication to: Trileaf Corp, Elsie, trileaf.com, 303 tional Circle, Suite e.boone@ Interna- 1 50, Hunt Valley, MD 21030, 410-853- 7128 ext. 902. September 26 2025 LHAG0376497 NT SUBMISSION PACKET - FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 11. SHPO Specific Forms N/A Applicant's Name: Milestone Towers Project Name: Smithsburg High School Project Number: 766917 FCC Form 620 . ins ztan. Pro Stevenson Rd - f Lions � k �'tP Stev , Communit rsb � enson•iq� •,�veq��d A. Park Y.'4N 9s C;rnve Cr`4k er►so 'f s ( nigans Environment �� wt cc -k 6ir , " _ •,tir - rvices,•Inc ;�" Q . 9�a , N� °& Creel. g+e�Nes�.� I V9 - . J; -t ' S sr 'rg ; • -'A� Middle hc�l> j' �'. L ...a j,•.. n "SIR 'f t.t• Wields c F Srnithsburg+High School �Recordin udio '. € / t. Dais neral Home �i/ $la ti5 h a yhra- 1 � '3. , � � •� kater� . ���e 'r � m �' �'r,, .�4 . . �'�-; ■ ' ..� In ti x �. + 40 + •yz �s. Smithsburq a ;. 3 cr Elementary School J & Gerage Doors d m * ► �o .a i? c r / otnpa�Y't n _ Rllenberg Or d d • Point AtSmithsburg rti Ds,,: i • Apartrnents 1a , Dixie'Dirfe greaves Home �st} ♦ a t� '' q, z AInspections•V Smithsburg Library( rteG,.41a ' d� f r i ,q. y fi•!� ��• .v -.r ��: fi dt' � * .7rackside--Kitchen F ,�yr Hadley Farms Bakery �� stow° -p s� s ►9� ftris Kringle' ' r ' r �aaPle9ror@.fit �y6,.r , �" �� oliday Craft Show �t ; :, ^3ati� fit,, ,y op,F 1 + ,a t aPve9 Fryzaholic+ ,y t. R� ��� Antietam Towing -- M' �` X r a2 Cat• ~ ,�° s �',. .� 'tC;'s@1 d7 8�5114p-3 }y y • f i P�fJi_ 1 "*M'anlPnrnua Fciata pou9�a } x VIEW #1 1 Approx. 1548 Feet S. of Site r; i 771iiM/'k r. Ir ��� ■� iii �^wrwrw.r r`r rw.rw.rr. I r r•iirt •` �w�wa���rar rt�lrwwr w�n�r� � •• Y .1 r��i Errwwr.rw w: � ��� ` iil� rrrwrr^• ��w chaol Smit burg Flh lieti i Id s . . . . •aey-. Fuoc aI f1I. r r �J `.ti 3 Garage Doors 0 • 1- .x - � f/// 0romPecrL✓7 �. .1. '.`��-._r �; =1 r�r.4,; '�II• - _�:s�r--mil- '�'�r== �-�-.:._ :ws�r S.. YR r.s,.f3- a l ' - .- -1 _________ ] fir.. .. 0r• ''•� 1 ��- !. - tY+' - r:ti - _ .1 - _ •rte �� .. ; .ai'�:--.� r,�'��' �Y-.•ti;R'y�'� `. � - . � - +'.yam ,%'' - _ - - : �. , - _ •'roc+? . ...., - - r__ _.., n.... ... ..-_..... r.'�'rF;;•'':.......i.1diS i��+sY.tYw•`..ii.yxR-3iLk:�>;��3..:.[.�,,:� �._. __,t7. -- - `�. r.. —._r .mod • _ _ _ a _ pis iRI t M - �Ft =fir i A Milestone 11 Towers Smithsburg HS 66 N Main St, Smithsburg, M❑ 21783 195ft. MONOPOLE NOT VISIBLE VIEW #5 Approx. 2534 Feet 5. of Site 9\S84 39°39'36.90"N, 179-34' 1 1 .73" V V ,Af±l oft 745 / ± SW242 V 242 'L -1 frimJ-- _r-' - "•+a..�_ } ?,., - ' 17Apr25 09:59 Smithsburg HS Balloon 12539 Bradbury Ave, Smithsburg MD 21783, US e 17 -Apr -25 09:59:41 1t 1 -' T vim Y � r . Jerraynns En><tranmenta a •� 1 r � � � Creek E Jrs ����•�. •'�'�'. ++.riddle Schaal 7 r .3. yp. ' SPh nc�: S I Ii - rV h 1 � rgH.gh Sc3wrl� cif` +a'+ ''LL7 haws Funeral Homes •1 •? .r_ -.•• •�. il. z�_ h 3 -�' .. .. -- .r arts. .,U,n ia- .� . �^ ... .. - � • +.'� � — .c 12934 ic'.a.Ar 1219 WGS84 39°39'54.97"N, 77°34'23.92"W A ti0ft 710 ±10 SE161 - fix- �•: :�;, ... •. . �� a y•2 ��'l~���5 �,r �• R��l, �_ _ _ _ -�F. 11 17Apr25 10:03 Smithsb`urg. HS Balloon 22840-22892 Stevenson Rd, Smithsburg MD 21783, US o 17 -Apr -25 10:03:27 i �� '� Srr. •hsNE, rt •Jltiddlc:^h Dol:. 4�+dr s• •. (1. ur ` l� ;i) ;raj Yk. s r z Fungi•:,; F:�r �fi l.��i folk WGS84 39°39'54.77"N, 77°34'43.51 "W iA 10ft o SE1 08 A Milestone I t Towers Smithsburg HS 66 N Main St, Smithsburg, MD 21783 195ft. MONOPOLE NOT VISIBLE VIEW #10 Approx. 1953 Feet NW. of Site a • w s` L'R'� MiUJII �� � 1, � n•scno�l � � / / ■ � / '�: ' -'iY •-�.lk Y *, __ l .�d�:.. 1�. X43 7• '4` .a`.�. a � �+" .: n y _' •tip : i � • •a ~�il/r` .•: • ,. ... ii: sa ,';* _ .6 --.» . rig WG#s$4 39°39'43.50"N, 77°34'50.43"W A±�1Dft 768 1 Q E92 r71 j - _ i ,�. r w, W�fs84 39°39'34.75"N, 77°34'48.28"W At10ft 727 �! 0 N E52 I.! •:i 'j tat1 tK, SQ Waft 39°39'31,37"N, 77°34'46.71 "\L\ ,A 10ft 720 N E58 �a. • • ham` �; �vi�:°'' . � a�pAF �� �;a �� �R+'• ' .�� �,s,�e� ►� �'�� Vii►;•. Rfd! • :' ��� yt/ a55 'i.�'� rte.." •.has S � � . ! :,per .r ���i'� � '� • � ' J — L —I'. =s r :a ' ice: rFe •r y'srYar��"�y'.'_n^��..'' Ftii - �4y� .•�. '� ��7rk x. d:Saa;��vl y�` - 'i r"'.. _F4-uS^•.".� x 4� � !tea -tea• '-%�• �.-Y�y •Y�..L5��i���'_�'�'yc��'S,t-L-.:f�Lr. .]��y'-' f� • •`.:.fir.,; sa.< < � s,.�c:: ��-`'•: ��-g_ �.,�, �a.ti "�--e `tiffs:=� .p5, ��-"�a"'�.�,i•+�. - - �:�;'_...;y,����g �`��.� . "' �.r� � e7 ,� �•+ �,s'�: ��'-rte; : x '� /s51 017 Smithsburg HS Balloon 50 Geier Way, Smithsburg MD 21783, US o 17 -Apr -25 10:17:40 f " E,, 'J V\r J •1111 J6Garage Ooore�' +•e�,o WGS84 39°39'29.14"N, 77°34'32.33"W10 769NJ ±10 NE26 f I : +r . - - t:?•y- ':fix.. .��.. ..1 R �.,' Vii._. _ 'Y� s+:....,� '�H:. - - '% � vi.x�:: � �'.i"-5:-' �. ta•.'•..: _ •:,+�.:xr ate .x -. .__._. . .._ - . ... .. . -. .. .. _ , . . r ., a .a .._ ._ _ ' :c• .. .. _ ,c �. :. 17Apr25 10:19 Smithsburg HS Balloon 59 N Main St, Smithsburg MD 21783, US cq 17 -Apr -25 10:19:59 r ; Sr ithshurg M fiddle SchooI 4 T. ±�10fS84 39°39'43.73"N, 77°34'16.69"W /At1Dft 720 f �1 SW212 I I _ i • },•'�' �• is � L - I II .. .. - A.. �... . .. _. I =' '. _. _.... .-'-ice .�- From: towernotifyinfo(abfcc.gov To: Elsie Boone Subject: Section 106 Notification of SHPO/THPO Concurrence- Email ID #11976391 Date: Thursday, January 8, 2026 10:17:37 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This is to notify you that the Lead SHPO/THPO has concurred with the following filing: Date of Action: 01/08/2026 Direct Effect: No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) Visual Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Comment Text: None File Number: 0011799314 TCNS Number: 301839 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 11/28/2025 Applicant: Milestone Towers Consultant: Trileaf Corporation Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Smithsburg High School Site Address: 66 North Main Street Detailed Description of Project: New 199ft-tall monopole communications tower, and associated equipment, within a new 60ft x 40ft fenced compound, and a new 12ft-wide gravel access drive that will extend approximately 150ft southeast and connect with an existing asphalt drive. Site Coordinates: 39-39-35.3 N, 77-34-22.3 W City: Smithsburg County: WASHINGTON State:MD Lead SHPO/THPO: Maryland Historical Trust NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 = .240.313,2430].E 240313.2431 l Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 ZONING APPEAL Property Owner: Donna Anderson Docket No: AP2025-034 20659 National Pike Tax ID No: 16013811 Boonsboro MD 21713 Zoning: A(R); RV Appellant: BMLS LLC RB Overlay: No 975 Mt. Aetna Road Zoning Overlay: Hagerstown MD 21740 Filed Date: 12/17/2025 Hearing Date: 01/21/2026 Property Location: 20659 National Pike Boonsboro, M❑ 21713 Description Of Appeal: Special exception for banquet/reception facility use and variance from the pavement requirement for off-street parking. Appellant's Legal Interest In Above Property: Owner: No Contract to No Rent/Lease: Lessee: No Contract to Yes Purchase: Other: Previous Petition/Appeal Docket No(s): Applicable Ordinance Sections: Washington County Zoning Ordinance: Article 3. Table No. 3.3 (1), B Article 22. Section 22.12 (f) (10) (iv) Reason For Hardship: See justification statement if Appeal of Ruling, Date Of Ruling: Ruling Official/Agency: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Event Venue Previous Use Ceased For At Least 6 Months: Date Ceased: Area Devoted To Non -Conforming Use - Existing: Proposed: I hearty affirm that all of the statements and information contained in or filed with this appeal are true and correct. Appellant Signature State Of Maryland, Washington County to -wit: Sworn and subscribed before me this . -5 My Commission Expires day of I_ 20 23 1111 Notary Public WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD21742-2723 .240.313.2430 i 240.313.2431 , Hearing Impaired:7-1-1 AFFIDAVIT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 25.51(C) Docket No: AP2025-034 State of Maryland Washington County, To Wit: On 12/17/2025, before me the subscriber, a Notary of the public of the State and County aforesaid, personally appeared JD Law Co., Inc and made oath in due form of law as follows: J❑ Law Co-, Inc will post the zoning notice sign(s) given to me by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with Section 25.51(c) of the Washington County Zoning Ordinance for the above captioned Board of Appeals case, scheduled for public hearing on 01/21/2026, and that said sign(s) will be erected ❑n the subject property in accordance with the required distances and positioning as set out in the attached posting instructions. Sign(s) wi11 be posted on 01/06/2026 and will remain until after the above hearing date. JOLaw Co., Inc Sworn and subscribed before me the day and year first ig(e written. roorary ruouc O tl Seal My Commission Expires WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 747 Northern Avenue . Hagerstown, MD 21742-2723 240-313.24301 F240-313-2431 i Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ATTENTION! Posting Instructions The premises MUST be posted in accordance with the following rules: 1. The sign must be posted a minimum of fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing Section 25.51(c) Property upon which the application or appeal is concerned shall be posted conspicuously by a zoning notice no less in size than twenty-two (22) inches by twenty-eight (28) inches at least fourteen (14) days before the date of the hearing. 2. The sign must be placed on the property within ten (10) feet of the property line which abuts the most traveled public road. 3. The sign must be posted in a conspicuous manner not over six (6) feet above the ground level, and affixed to a sturdy frame where it will be clearly visible and legible to the public. 4. The sign shall be maintained at all times by the applicant until after the public hearing. If a new sign is needed or required, please contact the Plan Review Department at 240-313-2460. 5. An affidavit certifying the property will be posted for the minimum of fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing date. Proper posting of the sign will be spot checked by the Zoning Inspector. IF SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE, IT MAY RESULT IN RESCHEDULING OF THE HEARING. Docusign Envelope ID: F71485508-584B-49F6-AtCF-627336702798 el ♦r O t G C 9 Department of Planning & Zoning Owner's Representative Affidavit .1JRii.M1. This is to certify that REBECCA PEARL KELLINGER of BMLS, LLC and Henson & Son, Inc. (the contract purchaser of our property) and its legal or civil engineering representative(s) is/are authorized to file with the Washington County Department of Planning and Zoning, an application for Special Exception for Banquet ! Reception Facility and related Variances with regard to the property located at 20659 National Pike, Boonsboro, Maryland 21713 containing +1- 20 acres which is owned in fee simple by the undersigned. PROPERTY OWNER - pocuS ned b . �bltit:L1 [LtIL/.f lI oui 5C5CCC t 1 7gp` Donna Anderson 20659 National Pike Boonsboro_ MD21713 11/14/2025 1 06:47 PST Date: AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 2e6.eeca Q j 11/14/2025 Rebecca Pearl Kellinger BMLS LLC / Henson & Son Inc. 975 Mt. Aetna Road Hagerstown, MD 2170 December 15, 2025 Board of Zoning Appeals 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21740 Re: Special Exception & Parking Surface Variance +/-20 ac. Property Located at 20659 National Pike, Boonsboro, Maryland (TM 63; Parcel 237) (the "Property") Dear Board Members: The Applicant, Rebecca Pearl Kellinger of BMS, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company is the contract purchaser of the above referenced Property located on the southside of U.S. Rte. 40 (National Pike) approximately 1,000 ft. to the west of its intersection with Md. Rte. 66. See attached aerial photograph. The Property is split zoned a combination of RV (Rural Village) along the U.S. Rte. 40 frontage and A(R) (Agricultural, Rural) to the rear of the Property. See attached zoning map. The surrounding area is primarily rural in character with several "Rural Business" overlay districts in the immediate vicinity of the Property (Flea Market & Sheetz) and to the northeast around the U.S. Rte. 40 / Md. Rte. 66 intersection. The Property is currently improved with a large, stone farmhouse and numerous accessory agricultural / commercial buildings previously used to support the business of David M. Merchant excavating contractor who owned the property before his passing in 2021. See attached aerial photo. Proposed Use The Applicant is not currently in the business of organizing or providing banquets, receptions or other special events and intends to reside on the Property as a primary residence. However, essentially as an accessory use to this primary purpose, the Applicant would like to put the existing buildings, paved/ gravel areas and large open grassy areas on the Property to good use as a "Banquet/ Reception Facility" as defined by and permitted by Special Exception in both the RV and A(R) zoning districts. See attached_ 11125 BemisderFer Road I Greencastle, PA 17225 1 301.791.9222 I jdivelbiss@divelbisslaw.com At this time, as shown and identified on the notated Aerial Photograph attached, Applicant's intent is to utilize a large semi -rigid tent structure measuring approximately 40 Ft X 60 Ft; self-contained, temporary bathroom trailer; and food trucks or other means of providing and serving prepared food and refreshments at hosted events. However, they would like to have the flexibility to construct and install a commercial grade kitchen / food prep area and/or a permanent enclosed or semi -enclosed structure should the need arise. There will be no full-time employees and no "regular" operating hours for the Property; the days and hours of operation will vary depending upon the needs of the particular event but will not extend beyond 10 p.m. and not be more frequent than 4 events per month. Maximum attendance for banquets, receptions or other special events is anticipated to be 150 or fewer. As per Section 22.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Off -Street Parking Requirement for "Banquet Halls, Dance Halls, Exhibition Halls, and Assembly Halls", which presumably is how the proposed Special Exception use will be viewed, is 1 space per 50 square feet of Gross Floor Area. However, since no permanent building is proposed as part of the Special Exception, the number of parking spaces that will be required to support the proposed sse is uncertain and may need to be determined by the Zoning Administrator as per § 22.12(b) of the Zoning Ordinance which provides that: "If a specific use is not listed, the Zoning Administrator shall have the right to determine the required off-street parking requirements, based on the most similar use(s) listed." No matter the requirement, Applicant is confident that sufficient parking can be provided in the grassy area shown and identified on the additional, notated Aerial Photograph attached. There will be no permanent exterior lighting or signage installed, only temporary lightning as needed and directional signs on the days there are events to be held. In Maryland, a use permitted by Special Exception carries with it a presumption of compatibility with the surrounding area. As the Courts have guided, to overcome this presumption there must be facts or circumstances demonstrating that the proposed use will have greater adverse effects at THIS location than on any other property with the same RV / A(R) zoning. In this case, there are no such facts or circumstances. To the contrary; this Property seems particularly suited for the proposed Special Exception use given its size, proximity to other Rural Business / Commercial uses, availability of existing buildings and improvements, the location of those buildings and improvements within the interior of the Property, and accessibility from an adequate, primary roadway (U.S. Rte. 40). Parking Surface Variance In addition to the request for Special Exception, Applicant also requests a variance from the Off -Street Parking design requirement in §22.12(f)(10)(iv) of the Zoning Ordinance that parking and access lanes / aisles with a total area greater than 3,400 sf. be paved. As explained above, the minimum number of parking spaces that will be required for the proposed Banquet / Reception Facility is uncertain, but it will more than likely require a parking area in excess of 3,400 sf. and thus be required to be paved. As shown on the notated aerial photo attached, the handicap accessible spaces will be located adjacent to the venue space and will be paved_ However, for all additional spaces required to be provided, the proposal is to use the large grass area to the north of the venue space and internal access drive which the Applicant should not be required to pave. In support of this request, the Applicant respectfully contends that conformance with § 22.12(f)(10)(iv) would be unnecessarily burdensome and create a substantial injustice due to (i) the periodic nature of the requested "Banquet / Reception Facility" which will not utilize or create a demand for the required level of parking on a regular basis, and (ii) the importance of reducing or eliminating the visual and environmental impact from impervious surfaces whenever possible. As referenced above, this Property is located in a predominantly rural area; adding additional paved, impervious surface that will only be used on a limited, temporary basis would negatively impact not only the nature and character of this Property, but potentially the surrounding area as well, Conclusion I look forward to discussing the particular facts and circumstances of the proposed use and this request for Special Exception and variances with you at the Board's next regularly scheduled hearing. Very truly yours, LAW COMPANY, INC. Ja o M. Divelbiss A to grey at Law Email: Jdlivelbiss@diue!bis�aw.coni t ti� ' Funk'Eiecincal Services 0 •pct ertyJ' Irish Seams N Co ■.....