Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
W&S Plan_1981 Update
WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN il±I:ltlfflultTh CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health -Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Department of the Environment, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County on January 16, 1990, the Board adopted text and map amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as requiredby Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health -Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland Department of the Environment for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County have adopted on January 23, 1990 and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of its ability, all aspects of the amendments as they pertain to the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this ci3_d Day of, 1990. Ronal .': Bgwe resident Board of County Commissioners for Washington County ATTEST: Joni L. Bittner, Clerk i IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION .02 OF THE REGULATIONS FOR PLANNING WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, TITLE 9 OF THE ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND, NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ALL MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY PLAN AND SUCH OFFICICALS OR ENTITIES HAVE BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN. THE WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE COUNTY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON FEBRUARY 17, 1981. TIMOTHY . LUNG, CIATE PLANNER WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ' ii CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health -Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County on January 27, 1987, the Board adopted text and map amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health -Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County have adopted on February 10, 1987 and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of its ability, all aspects of the amendments as they pertain to the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this 17th Day of March, 1987. Ronald L. Bowe s, President Board of County Commissioners for Washington County ATTEST: Joni L. Bittner, Clerk iii IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION .02 OF THE REGULATIONS FOR PLANNING WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, TITLE 9 OF THE ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND, NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ALL MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY PLAN AND SUCH OFFICIALS OR ENTITIES HAVE BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN. THE WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN AND A[M]ENDMENTS HEREIN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE COUNTY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON FEBRUARY 17, 1981. C_\]T IENT.GOO /. oy/Lc4 S EPH T. GOODRICH, SENIOR PLANNER WASINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION iv CERTIFICATE OF AMEMDMENT WHEREAS, Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health -Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the govern- ing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems; and WHEREAS, following public hearing by the Board of Washington County Commissioners on April 15, 1986, the Board extends for a period of six months from the date of this action the June 21, 1983 Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Health -Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY,.that the Washington County Board of County Commissioners have adopted and declared their intentions to further review and revise the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan according to a specified schedule and will faith- fully execute and implement, to the best of its ability, all aspects of the amendments as they pertain to said Plan. Signed this 21st day of April , 1986. Ronald L. ow rs, President Washington County Board of County Commissioners ATTEST• athryn . Short, lerk V CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Article 43, Section 437C of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following public hearing by the Board of Washington County Commissioners on June 14, 1983, the Board adopted text and. map=mendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Article 43, Section 437C of the Annotated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland State Depart- ment of Health and Mental Hygiene for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the Washington County Board of County Commis- sioners have adopted and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of its ability, all aspects of the amendmentsas they pertain: t� the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this `l pDay o , - 1983. Ronald L. Bowes, President Washington County Board of County Commissioners ATTEST : Kath'ryn : S ort, Clerk vi IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION .02 OF THE REGULATIONS FOR PLANNING WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, ARTICLE 43 OF THE ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND, NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ALL MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY PLAN AND SUCH OFFICIALS OR ENTITIES HAVE BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION OF THE PLAN. CATHERINE T. THOMPSON, SENIOR PLANNER WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SECTIONS OF THE WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY COVERING ENGINEERING ASPECTS OF WATER AND SEWERAGE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN EXAMINED AND/OR REVIEWED FOR ADEQUACY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS TO MEET THE DEFINED NEEDS IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION 10.03.30. GLENN L. DULL, COUNTY ENGINEER WASHINGTON COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE a r : ��/pllx;uJUN�r���y ylll CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Article 43, Section 437C of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following public hearing by the Board of Washington County Commissioners on October 14, 1980 , adopted text and map amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Article 43, Section 437C of the An- notated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the Washington County Board of County Commis- sioners have adopted and declared their intentioz,s to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of its ability, all aspects of the amendment as they pertain to the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this 10th. day of November , 1980. Marti L. Snook, President Washington County Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: Kathryn F. Short, Clerk Washington County Board of County Commissioners CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Article 43, Section 437C of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Depart- ment of Health and Mental Hygiene, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following public hearing by the Washington County Planning Commission, Hagerstown Planning Commission, Board of Washington County Commis- sioners, and City of Hagerstown Mayor and Council on January 10, 1977, the Board of Washington County Commissioners on April 5, 1977, adopted text and map amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that The Washington County Board of County Commis- sioners have adopted and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of it's ability, all aspects of the amendment as they pertain to the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this 5th. day of April , 1977. ATTEST: dthryn F. hors, er Washington County Board of County Commissioners Martin . Snook, esident Washington County Board of County Commissioners ix CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each 'hunty to adopt and submit to the Depart- ment of Health and Mental Hygiene, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following a public hearing by the Washington County Planning Commission, Hagerstown Planning Commission, Board of Washington County Commis- sioners, and City of Hagerstown Mayor and Council on September 17, 1975; the Board of Washington County Commissioners on December 9, 1975, ad,pt.ed text amendments, and on February 3, 1976, adopted map amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, the The Washington County Board of County Commis- sioners have adopted and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of it's ability, all aspects of the amendment as they pertain to the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this /a day of February, 1976. i Mar n L. Snoox, President Washington County Board of ATTEST: County Commissioners -R nald L. Charles, Clerk Washington County Board of County Commissioners x CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION WHEREAS, Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Depart- ment of Health and Mental Hygiene., a plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following a public hearing by the Washington County Planning and Zoning Commission on September 26, 1974, by the Board of Washington County Commissioners on November 19, 1974, by the Washington County Planning Commis- sion, Hagerstown Planning Commission, Board of Washington County Commissioners, and City of Hagerstown Mayor and Council on April 8, 1975, the Board of Washington County Commissioners on May 13, 1975, adopted a Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland: THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the Washington County Board of County C)rrnissioners have adopted and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and'implement, to the best of it's ability, all aspects of the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this /SWday o 1975. 'Za L (1 Y. JL{JJn, ar.�au .... Washington County Board of County Commissioners tttonald L. Charles, Clerc' Washington County Board of County Commissioners xii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. GOALS AND ORGANIZATION Purpose I - 1 Goals I - 2 Objectives I - 3 Organization I - 6 Development Review Procedures I - 8 II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Physical Features II - 1 Population Analysis II - 44 Land Use II - 54 III. EXISTING AND PLANNED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Existing Water Service Areas III - 2 Planned Service Areas III - 4 Projected Demands III - 17 Water Problem Areas III - 22 Water Conservation III - 22 Policy For Water Line Installation In Areas Where Service Is Not Available III - 35 Priority Area Requirements III - 35 xii PAGE IV. EXISTING AND PLANNED SEWERAGE SYSTEMS Existing Sewerage Service Areas - Washington County Sanitary District IV - 2 Planned Sewerage Service Areas - Washington County Sanitary District IV - 9 Existing and Planned Sewerage Service Areas - City of Hagerstown, Other Municipalities and Service Providing Agencies IV - 14 Projected Demands IV - 22 Sewage Flow Allocation IV - 35 Sludge Management IV - 53 Policy For Sewer Line Installation In Areas Where Service Is Not Available IV - 62 Policy On Sewage Disposal Alternatives IV - 63 Policy On Interim Treatment Plants IV - 66 Priority Area Requirements IV - 67 V. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Introduction V - 1 Water Facilities V - 1 Sewerage Facilities V - 3 Management Of Connection Allocations V - 5 County -Wide Water And Sewer Authority V - 5 APPENDICIES A. Definitions A - 1 B. Amendment Procedures B - 1 C. General Service Agreement C - 1 D. Policy On Interim And Permanent Community Water And Sewerage Systems D - 1 E. Agreement For Provision Of Sanitary Sewer Service For The Maugansville/ Orchard Hills Area E - 1 F. Agreement For Provision Of Sanitary Sewer Service For Fountainhead Area F - 1 G. Agreement For Provision Of Sewer Service To The Sharpsburg Pike Area G - 1 H. Memorandum Of Understanding Between The City of Hagerstown and the Washington County Sanitary District Regarding Industrial Waste Pretreatment H - 1 I. Compilation of Financial Management Statistics, "FS" Schedules for Publicly Owned Community Sewerage Systems I - 1 J. Memorandum Of Understanding Between Washington County Commisisoners And The J - 1 Department of Health And Mental Hygiene xiv LIST OF MAPS FACES MAP NO. PAGE I Generalized Topography II - 3 II Ground Cover II - 3 III Soil Drainage Characteristics II - 3 IV Septic System Failures II - 7 V Major Watersheds II - 13 VI Water Provinces II - 33 VII Aquifer Characteristics II - 35 VIII Contaminated Wells II - 37 IX Washington County Election Districts II - 45 X Generalized Existing Land Use II - 58 XI Major Public Institutions II - 60 XII Smithsburg Town Growth Area II - 60 XIII Boonsboro Town Growth Area II - 60 XIV Urban Growth Area II - 60 Series of Water Service Priority Area Numbers Maps (1" = 2000') III -38 Series of Sewerage Service Priority Area Numbers Maps (1" = 2000') IV - 70 XII Water Facilities And Service Areas (1" = 1 mile) Inside Front Pocket XIII Sewerage Facilities And Service Areas (1" = 1 mile) Inside Front Pocket xv LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO. PAGE 1. Washington County Population Patterns II - 46 1-A. Washington County Projections By Election District II - 47 1-B. Water Service Area Population Projections II - 48 1-C. Sewer Service Area Population Projections II - 51 2. Existing Land Use II - 59 2-A. Population Of Major Public Institutions II - 60 2-B. Urban Growth Area Water and Sewer Study - Project Schedule II - 70 3. Projected Water Supply Demands And Planned Capacity III -19 4. Inventory Of Existing Community Water Supplies III -20 5. Inventory Of Water Supply Problem Areas III -28 6. Immediate Five And Ten Year Priorities For Water Development III -31 9. Projected Sewerage Demands And Planned Capacity IV - 23 xvi TABLE NO. PAGE 10. Inventory Of Existing Sewage Treatment Plants IV - 25 10-A. Inventory Of Existing Interceptors, Pumping Stations And Force Mains For Large Service Areas IV - 27 11. Inventory Of Discharge Permits IV - 31 12. Flow Allocations For Sewage Treatment Plants IV - 36 12-A. Flow Allocations For Interceptors Or Pumping Stations For Large Service Areas IV - 37 12-B. Flow Allocations For Major Developments IV - 40 13. Inventory Of Sewage, Drainage, And Water Pollution Problem Areas IV - 48 14. Immediate Five And Ten Year Priorities For Sewerage Development IV - 49 15. Inventory of Current Sewerage Sludge Generation and Utilization IV - 59 xvii Chapter One GOALS AND ORGANIZATION PURPOSE The State of Maryland's fundamental purpose in establishing regulations which require the governing body of each County to develop an on -going plan for water supply and sewerage systems is to achieve a consistency with the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan for guiding development. Inherent in this purpose is the realization that the planning and implementation of water and sewerage facilities constitute the most physically direct method of guiding development within the County. In virtually every instance growth is contingent upon the availability of the necessary facilities to sustain the higher orders of development. The installation of water distribution lines, sewage collection lines, and adequate transportation networks serve as a magnet for the location of new residential projects, industrial complexes and supportive commercial activities. Although the exact timing and magnitude of the higher development forms will be determined in part by much more regional econanic conditions, the fact remains that their location will directly manifest the development policies of Washington County and its incorporated municipalities. Consequently, it becomes well apparent that a Water and Sewerage Plan, in order to be truly comprehensive, must go beyond merely the crisis oriented approach of abating existing problems, and strive to contribute and reinforce the overall planning objectives of the study area. While zoning establishes the developmental guidelines for primarily private sector initiatives, the process of implementing water and sewerage plans is a direct, more immediate public effort to move from plan to reality. I-1 This plan provides information in the form of maps, charts, and tables which give a general overall picture of the current and projected status of water and sewerage systems in Washington County. The plan is intended to provide the basis for more detailed planning at the projected level. The general level of information and the scale of mapping within the plan do not reflect such details as the specific location of all water and sewerage lines, or the availability or economic feasibility of service to particular parcels of land. For such information, the applicable agencies and municipalities providing these services must be contacted. Plan maps within this document do not represent a commitment by the Board of County Commissioners or by any agency or municipality to provide water and sewer service by a specified time. Service priority designations shown on the plan maps indicate the general time frame in which it can be reasonably expected that these services will be provided and are based upon the current intentions of service providers and of private land owners and developers to the extent that they are known. The actual construction of facilities and extension of services will depend upon a number of factors such as economic feasibility, availability of funds, and initiative on the part of private land owners and developers. GOALS It is the purpose of the Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan to provide for the continued health and well-being of Washington Countians and our downstream neighbors through extensive, through public and private sector cooperation in the formation of long range plans for adequate water supply and effective sewerage disposal and treatment for Washington County. To this end, the following goals are hereby established. I-2 1. To protect the health, safety and welfare of the people of Washington County by providing acceptable and adequate water supply and sanitary sewerage facilities to all areas of the County. 2 To coordinate the policies and plans relative to land use and the provision of water and sewerage facilities to assure a logical growth pattern in Washington County. 3 To identify and analyze all sources of pollution within the County and devise the means by which the adverse impact can be minimized or eliminated. 4. To provide for the qualified management of water resources in the County in cooperation with the municipalities of the County, in order to effectively cope with water pollution and to conserve and/or improve the quality of streams and groundwaters within and adjacent to the County. 5 To establish plan priorities which can be directly related to the programming and budgetary processes of Washington County, the City of Hagerstown and other municipalities. 6 To provide for the periodic amendment of the Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan as required by changes in need or conditions within the County. OBJECTIVES In refinement of the overall goals for Washington County, the following itemizes the objectives which specifically encompass the policy guidelines relative to water and sewerage planning. I-3 1. Develop a plan for water and sewerage facilities which is fiscally responsible and reasonable and at the same time provide facilities which will eliminate the extraordinary problems of groundwater pollution caused by existing development and encourage the implementation of the Plan for the County. 2. On -lot septic disposal systems in Washington County have, in many cases, proven inadequate in terms of implementing the goals of this plan. As a result, a primary objective is to provide to the greatest extent possible, alternatives to these systems. 3 To seek the closest possible cooperation between Washington County and the City of Hagerstown in the implementation, operation and management of applicable existing and planned water and sewerage systems. 4. To encourage and guide residential growth to those areas which are served or planned to be served with community water and sewerage systems to provide opportunities for new and adequate housing at reasonable cost for the citizens of Washington County. 5. To assure a logical development pattern and continued ability of the County and municipalities to provide the other necessary public facilities and services (in accordance with existing land use plans and controls) as a result of the availability of new systems in areas outside planned service areas. 6. Encourage development of an organizational framework which will result in "REGIONAL" planning, programming and implementation of the plan. I-4 7. Prepare guidelines which are both permissive and prohibitive with regard to the use of various types of systems and levels of treatment which will be compatible with the planned staging policy and its feasibility for implementation. 8. Provide for adequate water supply, storage, treatment and distribution on a regional basis. 9. Encourage resource conservation by particularly large water users through cooperative recycling programs. I-5 ORGANIZATION The following charts illustrate the existing organizational framework relative to planning and implementing water and sewerage within the County and incorporated municipalities. Figure No. 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PLANNING WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION IMPLEMENTATION WATER AND SEWER WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT *Sewerage system responsibility currently includes the Towns of Sharpsburg and Keedysville (Subdistrict #4-1), and Sanitary Subdistricts within the County. (Subdistrict #1 Halfway, #5 Potomac (Tammany/Van Lear), #5-1 Cloverton/Greenlawn, #6 Fountainhead, #14 Sharpsburg Pike, #15 Maugansville/ Orchard Hills, #18 Highland Manor and #19 Sandy Hook.) Water system responsibility currently includes the Town of Sharpsburg and adjacent areas (Subdistrict #4) and Subdistricts within the County (Subdistricts #9 Highfield/Cascade, #15-1 Martins Crossroads/Cearfoss, #17 Elk Ridge and #19-1 Sandy Hook). I-6 FIGURE NO. 2 CITY OF HAGERSTOWN I MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I PLANNING** HAGERSTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PLANNING WATER* HAGERSTOWN WATER DEPARTMENT IMPLEMENTATION SEWER* DEPARTMENT OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL *Water and Sewer System responsibility includes both city and non -subdistrict, unincorporated areas of the County. **Planning responsibilities (directly) only City. Substantial input to County Planning process. TOWNS OF HANCOCK, CLEAR SPRING WILLIAMSPORT, KEEDYSVILLE* BOCNSBORO, SMITHSBURG AND FUNKSIOWN MAYOR AND COUNCIL TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION IMPLEMENTATION WATER AND SEWER COMMITTEE OF COUNCILMAN I TOWN EMPLOYEES ' *The Washington County Sanitary District is responsible for the sewer system in Keedysville. I-7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES The following are brief descriptions of development review procedures within Washington County unincorporated areas and within the limits of municipal incorporations. For developments planned for unincorporated areas, the review procedures of the Washington County Planning Commission are applicable. However, where such developments are dependent upon municipal water or sewerage service, the municipalities concerned should be consulted early in the process. The following descriptions are intended to assist citizens and prospective developers in becoming familiar with the organizational and procedural relationships between approving authorities and water and sewer service agencies. Washington County (Unincorporated Areas) Proposals for development within unincorporated areas are submitted for review and approval to the Washington County Planning Commission. The Commission meets on the first Monday of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the County Office Building. Initial contact may be made with the Washington County Planning Commission staff. At this stage the proposed development is reviewed for conformance with the County Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Water and Sewerage Plan. Upon request, the staff will arrange for a preliminary consultation at which the developer can informally discuss the proposal with representatives from the applicable review agencies including the Health Department and water and sewer service providers. In lieu of a preliminary consultation, the appropriate water and sewer authorities should be contacted individually. Developments which are proposed for wells and septic systems should be discussed with the Division of Environmental Health of the Washington County Health Department. Developments which are proposed for service by means of the extension of existing community water and sewerage systems should be discussed with the responsible municipality or with the Washington County Sanitary District as applicable. Any development proposed for an unincorporated area which is intended for service by a new community water or sewerage system or by the extension of existing Sanitary District facilities should be brought to the attention of the Washington County Sanitary District. Such developments must be located within the boundaries of a Sanitary Subdistrict and included in the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Procedures for inclusion of an area within an established Sanitary Subdistrict or for the creation of a new Sanitary Subdistrict are provided for by Sanitary District Law. Formal application for development approval is made to the Washington County Planning Commission or Department of Permits and Inspections in the form of a subdivision plat or site plan respectively. Water and Sewerage system construction drawings are submitted along with the application for final plat approval. Copies of submitted plats, site plans, and construction drawings are circulated to the appropriate agencies and municipalities for information, review and approval. Approval of water and sewerage construction drawings by the Washington County Sanitary District constitutes a firm commitment to allocate the needed water supply or sewage treatment capacity for the proposed development. The Sanitary District issues an approval letter to the I-9 Planning Commission for the final development plat upon receipt of an approved construction permit from the Maryland Department of the Environment. The Washington County Health Department issues an approval letter for the final plat after the issuance of approval letters from water and sewer service providers when the development is to be served by a community system. Upon the receipt of correspondence from all applicable review agencies, the plat or site plan is reviewed for approval by the Planning Commission at the regular monthly meeting. CONTACT: Washington County Planning 791-3065 Commission Washington County Health 791-3270 Department t Washington County Sanitary Department 791-3083 Town of Boonsboro For developments proposed for within the municipal limits, a tentative sketch plan may be submitted to the Town Manager in the Municipal Building. The tentative sketch plan procedure is optional but strongly recommended as an early and informal method of consulting with the Boonsboro Planning Commission. Preliminary and final plat submittals are also made through the Town Manager who circulates plat copies to the appropriate review agencies including the Boonsboro Municipal Utilities Commission for availability of water and sewer services. Upon receipt and consideration of the comments of review agencies, the Boonsboro Planning Commission considers the plat at its regular monthly meeting at the Municipal Building. I-10 Developments located outside the Town limits which desire water and sewer service, should contact the Town Manager through the municipal office to discuss annexation procedures. CONTACT: Barbara Rodenhiser, Clerk 432-5141 or Faye L. Smith, Town Manager Town of Clear Spring Water and sewer facilities are constructed within a development at the developer's expense and dedicated to the Town of Clear Spring. Initial proposals are made to the Mayor and Council which meets on the first Tuesday of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the Town Hall. CONTACT: Betty L. Shank, Mayor or Nancy L. Keefer, Town Clerk Town of Funkstown 842-3344 842-2252 All areas within the corporate limits of Funkstown are physically capable of being served by the Town water and sewer systems. For