HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221005_Agenda Packet
Gregory Smith, Chair Vernell Doyle
Lloyd Yavener, Vice Chair Michael Lushbaugh
Ann Aldrich Kourtney Lowery
Brianna Candelaria Jeffrey A. Cline, BOCC Rep HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OF WASHINGTON COU NTY, MARYLAND
WWW.WASHCO-MD.NET
747 Northern Avenue | Hagerstown, MD 21742 | P: 240.313.2430 | F: 240.313.2431 | TDD: 7-1-1
AGENDA
October 5, 2022, 7:00 p.m.
Washington County Administration Complex, 100 West Washington Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD 21740
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
MINUTES
1. Minutes of the September 7, 2022 meeting *
NEW BUSINESS
1. Demo Permit 2022-04701 3833 Harpers Ferry Road - (Discussion/Support) -Demolition
of 968 sq. ft. two story, two bedroom, one bath single family dwelling (ANTIETAM
RURAL VILLAGE) *
2. Demo Permit 2022-04877 18614 Burnside Bridge Road – (Discussion/Support) -
Demolition of 2,776 sq. ft. 2 story single family dwelling and foundation, all salvaged
material to be repurposed *
3. Permit 2022-04976 4265 Main Street, Rohrersville– (Discussion/Action) - Replace rear
two story covered porch, on first floor replace porch posts, existing concrete slab to
remain, on second floor convert 168 sq. ft. enclosed sunroom to a covered balcony with
railing, existing roof system to remain (ROHRERSVILLE RURAL VILLAGE) *
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Staff Report
a. Staff Reviews *
ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETING
1. Wednesday, November 2, 2022, 7:00 p.m.
*attachments
The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals
requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240-
313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda
may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY September 7, 2022
The Washington County Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday,
September 7, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. in the Washington County Administration Complex, 100 W Washington
Street, Room 2001, Hagerstown, MD.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Commission members present were: Greg Smith, Chairman, Vernell Doyle, Michael Lushbaugh, Kourtney
Lowery, Brianna Candalaria, and Ann Aldrich. Staff members present were: Washington County
Department of Planning & Zoning: Meghan Jenkins, GIS Coordinator and HDC Staff member and Debra
Eckard, Administrative Assistant.
MINUTES
Motion and Vote: Ms. Aldrich a motion to approve the minutes of the July 6, 2022 meeting as presented.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Lushbaugh and unanimously approved.
NEW BUSINESS
Permit 2022-04324 – Old Georgetown Road
Ms. Jenkins presented a new construction permit for an 852 square foot rear addition on crawlspace
which will include a new stairway to the second floor, a family room and a full bath on the first floor, two
bedrooms and a full bath on the second floor, and replacement of the 120 square foot covered front
porch. The property is located at 22335 Old Georgetown Road in the Cavetown Rural Village.
Ms. Jenkins noted the following points of interest for the proposed project:
• Existing roof has flat asphalt shingles; proposed replacement using fiberglass shingles
• Existing guttering is k style with front porch having half-round; proposed replacement using k style
all around the structure
• Front porch has tapered columns and a balustrade with wood steps existing to the right;
replacements are straight columns, base of porch will be elevated concrete construction with
concrete steps, no balustrade
• Most windows ae double sashed wood construction and contain 4 vertical panes on top over one
pane on the bottom; replacement of most windows for energy efficiency
• Shutters are a variety of wood and vinyl and do not appear to have any functioning hardware; no
shutters are proposed
• Vinyl siding is proposed for the entire structure
• Front door matches the style of the windows; proposing to replace the front door
Discussion: There was a brief discussion regarding the windows and shutters and if they are original to
the house. Members believe the shutters are probably not original to the house because they don’t have
any functioning hardware and they appear not to have been installed properly for their intended use. Ms.
Jenkins stated that the property owners intend to use in-stock materials for this project. The owners are
not intending to re-use or rehab any of the original materials.
Motion and Vote: Mr. Lushbaugh made a motion to recommend approval of the permit. Ms. Aldrich
asked for the following comments to be added to the motion for approval:
1. To the extent practicable, this project should retain the existing wood windows on the primary
façade including the flat top trim. If energy efficiency is a concern, the HDC recommends
exterior storm windows.
2. To the extent practicable, the existing front door with matching 4 glass panels should be
retained to keep continuity with the retention of windows on the primary façade and because
it is architecturally significant on its own. If energy efficiency is a concern, the use of an
updated storm door is recommended.
