Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_1986 Annual ReportANNUAL pan REPORT 1986 ING WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND a March 24, 1987 Board of County Commissioners Court House Annex - Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Gentlemen: The Planning Commission is pleased to forward for your use its 1986 Annual Report. This report, submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 66B of the Annotated Code, summarizes the activities of the Commission in calendar year 1986. In addition to the routine review and approval of subdivisions and site plans, the Commission continued to implement the Comprehensive Plan that was adopted in 1981. The various elements of the Plan worked on by the Commission in 1986 are described in this report. Of particular significance is the effort on the Town Growth Areas. The studies for Smithsburg and Boonsboro were completed in the summer and subsequently adopted by the elected officials for both the towns and the County Commissioners. Clear Spring and Hancock have been contacted with proposals for similar studies. for those two communities, and we are curently awaiting their decisions. Sincerely, , j .'ack B. Byers Chairman JBB/JSH/jlk TABLE OF CONTENTS Planning Organizational Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Agency Inter -Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii The Comprehensive Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1987 Work Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 The Agricultural Land Preservation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Watershed Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Water and Sewerage Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Transportation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Historic Preservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 House Numbering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Innovative and Alternative . On -Site Sewage Disposal Grant Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Park Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Rezoning Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Highway Interchange Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Significant Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 1986 Subdivision Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Subdivision Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 1986 Development Map . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 1986 Rezoning Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Agricultural Preservation District Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Washington County Planning Commission 1986 Annual Report Board of County Commissioners Ronald L. Bowers, President Richard E. Roulette, Vice President R. Lee Downey Linda C. Irvin Martin L. Snook Planning Commission Jack B. Byers, Chairman Donald E. Zombro, Vice Chairman Judith A. Acord Bertrand L. Iseminger Ray M. Johns Richard E. Roulette, Ex -officio Sidney Salitsky Published, March 1987 Washington County Planning Commission 33 West Washington Street Hagerstown, Maryland ) ) \ ` 2 \� ° a4 >c: (z}®\ !» //\j zj2j) ,u `� 4O 4uo u//00)H (o )/\\\/ { )/it/\ ® & . 44 \ �/ 0 m ) ) * \ 32 @_ O4 2 )3 @ ( ° _ © ) o * ( { )/ ) }� j 4 ,:J /4 )+ a)- �\ j� ) 0) \ \ \ = 2 } 2 \ / x u 41 | � L__—____J ) ) p F 4 •� YiW �iWi W O ' r1 Th �� Yid Y1 mia NO 1a ? W�a l L QT O 4P' Np afl' JfO Nm�O i O i0 O W 4 p2 N +� ON y mi YmiJ JSS° Y° ° i � •clli �+mrsryp r e \ uno/ uAle* I (Q ocrarmcxr I O od U: \ \ p pig m i w, riL i C a O e �i 4• 'r L t0°°' Wc° b i ^� • cso �i mS �o / Qt t o a° u rmW S QO" W o NN J� fi p�m m�N o a z O ♦ t AT A W O Y N y" W a, a 1• W i Z a ♦ S S W N �O °O T O W O 2 i 6 Z l °o o THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Planning Commission continued to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan in 1986 through further work on the Town Growth Areas, the Watershed Study, and Historic Preservation. Town Growth Area studies were completed for Smithsburg and Boonsboro with the results of those studies being presented to the elected officials of both those towns and the Board of County Commissioners. The studies, along with the findings, recommendations, and the growth area boundary, have been adopted by the Town and County governments. An initial meeting has been held with the County Commissioners