Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_1985 Annual Reporttnnual Henc March 18, 1986 Board of County Commissioners Court House Annex Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Gentlemen: The Planning Commission is pleased to forward for your use its 1985 Annual Report. This report, submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 66B of the Annotated Code, summarizes the activities the Commission was involved in throughout calendar year 1985. In addition to the routine review and approval of subdivisions and site plans, the Commission continued to implement the Comprehensive Plan that was adopted in 1981. The various elements of the Plan worked on by the Commission in 1985 are described in this report. Of particular significance is the effort that continues between the Commission and the incorporated towns for establishing the Town Growth Areas similar to the Urban Growth Area developed with Hagerstown, Funkstown, and Williamsport. Meetings with Smithsburg and Boonsboro are currently being completed, and the outlook for positive policies mutually beneficial to the towns and the County is most encouraging. Significant effort on the part of the staff was devoted to special projects throughout the year. Tasks that were chaired by the Executive Director with resulting reports made to the County Commissioners included: a special study for PUD densities; a special infrastructure analysis for the Robinwood Drive/Mt. Aetna Road area; an analysis of the airport area infrastructure; and, a detailed study of infrastructure financing problems and accompanying recommendations for the Urban Growth Area. Sinceyely, Jack B. Byers Chairman JBB/JSH/ckw WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 1985 ANNUAL REPORT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ronald L. Bowers, President Richard E. Roulette, Vice -President R. Lee Downey John R. Salvatore Martin L. Snook WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION William E. Wolford, Jr., Chairman Jack B. Byers, Vice -Chairman Michael D. Barnhart Donald E. Zombro Dr. Ray M. Johns Judith A. Acord Richard E. Roulette, Ex -Officio Published, March 1986 Washington County Planning Commission County Office Building Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 TABLE OF CONTENTS Planning Organizational Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency Inter -Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The rnmnrchcnoive P1 PAGE i ii 1986 Work Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Town Growth Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Park Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 The Agricultural Land Preservation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Solid Waste Management ..........................10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 New Landfill Site Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Transportation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Additional Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Innovative and Alternative On -Site Sewage Disposal Grant Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Rezoning Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Zoning Board of Appeals Activity .....................21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 1985 Subdivision Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Subdivision Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28, 29, 30 1985 Development Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 1985 Rezoning Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Agricultural Preservation District Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 H (d4 aa) 0) NO +) k si.C v id roa r -I 00 H H H ti Uim,H a a • to roz m a)� ro • -J tP •6) >Y x 00 O rorlo r-1 OS (1) Si a) N O 0) N •ri to a)4J - C NH N N ro 0 R' •ri •ri U a C >4 •ri � EU 0 ro S C C • d a) ro O -) -P •r1 bi C U ti C N .r•i ro •ri• ?i 00),1u Q z N w 0 )-1 •HP, C U •ri i4) 0 .C C H U) N a) 0 ro ii 1 I-1 U .�. H C a) a) 1 -ix •r1 -.C ro O ro k 0 )a •rl 0 a' 0 fa U ->r.0 O N • U .C Si li W 4-) a) Si )•i r7 '.. N •r1 R, ••i a) 4JO N ii C ,Q N 0 U X U) 'Z7 H N > C rt) C •r1 1] a) u E C 0- a) rd C 0 Z N - $ >U) O ro 04 a) li .Q C 0 •r1 N - 0 r-1 S - •r1 M N 0 i) •r1 3 ro 0 C) S N a) O ro• - 0 rd > b4-3 Q ro Hx m4) Na U u a) x a 0 3+ Q 0 -raw • ri a) r' ro U 0 a) a)•C to 4-I (0 .C C > Si .14 U PQ r-1 a R'i •ri C r-1 Si r-♦ rd 4)Q •ri U) 0 C > z >r C i-) •ri O a) N r -I >•r1 Pi +) •ri a) 0 '... z i-la x.C ro C W.C C94 7 U U 0 Q4 •r1 U z 0 ro • 00 r7 w a) ro N a) C ro FC 0 rd • h H M --HO X h •1-) C +) U r1 W P+ W •d w to it m a it O1 -4x H0 > U•rr1h b rt w a H I Hi C U) C >11 m� H ax a u � mm ii ri •r1 Na H. U N F 4 Y ° o • e Q yY �0 tie t�Ye�} i i4 /::? 7 b Ii ii (p s yr Ziouelw i t9 • • C: Oo[NIAILM I a: I.atlI `i. cI A Di {,V�Ai} 0 'pqY Nt Q 11 Y L! f 14 Y t S Y �e VWWr `W �1� �f ! 0 40+ji a°oir% z♦�isR y p♦ S 'e �� •� Y's• W�u �'e • �y� a>^ R� a S� ° ZIC f i 4 F Wp �f �f' O if G D l• S{ a. 13. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Planning Commission continued with its implementation of the Comprehensive Plan by working on those elements in the adopted Work Program. In 1981, upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission assigned priorities to the various components of the Plan for implementation. Priority A constituted those tasks with an immediate need for implementation, and those are the ones that have been a part of the Work Program since the Plan's adoption. The following is a status of the Priority A policies and their implementation status. Priority A Status Urban Growth Area Study Completed Town Growth Area Studies In Work PUD Completed Industrial Development/HI Study In Work Agricultural Lands Study Mapping Completed Development Strategy To Be Done Rural Development To Be Done Land Use Plan To Be Done Mineral Extraction Completed Transportation To Be Done Educational Facilities/Site Plan Completed Water Supply Study In Work The Work Program for 1986 on the following page itemizes those elements of the Comprehensive Plan to be addressed in the new calendar year along with other tasks slated for work by the Commission. 