areas outside the Town, Public Works personnel should be contacted. CONTACT: Roger Griffith or Timothy Faulder 797-3228 or 791-0948 For proposed developments within the Town limits, application must be made to the Funkstown Zoning Administrator who reviews plans for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Town water and sewer personnel then review the plans for placement of utilities. The Planning and Zoning Commission considers the application at its regular meeting on the first Tuesday of each month at 6:30 P.M. in the Town Hall. CONTACT: Brenda Haynes, Town Clerk 791-0948 City of Hagerstown Proposals for large developments intending to be served by the City of Hagerstown water and sewerage systems should be brought to the attention of the City Planning Department. Developments proposed within the municipal limits will receive guidance from the Planning Department on the City of Hagerstown development process. Developments proposed for outside the municipal limits will receive guidance on annexation procedures if applicable. A preliminary consultation between the applicant and the Planning Department staff is recommended but not required. For developments within the municipal limits, the staff may recommend a preliminary consultation with the City of Hagerstown Planning Commission. Early discussions with the City Water Department and with Water Pollution Control are also advisable. Formal application for development approval within the City is made in the form of a site plan or subdivision plat submission to the Planning Department. Copies of the plat or site plan are circulated to various review agencies including the City Water Department, Water Pollution Control and the County Health Department. Plat or site plan submission must occur on or before the first working day of the month to be reviewed at the regular Planning Commission meeting. The Commission's regular meeting is on the last Tuesday of the month at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall. CONTACT: City Planning Department City Water Department City Water Pollution Control City Engineer I-12 790-3200, ext. 138, 140 790-3200, ext. 171 790-3200, ext. 165, 166 790-3200, ext. 125 Town of Hancock The Town Manager issues individual water and sewer connection permits from the Town Office. Development proposals are submitted for review to the Town Planning Commission which meets on the first Wednesday of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the Town Hall. The proposal must include the proposed water and sewer layout and the number of people to be served. Based upon this proposal a tentative commitment is made by the Town to serve the proposed development. Water and sewer design is reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer and the State Health Department. The Town Planning Commission recommends plat approval to the Mayor and Council. With Mayor and Council approval, the proposed development receives a firm commitment for water and sewer service. CONTACT: Peter Sheehan, Town Manager 678-5622 Town of Smithsburg Land development proposals are first discussed in concept with the Smithsburg Planning Commission. The Commission meets on the last Tuesday of each month at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Hall. The Commission then refers the applicant to the Smithsburg Mayor and Council for a determination on the provision of water and sewer services. The applicant may then submit a preliminary plat to the Smithsburg Planning Commission for developments within the corporate limits, or to the Washington County Planning Commission for developments outside the corporate limits. CONTACT: Harold Boyer, Chairman 824-3581 Smithsburg Planning Commission (After 5:00 P.M.) I-13 Town of Williamsport Development proposals should be discussed initially in concept with the Williamsport Planning Commission. The Commission meets on an "as needed" basis. At the time of the initial meeting a tentative agreement will be made on the allocation of sewer capacity for the proposed development. This allocation is subtracted from the total allocation granted to the Town of Williamsport by the Washington County Sanitary District. The developer will then meet to advise the Town Mayor and Council of the proposed development. If the development is located within the Town limits, a development plat is submitted to the Williamsport Planning Commission for approval. Current Town policy requires annexation for any development located outside the corporate limits that will connect to the Town of Williamsport sewage collection system or water distribution system. CONTACT: George Stumbaugh, Chairman 223-7711 Williamsport Planning Commission (City Hall) I-14 CNaliN2171i5`b; BACKGROUND INFORMATION In order to establish parameters for the planning of sewer and water facilities, it is necessary to determine the physical, social, economic and land use factors which in part dictate the needs and priorities for such systems. The following discussion of background information attempts to sumarize the relevant factors which have been previously developed and analyzed through the preparation of the County's Comprehensive Plan, Solid Waste Plan, and prior Water and Sewerage Plan. 1. PHYSICAL FEATURES - An analysis of the physical features of Washington County provides a framework whereby planning and future engineering decisions can be made in part based upon environmental characteristics. TOPOGRAPHY - The Physiographic characteristics of Washington County are formed largely from the western slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains, the wide Hagerstown Valley which is in turn a portion of the expansive Great Limestone Valley network of the east; and the eastern ridge of the Appalachian Mountain system. Elevations within the county range from a high of 2,145 feet at the crest of the Quirauk Mountain of the Blue Ridge to a low of approximately 300 feet near the Potomac River. Topographic features are rather steep at the Blue Ridge, gently rolling within the broad and shallow valley to Fairview Mountain, and with sharp ridges and intervening small valleys or ravines differentiating the westward portion of the County. As illustrated on Map No. I - Generalized Topography , slopes are steepest along both the eastern and western boundaries of the County and within the area between Licking Creek and the Little Conococheague Creek. Approximately 35% of the County's land area has slopes in excess of 15% while the Hagerstown Valley portion of the County comprising slightly more than half of the land area is essentially level or very gently rolling. GROUND COVER - Natural ground cover patterns in Washington County, as illustrated on Map No. II - Ground Cover, are characterized by wood- lands both in the mountainous areas and along the ridge and valley section west of Fairview Mountain. Also, in these steeply sloping areas very rocky and stony features prevail. The remaining un- developed portions of the County are largely in open field/agri- cultural coverage or flood plains or wetlands. SOIL CHARACTERISTICS - The soils of Washington County have been categorized into four broad groupings based upon the history of their formation and position on the landscape. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, the formations stemmed from soils of the uplands, soils of old colluvial deposits, soils of old stream terraces, and soils of the flood plains. A percentage breakdown of the four groupings reveals that the soils of the uplands comprise about 71% of the land area in the County while the other formations comprise 16%, 5%, and 8% respectively. The II -2 upland soils have been developed in place from materials weathered from the underlying rock. The remaining soil categories are formed from deposits transported by water. There are 14 general soil patterns in Washington County referred to as soil associations. These associations have been combined into the following four divisions by the Soil Conservation Service based upon drainage and soil depth. 1. Well drained, stony and very stony soils. 2. Well to excessively drained, shallow, medium textured soils. 3. Moderately well to well drained, deep, medium textured soils. 4. Well drained, deep, medium textured soils. Map No. III - Soil Drainage Characteristics, illustrates the generalized location of soil drainage patterns within Washington County. For the purpose of planning water and sewerage facilities an analysis of the soils is fundamental. With both water supply and quality discussed later in this Chapter, attention is directed here to the suitability of the soils to accommodate (properly) on -lot subsurface disposal systems. The most common on -site sewage disposal method used in areas where central sewage systems are unavailable is the septic tank system. Successful operation of the system depends upon the ability of the soil to absorb and filter the liquid or effluent once it passes through the tile field. The presence of a soil characteristic which impairs proper absorption and filtering of the effluent will cause health hazards as well as public nuisance situations. Soil characteristics affecting the operation of the tile disposal field include permeability rates, depth to bedrock, depth to seasonal high water table, slope, stoniness, and flood hazard. II -3 SUITABILITY FOR ON -LOT SUB -SURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS- Past and present practices with regard to septic system usage seem to indicate that residents have the attitude that such methods of disposal are a matter of right rather than privilege. Furthermore, many residents believe that, so long as no surface malfunctioning is apparent, their household sewage system is operating properly. Little concern is directed toward the issue of groundwater contamination except when it affects an individual's own property or well. It is important to have a basic understanding of the sewage decomposition processes that take place within a septic system in order to fully appreciate the serious health hazards which can potentially exist. A septic tank is a watertight receptacle which receives sewage and is designed and constructed to provide for sludge storage, sludge decomposition, and to separate solids from the liquid through a period of detention before allowing the liquid to be discharged to a subsurface absorption area. The sewage is broken down through an oxygen -less process called anaerobic decomposition in which anaerobic bacteria digest suspended solids, liquifying much of the material and reducing the rest to inert masses of sludge and scum. This primary treatment stage removes solids so that the effluent or clarified liquid which is discharged from the tank does not clog the distribution system. II -4 Septic tanks do not remove pathogenic organisms (harmful bacteria and viruses). The removal of pathogens from the effluent is affected only by percolation through the soil after the effluent is distributed through the tile field. Therefore..., "septic tank effluents cannot be considered safe. The liquid that is discharged from a tank is, in some respects, more objectionable than that which goes in, it is septic and malodorous."* The bacteria are removed from the effluent by filtration and because the soil presents an unfavorable environment for their existance. In an efficient system, pathogens and other waste products are completely removed from the effluent before it recharges the groundwater table. In an inefficient and unsafe system, the effluent may drain rapidly into solution channels and fractures in the bedrock and may reach the groundwater table before complete purification occurs. The untreated sewage will then flow with the groundwater to pollute wells and streams with disease causing bacteria. "Studies in the Nittany Valley, Pennslyvania, a hydrogeologic environment similar to that of the study area (the Hagerstown Valley), show, on the basis of dye tracings, (Jacobson and Langmuir, 1970) that the groundwater moves roughly 4,000 feet in 2 to 6 days."** *Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Manual of Septic Tank Practice, 1969, p. 29. ** Nutter, Larry J. Hydrogeology of the Hagerstown Valleys, Maryland, Maryland Natural Resources, 1973. 1I-5 In another type of malfunctioning system, more obvious to the homeowner, the effluent flows through the drainage bed until it reaches an impermeable layer such as clay or a fragipan (a compact, brittle layer of soil) or bedrock in which case it is forced to the surface where it becomes an immediate health hazard. A third type of pollution hazard can develop when too many septic systems are constructed within a given area. The accompanying Map No. IV - Septic System Failures shows failures for the year 1978 based upon septic system repairs for which Health Department approval is required. While more recent septic system repairs are not mapped, permits issued for the repair of failing systems constitute a large share of the installation processing of the health department. In 1989 approximately 20 percent of the permits issued for the septic system installation were for repairs. These repairs generally require the complete replacement of all parts of the system except the septic tank itself, including the replacement of drain tiles and distribution box and the relocation of the drain field or seepage pit to another area. These kinds of repairs become necessary when drain tiles are clogged or drain fields are saturated resulting in the back up of effluent to the house or the appearance of effluent on the surface of the ground. Such problems may be caused by poor initial installation, by inadequate maintenance by the homeowner, or by overuse resulting in saturation of the absorption area. The map does not reflect those failures in which effluent may drain into fracture in the bedrock and for which there are no apparent symptoms on the surface. II -6 In an effort to minimize the risks of septic system failure and groundwater contamination, the Washington County Health Department has established standards and instituted procedures for the planning and installation of new on -lot sub -surface disposal systems. Prior to the approval of such systems for use on building lots, percolation tests are conducted to evaluate the renovative capabilities of on -site soils. Trenches are excavated to ensure that a minimum filterable soil cover exists between drain tiles and bedrock or groundwater. A reserve area is set aside to allow for the use of alternate drain fields in the event that the first field becomes saturated. The location of septic systems and reserve areas are limited to a minimum distance from on -lot and adjacent well water -supplies. Where a number of on -lot sub -surface systems are planned for a given area, a geohydrologic study is conducted for the entire area of the proposed development in an effort to evaluate the cumulative effect such systems might have on sub- surface geology and groundwater. The above standards and procedures have their limitations however. Percolation and trench tests are limited to relatively small areas and conclusions drawn from these tests must be generalized to the larger areas of the absorption fields where they may or may not be valid. Even the percolation (absorption) test is seen by some authorities as an incomplete testing procedure: II -7 "The principal weaknesses of the absorption test are that it is made in a short time and with clear water. It should be recognized that two processes take place during the test --infiltration, or entrance of the liquid into the soil, and percolation through the soil. The infiltration rate is largely dependent upon the characteristics of the liquid, while speed of percolation depends upon the soil characteristics. When clear liquid is applied continuously to a soil, there is first a drop in the infiltration rate for 1 to several days. As air escapes from the soil, the rate rises to a maximum after a time measured in days, and thereafter it slowly decreases to a small percentage of the original rate. The slow decrease is caused by the following phenomena, which are dependent upon soil characteristics: migration of fine particles with water movement to accumulate and clog pore spaces; ion exchange, which affects the cohesive force between particles and deflocculates materials, and the continued swelling of colloidal materials. Even with water as the liquid, there will be microbial growths that will clog soil pores and interfere with infiltration and percolation. Obviously, substitution of septic sewage for water will increase the number of fine particles and will encourage microbial growth. Ion exchange and colloidal swelling will depend upon the chemical activity of the soil. So far, no soil test or examination method has been devised that will indicate the suitability of a soil for absorption of sewage over a long period... II -8 In the absence of a more effective procedure than the absorption test, precautions should be applied that will prevent disposal -field failures or at least postpone them for a long period. Important is resting, which permits air penetration, the establishment of aerobic conditions in clogged areas, and digestion of solid accumulations. With food no longer available, the bacteria will also die. This housecleaning requires days, not the hours that will be provided by the usual sewage -flow variations of a residence...* *Ehlers, Victor M., C.E., and Steel, Ernest W., C.E., Municipal and Rural Sanitarian, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill Co., 1966. (p.126) As part of the continuing effort to improve on -lot testing reliability and to guard against groundwater contamination by on -lot systems, a County -wide Geohydrologic Study was conducted by the consulting firm of R. E. Wright and Associates. This study was jointly funded by the Washington County Board of County Commissioners and by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency administered through the Maryland Water Resources Administration. By means of on -site testing and evaluation within three prototype study areas of the County, three remote sensing techniques were found to be valid in determining shallow bedrock within prospective septic disposal areas. However, the consultant report concluded that the use of these methods "will require the continuation of the conventional site investigation (slit trench evaluation). II -9 8 A further product of the study was the development of a comprehensive County sub -surface sewage disposal ordinance in accord with minimum State requirements which includes (a) subsurface sewage disposal planning requirements, (b) site investigatory procedures, (c) system design criteria, (d) comprehensive inspection program, (e)legal enforcement procedures, (f) designated enforcement personnel and training program, (g) monitoring of the functionality of subsurface disposal system, and (h) procedures for modifying design criteria. The On Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance for Washington County was adopted in September 1983. The Washington County Health Department administers the Ordinance with guidance from the companion Technical Manual. The Ordinance also encouraged the use of innovative and alternative sewage disposal methods in light of the County's limestone geology. Pursuant to Health -Environmental Article, Subtitle 9-14 and a Memorandum of Understand- ing, Washington County participates in the Innovative and Alternative On Site Sewage Disposal Grant Program. Funds are made available, on a cost - sharing basis, to owners of improved properties with failed septic systems or parcels which have failed percolation testing to assist with costs of design and installation of innovative disposal systems. The program provides for a list of qualified and prioritized applications, joint funding and monitoring, collection and reporting data on the system's performance. II -10 The program offers alternative disposal system possibilities for properties previously considered unsuitable. It also will generate an important data base for evaluation of these systems with an eye toward use of those that prove to be effective and reliable as standard sewage disposal methods. The results of the geohydrologic study are especially relevant in light of renewed emphasis placed by the Environmental Protection Agency upon the consideration of land treatment alternatives as opposed to central sewer systems which discharge to surface waters. If land treatment is chosen as an alternative to stream discharge, a new facility may receive a Federal Construction Grant of 85% of the project cost instead of the usual 75%. Even the use of the traditional septic system is seen by some authorities as a viable wastewater treatment alternative to central treatment processes. A recent report by the Comptroller General of the United States concludes that, "if properly designed, constructed, operated, and maintained, septic systems - should not fail, - can be as permanent as central treatment facilities, - are often more ecologically sound than sewers and central facilities, and - can provide a high degree of wastewater treatment as good or better than the effluent produced by conventional central treatment processes."* *The Comptroller General of the United States, Report to the Congress, Community -Managed Septic Systems: A Viable Alternative to Sewage Treatm Plants, United States General Accounting Office, November 3, 1978. (p.i. The report emphasizes, however, that the key to good septic system performance is a system for public supervision and management of septic systems and recommends that the Environmental Protection Agency establish minimum standards for such public management. The report does not address septage disposal. A management system and criteria which are uniquely suited to the Washington County natural -physical environment in the form of the On Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance is an important product of the geohydrologic study mentioned above. SURFACE WATER CHARACTERISTICS - Washington County lies totally within the Potomac River Basin and is drained by the Conococheague Creek in the western portion of the Great Valley and by the Antietam Creek in the eastern section as both Creeks flaw southward into the Potomac River. The majority of the County lies within the Upper Potomac River Sub - basin. The remainder, a small section in southeastern Washington County, lies within the limits of the middle Potomac River Sub -basin. The tributaries of the Potomac River drain approximately 342 square miles in Washington County. The pattern and intensity of surface water drainage is dictated by the County's location in the Valley and Ridge physiographic province which is characterized by long, ridge -like, parallel mountains and intervening valleys. In the western, more mountainous area of the County, the streams have rather flashy runoff as a result of the steeply sloping terrain and rough topography. Moving eastward into the valleys, the relief is gentle and slightly rolling; hence, the streams are less flashy and meandering. II -12 DRAINAGE SHEDS Washington County is divided into nine major watersheds, as indicated on Map No. V, in addition to those areas draining directly into the Potomac River. The Antietam Watershed, which drains approximately 187 square miles or about 40% of Washington County is by far the largest drainage area. The following table indicates the drainage area of each major watershed in the County. FIGURE NO. 3 WASHINGTON COUNTY WATERSHED AREAS* WATERSHED DRAINAGE AREA (SQ. MI.) Washington Total County Antietam Creek 187 292 Conococheague Creek 65 563 Israel Creek 14 14 Licking Creek 27 214 Little Conococheague 16 18 Little Tonoloway 16 26 St. James -Marsh Run 20 20 Sideling Hill Creek 9 104 Tonoloway 2 114 *Source: Washington County, Plan For The County I1-13 WATER QUALITY Quality of Washington County's surface water has been studied by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Administration in its 1974 Water Survey. Studies have also been done by the Office of Environmental Programs, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene 1986 Report to EPA According to Section 3.05(b) Clean Water Act (P.L.97-117) and the Water Management Administration, Maryland Department of the Environment 1988 Report to the EPA According to Section 3.05(b) of the Clean Water Act (P.L.100-4). The 1986 report to the EPA includes basin description and trend analysis of all the watersheds in the County. The 1988 report includes an updated trend analysis of the Potomac mainstem, the Antietam Creek and the Concoccheague Creek. The Water Management Administration is planning an updated basin description for all the watersheds to be completed in April 1990. The quality of Washington County's surface waters as a source of supply would necessitate considerable treatment prior to consumption. Even a generalized analysis of the sampling data compiled by the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin and the Maryland Water Resources Administration indicates a high coliform count. In addition to the high coliform count, most of the watercourses were quite alkalines because of the limestone formation. The predominate cause of the degradation of water quality of the watercourses in Washington County are agricultural and urban runoff, and industrial and sewage treatment discharges. The following dissertation discusses the significant pollution problems and predominant causes of pollution of each of the watercourses traversing Washington County. The 1988 report summarized that water quality in the Upper Potomac River sub -basin is Good and suited to water contact recreation and aquatic life and, where classified, trout production. Elevated suspended sediment, nutrient and bacterial levels are primarily due to agricultural runoff and upstream sources. Urban runoff and failing septic systems also contribute to bacterial and nutrient levels observed in the sub -basin. Overall, water quality has degraded slightly in the Upper Potomac River sub -basin between 1976-7 and 1985. Total nitrogen and total phosphorus levels show significant increases throughout must of the basin. Fecal coliform bacteria and total suspended solids levels generally show no trend. POTOMAC RIVER MAINSTE4 The mainstem of the Potomac River is 112.3 miles in length. It follows a sinuous course through most of its length. Upstream reaches flow through primarily forested land, while the land draining the lower reaches is principally agricultural. Several small towns are located along the River's banks. In 1974 the river met state water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature. The water was found to be alkaline having flowed through the limestone areas of the Appalachian Region. Nitrogen averages tended to be high particularly in the section of the river from Shepherdstown to the mouth of the Shenandoah River where the average concentration was above 1 part per million (ppm) nitrogen. Phosphate concentrations were found to be higher both in the upper and lower sections. Algae blooms were indicated by occasionally high values for chlorophyll, recorded during the summer months. II -15 Bacteriological values met the water quality standard not exceeding a log mean of 200 for fecal coliform bacteria throughout most of the mainstem. Although the Potomac River has a consistently good water quality, the waste flowing from the North Branch resulted in poor bacteriological quality water, therefore influencing the water quality of the Potomac in Washington County. Other sections of the Potomac River that did not meet the numerical standard were the portion passing through Hancock, Maryland, and a stretch below Shepherdstown, West Virginia. Domestic wastes, agricultural wastes and soil erosion are the primary sources of pollution in the mainstem of the Potomac throughout Washington County. Septic tank seepage enters the river from numerous non -point source locations throughout the County. In the Hancock area, sewage treatment plant wastes from the Town are discharged into Tonoloway Creek a short distance above its mouth. At Williamsport, the Sanitary Commission's treatment plant serving Williamsport and the Halfway area has a discharge to the river. Also, at Williamsport, a tannery discharges wastes to Conococheague Creek, just above its mouth. In addition to the Maryland discharges, the West Virginia towns of Shepherdstown, Bolivar and Harpers Ferry have domestic waste discharges to the mainstem of the Potomac River. Also, Jellystone Park discharges waste- water to this segment of the river. II -16 The 1988 report to the EPA concluded that in the lower mainstem river (Segment 01), total nitrogen and total phosphorus significantly increased between 1976 and 1985 respectively. The ICPRB reported significantly increased nitrate and nitrite levels are between 1974 and 1984 in this segment (Haywood et al., 1987). Fecal coliform bacteria levels significantly declined between 1976 and 1985. The Antietam Creek segment lies east of Hagerstown, Maryland, having drainage areas in Maryland of 187.0 square miles. Another 104.9 square miles of Antietam Creek drainage is contained in Pennsylvania. Average stream discharge measured at the U. S. Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) gage four miles upstream from the mouth is 265 cfs. The principal cities in the watershed are Waynesboro, Pennsylvania and Hagerstown, Maryland. The 1986 Report to EPA mentioned previously indicates "Unlike most of the sub -basin, land use in this segment is primarily agricultural. Little Antietam Creek, Beaver Creek and Marsh Run are all classified as Class III (natural) trout waters while the remaining surface waters are classified as Class IV (recreational) trout waters. Water quality in this segment ranges fran Fair to Good. High bacterial levels are due to agricultural runoff and malfunctioning septic systems. Nutrient levels are also high, but there are no eutrophication problems in this segment due to the continual streamflow. Because of intense agricultural use and practices and soil type in this segment, the Antietam Creek drainage is designated a "priority watershed" for the potential release of phosphorus from agricultural sources (State Soil Conservation Committee, 1984). The branches and headwaters of Antietam Creek in Pennsylvania are reportedly "water quality limited" (Department of Environmental Resources, 1984). II -17 Benthic community structure and diversity from three stations in the mainstem Creek indicate Excellent water quality in the lower portion of the segment (ANT0044), Fair water quality below Hagerstown (ANT0203) and Good water quality just south of the State line (ANT0366). In both 1984 and 1985, 1750 adult rainbow trout were stocked into this segment as a put -and - take fishery (Tidewater Administration, 1984, 1985a). The 1988 report to the EPA stated that in the Antietam Creek basin (Segment 02), total nitrogen and total phosphorus significantly increased throughout the sub -basin between 1977-1985 and 1976-1985, respectively. The ICPRB reported significantly increased nitrate levels between 1974 and 1984 were reported in this segment. Fecal coliform bacteria levels significantly increased at mid -basin (ANT0203) although the upstream and downstream stations (ANT0044, ANT0306) showed no trend. This is probably due to urban runoff and/or operation problems with the municipal treatment plant. (The mainstem of Antietam Creek is classified by the State for purposes of water pollution control as Recreational Trout Waters.) In -stream sampling performed by the Maryland Water Resources Administration during 1974 revealed the following conditions of surface water quality. II -18 Bacterial concentrations were found to be in violation of State standards throughout the entire course of Antietam Creek. The mainstem of the stream did not meet the fecal coliform standard, and almost all bacterial counts were greatly in excess of the standard. The highest counts were recorded one mile downstream from the Pennsylvania State line. Significantly lower values were recorded immediately below the sewerage treatment plants serving Hagerstown and Funkstown. Ultimately, though, the water supplied to the Potomac River by Antietam Creek was still bacteriologically poor. Water temperature in the mainstem of Antietam Creek below Hagerstown did not meet the standard for Class IV "Recreational Trout Waters". Temperature elevation downstream from the Hagerstown Municipal Power Plant was pronounced, often 56 degrees F above stream temperatures. Maximum temperatures below the plant reach the high eighties and low nineties on hot summer days. The return to ambient temperature did not occur for miles downstream. The Hagerstown Sewerage Treatment Plant, 2.0 miles below the power plant, also releases an effluent warmer than the ambient stream temperature. Factors which contributed to maintaining elevated temperatures far below the two effluents were slow stream flow and a lack of cold water springs entering the stream. In the past few years, the Municipal Power Plant has been used for peak loading only. The effect of power cut back on stream temperatures is not known. Marsh Run and Beaver Creek, tributaries to Antietam Creek, were found to have water temperatures well above the Natural Trout Water Standards (Class III) for these streams. However, no warm water discharges are known, and these waters may be solar heated. II -19 8 The waters of Antietam Creek and its tributaries are used by several industries and municipalities for cooling purposes and sewerage disposal. Hagerstown and Funkstown sewerage treatment plants are located south of Hagerstown about 1 1/2 miles apart and discharge directly into the stream's mainstem. There are eleven other, but small sewerage treatment plants in the segment. Little Antietam Creek in the towns of Boonsboro and Keedysville has exhibited high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as a result of organic wastes utilizing the oxygen in the stream. The BOD in Falls Creek below the Fort Ritchie Military Reservation was also above normal for this stream. Antietam Creek waters are found to be alkaline, to contain large amounts of dissolved material, and were greatly enriched with nitrogen and phosphorus. Except for bacteriological degradation and temperature elevation, water quality standards were met during 1974. The effects of municipal discharges on the level of dissolved oxygen in Antietam Creek is the subject of a computer modeling exercise being performed by the State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The model indicates that some future municipal discharges of secondary effluent would be likely to cause violations of the dissolved gxygen standards (5 mg/l avg.) in Antietam Creek. Therefore, Antietam Creek has been designated as "Water Quality Limited" with respect to dissolved oxygen. Special effluent limitations will be determined by the State in order to protect the Antietam Creek from oxygen depletion. 1I-20 Most of the industries located in the Antietam Creek drainage area are in compliance with the State industrial effluent standards. Those few which are not, are working toward compliance. CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK The Conococheague Creek segment lies to the west of Hagerstown, Maryland. The drainage area consists of 65.8 square miles with a main stream length of 22.0 miles. The great majority of the stream's drainage, 497.6 square miles, is contained in Pennsylvania. Most of the segment is agricultural or forest, except for the eastern edge which drains the western urban fringe area surrounding Hagerstown. Few small towns are found in the segment, the largest being the greater part of Williamsport. The average discharge measured at the U. S. Geological Survey gage at Fairview, Maryland, 18.7 miles above the stream's mouth, was 572 cubic feet per second. Conococheague Creek water exhibited poor quality from 1966 to 1969. Extremely high bacteriological values were recorded just downstream of the Pennsylvania State line. Bacterial water quality of the remainder of the stream's length did not meet water quality standards. During summer months, dissolved oxygen concentrations were low and occassionally dropped below 4.0 parts per million; the lower limit for Class IV waters. Water temperatures as high as 86.9 degrees F, well above the temperature standards of 75 degrees F, were recorded, but there is no known source of thermal pollution. High temperatures are probably due to natural conditions. II -21 By 1974, water quality had improved. Fecal coliform values still violated the numberical standard but were generally lower throughout the stream. Dissolved oxygen values were generally high and at no time went below the standard. The stream water was found to be alkaline and to contain large amounts of dissolved solids. Nitrate concentration was high and phosphate was unusually high. Computer modeling performed for the Maryland portion of the Conococheague indicated that future planned dischargers from standard secondary treatment plants are not likely to cause violations of the dissolved oxygen standard of 5 milligrams per liter (mg/1) daily average. Conococheague Creek upstream of the Maryland/Pennsylvania line receives a large variety of domestic and industrial wastes. The towns of Chambersburg and Mercersburg, Pennsylvania discharge sewage treatment plant wastes into the stream. In Maryland, the stream is polluted by farm wastes and individual septic system seepage. A tannery discharges wastes into the stream just above its mouth. The 1986 Report indicates surface waters are all classified as Class I for water contact recreation and aquatic life. Water quality in the Conococheague Creek segment is generally Good. High bacteria and nutrient levels are monitoried thoughout the segment and are attributed to agricultural runoff. Because of the intensive agricultural use and II -22 practices and soil type, this segment was designated as a "priority water- shed" for the potential release of nitrogen from agricultural sources (State Soil Conservation Committee, 1984). An extreme range of pH conditions (<6.5, >8.5) has been monitored on occasion in this segment and is considered to be naturally occurring. The upper tributaries of Conococheague Creek in Pennsylvania are generally considered to be "water quality limited" (Department of Environmental Resources, 1984). Benthic community structure and diversity at two stations near each end of the segment CON0005, CON0180) indicate Good water quality. LITTLE CONOCOCHEAGUE The 1988 report to the EPA indicates that in the Concocheague Creek basin (Segment 04), total nitrogen significantly increased throughout the sub -basin between 1977 and 1985. The ICPRB reported significantly increased nitrate levels between 1974 and 1984 in this segment. Total phosphorus significantly increased at the downstream station (CON0005) between 1976 and 1985; at the upstream station (CON0180), no significant trend was found between 1977 and 1985. At the lower station, pH signifcantly declined but no trend in pH was observed at the upper station between 1977 and 1985. The ICPRB reported significantly decreased pH between 1976 and 1984 at the downstream station. Fecal coliform bacteria showed no trend throughout the sub -basin. I1-23 Little Conococheague Creek is located just west of Conococheague Creek. Of its total drainage area of 18.0 square miles, 16.7 square miles are contained in Maryland. A large tract of land in the upper segment, the Indian Springs Wildlife Management Area, is forested. The watershed is generally sparsely populated with some farm land in the lower section. Clear Spring, the only town in the watershed, is located on Tom's Run, which is the largest tributary. Water quality of the stream was monitored in 1974 in Tom's Run just below Clear Spring and at the mouth of Little Conococheague Creek. At both points, these streams did not meet the bacteriological numerical standard. Water quality was especially degraded below Clear Spring where fecal coliform counts were always in the thousands of organisms per 100 milliter of sample. However, dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature met water quality standards. It is likely that water quality with respect to dissolved oxygen and bacteria has improved in Toms Run and the Little Conococheague due to a recently constructed sewage treatment plant which serves Clear Spring and discharges to Tom's Run. No industrial wastes are known to enter the stream. The 1986 Report confirms that water quality has improved. All surface waters in this watershed are classified as Class III (natural) trout waters. Water quality in this segment is Good. High bacterial levels are due to agricultural runoff. Benthic community structure and diversity at a station near the confluence with the Potomac River (LCC0001) indicates Good water quality. II -24 LICKING CREEK Licking Creek is located west of Little Conococheague Creek. Its large drainage area is mostly in Pennsylvania (185.5 square miles), and only 27.6 square miles are included in the Maryland segment. Most of this area is forest. Part of the Indian Springs Wildlife Management Area is located in the western segment of the drainage area. One small town (Pecktonville) lies on the stream's western bank approximately two miles above the stream's mouth. Water quality of Licking Creek has been monitored by the Water Resources Administration at a single station 0.4 miles above the mouth. At this point, stream quality met State standards, except for bacteriological values which were in violation of the numerical standard for this parameter. Nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus) concentrations were slightly below the average for streams in the Upper Potomac Basin. There are no known sources of contamination of this stream. Farm animals undoubtedly contribute to the fecal coliform count in the stream. Other possible sources of contamination in Pennsylvania are not known. The Office of Environmental Programs indicates in its 1986 Report to EPA that surface watersin this segment are classified as Class IV (recreational) trout waters. Water quality in this segment is very Good, however, some high temperatures are occasionally monitored during the summer months. This is a natural condition, but it probably reflects a lack of stream cover and may stress coldwater fishes such as trout. In both 1984 and 1985, 1000 adult rainbow trout were stocked into this creek (Tidewater Administration, 1984, 1985a). Benthic community structure and diversity at a single station near the confluence with the Potomac River (LIC0004) indicates Good water quality. Most of the upper drainage in Pennsylvania is classified as "water quality limited" (Department Environmental Resources, 1984). I1-25 TONOLOWAY CREEK The Tonoloway Creek drainage segment is located just east and northeast of Hancock, Maryland. This segment is quite small consisting of only 2.1 square miles. The remainder of the watershed is in Pennsylvania and is 111.5 square miles in size. Several orchards are found in the segment, but no towns and very few dwellings. Water quality of Tonoloway Creek was determined 0.4 miles above the stream's mouth and 0.4 miles downstream from the point of discharge for the Hancock Sewerage Treatment Plant. Except for fecal coliform values which exceeded the numerical standard of 200 MPN per 100 ml, water quality met the State standards in 1974. Disolved oxygen was sufficient for aquatic organisms and nutrient values were generally low. All surface waters in this segment are classified as Class IV (put - and -take) for recreational trout segment was considered Good in 1986 Water quality in the Tonoloway Creek High bacteria and nutrient levels from runoff from the limited agricultural land and failing septic systems are the segment's most serious water quality concerns. The town of Hancock's treatment plant is probably the major cause of high bacteriological values. The nature of wastes entering the stream above the Maryland/Pennsylvania State line is, as yet, undetermined. Benthic community structure and diversity at a single station near the confluence with the Potomac River (IOC0004) indicate Good water quality. In 1985, the State stocked 500 adult rainbow trout into this stream (Tide- water Administration, 1985a). II -26 LITTLE TONOLCWAY "All surface waters in this segment are classified as Class IV (recreational) trout waters. Water quality in this segment is Good. Elevated bacterial levels from agricultural runoff and failing septic systems and high suspended sediments from agricultural runoff are the primary water quality concerns in this segment. In 1984 and 1985, 500 adult rainbow trout were stocked each year into this segment as a put -and -take fishery (Tidewater Administration, 1984, 1985a)." SIDELING HILL CREEK The Sideling Hill Creek segment includes 23.1 square miles. The total drainage area includes an additional 80.5 square miles in Pennsylvania. Sideling Hill Creek and all tributaries are classified as Class IV waters (to be protected for use as recreational trout waters). Average stream discharge was 124 cfs measured at the U.S. Geological Survey gage 1.2 miles upstream from the mouth. Land in the watershed is largely forested with some farm land. Included in the drainage area is the Sideling Hill Wildlife Management Area. Water quality of the stream was excellent in 1974, as determined one and one-half miles above the mouth. All water quality standards were met, and fecal coliform values were very low at this point. Measurements of pH, although not very high, were on the alkaline side of neutral. Dissolved ionic constituents were low, including nitrate which was very low in concentration. Phosphate was below average for many streams in the sub - basin. I1-27 Few domestic wastes enter the stream, and little agricultural pollution is present. A boy scout camp near the mouth of the stream, and above the sampling station, discharges treated wastes into the stream. There are no known industrial discharges. The 1986 Report to EPA indicates that water quality in this segment is Good to Excellent. Elevated bacterial and suspended sediment levels are due to agricultural runoff. Benthis community structure and diversity in the lower portion of the segment (SID0015) indicate Good water quality. In 1984 and 1985, this segment was stocked as a put -and -take fishery with 3000 to 4000 adult rainbow trout, respectively (Tidewater Administration, 1984, 1985a). DARGAN AREA DRAINAGE The Dargan Area Drainage is located just above the town of Harpers Ferry between Antietam Creek and Israel Creek. It consists of 11.1 square miles of drainage, and includes several small unnamed tributaries which enter the Potomac River directly. The watershed is sparsely populated and contains forest land and small farms. Accessibility to the river is good and boating, fishing and camping are popular along the river's banks. There is no known water quality data for the streams in this segment, but no probable sources of pollution are suspected. II -28 IXJWNSVILLE AREA DRAINAGE The Downsville area segment lies to the west of Antietam Creek between Williamsport and Shephardstown, and contains many streams directly tributary to the Potomac River. The area is 52.4 square miles in size. The largest stream in the segment is St. James -Marsh Run whose headwaters originate at St. James, a suburb of Hagerstown. One station was monitored in Marsh Run at stream mile 1.6 in 1974, but no data is available for the other streams. Marsh Run was found to be polluted by high concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria, but the other parameters met the water quality standards. The stream was found to have hard water due to a high total alkalinity measured as calcium carbonate. The pH was generally a little E above 8, but well within the limits of the pH standard. The stream receives wastes from urban and agricultural runoff. Probably the agricultural activities are the major cause of the bacteria counts. PINESBURG STATION AREA DRAINAGE Pinesburg Station Area Drainage is a small segment (6.3 square miles) being at the southwest of Conococheague Creek. It consists of a few small unnamed tributaries and is sparsely populated. Water quality of these streams is not known, but there is no reason to believe that the streams do not meet water quality standards. 1I-29 GREENSPRING AREA DRAINAGE This segment which drains 20.5 square miles is located between the Conococheague Creek and Licking Creek watersheds. Fort Frederick State Park adjoining Big Pool, a large lake, on the C & O Canal, is found near the Potomac River. No data is available for the small streams of this small segment, but no water quality problems are suspected. TIMBER RIDGE DRAINAGE AREA The Timber Ridge segment (11.0 square miles) lies to the west of Licking Creek. Ditch Run and several small tributaries drain this area. Water quality of these streams has not been tested, and no wastes are known to enter the stream. TONOLOWAY RIDGE DRAINAGE AREA Tonoloway Ridge Area Drainage (20.8 square miles) is located west of Tonoloway Creek and east of Sideling Hill Creek. Little Tonoloway Creek contained almost entirely within Maryland is the largest stream in the segment. The town of Hancock, Maryland, is found within the Little Tonoloway drainage area, although the town's sewage treatment plant discharges into Tonoloway Creek, another watershed. Sideling Hill Mountain and Tonoloway Ridge, which pass through the area, are forested. Orchards and small farms characterize the cultivated areas. II -30 FIGURE NO. 4 CLASSIFICATION OF THE WATERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY SUB -BASIN SUB -BASIN UNIT CODE NAME DESCRIPTION Class II Waters- NONE NONE Shellfish Harvesting (NONE) Class III Waters - Natural Trout Beaver Creek Mainstem only, in Waters Antietam Creek Watershed Marsh Run Mainstem only, in Antietam Creek Watershed Class IV Waters- Sideling Hill Creek Entire Sideling Hill Recreational Trout and all Tributaries Creek Watershed Waters Tonoloway Creek and Entire Tonoloway Creek all Tributaries Watershed Licking Creek and all Entire Licking Creek Tributaries Watershed Conococheague Creek Entire Conococheague and all Tributaries Creek Watershed Antietam Creek and Entire Antietam Creek Tributaries, Watershed, Except Except Classified Those Designated Above as Natural Natural Trout Waters Trout Waters SOURCE: Water Resources Administration 44 01 C C N 14 A 0 w U 0 a O 0 0 N o b O M A a X Y .Oi €4C T O •.Ci aCf. 7 ++ y ro 1-13.0 N C C > aai O 0 M 0 0 0 .H•1 'O E 0 01 '40 U . N O a z a Z z z 0. '-.a' .1 U. U m N a U 34441 a' ONN m q3 0 7E •.1 asN A ro • TO ro 4. ro • Ym .-4 O 33 nm w a N aam ..y u •A CC qy '4 ac c ac ac ac ac U.. w 61034 ° m 0% c a a 40 'o'' ] '114 60 V.4 40 V-• 40 a•� Na u 0 11UroA •.>i a Y C N • y a y' O. T7 ami 1 TJ T7 TO TU a 'O 0 643 a 0. 0 q mY Ca m 3 yN 7 C y.-1 yN a.-4 ro N N CM 01 U qy 13643 U • -.4.4 .a0 .411 .r0 •H .-1 .a0 •.1 .1 .10 "4.4 .-'0 )J 00 roC I 4J001 .101 6'0 01 90. EON wC 40. 013 row 60. 60. .aa ro a as u N C 0 O m c N YOU ro.a 0 T•.. 0 0'w 0..a 7 9 O'w' 7 0'ua 7 O•w 0 CC garo "' 3 wa 7 m T ..y 0 7 0 0 0 N --40.--44 .a , . y N ro E 3 0 1 > .1 N m U M 0.' N N 1301 N m U N ma (O. OS C 0 1 W 0 0L U E 7 W Uw ITi W C r 0 j 0 •A.•. 430 0• +a0 ym 4343 0.4 q 43 1443 NO mw Co w•./ 0.-1 0 •.4 4.0.1 000 +a0 60. 40 314 tro a 010 33.4 .00 ro 0 .1C £ 04ti b7 Im 3% 314 431 00014 a1w Ero 434 Elk W." 0. R 0a0 yw 00 C C 00 00 00 -4>1 U1 Zo za ZC za za za .7A 3 a a a a a >4 >. >4 >4 >4 W W 3 4 W W 3 01 Dl a U >4 U r z3 z3 z3 0 z 0 z 41 " a 0 z z >4 >4 >4 >a is >a 43 >Ui >4 a >4 $4— >o ---4 _ y dl m E la 0' E01 N a0C a O d a a a a a a 01 H >4 >4 N N >4 U N ~ '• • 7 O U ~ . ry .i v 0 O b.. C N H S.. p U '4 8 On U U H ~ y N CO u N0 04 0 ` + .•1 0V U 04 3`.' C`.' .,a 7 N u 0 U QQ >N U 0a! .4 04 •.4i .Y .1Y .q N C '4.— 01) 434 Y.. 0 Om mm 04 C U 0 + ry CU y 0 0u1 CO '04) N 3 gqa u U 0 4 .~.1 .H.1 ' E. U 'sit) O q 0. 0 O N -40 -0 001 CV 0 F E0: .N U amN a 3 0 y M A .-I H ta 4,43 V.4 41 00 C Uw 0' A U N y U ro U roA C ro H 60 aaaa a 0 Ca.. ••- .4 N N C U + 433 0 0 DC roA A U 0 U-'/ y a. a m 0 'I —17 U 06 0. m ym 001 N 4301 0.10 A 014 a CC a 3 .1 CC .1 +a M q N y 434 6'' b 001 C-.4 aJ .1 > o E s U . AC -ias aaa ac a>, TO Cr. y .C.4 .40 a4 '-'0 O 634 U-4 9 0 u .C C 0 m 60 14 wN043 yC 043 0 30 +. . C Ii • Oa 00 3.1 3 C `r -4- C .N y ro N y N .4 C 1 I N m 0 I 0 ya N U as 3 W u a 0 m II -32 Little Tonoloway, which was sampled in 1974, by the Water Resources Administration, seems to be degraded by farm runoff, although exact sources have not yet been determined. Fecal coliform values did not meet the water quality standard and were extremely high in two samples taken during spring months. Other water quality parameters met the standards. GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS AND AQUIFERS - Washington County is divided generally into four water provinces based upon physiographic formations. As illustrated on accompanying Map No. VI -Water Provinces, the division includes the South Mountain -Elk Ridge province averaging three miles in width along the eastern boundary of the County; the Hagerstown Valley province extending approximately 18 miles in width to the base of Fairview and Powell Mountains; the Hancock -Indian Springs province reaching westward from the Fairview and Powell Mountains nearly 19 miles to the base of Sideling Hill Mountain; and the Sideling Hill -Town Creek province extending to the County line. 1. Within the South Mountain -Elk Ridge water province only small differences exist in the water -bearing capacities of the geologic formations. According to compiled data the mean yield form wells is less than 10 gpm with a range from 1 to 60 gpm. The best yields appear to be located in the Catoctin metabasalt formation in the Cascade-Highfield-Fort Ritchie area. Springs in this water province, although numerous, are generally small with discharges ranging from less than 10 to 100 gpm. The chemical quality of groundwater is considered suitable for most uses with spring water lower in mineral content, but slightly more acidic than well water. 2. The Hagerstown Valley water province covering an area of approximately 300 square miles is considered hydrogeologically complex II -33 because of the broken and folded characteristics of the limestone and similar carbonate rocks such as dolomite. "In consolidated carbonate rocks most of the water is stored in joints, bedding planes, irregular fractures, and solution openings and at many places in the intergranular pores of the residum (soil derived from weathered rock)...The number, size and degree of interconnection of the joints, solution cavities and other secondary openings of the carbonate rocks determine their capacity to transmit water."* The major direction of groundwater movement in the Hagerstown Valley province is southward to the Potomac River. Although local variations may exist in rock permeability, the water table contours within the Hagerstown Valley closely parallel the topographic patterns. Groundwater recharge in this province occurs primarily by precipitation filtering through the soil and subsoil. "Streams that flow off South Mountain to the east. ..and Powell and Fairview Mountains to the west are major sources of recharge."** Surface depressions and sags acts as efficient basins to collect rain water and a sinkhole at Jugtown, Washington County is known to have "captured" a perennial stream with a flow of 220 gallons per minute.*** The quantity of groundwater available in the limestone and dolomite aquifers of the Hagerstown Valley is quite large. As Nutter has noted, "Carbonate rocks. ..are often excellent sources of water because the interstices (fractures and solution cavities) are large and hence yield freely nearly all the water being held against gravity."**** Wells drilled in the Hagerstown Valley yield from 2 to 400 gpm with the Tomstown dolomite, *Nutter, Larry J., Ibid., p. 13. **Ibid., p. 13. ***Ibid., p. 13. ****Ibid., p. 32. II -34 Conococheague limestone, and Stonehenge limestone evidencing respectively the highest yields. Springs also occur throughout the Hagerstown Valley water province and have a discharge range from 25-100 gpm to 2000-3000 gpm. 3. The third major water province in Washington County, the Hancock - Indian Springs province, extends westward from the Fairview -Powell Mountains to the eastern base of Sideling Hill. With shale as the dominant rock type in this province, groundwater recharge is low. Shale soils evidence a low to moderate moisture holding capacity and a relatively high direct surface runoff results. Hydrogeologic conditions, therefore, are unfavorable for large capacity wells of any sustained yield. Springs occur in all of the formations in the Hancock -Indian Springs water province, and are for the most part gravity fed. Although sufficient amounts of water may be available for modest domestic and farm use, test results indicate rather poor aquifers are present. The quality of water in this province is generally satisfactory. However, both a high iron content and a hardness factor prevail. One of the least desirable water supply areas is along the Tonoloway Ridge west of Hancock where hardness and nitrate content were significantly high. 4. The Sideling Hill -Town Creek water province occupies the small portion of Washington County between Sideling Hill and Sideling Hill Creek. The best well in the province yields only 36 gpm which indicates the absence of any significant groundwater supplies. Also in the province, hardness and iron content may necessitate treatment of water supplies. Additionally, high sulfur and nitrate contents have been found in certain wells in the Jennings formation. The accompanying map generally illustrates the aquifer characteristics in Washington County in terms of the following three Hydrologic Units. II -35 Hydrologic Unit I - Contains the most productive aquifers. Average yields and specific capacities fall in the upper 25%. Well yields range from 1 to 580 gpm. There is approximately a 20% chance of getting a well yielding 50 gpm or more. Hydrologic Unit II - Aquifers are of intermediate productivity. There is approximately a 6% chance of getting a well yield of 50 gpm or more. Hydrologic Unit III - Contains the poorest aquifers within the County. Well yields range from 1 to 200 gpm with only a 2% chance of getting 50 gpm or more. GROUNDWATER QUALITY - Although ample groundwater quantity is apparent, groundwater quality continues to be a problem. One method of determining the pollution level of groundwater is to count the coliform organisms. Positive coliform bacteria which are found in the excreta of warm blooded animals are harmless, but their presence indicates the groundwater is likely contaminated by pathogenic organisms. Unfortunately, "there is no easily applicable method of demonstrating the presence or absence of pathogenic micro-organisms in water" as Ehler and Steel note.