■ U...... ■..Uit. ' �dffQ�t? • �A. L 4 ** O I 1 Definition of "Banquet/Retention Facili servicing and minor repairs are provided Uses at a service station do not include major mechanical and body work. storage of automobiles not in operating condition, or other work involving noise, glare, fumes, smoke, or other characteristics to an extent greater than normally found in such stations. A service station is not a repair and service garage or a body shop. Banquet/Reception Facilities:=71 '15 Commercial establishment engaged in the provision of meeting or congregation facilities for special events such as weddings. parties, public meetings. and social gatherings. Such facilities may include on -site catering services. Restaurants are not included as part of this definition. Bed & Breakfast:" 7" An owner —occupied residential structure providing rooms for temporary. overnight lodging, with or without meals, for paying guests. Such uses shall be limited to no more than five (5) guest rooms. Board: The Board of Appeals. Boarding House: x18 A private dwelling unit in which, for compensation, lodging and possibly meals are provided to no more than four (4) roomers/boarders by a resident family. Rooms are offered on a single -room occupancy basis and sanitary facilities may be shared A common cooking area may be provided. Lodging is provided on no less than a month - to -month basis. Brewery, Commercial:21' An establishment with facilities for manufacturing and bottling malt beverages for sale on -site or through wholesale or retail outlets in accordance with a valid Class 5 manufacturing license from the State of Maryland. A commercial brewery is a brewery that does not meet the definition of a Farm Brewery. Accessory uses may include beer tasting rooms at which beer tasting occurs, accessory food sales related to the beer tasting, and the sale of beer produced on site. The area for beer tasting, accessory food sales related to the beer tasting, and sales of beer produced on -site shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the structures located ❑n -site and being used for manufacturing and bottling. 214 Revision 17. deflnilion added 4123113 (RZ-12-0021ORA-2013.13) 215 Revision 18. definrtlon amended 1115118 (RZ-17.0671ORD-2018.03) 216 Revision 18_ detndion amended 10/11/16 tRZ-13-0031ORO-261&-181 217 Revision 18 def+ndion amended 1118118 {RZ-17.00710RD-2018-0 215 Revision 18. def+nrtion amended 1116118 (RZ-17-00710RL1-2018.031 2TS Revision 17 defnilion added 4123113 (RZ-12.002/ORD-2013.131 318 Zoning Ordinance — Land -Use Chart A(R.Agrkaaure (Rurw) EC-EnUronmenlal Canserrmlbn P-Preservarron RV -Rural V+Ipge R5 -R oral Business IAHrlb,stnal Minerpl Table No. 3.3(1) 1 TABLE OF LAND USE REGULATIONS {RURAL AREA USES} LAND USES A1RI EC P RV RB IM Intensity or Use A. Accessory Guest house in an accessory ncssarybuIIdin SE SE SE SE N N NIA Private stables as defined In Article 28A shall be subject to the requne merits set forth In Adios 4 Section 4 13 A A A A A N WA Swrmrmng pools. tennis and other sender dcuns and other reCreaoonel faotilieswhen accessory to a residents A A A A A N NIA Uses anu structures custanany eoc€ssary ally •[dental Is any pmcoil permitted use er SpeGRI e ceptlen. 003415) buslress 6505 pen amhg Is u55 on the premises' 1proo33edthat sad+ sgns are tpcateu as ryquratrd In Settler 22.2 I. and a singie-tarrrpy dwelling and in the same bulldmrj with a principal 555 A A A A A A NIA B. Accanwnodation and Food Services' • 98 ue/Rece bon Factltlies SE SE SE SE P N HIGH Bed and Breakfastup to non IS guest rooms A A A SE P N MODERATE 9oardin or rooming houses SE SE SE P P N MODERATE Conference Center; SE SE SE SE P N HIGH Donnby Inn SE SE SE SE P N Hotels and a anment hotelsinduoin motets N N N N P N MODERATE Restaurants *fl drive-in, drive thru service N N N N F N MODERATE Restaurants without drive -In, drive-Ihru service N N N N P N MODERATE Resorts N N N N P N HIGH Tavems N N N N P N HIGH C. Adrnlnintrative and Support and Waste Management and Remedlanon Services Burldin and l3weihfl5 services as defined in Article 28A N N N N P N MODERATE LandsspIr,g Contractor P P P P P N MODERATE Table Na 3 3111 amended &19tD6 (RZ-06 00710Ro-ua-D9) Table No 3.311) alnanded 84109 IRZ-00-001IORD-09-Ds1 Revision 17. Table No 3.311)8 amended 4!33113 (RZ-I2-002lORD.2013-131 Rev4ipn 15, Table W. 3 31f)s amended 1!16!]8 (RZ-17-W7lORD-2011-031 P-Permtted EA -Special Excepl+on A -Accessory N -Not Permitted , / ►!' Bathroom _ F._ Trailer Potential Parking Area(s) ;Grass) r - Handicap Parking (Paved) Lloyd Yavener, Chair Washington County Michael Lushbaugh Justin Bedard, Vice Chair - Tyler Milam Ann Aldrichp Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND DATE: January 15, 2026 TO: Board of Zoning Appeals c/o Katie Rathvon 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 FROM: Meghan Jenkins, HDC Staff SUBJ: AP2025-034, 20659 National Pike, Boonsboro The Rural Village of Beaver Creek where this property is located has not been surveyed in its entirety for historic resource purposes but there are several excellent examples of stone architecture scattered throughout the village, of which, this structure is included. The subject property does contain resources identified in the Washington County Historic Sites Survey/Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties #WA -II -099, Christian Newcomer House. The main house is a 2 %z story coursed fieldstone structure with a 1 %z story el addition to the rear. It has had modern additions extending to the north for both more living space and an attached garage but otherwise the main house is intact from the survey. The barn from the farm complex has had modern siding and framing added but the stone end walls and foundation appear to be retained as well. The complex is associated with Christian Newcomer, who was a prominent early leader of the Brethren Church. Overall, this farm complex retains enough integrity to continue to be significant for vernacular stone architecture and associations with Newcomer. The proposed use of the property as a primary residence is consistent with its use historically. In addition, the applicant also wishes to utilize existing buildings for Banquets and Receptions. The use of large open grassy areas and currently paved/gravel areas is also proposed. As these accessory uses proposed would utilize existing buildings or are of a temporary nature, staff does not feel they will adversely impact the historic resources. The applicant should note that the Historic District Commission would strongly recommend reviewing the Design Guidelines for Historic Structures for Washington County prior to exterior work or property grading to ensure any work will not negatively impact the resources. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. Sincerely, Meghan Jenkins Att: 1, WA -II -099 documentation 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 : 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET .-7- MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST WORKSHEET Cop; 1 NOMINATION FORM WA -II -O9 • District 16 for the NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, NATIONAL PARKS SERVICE Vt Z 0 1•- • I- Vt W W N NAME C OMMON: The Lakin Farm AND/OR HISTORIC: The Christian Newcomer House, Resurvey on Stull's Forest 2 *LOCATI0N STREET AND NUMBER: south of U.S. 40, just west of Wagner'.s Crossroads CITY OR TOWN: Beaver Creek, Route 9 STATE COUNTY: Maryland Washington 3. CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS ACCESSIBLE (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC ❑ District Building 0 Public Public Acquisition: ❑ Occupied Yes: ❑ Site ❑ Structure ® Private ❑ In Process ® Unoccupied ❑ Restricted Cl Object ❑ Both 0 Being Considered ❑ Preservation work Unrestricted in progress ® No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) 0§ Agricultural. ❑ Government ❑ Park 0 Transportation ❑ Comments ❑ Commercial 0 Industrial W Private Residence ® Other (Specify) 0 Educational ❑ Militu.. 0 Religious being remndpled ❑ Entertainment ❑ Museum 0 Scientific at present - 4 OWNER OF PROPERTY WNER'S NAME: John R. and Marie F. Lakin STREET AND NUMBER: Route 2, Box 95 CiTY OR TOWN: STATE: Boonsboro Maryland 21713 3• 'LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Washington County Court House STREET AND NUMBER: West Washington Street CITY OR TOWN: STATE Hagerstown Maryland itle Reference of Cur' (Book & #): i4l REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING 5t)RVEY5 TITLE OF SURVEY: DATE OF SURVEY: ❑ Federal ❑ state ❑ County ❑ Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS* STREtT AND NUMBER, CITY OR TOWN: STATE, ?,j' (\/Li ,Y I II DE5CR1PTION (Check One) l; Excellent ❑ Good O Fair 0 Deteriorated ❑ Ruins ❑ -Unexposed CONDITION (Chock one). (Check One) Altered ❑ Unaltered ❑ Moved ® Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT ♦ 40 ORIGINAL (!f known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This house is located south of U.S. 40, just west of Wagner's Crossroads, about six miles east of Hagerstown in Washington County, Maryland. It is situated on a slope, directly over a spring and faces east. The structure is a two -and -one-half story, five -bay stone dwelling with white trim. A one -and -a -half story, two -bay el addition extends to the rear or west of the main section. A modern lean-=to addition has been attached to the north side of the el. The walls are constructed of coursed local fieldstone at the front and. north side elevations with much rougher stones evident in the south and rear walls and in the addition. At the southwest corner of the house, the full cellar is exposed above ground level. The spring was present in that portion of the ground floor. Its course has been. changed slightly in recent alterations. Decorative stonework at the exterior of the house includes flat arches of finely cut stone over major openings in the front and north end walls. The arches contain seven stones with a larger key- stone at the center. A circular plaque lined with header bricks is located under the gable in the north wall. The plaque is said to have held a date inscription at one time. Windows appear to be spaced evenly in the facade. In other walls, how- ever, less concern for uniformity of placement is shown. The openings are framed with wide wooden members which are mitered at the corners and are finished with a bead at the inside edge. Nine -over -six light double -hung sashes are present at the first story while six -over -six light sashes are used at the second story level. Small four -light openings illuminate the attic. The. main entrance is located in the center bay of the facade. The entrance- way is framed simply and includes a transom.- The original front door has been replaced with a modern one. Other entrances are located at the rear of the house and the addition. -These doorways are wide and are quite primitive in appearance. A one-story hipped roof entrance porch is present at the front door. The roof is covered with modern asphalt shingles. Brick chimneys are present inside each gable end. A two-story chimney rises from inside the end of the el. The roof is finished with a tapered barge board which shows a decorative bead. The eaves boxing shows a band of decorative mold- ing both on its surface and cornice molding. A short distance west of the house are the ruins of a large stone end bank barn. The interior of the house is divided by a center hall. The fireplace mantels appear to have been influenced by the early federal period and show much use of decorative reeding. All original interior doors have six raised panels trimmed with quirked quarter round molding. The house is in excellent condition and is at present being remodeled. It stands on a tract containing 130.0 acres. N In] m z N —I M C n 0 z N ] Slt"iEEf1°ECA JCI` . - fI PERIOD (Check One or More an Appropriate) _e;umbian O 16th Century 18th Century (late) H loth century (J 15th Century O 17th Century O 19th Century SPECIFIC DATE(SI ([(Applicable and Known) G ! G AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Check One or More ae Appropriate) Abori inal Education ❑Urban Planning g• ❑ Political O 9 ❑ Prehistoric O Engineering Ja Religion/Phi. O Other (Specify) ❑ Historic ❑ Industry losophy ❑ Agriculture O Invention ❑ Science Architecture O Landscape ❑ Sculpture ❑ Aft; _• - Architecture - O Social/Human- ❑ Commerce O Literature itarian ❑ Communications O Military O Theater _ O Conservation _ _ _ .Music O Transportation STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The area of significance of this house is its architecture. The property is also important for its association with Christian Newcomer (1749-1830), a prominent early leader in the Brethren Church. c''. = The house is an excellent example of a five -bay, center hall plan dwelling. Said to have been built by Christian Newcomer between 1795 C and 1800, the stone house is an example of a major architectural group — in Pennsylvania and Central and Western Maryland. The five -bay house is _t I- based remotely on the more formal Georgian plan and was adopted for exten- sive use in fieldstone and brick farmhouses of the 18th and 19th centuries This house is one of several stone dwellings dating from the late 18th or early 19th centuries in the Beaver Creek area. Many of these struc- / tures are associated with the Newcomer family who moved to Maryland from I(' Lancaster County, Pa. about 1775. The Newcomer family operated several grain mills on the Beaver Creek. 7,# z Christian Newcomer who owned this property was a carpenter by trade. After coming to Washington County in 1775, he became active in the early -Brethren Church as a circuit -rider who traveled through Maryland, Penn- :I`} w sylvania, Virginia and Ohio. He served as Bishop in the church from W 1813-1830. Newcomer acquired 214 acres of land in 1794 from John Ingram. At Christian Newcomer's death in 1830, the property was passed to his son t Andrew. - It�� y�1 ( / {� ��J - �• \r�, ` r�"�` ��,� ( r i _.i i ;�J� ' rJ 1 n` - _______________ : ZLcf /i / \�'( VIa, )I co, S 7 Ji' I:: ~`� �( f;' V rte: �o ,✓ f l%'� 1 - ( �r � /:�� �' �r%�< \;J/ �J boo ' _ :� ` �j `\� �� ),l•t ` J 0 . � ,{� •v /� �`.