1 I! I 0000M001-i��t'1 a______ II__ ommmmmmI-IO_H ®mmmmmm mmI-I ommmmmmI-I__u 0mmm___I_Im_LI 0■■ru"MMMLI I_LI ©_ElI-U___nmm� oml-i""MI lMmm ©nl-iun_rinrui 1 ©HLJI IIIO _HHu-In 01-flu-HIHNnH onl-lunl-t0n00n o1-Iuunl-i_I-Ir-� OH uII�iH_I-I mp ©ffn 1-ll_I-I__ o unnI-l-1 I I00 H o urIfI-Iumum_ 01 I00uuI-Iu1_I0 on__1111u1 IL_LI onnnunuml I ©ni_n_un1 IA ©I-100I-Inrinur� 01 I00H_fl-m i Ill ----------- I 2 nflnn nHsnnnn nH_i-i�nn nN_H_n_ ouu___ flu �nuww_ ©urunwu n unr�www onuuau __ an _no__ I ©uHnu� o u_Hnu_ o unNn� _ u� nuunnn nn�uHnn onnhJE-1nn OnMnuHH ©nnnuNN Hriuuu o h n J TOWN GROWTH AREAS Following the completion of the Urban Growth Area Study in 1983, the Planning Commission began working with Smithsburg and, in 1985, Boonsboro on establishing a Town Growth Area Boundary for each of those towns. Upon completion of an adopted Boundary for those two municipalities, work will begin with Clear Spring and Hancock on the same program. The Comprehensive Plan states as a general policy that a Town Growth Area Boundary should be established in order to maximize use of the existing infrastructure and to encourage future residential, commercial, industrial and institutional growth in areas that can be adequately served by water, sewer, transportation corridors and similar public facilities. The Boundary of each of these Growth Areas should encompass a realistic, geographic area that can be sere€ by the municipality and which the town feels is a logical growth boundary for the next twenty-year planning period. As of this writing, the Growth Area Studies for Smithsburg and Boonsboro are both near completion. The Planning Staff has been working with a committee from each of those two municipalities during which time all aspects of growth boundaries have been addressed, including water and sewage service districts, transportation corridors, drainage patterns, annexation policies, existing zoning classifications, population densities, solid waste management, and financing arrangements for various services within the Growth Area. The completion of these studies and the ultimate adoption of a Growth Area Boundary will result in closer ties between the county and town governments, a more economical allocation of public funds for infrastructure, and a firm base from which future planning activities may begin. PARK PLANNING Park planning in 1985 included a variety of projects and activities. A significant part of planning activity was committed to a bicycle route study recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. A seven member study committee met on six occasions to accomplish its goals of locating safe bicycling routes and increasing opportunities for bicycling by various means. During the study, an inventory of named state and county roads preferred for bicycling was adopted, and recreational and touring routes were suggested. A series of five photocopied loop maps for recreational riders was produced, showing short circuit rides on state bike routes and county roads outside the city. The maps are being distributed and promoted by County Tourism. One of the Committee's recommendations was designing and printing a county bicycle tour map and guide to promote and increase tourism by out -of -county and out-of-state bicyclists. Production of the map was started in November following acceptance of the Study Committee report by the Planning Commission. It is anticipated that the map will be available from. County Tourism in early 1986. Final concept planning and coordination of permits, specifications,. and Health Department review of plans for the long awaited South County, Park. was completed early in 1985. Site grading began in August, with final construction expected to be finished by the summer of 1986. Permit application packets including maps and photographs for stream side repair work at two county parks were prepared and submitted to the State Water Resources Administration. Stabilization and repair was completed at the new Wilson Bridge Picnic Area, while maintenance and repair at Camp Harding Park will be completed in 1986. -5- THE AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM Washington County's effort to preserve valuable farmland via the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program began in April of 1978 and has continued through 1985. The program was established and is regulated by Agricultural Article, Section 2-501 through 2-515 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. It is administered through a Planning Commission staff member by the Washington County Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board, the County Commissioners, and the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation of the Maryland Department of Agriculture. The program encourages landowners to voluntarily enter into an Agricultural Land Preservation District in which it is agreed that the land will not be developed for a period of at least five years. In return for that restriction the landowner receives protection from nuisance complaints and becomes eligible to sell a development rights easement. A landowner may exercise the option of selling a development rights easement to the Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation provided that his offer to sell is recommended by the County's Advisory Board and the County Commissioners. At the local level the Agricultural Advisory Board will review and rank easement applications, assigning point values to such items as farm size, soil quality, and development pressure indicators on its easement checklist. Each farm's total point value will assist the Board in determining which farms to recommend for easement purchase and in what order of priority. The Board of County Commissioners makes the final local decision based on Advisory Board recommendations and data gathered at the required public hearing. If purchased by the State of Maryland, the easement will remain effective in perpetuity. 6 The total acreage of productive farmland in preservation districts rose from 3388.01 acres in 1984 to 4156.01 acres at the close of 1985. One application was reviewed in late 1985 and has not yet been ruled upon by The Foundation. District application activity is listed below. Name and No. Farm Type Acres Status *Lola V. Barnhart French Beef Cattle, Hogs 320.00 Approval AD -84-1 and Crops 4-1-85 Rollins/Rall/Blumberg Beef Cattle and 448.00 Approval AD -84-2 Crops 5/14/85 Russell A. Wolfinger, Jr. Beef and Dairy 149.63 Pending AD -85-1 Cattle and Crops *Current status of Preservation Agreement uncertain at this time due to foreclosure sale. MALPF received two applications from Washington County participants to sell development rights easements in 1985. Final action on these applications and decisions on which easements to purchase will not be made until the spring of 1986. The two applications are listed below along with actions taken at the local level. Name and No. Size and Type Agricultural Advisory County Commissioners of Farm Board Action Action Joseph H. 310.82 Ac. Approval Approval Wiesenbaugh Beef Cattle and 8/1/85 8/27/85 Kathleen M. Crops Wiesenbaugh AD -83-2 Rollins/Rall/ 448.00 Ac. Approval Approval Blumberg Beef Cattle and 8/1/85 8/27/85 AD -84-2 Crops Funding is also a variable in determining which farms will enjoy permanent protection. In mid calendar year 1984 available Fiscal Year 1985 funds were determined. Settlement procedures are still to be completed on the easement purchases to be made in Washington County with FY '85 funds. Only after conclusion of settlement is the landowner's identity available for general publication. 