HomeMy WebLinkAbout041109
November 9, 2004
Hagerstown, Maryland
The regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners of
Washington County, Maryland, was called to order at 1:00 p.m. by
President Gregory I. Snook with the following members present:
Vice President William J. Wivell and Commissioners James F.
Kercheval, John C. Munson, and Doris J. Nipps.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Invocation was delivered by Commission Snook, followed by
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by the full assemblage.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES – NOVEMBER 2, 2004
Motion made by Commissioner Munson, seconded by Kercheval, to
approve the minutes of November 2, 2004. Unanimously approved.
COMMENTS ON MELLOTT QUARRY REZONING APPLICATION
Mr. & Mrs. Rhett Eklund appeared before the Commissioners to
request that the Commissioners postpone the public hearing on
rezoning application RZ-04-008 made by H.B. Mellott Estates,
Inc., which is scheduled for November 15. Mr. Eklund stated
that the residents in the area feel that this is a complex issue
and would like to have it postponed until after the holidays to
allow them time to research the issues involved in the case.
The Commissioners discussed the request and expressed concerns
about a postponement since the case has been duly advertised and
all procedures followed. John Martirano, Deputy County
Attorney, outlined possible options for their consideration.
It was the consensus of the Commissioners to proceed with the
hearing as scheduled but they agreed to consider continuing the
public hearing and resuming on a future date to allow additional
public testimony and Applicant comment.
REACH SHELTER BUILDING PROJECT
Terri Baker, Executive Director of REACH, and Tom Newell, Vice
President of the REACH Board of Directors, met with the
Commissioners to request financial assistance in completion of
the REACH Cold Weather Shelter for the Homeless. Mr. Newell
reviewed the programs sponsored by REACH, which include a 24-
hour crisis intervention hotline, cold weather shelter for the
homeless, and the Faith in Action program. Mr. Newell informed
the Commissioners that they have raised over $500,000 of the
$750,000 needed to complete the project. He explained that the
new shelter would provide a stable, central location for the
homeless to access the services they need to make the transition
to permanent housing. He also informed the Commissioners that
REACH has applied for a grant from the Maryland Affordable
Housing Trust to complete the shelter. Mr. Newell requested a
$50,000 grant from the County to leverage the State grant
funding. He indicated that they would also be requesting the
City of Hagerstown to match this contribution.
The Commissioners discussed the request and agreed to consider
it. Commissioner Snook thanked Mr. Newell and Ms. Baker for the
presentation.
APPROVAL - MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION GRANT AGREEMENTS
Motion made by Commissioner Munson, seconded by Nipps, to
approve the following grant agreements with the Maryland Transit
Administration (MTA) for the Washington County Transportation
Department: 1) FY 2004 Small Urban Area Public Transportation
Operating Grant Agreement for $538,000 in federal and state
funds to assist the County in providing transportation services
under MTA’s public transportation program; 2) FY 2004
Subscription Employment Transportation Grant of up to $49,470 to
assist in providing transportation service under MTA’s Job
Access and Reverse Commute program; 3) FY 2005 Job Access and
Reverse Commute Program grant agreement for a $52,750 grant to
Washington County to assist in providing transportation services
under with local funding to be provided by the Washington County
Department of Social Services; 4) FY 2005 Americans with
Disability Act (ADA) Assistance Grant Agreement for $188,100 to
provide transportation services to persons with disabilities in
Washington County; 5) FY 2005 Statewide Special Transportation
Assistance Program (SSTAP) Operating Assistance Grant for
seventy-five percent of the approved net project cost or
;
$146,917, whichever is less and 6) FY 2005 capital grant
agreement with the Maryland Department of Transportation for 90%
of the actual net project cost or $480,600,
NOVEMBER 9, 2004
PAGE TWO
whichever is less, to assist with the purchase of three small
buses with lifts and a service vehicle to assist with relocation
transfer point and certain facility renovations. Unanimously
approved.
SHORT- AND LONG TERM FISCAL MANAGEMENT POLICY AND REVENUE POLICY
Debra Bastian, Director of Finance, reviewed the Short- and
Long-Term Fiscal Management Policy and the Revenue Policy for
their consideration. Ms. Bastian stated that the objective for
the Short- and Long-Term Fiscal Management Policy is to provide
financial monitoring and control.
Ms. Bastian explained that the Revenue Policy would aid the
County in guiding the provision of public services and help
ensure financial stability regardless of economic fluctuations.
She stated that the Policy addresses diversification,
stabilization, estimates, user fees, taxes, rate models, ratio
analysis, non-recurring revenues, and other related issues. The
meeting was then opened for questions and discussion on the
Policy.