`�f '� ;•`\` irk , o J J K ; k =� t f f' moo i�� / 1\ > }'o x555 )� -•1 (7 (ice 7/L•f \" ifs ){ Q• `t K') '\)( I // £71 ':: ���1•al„nrn Gress :'— fr[ rJJJ/4/Jj1J��_:_� ., ff .,r, . •a•i i' 0 r. i"1 1' 'ri 1I - L : ' )4J 41 • d. 1s - e-� Esc. environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trilea£com December 4, 2025 Washington County Historic District Attn: Mr. Meghan Jenkins 100 West Washington Street, Suite 2066 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Phone: (240) 313-2430 Email: mjenkins@washco-md.net RE: The Towers, LLC — Sharpsburg / US -MD -5102 — Trileaf Project #746609 5404 Mondell Road, Sharpsburg, Maryland 21782 Washington County, Shepherdstown Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 27' 47.32" N, Longitude: 77° 45' 18.29" W Greetings: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a Section 106 Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a new 195 -foot -tall monopole communications tower with an overall height of 199 feet including appurtenances. The tower and associated ground -based equipment will be installed within a new 50 - foot by 50 -foot (2,500 square feet) fenced compound within a larger 75 -foot by 75 -foot (5,625 square feet) lease area. Access will be granted via a proposed 12 -foot -wide gravel access drive within a larger 30 -foot -wide access and utility easement that will extend approximately 200 feet, generally northeast away from the compound, to an existing lot associated with the residential and agricultural development on the parcel. This easement will extend an additional approximately 650 feet further southeast to connect to Mondell Road. This site is currently an agricultural field. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 ext. 902 or email e.boone@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager Shepherdstown Quadrangle, West Virginia (2023) Contour Interval = 20 Feet Latitude: 39° 27' 47.32" N, Longitude: 77° 45' 18.29" W Site Vicinity Map The Towers, LLC - Sharpsburg 5404 Mondell Road Sharpsburg, MD 21783 North 1 . Li Site Location a Tv. &TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering Site Location & Surrounding Properties Site Location - - - - - Easement Aerial Photographs (2025) The Towers, LLC - Sharpsburg 5404 Mondell Road Sharpsburg, MD 21783 £TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R VICINITY MAP SCALE: I " = 1000' SITE NOTES: I. APPLICANT: THE TOWERS, LLC 150 PARK OF COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 200 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA TEL. (561) 148-6361 TENANT: VERIZON WIRELESS 10110 JUNCTION DRIVE, STE 300 ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD 20101 TEL. (3O1) 512-2000 FAX (3O1) 512-2186 2. PROPERTY OWNER: RYAN KEADLE 5405 MONDELL ROAD SHARPSBURG, MARYLAND 21182 3. SITE DATA: MAP: 0016, GRIP: 0001, PARCEL: 0213 DEED BOOK 06150, PAGE 00112 PARCEL ID: 015850 TRACT AREA: 20.20 ACRES DISTRICT: 01 ADDRESS: 5405 MONDELL ROAD SHARPSBURG, MARYLAND 21182 EXISTING USE: AGRICULTURAL 4. ZONING: PRESERVATION 5. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON A GPS LATITUDE BY MORRIS 8 RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED OCTOBER 2O25: LATITUDE: 31.4631° (N3q° 21' 41.32) GROUND ELEVATION (AMSL): 443.25AMSL LONGITUDE: -11.1551° (W11° 45' 18.21') PROPOSED TOWER HEIGHT: I5.O' AGL TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD (HIGHEST POINT): Igq.O' AGL TOTAL ELEVATION (AMSL): 642.25' AMSL 6. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 6,200 SF 1. THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL CONSIST OF A 5O' x 5O' FENCED COMPOUND WITH A Iq5'-O" TALL TOWER AND VARIOUS CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PADS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. NINE (1) ANTENNAS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE PROPOSED TOWER WITH A RAO CENTER ELEVATION OF IqO'-O" ABOVE GRADE. ao��a a O n 0 A O° Q P 4 0 4 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil /,Structural EAgineere 1220-B East Joppa Rd, Suite 400K Towson, Maryland 21286 410-821-1690 410-821-1748 Fax PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 233O3, EXPIRATION DATE: 01/01/2026. LW YC1H1 IIIo ff1 U' Q � �q--{N 'JJ �11J /ll II11111 Oiyz n' W Z \\\ \I\ 11 JJJ i) ii 8. THE STRUCTURE WILL NOT SUPPORT LIGHTS OR SIGNS UNLESS REQUIRED FOR AIRCRAFT WARNING OR OTHER SAFETY RECORDS. q. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATION FROM A REGISTERED ENGINEER THAT THE STRUCTURE WILL MEET THE APPLICABLE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR WIND LOADS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION. 1O. NO WATER OR SANITARY UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE OPERATION OF THIS FACILITY. II. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTE: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE. 12. BOUNDARY SHOWN PER COUNTY RECORDS. EXISTING SITE FEATURES SHOWN PER SURVEY BY MORRIS 8 RITCHIE U ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2O25. 13. ALL DETAILS SHOWN ARE "STANDARD" OR "TYPICAL" FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR ACTUAL DETAILS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS BY OTHERS. 14. THE COMMUNICATION SITE SHALL BE UNMANNED, WITH INFREQUENT VISITS (FOUR OR FEWER PER YEAR) BY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, AND WITH ACCESS AND PARKING FOR NO MORE THAN ONE VEHICLE. THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION AND THEREFORE HANDICAP ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED. 15. WIRELESS TRANSMITTING DEVICES MUST COMPLY WITH AN51 STANDARD C15-1182. 16. THERE IS NO FLOOD PLAN DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATION SITE. O 11. THERE ARE NO STREAMS WITHIN 500' OF THIS SITE. JJ(._.) I8. THE TOWERS, LLG SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE ACCESS ROAD TO THE SITE AS NEEDED. GENERAL NOTES I. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "MISS UTILITY" (811) 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DOING ANY EXCAVATION IN THIS AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT A SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATOR FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS BY TEST PIT AS NECESSARY. LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES OR PROPERTY OF OTHER BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED TO PRECON5TRUCTION CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES, THE LATEST EDITION THEREOF. 3. ANY PERMITS WHICH MUST BE OBTAINED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR THIS PROJECT FROM ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ABIDING BY ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMITS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY OWNERS. 5. THESE PLANS ARE NOT FOR RECORDATION OR CONVEYANCE. 6. EXISTING PAVEMENT AND OTHER SURFACES DISTURBED BY CONTRACTOR (WHICH ARE NOT TO BE REMOVED) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR. SETBACK $ SITING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: LOCATION PROVIDED REQUIRED NEAREST DhELLIN (ADJACENT PROPERTY) 563'-8'± 400' SETBACKS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH PROPERTY 614'-0"± 200' EAST PROPERTY 56O1 -q'± 200' SOUTH PROPERTY I' -O'± 200' SOUTHhEST PROPERTY 26q' --f'± 200' WEST PROPERTY 6118'-O'± 200' Knc Ca F (REVISIONS: N0. DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGNED BY: BE5 DRAWN BY: GJ5 REVIEWED BY: BE5 PROJECT NO: M41.016 DATE: 10/15/2025 TITLE: SHEET: Site Plan 11 rN a, III W 6 WA I. 6 10 11 THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY I COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL S I TE PLAN I�l CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE c-1 WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERE TO APPURTENANT. SCALE: = 70'-0" A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R 811 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROTECT YOURSELF, GIVE THREE WORKING DAYS NOTICE THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERE TO APPURTENANT. \ \ SzS \ \ \ / \ / / /\ � I \ ` I \ \ \\ PROP THE TOWERS, LLG \ �\I 50'-0" WIDE AGGE55 4 UTILITY \ �\ I EASEMENT \ \ \ NEW TRANSFORMER W/ BOLLARDS �� —NEW GRAVEL TURNABOUT -- NEW 10'-0" WIDE H -FRAME �\ I / \ I I/ 0 0 0 \--: I NEW TELGO HANDHOLE J 0 0 T \ PROP VERIZON WIRELESS � x —x— x —x —x EQUIPMENT SPACE ON x / 3'-O'xII'-O" CONCRETE t SEX / PAD W/ GE BRIDGE x - / FIELD- — \ / / I Aaw / \ \ I / r------------i \\ \\ PROP VERIZON �\ x I WIRELESS EQUIPMENT I / I \ \ \ ON 10'-0" WIDE x I / \ \ \ EQUIPMENT FRAME W/ I in' / I \ \ ICE BRIDGE x I / I / \\ \\ / x PROP VERIZON I \ \ WIRELESS GENERATOR x \ \ ON 3' -6'x7' -O" I I 1 \ CONCRETE PAD I I I III i I x I I I I ----- x --------I I I 1 PROP VERIZON WIRELE55 I 20'-O'x25'-O" LEASE AREA (500 5Q FT) I I —FUTURE I 1 x I GO -LOCATOR I SPACE— I II l I PROP VERIZON x / WIRELE55 ICE I x x—x—x—x—x—xxxx x —x —x - BRIDGE 1 I I PROP THE TOWERS, LLG 7'-O" I I 50'-0" (FENGCOMPOUND 4D HIGH CHAIN LINK F NGL 4 3 I I STRAND OF BARBED WIRE, TYP I (6'-0" MINIMUM HEITHT) I I I / / I / \ `I 1 \ 1 fr,frD / 1 1 ) / // / / 1 / / / PROP THE TOWERS, PROP THE TOWERS, / LLG 14'-0" WIDE LLG 15'-0" x 15'-O" \\ / AGGE55 GATE LEASE AREA // \ \ / PROP THE TOWER, LLG /pp� 19a' -O" MONOPOLE / � \ I I I I I I l I I I FUTURE I GO -LOCATOR I SPACE— I x /� I Iz I / I x O --- I O — — v C ILI v z w 0 i 1 x I I I I I I I I I I I FUTURE I x 0 GO -LOCATOR I , SPACE- I x N I I I I I I I I I I x ENLARGED COMPOUND LAYOUT SCALE: I" = IO'-O" \\ \ tI0 \ , , —EX SHED— / / PROP VERIZON WIRELESS GPS ANTENNA PROP VERIZON WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE, TYP PROP VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET, TYP PROP VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT GENERATOR CONCRETE PAD ELEVATION A/ DIESEL GENERATOR SCALE: I/4" = I'-0" FACE OF FENG I NG, TYP 2'-0" ROUND OFF 3:1 MAX SLOPE 3" MIN, 3/4" AGGREGATE SURFACING OVER 6" MIN SUB -BASE COMPACTED IN LAYERS OF 3" MIRAFI 5OOX OR APPROVED EQUAL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND STONE TO EXTEND I' -O" OUTSIDE FENCE, UNDER AGGE55 DRIVE AND TURN AROUND PROOF ROLL AND STABILIZE SUBGRADE SLOPE 1/4" PER FT EX GROUND SURFACE EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO MEET FINISH GRADE GRADE AREA LEVEL STRIP TOPSOIL COMPACTED FILL AS REQUIRED TO MEET FINISH GRADE (6" LIFTS MAXIMUM) CONSTRUCTION NOTES: I. CLEAR AND GRUB THE LAND ALONG THE ACCESS DRIVE. 2. REMOVE ALL EXISTING ORGANIC MATERIAL TO SUITABLE SUBGRADE. 3. PLACE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER SUBGRADE AND THEN PLACE AGGREGATE BASE. 4. GRAVEL SUBBASE SPECIFICATION: MARYLAND DOT: SECTION 304 GRADED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE VIRGINIA DHT: SECTION 210 AGGRGATE BASE COURSE LEASE AREA, ACCESS DRIVE 4 TURN AROUND AREA SURFAC I NG SCALE: = O F- O in -o" CHAIN LINK TOP SELVAGE BARBED AND TWISTED BOTTOM SELVAGE KNUCKLED TIE WIRE ,- BARBED WIRE, TYP TOP RAIL LINE POST, GLASS B RAILS, CLA55 B STEEL TUBING, 2" DIA STEEL (2 3/8" OD) SGH 40 (TYP) TUBING, 11/4" DIA SCREENING (I 5/5" OD) SGH STRIPS, 7YP 40 (TYP.) END POST, GLASS B STEEL TUBING, 2 1/2" DIA z (2 '7/8" OD) SGH 40 (TYP) N TENSION WIRE CONCRETE FOOTING (TYP) 10'-0" MAX CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL LINE POST TIES SCALE: 3/a" = TYPICAL WOVEN WIRE FENCE NOTES I. GATE POST, CORNER, TERMINAL OR PULL POST 2 1/2" DIA (2 7/8" OD) SCHEDULE 40 FOR GATE WIDTHS UP THRU 6 FEET OR 12 FEET FOR DOUBLE SWING GATE PER ASTM-FI083. 2. LINE POST: 2" DIA (2 3/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIO83. 3. GATE FRAME: 1 1/4" DIA (I 5/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FI083. 4. TOP RAIL $ BRACE RAIL: 1 1/4" DIA (I 5/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER A5TM-FIO83. 5. FABRIC: 4 GA GORE WIRE SIZE, 2" MESH, CONFORMING TO ASTM-A3ci2. 6. TIE WIRE: MINIMUM II GA GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND RAILS, A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX 24" INTERVALS. 7. TENSION WIRE: 7 GA GALVANIZED STEEL. 8. BARBED WIRE: DOUBLE STRAND 12-2 1/2" OD TWISTED WIRE TO MATCH WITH FABRIC, 14 GA. 4 PT BARBS SPACED ON APPROXIMATELY 4" CENTERS. T. GATE LATCH: I-3/8" OD PLUNGER ROD WITH MUSHROOM TYPE GATGH AND LOCK, KEYED ALIKE FOR ALL SITES IN A GIVEN MTA. 10. LOCAL ORDINANCE OF BARBED WIRE PERMIT REQUIREMENT SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, IF REQUIRED. II. GHAINLINK FENCE SHALL INCLUDE VERITGAL PVG SCREENING SLATS, ALL SIDED. (COLOR: DARK GREEN OR BLACK) a \:7 O/, V A O, MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil /,Structural EAgineere 1220-B East Joppa Rd, Suite 400K Towson, Maryland 21286 410-821-1690 410-821-1748 Fax PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 233O3, EXPIRATION DATE: 01/01/2025. LW YC1H1 IIIo ff1 (' Q �W--4N '1J tlIJJ /ll II11111 Oiyz n' -4 O II m l" \\\ (flr Jl /ll ii in � U vx REVISIONS: N0. DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGNED BY: BE5 DRAWN BY: GJ5 REVIEWED BY: BE5 PROJECT NO: 1 gS41. 016 DATE: 10/15/2025 TITLE: Site Details SHEET: C-2 1 rN ri 6 rs I. I, 10 11 A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R PROP \/ERI RAP GENTE FUTURE GAf RAP GENTE FUTURE GAf RAP GENTE FUTURE GAf RAP GENTE PROP THE 7 MONOPOLE ao��a a O n V A O ° D Q P 4 0 4 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil /,Structural EAgineere 1220-B East Joppa Rd, Suite 400K Towson, Maryland 21286 410-821-1690 410-821-1748 Fax PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 233O3, EXPIRATION DATE: 07/01/2026. LW _ 0 O L4NII ,1J PROP VERIZON WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE < } OO i/ z � PROP TRANSFORMER O v W/ BOLLARDS Q z PROP THE TOWERS, LLG Z � � II Z CHAIN LINK FENCE O 111 EX GRADE Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROTECT YOURSELF, GIVE THREE WORKING DAYS NOTICE THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERE TO APPURTENANT. b L1) TOY R ELEVATION SCALE: I" = 20'-0" t , c U O JMA MXO&fHGB&5-HG I SAMSUNO MTC41S-77A VERIZON YVIRF-LF-55 ANTENNA DETAILS NOT TO SCALE (REVISIONS: N0. DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGNED BY: BE5 DRAWN BY: GJ5 REVIEWED BY: BE5 PROJECT NO: M41.016 DATE: 10/15/2025 TITLE: Antenna Details & Elevation SHEET: C-3 11 rN a, N VA I. 6 10 11 Michael Lushbaugh Lloyd Vavener, Chair � Washington County Justin Bedard, Vice Chair J_ Tyler Milam Ann Aldrich Gregory Smith Brianna Candelaria Randal Leatherman, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND DATE: December 23, 2025 TO: Board of Zoning Appeals c/o Katie Rathvon 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 FROM: Meghan Jenkins, HDC Staff SUBJ: AP2025-031, 5404 Mondell Road, Special Exception for Commercial Communication Tower Historic District Commission (HDC) staff reviewed the special exception documentation provided by the applicant. Staff offers the following for the consideration of the Board of Zoning Appeals: 1. The applicant states "the property is a non-residential use in the middle of an area of residential and agricultural zoning districts...". This property's existing land use is a mix of residential and agricultural and is consistent with adjacent land uses. It is not non-residential which is mentioned in more than one place in this application. The proposed change of this special exception will introduce commercial use in an area predominantly incongruous with commercial activity due to nearby existing land use, preservation easements and government owned lands. These existing conditions are consistent with the purpose of the Preservation Zoning District as stated in the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has attached a map of preserved lands adjacent to this site as well as the existing zoning of this area. 2. The applicant states "tree cover existing around the property on adjacent properties will further minimize the need for additional screening." The tree cover surrounding this property is primarily deciduous and will provide limited screening for several months out of the year. This is supported by several of the photo simulations provided. Staff recommends screening facilities using native evergreen mixed species. 3. The visual impact survey using photo simulations, while appreciated, did not provide a GIS generated viewshed to inform the locations the technician chose to photograph nor to show the full impact of visibility. The photos where no visibility were noted were not provided for context. Staff would suggest that the BZA request a GIS generated viewshed analysis that indicates the level of visibility of the tower to ensure that the areas of potential impact can be seen and photographed in a logical and consistent manner. The tower's visibility to residents will not be limited to roads so the supplement of the viewshed analyses will help 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 240.313.2430 240.313.2431 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET determine impact more appropriately. Staff has provided a basic GIS viewshed indicating widespread visibility of this site. 4. The applicant has provided no documentation regarding the existing co -location facility on the Sharpsburg Water Tower which is less than a mile from this proposed location. Their narrative regarding viable co -location is generalized and provides little detail regarding their alternative analyses completed. 