Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout200211a Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Office of the County Commissioners, 240.313.2200 Voice/TDD, to make arrangements no later than ten (10) working days prior to the meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 11, 2020 OPEN SESSION AGENDA 10:30 A.M. MOMENT OF SILENCE AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CALL TO ORDER, President Jeffrey A. Cline APPROVAL OF MINUTES – January 31, 2020 & February 4, 2020 10:35 A.M. COMMISSIONERS’ REPORTS AND COMMENTS 10:45 A.M. REPORTS FROM COUNTY STAFF 10:55 A.M. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 11:00 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING – APPLICATION FOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-19-006 – HERITAGE HUYETT LLC – Jill Baker, Director, Planning and Zoning 11:20 A.M. INTERAGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WORKGROUP – Earl Stoner, Health Officer, Washington County Health Department, Sara L. Trescott, Environmental Health Director, Washington County Health Department, and Jill Baker, Director, Planning and Zoning 11:25 A.M. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PERENNIAL SOLAR, LLC CASE – POTENTIAL INTERVENTION BY THE COUNTY AS PARTY – B. Andrew Bright, Assistant County Attorney, and Jill Baker, Director, Planning and Zoning 11:35 A.M. YOUTH MERITORIOUS AWARD PRESENTATION – Board of County Commissioners and Allison Hartshorn, Grant Manager, Office of Grant Management 11:45 A.M. HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA GRANT ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS – John Martin, Sergeant, Narcotics Task Force and Stephanie Lapole, Senior Grant Manager, Office of Grant Management 11:50 A.M. FORT RITCHIE EASEMENT RELOCATION – Todd Moser, Real Property Administrator and Andrew Eshleman, Director, Public Works 11:55 A.M. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MDOT) PROPOSED SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY TO WASHINGTON COUNTY – Todd Moser, Real Property Administrator 12:00 P.M. FY21 AND BEYOND FUNDING REQUEST FOR BLACK FLY CONTROL IN SOUTHERN WASHINGTON COUNTY – Linda Ebersole Jeffrey A. Cline, Terry L. Baker, Vice President Krista L. Hart, Clerk Cort F. Meinelschmidt Randall E. Wagner Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Office of the County Commissioners, 240.313.2200 Voice/TDD, to make arrangements no later than ten (10) working days prior to the meeting. 12:05 P.M. PRESENTATION OF THE 2021 – 2030 CAPITAL BUDGET – DRAFT 1 – Sara Greaves, Chief Financial Officer, and Kelcee Mace, Deputy Director, Budget and Finance 12:25 P.M. CLOSED SESSION (To discuss the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion, compensation, removal, resignation, or performance evaluation of appointees, employees, or officials over whom this public body has jurisdiction; or any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals; To consider a matter that concerns the proposal for a business or industrial organization to locate, expand, or remain in the State; To consult with counsel to obtain legal advice on a legal matter; & To comply with a specific constitutional, statutory, or judicially imposed requirement that prevents public disclosures about a particular proceeding or matter.) 01:15 P.M. RECESS 03:00 P.M. JOINT MEETING: CITY OF HAGERSTOWN Location: Washington County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington Street, Hagerstown, Maryland Agenda proposed by the City of Hagerstown • Economic Development Updates • Medium-Range Growth Area (MRGA) Updates 04:00 P.M. RECESS EVENING MEETING AT THE TOWN OF WILLIAMSPORT Location: Town Hall: 2 North Conococheague Street, Williamsport, MD 06:00 P.M. MOMENT OF SILENCE AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CALL TO ORDER, President Jeffrey A. Cline 06:05 P.M. TOWN OF WILLIAMSPORT LEADERS’ REPORTS AND COMMENTS 06:10 P.M. COMMISSIONERS’ REPORTS AND COMMENTS 06:15 P.M. CITIZEN AWARD RECEIPENT – Larry Jessop 06:25 P.M. REPORTS FROM COUNTY STAFF 06:35 P.M. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 06:40 P.M. ADJORNMENT Open Session Item SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Application for Zoning Map Amendment RZ-19-006 – Heritage Huyett LLC PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Jill Baker, Director, Department of Planning and Zoning RECOMMENDED MOTION: The purpose of this public hearing is to take public comment on the rezoning application. The Commissioners have the option to take action to either approve or deny the request after the public hearing closes or deliberate on the issue at a later date. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: Application has been made by Heritage Huyett LLC to rezone land located on the west side of Greencastle-Williamsport Pike (MD 63), 0.1 miles north of the intersection with National Pike (US 40). The applicant is seeking to rezone 29.57 acres of land currently zoned Business Local (BL) to Planned Industrial (PI). DISCUSSION: When rezonings are not part of a comprehensive rezoning by the governing body, individual map amendments (also known as piecemeal rezonings) are under an obligation to meet the test of the change or mistake rule. As part of the evaluation to determine whether the applicant has proven whether there has been either a change or mistake in the zoning of a parcel, the Maryland Annotated Code Land Use Article and the Washington County Zoning Ordinance state that the local legislative body is required to make findings of fact on at least six different criteria in order to ensure that a consistent evaluation of each case is provided. These criteria have been evaluated in the attached Staff Report dated November 2019. The applicant asserts that there was a mistake in the applied zoning based on assumptions made by the Commissioners at the time of the last rezoning. The applicant asserts that the Commissioners made their previous decision based on an assumption that the existing sewer line that ended at the intersection of MD 63 and US 40 could not be extended any further north based on financial feasibility. This has since been invalidated by the developer of this property recently extending the line north of the intersection to this property. This application was presented to the Washington County Planning Commission at a Public Information Meeting held during their regular meeting on December 2, 2019. At the meeting no evidence was formally presented to prove that either there had been a change or a mistake in the applied zoning. The issue was heard again at the Planning Commission meeting on January 6, 2020 where the members unanimously recommended approval of the proposed map amendment. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A CONCURRENCES: Washington County Planning Commission Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Rezoning application, Staff report, Planning Commission minutes, Planning Commission recommendation AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: None Snyder * Secary & Associates, LLC ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS Via FedEx Overnight September 23, 2019 Ms. Jill Baker Deputy Director Washington County Planning & Zoning 100 West Washington Street, Suite 2600 Hagerstown, MD 21740 2000 Linglestown Road, Suite 304 Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 651-1010 227 West Market Street, Suite 104 York, PA 17401 (717) 781-2929 Re: Zoning Map Amendment Heritage Huyett, LLC Creekside Logistics Center Greencastle Pike, Washington County, MD Dear Ms. Baker: On behalf of Heritage Huyett, LLC, Snyder, Secary, & Associates, LLC is pleased to submit the Zoning Map Amendment for the above referenced project. Heritage Huyett, LLC would like to rezone the rest of their property to allow for the construction of a warehouse. The properties are located along the western side of Greencastle Pike (MD-63), approximately 700 feet north of the intersection with National Pike (US-40). The properties are identified as Tax Map 0036, Grid 0015, Parcel No's: 0393 and 0561. A Preliminary Consultation has been previously submitted for the proposed development to the County. We are enclosing the following information constituting the formal submission of a Zoning Map Amendment for these properties: 1. One (1) Original and thirty (30) copies of the Washington County Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment Application 2. Thirty (30) copies of the Fee Worksheet 3. One (1) check in the amount of $2,756.40 made payable to the "Washington County Treasurer" 4. Thirty (30) copies of the SDAT Records and Deeds of Exchange. 5. Thirty (30) copies of the Boundary Plat. 6. Thirty (30) copies of the list of names and addresses for adjoining property owners 7. Thirty (30) copies of the Vicinity Map 8. Thirty (30) copies of the Justification Statement With this submission we request that a date be scheduled with the County Planning Commission to discuss the project. We will be in attendance to represent the project and to answer any questions that the County may have in this regard. Vision # Commitment 1 Design # Results www.snydersecary.com Ms. Jill Baker Washington County Planning & Zoning September 23, 2019 Page 2 If you have any interim comments or questions or require further information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Snyder, Secary & Associates, LLC Kenneth W. Hinebaugh, EIT Project Manager cc: Mr. James LaFleur, Heritage Huyett LLC (via e-mail, w/encl.) Mr. Terry Randall, Heritage Huyett LLC (via e-mail, w/encl.) Mr. Bill Pllington, CBRE (via e-mail, w/encl.) Mr. Jon Casella, CBRE (via e-mail, w/encl.) Mr. Brian Kurtyka, Esp., Kurtyka & Associates (via a -mail, w/encl.) Mr. James Snyder, SS&A (via e-mail, w/encl.) File i:\18\1"460.001\engr\corres\2019-09-23 zoning map amendmem.doc Washington County FOR PLANNING COMMISSION USE ONLY Rezoning No. — Date Filed: WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION Heritage H uyett, LLC aProperty Owner ❑Contract Purchaser Applicant ❑Attorney ❑Consultant PO Box 3800 Hagerstown, MD 21742 ❑Other: Address James A. LaReur (240) 520-3484 Primary Contact Phone Number 1301 W. Washington St. Hagerstown, MD 21740 jlafleur@trustdevelop.us Address E-mail Address 16422 National Pike, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Property Location: 0036 0015 0393/0561 29.57 Tax Map: Grid: Parcel No.: Acreage: Planned Industrial /BusinessLocal Current Zoning: Requested Zoning: Planned Industrial Reason for the Request: A Change in the character of the neighborhood ❑ Mistake in original zoning PLEASE NOTE: A Justification Statement is required for either reason. ln��z A f Rl_� Applicant's Signature Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 20. My commission expires on I b Z3 otary Public FOR PLANNING COMMISSION USE ONLY ❑ Application Form ❑ Fee Worksheet ❑ Application Fee ❑ Ownership Verification ❑ Boundary Plat (Including Metes & Bounds) ❑ Names and Addresses of all Adjoining & Confronting Property Owners ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Justification Statement ❑ 30 copies of complete Application Package LAURA LaFLEUR SMITH NOTARY PUBLIC WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND W COMMISSION EXPIRES MO-2023 Washington County WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING FEE WORKSHEET Applicant's Name: Heritage Huyett, LLC FOR PLANNING COMMISSION USE ONLY Rezoning No. Date Filed: PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THI? SECTION THAT APPLIES. Date: 9-23-2019 Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment ................................ $ 2,000.00 Number of Acres * 29.57 x $20.00 per acre ................ $591.40 Engineering Review Fee .................................... $ 150.00 Technology Fee ........................................... 15.00 TOTAL FEES DUE — MAP AMENDMENT ..... $2,756.40 Text Amendment ................................................ $ 2,000.00 Choose One: ❑ Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance ❑ Forest Conservation Ordinance ❑ Solid Waste Plan ❑ Subdivision Ordinance ❑ Water and Sewer Plan ❑ Zoning Ordinance ❑ Other: Technology Fee ........................................... 15.00 TOTAL FEES DUE — TEXT AMENDMENT ..... $ 2,015.00 ;sorest Conservation Exemption .................................... $ 25.00 Fechnology Fee ................................................. $ 15.00 TOTAL FEES DUE — FOREST EXEMPTION.... $ 40.00 Please make checks payable to "Washington County Treasurer". Real Property Data Search Search Result for WASHINGTON COUNTY View Map View GroundRent Redemption View GroundRent Registration Tax Exempt: Special Tax Recapture: Exempt Class: NONE Account Identifier: District - 23 Account Number - 008092 Owner Information Owner Name: HERITAGE HUYETT LLC Use: COMMERCIAL Principal Residence: NO Mailing Address: 1301 W WASHINGTON ST Deed Reference: /05537/ 00377 HAGERSTOWN MD 21740- Location & Structure Information Premises Address: 16422 NATIONAL PIKE Legal Description: 81.90 ACRES HAGERSTOWN 21740-0000 16422 NATIONAL PIKE Map: Grid: Parcel: Sub Subdivision: Section: Block: Lot: Assessment Plat 10689 District: Year: No: 0036 0015 0393 0000 2018 Plat Ref: Special Tax Areas: Town: NONE Ad Valorem: Tax Class: Primary Structure Built Above Grade Living Area Finished Basement Area Property Land Area County Use 81.9000 AC Stories Basement Type Exterior Full/Half Bath Garage Last Major Renovation Value Information Base Value Value Phase -in Assessments As of As of As of 01/01/2018 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 Land: 2,895,900 2,895,900 Improvements 0 0 Total: 2,895,900 2,895,900 2,895,900 2,895,900 Preferential Land: 0 0 Transfer Information Seller: SHIFLER RANDY M & Date: 06/30/2017 Price: $0 Type: NON -ARMS LENGTH OTHER Deedl: /05537/ 00377 Deed2: Seller: MCRAND HUYETTS LMTD PRTNRSHP Date: 06/30/2017 Price: $0 Type: NON -ARMS LENGTH OTHER Deedl: /05537/ 00346 Deed2: Seller: BANK ORRSTOWN Date: 04/02/2012 Price: $515,000 Type: NON -ARMS LENGTH OTHER Deedl: /04257/ 00169 Deed2: Exemption Information Partial Exempt Assessments: Class 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 County: 000 0.00 State: 000 0.00 Municipal: 000 0.0010.00 0.0010.00 Tax Exempt: Special Tax Recapture: Exempt Class: NONE Homestead Application Information Homestead Application Status: No Application Homeowners' Tax Credit Application Information Homeowners' Tax Credit Application Status: No Application Date: Real Property Data Search Search Result for WASHINGTON COUNTY View Map View GroundRent Redemption View GroundRent Registration Tax Exempt: Special Tax Recapture: Exempt Class: NONE Account Identifier: District - 23 Account Number - 022141 Owner Information Owner Name: HERITAGE HUYETT LLC Use: COMMERCIAL Principal Residence: NO Mailing Address: 1301 W WASHINGTON ST Deed Reference: /04257/ 00169 HAGERSTOWN MD 21740- Location & Structure Information Premises Address: GREENCASTLE PIKE Legal Description: PARCEL B 8.32 ACRES HAGERSTOWN 21740-0000 W/S GREENCASTLE PIKE Map: Grid: Parcel: Sub Subdivision: Section: Block: Lot: Assessment Plat No: 1853 District: Year: 0036 0015 0561 0000 2018 Plat Ref: Special Tax Areas: Town: NONE Ad Valorem: Tax Class: Primary Structure Built Above Grade Living Area Finished Basement Area Property Land Area County Use 8.3200 AC 000000 Stories Basement Type Exterior Full/Half Bath Garage Last Major Renovation Value Information Base Value Value Phase -in Assessments As of As of As of 01/01/2018 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 Land: 416,000 416,000 Improvements 0 0 Total: 416,000 416,000 416,000 416,000 Preferential Land: 0 0 Transfer Information Seller: BANK ORRSTOWN Date: 04/02/2012 Price: $515,000 Type: NON -ARMS LENGTH OTHER Deedl : /04257/ 00169 Deed2: Seller: D & A DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Date: 01/04/2012 Price: $0 Type: NON -ARMS LENGTH OTHER Deedl: /04210/ 00370 Deed2: Seller: RHOTON DOROTHY F Date: 08/18/2005 Price: $400,000 Type: ARMS LENGTH VACANT Deedl : /02752/ 00081 Deed2: Exemption Information Partial Exempt Assessments: Class 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 County: 000 0.00 State: 000 0.00 Municipal: 000 0.0010.00 0.0010.00 Tax Exempt: Special Tax Recapture: Exempt Class: NONE Homestead Application Information Homestead Application Status: No Application Homeowners' Tax Credit Application Information Homeowners' Tax Credit Application Status: No Application Date: BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 377 PREPARED DEED OF EXCHANGE `'rO TULE THIS DEED OF EXCHANGE, made this .5 ' day of April, 2017, by and between -' EXAMINATION Heritage Huyett, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company ("Heritage") and Randy M. Shifler J and Angela M. Shifler (collectively, the "Shifters"). 5 WHEREAS, Heritage and the Shiflers, inter alia, made application to Washington County, Maryland for a simplified subdivision of certain parcels of real property, including the parcels as more particularly described hereinbelow, to adjust certain property lines and enlarge certain parcels for the purpose of widening the right of way of "Lager Drive" along Greencastle Pike (Maryland Route 63), all as depicted on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" (the "Plat"); and WHEREAS, said simplified subdivision was approved by the Washington County Planning o Commission on January 24, 2017 and said Plat subsequently recorded at Plat folio 10689 among the o Plat Records of Washington County, Maryland (a copy of said Plat being attached hereto and a incorporated herein by reference as "Exhibit A"); and u WHEREAS, this Deed of Exchange is intended to and does complete the adjustment of certain property lines and enlarge certain parcels as set forth on said Plat. r NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the foregoing, but for no monetary consideration, the respective parties hereto grant and convey unto one another the �i following lots or parcels of real property: A. HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, does hereby = grant and convey unto RANDY M. SHIFLER and ANGELA M. SHIFLER, as tenants by the entireties, in fee simple, all the following described real property, together with any improvements, easements, rights of way, benefits, and appurtenances, thereunto belonging or appertaining, situate along the West side of the Williamsport -Greencastle Highway and on the North side of U.S. Route 40 West of Huyetts Cross Roads in Election District No. 23, Washington County, Maryland, and being more particularly described as follows: Parcel No. A l : All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.61 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel F" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels u A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. a 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland. The above -described property Ybeing part of the property Yconveyed unto Heritage Huyett, LLC from Orrstown Bank, by deed dated March 30, 2012 and recorded in Liber 4257, folio 169 among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland, to which deed reference is hereby made. This property is conveyed together with and subject to all applicable covenants, conditions, _ restrictions, limitations, rights of way, streets, reservations, alleys, and easements of record. KUKTYM & AS50M7Rk LW j ArrOMEVATLAW B. RANDY M. SHIFLER and ANGELA M. SHIFLER, husband and wife, do hereby 201 PROSPECYAVENUE grant and convey unto HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, in fee SUITE 22 HAGEMTOwn,MO2170 simple, all the following described real property, together with any improvements, easements, rights (301)714-0889 of way, benefits, and appurtenances, thereunto belonging or appertaining, situate along the West side c 1312 PABK Work\Zoning\Heritage Huyett%xchange Deed (Heritage-ShiFler).doc Page 1 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 378 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION J g KURMA&AMOQATMU.0 ATTORNEY AT LAW 201 PROSPIZu AVENUE SUITE 122 HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 (301) 714-0W of the Williamsport -Greencastle Highway and on the North side of U.S. Route 40 West of Huyetts Cross Roads in Election District No. 23, Washington County, Maryland, and being more particularly described as follows: Parcel No. B1: All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.15 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel B" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland; and Parcel No. B2: All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.20 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel E" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and .Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland. The above -described property being part of that one-half (1/2) undivided interest in real property conveyed unto Randy M. Shifler and Angela M. Shifler, his wife, from Randall Properties, L.L.L.P., a Maryland limited liability limited partnership, by deed dated April 30, 1997 and recorded in Liber 1333, folio 522 among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland, to which deed reference is hereby made; and also being a part of that one-half (1/2) undivided interest in real property conveyed unto Randy M. Shifler and Angela M. Shifler, his wife, from EB Limited Partnership, a Maryland limited partnership, by deed dated April 30, 1997 and recorded in Liber 1333, folio 524 among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland, to which deed reference is hereby made. This property is conveyed together with and subject to all applicable covenants, conditions, restrictions, limitations, rights of way, streets, reservations, alleys, and easements of record. The respective grantors hereby covenant each unto the other that each is seized of title to the property which is hereby granted, and each hereby warrants specially such title unto the other, and each hereby further covenants that they will provide unto the other such further assurances thereof as may be requisite. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and sealed this Deed of Exchange as of the day and year first above written. HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC a Maryland limited liability company A C_� � �__ By: (SEAL) tness/Attest Tef L/Randall,)Aanagirfgg Member PA13K Work\Zoning\Heritage HuyettlExchange Deed (Heritage-Shiner).doc Page 2 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 379 PREPARED WffHOUT TULE EXAMINATION J D KURnKA&ASSOCUMS�LLC ATTORNEY AT LAW 201 PROSPECT AVENUE SUITE 122 HACERSTOWN, MD 21702 (301)714-0889 C My Commission expires: 9�,�',20/0 BRIAN M. KURTYKA NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2018 EAL) Wi ess Randy M. Shifter (SEAL) Witdess Angela . Shifter STATE OF MARYLAND; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, to -wit: On this 0- day of fiell- , 20_L7, before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Terry L. Randall, Managing Member of Heritage Huyett, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and that he, as such Managing Member, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing Deed of Exchange for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the company by himself as Managing Member; and he further acknowledged that the consideration recited therein is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official Notarial Seal. N tary Public STATE OF MARYLAND; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, to -wit: On this 5 day of APRIL , 2017, before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Randy M. Shifler, known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the person described in the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same in his capacity therein stated for the purposes therein contained, and that the consideration recited therein is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official Notarial Seal. My Commission expires: 9.A4 _'2.0 BRIAN M�YKA No y Public NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2018 P:\BK Work\Zoning\Heritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-ShiIler).doc Page 3 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 380 PREPARED WITHOUT T1TLE ''— EXAMINATION J u KUKFVM&ASiO(.1ATE$LLC ATToRNEV AT LAW 201 PROSPECCAVENH s SWTE122 HACERSTOWN,MD21742 (301)714.0899 C > STATE OF MARYLAND; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, to -wit: On this 54 day of AP91J , 20 17 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Angela M. Shifler, known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the person described in the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she executed the same in her capacity therein stated for the purposes therein contained, and that the consideration recited therein is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official Notarial Seal. My Commission expires: f-.4 'ola / 81 / w / �-Mlkz BRIAN M. KURTYKA Not y Public NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2018 AFFIDAVIT OF NO CONSIDERATION I hereby certify, under the penalties of perjury, that the actual consideration paid or to be paid for the foregoing conveyances, including the amount of any mortgage or deed of trust assumed by the grantees, is in the sum total or $0.00. Lo 4 t4e"L Witness Terry . &ndall Sworn and subscribed to before me this `�"� day of A 2017. My Commission expires: 9..,Z'/o BRIAN M. KURTYKA NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2018 P:\BK Work\ZoningWeritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-ShiFlcr).doc oe No ary Public TODD L. HERSHE , T' EASURER TAXES PAID Page 4 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 381 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION 4 7 U KURTYNA&ASSOCATf' UZ j ATTORNEY AT LAW 201 PROSPECTAVENUE SUITE 122 HAGERSTOWN. MD 21742 (301)714-0889 a C AFFIDAVIT OF NO CONSIDERATION We hereby certify, under the penalties of perjury, that the actual consideration paid or to be paid for the foregoing conveyances, including the amount of any mortgage or deed of trust assumed by the grantees, is in the sum total or $0.00. Wit ss Zyy M. Shifler Wit ess gefaFft Shifler Sworn and subscribed to before me this Jr day of 12017. My Commission expires: 9-.'74 "ow /8 BRIAN M. KURTYKA N ary Public NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY commissION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2016 Joinder of Mortgagee Orrstown Bank, a Pennsylvania banking corporation, as mortgagee or the property owned by Randy M. Shifler and Angela M. Shifler as specified in the foregoing instrument, joins herein for the sole purpose of consenting to the transfer of a portion of said property to Heritage Huyett, LLC, as more particularly described in said foregoing instrument. -- B /C y:— Wi / tt st , Vice President as I HEREBY CERTIFY that the within instrument was prepared by or under the supervision of the undersigned, an Attorney duly admitted to practice before the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Bridi M. Kurtya After recording, please mail to: Kurtyka & Associates, LLC 201 Prospect Avenue, Suite 122 Hagerstown, MD 21742 P:\BK WorkQoning\Heritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-Shifler).doc Page 5 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 382 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION u KURIvxA&ASSOCU7ss.1d.0 ATT'OR71ev ATLAW 201 PROSPECT Avenue Sure 122 HAceusrOWR, MD 21742 (301)714-0889 a C Certification of Exemption from Withholding Upon Disposition of Maryland Real Estate Affidavit of Residence or Principal Residence Based on the certification below, Transferor claims exemption from the tax withholding requirements of § 10-912 of the Tax -General Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. Section 10- 912 provides that certain tax payments must be withheld and paid when a deed or other instrument that effects a change in ownership of real property is presented for recordation. The requirements of § 10-912 do not apply when a transferor provides a certification of Maryland residence or certification that the transferred property is the transferor's principal residence. I 1. Transferor Information I Name of Transferor HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC 2. Reasons for Resident ❑ I, Transferor, am a resident of the State of Maryland. Status ® Transferor is a resident entity as defined in Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 03.04.12.02B(11),1 am an agent of Transferor, and I have authority to sign this Document on Transferor's behalf. Principal ❑ Although 1 am no longer a resident of the State of Maryland, the Property is my Residence Principal residence as defined in IRC 121 and is recorded as such with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I have examined this declaration and that, to the best of my knowledge, it is true, correct, and complete. 3a. Individual Transferors Witness Name Signature L,4A �qA_ j itness/Attest 3b. Entity Transferors Heritap-e Huvett. LLC Name of Entity By Q. Terry L. Randall Name Managing Member Title PARK WOTMoning\Heritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-ShiOer).doc Page 6 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 383 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION 7 S u KURrvKA & ASSOCAM U-C ATTORNEY AT LA W 201 PROSPECTAVENUE r Surre 122 MCERSTOW N, MD 21742 (301)714-0889 r C Certification of Exemption from Withholding Upon Disposition of Maryland Real Estate Affidavit of Residence or Principal Residence Based on the certification below, Transferor claims exemption from the tax withholding requirements of §10-912 of the Tax -General Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. Section 10- 912 provides that certain tax payments must be withheld and paid when a deed or other instrument that effects a change in ownership of real property is presented for recordation. The requirements of § 10-912 do not apply when a transferor provides a certification of Maryland residence or certification that the transferred property is the transferor's principal residence. 1- 1. Transferor Information I Name of Transferor �— 2. Reasons for Exemption Resident ® I, Transferor, am a resident of the State of Maryland. Status L7 Transferor is a resident entity as defined in Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 03.04.12.02B(11),1 am an agent of Transferor, and I have authority to sign this Document on Transferor's behalf. Principal p Although I am no longer a resident of the State of Maryland, the Property is my Residence Principal residence as defined in IRC 121 and is recorded as such with the State Department of Assessments and'Taxation. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I have examined this declaration and that, to the best of my knowledge, it is true, correct, and complete. I 3a. Individual Transferors I Witness Witness/Attest Randy M. Shifler Name cje.,2. G.bb`i� Signature 3b. Entity Transferors PABK Work\Zoningftritage Huyett%xchange Deed (Heritage-Shifler).dcc Name of Entity go Name Title Page 7 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 384 PREPARED WHHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION J u KUR7YRA & A_ssoams.11.0 ATTORNEY AT LAW 201PNOSPECT AVENUE SUITE 122 IIACERSTOWN,MD21742 (301)714-0889 Certification of Exemption from Withholding Upon Disposition of Maryland Real Estate Affidavit of Residence or Principal Residence Based on the certification below, Transferor claims exemption from the tax withholding requirements of § 10-912 of the Tax -General Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. Section 10- 912 provides that certain tax payments must be withheld and paid when a deed or other instrument that effects a change in ownership of real property is presented for recordation. The requirements of § 10-912 do not apply when a transferor provides a certification of Maryland residence or certification that the transferred property is the transferor's principal residence. Name of Transferor 1. Transferor Information _ ANGELA M. SHIFLER 2. Reasons for Exemption Resident ® I, Transferor, am a resident of the State of Maryland. Status ❑ Transferor is a resident entity as defined in Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 03.04.12.02B(11), I am an agent of Transferor, and I have authority to sign this Document on Transferor's behalf. Principal ❑ Although I am no longer a resident of the State of Maryland, the Property is my Residence Principal residence as defined in IRC 121 and is recorded as such with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I have examined this declaration and that, to the best of my knowledge, it is true, correct, and complete. I 3a. Individual Transferors I Witn ss Witness/Attest Angela M. Shifler Name 3b. Entity Transferors Name of Entity an Name Title PABK Work\Zoning\Heritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-ShiFler).doc Page 8 of 8 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 385 EXHIBIT A n 1 w 1 n I o 1 m I —" I s'II o ? �' zB J pSZ 03 �' i na. A i �� ail n5 $ SS s So o> �1 X , I 1 1 I 61 p A I F g R 04 a r i a o a ncn-n tom � om, z � g$ v 008 ro 4 � 9 O~ I xSyyS qg r j r LIM I"�L`td,,t(y/ 6■ C / jg 1. r 4Alaoa��P'i SL 11-4 II I 2>r�+� �" `•c °°6 i ebyb'$; � � j 1 �� I ��8. � �r S�• � I� ! I Y �r;t9n I gdB I N I Nraylirw \ \ � t ,/ \ Isar � � • y -/j4 a.h.