* The following chart prepared from data supplied by the Washington County Health Department clearly shows that there is a large percentage of contaminated wells in Washington County and particularly in the Hagerstown Valley. In 1975, 45% of the wells tested were contaminated by coliform bacteria. Furthermore, a recent study by Dr. George Comstock states that of 234 wells** sampled, that 133 or 57 percent tested positive for fecal coliforms.*** *op. cit., p. 31. **Method systematically sampled those households who reported that their drinking water source was a well more than 50 feet deep. ***Comstock, George W. (MD), Bacteriological Survey of Deep Wells i 11-36 Figure 6 Private Water Samples (Residences) 1968 through 1986 Washington County, Maryland YEAR TOTAL # WELLS TOTAL # NEGATIVE TOTAL# POSITIVE PERCENTAGES POSITIVE 1968 285 94 191 67.0 % 1969 228 109 119 52.2 % 1970 156 70 86 55.1 % 1971 251 128 123 49.0 % 1972 375 181 - 194 52.0 % 1973 476 227 249 52.0 % thru March Apr '74 thru Dec. '75 429 234 195 45.0 % 1976 228 171 57 25.0 % 1977 299 176 123 41.0 % 1978 244 154 90 36.0 % 1981 292 178 114 39.0 % Permits Issued 1982 227 122 11 4.8 % 1983 303 114 1 0.3 % 1984 303 144 2 0.9 % 1985 335 202 1 0.3 % 1986 384 84 0 0.0 % II -37 The lower percentages shown for contaminated wells since 1975 are not necessarily an indication of improved water quality, but are more likely the result of a change in the sampling base. Prior to 1976, water samples were taken from wells in which contamination was already suspected. Between 1976 and 1981 however, the data is based upon samples taken from all new residential wells for which Health Department approval was requested. All such wells were subject to on -site inspection and observation of grouting by Health Department personnel. The average incidence of contaminated wells sampled under these conditions for the years 1976, 1977, and 1978 was 35%. The figures supplied for the years 1982-1986 apply only to new wells drilled in the given year and properly constructed and grouted under Health Department supervision. They do not apply to existing wells sampled on request. The large decrese in positive samples is also attributed to a greater degree of follow-up since Use and occupancy permits for new dwellings are dependant upon a Certificate of Potability. The Geohydrologic Study for Washington County included a comprehensive water quality sampling and analysis program to determine existing groundwater quality and specific problems within three designated prototype areas. Analyses included total coliform, fecal coliform, fecal streptococci, nitrates, chlorides, and ABS to establish water quality relationships to point and non -point pollution sources such as malfunctioning septic systems, agricultural sources (cattle barns, feed lots, chemical fertilization, and manure application), storm water sources, background water quality, etc. As a result of these analyses, the following conclusions were presented in the consultant's report: I1-38 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS* Conclusions Relative to Coliform Contamination 1. Twenty-four percent of all wells sampled from the three prototype areas exhibited total coliform contamination as measured by the MPN method. However, only thirteen percent of the wells were characterized by the presence of total coliform in three or more tubes of the five -tube MPN method. 2. Seven percent of all wells exhibited fecal coliform contamination as measured by the MPN method; however, only two percent of all wells exhibited fecal contamination in three or more of the five -tube MPN tests. 3. The MPN method of total coliform analysis is considerably more sensitive than the ME method to the presence of non -fecal coliform organisms (environmental coliforms) and other bacterial organisms which yield positive results by this method. 4. The hydrogeologic environment of Washington County is quite susceptible in many locations to contamination by naturally occurring shallow bacterial organisms. Such susceptibility, as demonstrated by the results of the MPN test results is undesirable from a public health standpoint as it indicates that potential avenues of bacterial or pathogenic communication exist between the surface and the subsurface groundwater supply. 5. Subsurface sewage disposal practices in Washington County appear to be generally providing adequate wastewater renovation before the infiltrate from these systems reaches the groundwater system. *From Groundwater Quality of Washington County, Maryland, R. E. Wright Associates, Inc., August, 1981. II -39 Three -fourths of the incidences of contamination are attributed to non -septic system sources. These sources are believed to be naturally occurring environmental colifrom orgainisms associated with soil, plant, insect, and cold-blooded animals. However, twenty- five percent of the incidences of contamination are generally attributed to incomplete renovation of subsurface disposal sewage effluents. Livestock and other want -blooded animal (non -human) sources are considered to be negligible as sources of fecal contamination of the sampled wells. 6. Many wells contaminated by environmental coliforms, will periodically be free of contamination due to the lack of fluid mechanism for transport. This means that many cases (+75%) of contamination are dependent upon rainfall frequency and intensity, vertical soil permeabilities, and travel time to subject wells. Conclusions Relative to Well Construction 7. Deeper wells generally have a lower incidence of bacteriological contamination. Conversely, the shorter the well casing length, the more likely a well is to have bacteriological contamination. 8. The closer a well is to the on -site or neighboring septic system, the more likely it is to be contaminated. Conversely, the greater the isolation distance between well and septic system, the less likely the well is to be contaminated. 9. The age of a well is directly related to its probability of being contaminated. Newer wells are more likely to be uncontaminated and older wells are more likely to be contaminated. This is attributed to improved well construction practices as well as improved septic system planning, design, and enforcement procedures in practice in recent years. II -40 10. The greater the depth to the static water level, the less likely a well is to be contaminted. Conversely, the shallower the static water level, the more likely the well is to be contaminated. 11. Well casings extended well below the static water level will provide an added degree of sanitary protection to the subject well. Conclusions Relative to Planning, Design, and Management 12. Certain aquifer units in the county appear to be more sensitive to groundwater contamination. Specifically, the Beekmantown (48%) and the Metamorphic Aquifer (36%) are much more likely to have wells which are contaminated. This conclusion is relative to the average rate of contamination across the three prototype areas (24%). For this reason, special planning and other protective measures may be especially warranted for these aquifer units. 13. Wells (and septic systems) are no more likely to be contaminated when placed on hydrogeologic and soils limitations than are those which are placed upon more ideal sites. This does not, however, refute the fact that sites characterized by bedrock outcroppings or shallow and rocky soils generally provide incomplete renovation of infiltrating sewage effluent. 14. Improvements in planning and design standards for the following criteria will result in improved groundwater quality.* (a) Well depth. (b) Length of well casing. (c) Isolation distances. (d) Soils and hydrogeologic conditions. (e) Depth to static water level. (f) Wells drilled in the Beekmantown and Metamorphic Aquifer Units. * Editorial note: Any changes to design standards for wells could only be made by, and with the cooperation of, the Maryland Department of the Environment. II -41 15. Any groundwater quality management plan which succeeds in significantly improving groundwater quality must be multi -faceted, designed to address and regulate point and non -point sources of surficial bacteriological contamination and to require appropriate well siting and construction standards. Ground water, and to a limited degree, surface water quality are under. further and more extensive investigation by the Maryland Geological Survey. The efforts of MGS to update Bulletin 24, The Water Resources of Allegany and Washington Counties, 1961 will produce the most up to date, comprehensive water quality document available for the area. The data will be the result of testing thousands of wells in the County. MGS has indicated tentative publication by mid 1990. Currently the Washington County Health Department in conjunction with the Washington County Sanitary District, has initiated a groundwater sampling program that will result in the collection of samples from across the County. Sample points, once defined, will be sampled on a semi-annual basis. The results, once compiled, will be made available to County and State agencies for consideration in planning and policy formulation. Ongoing groundwater sampling should enable an evaluation of the effectiveness of the current well -head protection program in effect in the County. II -42 WATER QUALITY PLANS - The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1977 made improved water quality a national priority and authorized funding for the planning, design, and construction of sewerage facilities. The planning and construction grants programs established by this Act have provided the means by which the County and municipalities can meet many of the local objectives for the development of sewerage facilities. Under section 303 (e) of the Water Pollution Control Act, the Water Resources Administration of the State of Maryland prepared the Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan in 1976. This plan evaluates existing water quality, sources of pollution, and recommends management approaches for the Basin, which includes all of Washington County. The scope of the plan is much broader than the need for sewerage facilities. The plan classifies streams according to the degree of water quality to be achieved, and thus determines either directly or indirectly the type of treatment works and operational efficiency required of sewerage facilities. The inventory of existing systems and problem areas is useful in establishing priorities for the construction of improvement sewerage facilities. While the Basin Plan prepared under Section 303 (e) deals primarily with pollution which can be traced to point discharges to surface waters, the Basin Plan prepared pursuant to Section 208 deals with non -point sources. The 208 Plan, completed in 1979 identifies non -point sources of water pollution and current management activities in the areas of stormwater runoff, sediment control, surface mining, residuals management, failing septic systems, forestry operations, agriculture, and snow and ice control. Section 201 of the Water Pollution Control Act established a construction grants program for public sewerage facilities. Funds are allocated by EPA II -43 to local areas on the basis of state-wide priorities in a three step process. In Step 1, Facilities Planning, the specific sewerage requirements of a planning area designated by the State are investigated, alternatives evaluated, and a particular solution recommended. The Antietam Basin Facilities Plan for Hagerstown metropolitan area, including the incorporated towns of Funkstown, Williamsport, and Smithsburg, was prepared with a Step 1 grant. Facilities planning for Clear Spring, Highfield-Cascade-Pen Mar, Hancock, St. James, and the Greenbriar State Park Area are either in preparation or planned for the near future. Facilities planning for Sandy Hook has been completed. The 201 Plan for Boonsboro-Keedysville-Sharpsburg was originally prepared in 1981 and updated in 1985. Steps 2 and 3 of the construction grant program, fund the preparation of detailed engineering plans and specifications and the construction of facilities respectively. A recent trend has been the consolidation of Steps 2 and 3 into 'Step 4'. 2. POPULATION ANALYSIS The 1980 population of Washington County at 113,086 persons represents an increase of 8.9% or some 9,257 residents since 1970. In addition to total population changes, the internal County patterns are significant to the planning of water and sewerage facilities. The following tabulation outlines the 1970-1980 population patterns for each Planning Sector and Election District within the County. The table illustrates that the Metro Planing Sector accounted for nearly 66% of the total 1970 to 1980 population increase in the County. Although the City of Hagerstown declined slightly in population, significant increases were evidenced in both the Halfway and Funkstown Election Districts. II -44 For purposes of water and sewerage planning, population projections developed by the Department of State Planning for the County as a whole will be used as a base. These total projections are broken down to election district projections in Table 1-A based upon a pattern of distribution developed by the County Planning Commission. Finally, Tables No. 1-B and 1- C show projected population by water and sewerage service areas. Population estimates and projections for some areas may vary between tables due to different sources of data and methodology of projections. Sources and methodologies are explained in the footnotes for each table. II -45 TABLE NO. 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY 1970 TO 1980 POPULATION PATTERNS SECTOR AND NET PERCENT ELECTION DISTRICT 1970 1980 CHANGE CHANGE 1 METRO 69,618 75,708 6,090 8.7 2 Williamsport 4,057 4,718 661 16.3 9 Leitersburg 2,267 3,070 803 35.4 10 Funkstown 4,761 7,801 3,085 63.9 13 Maugansville 4,107 5,030 923 22.5 18 Chewsville 5,126 5,532 406 7.9 24 Cedar Lawn 827 867 40 4.8 26 Halfway 7,346 9,489 2,143 29.2 27 Fountainhead 5,310 5,069 - 241 - 4.5 Hagerstown 35,862 34,132 -1,730 - 4.8 II MID 13,407 14,825 1,418 10.6 1 Sharpsburg 2,054 2,313 259 12.6 6 Boonsboro 3,384 3,927 543 16.0 12 Fairplay 3,393 3,089 305 - 9.0 16 Beaver Creek 2,182 2,725 543 24.9 19 Keedysville 1,011 1,216 205 20.3 20 Downsville 1,383 1,555 172 12.4 III SOUTHEAST 2,986 3,451 465 15.6 8 Rorhersville 1,571 1,901 330 21.0 11 Sandy Hook 1,415 1,550 135 9.5 IV NORTHEAST 7,935 8,573 638 8.0 7 Smithsburg 3,454 4,418 964 27.8 14 Ringgold 4,481 4,155 326 - 7.3 V CENTRAL 6,255 6,925 670 10.7 4 Clear Spring 2,071 2,368 297 14.3 15 Indian Springs 1,595 1,694 99 6.2 23 Wilson 2,589 2,863 274 10.6 VI WESTERN(Hancock) 3,583 3,609 26 0.7 TOTALS 103,829 113,086 9,257 8.9 1I-46 TABLE N0. 1-A WASIMUTCI COMM PRDIECTION3 BT ELECTION DISMICr (1) ELWTION OROWIN RATE % OP TOTAL COII Ely SECTOR DISTRICT BMEE4 1970-1980 POPULATION 1980(2) 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 I 2 Williamsport 16.3% 4.17% 4718 4902 5010 5077 5123 5148 9 Letteraburg 35.4%(3) 2.71% 3070 3190 3261 3304 3334 3350 10 Plinks town 63.9% 6.89% 7801 8105 8284 8394 8470 8511 13 Maugansville 22.5% 4.44% 5030 5226 5342 5413 5462 5489 18 Cheweville 4.8% 4 5532 5748 5875 5953 6007 6036 24 Cedar Lawn .76% 867 901 921 933 941 946 26 Halfway 29.2% 8.39% 9498 9869 10,087 10,221 10,313 10,363 27 Fountainhead -4.5% 4.48% 5069 5267 5384 5456 5505 5532 II 1 Sharpaburg 12.6% 2.04% 2313 2403 2456 2489 2511 2523 6 Boonsboro 16.0% 3.47% 3927 4080 4170 4226 4264 4285 12 Fairplay -9.0% 2.73% 3089 3210' 3281 3325 3355 3371 16 Beaver Creek 24.9% 2.40% 2725 2831 2894 2933 2960 2974 19 Keedysvllle 20.3% 1.07% 1216 1263 1291 1308 1320 1326 20 Downsville 12.4% 1.37% 1555 1616 1652 1674 1689 1697 III 8 Rohrersville 21.0% 1.68% 1901 1975 2019 2046 2064 2074 11 Sandy Hook 9.5% 1.37% 1550 1610 1646 1668 1683 1691 IV 7 Sulthsburg 27.8% 3.90% 4413 4585 4686 4748 4791 4814 14 Ringgold -7.3% 3.67% 4155 4317 4413 4472 4512 4534 V 4 Clear Spring 14.3% 2.09% 2368 2460 2514 2547 2570 2583 15 Indian Springs 6.2% 1.49% 1694 1760 1799 1823 1839 1848 23 Wilson 10.6% 2.53% 2863 2975 3041 3082 3110 3125 VI 5 Hancock .7% 3.19% 3609 3705 3833 3884 3919 3938 TOTALS 113,086 117,500(4) 120,100(4) 121,700(4) 122,800(4) 123,400(4) CHANCE •3.90% +2.12% +1.33% +.90 % +.49% 4414 2600 1600 1100 600 Total County Growth Rate 1970-1980 • 8.9% NO ES: (1) Figures are based on Maryland Department of State Planning Final Population Projections (September 1987). Projections for Election Districts are based on each District's percent of the County's total population in 1980 as a part or the projected total County population. This method does not account for different growth rates in Election Districts but asauemee a constant rate of growth throughout the County for each projection period. (2) 1980 figures from actual Census counts. (3) Election District 10 contains large Group Quarters population. 63.9% increase reflects growth of resident population, as well as Group Quarters. True growth in resident population was 25.0% between 1970-1980. (4) Totals also include population within municipal limits of Hagerstown (Election Districts 3, 17, 21, 22 and 25 not shown in table). II -47 TABLE NO. 1-B WATER SERVICE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS WATER SERVICE 1989 1995 2005 AREAS ESTIMATE PROJECTION PROJECTION HAGERSTOWN Hagerstown (City) ( 1) 36,750 37,563 38,400 Funkstown ( 2) 1,439 1,471 1,504 Williamsport ( 3) 2,243 2,292 2,344 Unincorporated ( 4) 29,660 30,316 30,992 MCI/MCTC/RCI ( 5) 5,331 6,829 6,829 HAGERSTOWN TOTAL 75,423 78,471 80,069 Smithsburg ( 6) 1,278 1,306 1,335 Highfield/Cascade ( 7) 1,212 1,239 1,267 Boonsboro/Keedysville ( 8) 2,726 2,786 2,850 Sharpsburg ( 9) 1,500 1,533 1,567 Weverton 40 40 40 Clear Spring (10) 559 571 584 Hancock (11) 1,820 1,860 1,902 Mt. Aetna (12) 525 550 600 Elk Ridge Lake (13) 68 68 68 Sandy Hook (14) 0 174 174 TOTAL POPULATION SERVED 85,151 88,598 90,456 TOTAL POPULATION NOT SERVED 33,253 31,502 32,344 TOTAL COUNTY POPULATION (15)(16) 118,404 120,100 122,800 II -48 NOTES FOR TABLE NO 1-B: (1.) The 1989 estimate is made by the City of Hagerstown Planning Department. City population projections for 1995 and 2005 are based upon the average projected growth rate for Washington County (See Table 1-A). (2.) The 1989 estimate is based upon residential water accounts and a factor of 2.7 persons per household. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Funkstown Election District (See Table 1-A). (3.) The 1989 estimate is based upon historic growth trends for the Town of Williamsport. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Williamsport Election District (See Table 1-A). (4.) The 1989 estimate is based upon 10,985 residential water accounts outside of the City limits and a factor of 2.7 persons per household. Projections are based upon, the projected average growth trend for Washington County (See Table 1-A). (5.) The 1989 estimate for the correctional institutions is made by the institutions. Projections for 1995 and 2005 are not available. Number provided is the projected inmate population for 1991. Source - Maryland Department of Corrections. (6.) The 1989 estimate is based and a factor of 2.5 persons based upon projected growth District (See Table 1-A). pon 511 residential water accounts per household. Projections are trends for the Smithsburg Election (7.) The 1989 estimate is made by the Washington County Sanitary District. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Ringgold Election District (See Table 1-A). (8.) The 1989 estimate is made by the Town of Boonsboro. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Boonsboro and Keedyvsille Election District (See Table 1-A). (9.) The 1989 estimate is made by the Washington County Sanitary District. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Sharpsburg Election District (See Table 1-A). (10.) The 1989 estimate is based upon 215 residential water accounts and a factor of 2.6 persons per household. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Clear Spring Election District (See Table 1-A). (11.) The 1989 estimate is made by the Town of Hancock. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Hancock Election District (See Table 1-A). (12.) The 1989 estimate and projections is made by the Mt. Aetna Water Company. II -49 (13.) The 1989 estimate and projections are made by the Washington County Sanitary District. (14.) Sandy Hook system to be completed prior to 1995. Projections for 1995 and 2005 are supplied by the Washington County Sanitary District and are based upon 58 equivalent dwelling units to be served and a factor of 3.0 persons per household. (15.) Total County population estimate for 1989 is based upon the updated U.S. Census estimate for 1988 plus a .513% annual growth factor. (16.) Total County population projections are based upon Maryland Department of State Planning final population projections (September 1987) (See Table 1-A). II -50 TABLE NO. 1-C SEWER SERVICE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS SEWER (1) SERVICE 1989 1995 2005 AREAS ESTIMATE PROJECTION PROJECTION HAGERSTOWN Hagerstown City (1) 36,750 37,563 38,400 Fountainhead District (2) 2,025 2,070 2,116 Maug./Orchard Hills (3) 3,545 3,624 3,705 Sharpsburg Pike District (4) 14 14 14 Other Uninc. Areas (5) 4,158 4,250 4,345 HAGERSTOWN TOTAL 46,492 47,521 48,580 Halfway/Williamsport(S.D.1)(6) 8,428 8,614 8,808 Potomac (Tammany/Van Lear) (S.D. 3) (7) 1,255 1,283 1,312 Highland Manor (S.D. 18) (8) 153 541 541 Funkstown (9) 1,133 1,158 1,184 Smithsburg (10) 1,028 1,051 1,074 MCI/MCTC/RCI (11) 5,331 6,829 6,829 Boonsboro (12) 2,110 2,157 2,206 Clear Spring (13) 559 571 584 Hancock (14) 1,820 1,860 1,902 Sharpsburg/Keedysville(S.D.4-1)(15) 0 1,890 1,936 Cloverton/Greenlawn (S.D.3-1)(15) 0 454 464 Highfield/Cascade/Pen Mar (S.D. 9-1) (15) 0 1,239 1,267 Sandy Hook (S.D. 19) 0 174 178 TOTAL POPULATION SERVED 68,309 75,342 76,865 TOTAL POPULATION NOT SERVED 50,095 44,758 45,935 TOTAL COUNTY POPULATION (16) 118,404 120,100 122,800 II -51 NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 1-C ( 1) The 1989 estimate is made by the City of Hagerstown Planning Department. City population projections for 1995 and 2005 are based upon the average projected growth rate for Washington County (See Table 1-A). ( 2) The 1989 estimate is based upon 750 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.7 persons per household. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Fountain Head Election District (See Table 1-A). ( 3) The 1989 estimate is based upon 1,313 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.7 persons per household. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Conococheague Election District (See Table 1-A.) ( 4) The 1989 estimate is based upon 5 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.7 persons per household. No projections are available. ( 5) The 1989 estimate is based upon 1,540 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.7 persons per household. Projections are based upon the projected average growth trend for Washington County (See Table 1-A). ( 6) The 1989 estimate is made by the Washington County Sanitary District. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Williamsport and Halfway Election Districts (See Table 1-A). ( 7) The 1989 estimate is made by the Washington County Sanitary District. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Halfway Election District (See Table 1-A). ( 8) The 1989 estimate is based upon 59 individual dwelling units (EDU's) and a factor of 2.6 persons per household. Projections are based on the total buildout for the Highland Manor residential development. ( 9) The 1989 estimate is based upon 472 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.4 persons per household. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Funkstown Election District (See Table 1-A). (10) The 1989 estimate is based upon 411 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.5 persons per household. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Smithsburg Election District (See Table 1-A). (11) The 1989 estimate for the correctional institutions is made by the institutions. Projections for 1995 and 2005 are not available. Number provided is the projected inmate population for 1991. Source: Maryland Department of Corrections. (12) The 1989 estimate is made by the Town. Projections are based upon projected growth trends for the Boonsboro Election District (See Table 1-A). II -52 (13) The 1989 estimate is based upon 215 residential sewer accounts and a factor of 2.6 persons per household. Projections are based upon the projected growth trend for the Clear Spring Election District (See Table 1-A). (14) The 1989 estimate is made by the Town. Projections are based upon the projected growth trends for the Hancock Election District (See Table 1-A). (15) The 1995 projection is made by the Washington County Sanitary District. The 2005 projection is based on the projected growth trend for the respective election district (See Table 1-A). (16) The total County population estimate for 1989 is based upon the updated U. S. Census estimate for 1988 plus a .513% annual growth factor. Projections for 1995 and 2005 are based upon Maryland Department of State Planning final population projections (Sept. 1987) (See Table 1-A). 