Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 - August Agenda Packet Gregory Smith, Chair Vernell Doyle Lloyd Yavener, Vice Chair Michael Lushbaugh Ann Aldrich Justin Bedard Brianna Candelaria Wayne K. Keefer, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET 747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1 AGENDA August 7, 2024 Workshop Meeting at 5:30 p.m. County stone arch bridges Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MINUTES 1. Minutes of the July 3, 2024 meeting * NEW BUSINESS 1. Residential New Construction Permit – 2024-02591 – 24807 Linden Avenue, Cascade (Discussion/Approval) 560 sq. ft. finished space one-story single-family dwelling on crawl space, with ladder access to 350 sq. ft. storage area above, frame construction, roof rafters (Pen Mar Rural Village, MIHP – WA-IV-19) * 2. Site Specific Grading Plan – GP-24-008 – 13215 Smithsburg Pike (Discussion/Approval) Wall restoration project for pond connected to spring house. Wall restoration includes repairing various locations of dry stack stone, as well as some holes on the backside of the wall to restore its foundation. In addition to the wall restoration, some parts of the pond floor will be dredged to remove debris with the goal of restoring the ponds original depth. SWM waived since this is a maintenance project with no increase in impervious area. * OLD BUSINESS 1. Tax Credit Application Updates (Discussion/Consensus) – Staff has revised the existing tax credit application and would like the members to review for any updates/changes.* 2. Grant Program DRAFT (Discussion/Consensus) – For members to review the previous draft to determine if it is still viable for forwarding to the County Attorney for their revisions/input. * OTHER BUSINESS 1. Correspondence a. Smithsburg Reservoir House * b. CLG Training Funds Available * 2. Staff Report a. Staff Reviews * b. Tax Credit Brochures (printed for handout at meeting) c. Membership updates d. Comp Plan update e. 250th Website and other updates ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETING 1. Wednesday, September 4, 2024, 7:00 p.m. *attachments The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240- 313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY July 3, 2024 The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 7:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 W Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commission members present were: Greg Smith, Chairman, Justin Bedard, Vernell Doyle, Lloyd Yavener, Michael Lushbaugh and Brianna Candelaria. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member. MINUTES Motion and Vote: Ms. Candelaria made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 5, 2024 meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bedard and unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS Review and Update of Historic Tax Credit Brochure Ms. Jenkins distributed copies of the draft Historic Tax Credit brochure. She briefly described changes that have been made to the brochure. Members had the following recommendations: • Put a link to the website under the QR code • Lists should be bulleted or typed in bold so they stand out • Use blue text instead of gold in the lists • Paragraphs alignment should be justified • Use a heavier weight of paper for printing Ms. Jenkins asked members to review the brochure and send her any additional comments via email. She also asked for suggestions of locations where the brochures could be distributed. One suggestion was local hardware stores, such as Lowe’s or Ace Hardware. Ms. Doyle pointed out that in the sentence “Applications should be submitted before the start of work for which the tax credit is sought”, the word should needs to be changed to “must”. Members recommended making the word “must” in bold type. OTHER BUSINESS Correspondence – Historic Bridge Review: US 522 over Potomac and CSX (15982) Ms. Jenkins stated that correspondence was received regarding the bridge over US 522 in Hancock. She noted that the area of effect is not greater than the SHA right-of-way. According to the SHA’s architectural historian and archaeologist on staff, there will be no adverse effect to any historic or archeological sites. Consensus: Members have no additional comments. Staff Report • Staff Reviews - Ms. Jenkins provided a written summary. She noted that the demolition permit for the property reviewed at the last meeting located in Smithsburg on Cavetown Church Road was released. Ms. Jenkins stated that the applicant provided an updated salvage plan for the barn, which has been donated. She also talked to MHT who previously determined the structures were not eligible for the National Register. Because no improvements had been made to the structures since that determination, MHT would not require any further review of the property. • The Director of Public Works and the Director of Engineering will be available for a workshop with the HDC on August 7th at 5:30 pm to discuss County historic bridges, specifically Price’s Bridge. • HDC By-laws – The county attorney’s office has determined that the Board of County Commissioners must approve the By-laws prior to recordation. She noted there is a change in Article 9 regarding recordation and final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Discussion: Mr. Yavener pointed out that in Article IX Amendments, the third sentence should be changed to be grammatically consistent with the first sentence. Also, the last sentence should begin with the word “Final” not finally. Ms. Jenkins will provide these comments to the County Attorney for the final review. o Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to approve the amendments to Article 9 pending ratification of grammatical errors as discussed and that final approval of the By- laws will rest with the Board of County Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Ms. Candelaria and unanimously approved. • Design Guidelines – Ms. Jenkins stated she has performed her yearly review of the Design Guidelines on the web and has updated and fixed all broken links. She has also updated the Tax Credit Ordinance as well. Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to adjourn to Closed Session. The motion was seconded by Ms. Doyle and so ordered by the Chairman. CLOSED SESSION To discuss the appointment, employment, assignment, promotion, discipline, demotion, compensation, removal, resignation, or performance evaluation of appointees, employees, or officials over whom this public body has jurisdiction; or any other personnel matter that affects one or more specific individuals. Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Mr. Yavener and so ordered by the Chairman. Motion and Vote: Mr. Bedard made a motion to forward the nominations discussed during Closed Session to the Board of County Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Ms. Candelaria and unanimously approved. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Candelaria made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lushbaugh and so ordered by the Chairman. ______________________________________ Gregory Smith, Chairman HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Washington County Historic District Commission From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff Date: August 1, 2024 Subj: Residential New Construction Permit/Stick Built Home, 2024-02591 Staff Report and Analysis Property Owner: ZOPPI IRENE M L/E, ZOPPI THOMAS J L/E Applicant: Irene Zoppi Location: 24807 LINDEN Avenue Tax Account ID: 14004505 Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 14/19/57/17 18 Legal Description: LTS17&18 PT 19 .2LINDEN AVELOT 125X95 Zoning: Rural Village Rural Village: WA-IV-019, Pen Mar (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village Project Description: 560 sq. ft. finished space one story single family dwelling on crawl space, with ladder access to 350 sq. ft. storage area above, frame construction, roof rafters Applicable Law and Review Criteria: The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD. Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A, Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance." The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. 1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria: A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural value. D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied. E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. 2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent. 3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures. For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include: 1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. 2. Building Size and Orientation 3. Landscaping 4. Signage 5. Lighting 6. Setbacks 7. Accessory structures Secretary of Interior Standards which may be applicable to this project review include: 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures which may be applicable to HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION this project review include: Guidelines for New Construction and Accessory Buildings (Page 71) 1. New construction should be sited to avoid demolition of contributing structures. 2. The design of new construction or new accessory buildings should be compatible with the form, height, scale, proportions, materials and details of the adjacent contributing structures or landscapes. 3. Consideration of the ratio of built versus open space of the site or the adjacent landscape should be given. 4. Existing setbacks, landscaping or site grading of adjacent historic resources should be preserved when siting new construction if those characteristics contribute to the historic site or its landscape. This includes circulation routes, fences, walls, and yards, etc. 5. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that the existing significant visual and special characteristics of the property are maintained. 6. Locate new construction and new accessory buildings so that significant viewsheds are maintained or enhanced. 7. See also Key Themes. (p. 57) Staff Report: This property is in the Pen Mar Rural Village in the North Eastern portion of Washington County and is situated along the s/s of Linden Avenue in the village. The project proposes a 560 sq.ft. finished space dwelling unit on crawl space. Pen Mar’s period of significance ranges from 1878 through 1943 covering a wide range of architecture. The majority of the contributing buildings in the district are wood construction single family homes. According to the MIHP, “virtually every street includes modest one-story cottages…with simple lines, without any notable detailing”. The property is flat along in its entirety. The property has no historic structures and is open with no trees in the area proposed for the house. There is a stone/concrete slab lying flat on the western half of the parcel. This may have something to do with the adjacent pump station. The property also appears to have had utilities recently extended to it or upgraded as indicated by a new concrete structure at the western corner of the property. The property is not listed on the most recent survey of this district with any detail. The original survey in 1976 was focused on Pen Mar Park and did not have any photos or full description of Linden Avenue and its resources. Historic aerial imagery indicates this lot has been vacant since 1960’s. The properties adjacent to it are all noted as contributing with a typical construction date of c.1920 and wood construction with shingle roofs. Staff Analysis: The site does not contain any existing resources and based on findings in historic aerial imagery and survey documentation, it is unlikely to yield any archaeological resources related to the history of the rural village during construction. The architectural styles in the rural village vary as do setbacks and the proposed construction is consistent with styles seen and setbacks nearby. The buildings orientation and placement on the site’s Liden Avenue frontage will be consistent with adjacent properties. Details on HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION the exact exterior trim elements are not known, however, it is proposed to have asphalt shingles and log siding both of which will not detract from the rural village with the shingles being common throughout the rural village. The included plans show flat arches for windows with minimal trim which are noted as common in the MIHP for this village. The variation in roof pitch proposed, while not found on a singular structure in the rural village are found separately throughout the village. There are also other structures which have mixed roof pitch. Many of the nearby structures are between 1,000 and 1,500 sq. ft. in size making this structure smaller in mass. However, the 40 ft. front width of the proposed structure is consistent with those nearby and will maintain a similar appearance from the street. The construction proposed does not conflict with the County Design Guidelines or the Secretary of Interior Guidelines which are applicable to this construction type. The characteristics detailed in this application have been reviewed against the characteristics listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural Review of the Zoning Ordinance and do not appear to detract from the rural village. Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of this new construction permit, 2024-02591, in the Pen Mar historic rural village, due to the proposed constructions consistency with the County’s Design Guidelines for Historic Structures, Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 5D.5 Architectural Review as listed in the County’s Zoning Ordinance based on details provided in the Staff Analysis of the permit. Respectfully Submitted, Meghan Jenkins, GISP Historic District Commission Staff Attachments: • Photos provided by Staff • Permit Submission Packet HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Permit Site Facing East Permit Site Facing Southwest MD S T A T E P L A N E NA D 8 3 N A V D 8 8 S M I T H S B U R G P I K E ( M D 6 4 ) LANDS OF JEFFREY & LAURA UNWORTHLIBER: 07359 FOLIO: 00021 25.5 AC LITTLE A N T I E T A M C R E E K FEMA F L O O D P L A I N PANE L # 2 4 0 4 3 C 0 1 6 5 D EFF. 0 8 - 1 5 - 2 0 1 7 SITE WM MB LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED SUBJECT BOUNDARY BUILDING SETBACK LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT LINE ADJOINER BOUNDARY FENCE (METAL) FENCE (WOODEN) DITCH (STREAM) EDGE OF WATER WETLAND FLOODPLAIN SOIL BOUNDARY RAILWAY CENTERLINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF GRAVEL CURB WALL GUARD RAIL EDGE OF CONCRETE BUILDING MAIL BOX SIGN (ROAD) SIGN (SITE) TRAFFIC SIGNAL TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES CONTOUR (INDEX) CONTOUR (INTERMEDIATE) SPOTS ELEVATION VEGETATION AREASTREELINE DECIDUOUS TREES EVERGREEN TREES SANITARY SEWERGRAVITY LINE FORCE MAIN LINE LATERAL MANHOLE CLEANOUT VALVE WATER COLD WATER LINE HOT WATER LINE MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT VALVE METER WELL STORM DRAINAGESTORM SEWER LINE ROOF DRAIN LINE MANHOLE INLETS CLEANOUT UTILITIES GAS LINE ELECTRICAL LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE COMMUNICATION LINE OVERHEAD LINES MANHOLE PEDS, BOX, & ETC POLE LIGHT POLE GAS METER GAS VALVE X X X X X X X X X X X X X X I I I I I I I I SS SS SS SS SS SS FM FM FM FM FM FM W W W W W W W HW HW HW HW HW HW G G G G G G G G UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE FO FO FO FO FO FO COMM COMM COMM OH OH OH OH OH OH 500 501 500 SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET FOR LEGEND SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET FOR LEGEND 501.65 501501.65 WM GM GM MB LEGEND - ABBREVIATIONS AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS ADS ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEM ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING ANDMATERIALAWWAAMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATIONBLDGBUILDINGBOTBOTTOMCIPCAST IRON PIPE CL CENTERLINE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN-OUT COMM COMMUNICATION CONC CONCRETE DA DRAINAGE AREADIADIAMETEREGLEXISTING GRADE LINEEXEXISTINGEIPEXISTING IRON PIN FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FH FIRE HYDRANT GV GATE VALVE HGL HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENEINVINVERTLFLINEAR FEETMAXMAXIMUM MB MAIL BOX MIN MINIMUM MJ MECHANICAL JOINTNONUMBERNICNOT IN CONTRACTNTSNOT TO SCALEOACOR APPROVED EQUAL OC ON CENTER PC POINT OF CURVE PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE PGL PROPOSED GRADE LINE PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVEPTPOINT OF TANGENTPVCPOINT OF VERTICAL CURVEPVIPOINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTIONPVTPOINT OF VERTICAL TANGENTROWRIGHT-OF-WAY SAN SANITARY SCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SDR STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO SIP SET IRON PIN SD STORM DRAINAGE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SF SQUARE FEETSSSANITARY SEWERSSMHSANITARY SEWER MANHOLESTASTATIONSTDSTANDARDSYSQUARE YARDS TAN TYPE AS NOTED TEMP TEMPORARY TS TOP OF STRUCTURE TG TOP OF GRATE TR TOP OF RIM TYP TYPICALU/P UTILITY POLEVIFVERIFY IN FIELDWLWATERLINE WM WATER METER WV WATER VALVE P: \ S H A R E D F O L D E R S \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 S \ 3 4 0 0 \ 3 4 0 0 . 1 \ D W G \ C O N S T R U C T I O N S E T \ 3 4 0 0 . 1 - C O V E R S H E E T - 2 0 2 4 . D W G 2 0 2 4 - 0 7 - 0 2 SCALE PROJECT MANAGER: DATEDWN BY SHEET TITLE DE S C R I P T I O N : DA T E : PROJECT NO. MA R K : © 12 8 S O U T H P O T O M A C S T R E E T CI V I L E N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S L A N D P L A N N E R S F • HA G E R S T O W N , M D 2 1 7 4 0 30 1 . 7 9 1 . 3 6 5 0 20 W E S T B A L T I M O R E S T R E E T GR E E N C A S T L E , P A 1 7 2 2 5 71 7 . 5 9 7 . 1 0 0 7 50 5 S O U T H H A N O V E R S T R E E T CA R L I S L E , P A 1 7 0 1 3 71 7 . 7 0 1 . 8 1 1 1 15 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T NE W B L O O M F I E L D , P A 1 7 0 6 8 71 7 . 2 7 5 . 7 5 3 1 FR E D E R I C K , S E I B E R T & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . fs a - i n c . c o m • • SA I hereby certify that these documents were preparedor approved by me, and that I am a duly licensedprofessional under the laws of the State of: Professional Certification: __________________, License # _________________, Expiration Date __________________. SHEET OF EMAIL: WA L L R E S T O R A T I O N SI T U A T E D A T 1 3 2 1 5 S M I T H S B U R G P I K E SM I T H S B U R G WA S H I N G T O N C O U N T Y , M A R Y L A N D JE F F R E Y & L A U R A U N S W O R T H 97 0 1 L A R K S P U R L A N E F A R M , H A G E R S T O W N M D 2 1 7 4 0 (3 0 1 ) 7 3 0 - 6 3 4 3 3400.1 TCH 04-30-2024 KCM KMOORE@fsa-inc.com TAX-GRID-PARCEL 0040-0001-0203 AS SHOWN TITLE SHEET C-001 01 03 MD 20945 08-23-2025 20 2 4 RE V I S E D P E R A G E N C Y C O M M E N T S 6/ 2 4 / 2 4 FIRE WATER LINE FW FW FW FW FW FW SITE PLAN FORWALL RESTORATION SITUATED AT 13215 SMITHSBURG PIKE SMITHSBURG WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND C-001 SHEET 01 COVER SHEETC-101 SHEET 02 SITE PLANC-301 SHEET 03 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 2000'USGS MAPS (SMITHSBURG, MARYLAND) TYPE NUMBER TITLE SCALE: 1" = 100' 0040 - 0001 - 0203: PROPERTY ACCOUNT #006748 CIVIL ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: FSA INC. 128 S POTOMAC STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 PROJECT MANAGER: KEITH MOORE EMAIL: KMOORE@FSA-INC.COM PHONE: (301) 791-3650 APPROVALS CLIENT/OWNER/DEVELOPER: JEFFREY & LAURA UNSWORTH 9701 LARKSPUR LANE FARM HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 ATTN: JEFFREY UNSWORTH EMAIL: JEFF@BRAVEHEARTRIDING.ORG PHONE: (301) 730-6343 R Know what's below.before you dig.Call LOCATION PLAN VICINITY MAP GENERAL NOTES 1. Any damage to adjoining public roads, utilities, etc. during construction will be repaired in kind by the contractor.2. No subsurface investigation has been performed by Frederick, Seibert and Associates, Inc. to determine ground water, rock,sinkholes or any other natural or man-made existing features.3. FSA, Inc. assumes no liability for the location of any above ground and below ground utilities. Existing utilities are shown from the best available information. Contractor to field verify location and depth of all above and below ground utilities prior to construction. 4. The contractor shall locate existing utilities in advance of construction operations in the vicinity of proposed utilities. 5. The contractor shall take all necessary precautions to protect the existing utilities and to maintain uninterrupted service. Any damage incurred due to the contractor's operation shall be repaired immediately at the contractor's expense. Contractor to use caution inareas where low hanging wires exist.6. All utilities shall be cleared by a minimum of 1'-0". All utility poles shall be cleared by a minimum of 2'-0" or tunneled if required.7. The Contractor shall notify the following utilities or agencies at least five (5) days before starting work shown on these drawings: Miss Utility 1-800-257-7777 Potomac Edison 1-800-255-3443 Columbia Gas (New Business)1-800-440-6111 Columbia Gas (Conflicts)(301) 964-1065Washington County Soil Conservation District (301) 797-6821 8. The contractor shall be responsible for coordination of his construction with the construction of other contractors. 9. Benchmarks to be established by FSA prior to the start of construction. 10. The contractor shall notify the Architect/Engineer, before construction, of any conflicts between the plans and actual field conditions. 11. The contractor shall protect all utilities and culvert pipes during construction by insuring proper cover, increasing cover, or constructing roadway and parking through base course before loading site with heavy vehicles. 12. Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The Contractor shall perform all excavation in accordance with O.S.H.A.Regulations for trench safety.13. The contractor shall perform his own field inspection and surveys (if necessary) to determine the limit of earthwork needed tocomplete this project. Any earthwork quantities that may be shown hereon are preliminary estimates only, and are intended for SoilErosion Control plan review, if required. There has been no correction made to the earthwork quantities shown hereon due to thecompaction of fill.14. The contractor shall be aware that in the event of discrepancy between scaled and figured dimensions shown on the plan, the figured dimensions shall govern. 15. Sediment erosion control measures shall be installed per sediment erosion control plans, details and specifications. 16. The entire area included within the proposed limits of cut and fill shall be stripped of all root material, trash and other organic and otherwise objectionable, non-complying and unsuitable soils and materials.17. It shall be distinctly understood that failure to mention specifically any work which would naturally be required to complete the projectshall not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to complete such work.18. The existing site contours shown hereon are LIDAR 1' contours and field checked by FSA in February 2024. (Contour accuracy is toplus or minus one half the contour interval).19. Limit of disturbed areas are to be the limit of property ownership, unless otherwise noted.20. A complete set of approved plans and a copy of the grading permit must be on site and available for use by the inspector, or other representative of Washington County. 21. There are no Board of Zoning Appeals Cases for this property. 22. All existing drainage culverts and drainage easements are to be maintained and unaltered. ZONING DATA ZONING DISTRICT A(R) - AGRICULTURAL (RURAL) BUILDING HEIGHT 40 FT MINIMUM YARD SETBACK: FRONT 40 FT. *SIDE 15 FT. *REAR 50 FT. *EXCEPT WHERE LOT AND PROPOSED USES ABUT AND REQUIRE ACCESS TO A RAILROAD OR RAILROAD SIDING, THE SIDE OR REAR YARD SETBACK ABUTTING THE RAILROAD OR RAILROAD SIDING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED *EXCEPT WHERE THE PROPOSED USES OR BUILDING ABUT A LOT IN A RR, RT, RS, RU OR RM DISTRICT, OR ANY LOT OCCUPIED BY A DWELLING, THE SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS SHALL BE 100' SITE DATA TAX MAP - GRID - PARCEL 0040-0001-0203 ELECTION DISTRICT 07 ACCOUNT NUMBER 006748 LIBER / FOLIO 07359 / 00021 AREA SUMMARY: PARCEL 25.5 Ac WATERSHED: NAME ANTIETAM CREEK NUMBER 02140502 FEMA PANEL #24043C0165D EFF. 08-15-2017 The stream buffers shown hereon are established pursuant to the requirements of the Washington County Subdivision Ordinance Article IV, Section 409. In an effort to preserve or improve water quality, the property owner is required to establish and thereafter maintain in perpetuity vegative ground cover in accordance with urban best management practices recommended by the Washington County Soil Conservation District. No permanent structures or construction are permitted within the stream buffer except those designed to improve water qualityor flow as approved by the Washington County Planning Commission in accordance with allapplicable regulations, laws, and policies. No septic systems shall be constructed within the buffernor shall any reserve area be established within the buffer. TITLE SENSITIVE AREA NOTICE SHEET INDEX DISTURBED AREA QUANTITY THE TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE APPROXIMATELY ____________ ACRES AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF EXCAVATION AND FILL AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAS BEEN COMPUTED TO BE APPROXIMATELY ____________ CU. YDS. OF EXCAVATION AND APPROXIMATELY ____________ CU. YDS. OF FILL. UTILITY NOTIFICATION The Soil Conservation District makes no representation as to the existence or nonexistence of any utilities at the construction site. Shown on these construction drawings are those utilities which have been identified. It is the responsibility of the landowners or operators and contractors to assure themselves that no hazard exists or damagewill occur to utilities. It is suggested that Miss Utility be contacted at: MD-ENG-6A 1/89 USDA SCS Phone No. 1-800-257-7777 ENGINEER / ARCHITECT DESIGN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify this plan for soil erosion and sediment control has been designed in accordance with local ordinances, COMAR 26.17.01.07, and Maryland Standards and Specifications for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control. DATE SIGNATUREREG. NO. DATE OWNER / DEVELOPERS CERTIFICATION "I/We certify all/any parties responsible for clearing, grading, construction and/or development will; be done pursuant to this plan and responsible personnel involved in the construction project will have a Certificate of Training at a Maryland Dept. of the Environmentapproved training program for the control of soil erosion and sediment." PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE 0.66 535.6124.94 W W W W W W W W W W W W W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X UGE UGE UGE UG E UGE WW OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H OH O H O H O H O H OH O H OH O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H OH O H O H O H O H O H O H OH O H O H O H O H OH O H OH DWELLING FF - 661.09 END WALL HEAD WALL CONCRETE WITH VALVE ON TOP 8" WATERLINE APPROX. LOCATION OF GEOTHERMAL LINES EDGE OF WA T E R Hole Behind headwallINV: 649.51 (Water Draining Around Wall) Hole Behind headwall INV: 649.48 (Water Draining Around Wall) STAIRS DRY STACK STO N E W A L L D R Y S T A C K S T O N E W A L L DRY STAC K S T O N E W A L L CONC. LEDGE ALONG BUILDING ARCHWAY IN WALL (WATER ORIGINATING FROM SPRING UNDER HOME) CONCRETE BOX UNDER OLD ROAD WITH CONCRETE ENCASEMENT CONTAINING 8IN WATERLINE EDGE OF WATER APPROX. LOCATION OF UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES POSSIBLY ELECTRIC BASEMENT ENTRANCEBF: 650.99 BASEMENT ENTRANCE UNDER PORCH BF- 650.45 FENCE F E N C E G U A R D R A I L C E N T E R L I N E G U A R D R A I L S M I T H S B U R G P I K E ( U S R T E 6 4 ) EDGE OF WATER EDGE OF WATER HEAD WALL GRAVEL DRIVEWAY BARN SHED SID E W A L K CONC. WALKWAY BEING RECONSTRUCTED DRAIN PIPE: 4" (6"?) INV: 647.50 SLIDING WEIR GATE INV: 649.84 ABANDONED OLD SMITHSBURG PIKE O V E R H E A D U T I L I T I E S ( T Y P I C A L ) INV. BEHIND WEIR GATEELEV: 648.70 648 648 648 654 653 652 651 6 5 2 648 655 656 657 658 659 652 6 5 3 64 6 647 648 648 649 651 649650 651 652 653 654 650 65 1 6 5 2 6 5 3 6 5 4 6 5 5 6 5 6 6 5 7 6 5 8 65 9 6 6 0 6 6 1 66 2 664 663 662 665 6 6 6 667 6 6 0 6 5 5 6 5 2 6 6 0 65 5 6 6 5 6 6 3 6 5 8 65 6 657 658 658 657 655 655 653 65 2 6 5 4 6 5 3 661 662 66 3 66 4 66 5 66 6 667 663 661 65 9 66 0 647 LITTLE ANTIE T A M C R E E K 44.5' CARTWAY FE M A F L O O D P L A I N PA N E L # 2 4 0 4 3 C 0 1 6 5 D EF F . 08 - 1 5 - 2 0 1 7 F E M A F L O O D P L A I N P A N E L # 2 4 0 4 3 C 0 1 6 5 D E F F . 0 8 - 1 5 - 2 0 1 7 O V E R H E A D U T I L I T I E S ( T Y P I C A L ) W W W W W W W W W W W W W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X UGE UGE UGE UG E UGE WW OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H OH O H O H O H O H OH O H OH O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H OH O H O H O H O H O H O H OH O H O H O H O H OH O H OH MD S T A T E P L A N E NA D 8 3 N A V D 8 8 REPAIR EXISTING WALL REPAIR EXISTING EROSIONBEHIND WALL PER ENGINEER REPAIR EXISTING EROSIONBEHIND WALL PER ENGINEER DREDGE BOTTOM OF POND TO ORIGINAL DEPTH REPAIR EXISTING WALL GEOTHERMAL LINESTO BE REPLACED PROPOSED WALL TO PROTECT FOUNDATION PROPOSED WALL TOPROTECT FOUNDATION P: \ S H A R E D F O L D E R S \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 S \ 3 4 0 0 \ 3 4 0 0 . 1 \ D W G \ C O N S T R U C T I O N S E T \ 3 4 0 0 . 1 - P R O P O S E D C H A N G E S - 2 0 2 4 . D W G 2 0 2 4 - 0 7 - 0 2 SCALE PROJECT MANAGER: DATEDWN BY SHEET TITLE DE S C R I P T I O N : DA T E : PROJECT NO. MA R K : © 12 8 S O U T H P O T O M A C S T R E E T CI V I L E N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S L A N D P L A N N E R S F • HA G E R S T O W N , M D 2 1 7 4 0 30 1 . 7 9 1 . 3 6 5 0 20 W E S T B A L T I M O R E S T R E E T GR E E N C A S T L E , P A 1 7 2 2 5 71 7 . 5 9 7 . 1 0 0 7 50 5 S O U T H H A N O V E R S T R E E T CA R L I S L E , P A 1 7 0 1 3 71 7 . 7 0 1 . 8 1 1 1 15 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T NE W B L O O M F I E L D , P A 1 7 0 6 8 71 7 . 2 7 5 . 7 5 3 1 FR E D E R I C K , S E I B E R T & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . fs a - i n c . c o m • • SA I hereby certify that these documents were preparedor approved by me, and that I am a duly licensedprofessional under the laws of the State of: Professional Certification: __________________, License # _________________, Expiration Date __________________. SHEET OF EMAIL: WA L L R E S T O R A T I O N SI T U A T E D A T 1 3 2 1 5 S M I T H S B U R G P I K E SM I T H S B U R G WA S H I N G T O N C O U N T Y , M A R Y L A N D JE F F R E Y & L A U R A U N S W O R T H 97 0 1 L A R K S P U R L A N E F A R M , H A G E R S T O W N M D 2 1 7 4 0 (3 0 1 ) 7 3 0 - 6 3 4 3 3400.1 TCH 04-22-2024 KCM KMOORE@fsa-inc.com TAX-GRID-PARCEL 0040-0001-0203 1" = 20' PROPOSED WORK C-101 02 03 MD 20945 08-23-2025 20 2 4 RE V I S E D P E R A G E N C Y C O M M E N T S 6/ 2 4 / 2 4 0 SCALE: 20 20 4010 1" = 20" W W W W W W W W W W W W W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE WW OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H O H O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H O H OH O H O H O H O H OH O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H OH O H O H O H OH O H OH O H O H O H DWELLING FF - 661.09 END WALL HEAD WALL CONCRETE WITH VALVE ON TOP 8" WATERLINE APPROX. LOCATION OF GEOTHERMAL LINES EDGE OF W A T E R Hole Behind headwall INV: 649.51 (Water Draining Around Wall) Hole Behind headwall INV: 649.48 (Water Draining Around Wall) STAIRS DRY STACK ST O N E W A L L D R Y S T A C K S T O N E W A L L DRY STAC K S T O N E W A L L CONC. LEDGE ALONG BUILDING ARCHWAY IN WALL (WATER ORIGINATING FROM SPRING UNDER HOME) CONCRETE BOX UNDER OLD ROAD WITH CONCRETE ENCASEMENT CONTAINING 8IN WATERLINE EDGE OF WATER APPROX. LOCATION OF UTILITY POLE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES POSSIBLY ELECTRIC BASEMENT ENTRANCE BF: 650.99 BASEMENT ENTRANCE UNDER PORCH BF- 650.45 FENCE F E N C E G U A R D R A I L C E N T E R L I N E G U A R D R A I L S M I T H S B U R G P I K E ( U S R T E 6 4 ) EDGE OF WATER EDGE OF WATER HEAD WALL GRAVEL DRIVEWAY BARN SHED SID E W A L K CONC. WALKWAY BEING RECONSTRUCTED DRAIN PIPE: 4" (6"?)INV: 647.50 SLIDING WEIR GATE INV: 649.84 ABANDONED OLD SMITHSBURG PIKE O V E R H E A D U T I L I T I E S ( T Y P I C A L ) INV. BEHIND WEIR GATE ELEV: 648.70 648 648 648 654 653 652 651 6 5 2 648 655 656 657 658 659 652 6 5 3 64 6 647 648 648 649 651 649 650 651 652 653 654 650 651 6 5 2 6 5 3 6 5 4 6 5 5 6 5 6 6 5 7 6 5 8 65 9 6 6 0 6 6 1 66 2 664 663 662 665 66 6 667 6 6 0 6 5 5 6 5 2 6 6 0 6 5 5 6 6 5 6 6 3 6 5 8 65 6 657 658 658 657 655 655 653 65 2 6 5 4 6 5 3 661 662 663 66 4 66 5 66 6 667 663 661 65 9 660 647 LITTLE ANTIE T A M C R E E K BARN 44.5' CARTWA Y FE M A F L O O D P L A I N PA N E L # 2 4 0 4 3 C 0 1 6 5 D EF F . 08 - 1 5 - 2 0 1 7 F E M A F L O O D P L A I N P A N E L # 2 4 0 4 3 C 0 1 6 5 D E F F . 0 8 - 1 5 - 2 0 1 7 O V E R H E A D U T I L I T I E S ( T Y P I C A L ) P FILTERBAG02 C-301 DRAWDOWN PUMP(TYPICAL)WITH 2" DISCHARGE HOSE (PHASE 2) 01 C-301 MD S T A T E P L A N E NA D 8 3 N A V D 8 8 W W W W W W W W W W W W W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE WW OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H O H O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H O H OH O H O H O H O H OH O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH O H O H OH O H O H O H OH O H OH O H O H O H REPAIR EXISTING WALL REPAIR EXISTING EROSION BEHIND WALL PER ENGINEER REPAIR EXISTING EROSION BEHIND WALL PER ENGINEER DREDGE BOTTOM OFPONDTO ORIGINAL DEPTH REPAIR EXISTING WALL GEOTHERMAL LINES TO BE REPLACED PROPOSED WALL TOPROTECT FOUNDATION PROPOSED WALL TOPROTECT FOUNDATION TOTAL LODAREA: 0.68 ac INSTALL INDOOR SEDIMENTCONTROLS IF POLLUTANTSDISCHARGE INTO SPRING (SEE SHEET NOTES) STOCKPILE(PHASE 2) SC E 03 C-301 STABILIZEDCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE 01 C-301 INSTALLSANDBAGS IN SPRING CHANNEL(PHASE 2) P 01 C-301 PUMP BYPASS SPRING FLOWTHROUGH EXISTING8" WATERLINE PIPE (PHASE 2) LODL O D L O D L O D L O D L O D LOD LOD LOD LOD L O D L O D L O D LO D LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD L O D L O D L O D L O D L O D L O D LO D LO D LO D LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD L O D L O D L O D L O D L O D LO D LOD L O D L O D LO D LODLOD L O D L O D L O D L O D LOD L O D LO D L O D L O D L O D L O D L O D L O D LO D LOD LOD LOD S F S F S F S F S F SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F S F SEPTIC RESERVE AREA 04 C-301 SILTFENCE(PHASE 2) P P P P P P 2 " D I S C H A R G E L I N E T O F I L T E R B A G ( T Y P I C A L ) C O N T R A C T O R T O C O N N E C T T O T H E S A M E F I L T E R B A G F O R E A C H P U M P L O C A T I O N . 01 C-301 01 C-301 INSTALL SANDBAGS(OR EQUIVALENT)(PHASE 1) 01 C-301 INSTALL SANDBAGS(OR EQUIVALENT)(PHASE 1) INSTALL SANDBAGS (OR EQUIVALENT)(PHASE 1) INSTALL SANDBAGS(OR EQUIVALENT)(PHASE 1) INSTALL SANDBAGS (OR EQUIVALENT)(PHASE 2)01 C-301 INSTALL SANDBAGS(OR EQUIVALENT)(PHASE 1) 01 C-301 0 SCALE: 20 20 4010 1" = 20' C-301 01 OR NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILEANCHORED FILTER BAG MULCH, LEAF/WOOD COMPOST, WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW BALES CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. TIGHTLY SEAL SLEEVE AROUND THE PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE WITH A STRAP OR SIMILAR DEVICE. 2. PLACE FILTER BAG ON SUITABLE BASE (E.G., MULCH, LEAF/WOOD COMPOST, WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW BALES) LOCATED ON A LEVEL OR 5% MAXIMUM SLOPING SURFACE. DISCHARGE TO A STABILIZED AREA. EXTENDBASE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM EDGES OF BAG. 3. CONTROL PUMPING RATE TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE PRESSURE WITHIN THE FILTER BAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. AS THE BAG FILLS WITH SEDIMENT, REDUCE PUMPING RATE. 4. REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF FILTER BAG UPON COMPLETION OF PUMPING OPERATIONS OR AFTER BAG HAS REACHED CAPACITY, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. SPREAD THE DEWATERED SEDIMENT FROM THE BAG IN AN APPROVED UPLAND AREA AND STABILIZE WITH SEED AND MULCH BY THE END OF THE WORK DAY. RESTORE THESURFACE AREA BENEATH THE BAG TO ORIGINAL CONDITION UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE. 5. USE NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS USING HIGH STRENGTH THREAD. SIZE SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM 4 INCH DIAMETER PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE. THE BAG MUST BE MANUFACTURED FROMA NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL VALUES (MARV) FOR THE FOLLOWING: GRAB TENSILE 250 LB ASTM D-4632PUNCTURE150 LB ASTM D-4833 FLOW RATE 70 GAL/MIN/FT²ASTM D-4491 PERMITTIVITY (SEC-1)1.2 SEC-1 ASTM D-4491 UV RESISTANCE 70% STRENGTH @ 500 HOURS ASTM D-4355 APPARENT OPENING SIZE (AOS) 0.15-0.18 MM ASTM D-4751 SEAM STRENGTH 90%ASTM D-4632 6. REPLACE FILTER BAG IF BAG CLOGS OR HAS RIPS, TEARS, OR PUNCTURES. DURING OPERATION KEEP CONNECTION BETWEEN PUMP HOSE AND FILTER BAG WATER TIGHT. REPLACE BEDDING IF IT BECOMESDISPLACED. ELEVATION STANDARD SYMBOL DETAIL F-4 FILTER BAG STRAP PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE PLAN VIEW FILTER BAG STRAP 12 IN MIN. 02 C-301 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION Pre-Construction Notification - Contractor to contact the Washington County Soil Conservation District inspector at 301-797-6821 and site engineer Frederick, Seibert & Assoc., Inc. (FSA) at 301-791-3650 a minimum of 48 hours prior to start of construction for a pre-construction meeting. Any spoil and/or borrow material must come from and/or go to a site with an approved and current Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Before beginning construction, limit of disturbance. 1. Contractor to access site through existing paved entrance. Contractor to install stabilized construction entrance as shown on plans if tracking of mud becomes an issue. If any tracking of mud occurs on any public roadway, the contractor shall immediately stop work and clean roadway. The contractor at a minimum shall clean the roadway at the end of each working day, whenever tracking of sediment or debris occur. 2. Contractor to install phase 1 sandbag perimeter controls. Begin on one area of wall repair and begin de-watering. 3. Upon de-watering of work area, construct wall repairs. Repeat process for all phase 1 wall restoration locations. 4. Contractor to remove all phase 1 perimeter controls upon completion of all wall restoration locations. 5. Install phase 2 silt fence for designated phase 2 stockpile area. 6. Contractor to install sandbag and pump around practice for phase 2. Begin de-watering pond. 7. Upon completion of de-watering, contractor to begin dredging pond floor, and replace geothermal lines. 8. Contractor to stabilize all areas of work. 9. Contact the Washington County Soil Conservation District inspector at 301-797-6821 to verify site is adequately stabilized before removing perimeter controls. 