7 Available FY '86 funds were also identified in mid 1985. The Foundation saw its largest available balance for easement purchases which resulted in Washington County also realizing the largest available fund in the eight year history of the program. Funding activity occurring in 1984 is detailed as follows. General County State Total Year Allotted Contribution Contribution Available Funds (Optional) 60% 40% FY '85 $119,413.61 $ 50,657.18 $ 75,985.77 $249,640.01 Allocated Mid -1984 FY '86 $187,502.25 $ 25,456.38 $ 38,184.57 $251,143.20 Allocated Mid -1985 AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT IN 1985 PLANNING SECTOR I E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 2 15.4 1 I 2 16.4 1 C 9 9.7 2 R 13 18.4 5 R 13 4.5 1 R(A) 13 109.2 4 C 18 10.5 6 R 27 10.7 14 R Total 194.8 34 PLANNING SECTOR II E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 1 69.5 6 R 6 1.9 1 R 12 .9 1 R 16 40.2 14 R Total 112.5 22 PLANNING SECTOR III E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 8 10.0 1 R 11 90.0 1 R Total 100.0 2 PLANNING SECTOR V E.D. ACRES NO. OF LOTS NEW USE* 4 4.1 4 R 5 3.0 1 R 15 25.4 2 R Total 32.5 7 R = Residential R(A) = Residential (Apartments) I = Industrial C = Commercial Fi TOTALS ACRES LOTS HSector I^ 194.8 34 Sector II Sul&jP �. 112.5 22 Sector III 100.0 2 Sector IV C `° 'ti 0 0 Sector V kJ 9a� 32.5 7 Sector VIJ 0 0 Total Acreage Converted 439.8 65 Total Acreage of land subdivided for development = 1144.6 Acres Percentage of development occurring on agriculturally significant land = 38.4% � p, SUMMARY VV AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT 1980-1985 Total Developed Total Converted % Converted 11 Acreage Lots Acreage Lots 1980 1,359.6 365 487.8 95 36%' 1 f 1981 1,137.1 332 251.3 59 22% V 1982 964.9 150 194.4 33 20.1% JC1983 895.3 220 305.6 127 34.1% 1984 1,092.3 235 409.6 68 .37.5% 1985 1,144.6 231 439.8 65 38.4% 1L Totals 6,593.8 1533 2088.5 447 31.6% 1C Thirty-one (31%) percent of the.land developed between 1980-1985 has been converted if from agriculturally significant land. IV f 1 C 9 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT The Solid WasteManagement Plan for Washington County was updated in 1985 in order to both satisfy the requirements for State law for a biennial update and to provide the county with a current status of its solid water management activities. The current biennial update is an outgrowth from the Solid Waste Management Study that was completed in 1982 and addresses those various factors for solid waste management that should be of concern to the local community. We discovered in 1982 that the per capita waste generation factor throughout the county was 7.1 pounds; this consistency has carried through to 1985 with an estimated waste generation factor of 7.8 pounds per day per person based on the total waste stream including industrial and commercial disposal. In 1982 we projected that the 148 acre Resh Road Landfill that was opened in September of that year will last another 22 years assuming that we continued with the same landfilling techniques that we have used in the past. That estimate still appears valid; the presently estimated conpletii date -for the Resh Road Landfill is 2004. The cost to operate the Resh Road Landfill has proven to be economical in comparison with other communities. The average cost per ton for landfilling between 1982 through 1985 is $5.04. Numerous other communities operate at a level 4 and 5 times that figure. A recent analysis of the Hancock Landfill indicates that that site will serve the west end of the County until the year 1998. The cost per ton of $6.16 for the Hancock area landfilling operation is higher than that for the Resh Road Landfill, but still in line with current day landfilling costs. In the 1982 Solid Waste Management Study, seven recommendations were offerred by the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners for improving the overall operations of our solid waste management. Those recommendations and the current status is as follows: A -10- 1. It was recommended that the county continue landfilling. This recommendation was adopted and has proved to be the most cost effective method for the community. 2. A search for additional sites was recommended so that we would have adequate landfill area for a 25 to 50 year period beyond 2004. This endeavor is currently being completed. 3. The Planning Commission recommended that additional weighing surveys be undertaken in order to establish a systematic data base for solid waste management. This recommendation is again offered in order to help us achieve more efficient solid waste management techniques. 4. The Commission recommended that a separate rubble area be established at the Resh Road site to handle demolition debris, trees and brush, and other such matter thereby saving on the landfill area and the daily cover. This recommendation is still valid. 5. In 1982 it was recommended that the Hancock Landfill be looked into in order to determine the most cost effective method of handling solid waste in the west part of the county. With only another 12 years estimated for the duration of that current site, work should begin now to determine whether it is most cost effective to establish a new adjacent site or to use the Hancock area as a transfer station for transporting solid waste to the Resh Road Landfill. 6. The recommendation that a separate area be established at the landfill for residential vehicles to deposit trash has been implemented. This has proven to be a major improvement to the landfill operation that provides not only an extra degree of safety but also a decided convenience for the public. 7. In 1982 we recommended that tires be sliced or shredded in some manner so as to reduce the volume taken up by landfilling them. The county currently has an agreement with the contractor to slice approximately 14,000 tires for year for a total cost to the county of about $3500. 