HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril_AgendaPacket_includesStaffReport
Gregory Smith, Chair Vernell Doyle
Lloyd Yavener, Vice Chair Michael Lushbaugh
Ann Aldrich Justin Bedard
Brianna Candelaria Wayne K. Keefer, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1
AGENDA
April 3, 2024
The HDC will be meeting at 6:30 p.m. at the Saylor House 371 Dynasty Drive, Hagerstown, MD
for a group photo in preparation for Preservation Month.
Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
MINUTES
1. Minutes of the March 6, 2024 meeting *
NEW BUSINESS
1. 2024-00996, 13215 Smithsburg Pike, Addition/Alteration Permit (Discussion/Approval)
Repairs to existing 200 sq.ft. covered porch to include replacing flooring, railings, and
posts as needed *
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Preservation Month 2024
a. Review general outline of proposed social media
2. Staff Report
a. Staff Reviews *
b. 250th Update
c. By-Laws Update
d. Historic Resource Tax Credit Ordinance Public Hearing April 23 9:30 am
ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETING
1. Wednesday, May 1, 2024, 7:00 p.m.
*attachments
The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals
requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240-
313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda
may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY March 6, 2024
The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday,
March 6, 2024 at 7:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administration Complex, 100 W Washington Street,
Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Commission members present were: Greg Smith, Chairman, Lloyd Yavener, Michael Lushbaugh, Vernell
Doyle, Ann Aldrich, Brianna Candelaria, and Justin Bedard. Staff members present were: Washington
County Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member and
Debra Eckard, Administrative Assistant.
MINUTES
Motion and Vote: Mr. Lushbaugh made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 1, 2023
meeting as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Yavener and unanimously approved.
NEW BUSINESS
HTC – 1004 The Terrace (John Williamson)
Ms. Jenkins presented for review and approval a tax credit application for property located at 1004 The
Terrace, which is in the Hagerstown Oak Hill Historic District. The project included: window refurbishment
(seals, ropes, sills), replacement of exterior molding, repair and replacement of patio tiles, and repair of
the slate roof, etc. Ms. Jenkins noted that the applicant has applied for MHT tax credits as well. The total
qualified rehabilitation expenses for MHT were $47,970 which was approved on February 1, 2024.
Discussion and Comments: Members commended Mr. Williamson for undertaking this project and
rehabilitating this historic structure.
Mr. Williamson stated that the property tax credit program is very important to incentivize homeowners
to rehabilitate and maintain historic structures. He believes more work needs to be done to educate and
make the public aware of the program. There was a brief discussion on ways to make the public more
aware.
Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to accept the MHT qualified rehabilitation expenses in the
amount of $47,970 for the County tax credit program. The motion was seconded by Mr. Yavener and
unanimously approved.
2024-00586 – 1244 Frederick Street Demolition Permit
Ms. Jenkins presented a demolition permit application for property located at 1244 Frederick Street,
which is in the Ravenswood Heights Rural Village district. The applicant is proposing the demolition of a
1,288 sq. ft. dwelling and associated outbuildings, to fill in the basement and to remove the driveway
pavement and sidewalks. The property was purchased by the County as part of property acquisitions
associated with Phase I of the Southern Boulevard roadway project. There is no direct access to this
property; adjoining property owners would not give access across their property at the time of purchase.
The structures have been vacant since the completion of Southern Boulevard; however, there are several
architectural features which could be salvaged. The County’s Engineering Department (the applicant) have
had discussions with Ms. Jenkins regarding the salvaging of materials. During review of this project, an
inventory of the County’s historic property holdings was also discussed. Ms. Jenkins provided the
Engineering Department with information on “mothballing” structures. This information will be passed
along to the Department of Public Works which is in charge of securing County properties. Ms. Jenkins
noted that Ravenswood Heights is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. She recommends
that this issue should be further explored.
Ms. Jenkins explained that demolition of the property would fall into Phase II of the Southern Boulevard
extension. Phase II would be a project completed by the City of Hagerstown, not the County. The County
would like to proceed with demolition of the property due to liability issues, vandalism and vagrancy.