3. During removal of asbestos siding, care should be given to minimize the impact to any wood
siding underneath. If drop siding is found and can be preserved under the proposed siding,
this should be undertaken in case future owners wish to restore the structure. This will also
limit landfill waste.
4. Landscaping is recommended along the base of the front porch in order to minimize the
change in material from wood to concrete as proposed.
5. If the existing tapered column wraps can be reused, this is preferred, or use of a similar new
construction tapered column.
6. If available, the chosen vinyl siding should have a similar profile to drop siding which is more
consistent with the original siding and the rural village character. An example of a drop siding
profile is available in the Design Guidelines for Historic Structures.
Motion and Vote: Mr. Lushbaugh amended his motion to include the comments above. The motion for
approval was seconded by Ms. Aldrich and unanimously approved.
Request for Section 106 Participation
Ms. Jenkins presented an “Invitation to Comment” letter from EBI Consulting. The developer is proposing
to construct a 152 foot telecommunication tower facility at 19224 Longmeadow Road. The area
surrounding this property consists of many commercial and industrial uses. There are no historic
structures next to this property and none in the area that are listed on the Historic Inventory that would
be affected by the project.
Consensus: The Historic District Commission does not wish to participate in the Section 106 review.
OLD BUSINESS
Historic Tax Credit Ordinance Updates
Ms. Jenkins reported that a meeting was held with the County Attorney’s office and they believe that
most of the changes that are being proposed can be completed without legislative approval. She has
drafted a new ordinance which is currently being reviewed by staff. The following changes to the
Ordinance are being proposed:
• The 25% real property tax credit and the 5% credit for compatible new construction attached to
an existing structure cannot be changed without legislative approval
• Extend the qualifying areas to include Rural Villages
• Allow municipalities to participate in tax credits (an MOU will be needed)
• Add language for historic preservation areas (areas for yearly tax credit for historic structures)
(stipulation for a 10 year period and a recorded easement)
• 100% tax credit if in a perpetual easement (MHT or HP) and 50% in another preservation area
• Add language to ensure ordinary maintenance
• Establishment of a grant program (minimum $150,000 per year total; $50,000 maximum per
individual)
OTHER BUSINESS
Staff Report
Ms. Jenkins provided a written report of staff reviews for the previous month.
Ms. Jenkins reported the following:
• There were a few demolition permits that were applied for; however, upon site visit the
structures were already gone.
• There are several events scheduled at the Saylor House on September 18th at 10 am
• There will be an open house at the visitor center at the Newcomer House from 10 to 4 on
September 18th.
• On September 17th from 10 to noon there will be a preservation workshop at the Tolson Chapel
cemetery.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Lushbaugh made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 p.m. The motion was seconded by Ms.
Aldrich and so ordered by the Chairman.
UPCOMING MEETING
The next meeting is scheduled for October 5, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________________________
Jill L. Baker, Director
Washington County Dept. of Planning & Zoning
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: September 23, 2022
Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/, 2022-04701
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: Virginia Home & Garden LLC,
Applicant: Hung-lien Chia
Location: 3833 HARPERS FERRY Road
Tax Account ID: 01003216
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 80/21/96/
Legal Description: LOT .237 ACRES3833 HARPERS FERRY RD
Zoning: Rural Village
Rural Village: Antietam (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village
Project Description: Demolition of 968 sq. ft. two story, two bedroom, one
bath single family dwelling
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The Historic District Commission shall review demolition permits using the Review Procedures adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as amended on July 17, 1990. “The policy does not
provide for approval or disapproval of the demolition permit. These permits are issued solely on the
basis of meeting technical requirements of applicable code.”
The review criteria for demolition permit is the same as the evaluation criteria in the Washington
County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
Staff Report:
This property is located along Harper Ferry Road on the east side of the road before its intersection
with Canal Road. The property is directly across from property owned by the USA National Park Service
as part of the C&O Canal. The house is listed as a contributing structure to the Antietam Historic Rural
Village which is also a National Register District. The structure is estimated to be built in 1856 and is of
frame construction. The MIHP contains the following description: 1.5-story vernacular residence of
wood construction, with laterally-oriented metal roof; appears to be of a "saddlebag" plan, with a
large central chimney of brick; windows flat-topped, with some multi-light sash retained; 1-story
shed-roofed porch on facade; 1-story dependency of wood construction at rear of house.