11 NEW LANDFILL SITE STUDY As an outgrowth from the Solid Waste Management Report of 1982, the Planning Commission Staff began investigating the Martinsburg Shale Formation for likely future landfill sites. The first phase of that study was completed in 1985, and work currently continues in order to narrow down likely candidate sites. Final recommendations are expected to made to the Board of County Commissioners sometime in the first quarter of 1986 that will result in adequate land to handle the County's landfill management needs until approximately 2050. 12 TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Transportation Plan for the county is adopted annually by the Board of County Commissioners in compliance with both State and Federal laws that require that a Unified Planning Work Program be put together each year to document the short range and long range planning activities of the community as they relate to transportation where State and Federal funds are involved. In 1977 the Allen M. Voorhees Company completed a study under contract with the county called "The Hagerstown/Washington County Transportation Study" that addressed all the elements of transportation for both the County and the City of Hagerstown. This study is a foundation from which to update all transportation activities in the community and also serves as the basis for keeping tabs on transportation projects both in the County and the City. Each of the elements of that plan were update in 1985 and address everything from Eastern Boulevard and the completion of the U.S.11/Wilson Boulevard grade crossing to more minor projects throughout the community. In addition to the above, the County also reports to the State on the various capital projects that are funded with Federal monies. These projects are always in the adopted CIP. The study completed in 1979 known as the "Blueprint For Mobility" was an assessment of local transportation needs primarily as mass transportation is effected. That study resulted in a number of recommendations to the County Commissioners. The Transportation Commission is currently planning to update that study under contract with a consultant with an estimated completion date of sometime in FY '86. The purpose of the study will be to analyze the effectiveness of the mass transportation system and to provide findings and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. -13- ADDITIONAL STUDIES Throughout 1985 the Planning Commission Staff functioned as the pivotal organization for a number of special studies that involved the participation of County and City agencies as well as community organizations and individuals. These studies, each chaired. by the Executive Director, resulted in presentations to the Board of County Commissioners along with appropriate findings and recommendations. A special committee was formed early in 1985 to study the appropriate densities for the PUD section that was subsequently adopted as a part of the Zoning Ordinance. The study group was comprised of Taylor Oliver of the Home Builders Association, David Kinish, Richard Kautz, and Richard Thomas with the City of Hagerstown, Frank Downey with the Farm Bureau, James Witherspoon, citizen at large, Dr. George Elliott of Hagerstown Junior College and Richard Bowers., Real Estate Appraiser. The committee recommended to the Planninq Commission that the density for PUD's be set at a maximum of 12 dwelling unit per acre with the specific density for each development being a function of the Commission's review of that application. A special committee was formed to study the availability of infrastructure in the Robinwood/Mt. Aetna Road area as it may be effected by a new golf course on the Ditto Farms Regional Park. The committee comprised of William Breichner, Richard Kautz, and Merle Seville with the City of Hagerstown; Glenn Dull, County Engineer; Barry Teach, County Administrator, and Robert Johnson of the County Sanitary District conducted its study over a period of several weeks and made its presentation to the Board of County Commissioners on April 30, 1985. The general findings of that committee were that 1) Mt. Aetna Road from Robinwood Drive to the park appears adequate to handle traffic; Landis -14- Road needs to be upgraded, and there should be a cost sharing agreement between the County and the developer for the upgrading.2) Public water could be provided to the area by construction of a loop from Londontowne to Youngstoun Development. 3) Through an agreement with the owners of Youngstoun and,Brightwood Acres East, public sewer should be made available to the area. 4) The City of Hagerstown can install a water storage tank to balance the water demand in the Londontowne area. 5) Public water will not be required to irrigate the golf course; drilled wells will be adequate. An Airport Infrastructure Committee was appointed by the Board of County Commissioners for the purpose of analyzing the infrastructure in that general area and with an objective of determining if there are adequate facilities to accommodate new expected growth over and above the currently planned growth for Citicorp and the immediate airport environs. That committee was comprised of Merle Elliott, CHIEF; John Ferguson, Columbia Gas; Joe Elliott, Bernard Moser, Potomac Edison; Glenn Dull, County Engineer; Bob Johnson, Sanitary District; Ted Wolford, County Roads; Steve Adkins, SHA; Leroy Burtner, EDC; Mike Shrader and Malcolm Davis of Davis, Renn & Shrader; Sam Young, Citicorp; William Breichner, City of Hagerstown; and Leigh Sprowls, Airport Manager. The concensus of this study group, after several sessions of analysis, was that there are adequate water, electrical, gas, and transportation facilities in the area to accommodate future growth on the Industrial Foundation property as well as new growth in the Airport Industrial Park, the MKT site and possible future development on the south side of Showalter Road. The study -15- group recommended to the Board of County Commissioners when the presentation was made on September 3, 1985 that additional analysis be performed by the consultant for the Sanitary District to determine the necessary steps for implementing adequate sewerage facilities to that area. The Urban Growth Area Study, completed in 1983, recommended that the County develop a standard policy by which public improvement costs are equitably allocated between the local government and private developers. The purpose of this recommendation was to establish a fair policy whereby a special fund is established to help defray the costs of oversized facilities where that oversizing is required by a governmental agency for growth beyond the application at hand. An Infrastructure