+bl�..aWwe:I`Iu iizl °I�° L16 I -- 0 1 = 1 Hp•rry�'W / I 7 1 I: r I I j/ { ` � � 7i'17t6'E � � •G� �J`bi fl; gp� I r C14 Po a 9•HUM U4�&G�5 � � p� �� �. ' 21'Ilt ..�� �. �•+ab � (� ` � IIL��Y iy Q•�2 i�� o� r / I 1 5 — a2vlao 6 i II ' T igill 1 t li'Fi1 iil !I Im vI !` IJ I .flat 1 f I fI] r 7 i JA 2 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 386 rn J 'n 6 D D L This page not to be counted in calculating Recording Fee For Clerks Use Only Improvement Fee 40.00 Recording Fee . 20.00 County Transfer Tax Recordation Tax State Transfer Tax Non -Resident Tax Clerk of Circuit Court Washington County, Maryland Dennis J. Weaver, Clerk 24 Summit Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21740 301-790-7991 LR - Deed (No -Taxes) Recordino Fee 20.02 Name: shifter Ref: LR - Deed (No -Taxes) Surcharoe 40.00 SubTotai ~MOO Total- 60.00 09/30/2817 01:04 CC21-TR #6659SSS CC0403 - Washington County/CC04.03.04 - Reoister• 04 TOTAL 60.00 17 r yp-k-1 �J of Instruments t U t necK Dox a auuenunm lnia Ke rorm is Hltakmetiq U (j ° -o ; a, o a- n eed Deed or Trust Mortgage Lease Other Other 2 Conveyance Type Check Box improved Sale Unimproved Sale Multiple Accounts yrNot an Arms- Arms -Length (IJ Arms -Length 121 Arms -Length [31 Length Sale 191 3 Tax Exemptions (if Applicable) Cite or Explain Authority Recordation State Transfer County Transfer 4 Consideration Amount - Finance Office Use Only Transfer and Recordation Tax Consideration _ Purchase Price/Consideration $ Consideration Any New Mortgage $' Transfer Tax Consideration $ and Tax Balance of Existing Mortgage $ -8'-" X ( ) % _ $ Calculations Other: $ Less Exemption Amount - $ Total Transfer Tax = $ Other: $ Recordation Tax Consideration $ X ( ) per $500 = $ Full Cash Value: $ TOTAL DUE $ 5 Amount of Fees Doe. 1 Doc. 2 Agent: Recording Charge $ $ Fees Surcharge $ $ Tax Bill: State Recordation Tax $ $ State Transfer Tax $ $ C.B. Credit: County Transfer Tax $ $ Other $ _ $ Ag. Tax/Other: Other $ $ 6 District Property Tax ID No. (1) Granto Liber/Folio Map Pa cel No. Var. LOG 2 �� 7-0� d7 q 7 f 2 f3D Q393 oogl ❑ (5) Description of Subdivision Name Lot (3a) Block (3b) ecUAR (3c) Plat Ref. SgFUAcreage (4) Property SDAT requires submission of all Location/Address of Pro rty Being Conveyed (2) applicable information. A maximum of 40 I ZZ a /k e- X1J D 217 1Z390 5411~Lt'c ?DW � ,20 Other Property Identifiers (if applica. e) Water Meter Account No. characters will be indexed in accordance Residential ❑ or Non -Residential Fee Simple or Ground Rent ❑ Amount: with the priority cited in Partial Conveyance? es ❑No I Description/Amt. of SgFUAcreage Transferred: DC DF� 6X6444 Real Property Article jj G) RCgL- 3 tC.UAfJ66� OR Q,I r D, J.0 A& AfZC9L 009l._. Section 3 104(g)(3){I). If partial Conveyance, List Improvements Conveyed: L7 -� — Doe. I - Grantor(s) Name(s) Doc. 2 - Grantor(s) Name(s) t � Transferred f�... L.A S / tg From 7Doc.1 - Owner(s) of Record, if Different from Grantor(s) Doc. 2 - Owner(s) of Record, if Different from Granter(s) �g Doc. I - Grantee(s) Name(s) Doe. 2 - Grantee(s) Name(s) Trarisferred M 5 1 Fak V .r-•r LLB To 1J&CLA M. 0IFL CCK New Owner's (Grantee) Mailing Address Ct7 ✓� t e �L�/TOI P�g&eT-D Cu 9 Doe. 1 - Additional Names to be Indexed (Optional Doc 2 - Additional Names to be Indexed (Optional) Other Names to Be Indexed: 0 COntaCUMaiI Information Instrument Submitted By or Contact Person . ElReturn to Contact Person ❑ Hold for Picku P [Return Address Provided Name: _ _ Firm r S�OGI 'I _ Address: A T /12,� p�UJAI, MnZ l i hone: (�d } % v Q o 11 IMPORTANT: Assessment Information hOTH THE ORIGINAL DEED AND A PHOTOCOPY MUST ACCOMPANY EACH TRANSFER Yes o Will the property being conveyed be the grantee's principal residence? d Yes 1�2o Does transfer include personal property? If yes. identify: Yes No Was ro erly surveyed? If yes, attach coy of survey ( record no copy re uired). Assessment Use OnI - Do Not Write Below This L Terminal Ver licatian Agricultural Verification Whole Part Tran. Process Verification Transfer Number: Date Received: Deed Reference: Assigned Properly No.: Year 20 120 1 Goo. Ma Sub W Block Land Zoning Grid Plat Lot BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 346 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION J u ' INKMA&ASMOAMUC ATTORNEY AT LAW ) 201 PR05PEC:AVENUE SUITE 122 HACERSTOWN.MD21742 i3D1>714.0999 DEED OF EXCHANGE THIS DEED OF EXCHANGE, made this day of April, 2017, by and between Heritage Huyett, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company ("Heritage") and McRand-Huyetts Limited Partnership, a Maryland limited partnership ("McRand"). WHEREAS, Heritage and the McRand, inter alia, made application to Washington County, Maryland for a simplified subdivision of certain parcels of real property, including the parcels as more particularly described hereinbelow, to adjust certain property lines and enlarge certain parcels for the purpose of widening the right of way of "Lager Drive" along Greencastle Pike (Maryland Route 63), all as depicted on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" (the "Plat"); and WHEREAS, said simplified subdivision was approved by the Washington County Planning Commission on January 24, 2017 and said Plat subsequently recorded at Plat folio 10689 among the Plat Records of Washington County, Maryland (a copy of said Plat being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as "Exhibit A"); and WHEREAS, this Deed of Exchange is intended to and does complete the adjustment of certain property lines and enlarge certain parcels as set forth on said Plat. NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the foregoing, but for no monetary consideration, the respective parties hereto grant and convey unto one another the following lots or parcels of real property: A. HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, does hereby grant and convey unto MCRAND-HUYETTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Maryland limited partnership, in fee simple, all the following described real property, together with any improvements, easements, rights of way, benefits, and appurtenances, thereunto belonging or appertaining, situate along the West side of the Williamsport -Greencastle Highway and on the North side of U.S. Route 40 West of Huyetts Cross Roads in Election District No. 23, Washington County, Maryland, and being more particularly described as follows: Parcel No. Al: All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.37 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel A" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland; and Parcel No. A2: All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.25 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel G" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland. The above -described property being part of "Parcel No. 1" conveyed unto Heritage Huyett, LLC from Orrstown Bank, by deed dated March 30, 2012 and recorded in Liber 4257, folio 169 among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland, to which deed reference is hereby made. PA13K WoMZoninoeritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-McRand).dcc Page 1 of 6 C 1 39 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 347 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION a J D KURIVEA & A%oaATES. L1_C ATTORNEv AT LAW 201 PROSPECTAVENUE SUITE 122 HAGERSTOWN. MD 21142 (301 j 71 "889 This property is conveyed together with and subject to all applicable covenants, conditions, restrictions, limitations, rights of way, streets, reservations, alleys, and easements of record. B. MCRAND-HUYETTS LUMTED PARTNERSHIP, a Maryland limited partnership, does hereby grant and convey unto HE, RLTYETT, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, in fee simple, all the following described real property, together with any improvements, easements, rights of way, benefits, and appurtenances, thereunto belonging or appertaining, situate along the West side of the Williamsport -Greencastle Highway and on the North side of U.S. Route 40 West of Huyetts Cross Roads in Election District No. 23, Washington County, Maryland, and being more particularly described as follows: Parcel No. B 1: All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.51 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel C" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland; and Parcel No. B2: All that lot or parcel of land, containing 0.09 acres, more or less, as shown and depicted as "Parcel H" on a plat of subdivision entitled "Simplified Plat of Subdivision of Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H for Randy and Angela Shifler and Heritage Huyett LLC and McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership" prepared by Frederick Seibert & Associates, Inc., bearing Job No. 4668, and recorded at Plat folio 10689, among the Plat Records maintained in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Washington County, Maryland. The above -described property being part of that real property conveyed unto McRand- Huyetts Limited Partnership from Powers Distributing Co., Inc., a Maryland corporation, by deed dated June 29, 1989 and recorded in Liber 920, folio 104 among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland, to which deed reference is hereby made. This property is conveyed together with and subject to all applicable covenants, conditions, restrictions, limitations, rights of way, streets, reservations, alleys, and easements of record. The respective grantors hereby covenant each unto the other that each is seized of title to the property which is hereby granted, and each hereby warrants specially such title unto the other, and each hereby further covenants that they will provide unto the other such further assurances thereof as may be requisite. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and sealed this Deed of Exchange as of the day and year first above written. HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC a Maryland limited liability company anrr a / By: (SEAL) itness/Attest Te L andall, agin ember PABK WorMoningUieritage Huyetff_xchange Deed (Heritage-McRand).doc Page 2 of 6 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 348 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION J J KURn 'KA&A%xuTF$ LLC ATTORNEY AT LAW 201 PROSPECT AVENUE SUM 122 IiACERSTOWN, MD 2i742 (301) 714-0889 q4,.v,. A mess/Attest MC -RAND HUYETTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP a Maryland limited partnership By; G- (SEAL) Terry LAaddall, LimiteX Partner STATE OF MARYLAND; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, to -wit: On this _ day of 20/7 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Terry L. Randall, Managing Member of Heritage Huyett, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and that he, as such Managing Member, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing Deed of Exchange for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the company by himself as Managing Member; and he further acknowledged that the consideration recited therein is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official Notarial Seal. My Commission expires: Not y Public STATE OF MARYLAND; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, to -wit: On this 49 day of 1001- , 20/7, before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Terry L. Randall, Limited Partner of Heritage Huyett, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and that he, as such Limited Partner, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing Deed of Exchange for the purposes therein contained, by signing the name of the company by himself as Limited Partner; and he further acknowledged that the consideration recited therein is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official Notarial Seal. My Commission expires: BRIAN M. KURTYKA NojjyPublic NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2018 P;\BK Work\Zoning\Heritage HuyettiExchange Deed (Heritage-McRand).doc Page 3 of 6 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 349 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION J 0 KuRTYNA&AmocvATMU,C ATTORNEY AT LAW 201 PROSPECTAWNUE Sucre 122 HAGERST—N, MD 21742 (30l) 714-0389 AFFIDAVIT OF NO CONSIDERATION I hereby certify, under the penalties of perjury, that the actual consideration paid or to be paid for the foregoing conveyances, including the amount of any mortgage or deed of trust assumed by the grantees, is in the sum total or $0.00. mess 44— � Terry andall 04 Sworn and subscribed to before me this -4/' day of hall- , 2017. My Commission expires: �� —. BRIAN M. KURTYKA NOTARY PUBLIC FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 26, 2018 Noiary Public I HEREBY CERTIFY that the within instrument was prepared by or under the supervision of the undersigned, an Attorney duly admitted to practice before the Court of Appeals of Maryland. Bri M. Kurtyka After recording, please mail to: Kurtyka & Associates, LLC 201 Prospect Avenue, Suite 122 Hagerstown, MD 21742 P:\BK Work\ZoningMieritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-McRand).doc Page 4 of 6 TODD L. HERSH -Y, TR -ASt1t+iEN TAXES PAID `�> BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 350 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE 2 EXAMINATION ` KUWMA&ASSOMTS. ILC ATTORNEY AT I.AW 201 PROS➢EGTAVENUE SUITE 122 5 HAGERSTOWN.MD21742 4301) 714-0889 C r a Certification of Exemption from Withholding Upon Disposition of Maryland Real Estate Affidavit of Residence or Principal Residence Based on the certification below, Transferor claims exemption from the tax withholding requirements of § 10-912 of the Tax -General Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. Section 10- 912 provides that certain tax payments must be withheld and paid when a deed or other instrument that effects a change in ownership of real property is presented for recordation. The requirements of §10-912 do not apply when a transferor provides a certification of Maryland residence or certification that the transferred property is the transferor's principal residence. 1. Transferor Information Name of Transferor HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC 2. Reasons for Resident El I, Transferor, am a resident of the State of Maryland. Status ® Transferor is a resident entity as defined in Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 03.04.12.02B(11), I am an agent of Transferor, and I have authority to sign this Document on Transferor's behalf. Principal ❑ Although I am no longer a resident of the State of Maryland, the Property is my Residence Principal residence as defined in IRC 121 and is recorded as such with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I have examined this declaration and that, to the best of my knowledge, it is true, correct, and complete. 3a. Individual Transferors Witness Name Signature L,. A fa,:A— iqt-ness/Attest 3b. Entity Transferors Heritage Huyett, LLC Name of ntity By Terry L. Randall Name Managing Member Title PABK Work\Zoning\Heritage HuyetAExchange Deed (Heritage-McRand).doe Page 5 of 6 BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 351 PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE '- EXAMINATION J s KUNTYKA& ASSOQATEs.id,C ATTORNEY AT law 201 PROSPECT AVENUE SOrre 122 HAC ERSTewx, M D 21742 t301> 714-0889 Certification of Exemption from Withholding Upon Disposition of Maryland Real Estate Affidavit of Residence or Principal Residence Based on the certification below, Transferor claims exemption from the tax withholding requirements of § 10-912 of the Tax -General Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. Section 10- 912 provides that certain tax payments must be withheld and paid when a deed or other instrument that effects a change in ownership of real property is presented for recordation. The requirements of § 10-912 do not apply when a transferor provides a certification of Maryland residence or certification that the transferred property is the transferor's principal residence. 1. Transferor Information Name of Transferor MCRAND-HUYETTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 2. Reasons for Exemption Resident ❑ I, Transferor, am a resident of the State of Maryland. Status ® Transferor is a resident entity as defined in Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 03.04.12.02B(11), I am an agent of Transferor, and I have authority to sign this Document on Transferor's behalf. Principal ❑ Although I am no longer a resident of the State of Maryland, the Property is my Residence Principal residence as defined in IRC 121 and is recorded as such with the State Deaartment of Assessments and Taxation. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I have examined this declaration and that, to the best of my knowledge, it is true, correct, and complete. 3a. Individual Transferors Witness Name Signature 3b. Entity Transferors L4 A McRand-Huyetts Limited Partnership fitness/Attest Name of Entity By Terry L. Randall Name Limited Partner Title PABK WorMoning\Heritage Huyett\Exchange Deed (Heritage-McRand).doc Page 6 of 6 BOOK: 5537 PAG��E:352 _ _ 1' I' I' (� �, r I � LI,l�I e I � lal.l• z Lr.l r •I. �r. a,l,i LI, EXHIBIT A T3'IR s s e �Idk Fig e 9 n En gg3agJ�Ir' L ?� 6 9 y� ! �y `I s I / crw AfA,blliH v, f: . z ; 4nlaa.aa� �� f / f: ~ r ; I V A (!l rr Y.-oer M,prR.CIN / .4° % �^ • 1 � L !.+� a 1 IH V �� g'✓�Mers,• !=lri( °u° lrre � _ � _ I LPG .. r�rQ��: r Po ����a��' q1 a I a T; I M,¢12VN/ yt ii 1 ir • � a;��flf�l� ii1 nz O . 4i � n3 as gib MPH ��j, RB1qkj8 � � s �eg�9dRA;�� Yg°e BOOK: 5537 PAGE: 353 This page not to be counted in calculating Recording Fee Clerk of Circuit Court Washington County, Maryland Dennis J. Weaver, Clerk 24 Summit Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21740 301-790-7991 For Clerks Use Only Improvement Fee 40.00 Recording Fee 20.00 County Transfer Tax Recordation Tax State Transfer Tax Non -Resident Tax TOTAL . 60.00 LR - Deed (ND -Takes) Recording Fee 20.00 Name_ huyetts limited Ref. LR - Deed (ND -Taxes) Surcharge 40.00 ------------------- SubTotal���-_-- 60.00 Total: 60.20 06/3012017 01:02 CC21-TR #8659531 CC0403 - Washinoton County/CC04.23.04 - Reoi ster• 04 L,J I Yp":'D/ Of Instruments t LJl RCl'R Dux ll HnuellUUn1 LiWRC rums IN r�uacucu.J iV ° z v7 Deed Deed or Trust Mortgage Lease Other Other 2 Conveyance Type Check Box -H Improved Sale Unimproved Sale Multiple Accounts Not an Arms- Arms -Length [1] Arms -Length 121 Arms -Length [31 Length Sale 191 3 Tax Exemptions (if Applicable) Cite or Explain Authority Recordation State Transfer County Transfer 4 1 Consideration Amount Finance Office Use Only Transfer and Recordation Tax Consideration Purchase Price/Consideration $ Consideration Any New Mortgage _ $ Transfer Tax Consideration $ and Tax Balance of Existing Mortgage $ X ( ) % = $ Calculations Other: $ Less Exemption Amount — $ Total Transfer Tax = $ Other: $ Recordation Tax Consideration $ X ( ) per $500 = $ Full Cash Value: $ TOTAL DUE $ 5 Amount of Fees Doc. I Doc, 2 Agent: Recording Charge $ $ Fees Surcharge $ $ Tax Bill: State Recordation Tax $ $ State Transfer Tax $ $ C.B. Credit: County Transfer Tax $ $ __ Other $ $ Ag. Tax/Other: Other $ $ 6 District Property Tax ID No. (1) , a for Jieffolio Map— Parc 1 No. Var. LOG �3 QO 492- DO Oe ❑ (5) Description of Subdivision Name Lot (3a) Block (3b) ect/AR (3c) Plat Ref. SgFUAcreage (4) Property SDAT requires T d submission of all Location/Address of Property Being Conveyed (2) applicable information. A maximum of 40. jbg7? t4Ap.Q LPig, V7 &L 1 2 O Other Property Identifiers (if applicable) Water Meter Account No. y characters will be indexed in accordance Residential ❑ or Non -Residential i[� Fee Simple V or Ground Rent ❑ Amount: with the priority cited in Partial Conveyance? Yes ❑No I Description/Anit, of SgFUAcreage Transferred' Di5 Ep OF ,)(Gf' A Real Properly Article 01 26 ac Pk90,LL 63 Ca 656g Section 3-104(g)(3)(i). If Partial Conveyance, List Improvements Conveyed: _ 7 Doc. I - Grantor(s) Name(s) Doc. 2 - Grantor(s) Name(s) tr cL iYIC E f P sN P Transferred From Doc. I - Owner(s) of Record, if Different from Grantor(s) Doc. 2 - Owner(s) of Record, if Different from Grantor(s) g � Doc. I - Grantee(s) Name(s) Doc. 2 - Grantee(s) Names)M0PM Traristerred D- U J f V L To New Owner's (Grantee) Mailing Address — _ i— Con/ CI�5 6 9 Names Doc. I - Additional Names to be Indexed (Optional) Doe 2 - Additional Names to be Indexed (Optional) Other — to Be Indexed 10 Contact/Mail Information Instrument Submitted By or Contact Person ❑ Return to Contact Person ❑ Hold for Pickup / [I? Return Address Provided Name: Firm /Z +— —'r Address: ,0Q5/9,�l VW'W SIJI 715 2- .S A/ Z/ Z Phone: ( t) o t t IMPORTANT: Assessment Information BOTH THE ORIGINAL DEED AND A PHOTOCOPY MUST ACCOMPANY EACH TRANSFER Yes No Will the property being conveyed be the grantee's principal residence? Yes No Does transfer include personal property? If yes, identify: Yes A Was property ef urvey surveyed? d? Iyes, attach coy of s( recorde , no copy required). Assessment Use Only - Do Not Write Below This L a Terminal Verification Agricultural Verification Whole Part Tran. Process Verification Transfer Number: Dale Received: Deed Reference: Assigned Properly No.: Year 20 20 Geo, I Map Sub I Block r° Land Zoning Grid Plat __.___ -- I Lot City of Hagerstown James A. Gillenwater Greencastle Pike Robin A. GilIenwater Hagerstown, MD 21740 12703 Greencastle Pike (Tax Parcel 0036-0008-0053) Hagerstown, MD 21740 Mailing Address: (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0459) City Hall Mailing Address: 1 E. Franklin Street 12703 Greencastle Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 Hagerstown, MD 21740 Krista O'Brien Kenneth L. Grimm, Jr. 16411 Leon Grimm Drive Ginger Grimm Hagerstown, MD 21740 12519 Huyett Lane (Liber 1847, folio 460) Hagerstown, MD 21740 Mailing Address: (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0447) 1583 Winter Camp Trail Mailing Address: Hedgesville, WV 25427 16428 Leon Grimm Drive Hagerstown, MD 21740 Kevin L. Grimm 16407 Leon Grimm Drive Samuel P. Croteau Hagerstown, MD 21740 Erin R. Croteau (Liber 1807 folio 457) 12515 Huyett Lane Mailing Address: Hagerstown, MD 21740 16407 Leon Grimm Drive (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0238) Hagerstown, MD 21740 Mailing Address: 12515 Huyett Lane Kenneth L. Grimm, Jr., et al. Hagerstown, MD 21740 0 Leon Grimm Drive (remainder parcel) (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0043) Landis E. Martin Mailing Address: 12511 Huyett Lane c/o Keith Grimm Hagerstown, MD 21740 16403 Leon Grimm Drive (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0239) Hagerstown, MD 21740 Mailing Address: 15085 Trolley Road Elaine M. Grimm Waynesboro, PA 17268 16421 Leon Grimm Drive Hagerstown, MD 21740 Timothy E. Fields (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0546-1) Sandra M. Fields Mailing Address: 12507 Huyett Lane 16421 Leon Grimm Drive Hagerstown, MD 21740 Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0240) Mailing Address: 12507 Huyett Lane Hagerstown, MD 21740 Wayne D. Cline WACOHU Grange 415 Laresa J. Cline National Pike 12427 Huyett Lane Hagerstown, MD 21740 Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0329) (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0282) Mailing Address: Mailing Address: c/o Gerry M. Reid 12427 Huyett Lane 15213 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 Hagerstown, MD 21740 Lowell M. Wigfield Randy M. Shifler Terri L. Wigfield Angela M. Shifler 12411 Huyett Lane National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 Clear Spring, MD 21722 (Tax Parcel 0036-0016-0241) (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0370) Mailing Adress: Mailing Address: 12411 Huyett Lane 16609 Fairview Road Hagerstown, MD 21740 Hagerstown, MD 21740 Mennonite Fellowship Home, Inc. Randy M. Shifler 12349 Huyett Lane Angela M. Shifler Hagerstown, MD 21740 National Pike (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0460) Clear Spring, MD 21722 Mailing Address: (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0091) 12349 Huyett Lane Mailing Address: Hagerstown, MD 21740 16609 Fairview Road Hagerstown, MD 21740 McRand Huyetts Limited Partnership Lager Drive Huyetts Mennonite School Hagerstown, MD 21740 16404 National Pike (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0568) Hagerstown, MD 21740 Mailing Address: (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0308) c/o Terry Randall Mailing Address: 3879 Gibralter Drive 16404 National Pike Naples, FL 34119 Hagerstown, MD 21740 McRand Huyetts Limited Partnership Kyle Michael Walter 12404 Lager Drive 16400 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0364) (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0332) Mailing Address: Mailing Address: c/o Sheetz Inc. 16400 National Pike 5700 6th Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21740 Altoona, PA 16602 Vinco Development 16306 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0445) Mailing Address: c/o TCA Trustcoip America 33 W. Franklin Street, Suite 301 Hagerstown, MD 21740 Vincent R. Groh, et al. National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0015-0093) Mailing Address: c/o TCA Trustcorp America 33 W. Franklin Street, Suite 301 Hagerstown, MD 21740 The Wilson Foundation, Inc. 16204 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0014-0360) Mailing Address: 16204 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 Jeffrey L. Suder Lori D. Suder 16048 & 16050 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0014-0094) Mailing Address: 16048 National Pike Hagerstown, MD 21740 Board of County Commissioners 12630 Earth Care Road Hagerstown, MD 21740 (Tax Parcel 0036-0008-0086) Mailing Address: County Courthouse Complex Hagerstown, MD 21740 \— o o 00 0 a H(o a = Z o 00 " ~ x r ou "I W U o Z J G }z O O 2 O U Z 0 �o W Z A w= 10 t)IN -a z wwob Q U W•'' N J IL F o Nja n � N is O Q O n U }O� U z 3 w n E � a0 0 U w W " w m p� W O m N m w D [� z g Uo a LL W o 3 c. 0 3 a w �0 a �? a W rc O zom' Z d Jng 0 W � o�rc n O F 1 a i w w C a ° z w w a F w w WU O Q z S a z aka aka W x � a a ova ww w x � a a cn 1900 0 JUSTWICATION STATEMENT HERITAGE HUYETT, LLC 16422 NATIONAL PIKE, HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND & 8.32 ACRES f GREENCASTLE PHCE, HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND This Justification Statement is submitted in support of the Application for Map Amendment, on behalf of and with authorization from the property owner, Heritage Huyett, LLC. The Property: The Property is owned by Heritage Huyett, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and was purchased in April 2012 as a bank -owned property, which obtained it in satisfaction of the prior owner's financial obligations. The Property consists of two (2) parcels, the first parcel containing 82.18 acres, more or less ("Parcel I"), and the second parcel containing 8.32 acres, more or less ("Parcel 2"), each as more particularly described in the deeds included with the Application. Each of the parcels borders on Maryland Route 63/Greencastle Pike. Parcel 1 is roughly rectangular in shape, with about 1000 feet of frontage along Maryland Route 63/Greencastle Pike, and runs in a west/northwesterly direction from said road approximately 3000 feet to the Conoco cheague Creek. Parcel 2 is adjacent to Parcel 1 at the northeasterly most corner thereof, and is also roughly rectangular in shape, with about 900 feet of frontage along the same road, and is approximately 425 feet deep. The layout of the two parcels are in a "boot" configuration, with Parcel 2 serving as the "toe" of the boot, as may be seen on the "Rezoning Exhibit for Creekside Logistics Center," included with the Application. Previous Zoning: The adopted Land Use Plan in the 2002 County Comprehensive Plan recommended an Industrial Flex land use for the Property. During review of the Urban Growth Area Comprehensive Rezoning file in 2005, the Property was identified for zoning as Planned Industrial (PI), in keeping with the Industrial Flex land use recommendation. However, the owner at that time desired to use the Property for residential dwelling purposes, and the Board of County Commissioners agreed to adopt a zoning of Residential Transition (RT) for the Property. In 2015, the current owner of the Property requested a rezoning of the Property to PI for the majority (approximately 60 acres) of Parcel 1 to the West, and Business Local (BL) for the remainder of Parcel l to the East and all of Parcel 2 (approximately 30 acres). Upon consideration of the Property owner's request and analysis by County Department of Planning & Zoning, the Board of County Commissioners granted the rezoning to PI/BL Page 1 of 2 Planned Property Use; The owner requests that the approximately 30 acres now zoned as BL be rezoned to PI. The owner intends to use the entire Property for truck ternrinal/distribution and warehousing purposes, each of which are principal permitted uses in the PI. In addition to sufficient road frontage allowing for multiple entrances to the Property, public water is now available at the Property. Justification for Rezoning: The Property remains unoccupied and undeveloped, so no existing use will be compromised by rezoning the 30 acres from BL to PI. Rezoning will allow for the entire Property to satisfy the 2002 Industrial Flex land use recommendation and to conform to the 2005 PI zoning identification. Respectfully submitted, Brian M. Kurf�ka, Esq. Kurtyka & Associates, LLC 201 Prospect Avenue, Suite 122 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 (301) 714-0889 (phone) (206) 312-0788 (fax) bkurtyka@kurtykalaw.com Page 2 of 2 �WashingtonCounty DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING I LAND PRESERVATION I FOREST CONSERVATION I GIS November 2019 Application for Map Amendment Staff Report and Analysis Case #: RZ-19-006 Property Owner(s) Heritage Huyett LLC Applicant(s) same Location W/S of MD 63 (Greencastle -Williamsport Pike) approximately 0.1 miles North of US 40 (National Pike) Election District #23 — Wilsons Comprehensive Plan Designation Industrial Flex Zoning Map 36 Parcel(s) 393 & 561 Acreage 90.34 Acres [82.05 (P. 393) & 8.29 (P.561) acres] Existing Zoning BL — Business Local (29.57 acres) & PI — Planned Industrial (60.77 acres) Requested Zoning Planned Industrial Date of Meeting December 2, 2019 Preliminary Consultation: The stated intent of the Planned Industrial (PI) zoning district is to assign this zoning to "large single parcels or an assemblage of parcels for planning, re -subdivision, and development of a cohesively designed industrial park with multiple lots, interior streets, and other amenities"'. To assist developers and citizens in planning a cohesive and compatible development, applicants for new PI zoning districts are required to first hold a preliminary consultation with the Planning Commission that outlines the intent of the developer and gives an early opportunity to supply guidance and feedback on the proposal. On June 20, 2019 a Preliminary Consultation was held with the property owner and developer, Heritage Huyett LLC. A copy of the meeting summary is included within this report as Exhibit 1. This consultation has not yet been presented to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. I Washington County, Maryland Zoning Ordinance, Article 18, Section 18.0 100 West Washington Street, Suite 26001 Hagerstown, MD 21740 1 P: 240.313.2430 j F: 240.313.24311 TDD: 7-1-1 WWW.WASHCO-MRNET Background and Findings Analysis: Location and Description of Subject t Properties The subject parcels are located along the west side of Maryland Route 63 (Greencastle - Williamsport Pike) approximately 0.1 mile north of US Route 40 (National Pike). The total acreage of the two parcels that are the subject of this rezoning case is 90.5 acres and is further described as follows: Subject Parcel #1: Tax Map 36; Grid 15; Parcel 393 — The parcel has a regular rectangular shape consisting of 82.18 acres and is currently unimproved. The property has a rolling topography that generally rises up from MD 63 to a high point in the back thud of the property. The rear of the property drops severely and borders the Conococheague Creek. The property consists of mostly grassland. The rearmost portion ofthe property along Conococheague Creek has a significant stand of forest. Subject Parcel #2: Tax Map 36; Grid 15; Parcel 561— This parcel also has a regular rectangular shape consisting of 8.32 acres and is currently unimproved. The topography is primarily flat with a gentle upward slope moving up away from MD 63. Both properties are located within the Urban Growth Area that surrounds the City of Hagerstown and the Towns of Williamsport and Funkstown. These properties form the westernmost boundary of the UGA along MD 63. Population Anal To evaluate the change in population, information was compiled