Discussion and Comments: Ms. Aldrich expressed her opinion that the County should approach the
neighbors again to see if they are willing to grant a right-of-way to this property so the house could be
sold. Other members don’t believe anyone would want to purchase the property knowing that it would
need to be sold and demolished in order to construct Phase II of the proposed roadway. Another concern
is the property would be sold cheap and left to deteriorate or be vandalized further until sold and
demolished for construction of the proposed road.
Mr. Bedard recommended requesting that an individual Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties form
be completed for this specific property.
Members discussed a list of materials they would like to see salvaged from the structure, as follows: bricks,
paneling, wood flooring, interior and exterior doors, front porch components, interior and exterior trim
and moldings; light fixtures, stair components, railings, and radiators.
Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich made a motion to support the demolition application for 1244 Frederick
Street with the following conditions:
1. The County will bid services for the selected demolition of salvageable materials that include the
following: exterior brick, wood flooring, interior and exterior doors, railings, radiators, stair
components, front porch components, interior and exterior trim and moldings, and light fixtures.
2. Request an individual Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties form to be completed for this
specific property prior to demolition. It is recommended that this work be performed by a
professional.
3. The County will follow the recommended guidelines for “mothballing” of all County owned
historic structures listed on the MIHP or have the potential for inclusion on the National Register.
4. Request MHT to consider Ravenswood Heights Rural Village district for listing on the National
Register.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Yavener and unanimously approved.
OTHER BUSINESS
Preservation Month 2024
Ms. Jenkins reminded members that May is Preservation Month. She noted that Preservation Maryland
has reached out to discuss a Preservation 101 workshop sometime during the week of May 20th. This
workshop will be held at the Washington County Library in downtown Hagerstown.
During Preservation month last year, posts were made three times a week on social media and Ms. Jenkins
provided members with a list of topics that were covered. Members discussed topics to be incorporated
this year, such as before and after photos of Mr. Williamson’s rehabilitation project on The Terrace and
how important tax credits are to homeowners; have people in County government or HDC members to
take a picture of themselves at their favorite historic structure; a group picture of HDC members in front
of the Saylor House with a short phrase telling why they are interested in historic preservation or why
they joined the HDC and their credentials; have PR create a specialized graphic for the theme “This Place
Matters”; choose a favorite project from 2023; etc.
Staff Report
• Staff Reviews - Ms. Jenkins provided a written summary.
• CAMP training was held and a follow-up e-mail with the meeting recordings were provided to all
attendees. Recordings are available for a limited time. The training was paid for by a CLG grant
received in partnership with West Virginia. There were approximately 20 participants each day.
• Correspondence was received from MHT regarding a culvert and sidewalk projects proposed in
Smithsburg.
• Correspondence was received from MDOT regarding a proposed sidewalk project in the City of
Hagerstown. Members agreed they will let the City HDC comment on this project.
• The MAHDC Symposium invitation was included in the agenda packet.
• There are two house bills currently being considered: Confederate Naming Prohibiition (at
referral to committee status) and Cemetery Acquisition (at referral to committee status).
• Updates for the 250th anniversary were included in the agenda packet. The 250th committee meets
on the last Monday of each month at the Public Safety Training Center along Sharpsburg Pike at
11 am.
• The Historic Resource Tax Credit Ordinance has been approved by the County Administrator and
will go to the Board of County Commissioners for a public hearing. Members decided that April
23rd would be the best date for the public hearing with April 16th as their second choice.
Ms. Jenkins reviewed members’ term expirations for the upcoming year. Ms. Doyle has served two full
terms on the Commission and has decided not to seek re-appointment in August. Ms. Aldrich has
completed two full terms; however, she would be willing to serve another term or partial term if re-
appointed. Mr. Yavener has served one full term and is willing to serve another term. Ms. Candelaria and
Mr. Bedard have both served a partial term and would be willing to serve for a full term. Members
discussed the need for staggering the appointments so we do not have a majority of the Commission with
terms expiring at the same time. Ms. Jenkins will contact the County Clerk’s office to see how we can
handle this issue appropriately. There was also a brief discussion regarding an update of the By-laws to
lengthen appointment terms because the HDC is required to have specific qualified professionals. It can
be difficult to find individuals to fill these positions.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Nomination for Chairman: Mr. Yavener nominated Mr. Smith to serve as Chairman. The nomination was
seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved.