Study Committee, chaired by the Executive Director was comprised of Jack Byers, Planning Commission Member; Glen Dull, County Engineer; William Breichner, City Administrator; David Kinash, Water Department Superintendent; Malcolm Davis, of Davis, Renn & Shrader; and Thomas Dwyer, former Planning Commission member. The Committee addressed this problem throughout a series of meetings and made its recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners in September of 1985 and January of 1986. In summary, the Infrastructure Study Committee recommended that the Board of County Commissioners appoint a review committee comprised of individuals in the necessary disciplines of technical and financial expertise to analyze on a case -by -case basis new projects where oversized infrastructure is required. The Committee recommended that in addition to providing a more equitable arrangement for the developers, there would be further advantages in the cost sharing resulting in better growth management, the creation of jobs, the creation of affordable housing, an expanded tax base, and an overall improvement to the local economy. -16- INNOVATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ON -SITE SERGE DISPOSAL GRANT PROGRAM The Planning Staff is coordinating the I & A systems program for the County which was authorized by State law and became effective in 1985. An agreement was signed between the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the Board of County Commissioners in June of 1985 that allocated $37,500 to the County Commissioners for assignment to projects that meet the established criteria for an I & A system. This program is expected to result in the utilization of sites that otherwise would have been prohibited under current State law, namely subdivisions approved before 1972 that do not meet current Health Department standards or lots of record with failing septic systems. The Planning Staff will continue to work with the Health Department representatives throughout 1986 in order to select candidate sites for this project. 2 17 REZONING CASES In 1985 the Planning Commission acted on thirty-four rezoning applications. Seventeen of these cases were for map amendments, and the remainder were for text amendments, two of which were withdrawn. Joint hearings with the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners are now being held regularly on a quarterly cycle, or as special hearings are called, in order to improve the overall efficiency of the hearing process. One map amendment of significance was RZ-290 for the POD addition to the Zoning Ordinance. The PUD classification replaces the PR Article and represents an implementation of the Comprehensive Plan policies. This PUD rezoning resulted in the elimination of the PR designation on the zoning maps and changed the classification for numerous property owners. Reference should be made to the reports in RZ-290 for a detailed listing of those properties effected by the Comprehensive PUD change. A detailed listing of the Planning Commission's recommendations and the Board's actions for the cases heard in 1985 are as follows: TYPE OF PLANNING COUNTY CASE APPLICANT AMENDMENT AREA REQUEST COMMISSION COMMISSIONER; RECOMMENDATION DISPOSITION RZ-290 Planning Map 998 PR to PUD Approve Approved Commission - A,RR,RS,HI,BL RZ-302 Paramount .Map ...11.11 RS,RR to IG Deny Approved Feed & Supply 1.50 Approve RZ-303 Allsafe Fire Map .42 RU to BL Approve Approved Equipment Co. RZ-304 Board of Co. Text Approved Commissioners RZ-305 Board of Co. Text Approved Commissioners RZ-306 Maryland Map 5.11 RS to IG Approve Approved Metals, Inc. WR TYPE OF PLANNING CASE' APPLICANT AMENDMENT AREA REQUEST COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RZ-307 Permits & Text Inspections RZ-308 Permits & Text Inspections RZ-309 Planning Text Commission RZ-310 Planning Text Commission RZ-311 Planning Text Commission RZ-312 Planning Text Commission RZ-313 Planning Text Commission RZ-314 Sarah A. Map Eyler RZ-315 Donald E. Map Thompson RZ-316 Hag./Wash: Map County Ind. Foundation RZ-317 Frederick W. Map Morrison RZ-318 Agnes Elliott Map RZ-319 Cora G. Myers Map RZ-320 Planning Text Commission RZ-321 Board of Text County Commissioners Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve 18.64 Ac. RS to BL Deny 4.58 Ac. A to RR Deny 53.58 Ac. HI to IG Approve COUNTY MMISSIONERS DISPOSITION Approved Approved Approved Remanded Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved 8 C to BG Deny Approved 1.8 Ac. C to BG Approve Approved 12 Ac. A to BG Deny Approved 8.5 Ac. A to PM Deny Denied 44,159 sq.ft. RR to BG Deny Denied Approve Approved Withdrawn 19 TYPE OF PLANNING COUNTY CASE APPLICANT AMENDMENT AREA REQUEST COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS RECOMMENDATION DISPOSITION RZ-322 Board of Text Withdra. County Commissioners RZ-323 Board of Text Approved County Commissioners RZ-324 Board of Text Approved County Commissioners RZ-325 Iris S. Map 19,236 sq.ft. RS to BG Deny Denied Reeder RZ-326 Richard N. Map 2.98 Ac. A to IR Deny Denied Bikle (1-7-86) RZ-327 Roy A. Grove Map 4.17 Ac. HI to BG Deny Denied Mildred Sollenberger RZ-328 Mae K. Cole Map 1.62 Ac. HI to BG Deny Denied RZ-329 Austin H. Map 4.39 Ac. A to IR Approve No Act'.n m Bikle RZ-330 Planning Text Approve Approved Commission RZ-331 Henry A. Hesse Map 23,087sq.ft RS to BL Deny Approved Ronald G. 1.03 Ac. (1-21-86) Toothman RZ-332 Alton W. Map .48 Ac. RU to C Approve Approved Rinard (1-7-86) RZ-333 Planning Text Approve Approved Commission (1-7-86) RZ-334 Planning Text Approve Approved Commission (1-7-86) 20 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ACTIVITY During 1985 the Board of Zoning Appeals considered a total of 147 cases involving petitions for relief from the requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Of this total, 38 requests were for Special Exceptions, 91 were for Variances, 9 were for -Expansion of a Non -Conforming Use, 7 were for a Change of a Non -Conforming Use, and 2 were appeals charging Administrative Error. GRANTED VARIANCE 73 SPECIAL EXCEPTION 32 EXPANSION OF NON -CONFORMING USE 5 CHANGE OF NON -CONFORMING USE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE 11 DENIED WITHDRAWN TOTAL 12 6 91 3 3 38 1 3 9 3 3 7 2 2 1 22 15 147 21 1985 SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY 1985 APPROVALS TYPE SUBDIVISIONS NO. OF LOTS ACREAGE Residential 107 214 963.8 Commercial 6 9 135.9 Industrial/ Institutional 7 8 44.9 Simplified 74 100 400.0 TOTAL 194 331 1544.6 1984 APPROVALS TYPE SUBDIVISIONS NO. OF LOTS ACREAGE Residential 101- 224 1006.0 Commercial .4-H 4 58.5 Industrial/ Institutional 5 7 27.8 Simplified 66 78 382.7 TOTAL 176 313 1475.0 TYPE SUBDIVISIONS NO. OF LOTS ACREAGE Residential 99 212 865.6 Commercial 4 4 12.7 Industrial/ Institutional 4 4 17.0 Simplified 65 89 570,788 TOTAL 172 309 1474.088 22 SUBDIVISIONS BY PLANNING SECTCR P?05RAM 4 PI3440 1985 DEflELOPMENT PLATS SECTOR/TYPE NO. OF TOTAL AVERAGE SIZE NO. OF SUBCI- AVERAGE SIZE LOTS ACREAGE OF LCT VISION PLATS CF SUBDIVISION SECTOR 1 (A) RESIDENTIAL 109 446.4 4.10 38 11.75 (B) COMMERCIAL 7 127.5 12.26 4 31.95 (C) INDUSTRIAL 6 41.3 6.88 5 9.26 (D) INSTITUTIONAL 1 3.C ?.CO 1 3.00 SECTOR 2 (A) RESIDENTIAL 50 211.6 4.23 25 7.Eo (8) COMMERCIAL 1 5.1 5.1C 1 5.10 (D) INSTITUTICNAL 1 .6 .60 1 .60 SECTOR 3 (A) RESIDENTIAL 13 110.4 2.49 9 12.27 SECTOR 4 (A) RESIDENTIAL 7 11.2 1.60 6 1.87 SECTOR 5 (A) RESIDENTIAL 31 170.0 5.48 24 7.08 (8) COMMERCIAL 1 3.C 3.00 1 3.00 SECTOR 6 (A) RESIDENTIAL 4 14.2 3.55 2 7.10 TOTAL 231 1,144.6 4.95 120 9.54 23 IJ7 in ,lt N N in N N VI in N N V• N N N N N N N N VI N N N IC! m N N N N N V1 N N N N N N N N N N N Vt N, N In w m m m m m w w w m m m m m m m m m w w m CO m m m m m row m m m in w U, m ro CD w m w m m w w w a CI_ F P P M r -I F m N .0 P M .p N M Y UO m M P .p r1 .O m 1 m N ry M .(I M M .p O •-r F 1 F m .O N N F N P N O O N >¢ O O N .-I n ry 0000 N.• ._IN N N•• .n NO _I00 "I O N O Nn. —_I -o fJ - r U N U N • O 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (Y \ \ \ O :-I m m ,O N M FO .-I 'A I` N p ..I N N P 1 m N m O •'• N y S N m P m .p V :1 1 1 O O M F F N O F M m O F W 0- 0 aW a a CD: • n U O.O NUO(]0O.ONN.f OMPN Y NS Y.I N.O NNO.-1000 Nm YMNrNCIF ONF.-•OPU, N ¢ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ a N N P "I H r1 .+ N 1 •-I— r -I F N V) N N .-I y w .n .y .y N ••I N M N .-I M F F N ti m P F.• 1 P• y 'O N m • U, O — — •+ m N r m O N 'O T t0 A 'I Y I •-IOOO•D N:'+N .•r'I r -I C00000-i.-.NU N. -I .-I .• tiCl r O.I NNI.-I I1 -I N -IN.• MN F NI M U, O N M W O N •r .• y .•r ..• 'I •y ^I .O N .y N •-I .-I .n m N ••I •+ •-I •-I .-I N .• N r -I .-I r •y .y .r N .I .+ N •-I .-I 1 •+ N .r N n M r -I M NI M M r r N N O H T O U W N U Z H r0 h 2 ro Z -4-_'- W CU, 7 Y Y } Y Y } Y Y Y}> } Y Y > } Y J> >_>-.>_ }}>-,->->-_,- Y} J N n J J J J J J J J J J J JJJ J J J J J¢ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 0\ O H N H H H H H N N H hl H M H 2 N H N M I-1 H M M H H H H N J Y£ J i£ JJJ 1 ££ ££ i_ J J i££ J i Y££ i O 2 ££ Z J 2 Z i£ }: £ i£ >0 W R 2 Q¢¢ Q¢ Q Q C Q C C C C 1—. 4 Q g q C¢ C C C C C N Q H C R¢ C Q 4 q Q C Q¢¢ CC m > 4. !i H a_ LLI+ H H 4. LL 4. LL LL LL LL H Z H H y, LL 4. N LL LL LL LL Ia_ F 1& 'L IJ_ LL LL H LL LL 4. li LL U t W LLL. • Li U 00 -ft 7 W fY U U O 1 IX W O W W K W W IX W X W 4J W W W W 2 W W W fY W W W W W_ W W W W F- W W W W W W W W X X W hl W J J W J J W N V1 J W JJJ J J J N I- M W J J J W JJJ J J H J J J J w J J J J J J J J W W J J H I- LL C- U Ur 2' t9 t•J £ O J !D J U' U Ur U t9 LO O' J i U U' t9 £ CO C9 Ct t9 Ct r t9 C[ lJ U t9 J L9 V L l9 Ur L'I t� L^ J J L9 O LC O O r r O r r O L L H= N r H r H H L n Z O r r r O r Iy H H !Y Z r a r r H Z r r r r r H r r= O H H Z W N m U N m IJ H N O N N N N N m H C M U NNN V m N N N N H m Q N N N H m N N N N m VINO CI N rlr 0= a !-! O Y LL LL L ly W£ Z Z LL X 4 [L LL ly !L LL Z n Z L W 4. ly T_ LL ly 1y LL Ir_ J LL O. LL LL LL Z LL LL lL IL LL 1a. LL la, %% ly ly N CL F m N N N H H N O m VI N N N VI M G N U N N N U N N m VI m H m g N N N M m V) N VI N N N N O O N m 9. O U, W J Z N H H rM rM T H J N 1-I rH J N N7 Ur K N U, U,= DIX VI O N N f] I LL CI 2 6 4 4 2 R 4 4 Q 'Y R S g q Q Q p) Q 6 [Y Q 4 S 6 (Y C 6 ♦'i p: R G G 4 (Y 4 {Y IY Q (Y lY UI W N N 'aM M M F 0 Ll m :D M N F P M F N M N N M P m m M F m m M N M m 1 S t] roM P M P M F -O M F m J H U N •4 •'• •"I N N N •+ 0 IV O r -I N U I CJ U r -I -------------N N r r -I •+ U ^I U •'I IV N H N _ W O _ m F C W CU N LL ~ W N Z F 4. O tJ N .O J H Z O N Z N I— Z C >- C J N c0 IJ Ii_I >0[X W [J •-I Y 2' Z V w W £ Z H J H J W H Ii U N W M K W W+ • IX • Y I- 04> Q} H U C • O S W hi •-IN O O X F F - W Q V Iy W V IL O Z J ♦' H G 1- m vl J h• X I-' W W LL W J 2 W J O } N H LL H I- 2 Z C Z J Y p N N N 2 Z W W N h1 H 1L W N 4. T J m H LJ > O H n O H 0 w w N U LI 00 T q 3 s FI U ti W H F h VI >1 3 [[ W J IX O C n F F 7•c + Ia_ VIN • W W m 2 3 C O 3 O Q W I- W [C W W N J w m J J O C [Y L U w J LL W w ¢ J J I'I L 1Y 07 w 7 ✓I f[ tt Y W C H H} V' F 7 w LL> 3 W Lf 1- H W IJ (40. W U U W 0 N N C H H> O Y 2 Ia_ O. m F_ VI [ti T J 2 N W' S ti 1.4W lJ W F. 9 1- ) l_ 1- ;Y T N J C 70 W m 1- O O cJ CZ W LI N} 1- [1 2 ♦ - U W N O O W H J J H H 1- U 2/ U (Y L LA) N VI [[I m N 'Y LL U H L J F` Y L F- J V .G N J N O 2 N m mJ O J H i J O T_ ¢ H tti m J C W W O O m Z C r N W 2 W H 4J Z W O [C N C J VI 1- W LJ W O O 3 0 0 0 C W 2 S R iY C H O- O J U U N Y !Y F- C W Z V C [E II: C O' J I J J Z 41 J J 7 [Y J J O O N O S C O (E W 3 C O J W 1- I -I )- J J W 1- R W L J Z } S W C [C C 0 J O> J LL Z R U C C % Z O' I- Y) IIJ J S O U H ? 2 n w O, &}} Z Y Z O T tJ U IO M LL C Z O M O: W H O C) Z Z 7 H H !- W r] 'L.J W W L Z L : m 'lh C Cr K IJ "• W R Y S r O [Y J O M. S O S. 7 0.007 Z W }_ Z [IJ W? O 2 H W W S T O O J S n£ 2 q b. 0 N VI O W Z T •:) J} n VI H Z I- O C LL2 r 2 H VI O O lJ 2 Z Z 1 W w W Z w W F- UZ J Z W r_J Z VJ 1- N Lu W O CC) J W• U H 1- S£ S C !4 N C L C W. R CC m !O W L L} H C N N -i )_ tY O 17 U W W T. U Y Y t>_0- L J F- W I- - L 2 3 O W I- LI e' 7 {- N N n T J !Y VI •+':l M I- Z O W rt H Q -4CI 1- J 1 H W' J Y U J I- VI M 'J! J N O Z ✓1 IL I£ 'L I£ H m LL U N H N Ll W I<I 3 :Y tat H O H N H J O [Y N O fl q I— J J U 1— T N K J 10 S IX .T J [J LLl I9 £ O H w VI LL LL 7 7 L o T J 3 >- './) ¢ J T X> ,7 N T J 2 O S r r 1 0, S C C O C Q U J l_ N H 'J O J K Q C W W W W V 0 0 J J Z IJ O O a U IJ IJ :J I -I O W H V U U .' Ui 4 !t C U U 0000 J W !.J ' i 4J ',J W LL n i J N S Z "L I I $ I I 2 lit -I Y J J L£ T T_ T Z Z IX T (Y K ✓I VI - 1- E 2_I -40 N Z ti ti •-i •+ ti r -I .4 .-I ti .4 •+ Iv .-I .-I .-I .v •-I .v •-I •+ ti .-I _ •-I .-I .-I r -I •r r -I •-I .v r -I .-I .-I r -I ti r -I r -I •-I •+ .v n •-I r .-I .-I r-[ •.• .v O =0 Or C w a J ✓ I a 24 in I(1 'A in N U) in V) N rA .(1 fl In V) V) N m m .n V) I(1 in V) 01 V) Vf .A VI it) V) in in in in in on N dl V) N VI 'J) V) in m m m m m m m m m m w m m w m m m m m w m m v m w m m m m m m w CO CO m m m m a) m w m m m N J'J \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ <_ Y ^+ N ti 2. m V1 .D m Fro .r P O H F P .O .r ..• N J) ry .r m JJ N t\) 'A \ M P I M \ \ >< 0 N 0 O N O ON O .rt 0 .-I N ti -• .I O ... O M N N N O N N O n 0N P m F P .r N N Y M .-r .O O 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N .. N H N M .4 O \ H'J .