from the US Census Bureau over a thirty-year time frame. A thirty year horizon was picked to show long term population trends both in the election district of the proposed rezoning, as well as the overall trends of the County. Both of the properties that are the subject of this rezoning are located in the Wilsons Election District, # 23. As shown in Table 1 below, this district has shown large increases in population over the thirty year time flame between 1980 and 2010. Population increases within this election district have far outpaced the average growth rate in the County as a whole of this 30 year time period. This district has increased approximately 83.58% (2.79% per year) while the County has increased in population by 30.37% (1.01% per year) during the same period. Table 1: Population Trends 1980 - 2010 o change trorn previous Year Area Population decade District 2863 1980 County 113086 District 3507 22.5% 1990 County 121393 7.3% District 3923 11.9% 2000 County 1 1319321 8.7% District 1 52561 34.0% 2010 County 1 1474301 11.7% Source: US Census Bureau Availability of Public Facilities Water and Sewerage The adopted Water and Sewerage Plan for the County establishes the policies and recommendations for public water and sewer infrastructure to help guide development in a manner that helps promote healthy and adequate service to citizens. By its own decree, the purpose of the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan is "...to provide for the continued health and well- being of Washington Countians and our downstream neighbors...s2 This is achieved through implementing recommendations within the County Comprehensive Plan and the Water and Sewerage Plan to provide for services in a timely and efficient manner and by establishing an inventory of existing and programmed services. Both properties are located within the County designated Urban Growth Area that surrounds the City of Hagerstown as well as the Towns of Funkstown and Williamsport. Both parcels are currently unimproved. Subject Parcel #1 previously had two dwelling units on the property that have since been demolished. Water: Subject Parcel #1 (Parcel 393) is delineated as a W-3 Programmed Water Service area in the 2009 Water and Sewerage Plan. Subject Parcel #2 (Parcel 561) has a split delineation in the 2009 Water and Sewerage plan W-1 Existing Service and W-1 Restricted Use Existing. There is an existing restricted use water line that runs along the same trajectory as MD 63. It is unclear if there had been public water service to either or both of the now demolished dwellings. The City of Hagerstown is the service provider. This application was sent to the City of Hagerstown Water Department for review and comment. Kathy Maher from the City of Hagerstown Department of Planning and Code Enforcement has offered the following comments: 2 Washington County, Maryland Water and Sewerage Plan 2009 Update, Page I-2 3 "The City has a pre -annexation agreement far water service for the Powers Estate when it was going to be housing. We honor those agreements even when the plans change under current. policy. There are parts of this area behind Sheetz that are not covered by a pre - annexation agreement however and this area is outside the MRGA. No guarantees of City Water Service for properties outside the MRGA. The City's Water & Wastewater Policy has an exception for economic development projects outside the MRGA which are sanctioned by the County and supported by the City, but our Mayor and City Council have put those requests on hold while the City and County staff work through the current MRGA prioritization discussions. If the proposed MRGA boundary adjustments are made in the City's Comp Plan, the goal would be to include this area. If agreement cannot be reached at the elected level on the areas that would be removed from the MRGA so new areas can be added, City staff cannot provide any assurance that the Mayor and City Council will move forward with the MRGA adjustments. " Wastewater: Both parcels are located within an S-3 Programmed Wastewater Service Area as delineated in the 2009 Water and Sewerage Plan. There are existing sewer service lines within the vicinity of the parcel that will need to be extended to the property. The Washington County Department of Water Quality is the service provider. This application was sent to the Department of Water Quality for review and comment. The Department replied that they had no comments. Emergency Services Fire: Subject Parcel #1 is located within the service area of the Williamsport Volunteer Fire Company (Company #2). Subject Parcel #2 is located within the service area of the Maugansville Goodwill Fire Company (Company #13). The property is approximately 5 miles away fiom both fire companies. Emergency Rescue: Emergency Rescue services are provided by Williamsport Volunteer Ambulance Service (Company #29). The properties are approximately 5 miles away from the station. A copy of this application was sent to each of the volunteer companies as well as to the Washington County Division of Emergency Services. Kevin Lewis, Director of Emergency Services commented that during review of the previous development proposed on this property (Powers Estates — a residential subdivision of 100+ dwellings), a request was made by the multiple involved agencies to have the developer set aside land within the development for the establishment of a new sub -station for fire and/or emergency services. They are asking for the same provisions fiom the developer of this proposed development. 4 Schools The subject site is within the districts of Jonathan Hager Elementary, Clear Spring Middle and Clear Spring High schools. The properties currently have zoning split between two districts; BL and PI, commercial districts which do not permit residential uses and, therefore, have no impact on school capacity. The requested change for the subject properties to be rezoned to PI would be a continuation of the existing commercial/industrial zoning districts and should not have an impact on school capacities. Present and Future Transportation Patterns Hrghways Both of the subject parcels in this case have existing road frontage along Maryland Route 63 (Williamsport -Greencastle Pike). This fiontage lies within a designated restricted access corridor regulated by the Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA). There is currently an approved entrance onto Subject Parcel #2 and an existing curb cut already constructed. Access to Subject Parcel #1 is proposed to be via Lager Drive and a newly constructed access road located behind the lands of McRand Huyetts Limited Partnership (L.920 F. 104). In addition to evaluating public access of a parcel for rezoning purposes, it is also important to evaluate traffic generation and existing traffic volumes. This is commonly accomplished through analysis of historic and existing traffic counts as well as any existing traffic impact studies. Due to the subject properties location along a State owned and maintained route, traffic volume data was retrieved from MD SHA. Given the two properties' proximity to the intersection of two major routes, traffic volume data for all four legs of the intersection of MD 63 and US 40 have been included in the chart below. The data shown in the chart is expressed in annual average daily traffic volumes. Table 2: Traffic Volumes 1980-2014 Year MD 63 @ Huyett Lane MD 63 south of US 40 US 40 west of MD 63 US 40 east of MD 63 2014 5820 11354 9382 12484 2010 5852 9652 11610 12740 2005 5975 10075 14150 13675 2000 7050 8100 14450 12418 1995 5925 7350 10625 10745 1990 3775 5500 9675 10044 1985 3300 3750 8000 8502 1980 2900 3500 8000 7736 Source: Maryland State Highway Administration As shown in Table 2, traffic volumes have been steadily increasing over the last three decades. Because the figures are expressed in annual average daily traffic there are some inconsistencies in year to year data but there is an obvious increase in traffic on all four legs of this intersection. More specific to this rezoning request is the traffic volume data in the column labeled MD 63 @ Huyett Lane. It is apparent fiorn the data that traffic volumes on this leg of the intersection have doubled over the last three decades; however, it is also important to note that this leg of the intersection also has the least amount of annual average daily traffic. In comparison to the other three legs of the intersection, traffic volumes on MD 63 north of US 40 has been about half the volumes of the other three legs. A copy of this rezoning application was sent to SHA for continent, however, there has been no continent received in response to this request. As part of the rezoning application for properties seeking a PI zoning district, the Zoning Ordinance states that the developer shall provide "...preliminary traffic data that includes available current traffic counts for existing roads within a one mile radians of the site, a projection of the additional traffic (amount and type) predicted to be generated by the proposed development, peak hour estimates, and the distribution and direction of travel of the projected vehicles.3" As part of a previous rezoning case reviewed in 2015 the applicant did complete a preliminary traffic analysis evaluating existing and projected traffic impacts along MD 63 from its intersection with the Interstate 70 Eastbound off ramps up to the intersection of US 40. The traffic analysis was completed assuming a mixture of traffic that would be produced from uses permitted in the BL and PI zoning districts. While this serves as a good basis from which to build traffic impact assumptions, it is important to realize that there are a wide variety of uses permitted in the BL and PI districts that can have different traffic impacts and that the assumptions made in this analysis may change over time. Ultimately, a full traffic impact study will need to be completed and approved at the site plan development stage to ensure traffic impacts will be appropriately mitigated. Public Transportation This area is currently not served by public transportation. Compatibility with Existing and Proposed Development in the Area: Currently Subject Parcel #1 is split between two zoning districts; Business Local (BL) and Planned Industrial (PI). Subject Parcel #2 is zoned BL and both parcels are requesting to be wholly zoned Pl. The purpose of the PI zoning district is to foster industrial development in Planned Industrial Parks that can be built and operated with a minimum of nuisance. Subject Parcel #1 is bounded to the south by properties zoned Residential Transitional (RT) and BL and bounded on the north by properties zoned EC (Environmental Conservation) and RB (Rural Business). Subject Parcel #2 is surrounded on the north and west by RB zoning and on the south by RT zoning. The area surrounding the subject parcels contain a mixture of residential, institution, and commercial uses. The majority of the property is bordered by large lot residential uses. There is also a scattering of institutional uses within a one half mail radius of the subject parcels including the former Huyetts Mennonite School, Emmanuel Baptist Church and school, and the WACOHU s Washington County Zoning Ordinance, Article 18, Section 18.6 [: grange hall. Commercial uses dominate the intersection of MD 63 and US 40 and radiate north to the boundary of Subject Parcel #1. Another important component of compatibility is the location of historic structures on and around the parcels being proposed for rezoning. The following historic sites listed on the Washington County Historic Sites Survey are located within a 0.5 mile radius of the proposed rezoning areas. WA-V-263 — Stunkle-Keefer Farm, early 19th Century brick house and bank barn, located on an adjacent property. WA-V-054 — Kershner-Summers-Groh House, late 18th century limestone house, located on an adjacent property. WA-V-425 — Huyett Public School #7 (currently Huyetts Mennonite School), constructed in 1924, located on an adjacent property. WA-V-427 -- Early 201h century brick house, located approximately 800' from the subject property WA-V-420 — Early 20"' century wood frame house, located approximately 800' from the subject property. WA-V-421 — Early 20th century wood frame house, located approximately 800' from the subject property WA-V-422 — Early 20t1' century brick house, located approximately 820' from the subject property. WA-V-423 — Early 20th century brick house, located approximately 820' from the subject property. WA-I-846 — Early 20th century formed concrete brick commercial building, located approximately 1200' from the subject property. WA-I-852 — Early 20th century brick house, located approximately 1800' fiom the subject property. WA-I-853 — Early 20th century wood frame house, approximately 2000' from the subject property. Relationship of the Proposed Change to the Adopted Plan for the County: The purpose of a Comprehensive Plan is to evaluate the needs of the community and balance the different types of growth to create a harmony between different land uses. In general, this is accomplished through evaluation of existing conditions, projections of fixture conditions, and creation of a generalized land use plan that promotes compatibility while maintaining the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. Both of the properties are located in the sub --policy area Industrial Flex. The Comprehensive Plan offers the following recommendations for this policy area: Industrial Flex Policy Area recommendations: "This classification [Industrial Flex] reflects a hybrid policy area comprised of different types of economic development associated land uses. It is an outgrowth of the change taking place in the workplace as more and more jobs move from manufacturing to the hi -tech and service sectors of the economy. " 4 a 2002 Washington County, Maryland Comprehensive Plan, Pages 242 and 243 VA Change in the Character of the Neighborhood or Mistake in Original Zoning Rule When rezonings are not part of a comprehensive rezoning by the governing body, individual map amendments (also known as piecemeal rezonings) are under an obligation to meet the test of the change or mistake rule. As part of the evaluation to determine whether the applicant has proven whether there has been either a change or mistake in the zoning of a parcel, the Maryland Annotated Code Land Use Article and the Washington County Zoning Ordinance state that the local legislative body is required to make findings of fact on at least six different criteria in order to ensure that a consistent evaluation of each case is provided. Those criteria include: 1) population change; 2) the availability of public facilities; 3) present and future transportation patterns; 4) compatibility with existing and proposed development for the area; 5) the recommendation of the planning commission; and 6) the relationship of the proposed amendment to the local jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Even when change or mistake has been sufficiently sustained, it merely allows the local governing body the authority to change the zoning; it does not require the change. When conditions are right for a change, the new zone must be shown to be appropriate and logical for the location and consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan. Staff Analysis: The analysis of a rezoning request begins with a strong presumption that the current zoning is correct. It is assumed that the governing body performed sufficient analysis, exercised care, and gave adequate consideration to all known concerns when zoning was applied to a parcel of land. However, there are instances by which a case can be established to show that the governing body either erred in establishment of the proper zoning of a property or that enough change has occurred within the neighborhood surrounding the property since the governing body's last assessment to require a new evaluation of the established zoning designation. As justification for this amendment the applicant has not provided reasoning to either a claim that there has been a change in the character of the neighborhood or that there was a mistake in the application of the zoning in 2015. Instead the applicant simply contends that the development being proposed will not compromise existing uses on the site. Furthermore, rezoning the property will conform to the adopted Comprehensive Plan Policy Area of Industrial Flex. Recommendation: While this rezoning would conform to the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the applicant has made no effort to analyze the required criteria of the change or mistake rule as applied in the State of Maryland. Absent this analysis, Staff does not support the rezoning of these parcels. Respectfully Submitted, Jill'Baker Deputy Director N These minutes have been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet been signed. WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REZONING INFORMATION MEETING AND REGULAR MEETING December 2, 2019 The Washington County Planning Commission held a public rezoning information meeting and its regular monthly meeting on Monday, December 2, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. at the Washington County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2000, Hagerstown, MD. Commission members present at the meeting were: Clint Wiley, Denny Reeder, David Kline, Jeremiah Weddle, and Ex-officio County Commissioner Randall Wagner. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Jill Baker, Director; Travis Allen, Comprehensive Planner; and Debra Eckard, Administrative Assistant; Washington County Department of Plan Review & Permitting: Rebecca Calimer, Chief of Plan Review. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the public rezoning information meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. RZ-19-007 – Heritage Huyett LLC Staff Presentation Ms. Baker presented a map amendment application submitted by Heritage Huyett LLC for property located along the west side of MD Route 63 (Greencastle-Williamsport Pike) approximately 0.1 mile north of US Route 40 (National Pike). The property consists of two parcels approximately 90.34 acres in size. Parcel 393 is 82.05 acres and Parcel 561 is 8.29 acres. The property is currently zoned PI (Planned Industrial; 60.77 acres) and BL (Business Local; 29.57 acres). The current zoning on the property was established in 2015 at the request of the applicant. Applicants for new PI zoning districts are required to first hold a preliminary consultation with the Planning Commission. A preliminary consultation was held on June 20, 2019 with the Department of Plan Review & Permitting; however, a summary of that meeting has not been presented to the Planning Commission. Both subject parcels are located within the Urban Growth Area that surrounds the City of Hagerstown, the Town of Williamsport and the Town of Funkstown. The population analysis for the last 30 year period shows an increase in this election district of 83% per year while the overall county population has increased only 30% per year. Public water and public sewer are available within a reasonable distance from the subject site. The City of Hagerstown has a pre-annexation agreement with the property owners for water service. Emergency Services would be provided by the Williamsport Volunteer Fire Company and Maugansville Goodwill Fire Company. Rescue services would be provided by the Williamsport Volunteer Ambulance Service. Kevin Lewis, Director of Emergency Services, commented that during the review of a proposed residential subdivision on this property several years ago, a request was made that the developer set aside land within the development for the establishment of a new sub-station for fire and/or emergency services. This provision is still being requested. There would be no impact on schools because the requested zoning (PI) would not permit any residential development. There has been a significant increase in traffic since the 1980s in this area. There is no public transportation provided to the site. The area surrounding the subject parcels contains a mixture of residential, institutional and commercial uses. The majority of the property is bordered by large lot residential uses as well as a scattering of institutional uses within a one mile radius of the site. Commercial uses dominate the intersection of MD 63 and US 40. There are several historic structures within a ½ mile radius of the site. The County’s adopted Comprehensive Plan shows this area as being in the Industrial Flex sub-policy area which reflects a hybrid policy area comprised of different types of economic development associated land uses. Ms. Baker explained that in a piecemeal rezoning, Maryland law requires the applicant to meet the test of the change or mistake rule. The applicant must provide substantial facts showing a change in the These minutes have been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet been signed. character of the neighborhood or a mistake by the local legislative body during the last rezoning of the property. In this particular case, the current zoning was established in 2015 at the request of the applicant. Ms. Baker stated that the applicant has not provided justification to either a claim that there has been a change in the character of the neighborhood or that a mistake in the 2015 zoning was made. Discussion and Comments: Commissioner Wagner asked what the property was zoned prior to the 2015 rezoning. Ms. Baker stated that the property was zoned RT (Residential Transition) during the Comprehensive rezoning in 2002, at the request of the property owner at the time. The developer had plans for a residential development of 100+ lots. In 2015, the applicant (Heritage Huyett LLC) requested a change in the zoning from RT to BL (Business Local) and PI (Planned Industrial). Applicant’s Presentation Mr. Brian Kurtyka, 201 Prospect Avenue, Hagerstown (21742), legal counsel for the applicant, stated that a justification for the rezoning has not been established yet. The applicant would like to rezone the portion of property currently zoned BL to PI for several reasons, as follows: 1) to have contiguous PI zoning across the entire property which would make it easier to market; 2) the PI designation would conform to the County’s adopted Comprehensive Plan; 3) the current market is more conducive to the PI zoning designa- tion; 4) the proposed zoning would be less traffic intensive; 5) there is public water and sewer available to the site; and 6) traffic studies have been verbally approved and the applicant has agreed to traffic signalization and roadway improvements as necessary. Mr. Kurtyka expressed his opinion that the current zoning, which was requested in 2015, was not a mistake; however, he believes that the proposed zoning would be a better fit for the County’s original intent of the area. He also stated that he doesn’t believe the applicant could provide substantial proof for a change in the character of the neighborhood. At this time, the applicant needs more time to meet the requirements for the change or mistake rule. Discussion and Comments: Mr. Kline asked what the applicant’s intent was for the BL zoning in 2015. Mr. Kurtyka stated that the applicant was proposing some office and retail uses; however, those plans did not come to fruition. Mr. Terry Randall, 13101 Fountainhead Road, Hagerstown, President of Heritage Capital (owner of Heritage Huyett LLC), stated that when the property was purchased, the biggest drawback for development was the lack of public sewer services to the property; however, the portion of the property currently zoned BL could be developed without public sewer. Mr. Randall stated that within the last two years, sewer services have been extended to the property. He contends that the extension of the sewer constitutes a change in the neighborhood and has expanded the possibilities for the property. Mr. Randall stated that a 730,000 square foot building is being proposed on the site and the developer has prepared a site plan, a grading plan, etc. to ensure that the proposed use could be accomplished on this site. Public Comment • Kyle Walters, 16400 National Pike – Mr. Walters had no public comment either in opposition or in favor of the request. However, he had several questions and was asked to speak to the applicant directly. Mr. James Snyder of Snyder, Secary and Associates, 2000 Littlestown Road, Harrisburg, PA, briefly discussed the proposed retaining wall which would prevent the fill slope from encroaching on the adjacent property. Ms. Baker recommended that when the applicant has provided staff with more information, a second public meeting should be held to obtain public comment and Commission members can make an informed decision to send forward to the County Commissioners. The public rezoning information meeting concluded at 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Motion and Vote: Mr. Kline made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 4, 2019 meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weddle and unanimously approved. These minutes have been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet been signed. -NEW BUSINESS FOREST CONSERVATION Ridenhour Family Lot 3 Mr. Allen presented for review and approval a request to utilize the payment in lieu fee to meet forest mitigation for the Ridenhour Family Lot 3. The property is located at 22740 Stevenson Road within the Town of Smithsburg. The total acreage of the current parcel is 7.12 acres; the applicant is proposing to subdivide and create a 1.26 acre lot. Approximately 0.12 acres of planting is required for this subdivision to meet Forest Conservation Ordinance requirements. Generally, with a planting requirement of this size, the express procedure could be used without approval from the Planning Commission. However, because there is a floodplain area on this site, which is a priority area targeted for retention or new forest per the Ordinance, the Planning Commission must review and approve the forest mitigation being proposed. Mr. Allen noted that planting 0.12 acre of forest would offer limited benefits to water quality, it would not qualify as forest, and the trees in such a small cluster may not survive long-term because there is very limited forest cover along the stream as it stands currently. Motion and Vote: Mr. Weddle made a motion to approve the request to utilize the payment in lieu of fee as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kline and unanimously approved. OTHER BUSINESS Thomas J. Gilbert III Ms. Calimer introduced a request from Thomas J. Gilbert III to remove an intra-family restriction on property located at 4738 Horizon Lane, Keedysville. In 2006, approval was given to build a second dwelling on the property. In July 2016, a plat was recorded with the 10 year immediate family restriction. Mr. William C. Wantz, 123 W. Washington Street, Hagerstown, MD, legal counsel for the applicant, gave a brief summation of the history of this property. In 2015, Dr. Gilbert sought approval from the Planning Commission to convey Lot 1 without the immediate family restriction. The request was treated as a petition for modification, which was denied by the Planning Commission. The applicant then filed an administrative appeal [AP-2015-021] with the Board of Appeals which in turn applied a more onerous “extraordinary hardship” standard. Mr. Wantz briefly explained that circumstances since the 2015 decision have changed due to the death of Dr. Gilbert’s father; and, therefore, the request to remove the restriction. Motion and Vote: Mr. Kline made a motion to approve the applicant’s request to remove the ten year immediate family restriction as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weddle and unanimously approved with Mr. Wiley abstaining from the vote. Update of Staff Approvals Mr. Holloway was not present at the meeting; however, a written report was distributed.to Commission members prior to the meeting -ADJOURNMENT Mr. Kline made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weddle and so ordered by the Chairman. -UPCOMING MEETINGS 1. Monday, January 6, 2020, 7:00 p.m., Washington County Planning Commission regular meeting, Washington County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2000, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Respectfully submitted, Clint Wiley, Chairman Minutes have not been approved by Planning Commission. WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING January 6, 2020 The Washington County Planning Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Monday, January 6, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. at the Washington County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2000, Hagerstown, MD. Commission members present at the meeting were: Clint Wiley, Denny Reeder, Drew Bowen, BJ Goetz, David Kline, Jeremiah Weddle, and Ex-officio County Commissioner Randall Wagner. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Jill Baker, Director and Debra Eckard, Administrative Assistant; Washington County Department of Plan Review & Permitting: Rebecca Calimer, Chief of Plan Review and Lisa Kelly, Senior Planner. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Motion and Vote: Mr. Reeder made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 2, 2019 meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kline and unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS RZ-19-006 – Heritage Huyett LLC Ms. Baker reminded Commission members that a rezoning public information meeting was held on December 2, 2019 for a proposed map amendment for 29.57 acres of property located at 16422 National Pike. The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the current Planned Industrial (PI) and Business Local (BL) zoning to Planned Industrial (PI). At the December meeting, the applicant was lacking justification to substantiate either a “mistake” in the original zoning or a “change” in the character of the neighborhood. At that time, the applicant requested a continuation until a later date. On December 19, 2019 the applicant’s attorney, Mr. Noel Manalo of Miles and Stockbridge, submitted a letter to the Department of Planning & Zoning claiming a “mistake” in the previous zoning designation of PI/BL as justification for the rezoning request. Ms. Baker noted that during the December meeting, it was recommended that when the applicant submitted justification for the request, a second rezoning public information meeting should be scheduled in order to give the public a chance to comment on this new information. Discussion and Comments: Mr. Wiley expressed his opinion that a new public information meeting should be scheduled in order for the public to have an opportunity to hear the new information and to voice any concerns or issues they have pertaining to the request. Ms. Baker stated that the applicant is claiming a “mistake” because during the previous rezoning, the County relied upon the assumption or premise that no public sewer would be available in the near future. However, since that time the developer has extended the sewer lines to the property, without any cost to the County. Minutes have not been approved by Planning Commission. Mr. Goetz pointed out that the attorney’s letter included the date of December 12th as the date of the public information meeting and he requested clarification of the date of that meeting; it was verified that the meeting was held on December 2, 2019. Mr. Wiley noted that the applicant did not make a case for a change in the character of the neighborhood or a mistake in the zoning at the previous meeting. Therefore, the public did not have all the pertinent information with which to make comment. Mr. Noel Manalo of Miles and Stockbridge and Mr. Terry Randall of Heritage Huyett LLC were both present at the meeting. Mr. Manalo expressed his opinion that the public information meeting held on December 2nd was advertised, the property was posted, and the public was given the opportunity to make public comment at that time. Anyone attending the December meeting was made aware that the applicant would be coming back at a later date with additional information. He believes that all appropriate procedures for public input were followed. Mr. Manalo stated that the intent of this rezoning is to obtain the highest and best use for this property. Discussion and Comments: Mr. Bowen expressed his opinion that this case is a continuance from last month’s meeting, the record is still open, and the information presented this evening is justification for the request. Mr. Goetz noted that during the public information meeting in December, it was recommended that a second public meeting should be held for the public to make comment. He questioned if this meeting meets the criteria. Mr. Bowen expressed his opinion that this evening’s meeting is a public meeting that has been duly advertised and the public could attend. Mr. Reeder noted that the public will have the opportunity to make comment during the County Commissioners’ public hearing. There was a brief discussion regarding the plans for this property and the timeline to execute these plans. Mr. Kline noted there were only 3 people in attendance at the December meeting, no written comments have been received and he believes the information provided during this meeting is not significant enough to warrant a second public information meeting and delay the developer’s progress. Commission members discussed the “change in the character of the neighborhood” and the “mistake” in zoning. Members believed that the extension of the sewer service in this area constitutes a “change”. Ms. Baker stated that to claim a “change”, specific criteria must be met. First, the neighborhood must be defined, which was not done by the applicant. Second, the change must be defined that happened within the neighborhood; not done. Thirdly, was the change enough to warrant rezoning of the property. Ms. Baker noted that the “mistake” rule is often misperceived. Mr. Manalo explained that under Maryland law, “mistake” means that there were factual predicates that were wrong or inaccurate. In this case, he believes the County did not anticipate the extension of the sewer lines, thus a “mistake” was made in the zoning. Motion and Vote: Mr. Kline made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request based on a mistake in the zoning to the Board of County Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Mr. Goetz and unanimously approved with Commissioner Wagner abstaining from the vote. Minutes have not been approved by Planning Commission. -NEW BUSINESS MODIFICATIONS Keeptryst Properties LLC [OM-19-008] Ms. Kelly presented for review and approval a modification request from Section 405.11.B of the Subdivision Ordinance for property located at 18846 Arthur Lane, Knoxville. The property is currently zoned RV – Rural Village. The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 3 acre parcel of land to create a new Lot 1 (.46 acre) and remaining lands of 2.54 acres. Each lot would have 12.5 feet of public road frontage; a minimum of 25 feet is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Frontage for the entire parcel is on Arthur Lane, which is a County owned road. Motion and Vote: Commissioner Wagner made a motion to approve the modification request as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Goetz and unanimously approved. SITE PLANS Shenandoah Mobile LLC Tower Site [SP-19-003] Ms. Kelly presented, on behalf of Mr. Holloway, a site plan for a proposed 150 foot monopole cell tower to be located at 20030 Professional Boulevard, situated along the south side of Yale Drive and west of Hagerstown Community College. The property is currently zoned ORI – Office, Research & Industry. A special exception was granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals in 2019 for the placement of this tower within the ORI zoning district. Maintenance of the tower will be no more than one time per week by two employees. Fencing is required around the base of the tower and any associated equipment buildings. A 30 foot easement off of Yale Drive will provide access to the site. A 6 foot high chain-link security fence will surround the tower. Forest Conservation requirements will be met by the retention of existing forest on the site; a forest conservation easement plat will be prepared. All agency approvals have been received. Motion and Vote: Mr. Bowen made a motion to approve the site plan as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weddle and unanimously approved. OTHER BUSINESS Update of Staff Approvals Mr. Holloway was not present at the meeting; however, a written report was distributed.to Commission members prior to the meeting. Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Element Ms. Baker briefly reviewed the Economic Development Element for the comprehensive Plan. Members reviewed the recommendations included in the element. Overall goals should include: infrastructure needs for economic development; zoning to accommodate land uses that make the county competitive; and maintain partnerships with municipalities, the private sector and quasi-governmental groups. Minutes have not been approved by Planning Commission. -ADJOURNMENT Mr. Goetz made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kline and so ordered by the Chairman. -UPCOMING MEETINGS 1. Monday, February 3, 2020, 7:00 p.m., Washington County Planning Commission rezoning public information meeting and regular meeting, Washington County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington Street, Room 2000, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Respectfully submitted, Clint Wiley, Chairman DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING I LAND PRESERVATION I FOREST CONSERVATION I GIS January 14, 2020 APPLICATION FOR MAP AMENDMENT PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Property Owner(s): Applicant(s): Location: Election District: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Tax Map: Parcel(s): Acreage: Existing Zoning: Requested Zoning: Date of Public Meeting: RECOMMENDATION RZ-19-006 Heritage Huyett LLC Heritage Huyett LLC West side of MD 63 (Greencastle -Williamsport Pike), approxi- mately 0.1 mile north of US 40 (National Pike) #23 - Wilsons Industrial Flex 36 393 and 561 90.34 acres 182.05 acres — P BL — Business Local (29.57 (60.77 acres) PI — Planned Industrial December 2, 2019 393 and 8.29 acres — P. 561 acres) and PI — Planned Industrial The Washington County Planning Commission took action at its regular meeting held on Monday, January 6, 2020 to recommend approval of Map Amendment RZ-19-006 to the Board of County Commissioners. The Commission considered the applicant's claim that a mistake was made in the property's original zoning, the application, supporting documentation, the applicant's presentation, public comment, and the Staff Report and Analysis. The Planning Commission believes that certain facts were not considered or were inaccurate during the previous rezoning of this property. Copies of the application packet, justification letter, Staff Report and Analysis, approved minutes of the December 2, 2019 public rezoning meeting and the unapproved minutes of the January 6, 2020 regular meeting are attached. Respectfully submitted, ;Jill L. Baker, Director Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning JLB/dse Attachments cc: Kirk Downey Miles & Stockbridge 100 West Washington Street, Suite 2600 1 Hagerstown, MD 21740 1 P: 240.313.24301 r: 240.313.24311 TDD: 7-1-1 WWW,WASHCO-MDAET Open Session Item SUBJECT: Interagency Environmental Health Workgroup PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Earl Stoner, Health Officer, Washington County Health Department, Sara L. Trescott, Environmental Health Director, Washington County Health Department, Jill Baker, Director, Planning and Zoning RECOMMENDED MOTION: Recognize the efforts of the workgroup and provide a letter of support. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: N/A DISCUSSION: On November 26, 2019 the Health Department convened a meeting of key state and local stakeholders to discuss the environmental health landscape within the county. The meeting served as an opportunity to discuss overarching challenges and constraints faced by each agency, and provided a mechanism to identify workable solutions; with the ultimate goal of bolstering economic development while also protecting the public's health. As a result of this meeting, the Interagency Environmental Health Workgroup was formed to explore identified challenges and opportunities discussed at the meeting. As a critical first step, the workgroup has identified the need to conduct a study to better understand public health priorities and to follow up on the R. E. Wright Study, which was conducted 40 years ago. The workgroup has met with the Hagerstown City Council, who agreed to provide a letter of support. Along with the support of the County Commissioners, meetings with the Maryland Department of Environment, to discuss the study, may begin. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to county budget CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: None AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Agenda Report Form Open Session Item SUBJECT: Public Service Commission Perennial Solar, LLC case—Potential Intervention by the County as party PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: B. Andrew Bright, Assistant County Attorney; Jill Baker, Director Planning and Zoning RECOMMENDED MOTION: Reach consensus to authorize the County Attorney to intervene in the manner as presented. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: A Procedural Schedule was adopted by the Public Utility Law Judge (PULJ), which sets deadlines and hearing dates for any person or entity wishing to intervene as a party. If the County intends to intervene as a party in the PSC proceedings, it must do so immediately. DISCUSSION: If any entity or person wishes to intervene as a party to the litigation before the PSC, the deadline is February 21, 2020 to file a Petition to Intervene. Intervening parties may, among other things, summon witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, present evidence and argument, and attempt to persuade the PSC to grant, deny, or attach specific conditions to the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN). The County may not wish to do all of those things. However, intervention as a party would permit staff to submit to the PSC information about the County’s Comprehensive Plan, applicable zoning, forest conservation, any necessary bonds, and other applicable ordinances with which the applicant is expected to comply. The County could request that the PSC make compliance a condition of the CPCN. Such evidence would be submitted to the PSC in writing. Intervenor status would permit the County should the need arise, to appeal the ruling of the PULJ to the PSC as a whole, to file motions for reconsideration, or other relief with the PSC. As a separate issue (whether or not the County intervenes), the PSC conducts “public comment hearings” in the county in which the facility is proposed to be located. These hearings are an opportunity for the public to make comments about the application. If the County Commissioners chose to do so, the Public Utility Law Judge (PULJ), would invite the Commissioners to join the PULJ in conducting the public hearing. The PULJ would preside at the hearing, and public comment on the application will be permitted. This, of course, would not confer any decision-making authority upon the Commissioners. A description of the process of the public hearing produced by the PSC is attached. Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form FISCAL IMPACT: N/A CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: Decline to intervene in PSC litigation. ATTACHMENTS: Public Utility Law Judge’s Notice of Procedural Schedule; Public Utilities Article, § 7-207; Pages 10-12 from PSC procedure summary re: CPCN cases (for entire summary, see https://www.psc.state.md.us/wp-content/uploads/CPCN-Process-4-10-19.pdf) AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: None IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PERENNIAL SOLAR, LLC FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO CONSTRUCT AN 8.0 MW SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC GENER-ATING FACILITY IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND * * * * BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND CASE NO. 9408 Issued: January 7, 2020 PUBLIC UTILITY LAW JUDGE'S NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE On December 23, 2019, in lieu of a pre-hearing conference, the parties submitted an agreed-upon procedural schedule for my consideration. After reviewing the proposed schedule, I find it to be reasonable and the following schedule is hereby adopted:  Petitions to Intervene shall be filed by Friday, February 21, 2020;  The first evening public comment hearing will be held in Washington County on Thursday, March 26, 2020, with the time and location to be determined;  The Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant Resource Program, the Office of People’s Counsel, and the Commission’s Technical Staff shall each file direct testimony and recommended licensing conditions, if any, by Thursday, May 14, 2020;  A status update shall be provided to the Public Utility Law Judge on or before Thursday, May 28, 2020;  All Parties shall file rebuttal testimony by Thursday, June 25, 2020;  A second evening public comment hearing will be held in Washington County on Tuesday, July 14, 2020, with the date, time, and location to be determined; and  An evidentiary hearing shall be held on Thursday, July 23, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in the Commission’s 19th floor hearing room, William Donald Schaefer Tower, 6 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland (if no contested issues).1 1 The Procedural Schedule will be modified in the event there are contested issues. 2 The Applicant is directed to cause a display advertisement to be published in a newspaper in general circulation throughout Washington County at least twice, in successive weeks to advise persons who seek to intervene in this proceeding that petitions to intervene should be filed with the Commission's Executive Secretary, Andrew S. Johnston, at 6 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-6806 no later than February 21, 2020. The Applicant is also directed to officially file the advertisements with the Commission. The Applicant is encouraged to use any social media or other communication methods to advise residents/businesses of Washington County of the date by which petitions to intervene must be submitted. /s/ Ryan C. McLean Ryan C. McLean Chief Public Utility Law Judge Public Service Commission of Maryland Reasonable accommodations will be made at Public Service Commission proceedings for qualified persons with disabilities, if requested 5 days in advance of the proceeding. (Dial 410-767-8000 or 1-800-492-0474 or access the prior numbers through the Maryland Relay Service at 1-800-735-2258.) COMMISSIONERS ___________ JASON M. STANEK CHAIRMAN MICHAEL T. RICHARD ANTHONY J. O’DONNELL ODOGWU OBI LINTON MINDY L. HERMAN S T AT E OF M ARYL AND P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION January 7, 2020 VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. OR INTERDEPARTMENTAL MAIL To All Parties of Record and Interested Persons: Enclosed is a copy of the "Public Utility Law Judge's Notice of Procedural Schedule" issued today in the above-entitled matter. Also enclosed herewith is a revised service list for this matter. Very truly yours, /s/ Kathleen Berends Kathleen Berends Administrator kab Enclosures WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER TOWER  6 ST. PAUL STREET  BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21202-6806 410-767-8000  Toll Free: 1-800-492-0474  FAX: 410-333-6495 MDRS: 1-800-735-2258 (TTY/Voice)  Website: www.psc.state.md.us § 7-207.1. Construction of on -site generating stations, MD PUBLIC UTIL § 7-207.1 West's Annotated Code of Maryland Public Utilities (Refs & Annos) Division I. Public Services and Utilities [Titles 1-151 (Refs & Annos) Title 7. Gas, Electric, and Water Companies (Refs & Annos) Subtitle 2. Electric Generation Facility Planning (Refs & Annos) MD Code, Public Utilities, § 7-207.1 Formerly cited as MD PUBLIC UTIL COMP § 7-207.1 § 7-207.1. Construction of on -site generating stations Effective: October 1, 2013 Currentness Application of section (a) This section applies to a person who: (1) constructs a generating station: (i) designed to provide on -site generated electricity if: 1. the capacity of the generating station does not exceed 70 megawatts; and 2. the electricity that may be exported for sale from the generating station to the electric system is sold only on the wholesale market pursuant to an interconnection, operation, and maintenance agreement with the local electric company; or (ii) that produces electricity from wind if: 1. the generating station is land -based; 2. the capacity of the generating station does not exceed 70 megawatts; -,,�STLM © 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. § 7-207.1. Construction of on -site generating stations, MD PUBLIC UTIL § 7-207.1 3. the electricity that may be exported for sale from the generating station to the electric system is sold only on the wholesale market pursuant to an interconnection, operation, and maintenance agreement with the local electric company; 4. the Commission provides an opportunity for public comment at a public hearing as provided in subsection (f)of this section; and 5. the generating station's wind turbines are not located within a distance from the Patuxent River Naval Air Station that is determined by regulations adopted by the Commission in coordination with the Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, provided that the distance requirement under the regulation is: A. not greater than is necessary to encompass an area in which utility scale wind turbines could create Doppler radar interference for missions at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station; B. not greater than 46 miles, measured from location 38.29667N, 76.37668W; and C. subject to modification if necessary to reflect changes in missions or technology at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station or changes in wind energy technology; or (2) constructs a generating station i£ (i) the capacity of the generating station does not exceed 25 megawatts; (ii) the electricity that may be exported for sale from the generating station to the electric system is sold only on the wholesale market pursuant to an interconnection, operation, and maintenance agreement with the local electric company; and WRSTLAM © 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2 § 7-207.1. Construction of on -site generating stations, MD PUBLIC UTIL § 7-207.1 (iii) at least 10% of the electricity generated at the generating station each year is consumed on -site. Approval by Commission required before construction of generating station (b)(1) The Commission shall require a person that is exempted from the requirement to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity to obtain approval from the Commission under this section before the person may construct a generating station described in subsection (a) of this section. (2) An application for approval under this section shall: (i) be made to the Commission in writing on a form adopted by the Commission; (ii) be verified by oath or affirmation; and (iii) contain information that the Commission requires, including: 1. proof of compliance with all applicable requirements of the independent system operator; and 2. a copy of an interconnection, operation, and maintenance agreement between the generating station and the local electric company. Notice of application (c) On receipt of an application for approval under this section, the Commission shall provide notice immediately or require the applicant to provide notice immediately of the application to: (1) the governing body of each county or municipal corporation in which any portion of the generating station is proposed to be constructed; WKTLM © 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. § 7-207.1. Construction of on -site generating stations, MD PUBLIC UTIL § 7-207.1 (2) the governing body of each county or municipal corporation within 1 mile of the proposed location of the generating station; (3) each member of the General Assembly representing any part of a county in which any portion of the generating station is proposed to be constructed; and (4) each member of the General Assembly representing any part of each county within 1 mile of the proposed location of the generating station. Review of application (d) When reviewing an application for approval under this section, the Commission shall: (1) ensure the safety and reliability of the electric system; (2) require the person constructing the generating station to notify the Commission 2 weeks before the first export of electricity from a generating station approved under this section; and (3) conduct its review and approval in an expeditious manner. Waiver of approval (e) Except for the notice required under subsection (c) of this section, the Commission may waive an element of the approval process under this section if the Commission determines that the waiver is in the public interest. Public comment and hearing (f)(1) The Commission shall provide an opportunity for public comment and hold a public hearing as provided under this subsection on an application for approval made under subsection (a)(1)(ii) of this section in each county and municipal corporation in which any portion of the construction of a generating station is proposed to be located. ISTI 1W © 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 4 § 7-207.1. Construction of on -site generating stations, MD PUBLIC UTIL § 7-207.1 (2) Upon the request of the governing body of a county or municipal corporation in which any portion of the construction of a generating station is proposed to be located, the Commission shall hold the public hearing jointly with the governing body. (3) Once in each of 2 successive weeks immediately before the hearing date, the Commission, at the expense of the applicant, shall provide weekly notice of the public hearing and opportunity for public comment by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or municipal corporation affected by the application. Credits Added by Acts 2001, c. 655, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2001. Amended by Acts 2005, c. 156, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2005; Acts 2007, c. 163, § 1, eff. July 1, 2007; Acts 2012, c. 643, § 1, eff. June 1, 2012; Acts 2012, c. 644, § 1, eff. June 1, 2012; Acts 2013, c. 500, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2013; Acts 2013, c. 501, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2013. MD Code, Public Utilities, § 7-207.1, MD PUBLIC UTIL § 7-207.1 Current through all legislation from the 2019 Regular Session of the General Assembly. End of Document 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. WMTLM © 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 5 CPCN Procedure,, cont'd • Public Hearing for Comment — At least one hearing for public comment is held at a location in close proximity to the proposed location (if available). — Written comments also may be filed with the Commission. — The governing body of the county or municipal corporation in which the project is proposed to be located is invited to join the Commission or Public Utility Law Judge in conducting the public hearing. 11 CPCN Procedure,, cont'd • NOTIFICATIONS OF PUBLIC COMMENT HEARING — Notice of Public Hearing with the dates, times, and locations is issued by the Commission. — Applicant must publish the Notice in a newspaper(s) of general circulation and post on two types of social media in each of four successive weeks immediately before the hearing date — The Notice also is posted on the MD PSC website as well as on the MD PSC Facebook and Twitter accounts — MD PSC website has a list of all public hearings being held in each active CPCN matter with link to the electronic docket which has pleadings filed by the parties (www.psc.state.md.us/public-comment-hearing_s/) — MD PSC coordinates with the governing body of the county or municipal corporation for an efficient and cost-effective means to provide notice to the public hearing through other types of media familiar to the residents in the county or municipal corporation — On day of the hearing, the Applicant must post an informational sign about the hearing at or near each public entrance of the building in which the hearing will be held 12 CPCN Procedure,, cont'd • Conduct of a Public Hearing — Either the Commission or a Public Utility Law Judge presides at the hearing — A court reporter is present and a transcript of the hearing is prepared — Representatives of Applicant, OPC, and Staff are present in the event any member of the public has a substantive question about the project — The Commission or Public Utility Law Judge is present to listen to the comments. The Commission or Public Utility Law Judge do not respond to substantive questions about the project or proceeding because they must render an impartial decision after considering all the written or oral evidence presented at the evidentiary hearing — The Applicant may be given a limited amount of time to describe the project prior to public comments being taken — Each member of the public who wishes to make a comment will come to the microphone when called and present an oral statement. A time limitation may be placed on the length of the comment based on the number of persons wishing to comment — After all members of the public have had an opportunity to comment, the hearing is adjourned Open Session Item SUBJECT: Youth Meritorious Award Presentation PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Allison Hartshorn, Grant Manager, Office of Grant Management and The Board of County Commissioners RECOMMENDED MOTION: No motion or action is requested or recommended. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: The following individuals have been selected for the Youth Meritorious Award. They were selected based on their scholastic achievement, leadership qualities, community service performed or other positive contributions to their school or community. Griffin Almany – Saint James School Parent(s) – Tim and Donna Almany Nominated by Mary Scro Cale Denton – Heritage Academy Parent(s) – Mark and Tami Denton Nominated by Dawn Horn Emily Stamper – Heritage Academy Parent(s) – Jason and Stephanie Stamper Nominated by Stephanie Stamper DISCUSSION: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Student Summaries AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form Youth Meritorious Award Summary for: Griffin Almany Saint James School Nominated by Mary Scro Parent(s) – Tim and Donna Almany Mary Scro endorsed the following: Griffin is a high moral and ethical young man that represents himself, his school, and his family very well. He is a loyal friend, helpful to those that need him, and he is a good citizen of Washington County. Griffin is a three sport Varsity athlete in soccer, wrestling and lacrosse. In soccer, he received the most improved player this year, and was one of the Team Captains. In wrestling last year, Griffin was the MAC and IPSL conferences Champion for wrestling at 126 pounds, where he had the highest team winning percentage with a 36-10 record and was second team All- County in 2019. In Lacrosse this past spring, Griffin was Second team all-County playing Attack. He finished the season eighth in the county for total points scored, and second on the Saints team for scoring. When Griffin is not competing he stays active on campus. He volunteers as a tour guide for families and prospective students at school. In addition he helped found the SJS Audio-Video club, a member of the chess club and provides lacrosse coaching lessons for kids. Griffin will be attending a four-year university upon graduation and hopes to Major in Sports Management with a minor in Political Science or Spanish and possibly pursue a law degree in the future. Cale Denton Heritage Academy Nominated by Dawn Horn Parent(s) – Tami Denton Dawn Horn endorsed the following: Cale is a very ambitious student and is self-driven to give his very best. He is an A student. He taught the class sign language and we used his teaching to perform a song for our Grandparent's Day program. Our class makes and sells popcorn for various mission projects. After school he volunteered to make and sell the popcorn in the parking lot and during after school activities. Cale is always willing to help out other students in the classroom with difficult lessons. He has a great laugh and inspires everyone he is around. Emily Stamper Heritage Academy Nominated by Stephanie Stamper Parent(s) – Stephanie Stamper Stephanie Stamper endorsed the following: Emily is a junior at Heritage Academy. She is a member of the National Honor Society, where she is the secretary. She plays varsity basketball and has been the lead female role in the school play for the last three years. Outside of school, Emily is involved in 4-H where she serves as the club president of two clubs. Emily attended Maryland 4-H Congress in 2017 and 2019 and will be traveling to Atlanta, Georgia this year for National 4-H Congress. Involvement in 4-H has afforded her many opportunities to serve the community through activities such as 4-H S.T.E.A.M. Camp, Washington County Ag Literacy trailer, and St. Jude's Trail Ride. She is this year's Miss Washington County Farm Bureau. Throughout the year she will be an advocate for Farm Bureau, teaching elementary students in Washington County about agriculture and where their food comes from. Open Session Item SUBJECT: High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Grant Acceptance of Funds PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: John Martin, Sergeant, Narcotics Task Force and Stephanie Lapole, Senior Grant Manager, Office of Grant Management RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the acceptance of funds in the amount of $26,805.00 for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Grant award. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: The High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant pays overtime expenses for up to three deputies assigned to the Washington County Narcotics Task Force/HIDTA group. The funds support overtime enforcement actions during drug cases in the amount of $8,935.00 per agent. DISCUSSION: The Office of Grant Management has reviewed the grant funding guidelines. There are no unusual conditions or requirements attached to the acceptance of the grant. FISCAL IMPACT: The grant will provide up to $26,805.00 in overtime expenses, saving Washington County monies spent on overtime. CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: N/A AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form Open Session Item SUBJECT: Fort Ritchie Easement Relocation PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Todd Moser, Real Property Administrator, Andrew Eshleman, Director, Public Works RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the easement relocation. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: The United States Army has contacted the County regarding current overhead utility easements inside the County property boundary at Fort Ritchie that are not reflective of where the overhead utilities are located. DISCUSSION: The Army is proposing a swap of easements to include releasing the current easement to the County and asking the County to convey the new easement area to the Army. The easement request should have no impact on the lands as the overhead utilities are already existing. Please refer to the attached aerial map that shows the current easement and the proposed easement. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A CONCURRENCES: County Attorney ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Map AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form 0 375 750 1,125 1,500Feet µ Fort Ritchie - Cascade, MD Overhead Utility Easement Washington County makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adaquacy of the contents of these maps and expressly disclaims liability for any errors and ommisions in the contents of these documents. Boundaries are not survey grade nor should be used in leiu of proper survey. Restriction of Liability: - Property Boundary - Proposed Utility Easement - Existing Utility Easement Open Session Item SUBJECT: Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Proposed Sale of Surplus Property to Washington County PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Todd Moser, Real Property Administrator, Division of Engineering RECOMMENDED MOTION: Agree on a consensus to decline the acquisition of surplus property or move forward with an offer on the property. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: MDOT has notified the County it intends to sell property located on the west side of US 40 and between MD 144 and Jerome Road in Hancock consisting of 0.88 +/- acres. State policy allows the County to review for a sixty-day period to determine any interest in acquiring the property at market value before proceeding with any sale activity. DISCUSSION: County staff has reviewed the property information and the property would offer little benefit to the County in terms of forestation credits or other utilization. FISCAL IMPACT: To be determined. CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Map, MDOT Letter with attachments AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form National Pike (US 40) HixonRoad Mcfar l a n d R o a d McFarlandRoad JeromeRoad Proposed Lot for Sale 0.88 Acres +/- Former Hixon Property (Hancock) 0 50 100 150 200Feet $- Parcel Boundaries - 0.88 +/- Acres Legend January 10, 2020 Ms. Jill Baker Director, Planning and Zoning Department County Administrative Annex, 2nd Floor 120 West Washington Street Hagerstown MD 21740 Dear Ms. Baker: The Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office (MDOT TSO) anticipates the sale of MC# 19-1093 identified as the former Hixon property, Item No(s). 