HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgendaPacket_April2023
Gregory Smith, Chair Vernell Doyle
Lloyd Yavener, Vice Chair Michael Lushbaugh
Ann Aldrich Kourtney Lowery
Brianna Candelaria Wayne K. Keefer, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1
AGENDA
April 5, 2023, 7:00 p.m.
Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
MINUTES
1. Minutes of the March 1, 2023 meeting *
NEW BUSINESS
1. Demo Permit 2023-01360, Building 160, 14336 Banfill Avenue - (Discussion/Support)
Demolish 5800 sq. ft. stick built portion of building (Fort Ritchie, Cascade) *
2. Demo Permit 2023-01460, 22416 Goose Street - (Discussion/Support) Interior and
exterior demolition of single family dwelling to include partition walls, joists, flooring,
stairs, and bathroom in first and second floor, demolish 300 sq. ft. of rear portion of
dwelling, and 35 sq. ft. rear porch (Cavetown Historic Rural Village, WA-IV-014) *
3. (Tentative) Building Permit 2023-TBD, 22416 Goose Street - (Discussion/Support)
Remodeling of existing house 513 sq/ft and new construction of 954 sq/ft rear addition
(Cavetown Historic Rural Village, WA-IV-014) *
OTHER BUSINESS
1. National Preservation Month (May) - (Discussion/Planning)*
2. Staff Report
a. Staff Reviews *
b. 12440 Burkholder Lane – PC-23-001
ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETING
1. Wednesday, May 3, 2023, 7:00 p.m.
*attachments
The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals
requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240-
313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda
may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY
March 1, 2023
The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday,
March 1, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administration Complex, 100 W Washington Street,
Room 1301, Hagerstown, MD.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Commission members present were: Greg Smith, Chairman, Lloyd Yavener, Vernell Doyle, Michael
Lushbaugh, and Ann Aldrich. Staff members present were: Washington County Department of Planning
& Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member.
MINUTES
Motion and Vote: Mr. Lushbaugh made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 1, 2023 meeting
as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved.
OTHER BUSINESS
National Preservation Month (May)
Ms. Jenkins began with a review of the outreach used last year for National Preservation Month. She
discussed the resources that worked best on social media. Members discussed ideas and ways to promote
preservation this year, such as: focusing on the Design Guidelines that were recently adopted; promote
the efforts of other historic preservation groups’ activities; display pictures of various architectural styles
and features; promote historic preservation in the County’s municipalities by highlighting a specific
historical structure; focus on the three categories of the John Frye award (Advocacy, Preservation,
Adaptive Re-use); discuss the designated Rural Villages in the County; and the use of production tools
such as slideshows or interactive prompts. Ms. Jenkins stated she will prepare a rough draft of some of
the posts she will be using and will reach out to Public Relations for their assistance. Staff will also contact
the Commissioners’ office to prepare a proclamation for National Preservation Month as we did last year.
Staff Report
• Historic Properties Incentive Ordinance
Ms. Jenkins reported that Staff met with the County Administrator who was very supportive of the
idea. The draft document has been sent to other County departments (County Attorney, Budget & Finance
and Grants Management) for their review. A kick-off meeting is scheduled for April 21st with these
departments. There was a brief discussion regarding the grant program funding and where those monies
will come from. Staff is hopeful that Budget & Finance will have several ideas.
• Staff Reviews
Ms. Jenkins provided a written summary but also noted that the State Highway Administration
performed a Section 106 review of the I-81 Phase 2 project which runs from North of MD 63/MD
68 to North of Halfway Boulevard. Staff reviewed the project and found no additional impacts to
any historic structures in the area.
• Professional Organization Outreach (Realtors/Builders)
Ms. Jenkins announced that a mass e-mail containing the Design Guidelines was sent to
approximately 100 organizations/businesses around the County. The Pen Mar Association of
Realtors responded and have asked Ms. Jenkins to present a workshop.
• Grant Ideas Sheet
Ms. Jenkins reported that she included a copy of the Grant Ideas Sheet in the agenda packet as well as
provided members with an on-line link. Members are encouraged to share their ideas using this format.
ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Aldrich made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:15. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lushbaugh
and so ordered by the Chairman.
______________________________________
Gregory Smith, Chairman
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: March 23, 2023
Subj: Non-Residential Demolition Permit/Building 160 Partial Demolition, 2023-01360
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: Cascade Properties LLC, John Krumpotich
Applicant: Landon Grove
Location: 14336 BANFILL Avenue
Tax Account ID: 14065204
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 28/1/162/
Legal Description: 345.08 REM PHASES 25036 PEN MAR ROAD P/O FT
RITCHIE MILITARY
Zoning: Special Economic District
Rural Village: Fort Ritchie (MHT) Historic Rural Village
MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): IV262
Project Description: Demolish 5800 sq. ft. stick built portion of building 160
Fort Ritchie for Pen mar Development Corporation,
Boundary Survey
Plat 170-171
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD.
Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by
Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A,
Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance."
The review criteria for demolition permit is the same as the evaluation criteria in the Washington
County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
Demolition Section – Design Guidelines
Demolition Alternatives
• Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structures or its setting;
• Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project;
• Converting the structures into another use (adaptive reuse);
• Relocating the structure on the property;
• Relocating the structure to another property.
Demolition Mitigation
• Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs,
drawings, and/or text. This documentation should follow the Standards and Guidelines for
Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland and be completed by a professional as
listed in those Standards;
• Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building
materials.
Full Demolition Guidance – Design Guidelines for Historic Structures in Washington County, MD
Staff Report:
This building is located on the Historic Fort Ritchie Military Base and is identified as building 160. The
building is accessed by turning left from the main gate (Barrick Avenue) onto Banfill Avenue. It sits at
the Southeastern corner of the overall base property and can be seen from both Banfill Avenue on base
and Ritchie Road. The main portion of the structure is typical green granite stone with the demolition
application portion being a later stick-built addition with white siding. Building 160 is described as
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
“castellated style…buttressed walls with bays” in the associated MIHP. The stick-built portion is not
specifically described in the MIHP. Building 160 is included in the Fort Ritchie district survey boundary
for the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties but is NOT included in the Maryland Historical Trust
easement in place on a large portion of buildings at the base’s core. The exterior of the stone portion of
the building has some significant overgrowth of vines, however, it appears in good shape from the
ground level. The addition portion, while appearing intact from the exterior, has significant infiltration
of water due to complete roof failure and collapse. A large brick stack attached to the addition is
proposed to remain at this time.
Staff Analysis:
There are significant safety and health hazards caused by water infiltration and roof collapse which this
demolition permit application would remedy. The portion of the structure being retained will be
renovated for reuse allowing continued utilization of the historic building. The main portion of the
building will still retain its architectural features mentioned specifically in the MIHP. The side of the
building involved in the demolition is not visible from the area included in the MHT easement and its
removal would not impact the overall context of the site.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend support of this demolition permit (2023-01360) for a portion of Building 160, 14336 Banfill
Avenue for the reasons stated in the Staff Analysis.
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Photos provided by Staff
• Permit Submission Packet
• Customer Provided Supporting Materials
1. Written description and history of the building or structure to be demolished.
Building 160 was built in 1942 by the United States Army to serve as a Mess Hall. Its construction is green
granite as are most of Ritchie’s field stone buildings. This portion is approximately 15,000 square feet.
Shortly thereafter, the stick-built portion of the building was added as a kitchen for the mess hall. Later
the building was the site of DISA-Westhem: The Defense Information Systems Agency for the Western
Hemisphere. Since the closure of Fort Ritchie, the stick-built portion has literally imploded upon itself and
its roof has caved into the floor. The requested demolition preserves the stone structure, and simply
removes the stick-built portion.
2. Detail drawings, such as construction or trim details.
Highlighted portion, only piece to be removed.
3. Floor plan for each floor level, drawn to approximate scale or fully dimensioned.
4. Applicant’s plan for the recycling of waste generated
Maryland Excavation, LLC of Emmittsburg MD is removing the portion of the structure and all associated
debris. It will be at the discretion of this company on how they dispose of the water generated.