and the Mayor and Council of Boonsboro for the purpose of beginning the implementation process. Presentations have been made by the planning staff to the Mayors and Councils of both Clear Spring and Hancock with a request that Town Growth Area studies be started for those communities. No action has been taken to date. The Commission's efforts on the Historic Preservation element of the Plan and the study and analysis of the Smithsburg and Edgemont watershed are presented separately in this report. As described in last year's Annual Report, the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan policies is being accomplished on a priority basis with those tasks under Priority A being addressed first. The status of Priority A task implementation is: Policy Status Urban Growth Area Study Completed Town Growth Area Studies In Work 1 Comprehensive Plan Policy Status (continued) Policy Status PUD Completed Industrial/Highway Interchange In Work Agricultural Lands Study Mapping Done Development Strategy To be done Rural Development To be done Land Use Plan In Work Mineral Extraction Completed Transportation Completed Educational Facilities/SitePlan Completed Water Supply Study Completed The Work Program for 1987 on the following pages itemizes those elements of the Plan to be addressed in the new calendar year along with other tasks slated for work by the Commission. I IL / 0 \ g ( \ ) § 2 < § P4 [ ) m / ] @ = w * k w < [ o l5n ) ° ° ^ ) )() / a ; 0 \ Cs] P4 \ ) ( P4 ) \ \ 3 0 z 0 _ > _ c z 0 _ \ \@ > ° _ < \ \ ■ U) \ } E \ - / � ` C ) / > § \ 4 @ \ ) 4 THE AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM Washington County's effort to preserve valuable farmland via the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program began in April of 1978 and has continued through 1986. The program was established and is regulated by Agricultural Article, Section 2-501 through 2-515 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. It is administered through a Planning Commission staff member by the Washington County Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board, the County Commissioners, and the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation of the Maryland Department of Agriculture. The program encourages landowners to voluntarily enter into an Agri- cultural Land Preservation District in which it is agreed that the land will not be developed for a periodlof at least five years. In return for that restriction, the landowner receives protection from nuisance complaints and becomes eligible to sell a development rights easement. A landowner may exercise the option of selling a development rights easement to the Agri- cultural Land Preservation Foundation provided that his offer to sell is recommended by the County's Advisory Board and the County Commissioners. At the local level, the Agricultural Advisory Board will review and rank easement applications, assigning point values to such items as farm size, soil quality, and development pressure indicators on its easement checklist. Each farm's total point value will assist the Board in determining which farms to recommend for easement purchase and in what order of priority. The Board of County Commissioners makes the final local decision based on Advisory Board recommendations and data gathered at the required public hearing. If purchased by the State of Maryland, the easement will remain effective in perpetuity. E Y The total acreage of productive farmland in preservation districts dropped slightly from 4,156.01 acres in 1985 to 3,897.75 acres at the close of 1986. Although new districts were established in 1986 as noted below, the Wolf district (AD -80-5, 148.30 acres) was completely terminated. Portions of the Lohman (AD -80-7, 273.25 acres) and Beckley (AD -81-1, 255.85 acres) districts were also removed from the program. Name and No. Russell A. Wolfinger, Jr. AD -85-1 Lu-Rose Estates, Inc AD -86-1 H. Lehman Toms AD -86-2 Paula L. Toms AD -86-3 Farm Type Acres Status Beef and Dairy 149.63 Approval Cattle and Crops 4/7/1986 Beef Cattle and 127.51 Approval Crops 8/12/1986 Dairy Cattle and 142.00 Approval Crops 10/24/1986 Crops and 72.26 Pending Pasture In FY 85, MALPF received two applications from Washington County for the sale of Development Rights Easements. While local action was taken in August 1985, the purchases were not concluded on the Wiesenbaugh (AD -83-2) and