72557 and further described in the attached Salient Fact Sheet with Property Plat, Tax and Location Maps. In accordance with Maryland Department of Transportation Policy and Procedures, before proceeding with any other sales activity, we will allow you a period of 60 days to review the attached information, request additional information and to notify us of your interest, in writing, concerning the property as offered. This review period shall expire on Monday, March 9, 2020 without further notice. Please be aware that in most cases an interest in the property would require the purchase of the property based on an appraised value or, in a few cases, a cost plus interest basis. Additionally, we are not interested in a conveyance or any exchange basis. Should you have an interest in acquiring the subject property, please contact this office, in writing, on or before the expiration of the review period. Any other extension for your consideration of this property must be requested, in writing, within the review period and shall be subject to specific written approval from this office. If you have no interest in the property, please notify the following individual at your earliest convenience. In either case, we request you provide all responses to: Shelton Haynes Real Property and Clearance Program Coordinator Office OF Real Estate & Economic Development Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary’s Office 7201 Corporate Center Drive, MS 470 Hanover, MD 21076 Phone: 410-865-1273 email: shaynes@mdot.maryland.gov Director, Planning and Zoning Department Stephen T. Goodrich Page Two If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 410-865-1273, toll free at 866-242-9405 or via email at shaynes@mdot.maryland.gov. Sincerely, Shelton Haynes Real Property and Clearance Program Coordinator Office OF Real Estate & Economic Development ATTACHMENTS • Salient Fact Sheet •Plat No(s).48205 • Location Map • Tax Map • Aerial Photos Rev. 04/01/2018 Salient Fact Sheet Conveyance of Real Property Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary’s Office Office of Real Estate and Economic Development Date of Preparation: 10/29/2019 Refer to: MC #19-1093 Property Name: Hixon, Lola C. Property Item/Reference No.: 72557 Internal Clearance: 08/08/2019 TBU Plat No.(s): 48205 Plat(s) Date: 10/29/1982 Location: The property is located on west side of US 40 between MD144 (Relocated Mountain Road) and Jerome Road in Washington County SDAT Property Tax Information: County: Tax Map #: Parcel: Grid: Block: N/A Account # Type of Transaction: Disposition Acreage: Containing a total of 35,379 square feet or 0.8122 +/- acres of land, plus or minus Improved: N/A Description of Improvements: N/A Consideration: TBD Federal Approval: N/A – Not acquired for Interstate project Additional Notes/Info: The MDOT TSO intends to sell the property at fair market value. Triangular in shape. It is wooded on a gentle slope that runs down hill from McFarland Road to Jerome Road. The land is rocky. The following information is provided subject to Appraisal and is in no way warranted: Assumed Zoning: Environmental Conservation (EC) Utilities Available: Electricity and Telephone are available Estimated Market Value: TBD Prepared by: Shelton Haynes Real Property and Clearance Coordinator Office of Real Estate and Economic Development Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary’s Office Phone: 410-865-1273 7201 Corporate Center Drive Email: shaynes@mdot.maryland.gov Hanover Maryland 21076 If co N OD C oj 1 cu �- CL .1 M sea NiirM YJW►r r ui� L r� : r, n� i h NV;H[,fcl�tHYQ • •i+fflNSrGYAN�A MAR itANO Hcllv�jri;�r U r+� �� ►hr+ccxi 00onws AMr SI: SidMing Hill dual i�cton W 11(pi f! Ma r►.�ppm�t A+ea • tiYpcadr+►unr Lillie Udearis BNkN� O iti4Kswh G"m coca", Dor Ginty Q u� I - i Ott 5` Hancock. Open Session Item SUBJECT: FY 21 and beyond Funding Request for Black Fly Control in Southern Washington County PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Linda Ebersole RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve up to $37,500 of FY2021 funds to provide for the 50% match required for treatments of Black Fly’s in Washington County and to incorporate costs into the County’s recurring operating budget. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: The Black Fly control pilot program was implemented in August 2017 after numerous engagements by affected citizens with the State of Maryland and local politicians. Since that time, most residents in the Southern Washington County region have noted marked improvement with consistent treatments. Effective with Maryland House Bill 1353, Agriculture – Nuisance Insects, being approved on April 18, 2019, and effective October 1, 2019, we now have the opportunity to take part in this program if the County or municipality in which the nuisance insects are located agree to pay 50%. DISCUSSION: Monthly control treatments of the Potomac River from early June through early October is optimal. Four treatments were performed by the Maryland Department of Agriculture (MDA) in FY 20 (three completed to date) and marked improvement in the quality of outdoor life for Southern Washington County residents was realized. Once the treatments were stopped or slightly delayed in September 2019, our black fly population increased and it was once again difficult to be outside. Requested funding for FY 21 includes a fifth treatment for October based on estimates provided by the MDA. The last treatment for FY20 will be applied at the Maryland Department of Agriculture’s discretion in either May or June 2020. It is best to secure funding early for FY 21 since treatment is dependent on available funding from MDA. The cost of treatment is directly related to river flow, therefore the number of treatments provided for $37,500 could vary. It is the hope that the $37,500 would provide a treatment in July, August, September, October, and May or June of 2021. If the black fly control program is not appropriately funded or reduced, the residents of Southern Washington County, businesses, and recreational activities, and our local tourism economy will be severely impacted. CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: Do not provide the match required for treatment ATTACHMENTS: N/A AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form Open Session Item SUBJECT: Presentation of the 2021-2030 Capital Budget – Draft 1 PRESENTATION DATE: February 11, 2020 PRESENTATION BY: Sara Greaves, Chief Financial Officer, Kelcee Mace, Deputy Director of Budget & Finance RECOMMENDED MOTION: For informational purposes REPORT-IN-BRIEF: Discussion of Draft 1 of the FY2021-2030 Capital Budget. DISCUSSION: A Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan is developed each fiscal year and includes scheduling and financing of future community facilities such as public buildings, roads, bridges, parks, water and sewer projects, and educational facilities. The plan is flexible and covers ten years with the first year being the Capital Improvement Budget. Funds for each project are allocated from Federal, State, and local sources. A primary purpose of the Capital Improvement Program is to provide a means for coordinating and consolidating all departmental and agency project requests into one document. Capital budget requests were submitted on December 27, 2019. It is the CIP Committee’s responsibility to review all requests that County departments and agencies submit. All projects are ranked based on established criteria for priority ranking. Considering current and future needs, as developed in the ten-year plan, available funding sources, and the results of the priority ranking process, the CIP Committee determines which capital projects best meet established criteria for the current fiscal year Capital Improvement Budget and the nine-year forecast. Not all projects can be funded due to limited resources. Topics of discussion will include: - Capital Funding assumptions - Draft 1 of Capital budget including project changes from what was originally submitted - Debt affordability analysis FISCAL IMPACT: FY2021 Capital budget of $60,631,000 CONCURRENCES: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A ATTACHMENTS: CIP Report; Summary of Original VS. Draft 1 AUDIO/VISUAL NEEDS: N/A Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland Agenda Report Form Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Airport Passenger Terminal Hold Room Expansion 7,178,000 3,737,000 3,441,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T-Hangar 1, 2, & 3 Replacement 436,000 103,000 20,000 33,000 28,000 34,000 35,000 35,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 38,000 Airport Roof Replacement Project 374,220 99,220 15,000 15,000 45,000 35,000 55,000 25,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 Airport Security System Enhancements 258,000 258,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Equipment - Airport 1,429,375 733,375 38,000 25,000 135,000 25,000 25,000 65,000 195,000 20,000 113,000 55,000 Land Acquisition-Airport 15,841,000 2,507,000 0 2,222,000 5,556,000 0 5,556,000 0 0 0 0 0 Airport Environmental Assessment 833,982 833,982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passenger Boarding Bridge 1,112,000 0 1,112,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Taxiway S 1,180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,180,000 0 0 0 0 Runway 9 MALSR 1,484,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244,000 1,240,000 0 Snow Removal Equipment Storage Building Expansion 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 Taxiway F Rehabilitation 6,300,000 0 0 0 300,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taxiway G Rehabilitation 1,920,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,920,000 0 0 0 Taxiway H Rehabilitation 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 Wildlife Assessment 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Airport 40,746,577 8,271,577 4,726,000 2,295,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 418,000 Bridges Bridge Inspection and Inventory 647,500 235,500 0 22,000 0 171,000 0 24,000 0 175,000 0 20,000 Bridge Scour Repairs 513,184 31,184 0 0 0 0 0 232,000 0 0 0 250,000 Halfway Boulevard Bridges W0912 3,737,000 115,000 1,032,000 990,000 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Keefer Road Bridge 15/20 231,000 85,000 146,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Appletown Road Bridge W2184 479,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 479,000 0 Ashton Road Culvert 04/06 399,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 369,000 0 Bowie Road Culvert 305,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 270,000 0 0 0 Burnside Bridge Road Culvert 01/03 329,000 0 0 0 0 114,000 215,000 0 0 0 0 0 Draper Road Culvert 04/07 428,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 392,000 0 Draper Road Culvert 04/08 379,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 343,000 Frog Eye Road Culvert 11/06 652,000 0 652,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greenspring Furnace Road Culvert 15/15 398,000 0 0 87,000 311,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gruber Road Bridge 04/10 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 Harpers Ferry Road Culvert 11/02 541,000 0 0 0 0 33,000 508,000 0 0 0 0 0 Henline Road Culvert 05/05 465,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,000 431,000 0 0 0 Hoffman's Inn Road Culvert 05/06 313,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,000 148,000 0 0 0 Kretsinger Road Culvert 14/01 316,000 0 0 31,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes Road Culvert 15/12 317,000 0 0 32,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Hollow Road Culvert 05/07 316,000 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 Mercersburg Road Culvert 04/16 384,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,000 368,000 Mooresville Road Culvert 15/21 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 Remsburg Road Culvert 287,000 0 0 0 0 189,000 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 Rinehart Road Culvert 14/03 332,000 0 0 31,000 301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stone Masonry Bridge Repairs 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 0 0 Willow Road Culvert 05/10 323,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151,000 172,000 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Yarrowsburg Road Bridge W6191 1,478,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124,000 1,354,000 Bridges Total 14,204,684 466,684 1,830,000 1,193,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 2,345,000 Drainage Stream Restoration at Various Locations 2,081,782 594,782 351,000 0 0 381,000 0 0 405,000 0 0 350,000 Stormwater Retrofits 12,748,660 3,245,660 586,000 1,009,000 945,000 962,000 979,000 996,000 1,013,000 1,013,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Drainage Improvements at Various Locations 825,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Broadfording Church Road Culvert 231,000 0 0 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Draper Road Drainage Improvements 509,000 0 0 0 0 0 259,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 Harpers Ferry Road Drainage, 3600 Block 376,000 0 0 75,000 301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shank Road Drainage 153,000 0 0 153,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trego Mountain Road Drainage 315,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315,000 0 University Road Culvert 203,000 0 0 0 0 203,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage Total 17,442,442 3,915,442 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 Education Board of Education Capital Maintenance - BOE 122,315,488 3,892,488 11,625,000 12,852,000 8,400,000 13,580,000 11,676,000 11,368,000 10,372,000 12,482,000 17,068,000 9,000,000 Sharpsburg Elementary School Replacement 26,728,000 20,537,000 6,191,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary School 1 43,806,000 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,806,000 19,500,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary School 2 43,806,000 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,768,000 19,400,000 2,138,000 0 0 0 Elementary School 3 43,806,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,500,000 19,500,000 2,306,000 0 Elementary School 4 42,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,750,000 19,750,000 Jonathan Hager Elementary School Addition 12,219,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 8,747,000 2,972,000 Urban Education Campus-BOE Component 19,400,000 16,848,000 2,552,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Board of Education 354,080,488 41,277,488 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 Hagerstown Community College Center for Business and Entrepreneurial Studies 8,291,000 6,281,000 2,010,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ARCC Air Conditioning 1,100,000 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATC Operations Building 5,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 958,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 0 0 0 Campus Road & Parking Lot Overlays 3,780,000 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 3,205,000 0 Career Programs Roof Replacement 1,562,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,562,000 0 0 CVT Instructional Facility Acquisition 2,000,000 1,400,000 0 0 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVT Renovation/Construction Project 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,759,000 741,000 0 0 0 0 0 LRC Exterior Metal Panel System and Roof Replacement 1,746,000 0 0 1,746,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Second Entrance Drive Widening Project 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Hagerstown Community College 28,379,000 7,681,000 3,110,000 1,746,000 1,000,000 1,759,000 1,699,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 1,737,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 Public Libraries Systemic Projects - Library 141,492 41,492 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Hancock Public Library Replacement 2,825,000 132,000 10,000 2,683,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Libraries 2,966,492 173,492 20,000 2,693,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Education Total 385,425,980 49,131,980 23,998,000 19,291,000 29,716,000 36,849,000 35,653,000 34,468,000 35,272,000 36,229,000 51,086,000 33,732,000 2 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 General Government Cost of Bond Issuance 1,203,875 143,875 98,000 98,000 99,000 98,000 99,000 98,000 98,000 122,000 124,000 126,000 Contingency - General Fund 1,931,933 931,933 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Systemic Improvements - Building 2,331,589 354,589 197,000 197,000 196,000 196,000 196,000 197,000 199,000 199,000 200,000 200,000 Facilities Roof Repairs 1,460,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 275,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 Information Systems Replacement Program 1,146,460 146,460 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Financial System Management & Upgrades 459,590 110,590 32,000 33,000 34,000 34,000 35,000 35,000 36,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 County Wireless Infrastructure 73,745 14,745 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 General - Equipment and Vehicle Replacement Program 4,120,812 120,812 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 General Government Total 12,728,004 1,923,004 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 Parks and Recreation BR Capital Equipment Program 368,618 4,618 64,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Tennis Court Resurfacing 342,990 42,990 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Park Equipment/Surfacing Replacement, Various Locations 1,917,000 242,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Parking Lot Repair/Overlay, Various Locations 805,100 305,100 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Ag Center Show Area Floor 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Antietam Creek Water Trail 65,000 0 25,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black Rock Club House Renovation 75,000 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BR Golf Simulator 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conococheague Creek Water Trail 210,000 0 0 0 10,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Parks - Bathroom/Drinking Fountain Upgrades 250,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 Doubs Woods Equipment Storage Building 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Dog Park 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Park Field Improvements 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Park Fitness Trail 300,000 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Park Pool Beach Entrance 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLK Gymnasium Upgrade 200,000 0 25,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Central County Park 3,286,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 561,000 562,000 563,000 Recreational Field Bleachers 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Regional Park Dog Park 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Regional Park Walking/Hiking Trail 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roof Replacements Various Locations 200,000 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Woodland Way Sidewalks and Pathways 40,000 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parks and Recreation 8,804,708 594,708 604,000 820,000 690,000 960,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 883,000 Public Safety Detention Center - Systemic Projects 3,249,323 582,323 220,000 450,000 450,000 300,000 270,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 200,000 257,000 Police & EMS Training Facility 12,000,000 7,300,000 1,900,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Communication Tower(s) Various 642,526 178,526 0 110,000 0 114,000 0 118,000 0 122,000 0 0 Motorola Portable Radio Replacement Program 1,268,821 106,821 108,000 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 120,000 122,000 122,000 Law Enforcement - Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Program 7,629,715 449,715 655,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 725,000 725,000 725,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Emergency Services Equipment & Vehicle Program 2,547,183 622,183 150,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 911 Center Building Expansion 1,800,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 1,200,000 350,000 0 0 0 Class A Burn Building - HFD Training Center 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P25 UHF Public Safety Radio Communications System Upgrade 6,500,000 0 200,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Patrol Services Relocation Renovation 5,180,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 800,000 1,880,000 Public Safety 41,317,568 9,239,568 3,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,845,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 Railroad Railroad Crossing Improvements 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Railroad 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Road Improvement Transportation ADA 1,195,450 351,450 82,000 83,000 84,000 86,000 87,000 84,000 85,000 85,000 84,000 84,000 Pavement Maintenance and Rehab Program 61,572,787 8,822,787 5,000,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 Longmeadow Road 810,000 0 0 0 0 0 810,000 0 0 0 0 0 Eastern Boulevard Extended 7,850,000 0 0 0 0 1,897,000 880,000 2,042,000 2,390,000 641,000 0 0 Eastern Boulevard Widening Phase II 5,672,300 2,691,300 2,981,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Boulevard Extended Phase II 4,309,200 4,059,200 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley Mall Area Road Improvements Phase II 992,000 250,000 0 0 0 742,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Boulevard Extended Phase III 1,203,000 0 0 0 771,000 432,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Showalter Road Extended East 2,983,000 510,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 367,000 1,180,000 926,000 0 Halfway Boulevard Extended 5,972,000 3,072,000 2,000,000 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burnside Bridge Road Spot Improvements 544,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 544,000 0 0 0 Colonel Henry Douglas Drive Extended Phase II 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 E. Oak Ridge Drive/South Pointe Signal 461,000 0 0 0 0 0 111,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 Mt Aetna Road Spot Improvements 2,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85,000 928,000 832,000 555,000 Professional Boulevard Extended - Phase IV 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 Rockdale Road and Independence Road Spot Improvements 1,225,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 650,000 575,000 0 Wright Road 2,750,000 0 454,000 1,518,000 778,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Highway - Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Program 15,305,122 1,135,122 1,116,000 1,199,000 1,259,000 1,322,000 1,389,000 1,458,000 1,531,000 1,608,000 1,688,000 1,600,000 Highway Western Section - Fuel Tank Replacement 847,000 486,000 0 0 0 193,000 168,000 0 0 0 0 0 Salt Storage Structure 350,000 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road Improvement 118,041,859 21,377,859 12,233,000 8,950,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 Solid Waste Contingency - Solid Waste 458,000 83,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 60,000 60,000 62,000 63,000 Close Out Cap - Rubblefill 2,091,000 0 190,000 1,901,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Equipment & Vehicle Replacement 576,698 285,698 27,000 28,000 28,000 29,000 29,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40 West Landfill - Cell 5 Construction 4,083,000 0 0 0 0 440,000 3,472,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 4 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 40 West Security Upgrades 60,000 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City/County Groundwater Investigation 156,000 0 156,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Solid Waste 7,424,698 368,698 373,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Transit Vehicle Preventive Maintenance 4,234,230 484,230 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Fixed Route Bus Replacement Program 6,580,000 3,972,000 0 652,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,956,000 ADA Bus Replacement 540,000 0 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 0 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 0 Transportation Development Plan 192,000 92,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 Support Vehicles 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transit 11,626,230 4,548,230 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 Water Quality Utility Administration Contingency - Utility Admin 166,677 135,677 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,000 General Building Improvements 964,000 0 0 0 0 370,000 594,000 0 0 0 0 0 Lab Equipment Replacement 354,117 30,117 105,000 25,000 25,000 23,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 WQ Equip/Vehicle Replacement Program 1,107,320 252,320 75,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 Utility Administration 2,592,114 418,114 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 Sewer Contingency - Sewer 86,939 36,939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Replace Grinder Pumps 890,418 50,418 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 Pen Mar/ Highfield/ Cascade Septic Tank Pumping and Replacement 115,000 75,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pump Station Upgrades - Various Stations 4,840,803 2,027,803 275,000 0 153,000 0 0 885,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 Collection System Rehabilitation Project 3,452,618 372,618 0 560,000 0 0 870,000 0 900,000 0 750,000 0 Capacity Management Project 10,900,542 4,460,542 6,440,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Smithsburg WWTP ENR Upgrade 12,903,387 4,403,387 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,500,000 Heavy Sewer EQP and VEH Replacement 893,934 361,934 94,000 94,000 94,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 Potomac Edison Pump Station & Force Main 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 General WwTP Improvements 1,350,000 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 300,000 250,000 300,000 0 0 0 Sewer Fund 37,133,641 11,788,641 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 Water Contingency - Water 26,800 26,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sharpsburg Water Meter Cradle Replacement 1,000,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Meter Replacement 260,339 110,339 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Mt Aetna Water System Improvements 729,000 130,000 0 0 599,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sharpsburg Water Treatment Plant 794,000 204,000 0 0 0 0 0 590,000 0 0 0 0 General WTP Improvements 1,152,298 50,298 30,000 0 242,000 290,000 0 0 290,000 0 0 250,000 Cascade Town Center Water System Improvements 125,000 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Highfield/Sharpsburg Water Storage Tank 336,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 336,000 WQ Main Replacement 1,366,000 0 0 0 566,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 500,000 5 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Water Fund 5,789,437 771,437 420,000 265,000 1,672,000 405,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 Water Quality 45,515,192 12,978,192 10,509,000 1,104,000 2,354,000 1,243,000 2,102,000 1,974,000 1,744,000 2,805,000 1,015,000 7,687,000 TOTAL 705,322,779 113,485,779 60,631,000 43,222,000 56,195,000 62,128,000 65,793,000 55,294,000 57,345,000 57,233,000 71,571,000 62,425,000 Funding Sources General Fund 75,130,806 14,530,806 5,800,000 5,700,000 5,850,000 5,750,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,250,000 6,250,000 6,500,000 6,500,000 Highway Fund 6,023,027 1,023,027 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Cascade Fund 13,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Solid Waste Fund 1,250,698 368,698 183,000 88,000 58,000 59,000 64,000 65,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Utility Admin Fund 1,598,714 388,714 180,000 105,000 105,000 103,000 108,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 Water Fund 287,139 137,139 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Sewer Fund 3,755,828 2,293,828 194,000 174,000 174,000 115,000 115,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 130,000 185,000 Airport Fund 1,205,169 372,169 35,000 73,000 98,000 94,000 115,000 125,000 51,000 77,000 102,000 63,000 Tax-Supported Bond 141,702,319 21,829,319 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 11,976,000 11,986,000 12,000,000 11,966,000 11,945,000 12,000,000 Self-Supported Bond 41,215,111 9,841,111 10,010,000 1,496,000 1,710,000 1,425,000 5,011,000 1,896,000 1,175,000 825,000 490,000 7,336,000 Transfer Tax 24,466,279 3,966,279 2,500,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Excise Tax - Schools 5,005,000 1,155,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 Excise Tax - Roads 1,530,320 270,320 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 Excise Tax - Other 319,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 Excise Tax - Library 163,900 63,900 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Excise Tax - Non-Residential 550,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 APFO Fees - Roads 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - General 1,956,000 1,956,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - Water 125,000 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 55,105,141 13,426,141 7,459,000 4,646,000 7,021,000 6,192,000 7,070,000 1,684,000 2,270,000 592,000 1,553,000 3,192,000 State Grant 255,110,443 32,799,328 14,041,115 13,249,000 20,283,000 24,774,000 24,586,000 22,440,000 24,292,000 22,179,000 33,137,000 23,330,000 Contributions 88,509,885 8,547,000 7,113,885 2,576,000 5,781,000 8,501,000 7,633,000 7,749,000 7,863,000 11,899,000 14,387,000 6,460,000 TOTAL 705,322,779 113,485,779 60,631,000 43,222,000 56,195,000 62,128,000 65,793,000 55,294,000 57,345,000 57,233,000 71,571,000 62,425,000 6 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Airport Project Cost 2021 Original 32,430,000 3,594,000 3,407,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 393,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 32,475,000 4,726,000 2,295,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 418,000 Change 45,000 0 1,132,000 -1,112,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 2,354,500 163,000 240,000 396,500 409,000 478,000 184,000 171,000 89,000 168,000 56,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 2,400,000 239,000 184,000 397,000 409,000 478,000 184,000 171,000 89,000 168,000 81,000 Change in Local Funding 45,500 0 76,000 -56,000 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 30,075,500 3,431,000 3,167,000 5,667,500 5,985,000 6,893,000 1,121,000 1,995,000 232,000 1,247,000 337,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 30,075,000 4,487,000 2,111,000 5,667,000 5,985,000 6,893,000 1,121,000 1,995,000 232,000 1,247,000 337,000 Change in Other Funding -500 0 1,056,000 -1,056,000 -500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bridges Project Cost 2021 Original 15,901,000 1,419,000 1,579,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 3,368,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 13,738,000 1,830,000 1,193,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 2,345,000 Change -2,163,000 0 411,000 -386,000 0 0 0 0 (35,000)(969,000)-161,000 -1,023,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 12,088,000 598,000 875,000 1,502,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 2,360,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 9,925,000 1,009,000 489,000 1,502,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 1,337,000 Change in Local Funding -2,163,000 0 411,000 -386,000 0 0 0 0 (35,000)(969,000)-161,000 -1,023,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 3,813,000 821,000 704,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,008,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 3,813,000 821,000 704,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,008,000 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage Project Cost 2021 Original 13,452,000 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 13,527,000 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 Change 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 13,202,000 762,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 13,277,000 762,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 Change in Local Funding 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Board of Education Project Cost 2021 Original 312,803,000 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 312,803,000 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 Change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 113,298,000 8,047,000 5,786,000 9,781,000 12,501,000 11,633,000 11,749,000 11,536,000 14,199,000 17,606,000 10,460,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 40,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Change in Local Funding -73,298,000 0 -4,047,000 -1,786,000 -5,781,000 -8,501,000 (7,633,000)(7,749,000)(7,536,000)(10,199,000)-13,606,000 -6,460,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 199,505,000 12,821,000 9,066,000 18,925,000 22,579,000 22,311,000 21,019,000 20,974,000 20,283,000 30,265,000 21,262,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 272,803,000 16,868,000 10,852,000 24,706,000 31,080,000 29,944,000 28,768,000 28,510,000 30,482,000 43,871,000 27,722,000 Change in Other Funding 73,298,000 0 4,047,000 1,786,000 5,781,000 8,501,000 7,633,000 7,749,000 7,536,000 10,199,000 13,606,000 6,460,000 Washington County, Maryland CIP Summary of Changes FY21 Original vs. Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland CIP Summary of Changes FY21 Original vs. Draft 1 Hagerstown Community College Project Cost 2021 Original 25,498,000 3,330,000 6,326,000 3,500,000 2,000,000 378,000 5,022,000 3,380,000 1,562,000 0 0 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 20,698,000 3,110,000 1,746,000 1,000,000 1,759,000 1,699,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 1,737,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 Change -4,800,000 0 -220,000 -4,580,000 -2,500,000 -241,000 1,321,000 (3,332,000)(628,000)175,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 9,335,000 759,000 2,578,000 1,463,000 690,000 131,000 1,733,000 1,443,000 538,000 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,498,000 1,000,000 608,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 690,000 Change in Local Funding -2,837,000 0 241,000 -1,970,000 -863,000 -90,000 469,000 (1,133,000)(843,000)62,000 600,000 690,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 16,163,000 2,571,000 3,748,000 2,037,000 1,310,000 247,000 3,289,000 1,937,000 1,024,000 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 14,200,000 2,110,000 1,138,000 400,000 1,159,000 1,099,000 1,090,000 2,152,000 1,137,000 2,605,000 1,310,000 Change in Other Funding -1,963,000 0 -461,000 -2,610,000 -1,637,000 -151,000 852,000 (2,199,000)215,000 113,000 2,605,000 1,310,000 Public Libraries Project Cost 2021 Original 2,794,000 20,000 2,694,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 2,793,000 20,000 2,693,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Change -1,000 0 0 -1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 969,000 20,000 869,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 968,000 20,000 868,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Change in Local Funding -1,000 0 0 -1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 1,825,000 0 1,825,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 1,825,000 0 1,825,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Government Project Cost 2021 Original 10,430,000 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 10,805,000 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 Change 375,000 0 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 10,430,000 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 10,805,000 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 Change in Local Funding 375,000 0 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland CIP Summary of Changes FY21 Original vs. Draft 1 Parks & Recreation Project Cost 2021 Original 8,970,000 604,000 820,000 540,000 1,110,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 1,643,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 8,210,000 604,000 820,000 690,000 960,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 883,000 Change -760,000 0 0 0 150,000 -150,000 0 0 0 0 0 -760,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 2,569,000 142,000 194,000 102,000 311,000 170,000 340,000 140,000 206,000 207,000 757,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 2,189,000 142,000 194,000 252,000 161,000 170,000 340,000 140,000 206,000 207,000 377,000 Change in Local Funding -380,000 0 0 0 150,000 -150,000 0 0 0 0 0 -380,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 6,401,000 462,000 626,000 438,000 799,000 690,000 475,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 886,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,021,000 462,000 626,000 438,000 799,000 690,000 475,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 506,000 Change in Other Funding -380,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -380,000 Public Safety Project Cost 2021 Original 33,708,000 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 6,277,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 32,078,000 3,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,845,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 Change -1,630,000 0 0 280,000 300,000 -500,000 145,000 925,000 (3,432,000)(2,300,000)875,000 2,077,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 33,358,000 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 5,927,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 30,728,000 2,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,495,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 Change in Local Funding -2,630,000 0 -1,000,000 280,000 300,000 -500,000 145,000 925,000 (3,432,000)(2,300,000)875,000 2,077,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 1,350,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Crossings Project Cost 2021 Original 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Change in Local Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road Improvement Project Cost 2021 Original 109,990,000 10,752,000 9,559,000 7,743,000 8,243,000 9,345,000 8,884,000 11,501,000 10,755,000 9,715,000 23,493,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 96,664,000 12,233,000 8,950,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 Change -13,326,000 0 1,481,000 -609,000 399,000 1,679,000 150,000 300,000 (1,499,000)(163,000)-110,000 -14,954,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 106,740,000 8,752,000 8,309,000 7,743,000 8,243,000 9,345,000 8,884,000 11,501,000 10,755,000 9,715,000 23,493,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 93,414,000 10,233,000 7,700,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 Change in Local Funding -13,326,000 0 1,481,000 -609,000 399,000 1,679,000 150,000 300,000 (1,499,000)(163,000)-110,000 -14,954,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 3,250,000 2,000,000 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 3,250,000 2,000,000 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland CIP Summary of Changes FY21 Original vs. Draft 1 Solid Waste Project Cost 2021 Original 7,057,000 374,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 7,056,000 373,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Change -1,000 0 -1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 6,192,000 374,000 1,124,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,191,000 373,000 1,124,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Change in Local Funding -1,000 0 -1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 865,000 0 865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 865,000 0 865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transit Project Cost 2021 Original 7,078,000 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 7,078,000 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 Change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 702,000 54,000 102,000 46,000 46,000 37,000 46,000 47,000 46,000 46,000 232,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 702,000 54,000 102,000 46,000 46,000 37,000 46,000 47,000 46,000 46,000 232,000 Change in Local Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 6,376,000 491,000 925,000 419,000 419,000 338,000 419,000 428,000 419,000 419,000 2,099,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,376,000 491,000 925,000 419,000 419,000 338,000 419,000 428,000 419,000 419,000 2,099,000 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Quality Project Cost 2021 Original 32,537,000 10,434,000 1,129,000 2,379,000 1,268,000 2,102,000 1,974,000 1,744,000 2,805,000 1,015,000 7,687,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 32,537,000 10,509,000 1,104,000 2,354,000 1,243,000 2,102,000 1,974,000 1,744,000 2,805,000 1,015,000 7,687,000 Change 0 0 75,000 -25,000 -25,000 -25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 29,412,000 10,309,000 954,000 2,204,000 1,243,000 1,777,000 1,974,000 1,429,000 1,080,000 755,000 7,687,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 29,412,000 10,384,000 929,000 2,179,000 1,218,000 1,777,000 1,974,000 1,429,000 1,080,000 755,000 7,687,000 Change in Local Funding 0 0 75,000 -25,000 -25,000 -25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 3,125,000 125,000 175,000 175,000 25,000 325,000 0 315,000 1,725,000 260,000 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 3,125,000 125,000 175,000 175,000 25,000 325,000 0 315,000 1,725,000 260,000 0 Change in Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland CIP Summary of Changes FY21 Original vs. Draft 1 Budget Total Project Cost 2021 Original 614,023,000 57,678,000 49,580,000 57,821,000 61,315,000 64,152,000 57,376,000 62,914,000 60,465,000 67,737,000 74,985,000 Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 591,837,000 60,631,000 43,222,000 56,195,000 62,128,000 65,793,000 55,294,000 57,345,000 57,233,000 71,571,000 62,425,000 Change -22,186,000 0 2,953,000 -6,358,000 -1,626,000 813,000 1,641,000 (2,082,000)(5,569,000)(3,232,000)3,834,000 -12,560,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 342,024,500 34,706,000 27,229,000 28,879,500 30,198,000 33,348,000 31,053,000 36,240,000 36,107,000 34,871,000 49,393,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 247,884,000 32,017,000 22,751,000 23,110,000 22,661,000 26,504,000 23,421,000 22,920,000 22,563,000 22,494,000 29,443,000 Change in Local Funding -94,140,500 0 -2,689,000 -4,478,000 -5,769,500 -7,537,000 (6,844,000)(7,632,000)(13,320,000)(13,544,000)-12,377,000 -19,950,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 271,998,500 22,972,000 22,351,000 28,941,500 31,117,000 30,804,000 26,323,000 26,674,000 24,358,000 32,866,000 25,592,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 343,953,000 28,614,000 20,471,000 33,085,000 39,467,000 39,289,000 31,873,000 34,425,000 34,670,000 49,077,000 32,982,000 Change in Other Funding 71,954,500 0 5,642,000 -1,880,000 4,143,500 8,350,000 8,485,000 5,550,000 7,751,000 10,312,000 16,211,000 7,390,000 Bonds - Tax Supported 119,873,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 11,976,000 11,986,000 12,000,000 11,966,000 11,945,000 12,000,000 Bonds - Self Supported 31,374,000 10,010,000 1,496,000 1,710,000 1,425,000 5,011,000 1,896,000 1,175,000 825,000 490,000 7,336,000 Speed Camera Fines 5,600,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 General Fund 55,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,750,000 5,750,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Other Funds 9,537,000 1,107,000 955,000 950,000 886,000 917,000 939,000 895,000 922,000 959,000 1,007,000 Transfer Tax 20,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Excise Tax 6,000,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 APFO - - - - - - - - Reserves (Transfer Tax)500,000 500,000 - - - - Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Passenger Terminal Hold Room Expansion 7,178,000 3,737,000 3,441,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,178,000 3,737,000 3,441,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T-Hangar 1, 2, & 3 Replacement 416,000 103,000 0 33,000 28,000 34,000 35,000 35,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 38,000 436,000 103,000 20,000 33,000 28,000 34,000 35,000 35,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 38,000 3 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Airport Roof Replacement Project 349,220 99,220 15,000 15,000 45,000 35,000 55,000 25,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 0 374,220 99,220 15,000 15,000 45,000 35,000 55,000 25,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 1 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Airport Security System Enhancements 258,000 258,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258,000 258,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Equipment - Airport 1,429,375 733,375 38,000 25,000 135,000 25,000 25,000 65,000 195,000 20,000 113,000 55,000 1,429,375 733,375 38,000 25,000 135,000 25,000 25,000 65,000 195,000 20,000 113,000 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Acquisition-Airport 15,841,000 2,507,000 0 2,222,000 5,556,000 0 5,556,000 0 0 0 0 0 15,841,000 2,507,000 0 2,222,000 5,556,000 0 5,556,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Airport Environmental Assessment 833,982 833,982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 833,982 833,982 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passenger Boarding Bridge 1,112,000 0 0 1,112,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,112,000 0 1,112,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1,112,000 (1,112,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Taxiway S 1,180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,180,000 0 0 0 0 1,180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Runway 9 MALSR 1,484,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244,000 1,240,000 0 1,484,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244,000 1,240,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Snow Removal Equipment Storage Building Expansion 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taxiway F Rehabilitation 6,300,000 0 0 0 300,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,300,000 0 0 0 300,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taxiway G Rehabilitation 1,920,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,920,000 0 0 0 1,920,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,920,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taxiway H Rehabilitation 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wildlife Assessment 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 40,701,577 8,271,577 3,594,000 3,407,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 393,000 40,746,577 8,271,577 4,726,000 2,295,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 418,000 45,000 0 1,132,000 (1,112,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Airport Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Airport Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Funding Sources General Fund 2,201,516 635,016 148,000 167,000 298,500 315,000 363,000 59,000 120,000 12,000 66,000 18,000 1,924,016 635,016 204,000 111,000 299,000 315,000 85,000 59,000 120,000 12,000 66,000 18,000 (277,500)0 56,000 (56,000)500 0 (278,000)0 0 0 0 0 Airport Fund 1,160,169 372,169 15,000 73,000 98,000 94,000 115,000 125,000 51,000 77,000 102,000 38,000 1,205,169 372,169 35,000 73,000 98,000 94,000 115,000 125,000 51,000 77,000 102,000 63,000 45,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Tax-Supported Bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278,000 0 0 0 0 0 278,000 0 0 0 0 0 278,000 0 0 0 0 0 278,000 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - General 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 35,077,077 6,634,077 3,202,000 3,000,000 5,369,000 5,670,000 6,530,000 1,062,000 1,890,000 220,000 1,181,000 319,000 35,077,077 6,634,077 4,202,000 2,000,000 5,369,000 5,670,000 6,530,000 1,062,000 1,890,000 220,000 1,181,000 319,000 0 0 1,000,000 (1,000,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 2,162,815 530,315 229,000 167,000 298,500 315,000 363,000 59,000 105,000 12,000 66,000 18,000 2,162,315 530,315 285,000 111,000 298,000 315,000 363,000 59,000 105,000 12,000 66,000 18,000 (500)0 56,000 (56,000)(500)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 40,701,577 8,271,577 3,594,000 3,407,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 393,000 40,746,577 8,271,577 4,726,000 2,295,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 418,000 45,000 0 1,132,000 (1,112,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 32,430,000 3,594,000 3,407,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 393,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 32,475,000 4,726,000 2,295,000 6,064,000 6,394,000 7,371,000 1,305,000 2,166,000 321,000 1,415,000 418,000 45,000 1,132,000 (1,112,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 2,354,500 163,000 240,000 396,500 409,000 478,000 184,000 171,000 89,000 168,000 56,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 2,400,000 239,000 184,000 397,000 409,000 478,000 184,000 171,000 89,000 168,000 81,000 45,500 76,000 (56,000)500 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 30,075,500 3,431,000 3,167,000 5,667,500 5,985,000 6,893,000 1,121,000 1,995,000 232,000 1,247,000 337,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 30,075,000 4,487,000 2,111,000 5,667,000 5,985,000 6,893,000 1,121,000 1,995,000 232,000 1,247,000 337,000 (500)1,056,000 (1,056,000)(500)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Tenth year funding added. 2 The Runway 9/27 Rehab project was originally programmed to use FY21 entitlement of $1M. Since there has been approval to fund project with discretionary grant, the $1M entitlement has become available for use on the Passenger Boarding Bridge. 3 Operating funds available to use toward CIP projects. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Bridge Inspection and Inventory 647,500 235,500 0 22,000 0 171,000 0 24,000 0 175,000 0 20,000 647,500 235,500 0 22,000 0 171,000 0 24,000 0 175,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bridge Scour Repairs 513,184 31,184 0 0 0 0 0 232,000 0 0 0 250,000 513,184 31,184 0 0 0 0 0 232,000 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Halfway Boulevard Bridges W0912 3,712,000 115,000 1,007,000 990,000 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,737,000 115,000 1,032,000 990,000 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Keefer Road Bridge 15/20 231,000 85,000 146,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 231,000 85,000 146,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Appletown Road Bridge W2184 479,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 479,000 0 0 479,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 479,000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (479,000)479,000 0 Ashton Road Culvert 04/06 399,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 369,000 0 399,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 369,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bowie Road Culvert 305,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 270,000 0 0 0 305,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Broadfording Road Culvert 04/03 466,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 466,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (466,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (466,000) Burnside Bridge Road Culvert 01/03 329,000 0 0 0 0 114,000 215,000 0 0 0 0 0 329,000 0 0 0 0 114,000 215,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Draper Road Culvert 04/07 428,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 392,000 428,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 392,000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 356,000 (392,000) Draper Road Culvert 04/08 379,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 343,000 379,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 343,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frog Eye Road Culvert 11/06 652,000 0 266,000 386,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 652,000 0 652,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 386,000 (386,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gardenhour Road Bridge W2431 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (100,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (100,000) Greenbrier Road Culvert 16/14 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (65,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (65,000) Greenspring Furnace Road Culvert 15/15 398,000 0 0 87,000 311,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 398,000 0 0 87,000 311,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gruber Road Bridge 04/10 288,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 278,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 1 (278,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (10,000)(268,000) Harpers Ferry Road Culvert 11/02 541,000 0 0 0 0 33,000 508,000 0 0 0 0 0 541,000 0 0 0 0 33,000 508,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Henline Road Culvert 05/05 465,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,000 431,000 0 0 0 465,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,000 431,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Bridges Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Bridges Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Hoffman's Inn Road Culvert 05/06 313,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,000 148,000 0 0 0 313,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,000 148,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kretsinger Road Culvert 14/01 316,000 0 0 31,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 316,000 0 0 31,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes Road Culvert 15/12 317,000 0 0 32,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 317,000 0 0 32,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Hollow Road Culvert 05/07 316,000 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 316,000 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mercersburg Road Culvert 04/16 384,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,000 368,000 0 384,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,000 368,000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (16,000)(352,000)368,000 Mooresville Road Culvert 15/21 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Poplar Grove Road Bridge W2432 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (100,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (100,000) Remsburg Road Culvert 287,000 0 0 0 0 189,000 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 287,000 0 0 0 0 189,000 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rinehart Road Culvert 14/03 332,000 0 0 31,000 301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 332,000 0 0 31,000 301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stone Masonry Bridge Repairs 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 0 0 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taylors Landing Road Bridge W7101 1,179,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 510,000 634,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (1,179,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (35,000)(510,000)(634,000)0 Willow Road Culvert 05/10 323,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151,000 172,000 0 0 323,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151,000 172,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yarrowsburg Road Bridge W6191 1,478,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124,000 1,354,000 1,478,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124,000 1,354,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 16,367,684 466,684 1,419,000 1,579,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 3,368,000 14,204,684 466,684 1,830,000 1,193,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 2,345,000 (2,163,000)0 411,000 (386,000)0 0 0 0 (35,000)(969,000)(161,000)(1,023,000) Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Bridges Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Funding Sources General Fund 12,209,684 121,684 598,000 875,000 1,502,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 2,360,000 1,285,684 121,684 0 22,000 0 171,000 0 256,000 0 445,000 0 270,000 (10,924,000)0 (598,000)(853,000)(1,502,000)(336,000)(887,000)(484,000)(1,035,000)(1,562,000)(1,577,000)(2,090,000) Tax-Supported Bond 170,000 170,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,931,000 170,000 1,009,000 467,000 1,502,000 336,000 887,000 484,000 1,000,000 593,000 1,416,000 1,067,000 8,761,000 0 1,009,000 467,000 1,502,000 336,000 887,000 484,000 1,000,000 593,000 1,416,000 1,067,000 Capital Reserve - General 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 3,813,000 0 821,000 704,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,008,000 3,813,000 0 821,000 704,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,008,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 16,367,684 466,684 1,419,000 1,579,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 3,368,000 14,204,684 466,684 1,830,000 1,193,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 2,345,000 (2,163,000)0 411,000 (386,000)0 0 0 0 (35,000)(969,000)(161,000)(1,023,000) 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 15,901,000 1,419,000 1,579,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 3,368,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 13,738,000 1,830,000 1,193,000 2,782,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 2,345,000 (2,163,000)411,000 (386,000)0 0 0 0 (35,000)(969,000)(161,000)(1,023,000) Local Funding 2021 Original 12,088,000 598,000 875,000 1,502,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,035,000 2,007,000 1,577,000 2,360,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 9,925,000 1,009,000 489,000 1,502,000 507,000 887,000 740,000 1,000,000 1,038,000 1,416,000 1,337,000 (2,163,000)411,000 (386,000)0 0 0 0 (35,000)(969,000)(161,000)(1,023,000) Other Funding 2021 Original 3,813,000 821,000 704,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,008,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 3,813,000 821,000 704,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,008,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Funding shifted between years based on available funding. 2 Projects pushed out beyond the current 10 year plan based on available funding. 3 Funding brought forward based on need and funding availability. 4 Funding increased based on need and funding availability. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Stream Restoration at Various Locations 2,081,782 594,782 351,000 0 0 381,000 0 0 405,000 0 0 350,000 2,081,782 594,782 351,000 0 0 381,000 0 0 405,000 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stormwater Retrofits 12,748,660 3,245,660 586,000 1,009,000 945,000 962,000 979,000 996,000 1,013,000 1,013,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 12,748,660 3,245,660 586,000 1,009,000 945,000 962,000 979,000 996,000 1,013,000 1,013,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage Improvements at Various Locations 750,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 825,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Broadfording Church Road Culvert 231,000 0 0 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 231,000 0 0 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Draper Road Drainage Improvements 509,000 0 0 0 0 0 259,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 509,000 0 0 0 0 0 259,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Harpers Ferry Road Drainage, 3600 Block 376,000 0 0 75,000 301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 376,000 0 0 75,000 301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shank Road Drainage 153,000 0 0 153,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153,000 0 0 153,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trego Mountain Road Drainage 315,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315,000 0 315,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 University Road Culvert 203,000 0 0 0 0 203,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 203,000 0 0 0 0 203,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 17,367,442 3,915,442 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 17,442,442 3,915,442 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Funding Sources General Fund 15,081,205 1,879,205 762,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 9,103,205 1,879,205 682,000 394,000 882,000 688,000 613,000 671,000 1,039,000 524,000 904,000 827,000 (5,978,000)0 (80,000)(1,149,000)(439,000)(933,000)(700,000)(650,000)(454,000)(564,000)(486,000)(523,000) Tax-Supported Bond 1,882,237 1,882,237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,002,237 1,882,237 0 459,000 301,000 203,000 259,000 250,000 0 564,000 486,000 598,000 3,120,000 0 0 459,000 301,000 203,000 259,000 250,000 0 564,000 486,000 598,000 Transfer Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,933,000 0 80,000 690,000 138,000 730,000 441,000 400,000 454,000 0 0 0 2,933,000 0 80,000 690,000 138,000 730,000 441,000 400,000 454,000 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - General 154,000 154,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154,000 154,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 17,367,442 3,915,442 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 17,442,442 3,915,442 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Drainage Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Drainage Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 13,452,000 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 13,527,000 1,012,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 13,202,000 762,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,350,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 13,277,000 762,000 1,543,000 1,321,000 1,621,000 1,313,000 1,321,000 1,493,000 1,088,000 1,390,000 1,425,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Tenth year funding added. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Capital Maintenance - BOE 122,315,488 3,892,488 11,625,000 12,852,000 8,400,000 13,580,000 11,676,000 11,368,000 10,372,000 12,482,000 17,068,000 9,000,000 122,315,488 3,892,488 11,625,000 12,852,000 8,400,000 13,580,000 11,676,000 11,368,000 10,372,000 12,482,000 17,068,000 9,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sharpsburg Elementary School Replacement 26,728,000 20,537,000 6,191,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,728,000 20,537,000 6,191,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary School 1 43,806,000 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,806,000 19,500,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 43,806,000 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,806,000 19,500,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary School 2 43,806,000 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,768,000 19,400,000 2,138,000 0 0 0 43,806,000 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,768,000 19,400,000 2,138,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary School 3 43,806,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,500,000 19,500,000 2,306,000 0 43,806,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,500,000 19,500,000 2,306,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary School 4 42,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,750,000 19,750,000 42,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,000,000 19,750,000 19,750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jonathan Hager Elementary School Addition 12,219,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 8,747,000 2,972,000 12,219,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 8,747,000 2,972,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Urban Education Campus-BOE Component 19,400,000 16,848,000 2,552,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19,400,000 16,848,000 2,552,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 354,080,488 41,277,488 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 354,080,488 41,277,488 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources General Fund 114,331,658 1,033,658 8,047,000 5,786,000 9,781,000 12,501,000 11,633,000 11,749,000 11,536,000 14,199,000 17,606,000 10,460,000 1,033,658 1,033,658 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (113,298,000)0 (8,047,000)(5,786,000)(9,781,000)(12,501,000)(11,633,000)(11,749,000)(11,536,000)(14,199,000)(17,606,000)(10,460,000) Tax-Supported Bond 8,153,830 8,153,830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,303,830 8,153,830 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 1 36,150,000 0 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 3,615,000 Excise Tax - Schools 1,155,000 1,155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,005,000 1,155,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 3,850,000 0 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 385,000 Capital Reserve - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 223,078,115 25,862,000 10,532,115 9,066,000 18,925,000 22,579,000 22,311,000 21,019,000 20,974,000 20,283,000 30,265,000 21,262,000 223,078,115 25,862,000 10,532,115 9,066,000 18,925,000 22,579,000 22,311,000 21,019,000 20,974,000 20,283,000 30,265,000 21,262,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contributions 7,361,885 5,073,000 2,288,885 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,659,885 5,073,000 6,335,885 1,786,000 5,781,000 8,501,000 7,633,000 7,749,000 7,536,000 10,199,000 13,606,000 6,460,000 1 73,298,000 0 4,047,000 1,786,000 5,781,000 8,501,000 7,633,000 7,749,000 7,536,000 10,199,000 13,606,000 6,460,000 TOTAL 354,080,488 41,277,488 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 354,080,488 41,277,488 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Board of Education Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Board of Education Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 312,803,000 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 312,803,000 20,868,000 14,852,000 28,706,000 35,080,000 33,944,000 32,768,000 32,510,000 34,482,000 47,871,000 31,722,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 113,298,000 8,047,000 5,786,000 9,781,000 12,501,000 11,633,000 11,749,000 11,536,000 14,199,000 17,606,000 10,460,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 40,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 (73,298,000)(4,047,000)(1,786,000)(5,781,000)(8,501,000)(7,633,000)(7,749,000)(7,536,000)(10,199,000)(13,606,000)(6,460,000) Other Funding 2021 Original 199,505,000 12,821,000 9,066,000 18,925,000 22,579,000 22,311,000 21,019,000 20,974,000 20,283,000 30,265,000 21,262,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 272,803,000 16,868,000 10,852,000 24,706,000 31,080,000 29,944,000 28,768,000 28,510,000 30,482,000 43,871,000 27,722,000 73,298,000 4,047,000 1,786,000 5,781,000 8,501,000 7,633,000 7,749,000 7,536,000 10,199,000 13,606,000 6,460,000 Adjustment Comments: 1 County funding was adjusted to $4M per year. In order to maintain and fund the BOE Capital Plan as submitted, contributions from the BOE would be required in the amounts shown (highlighted in yellow). Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Center for Business and Entrepreneurial Studies 8,291,000 6,281,000 1,510,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,291,000 6,281,000 2,010,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 500,000 (500,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ARCC Air Conditioning 1,100,000 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATC Operations Building 5,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 378,000 5,022,000 0 0 0 0 5,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 958,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 580,000 (3,332,000)2,752,000 0 0 0 Campus Road & Parking Lot Overlays 3,780,000 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 3,380,000 0 0 0 3,780,000 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 3,205,000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3,380,000)175,000 3,205,000 0 Career Programs Roof Replacement 1,562,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,562,000 0 0 1,562,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,562,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVT Instructional Facility Acquisition 2,000,000 1,400,000 0 0 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 1,400,000 0 0 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVT Renovation/Construction Project 2,500,000 0 0 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,759,000 741,000 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 (2,500,000)1,759,000 741,000 0 0 0 0 0 LRC Exterior Metal Panel System and Roof Replacement 1,746,000 0 0 1,746,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,746,000 0 0 1,746,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Second Entrance Drive Widening Project 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 1 0 0 0 0 0 (2,000,000)0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Solar Carport 4,800,000 0 720,000 4,080,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (4,800,000)0 (720,000)(4,080,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 33,179,000 7,681,000 3,330,000 6,326,000 3,500,000 2,000,000 378,000 5,022,000 3,380,000 1,562,000 0 0 28,379,000 7,681,000 3,110,000 1,746,000 1,000,000 1,759,000 1,699,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 1,737,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 (4,800,000)0 (220,000)(4,580,000)(2,500,000)(241,000)1,321,000 (3,332,000)(628,000)175,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 Funding Sources General Fund 9,335,000 0 759,000 2,578,000 1,463,000 690,000 131,000 1,733,000 1,443,000 538,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (9,335,000)0 (759,000)(2,578,000)(1,463,000)(690,000)(131,000)(1,733,000)(1,443,000)(538,000)0 0 Tax-Supported Bond 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,598,000 100,000 1,000,000 608,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 690,000 6,498,000 0 1,000,000 608,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 690,000 Federal Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 19,493,000 4,108,000 1,793,000 3,748,000 2,037,000 1,310,000 247,000 3,289,000 1,937,000 1,024,000 0 0 16,422,000 4,108,000 1,332,000 1,138,000 400,000 1,159,000 1,099,000 1,090,000 1,825,000 1,137,000 1,824,000 1,310,000 (3,071,000)0 (461,000)(2,610,000)(1,637,000)(151,000)852,000 (2,199,000)(112,000)113,000 1,824,000 1,310,000 Contributions 4,251,000 3,473,000 778,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,359,000 3,473,000 778,000 0 0 0 0 0 327,000 0 781,000 0 3 1,108,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 327,000 0 781,000 0 TOTAL 33,179,000 7,681,000 3,330,000 6,326,000 3,500,000 2,000,000 378,000 5,022,000 3,380,000 1,562,000 0 0 28,379,000 7,681,000 3,110,000 1,746,000 1,000,000 1,759,000 1,699,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 1,737,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 (4,800,000)0 (220,000)(4,580,000)(2,500,000)(241,000)1,321,000 (3,332,000)(628,000)175,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Hagerstown Community College Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Hagerstown Community College Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 25,498,000 3,330,000 6,326,000 3,500,000 2,000,000 378,000 5,022,000 3,380,000 1,562,000 0 0 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 20,698,000 3,110,000 1,746,000 1,000,000 1,759,000 1,699,000 1,690,000 2,752,000 1,737,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 (4,800,000)(220,000)(4,580,000)(2,500,000)(241,000)1,321,000 (3,332,000)(628,000)175,000 3,205,000 2,000,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 9,335,000 759,000 2,578,000 1,463,000 690,000 131,000 1,733,000 1,443,000 538,000 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,498,000 1,000,000 608,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 690,000 (2,837,000)241,000 (1,970,000)(863,000)(90,000)469,000 (1,133,000)(843,000)62,000 600,000 690,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 16,163,000 2,571,000 3,748,000 2,037,000 1,310,000 247,000 3,289,000 1,937,000 1,024,000 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 14,200,000 2,110,000 1,138,000 400,000 1,159,000 1,099,000 1,090,000 2,152,000 1,137,000 2,605,000 1,310,000 (1,963,000)(461,000)(2,610,000)(1,637,000)(151,000)852,000 (2,199,000)215,000 113,000 2,605,000 1,310,000 Adjustment Comments: 1 Projects were moved up/pushed back to allow for a level annual contribution of about $600K. 2 The Solar Carport project was removed due to funding limitations. 3 In years 2027 and 2029, there were costs requested above the $600K County allocation that would be the responsibility of HCC. Amounts shown as Contributions (highlighted in yellow). Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Systemic Projects - Library 141,492 41,492 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 141,492 41,492 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hancock Public Library Replacement 2,826,000 132,000 10,000 2,684,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,825,000 132,000 10,000 2,683,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (1,000)0 0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,967,492 173,492 20,000 2,694,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 2,966,492 173,492 20,000 2,693,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 (1,000)0 0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources General Fund 1,078,592 109,592 20,000 869,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 129,592 109,592 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (949,000)0 (10,000)(859,000)(10,000)(10,000)(10,000)(10,000)(10,000)(10,000)(10,000)(10,000) Tax-Supported Bond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 848,000 0 0 848,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 848,000 0 0 848,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Excise Tax - Library 63,900 63,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163,900 63,900 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 100,000 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Capital Reserve - General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 1,285,000 0 0 1,285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,285,000 0 0 1,285,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contributions 540,000 0 0 540,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 540,000 0 0 540,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,967,492 173,492 20,000 2,694,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 2,966,492 173,492 20,000 2,693,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 (1,000)0 0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 2,794,000 20,000 2,694,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 2,793,000 20,000 2,693,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 (1,000)0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 969,000 20,000 869,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 968,000 20,000 868,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 (1,000)0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 1,825,000 0 1,825,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 1,825,000 0 1,825,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Hancock Library project was reduced $1000 so that the County portion did not exceed $1M. Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Libraries Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Cost of Bond Issuance 1,203,875 143,875 98,000 98,000 99,000 98,000 99,000 98,000 98,000 122,000 124,000 126,000 1,203,875 143,875 98,000 98,000 99,000 98,000 99,000 98,000 98,000 122,000 124,000 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contingency - General Fund 1,556,933 931,933 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 1,931,933 931,933 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1 375,000 0 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Systemic Improvements - Building 2,331,589 354,589 197,000 197,000 196,000 196,000 196,000 197,000 199,000 199,000 200,000 200,000 2,331,589 354,589 197,000 197,000 196,000 196,000 196,000 197,000 199,000 199,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Facilities Roof Repairs 1,460,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 275,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 1,460,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 275,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Information Systems Replacement Program 1,146,460 146,460 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1,146,460 146,460 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Financial System Management & Upgrades 459,590 110,590 32,000 33,000 34,000 34,000 35,000 35,000 36,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 459,590 110,590 32,000 33,000 34,000 34,000 35,000 35,000 36,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Wireless Infrastructure 73,745 14,745 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 73,745 14,745 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General - Equipment and Vehicle Replacement Program 4,120,812 120,812 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 4,120,812 120,812 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 12,353,004 1,923,004 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 12,728,004 1,923,004 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 375,000 0 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Funding Sources General Fund 11,347,004 917,004 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 11,622,004 917,004 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 940,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 275,000 0 75,000 75,000 50,000 (50,000)25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Tax-Supported Bond 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - General 906,000 906,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 906,000 906,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 12,353,004 1,923,004 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 12,728,004 1,923,004 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 375,000 0 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - General Government Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - General Government Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 10,430,000 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 10,805,000 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 375,000 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 10,430,000 993,000 995,000 991,000 990,000 1,067,000 1,180,000 1,058,000 1,057,000 1,036,000 1,063,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 10,805,000 1,068,000 1,070,000 1,041,000 1,040,000 1,092,000 1,205,000 1,083,000 1,082,000 1,061,000 1,063,000 375,000 75,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Increased Contingency to a more appropriate funding level. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs BR Capital Equipment Program 368,618 4,618 64,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 368,618 4,618 64,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tennis Court Resurfacing 342,990 42,990 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 342,990 42,990 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Equipment/Surfacing Replacement, Various Locations 1,917,000 242,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,917,000 242,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking Lot Repair/Overlay, Various Locations 805,100 305,100 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 805,100 305,100 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ag Center Show Arena Floor 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Antietam Creek Water Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 0 25,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 65,000 0 25,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Antietam Creek Water Trail - Devils Backbone Trail 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (10,000)0 (10,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Antietam Creek Water Trail - Keedysville Road 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (30,000)0 0 (30,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Antietam Creek Water Trail - Security Road 25,000 0 15,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (25,000)0 (15,000)(10,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black Rock Club House Renovation 75,000 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BR Golf Simulator 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conococheague Creek Water Trail 210,000 0 0 0 10,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 0 0 0 10,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Parks - Bathroom/Drinking Fountain Upgrades 250,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Doubs Woods Equipment Storage Building 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Dog Park 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Park Field Improvements 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Park Fitness Trail 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 150,000 (150,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Marty Snook Park Pool Beach Entrance 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLK Gymnasium Upgrade 200,000 0 25,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 25,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Parks and Recreation Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Parks and Recreation Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 North Central County Park 4,046,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 561,000 562,000 1,323,000 3,286,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 561,000 562,000 563,000 3 (760,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (760,000) Recreational Field Bleachers 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Regional Park Dog Park 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Regional Park Walking/Hiking Trail 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roof Replacements Various Locations 200,000 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 200,000 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woodland Way Sidewalks and Pathways 40,000 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9,564,708 594,708 604,000 820,000 540,000 1,110,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 1,643,000 8,804,708 594,708 604,000 820,000 690,000 960,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 883,000 (760,000)0 0 0 150,000 (150,000)0 0 0 0 0 (760,000) Funding Sources General Fund 2,640,618 71,618 142,000 194,000 102,000 311,000 170,000 340,000 140,000 206,000 207,000 757,000 2,260,618 71,618 142,000 194,000 252,000 161,000 170,000 340,000 140,000 206,000 207,000 377,000 (380,000)0 0 0 150,000 (150,000)0 0 0 0 0 (380,000) Capital Reserve - General 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 760,000 0 0 120,000 0 150,000 240,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 760,000 0 0 120,000 0 150,000 240,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 6,134,090 493,090 462,000 506,000 438,000 649,000 450,000 225,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 886,000 5,754,090 493,090 462,000 506,000 438,000 649,000 450,000 225,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 506,000 (380,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (380,000) TOTAL 9,564,708 594,708 604,000 820,000 540,000 1,110,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 1,643,000 8,804,708 594,708 604,000 820,000 690,000 960,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 883,000 (760,000)0 0 0 150,000 (150,000)0 0 0 0 0 (760,000) 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 8,970,000 604,000 820,000 540,000 1,110,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 1,643,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 8,210,000 604,000 820,000 690,000 960,000 860,000 815,000 815,000 881,000 882,000 883,000 (760,000)0 0 150,000 (150,000)0 0 0 0 0 (760,000) Local Funding 2021 Original 2,569,000 142,000 194,000 102,000 311,000 170,000 340,000 140,000 206,000 207,000 757,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 2,189,000 142,000 194,000 252,000 161,000 170,000 340,000 140,000 206,000 207,000 377,000 (380,000)0 0 150,000 (150,000)0 0 0 0 0 (380,000) Other Funding 2021 Original 6,401,000 462,000 626,000 438,000 799,000 690,000 475,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 886,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,021,000 462,000 626,000 438,000 799,000 690,000 475,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 506,000 (380,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (380,000) Adjustment Comments: 1 Partial funding brought forward based on available funding. 2 The three Antietam Water Trail projects were combined into one. 3 Realigned the funding in FY30 with preceding years per the suggestion of the CIP Committee. Specifics have not yet been identified to support the $1.3M request. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Detention Center - Systemic Projects 3,249,323 582,323 220,000 170,000 100,000 700,000 500,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 200,000 257,000 3,249,323 582,323 220,000 450,000 450,000 300,000 270,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 200,000 257,000 5 0 0 0 280,000 350,000 (400,000)(230,000)0 0 0 0 0 Police & EMS Training Facility 12,000,000 7,300,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,000,000 7,300,000 1,900,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 500,000 0 0 (500,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Communication Tower(s) Various 642,526 178,526 0 110,000 0 114,000 0 118,000 0 122,000 0 0 642,526 178,526 0 110,000 0 114,000 0 118,000 0 122,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Motorola Portable Radio Replacement Program 1,146,821 106,821 108,000 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 120,000 122,000 0 1,268,821 106,821 108,000 110,000 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 120,000 122,000 122,000 122,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122,000 Law Enforcement - Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Program8,404,715 449,715 655,000 700,000 750,000 800,000 850,000 900,000 950,000 1,000,000 675,000 675,000 7,629,715 449,715 655,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 725,000 725,000 725,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 1 (775,000)0 0 0 (50,000)(100,000)(125,000)(175,000)(225,000)(250,000)75,000 75,000 Emergency Services Equipment & Vehicle Program 2,547,183 622,183 150,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,547,183 622,183 150,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 911 Center Building Expansion 1,800,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 600,000 950,000 0 0 0 1,800,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 1,200,000 350,000 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 (600,000)0 0 0 Class A Burn Building - HFD Training Center 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P25 UHF Public Safety Radio Communications System Upgrade 7,000,000 0 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 6,500,000 0 200,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 3 (500,000)0 (500,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Patrol Services Relocation Renovation 5,657,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,107,000 2,550,000 0 0 5,180,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 800,000 1,880,000 2 (477,000)0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 (2,607,000)(2,050,000)800,000 1,880,000 TOTAL 42,947,568 9,239,568 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 6,277,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 41,317,568 9,239,568 3,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,845,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 (1,630,000)0 0 280,000 300,000 (500,000)145,000 925,000 (3,432,000)(2,300,000)875,000 2,077,000 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Public Safety Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Public Safety Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Funding Sources General Fund 38,670,245 5,312,245 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 5,927,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 29,740,245 5,312,245 2,513,000 2,495,000 2,312,000 2,328,000 2,511,000 2,381,000 2,245,000 2,642,000 2,472,000 2,529,000 (8,930,000)0 (1,220,000)(870,000)(950,000)(800,000)(105,000)(275,000)(3,682,000)(2,300,000)575,000 697,000 Tax-Supported Bond 3,379,752 3,379,752 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,009,752 3,379,752 0 700,000 800,000 0 250,000 1,200,000 0 0 300,000 1,380,000 4,630,000 0 0 700,000 800,000 0 250,000 1,200,000 0 0 300,000 1,380,000 Transfer Tax 90,571 90,571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,760,571 90,571 220,000 450,000 450,000 300,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 1,670,000 0 220,000 450,000 450,000 300,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - General 456,000 456,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 456,000 456,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 1,350,000 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 4 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contributions 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 42,947,568 9,239,568 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 6,277,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 41,317,568 9,239,568 3,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,845,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 (1,630,000)0 0 280,000 300,000 (500,000)145,000 925,000 (3,432,000)(2,300,000)875,000 2,077,000 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 33,708,000 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 6,277,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 32,078,000 3,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,845,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 (1,630,000)0 280,000 300,000 (500,000)145,000 925,000 (3,432,000)(2,300,000)875,000 2,077,000 Local Funding 2021 Original 33,358,000 3,733,000 3,365,000 3,262,000 3,128,000 2,616,000 2,656,000 5,927,000 4,942,000 1,897,000 1,832,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 30,728,000 2,733,000 3,645,000 3,562,000 2,628,000 2,761,000 3,581,000 2,495,000 2,642,000 2,772,000 3,909,000 (2,630,000)(1,000,000)280,000 300,000 (500,000)145,000 925,000 (3,432,000)(2,300,000)875,000 2,077,000 Other Funding 2021 Original 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 1,350,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Reduced project due to funding limitations 2 Patrol Relocation project was adjusted to use Speed Camera revenue to build up funding for project construction. 3 Reduced first year funding to only the amount needed for consulting. Current system is supported through 2023. 4 Funding brought forward to better match construction schedule. Grant monies added to FY21; $500K for FY20 Governor's grant that was awarded and another $500K for Governor's grant being applied for in FY21. 5 Funding shifted between years based on available funding. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Railroad Study & Improvements 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources General Fund 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 2,044,837 669,837 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 1,375,000 0 295,000 0 0 348,000 0 360,000 0 372,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Railroad Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Transportation ADA 1,195,450 351,450 82,000 83,000 84,000 86,000 87,000 84,000 85,000 85,000 84,000 84,000 1,195,450 351,450 82,000 83,000 84,000 86,000 87,000 84,000 85,000 85,000 84,000 84,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pavement Maintenance and Rehab Program 60,322,787 8,822,787 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 61,572,787 8,822,787 5,000,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 1 1,250,000 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 Longmeadow Road 1,251,000 0 0 0 0 0 810,000 0 0 0 0 441,000 810,000 0 0 0 0 0 810,000 0 0 0 0 0 (441,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (441,000) Eastern Boulevard Extended 7,850,000 0 0 0 0 0 677,000 1,992,000 3,990,000 1,191,000 0 0 7,850,000 0 0 0 0 1,897,000 880,000 2,042,000 2,390,000 641,000 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1,897,000 203,000 50,000 (1,600,000)(550,000)0 0 Eastern Boulevard Widening Phase II 5,672,300 2,691,300 1,854,000 1,127,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,672,300 2,691,300 2,981,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1,127,000 (1,127,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Boulevard Extended Phase II 4,309,200 4,059,200 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,309,200 4,059,200 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley Mall Area Road Improvements Phase II 992,000 250,000 0 0 0 742,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 992,000 250,000 0 0 0 742,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Boulevard Extended Phase III 1,203,000 0 0 0 0 900,000 303,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,203,000 0 0 0 771,000 432,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 771,000 (468,000)(303,000)0 0 0 0 0 Showalter Road Extended East 2,983,000 510,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 351,000 1,026,000 364,000 732,000 2,983,000 510,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 367,000 1,180,000 926,000 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,000 154,000 562,000 (732,000) Halfway Boulevard Extended 5,972,000 3,072,000 2,000,000 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,972,000 3,072,000 2,000,000 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burnside Bridge Road Spot Improvements 544,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 544,000 0 0 0 544,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 544,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Colonel Henry Douglas Drive Extended Phase II 4,720,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 3,920,000 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 3 (3,920,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (800,000)(3,120,000) E. Oak Ridge Drive/South Pointe Signal 461,000 0 0 0 0 0 111,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 461,000 0 0 0 0 0 111,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hopewell Road Extended 3,719,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,719,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (3,719,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3,719,000) Marsh Pike from MD60 to Longmeadow 850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (850,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (850,000) Maugans Avenue III 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (1,400,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,400,000) Mt Aetna Road Spot Improvements 2,399,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 695,000 704,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85,000 928,000 832,000 555,000 2 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85,000 233,000 128,000 (445,000) Professional Boulevard Extended - Phase IV 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Road Improvement Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Road Improvement Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Rockdale Road and Independence Road Spot Improvements 1,225,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 650,000 575,000 0 1,225,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 650,000 575,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sandstone Drive Spot Improvements 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (500,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (500,000) Wagaman Road Realignment 252,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 252,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (252,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (252,000) Western Maryland Parkway to Underpass Way 4,095,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,095,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (4,095,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4,095,000) Wright Road 2,750,000 0 100,000 1,250,000 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,750,000 0 454,000 1,518,000 778,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 354,000 268,000 (622,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Highway - Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Program 14,705,122 1,135,122 1,116,000 1,199,000 1,259,000 1,322,000 1,389,000 1,458,000 1,531,000 1,608,000 1,688,000 1,000,000 15,305,122 1,135,122 1,116,000 1,199,000 1,259,000 1,322,000 1,389,000 1,458,000 1,531,000 1,608,000 1,688,000 1,600,000 5 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 Highway Western Section - Fuel Tank Replacement 847,000 486,000 0 0 0 193,000 168,000 0 0 0 0 0 847,000 486,000 0 0 0 193,000 168,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salt Storage Structure 350,000 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 131,367,859 21,377,859 10,752,000 9,559,000 7,743,000 8,243,000 9,345,000 8,884,000 11,501,000 10,755,000 9,715,000 23,493,000 118,041,859 21,377,859 12,233,000 8,950,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 (13,326,000)0 1,481,000 (609,000)399,000 1,679,000 150,000 300,000 (1,499,000)(163,000)(110,000)(14,954,000) Funding Sources General Fund 102,170,624 3,430,624 8,252,000 7,759,000 7,143,000 7,593,000 8,595,000 8,034,000 10,551,000 9,705,000 8,615,000 22,493,000 14,409,624 3,430,624 952,000 832,000 843,000 1,101,000 1,144,000 1,042,000 1,216,000 1,293,000 1,372,000 1,184,000 (87,761,000)0 (7,300,000)(6,927,000)(6,300,000)(6,492,000)(7,451,000)(6,992,000)(9,335,000)(8,412,000)(7,243,000)(21,309,000) Highway Fund 9,023,027 1,023,027 500,000 550,000 600,000 650,000 750,000 850,000 950,000 1,050,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 6,023,027 1,023,027 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 6 (3,000,000)0 0 (50,000)(100,000)(150,000)(250,000)(350,000)(450,000)(550,000)(600,000)(500,000) Hotel Rental Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tax-Supported Bond 8,043,500 8,043,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,479,500 8,043,500 6,376,000 6,151,000 5,182,000 7,246,000 6,087,000 5,837,000 6,785,000 6,594,000 5,528,000 4,650,000 60,436,000 0 6,376,000 6,151,000 5,182,000 7,246,000 6,087,000 5,837,000 6,785,000 6,594,000 5,528,000 4,650,000 Transfer Tax 3,875,708 3,875,708 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,824,708 3,875,708 2,200,000 12,000 1,412,000 870,000 1,559,000 1,600,000 1,296,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 14,949,000 0 2,200,000 12,000 1,412,000 870,000 1,559,000 1,600,000 1,296,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Excise Tax - Roads 270,320 270,320 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,530,320 270,320 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 1,260,000 0 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 126,000 Excise Tax - Other 29,000 29,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 319,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 290,000 0 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 Excise Tax - Non-Residential 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 550,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 500,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Road Improvement Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 APFO Fees - Roads 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 6,155,680 3,155,680 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,155,680 3,155,680 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contributions 250,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 131,367,859 21,377,859 10,752,000 9,559,000 7,743,000 8,243,000 9,345,000 8,884,000 11,501,000 10,755,000 9,715,000 23,493,000 118,041,859 21,377,859 12,233,000 8,950,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 (13,326,000)0 1,481,000 (609,000)399,000 1,679,000 150,000 300,000 (1,499,000)(163,000)(110,000)(14,954,000) 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 109,990,000 10,752,000 9,559,000 7,743,000 8,243,000 9,345,000 8,884,000 11,501,000 10,755,000 9,715,000 23,493,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 96,664,000 12,233,000 8,950,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 (13,326,000)1,481,000 (609,000)399,000 1,679,000 150,000 300,000 (1,499,000)(163,000)(110,000)(14,954,000) Local Funding 2021 Original 106,740,000 8,752,000 8,309,000 7,743,000 8,243,000 9,345,000 8,884,000 11,501,000 10,755,000 9,715,000 23,493,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 93,414,000 10,233,000 7,700,000 8,142,000 9,922,000 9,495,000 9,184,000 10,002,000 10,592,000 9,605,000 8,539,000 (13,326,000)1,481,000 (609,000)399,000 1,679,000 150,000 300,000 (1,499,000)(163,000)(110,000)(14,954,000) Other Funding 2021 Original 3,250,000 2,000,000 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 3,250,000 2,000,000 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Project increased based on need and available funding. 