-1 O N C LY J) m m N M O .-1 p S O N O .f N r -r S F m O S m .O N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ IO N '7 F \ \ \ \ Si O. y 0000 0.-4..10.-.0... O 0 r-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� O U o p U U o O O rA O IU p CO 00 0--0—.-i 00' U u 0 .-r O a a Lt * & U NO P H F O O F O O m O M F m o P P rA o m N Y Y o O • .p H H • •IA M O m 0 0 0 M O N ^I S O H S M O .'I F NM.y S p SM.y S S IA P.O ,. M M.n .y0 H V).-1 F M H MOMoM nr0 O M.w HM r-1 N - .-r .-1 r0 N .r H r0 H N N O N Y La U H A ? .yti r-1 N N. -r .1MF O M ry N S N r-1N(V N H.y N HN...nP.-IO.n J J W 0 p N R La .r .. n N N -1 .. M F .+ M H N S N H N N N .+ .+ N .-I N H F .-r ....1 .�... O V tL ¢ O O O H H H V V 0 J . w m ✓ v M m Z Z H .O H H 201 L Z Z .C'.. W Z Z CU) £ T T Y T Y Y} Y} J Y}} T T } Y} Y T Y} T T } Y _4"I 2 J J J J J J J J J a J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J .)->-)- J >.>-)>) d\ O J H H H 11-41-41-I... H 2 H H N H H H N H H H H H H H W d J J J J J J J J J O. J J J J J N J W.. H £ L £ £ £ 1 £ £ £ O £ £ £ £ i 1 £ £ £ S £ £ Z £ £ H H H H H H H H H >0 W £ Y £ J £ g Q 4 4 q¢¢ a 4 H¢ Q 6¢ QQ a 4 4 4¢ a 4¢ CC ]: £ £ £ Z £ L ). Cr £ £ £ £ £ m > O O 4 4 C LLLL4ll lyLL W LLLL I -U. LL -LL LLIt LL LL4IL LL Ir_ LL IL 1y LLS2LLHLL O ¢ 4 4 a g 4 Q R O <<<<-11 W J IL II_ ly ly ly 1y LLLLLL LL U. 4LLLL LtLL W O U W W W IJ W W W W W H W 41 W W W w W W W w W W W W W W W W K W J W W W W w W W W W J W W W W W .40) J J J J J J J J J H J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J w J Q -4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4 4 J.44 H 1- LL Ur Ur Ur U' t'J 19 V' U' fb 1-. J• Ur U-lD l0 r9- m U' (, In Ur C1 C'J U r9 H H Ip £ lD F U• U' U (9 (rJ VJ 19 U' 'J' 1- 00000 LL Q O Y Z L Z L Z Z :C Z VI Z L L Z% G Z L L Z Z Z L Z 2 .9 1) 2 Z 2 U Z Z Z 1_ Z 0 ---------Z-______________00_40_ Z Z 2 O Z Z Z Z Z 'L rA N N VI N VI N N VI H NIA VI VI VI NVI V) N N VI N VI rA f- H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 02 d N £ £ VI U N V) VI N N N VI IA VI N VI VI VI VI m 40 Y U. LLLL LL ly IJ. LL LL LL J u u ii.II_ LL, w U LL LL W Y. W LL (I. w 2 2 w£ LL II. Nn. i— VI VI m VI N N N Vr N NIA NN m VIM VIN m VI VI VI VIM £ LL 11. I1. 11. LL LL W 4. LL 11, la. li IL Vf F N O V: m M VI N VI m N N VI m Vl N N VI H U m wH 201 I 01.4 H V Q 4 U 4 U¢ Q Q q¢ q¢ g U U J 4 0 0 0 U 4 4¢ R¢ N p 2 R V U K U V U J U U V Q 4 U Q W VI '0000'i00 .O .O N 101000 H .-1 Jl .a .0 O O ...O .1 .0 .p .O N O J H .O N .1 N N .1 U .1 .i r -a — V— N N O V -I O .1 1 V N o H O U p O .1 N .1 .. m N m m .-I H m m .1 O D U U I i U 0 I F y F F F 0000 W O 0 N m "1 I W a .. > 4 '43 W m CO N W F itH S ) -Ii. .1 IA U J .. W O W H S I V) £ W 1 (0 in h O Z J LL 3 m 14 W S C O Z .-r H i H 2' ). d Y W W Q ~ J 4 W J M ¢1 S U O¢ J m M VI U LL LL J J W 1 -IC LL VI O 'A0 Z VI W N 7 I F. Z. z -.,-.C £ 00 0 O H 1. Z '.10 La14C010 Q N0 U W U W d' W W W H :e 3 I W 1-0 .4'... - H J W 3 J 1-10 >£ 'J .1 Ii 0 O Y 1- 0.4 <4 LL U Is) Y T 1- O X H J H ¢ LL LY 0" > 1Y J R 4 W IN J W w W U. H I > w 2 Z J O I. [l 2. U 0. 3 &f X R T 2 :T W 2 1.414 O <2 0 Z U W J N O< W V) 010-o in 7> V) r. LL W w H d) d 4 O W o m 00000. W w W W vl 1- H W U W 3 ry. N W 2 V) 7 W Li 1- W VI p 6 J Li J 1Y 1Y Q N V 00 G rt Vl Y p O H W< J m 1-1 N O u- U S S Vr W y Z U U U WJ !_ K O Z Z J Z. W Z O (Y r.f .40.4>21 (Y O VI [L o W R d d I (0c< L W - 4 W (L 2 W O J O 4 4 m O H (1. LY [Y (Y W T 2 -44020's) H H I- T Q£ Y Z J 01 K 0. O w J M LY 2 X, W a o IY lJ W w V 0}< VI a Y Q Q !L' H> W w F. > VI ll 1- 6 Z Z O: J W W O J J Q F L U Z J 0 VI U I- m Q¢ Q W S U tt (C 0.1< Z Z VI W IY rA Q 4 O W O :0 H g W 2 :[ O H¢ ( s)0 2 (0(s) J£ U O J J 2 IY 11_ Y U O CJ T O 0 0 0 i L c. W Il fL rY) £. g O 2 4 W IJ V R /Y d' 41 m V) V) J 7 K 4 H K Q H LI (0}} J O (Y O Y. 0 Z ¢ Z J IL h, tt J V' 1y 0 £ In IiI 3 3 J T (J IM 'J W W N VI VI VI Q W (O £ /. V) rO r (Y LY U' Vl lJ L Ll } W W I - it C L4 CJ 1. R V) Y) J H VI Y 0 1o0t-4 J m J J W Q •1 V) N J 2 W W W W Z H J O 1 W J J Y :J W T Y 0 0 J 4 U O p LL Y 2 U J J O S f- 0. U U W L T rY T. Itl U Y O O J H 2 _t J d J W 11 W J 1 p U -ti,., T J r -r (J LL W rJ N L 5 F. O (0J rY LY¢ a O O T H r-1 J H O (Y 4 R 0 0 0 } f. 0} K¢ W W R IJ W La O J W J CO T '1] l) U U O :.1 LL LL r1 S Z S_ T )' £ L F T O d d M F. J U 4 J lal O n J frIOOLtO a ¢ Y.T K 2 In 3 3 N U U J£ M1 fL 1' IA N V U 2 'A H O LI 2 I- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O L U N N M M M M M M M M M Y S S S S Y 4LI 1 .)v1 1 25 in In N In In N L In N Ui In In In In u+ Li) N 'n In in In Li) in U) In n 0) 0) m m 0) a) 10 m CO cv m v m m CO v CO U) a> I m a m a) w it) m w m U) I <1-' hi N .O W t_In m N h O N w .1 S N N .O O N M N y P Into • >¢ N .-I N O NOON .y N .• .-1 0 .• O .-I N N O N O O O N .-1 N H Cr n O N CO O O U) N— .O N T N. M in N N H N 1'- N U) 0' .y In .O W Cr 0 .y 000 r.l OO.y 0OO o 0.+.•000 Oti.+OOOO,. 00 R CO d W # R R R ¢ a¢ d U ¢ N N NMI' -0N00 N-. O.. NNNmN00 O ON N .0 .1 .. . MMN.• V) M.y .-I nN N 3.i In.y S M..S N S MMN M M M.w S S in — .• N N N N — - S h O H .y Cr O ti # in # H R # # N ti 1� .-1 .1 .• r -I S .• n 'I .y .• .• .r n .r .r .y H H N N N .• .1 N .r N .,.M y Z M O 0 t0 R # # # R N .-I 1� .r .• ..• .r S .-1 .• 'I .1 .-1 H .y .y ..• .r ..y ..1 rl 1•I N N .• N .. N .y M S - Ni M O N Cr Cr Cr J O O O a H I- h H U U U O W W W 4- N in in O O Z U' U 2 L - H R H Cr 2 Z Z 2 W W ¢ Z 4 a £ Y J Y}} T Y} Y Y T Y Y} Y T} Y Y}}}} >'>')' J T J d J d J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J d J d O H H I-1 H M H H H H H H H H H M M M M !J M J £ Cr £ i££ T_ £ i Z£ i i£££££ Z£ J 3: 1 i Ct££ tt W Q 0 ¢ 4¢¢ Q Q Q¢C a Q¢C 4 Q¢ 4 4 Q 4 Q Q a¢¢¢ 0 O CC O > W Li, LL W L LL LL LL LL 4 LL W LL IL W LL LL LL li LL LL LL It H LL LL LL W Z LL U. W U 0 W J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W lal W W W W¢ W W W J W W J J ¢ J J J J J J J J 44444444 J J J J J W J J J 'Q 44 ¢ 0 O 0 U U U' 4 2 2 U' 2 U 2 2 O C O IO 2 2 0 U' O U' T_ U' U' U' 0 0 2 0 O 2 O 242422224222224222242r242 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 LG 2 L 2 2 L£ 2 G Z Un Z O H M M M H M F• H H M H 0-4 H H N M H H M H H O H F1 H W in N VIN VI VI VI N N VI N VI VI in VI VI UI V1 V1 V1 VI VI V1 U VI VI VI £ V1 0- > LL inN NinVI LL IiLL LL,lyLL IL 1LII. 4IL W LL II.U.LL L. £L.LLLL S F- in V) VI VI V) VI N V1 N inIn VI VI V) inV1 VI VI V1 N VI U V1 N N £ in ✓I W F Z in 014 a N O Lain S 41-i .