Robbins (AD -84-2) requests until December 1986. These purchases bring the total area permanently restricted to agricultural use to 1,877 acres. MALPF received one application from a Washington County participant to sell a development rights easement in 1986. Final action on this applica- tion will not be made until. the spring of 1987. Local action on the application is shown below. Name and No. Oscar E. Lohman AD -80-7 Size and Type of Farm Diversified Crops and Stock 285.00 Acres Agricultural Advisory Board Action 7/16/1986 County Commissioners' Action 7/22/1986 11 AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT IN 1986 E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 2 1.8 1 R 2 6.5 1 I 9 2.1 1 R 10 11.4 8 R 18 9.2 28 R 18 6.0 1 R(A) 24 21.7 1 I Total 58.7 41 PLANNING SECTOR II E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 1 3.0 1 R 6 49.3 7 R 12 2.9 2 R Total 55.2 10 PLANNING SECTOR III E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 8 4.8 1 R PLANNING SECTOR IV E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 14 10.2 4 R PLANNING SECTOR V E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 15 9.9 4 R *R = Residential *R(A) = Residential (Apartments) *I = Industrial 7 Totals Acres Lots Sector I 58.7 41 Sector II 55.2 10 Sector III 4.8 1 Sector IV 10.2 4 Sector V 9.9 4 Sector VI 0 0 Total Acreage Converted 138.8 60 Total acreage of land subdivided for development = 946.9 acres Percentage of development occurring on agriculturally significant land = 14.6% Funding is also a variable in determining which farms will enjoy permanent protection. Available FY 87 funds were identified and committed in mid 1986. The figures are shown below and are approximate: General County Contri- State Total Alloted bution (Optional) Contribution Available Funds 40% 60% $171,285.00 $31,915.00 $47,873.00 $251,073.00 SUMMARY AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT 1980-1986 Total Developed Acreage Lots 1980 1,359.6 365 1981 1,137.1 332 1982 964.9 150 1983 895.3 220 1984 1,092.3 235 1985 1,144.6 231 1986 946.9 250 Totals 7,540.7 1,783 Total Acreage Converted Lots % Converted 487.8 95 36.0 251.3 59 22.0 194.4 33 20.1 305.6 127 34.1 409.6 68 37.5 439.8 65 38.4 138.8 60 14.6 2,227.3 507 29.5 29.5% of the land developed between 1980-1986 has been converted from agriculturally significant land. F:3 WATERSHED STUDY The Watershed Study is an analysis of the Edgemont and Smithsburg Reservoir Watershed, referred to in the County's Comprehensive Plan as a Special Planning Area. By definition given in the Plan, this is a - geographic area with unusual or significant importance and should be the subject of special policies and land use management techniques set up for addressing concerns for the future use or development of this area. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that special attention in planning for this watershed area is necessary in order to: A.) Maintain and improve the watershed as a source of high quality water B.) Minimize and improve the watershed on costly treat- ment processes and facilities. Current and proposed land use management te'-iniques concerning this special planning area are discussed in the watershed report. This report is broken up into several major sections with various sub -topics discussed in each. The first section is entitled Land Use and discusses such topics as residential density policies, watershed boundary delineation, grading permits, and waste disposal. The second major section, Environmental Resource Management, covers items such as pollution sources, groundwater quality, and erosion and sediment control measures. The third and final section, Public Facilities, reviews the process of the acquisition of additional watershed lands put up for sale by private property owners. The Study concludes that the concerns of the Comprehensive Plan have been addressed over the years by the various agencies having jurisdiction within the watershed, and that there are no indications of conditions adverse to the natural environment within the watershed. The Study also 9 concludes that the original concerns of the Plan for protection of watershed lands has become moot through the announced plans of the City of Hagerstown to abandon the reservoir as a water supply and to instead pump water from the Potomac River to those areas currently supplied by the reservoir. 