5. While this proposed tower is not located in the Appalachian Trail Corridor, Antietam Overlay or Historic Preservation zoning districts which require stealth technology, it should be noted that this proposed tower is within half a mile of the Antietam Overlay 2 and less than a mile of the Antietam National Battlefield. The Antietam Overlays were designed to minimize impacts of residential and commercial uses within view of the Battlefield. The viewshed analyses used to create these areas more than 40 years ago did not take into account a 199' tower as a commercial use for their delineation. The intent of the AO is to ensure that uses are compatible with the agricultural and historic character of the area. While outside of the AO this commercial use will not be compatible, and stealth technology should be required should this application proceed. Staff has provided a zoning map with distance buffers for visual reference. 6. The applicant responded to "consideration shall be given to the view shed associated with the scenic and historic areas and the use of stealth technology to minimize the visibility of the proposed tower" with minimal information that was generalized. The only historic resource directly referenced in their documentation is Antietam Battlefield and there are other resources within a %2 mile, including the Sharpsburg National Register district or resources directly on this site which should have their impacts considered. The applicant can utilize the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties MEDUSA to locate these resources and provide appropriate resource impact analyses. Visibility varies in these areas but there are impacts and, if approved, mitigation of these impacts such as stealth technology is recommended for this site. Staff has provided a map of known National Register sites including the basic viewshed analysis. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this application. Sincerely, Meghan Jenkins, GISP HDC Staff Att: Map of National Register of Historic Places with viewshed Map of existing zoning conditions with distance buffers Map of Antietam National Battlefield with viewshed AP2O25-031, Mondell Tower �YTOWN RO o a p �Ra ISO / ■ a ■ • ■ r ear ■ rf. • ■ r ■ ■ ■ • ��' _ jLJ' W J .J .-fl WAANINGI This map was seated bythe Wachlneson County Plarcurce Deaa.iment and is Imonded for the reepients use only. It lent far general dnu iburan to the public. and dwrdd not be waled at copied Any modficaoons or changes taxies map ate prohibitedwidwW the egrcess prior written approval of the PNnNng Department GIS sowces of the datacaoamod hereon are Iran various putle agent- wtudr may haw use restricrlorn or dfcl.uman. • Tower Site ® Antietam Overay 3 r ' Site Buffer (miles) Historic Preservation Overlay Antietam Overlay 1 !.Z Rural Business Antietam Overlay 2 A(R) 3 000 The parcellmes shown an this map arederiuedfrom asarcery of sources which have tha,, own / accuracy sundaeds. The parcel Imes are approwmate and for mformanonal purpose ONLY. They are not guaranteed by Washington County Maryland or the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taarons to be tree of erron including errors of omission. commuslon, posmonal accuracy er any attnhutes msociaud wdh real property. Theydull not be copied, EC Feet reproduced or soled in any way without the express prior written approval of Washmgron County Maryland Plannngand Zoning Oepartment lho data GOES NOT replace an accurate P 1 inch equals 3,000 feet survey by a housed professional and,nfat— on shag be yenfied wing the reloyanr deeds. RV plats and other recorded legal chow menre by the user TOWN AP2025-031, Mondell Tower rap wataeated bytheWashlnetonCountyPlarrun80eoartmentand is 3 000 Thep arc ellmes s hmvnon this map arederesed lrom avanery of sourceswhich have thin,own mended for the rcopienrs use only. It snot for goncral dssnibution to the public, and ohou d T curacy standards. The parcel Imes aro approximate and for mformasional purposes ONLY. They not be scaled or copied My modrhwoons or chances Inflict map are probibited widsag the eW. pnorvnrttenappcoyalol the Planning pepatlmen1G15 SOWcesol thedatacadalned flsa notgotsicoeedtumonsto by ho Countyors odrImSe—yland or a oland0eparsmemof henaon are Iran yarlous public agencies whits may have use restrictions or dssd.Wners. posessmen c and Taaationc to ins Irea o[ error i ndudmg ono. s of dnnvon, cant be on, posmrnal accuracy or any attributes associated with real property. They scull not be copied, • Tower Site ® Viewshed Analysis Feet reproduced or scaled in any waywKhout the express prior written app —I of Washington County Maryland Planning and Zoning OepannienSits Thdata DOES NOT replace an accurate Antietam National Battlefield I inch equals 3,000 feet sursr:y by a licensed professional and information shallbeveohodwmg the relevantdeeds, plats and other recorded legal do iuments by the user environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trileaf.com January 12, 2026 Washington County Historic District Attn: Mr. Meghan Jenkins Senior Planner 100 West Washington Street Suite 2600 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 240-313-2430 mjenkins@washco-md.net RE: The Towers, LLC — Mt Briar / Client #US -MD -5131 — Trileaf Project #778831 4220 Chestnut Grove Road, Keedysville, MD 21756 Washington County, Keedysville Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39°25' 50.57" N, Longitude: 77° 41' 32.94" W Greetings: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a new 195 -foot -tall monopole communications tower, with an overall height of 199 including attachments, and associated ground -based equipment within a new 50 -foot by 50 -foot (2,500 square feet,) fenced compound within an overall 60 -foot by 60 -foot (3,600 square feet) lease area. Access and utilities will be ranted via a new 30 -foot -wide easement that will extend approximately 175 feet southeast, connecting to an existing drive that further extends approximately 0.20 miles northeast to connect with Chestnut Grove Road. The proposed lease area site is currently forested land. The antennas will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 or email e.boone@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Elsie Boone Assistant Project Manager Keedysville Quadrangle, Maryland (2023) Contour Interval = 20 Feet Scale 1 Inch = -2,000 Feet Latitude: 39°25' 50.57" N, Longitude: 77° 41' 32.94" W North Gro% JJ � MOUnt Briar TWO nii 1N 1[ir i rr1ll; 11 W— Rohrersville Station n W . � W Site Location (-d ` yl Site Vicinity Map The Towers, LLC — Mt Briar £TRILEAF 4220 Chestnut Grove Road environmental architecture engineering Keedysville, Maryland 21756 r+ z `a y r.. t4. 4.4 A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R ABBREVIATIONS AC ACRES AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL AMSL ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL CENTERLINE CLR CLEAR DIA DIAMETER DWG DRAWING EX EXISTING ETC ETCETERA FT FEET LB5 POUNDS MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM NTS NOT TO SCALE NO / # NUMBER ROW RIGHT OF WAY SF SQUARE FEET TYP TYPICAL A/ WITH SOIL TYPES PRESENT IN DISTURBED AREA MAP UNIT MAP UNIT NAME SYMBOL Thy HAZEL CHANNERY SILT LOAM, 3 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES BaD BAGTOWN COBBLY LOAM, 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES, EXTREMELY STONEY LEGEND PROPOSED GRAVEL AREA FLOOD PLAIN - ZONE A PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (L.O.D.) LOD LOD PROPERTY LINE OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES I' COUNTOUR LINE (EXISTING) 5' COUNTOUR LINE (EXISTING) - - - - - - - - I' COUNTOUR LINE (PROPOSED) 5' COUNTOUR LINE (PROPOSED) - - - - - - - - TREEL I NE UTILITY POLE CHAIN LINK FENCE -'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'- BOARD ON BOARD FENCE —//—//—//— SILT FENCE SF SUPER SILT FENCE EASEMENT — - - - - PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE --------- STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SCE EXISTING TREES 0 (D (eJ FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE OS GAS VALVE OG WATER VALVE MAILBOX 811 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROTECT YOURSELF, GIVE THREE WORKING DAYS NOTICE THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERE TO APPURTENANT. N N N PROP THE TOWERS, LLC COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ENLARGEMENT- ,\ lP I N O 10 F IF 41� dli N N N N SITE PLAN N- SCALE: I" = 100-0" 0 100' 200' PROP THE TOWERS, LLC. 24A ACCESS TO SITE -EX ODDS, TYPE — H 72°36'51" W 15O.85' W /I/ Lii it E 380.77' I / / / / STEVEN HARTLE 4 th ANDREA HARTLE ACCT: 017522 ZONING: P (PRESERVATION) 1/: VICINITY MAP SCALE: I" = 1000' SITE NOTES: I. APPLICANT: THE TOWERS, LLC 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 200 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA TEL. (561) q48-6367 TENANT: VERIZON WIRELESS 10170 JUNCTION DRIVE, STE 300 ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD 20701 TEL. (3O1) 512-2000 FAX (3O1) 512-2166 2. PROPERTY OWNER: DANIEL MOELLER 4220 CHESTNUT GROVE ROAD KEEDYSVILLE, MARYLAND 21756 3. SITE DATA: MAP: 0081, GRID: 0007, PARCEL: 0316 DEED BOOK 00717, PAGE 00755 PARCEL ID: 00278'1 TRACT AREA: 26.25 ACRES DISTRICT: OS ADDRESS: 4220 CHESTNUT GROVE ROAD KEEDYSVILLE, MARYLAND 21756 EXISTING USE: AGRICULTURAL 4. ZONING: P (PRESERVATION) 5. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON la PREPARED BY MORRIS 8 RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED OCTOBER 6, 2O25: LATITUDE: N3q° 25' 5O.57" (3q.43O1°) GROUND ELEVATION (AMSL): 566.8AMSL LONGITUDE: A77° 41' 32.'14" (-77.6g25°) PROPOSED MONOPOLE HEIGHT: I5.O' AGL TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD (HIGHEST POINT): Ig'1.O' AGL TOTAL ELEVATION (AMSL): 761.8' AMSL 6. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 7,200 SF 1. THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL CONSIST OF CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PADS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WITHIN A 5O'x5O' FENCED COMPOUND. NINE (q) ANTENNAS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED I5' -O" MONOPOLE WITH A RAD CENTER ELEVATION OF I'1O'-O" ABOVE GRADE FOR THE RECEPTION OF VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS. 8. THE STRUCTURE WILL NOT SUPPORT LIGHTS OR SIGNS UNLESS REQUIRED FOR AIRCRAFT AARNING OR OTHER SAFETY RECORDS. q. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATION FROM A REGISTERED ENGINEER THAT THE STRUCTURE WILL MEET THE APPLICABLE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR WIND LOADS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION. 1O. IF THE ANTENNAS ARE NO LONGER USED FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS PURPOSES FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF ONE (I) YEAR, THEY SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE ANTENNA OWNER AT OWNER'S EXPENSE. 11. NO WATER OR SANITARY UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE OPERATION OF THIS FACILITY. 12. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTE: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE. 13. BOUNDARY SHORN PER COUNTY RECORDS. EXISTING SITE FEATURES SHOWN PER SURVEY BY MORRIS $ RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, SEPTEMBER 2O25. 14. ALL DETAILS SHOWN ARE "STANDARD" OR "TYPICAL" FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR ACTUAL DETAILS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS BY OTHERS. 15. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS/DESIGN TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS AT CLIENT AND/OR OWNER'S DISCRETION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. 16. THE COMMUNICATION SITE SHALL BE UNMANNED, WITH INFREQUENT VISITS (FOUR OR FEWER PER YEAR) BY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, AND AITH ACCESS AND PARKING FOR NO MORE THAN ONE VEHICLE. THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION AND THEREFORE HANDICAP ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED. 17. THE PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS CONCRETE PAD, ANTENNAS AND RELATED MOUNTING DEVICES DO NOT EXCEED TWELVE (12) FEET IN TOTAL HEIGHT. I8. WIRELESS TRANSMITTING DEVICES MUST COMPLY WITH ANSI STANDARD C'15-Ig82. I. THERE IS NO FLOOD PLAN DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE. 2O. THE SHARMANS BRANCH STREAM IS WITHIN 500' (442'-O') OF THIS SITE. 21. VERTICAL BRIDGE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE ACCESS ROAD TO THE SITE AS NEEDED. 22. THE PROPOSED TOWER SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH A FALL RADIUS OF 15O' OR LESS. GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "MISS UTILITY" (511) 45 HOURS PRIOR TO DOING ANY EXCAVATION IN THIS AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT A SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATOR FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS BY TEST PIT AS NECESSARY. LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES OR PROPERTY OF OTHER BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED TO PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES, THE LATEST EDITION THEREOF. 3. ANY PERMITS WHICH MUST BE OBTAINED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR THIS PROJECT FROM ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ABIDING BY ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMITS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY OWNERS. 5. THESE PLANS ARE NOT FOR RECORDATION OR CONVEYANCE. 6. EXISTING PAVEMENT AND OTHER SURFACES DISTURBED BY CONTRACTOR (WHICH ARE NOT TO BE REMOVED) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR. SETBACK 4 SITING REQUIREMENTS TABLE: LOCATION PROVIDED REQUIRED NEAREST DWELLING 848-0" 400' SETBACK FROM RURAL VILLAGE (RV) ZONING 5124'-O" 400' SETBACK FROM SHARMANS BRANCH STREAM 442-0" SETBACKS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES NORTH PROPERTY 325-0" 200' EAST PROPERTY O -O 200 SOUTH PROPERTY 564-0" 200' WEST PROPERTY 3q8' -O" 200' a 0 o a D o n V n o—/7 ° D Q P 4N, 0 4 — 0 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil /S'tructural Engineers 1220-B East Joppa Ed, Suite 400K Towson, Maryland 21286 410-821-1690 410-821-1748 Fax PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 233O3, EXPIRATION DATE: 07/07/2026. W Z __ 0)-)- z iu v I� 't V K Q) �-I a U� � x N � REVISIONS: NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGNED BY: BES DRAWN BY: C.JS REVIEWED BY: BES PROJECT NO: 1x847.020 DATE: 01/ 16/2025 TITLE: Site Plan SHEET: C-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 GA5E # (##-##-###) A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R 811 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROTECT YOURSELF, GIVE THREE WORKING DAYS NOTICE THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERE TO APPURTENANT. -EX WOOD5- I / / 4T / '.IEW 7'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK =ENCE w/ 3 STRANDS OF 3ARBED WIRE, OVEALL -EIGHT = =ROP VERIZON NIRELESS ICE BRIDGE PROP VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT ON 10'-0" WIDE EQUIPMENT FRAME W/ ICE BRIDGE 'ROP VERIZON WIRELESS 5ENERATOR ON 3' -"x7' -O" ;ONCRETE PAD PROP VERIZON WIRELESS 20'-0" x 25'-0" LEASE AREA (500 SQ FT) PROP VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT ON 3'-O'x11'-O" CONCRETE PAD W/ ICE BRIDGE i ENLARGED COMPOUND LAYOUT 0 10' 20' SCALE: I" = IO'-O" LEGEND PROPOSED GRAVEL AREA FLOOD PLAIN - ZONE A PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (L.O.D.) —LOP-----LOP-- PROPERTY LINE OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES I' GOUNTOUR LINE (EXISTING) 5' GOUNTOUR LINE (EXISTING) - - - - - - - - I' COUNTOUR LINE (PROPOSED) 5' GOUNTOUR LINE (PROPOSED) TREEL I NE UTILITY POLE CHAIN LINK FENCE -'-'-•-•-'-'-•-•- BOARD ON BOARD FENCE —//—//—//- SILT FENCE SF SUPER SILT FENCE EASEMENT — - - - - PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE -•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•- STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SCE EXISTING TREES 0 FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE GAS VALVE OG WATER VALVE MAILBOX FACE OF FENCING, TYP 2-0" ROUND OFF 1'-0" 3:1 MAX SLOPE 3" MIN, 3/4" AGGREGATE SURFACING OVER 6" MIN SUB -BASE COMPACTED IN LAYERS OF 3" MIRAFI 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND STONE TO EXTEND 1'-0" OUTSIDE FENCE, UNDER ACCESS DRIVE AND TURN AROUND PROOF ROLL AND STABILIZE SUBGRADE SLOPE 1/4" PER FT EX GROUND SURFACE EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO MEET FINISH GRADE GRADE AREA LEVEL STRIP TOPSO I L COMPACTED FILL AS REQUIRED TO MEET FINISH GRADE (6" LIFTS MAXIMUM) CONSTRUCTION NOTES: I. CLEAR AND GRUB THE LAND ALONG THE ACCESS DRIVE. 