The property has significant overgrowth which limits visibility of the front of the house. The entire rear
of the property is overgrown with dense bamboo. The property’s main house has significant
deterioration and water infiltration with multiple points of siding, fascia and roof failure visible. The
surrounding vegetation has further grown into and damaged the main building. To the rear of the
structure are large concrete pads which may be part of the septic. These pads are directly against the
rear of the building, again causing water infiltration issues. The siding of the main house is vinyl with
windows which appear to be modern. The outbuilding does appear to have drop siding and some
architectural details but is also showing signs of extensive deterioration. There is a hole in the front
porch which may have been a hand dug well at some point. The new owners approached several
contractors regarding the viability of clearing the land and remodeling the house. However they were
advised that the extensive water damage and mold would be cost prohibitive and health hazardous to
remedy.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Staff Analysis:
Overall, the main building shows minimal integrity of the resources original 1850’s trim. There are
significant safety and health hazards caused by many years of exposure to the elements. This includes
both biological hazards such as mold as well as structural issues. The outbuilding, while it does appear
to have its original trim and siding is accessory to the main building and not significant without its
primary structure. The proposed demolition would remedy significant hazards present on the property.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend support of this demolition permit (2022-04701) for 3833 Harpers Ferry Road for the
reasons stated in the Staff Analysis.
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Photos provided by Staff
• Permit Submission Packet
• Customer Email Communication
1 2
3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11
13 14 15 Customer Supplied Image
BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT
IVR/Record No:2022-04701 Applied:9/1/2022
Project No:Approved:
Record Type:Residential Demolition
Permit
Status:Pending
Inspector Area: B4
Job Address:3833 HARPERS FERRY Road
Location:3833 Harpers Ferry Road
Tax Acct ID:01003216
Zoning District:RV
Floodplain:Yes
Owner:Virginia Home & Garden LLC
Applicant:Hung-lien Chia
1620 Great Falls St.
McLean VA 22101
Phone No:(571)405-7241 Mobile No:(571)405-7239 Email Address:JackieLan@hotmail.com
Contractor:
Phone No:
Description:Demolition of 968 sq. ft. two story, two bedroom, one bath single family dwelling
Foundation Size:Construction Type:
Type of Heat:
Public Sewer:
Public Water:
Gas:
Electric:
No
No
Exterior Finish:
Air Conditioning:
Septic:
Time Existed:
Well:
Time Existed:
Valuation:No. of Bathrooms:
Code Enforced:No. of Half Bathrooms:
No. of New Bedrooms:
No. of Exist. Bedrooms:
Setbacks Proposed Minimum Required
Lot Tract Area
Front Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
Left Side Setback
Right Side Setback
Lot Width
* All final State Fire Marshal inspections (850), if required, must be scheduled directly through the State Fire Marshal's office at 301-
766-3888.
This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Permitting Department and meets all applicable local and state codes
and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m.
through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
From:Chia, Jackie (NIH/NIMH) [E]
To:Jenkins, Meghan
Cc:Jackie Lan; andy999lan@gmail.com
Subject:RE: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: 2022-04701, Demolition Permit, 3833 Harpers Ferry Road
Date:Monday, September 12, 2022 12:55:53 PM
Attachments:image001.pngimage002.pngimage003.pngimage004.pngimage005.png
image006.pngimage007.pngimage008.pngimage009.pngimage010.pngimage011.pngimage012.pngimage013.pngimage014.pngimage015.pngimage016.pngimage017.png
Importance:High
WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
Any claims of being a County official or employee should be disregarded.
Good afternoon Meghan,
First, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to you for your kind assistance & detailed
explanations for many phone calls I had made to you.
Second, I would like to explain why I really need to tear down this house. This house have been vacant for years before we bought it. The collapsed roof causes severe
water damage and mold issues.
We cleared the passage to the front door so we had invited several contractors to come.
However, no company wanted the job due to the damage being too big and the mold issue
being too severe.
We have reached the conclusion that those molds now in the house cannot be completely
treated or removed.
Results from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) investigationTrusted
Source revealed the link of bleeding in the lungs, a condition called idiopathic pulmonary
hemorrhage, and homes with severe water damage with toxin-producing mold inside. We have
young grand kids and we cannot take this risk.
Third, we left the front door unlocked for your convenience to get inside of the house. I am sorry that Icannot be on site to meet you due to my busy schedule at work. Please feel free to stop by anytime at
the property for your review. Attached, please find a photo to show inside of the house.