10 WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN The required biennial update of the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan was completed, except for the public hearing process, in 1986. The Plan and subsequent updates are required by Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland. Many of the changes accomplished in 1986 were to update the status of ongoing projects such as improvements to the various public water and sewerage systems. However, there were also additions or substantial changes to other major projects or subjects. These included the Sharpsburg/ Keedysville Sewerage System, current status of the Highfield Water System and several references to the completed or recently initiated Town Growth Area Studies for Smithsburg, Boonsboro, Hancock and Clear Spring. Other modifications included a major overhaul of the surface water quality information. Inclusion of new service areas for public water and sewerage service were not made for several reasons. Public service depends, for the most part, on the owner's desire to develop. Since these are often not known in advance, it was determined that an amendment at the time of development and need or request for service would be more appropriate. Each request will receive more accurate and indepth attention at that time rather than wide ranging changes that may be only partially correct. 11 Those properties that were included for service, which weren't in the previous plan, were those for which individual amendments were adopted in the interim period between the last adopted plan and the present. They include the 70/81 Industrial Park, the Hurst, Burkholder and Citicorp properties in the vicinity of the Washington County Regional Airport, and 25 acres in the southern end of the County proposed for a motel and restaurant. The Commission staff continues to collect data and proposals to be included in the next scheduled update, which will be due in early 1989. 12 TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Transportation Plan for the County is adopted annually by the Board of County Commissioners in compliance with both State and Federal laws that require .that a Unified Transportation Plan Work Program be put together each year to document the short-range and long-range planning activities of the community as it relates to transportation where State and Federal funds are involved. In the 1986 UTP, the Planning Commission reported to the State on the projects we've been involved in relating to transportation. These included the Washington County Regional Airport projects, the County Engineering Department projects, the projects of the County Commuter System, and special projects completed by the Planning Commission that produced a bicycle tour map for the County. This latter project was accomplished in conjunction with the Department of Tourism. Projects performed by other County departments already included in the County's Annual Report were Road, Bridges, Signalization and Drainage projects undertaking by the Engineering Department; numerous Capital Projects accomplished under the direction of the Washington County Regional Airport; and a special study on transit service performed by a consultant for the County Commuter system. In preparing the annual UTP for the Board of County Commissioners for submittal to the state, the Planning Commission has also included numerous State initiated projects as well as reference to certain City of Hagerstown transportation oriented projects. 13 HISTORIC PRESERVATION The Board of County Commissioners adopted a new Historic District Preservation Ordinance in 1986 as an amendment to the County Zoning Ordinance. Previously zoned "HP" lands in the County have been amended on the zoning maps to show them as an overlay, with the underlying zoning district being the governing land use control for that property. The adoption of the Historic Preservation Ordinance itself has resulted in the appointment of a seven member Historic District Commission that is charged by the Ordinance to review and approve all applications for construction to buildings either on or adjacent to "HP" zoned lands. The duties and powers of the Commission are set forth in the Ordinance as are some of the general standards to be employed by the Commission in its review of construction applications. In addition, specific criteria have been enumerated in the Ordinance that governs