1I-53 3. LAND USE A generalized land use analysis of Washington County indicates that the highest orders of development are located in the Hagerstown Valley. In particular, the City of Hagerstown and the surrounding adjacent communities evidence the most intense residential, commercial, and industrial land use activities. With the Hagerstown Metropolitan Area as the virtual hub of the County, small incorporated towns and communities are situated along almost every primary corridor emanating from the City. Considerable strip development has taken place along those roadways between the Hagerstown Metropolitan Area and the established communities. Outside the Hagerstown Valley, land use patterns are manifested largely by open space/agricultural uses and sporadic residential clusters. Table No. 2 illustrates the changes in land use composition of the County. Also shown is the composition of County land area by Zoning District. Zoning Districts are shown on the detailed Water and Sewer Maps at the conclusion of this document. The County Planning Department is currently improving its data base of subdivision activity and building permits. Once complete, this system will provide a continuous up-to-date source of data on what type of development is occuring and where it is occuring. The system will also allow tracking of construction activity relative to approved subdivisions. II -54 The Comprehensive Plan for Washington County seperates the County into three specific planning areas: the Urban and Town Growth Areas, the Rural/Agricultural Area and Special Planning Areas. Areas where public facilities and services either exist or can be cost- effectively planned and programmed over the next twenty years are designated as Growth Areas. An area around the City of Hagerstown, Funkstown and Williamsport has been designated as the Urban Growth Area. Town Growth Areas have been designated around Smithsburg and Boonsboro. A Town Growth Area for Hancock is expected to be adopted in early 1990. The remainder of the land in the County, outside of the boundaries of the Urban and Town Growth Areas, is designated as the Rural -Agricultural Area. Of highest priority in this area are the goals of preserving agricultural land and conserving open space, water supply sources, mountain and woodland areas and other natural and scenic resources. Development within the Rural - Agricultural Area should be in keeping with the rural character of the environment and should not require public investments in services or facilities which would result in increased growth pressures and divert priorities from the Growth Area. Three areas have been identified as being particularly critical at the present time for natural resource protection. These areas are the Edgemont and Smithsburg Reservoir Watersheds, the Beaver Creek Watershed, including the Albert M. Powell Trout Hatchery, and the Appalachian Trail. They have been designated as Special Planning Areas and are identified on the General Plan Map in the Comprehensive Plan. II -55 In an effort to implement the policies established for the Rural/Agricultural Area and the Growth Areas, the County has adopted, or is currently working on, the following policies: Rural -Agricultural Area: New subdivision regulations have been adopted to restrict the use of panhandle lots. Subdivisions on sub -standard roads are not permitted unless provisions are made to improve the road. The Washington County Health Department is conducting a water quality study by testing wells in the rural areas. Washington County is developing new policies and programs to encourage agricultural preservation and the sale of development rights. Urban and Town Growth Areas: Town Growth Areas have been established around Smithsburg and Boonsboro. Hancock should be completed by early 1990. The County is considering a joint town/county infrastructure funding program. Maps XII and XIII show the adopted Town Growth Areas. On August 22, 1989, the Mayor and Council and the Board of County Commissioners entered into an agreement with BCM Potomac, Inc. to perform a 20 -year comprehensive water and sewer study for the Hagerstown metropolitan area commonly referred as the adopted Urban Growth Area (UGA). II -56 RCM's study, to be completed by July 1990, will project the UGA infrastructure needs and formulate methods to provide them in the most cost- effective manner. The consultant's study contains many key steps or functions and are outlined below: 1.) Determine population trends and their inter -relationship with current and future land use patterns. 2.) Determine health hazard zones and their immediacy of need. 3.) Analyze current load requirements and the ability of existing water and sewer plant facilities and associated infrastructures to provide these services. 4.) Produce computer models for water and sewer systems for simulation of existing systems and the analysis of system alternatives. 5.) Develop policy consideration and cost estimates to produce an implementation plan to meet the goals and objectives of the study. I1-57 The City and County has appointed a Water and Sewer Study Committee that consists of the heads of the Hagerstown Water Department, Hagerstown Water Pollution Control, Washington County Sanitary District, City and County Planning Directors and Walshington County's Chief of Planning and Codes Administration. The Study Committee's responsibility is to review the progress of the consultant, insure criteria and assumptions are correct or valid and that the goals of the study remains focused and are completed within the contractual time frame. Map No. XIV shows the existing Urban Growth Area. Table No. 2B illustrates the project schedule for the Water and Sewer Study in a flow chart format. II -58 MAP X GENERALIZED EXISTING LAND USE OUT OF PRINT CURRENTLY BEING REVISED o o N LA chi Pv' �i LAN N yC N O a • M CT �v y aT en s in C U O\ Ln LA O In N v • v v v v 6 J-) N m C. .1 O a0 2 ap - T N M O' -i .i O O •LA-� M . m . en N S N M M pi n C. en S Yp 0 - M M .i M LA LA X H > H N I • z m .1 o N• en N ri M a M N N O '0 M C. r• 4 M M a H M • M C. . H LA LA ri N N am o en , m .- i in LA N- m a a rn U M LA N C .-i C. )O LA •O N •O L(1 .+ .y r, M Q M M LA �6 O Z N- N- rf O r I> O' N 0 a' K rQ] O.Y000OMOrI •-1� [rx ?L -I-N-O N N LA L -O N C. .-I LAILA -4 a il r� oL U yF SO msw.°1 'tJ €�SoS N.�mEi d�a��ayy p^ p Oa°''C 6� H N-OiN6wP+TTF MOD O [-a0Oa'ODNNMr1H LCON.1000000 o t-LIlr1000OMa0CC0 Mt -00 MOIhMMNC. LAN OLnL 'OC en -I UICS l-C'N (iI a .o I O gG of �Lr4L 10 Gp . y rr� _ •� ga y L 0 �A U o (`Z Z $ . v C)'OOOC 'O'O'O C oQopm L C M g M W L C c4�aLraLx�m'a� II -59 TABLE tO. 2-A POPULATION OP MAJOR Itc11vrI0tc (FIGURES POR PALL 1989) Map Ref. Educational Lhstituttons Total Dirdllment Map Ref. Educational Institutions 'tOtal IIuollment E-1 North Hagerstown High School 1,070 E-31 Sharpeturg Elementary School 303 E-2 South Hagcre town High School 880 E-32 Clear Spring High School 456 E-3 Northern Middle School 552 E-33 Clear Spring Middle School 521 E-4 E. Russell Hicks School 601 E-34 Clear Spring Elementary School 383 E-5 Western Heights Middle School 417 E-35 Snithsburg High School 664 E-6 Beater Elementary School 549 E-36 Snithsburg Middle School 521 E-8 Conococheague Elementary School 239 E-37 Snithaturg Elementary School 361 E-9 Phma K. D sub Elementary School 256 E-38 Cascade Elementary School 345 E-10 Pountalndele Elementary School 561 8-39 Williamsport High School 696 2-11 IAakstown Elementary School 231 E-40 Springfield Middle School 542 E-12 Lincolnshire Elementary School 524 8-51 Williamsport Elementary School 387 2-13 Maugansville Elementary School 334 1-42 Fountain Rock Elementary School 319 2-14 Old Forge Elementary School 260 E-43 Ransack Middle School 444 2-15 Pangborn Boulevard Elementary School 590 E-44 Hancock Elementary School 318 E-16 Paramount Elementary School 191 9-45 Hickory Elementary School 257 2-17 Potomac Heights Elementary School 321 Pleasant Valley 220 E-18 Salem Avenue Elementary School 448 Alternative Center 45 E-20 Winter Street Elementary School 352 8-46 Hagerstown Junior College a 6,002 E-22 Marshall Street Education Center 91 a Hagerstown Junior College has enrolled 3,165 Credit Students and 2,837 Continuing Education E-23 Job Development Center 71 Students. E-24 Boonaboro High School 683 Major Health Centers Capacity E-25 Boonaboro Middle School 589 H -I Washington County Hospital 317 beds E-26 Boonaboro Elementary School 507 H-2 Coffman Health Center (Adainistrati 2.27 Greenbrier Elementary School 277 11-3 Western Maryland Center Offfices) 175 beds Governmental Establishments 0-1 Maryland Correctional Institute Maryland Correctional Training Center and Roxbury Correctional Institute 5.237 0-2 Fort Ritchie II -60 Map No. XII S M I T H S B U R G Town Growth Area /ROOT( NE 'IIS I TRN; 670'\°' ,(• 64 ' J �i �aoM P g^ 670 Mum � 'm) •,''rn >� v, �� ?0 NAGERST0WN ••j: ..` ,t N ,.nj�� f. y AREAS d9 ,,jI HOLIDA '.a ' ACRES .•�r.Mt7 Oct cV. • .. i.� b r 660 aim a n/ 66 6 Nu a kg a' <a'' A �i / . • MAP SCALE O I 2 MILES Map No. XIII A BOONSBORO Town Growth Area - _ _ ®day •�'/ "'"'/, 0 1 2 MILES Map No. XIV Urban Growth Area t s( j �. fl\••�• .e ; V• q ;' • .\\22t c q I ` xx'. i' ' z JLi c r4�V : I -<cr ./._('t-_,•_',, ¶-iiJ4 0 •i / ;e:m: : � a - ircY..y...o __ 7 u Ito g° „ t yc. • � d " !1'� t o • r° • ' � ...a d • " N F iii � 's0 Ia;m _. '1 •-fl..I .�� 4S •i i . Z� t • L' A a r J p . • •4 . i a ' '� YI r r•LY• .t a _ •( ' "�, M � • Ir..rT,• l9 � p :1 t, .•1 � /l I i .Ir'l. � 1 ..a MAP SCALE •a• 0 s LL 3 i = r s � Y( r i Y O i xi F Y W > t., Cep ( W � W 0; W F Y i . O O U C 6 rJ .. Yp I( o ( O( o o �c all O< M >Sl O L HL6 ■ a Q I. A W N W a s � Ni LL O xS ( W NY < N Zd y W <S O L LL a -s O$ <J z Q W S ( f W Y r� F LW C Wb XW3 M YW a FNi O 14 YL ou F4 e° so, W O _' j N L W S O Y L p Y O Y> < V 2 Y > O S f p0. O J F C L S t r W p O < 3 a. C Y N M t W C < W i s F Y 0 q W 00 U O W J J 2 O V F ¢~ Z N C W �- E W O y f uo O Q U N T o O tar a O U) 2w G z O z O w S IL O J V d • • • • • I- I- to W W N 0 Z a w W J 0 C w U N N N v m I- 11-70 CHAPTER THREE EXISTING AND PLANNED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT: The Washington County Sanitary District operates and maintains three (3) water distribution systems and one (1) water filtration plant within Washington County. These systems serve the communities of Subdistrict No. 4 - Sharpsburg, Subdistrict No. 9 - Highfield/Cascade, and Subdistrict No. 17 - Elk Ridge. The District is also involved in the water distribution system which serves Subdistrict No. 15, the Martins Crossroads/Cearfoss area. The City of Hagerstown provides the billing services and collects the fees for this subdistrict and forwards the debt fees to the District collected from the customers to pay the loans against the project costs. The District is actively preparing for several planned water service areas. The Pen Mar community is proposed to be incorporated into Subdistrict No. 9 Highfield/Cascade and the Sandy Hook community (Subdistrict No. 19-1) is to be provided with a water distribution and treatment system by year end 1990. The following information will provide data on each of the existing and planned water service areas. EXISTING WATER SERVICE AREAS: SHARPSBURG AREA - SUBDISTRICT NO. 4: The Town of Sharpsburg is situated 12 miles south of Hagerstown. The District owns, operates and maintains the water filtration plant and water distibution system which extends through the corporate boundaries of the Town of Sharpsburg and to adjacent subdivisions of Forge Hill Estates, Battlefield Knolls, Potomac Crest and Confederate Hills. The water distribution system also serve the Antietam Battlefield Visitors Center and extends west on Maryland Route 34 to the end of the developed area. The water filtration plant is situated along the Potomac River, which is the raw water source. The District processes and chemically treats the raw water and adds fluoride prior to distribution. The water system also includes a 200,000 gallon elevated storage tank. The capacity of the filtration plant is 230,000 gpd. This water system presently serves approximately 536 residential and commercial Eqivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). HIGHFIELD/CASCADE AREA - SUBDISTRICT NO. 9: The Washington County Sanitary District began operating the Highfield/Cascade Water System (previously known as the Blue Ridge Water Company) October 1, 1978 following revocation of the franchise by the Maryland Public Utilities Commission and a subsequent Washington County Court Order sought by the Maryland State Health Department. The Highfield/Cascade area is located in the northeast portion of Washington County. 111-2 Followed by six years of legal entanglements, in July 1984 the Washington County Sanitary District became owners of the water system. Soon after the District began operation and maintenance of the water system in 1978 it was realized that the deteriorated system would have to be replaced with a new one. Study, planning and subsequent design began shortly thereafter. In October 1986 construction of a new water distribution system with fire protection, a 400,000 gallon storage tank and upgrade of the Cascade and Willard Wells was completed in October 1987. In 1988 the Sanitary District drilled a third well, known as the "Highfield Well". The District chemically treats the well water without filtration prior to distribution. Together with the Cascade, Willard and Highfield Wells, the average maximum capacity if 120,000 gallons per day. This water system presently serves 433 residential and commercial Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). MARTINS CROSSROADS/CEARFOSS - SUBDISTRICT NO. 15-1: The Washington County Sanitary District managed the water line extension program for the Martins Crossroads/Cearfoss area (Map Nos. 10, 23, 24 and 36). Upon completion of the planning/study/design phase, construction began July 1987 with completion one (1) year later (July 1988). The system was an extension of the City of Hagerstown's lines which includes the following areas: Route 40 at Huyetts Crossroads; Maryland Route 63 from Route 40 to Route 58; portions of Mt. Tabor Church Road, Resh Road, Pinecrest Road, Broadfording Church Road, Route 58 and Route 416. Public water is being supplied to approximately 331 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). The water distribution system is maintained by the City of Hagerstown. III -3 ELK RIDE AREA - SUBDISTRICT NO. 17: In November 1987 the Washington County Sanitary District assumed the operations and maintenance of the Ridge Water Corporation which was privately owned by the citizens of the community known as Elk Ridge located adjacent to Chestnut Grove Road in South Washington County. In April 1989 the Sanitary District assumed ownership of this water system pursuant to the request of the property owners. This water system supplied 24 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) with the source being three (3) wells. (No. 1, 2, and 3). An average of 2,700 gallons per day is presently being pumped. As of July 1989, the District proposes the implementation of an improvement program for this water system which includes installation of water meters to each property and to provide equipment to rid the system of turbidity. PLANNED WATER SERVICE AREAS: PEN MAR AREA: In July 1988 the Washington County Board of County Commissioners were petitioned by the property owners of the Pen Mar area to investigate the probability of extending public water service to their area. The petition was presented to the Washington County Sanitary Commission and they directed the Sanitary District to perform a Feasibility Study Report for the Pen Mar area. In March 1989, the Feasibility Report was completed and the Sanitary District held a public hearing regarding the project on May 22, 1989. The proposed outlay of the project is to extend the Highfield/Cascade water III -4 supply system which would require the current subdistrict boundaries to be extended to include the Pen Mar area. This project would include a water supply distribution system with fire protection, above ground water (100,000) gallon storage tank, well and disinfection facilities. This water system would serve approximately 79 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). SANDY HOOK AREA- SUBDISTRICT NO. 19-1: In conjunction with the proposed plan to provide public sewerage facilities to the Sandy Hook area, the Sanitary District also implemented a "Water Feasibility Study" for this south Washington County community. Through the findings of the report it was determined that a public water supply system was needed in the Sandy Hook community. The plan proposes construction of a new water supply, distribution system with fire protection, and an above ground water storage facility to serve approximately 58 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). The water system is currently being designed with construction to start early 1990. III -5 CITY OF HAGERSTOWN The City of Hagerstown Water Department serves more than 75,000 people within the Hagerstown corporate limits, in unincorporated areas, and in other municipalities. The Hagerstown system provides the entire water supply for the Towns of Funkstown and Williamsport and some of the water for the Town of Smithsburg. These towns purchase their water from Hagerstown but they retain responsibility for the operation and maintenance of their own distribution facilities such as pumps and water lines. The Hagerstown system also serves large industrial and institutional water users such as Mack Truck, Fairchild Industries, and the Maryland Correctional Institution. Note in Table No. 3 the high per capita rate of water consumption especially in the unincorporated part of this service area. This is probably due to these large industrial and institutional water users which are located primarily in the unincorporated areas. The Hagerstown system is served by the R. C. Willson Filtration Plant on the Potomac River and is listed in Table No. 4. While the Potomac River provides a reliable and more than adequate source of drinking water for the Hagerstown Service Area, with extensive treatment and pumping facilities. Use of the Edgemont and Smithsburg Reservoirs for water supply was suspended on July 1, 1987. These facilities remain on stand-by for emergency supply only. The City continues to maintain the reservoirs and watershed land as public water supply facilities. III -6 Watershed land in City ownership is shown on Map Nos. 27 and 40 at the conclusion of this chapter. The Washington County Comprehensive Plan also itemizes efforts to be made in monitoring development in the watershed in order protect water quality. The study and development of recommendations for further action was completed in mid 1987. PLANNED WATER SERVICE AREAS Planned improvements to the Hagerstown system are listed below. Using a prioritized listing of future trunk mains, water tanks, and pumping stations, the Hagerstown Water Department will meet the needs of its growing service area, when and where develoment occurs. Also planned is phase 4 of the R. C. Willson Filter Plant development which will provide enlargements and improvements to the plant required to produce the optimum flow from the plant (estimated at 20 mgd) while meeting current and future water quality requirements. a. Richard C. Wilson Water Treatment Plan - Expansion of the pumping capacities along with the majority of the chemical treatment processes have been completed to increase from 10.0 MGD to 20.0 MGD. Before the maximum capacity can be utilized, transmission improvements must be made. When a 15 million gallon per day production is reached, equipment will be added to aid the sedimentation process and to automatically clean the sedimentation basis. (Plant shown on Map No. 47). III -7 b. Hortonsphere Storage Tank - An additional storage tank for the area north of Hagerstown is proposed because of the possibility of a structural failure in the existing 40 -year old tank. In that event, Fairchild Industries and other plants in the area would have to curtail activities and fire protection would be rendered undependable. The second tank is proposed to provide additional storage capacity, to allow either unit to be taken out of service for routine inspection and maintenance, and to provide a back-up system in the event of failure in either unit. (Proposed tank shown on Map No. 24). c. Pipe lining program - The City has presently embarked upon a program of reconditioning approximately 102,000 lineal feet of existing lines within its service area. The program is scheduled for completion by the end of fiscal year 1988. d. Oak Ridge Industrial Area - Oakmont Drive - Ditto/Horvath Industrial Park is presently being serviced by a twelve inch (12") water line. Provisions should be included to extend the system along East Oak Ridge Drive to the Roadway -Plummer Industrial Park area and eventually inter -connect with facilities in the Ravenswood Luthern Home area. (Map Nos. 49 and 57). e. Watershed Land and Improvements - Acquire watershed lands above Edgemont Reservoir in the area of Maryland Route 491, Fort Ritchie Road, Pleasant Valley Road and Warner Hollow Road. III -8 f. Robinwood Drive - Extend twelve inch (12") line from Hagerstown Junior College to the Dual Highway and locate elevated storage facility. (Map No. 50). With the advent of private development, portions of this 12" line have been installed. The connection between Robinwood Drive and Mt. Aetna Road is nearing completion. The policy of requiring private developers to provide portions of this and other lines in their projects continues. g. Paramount Loop - Extend twelve inch (12") loop distribution system from existing Longmeadow Road transmission main to existing Marsh Pike facilities. The Water Department is currently not accepting new development in the Spring Valley -Paramount area or east of Western Maryland Railroad and north of Marsh Pike -Maryland Route #60 intersection until improvements are made. (Map No. 25). h. Cedar Lawn - Extend sixteen inch (16") water line north from intersection of Underpass Way and Railway Lane to Washington County Detention Center thus, completing a major interconnection between two 24 inch transmission mains. Also, within the Cedar Lawn area, extend water service from 24" main in Md. Route 144 to existing development to the north. (Map Nos. 37 and 49). i. Downsville Pike - Extend twelve inch (12") line along Downsville Pike from the Potomac Edison Office Building to West Oak Ridge Drive. (Map Nos. 49 and 57). j. In Zone 2 locate elevated storage tank near Interstate 81 and U.S. Route 40 intersection within City Limits for the purpose of increasing supply capabilities in this area. (Map No. 37). III -9 k. Conrail Site - Extend water distribution improvements in Massey Boulevard, Sherman Avenue and Burhans Boulevard from Valley Plaza to Virginia Avenue overpass, to provide service for industrial and commercial development. 1. Paramount Storage - Locate elevated storage tank in the Avalon Manor vicinity for purpose of increasing supply capabilities in the area. (Map No. 25). m. Potomac Avenue Booster and Transmission Main - Project includes installation of a booster station at Northern Avenue and extension of transmission main from Northern Avenue up Marsh Pike to Long Meadow Road. This project is necessary to meet additional demands as residential and planned commercial development is permitted upon the installation of sewerage facilities. (Map Nos. 25 and 38). n. Hopewell Road - Extend twelve inch (12") water line to Hopewell Road to service area north of Interstate 70 and Interstate 81 intersection. (Map No. 48). o. Extend water service to area bounded by Maryland Route 63, Interstate 70, and Interstate 81. This area is recognized as a prime, future highway interchange and industrial location. Water service extensions should be based upon developmental patterns and economic feasibilities. (Map No. 48). p. Extend service to Sanitary Subdistricts #1 and #5 as determined by developmental patterns and economic feasibilities. (Map Nos. 36 and 48) q. Transmission Main - A third twenty-four inch (24") or larger water transmission main is needed to deliver the increased demand from the filter plant along the southern portion of the Hagerstown system a proposed water tank site near I-70 and U. S. Route 40. III -10 SMITHSBURG The Town of Smithsburg has two sources of water supply in the form of springs. One is located south of town (Map No. 52) near the existing reservoir. The reservoir receives the spring water. Water is then fed by gravity to the town distribution system. A new spring has been developed northeast of town (Map No. 27). Also, a water pumping station and transmission line from the spring to the town distribution system have been built. In addition, the reservoir storage capacity has been expanded to 360,000 gallons. During the Smithsburg Town Growth Area Study adopted by the County Commissioners on July 22, 1986, Town and county officials recognized the need to investigate and develop new sources of public water supply in order to meet the demands of expected growth in population. The study recommends investigation of new sources including land for a permanent storage facility, continued cooperation in use of water from Hagerstown's Edgemont resevoir and improvements to the existing transmission system. Government officials acknowledge the purpose and effect of Growth Areas establishment to encourage development and make use of existing public health facilities. The Town no longer purchases water from the City of Hagerstown. Water mains have been extended to serve property recently annexed into the Town. This property is located on the west side of town and includes new residential developments called Meadows of Grove Creek and Wispering Hills. The Town is currently awaiting State approval for the use of two (2) existing wells located west of town to supplement the existing sources. Future plans also call for the extension of a 12 inch line through the Wispering Hills development to connect with the existing line in Cavehill Road in order to form a loop. Service priority designations for individual properties inside the Growth Area boundaries have not been changed in this plan. It is acknowledged that requests for service and subsequent amendments to this plan will be made and will complement and coincide with other planning activities and goals. FT. RITCHIE The Fort Ritchie system provides water service to approximately 220 personnel including a few off -post residential customers. Water for this system is provided by two springs, which during periods of low yield are supplemented by well water. BODNSBORO-KEEDYSVILLE The Boonsboro-Keedysville water system is supplied by two active springs-- Keedysville Spring located outside the Town of Keedysville (Map No. 73), and Warrenfeltz Spring located within the Town of Boonsboro (Map No. 73). The water is treated with chlorine disinfection by the Town of Boonsboro at each spring location. Excess water is stored in a 1.5 million gallon reservoir located east of Boonsboro (Map No. 68). The Town of Keedysville purchases water from the Town of Boonsboro, but owns and operates its own distribution system. Much of the maintenance of the Keedysville system is performed on a cost reimbursement basis by the Town of Boonsboro. A - In Boonsboro, an apparent high per capita consumption caused mainly by unaccounted water losses has been significantly reduced by the installation of residential meters, thelining and covering of the storage reservoir (to reduce the need for overflows), and a triennial leak detection program. A serious problem of inadequate fire flows and water pressure is widespread in Boonsboro. Preliminary engineering to address the problems calls for a $1.2 million project to install larger mains and complete loops in the distribution system. The distribution system upgrade will be funded in two phases: $300,000 from Small Cities CDBG in fy'90 has been awarded, and the Town hopes to obtain $500,000 from MDE Water Supply Financing Program in fy'91. A local match of at least $400,000 will be required, and will result in an increase in water rates to generate sufficient revenues for debt service. An equally serious deficit in supply will be corrected when Well #8 behind Graystone Hills in Boonsboro goes on line in the fall of 1989, yielding nearly 130,000 gpd (90 gpm). To address the impact of growth on the water supply, the Utilities Commission has adopted a policy requiring each developer (except minor subdivisions of 5 or less units) to provide a minimum new water supply of 100,800 gpd (70 gpm) in the form of a well to be connected to the existing distribution system. The Boonsboro Town Growth Area, adopted in 1986 by the Town and the County, identifies an area surrounding Boonsboro where growth and extension of public utilities is encouraged. Service priority designations for property within the growth area will be assigned once development proposals are reviewed and approved by the County and the Town. The Boonsboro Utilities Commission is willing to make extensions of the water system within the growth area. However, it is clearly the policy of the Town to require that the cost of all such extensions be borne by the developer. The Pleasant Valley Elementary School and approximately twelve residences in southern Washington County are served by the water system for the Town of Brunswick in Frederick County. Service is provided via the transmission main leading from the Yourtee Srpings to the Town of Brunswick. CLEAR SPRING The Town of Clear Spring and a few residences outside of town are supplied by a series of wells and springs feeding a 1.5 million gallon reservoir at the foot of Fariview Mountain. The Town recently expanded its service area with the construction of a second transmission main from the reservoir to the Clear Spring has recently completed the extension of a water line south of town to create a loop with the existing line in Martin Road. Table 3 indicates a high domestic per capita water use by the Clear Spring System, probably due in part to the lack of residential metering. The Town is currently conducting a study to determine possible future growth trends in the vicinity of the Town. Growth is expected to most likely occur to the east and south of the Town's corporate limits. The Town has not requested that the County perform a Growth Area Study or estblish a County recognized growth area boundary. The Hancock water system provides water for approximately 2170 people who are mostly located within the municipal limits. The principal source is the Little Tonoloway Creek with two storage tanks'and a reservoir providing a total storage capacity of 1.3 million gallons. A new modular water treatment plant was recently constructed with Federal funding assistance from the Economic Development Administration and the Farmer's Home Administration. The volume of water flowing in Little Tonoloway Creek is highly variable, and during many summer months the flow is insufficient to meet the existing water supply demands of the town. The variable water supply along with inadequacies in the distribution system have reduced water volumes required for fire protection in the eastern part of town. The town has been working with the Maryland Water Resources Administration in evaluating alternative water supply sources. One alternative which is being pursued is the reconstruction of an existing well north of town (Map 3). The project includes the installation of a pump and chlorinator and connection of the well to the existing distribution system. Other improvements planned for the Hancock Water System include relining and cleaning existing water lines, construction of a new well and storage tank north of I-70 (Map No. 17) and installation of a pump at the Potomac River to serve as a back-up source of water. The Town has recently completed construction of a new eight inch (8") water line east of Town. A Town Growth Area Study was initiated in 1988 and is expected to be adopted by the Town and the County in early 1990. This study may result in recommendations for changes, improvements, or expansion of the system, service area and service priorities to accommodate future growth. Mt- . Arifnn The Mt. Aetna area is served by a private community water system owned and operated by the Mt. Aetna Water Association, Inc. This area is considered a water problem area because of an inadequate distribution system. The community has recently replaced 3000 feet of water line and has plans to replace and increase the size of additional water lines. PROTECTED DEMANDS Projected water supply demands for existing water service areas are shown in Table No. 3. Note that present year per capita water consumption in each service area was used as a factor in determining future supply requirements (See Note #9). As a result, Table No. 3 reflects projected water supply demands for the future assuming present consumption rates remain the same. It is anticipated that some service area consumption rates will decrease in the future due to system improvements. It is assumed that present water consumption rates will not appreciably increase due to current conservation trends, especially for hot water. Notes for Table No. 3 1) Water Service Area - That area served, or potentially served, by a single distribution system under control of a single utility, or, in a very large system, sub -areas as delineated by the County. 