We plan to put a new house manufactured by Champion Home Builders. Copied below, please find 4
plans approved by the state of Maryland that we like and hopefully your committee will approve one of
these plans.
#1: The plan can be found at the link of https://www.championhomes.com/home-plans-photos/shiloh?location=Sharpsburg,+MD&floorplans=basement-access:standard
#2: The plan can be found at the link of https://www.championhomes.com/home-plans-photos/custom-cape?location=Sharpsburg%2C+MD
#3: The plan can be found at the link of https://www.championhomes.com/home-plans-
photos/phoenix?location=Sharpsburg%2C+MD
#4: The plan can be found at the link of https://www.championhomes.com/home-plans-
photos/guthrie?location=Sharpsburg%2C+MD
I will have a travel out of country between 9/30 to 10/16 so I may delay my response to you during
these days. Otherwise, I will promptly reply to your email & phone call and hope I can successfully
obtain the approval of the demolition permit. Thank you and have a great day. Jackie
From: Jackie Lan <jackielan@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2022 9:55 AM
To: Chia, Jackie (NIH/NIMH) [E] <jackie.chia@nih.gov>; Lan Andy <andy999lan@gmail.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: 2022-04701, Demolition Permit, 3833 Harpers Ferry Road
Sent from myMail for iOS
-------- Forwarded message --------
From: Jenkins, Meghan <mjenkins@washco-md.net>
To: jackielan@hotmail.com <jackielan@hotmail.com>
Cc: Eckard, Debra S. <deckard@washco-md.net>, Baker, Jill <JBaker@washco-md.net>
Date: Thursday, September 8, 2022, 10:54 AM -0400
Subject: 2022-04701, Demolition Permit, 3833 Harpers Ferry Road
Hello Jackie,
We have spoken on the phone a few times regarding this property. I did receive the demolition permit for
review and have tentatively placed it on the October 5th agenda for the HDC. There are some pieces of
information which are requested in advance of the meeting noted in the attached letter. The items can be
provided to the best of your ability and knowledge. Please be sure to at least provide comments on the
demolition alternatives (Number 5 on the list). I know you mentioned extremely deteriorated interior
conditions were the biggest factor for your request for demolition and that you had some supporting photos.
Please include those in your response if you can. You also provided some additional details about buying the
property as/is with no ability to enter and assess prior to closing so please confirm that and any other details
you wish to share to provide context on the property. As we discussed I will visit to take exterior photos ahead
of the meeting. If you would prefer I do that while you are on site please let me know so we can coordinate.
Otherwise I will stop by a few weeks ahead of the meeting to take those. If you have any questions after
reviewing the attached letter please feel free to reach out. I have also linked the history of the village noting
this address as contributing for your information. WA-II-031.pdf (maryland.gov)
Thank you.
Meghan
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Coordinator | Historic District Commission (HDC) Staff
747 Northern Avenue
Hagerstown, MD 21742
P: (240) 313-2439 | F: (240) 313-2431
www.washco-md.net
(Pronouns: she/her/hers)
Get Connected and See Updates
NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information, the unauthorized disclosure or
use of which is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or if you received this e-
mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this e-mail and any
attachments from your system. Thank you.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: September 23, 2022
Subj: Residential Demolition Permit/, 2022-04877
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: PIPES HAROLD A &, PIPES EVA R
Applicant: Harold & Eva Pipes
Location: 18614 BURNSIDE BRIDGE Road
Tax Account ID: 01020854
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 0080/0005/0351/
Legal Description: 26.60 ACRES18614 BURNSIDE BRIDGE RD
Zoning: Preservation
MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): II0366, Frame house and Barn
Project Description: Demolition of 2,776 sq. ft. 2 story single family dwelling
and foundation, all salvaged material to be repurposed
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The Historic District Commission shall review demolition permits using the Review Procedures
adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as amended on July 17, 1990. “The policy does not
provide for approval or disapproval of the demolition permit. These permits are issued solely on the
basis of meeting technical requirements of applicable code.”