the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission in an application for an "HP" zoning application. • As of this writing, the Historic District Commission has been meeting weekly and presently has for its review one building permit application for a house on land zoned HP. 14 HOUSE NUMBERING In 1986, the Board of County Commissioners directed the Planning Staff to proceed with a County -wide House Numbering Program for the purpose of providing a location and address system as an aid to the various emergency services. Two Grid Development Technicians were hired and the project was begun in the fall of 1986. A Committee comprised of representatives from the Fire, Ambulance, Police, and public utilities was formed and chaired by the Planning Commission's Executive Director to oversee the program through its completion 2 1/2 to 3 years hence. As of this writing, the Cascade Postal District has been completed as has the Sandy Hook Postal District. The rest of the County will be assigned house numbers postal district by postal district. In addition to providing an aid to the emergency services, this new house numbering system will be tied into the 911 emerc,ncy phone system and will be also used as a County -wide address system for mail delivery. 15 INNOVATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ON -SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL GRANT PROGRAM The I & A Systems Program, under the direction of the State Health Department and coordinated by the Planning Commission staff, made some progress in 1986 but not as much as had been anticipated. A schedule was developed for applicants to make application with the local Health Department for grant funds where existing on -site sewage disposal systems have failed or where lots of record have not successfully passed percolation tests. To date, only one application has been excepted by the Health Department, and no decisions have been made to date by the Health Department for the installation and testing of an I & A System in the County. iU PARK PLANNING Park Planning in 1986 involved a variety of projects and activities. A parks gift brochure was prepared for public distribution by the County Parks Department. By listing suggested items that could be donated, the brochure will offer individuals and organizations the opportunity to help improve the parks system. The County Bicycle Tour Map, recommended by the Bicycle Route Study Committe in 1985, was completed and printed. Two promotional ads were also prepared for use by the Tourism Department in promotion and distribution of the map. Landscape planning and cost estimate for the new South County Park were completed. The plan features trees native to the County and therefore hardy, with low maintenance needs. Also, final planning and coordination for the Camp Harding development was begun and will be completed in early 1987. This will result in a final concept plan based on soil test results and the site survey. Much of the last half of the year was devoted to beginning the update of the County Open Space, Parks and Recreation Plan. Existing and new parks acreages and projected future needs were determined. Elected officials in the towns were contacted for information on future park needs. As part of the plan update, an Open Space Set Aside Ordinance for the Urban Growth Area was investigated. As recommended by the Comprehensive Plan, a suitable Ordinance should be adopted in 1987. 17 REZONING CASES In 1986, the Planning Commission acted on sixteen rezoning applications. Eleven of these were for map amendments, and the remainder were for test amendments. Joint hearings with the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners are now being held regularly on a quarterly cycle, or as special hearings are called, in order to provide for efficiency in the hearing process. A listing of the Planning Commission's recommendations and the Board's actions for the cases heard in 1986 is as follows: CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATION ACTION RZ-335 Planning Text Sect.4.11 Approve Approved Commission RZ-336 TruJoy Map 1.2 A to RU Approve Approved Homes RZ-337 Wolfinger Map 150 A to RS Application Withdrawn Estate RZ-338 McCusker Map 226 IM to C Approve Approved et al. RZ-339 Planning Text Sect.110 Approve Approved Commission RZ-340, Planning Text Sect.23.1 Approve Approved Commission RZ-341 Paul Map 1.66 