2) Population Served - From Table No. 1-B. Interpolated for 2000. Projections for 2010 based on projected growth trends for the applicable election district (See Table 1-A). 3) Domestic Corporation - (Million Gallons Per Day) - Water consumed for domestic or residential purposes. 4) Other Consumption - (Million Gallons Per Day) - Water consumed for other than domestic purposes such as industrial, commercial, and institutitional uses. 5) Total Consumption - (Million Gallons Per Day) - The sum of Domestic and Other Consumption. Figures provided by agency or municipality concerned. 6) System Capacity - (Million Gallons Per Day) - Based upon 'Design Capacity' from the Drinking Water Supplies System print-out by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene dated 2-8-79 and updated by minicipalities. Unless indicated otherwise, projected SYSTEM CAPACITY for future years will be considered the same as for the present year. 7) Domestic Per Capita Consumption (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) - Determined by dividing DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION (3) by POPULATION SERVED (2). This is a more realistic figure for water use per person than TOTAL PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION (8), but it may include 'unaccounted for' losses. 8) Total Per Capita Consumption - (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) - Determined by dividing 'TOTAL CONSUMPTION (5), by POPULATION SERVED (2). This is an overall figure for water use per person which includes water use by businesses, industry, institutions, and 'unaccounted for' losses. 9) Total Consumption - (Million Gallons Per Day) - A projected figure determined by multiplying the projected POPULATION SERVED (2) by TOTAL PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION (8). ... k4T0EdEj ua sAg • (Q) h v M ^ 0 .-, 0'O M Z. uopcl IIISIlOj .mi O N N O .-• O a a TEgaL o o o L O .-i O N N.r Nl N M W O. O• i-• M O N ^ O .O -1 O Co Co . T vl 'tN M V N- O .O Ui Co .r O 'O N--i f� /ZGS C0 Vl Vl m^ CO t C N N Co N V1 0 .O �TIWTndOd CO ti N ti 'o lo N N ll•'"�' M M ICo (asw) V )4TOed.s o uInSAS en M O ate.• Caw) UOT�d1iI15UOJ Ui N- O M N N- N N- O N Co N- O O O N Tw4Q o O O O (NN m- en 0' 0l Ui M '0 o M O Co M Ui Co .0 �i . O O l N-• N N N v 1 O N N l V N- Co 1- d h • UOflup1dOj NO - O M N N Co N M Co Ui .y N 1 N O O O\ ti ti N N - M M h t o1 FITORd..y)en O S2 ue4SAS m N m h h Co -t M m _ 01 (QUA) •+ O N N O N Co O O W uopdwsuoo Oto O O N enf+N.00l.- O O• O •O M O O O Co -t rJ O h T f+ N h O M O Co M -t h .O V1 .O N-- P v1 -t N mCO, M N N vl Ui Co v1 - uo'neTUdod .y O .D M m W h .-• '4 N N .+ .-• (QdoaD) N- Co •O b O .t O• M d 9• TElot .v . .. Ui O of UiN rn - .t N O (Qd DaD) V '00' V OT�S2U1'Xj `O Co O Ui v V .O V1 Ui G (GON) N1 O o O O O O O IC'�TOEdE, N O O CoW O CO O O u;sAg O .h i �t N M Co N O ti 000 O O 0000 0 Ol fSUO3 O Co Tt%OZ vl O N N O N O O O O O O O O O (c 41) UO}'3d11I1SU0, enCo m RQ h O O Ui 0 o (Q`JW) o N1 1- O M UOTjddlfsuO,') Co 0 0 0 0 0 CT49OUCO Ni o o o O T M O M CO N o .O o o O• o N1 Co o UOnETndod v1 M.t.OmN h V N0 M O N- N N O N N O N1 t v1 N1 N CO N Ui b '0 NOl Nl Vl - - N N - - M N 1 N 41 N W H U Co ++ 6 P. H G x o a-1 C 4 W O ,7. 3 O PO'• 1441 r t Co H O > Co 0 Co bd 1-I 0 Co ((�� VI EU 0 .1 vl H Co H W PC Co N P. lyl W' 14 PCO1440,4004 4 O2¢ 6 CS O 51 W a 0£ O O W > W �G F ai H 0 0 [-- H W x x Co 3 S rn TTT_10 IC uap 6 W L cm C M ,-. C N W d 66. N 4 G U z O —o 'C M N CO N- p N • In C M =114 -s N Ol C O O. N H Q O O to O Co M C7 C Q ,••1 '' N N N C H 0 i — 04 O O •-i N ,•-i ti CJ O O O O O p p O 1140-' ~ C v = H I V) O O O a' W C^. � W W Q f6 r+1 0.0 en C4 z G O O N '-4 N r-1 4_ 6 0 0 0 0 CO. O U, 4 0. N N n N- •"W 6 3 6 3 d 3 6 C 3 3 a � " 4 0 `o ' o N. ,M•1 •Yrr vet .'c 1 z H < 1 1 W W 1 W W 1 W W W W W C U N U .O .O '.o'0 O •OD 110 1101 z z z z z z z z z z H E .ti CO ba ••'1 C) C C ..N M .> N C •$ .F a a U ' L, 0 0 b0 1 C CO c:0 C4 C t O to ul F 0 a) N O C d •.4 .4' •.4 C. O 44-i C E >* e C4 v N C C) E y� O a+ C •^ C) +` >. C) E 4) N s+ O 7> O — 111 '� N F O F S. i. 4400 O O r-1 V~i 0 7 �j C) 44 tO >. y 4) O0 O O 0 G W UI = = cc, = v) 1 z 0.. >- >- a W a W ti y C C 3 CO L. •O O ,•. O'-. CC S. U Z 44 .7 O O> .0 0 F •~ W !. W O O u w UI N CC -• CO 0 4) C > Cl) O v N III -20 O N C) ..1 IA Coo 3 u U N O C) 44 ?3'jN .y N 44 L, I. 011. N "J 7 C •N VI W 0 1101 O N O 4) 44 4) O C t 0 C) 3 C u :7 C) ^^J .00 0 I F 4) r. 4+ 4U+ s O C O CJ N G O O = 3 o •M G 3 . O N O ^ n 4- 0 0.0 Co O ..7 C _ C. N O0. C C U o } iC) 0. 4 H C. LU a W < 3 O to $. L 7 W - 4. r U C) N Cl) — C 4+ C r7 O C) C C1 0 Z wt:J W Y F U ce�a 4 a,U z ' rn o n o0 0 .l w N O tft N O N. N G G O O O — ('1 M• O OON 0O �-•. .�.� O O O O OO O O 0 H W 0000 tnotn OOtntnr-NNm w` g U) O- W Nd F a <C,, en o 0 oz C ~ O er to N N O a a a S NNON N to I O) n t t i i to vl O C .a.)a. 00'0N' L) Co N to O H F 9 ca w r: 040 oa a LO � CoN v Co CO .0 a a n .c z z z z z 04 0 c U) ..4N C .t4. tiN W x x I- I) 0004 <c U e0 cOxx a ax x xs . n..C i ....+ .r ..� 1 N 0) r r .. .4 rl .. C I .N ...r - ...., .. - .•+ $4 .4 ^ .-, —4 .+ -4 N O) 0) N 440 n F $4 F G H N .-I O) ) d N F ...-..r4 .r ..r .2U a)vf w 4 M a eo C) „•, = W — 00 J V d to OC O 7 O 6 —. V C• " III -21 WATER CONSERVATION Compliance with the Maryland Water Conservation Plumbing Fixtures Act - Investigation of compliance with MWCPFA revealed some shortcomings. Although planning officials were advised of the intention to adopt requirements for documenting compliance in 1984 and subsequent adoption in 1986, building officials were not advised of the new statute. In an effort to comply, the Washington County Plumbing Board has made an initial attempt by contacting all businesses that sell plumbing fixtures. This method also included contact with all persons who hold "Master Plumber" licenses. The Board has requested documentation that all fixtures currently available for sale and installion in Washington County comply with MWCPFA. The Board must first determine the degree of non-compliance, if any, prior to formulating a plan of corrective action. The needed action may involve a simple amendment to the Building Code or a large scale program yet to be developed. Other water conservation efforts are noted below. Hagerstown - By far the largest water provider in Washington County, the Hagerstown Water Department does not have a formal program of educating it's customers about water conservation. However, the City's ongoing program of waterline rehabilitation does qualify as a conservation effort. Also, the Department advises that encouraging the customer to rehabilitate private water lines is accomplished through billing for water used, even when high consumption is the result of leakage. This promotes correction and conservation rather than waste. 111-22 Washington County Sanitary District - The Sanitary District provides a potable water supply to the incorporated municipality of Sharpsburg (Subdistrict #4) and the Highfield/Cascade area (Subdistrict #9). Presently, the Sanitary District does not have a formal conservation plan. During low water emergencies, the District employs the news media to advise consumers of a ban on all non -essential water uses such as watering lawns and washing cars. The District also uses "bill stuffers" during these times if the emergency should coincide with the billing. Boonsboro - The Utilities Commission is planning to introduce two programs to address water conservation issues. Passive conservation will be encouraged through a plumbing retrofit program for single-family homes coordinated by the Department of Natural Resources. The Camnission will also encourage active conservation, in which consumers change their consumption habits, through an aggressive public information campaign on water conservation with the help of the University of Maryland Extension Service. The Commission is also considering the adoption of a low -flow plumbing fixtures ordinance, which would require low -flow toilets and other water saving devices in all new construction. Clear Spring, Funkstown, Hancock, Williamsport, and Smithsburg - The other small towns in Washington County have indicated that they do not have formal or continuing programs on water conservation. All have indicated that in the event of a need to conserve or any other need to advise customers regarding water use, they have or would use media campaigns on local radio stations and newspapers. III -23 IDENTIFICATION Contamination is present in a large percentage of wells in Washington County, particularly in the Hagerstown Valley. Water samples taken from residential wells by the Washington County Health Department between 1976 and 1981 indicated that over 35% tested positive for coliform bacteria. The data is based upon samples taken from old existing wells and from all new residential wells for which Health Department approval was requested. All new wells were subject to on -site inspection and observation and grouting by Health Department personnel. It can be reasonably assumed that the pollution of groundwater is a direct result of the insurgence of contamination from numerous non -point sources in the County, due in large part, to the County's unique karst or limestone geology. Extensions to and improvements in public water systems will partially alleviate the problem. The major correction to this situation, however, will be in the form of community or multi -use sewerage service to replace on -lot disposal and serve new developments, thereby reducing the source of groundwater contamination. Table No. 5 lists Water Problem Areas in terms of water quality problems and water quantity problems. First, water quality problems have been identified by the Washington County Health Department and listed in priority order according to the degree of seriousness and number of persons affected. The areas listed in Table No. 5 do not represent all water quality problem areas in Washington County, only those judged by the Health Department as being III -24 the most serious and in the most need of immediate attention. Secondly, water quantity problems have been identified by municipalities and local fire companies and are also listed in priority order. PROGRAM FOR CORRECTION A multi -faceted approach is proposed for the solution of problem areas identified in Table No. 5. The approach for water quality problems will follow the headings listed below: 1. Geohydrologic Study - This study has been conducted by R. E. Wright Associates and funded jointly by the Washington County Board of County Commissioners and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Specific water problem areas were evaluated by the study and the results for the areas sampled appear in Table No. 5. In an effort to supplement and update the R. E. Wright Study, the Washington County Health Department, in conjunction with the Washington County Sanitary District, has initiated a groundwater sampling program that will result in the collection of well samples from across the County. The results once compiled, will be made available to County and State agencies for consideration in planning and policy formulation. New problem areas may be identified and added to Table 5 in the future as a result of this new program. III -25 2. Data Collection - The Washington County Health Department will compile all relevant data including recent water sample reports for the problem areas listed. Data collection work will be done in the order of priority shown in Table No. 5. In each case the Health Department will determine the need for conducting a house - to -house water sampling survey for the affected area. When available data indicates that a listed area is no longer a problem, the area will be removed from the list. Where available data indicates a current and potentially hazardous water quality problem, the Health Department will present its findings to the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the Board of Health. One method for preventing new problem areas is the requirement in the On Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance for test wells prior to approvals of large development proposals. 3. Feasibility Study - For each problem area so identified to the Board of County Commissioners by the Health Department, the Board will take such action as it deems appropriate. Such action may include the funding of a feasibility study to determine possible abatement measures and the feasibility of a community water system for the affected area. The Board will be assisted in this effort by the Washington County Sanitary District and by the Washington County Planning Commission. 4. Sanitary District Law - As a long term measure, the Sanitary District Law for Washington County will be evaluated for possible amendment to facilitate the future management of community water systems by the Washington County Sanitary District. III -26 Specifically, the need for establishing a Sanitary Subdistrict prior to the involvement of the Sanitary District in the operation and management of a community water system should be reviewed. Based upon the above program, planned correction measures will be identified in Table No. 5 as they occur. Planned correction measures will be listed, not as intentions, but when specific action has been taken, such as the application for a grant or loan, the actual appropriation of funds for a project, or the undertaking or completion of the project itself. III -27 O 4) O ,i rt Co r/] LCWC W O p�Paa 2 V] F-7 3 o � GO 62�i 2 O a. E-1 6 m 3O4IdF� m m 4) Ln H C) �3t\C in w a O M rl lflro rmi a -'c L I aw O r44OO>� N I rl N 3 U m NAW>N ro ro r~ 4 0) 0)000 O O m (�tdw O N U w +)r4�Q � C000 ; 3 U Gy R� r1 ro HP a c N C tcc ad U to) bC. O m N RE 9aD ro r1 O) 0) tdA u C.. 0 U Q m 4 m ri r A. PCB O -I °w r-I.Oro U) 4 ?�7 ��vro crp� S. 00 C ro 44.-4 y b0 +-I W r4 tN00) ,-44 14 cd O co 3 -I 4) N4� m d0 a roH Z4) aw H A U m r4 3 a) coNw (C. 1i U W U., to �a Co N -4 U U) A N C ro . 4 bO 0 U td m 0 H rl 1) tl 4) C7 U z 0 H 0 O w O O M O H O O O O 7 O O M Z H h O c0 In ow W� �z z° o o I.n z O Cu '-O ow W oz M z° o W In ti z O W o c� z m W0 O U d td 8 Q 1 H A 2 H N ri �5 III -28 a TES ti CC ro 4b w bO C co Cori )p dL-) 4.) , '0 O 1 Co &)0( C C HC �b�OA oN >, W45 iu �E Ha� '1)El3 C y+ O O N ctl 4i rl H t .-I OO( cd bD L U1 w 60 E O 11 L r1 a. L U L C r14-) _ L cd a) !- O'-4. ,-1 r1 L a) ba 3 U o,ar-1r4 OCd •3CC c O4C a) ro TA cd C r1 Co IC U N V co L L ro b,UI 1 N N HW 4i� rl pp ,C 6 4- L N a) b0 4-)4.) N Cd N A C U C �a r-i � LLH aa))Cor, sue,b ppro ,r -1 rCi C i o14 41ai7 r") 'O14. CC) C 1H O a) a) o p 2 S. cd.i U o hO 4 34- O O4-) Co Co U 3 C 003 cdrl Co Co O U cd a) 4N C C C ✓a CA.C a) C O'(e(e"OI rO1 C N� U 0 ro NA'rl Oil L A «Ld I cd V) U ,sv cd V) O a) a) e J� !.� .C N rl Co d.� N L a) w N ro U <d C/) L .C a) rl 43 4.) a) 'CO J-> rl td Oro L 0] C O L C. rl ai rI O b ri v0) +C -I �C Coj °i cd o N O 0 .C OO U a) w O4 -)H N 4)4.) ,'H -I zo.moff °�rb Cov❑❑OTCs LC-4COC8oC) r`-i 00 3d cd<C Cd x Cc d O,CCV U U 3 O OZ II O 0 O I O c0 O LI .c - I .-I N M N O �N7 00 W O O In 0 LIn OOi 000 In H¢ w� w w w w 2 O(V N en In 0 rn o z3 z z z z z O ro 3a A v�'1O 3 Apoo z o V �❑ C!) 3 P7 v W IX E-1 O III -29 H cDti 03 00L 1] L H O O o W a) 4) N r -4.O 4a N U C O OO ri moo z O 0°ai Ui 0 U 0 0) <d .�-i (zOH] 0 y a 0 0 5 I gg0) O OO4.)I m H 993 O a ,1 N z O a 3 DL mL a) � C 3 O rl 4OiCL CO O ro 2s•a) +i m N H b ai C 4.) O N N O 9 4) N01 m o. CO 4)�t L L U 4-) L ,0i OGU A 'A C 0)C �a i L p 55++ Cd a a w a) A 0 4-'' 04 41 ri a) 03 •O H rO-I " a d Nom` 4Hi rO-I r0 0 to) 4y N WRY 0 4-) L 4y 4i w H4 ri H a) za C' ,L-i td DinW4a ,Li ,Li42 t5 4.,0 .-H c+' 4. 4. ,i1O a)H C,[• P ,A N a) (1) O N C 00ocd ,-11 4n1 : U 01 W O �N 3 0' O 3 N A 7 700 7 L bb' -41 b 4-)i V4-).0 a0 t' O10) qH Pi,°- H&a Ho II H I O O o O O O O ti ( ('.J0 0 O ti N N N II cC O c -I Cfl 10 w w w w w Lfl 00 O OO 8 z z z z z 9 v O 4) n O b b U .OO O W¢ C) N '401 O N O 0 t0 O (1) GO a III -30 0 oo u HI I rn 0\ N z z � ti 8 a � a 7R C � Wy 7 N 4E1 a �ti z z c4 C. c4v O m1m�a en O N S O O 0 en O± b O\ M O O O to In O N O M N N H pC(�N .-1 7 70tO apyVO 4 .C N p L H Cf o ON LO p C St-rOi 07N L as L5 or-I..4O q CTI -i ; "V o0 pot w xc CH >IP> Caa .a o aSya. '� v p u ,-I.-ILO ( r4 -a N N 00 O.a ol�pC°8't•yCm aaU a7 z O m Hv H IflO 40�p 1O �O w lON I Is IO IO zw OO Ul O I�l1O zw 0DO 'O n l0 l(Il Aw O? Io O lO IO w OO t - u1 b1O zw NO N N IO lO zi rn as r4 a I iii) If v a [zl 0'..-I " r4 r U1 'F�c�C .Ui N N W N �yo��...I1IIv 0 n Ot. C5 n 3p S❑ 3❑ H C O CO CO :: i t fi 3l 3 r I& 111111 z or $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ c� aft �+ a a..+ N a a.+p C a PC a .' C a P C a PC a a•..o Pg.LC C{{��� a PC . pup g99jj ySS Ci 3 ti 4 i Pp N �.000 iCpCp-+ N 00 Pp N 00 43p N 00 .-I 4p N +-I Ypp N �.Ci Ypp N .-I upp N Z U'O U'�O V v U'�O U'00 U U•iO N � 00 oC V 6 uU N M - O O O O C O 0 O 0 O O 0 N O € o 0 o 6 N N t[1 10 R N .may{{ ' U' to S� 0a. 0 n o S L m S o z 8T .,.i, mp O N p¢p� N .Y° -I 430 "4 m .°I o H O . Q] C• J> M L� " 0 O P r I y1 H tLy .E mi C �+ q3� i-�1 •p V) COl N per, on CS W� y 25aWWa w y"' tz3 00Sao FOG $2 u pGp. G m a L 2S� 3 5 &Zvyio O a POC , "' G O 0 L? W 03 Cu EI C 2U o E 3 '' ° p� u � o� Q�3 .°+N .°+ro I-, i-0..9 19 A Ia a. t. 4� IL -I.' zs o en av �� a �� �� c'JU' '01043 a w zw ri zw fw di zw v 2 8 8 s s s s CC — cc C C C C C C m r�ipo1 M Z0.. Y E OP 2 )4W 2 6, lms 2 2 41YGSf. u 2 8 HH N L N Nufl N Npp W y tptl� �p y W pO III -32 N cg 0 .1 U O O m 0 OO\ 0 ¼0 N N a)H N' 0 a L Oga Y 0' 0 gOa o 0 0. 0 W 65a U C 4) EE O 00 U'�d ti N U ti W U m 0) S U G 0000... a 0 O p0 U'O N ^ oo Hm O- O -'H' H O000r. H O ns M O0O£ Z O H 0 0 0 0 0 C cn cn" o 0 N N ' 'H .v 2 0 '0G C❑ N v 3 yN .9 o C.-1 NNwo IN 'H a).4 0 03 Fi 0 1-4 a o € 'H F ti a 0. N 0 0 v J N u U 3 N 44-) C N 0 ti wo 3 E0E C N O 1003 u i.z 8 o aN v v o 'H OI O 3� W 0 1- 308 Spp Tl a0>v W N y N +0-f 0. 4)><'H t011 N r� R ch. ' , f1 W f: r-i it 0 it 4U� 0 b 0 qa O H y 0 0.'H 3 0 S a N O)4'H "G m 7 m GCO fK FI3 ,1 w 1 4.'HO ,-I-I 04 3 0 4' t03ctlU z-� o M H� H �5H1j cON W'.0 z w NO M z w 000 .? O z w Ml-. QOM z w 0 'H .-.ti z w 'H'H z w MO QOM z w yy 4 O'H O'H L (� 0 0 O N ON. o Sli A o N N .o a w o id rj)C C N `!{ H 0 0.-I o 0 0 0 0 'HO) p E E 6 F 02% O H E III -33 Notes for Table No. 6 1) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY, OR DEVELOPER - Responsibilities include project initiation and management, but not necessarily financing. 2) WATER SERVICE AREA - That area served, or potentially served, by a single distribution system under control of a single utility, or, in a very large system, sub -areas as delineated by the County. 3) LOCATION - In accordance with the Maryland Grid System. 4) GRANTS ELIGIBLE - Dollar amounts indicate funds for which the project may be eligible from sources shown in parentheses. Source abbreviations represent agencies and programs as follows: EPA - Environmental Protection Agency EI]A - Economic Development Administration UDAG - Urban Development Action Grant CDBG - Community Development Block Grant FmHA - Farmers Home Administration ARC - Appalachian Regional Commission MDE - Maryland Department of the Environment The local cost for any project may be assumed to be the total cost estimate less any amount shown as grants eligible. III -34 POLICY FOR WATER LINE INSTALLATION IN AREAS WHERE SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE In order to prevent street and other damage encountered in providing public water service to developed areas, and to provide for efficient and effective connection to public water service, the following policy is presented for water line installation in areas where water service is not available at the time of street and residential construction but will be made available at some future time: 1. Requests for such installation will only be accepted where interim systems are permitted by the Water and Sewerage Plan. 2. Each application for a water construction permit must be accompanied by a letter from the County Health Officer requesting that such installation be permitted. 3. Building permits, subdivision plats, and well approvals shall include a provision requiring the connection of the premises to community water within twelve (12) months of announced availability. 4. Water lines shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable municipal or Commission specifications. 5. The connection of the "dry" system shall be plugged with a visible and readily inspectable plug at the future point of connection to the existing system. PRIORITY AREA REQUIREMENTS The following requirements shall be applicable to each respective designated priority area: 1. W-1 Priority Areas (Existing Service) a. Individual water systems shall not be permitted, except as follows: III -35 If an existing community water facility is inadequate or is not available,* an interim individual water system may be used subject to the following conditions: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations. (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within 1 year or less after such system becomes available. (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner. b. Extensions of existing community water systems shall be permitted and encouraged. 2. W-3 Priority Areas (Five Year Priority) a. Individual water systems may be permitted on an interim basis provided that: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations. *The adequacy or availability of community water service to a particular parcel of land is a judgement which must be made in each case through consultation among the responsible agencies and cannot be made on the basis of this Plan alone. III -36 (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within 1 year or less after such system becomes available. (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most econanical and convenient manner. b. Extensions of existing community water or sewerage systems shall be permitted and encouraged. 3. W-5 Priority Areas (Five to Ten Year Priority) a. Individual water systems shall be permitted. b. Extensions of existing community water systems shall not be permitted, except as provided by Policy For Water Line Installation In Areas Where Service Is Not Available. c. New, permanent community water systems shall not be permitted. 4. W-7 Priority Areas (No Planned Service) a. Individual water systems shall be permitted. b. Extensions of existing community water systems shall not be permitted. c. New, permanent community water supply systems shall not be permitted. In all cases where interim or permanent community water systems are permitted, they shall be subject to the standards and regulations of the applicable State and Federal agencies. Adequate documentation that the State and Federal standards can be complied with shall be evidenced prior to County Plan amendment consideration. All interim or permanent community water systems, or multi -use water supply systems in Washington County, III -37 excluding municipal systems, shall be approved by and dedicated to the applicable agency for ownership, operation, and maintenance in accordance with established County and State standards and procedures. WATER SERVICE PRIORITY AREA MAPS (1" = 2000') The maps on the pages that follow show existing and planned facilities and service priority areas which are based upon a ten-year planning period. These maps utilize a 1" = 2000' scale base taken from the Washington County Zoning Ordinance. Letter designations shown on the maps are zoning districts for which more information may be found in the Zoning Ordinance. While every effort was made to insure accuracy in the preparation of these maps, errors may have resulted from the transfer of information from maps at different scales. The classification of parcels of land as having either existing service or planned service was based upon the location of existing service lines and upon the best estimates for future service by the service providing agencies. Because of these inherent accuracy limitations, the maps should be used for general planning purposes only. For certainty as to the exact location of facilities or to the status of particular parcels of land, service providing agencies should be contacted. Changes to these maps which may be required by errors or inaccuracies may be made in accordance with the administrative procedures set forth in Appendix B (Page B-11) of this Plan. III -38 El \ 2 a _ ---o— . '4 o } ■ 0 7 k ( ) ) �o ) 2 § 2 ) k ) | ( % § 2 ` , _ ; _ ■� : ., -- ] 2 : _ ; 0 0 a Is \ « - || ° � -- i! IM 2 Q. - _ — ■ a. ■= 2 - ;||. -- p-0 _ fi L§ § a• §. ®; , ., _ S _ k§ ' |� |! !! ! 0 f r crz 00 a Q z w U U � > w W U) 0 a, O a 0 a- .... O c 2 0 • w U ••• — a. O_ T �L 0 n a` N L ; o M aoo-o-s 4 S•G I F - z a H O z z w a w cv a a Iii I I- Crvi Z E- Cr I— 4 Cr F— 4 Cr I— 4 —� z w N Lu Q Cr 3 ai Cr 0 z 0In I W ZQ bc,, crz OO Q Z wo U N W cr O w 0 0 a 0 6`. rn C 'C hi W 'Co. Cwo O >, ::::.::::*z.::::: O � O Io m :: I } Q❑ o e ■ I Sn I z a H O z F z z w It w CD z a I F W Ix W Cl) It W 3 J CDI z W Ui U) U) z 3 3 3 ca n Ix F- W U W U) O Z W z Z a r J °" 3 0 ED } U) } az ^O 0 z WC7 It' - >w LL_ O U LO O a O a x W x O .... W U •• d C O r 0 O ,rO o � 1 3 < I 'o®0 ■ ■S.. I z z 0 z F z z w t W � F- CD z n. = a I 0 U) Ir z 0 U) ) Ir W 4 M W 4 cc W 4 J 3 CD z U) > W I U) z H W O Lu W O W Z a W Z Z tia a 3 � I ! i , i I .`i a a ____ L4L$ .1 _____ I 'H ft • iFEEE I•__• i — a 13 00 d Q Z W O U � W 0 w •0 0 n O a N % W w W 2Q S 2 .... LIJO O d ,- C o o '_ u, a` Io I Y ci 'o®sj_ Sn I H Z a z O F Z < z z Z W 2 I-' Wix CD Z d L ix 0 Z 0 H W a W F W J Z E Lu W iii cn z Z 3 3 3 3 ( 1) ix H I- W U W Z 0 W z z a 1 J °' 3 rr LI 4 NyC___ _____ S f . p. T7; ;,_.,., •�, ,•,.. ....�� ::mot:: QN M a a H a / Ill i r. 0-. I I I co0 c U, G LL W 2Q } 00 as Z W C7 U W W N C 'Co. W ••••• C. 3 � o O ■ IC' ioesj_ . U N ,n I Z 0 Z d Z z Z W 2 W z (D z W = I a W W W J Z w zU) W Z 4 4 4 3 U) It H W U W (1) o Z W Z Z a ti J a 3 Sr rc • y ti \ u V' Q•\. w p 4 IiIii1.