2 Project funding shifted between years based on available funding. 3 Project pushed out 1 year based on available funding. 4 Projects pushed out beyond current 10 year plan based on available funding. 5 Increased tenth year funding based on project cost trend. 6 Reduced amount of Highway Fund contribution based on operating constraints. Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Contingency - Solid Waste 458,000 83,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 60,000 60,000 62,000 63,000 458,000 83,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 60,000 60,000 62,000 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Close Out Cap - Rubblefill 2,092,000 0 191,000 1,901,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,091,000 0 190,000 1,901,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (1,000)0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Equip/Vehicle Replacement 576,698 285,698 27,000 28,000 28,000 29,000 29,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 576,698 285,698 27,000 28,000 28,000 29,000 29,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 West Landfill - Cell 5 Construction 4,083,000 0 0 0 0 440,000 3,472,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 4,083,000 0 0 0 0 440,000 3,472,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 West Security Upgrades 60,000 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City/County Groundwater Investigation 156,000 0 156,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 156,000 0 156,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 7,425,698 368,698 374,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 7,424,698 368,698 373,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 (1,000)0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources Solid Waste Fund 1,250,698 368,698 183,000 88,000 58,000 59,000 64,000 65,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 1,250,698 368,698 183,000 88,000 58,000 59,000 64,000 65,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Self-Supported Bond 5,310,000 0 191,000 1,036,000 0 440,000 3,472,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 5,309,000 0 190,000 1,036,000 0 440,000 3,472,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 (1,000)0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 865,000 0 0 865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 865,000 0 0 865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 7,425,698 368,698 374,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 7,424,698 368,698 373,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 (1,000)0 (1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 7,057,000 374,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 7,056,000 373,000 1,989,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 (1,000)(1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 6,192,000 374,000 1,124,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,191,000 373,000 1,124,000 58,000 499,000 3,536,000 236,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 93,000 (1,000)(1,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 865,000 0 865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 865,000 0 865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Project was reduced $1000 because bonds are issued in $5000 increments. Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Solid Waste Fund Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Vehicle Preventive Maintenance 4,234,230 484,230 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 4,234,230 484,230 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fixed Route Bus Replacement Program 6,580,000 3,972,000 0 652,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,956,000 6,580,000 3,972,000 0 652,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,956,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADA Bus Replacement 540,000 0 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 0 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 0 540,000 0 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 0 90,000 0 90,000 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation Development Plan 192,000 92,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 192,000 92,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Support Vehicles 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 11,626,230 4,548,230 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 11,626,230 4,548,230 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources General Fund 1,022,923 320,923 54,000 102,000 46,000 46,000 37,000 46,000 47,000 46,000 46,000 232,000 1,022,923 320,923 54,000 102,000 46,000 46,000 37,000 46,000 47,000 46,000 46,000 232,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - General 135,000 135,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135,000 135,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Grant 9,299,384 3,636,384 436,000 822,000 372,000 372,000 300,000 372,000 380,000 372,000 372,000 1,865,000 9,299,384 3,636,384 436,000 822,000 372,000 372,000 300,000 372,000 380,000 372,000 372,000 1,865,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 1,168,923 455,923 55,000 103,000 47,000 47,000 38,000 47,000 48,000 47,000 47,000 234,000 1,168,923 455,923 55,000 103,000 47,000 47,000 38,000 47,000 48,000 47,000 47,000 234,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 11,626,230 4,548,230 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 11,626,230 4,548,230 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 7,078,000 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 7,078,000 545,000 1,027,000 465,000 465,000 375,000 465,000 475,000 465,000 465,000 2,331,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 702,000 54,000 102,000 46,000 46,000 37,000 46,000 47,000 46,000 46,000 232,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 702,000 54,000 102,000 46,000 46,000 37,000 46,000 47,000 46,000 46,000 232,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 6,376,000 491,000 925,000 419,000 419,000 338,000 419,000 428,000 419,000 419,000 2,099,000 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 6,376,000 491,000 925,000 419,000 419,000 338,000 419,000 428,000 419,000 419,000 2,099,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Transit Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Contingency - Utility Admin 166,677 135,677 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,000 166,677 135,677 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Building Improvements 964,000 0 0 0 0 370,000 594,000 0 0 0 0 0 964,000 0 0 0 0 370,000 594,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lab Equipment Replacement 354,117 30,117 105,000 25,000 25,000 23,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 354,117 30,117 105,000 25,000 25,000 23,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WQ Eqiup/Vehicle Replacement Program 1,107,320 252,320 75,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 1,107,320 252,320 75,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,592,114 418,114 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 2,592,114 418,114 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources General Fund 29,400 29,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,400 29,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Utility Admin Fund 1,598,714 388,714 180,000 105,000 105,000 103,000 108,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 1,598,714 388,714 180,000 105,000 105,000 103,000 108,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Self-Supported Bond 964,000 0 0 0 0 370,000 594,000 0 0 0 0 0 964,000 0 0 0 0 370,000 594,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,592,114 418,114 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 2,592,114 418,114 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 2,174,000 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 2,174,000 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 2,174,000 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 2,174,000 180,000 105,000 105,000 473,000 702,000 109,000 114,000 115,000 120,000 151,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Utility Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Contingency - Sewer 86,939 36,939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 86,939 36,939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Replace Grinder Pumps 890,418 50,418 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 890,418 50,418 60,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pen Mar/ Highfield/ Cascade Septic Tank Pumping and Replacement 115,000 75,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115,000 75,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pump Station Upgrades - Various Stations 4,840,803 2,027,803 275,000 0 153,000 0 0 885,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 4,840,803 2,027,803 275,000 0 153,000 0 0 885,000 0 750,000 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collection System Rehabilitation Project 3,452,618 372,618 0 560,000 0 0 870,000 0 900,000 0 750,000 0 3,452,618 372,618 0 560,000 0 0 870,000 0 900,000 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Capacity Management Project 10,900,542 4,460,542 6,440,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,900,542 4,460,542 6,440,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Smithsburg WWTP ENR Upgrade 12,903,387 4,403,387 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,500,000 12,903,387 4,403,387 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Sewer EQP and VEH Replacement 893,934 361,934 94,000 94,000 94,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 893,934 361,934 94,000 94,000 94,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Potomac Edison Pump Station & Force Main 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General WwTP Improvements 1,350,000 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 300,000 250,000 300,000 0 0 0 1,350,000 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 300,000 250,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 37,133,641 11,788,641 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 37,133,641 11,788,641 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Funding Sources Sewer Fund 3,755,828 2,293,828 194,000 174,000 174,000 115,000 115,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 130,000 185,000 3,755,828 2,293,828 194,000 174,000 174,000 115,000 115,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 130,000 185,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Self-Supported Bond 30,702,813 9,494,813 9,715,000 460,000 403,000 250,000 870,000 1,135,000 885,000 750,000 490,000 6,250,000 30,702,813 9,494,813 9,715,000 460,000 403,000 250,000 870,000 1,135,000 885,000 750,000 490,000 6,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 975,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 300,000 0 315,000 0 260,000 0 975,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 300,000 0 315,000 0 260,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contributions 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 37,133,641 11,788,641 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 37,133,641 11,788,641 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Sewer Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Sewer Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 25,345,000 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 25,345,000 9,909,000 734,000 577,000 365,000 1,285,000 1,260,000 1,325,000 2,575,000 880,000 6,435,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 22,670,000 9,909,000 634,000 577,000 365,000 985,000 1,260,000 1,010,000 875,000 620,000 6,435,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 22,670,000 9,909,000 634,000 577,000 365,000 985,000 1,260,000 1,010,000 875,000 620,000 6,435,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 2,675,000 0 100,000 0 0 300,000 0 315,000 1,700,000 260,000 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 2,675,000 0 100,000 0 0 300,000 0 315,000 1,700,000 260,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Page Project Costs Contingency - Water 26,800 26,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,800 26,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sharpsburg Water Meter Cradle Replacement 1,000,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Meter Replacement 260,339 110,339 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 260,339 110,339 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mt Aetna Water System Improvements 729,000 130,000 0 0 599,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 729,000 130,000 0 0 599,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sharpsburg Water Treatment Plant 794,000 204,000 0 0 0 0 0 590,000 0 0 0 0 794,000 204,000 0 0 0 0 0 590,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General WTP Improvements 1,152,298 50,298 30,000 0 242,000 290,000 0 0 290,000 0 0 250,000 1,152,298 50,298 30,000 0 242,000 290,000 0 0 290,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cascade Town Center Water System Improvements 125,000 0 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 75,000 (25,000)(25,000)(25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Highfield/Sharpsburg Water Storage Tank 336,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 336,000 336,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 336,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WQ Main Replacement 1,366,000 0 0 0 566,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 500,000 1,366,000 0 0 0 566,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 5,789,437 771,437 345,000 290,000 1,697,000 430,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 5,789,437 771,437 420,000 265,000 1,672,000 405,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 0 0 75,000 (25,000)(25,000)(25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Water Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Total Prior Appr.2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Washington County, Maryland Capital Improvement 10yr Detail - Water Fund Fiscal Year 2021 - 2030 Draft 1 Funding Sources General Fund 350,000 0 0 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 525,000 0 175,000 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 0 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cascade Fund 13,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Fund 412,139 137,139 140,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 287,139 137,139 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 (125,000)0 (125,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Self-Supported Bond 4,289,298 346,298 80,000 25,000 1,332,000 390,000 75,000 590,000 290,000 75,000 0 1,086,000 4,239,298 346,298 105,000 0 1,307,000 365,000 75,000 590,000 290,000 75,000 0 1,086,000 (50,000)0 25,000 (25,000)(25,000)(25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Capital Reserve - Water 125,000 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grant 600,000 150,000 125,000 75,000 175,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 600,000 150,000 125,000 75,000 175,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 5,789,437 771,437 345,000 290,000 1,697,000 430,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 5,789,437 771,437 420,000 265,000 1,672,000 405,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 0 0 75,000 (25,000)(25,000)(25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 10 yr total Total Project Cost 2021 Original 5,018,000 345,000 290,000 1,697,000 430,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 Total Project Cost 2021 Draft 1 5,018,000 420,000 265,000 1,672,000 405,000 115,000 605,000 305,000 115,000 15,000 1,101,000 0 75,000 (25,000)(25,000)(25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Local Funding 2021 Original 4,568,000 220,000 215,000 1,522,000 405,000 90,000 605,000 305,000 90,000 15,000 1,101,000 Local Funding 2021 Draft 1 4,568,000 295,000 190,000 1,497,000 380,000 90,000 605,000 305,000 90,000 15,000 1,101,000 0 75,000 (25,000)(25,000)(25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Original 450,000 125,000 75,000 175,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 Other Funding 2021 Draft 1 450,000 125,000 75,000 175,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment Comments: 1 Shifted funding for this project into 1 year and replaced $50K of bond funding with General Fund. CITY OF HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND Planning and Code Administration Department One East Franklin Street | Room 300 | Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-4987 301.739.8577, Ext. 138 or 103 codecompliance@hagerstownmd.org | planning@hagerstownmd.org M E M O R A N D U M TO: Scott Nicewarner, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen A. Maher, Director of Planning and Code Administration DATE: February 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Update on MRGA Discussions Staff will be present at the February 11 meeting to provide an update to the Mayor and City Council and County Commissioners on discussions held with County staff on potential modifications to the Medium Range Growth Area (MRGA) boundary to better reflect County goals for economic development while respecting capacity constraints and City goals for growth. Properties located within the MRGA are planned for City utilities service. Properties outside the MRGA are not planned for service unless an exception is granted via the City’s Water & Wastewater Policy. In our boundary discussions, commercial and industrial economic development areas around the airport and the Greencastle Pike are what have been proposed for inclusion in an expansion. The pending water requests on the west side of the Greencastle Pike are included in that area. Discussions are ongoing on the appropriate boundary retractions to offset the expansions. The expansions and retractions must balance so there is no increase in demand for City utilities service from raw land in the MRGA. To aid discussion, attached is a status update on capacity of the City Water Plant and demand from existing and projected development, a map from the Comprehensive Plan referenced in this status update, a map of the existing MRGA boundary and pre-annexation agreements, and a summary of meetings to date. Once City and County staff finalize a recommendation on MRGA boundary adjustments, presentation will be made to the elected bodies. The next step would be for the City to proceed with the process to amend the City Comprehensive Plan to modify the boundary and update capacity and growth data in the Water Resources Element. Given the fact it will take at least 6 months to update the Comp Plan, if the Mayor and City Council are comfortable that the amendment is pending, staff could bring forward the pending water requests outside the MRGA for Mayor and City Council consideration of an economic development exception via the City’s Water & Wastewater Policy. Attachments C: Jill Thompson, Director, DCED Susan Small, County Business Development Director Doug Reaser, Business Dev. Spec. Jonathan Horowitz, County Business Development Megan Flick, Planner Jill Baker, County Planning Director Nancy Hausrath, Director, Utilities Jeremy Mose, County Environmental Management Director Matt Mohler, Utilities Engineer Mark Bradshaw, County Environmental Management Sarah Trescott, County Health Dept. Joint meeting documents _`40 §¨¦70 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦70 _`11 _`11 _`11 _`11 _`40_`Alt40 _`Alt40 ")65 ")632 §¨¦70 §¨¦70 ")64 ")62 ")60 ")58 ")63 ")63 ")63 ")494 ")68")63 ")632 Pre-Annexation Agreements 2020 0 1.5 3 4.50.75 Miles Airport Targeted Economic Development Area Muncipal Boundaries Urban G rowth Area Corporate Boundary MRGA Road Pre-Annexation Agreement / Map Projection:NAD83 State Plane M aryland (feet) Data So urces: City of Hagerstown, 2017 Washington C ounty, 201 6 Prepared By: Hagerstown Planning O ffice, 09/12 /18 Revised through 1/28/2 0 WS-2018-06- Willard Graves- 10902 Decker AveWS-2018-08- DRI/TCC Vista LLC- Trammel Crow- 13905 Crayton BlvdWS-2018-09- Floyd Brady- 14106 Stone Ridge LnWS-2019-07- Mountain View Animal Emergency- 13810 Crayton Blvd Water & Sewer and MRGA Discussions/Actions in 2019 and Early 2020 PCAD 1 2/5/2020 Mayor and City Council Review of Water Requests Outside MRGA and Discussion of Implications  March 12, 2019 – discussion of implications of continued exemption requests and potential impact on ability to serve MRGA; suggested that MRGA boundary should be adjusted if the airport area is a priority.  May 21, 2019 – Health Department indication that if water line is present, the tract should be connected; CC suggested conversation needed between M&CC and County Commissioners; suggested by staff that City and County staff should meet to consider boundary adjustments.  June 11, 2019 – consensus for City and County staff to meet and look at ways to facilitate growth; acknowledgement that boundary would need to retract if it expands in other areas.  June 18, 2019 – approval of amendment to City Water & Wastewater Policy to revise economic development exemption and create a deadline for action after approval of exemption; approval of update to City Annexation Policy.  August 27, 2019 – joint Mayor and City Council and County Commissioners meeting.  February 11, 2020 – NEXT MEETING – joint Mayor and City Council and County Commissioners meeting OR Mayor and City Council work session. City & County Staff Discussions of MRGA Capacity/Demand Issues  July 17, 2019 – discussion of City capacity challenges, growth demands, and Health Department refusal to approve wells inside UGA even if outside MRGA.  August 7, 2019 –discussion of challenges with Health Department review of well requests – will approve where no water line exists, but refusal if water line is present even if outside MRGA; require expensive testing before approval of well, but why not just require the treatment system?; staff agreement City should make formal request to amend County W&S Plan to reflect City Comp Plan MRGA goals and strategies for growth and utility service and the fact outside the MRGA is not planned for service by the City. Update to County Water & Sewer Plan  August 14, 2019 – City application requesting amendment to include City Comp Plan growth and utility service goals and strategies.  October 7, 2019 – County Planning Commission public hearing.  October 18, 2019 – County Health Department response requests inclusion in any planning meetings and indicates need for service to be provided for GWUDI areas.  November 4, 2019 – County Planning Commission made some tweaks and recommended approval.  December 10, 2019 – County Commissioners public hearing and decision to approve.  Pending – County Commissioners approval of resolution to amend plan. City & County Staff Discussions of MRGA Priority Areas and Capacity/Demand Issues  September 6, 2019 – identification of County EDC staff recommendations on priorities for growth.  October 24, 2019 – review of City analysis of capacity demand to accommodate EDC priorities and capacity demand in areas of possible retraction from MRGA to accommodate expansion.  November 20, 2019 – County Planning staff recommendations on priorities for growth and MRGA boundary adjustments.  January 22, 2020 –review of County analysis of capacity impacts for expansion and retraction of the boundaries as discussed on November 20, 2019. Water & Sewer and MRGA Discussions/Actions in 2019 and Early 2020 PCAD 2 2/5/2020  February 2020 – NEXT MEETING – review County economic development staff’s input on County planning staff’s proposal for MRGA boundary adjustments. County Health Department Environmental Health Meetings  November 26, 2019 – large meeting convened by Health Department – included County and State elected officials, an MDE rep, Health Dept staff, City and County staff, and a Meritus rep – need to address problem areas identified in 2009 W&S Plan; direction – joint letter of support from County Commissioners/M&CC/Health Department, form a work group to outline issues of concern related to County W&S Plan/wells and septics/public water and sewer systems, work group to meet with MDE on several issues, work group prepare a briefing report to County and City Administrators for delivery to elected bodies.  December 16, 2019 – first work group meeting – discussion of problem areas identified in 2009 W&S Plan, desirability of update of 1980 R.E. Wright Report, capacity and infrastructure constraints, differing water quality expectations for private wells and public water plants; Health Dept goals for the work group include setting health priorities, gaining an overview of core infrastructure, and creating a regulatory changes wish list; future meeting to review conflicting regs affecting water and wastewater; County GIS will provide Health Dept with their GIS layer of failing wells and septics with data from last 11 years; Health Dept will provide copy of R.E. Wright Report; all agencies identify potential limitations, priority service areas, and public health issues.  January 21, 2020 – Health Department presentation to Mayor and City Council with Jill Baker and Kathy Maher in attendance; Health Department seeking support for update to 1980 R.E. Wright Report.  February 2020 – NEXT MEETING !" !" !" !" ¡¢ ¡¢ ¡¢ ¡¢ ¡¢ ßÿ— ßÿ— ßÿ— ßÿ— ßÿ— ßÿ— ßÿ— 7 39 14 8 53 68 70 64 18 48 14 73 10 30 52 4 34 38 32 13 75 69 11 31 36 54 5 9 32 35 59 25 74 16 55 33 37 76 72 61 11 24 44 20 43 41 19 57 67 66 56 58 22 17 42 12 45 51 65 62 46 63 26 6 47 29 71 23 50 15 49 40 27 51 2821 1 60 Funkstown 11 11 40 40 40A65 60 64 144 632 70 70 81 Major Road Street Corporate Boundary Medium-Range Growth Area Vacant Land Underutilized Property Pipeline: Approved Plat or Plan Future Planned Development: No Approved Plat or Plan Potential Annexation: Annexation Discussed · 0 0.5 1 1.5Miles Map IDs are described in Figure 2-3:Planned & Future Development Vacant Land refers to parcels that have nodevelopment and are over 2.5 acres in size Underutilized Land refers to parcels that are lessthan 50% occupied and are over 2.5 acres in size Map Projection: NAD83 State Plan Maryland FIPS (feet) Data Sources: City of Hagerstown, 2017; State of MD Imagery, 2014 Washington County, 2016 Prepared By: Hagerstown Planning & Code Admin Dept, 01/27/17 Map 2-3: Planned andFuture Development Hagerstown 2035visionComprehensive Plan Hagerstown Comprehensive Plan visionHagerstown 2035 Water Demand Based on Growth Projections - 2019 Status Update Projected Growth between 2015 and 2035 and Capacity (all in EDU's) 15 MGD at Potomac Potomac (15 MGD) & Edgemont 18 MGD at Potomac 1 Total Water Supply - Potomac is 15 MGD and Edgemont is 0.7 MGD 75,000 78,500 90,000 2 Existing peak water demand (peak demand in summer months in FY 2019)61,050 61,050 61,050 3 Available Capacity in the System for New Development [1-2]13,950 17,450 28,950 4 New residential demand from Map 2-3 4,837 4,837 4,837 5 New non-residential demand from Map 2-3 (assumes 25% of total demand)1,612 1,612 1,612 6 Increased water permit requests by Towns (unused allocation plus increase of 1,700 by Smithsburg)2,858 2,858 2,858 7 Water demand from LRGA properties with pre-annexation agreements (total is 998 in 2019)499 499 499 8 Sub-Total of Projected Demand 9,806 9,806 9,806 9 Capacity Available for Other MRGA growth [line 3 minus line 8]4,144 7,644 19,144 Ultimate Demand if Built Out and Capacity (all in EDU's) 1 Available Water Supplies at Hagerstown WTP 75,000 78,500 90,000 2 Existing Water Demand (peak demand in summer months in FY 2019)61,050 61,050 61,050 3 Available Capacity in the System for New Development [1-2]13,950 17,450 28,950 4 Potential new water demand from City and annexable areas (Map 2-3)6,449 6,449 6,449 5 Potential new demand from Towns (2,858) and Prior Annexation Policy approvals outside MRGA (998 in 2019)3,856 3,856 3,856 6 Potential demand from residential raw land in MRGA (2019)6,716 6,716 6,716 7 Potential demand from non-residential raw land in MRGA (2019)2,474 2,474 2,474 8 Demand from residential pre-annexation agreements in MRGA (2019)2,222 2,222 2,222 9 Demand from non-residential pre-annexation agreements in MRGA (2019)158 158 158 10 Total Ultimate Potential New Water Demand in City and MRGA [4+5+6+7+8+9]21,875 21,875 21,875 11 Capacity Deficit (line 3 minus line 10)-7,925 -4,425 7,075 Updated data from Figures 4-6, 4-7, and 4-8 in Comp Plan, with below caveats: 1. Used FY 2019 peak demand. Average daily demand was 10.25 MGD in FY 2019. 2. Because of changing MDE requirements and funding, Edgemont is no longer viable for capacity planning. 3. When reach 80% capacity of plant (12 MGD or 60,000 EDU), the City can request an increase in our permit for Potomac up to 18 MGD total. This increase would require hydrolic upgrade and addressing system pressure issues with transmission mains. 4. New estimate for raw land and pre-annexation agreements based on developers, Google map aerials, or Comp Plan land yield formula. PCAD, 10/18/19