5. A report analyzing the following alternatives (listed in descending order of
preference) as to the feasibility. The report shall consist of thorough, deliberative
analyses of each of the alternatives, explaining why each alternative is or is not
feasible and additional photographs should be provided in support of the analysis. In
cases where a permit may involve multiple structures, each structure must have its
alternatives documented.
(a) Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structure or its setting;
The stone built portion will remain intact and retain the same vernacular look as when built in
1942.
(b) Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project;
This not feasible for this portion of the building.
(c) Converting the structure into another use (adaptive reuse);
The building roof has imploded upon itself, the stick built portion is beyond the point of return.
(d) Relocating the structure on the property;
Would be unfeasible and undesirable to move the 80-year-old stone structure.
(e) Relocating the structure to another property;
Not feasible.
(f) Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and
building materials;
Stick built portion was not built during the MHT period of significance (1926-1945) and is not
stone as was the original portion of the building.
(g) Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in
photographs, drawings, and/or text
This has already been accomplished through photos, blueprints, and maps.
6. A site plan illustrating any proposed development or introduction of plantings
following demolition (if applicable) Attached.
Attached to applicants’ email.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: March 23, 2023
Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/, 2023-01460
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: LLANOS MISAEL JAVIER,
Applicant: Misael Javier
Location: 22416 GOOSE Street
Tax Account ID: 07013132
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 39/23/259/
Legal Description: LOT 66X165 .25 A22416 GOOSE ST
Zoning: Residential, Transition
Rural Village: Cavetown (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village (IV014)
Project Description: Interior and exterior demolition of single family dwelling
to include partition walls, joists, flooring, stairs, and
bathroom in first and second floor, demolish 300 sq. ft. of
rear portion of dwelling, and 35 sq. ft. rear porch
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD.
Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by
Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A,
Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance."
The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological,
or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be
visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes
may still be subject to building permit procedures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural
Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include:
1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style,
arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and
pitch, proportion.
2. Building Size and Orientation
3. Landscaping
4. Signage
5. Lighting
6. Setbacks
7. Accessory structures
Demolition Section – Design Guidelines
Demolition Alternatives
• Redesigning the project to avoid any impact to the structures or its setting;
• Incorporating the structures into the overall design of the project;
• Converting the structures into another use (adaptive reuse);
• Relocating the structure on the property;
• Relocating the structure to another property.
Demolition Mitigation
• Documenting the structure as a whole and its individual architectural features in photographs,
drawings, and/or text. This documentation should follow the Standards and Guidelines for
Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland and be completed by a professional as
listed in those Standards;
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
• Salvaging from the structure historically significant architectural features and building
materials.
Full Demolition Guidance – Design Guidelines for Historic Structures in Washington County, MD
Staff Report:
This property fronts on North side of Goose Street in the Rural Village of Cavetown. The lot is 66 feet
by 165 feet according to Tax Assessment records. The house sits approximately 15 feet back from the
road and is situated in the southwestern corner of the property within 10 feet of the property lines. The
house is listed as contributing to the historic rural village of Cavetown. The MIHP contains the following
description: two-story vernacular brick residence with laterally-oriented gable roof; windows flat-
topped 2/2 with jack-arched lintels; four-bay facade (c. 1840). The main brick portion of the house is
to remain with the demolition permit subject to HDC review being for the rear addition and covered
porch area. The front porch is also to be removed/updated. The painted brick portion of the house has
American Bond brick with irregular spacing of header/stretcher rows with the average being 8 stretcher
rows between each header row. The condition of the brick varies. The rear addition has a mixture of
vinyl siding, drop siding and corrugated metal again with condition varying. The foundation of both
portions of the building is a rubble stone foundation with noticeable failure of mortar in some
locations. Specifically on the west side of the building there are several trees which may be causing
water deterioration due to roots. The majority of the roof is covered in black asphalt shingles for both
portions of the structure. The front porch has corrugated metal roofing. That porch also does not
appear original but does have some architectural interest in the overhanging eaves. There are trim
pieces on some of the columns at each end of the porch. Columns are wood encased beams and
straight with no flair. There is some decorative crosshatch trellis between the left most columns of the
porch. There is a mixture of window types on the brick and addition portion of the house with varying
levels of repair. Most windows appear to be replacements. The rear addition may have been a kitchen
as it has its own brick chimney at the north/back portion. The main house has a single chimney on the
west gable end. There is definite deterioration of the small porch encased in corrugated metal. The
remainder of the addition has some visible water damage and deterioration as well on the exterior.