•1 7 0 } c 2 G wO d C. N O T • C CC V yx o x x In a` xxxCC x xx CC y xxyx N!) xx x I 3 '` o 4- 2 O n a` N L .. o u. 1 } CIto®0 ■ See I r Z 4. O Z Z W 1- W cc I- V' d = a cc 0 I- U) c Z 0 N a 3 Q 3 a 3 w 3 z a. cn > w w ac 2 z cc F- w U w w Oct z w z z a ti °' 3 0 m 2 >- C', 2 ix W a Qz 00 aZ we U N W w 0 C U, W CIS 0 V c W o C. o a U o � } cito®s Sn_ I_ I- z d z O N Z Z z w Wcc 0 Z CL L 0 c 0 3 a 3 a 3 J w 3 z a.. cn > w cc cc H w U d' w 'n o z W z z tia � I a 3 24/ 1r ____ Ty r % =\.1 M1 ._ ' r •Y7 I a � 1 I \ \ f YI h 1 r J \ 4 f O 1_. NC tz ::::: crZ CO O O - ..... :::.. o >. t d ..... d . . Q •c _2 .o y�M•„°µ Z u Q. U U7 W a • ti M FN " p V ::::: . NN w 3D 3 V 0) O o. 0 a` x W W o >. o u> a o � <I_ _ II ■ I .GG I I.- I— ~ f- z W Q W CDz 2 = a w 0 I- L 0 N W 3 W 3 IJ 3 J 3 z can W ix N Z I- w U Lu w o°' Z p W Z Z a ti J 30 �. ✓�/ Y aaxY11Y M .tV' :: T : Q/ \ R X / I[Mi%Y kY % (A' �\ %a RYaM Y%FY Wes•%%x%%%xa • .... .. N / kR%MRX I. . :�.......� %Y ax�Y xnxiCY `0; tU ..m I, .....: tt Xx%�xn *Y /.1 r r �`r •I Q. • %%ii [ xYa%%k i Yk A, + .. 9::::::: Q % IC N Y % % Y IC .. . ICIC1 +k ... axi R % Xx M v'l Flk^�.......... v iIC O.J• :I+T} �xa Y%nnx Y.• 3SQ .`! •!!*� !fix ilxxn1d}!� F}! !f / % .'� '1•..• p IC X IC QH _ � 1 7 / a. I bf /�_ 0 0 2 } 2 co OO d Z wco 0 � W w d3 c .•:.. N N W U d _ C, O >+ O : O � a In } <I IO®$_ U .GG I Z a 0 Z z W W U' Z 0=. w Cl)C 6 �L z N 3 ac 3 3 3 (9 z Cl) > Iii Cl) z I -- W U W U O Z U Z Z tia J 30.. 0 m 5 } S W az 00 LL Q Z wc� U > W Cto w U) d N a 0 a` 0 C N it w 0 N C W U •• v O _r O : O o N a O v • I ______ I- z J z N Z N Z z W CD z a W C7 a N z 0 N w Q 3 w a 3 LU a 3 w 3 z a Cl) 0 w 4 E- W U U. w N O Z W Z Z a ti J � 0 m 2 r 2 W a2 ° ::::: r I.-.' O ..t * U• > HHHH ".XXX ". W U x O U W U .... :.... W d . . > ::::: M x. _ 0 CD CO a O a` C U. '- c 0) A S•G I F- a F- z y z z a w w CD z W a F- z 0 w Q 3 ~a 3 a 3 w 3 CD Z a cn w N F- W U w ow W z z a ti J i °' 3 V 0 In U) >- 00 zZ W O O w U N a O L. T a N w ..... (i C U titi wo ..... 1 C O _r a a` I 1 r Q❑ (D o 0 ■ Sn r z O Z F 2 Z W Q W I- (D 2 = D. 0 N Cr 0 N 3 3 3 Z U) O Cr W Cr N z F�- W 0 LU w o z o LU z tia J 5 0 CO w a 3 N N ci:z 00 as z wc) N w w 0 0 n 0 a` 0• c 2 < d C. 0 „ 'n a` In <I_to®sIu III ■ See I— z a H o H z H z z w f' w CD z o. M Lii i a z H a 3 a a 3 ai a 3 w 3 z a m a w w a U) z I- W U w o z o w z Z a J a 3 Y Y ':•�•::•:•� :ti'J: JJ' ': / " '.�' " • rte'. (.':'.•C: f ::I:; �-r +' L VL 1 r r .• � �.•.� i i i i . :.... •: Nr r:. ' ••••:: ss iri�i�f:cL 1 _ (J __ I ____ _ L - ____IL 0 5 } Cl) 00 as Z we U � w w a'c Yl X w Cd 0 0 W U .... d C. o 0 to a ❑ O -o- v ■ I See I I- Z a Z 0 Cl)I- z z W a C9 z °- w S 0 F- a F- 4 a a F- 4 a I- 4 J C� z 2 N Q 3 Cl) a I- U 0 U U U) o z o z z a ti °' 3 I. �Ey . x�x } - w xM x I IXiI[i.X �d1'f� '�� •• Y XX X JIxY�� fw'�sON ii74ni�i�toi- inuund�E _._ 1.�����. - -NEW lliuii 111= ]n 0 U) IC cr W } co crz OO LIEa Q Z W (O U to 5U LIo N O O a` C c w W C .... .� w0 ..... ,- C O >. :• 'tea` Io I c 'oesj_ • 4 S•G I I— z a I z p z z z wz W c� a. a 0 Cl) cc 0 N w 3 w 3 w 3 3 vi ccw Lii cc z H W U W O 0) Z p w z z r J 3a" a IL x: t�3� in �t. iII in 0 w 00 azz w 0 U � w 0 w ..... O• U .. w a C o _T O r O (I, Io I ).- < a o -o- s ■ I ______ I- z d z O U) Y z F- z z z w w c9 O. w Cr Cr z H Cr F- a Cr F- N Cr H 4 -� c9 z 2 Cl)Q LU 3 3 U) Cr H Iii 0 W W ow Z a w Z Z tia J 3°" 00 aQ Z W C7 U ≥ W Q w U) lv O 0. 0 0 x W It CO ..... 0 O .... c 2 i WU • c O a > 0 � a o L <I'°®s I. Sn I H z oJ. I- O z z z w W H c� z a w 0 c 0 N W 4 W 4 W 4 J 3 z a. U) cc w cc z z cc I I W U (J1 Ui z z Q J a III1tII!, tTaarAt IPW$WLIUI ♦ ♦,, o'er♦� via 0 w W 2Q crz OO dzz W (O U 0 cW w V 0 n 0 a K o W O 0 0. C. L O TNNNN r' o . „ IL) d x N x MN N N " o T O II) a` N I 1 } 3 <❑ O % ■ I See I F z nJ. Z 0 H z z z w(9 2 -- w z o. M L a c I- z it 1— aCl) H H J c9 z M N Cl)H Q 3 3 3 3 U) awc I— 0 z 3 W 0 Lu w 0 W z Z Q J a- V I �.. fyJ Q TT/7SL X11 o S .� a � • � II Zi pq 1 i. L.../ Q' 1. \ Il 1 11 1 `I v/ < I � � / //tJI ^IyJ 7l% + 1 1 ( 1 1 Ill f ' I x _ Q 'T> / it M it a o N ___� 11 0 a I I 11 = a a % r \ a 0 >- U) W 2Q rz OO as Z WO U � W W 0 d 0 a 0 a 0 ..... O• t3 X 0 W U• L d C. 0 r L' O � O aL U' L v u, a ❑ O \J • I ______ I Z � z z z w a w CD z a w Cr 5 ZO O vi a a a w CD z Ir Cr U) LU U) a Cr 3 3 3 3 U ) Cr 0 z t N OO 0- Q Z W U U c O W 0 a C w QL w 2Q U ' N G Wo ••••• _ d c O >+ L o In CI'° -E -O ■ Sn I I- Z a I- O H Z z w w I- CD a. D L a H a z U) a 3 a a 3 Cl) a 3 w 3 CD Z_ a. vi O a Iii U) a U) co z a a: I- U U Iii ", o Z W Z Z a ti J a 3 0 }- a. L} r cn OO as Z W C.o U N W w C c O, W C .... o U Wa C — v 'L O r O a o L Q ❑ 0 ® s ■ Sn I I- Z a p U) H z z w w co z O g I- it Q a It Q It Q W C!)> z d w W z it 3 3 3 3 U) It t- W U w 0 0) Z W w z z h J ' a 3 Im .1 9 a . a VIII '�Ilj ��/leek �e � aU��!�_Y�niie 4e ��` Ykre mi•�so�• l �iaw. �i1�.�.hIYY1�. � qY� f i 19~PHpe a is iaaiawa {+�i 10.Ii Vi Or�A�e✓ � 'r Oi S ,►\ �„o pip\. - •a; �..a� s • J 0 m >- U) IL W 2Q } H U) 00 aQ Z W O O U5 W w O w 0 a 0 I- 0 On c N X W .... O 0,0 2 y 0 WU .•••• d V. XXx U) T 0 _ O 0 'O a XI IC XXX IC .X. M XXXX a >. O : f, O • y •: V j O ; Ill } O Sn I F z a F- z O z z w cD 2 a w 0 I- o S z 0 iii CO Q 3 a 3 a 3 w 3 co z a to > w CO Ix F- w U Lu W CU) 2O W z z a ti J � °' 3 s r crz OO aZ W (7 c >w O w U) N N a 0 I- 0 CO c a..... X O : ..... w O O O a` In 1 3 'o®sj_H I Sn I z Ja z O Y Z z z w 2 a H CD z a a a It N a:13 Z ac 3 a 3 a: 3 3 CD can > w iii a:H U) z w 0 w U) o zw Z Z a ti J 30 r 0 m } x Z >- 00 Z W<7 U <n W X 0 w 0 d 0 a 0 a` % 0 .... w U I D C. a T 'a 0 a` v L I r 3 44 Sn I F- z F- Z O Cl) z F- z w es- CD Z a. w Q Cr N Cr z N F a a J w CD z a 0 > w w z 4 3 3 3 3 U) Ct E- Iii U w W O Z U W Z Z a ti I _i a 3 Q I Qi ' U = a 0 1 V r j N 1 y la ,Ii Co IA IA 1S3* = U I .' 11 r Q � it 4//111 Q / Q J O m } cC r -' >- bcn = z 00 as Z W U' U � >w (ro W 0 0. a i W o C. p T xat xx'C x. IL) a .` I M„r N M x X x 3 y O o � } < O ® s Sn I Z a F- O Q Z I -- Z z W �- (D Z a W V, a Cl) o Z SQ Iii Iii 3 IiiJ Q 3 W 3 CD z a. Cl)3 > It U 2 Cl) It W U w N o Z W Z Z a ti J , 3 F 0- C crz OO OF - w O U ≥ w � o w U) V N N a 0 I.- 0 O S 2 % a .... w O '— c .... O_ O O to .- I Sn z a F-- z p a z H z w w CD z a a O U) l z 0 N U) 3 Q 3 a 3 J w 3 zz a U) o > w cr cc I- w U U U O<' Z U Z z a ti J a a 4 $ 0 In 2 w bin x z 00 WC7 U >w W c C N X W ....: U N C O .... W —C. d O . O o to cai_ _ Sn I r z F Z 0 I- Cl) F- Q z W 2 0 Z 2 a lJJ C� a 0 U) 2 z 0^ N F- cc 4 cccc 4 4 J 3 0 co 0 cc cc N I- W U Ui W U) o z W z z a ti d 3 0 5 U) S w 2Q >- 00 afl Q z w O U � w w 0 O o. 0 a` dS O 4- : X O w U d 0 v C. o a U I } I ______ I- z a z z z z w 2 w CD z 2 D a w 0 U) It 2 z 0 U) Q 3 ac a 3 a 3 w 3 z a U) w I z U U w 0) o Z W z z a ti °' 3 y y 2 pa N U rd lr crz 00 a Z W(O U � ≥ W cr 0 Li 0 O 0 I- a. W O ..... U.... 2 ..:: •C K0 o .....• W U •• •• 3 C. � xx %% O } X% O x%KKK to a. % %' %% %X% %% % • %X% O o M I } Q❑ Q ■ Sn I N F- Z W W E- CD Z a H N W 3 W 3 W 3 J 3 Z vi L W UI Z Z H w U W U) o Z w Z Z a ti a 3 — oI w w } h a Z 00 Z w U U 5U w U) U UJO C o O n QL. o ii., 1 )... a❑ See I F Z a F- z z w I- CD z M Q. L F U) o co Sn W 3 W 3 W 3 J 3 Z vi Lu W I z Z I- w U W ow Z p W Z Z a r J a 3 En N bN c OO Z w(� 0 W w U) V N 0 n 0 a- w w 2Q N C W U N c O : � O L I L } a ❑ IQ %$_ 0 I Sn I z a H 0 R- z H z z w w CD 2 a. L 0 0 I Q Q Q J w CD z d 0 > Cl) U) m 3 3 3 3 cn It I— w 0 W w u, o Z W Z z tia a 3 Ii iVV \ ��=bJy J II I V ��W ay"y w �1J r :i/ ii• : _ I N a �/ S&4Lt/m 0 in >- U) rU) IC x W >- u) oz 00 aQ Z w C7 U 05 >w w C, O G. 0 Q. x W O O ..... .. j N N W o • c 0 >. O O It) a` 0• � O 3 <__ a O -o- I ■ Sn I F- z G. 1 O N z z w w CD z 4. j a w a Ir N Cr z y Cr 4 4 4 3 CD Cl) w Cr U) z H w 0 Iii o z W z z a ti °' 3 0 m } C!) W L N OO az w cO U >w Ira w U) 0 6 O I- 0- CI C `a W O• U c 2 '� N X O .... w vC. o T ' O r 'n a` Co o` In <❑ Q ■ See I Z 0 N Z f - z W w C9 Z w 0 2 Na. 4 4 4 J z 2 U) I Iii w U) a H w U U W ow Z W z z a a 3 `�. �; :ice •::: • `. J! J � u Q —'XN c\t'C a LLT1 N } •x } Ic N X %• / 1 • X.. / cm }xIXX}}}##}} X I Q� x } % X X}k = C aw/ � -EE a .\ T T•xT I NYC �} YTY . OO aZ 1±4O \U_ Eo / W 'xO U U) t 0 O. 0 I- 0 c C W w W O ..... C .... WU ••••• d C O 'O 0 r O a` Q❑ O % $ ■ ■ Sn Z H 0 h- Z W tD a a. a W ,V It � 0 Z U) Cc 3 cr 3 I 3 J 3 CD Z U) > cr w 2 U) H W U W N o 2O Z Z 30 Or OOO ;�cQQ O Sd o w B 4J c • i I 0 m >- U) N crz 00 aI- wo U � Itw O U C c W W U • V 0>' O O �a � o 1 a__ ❑0-o-0 I Sn I z 0 Cl) z I- z W 1- CD p_ _ W C7 z F- W a W U) W 4 J z p w w z z 3 3 3 U) I H 0 z ti w 0 W 0 w z z a J a 0 a 0 m 2 2 w 2Q V d 0 a 0 0_ a C N w U .... 2 x C w O N C. w T 0 in a Pt Pt .. M µ: „ Pt %% µ N O O 0- c ❑ •GG I z a z 0 N Y z H z z 0 z a L U, o z a 3 a 3 a 3 w 3 0 z a U) > w ww ix X. z H w 0 w o°' Z p w z z a ti a � 0 m 2 r 0- C b 0: z OO aZ w U U 7 >' w U) a, a, 0 a O 0_ 0 N X W C6 O c 2 wU - U). c r 0 O L � o 1 } 3 ci . .GG z a � 0 N Z I- z z w Q CD z d a U 0 z 0 0 3 3 3 J 3 cD z U)awc > cr X. N H O z 3 W U W w z z Q J 0 e I S. S H 0 U, w W 2Q _H z 00 a Z W t 9 U N W ca W 0 o. 0 a 0 C N X W a W O C. � O � a l 1 r a O v o I. Sn I L J Z Z z cWc L UI C9 Z a W H z U) ~ cc 3 3 W 3 J 3 Z Cl) > W a 2 Z H W U W 0) 0 z w z z a ti J a 3 w + a a a. cc W N crz OO aZ W o;5 W ti .... c W cO ..... v ,- C. O _T a O a ❑ Sn I Z a Z a z z W � Lii C7 Z D � ~ Z o U) 4 LU 4 W 4 J J 3 Z or. U) W N w Z 4 F- W U W O) 0 z w z z a ti J °' 3 In 1985 three (3) projects were completed to improve the plant's performance they were: 1) pump modifications at the Wright Road, Williamsport and Industrial Park Pump Stations; 2) flow equalization facilities to provide a constant flow rate into the plant and; 3) sludge dewatering improvements to improve the sludge process for disposal at the County landfill. The plant is operating near its maximum hydraulic capacity of 1.6 MGD and no major expansion to the plant is possible because of the terrain of the land immediately adjacent to the plant. When the District realized that capacity was nearing in 1987, the planning and study of a new treatment facility began. Note: See "Conococheague Waste Water Treatment Plant under "Planned Sewer Service Areas". Early 1989, the Sanitary District imposed a policy whereas sewer allocation not previously allocated can only be approved to any one (1) lot of record in an amount equivalent to not more than 3 Equivalent Dwelliing Units (EDU's) or 600 gpd. At which time the new treatment plant comes on line, approximately 1 MGD of sewer flow can be diverted from the collection system of Subdistrict No. 1 - Haflway and Subdistrict No. 5 - Potomac-Tammany/Van Lear to the new plant. This will allow the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plan to open service to the area east of Interstate 81. EXISTING SEWERAGE SERVICE AREAS The Sanitary District is currently active in eight (8) sanitary sewer subdistricts. The following is a description of each. IV -2 EXISTING AND PLANNED SEWERAGE SYSTEMS WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT The Washington County Sanitary District operates and maintains several public waste water collection systems and treatment plants throughout Washington County. The Sanitary District has jurisdiction to any area serviceable with public waste water facilities which is not incorporated or is served by an incorporated municipality. The Sanitary District operates the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plan which currently services Subdistrict No. 1 Halfway, Subdistrict No. 5 Potomac-Tammany/Van Lear and Williamsport areas. The Nicodemus plant will also provide treatment when the sewer system is completed in the Cloverton and Green Lawn area slated to be complete by year end 1990. The following is a description of the plant. John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plant The John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plan (formerly called Halfway) is located along the Potomac River on Lockwood Road on the outskirts of Williamsport, Maryland. The plant provides secondary treatment of waste water by means of primary clarification, high rate trickling filters, secondary clarification and disinfection. IV -I Halfway Area - Subdistrict No. 1 The Halfway area is situated approximately three (3) miles south of Hagerstown and three (3) miles north of Williamsport. The Halfway area conventional gravity collection system includes the following areas: Halfway, Oak Ridge, Woodmoor, Greenberry Hills, Valley Mall, Valley Plaza, Lakeside Trailer Park, and the 70/81 Industrial Park. Within the Halfway sewer service area there are three (3) pumping stations: 1) Potomac Edison Pump Station, 2) Oak Ridge Pump Station/Oak Ridge Ejector Station, 3) Wright Road Pump Station. All ot the waste water ultimately flows to the Wright Road Pump Station then transported by force main lines to the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plant for treatment. The average daily waste water flow at the Wright Road Pump Station is currently 700,000 gpd. The Halfway sewer area currently has a total of 2,257 residential/commercial/industrial services representing 3,791 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). The most recent major development in this subdistrict has been Towne Oak Village, Section C - seventeen (17) additional units and the new 100 lot subdivision known as Parkview Meadows. IV -3 Sharpsburg/Keedysville Area - Subdistrict No. 4 The amended Boonsboro/Keedysville/Sharpsburg 201 Waste Water Facilities Plan was completed and approved by State and Federal environmental agencies April 1986. The Washington County Sanitary District implemented the facilities plan recommendations to design and construct a low pressure sewer collection system utilizing a grinder pump for each residence, two pumping stations, and to provide a waste water treatment plant for processing of the liquid waste, with the solids being transported by truck to the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plan for dewatering. The communities to be served are Sharpsburg, Keedysville, and the surrounding subdivisions of Potomac Crest, Battlefield Knolls, Forge Hill Estates and Confederate Hills. Construction for the Sharpsburg/Keedysville sewer project begin in September 1988 and is scheduled to be complete July 1990. The Antietam Waste Water Treatment Plant has been designed with ultimate capacity of 163,000 gpd. When the construction is complete and the system is put into operation, the District will be providing sewer srvice to approximately 700 residential and commercial establishments with the ability to serve an additional 115 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). The actual number of Equivalent Dwelling Units (ECU's) that can be served will depend upon the actual competency of the treatment plant. IV -4 Potomac/Tammany/Van Lear Area - Subdistrict No. 5 The areas included in Subdistrict No. 5 are as follows: 1) Mt. Tammany Manor, 2) Van Lear Manor, 3) Interstate Industrial Park. This area is situated between Halfway and Williamsport, Maryland. The collection system is a conventional gravity system which includes four (4) pumping stations. The waste water flow from the west side of U. S. Route 11 gravity flaws to the Wright Road Pumping Station, whereas the waste water generated from the east side of U. S. Route 11 ultimately collects at the Industrial Park Pumping Station. The waste water is then transported for treatment to the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plant via 16 inch force main sewer line. Sewer service is provided to 448 residential/commercial/industrial establishments representing 866 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Major development that has occurred in this subdistrict includes additions to Homewood Retirement Center (242 cottages/apartments), Van Lear Manor (52 units), and extensions within the Interstate Industrial Park. IV -5 Cloverton/Green Lawn Area - Subdistrict No. 5-1 Construction is scheduled to begin in December 1989 for a small diameter gravity sewer collection system for the communities of Cloverton and Green Lawn adjacent to the Town of Williamsport. This type of system will utilize septic tanks for each resident for primary treatment with the liquid waste ultimately being piped to the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plant for treatment. The construction project also includes two (2) pumping stations and modifications at the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plant consisting of septage receiving tanks and pumps, belt filter press, sludge dewatering building and odor control facilities. The District will be serving approximately 168 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) when construction is complete one (1) year from start. Fountainhead Area - Subdistrict No. 6 The Washington County Sanitary District managed the planning, design and construction projects for providing public sewer service to the area north of Hagerstown's city limits. The subdistrict encompasses the area bordered by Northern Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue, Longmeadow Road and Marsh Pike. The Fountainhead subdistrict's conventional gravity system and one (1) pumping station has been operational since summer 1980 with the City of Hagerstown providing treatment of the waste water generated from this area. Currently there are 770 services in this subdistrict representing 995 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). IV -6 Major development has occurred within this subdistrict during the last five years, these development projects include - Fountainhead Estates, Rolling Hills, Fountainhead Plaza and Fountainhead Meadows, and Foxleigh Meadows. Sharpsburg Pike Area - Subdistrict No. 14 At the request of the Board of County Commissioners, in February 1987 the District implemented the planning and design for extending public sewer service south on Route 65 (Sharpsburg Pike) to a point approximately 1000 feet south beyond the I-70 overpass. The construction consisted of approximately 4,085 feet of 8 inch and 10 inch gravity sewer, 4,556 feet of 8 inch force mains, and 1 pumping station with the City of Hagerstown providing treatment of the waste water generated from this area. The present design capacity of the pump station is 108,000 gpd. With upgrading the pump motors and impellars of the station, ultimate capacity of the station and collection system can be increased to 350,000 gpd. The District is presently serving commercial and residential units representing 45 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). IV -7 Maugansville/Orchard Hills Area - Subdistrict No. 15 The Washington County Sanitary District completed the planning, design, and construction of gravity sewer system in 1985 with the City of Hagerstown providing treatment of the waste water generated from this area. The subdistrict includes the areas of Maugansville, Orchard Hills, North Ridge, State Line, a portion of Paramount and the Washington County Regional Airport. A significant amount of growth has occurred in the subdistrict since 1985, they are: Citicorp, Garden Spot Apartments, Fountain Head North, Maugans Meadows and several projects at the Washington County Regional Airport. The area is served by 984 services representing 1,838 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Highland Manor Area - Subdistrict No. 18 The District established this subdistrict in June of 1988. A local developer has constructed the collection system, interceptor line and a package waste water treatment plant. Through an agreement with the District, the developer has/will convey all rights, title and interest of the system to the District. IV -8 The construction of the collection system is being completed in phases. Ultimately 208 units will be served by the system. Start up of the initial phase was November 1988 and upon completion of the Conococheauge Area Collection System, the flows from Highland Manor will be diverted to the Conococheague Waste Water Treatment Plant. Currently 59 units are connected to the system. PLANNED SEWERAGE SERVICE AREAS As mentioned previously, the District is actively pursuing the task of providing sewerage facilities to various areas throughout Washington County where there is a need. The following is a decription of each. Highfield/Cascade/Pen Mar Area - Subdistrict NO. 9-1 The District has completed the 201 Waste Water Facilities Plan for providing sewer service to the communities of Highfield, Cascade and Pen Mar. On October 9, 1989, the official public hearing was held on the facilities plan. The District anticipates approval of the facilities plan by Maryland Department of the Environment and Environmental Protection Agency by December 1989. IV -9 The proposed sewage collection system is a small diameter gravity sewer system combined with a STEP (septic tank effluent pump) pressure sewer system and a gravity interceptor sewer. The sewage treatment system will be Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR). Disinfection will consist of ultraviolet radiation of the effluent before discharge to Falls Creek. A sludge holding tank will be utilized and the sewage will be transported by truck to the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plan for dewatering. Approximately 450 services are proposed representing 556 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). The District's schedule indicates start of construction by June 1991 with completion by November 1992. Saint James Area - Subdistrict No. 16 The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan approved in 1978 calls for providing public sewer facilities to the area known as the Saint James Service Area, located south of Hagerstown off of the Sharpsburg Pike (Maryland Route 65) by the year 1990. The plan proposes for gravity collection utilizing pump stations, interceptor and force main sewer line with treatment to be provided at the Maryland Correctional Institute Waste Water Treatment Plant. In May 1989 at the request of the Board of County Commissioners and interested property owners, the District conducted a sanitary sewer survey mailing. The area surveyed was that; beginning at Poffenberger Road on the Sharpsburg Pike south to Roxbury Road, Wagaman Road to the railroad tracks, College Road to Saint James School, Saint James Village and Clover Heights developments and the Earley Industrial Park. IV -10 A total of one hundred ninety two (192) surveys were returned out of the 350 which were delivered, which represents sixty-four percent (64%) of the survey area. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of the responses indicated that they were interested in public sewer service. This thirty-seven percent (37%) of the responses represents the equivalency of one hundred fifty-five (155) Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Whereas fifty-eight percent (58%) of responses indicate a negative interest to public sewer service thereby representing one hundred fourteen (114) Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Five percent (5%) of responses were undecided about their desire for public service. Upon evaluation of the survey responses, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the Sanitary District to continue with the study/planning phase of the service area. This procedure is slated to be addressed in 1990. Sandy Hook Area - Subdistrict No. 19 The District is currently in the design phase of this project. The approved facilities plan calls for providing public sewer service to fifty-three (53) existing units located on Sandy Hook Road. The proposed sewage collection system is a grinder pump pressure sewer system. The treatment process proposed is that of Imhoff Tank for primary treatment and intermittent sand filter for secondary treatment and ultraviolet radiation for disinfection of the effluent before discharge into the Potomac River. Sludge will be removed from the Imhoff Tank by truck and transported to the John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plan for dewatering and disposal. IV -11 Design is slated to be compete February 1990. Construction is proposed to take six (6) months with the project scheduled to be complete by December 1990. Conococheague Domestic Waste Water Treatment Plant The Washington County Sanitary District, John "Al" Nicodemus Waste Water Treatment Plant is approaching its design capacity of 1.6 MGD. The Nicodemus facility serves existing sanitary subdistricts of No. 1 - Halfway and No. 5 - Potomac (Tammany/Van Lear) and the Williamsport area, and will also serve subdistrict No. 5-1 - Cloverton/Green Lawn upon its completion in 1990. Subsequent to the 1981 "Washington County Sanitary District Halfway - Williamsport Sewerage Study" in July 1987, the Washington County Sanitary Commission initiated a further evaluation of a site location for the construction of a new treatment facility. Upon conclusion of this study (Conococheague Waste Water Treatment Plant - location study December 1987) the selected site location was determined to be that of the 70/81 Industrial Park parcel. Therefore, the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County and the Washington County Sanitary Commission approved the continuance of the "Phase I - Planning" concept for this project. The planning document was completed and approved March 1988. IV -12 The design process was completed August 1989 and the project will be bid November 21, 1989 with construction starting as early as February 1990. Construction is slated to be complete July 1991. The initial design capacity will be for 2.5 MGD with expansion to 10 MGD. Flow will be diverted from the existing interceptor, which conveys flows from the Halfway and Potomac service areas to the Wright Road Pumping Station to the new facility via a connector line. The treatment process consists of sequencing batch reactors (SBR's) for biological treatment, tertiary sand filters and ultraviolet (UV) for disinfection. The discharge point will be the Conococheague Creek. IV -13 CITY OF HAGERSTOWN EXISTING SEWERAGE SERVICE AREAS The City of Hagerstown's wastewater collection and treatment system serves approximately 36,750 persons and numerous commercial and industrial concerns within the City. Outside the corporate limits, approximately 9,900 people are served in Fountainhead, Maugansville/Orchard Hills/Paramount, Colonial Park, Londontowne, Brightwood Acres East, Youngstoun/Robinwood Court, part of Greenberry Hills, and a small area west of Hagerstown. Service is also provided to industrial, commercial and institutional customers in the County such as Mack Truck, Citicorp and Hagerstown Junior College. The Hagerstown wastewater treatment plant is located in the southern part of the city along the Antietam Creek. It provides secondary treatment of both domestic and industrial wastes by means of grit, oil, and grease removal, bar screen oxygen, activated sludge treatment, secondary clarification, and disinfection. The plant's present capacity is about 8 MGD (million gallons per day). The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan was completed in 1976. This plan evaluated the Hagerstown system, among other systems located in the Antietam Basin, and identified a number of problem areas. Among the problems indentified were infiltration and inflow to the collection system and lack of instrumentation and control equipment in the treatment plant. In addition, some pumping stations were found to be overloaded, some lacked standby power, and sane were subject to flooding. IV -14 The City of Hagerstown Water Pollution Control Department has undertaken a number of projects to improve the existing treatment and collection facilities as recommended by the Antietam Basin Plan. The Department completed a sewer collection system rehabilitation and improvements program in 1985 which included the replacement of Pumping Stations #3 and #6 and pipe relining by the insituform process. In addition, the Department managed the design work for extending sewer service to additional areas in the County in accordance with recommendations of the Antietam Basin Plan. Plans for the extension of public sewer service to U.S. Route 40 East, Brightwood Acres, and Robinwood areas were subsequently abandoned, however, due to unfavorable public response. Plans for the extension of service to the Pangborn and Cedar Lawn areas were dropped from the State priority list for funding. Some facilities located within the Hagerstown sewerage service area, outside of the corporate limits of the City are managed and maintained by the Washington County Sanitary District with the City providing treatment only. These areas include the Fountain Head district, Maugansville/Orchard Hills district and the Sharpsburg Pike district. A General Service Agreement between the City of Hagerstown and the Washington County Sanitary District was signed