2. REMOVE ALL EXISTING ORGANIC MATERIAL TO SUITABLE SUBGRADE. 3. PLACE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OVER SUBGRADE AND THEN PLACE AGGREGATE BASE. 4. GRAVEL SUBBASE SPECIFICATION: MARYLAND DOT: SECTION 304 GRADED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE VIRGINIA DHT: SECTION 210 AGGRGATE BASE COURSE LEASE AREA, ACCESS DRIVE 4 TURN AROUND AREA SURFACING SCALE: %2" = 1'-0" GATE POST 2V2" DIA (27ia" OD) 5GH 40 GALVANIZED STEEL, TYP 2"x2" CHAIN LINK FENCE CUTOUT FOR PAD LOOKS AND CHAIN CHAIN LINK BLACK OR DARK GREEN VINYL SCREENING STRIPS, TYP MALLEABLE IRON FORK TYPE LATCH WITH DROP BAR AND WITH PROVISION FOR PADLOCK (PAGE-WILSO t TYPE '75 DOUBLE GATE LATCH ASSEMBLY OR EQUAL) CONCRETE FOOTING, TYP 11/2" 14'-0" GATE OPENING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2 aUi W I- w v� 0 vz OILO L Q QLU O � z v _ 1 X X O — QI - O 0 O PROP VERIZON WIRELESS RECEIVER PROP VERIZON WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE, TYP PROP VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET, TYP "'?ON WIRELESS GENERATOR CONCRETE PAD ELEVATION M/ DIESEL GENERATOR SCALE: I/4" = 1'-0" CHAIN LINK TOP SELVAGE BARBED AND TWISTED BOTTOM SELVAGE KNUCKLED TIE WIRE BARBED WIRE, TYP BARBED GATE FRAME 1 1/4" DIA WIRE, TYP (15/a" OD) 5GH 40, TYP LINE POST, CLASS B RAILS, CLASS B STEEL TUBING, 2" DIA -'-'-'-'-'-' '--'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-' '-'- STEEL (2 5/5" OD) SCH 40 (TYP) '-' SCREENING TUBING, 11/4" DIA STRIPS, TYP 5GH 40 (TYP.) PAIR INDUSTRIAL O MALLEABLE IRON OFFSET FIN HINGE END POST, CLASS B w v (PAGE -WILSON STEEL TUBING, 2 1/2" DIA zz M-61250 OR (2 -I/5" OD) SGH 40 (TYP) EQUAL) cV w �0 -1 3 I/2" ELECTRICAL COPPER flfl1fl _______ _______ ___________________ ________________________________ BRA ID, TYP (SEE GROUNDING DETA I LS) � fiT 11/2"• \%\\\//\/i �\%��� i 2" MIN f(1 CLEARANCE GALVANIZED GATE CENTER STOP - 13 14' DOUBLE SNI NG GATE DIA WITH I/4 SLOTT, , I /a I_p" SHANK IN A 15/a" DIA SCALE: 3/a" = I' -O" PIPE SET IN CONCRETE TYPICAL WOVEN WIRE FENCE NOTES I. GATE POST, CORNER, TERMINAL OR PULL POST 2 1/2" DIA (2 7/3" OD) SCHEDULE 40 FOR GATE WIDTHS UP THRU 6 FEET OR 12 FEET FOR DOUBLE SWING GATE PER A5TM-FI063. 2. LINE POST: 2" DIA (2 3/8" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIOSS. 3. GATE FRAME: 1 1/4" DIA (I 5/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIOSS. 4. TOP RAIL t BRACE RAIL: 1 1/4" DIA (I 5/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIO63. 5. FABRIC: 9 GA. CORE WIRE SIZE, 2" MESH, CONFORMING TO ASTM-A36t2. 6. TIE WIRE: MINIMUM II GA. GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND RAILS, A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC, TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX. 24" INTERVALS. 7. TENSION WIRE: '7 GA. GALVANIZED STEEL. S. BARBED WIRE: DOUBLE STRAND 12-2 1/2" OD TWISTED WIRE TO MATCH WITH FABRIC, 14 GA. 4 PT. BARBS SPACED ON APPROXIMATELY 4" CENTERS. 9. GATE LATCH: I -3/b" OD PLUNGER ROD WITH MUSHROOM TYPE CATCH AND LOCK, KEYED ALIKE FOR ALL SITES IN A GIVEN MTA. 10. LOCAL ORDINANCE OF BARBED WIRE PERMIT REQUIREMENT SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, IF REQUIRED. TENSION WIRE U CONCRETE FOOTING (TYP) 10'-0" MAX 1'-0" CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL LINE POST TIES SCALE: 3/a" = I' -O" TYPICAL WOVEN WIRE FENCE NOTES I. GATE POST, CORNER, TERMINAL OR PULL POST 2 1/2" DIA (2 '7/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 FOR GATE WIDTHS UP THRU 6 FEET OR 12 FEET FOR DOUBLE SWING GATE PER ASTM-FIOb3. 2. LINE POST: 2" DIA (2 3/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIOb3. 3. GATE FRAME: 1 1/4" DIA (I 5/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIOSS. 4. TOP RAIL 8 BRACE RAIL: 1 1/4" DIA (I 5/5" OD) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM-FIOSS. 5. FABRIC: Q GA CORE WIRE SIZE, 2" MESH, CONFORMING TO ASTM-A31i2. S. TIE WIRE: MINIMUM II GA GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND RAILS, A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX 24" INTERVALS. 7. TENSION WIRE: 7 GA GALVANIZED STEEL. S. BARBED WIRE: DOUBLE STRAND 12-2 1/2" OD TWISTED WIRE TO MATCH WITH FABRIC, 14 GA. 4 PT BARBS SPACED ON APPROXIMATELY 4" CENTERS. Q. GATE LATCH: I -3/a" OD PLUNGER ROD WITH MUSHROOM TYPE CATCH AND LOOK, KEYED ALIKE FOR ALL SITES IN A GIVEN MTA. 10. LOCAL ORDINANCE OF BARBED WIRE PERMIT REQUIREMENT SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, IF REQUIRED. II. CHAINLINK FENCE SHALL INCLUDE VERTICAL PVC SCREENING SLATS, ALL SIDED. (COLOR: DARK GREEN OR BLACK) a 0 o a D o,Vao -o Q P 4N, 0 4 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil /S'tructural Engineers 1220-B East Joppa Rd, Suite 400K Towson, Maryland 21286 410-821-1690 410-821-1748 Fax PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 253O3, EXPIRATION DATE: O7/O7/2O26. a ul W Z ® L-IO zluv p(1 lu } V K �-I a U� � x N � REVISIONS: NO. DESCRIPTIONI DATE DESIGNED BY: BES DRAWN BY: GJS REVIEWED BY: BES PROJECT NO: 1 a847.O20 DATE: 01/ 16/2025 TITLE: Site Details SHEET: C-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 GA5E # (##-##-###) A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R 12.2 _JMA MXO6FHG865-HG PROP VERIZON MIRELE° RAD CENTER = I4O'-O"� FUTURE CARRIER SPACI RAD CENTER = 1 -f8' -O'± FUTURE CARRIER SPACI RAD CENTER = IS'-O'I FUTURE CARRIER SPACI RAD CENTER = 158'-O't PROP TI LLC MCI PROP TRANSF w/ BOLLL ARDSD5 ET PROP THE TOMERS FENCED COMPOUNI 5.5 SAMSUN& MT64I S--1-1 A EX GRADE VERIZON YM I RELESS ANTENNA DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 811 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROTECT YOURSELF, GIVE THREE WORKING DAYS NOTICE THIS DRAWING DOES NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 AND ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS THERE TO APPURTENANT. TOWER ELEVATION SCALE: I" = 15'-0" 0 15' 30' a 0 o a D o A V A o-/7 ° Q Q P 4N, 0 4 MORRIS & RITCHIE ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil /Structural Esigineera 1220-B East Joppa Ed, Suite 400K Towson, Maryland 21286 410-821-1690 410-821-1748 Fax PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS MERE PREPARED OR APPROVED BY ME, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAMS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, LICENSE NO. 233O3, EXPIRATION DATE: 01/0'7/2026. Q u1 � Q 4TWz __ 0)-)- ® zluv Q = ' � a 1 U � 0 N � (REVISIONS: N0. DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGNED BY: BES DRAWN BY: CJ5 REVIEWED BY: BES PROJECT NO: 1gS47.020 DATE: 01/ 16/2025 TITLE: Antenna Details & Elevation SHEET: C-3 1II 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 GA5E # (##-##-###) £TRI LEAF environmental architecture engineering 303 International Circle, Suite 150, Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030 - 410.853.7128 - www.trilea£com December 18, 2025 Washington County Historic District Commission 100 West Washington Street, Rm 2001 Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2430 Email: askplanning@washco-md.net RE: Arcola Towers — Whitehall / Trileaf Project # 770617 10944 White Hall Road, Smithsburg, MD 21783 Washington County, Funkstown Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 39° 36' 51.69" N, Longitude: 77° 38' 45.77" W To whom it may concern: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 187 -foot monopole communications tower with an overall height of 189 feet, including attachments. Associated equipment will be located within a 50 -foot by 50 -foot (2,500 square feet) fenced compound in an overall 75 -foot by 75 -foot (5,625 square feet) lease area. The project includes a 30 -foot wide access and utility easement extending southwest, then east away from the lease area approximately 0.16 miles toward White Hall Road. The proposed location is currently an agricultural field. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the NEPA review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853-7128 or email m.grasham@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, McKayla Ordak Assistant Project Manager 6a :; Site Location & Surrounding Properties 1:?JI4,Ihh4 ', L '-'' ✓! 14iw _ It �} 1 Site Location - - - - Easement Aerial Photographs (2023) Arcola Towers — Whitehall 10944 White Hall Road Smithsburg, MD 21783 a &TRILEAF environmental architecture engineering Funkstown Quadrangle, Maryland (2023) Contour Interval = 20 Feet Scale 1 Inch = -2,000 Feet Latitude: 39° 36' 51.69" N, Longitude: 77° 38' 45.77" W North A S *o O a � _ lN 0 Site Location o E9 ( Mouni Aetna 'V I) Site Vicinity Map Arcola Towers — Whitehall &TRILEAF 10944 White Hall Road environmental architecture engineering Smithsburg, MD 21783 ARCOLA TOWERS MD -003 WHITEHALL TOWERS 10944 WHITE HALL ROAD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 ■ 1 '�Zfln 187' MONOPOLE SITE INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK: 1. INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS MEASURES 2. CLEAR AND GRADE SITE TO FINAL SUBGRADE ELEVATION 3. INSTALL MONOPOLE FOUNDATION AND MONOPOLE 4. INSTALL GROUNDING, TELCO HANDHOLES, UTILITY WIREWAY 5. INSTALL ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE CONDUITS AND HANDHOLES 6. INSTALL FENCE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS rill PROPERTY INFORMATION: JURISDICTION: WASHINGTON COUNTY, MD ZONING: A(R) TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 18-013932 PARCEL AREA: 154.0000 ACRES PARCEL OWNER: MILLER, JAMES H & ELAINE K OWNER ADDRESS: 12290 SCOTT RD, WAYNESBORO, PA 17268 STRUCTURE TYPE: 187' MONOPOLE + 2' LIGHTNING ROD GROUND ELEVATION: 605.0' NAVD88 LATITUDE: N 39 36' 51.686" (N 39.614357) LONGITUDE: W 77' 38' 45.768" (W 77.646047) PROJECT TEAM ARCOLA TOWERS 112 W WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 201 APPLICANT: MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 (571) 895 3990 ENTREX COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD, SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 CAMILLE SHABSHAB (202) 408-0960 ROBIN WOOD Block Rock Golf Course VICINITY MAP JI I L V,1' A ETNA SCALE: 1" = 2,000' MAGNETIC NORTH TRUE NORTH 10..11. W CODE COMPLIANCE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. - 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE - 2021 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE - 2023 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE - 2018 NFPA 101 LIFE SAFETY CODE - AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE - AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION - ANSI/TIA-222-H SHEET INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET Z-1 SITE PLAN Z-2 ADJOINERS Z-3 PARTIAL SITE PLAN Z-4 COMPOUND PLAN & MONOPOLE ELEVATION Z-5 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Z-6 SITE DETAILS Z-7 SIGNAGE AND GATE DETAILS DRAWING APPROVALS SIGNATURE DATE OWNER REPRESENTATIVE SITE AQUISITION CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ZONING RF ENGINEER CALL UTILITIES NOTIFICATION MISS UTILITY \v\8ILPG 1-800-257-7777 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING \I/ entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 0,%arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: $& ' 'PS D. IQ ••4' , 17 6 :'• ����� Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T-1 Juc 10944 White Hall Black Rock SITE Golf Course VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2,000'-0" TRUE NORTH ZONING DRAWING NOTES MT AETNA 1. SITE NAME: ARCOLA TOWERS SITE - WHITEHALL 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY. 3. THE SUBJECT PARCEL INFORMATION; OWNER: MILLER, JAMES H. & ELAINE K. PREMISES ADDRESS: 10944 WHITE HALL ROAD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 12290 SCOTT ROAD WAYNESBORO, PA 17268 JURISDICTION: WASHINGTON COUNTY ACCOUNT NO.: 18-013932 PARCEL: 0322, DEED REF: 01652/00685 MAP 0050 GRID 0024 AREA: 154 ACRES 4. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED MONOPOLE IS AS FOLLOWS; THE VALUES LISTED BELOW ARE WITHIN ±50' HORIZONTAL AND ±20' VERTICAL. LATITUDE: ± N 39 36' 51.686" LONGITUDE: ± W 77' 38' 45.768" ELEVATION: 605.0' NAVD88 AT MONOPOLE BASE 5. THERE IS NO FLOODPLAIN ON THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION THE CURRENT FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MD, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER FOR THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION IS 24O43CO31OD, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 15, 2017. 6. THIS SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL CARTER SPECIAL PLANNING AREA, THE ANTIETAM OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT OR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONING DISTRICT 7. THE SITE IS LOCATED MORE THAN 389' FROM ANY EXISTING OFFSITE DWELLING, SCHOOL, CHURCH, OR INSTITUTION FOR HUMAN CARE. 8. THE CLOSEST EXISTING TOWER IS A 205' AMERICAN TOWERS SELF-SUPPORT TOWER, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1.75 MI SOUTH. 9. THERE ARE NO OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES WITHIN TWO TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER. 10. NO WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DEFINED AND ANY AREAS SHOWN AS MARSH, PONDS OR DITCHES ARE DONE SO FROM VISIBLE SURFACE FEATURES AND IN NO WAY CONSTITUTE A DEFINED WETLAND. EXISTING HEAVY MATURE VEGETATION WILL BE UTILIZED IN LIEU OF NEW LANDSCAPING. MONOPOLE SETBACKS REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT YARD (SOUTHEAST) 187' 590.1' REAR YARD (NORTHWEST) 187' 2150.4' SIDE YARD (SOUTHWEST) 187' 281.2' SIDE YARD (NORTHEAST) 187' 2181.2' CLOSEST OFF SITE RESIDENCE 187' 703.9' COMPOUND SETBACKS REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT YARD (SOUTHEAST) 50' 549.8' REAR YARD (NORTHWEST) 50' 21282' SIDE YARD (SOUTHWEST) 50' 256.7' SIDE YARD (NORTHEAST) 50' 2173.2' / \ /. / \ /. / / \ / / / O / / \ 6030 Q 18 00 !.y S0. C / ACCOUNT ID. 18-013932 MILLER, JAMES H. & ELAINE K. DEED REF: 01652/00685 MAP 005C PARCEL 0 LAND ARE Y/\ o / __ EXISTING FARM FIELI A•oo�, ' 215 2128.2 LATIT LONGITU] ELEVATION: 605.0' 469.4' i i /. \ \ i 4 7.77.77.77 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"= 200' Z-1 TRUE NORTH 3oo�o"w 0 LINE TYPES PROPERTY LINE RIGHT OF WAY BOUNDARY EDGE OF ASPHALT - - - EDGE OF CONCRETE 0 FOUND PROPERTY CORNER Q BENCH MARKS Op UTILITY POLE SIGN xx LIGHT POLE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft. unarrilu L.ALL 200 0 100 200 400 \ \ \ `I/ 0 entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola I TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: F . Sy9��,Gd iQ yi . Ci'i;q,j �. nnl Professional Certlflcaton. I hereby ce► I 'that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that lam a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-1 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 1. ACCOUNT ID: 18-019493 N/F DRB GROUP MID -ATLANTIC LLC PARCEL ADDRESS: 11301 BOVEY LN SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 2099 GAITHER RD STE ROCKVILLE, MD 20850 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0017/0309 DEED BOOK 06871 PAGE 00421 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RT AREA: 153.45 AC 2. ACCOUNT ID: 18-002264 N/F 600 TOOTHMAN RONALD G & TOOTHMAN COLLEEN M PARCEL ADDRESS: 11350 KIEFFER FUNK RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 185 CHEWSVILLE, MD 21721 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0051/0018/0307 DEED BOOK 000787 PAGE 00975 USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 22.4 AC 3. ACCOUNT ID: 18-009315 N/F MARTIN NATHAN R & MARTIN REBECCA PARCEL ADDRESS: 11219 KIEFFER FUNK RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 11131 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0051/0018/0306 DEED BOOK 02887 PAGE 00635 USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 145.63 AC SUBJECT PARCEL ACCOUNT ID: 18-013932 N/F MILLER, JAMES H. & ELAINE K. PARCEL ADDRESS: 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21738 MAILING ADDRESS: 12290 SCOTT ROAD WAYNESBORO, PA 17268 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0024/0322 DEED BOOK 01652 PAGE 00685 USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 154.00 AC 4. ACCOUNT ID: 18-042347 N/F RIDENOUR HAROLD E JR L/E & RIDENOUR PEGGY J L/E PARCEL ADDRESS: 11047 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 11047 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0051/0019/0718 