Staff Analysis:
The elements proposed for removal are in varying degrees of disrepair and deterioration. The removal
of these elements, which are not specifically mentioned in the MIHP description, will not negatively
affect the integrity of the property or the rural village context further. Removal will remedy the unsafe
condition of these elements. The main portion of the structure will continue in residential use once
these elements are removed.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend support of this demolition permit (2023-01460) for the portions specified at 22416 GOOSE
Street for the reasons stated in the Staff Analysis.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Photos provided by Staff
• Permit Submission Packet
Record #Type MIHP#Record
Status
Status Date Task Name Comments
24-Feb-23 Historical Review Per Meghan, not required
27-Feb-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
3
Status Date Task Name Comments
27-Feb-23 Historical Review
28-Feb-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
13-Mar-23 Historical Review
14
Status Date Task Name Comments
17-Mar-23 Historical Review
17-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
0
Status Date Task Name Comments
14-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
33
Status Date Task Name Comments
28-Feb-23 Historical Review
Property is in the Millbrook individual district with RV zoning for Rohrersville. New construction isn't
reviewable here so passing on permit. Will talk to the property owner to let them know exteriors may be
reviewed for recommendation if they do anything down the line.
28-Feb-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
10-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
17-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
17-Mar-23 Historical Review
18
Status Date Task Name Comments
03-Mar-23 Historical Review
07-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
8
Status Date Task Name Comments
14-Mar-23 Historical Review Property is on the MIHP but is not in an review area for the HDC. Sent the customer a letter to let them
know they are on the MIHP.
14-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
6
Status Date Task Name Comments
22-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
1
Status Date Task Name Comments
24-Mar-23 Historical Review Updated by Script from EPR.
0
Status Date Task Name Comments
22-Mar-23 Historical Review Added to HDC Agenda for April 5th meeting.
6
Status Date Task Name Comments
23-Mar-23 Historical Review Added to April HDC Agenda
1
Activity Count:11
No Comments
Received
Note Passed - Info
2 0 1
0 1 0
0 1 4
0 1 0
1 1 1
0 0 2
3 4 8Total3 11
Town of Keedysville Residential Building Permit Total 0 2
Residential New Construction Permit Total 0 1
Residential Demolition Permit Total 0 1
Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 2 4
Non-Residential Demolition Permit Total 0 1
Non-Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 1 2
Review Activities Summary
Application Type Application Number Approved Total
22-Mar-23 LOR 22416 GOOSE STREET
INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR DEMOLITION OF
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO INCLUDE
PARTITION WALLS, JOISTS, FLOORING, STAIRS,
AND BATHROOM IN FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR,
DEMOLISH 300 SQ. FT. OF REAR PORTION OF
Folder Status
Note
Days in Review:
2023-01460 Residential Demolition
Permit Review 14-Mar-23
16-Mar-23 14336 BANFILL AVENUE
DEMOLISH 5800 SQ. FT. STICK BUILT PORTION
OF BUILDING 160
FORT RITCHIE FOR PENMAR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, BOUNDARY SURVEY
PLAT 170-171
Folder Status
Note
Days in Review:
2023-01360 Non-Residential
Demolition Permit IV262 Review 09-Mar-23
23-Mar-23 LOR 54 S MAIN STREET
REMOVE EXISTING 482 SQ. FT. DECK IN THE
REAR OF THE HOME TO ALLOW FOR
SUBSTRUCTURE AND SUPPORTS TO BE REBUILT.
CONCRETE FOOTERS WILL BE DUG OUT AND RE-
POURED TO ALLOW PROPER SUPPORT. THE
Folder Status
Passed - Info
Days in Review:
KV2023-0006
Town of Keedysville
Residential Building
Permit
II1069 Review 06-Mar-23
20-Mar-23 35 N MAIN STREET
152 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO
RECONFIGURE SECOND FLOOR BATHROOMS
AND ADD A CLOSET TO THE MASTER
BEDROOM, EXPAND HALL BATHROOM BY 15
SQ. FT.