Motion made by Commissioner Wivell, seconded by Kercheval, to
adopt the Short- and Long-Term Fiscal Management Policy and the
Revenue Policy as amended by the County Commissioners.
Unanimously approved.
TEXT AMENDMENT WS-04-003 – TOWN OF BOONSBORO (WATER & SEWERAGE
PLAN)
Tim Lung, Senior Planner, reviewed rezoning text amendment WS-
04-003, which was heard at a public hearing held on September
20, 2004. The proposed amendments is to include in the text of
Chapter Four, Existing and Planned Sewerage Systems, updated
information concerning proposed upgrades to and expansion of the
Boonsboro wastewater treatment plant. Mr. Lung stated that the
Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendment.
The meeting was then opened for further discussion and
questions. Commissioner Wivell indicated that he would abstain
from the vote since he did not attend the public hearing when
this application was heard.
Motion by Commissioner Nipps, seconded by Munson, to approve
Text Amendment WS-04-003, as presented at a joint public hearing
held September 20, 2004. Motion carried with Commissioners
Nipps, Kercheval, Munson, and Snook voting “AYE” and
Commissioner Wivell “ABSTAINING.”
TEXT AMENDMENT WS-04-004 – TOWN OF FUNKSTOWN (WATER & SEWERAGE
PLAN)
Tim Lung, Senior Planner, reviewed rezoning text amendment WS-
04-004, submitted by the Town of Funkstown, which was heard at a
public hearing held on September 20, 2004. The proposed
amendments would include updated information concerning the
Town’s plans to replace its existing lagoon- style wastewater
treatment plant with a new sequencing batch reactor-style
treatment plant and increase the treatment capacity from 0.15
mgd to 0.20 mgd.
The meeting was then opened for further discussion and
questions. Commissioner Kercheval expressed his concerns that
if this amendment were approved, it would preclude the Town from
hooking onto the City or County’s system. Commissioner Snook
noted that the State offered an incentive to the Town to hook up
to either of the larger systems instead of replacing its
existing plant. The Commissioners also discussed nitrogen-
loading limits. They agreed that they would like to have
additional dialogue with representatives from the Town of
Funkstown before making a decision. It was the consensus to
delay the issue until the December 7 meeting and directed staff
to notify the Town that they would like to meet with them
regarding the proposed amendment.
TEXT AMENDMENT RZ-04-007 – OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNS
Jill Baker, Associate Planner, reviewed zoning text amendment
RZ-04-007, which was heard at the public hearing held on
September 20, 2004. Ms. Baker stated that the Planning
Commission is recommending approval of the proposed amendments
to Articles 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19A, 21, 22, and 28 of the
Zoning Ordinance. She then reviewed the modifications made by
staff and the Planning Commission following the public hearing.
Amendments relate to how existing signs will be dealt with under
the new
NOVEMBER 9, 2004
PAGE THREE
Ordinance, size criteria, orientation, height, and illumination.
The meeting was then opened for questions and discussion. The
Commissioners agreed to vote on this text amendment next week
after the revisions have been made and the ordinance drafted for
their review.
COMPREHENSIVE RURAL AREA REZONING – DISCUSSIONS ON EQUITY ISSUES
Michael Thompson, Director of the Planning Department, and Eric
Seifarth, Rural Preservation Administrator, met with the
Commissioners to continue discussions on the equity issues
associated with the Rural Area Rezoning proposed for the
Agricultural, Environmental Conservation and Preservation
Districts. The Commissioners reviewed the methods being
proposed by Commissioner Kercheval and Commissioner Wivell.
Commissioner Wivell explained that his proposal would accomplish
two objectives - preserving agricultural land and compensation
for equity by allowing landowners to buy back densities for land
preservation at twice the price it would cost per acre to
preserve the land. Commissioner Wivell explained that this
would preserve agricultural land at a 2:1 ratio. Commissioner
Wivell stated that he had been a proponent of transferable
development rights (TDR) programs but felt that, with the high
rate of failure, a simpler process should be implemented. The
meeting was then opened for questions and discussion.
Commissioner Kercheval stated that he is concerned that this
proposal would not preserve the large blocks of land that a TDR
plan would.
Commissioner Kercheval outlined the details of using a TDR plan.
He also discussed the possibility of capping the number of lots
to be developed per year in rural areas due to water and septic
concerns or limiting amounts in certain developments.