The review criteria for demolition permit is the same as the evaluation criteria in the Washington
County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
Staff Report:
This structure is listed on the MIHP as a frame farmhouse with hipped roof and a double porch
extending across its front elevation. It is not visible from Burnside Bridge Road. Currently, the entire
structure is vinyl sided with several additions. The first addition is the enclosure of the original 2-story
front porch. This enclosure included the extension or modification of the foundation of that porch to
cinder blocks. Both the framing and the foundation of this addition are failing causing wind and water
infiltration to both. The most prominent addition is to the left of the original portion and is a one story
addition with bay window. This addition, according to the property owner, has had water flow under
the slab and into the original portion of the structure and out through its basement towards a closed
cistern. This movement of water may have contributed to the deterioration and settling of the various
additions foundations as well as the original structures foundation. The original structures field stone
foundation has several points of mortar failure and some settling visible. To the right side of the
structure, the original stone foundation can be seen at the lowest level. There appears to be an original
window and again multiple points in the foundation where mortar is failing. The rear of the structure
has a one-story addition of a sunroom with similar foundation issues to the rest of the additions. The
current owners estimate these additions were done in the 1970’s and have concern for the quality of
the additions workmanship due to consultation with contractors. The current owners also stated that in
the interior there are several points in the original portions floor that have significant slant and sagging.
The original portion of the structure still maintains its hipped roof which is in fair conditions. To the rear
of the structure there is an original log outbuilding in poor condition. This is not the subject of this
demolition permit and it appears to be under the size for review by the HDC. The customer does plan to
rebuild on the site, however due to the existing water flow concerns, it will be some approximately
100’- 150’ to the n/e of the existing building. The owners plan to build a one story energy efficient
home on-grade with handicap accessibility to meet their existing and future needs. The interior of the
existing structure does not allow for handicap accessibility without structural wall changes.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Staff Analysis:
The main building shows minimal integrity due to multiple additions over time. There are multiple
points of foundation mortar failure and potential settling throughout the original and additions. The
building is not visible from Burnside Bridge Road, so its removal will not detract from the surrounding
landscape nor is the future proposed structure likely to be visible or affect the landscape.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend support of this demolition permit (2022-04877) for 18614 Burnside Bridge Road for the
reasons stated in the staff analysis.
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Photos provided by Staff
• Permit Submission Packet
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT
IVR/Record No:2022-04877 Applied:9/14/2022
Project No:Approved:
Record Type:Residential Demolition
Permit
Status:Review
Inspector Area: B4
Job Address:18614 BURNSIDE BRIDGE Road
Location:LOR 18614 Burnside Bridge Road
Tax Acct ID:01020854
Zoning District:P
Floodplain:No
Owner:PIPES HAROLD A &
Applicant:Harold & Eva Pipes
18614 Burnside Bridge Road
Sharsburg MD 21782
Phone No:(410)596-4079 Email Address:440hayfarmer@gmail.com
Contractor:
Phone No:
Description:Demolition of 2,776 sq. ft. 2 story single family dwelling and foundation, all salvaged material to be repurposed
Foundation Size:Construction Type:
Type of Heat:
Public Sewer:
Public Water:
Gas:
Electric:
No
No
Exterior Finish:
Air Conditioning:
Septic:
Time Existed:
Well:
Time Existed:
Valuation:No. of Bathrooms:
Code Enforced:No. of Half Bathrooms:
No. of New Bedrooms:
No. of Exist. Bedrooms:
Setbacks Proposed Minimum Required
Lot Tract Area
Front Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
Left Side Setback
Right Side Setback
Lot Width
* All final State Fire Marshal inspections (850), if required, must be scheduled directly through the State Fire Marshal's office at 301-
766-3888.
This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Permitting Department and meets all applicable local and state codes
and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m.
through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
To: Washington County Historic District Commission
From: Meghan Jenkins, GISP, GIS Coordinator - Historic District Commission Staff
Date: September 23, 2022
Subj: Residential Addition-Alteration Permit/Porch-Deck-Slab, 2022-04976
Staff Report and Analysis
Property Owner: WHITE WAYNE D ET AL, WHITE CHASTEN L
Applicant: Clean Cut Construction
Location: 4265 MAIN Street
Tax Account ID: 08007934
Map/Grid/Parcel/Lot: 0081/0010/0163/
Legal Description: 1 ACRE4265 MAIN ST
Zoning: Rural Village
Rural Village: Rohrersville (MHT-C) Historic Rural Village
MD Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP): III164, Holmes House
Project Description: Replace rear two story covered porch, on first floor
replace porch posts, existing concrete slab to remain, on
second floor convert 168 sq. ft. enclosed sunroom to a
covered balcony with railing, existing roof system to
remain
Applicable Law and Review Criteria:
The HDC is enabled through Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, MD.