10. Remove any remaining erosion and sediment control devices and stabilize any disturbed area. PROFILE EXISTING PAVEMENT EARTH FILL PIPE (SEE NOTE 2) 5:1 5:1 PLAN VIEW EXISTINGGROUND WI D T H 10 F T M I N . 10 F T M I N . 10 F T M I N . MOUNTABLE BERM(6 IN MIN.)3 FT EDGE OFEXISTINGPAVEMENT 50 FT MIN. 50 FT MIN. LENGTH * SCE MIN. 6 IN OF 2 TO 3 INAGGREGATE OVER LENGTHAND WIDTH OF ENTRANCE NONWOVENGEOTEXTILE STANDARD SYMBOLDETAIL B-1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 2011U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 8 FT MIN. Construction Specifications 1. Place stabilized construction entrance in accordance with the approved plan. Vehicles must travel over the entire length of the SCE. Use minimum length of 50 feet (*30 feet for single residence lot). Use minimum width of 10 feet. Flare SCE 10feet minimum at the existing road to provide a turning radius. 2. Pipe all surface water flowing to or diverted toward the SCE under the entrance, maintaining positive drainage. Protect pipe installed through the SCE with a mountable berm with 5:1 slopes and a minimum of 12 inches of stone over the pipe. Provide pipe as specified on approved plan. when the SCE is located at a high spot and has no drainage to convey, a pipe is not necessary. A mountable berm is required when SCE is not located at a high spot. 3. Prepare subgrade and place nonwoven geotextile, as specified in Section H-1 materials. 4. Place crushed aggregate (2-3 inches in size) or equivalent recycled concrete (without rebar) at least 6 inches deep over the length and width of the SCE. 5. Maintain entrance in a condition that minimizes tracking of sediment. Add stone or make other repairs as conditions demand to maintain clean surface, mountable berm, and specified dimensions. Immediately remove stone and/or sediment spilled, dropped, or tracked onto adjacent roadway by vacuuming, scraping, and/or sweeping. Washing roadway to remove mud tracked onto pavement is not acceptable unless wash water is directed to an approved sediment control practice. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 1. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained in continuous compliance with the latest version of the 2011 Maryland Standards and Specifications for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control. 2. Sediment controls need to be included indoors at points where there would be potential discharge of pollutants to waters ofthe state. Examples of these controls include, but are not limited to, silt fences and sandbags.3. Temporary platforms, piers, etc. should be covered in plastic sheeting to collect debris, fine debris, and dust. C-501 03 P: \ S H A R E D F O L D E R S \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 0 0 0 S \ 3 4 0 0 \ 3 4 0 0 . 1 \ D W G \ C O N S T R U C T I O N S E T \ 3 4 0 0 . 1 - E R O S I O N & S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L - 2 0 2 4 . D W G 2 0 2 4 - 0 7 - 0 2 SCALE PROJECT MANAGER: DATEDWN BY SHEET TITLE DE S C R I P T I O N : DA T E : PROJECT NO. MA R K : © 12 8 S O U T H P O T O M A C S T R E E T CI V I L E N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S L A N D P L A N N E R S F • HA G E R S T O W N , M D 2 1 7 4 0 30 1 . 7 9 1 . 3 6 5 0 20 W E S T B A L T I M O R E S T R E E T GR E E N C A S T L E , P A 1 7 2 2 5 71 7 . 5 9 7 . 1 0 0 7 50 5 S O U T H H A N O V E R S T R E E T CA R L I S L E , P A 1 7 0 1 3 71 7 . 7 0 1 . 8 1 1 1 15 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T NE W B L O O M F I E L D , P A 1 7 0 6 8 71 7 . 2 7 5 . 7 5 3 1 FR E D E R I C K , S E I B E R T & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . fs a - i n c . c o m • • SA I hereby certify that these documents were preparedor approved by me, and that I am a duly licensedprofessional under the laws of the State of: Professional Certification: __________________, License # _________________, Expiration Date __________________. SHEET OF EMAIL: WA L L R E S T O R A T I O N SI T U A T E D A T 1 3 2 1 5 S M I T H S B U R G P I K E SM I T H S B U R G WA S H I N G T O N C O U N T Y , M A R Y L A N D JE F F R E Y & L A U R A U N S W O R T H 97 0 1 L A R K S P U R L A N E F A R M , H A G E R S T O W N M D 2 1 7 4 0 (3 0 1 ) 7 3 0 - 6 3 4 3 3400.1 TCH 05-01-2024 KDM KMOORE@fsa-inc.com TAX-GRID-PARCEL 0040-0001-0203 1" = 20' EROSION & SEDIMENT PLAN C-301 03 03 MD 20945 08-23-2025 20 2 4 RE V I S E D P E R A G E N C Y C O M M E N T S 6/ 2 4 / 2 4 FLOW POSTS CROSS SECTION ELEVATION STEP 1 STEP 2 UNDISTURBEDGROUND 8 IN MIN. DEPTHINTO GROUND FENCE POST DRIVENA MIN. OF 16 IN INTOTHE GROUND JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT FENCE SECTIONS (TOP VIEW) 6 FT MAX. CENTER TO CENTER 36 IN MIN. FENCE POST LENGTHDRIVEN MIN. 16 IN INTO GROUND 36 IN MIN. FENCEPOST LENGTH STEP 3 STAPLE FENCE POST 18 IN MIN.ABOVE GROUND TWIST POSTS TOGETHERSTAPLE STAPLE STAPLE STAPLE STAPLE STAPLESTAPLE 16 IN MIN. HEIGHT OFWOVEN SLIT FILM GEOTEXTILE WOVEN SLIT FILM GEOTEXTILE EMBED GEOTEXTILE MIN. OF 8 IN VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE SOIL ON BOTH SIDES OF GEOTEXTILE. B A A A B B B A SF STANDARD SYMBOL DETAIL E-1 SILT FENCE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT WATER MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 2011U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE FINAL CONFIGURATION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. USE WOOD POSTS 1 34 X 134 ± 116 INCH (MINIMUM) SQUARE CUT OF SOUND QUALITY HARDWOOD. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO WOODEN POST USE STANDARD "T" OR "U" SECTION STEEL POSTS WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN 1 POUND PER LINEAR FOOT. 2. USE 36 INCH MINIMUM POSTS DRIVEN 16 INCH MINIMUM INTO GROUND NO MORE THAN 6 FEET APART. 3. USE WOVEN SLIT FILM GEOTEXTILE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION H-1 MATERIALS AND FASTEN GEOTEXTILE SECURELY TO UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES AT TOP AND MID-SECTION. 4. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION TO THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSPECTION/ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY SHOWING THAT THE GEOTEXTILE USED MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION H-1 MATERIALS. 5. EMBED GEOTEXTILE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE SOIL ON BOTH SIDES OF FABRIC. 6. WHERE TWO SECTIONS OF GEOTEXTILE ADJOIN: OVERLAP, TWIST, AND STAPLE TO POST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS DETAIL. 7. EXTEND BOTH ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE A MINIMUM OF FIVE HORIZONTAL FEET UPSLOPE AT 45 DEGREES TO THE MAIN FENCE ALIGNMENT TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM GOING AROUND THE ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE. 8. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS WHEN BULGES DEVELOP IN SILT FENCE OR WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 25% OF FENCE HEIGHT. REPLACE GEOTEXTILE IF TORN. IF UNDERMINING OCCURS, REINSTALL FENCE. 04 C-301 v.07/26/2024 Page 1 | Part I – Evaluation of Significance Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit ORDINANCE 2024-23 Part I – Evaluation of Significance HTC Number (HDC office use only): Instructions: Fill out this form for determination of whether the historic structure is located within a qualifying area. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Name Street Address City Zip Check all designations that apply: Historic Structure in the Antietam Overlay 1 or 2 Historic Structure in a County Historic District (ex. HP Overlay) Historic Structure contributing to a Historic Rural Village Historic Structure under MHT Easement Historic Structure in an eligible municipality (list below) Municipality____________________________________ APPLICANT INFORMATION Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant) Name Company Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address Page 2 | Part I – Evaluation of Significance PROPERTY DETAIL INFORMATION Date(s) of building(s) including source of date(s) Construction materials (brick, wood frame, etc.) Date(s) of exterior alteration(s) Description of the physical appearance (size, number of stories, style) Statement of significance Page 3 | Part I – Evaluation of Significance APPLICATION CHECKLIST Application Form – I have filled in all applicable fields. (check Equivalent Documentation below if applicable) Signature – I signed and dated the Part 1 application Ownership – If I am not the fee-simple owner of the property, I have provided a written statement from the fee-simple owner indicating that he or she is aware of the application and has no objection to the request for review Significance justification – I have attached documentation to support the significance of the historic structure Photographs – I have attached exterior photographs of all sides of the structure including areas applicable to the application Equivalent Documentation – I am attaching an equivalent documentation packet for review. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the information provided in this application is true, completed and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant Printed Name of Applicant Date Signature of Applicant Printed Name of Applicant Date Historic District Commission Use Only The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit – Part I for the above- named property and has determined that the property: Is located in an existing qualified area and meets historic structure criteria Appears to meet the qualifications of a historic structure pending designation through individual Historic District Is not a historic structure because it is not in a qualifying area; does not meet criteria for local designation Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed Date of HDC Review v. 07/26/2024 Page 1 | Part II – Description of Rehabilitation Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit ORDINANCE 2024-23 Part II – Description of Rehabilitation HTC Number (from Part I Application):_______________ Instructions: Fill out this form for determination of whether the proposed work is consistent with Washington County Design Guidelines and Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Name Street Address City Zip APPLICANT INFORMATION Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant) Name Company Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROPERTY DATA Indicate One: Primary/Secondary Residence Mixed-Use Residential Commercial Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Date Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures HTC Number:_______________ Page 2 | Part II – Description of Rehabilitation DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Use this page to describe all exterior work and new construction. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers HTC Number:_______________ Page 3 | Part II – Description of Rehabilitation DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Use this page to describe all exterior work and new construction. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers HTC Number:_______________ Page 4 | Part II – Description of Rehabilitation DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Use this page to describe all exterior work and new construction. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers HTC Number:_______________ Page 5 | Part II – Description of Rehabilitation DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK Use this page to describe all exterior work and new construction. Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers Number Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Describe work and impact on feature Photo Numbers Drawing Numbers HTC Number:_______________ Page 6 | Part II – Description of Rehabilitation APPLICATION CHECKLIST Application Form – I have filled in all applicable fields. Signature – I signed and dated the Part 2 application Description of Rehabilitation Work – I have described ALL proposed work planned for the exterior of my property. I understand that all work must be consistent with the Washington County Design Guidelines and Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and be reviewed and approved by the Historic District Commission Supplementary Materials – If applicable to my project, I have attached site plans, demolition plans, architectural plans, HVAC plans, replacement window/door drawings and/or product specifications. Photographs – I have attached photographs to support the description of work. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the information provided in this application is true, completed and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant Printed Name of Applicant Date Signature of Applicant Printed Name of Applicant Date Historic District Commission Use Only The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit – Part II for the above- named property and has determined that the proposed rehabilitation described herein: Is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Washington County Historic Guidelines. Final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 application is submitted and approved Is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation if the attached conditions are met. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. Is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied. Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed Date of HDC Review v. 07/26/2024 Page 1 | Part III – Request for Certification of Completed Work Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit ORDINANCE 2024-23 Part III – Request for Certification of Completed Work HTC Number (from Part I Application):_______________ Instructions: Fill out this form at project completion for review of the rehabilitation costs and determination of project results consistent with Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Name Street Address City Zip APPLICANT INFORMATION Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROJECT CONTACT (if different from applicant) Name Company Street Address City State Zip Telephone Email Address PROJECT DATA Project Start Date Project Completion Date Total Rehabilitation Costs Total Ineligible Expenses - Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (QRE) = HTC Number:_______________ Page 2 | Part III – Request for Certification of Completed Work APPLICATION CHECKLIST Application Form – I have filled in all applicable fields. (Check Equivalent Documentation below if applicable) Signature – I signed and dated the Part 3 application Itemized Expense Spreadsheet – I have included a spreadsheet of all my itemized expenses, with eligible and ineligible expenses clearly delineated. For each item on the spreadsheet, I have included supporting documentation consisting of BOTH (1) a copy of the invoice or receipt, showing which goods or services were purchased, and (2) certifiable proof of payment such as a credit card receipt or cancelled check. Photographs – I have attached photographs to support the description of work. Equivalent Documentation – I am attaching an equivalent documentation packet for review. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Properties Tax Credit Application and that the information provided in this application is true, complete and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge and belief; and that the completed rehabilitation is consistent with the work described in Part 2 of the application process. I hereby apply for certification of rehabilitation work described for the purposes of a Washington County Historic Properties Tax Credit. Signature of Applicant Printed Name of Applicant Date Signature of Applicant Printed Name of Applicant Date Historic District Commission Use Only The Historic District Commission has reviewed the Application for Historic Properties Tax Credit – Part III for the above- named property and has determined that: The completed rehabilitation is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and is consistent with the historic character of the property and where applicable, the district in which it is located. Completed projects may be inspected by an authorized representative of the HDC to determine if the work meets the Standards for Rehabilitation. The HDC reserves the right to make inspections at any time up to five years after completion of the rehabilitation and to revoke certification, if it is determined that the rehabilitation project was not undertaken as presented by the owner in the application form and supporting documentation, or the owner, upon obtaining certification, undertook unapproved further alterations as part of the rehabilitation project inconsistent with the Secretary’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The completed rehabilitation is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied Date of HDC Review Property Address:Part 3 Itemized Expense Sheet FOR HDC USE ONLY HTC Number:______________ COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4 COLUMN 5 COLUMN 6 COLUMN 7 COLUMN 8 Date of Payment Your page #(s) of invoice / receipt / check Payee for Item (name of contractor, company, etc.) Part 2 Work Item # Description of Expenditure Expenditure Amount Eligible Expense Ineligible Expense $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS (will auto-calculate): Part 3 Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures as submitted: Revised 10/25/2023 MHT Project Number (MHT office use only) Instructions: Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. No certification determination will be made until this form is complete. Please note that it is not necessary for owners of individually listed National Register properties to complete a Part 1 Application. 1. Property Name Zip 2. Nature of request (check only one box) Certification that the building contributes to the significance of the above-named historic district or heritage area. Certification that the structure has been individually designated under local law and is eligible for the National Register (designation documentation required). Preliminary determination that the structure will be a certified historic structure pending the official National Register or local designation. Certification that a building owned by DNR is eligible for listing on the National Register. 3. Project Contact (if different from applicant) 4. Applicant MHT Official Use Only The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application- Part 1 for the above-named property and has determined that the property: Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature MHT comments attached Maryland Historical Trust Historic Revitalization Tax Credit HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 1 – EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Name Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address Company Name Signature Date Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address MHT Easement property? Street City Check all designations that apply: Name of Historic District or Heritage Area (if applicable) Is a "certified historic structure." Appears to meet "certified historic structure" criteria, pending official National Register or local designation. Is not a "certified historic structure" because it is not individually listed in the National Register or designated under local law; does not contribute to the significance of the above-named historic district or heritage area; is a structure pending National Register or local designation that does not appear to meet "certified historic structure" criteria; or is not determined eligible for listing in the National Register. Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed. Maryland Historical Trust / 100 Community Place, Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov Yes No Unknown County National Register historic district or National Register individual listing Local historic district or Local individual listing Pending National Register or local designation (must submit documentation justifying historic district or individual listing) Eligible curatorship property owned by DNR (must submit DOE justifying eligibility) Eligible property within a Certified Maryland Heritage Area (must submit documentation from the Maryland Heritage Area Authority justifying eligibility) I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) I am the fee-simple owner of the above-described property or (2) if I am not the fee-simple owner of the above-described property, the fee-simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article, §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland. Page 2 of 3 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 1 – EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Property Name Street Address 5. Description of physical appearance Date(s) of building(s) Type of construction (brick, wood frame, etc.) Source of date(s) Date(s) of alteration(s) Has building been moved?no yes, specify date 6. Statement of significance 7. Photographs and maps. Submit interior and exterior photographs in accordance with the photographic guidelines. If located within a local historic district attach the official historic district boundary map with the location of the property clearly marked. Page 3 of 3 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 1 – EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Instructions: After completing your Part 1 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each line carefully; the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted. Property Address Name Signature Date MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and Instructions. APPLICATION FORM- I have filled in all applicable fields. I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information on my behalf; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned to me for completion. SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 1 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHT's signature guidelines. OWNERSHIP- If I am not the fee-simple owner of the property, I have provided a written statement from the fee-simple owner indicating that he or she is aware of the application and has no objection to the request for certification. DESIGNATION JUSTIFICATION - I have attached the required documentation if applicable. HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP- If located within a local historic district, I have attached the official historic district boundary map and clearly marked the property's location within the district. PHOTOGRAPHS - I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines. MOVED BUILDINGS- My property was moved (or I plan to move it) and therefore I am submitting additional information in accordance with the Homeowner Application Instructions. MULTIPLE BUILDINGS- My property contains multiple structures (such as garage, barn, shed, etc.) and therefore I am submitting additional information in accordance the Homeowner Application Instructions. DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records. Revised 10/25/2023 MHT Project Number (MHT office use only) 1. Property Name Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature MHT conditions or comments attached Maryland Historical Trust Historic Revitalization Tax Credit HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Instructions: Fill out this form in accordance with the application instructions. This page must bear the applicant’s electronic signature and must be dated. The Maryland Historical Trust's certification decision is based on the descriptions in this application form. In the event of any discrepancy between the application form and other supplementary material submitted with it (such as architectural plans, drawings and specifications), the application form shall take precedence. A Part 1 – Evaluation of Significance was submitted Date of certification (if applicable) Project Data2. Date of building construction Start date (estimated)Completion date (estimated) *Estimated Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures Floor area before / after rehabilitation Project Contact (if different from applicant)3. Applicant4. MHT Official Use Only The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application – Part 2 for the above-named property and has determined that the proposed rehabilitation described herein: /sq ft Name Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address Company Name Signature Date Street City State Zip Telephone Email Address Primary/secondary residence Mixed-use residential/commercial Owner-occupied residential co-op unit CHECK IF YOU ANTICIPATE RECEIVING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT Insurance claim reimbursement funds Other local and/or state funding (i.e. grants or loans) Yes No Unknown Street City Maryland Historical Trust / 100 Community Place / Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov County is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation if the attached conditions are met. A final certification can be issued only after the rehabilitation work is completed as herein described and a Part 3 Application is submitted and approved. is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied. Is not adequately documented in the application and therefore cannot be reviewed. Specify funding source *Estimated qualified rehabilitation expenditures are capped at $250,000 and should not include additional state/local funding, insurance reimbursements or ineligible expenses including new construction, site work, appliances, etc. I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct. I further attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a political subdivision of the State or the Federal government and that [check one box as applicable] (1) I am the fee-simple owner of the above-described property or (2) if I am not the fee-simple owner of the above-described property, the fee-simple owner is aware of the action I am taking relative to this application and has no objection, as noted in a written statement from the owner, a copy of which either is attached to this application form and incorporated herein, or has been previously submitted. I understand that intentional falsification of factual representations in this application is subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article, §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland. Zip Date submitted MHT Easement Property? Page 2 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property address Property name 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Page 3 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property address Property name 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Page 4 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property address Property name 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Page 5 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION Property address Property name 5. Detailed description of rehabilitation work Use this page to describe all work or create a comparable format with this information. Number items consecutively to describe all work, including building exterior and interior, additions, site work, landscaping, and new construction. Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Number Feature Date of Feature Describe existing feature and its condition Photo numbers Drawing numbers Describe work and impact on feature Page 6 of 6 HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 2 – DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST Instructions: After completing your Part 2 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each line carefully; the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted. Property Address Name Signature Date I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and Instructions. APPLICATION FORM- I filled in all applicable fields. I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information on behalf of me; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned. SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 2 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHT's signature guidelines. DESCRIPTION OF REHABILITATION WORK- I have described ALL proposed work planned for the next 24 months to the interior and exterior of my property, including ineligible work items that I do not anticipate receiving a tax credit for. I understand that all work must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and be reviewed and approved by MHT. SUPPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS- If applicable to my project, I have attached site plans, demolition plans, architectural plans, HVAC plans, replacement window/door drawings and/or product specifications. PHOTOGRAPHS- I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines. REVIEW FEE - I will pay a $10 Part 2 review fee when sent an electronic invoice by the Maryland Historical Trust. I understand that payment must be made within ten (10) days of receiving the invoice. DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records. Revised 10/25/2023 MHT Project Number (MHT office use only) Instructions: This page must bear the applicant's electric signature and must be dated. A copy of this form will be provided to the Comptroller of the Treasury. Maryland Historical Trust Historic Revitalization Tax Credit HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 3 – REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK 1. Property Name Street City Zip Is the property a certified historic structure? yes no If yes, date of MHT certification OR date of National Register/local listing 2. Project Data Project start date Project completion date 3. Project Contact (if different from applicant) Name Street City State Zip Telephone 4. Applicant List all additional owners on next page. MHT Official Use Only The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application – Part 3 for the above-listed "certified historic structure" and has determined that: the completed rehabilitation is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and is consistent with the historic character of the property and, where applicable, the district in which it is located. Effective the date indicated below, the rehabilitation of the “certified historic structure” is hereby designated a “certified rehabilitation.” Questions concerning specific tax consequences or interpretations of Maryland tax law should be addressed to the Comptroller of the Treasury. Completed projects may be inspected by an authorized representative of the MHT Director to determine if the work meets the Standards for Rehabilitation. The MHT Director reserves the right to make inspections at any time up to five years after completion of the rehabilitation and to revoke certification, if it is determined that the rehabilitation project was not undertaken as presented by the owner in the application form and supporting documentation, or the owner, upon obtaining certification, undertook unapproved further alterations as part of the rehabilitation project inconsistent with the Secretary’s Standards for Rehabilitation. the completed rehabilitation is not consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, eligibility requirements, and/or does not comply with program requirements and therefore certification is denied. Date Maryland Historical Trust Authorized Signature MHT comments attached Email Address City Zip Telephone Email Address Company I hereby apply for certification of the rehabilitation work described above for purposes of the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit. I hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge, the information provided is correct, and that the completed rehabilitation is consistent with the work described in Part 2 of the Maryland Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application Part- 2 certified by the Maryland Historical Trust. I also attest that the structure is not owned by the State of Maryland, a political subdivision of the State, or the Federal government, and that I own, as my residence, the property or the portion of the property, described above, excepting those curatorship properties owned by DNR. I understand that intensional falsification of factual representations in this application are subject to civil penalties and imprisonment for up to 10 years pursuant to Tax General Article §§ 13-703 and 13-1002(b), Annotated Code of Maryland. Name Signature Date Last 4 digits of SSN (or Taxpayer Identification Number) Street State Maryland Historical Trust / 100 Community Place / Crownsville, MD 21032 / mht.maryland.gov Total rehabilitation costs (including new construction, site work, appliances, etc.) Total ineligible expenses attributed to new construction, site work, appliances, etc. Total ineligible funding, including but not limited to state or local grants or insurance reimbursement funds as described in the Part 2 (see instructions). Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (QRE) -Do not round numbers (the 20% tax credit will be based on this amount, which may not exceed $250,000) $ -$ -$$ = $ Is the required "Part 3- Itemized Expense Spreadsheet" included with corresponding paid invoices/receipts? yes County Did the project take more than 24 months to complete? yes* no *If answer is yes, you may only claim expenditures incurred in a 24 month period ending with or within the taxable year. HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 3 – REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK Property name Property address Additional Owners Continue on additional sheets as needed to list all owners. Name Street Address City State Zip Page 2 of 3 SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number 5. Name Street Address City State Zip SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number Name Street Address City State Zip SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number Name Street Address City State Zip SSN or Taxpayer Identification Number Itemized Expense Spreadsheet Attach the itemized spreadsheet and supporting documentation (paid invoices/receipts/cancelled checks) to the Part 3 Application. Supporting documentation must be keyed to the spreadsheet. Include both eligible and ineligible expenses. 6. MANDATORY APPLICATION CHECKLIST Instructions: After completing your Part 3 application, fill out this checklist to ensure that your application contains at least the minimum documentation required for MHT staff review. This checklist is based on the detailed information included in the Homeowner Instructions. Read and check each section carefully; the application review period will not begin until a completed application with checklist is submitted. Property Address Name Signature Date DUPLICATE COPY OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS- I have saved a complete copy of all materials for my records. I attest that I have read and understand the Historic Revitalization Tax Credit Application and Instructions. APPLICATION FORM- I filled in all applicable fields including the last 4 digits of the social security number of all owners (if jointly owned). I understand that MHT staff may not fill in any missing information on behalf of me; therefore if my application is missing information it will be returned. SIGNATURE- I signed and dated the Part 3 application and Mandatory Application Checklist in accordance with MHT's signature guidelines. ITEMIZED EXPENSE SPREADSHEET- I have included a spreadsheet of all of my itemized expenses, filled out according to the instructions, with eligible and ineligible expenses clearly delineated. For each item on the spreadsheet I have included supporting documentation consisting of BOTH (1) a copy of the invoice or receipt, showing which goods or services were purchased, and (2) certifiable proof of payment such as a credit card receipt or canceled check. All supporting documentation is keyed to the spreadsheet. PHOTOGRAPHS - I have prepared all photographs in accordance MHT's photographic guidelines. REVIEW FEE- I will pay the remainder of review fee when sent an electronic invoice by the Maryland Historical Trust. I understand that payment must be made within ten (10) days of receiving the invoice. The review fee is 3% of the credit amount based on the GREATER of the Part 2 estimated Total Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures (QRE) or the final total QRE in the Part 3 application, minus the $10 Part 2 review fee. - If Part 3 final QRE is higher than the estimated Part 2 QRE: ((Part 3 QRE x .20) x .03)- $10 = final review fee - If Part 3 final QRE is lower than the estimated Part 2 QRE: ((Part 2 QRE x .20) x .03)- $10 = final review fee HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION PART 3 – REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK Page 3 of 3 19 5. HISTORIC PROPERTY GRANT PROGRAM 5.01 Establishment of the Historic Property Grant Program 5.01a There is a Historic Property Grant Program established to assist in the protection, preservation, and enhancement of Washington County’s rural historic properties as authorized by § 9-204 of the Tax-Property Article of State Code. 5.01b The rehabilitation activities referred to in this Ordinance shall be in conformance with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation and subsequent revisions and with the Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures and subsequent revisions. 5.02 Grant Funding Source for the Historic Property Grant Program 5.02a The funding source and yearly allocated amount for this grant program shall be: i) Any listed below or combination thereof: (1) Recordation Tax (2) Ag Transfer Tax (3) General Fund ii) The yearly allocated amount for this grant program shall be a minimum of $150,000 or greater as determined by the County. 5.03 Grant Amounts for a Historic Property Grant 5.03a An individual grant shall be a minimum of $5,000. 5.03b An individual grant cannot exceed $50,000. 5.04 Eligibility for a Historic Property Grant 5.04a Eligible applicants include individual property owners and non-profit organizations. i) Applicants must not have outstanding County permit or zoning violations. ii) Non-profit organizations must be in good standing with the State of Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT), be qualified to do business in Maryland, and have the legal capacity and authority to incur obligations involved under the grant program. Commented [JM75]: County Attorney assistance needed to define authorization Commented [JM76]: Not sure where this needs placed in here but it needs to be discussed somewhere and hammered out by the appropriate departments and Commissioners Commented [JM77R76]: CFO review needed on the wording and funds. Obviously Commissioner input as well. Commented [JM78]: Inquire about whether good standing with taxes should be included in elgibility Commented [JM79R78]: Check with MHT MHAA Grant wording SDAT Commented [JM80R78]: Non-profit wording updated to follow MHAA grant guidelines. Excluded the link which was also in the guidelines. This information could be included in a grant guideline document such as the ones put out by MHAA or Frederick County each cycle. Commented [JM81]: This is a tricky statement but is included in Frederick County. This is wide ranging to me, since its for an owner. That means if they own multiple properties and something has a violation they can't use this to resolve it or keep another property in good order. Commented [JM82R81]: Valid point per discussions with Jill. Leaving in. 20 5.04b Criteria of Eligible properties include: i) Located in unincorporated areas of Washington County; and ii) The property is in a Historic Preservation Area; or iii) The lLandowner has placed the property in a Maryland Historical Trust permanent easement, that provides additional review and restrictions to the exterior appearance and maintenance of the historic structures; or iv) The landowner has placed the property in a Historic Preservation District as defined by the Washington County Zoning Ordinance; or v) The property is located in the Antietam Overlay 1 – Battlefield Buffer or the Antietam Overlay 2 – Approach as defined by the Washington County Zoning Ordinance and listed with the Maryland Historical Trust on the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties; or vi) The property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, individually or as a contributing property in a National Register District; or vii) The property is determined to be eligible by the Maryland Historical Trust for National Register designation; or viii) The property is in a County adopted Historic Rural Village; and the structure is a contributing resource to the Historic Rural Village. 