Folder Status
Passed - Info
Days in Review:
KV2023-0005
Town of Keedysville
Residential Building
Permit
II1018 Review 06-Mar-23
08-Mar-23 LOR 20148 COOL HOLLOW
ROAD
269 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO
INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXISTING HALF BATH
AND CREATE A FULL BATH AND LAUNDRY
ROOM ON FIRST FLOOR, CREATE A DOORWAY
OFF OFFICE INTO FIRST FLOOR BATHROOM,
WIDENING OF STAIRCASE, CONSTRUCTING
WALLS ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO CREATE A
Folder Status
Note
Passed - Info
Days in Review:
2023-01123 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit II0171 Approved 27-Feb-23
27-Feb-23 LOR 14403 NATIONAL PIKE
128 SQ. FT. ONE STORY ADDITION TO RIGHT OF
DWELLING ON EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB TO BE
USED AS A FULL BATHROOM AND HALF
BATHROOM WITH LAUNDRY AREA
Folder Status
Passed - Info
Approved
Days in Review:
2023-01092 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit Approved 25-Feb-23
27-Feb-23 LOR 20029 MILLBROOK
ROAD
2,048 SQ. FT. POLE BUILDING ON GRAVEL BASE
TO BE USED FOR STORAGE, (2) 12' OVERHEAD
DOORS, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, POLE
CONSTRUCTION WITH METAL ROOF AND SIDES
Folder Status
Note
No Comments
Received
No Comments
Received
No Comments
Received
Passed - Info
Days in Review:
2023-00980 Residential New
Construction Permit Approved 21-Feb-23
09-Feb-23 S-94-108 4831 HANNAH
LANE, LOT 1
INSTALLATION OF (11) WALL ANCHORS AND 66
LNFT BASEMENT GUTTER ALONG THE
PERIMETER, BASEMENT GUTTER WILL
CHANNEL WATER TO ONE SUMP PUMP
JOSEPH HANNAH, LOT 1
Folder Status
Passed - Info
Days in Review:
2023-00682 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit Approved 08-Feb-23
17-Mar-23 SP-22-011 14319 BARRICK
AVENUE
CHANGE IN USE FROM FORMER MILITARY USE
BUILDING TO FORT RITCHIE MUSEUM, 3,525
SQ. FT. TENANT FIT OUT TO INCLUDE
REMOVING EXTERIOR CONCRETE STEPS, SINK,
REMOVE AND INFILL DOOR, CREATE NEW
RESTROOM, ADD NEW PARTITION WALLS ON
FIRST FLOOR, BASEMENT AND SECOND FLOOR
Folder Status
Passed - Info
No Comments
Received
Days in Review:
2023-00671
Non-Residential
Addition-Alteration
Permit
Approved 07-Feb-23
27-Feb-23 20025 MT. AETNA ROAD
INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO INCLUDE
CARPETING, DROP CEILING, HVAC SYSTEMS,
LIGHTING, INSULATION ON ROOF DECK,
PROSHOP GLASS DIVIDER PANELS, STANDING
SEAM ROOFING AND NEW 12' X 24' PORCH.
Folder Status
Approved
No Comments
Received
Approved
Days in Review:
2023-00617
Non-Residential
Addition-Alteration
Permit
II0092 Approved 04-Feb-23
24-Feb-23 S-88-96 13827 NATIONAL
PIKE
196 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS DUE TO
FIRE DAMAGE TO INCLUDE REPLACING
DRYWALL AND INSULATION IN LAUNDRY ROOM
AND BATHROOM ON FIRST FLOOR, REPLACE
WINDOW IN BATHROOM SAME SIZE AND
LOCATION, EXTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO REPAIR
STICK BUILT TRUSSES ON EXISTING REAR
Folder Status
Passed - Info
Approved
Days in Review:
2023-00479 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit Approved 26-Jan-23
Historic Review Activity 02/17/2023 thru 03/24/2023
Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info