Specifically Section 20.3.a states: "The Commission shall act upon all applications as required by
Section 20.6, Historic Preservation district, Section 5D.4, Rural Village District and Article 20A,
Antietam Overlay District of this Ordinance."
The HDC shall consider only exterior features of a structure that would affect the historic, archeological,
or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be
visible from a public way. It does not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes
may still be subject to building permit procedures.
1. The application shall be approved by the HDC if it is consistent with the following criteria:
A. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
B. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, cultural, architectural,
or archeological features of the site, structure, or district and would not be detrimental to
achievement of the purposes of Article 20 of the County Zoning Ordinance.
C. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private
utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological,
architectural, or cultural value.
D. The proposal is necessary so that unsafe conditions or health hazards are remedied.
E. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings and subsequent revisions are to be used as guidance only and are not to
be considered mandatory.
2. In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the HDC shall give consideration to
and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below.
A. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship
to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area.
B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of
the structure and to the surrounding area.
C. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and
materials proposed to be used.
D. Any other factors, including aesthetic factors, that the Commission deems to be pertinent.
3. The HDC shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites, or districts deemed to
be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The
HDC shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans
would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures.
For Rural Villages, additional review criteria for applications are listed in Section 5D.5 Architectural
Review of the Zoning Ordinance and include:
1. The exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village, including materials, style,
arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and
pitch, proportion.
2. Building Size and Orientation
3. Landscaping
4. Signage
5. Lighting
6. Setbacks
7. Accessory structures
Secretary of Interior Standards which may be applicable to this project review include:
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive
materials or alterations of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize the property will
be avoided.
5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship
that characterize a property will be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
design, color, texture and where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be
substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic Structures which may be applicable to this project
review include:
Guidelines For Porches (Page 68)
1. Porch support structures should be inspected regularly to ensure they are not sagging,
crumbling or separating from the structure or the rest of the porch. If necessary,
stabilization and repair should be undertaken to ensure that the rest of the structure
remains intact.
2. Carpet can trap water on wood porches causing decay of painted surfaces or rot of wood,
and carpet should not be installed
3. Avoid enclosing a porch. If the porch is not visible from a public right-of-way, it may be
enclosed if the change does not significantly alter the original character of the porch.
4. See also Wood Exteriors (p.60) for more guidelines and the Key Themes (p.57)
Staff Report:
This project is located in the Rohrersville Historic Rural Village. It sits at the corner of Main Street and
Rohrersville School Road. The structure is a combination of log walls cased with common bond brick
with fieldstone foundation as well as fieldstone. According to the MIHP for this property: “The east side
has been altered with the second story enclosure of a built-in, two-story porch. This type of porch is
found regularly in south-central Pennsylvania and adjacent Maryland. The first floor of the porch is made of stone and has two alternating sets of doors and aluminum windows. The second story is
covered with vinyl siding and has four aluminum windows.” The existing vinyl clad enclosure has
several points of failure leading to infiltration of insects and birds according to the owner. The project
involves the opening of the porch and replacement of support columns. The materials proposed are a
combination of wood and vinyl clad in order to reduce maintenance and pests such as wood boring
bees. The stone and brick exterior walls would remain, as would the recently replaced roof with half
round gutters. The number of supports through the two-story porch will be no more than 4 as is
existing. The proposed balustrade would also be similar combination of wood/vinyl as the columns.
Staff Analysis:
The proposed porch replacement is in line with the Washington County Design Guidelines for Historic
Structures by returning the 2-story porch to its original open nature. While the proposed materials are
not the same as the original wood, the materials will not detract from or harm the existing structure
and the difference will not be readily apparent from the right of way. This porch is also to the rear and
the change will not affect the streetscape of Rohrersville Main Street. The project remedies the
deteriorated structure, prolonging and enhancing the residential use of the building.
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend approval of the Residential Addition-Alteration Permit/Porch-Deck-Slab, 2022-04976,
located in Rohrersville Historic Rural Village for the reasons stated in the staff analysis.