5.05 Procedures for Historic Property Grant 5.05a Applications will be accepted once a year from December through February and; i) Applications will be reviewed by Planning Department of Planning and Zoning Staff for completeness and to give applicants the opportunity to submit a revised application. ii) Applicants may revise final applications through March 31 of each year. 5.05b After receipt of a final application for a Historic Property Grant: i) The Historic Property Grant Subcommittee shall review and rank the applications based on competitive selection criteria established in this Ordinance. ii) Award recommendations will be presented to the Historic District Commission for approval or revision and subsequent recommendation to the County Commissioners. iii) Final award recommendations will be presented to the County Commissioners for approval or revision. 5.05c If neither the Historic Property Grant Subcommittee nor the Historic District Commission recommends the award of grant funding, the grant application shall be deemed denied and the County shall notify the landowner or landownersApplicant stating the reasons for denial. Commented [JM83]: For the time being, recommendation would be to determine if the program is working in unincorporated areas where County has jurisdiction and review authority before contemplating extension to the municipal areas. Commented [JM84]: Says MHT explicitly Commented [JM85]: We do not have review authority or any control on NR Districts or NR nominations so there is a potential that investment could be made and subsequent updates could be against design guidelines or SOI standards. We do have review in the RV though so it is recommended to at least keep that option to be consistent with other incentive updates Commented [JM86]: Timing is from Frederick County. That seems like a good time of year to do many exterior project reviews since they are likely to go to construction in the spring. Commented [JM87R86]: Per Jill this timing seems to work for us as well. Leaving as is. Commented [JM88]: Should this be applicant? Property owner? Which is more consistent with this and other ordinances? (County Attorney Question) 21 5.05d The County may approve a Historic Property Grant only if: i) The property meets the eligibility criteria established under this Ordinance and any Regulations associated herewith; ii) The grant application has been reviewed by the Historic Property Grant Subcommittee; iii) Approval of the grant has been recommended by the Historic District Commission. 5.05e Award of grant funding shall not occur until: i) The County approves the grant application; ii) All parties have executed a Historic Property Grant Agreement. 5.06 Historic Property Grant Subcommittee 5.06a The Historic Property Grant Subcommittee may be appointed by the Historic District Commission (HDC) Chairperson and shall consist of five (5) members. The cChairperson may invite representatives to serve on the Subcommittee or may use the HDC Commission members as the Subcommittee. Members may be from, but are not limited to, the following: i) A staff member of the Department of Planning and ZoningPlanning Department ii) A staff member of the County Division of Permits and Inspections iii) A member of the Historic District Commission iv) A member of the Historic Advisory Committee v) A staff member of the County Office of Grant Management 5.07 Eligible Activities and Expenses for Historic Property Grants 5.07a Costs for work funded by grant funds are NOT eligible for the Washington County Property Tax Credits for Improvements to Historic Specified Historic Structures. 5.07b Eligible Activities include the stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration and/or preservation to the EXTERIOR of a historic property. Examples of Qualified Rehabilitation Expenses include, but are not limited to: i) Roof Repair and Replacement ii) Chimney Repair and Replacement iii) Window Restoration iv) Masonry Repointing v) Structural Repairs Commented [JM89]: Grant Agreement with Grant Management and what they would need to assist with this. Commented [JM90]: Do we need to specify this? Its not in Frederick County's but I thought it might be pertinent to outline who should be involved in the initial review. Commented [JM91R90]: There is more specificity in Prince Georges where Frederick pulled from here: Attachment B (with additions corresponding to Piret letter to Turner, 9 (pgparks.com) 22 5.07c Ineligible activities include, but are not limited to: i) previously completed rehabilitation work; or ii) rehabilitation work that is underway; or iii) new construction; or iv) Landscaping, with the exception of historic landscaping, man-made objects or features (such as stone walls or fences); or v) projects that do not conform to the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation and subsequent revisions and with the Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures and subsequent revisions. 5.07d Eligible expenses for the grant will be those directly associated with the stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, and/or preservation of the property. 5.07e Ineligible expenses are those expenses associated with predevelopment costs necessary to prepare the application, such as fees for architectural plans and/or structural and/or condition assessments, or other expenses not directly associated with the rehabilitation of the property. 5.07f Work must be completed by licensed contractors who have demonstrated applicable preservation skills and/or experience. 5.08 Competitive Selection Criteria for Historic Property Grants 5.08a The Historic District Commission, in coordination with the Historic Property Grant Subcommittee, may adjust the points to be awarded and the subcategories criteria before the call for applications each year through regular meeting vote; however, the Historic Property – Forty (40) points, Project - Forty (40) points, and Project Management - Twenty (20) points, shall remain overall categories and points for ranking. 5.08b A grant match is considered, but not required. Inclusion of a match will be considered during the evaluation and selection process. In-kind matches of labor and materials are permitted. Commented [JM92]: Reword to make sure its clear that only non-historic landscaping maybe add to permissible. Commented [JM93R92]: County attorney verify wording, historic landscaping should be allowed and also man made objects like stone walls and fences would be allowed, just not things like new plantings or new walls or new pools etc. Commented [JM94]: Or supervised by?? Want to make sure trade programs under supervision are applicable with the statement as is or if the "or supervised by" needs included Commented [JM95R94]: Historic building tradespeople Commented [JM96]: Follow the state MHT guidelines for in kind matches Commented [JM97R96]: MHAA Grant Matching: All grants must be matched by a grantee’s contribution to the project in an amount at least equal to the grant (dollar-for-dollar match). A matching contribution means money, or donated goods and/or services, that the applicant organization also spends on the project. Applicants will be asked to identify which project expenses will be covered by grant funds and Maryland Heritage Areas Authority FY 2024 Grant Guidelines Page 10 of 30 match funds in their application budgets. Commented [JM98R96]: MHT Non Capt Grant Matching: Local Jurisdictions require one-to-one match. Non profits are exempt from matching. 23 HISTORIC PROPERTY 0-40 points Historic and cultural significance of the resource(s) What is the historical and cultural significance of the property? Does it have local, state, or national significance? Does it contribute to a district? For example, a property with low to medium significance at a local level would score lower than a property with high significance at the local and state and/or national level. Urgency of need for financial assistance Is the property at risk because of development or deferred maintenance? Is there a special window of opportunity for the applicant to rehabilitate this property? Is it critical to the operation of the property? A property at risk of collapse, for example, could be scored at 10 points. 0-10 points 0-10 points Diversity of resource types Extent to which the property would expand the diversity of resource types within the current funding cycle. For example, if applicant pool is mostly houses but one consists of a barn, the barn application would score 5 points. Equitable countywide distribution of funds Extent to which the project would contribute to the equitable geographic distribution of the grants funds across the County within the current funding year. For example, if most grant awards or applications have been received from the southern part of the County but one or two applications are from the northern and eastern parts of the County, then those two applications could score 5 points. Continued use of resource Historic resource has an identified use and will not be left vacant 0-5 points 0-5 points 0-10 points PROJECT 0-40 points Retention of historically significant material or details If the property has extensive and/or original materials, features, and finishes, is extra effort being expended in their retention? For example, if the project involves retaining all the original materials in the resource, then the maximum number of points should be awarded versus a project that calls for the majority of materials to be replaced. Provision for long-term resource preservation Will this project provide long-term protection of the resource? For example, if the project will stabilize or weatherize a resource and protect it from further deterioration, then it should receive the maximum number of points. Realistic and feasible budget Does the budget provide enough detail and rationale to complete the project? 0-15 points 0-15 points 0-10 points PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0-20 points Readiness to initiate and complete the project Can the project begin and finish on schedule? Administrative capability Does the applicant demonstrate a thoughtful and orderly approach to organizing information? Is the proposed project well-presented, and does it meet the goals of the program? 0-10 points 0-10 points Commented [ES99]: Is this to be one or only? Commented [ES100]: Should this be barn instead of bar? Commented [JM101]: Is this too much to explicitly state? Commented [JM102R101]: Information is directly from Frederick County, amended slightly. Commented [JM103R101]: Leave as is to get all stakeholders feedback on this section including HDC, Commissioners and other staff. Commented [ES104]: Should be it not if. From:Nancy Hall To:Jenkins, Meghan Subject:Re: Smithsburg Reservoir House Date:Thursday, July 18, 2024 10:27:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to thisemail. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. Hi Meghan, I hope this springtime of 2024 finds you well.Regarding the barn/carriage house on the property of the Smithsburg Reservoir I was eventually directed to Nancy Hausrath, director of Utilities Dept in Hagerstown. She lookedinto the building (Jan 2023 and said plans for the reservoir were being talked about and in 12 -18 months she might know something. That time frame has passed and she has notresponded to my emails. When I walked into the meeting some months ago someone jokingly asked if I wanted toadopt a building? There are local people nearby to the barn/carriage house on the Smithsburg Reservoir site that are interested in helping the building to be preserved or at least its declinearrested. Is that a serious possible thing for a group of neighbors to do? What would it entail? I fear time is taking its toll.. and the city water folks that I've encountered there said they thinkthe building is slated to be razed. What can we do to have that not happen? Many thanks for any direction you can give,Nancy Hall (and other interested nearby residents) Cavetown, MD On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net> wrote: Hello Ms. Hall, Thank you for stopping by the meeting yesterday to discuss the property at the Smithsburg Reservoir. I have attached the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP) listing forthe property. The other attachment is the tax account information which is another identifier for the property. For determining the future plans for the property, I would suggest reaching out to the City ofHagerstown staff. I would start with Steve Bockmiller (SBockmiller@hagerstownmd.org) because he is familiar with historic resources and may be able to direct you to theappropriate City Department or staff that oversees the plans for the property. Sincerely, Meghan Meghan Jenkins, GISP Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator | Historic District Commission(HDC) Staff 747 Northern Avenue Hagerstown, MD 21742 P: (240) 313-2439 | F: (240) 313-2431 www.washco-md.net (Pronouns: she/her/hers) Get Connected and See Updates NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you. From:Nell Ziehl -MDP- To:Nell Ziehl -MDP- Subject:NEW EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CLGS Date:Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:43:51 PM WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded. CALLING ALL CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS! Do you need some additional training fromthe Maryland Association of Historic District Commissions or the National Alliance of PreservationCommissions before the end of the year? Do you want to attend the National Trust's PastForward conference inOctober? We have an additional $18,000 in FFY23 education and training funds that must be spent by November29, 2024! CLGs may apply for up to $5,000 for any eligible education and training expenses incurred between May 17, 2023and November 29, 2024. Applications submitted by August 2, 2024 will receive first priority, although applicationswill remain open through August 16. You can complete the simple application formhere: https://us.grantrequest.com/application.aspx?sid=1777&fid=35302. Questions? Email me or Leslie Gottert at director@mahdc.org. Good luck! -- Nell Ziehl Chief, Office of Planning, Education and Outreach Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Department of Planning (410) 697-9592 she, her, hers mht.maryland.gov Planning.Maryland.gov Record #Type MIHP#Record Status Status Date Task Name Comments 21-Jun-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 0 Status Date Task Name Comments 01-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. 4 Status Date Task Name Comments 05-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. 44 Status Date Task Name Comments 05-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. 45 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historical Review Added to the agenda for the August HDC Meeting 0 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. 35 Status Date Task Name Comments 21-Jun-24 Historic District Commission The majority of disturbance is to the rear of existing structures which are on the MIHP. Disturbance is largely limited to an area that has already been disturbed by existing dog runs. Requesting standard note addition. 21-Jun-24 Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. 1 Status Date Task Name Comments 21-Jun-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 0 Status Date Task Name Comments 21-Jun-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 21-Jun-24 Historical Review in Fahrney Keedy, not an HDC review area. 28-Jun-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 7 Status Date Task Name Comments 26-Jun-24 Antietam Overlay Zone Review In AO2 which does not need HDC review for residential activities. 26-Jun-24 Antietam Overlay Zone Review 0 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historical Review property is not located in a review area for the HDC and permit is for interior only. no review required. 17-Jul-24 Historical Review17-Jul-24 SP-15-003 13121 BROOK LANE 132 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING, REMOVAL OF EXISTING LOBBY RECEPTION DESK AND PLEXIGLASS SURROUND, FRAME TWO NEW 2X4 WALLS TO CREATE A NEW RECEPTION OFFICE, PLEXIGLASS WINDOW PASS THROUGH HOLE Folder Status Note Passed - Info2024-03138 Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit I140 Review 28-Jun-24 26-Jun-24 S-89-161 18906 GEETING ROAD, LOT 5 464 SQ. FT. ATTACHED OPEN DECK TO REAR OF DWELLING, PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER, STEPS TO GRADE WILLIAM H REAMS ET UX, LOT 5 Folder Status Note Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-03062 Residential New Construction Permit Approved 26-Jun-24 21-Jun-24 SP-23-007 8449 SYMPHONY DRIVE, RIGHT SIDE 1,767 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO BE UTILIZED AS A MODEL HOME, SLAB ON GRADE, ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE, SUNROOM, COVERED FRONT PORCH, COVERED SIDE PORCH, ELECTRIC FIREPLACE IN GREAT ROOM, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES FAHRNEY-KEEDY HOME & VILLAGE Folder Status Passed - Info Note Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-02961 Residential New Construction Permit II0061; II0062 Review 19-Jun-24 21-Jun-24 S-23-059 11175 DAM NUMBER 5 ROAD, LOT 5 2,483 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON FULL UNFINISHED BASEMENT WITH BILCO DOOR, GAS FIREPLACE IN GREAT ROOM, INTEGRAL THREE CAR GARAGE, COVERED FRONT PORCH, Folder Status Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-02864 Residential New Construction Permit V109 Review 13-Jun-24 20-Jun-24 18126 LAPPANS ROAD FAIRPLAY, MD 21733 CONSTRUCT A 192' BY 21' ENCLOSED DOG KENNEL. Folder Status Note Revisions Required Days in Review: SP-24-021 Site Plan II0020 In Review 12-Jun-24 11-Jun-24 1230 MOUNT AETNA ROAD HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 AGE RESTRICTED RESIDENTIAL CONCEPT CONSISTING OF 52 SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING UNITS ON 52 LOTS. PROPOSED PUBLIC STREETS, WATER & SEWER UTILITIES AND SWM. Folder Status Approved Days in Review: PC-24-005 Preliminary Consultation I437 In Review 05-Jun-24 17-Jul-24 LOR 24807 LINDEN AVE, LOTS 17 & 18 560 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON CRAWL SPACE, WITH LADDER ACCESS TO 350 SQ. FT. STORAGE AREA ABOVE, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, ROOF RAFTERS Folder Status Note Days in Review: 2024-02591 Residential New Construction Permit Review 30-May-24 21-May-24 SASHA BOULEV HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 CONCEPT PLAN SUBMITTAL FOR THE REMAINING 220 ACRES. DEVELOPING PER STD RT ZONING REQUIREMENTS USING THE CLUSTERING PROVISION AS APPROVED BY THE WASH CO PC AT THEIR 5/6 MEETING. Folder Status Approved Days in Review: PC-24-004 Preliminary Consultation I075; I063 In Review 16-May-24 22-May-24 22637 CAVETOWN CHURCH ROAD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 SITE IS NORTH OF JEFFERSON BLVD AND SOUTH OF CAVETOWN CHURCH RD. PROPOSED SELF STORAGE BUILDINGS WITH POSSIBLY TWO OTHER COMMERCIAL/DRIVE THRU RESTAURANTS. Folder Status Approved Days in Review: PC-24-003 Preliminary Consultation IV270 In Review 15-May-24 27-Jun-24 20925 FISH HATCHERY ROAD HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 SITE PLAN FOR A BANQUET HALL Folder Status Approved Days in Review: SP-24-016 Site Plan II0160 In Review 02-May-24 21-Jun-24 S-02-004 13202 SAINT PAUL ROAD, LOT 1 1,120 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE SINGLEWIDE MOBILE HOME REPLACEMENT, NO DECKS OR PORCHES, FRONT AND REAR STOOPS AS REQUIRED BY CODE, MODEL: NORRIS 1996 N01020875TN Folder Status Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-01567 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit V023 Review 05-Apr-24 Historic Review Activity 06/21/2024 thru 07/26/2024 Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info Record #Type MIHP#Record Status Historic Review Activity 06/21/2024 thru 07/26/2024 Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info 18-Jul-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 1 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 17-Jul-24 Historical Review Not in an HDC Review area 8 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historical Review Not in an HDC review area; not reviewable work type 17-Jul-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 7 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Added to August HDC agenda for review and comment. 7 Status Date Task Name Comments 17-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Request addition of Antietam Overlay to be shown on property; no historic resources on the subdivided portion. No note requested regarding the II0375 number. 17-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Updated by Script from EPR. 6 Status Date Task Name Comments 26-Jul-24 Historic District Commission Staff reviewed this as the historic resources on the property are excluded. Comments were provided to the planner. 1 Status Date Task Name Comments 25-Jul-24 Historical Review Not in an HDC review area 25-Jul-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 3 Status Date Task Name Comments 25-Jul-24 Historical Review Not in a review area and also not a reviewable project type 25-Jul-24 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR. 6 Status Date Task Name Comments 26-Jul-24 Historical Review Structure was listed as not contributing to Weverton and is not individually listed; also due to fire; unsafe conditions, no hdc review required. 0 Activity Count:19 Note Passed - Info Revisions Required110 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 4 4 0Total0 5Residential New Construction Permit Residential Demolition Permit Total 0 1 Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 0 4 Preliminary Consultation Total 3 3 Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 1 1 Review Activities Summary Application Type Application Number Approved Total 26-Jul-24 LOR 1326 WEVERTON ROAD DEMOLISH 1,023 SQ. FT. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DUE TO FIRE DAMAGE, THE EXISTING SEPTIC AND WATER WILL BE CAPPED OFF FOR FUTURE USE AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES WILL BE DISCONNECTED BY UTILITY COMPANY Folder Status Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-03598 Residential Demolition Permit Review 25-Jul-24 19-Jul-24 LOR 11605 ERNSTVILLE ROAD INSTALL 18 LNFT OF BASEMENT GUTTER ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE BASEMENT, FOR WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Folder Status Note Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-03495 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit Review 19-Jul-24 22-Jul-24 LOR 13801 VILLAGE MILL DRIVE 1,548 INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO INCLUDE FINISH DRYWALL AND PAINT ENTIRE INTERIOR, COMPLETE "ROUGHED IN" 1ST FLOOR BATHROOM, KITCHEN, AND LAUNDRY ROOM AS WELL AS 2ND FLOOR BATHROOM, REFINISH ALL HARDWOOD FLOORING AND INSTALL TILE FLOORING IN BATHROOMS, FINISH HVAC Folder Status Note Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-03474 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit I808 Review 18-Jul-24 25-Jul-24 12635 FLYING DUCK LANE REQUEST TO APPLY THE RB FLOATING ZONE ON 6.82 ACRES Folder Status Note Days in Review: RZ-24-002 Zoning Ordinance Amendment In Review 16-Jul-24 11-Jul-24 17000 SHEPHERDSTOWN PIKE SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 CREATE 40 ACRE PARCEL B FOR AG USE ONLY, NOT FOR DEVELOPMENT. SEE OM-24-006 Folder Status Note Revisions Required Days in Review: SI-24-016 Simplified Plat II0375 In Review 10-Jul-24 10-Jul-24 13215 SMITHSBURG PIKE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 WALL RESTORATION PROJECT FOR POND CONNECTED TO SPRING HOUSE. WALL RESTORATION INCLUDES REPAIRING VARIOUS LOCATIONS OF DRY STACK STONE, AS WELL AS SOME HOLES ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE WALL Folder Status Note Days in Review: GP-24-008 Site Specific Grading Plan IV029 In Review 09-Jul-24 10-Jul-24 LOR 21373 MOUNT LENA ROAD INSTALL 26 LNFT OF BASEMENT GUTTER ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE BASEMENT Folder Status Note Passed - Info Days in Review: 2024-03280 Residential Addition- Alteration Permit Approved 09-Jul-24 09-Jul-24 LOR 1021 JEFFERSON BLVD, LOT 21 576 SQ. FT. DETACHED PREFABRICATED ONE STORY GARAGE ON CONCRETE SLAB, METAL ROOF AND SIDES ANTIETAM HEIGHTS, LOT 21 Folder Status Passed - Info Note Days in Review: 2024-03245 Residential New Construction Permit Review 08-Jul-24 PLEXIGLASS WINDOW, PASS THROUGH HOLE AND COUNTERTOP, AND CLOSE OFF THE ENTRY INTO A HALLWAY WITH A NEW METAL DOOR BROOK LANE HOSPITAL Approved Days in Review: Permit Record #Type MIHP#Record Status Historic Review Activity 06/21/2024 thru 07/26/2024 Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 12 10 2Total5 19 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Total 0 1 Site Specific Grading Plan Total 0 1 Site Plan Total 1 2 Simplified Plat Total 0 1