Nomination for Vice Chairman: Ms. Doyle nominated Mr. Yavener to serve as Vice Chairman. The
nomination was seconded by Mr. Lushbaugh and unanimously approved.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Lushbaugh made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 pm. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Yavener and so ordered by the Chairman.
______________________________________
Gregory Smith, Chairman
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: March 27, 2024
Subj: Residential Addition-Alteration Permit/Porch-Deck-Slab, 2024-00996
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: UNSWORTH JEFFREY PAUL, UNSWORTH LAURA LANE
Applicant: Paul Wade
Location: 13215 SMITHSBURG Pike
Tax Account ID: 07006748
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 40/1/203/
Legal Description: 25.50 ACRES13215 SMITHSBURG PIKE
Zoning: Agricultural, Rural
Zoning Overlay: Historic Preservation Overlay
MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): IV029
Project Description: Repairs to existing 200 sq. ft. covered porch to include
replacing flooring, railings, and posts as needed
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD.
Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by
Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A,
Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance."
The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological,
or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be
visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes
may still be subject to building permit procedures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
Applicable Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation:
1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal
change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of
distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize
a property will be avoided.
3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes
that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or
elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained
and preserved.
5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old
in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be
substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
Washington County Design Guidelines For Porches (P.68)
1. Porch support structures should be inspected regularly to ensure they are not sagging, crumbling or
separating from the structure or the rest of the porch. If necessary, stabilization and repair should be
undertaken to ensure that the rest of the structure remains intact.
2. Carpet can trap water on wood porches causing decay of painted surfaces or rot of wood, and carpet
should not be installed
3. Avoid enclosing a porch. If the porch is not visible from a public right-of-way, it may be enclosed if
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
the change does not significantly alter the original character of the porch.
4. See also Wood Exteriors (p.60) for more guidelines and the Key Themes (p.57)
Additional Resources
Preservation Brief #45 – Preserving Historic Wooden Porches
Staff Report:
This parcel is located approximately .4 miles south of the intersection of Rowe Road and Smithsburg
Pike (State Route 64) on the East side of Smithsburg Pike. The permit is associated with a portion of the
main house which is a multi-part stone dwelling. The dwelling’s main portion is 2-story stone
construction with a date stone of 1810 in the west end wall. Extending to the north of the main portion,
is a 1 ½-story three bay stone cabin built over a large spring. This spring emerges into a large stone
walled pond behind the house. According to the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP)
documentation, it is estimated this northern portion was built in the late 18th century and was
traditionally known or associated with “Peter Mong’s Cabin”. There is also a stone portion extending
east of the main portion that is 1 ½-story five bay wing that was built in 2 stages.
The 1 ½ story portion contains the porch that is the subject of the permit. The permit proposes to
replace the flooring of the porch, which was severely deteriorated on the ends nearest to the
weather/edge of the roof. There is currently no gutter system in place which likely sped up that
deterioration. The replacement flooring is listed as 5/4 mahogany wood. There are wood beams in the
flooring which are noted as reclaimed logs running parallel to the 1 ½ story stone house and then
perpendicular summer beams pocketed into the stone supporting the porch flooring. The posts and
railings are to be repaired if possible and replaced if necessary. The plans indicate there may be a slight
change in grading up to the porch entrance, potentially eliminating the concrete step currently in place.
There may also be some changes to the porch support posts as there are currently 5 with only 3 shown
on the provided plans.
Staff Analysis:
The work proposed on the porch favors the themes of the SOI Standards of Rehabilitation which
include repair when feasible and replacement with in-kind materials when necessary. This portion of
the structure previously was not maintained, and this application seeks to remedy that before further
deterioration can occur. The proposed work also follows the County’s Design Guidelines for Porches
completing necessary steps for stabilization of the remaining viable portions of the porch. The work
proposed also aligns with Section 20.6 Activity within an “HP Zone” within the zoning ordinance as the
permit does not propose to substantially alter the exterior features, remedies unsafe conditions, and is
compatible with the existing structure’s construction and materials. While not part of this permit
application, half round guttering should be installed to enable longevity of the current work and
prevent future deterioration, if not already planned.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend approval of Residential Addition-Alteration Permit/Porch-Deck-Slab, 2024-00996, which
includes repairs to existing 200 sq. ft. covered porch to include replacing flooring, railings, and posts as
needed for the reasons stated in the staff analysis.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Aerial Location of Work
• Photos provided by Staff (taken September of
2023)
• Permit Submission Packet
Aeria Aerial Image (2019) with red box around portion with the subject porch
Record #Type MIHP#Record
Status
Task Name Comments
Historic District
Commission Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review Property was associated with parent at initialization. No Historic Resources or Chewsville connection to
this piece and therefore no HDC review required.
Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review This was reviewed at the March 6 HDC Meeting. A follow up letter was sent to the applicant regarding
the HDC's support of the permit with conditions.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review
Property in on MIHP and NR but this is not in an HDC review area. Previously sent no review contact
letter to contractor and customer for changes to rear addition at 2021-05464 and no changes in
contacts for this permit so not resending at this time.
Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review
Based on MIHP photos this property is either fully encompassed by new exterior brick/additions or the
structure was previously demolished prior to the AA system records. Not in an HDC review area and do
to lack of integrity/comparison with MIHP not sending any outreach materials.
Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historic District
Commission Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review Property is on MIHP but is not in a review area for HDC. No HDC review required. Sent no review
contact letter.
Task Name Comments
Historic District
Commission
Plat has associated variance that was applied for to reduce setback requirements in order to place barn
on separate parcel. Associated farm buildings should be kept as a complete complex on the same
parcel. Requesting standard note regarding MIHP on the property and also providing the comment
separately about the farm buildings.
Historic District
Commission Updated by Script from EPR.
Task Name Comments
Historical Review Added to agenda for the April HDC Meeting 4/3
Task Name Comments
Historic District
Commission Request addition of standard note regarding presence of MIHP number on property.
Historic Review Activity 02/24/2024 thru 03/21/2024
Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info
Status Date
Approved 14-Mar-24
Days in Review:0
SP-24-002 Site Plan IV262 In Review 15-Jan-24
2024-00571 Residential New
Construction Permit I051 Review 08-Feb-24
14-Mar-24 14304 CASTLE DRIVE
CASCADE, MD 21719
MINOR SITE PLAN FOR A CHURCH IN AN
EXISTING BUILDING
Folder Status
27-Feb-24 S-23-038 20734 TROVINGER
MILL ROAD, LOT 3
2,541 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE TWO STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON 1,077 SQ. FT.
UNFINISHED WELLED EXIT BASEMENT AND 344
SQ. FT. CRAWL SPACE, ATTACHED THREE CAR
GARAGE WITH 1077 SQ. FT. UNFINISHED
BONUS ROOM ABOVE, GAS FIRE PLACE IN
FAMILY ROOM COVERED FRONT PORCH OPEN
Folder Status Status Date
Note 01-Mar-24
Passed - Info 01-Mar-24
Days in Review:3
Status Date
No Comments
Received 21-Mar-24
Days in Review:0
2024-00554
Non-Residential
Addition-Alteration
Permit
IV262 Revisions
Required 08-Feb-24
2024-00586 Residential Demolition
Permit Review 09-Feb-24
20-Mar-24
SP-07-052.R01 14340
BANFILL AVENUE
"MYSTICAL PAWS"
CHANGE OF USE FROM MILITARY OFFICE TO
PET GROOMING BUSINESS, ZONING
CERTIFICATION FOR "MYSTICAL PAWS" TO TAKE
OVER 1,368 SQ. FT. TO BE USED AS PET
GROOMING BUSINESS, HOURS OF OPERATION:
Folder Status
12-Feb-24 LOR 1244 FREDERICK
STREET
DEMOLITION OF 1,288 SQ. FT. DWELLING AND
ANY ASSOCIATED OUTBUILDINGS, FILL IN
BASEMENT, REMOVE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
AND SIDEWALKS
Folder Status Status Date
Note 07-Mar-24
Days in Review:24
Status Date
Note 01-Mar-24
Passed - Info 01-Mar-24
Days in Review:1
2024-00644 Residential New
Construction Permit II0251 Review 13-Feb-24
2024-00873 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit I110 Approved 27-Feb-24
29-Feb-24 S-21-022 18651
KEEDYSVILLE ROAD, LOT 1
560 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY POOL
HOUSE TO REAR OF EXISTING SWIMMING
POOL TO INCLUDE FULL BATHROOM,
BAR/LOUNGE AREA, REC ROOM, GYM AND
CLOSET, 405 SQ. FT. PAVILION TO RIGHT OF
POOL HOUSE,100 SQ. FT. CONCRETE SLAB ON
GRADE FOR FUTURE HOT TUB
HOLLYDAY FARM LLC LOT 1
Folder Status
29-Feb-24 SI-93-3 12706 LITTLE
ANTIETAM ROAD
INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR RENOVATIONS DUE
TO VEHICLE DAMAGE TO INCLUDE REPLACING
DAMAGED FRAMING, DRYWALL, INSULATION,
WINDOWS, AND EXTERIOR WALLS AND BRICK,
GEORGE I HORN, JR.