Respectfully Submitted,
Meghan Jenkins, GISP
Historic District Commission Staff
Attachments:
• Photos provided by Staff
• Permit Submission Packet
1 2
3 4
5
6
BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT
IVR/Record No:2022-04976 Applied:9/20/2022
Project No:P2022-1068 Approved:
Record Type:Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit
Status:Review
Inspector Area: B4
Job Address:4265 MAIN Street
Location:LOR 4265 Main Street
Tax Acct ID:08007934
Zoning District:RV
Floodplain:No
Owner:WHITE WAYNE D ET AL
Applicant:Clean Cut Construction
4436 Iron Bridge Road
Waynesboro PA 17268
Phone No:(240)217-9712 Email Address:austinla97@gmail.com
Contractor:Austin Martin
Phone No:(240)520-8634
Description:Replace rear two story covered porch, on first floor replace porch posts, existing concrete slab to remain, on
second floor convert 168 sq. ft. enclosed sunroom to a covered balcony with railing, existing roof system to remain
Foundation Size:7x24 Construction Type:Porch-Deck-Slab
Type of Heat:
Public Sewer:
Public Water:
Gas:
Electric:
No
No
Exterior Finish:
Air Conditioning:
Septic:
Time Existed:
Well:
Time Existed:
Existing
Unknown
Existing
Unknown
Valuation:$18,000.00 No. of Bathrooms:
Code Enforced:2018 IRC No. of Half Bathrooms:
No. of New Bedrooms:
No. of Exist. Bedrooms:
Setbacks Proposed Minimum Required
Lot Tract Area
Front Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
Left Side Setback
Right Side Setback
Lot Width
1 acre
155
105
40,000 sq. ft.
25
8
* All final State Fire Marshal inspections (850), if required, must be scheduled directly through the State Fire Marshal's office at 301-
766-3888.
This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Permitting Department and meets all applicable local and state codes
and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m.
through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Record #Type MIHP#Record
Status
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Approved
w/Comments 08-Sep-22 Historical Review
HDC Recommended approval for this permit with the following comments to be forwarded to the
applicant and owner:
1. To the extent practicable, this project should retain the existing wood windows on the primary façade
including the flat top trim. If energy efficiency is a concern the HDC recommends exterior storm windows.
2. To the extent practicable, the existing front door with matching 4 glass panels should be retained to
keep continuity with the retention of windows on the primary façade and because it is architecturally
significant on its own. If energy efficiency is a concern the use of an updated storm door is
recommended.
3. During removal of asbestos siding, care should be given to minimize the impact to any wood siding
underneath. If drop siding is found and can be preserved under the proposed siding this should be
undertaken in case future owners wish to restore the structure. This will also limit landfill waste.
4. Landscaping is recommended along the base of the front porch in order to minimize the change in
material from wood to concrete proposed in this project.
5. If the existing column tapered columns wraps can be reused this is preferred or use of a similar new
construction tapered column.
6. If available, the chosen vinyl siding should have a similar profile to drop siding which is more consistent
with the original siding and the rural village character. An example of a drop siding profile is available in
the Design Guidelines for Historic Structures.
Full letter is available in the documents tab.
Days in Review:27
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Passed - Info 26-Aug-22 Historical Review
The subject of demolition is not mentioned as contributing to the site in the MIHP form and was likely a
later addition to the site than the stone house which is listed. No HDC review is required because the
subject of the demo is not part of the listing.
Days in Review:1
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Passed - Info 30-Aug-22 Historical Review Historic site was demo'd over several years. No HDC review required.
Days in Review:0
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Passed - Info 02-Sep-22 Historical Review Sent property owner the MDE form to complete and return to MDE. See attached email in docs.
Note 08-Sep-22 Historical Review This permit will be reviewed at the October 5th HDC meeting.
Days in Review:6
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Note 14-Sep-22 Historical Review Permit has been tentatively scheduled for the October 5 meeting of the HDC.
Days in Review:0
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Passed - Info 14-Sep-22 Historical Review Per Meghan Jenkins, no review required for town
Days in Review:0
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Passed - Info 20-Sep-22 Historical Review Blairs Valley RV is not reviewable for new construction. HDC review not required.