A to PM Approve Approved Crampton RZ-342 Frall Map .57 RS to BL Deny Denied Developers RZ-343 Dorothy Map .81 RS to BL Postponed Rowe RZ-344 James Map 1.66 A to BL Approve Approved Thompson 18 CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATION ACTION RZ-345 Tanglewood Map 1.13 RU to PUD Pending RZ-346 County Text Art.20 Approve Approve Commissioners RZ-347 County Map 552 HP Approve Approve Commissioners RZ-348 County Text Sect.23.1 Approve Approved Commissioners RZ-349 Charles T. Map 21.7 IM to A Approve Approved Shifler RZ-350 Christian Map .1 A to BG Withdrawn Martin 19 HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE STUDY During the second half of 1986, the Planning Commission staff began its analysis of all Highway Interchange zoned lands in the County using the Urban Research and Development Study as a base line. The purpose of this study is to replace current HI zoning with specific zoning classifications, or with some alternate mechanism, for the 11,000 acres now in the HI District. At present, HI zoning allows residential, business, and light industrial uses. The potential for conflict has become obvious within the past several years; the presence of residences on HI lands may act as a disincentive to commercial and light industrial developers, and the unexpected development of a business use in the proximity of existing residences may adversely affect that homeowner's property values. When the Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1973, it was the intent of the Ordinance that Highway Interchange zoning be a stop -gap measure until specific classifications could be assigned. Section 19.2 of the Ordinance says: To provide a more detailed guide for review of development proposals within Interchange Districts, the Planning and Zoning Commission will undertake more detailed site studies of each interchange area. There are 17 interchanges in the County between State Line and Williamsport on I-81 and between i reclassification of these Highway better protection for residences, intrusion from incompatiable uses 3eaver Creek and Hancock on I-70. The Interchange districts will result in businesses, and industries alike against that could result from an incompatible 20 mix. As of this report, the exact mechanism for eliminating the potential for land use conflict within the HI districts has not been decided. The Planning Commission will make additional proposals to the Board of County Commissioners who will ultimately rule on the method to be employed. 21 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS Hagerstown Mall: Preliminary Consultation In July of 1986, a preliminary consultation was held for a proposal by Crown American Corp. to construct Washington County's second shopping mall. Located on a 120 acre Highway Interchange zoned parcel at the northwest corner of the intersection of I-81 and Maryland Route 58, the Hagerstown Mall is proposed to contain 386,900 square feet of Gross Leasable Area. The site is proposed to be developed in two phases; Phase I involving construction of two major department stores plus smaller shops for a total of 326,900 G.L.A. to be completed in 1988. Phase II would involve the construction of an additional department store 11 and shops amounting to 60,000 square feet of additional G.L.A. This phase also includes the construction of a 200 room hotel. Phase II is projected to be completed by 1990. As of this writing, no additional plans have been submitted. 22 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS Meir Schecter: Preliminary Consultation In October of 1986, a preliminary consultation was held to discuss a concept plan by Mr. Meir Schecter for a private summer resort to be constructed on 54 acres north- east of Hancock. This project is the first of •its kind to be proposed for Washington County and involves con- struction of approximately 100 summer homes and associated recreational facilities. The homes would be marketed towards families who live in the Washington metropolitan area with the idea being that the families would live in the summer home during the summer months, with the working spouse joining the family on weekends. According to Mr. Schecter, this concept originated in the Catskill Mountains near New York City. As of this writing, no additional plans have been submitted. 