Commissioner Kercheval stated that Montgomery County has a TDR
program in place that has been successful. Commissioner Snook
expressed concerns that property owners would accept the concept
of having increased density in a “receiving area.” Commissioner
Kercheval stated that the County could approve requests for
parcels to be given TDRs as receiving areas based on criteria
such as size, zoning, quality of parcel, soil types, and
proximity to existing easements, current use, and development
pressure. He suggested that if they choose to do so, the County
could pay a landowner a partial fee per TDR for a partial
easement until the landowner sells a TDR. The TDR owner would
still have lot exemptions to provide lots to family members.
All of the remaining rural parcels without TDRs would become
“receiving areas,” thus having the ability to purchase TDRs to
increase density.
The Commissioners discussed the current preservation programs in
place with Mr. Seifarth and the priority list used to purchase
easements. Mr. Seifarth informed the Commissioners that that
the County currently has real estate transfer tax funds and
agricultural transfer tax available to purchase agricultural
easements. The Commissioners directed Mr. Seifarth to develop a
list of priorities for purchasing preservation easements in
order to leverage the money from State.
EPA/MDE – EARLY ACTION PLAN FINDINGS
Michael Thompson, Director of Planning, informed the
Commissioners that the representatives from the Maryland
Department of the Environment informed him that it does not look
promising that the EPA would include Washington County in its
non-attainment area for ozone standards. The Commissioners
authorized Mr. Thompson to draft a letter on their behalf to
Maryland Congressional Delegation to request their assistance in
this matter.
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS - 2005 SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Richard Douglas, County Attorney, distributed a list of items
suggested by various County Commissioners and staff for the 2005
legislative agenda. Mr. Douglas stated that the Board has not
approved the list. He asked them to review the items and
determine which of the attached suggestions they would like him
to pursue.
1)Recommendations for salary increases for the Sheriff, Board
of Education, and substitute members of the Board of
Election Supervisors. The Commissioners agreed to proceed
with this request.
NOVEMBER 9, 2004
PAGE FOUR
Amend the Salary Study Commission statute to provide a
replacement for the now-defunct Washington County Taxpayers
Association and for recommendations as to the salaries of
the County Commissioners to be sent directly from the
Commission to the Delegation.
2)Support the Court’s request for a fifth Circuit Court judge.
3)Building Excise Tax Revision – accelerated the lifting of
the ceiling on building excise tax limitation from 2008 to
2005 to increase revenues for school construction. The
Commissioners also discussed the collection of the 2%
administrative fee by municipalities and asked that it be
clarified that, payment of a higher percentage fee requested
is contingent upon submission of proper documentation and
prior approval from the Commissioners.
4)Clarify the County’s authority to regulate weeds and
provide for the imposition of liens to pay for the cost of
county weed control when the property owner fails to comply
with the requirements of the ordinance. The Commissioners
supported the request.
5)Transfer of the Agricultural Center property to the County.
6)Clarify the authority to charge violations of the Animal
Control Ordinance as municipal infractions.
7)Provide for criminal enforcement of the Animal Control
Ordinance.
8)Provide additional flexibility in the County purchasing law
by allowing procurement by negotiation in certain
circumstances, among others.
9)Support legislation to clarify the provisions of the New
Jobs Tax Credit law (“Miller bill”) as to the base value on
which the credits are to be computed.
10)Clarify the regulatory authority of the Electrical Board.
11)Authorization to employ more than one county attorney. The
Commissioners did not support this request.
County Administrator Rodney Shoop proposed that all counties be
afforded the additional 180 days to file their required annual
financial reports to the state that was given to the five
counties with over 400,000 population in a 2002 amendment to the
statute governing such reports. In questions from the
Commissioners, Shoop responded that County staff had no real
problem in meeting the deadline imposed by the law, but stated
that it was a question of fairness. The Commissioners agreed
that all counties should be treated the same regardless of size,
but also agreed that the reports should be filed by the existing
statutory deadline. Thus, the Commissioners agreed to recommend
to the Delegation that the statute be returned to its pre-2002
form, requiring all counties to file their annual financial
reports at the same time, with no 180-day delay for large
counties. This would be an amendment of statewide application
to reverse an amendment presumably sought three years ago by the
delegations of the three largest counties.
Commissioner Wivell asked Mr. Douglas to determine if
legislative authority is needed to implement a TDR or IPA
program to purchase agricultural land. He stated that, if the
sale of Fort Ritchie were finalized, there would be no need for
the PenMar Development Corporation and suggested getting
legislative authority to have the group abolished when the
transaction is complete. The Commissioners asked Mr. Douglas to
provide more detailed information and background information on
each request when they are provided to the Delegation. He
responded that that is the usual process.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion made by Commissioner Wivell, seconded by Kercheval, to
adjourn at 4:50 p.m.
,
County Administrator
,
County Attorney
____________________, County Clerk