DEED BOOK 07072 PAGE 00360 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 1.69 AC 5. ACCOUNT ID:18-017121 N/F RIDENOUR DAVID MATTHEW & RIDENOUR BETHANY DIANE PARCEL ADDRESS: 11035 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 11035 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0024/0323 DEED BOOK 06201 PAGE 00420 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 1.77 AC ACCOUNT ID: 18-018195 N/F SCRIVENER THOMAS F PARCEL ADDRESS: 10901 WHITE HALL SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 10901 WHITE HALL SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0051/0019/0061 DEED BOOK 00509 PAGE 00499 USE: AGRICULTURAL ONING: A(R) AREA: 120.51 AC RD 7. ACCOUNT ID: 18-040344 N/F SCRIVENNER JOHN T & SCRIVENER LISA M PARCEL ADDRESS: 11005 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 11005 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0024/1699 DEED BOOK 01225 PAGE 00203 USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 15.7 AC 8. ACCOUNT ID: 18-014831 N/F NEEDY PAUL E PARCEL ADDRESS: 10863 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 10863 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0024/0324 DEED BOOK 03779 PAGE 00209 USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 8.41 AC 9. ACCOUNT ID: 18-040387 N/F FERGUSON MICHAEL T & FERGUSON LISA ANN PARCEL ADDRESS: 10853 WHITE HALL RD RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 10849 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0024/1703 DEED BOOK 01414 PAGE 00755 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 1.48 AC 10. ACCOUNT ID: 18-028328 N/F FERGUSON MICHAEL T & FERGUSON LISA A PARCEL ADDRESS: 10849 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAILING ADDRESS: 10849 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG MD 21783 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0024/1649 DEED BOOK 01072 PAGE 01021 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 40,336 SF 11. ACCOUNT ID: 16-008664 N/F PRYOR DAVID ET AL & PRYOR KENNETH PARCEL ADDRESS: MT AETNA RD HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 MAILING ADDRESS: 20615 MT AETNA HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0023/0001 DEED BOOK 06275 PAGE 00017 USE: AGRICULTURAL ZONING: A(R) AREA: 70.29 AC 12. ACCOUNT ID: 18-019507 N/F DRB GROUP MID -ATLANTIC LLC PARCEL ADDRESS: MT AETNA RD HAGERSTOWN MD 21742 MAILING ADDRESS: 2099 GAITHER RD STE ROCKVILLE, MD 20850 MAP/GRID/PARCEL: 0050/0023/0321 DEED BOOK 07544 PAGE 00155 USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: RT AREA: 63.97 AC 600 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: /,17 i�ii►���� ���`�� Professional CerNflcadon. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 ■ � a. aaaa� � GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: ADJOINERS SHEET NUMBER: Z-2 GRAPHIC SCALE PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"= 20' Z-3 TRUE NORTH 0 10 Z0 40 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: `�\\II I I I ````���0Mg≥hh' Professional CesVflcadon. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: PARTIAL SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-3 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. DESIGN NOTES 1. PROPOSED ANTENNA, ANTENNAS ARRAYS, CABLES, AND OTHER MONOPOLE ATTACHMENTS WILL BE PAINTED GRAY TO BETTER BLEND WITH GALVANIZED METAL MONOPOLE AND FURTHER MINIMIZE THE VISUAL IMPACT. 2. THERE IS NO ILLUMINATION PROPOSED FOR THE MONOPOLE. 50'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 2' LIGHTNING ROD TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD TOP OF MONOPOLE w FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA RAD CENTER 0 PROPOSED COMPOUND SURFACING, SEE 2/Z-6 C) r1 rn r1 rr I I I I I I I I II II II II I FUTURE ANTENNA CENTERLINE -4 k==l 4 k==4 x -•x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x —x, —x —x. —x —x —x. -x —.x —x-_ II II II II Ix x II I I II I Q I LJ LJ LJ LJ I I II II II II _____ I i i i i i i i i FUTURE ANTENNA CENTERLINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I......... .... I I I I .. 1 � k==� d k==� x II II II II II 11 11 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LJ LJ LJ LJ I I I I I rl rl r, r, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FUTURE ANTENNA CENTERLINE x I I x I I I I I 11 11 11 11 x I x 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 x I I x LJ LJ LJ LJ I I I ri r� ri ri 11 11 11 11 x I I I x ii ii ii ii FUTURE ANTENNA CENTERLINE FUTURE ARRIER I i I I i i i i i i I FUTURE VERIZON WIRELESS L j FUTURE CARRIER I 10'x15 L ASE AREA I ;12' -6"x21' -O" o J LL J J L 1 3 -0 _ I I I 4 -6 LEASE AREA 3'_0°° _ N 12 x20 LEASE AREA 5'-0 x I I I 1 I FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNAS, I I I I I ' I I TYPICAL I I I I I ' I x I I LJ ; I I I x x I I 1 x I I 1 L--------- -----� I I © ; . I ,: L-------------------------------� I rI MONOPOLE r------------------------� i I I PROPOSED 187' I I x PROPOSED 187' MONOPOLE I I x MONOPOLE o I I I I C14 I I I I I I I FUTURE CARRIER I [ I I I I 10'x20' LEASE AREA I 10 FUTURE CARRIER I I I I �, I I 12'x20' LEASE AREA I I I I N - I I I I I HH I I I I I I ml I I I I I I iI I L ---------------------------I i I I i i I I i I I PROPOSED 2' x 2' I. I I TELCO VAULTS x I I PROPOSED ARCOLA x. . METER CENTER & TELCO L---------------------- BACKBOARD, SEE 1 /Z-6 I x. --� x x __ En __ x -x -x -x x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x PROPOSED 8' CHAIN LINK I PROPOSED 8'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE, SEE 4/Z-6 FENCE WITH 1'-0" BARBED WIRE 12' GATE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED 10' ACCESS ROAD COMPOUND PLAN WITH TURNAROUND, SEE 3/Z-6 I o 00 GROUND ELEVATION EL. ±805.0' (Th MONOPOLE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=l' -O" Z-4 SCALE: 3/32"=l' -O" Z-4 TRUE NORTH 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: . Si Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared orapproved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 ■ � a. aaaa� � GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN & MONOPOLE ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: Z-4 AREA TABULATION ARCOLA TOWERS 50' x 50' / - -� )� FENCED EQUIPMENT COMPOUND + EXISTING ROCKS o INSIDE A 75' x 75' LEASE (TYPICAL) / SITE AREA: 154.0 AC AREA DETAIL 31 - TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 22 - SILT FENCE / + / 10' 36' MINIMUM LENGTH FENCE POST, MAXIMUM CENTER TO CENTER DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16' INTO DISTURBED AREA: 7,390 SF GROUND ' EXISTING LIVE STOCK / FENCE (TYPICAL) + 55.4 I // / LEGEND ............... NOTE ALL PROTECTIVE FENCING SHRUBS . ( SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE SNOW FENCE �o ( � TREE DRIPLINE `r 16' GEOTEXTILEMCLASSHF OF / \ + / / " / ` \ I I I 8" MINIMUM DEPTH IN GROUND O FOUND PROPERTY CORNER Q BENCH MARKS / / TEMPORARY MEASURES FLOW FLOW +/ °�\ $ UTILITY POLE / / \ / + + \O -p SIGN + / < / / +\ \ y y y y y NOTE: ALL PROTECTIVE MEASURES y y 1 FENCING EXTEND THE y PERSPECTIVE VIEW 36' MINIMUM FENCE - POST LENGTH EXISTING TREE /FILTER \ l TREESHALL DRIPLINEBEYOND CLOTH FENCE POST SECTION LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN / °�\/� iv / // ` / / / +� /// PERMANEENTTEMPORARMEASY URES J 20' ABOVE FLOW GROUND UNDISTURBED GROUND TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TP / L / \ / / / / / / / ` / EMBED GEOTEXTILE CLASS F TOP VIEW A MINIMUM OF 8' VERTICALLYiJI FENCE POST DRIVEN A INDIVIDUAL TREE - DECIDUOUS ° \/ ` ORIGINAL `1 y y yyy INTO THE GROUND MINIMUM OF 16' INTO POSTS THE GROUND / GRADE y y y y y y CE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE + O� l / / \ yy yyy FINAL SECTION B CROSS SECTION / \ _ GRADE :::: _ SECTION A �� STAPLE \ /O ) / Q \ b / / F \ / - _ _ _ ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE : _ GRADE - STANDARD SYMBOL STAPLE + \ + / / +\ FILL AREAS CUT AREAS JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT �sF� FENCE SECTIONS \ +/OD / / / Construction Specifications / / / 1. Fence posts shall be a minimum of 36' long driven 16' minimum into the Wood shall be 11/2' x 11/2' square (minimum) cut, or 13/4' diameter +/ / \ ground. posts (minimum) round and shall be of sound quality hardwood. Steel posts will be / / /� / standard T or U section weighting not less than 1.00 pond per linear foot. + / p if �° 2. Geotextile fastened to fence ties / + / / WWW WELL � #ANDFILL shall be securel each y post with wire or staples at top and mid -section and shall meet the following requirements / / for Geotextile Class F: O / / ^ / / O Tensile Strength 50 lbs/in( min.) Test: MSMT 509 Tensile Modulus 20 lbs/in (min.) Test: MSMT 509 + CUT FI� Flow Rate 0.3 gal ft`/ minute (max.) Test: MSMT 322 Filtering Efficiency 757.(min.) Test: MSMT 322 FILL PROPOSED SILT FENCE ON E RETAINING WALL 3. Where ends of geotexttle fabric come together, they shall be overlapped, folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass. ALL DOWN SLOPES (TYP.) + / / SEE DETAIL 2/Z-4 IMPROPER PROCEDURE PROPER PROCEDURE 4. S t l t Fence shall be inspected after each rainfall event and maintained when EXISTING RESIDENTIAL / I bulges occur or when sediment accumulation reached 507. of the fabric height. TRAILER / I ° U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE E - 15 - 3 WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION + O d / \ I SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE G - 23 - 3 WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION + J C \ TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL SILT FENCE DETAIL +/ EXISTING TREE \ 2 3 PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, TOTAL � / TO REMAIN SCALE: N.T.S. Z-5 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-5 DISTURBED AREA / / = 7,390 SF. / \d° / / / PROPOSED 12' WIDE / / \ / PROPOSED 10' WIDE SWING GATE IN `° DETAIL 24 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE k EXISTING FENCE (TYP) AND PARKING AND 3' MOUNTABLE / d° / TURN AROUND \ /� BERM (6' MIN. ) 50' MINIMUM / / / / u / PAVEMENT EAR FILL GEOTEXTILE CLASS 'C' �� \ \ ° AS PIPE AS NECESSARY MINIMUM 6' OF 2'-3' AGGREGATE EXISTING GROUND OVER LENGTH AND WIDTH OF STRUCTURE C E PROFILE EXISTING GRASS / AREA (TYPICAL) ■ 50' MINIMUM LENGTH T PROPOSED STABILIZED 1 ta' MIN. EXISTING +\ `� +\ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TRANSFORMER + + \+\ EXISTING / +\ 1010' MIN. PAVEMENT WILTMINIMUM IN\ �,°� \+\ + �� \ + / \ \+ PLAN VIEW 11W, MIN. STANDARD SYMBOL 1 EXISTING FENCE i / (TYPICAL) \ + hC'\ \ + Construction Specification / p��0 EXISTING LIVE STOCK \+ `� 1. Length - minimum of 50' ()K3O' for single residence lot) . EXISTING PROPERTYJ +\ FENCE (TYPICAL) LINE (TYPICAL) \+ 2. Width - 10' minimum, should be flared at the existing road to provide a turning +\ radius. \+ 595' \ 3. Geotextile fabric (fitter cloth) shall be placed over the existing ground prior EXISTING ACCESS N \ + -`- to placing stone. wwThe plan approval authority may not require single family DRIVE (TYPICAL) \ \ residences to use geotexttle. Njg��\+ 4. Stone - crushed aggregate (2' to 3') or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent shall be placed at (east 6' deep over the length and width of the Ss. \ / + entrance. \+ \ + — \ 5. Surface Water - all surface water flowing to or diverted toward construction entrances shall be piped through the entrance, maintaining positive drainage. Pipe 5 93, + + \ \ installed through the stabilized construction entrance shall be protected with a + + 60. / mountable berm with 5:1 slopes and a minimum of 6' of stone over the pipe. Pipe has \ \ to be sized according to the drainage. When the SCE is located at a high spot and + \ has no drainage to convey a pipe will not be necessary. Pipe should be sized \ + according to the amount of runoff to be conveyed. A 6' minimum will be required. \ / 592' J \ + \ 6. Location - A stabilized construction entrance shall be located at every point where construction traffic enters or leaves a construction site. Vehicles leaving the site must travel over the entire length of the stabilized construction entrance. N\ + +\ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE F - 17 - 3 WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN , STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL SCALE: 1"= 20' Z-5 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-5 TRUE NORTH \I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: ■- �■ _ /,17 l�ii►111� ������ Professional Cartlficadon. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Z-5 -„ 5'-0„ 5'-0 NEW 3"� SCH 40 PIPE (GALV) I WITH PIPE CAP, TYPICAL I I w O LiJ N COMPOUND FENCE, - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SEE PLAN 6" OF CRUSHER RUN /ABC I I \--NEW 10'-0" ACCESS ROAD P1000 STEEL UNISTRUT, LIMIT OF 6" (TYP.) 11'-0" LONG W/ 1/2"� GALV. #57 STONE SURFACING STEEL U -BOLTS AND LOCK EXISTING MATCH EXISTING WASHERS (TYP.) GRADE NEW PIER, TYPICALCONCRETE • /� / GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI FINISH GRADE I I r\\ r\\ rte\\\ MIRAFI 500X COMPACT SUBGRADE AND 500X OR APPROVED EQUAL .�• SURFACING TO 95% MAX. COMPACTED SUBGRADE ` I I ` I I ` I I DRY DENSITY TO PRODUCE SEE NOTES C` .I : I - III�� AN UNYIELDING SURFACE II 'II�<I c, LI lil. <. II III r =I - II I I =I •I I '. H -I l I ..I .. -I l _ I I . - ACCESS ROAD: - I I <. ` ' I -I I I= <. ' I I- _ < ` ' I L -III FILL, UNDERCUT AND COMPACT TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD UP I I. , I- I I -I I I I I II. I I\ TO 6" BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLACE MIRAFI, 50OX STABILIZATION IL / I I L L / I I L ' L / I I f I I I < I I. < I I I L< COMPOUND AREA SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. REMOVE UNSUITABLE LOOSE OR SOFT SOIL NOTE: FABRIC ON SUBGRADE. PULL TIGHT AND STAKE IN PLACE. PLACE AND COMPACT 6" DEPTH OF CRUSHER RUN/ABC TO FINISH GRADE - - -I -III �I �� III� I ORGANIC MATERIAL OR RUBBLE TO FIRM GRADE. FILL UNDERCUT AND COMPACT UP TO 6"�' �I 11-I'. FINISH GRADE. PLACE A MIRAFI 50OX SOIL STABILIZATION FABRIC ON SUBGRADE. _BELOW __..LL I I I l I FILL WITH 6" OF AASHTO 57 STONE TO FINISH GRADE. COMPACTION NOTES: } - = _ -1 I I I � ���IIIII- III III II �� ��� ��� ���- 1. SURFACE COURSE AND BASE COURSE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98% MAX. DRY DENSITY -III STANDARD PROCTOR. 2. SUBGRADE SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAX. DRY DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR. 1'-6"0 TYP. FRONT ELEVATION UTILITY FRAME DETAIL , COMPOUND SURFACING DETAIL 2 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL 3 SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" Z-6 SCALE: 1"=1'-0" Z-6 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-6 3 5 13 12 15 11 16 8'-0" 12'-0" T-0" MAX. 8 2 00 4 10 14 9 COMPOUND GRADE 56 � :. \\j\\j\\jam\\j . I I .. \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ � I. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ <• II \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ i f \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Q !H2 I I. / �I I Y.1GATE CENTER STOP I 10"I 12" 24"REFERENCE I I NOTES: ---I ---I - --I24" I ---I GENERAL NOTES: OGATE POST: 6" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. CORNER, END OR PULL POST: 4" NOMINAL SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. 9 3/8" DIAGONAL ROD WITH GALVANIZED STEEL TURNBUCKLE OR DIAGONAL THREADED ROD. 1. INSTALL FENCING PER ASTM F-567 O2 LINE POST: 3" SCHEDULE 40 PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. LINE 2. INSTALL SWING GATES PER ASTM F-900 POSTS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AT MAXIMUM 6'-O" O.C. 10 FENCE CORNER POST BRACE: 1 5/8" DIA. 3. FENCE PIPE AND COMPONENTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. EACH CORNER EACH WAY. O3 TOP RAIL & BRACE RAIL: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. 4. GATE FRAMES SHALL BE WELDED. 11 WELDING SHALL BE COATED WITH (3) COATS O4 FABRIC: 9 GA CORE WIRE SIZE 2" GATE FRAME: 1 1/2" PIPE, PER ASTM-F1083. MESH, CONFORMING TO OF COLD GALV. (OR EQUAL). ASTM-A392. 12 NOT USED 5. POSTS SHALL HAVE END -CAPS. O6. GATES SHALL HAVE LOCKING HARDWARE. TIE WIRE: MINIMUM 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND 13 NOT USED 7. PROVIDE GATE STOPS TO SECURE GATES IN OPEN O RAILS A SINGLE WRAP OF FABRIC TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE POSITION. BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX. 24" INTERVALS. 14 GATE FRAME BRACE: 1 5/8" DIAMETER. TENSION WIRE: 9 GA. GALVANIZED STEEL. 