Days in Review:1
19-Sep-22 SI-17-010 13640 BLAIRS
VALLEY ROAD
5,810 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE TWO STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ON CONCRETE SLAB,
WOODSTOVE IN DINING ROOM, FIREPLACE IN
DEN, 162 SQ. FT. FINISHED ATTIC STORAGE
SPACE ABOVE MASTER WALK IN CLOSET,
2022-04954 Residential New
Construction Permit Review 19-Sep-22
14-Sep-22 LOR 18614 BURNSIDE
BRIDGE ROAD
DEMOLITION OF 2,776 SQ. FT. 2 STORY SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING AND FOUNDATION, ALL
SALVAGED MATERIAL TO BE REPURPOSED
SH2022-0003
Town of Sharpsburg
Residential Building
Permit
II0689; II0688 Approved 14-Sep-22 14-Sep-22 223 E MAIN STREET
855 SQ. FT. REPAIRS TO EXISTING GARAGE, DUE
TO BEING DAMAGED BY A VEHICLE THAT RAN
THROUGH FRONT DOOR AND BACK WALL OF
GARAGE, PURPOSE IS TO RESTORE TO ORIGINAL
APPEARANCE
2022-04877 Residential Demolition
Permit II0366 Review 14-Sep-22
30-Aug-22 SP-22-027 11159 HOPEWELL
ROAD
515,241 SQ. FT. ONE STORY SHELL BUILDING TO
BE USED AS A WAREHOUSE FOR FUTURE
TENANT WITH (46) DOCK DOORS, (4) DRIVE IN
DOORS, SPRINKLER ROOM, ELECTRICAL ROOM,
MULTIPLE 30 SQ. FT. CONCRETE STOOPS WITH
2022-04701 Residential Demolition
Permit Review 01-Sep-22 02-Sep-22 3833 HARPERS FERRY ROAD
DEMOLITION OF 968 SQ. FT. TWO STORY, TWO
BEDROOM, ONE BATH SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING
2022-04551 Non-Residential New
Construction Permit I356 Review 25-Aug-22
12-Aug-22 LOR 22335 OLD
GEORGETOWN ROAD
792 SQ. FT. INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO
EXISTING TWO STORY DWELLING TO INCLUDE
RELOCATION OF KITCHEN, REMOVAL OF STAIRS
TO SECOND FLOOR, RELOCATION OF LAUNDRY
ROOM, 852 SQ. FT. FINISHED SPACE TWO
STORY REAR ADDITION ON CRAWLSPACE TO
INCLUDE NEW STAIRWAY TO SECOND FLOOR,
FAMILY ROOM AND FULL BATH ON FIRST
FLOOR, TWO BEDROOMS AND FULL BATH ON
SECOND FLOOR, REPLACE 120 SQ. FT. COVERED
FRONT PORCH, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE-
ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES
2022-04560 Residential New
Construction Permit II0041 Approved 25-Aug-22 25-Aug-22 S-05-173 8613 & 8617 OLD
NATIONAL PIKE, LOT 1
DEMOLITION OF CARRIAGE HOUSE, 1,500 SQ.
FT. PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING TO
RIGHT OF DWELLING TO BE USED AS A GARAGE,
CONCRETE SLAB, ROOF RAFTERS
THOMAS E FATH, LOT 1
2022-04324 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit Approved 12-Aug-22
Historic Review Activity 08/26/2022 thru 09/23/2022
Open Date Date Assigned Location Description Workflow Info
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Note 20-Sep-22 Historical Review Added to the 10/5 HDC meeting and sent initial contact letter.
Days in Review:0
Folder Status Status Date Task Name Comments
Passed - Info 21-Sep-22 Historical Review Property is not in a reviewable are for HDC. Sent no review contact letter.
Days in Review:0
Activity Count:9
Note Passed - Info Total
0 1 1
1 1 3
2 1 2
0 2 2
0 1 1
3 6 9Total1
Town of Sharpsburg Residential Building Permit Total 0
Residential New Construction Permit Total 0
Residential Demolition Permit Total 0
Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Total 1
Non-Residential New Construction Permit Total 0
Review Activities Summary
Application Type Application Number Approved
21-Sep-22 LOR 14719 MARSH PIKE
CONVERT EXISTING 208 SQ. FT. ATTACHED
COVERED PORCH AND ENCLOSED PORCH TO
REAR OF DWELLING TO A NEW MASTER
BATHROOM AND DRESSING AREA, WITH NEW
CRAWL SPACE, FOOTER AND FOUNDATION,
2022-04987 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit I233 Review 21-Sep-22
2022-04976 Residential Addition-
Alteration Permit III164 Review 20-Sep-22 20-Sep-22 LOR 4265 MAIN STREET
REPLACE REAR TWO STORY COVERED PORCH,
ON FIRST FLOOR REPLACE PORCH POSTS,
EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB TO REMAIN, ON
SECOND FLOOR CONVERT 168 SQ. FT.
ENCLOSED SUNROOM TO A COVERED BALCONY