Folder Status Status Date
Note 01-Mar-24
Passed - Info 01-Mar-24
Days in Review:1
Status Date
Revisions Required 01-Mar-24
Days in Review:1
S-24-004 Preliminary-Final Plat I261 In Review 27-Feb-24
2009-
03353.R01 Revision Approved 29-Feb-24
28-Feb-24 17811 REIFF CHURCH ROAD
HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740
CREATE A 10 ACRE LOT AROUND EXISTING
FARM COMPLEX WITH 82.68 ACRES IN THE
REMAINING LANDS
Folder Status
29-Feb-24 S-84-83 16834 LAPPANS
ROAD
REVISION TO ADD 100 SQ. FT. ATTACHED OPEN
DECK TO RIGHT OF SUNROOM ADDITION,
COMPOSITE DECKING, STEPS TO GRADE
M. E. DONEGAN ET UX, LOT 1
Folder Status Status Date
Passed - Info 01-Mar-24
Days in Review:1
Status Date
Note 14-Mar-24
Revisions Required 14-Mar-24
Days in Review:3
S-24-005 Preliminary-Final Plat V090 Revisions
Required 01-Mar-24
2024-00996 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit IV029 Review 06-Mar-24
11-Mar-24 11505 ASHTON ROAD
CLEAR SPRING, MD 21722
CREATE A LOT AROUND EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT FOR AN IMMEDIATE FAMILY
MEMBER
Folder Status
20-Mar-24 LOR 13215 SMITHSBURG
PIKE
REPAIRS TO EXISTING 200 SQ. FT. COVERED
PORCH TO INCLUDE REPLACING FLOORING,
RAILINGS, AND POSTS AS NEEDED
Folder Status Status Date
Note 21-Mar-24
Days in Review:1
Status Date
Note 21-Mar-24
Days in Review:2
S-24-006 Preliminary-Final Plat V248 In Review 12-Mar-24 19-Mar-24 11681 CEDAR RIDGE ROAD
WILLIAMSPORT, MD 21795
CREATE .92 ACRE LOT FOR AN IMMEDIATE
FAMILY MEMBER
Folder Status
Task Name Comments
Historical Review Property was previously reviewed for demolition permit and this is the new construction permit. No
HDC review required in this area for new construction.
Activity Count:12
No Comments
Received
Note Passed - Info
1 0 0
0 2 0
0 2 1
0 1 0
0 2 3
0 0 1
0 0 0
1 7 5
2024-01164 Residential New
Construction Permit II0366 Review 14-Mar-24 14-Mar-24 LOR 18614 BURNSIDE
BRIDGE ROAD
3,117 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE ONE STORY
SINGLE FAMILY REPLACEMENT DWELLING ON
CONCRETE SLAB, ATTACHED THREE CAR
GARAGE WITH FULL FINISHED BATH, COVERED
WRAP AROUND PORCH, WOOD BURNING
Folder Status Status Date
Passed - Info 20-Mar-24
Days in Review:6
Review Activities Summary
Application Type Application Number Approved Revisions
Required
Total
Total 0 2
Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 0 0 1
3
Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 0 0 2
Preliminary-Final Plat
0 0
Residential Demolition Permit Total 0 0 1
3
Revision Total 0 0 1
Residential New Construction Permit Total
Total 1 2 12
Site Plan Total 1 0 1