15 CENTER GATE STOP O7 NOT USED 16 BARBED WIRE: DOUBLE STRAND 12-1/2" O.D. TWISTED WIRE TO MATCH WITH FABRIC 14 GA, 4 PT. BARBS SPACED ON O8 STRETCHER BAR. APPROXIMATELY 5" CENTERS. GALVANIZED STEEL FENCE AND GATE DETAIL 4 SCALE: NTS Z-6 'F, • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: '- //,717\J Professional Certification. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared orapproved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of Me State of Maryland, License No.17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SITE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: Z-6 SITE SIGNAGE DETAILS arcola TOWERS WHITE BACK GROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING I BLUE BACKGROUND ORANGE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING (SITE ID SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 SF) W/ WHITE LETTERING IN CASE OF EMERGENCY ORANGE BACKGROUND CALL: XXX—XXX—XXXX XXXX W/ BLACK LETTERING ` • SITE: XXXX WHITE BACKGROUND W/ BLACK LETTERING Beyond this point: WHITE BACKGROUND FCC NO. XXXXXXX adi. icyft.td. b.yond this po1M .xe..d the FCC psnwel pubNe exposure 1"t. 12'W X 18"H Radio frequency fields at W/ BLACK LETTERING this site exceed the FCC rules for human exposure. 12'W X 18"H OMy .. posted slNw .eN .M. �vMnllnrh W/ BLACK LETTERING LOCATE AT BASE OF TOWER lnlun to,M,. oF.a. rn0 Mr 4M41 LO /or blrAn[ n r1AO MW 1n:r rnANMMIIJ foal[ LEASING: XXX—XXX—XXXX LOCATE ON FRONT OF GATE • -M M.._ ^�'^�"'"•n�'� MARKETING I ID SIGN , RF NOTICE SIGN 3 RF WARNING SIGN SCALE: N.T.S. Z-7 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-7 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-7 0 NOTICE Ax WHITE BACKGROUND N0 W/ RED LETTERING 18"H X 24"W iQALL PERSONNEL SHOULD HAVE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) AWARENESS TRAINING. 0 ALL PERSONNEL ENTERING THIS SITE SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED. ORANGE BACKGROUND TRESPASSING0 OBEY ALL POSTED SIGNS. w / BLACK LETTERING ASSUME ALL ANTENNAS ARE ACTIVE iQ BEFORE WORKING ON ANTENNAS, NOTIFY OWNERS AND DISABLE APPROPRIATE TRANSMITTERS. 1 2"W X 18"I IHI I 0 MAINTAIN MINIMUM 3 FEET CLEARANCE FROM ALL ANTENNAS. DO NOT STOP IN FRONT OF ANTENNAS. RUSE VIOLATORS PERSONAL RF MONITORS WHILE WORKING NEAR ANTENNAS. WILL BE PROSECUTED NEVER OPERATE TRANSMITTERS WITHOUT SHIELDS DURING NORMAL OPERATION. D DO NOT OPERATE BASE STATION ANTENNAS IN EQUIPMENT ROOM. NO TRESPASSING SIGN 2 RF NOTICE SIGN 2 4 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-7 SCALE: N.T.S. Z-7 16'-0" IOH HINGE, BY FREDERICK 8' STANDARD FARM GATE 3/16" THICK CAP FENCE CO., OR APPROVE EQUAL, TYP. SEE SPECIFICATIONS, BELOW PLATE SEAL WELD M 3 1/2" SCH 40 PIPE (4" O.D.) (U I 1 I o I I ° ° GRADE ///>.q4 •° a , . ° \j\\ \\ GRAVEL ROAD /// ° I /\/\ \\ \\\\ 19 GA, 1 5/8 ROUND TUBING OR BETTER, WELDED \\\\\ � I24" DIA. 4'—O,f �/> x CONCRETE PIER (TYP.) 1 /\ ><, H:; I /�\\ 9x9"x1 /4" PL WELD /\//\ \//\//\/ M NOTES: 12„ 1. GALVANIZE ALL MATERIAL AFTER FABRICATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM-A53, ASTM-B633, ASTM-A392. 2. GATES SHALL BE CHAINED AND LOCKED TOGETHER WITH VZW COMBINATION LOCK. 3. USE SOCKEL AND GUDGEON PIN HINGES FASTENED TO STEEL PIPE SET IN CONCRETE AS NOTED. 4. WELDED STEEL PROOF COIL CHAIN 1/4" GRADE 80 CUT TO LENGTH. GATE DETAIL SCALE: NTS Z-7 \I/ • entrex communication services, inc. 6100 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 430 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 PHONE: (202) 408-0960 arcola TOWERS 112 N. WASHINGTON ST SUITE 201 MIDDLEBURG, VA 20117 PHONE: (571) 895 3990 ARCOLA TOWERS WHITEHALL 10944 WHITE HALL RD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SEAL: 1111///%, '- //,717\J Professional Cartificedon. I hereby certify that these documents were prepared or approved by me, and that I am a duty licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Maryland, License No. 17641, Expiration Date: 12/27/2025 SUBMITTALS DATE DESCRIPTION REV. 09-09-25 ZONING REVIEW A 09-24-25 ZONING REVIEW B 10-08-25 ZONING REVIEW C 10-14-25 ZONING 1 PROJECT NO: 1164.015 DESIGNER: R.S. ENGINEER: C.S. THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36" 0 1/2 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN INCHES SHEET TITLE: SIGNAGE DETAILS AND GATE DETAIL SHEET NUMBER: Z-7 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION December 2, 2025 Ms. Elizabeth Hughes State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032-2023 Dear Ms. Hughes: Introduction and Project Description Wes Moore Governor Aruna Miller Lieutenant Governor Samantha J. Biddle Acting Secretary William Pines, P.E. Administrator This letter serves to inform the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) of the finding by the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (SHA), on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), that there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed Project No. WA468C21, I-70 Bridge Nos. 2109403 and 2109404 over Licking Creek and Bridge No. 2109300 on US 40 Ramp, in Washington County. The proposed work includes removal of the existing steel beam bridges and the construction of new, wider steel beam bridges for Bridge Nos. 2109403, 2109404, and 2109300. Stormwater management measures will be constructed throughout the limits of the project. The work also includes widening and resurfacing of the approach roadways and portions of westbound and eastbound I-70 bridges over Licking Creek, as well as along the ramp and bridge from I-70 eastbound to US 40 crossing I-70 westbound. Additionally, it involves utility relocation, pipe replacement and stormwater management, the placement of traffic barriers, signage, and pavement markings. All work would take place within existing SHA right-of-way (ROW). A location map is included as Attachment 1. Project plans are included as Attachment 2. Note that these plans are draft and are subject to change. These plans constitute an interagency/intra-agency deliberative communication that is not for public disclosure under the Annotated Code of Maryland, General Provisions Article § 4- 344 (Maryland Public Information Act). Funding Federal funds are anticipated for this project. 707 North Calvert St., Baltimore, MD 21202 1 410.545.8500 1 1.800.323.0502 1 Maryland Relay TTY 800.735.2258 1 roads.maryland.gov Ms. Elizabeth Hughes Page Two Area of Potential Effects In determining the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for this project, SHA considered the ways in which the undertaking may cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, should such properties exist, that could diminish the integrity of those characteristics that would qualify a property for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The project involves replacement of I-70 Bridge Nos. 2109403, 2109404, and 2109300 within existing ROW south of Pecktonville in Washington County. The project also includes traffic barriers, resurfacing, and stormwater management along I-70 and within the median. The steel girder dual bridge, crossing Licking Creek, and the US 40 ramp bridge are bordered by trees, partially screening them from view. The area surrounding the bridge includes scattered buildings and agricultural fields and retains a rural character. Although wider and longer, the replacement dual bridge and ramp bridge will be constructed along the same alignments and at similar elevations to the originals, maintaining the existing visual appearance. Construction is anticipated to occur within existing SHA ROW. The APE is therefore defined as the limits of direct construction disturbance for the proposed bridge replacement, as indicated on the attached map within the USGS quadrangle for Cherry Run (Attachment 3). The archaeology survey area is defined as the worst -case limits of disturbance (LOD) and is coterminous with the APE. Identification Methods and Results Potentially significant architectural and archaeological resources were both researched as part of the historic properties investigation for the proposed structure repairs. Architecture: SHA Consultant Architectural Historian Matt Manning examined the State of Maryland GIS Cultural Resources Database, the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP), and Google Street View to identify architectural historic properties within the APE. Bridge Nos. 2109403, 2109404, and 2109300 are part of I-70 and are exempt from Section 106 requirements under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Exemption Regarding Historic Preservation Review Process for Effects to the Interstate Highway System (Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 46). No other architectural resources are present within the APE; the C&O Canal National Historical Park (WA -VI -048) is immediately south of the project area but outside the APE. SHA has determined the project will not affect architectural historic properties. Archaeology: SHA Senior Archaeologist Richard Ervin assessed the archaeological potential of the survey area based on review of the SHA GIS Cultural Resources Database, historic maps, USGS mapping, aerial imagery, and SCS soil survey data. No field visit was made based on the availability of information about the survey area. Ms. Elizabeth Hughes Page Three The APE is largely unexamined for archaeology, and no sites are recorded in the survey area, which has been disturbed by construction of the existing interstate highway and bridges. However, there are a number of sites recorded in the immediate vicinity. Soils in the immediate vicinity of the I-70 bridges over Licking Creek are mapped as Opequon-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes, and occasionally flooded Philo gravelly sandy loam, settings where significant archaeological sites are considered unlikely to occur. Soils on the approach roads include gently sloping Downsville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes and Monongahela gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, where sites are recorded in the vicinity of the survey area. Plans dated August 2025 indicate that the LOD is confined to previously disturbed SHA ROW. Archaeological sites in proximity to but outside the APE include 18WA10 (Late Archaic/ Transitional base camp or village), which has been partially disturbed and paved over by a parking area and storage bins associated with a salt barn. No work is proposed within the site boundary, and site 18WA10 would not be impacted by the project. Site 18WA171 (prehistoric lithic scatter) has been marginally impacted by what appears to be another SHA facility, although the site appears to be largely outside the footprint of that facility. Site 18WA171 would not be impacted by the proposed project. Based on prior disturbance, the project as designed would not impact significant archaeological resources, and no further archaeological work is warranted. Project plans will be monitored to ensure that there are no impacts to archaeological sites 18WA10 or 18WA171. Review Request Please examine the attached maps and plans. We request your concurrence by January 5, 2025, that there would be no historic properties affected by the I-70 Replacement of Bridge Nos. 2109403, 2109404, and 2109300 in Washington County. By electronic copy, we invite the Washington County Department of Planning and Zoning/ Historic District Commission and the Washington County Historical Trust, Inc., to provide comments and participate in the Section 106 process. Pursuant to the requirements of the implementing regulations found at 36 CFR Part 800, SHA seeks their assistance in identifying historic preservation issues as they relate to this specific project (see 36 CFR §800.2[c][3] and [5], and §800.3[f] for information regarding the identification and participation of consulting parties, and §800.4, and §800.5 regarding the identification of historic properties and assessment of effects). For additional information regarding the Section 106 regulations, see the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's website, www.achp.gov, or contact SHA or MHT. If no response is received by January 5, 2025, we will assume that these offices decline to participate. SHA will also assume concurrence by MHT with the finding of No Properties Affected if no response is received within 30 days following receipt of this letter. Please call Matt Manning at 410-545-8560 (or email at MManning@mdot.maryland.gov) with questions regarding Ms. Elizabeth Hughes Page Four architectural history for this project. Richard Ervin may be reached at 410-545-2878 (or via email at RErvin@mdot.maryland.gov) with concerns regarding archaeology. Sincerely, Digitally signed by Steve Archer Adob e Acrobat version: 2025.001.20813 Steve Archer Assistant Division Chief Environmental Planning Division Attachments cc: Ms. Meghan Jenkins, Staff to Washington County Department of Planning and Zoning/ Washington County Historic District Commission Ms. Pat Schooley, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. Ms. Irene Enweze, Environmental Manager, SHA- EPLD Mr. Richard Ervin, Archaeologist, SHA-EPLD Mr. Matt Manning, Architectural Historian, SHA-EPLD �• f Y �* � 9 Project Location, Bridge MG. 2109300 ,ham --f ■ , 4 'I ____ ** I_._ •1 Project Location, Bridge Nos. 2109403 & 2109404, I', - J Project Location Map - Attachment 1 1-70 Br 2109403 & 2109404 over Licking Creek Topo Quad: CHERRY RUN MARYLANODEPARTMENT & US 40 Br 2109300 County: Washington OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY WA468C21 Scale: 1:7,000 N ADMINISTRATION MAPEL ID: WA4681 Coordinates: 78.0464704°W 39.6518296°N 11/14/2025 0 315 630 1,260 Feet Note: Project location is approximate. I I I I I II Attachment 3: APE Map r-► U or ruye r�eua. L r UU4v,) a c r U '+u4+ over Liur li ry .r eer% Legend ® Project Area Archaeological Surveys MHT Preservation Easements NHL Properties Q National Register of Historic Places 0 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties C&O Canal National Historical Park (WA -V1-018) USGS 7.5' Quadrangle - Cherry Run 1:12,000 Wester et al., 1981 ri Washington County C APE IL/ZULU hCo MD, West Virginia GIS, Es��Garmin, INCREMENT P, Intermap, ETI/NASA, EPA, USDA 0 0.1 0.2 Miles N Il I A Concurrence with the MDOT State Highway Administration's Determination(s) of Eligibility and/or Effects Project Number: WA468C21 MHT Log No. Project Name: I-70 Bridge Nos. 2109403 and 2109404 over Licking Creek and Bridge No. 2109300 on US 40 Ramp County: Washington Letter Date: December 2, 2025 The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the documentation attached to the referenced letter and concurs with the MDOT State Highway Administration's determinations as follows: Effect: [ ] No Properties Affected [ ] No Adverse Effect [ ] Conditioned upon the following action(s) (see comments below) [ ] Adverse Effect Comments: MD State Historic Preservation Office/ Date Maryland Historical Trust Return by U.S. Mail or Facsimile to: Mr. Steve Archer, Assistant Division Chief, Environmental Planning Division, MDOT State Highway Administration, P.O. Box 717, Baltimore, MD 21203-0717 Telephone: 410-545-8870 and Facsimile: 410-209-5046 Master No. 15123 cc: Enweze Ervin Manning U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Chief Readiness Support Officer Springfield, VA 20598-0075 Homeland NUM50 Security January 12, 2026 Mr. Lloyd Yavener, Chairperson Historic District Commission Washington County Planning and Zoning Department 747 Northern Ave. Hagerstown, MD 21742 Phone: (240) 313-2430 Email: askplanning@washco-md.net New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740; Initiation of Consultation and Finding of No Historic Properties Affected Dear Mr. Yavener: This letter is provided to initiate consultation on a proposed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) undertaking subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in Hagerstown, Maryland (Figures 1-4). ICE is proposing to purchase, occupy and rehabilitate a 53.74 -acre warehouse property in support of ICE operations. Proposed site improvements may include, but are not limited to, installing, upgrading, or rehabilitating existing parking areas, fencing, site lighting, landscaping, drainage/stormwater, recreation areas, and cameras. Tentage and a guard shack may also be installed. No site improvements are expected to be taller than the existing structure or expand beyond the current site boundaries, and all work and construction staging will occur within the previously developed parcel (Figure 4). As part of the undertaking, ICE may conduct exterior and interior modifications to the existing warehouse facility. Exterior upgrades may include, but are not limited to, painting or sealing the exterior of the structure; installing, removing, or modifying bays (truck bays, window bays, or doors); repairing or replacing the existing roof or cladding materials; adding security equipment; or adding exterior personnel/guest access controls. The interior of the structure may be renovated or rebuilt to support ICE operational requirements, which may include but are not limited to construction of holding and processing spaces, office space, public -facing visitor spaces, and installation of amenities, such as cafeterias, bathrooms, and health care spaces. ICE has determined that the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for this undertaking consists of the subject property and adjacent resources with a potential viewshed of the proposed undertaking (Figure 5). Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 The subject property is an existing warehouse constructed in 2022 (Figures 5-10). As part of the historic development of the property, the ground has been extensively disturbed to accommodate utilities, parking, and warehouse size requirements. Potential ground disturbing work will be consistent in depth and method of disturbance with past modifications to the site. Maximum ground disturbance to construct piers and fence posts are anticipated to be no more than four feet in depth. Due to the substantial past disturbance, ICE finds the potential for encountering intact archaeological resources is low, and ICE does not recommend any further archaeological investigations at the property. The subject property is a modem industrial site, and adjacent buildings within the northern portion of the APE consist primarily of similar industrial resources constructed in the 1990s and early 2000s (Figures 12 and 13; see Figure 5). The subject property and all modem industrial resources do not rise to the level of exceptional importance under Criteria Consideration G, per National Register Bulletin 15, and are recommended Ineligible for the National Register of Historic Place (NRHP) under all criteria. Resources to the east and south of the subject property consist of several mid -twentieth century residences (see Figure 5) Based on aerial photographs, these resources along Rauch and Hopewell Roads appear to have been built primarily between 1952 and 1974. None of the structures have been evaluated for inclusion on the NRHP; however, all will have only limited visibility to the proposed undertaking. Regardless of eligibility, the proposed undertaking will not affect these resources' integrity or ability to be included on the NRHP. The remaining resource within the APE is WA -I-368, a two-story residence and associated farm complex that was originally surveyed in 1967 and resurveyed in 1975 (Figure 14; see attachment). Other previously recorded resources along Hopewell Road (WA-I-022/Milestone Farm, WA-I-357/Sprecher's Mill House, and WA-I-364/Salisbury Mill Site and House), will not have visibility to the proposed undertaking. As examined in 1975, the house was a tripartite structure two stories high and totally sheathed with asbestos shingles (Figure 15). WA -I-368 likely originally consisted of a log frame building before expanding into its current tripartite form. Its original survey form notes the structure was constructed no later than 1820 when its owner, Matthew Van Lear, passed and left it to his family. Research indicates that the Van Lear family, owner of nearby Mount Tammany, a NRHP-listed Georgian residence built in 1780, had extensive influence in this region. It is possible that the log, and later, encapsulated log and frame structure was built in the 1790s during the farming boom catapulting Williamsport to national importance. Though owned by Matthew Van Lear, it is also possible the house served as a residence for a sibling or child given Matthew Van Lear's ownership of Mount Tammany during this period. Expanded over the years, the structure retains many of its original ornamentation elements, including its 6/6 windows, orientation, and general symmetry of design, which date the structure to no later than roughly 1790-1810. Also present on the lot are the foundation of a barn and a well-preserved springhouse (Figure 16), both of which date to c. 1887. Though the auxiliary springhouse remains in good condition (Figure 17), the roof of the residence has partially burned and completely collapsed, as has one of its porches and the rear of the structure (Figures 18-20). 2 Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Due to the severe structural condition and development of the adjacent area, the residence has lost integrity of design, workmanship, setting, feeling, and association. ICE has determined that the main residence of WA -I-368 is Ineligible for the NRHP under all criterions. ICE has withheld commenting on the extant stone springhouse due to a lack of information on the structure. It is possible that, were the springhouse evaluated as part of a multiple property documentation form survey of masonry auxiliary resources in the county or Williamsport, that the springhouse could be determined Contributing under Criterions A or C. ICE notes that, regardless of the eligibility of part or all of WA -I-368, the proposed undertaking will not impact any aspects of integrity that remain, and no effects to WA -I-368 will occur. Therefore, pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5(b), ICE has determined that the undertaking will result in a finding of No Historic Properties Affected. In accordance with 36 CFR 800.3, ICE has invited the Hagerstown Planning Department and the Washington County Historic Preservation Commission, both certified local governments, to participate in consultation for this undertaking. ICE has also invited the following federally - recognized Tribes to participate in consultation: the Delaware Nation, Oklahoma; and the Seneca -Cayuga Nation. ICE has not received any comments from the Planning Department, Historic Preservation Commission, or Tribes at the time of this letter. Please provide any comments on the undertaking and ICE's finding within 30 calendar days of the date of receipt of this letter. Written correspondence may be submitted to Alexis Price via e-mail at alexis.t.pricegassociates.ice.dhs.gov. If you have questions or wish to discuss the undertaking, please contact Alexis Price at 443-635-4661. Thank you for your cooperation on this undertaking. Sincerely, Digitally signed by GABRIELLE M GABRIELLEM FERNANDEZ FERNANDEZ Date: 2026.01.13 09:47:02 -0500' Gabrielle Fernandez Environmental Protection Specialist Office of the Chief Readiness Support Officer Department of Homeland Security Gabrielle.Fernandez(c ,hq. dhs. gov Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 4 ; • ru 4 4 6 Conocooheague �onococheague r Creek rr; ' 47' Ha er' Crossir ao _ - Huyett,- H = ao— o �_ - 144 u m �o 3a c�L * t n 20 - 70 ih' boa 63 = 6S 5N Subject Property °: Halfway �• �:4 Woodmoor Van Lear Manor _ _ Williamsport Y r 637 S}, Elmwood, Farm Conococheaque ?4 lil mile Open S/reet-Map Figure 1. Project site location map. El Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 2. Project site on USGS topographic map. °rp is � - 1 � �lr { * • rIL I1iRHU1, Z: IIj- F's., ' -yr- Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 4. Proposed project site plan. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Subject 1 Property r � + ,/ - __ �l.• ,. f r1uLj V) U • z w w :.- w - APE a P�-s�o v1�Gt�IP Pvti l5gIG1 VtiRGjNI� PEE y Figure 5. Area of Potential Effects (APE) for cultural resources. Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 6. North elevation. Figure 7. East elevation. 7 Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 8. West elevation. Figure 9. South elevation. 10 TTLJ1L ICI�I . t Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 12. North adjoining property. Figure 13. North adjoining property. 12 Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 14. Southwest adjoining property, depicting Resource WA -I-368. Figure 15. Resource WA -I-368 as it appeared in 1975, facing east. 13 Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 16. Springhouse at Resource WA -I-368 as it appeared in 1975, facing northeast. Figure 17. Google Earth Streetview of springhouse at Resource WA -I-368 in 2025, facing northeast. 14 Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 18. GoogleEarth Streetview of western portion of residence at Resource WA -I-368 from Wright Road in 2025, facing northeast. Figure 19. GoogleEarth Streetview of eastern portion of residence at Resource WA -I-368 from (Old) Wright Road in 2025, facing northeast. 15 Re: New ICE Baltimore Processing Facility, 10900 Hopewell Road, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Figure 20. GoogleEarth Streetview of western portion of residence at Resource WA -I-368 from (Old) Wright Road in 2025, facing southwest. 16 Historic Review Activity 11/20/2025 thru 01/21/2026 Record Record # Type MIHP# Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Status SUBDIVISION OF 2 EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD, Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 120432 LANDIS ROAD :LOTS 1-6 NORTH SIDE OF LANDIS ROAD AND Historic District S-25-021 Preliminary -Final Plat 110138 In Review 14 -Jul -25 09 -Jan -26 I :HAGERSTOWN, r Revisions Required 13 -Jan -26 Updated by Script from EPR. MD 21740 LOTS 7-13 ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF LANDIS Commission ROAD. Days in Review: 4 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Town of Sharpsburg I 204 WEST CHAPLINE INSTALLATION OF (16) 7.04 KW ROOF Note 17 -Dec -25 Historical Review Not a property/project for HDC review SH2025-0006 Residential Building 110656 Closed 14 -Oct -25 16 -Dec -25 STREET, LOT 136 MOUNTED SOLAR PANELS ON DWELLING Permit I Passed - Info 17 -Dec -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Days in Review: 1 l l Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments l I Note 15 -Dec -25 Historic District to the S-25-034 Preliminary -Final Plat I V132 Approval 06 -Nov -25 12 -Dec -25 :12158 OREBANK ROAD REMAINDER LOT FROM PLAT 11874 INTO A Commission added standard note plan. Letter Issued : SPRING, MD 21722 DWELLING LOT. Historic District :CLEAR Approved 15 -Dec -25 Updated by Script from EPR. Commission Days in Review: 3 I I Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments DEMOLITION OF 3,900 SQ. FT. SINGLE FAMILY reviewed by HDC at their 12/3 meeting and supported based on documentation provided. Uploaded to Residential Demolition S-24-014 20313 LOCUST DWELLING INCLUDING FOUNDATION AND Note 04 -Dec -25 Historical Review documents. 2025-05388 l Permit 111071 Approved 12 -Nov -25 14 -Nov -25 GROVE ROAD, LOT 5 GARAGE : ;DETACHED 'THEODORE Approved 04 -Dec -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. & SHARON LAPKOFF, LOT 5 Days in Review: 20 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments No Comments 24 -Nov -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Town of Williamsport :540 SQ. FT. METAL DETACHED ONE CAR Received W12025-0024 ' Residential Building I Approved 17 -Nov -25 17 -Nov -25 LOR 41 E. FREDERICK :GARAGE ON CONCRETE SLAB TO REAR OF Note 02 -Dec -25 Historical Review HDC has not review in WM Permit STREET, PARCEL F :DWELLING, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES I l Passed - Info 02 -Dec -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Days in Review: 15 1,800 SQ. FT. STORAGE BUILDING ON Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments CONCRETE SLAB TO REAR OF DWELLING, PRE - Residential New SI-09-009 14603 FAIRVIEW ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, METAL SIDES AND Note 02 -Dec -25 Historical Review No HDC review in this rural village for new construction 2025-05520 Construction Permit Approved 19 -Nov -25 02 -Dec -25 CHURCH ROAD, PARCEL 3 ROOF MOUNT TABOR EVANGELICAL CHURCH, PARCEL! Passed - Info 02 -Dec -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 3 Days in Review: 0 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments PORCH WITH 147 SQ. FT. CONCRETE SLAB, REPLACE FRONT DOOR THRESHOLD TO MATCH Even thought this permit is not technically in a review area for the HDC and the porch area of removal is :17504 SNYDERS LANDING :NEW PORCH (PORCH ROOF TO REMAIN), Note 10 -Dec -25 Historical Review under the threshold, staff has reached out via email to the applicant to get further details and see if 2024- Revision Closed 20 -Nov -25 02 -Dec -25 :ROAD REPLACE RIGHT WOODEN PORCH WITH 140 SQ.: anything can be done to keep the porch line intact. Will update once I hear back from the applicant. 04219.R02 :SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 :FT. CONCRETE SLAB (PORCH ROOF TO REMAIN), :REMOVE PORCH ROOF AND CONCRETE SLAB AT Passed - Info 10 -Dec -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. BAY WINDOW AREA AND REPLACE WITH IncrAoIMr r,jrs ci.ipi Days in Review: 8 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments 8505 FAHRNEY CHURCH Note 09 -Jan -26 Historic District Requesting standard note. SP -25-045 Site Plan 110055 In Review 26 -Nov -25 26 -Dec -25 :ROAD BUILDING RENOVATION AND PARKING LOT Commission BOONSBORO, MD 21713 EXPANSION Revisions Required 09 -Jan -26 Historic District Updated by Script from EPR. Commission Days in Review: 14 FRONT COVERED PORCH, GUTTING ALL Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Non -Residential INTERIOR LEVELS OF STRUCTURE TO CREATE Note 09 -Jan -26 Historical Review Added to February Agenda 2025-05780 Addition 110055 Review 10 08 ISP-25-045 8505 FAHRNEY 1 SUITES, ASSOCIATED ROOMS, AND -Alteration -Dec -25 -Jan -26 ROAD ;INDIVIDUAL i No Comments Permit I :CHURCH :COMMUNITY USE ROOMS FOR THE PURPOSE 09 -Jan -26 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Received :OF YOUNG ADULT HOUSING AND STAFFING, Days in Review: 1 2,128 SQ. FT. DETACHED TWO STORY GARAGE Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments ON CONCRETE SLAB, SECOND FLOOR TO BE Town of Clear Spring l Revisions ;USED AS UNFINISHED WORKSHOP AND FULL Note 18 -Dec -25 Historical Review no permit review by hdc in clear spring CL2025-0005 Residential Building V310 16 -Dec -25 18 -Dec -25 102 CUMBERLAND STREET Required BATHROOM, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE Permit Passed - Info 18 -Dec -25 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, TO BE PLACED IN ;SAME LOCATION OF DEMOLISHED GARAGE Days in Review: 0 i i i 'rr%Ki!'DFTF CI AR Tf DAD Ct MM I I IN!_ T!l RC Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Historic Review Activity 11/20/2025 thru 01/21/2026 Record Record # Type MIHP# Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Status Residential New LOR 21245 MOUNT LEAN 2025-05908 Review 21 -Dec -25 30 -Dec -25 USED AS A GARAGE, (7) OVERHEAD DOORS, Note 09 -Jan -26 Historical Review Added to February meeting per HDC Pole building policy Construction Permit ROAD METAL ROOF AND SIDES, PRE-ENGINEERED Days in Review: 10 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Town of Keedysville Note 13 -Jan -26 Historical Review Not a tax credit app therefore no HDC review INSTALLATION OF (20) 9.1 KW ROOF MOUNTED KV2026-0002 Residential Building 110988 Approved 06 -Jan -26 09 -Jan -26 74 NORTH MAIN STREET Permit SOLAR PANELS ON DETACHED GARAGE Passed - Info 13 -Jan -26 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. Days in Review: 4 Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments Residential Demolition LOR 13511 MAUGANSVILLE DEMOLITION OF 3,256 SQ. FT. DWELLING AND 2026 00212 1252 Review 20 -Jan -26 21 -Jan -26 Note 21 -Jan -26 Historical Review Added to February 4 agenda Permit ROAD FOUNDATION Days in Review: 0 Activity Count: 13 Review Activities Summary Application Type Application Number Approved No Comments Received Note Passed - Info Revisions Required Total Non -Residential Addition -Alteration Permit Total 0 1 1 0 0 1 Preliminary -Final Plat Total 1 0 1 0 1 2 Residential Demolition Permit Total 1 0 2 0 0 2 Residential New Construction Permit Total 0 0 2 1 0 2 Revision Total 0 0 1 1 0 1 Site Plan Total 0 0 1 0 1 1 Town of Clear Spring Residential Building Permit Total 0 0 1 1 0 1 Town of Keedysville Residential Building Permit Total 0 0 1 1 0 1 Town of Sharpsburg Residential Building Permit Total 0 0 1 1 0 1 Town of Williamsport Residential Building Permit Total 0 1 1 1 0 1 Total 2 2 12 6 2 13