23 1986 SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY 1986 APPROVALS TYPE QUANTITY NUMBER OF LOTS ACREAGE Residential 125 229 784.0 Commercial 12 15 107.5 Industrial/ Institutional 5 5 49.4 Simplified 70 93 447 TOTAL 212 342 1387.9 1985 APPROVALS TYPE QUANTITY NUMBER OF LOTS ACREAGE Residential 101 224 1006.0 Commercial 4 4 58.5 Industrial/ Institutional 5 7 27.8 Silified 66 78 382.7 TOTAL 176 313 1475.0 1984 APPROVALS TYPE QUANTITY NUMBER OF LOTS ACREAGE Residential 99 212 865.6 Commercial 4 4 12.7 Industrial/ Institutional 4 4 17.0 Simplified 65 89 578.788 TOTAL 172 309 1474.088 24 SUBDIVISIONS BY PLANNING SECTOR PROGRAM # PI0440 .- 1986 DELVELOPMENT PLATS SECTOR/TYPE NO. OF TOTAL AVERAGE SIZE NO. OF SUBDI- AVERAGE SIZE LOTS ACREAGE OF LOT VISION PLATS OF SUBDIVISION SECTOR 1 (A) RESIDENTIAL 118 281.6 2.39 43 6.55 (B) COMMERCIAL IS 107.5 7.17 12 8.96 (C) INDUSTRIAL 4 49.2 12.30 4 12.30 (0) INSTITUTIONAL 1 .2 .20 1 .20 SECTOR 2 (A) RESIDENTIAL 40 229.9 5.75 30 7.66 (Cl INDUSTRIAL 1 6.1 6.10 1 6.10 SECTOR 3 (A) RESIDENTIAL 9 55.9 6.21 6 9.32 SECTOR 4 (A) RESIDENTIAL 20 44.5 2.23 12 3.71 SECTOR 5 (A) RESIDENTIAL 36 156.7 4.35 28 5.60 SECTOR 6 (A) RESIDENTIAL 6 15.3 2.55 6 2.55 a TOTAL 250 946.9 3.79 143 6.62 25 N H 2 J J W 3 O d'0.00 '0 dN U!Nd'0 '0.0.0 '0 U)d '0.0 '0 d NN d d 0N.0.0 O Nd 0d.0 d N•O.O dd.0.0.0 N.0'00.Ud [O 0 0 0 0 0 0) OW 0 o] 000000000000000000000000000 0000000 00000 .\\.....\....\..\\\..\\.\\%%%' \\\\ MN S S N'0 JOMON0hdO S0 nN.0 MMh hN V1. -f ONM Vf h NN.1h NN.0 Ph N0P Ill OOM0S O O O N N O O N O N N N N O N N.4M N 0000 N 00 M N N N N O N N N N O N N O N N N N N .r NON O .I N O .+ h 0 M 00' O Vl N V1 O H P N N Vf Ni 0.0 .1 Ul 0.0 N 05 N N N N Uf S .O .0 .n h P O? N P N S P N Ni N 000.'100 0.+0.1000.-I O 0.1000.10 _ 0000-ONI.10 00 000.100.+000 O 00 r -I OO P.. (0 N O O S 00 .0 N 'ON S N .O ON V1 . NON 0 00' S h 0 H N M .0 00 N NO VI VI ON 0 0 P N O O. N S 0 SMNNOM NNNNNN.0ON M r r NN 1 O.I rNNNNN rUINNNUIMNMN IMMO•.0 1 0'NI 0 N .-I U1 h NI r •-I N NNN N NNNON.4.-40 NP N NOMNO NM000NN NNNNNNNOON 0...1.1.10 N N N 00 NN N N N N N NNN N N N N N N P N N N NNN N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N h N N N N N 0 N N N 0 H N O J K0 4- 0 W N U. z H h H 2 0 z Z W < M £ ). Y Y )>> Y} Y >-.i)> Y} Y Y Y} Y Y Y Y Y > Y Y Y Y Y} Y .40 d J J J .4.3_i J J J 4C.i.3 J J J J J J J J J J J J -1.3.3.3.1 .3.3_i 0.\ O W H H H H H H H H H H Z H H H H H H H 4 H H H H H H H H H 1.41.44- N J J J£££ J S J££ L J ££ J£ J S O££ J J J ££ i£ L£££ S£ J J£ J L i S£ S i££ J ,.o W Q 4 O¢< Q 4 Q 4¢ 4 a 4 C< Q H Q 4 a< Q Q Q a Q Q Q Q 4 a Q 2 a 4 a Q Q Q H Q a a 0 > HHS LL W HLLHLL W LLHLL LLHLLH W HLL W H HH LL WLLLLLLLL W LL I-LHHLL HLLiL IL . ll Z1L IY 11.H W 00 U U K V U 0 _ U 5 O 00 O: W U W 0 0_ 0: W W W C W IY W W W H W W K. W K X W H W W O: Y R X W W IU W W W W W W W K K W W W W W W£ W W W Z J W W W J J J W J W JJJ VI J J W J W 'W J H J J W VI IU W J J J J J J J J .3.4W W W J N J .4.4 .4 J H.1 J J W H F- U. t£ f1 O O£ O£ O O O O U' 'U £ 0£ J U' _ W U' O£ J U' U' U' 0 U' W U' 0 Z£ i l9 O O Z Z to K t9 l9 O£ W 4 O O O O O H -40 H O H H H Z H H O H O 0 H Z H NI O Z 00 HHHHH H H Ni H H O O H Z HHHHH O. H H H O Z W U USN VI U N U V) N H VI UI U N U O N H M N U H U O N N UI IA NN N h VIN O U V1 H VI N N N H¢ N VI VI O t O 2 d 140 Y ££ S LL LL S LL£ tt W LL Z LL W£ W£ X LL J LL LL i Z£ X W LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL W££ LL 2 W LL LL W LL d W LL LL£ nix H U U£ N N U Ul U VI 0 UI H N N U N U O N H U1 N U H U O U1 VIN VIN U1 N N UI N U U U1 H ilI N N In N< vl VI IA U H H O W H 0... 0 0I4 HH Ni H O0: C Htt OK J OOO: ix 00010 0: J NK 0 VI OH 22<¢¢24544¢HKK4<2O'4HK<mmd'<44<0:¢4¢<01 u]0:H¢d'¢O:K5<¢IO NO U h W N M M M O O M N O N 0 0 S S S S O S M O h O J N N N M M M M M P M O. O h M h M N S 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 O O h .444 N N N O N N O N O O O N N N N O N N O N N N N O N N N N N N O N 0 0 N .+ N N N N N N N N N N N O N N W 0 N N J 0.4 N < N VWI W N a 1- U 0 S 0 LL I W S < U 0N S 0 H _ S 0) 2 H U J 0: W .40 4-0 d 2 3 W< .'. W W H 2 d won J H Z VI W< J N 04- W 0f J W O 2 U 4 4-U- d O J O= L J Q W< W Z H N N H U W O< U ixl.. 2 N mow 0 X 0< U N H N U J H J H O: 4-40 00. 