• W O U U U¢ Q U 4¢ Q Q¢ Q¢¢ a Q a¢ Q U a U U C U S S V) Ni S N Y 3 Y VI Ni Ni S Cl) S Ni Ni Ni Ni y y V) In Y In 0 0 .y nl O .'I O U O .1 N N O N U N N ('0 N (l 1J - ^I LI O O CO in U 0 W Cr — U v) .n ¢ N s x ... F w C a o o0 O ZwW 1- W Y- J CO W W J en 1 W W h O LL U. LI f- 1-..y F 4 U Cr W W W J W W in H H U 00 in O N IJ L, W LL J 3 3 K J J N 1' J Cr in U W U H 141'l W ¢ -o (e Cr f3 0 3 3 U W w& 04102 4N) COO T2 Cr 3J7J CU, Q W W O K IJ 2 1- CC U i- £ ,J0 W Y •C t G Cr W VI J O U W 2 I W r W} Lb R1 TO K W IJ Q C Y- H K - J '0< >5 d J K Z rt: K£ 2 N> C N Y K K I- } K¢¢ Cr Z W 4 Q W 0 O LL U W H S W O'IJ W K O£ Z0>''% N 2 U 2 Z Z LL¢ J 0 U Cr K N O W )Y Q N O O S K J O O N <CCC O IO 0,0 W CO O L In C C LJ C¢ ') T O Z Cr I- in /I O J IJ H U Crd' C J J 1 '/I J in W 7 Cr V IJ .Y J L 10 Z G G 2 L Z J W Ll K. Li Y W Cr44 J W1 -44004)Z T W O J C¢ W Y Z L9 C d Y W Cr Cr} s Z W 1- F- 0 W 0 LL 1- T O I t J 0 W H T d Z Y C C O !C Z> J J J W T_ W} I£ U U J? O ([ J J J C I I 0 0 0 1'40 0 0 Cr C LJ W O U I -I N ra C M IL] Cr S O t U (l U (JO O 1i it. '010 S Y X J Cr Cr Cr Cr Cr Cr in in n } in V) In u) in in in Vl In U) in In N in U) N V) N In in V) in in in V) U C di in U U 26 J in in in in Vt in in In V1 vi Ill Ul N in in In in in in In V) Y1 in M in (Si fl to In (Si Vl ¢ (0 m¢ Co m U) CO m w m tO w m 0) w UI m w tv w CO U) w w m/ w m U) w CO m O )- N P N ti VI N N V) tD S N M P N W (O M O (O O .r .O N N N. P Y N P N K 4 ONO NO-• NO NN tiN0 O O NN N.a .+N 0.+,.NO NO.'I N IL U) OJ W .p IV .-I N P O .I .p P S M O O N P in O I.- Ni N V N. T N N N- N 4 000O0_0O.•oo000__O00.-1000_o0o 0.1 O U) P N N O O O O N O P n N S S b m n 0) O N m O N. O N P N o c0 o P w to - ¢ N (VU' 00 .a 0 In M .O S— .y O Y 0 ¢) P O N ..4 P N N M P W U NO -- N r-1 .O P Ni — S V 4 JJ .• Y.+.• ti ^+.+M I' -.I 4000 N M.-4.r.r Y N ey N.4,4.4 M) NM. -t.+ r ¢ J S In W O o. J .O )-O W i W \ • 010 4 N 0 d U)", 0c) 0-N J U O too) W LL V. li W LL li. W w LL O. Z L Ir_ 1>_ ly LL LL LL LL U. LL 4. Ia_ LL W LL LL LL U. a> N U N N N N N N V) VIN ¢ M U N V I N N V I V I V 1 N N N V I V t N V I N N V 1 • >W • -O DC I- H- O 0I - .J LLI (S)- J) O 2 JN - - i-. .r O.-.tV ti ti.• 0.� OO.y .I .I ..0-0.+o.+.+ON O.+O n On ho -cc 0 O 4 4 Z1 F <C,) N .-) V) .4 VIN. -I N N .1 Vl - .y .-1 N N - ti M N N .4 .4 M ti tV .y N .y V) N -iii) - F (1 VI O O in '-40 N P N Ni Ni .A 0) O .O N in M S P .p in Ni Ni P M- Ni O S Y O U) Z - N N U) S N 0-- .O S P N N N N N .O O Ol N N U U P O CI S .-) (Si P Co N N N N N iO iO N N In N N N N .O .O .p N N N N In .O .p N .O .O N V) S N J I -I W W W W IL W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w W W W w W W W W W W W Y O: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • CCC) (V m P U N N P Ul P Y N N .O .O N N 1- U .• P .,. S N S O N Ill S 4 .O rp N CO[O in S W Ni M to in w :O Y Ni S S Y •A U) CO P b n in N n N (Si N .O N .p .O .O in in .O Y) W .p W V) in .O .O W in Yl .O fl in in in .p in .p .O .p '0 .l) .p .p Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZZZZ U U 1 LL Zc0 O CO - N in I .-I .I S W N I.l X O IJ NCC Y X N ~ I r- H W O 2 4 W W U w Z Di ti0 I>0-40< K W ~ .4 Y O I - NI r 1 U- Z H J •'I Z I- LL I- M J% J O J W Y J O N w 10 V I K NI(S) N V I w W Y O W N O 2( O LL O l U W> O J W r W W VI It) W 3 J W V r 0)4-I M N w w I"I p J so O O w I- e. N15J K O L- U C W N I.I U W N J J U O N Z U ¢ in N J W M [C I- N Vl CC0z 3 2 1J LL> -- O O_ W U W O. M Y - W O )—N2 N N D_ £ N K W NI CO W K W W W I'I Z CC11 1- O W L W W 14100 W W in u ') U 3 N 2 W t - N -' ¢ 4 M I- J L Cr!Y V IL L W Vl Ql U I'1 VI U I- Y Z 010 >2 S O W Y Z Z O O !O ¢ 1-1 K J 0 K> w J W 2£ W Z 14 F - J W Z W Q O¢ (G S¢ 4 11 O_ O J W K 4 I-1 F. CC 4 0-0.,)')) H 0 -CC J tY W O LLI 4¢ (0 J I"1 I-1 Z O Q T_ 4 0- K S N J IJ LL¢ Y W U£ 4 > -) W W J Z U F• i> Y O 9 I- K l'l W w a J 1-I T O O :D ¢ Z N Z >_ W O W £ K W O IA ¢ :Y £ J W S O. 0< S O N Z 2 0 0 VJ ¢ O£ W O K J N W W¢ K J Z N K O N tY ID O N 0 4 . I- S I -I N O IS Z W £ W W O Co ') W K LL is -I0 L U) N£ Vl N 3 Z In ¢ Z¢¢ O] Y W£ 1 0 C IY L toss) N Ol J U I -I Y J Y IJ O O O Z O I- J N O] J J O Z Z Y O w FI O. I- Y O O K)1Z W W U J J J OI. W I £ly 2I- W m V U OI+W £OJ0- NZ J 7 S I-4 0 4 N Cr N I -I -1 00:r ¢ Q W N O 0 4¢¢ N 0 O IJ W O S O: O W N U U U 0 0 W W LL W W W M S S S S i J£££ 2.2 2 O' K K N I. Y N K O W N O - NN N S P .p .I M O P N N W N N W M N 4-10 N O O inin tO lO W N In M S N O .I Y W_ .O N P M P S P .O .-I N P EO W .L P N N S O m 000 00-I0 O.-I.I OOOOO OOOOOOO OOO J OO.+O Cr 2 V1 N N N In N N N In S N N V. N M If. N N N VI N N N N N If. V. M N In N a 0 a N a O Ol 41 t0 W Ul W N W OJ tO CO W IO(O W G) W N W W W W W W W W N Z VI Vl N N N U N U IA Vl N N V) N N VI N N N IAN VI N N N N VI Vl N VI VI 27 � m Z U7 W co O z O - cn ao ≥ � D o rn m 0 (is) J C 0 J Q Z O I- M F- I - 0) z I J J Q S3 N W a z ) I. J 50 F W z O I N 2 W U) 1 1 E 1 1 eE E 1 ii_ \ / I: / In 0 1n 0 a 0 U) 0 N 0 N U) N 0 N IC) N N N — — — — S.Vld a3AO8ddV JO L139Wf1N m m to co m Cu co 0) co N m o 28 d W U 0 z ~ O J Z Li O O U O E Z m D cn J O J a z 0 r= F- I - z Z J J Q <0 w c O Z V 1 I J a o z w 0 a 0 w 0 i I f 1 __Li ! E is -\- i I ___! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (0 t d' M N SI0l 03A0addV d0 838WfN 29 tO OD m Li M aD 0) 0) ti o z 0 F- m U) CO z I J a. Co Q W r 00 z m C/) o zw L(7 w O Q I 1 I --WW x U O IC Cn m o > I- W E rn > m - O D Ir a Q J cC — 0 IIIIIII[IIIIiIIiTI 91 7 7i S A .I I I I'. 1 <- 1 I i LIIIII1IIIItIIIr OO OO OO OO OO 0 0 0 0 29 d' N OW cD I7 N S380V 03AOaddV JO 2i38WfN N co 0) 0) N- 0) a 30 u1 w C p I j ♦i � x xoe 6 �I onOnn Net � m • � r �_ _ €' SPPNG MAdxn BP r a ^kyw 8 •� urF �[ WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND 1985 ZONING MAP CHANGES CASE NO. CHANGE ACRES CONFORMS TO PLAN RZ-290 PUD 988 YES RZ-302 RS,RR to IG 12.61 YES RZ-303 RU to BL .42 YES RZ-306 RS to IG 5.11 YES RZ-314 RS to BL 18.64 YES RZ-315 A to RR 4.58 YES RZ-316 HI to IG 53.58 YES RZ-317 C to BG 8 YES RZ-318 A, C to BG 13.8 NO RZ-331 RS to BL 1.56 YES RZ-332 RU to C .48 YES Ii: SCALE Feet a 2000 0000 'p w 00000r 0400 Mllesr �• H1- Jt $77 I WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT MAP LEGEND • RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL • COMMERCIAL - INSTITUTIONAL KFIeS O • SCALE Feet 4000 y i. o4000 Miles I I e u oW. etl I Aa F.. • Ex r W � xrvae II ` E d •1 `� i F �6•-¢-¢ a �, CLE1R x o� 1 �F SPRING ei[ WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS CUMULATIVE FROM 1980 DISTRICT NO. NAME ACRES I AD -80-I FORD 178.59 AD -80-2 CARR 245.64 AD -80-3 ALLENBERG 129.52 AD- 80- 4 ST. JAMES SCHOOL, INC. 278.75 AD- 80-5 WOLF 148.30 AD -80-6 HARSHMAN 232.44 AD -80-7 LOHMAN 565.25 AD -81-I BECKLEY 321.85 AD -81- 2 TOMS 140.00 AD -82-2 F.TBIK. INC. (BARNHART) 174.30 • AD -82-3 ANKENEY 460.00 AD -83-2 WIESENBAUGH 312.82 AD- 83-3 HAYES 200.55 AD -84-1 FRENCH 320.00 AD -84-2 ROBBINS,RALL,BLUMBERG 448.00 Fi SYLVAN SROVL SUNSET SCALE Feet a xoo Miles x o 2000 '6000 I TOTAL 4156.01