25 N J J W O H . H 021 -IN W H W Z J V W W 4 0< <.3 O O: VI O N a N C W 3 H 04-5 N >£ O: H Q 0 2 U J 1. J W d K LL O 2 U I I- tt 0 L4NI 4 Ofr.44002 ¢ H4 < O 24.4 <VI<' 7J U U 0 0 <Z H d&RUJwYW <VIW OX VII 31..C U VI W 7 NO W N W J H J W > d U v1 H VI W O . W J N H 0: £ O W O H 0 VI U 0 O Y W K Y W £ W 0 0 O: 2 0I t< W 3W 3 0 U W W O< C J Z W 0 W 2 42 J 7 H 0 J W U S Z V I M Y- J U I U 4 0 O Z O W W O O: ¢ 0 O Z N¢ H J W 2 S W S > J S W} W H Z Q< W O ix.3 <* N HHH K tt U W W .. W W K O J S J O W< 2 H O K N W W 0.3 2 Z H L Q H O: K O< U W S O J 0 0 W <>0 Q£ J V W Z¢ N 2 3 H U U J O: W J W Z 2¢ W W £<< O O W 0.3 J Y W J Z O NIX £< 4 J} H H< W S O\ O a 3 0 0 W< H W Z W H d J 0 2 0 1. 3 Z U C V1 2 4 Z O< Y K O J W m£ JJJ 4 Y O: 2 U W N U 2 J W 0: K H S O: N O: J>£ J O U H C V I O< NINI « 4 Z C O O O 0: O 0 O O H¢ U G H i H 3 J O O Z U O Q W J J O H Z H W I Z 0 0 Z O: K .3 .303030]0 ¢00.3.33 £ W HJ£Ii.J SOH 4H <2> <4U>a U £< 00 W d W O J J W 0 0 2 3 O: J Q V I J L H O V I H H V 1 2 Z 0 2 VI.3 N H •0 V 0 0 0 V I 0 O 13W J K W H W O 7 Y K C K VI 2 0 2 0: K 2< VI W Z a 4 ¢ 2 2 Z 2 Z Z J¢¢ K H Z¢ 3 3 H N K O W O S Z H W W W< O V10= U W O\ K H££ Y W<< HHH < W W W W W W S Z Z O Y 13 0 O: ix W F- K O Z O H Y V1 2 H H H 0: H K W K J J VI I W H O Ii LL VI J Z££ Y H -0 J S VI.3 J Y O H H U Y 0' H W W Y O: < K 4 H H O N O V I N V I 04-- W O H J} Z O O¢ O W LL O: 41 0 2 2 0: 0' d. 00 T A 0 J Y U H 0000 S d «<<W W Kd•O:000OO0 W 0Oj<40 <H <<<HOOO W W W W«<Q UU W H<HOOOOOU O 01m O0f 0l 0)m'9ODUUUUU 00 W LLLL W OO S2SSSSSY Y JJ ££ £ £ £ £ x £odd K m'Y_d'•N a Z K -40 N N N N N H N H N H U Z H N N N .I NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNN N N N N N N N .1 N H 0 20 ) iV 1 i 26 J C Z 0 I- I- F - 0, Z J J Q <0 er W Z 0 Z m ' Lv I LX D cDH U 1 J Z 2o I u > 0 m O Z CO-i Q 0 I a z W W i i I m N ('3 Co Q) '4O OD � E IIIIItIIItf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 In It M N — S101 03AOaddV d0 38NnN 31 0, 0 + N 00 ci �o Er a w m 0 ZLii (9 W Q Q I- W U O I4 > W D - > m O 0 Q Q I- 0 I - J z z O I- F - 0 z' J J Q Co w 0o z � 1 I 1 I i I 1 1---J 1 .1 i 1 1 1 :Ad I Z A T ttip ---- IITiJIIItIIL ( O 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 d- N 0 0 (O — — 0 a) S321OV 03AOaddV d0 83E 32 co tn r a r R lna O 000N500fl0 �. xel. •ry EUVOVILLE,9V el •, a uu _ _ ....p 1iPG a ' x • - SCALE Feet ° Miles ° I s n t +' � Jr a jfQ� .• �. r. ••` "tj y •, rx/ .. F' Nttx}, ) x (�_ $ � q ^ % •,°P"^ t40 E n� f 4 •� / TANI_ - _ ., .. . x. S x.a..x..r/u I "' e L ' j y a° 1_ °�s• � \ ?G•r j 81 e°ve P f 3 '•4 i � • ew^ r c t .ter+ SVRING NOG4 w " du `q.• `• G g • v 8 �� ° eo [x x t, wa X4411RG • i li' % . •'\ °'" c € o,r8 / sxKAGE Sown [. .. [..[ is , " it raµ p 'I x I ex w� sx � wam u8 f ux�w J' - Lnitxr.mo x� WASHINGTON COUNTY 44 \ - 9pd rx FNNST MARYLAND - ; i., RILAMeRG ₹ ti q i NNL.°.a - zr •.i ° *w AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS •a.. e.° 2 W„ Pw CUMULATIVE FROM 1980 1 PA:M [ d \. 4tr •4 N 4402 41 11 ° A nW er wu@� .x. ¢ 0.11in .r 4004 011446K DISTRICT NO. NAME ACRES Y/ ° AD -80-I FORD 178.59 2 00 I GGGNGBORG, AD -80- 2 CARR 245.64 <460062 ` NEE�4 AD- 80- 3 ALLENBERG 129.52 % J •°x° GVil;F } AD- 80- 4 ST. JAMES SCHOOL, INC. 278.75' oo. 001 x ° . 3 AD -80-6 HARSHMAN 232.44 �i\ 'R T42 AD- 80-7 LOHMAN 292.00 `° ti i +F q d'' v - '�r� ux[rA. a:.•.�- AD-81- I BECKLEY 66.00 SCALE AD -81-2 TOMS 140.00 t' 0000 170 00o_O0 'w , ,*l_ i. AD -82-2 F.T&K. INC. (BARNHART) 174.30 — —) AD -82— 3 ANKENEY 460.00 _ e y AD -83-2 WIESENBAUGH 312.82 AD -83-3 HAYES 200.55 .\ <•" AD -84-I FRENCH 320.00 / LLy � _ / rm AD -84-2 ROBBINS,RALL,BLUMBERG 448.00 ..N vanx°Mew° qa ORux AD -85-I WOLFINGER 149.63 AD -86-I LUROSE ESTATES 127.51 N• 404000 1 AD -86-2 TOMS 142.00 % IA '8 / i ! NOTE' DISTRICT TERMINATED AFTER INITIAL 5 YEARS. TOTAL 3897.75 II 7 — T -- — - r —T — �' r -- _c_t —Ipp s r-: —F — T'7 • "*, �[ ° is Po ro f ., u. + uxx �a.... 5 , e f°• tt mr ,.i €• xaxcap�� ° ;C, ,. � x � rvFni r� . �-' d a F � " 1 ♦ _ � { •• f `� .. ` �` ` r x,y . -�-6 '�;;v. �.... M0 '� � � 6✓ IM ' � ry Exw + � , % : cLEnP aa.E • o} ° a, ' IZi °p `6i9 U F;ppx[n4OE x {4 a" eqx 1 " m J 5 9 4016qi ExEw +° n SMITNSGVP\ 4 $V: \ p Hac `; / '\\ a /e wmh� �+ , '2 71-/i' TMaF s NI t aY `"p " °Iwc =1 xE 1 \ I flEDE / •.1 a il L �.. MANOR P NCGT LOI:tP E -I FURY ax. • l \ ..fl'.i . ILLIRMSPOPlynn. ". e 1 l MM— �! I� V/LOOM LOOMa x Mxmo NM WASHINGTON COUNTY • MARYLAND °° a°g t1 MT PLC LU aME�`� ` 1986 SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT MAP h IM P°°x EOVSVIl.LE `e � e e •+xn _ LEGEND AF a g ;. fl • RESIDENTIAL , r ;Ne-N, •� { *w - + ,.. SCALE A �1 INDUSTRIAL Md ,,,, ° e`e x E .006 .000 ° rV t lOLL • Mile =I—� Mil0s0 0/OOOMER7 • COMMERCIAL flM F „ "I /no • INSTITUTIONAL ;/ .,. i