on May 1, 1978. A copy of this agreement is presented in Appendix C. IV -15 The following Water Pollution Control projects are currently in progress: a. Water Pollution Control Plant Improvements - Modifications and repairs recently completed or in progress at the existing waste water treatment plan include repairs of structurally damaged polishing filters, modification of ozone contact basins and replacement of ozone generators, conversion of anerobic sludge management system to enviro gro sludge pellitization. Major planned developments within the Hagerstown Sewerage Service Area for which public sewerage service will be required and which have received at least preliminary development approval are listed below: a. Antietam Heights - 85 single family dwellings in east Hagerstown off Pangborn Boulevard (Map 50). b. Youngstoun - (Phase 2) - 200+ garden apartments of a potential 678 mixed residential unit development east of Hagerstown off Robinwood Drive (Map 50). c. Brightwood Acres East - 54 single family residential units of a potential 197 unit development east of Hagerstown off Mt. Aetna Road (Map 50). d. Londontowne (Section A) - 232 remaining units of a 300 unit townhouse and apartment development east of Hagerstown off Landis Road (Map 58). e. Londontowne (Section B) - 122 unit single family residential development located northwest of Londontown, Section A (Map 50). f. Potomac Manor - 200+ single family units south of Northern Avenue. IV -16 The Town of Funkstown operates a wastewater collection and treatment system which serves approximately 1,133 residents and the Funkstown Elementary School east of town. Treatment is accomplished by utilizing a system of lagoons with effluent chlorinated and dechlorinated by sulfur dioxide before discharge to the Antietam Creek. The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan determined that Funkstown sewerage was subject to excessive infiltration and inflow. The Plan recommended that the Funkstown lagoon system should: (1) remain in service, (2) be modified for capacity expansion with more efficient operation from 0.12 MGD to 0.15 MGD and (3) eventually serve certain areas outside the town limits. The town has completed pursuing a major project of sewage treatment plant modification, system rehabilitation, and pumping station improvements (See Table No. 14). SMTTHSRITRC, The Town of Smithsburg operates a wastewater collection and treatment system which serves 920 people who live primarily within the town limits. The treatment plant provides secondary treatment of wastewater by means of comminution, extended aeration, secondary clarification, and chlorination. Ultra -violet disinfection was installed in 1984. The design flow capacity is 0.18 MGD. IV -17 The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan found that the Smithsburg collection system suffered from infiltration and inflow as well as exfiltration, or the escape of raw sewage from the collection lines. The Plan stated that the raw sewage exfiltration was especially serious because of the potential for groundwater contamination. The town is currently pursuing grant assistance to accomplish sewage treatment plant improvements and sewer system rehabilitation. Additional capacity is expected to be needed in the future if the town's system is ever to serve adjacent areas of the County. This is a recommendation of the Town Growth Area Study. The study also recommended vigorous pursuit of corrective measures at the plant. The Town has recently completed work to flood proof the treatment plant and has relocated the outflow line. New lines have been installed to serve new residential development on the west side of Town, north and south of Leitersburg/Smithsburg Road. A feasibility study has been completed to examine the possibility of doubling the current size of the treatment plant in order to handle new development. MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION The present treatment facility is operated by the Maryland Environmental Service and has a rated capacity of 0.58 MGD. A major improvements project at the plant has expanded this capacity to 1.23 MGD to accommodate an increased inmate population and to ultimately serve the St. James area in accordance with the Antietam Basin Plan. The Town of Boonsboro provides public sewerage to a population of about 2,110 people residing within town limits. The two -cell lagoon system wastewater treatment plant with chlorination and dechlorination has a design capacity of .460 mgd. A 1989 amendment to the 201 Facilities Plan calls for allow pressure sewer system at King Raod and Route 34 to serve four unsewered homes in septic failure. A $161,600 EPS Construction Grant was awarded in July of 1989, construction will be completed by the end of calendar 1989. The Town anticipates replacement of all five aerators at the lagoons within the next two years. In addition, each cell must be dewatered and cleaned in the next five years. The Boonsboro Town Growth Area Study, adopted in 1986 by the Town and the County, identifies an area surrounding Boonsboro where growth and extension of public utilities is encouraged. Service priority designations for property within the Growth Area will be assigned once development proposals are reviewed and approved by the County and the Town. The Boonsboro Utilities Commission is willing to make extensions of the sewer system within the Growth Area but only for annexed properties. It remains the Town's policy that public sewerage will not be extended beyond corporate boundaries. IV -19 CLEAR SPRING The Town of Clear Spring completed modifications in 1988 to its sewage treatment plant that was initially constructed in 1976. The treatment plant capacity is 0.2 mgd. The treatment of sewage is accomplished by an oxidation ditch with two rotors for mechanical aeration. A comminutor, clarifier, digester, and sludge holding tank are employed within the Town's treatment process. An ultraviolet light unit as well as a sand filter is used at this location in final treatment of effluent. By contractual agreement, the Washington County Sanitary District provides operations and maintenance of the system. The 201 Facilities Plan which has been prepared for Clear Spring proposes no improvements to the treatment plant but reflects no intentions for the future expansion of service beyond the Town limits. HANCOCK The Town of Hancock owns and operates a wastewater collection and treatment system which serves a population of about 2,000 people mostly located within the town limits. Treatment is afforded by 12.8 acre faculative lagoon from which the treated effluent is discharged to the Tonoloway Creek. The lagoon was designed to treat an average daily flow of 0.25 MGD. IV -20 The 201 Facilities Plan which has been prepared for the Town of Hancock states that the existing lagoon system has been unable to attain the degree of treatment required by the current NPDES permit for the facility. Extensive groundwater infiltration into the lagoon from springs has contributed additional hydraulic loading to the system. Infiltration and inflow to the collection system has caused pumping capacity of pumping stations to be exceeded and resulted in periodic discharges of untreated wastes to surface waters through pump station overflows. As a result of these findings the Facilities Plan recommends: 1. Upgrading and expansion of the sewage treatment plant. 2. Construction of the Ice Hollow interceptor to eliminate the malfunctioning Pennsylvania Avenue ejector stations, reduce long-term energy requirements and eliminate untreated overflows. 3. Rehabilitation of the existing collection system to reduce hydraulic loading at the treatment facility. 4. Upgrading of pumping stations 1 and 2 and replacing undersized force main to allow for normal wastewater feeding to the treatment plant and avoid periodic overflows of the untreated wastewater. The Town has received a grant for system rehabilitation. Between November of 1988 and March of 1989, the treatment plant and sewer system was improved to address items 1, 3, and 4 listed above. Other improvements are to be completed by early 1990 and involve dechlorination, upgrading of the contact chamber and chemical feed building. IV -21 FORT RITCHIE The Fort Ritchie system serves mostly an on -base population of 2,200. The system has a capacity of 0.40 MGD and provides treatment by means of trickling filters. Plans are to increase capacity to 0.5 MGD within two years. PROJECTED DEMANDS Projected demands for existing service areas are shown in Table No. 9. Future demand projections presented in this table are based upon future population projections for each area and a figure for TOTAL PER CAPITA FLOW in gallons per capita per day. IV -22 (a1u) ue'is.SS M OT3 N N N N tO V 'O N O N T O N- O a OJ O W O O M m N. N N ~ pan.raS N O en '0 T O N W .y N N U/1 N a uo.IvTndOa ' O .-� 'a .o N .y (oa- ) 44TOsdes _ U04S SS W a (asa) MoTd N N ? V1 N - '0 o H e .y °.° P o tO - o ry O N `o - O O r O O O O O ~ in .ry^. gg O 'O m en N- vl b P N b 00 aD N N 00 O vo'.4uTndOd en m .Y O W vi 00 N V' O .r .-i tO N ti V (aaw) o )4TOede3 N usgsAS o (aow) v1 MOTIq 'D °D N -s O N- rn ao n Ni o M Tp;py O �Y O O .Nr O ry '0 '� O O ti O O O O in v v vt N — Ui O in - v1 rn N N - O panraSr N O Co .-' vl w O u0fly ndod o .-4 .4 '0 N .� �: e N Ts}O.I N N (O '0 m -s m en m tO •Od - (aaaaD) OTlBdIOa (�sw) t%TOede' O O O O O ti O Co O m o N V N to N o o us sAS O �p N V .-� N V1 p0 �..� O O ,- O O O (MO d m e o o N- - N o T�7QL `11 O O O O O O O E (an -a) MOt uI w /toTpernTT.TuI aew Mold TeTOauuoo /TeTRsnpul (a�w) Mold 00 w OT'�S211K1a N Pe�aS N P 'O f of .nn N o en n O P U O O N uoT4eTndod o. .. h N .-� N HypQgQj W y IV-2 NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 9 (1) SEWERAGE SERVICE AREA - That area served, or potentially served, by a system of sanitary sewers connected to a treatment plant, or, in a very large system, sub -areas as delineated by the County. (2) POPULATION SERVED - From Table No. 1-B. Interpolated for 2000 (3) DOMESTIC FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Sewage flows from domestic or residential sources. Figures provided by the agency or municipality. (4) INDUSTRIAL/CO.IMERCIAL FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Sewage flows from industrial and commercial uses. Figures provided by the agency or municipality. (5) INFILTRATION/INFLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Infiltration is groundwater entering a sewer system and service connections through such means as defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or manhole walls. Inflow is water discharged into a sewer system from such sources as roof leaders, drains, cooling water discharges, manhole covers, catch basins, surface runoff, and street washers. Figures provided by the agency or municipality. (6) TOTAL FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Based upon 'Calendar Year 1988 Average Flow' from the Sewerage Flow Allocation Table published by the Maryland Department of the Environment. (7) DOMESTIC PER CAPITA FLOW (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) - Determined by dividing DOMESTIC FLOW by POPULATION SERVED. (8) TOTAL PER CAPITA FLOW (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) - Determined by dividing TOTAL FLOW by POPULATION SERVED. (9) TOTAL FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - These projected figures are determined by multiplying TOTAL PER CAPITA FLOW for the present year by POPULATION SERVED for the planning year. (10) SYSTEM CAPACITY (Million Gallons Per Day) - Present year system capacity is based upon 'Design Capacity' from the Sewerage Flow Allocation Table published by the Maryland Department of the Environment for Calendar Year 1988. Future system capacity figures are assumed to remain the same as present year unless indicated otherwise. IV -24 O z El r". .-I .-4 -N .-4 In O U M .O O H .D O U-1 V 1 O NI e e ci - u u sa a N V n V H u •9 U U • 2f s 0 2 u 0 u d Ca O u 1- y • y Y Y O Y > N 9 4.1b0 < O L O Y Y O C L Y • L O O O i O CC i J L V a a VT. as U O .a O m ` OC L LL 'T N CJ Z V Y of C H f+ • • N A M L Sc . . >. J y J {C U q Y • V }• • C V L F as O ► Y • Y a Y Y J {C 1 0 U O L ^ 6 O Y • V a L• U U w • O O J 5.4 N O J 53 L • 0 Y O Y -� Y > C J O N O . i J i Y is p.O D U O O O • a — M a Y 4 ? L 9 1.40 it n° 2 w4 tL- IF u t°- 1°- o. t± m° .a 9 F FL- 5 a ci O b N w 000 N O ''0 . .m+ N -7 N N a o 0 0 0 0 I') 0 o O m n O O •--� O C, O O O O O O• F 0 .4 aJ C O H •11 0 u rt Cd U U H 'o d O wM 'Ci Y U44 L 'C O L C O 4. 4 u u U 4 4 4- •0 aH o — r F as 0 e a 0 N a u y H .•a w h s k O a u w e a 0 3 M ♦J M W "' C4 o C C 'J Y a M M a • 0 Y Y N a L • L U L 0 C O L M ay O . 4 • U V as U. t C U Ca ci cm O .. C O o y . v o u a' • U a y L L L O = N u C N O 0o U -4 M — b0as Y Y (d (d • a • C CC145.14 cU4.1 U H 00 N C N w O Y 4 C a W OO 00 ~ b Y .9 Y C O C • 6 -5 U y N 'C u u u 0 0 0 J -C 4 'J 9 9 -r 4. u u u M M a fi 4440 4) 0 U d Cl O 'NO V N O r n N O N N N 4i - N m N N N N m b N N b N W b tia b W N d N b b N •O b N N b N D r C FF g 44 Ca au. N N N � W Ca R W N aY b &4 6a N •0 Ca N W N aJ .4 W lu N W N 14 4440 fr U V V ''O 'b0 V b •O b m b Cl b N 'O b N as b Cl b N b V b O r b O b N .O 0.z H z z z z z z z z — z z z z z b z z z b z tO O U • — p. N •w O LC • = 'J Y N Y Cd M CO a L S N-- 4 n N s E a L O Y 7 a. u • - J ≤ O O y- 2 J 4 a u I. n 45 's O Cd Gw u Y W ` -. 1402 C N L ^ V U i - ci U a 45 • J' Y L G 4 Y S - „ =Z= N - m U Y. m = ti .0 U== 6 N 2 •� v rn nc NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 10 (1) TREATMENT TYPE is described more fully in the text of this Plan. Both TREATMENT TYPE and STP DESIGN CAPACITY information has been extracted from the applicable Facilities Plans. (2) RECEIVING WATERS The stream or river into which the treated effluent is discharged. (3) GENERATED SLUDGE information is taken from the Upper Potomac River "208" Water Quality Management Plan and represents 1978 data. (4) Little sludge generated. IV -26 a H 2 en Q�x tS � N v Czy�J7 M to O W N O N b O O N W N W O O b O b W O •p O pp O j7 444444 tJ V O O O . O O O .. O O O, t•W�� z V' N en N O• N to '0 O N oH (3 W W W W W W W W W m to e e to e to e e to to e m en o H M b P N W T .{ .4 N (OWy W W Ul N CO CO W W W Cl] S H - M a d a d a a d W M p• to p• UU v H 00 N WW N H b F�O & IbI ZZ. .{ H M C rI en I f� W gy•p W Uq� W A � W F yQ IV -27 W j j j j j 8 . 3 f - Q k2� ) / I I I \ /� ) $ ) . § �� ■k�! &§ 5! O9 2\ § ) 4o 6 d , } §�} ) } \ ) } ) j § §k § & & a * & § § , B \ ! ; 2 !� k\\ j j j } §!\ R 3 2 I §§/ \ I I I firi ) {/ [\ § Is;, q w \ { 2� k k §2§ ) § § IV -28 h A CO O N O N n In .p Q) N N O N 0- In O N O C1 [jq O N O . O O O O U� [p� $ N j[ O V in T O . 0 al P m T O. O. O. C O Cn IZi N I N I I .Fagzi W N w w w C.� In In N n m n O 41(VQ¢yyJll .1 IO n m m N n m n N C m .? .o .c .o u .c e e e WOp4 z z z z z z z z z 0144 00 G O • N N W W W 440.0 .i O.0i gcIJda '00w �Yd W .01 44 .4 od -- �X o4 8.4 00 0 o $4600 41=0 4 82 "40. Ma $40 W.'$ $40 4 I. - w= d w d w 44 w $4144 9-444 w w tl tl 6 *4 h •a 0 •.4 60 4.1460 z. 44 •44 c m X d m z o o zoo z o c • o z W o z o•c c y a 44 .0 .14 .0 .14 R, d .1 • .I •'4 pu d H {FFp{yl'1 W M CY 11.44P. 11.440. 041 0400 W O. 00 0404 W W y o o 44 o u 44 - - - o - u e 0 o 0 e o m N W '0040. O W W —pdr. 00 4 O .O W y •0. M In �hyV[yyJ}11 /l. �y O O O N - O -. O 00 CFPUo.4j1 O [1. N In V In C C C O W N N P On On P On T O O Cn FCC�i7 W Id W W Oa In Cd W W W Id In In d n b C b b en b .O b O 'n b CO COO z z z z z z z z z z d C 60 O 60 C .tli 00 C 44 wo 0i n N q. 0. d 44 .4 114 MO Z W41 444J 44 44 0. di W d 00 W 44 Y W m x W a 44 y G44 . 00 44 00 4 4 tl b tl u tl 44 60 d O 44 ..1 4444 00 00 O ..0 O 110 4444 4 0 O 04,4 0-.4 U.-4 4444 H 0.4 44-4 4J,-4 44 d 1404 4404 .40 00 440 0.44 000. tl 4 C M 14444 445 044 00 $444 1444 4444 4444 $4 C 60 0. 1P. Urn y' N W N {' N XP. U N W fn O M0� [JV O yv m Nnry O n W '1 V z I. I -CO 0044 u I M U M d M d W In M O N HC d 04-I = O 0 0 0 O .+(Old d �Rty x m .V v —.4 W d 0.4 x x 4 .14 44 P. In Y1 4 .44 0 4 d W o a u U 44.44 C .C 0041 CC O u 4414 N O W U IV -29 NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 10-A (1) This table lists only those facilities which are considered critical to the future service of significant land areas for which future development is likely. (2) COORDINATE LOCATION - In accordance with the Maryland Grid System. Grid reference shown for interceptors are the locations of critical points of most restricted flow. References shown for force mains are the same as those for their respective pumping stations. (3) CAPACITY (MGD) - Average daily flow capacity in million gallons per day for which a facility is designed. This figure does not represent the capacity for peak loads. Average daily flow capacity for Sanitary District facilities has been determined by applying peak pumping rates to the Standard Sanitary Sewer Design Peak Flow Curve. For the City of Hagerstown facilities, peak pumping rates have been divided by a peak factor of 2.5. IV -30 DO m ml m m m m 0 OW m CO Cl) m N m m m m m m 00 m m CO w m m N m O O O m m O 0 O O m m m O w m Cl) O m O O w m w H P L7 0 Q 0. I- m (0 0) (0 (0 Cl) T) Y 4M YYw- WQ7 N .1 H HHHMMMm m H HH HHNNONNN mN HHH '0'C' N NNN N C0 P r1P P MMM V V NNONNN '-IN 000 0 •0.0.0 000 NNNI lit N N M M N M M M N 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CI) P N N N M M M •pIr+� m O h NNNN N4747 N.M0000 NNN 1 1 N N NCOJN M 6 .NO h7 N4)h)hl UM1NN •000 O 0 0 00000000 000 00000000 00 000 0 0 0 0 000 '0 00 000 000 0 000 a p 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 O G a O G 4 a 00 000 000 4 000 a J 11 G A a 0 0 0 G 4 G G a 000 Q L E L L E E L S E E L E S S L L E L E E L E EL E E E S L 2 S EEL V O 0 H N H 0 N V .O N r HHH H r r r O N M m H H N V H H P V N .+•C M V V m O m m H H H H O P r P H .1 H to H M O H M N N H N N N 0 0 0 0 O N N M O N 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 (14N N O N N N N H H H 0 0 0 0 M H .I 0 N O O '-F I V H0 Mr O MN MNMN•O.ONN NNN0PHP NPNM00 N'0N h7 M.0 rr m N C`LN m V P P•OH •-IN P •0.0 a ¢ 00'400'400000000"4'4 O HH00H0HOHO•i.+.1000000000.1 •+00000.100000 Lrlla 0 V.p N -0N P•0 Mrpp V PP'r r M W WPP1P MPm000 Nrr •O.OM PPP Nrr NP -NV P PPN PMO• P P mm,mmmmmr,mm(Ommm07m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm0)mmmmmmmmmmmrmrmrmOD 00 0/ I i HJ i CIA HC A A a A A 000 'W W W W a a fits) W W WW wfO :a a a A j A W W 4WA 4 .000 X !W W W W W O) N WN W W W W W CD UI W W J A W 14 m J m W A W W W W (t Z '.Z Z Z H J- Z W J W H W Z J Z Z Z Z ON 0 WOr I r r 1- WI r 02 F- I-rr > r m H H H W tt WW H W W CC W W W CL W W W C CC H W W W W H W H W H H W W F- H W E G S G m>\ 0> O > S O J &0 7 J J a O J >\ a E )> O O) E > a E S Z » Z Eli G G IY W m W a i C M A 2 H H a H G Y. H H G Z H G H H H H 4 H a CC G H H G Z H H 4 1 L H H G W tY iL CC H H G 0 (CO W W W iC W m W W r W H r r W W W r r W O H r W r r O r r W I - W O W W r r W H r r W W r r W if W W W r r W O UICC H a H a H= a U m m 0 0 0 U 0 d U U J Z OC 0 0 0 U 2 U U 0 U 7 Z a 7 U U fC 0 0 0 d U U 0 H a a a U U 7 CC U.ft. EnWyfO XOX fmOOZW W ZZIn ZCmfiOZZN11HL1fL {aI��IIZLmO Z Z W 2Z1m ZN W ONZ ZN W ZZ NOZ Z NXOOOZ N H G 2 W Z W H 2 H H I H H H H Z H H H m I M H H H {A H H H H H O Z H H H H I H H H Z H H H W Z Z Z H H H WW a ¢ m a a a z WO H (CU N ,ti N F- 1H PO f bIs) C NNNNOO.0 MMMr r'N0NN V V M P P P OOOO.OOOO N P P P NP P P•0.0 P P P f.•.0NNNMrr OOOO.IN .0 `0 W UI M V'0 NNP r PNNN000I NNp10 mmm No. 0 NN Q mm m NCd NNP P'0 t 0 N N 00 M N 0000 O 00 N N 0 N N N r •0 .0 N N N 000 V V V V V 0 0 0 P N N N 00 .O 0000 U • O S 0:0 NNQ NNNOO HNOOOOH.I N N 0I I .I I I0 0I 0000 N I 1 I I0 I I NN I .I HHN 0 0I 0I •I .I HN N I .I I 0I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I z IY 11 W LO d E I I 1 I I 1 I0 1 I 1 I I I I a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a d a a d a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a d d a a a a a a 0 a a d 0 a \ 00 G A a a a a 4 a a G a 0.0 00 G a 0000000000000 a 0000000 G 00 a 000000 a 0 a 0 WZ 1D .JZ II l-1111111IIIII1111111111111111 I I I 11111 I' H � a tNNW O. N10 V.M PNr '7 NO 0WNOC W OPOW.0NmNONrNr M0NNm PNW NN(0p NP P N,NN rmmmmr D a w W W Nl mmmrmrmrrrmrmi m0mrmmmrmfDrr r r1 W rmrir mmPmmmrmmrmm 6 t0 S I W f a z 0 w CC C O F- rrr FFFOW 0 U a CCIXCC CCCCCCzzC G a3 10111112 000Z000HI-IZZZZZZZ(0 22122222 2222 U I- O N 0000 00 CCCC pp 3Z 3 0000000'OCf N00 W W N &0&0000 0000 0000000OCOC CCC CCCC 000Or 3 33 m H IYCCCC r L r r r r r r 0 0 0 r r r r r r E E E r E E E m m r r r r r r r O W r r r r r r r r 0 0 0 r r r 0 0 0 0 H 2 m¢ NC m N m m m G m m m CO m m m m Q a a 0! ¢¢¢ m m C7 m N m m a m m m N m m m N m m m m N N Z r r 'r G Z Z Z Z Z Z W W 1 1 1 Z J W W W W W W W W W W W W J J J W J J J Q 2 W W W W W W W CL U W W W W W W W W W I CW�JI7 WOW 'O pLp Q H Q¢¢ Q¢ ¢_I 0 0¢ 6 0 0 0¢ H H H Q H H H J J Q¢ Q¢ 6 6¢ W 6¢ Q¢ 6¢¢¢ 0 0 0 O¢¢¢¢ O O ;U S 32 I I 2 I S m m 0) 111111333133300111111120111111110) S 2.5 I I 3 3 3 I 3 3 3 U U S S 2 2 2 I I Z U I S Z I 12 2 I m m 0) 1113 I 13 LL Is. Is. U I X X U O W(s) H Z .4 .4 S • .i CUCIUY E 7 UU 00000 •007 CC WWW • r . • 22200 2 H 00 III: ¢ > III F- 0000 HHH 0 22 U U U a 0: LL Z r r r LL ¢ ZZZ N N F- 14H 14W Q Ly H H H • O G Z Z Z.r r> a - E D w w w Z W W W W 2 20x000 E >» O Z. •JJ S S r rz Y m W Z Z H I r m CCCC m m W W H Z z 222 U Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z 4 2 I I U U¢ H H M oo 022 ¢ -...-.o C¢C •I z 1-rr G 0.0 0000.0.0. 6 CC CC tt JJ a 6 00(C1210 IY CC I O W W W U U O H H .222111 m •6 r !- r .4.4.40.0.10. 3 dZrr H LCO:CCHHmmmm ZI-I- • •rHHH000 r 222 ¢ ¢¢0 CCHNmO r aa0.00m L(CJZZZ H¢¢rr 000 COZ ZZ0000 HHH W COU W 0 0D 2 ¢ F F J000 mu(C ¢ 0002000 (C LY C(W W I - U 4 a H a WWW ¢¢ H m m N 0 0 0 O • '3222(0(0(0 H H H H H 0 0p 0 H H O Q W Z m Z 2 fO 0 r r r J J J H H X Z r 0 d 3 3 0 0 0 Y Y Y 3 r r r 7 as w E E E w OC H r d a a E HZHHLC a mmm1I 400HUCCO: • HHHCC(CCC QQQ¢HHH W W Wrr Jm Q H O (C0 H H H U U .222 ¢ 0 0 • 3 r r r 0 0 0 W I CC a CC CC ¢¢¢ EZEWWI Z • 0 0 0 Z O Z 3 3 3 m m m » J¢ Q 6 •LLUU33 CCC3330 3 3 0 0000 >>> Y r r r 010.4_H OH m Ul •Z O W r r r a> a a 0 Z J J J » Y a f L u Y Z J I I CC 00 0 a 6 Z 3 Z O a 0 0 0 CC K m J J J O E K m m W¢¢ 6 a a a Z Z W H O: HWOCa0 •03332ZZ GAa0¢W W ZZ07OOO ¢Q¢JC0000 rrrZ W W W HHCCCCmmm F- m Z¢¢ Z m Z H H H W W iC L W W H H¢ d a d r r r ¢ U U U r Z Z Z 2 W W w W m r¢ OCCC¢ OOOOOaaaz ZZ • m (CCC Wm mm W W WY W W W W OYYY0AGGZZZ P n JJZ00t CCJCCCCCCCC(C(CQ¢3333 J I I O.CIZZZESEKLL W W W EEE E7 I I I JJJ W 3-3 CM 0 ¢ Q M1000000-1-14 J J Z Z m m O Q Q¢_ 0 0 0 O 0 0 Z Z Z >> Y H H H (Cr ) \ Z 0120002 Km mmLLLLLL J •CC WHH 0(CC CC ICLYIYa Q C 6(C 000 •W W W II ILL I M H IH JJO m W m mma44YYY2 ZZ63¢6Ci CCU rrr W W W • ZZZI-CCCCCCIZz ZUUU w .O 0 \ O ¢4 O 0 J Y r Z Z Q Q 6 0 0p 0 O O O W 4 r r Q 6 0 N N N a I- H H H Li HHH r tY 1y S S fC Iz r Y 1 CCIY JIY W W ZXX XZZZ W O..J 7J W 070 QSI IHH H S Z Z rl .W ZZ¢ ZCOO0000O001Y O: O .4 Y iIS IYix76W0 OIY m0:, 0:as>YY • C WWJJOm000¢¢¢ W W.m JD JZ2ZCC QQQ¢.a Q 0,0» Q iQ ¢Q.6 mm.m m!m m mim mmmmmUUU,U_UU,.000UQPCIOQQQQWWWW,w LLLLLILL'I;, 1, LL LL LL LLI 1- 1� .1 ... ..TT I.}_I,_.: •. ,. ,. "I'. .. ., 'r; . I, ,.. .: IV -31 1 , 70 mtll m m m' 0 W 0 0 03 m', m m (DO m m m CCl m Zn 0 Cfl m O to to mmm 0(9 U) m m (0 m Zn m mm O (0 lf) Ifl CC/ m In mm;m N 0 W 0 CL Law CZ }Y YY Y Lao Y)M 0r h)V0N mm0 x000 M101010 V V NNN NN 1010 d r h1010 MHH.a I0 00 N Into ONNN •+fir PHH a 1010 1010rrr NNNN 0hih1 b7.+ 000 OM 1010 0010101010dd N.iNNNMMM 00000000 O .4-4..'1000 a Q V 0000CQMv '0'00'0'04'44'0 <NN 0NN N0 Y v M mM CC W .i.M+ 4�b'1 ddmVI NNNN 0NNN 0NNNNNNNNN 1010 NNN C4NNN 000010 L]N1 00 W 00 00000000 0000 000000000 00000 G00OGono0 G0O 00 d zZ EE EEEEEEEE ZEES EEEEEEEEE EEEEE EEEEEELEL EEL Zr H N N .-4 VI H r. 10 H H .+ .+ O N r.+ HM HH.I .1 •-4 M .+ H 0 r N 000 V NH.4.I•+ VI U) M M0 V1 .+ '0 .+ M H 10 hi VI N 0 NNN.4.4 N.-400000'40'"4 N H MNN CI N N.+.+ m N N H N O.+ O N NOOOOMO N 0 MNOOOO M N 0100 r hi N.+.i M MHM N N hi M N M 03 P P m hi hi Mrr ON PPHMI MNN hi '-4.4 H V N.+.+ N N O .+ N N CC .+ o o .I o O H o o .+ 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 .40000 0000000000'4 00000.4.4.40000000000 G r r010m.M0•P hi U) .40) 0' U) M m.4 NO' N MHr N Pmm V PP 0' 00' P r r.a.+r r '00' N MN '0 dM CI' 0- 0m d ZjZ Z ZZ Z OW OW Z OM MW 0 mm a OW M M M MW MW 00 mm 00300 m m m 0 Z N 000)0 00 NW 000 00 �6y.. q W W; Qww a WW WW W WW •wm a G G, WOO W 0 00 Ga G aG UI Law K 0OH W W WI ZWW 9 a WW W W W ZrZZ Z ZZ Q HJZb.La Z. Z W ZZ W 0 U {I LL W S!- F OFF- I W IFF F1- I- FF H HW W W W W fCHH W W CC W W W WCC HH W W Law HH H HHW W Y Fm r H W Z EU CC '-oz G a E» > >> u E E a» 0. >> O> >\ O E E> > G» E E P E E E» 0ZCCQOI W Wa:HHIGfCIlHGHH CC t W HH HG HHG ZHG Ha ZCCCCHGHG W HH GCC CCWCCG f[CCHH0 0 U I � NW ZNZ mNZZ�H�IIOO XZZ�f2N ZSN W ZNZfmfI W OOZNZ NXZZ moo Zn om OOZZN ONNXXOZ H G Z Z W H4G H H H H HI H H H H I 22 H H H H W H H H 22W W Z H Z Z H H H > H I,Z H H W W Z,H H H H HH m mw DO C C ¢ C z o H (CU I ''N F 0 bim 10 NIP P PjM M M V1 Id) fiN r' 0r 03 00.+.+ N N N N M M 000 M0 V too V 101010 M r.+. -d W r 000 0 Ii NP1 ~U E K 00110 M.4C NNN r r III M M to M N CJ P N rm r N r 0 03 010 OOm0 m Mm O Odd M M M.4 V MMI U) N M MM O GC W .+.+.4 N N.+.+.+ 000.+.+ 000 N N.�4 000 00 NN 04 000 N.+ - .+00 0 O N (4.+ N 0.+000 III a a E 'C a pp l,, 6 LL a.0. ri. a.1 S a ri. 0p., ri. I A. h S S O. a n a. A. 0. . ri. LL LL a h i i n 0. S ri & u. 0. h a u S s i. a. a. R i 00000000,0000 III III III 1 1 11.1IIIIIII I I I I I II II I I II I I I I I I I I.II I Z Z R7H II I II.?Ilil ,OO to M r 1- NW M H MNr I,)OdPP d m .r N V�0 N' or to N I)U).+m.0' U)0 0' to 00' V P r.It) I U) N + rm,rmm,rmm r'rmrmmmmm:NWNNNO�mmmrmmmmrmrmrrmmmmrmmrmrma m 1¢ HH I 1 I a o UI FF Q 22 Zz 00000022 o ,p r py 22222200 3p W gpz Z z z Z Z z z z Z z a Z z z z z z Z 2222 33 0O00 OJHiC EY`L H 0 M H FO P - 10-F- F0-10-10-33333 10-0 t-0000 CC O.LW 1I0J-AFC `LU9-F to-hl0-r L 0- CS�0000010-0C`G�'1 K0 W W W OCmCCC K Ca: fmC W CCCHIQi 000 faC fmc fml COCCCCCOC fmC fff CaaC0C CmCCC OCaC aCCcc ccc CCCOC fcCO O faa COC CCCCK J fcCmCJ WIyWWfC (CC(CCO CmCCC X Z z Z W W U U U W W W W W W J J U U U W W W W W W W W W W W W O W W W W W W W U U W W W W 0 W WOW Q QIM a OZ H N OO OO O'2 Q C Q 034. Q Q Q Q H H Q Q Q Q C 6 6 Q Q 6 Q Q¢ 6 0 0 0 Q¢ Q 6 Q¢ 6¢ 6 Q¢ Q Z Fm11 C S2S2I ,U SSIS IYGG G,G GG,2SI'.I 2ISSISS3322ISSS2SSSSSI2IUSS2S2I2.2 G W C 6 M M Q M 1 m HZ J 3 CHH 4 hl FWF+ E U. SHt IA G is U 030 0 oa -I-H >a:0LLaLH00 H F 'J J Y J tt f- F- I- H H H 11 0 > > ' • CC UI a F• F- ¢ F F - 33•F•¢¢c Z CCCC 333 ¢> 0 F'• Y» F H I :CC¢ 222' Zn m &W 33 mCCCC CC 20[}10 E <¢ Q' m W ' a C"33 000 W Z 2 m UU 1 0uu 3331WI W J • • J33 .06.6. E HH H m Q 3 Zz LLZEEE CC ¢`L 6.0.0. Mm E0CCC a CC 4 HH> Oz OOO G`{Z`1 CC d H • • YY Y YF F• 000 H• • E Z Z J U U U 0 0 (9 0 I CC Z H U U U CC ¢ I- F- F• E E E "CE ¢¢¢I fC CC F u) 2 W W W W W W G m O LL4 LL Z Z u Q> fC K 4 u u W W a G P m C6.&&0.& O 3 3 3 G 0 G G E E 3 F F F O W E E E W E OOE WCCIIJ� W W ❑ Gi ji11J3 H ¢¢Q ¢F•M ZZ zH 3 w 3 - H H.0 F- F F F- W W W H H J J J O J G F F F- • • F 3 3 3 0 0 0 U CC K I W W W F aC W W W 000 ¢ Z F h. G.G. ¢ ¢¢¢¢¢ ¢ EE E W O NNNN •222 FFOUZ¢3344400 ZH W .....F 0 3 3-¢ ¢ Q H E W 3 3 3 K C<CC K u u¢ W W W Q W W W W¢ H H H ¢ Q 0 3 W W m W 0 t H F m N W W W 6 F -F• H o 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 6 Q W U U U J iC WWW J iC CC F 0 0 0 0 0 m m m•• 0 0 0 1 1 03 3 3 3 3 3 ••• G. Z Z Z W W W W u u F I 12 Q K F 00a:,4zZZ WUICCC 333 CC • C¢¢ HHHHJJ¢1-F• F uUU W Jmmm W IIy�¢ 3H HHCC fY CCJ JLC ft CCZZ ZZZ Z • • • • • ODUE E E»» JJ zZ ZJ W m P 0 4 K u 0 W CC iL iC W W W Y Y 0 0 0 3 3 333333333022 H H F- W W W Q F Z z Z G H O O U Z H u Ca H H H U O F F' F O O o 0 0 0 H H a G g G G G a I S m G a a H Q 0 0 0 iC r 7>> m a LL JJ W 0> W0 W CC a aH HtoM0FF HFFF» iCil J 2222222 W ZZ ZCCF mm m OHCC'ZCC Q G G G Z Z m m m m m m¢ ¢UUU J Q¢¢¢¢¢¢ fC m u W W W F m CC C CC 4 F 1- F \ z M H 0 Q Z G CC a H G Z Z Z Z Z z m m 2 2 2 CCa a a a CC 3 3 0 0 0 W O O J J J J J J J W W a 0 d m CC W W W J W W�yl G Z W W W W W W m m W W W W W W LL LL 2 U 0 a U 0 S I 12 2 S 2 F F 0 W W W W W LLLL L¢ Z X m m 0 0 0 m m 0 Z r 0000 F LL LL LL fY U 000 \ O I 222 J Q W W W.W W W.O 0 -0.-0 4 0 0 0 0 0U.. 0 J J z Z fY 0 W w W o fY a fYfY CCIYCL fC {� '_ CC a•a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ W WH HHH HH_ H_ 0 1 2 Z Z Z Z W W H O C ¢ ¢ H H H H H.H �'fl'7 Y JE E E .'• 0) U• O m m m m m O m mom f_ :i _ _____ IV -32 M CD Q a z O U m H N H F r W a N 0 ut co in co in N N NO O 00 ONO a O COW NNNOOO NNN NO(D0 N a N N N NO CO in to NM N N a NNN N 0 W F aH Iwo i 7 K urn 'fit I- IA N N M �FN,c 6z N H W as F H z z 0, X H N Q 3 J S H NN WW TY NNW W W W YYY MMM `0`0`0010• Nd ' C `0`0`0`0`0 NYC C NH Doom NNN Y C PQ 1`1`1`4) NNN NNNONNN NN 4) W OPPP 1101,) 1`0) 1`1`1` N NONV)NNF .4.I.IO N'000 000'0'0' -C . O 00 01060 Q00000O PO MM1r) d 0000 CC- NN Nd gq0 h74)4) NNNN . 47 •0.0104)4) 01 1047 •010 4)111 000 V7474)4] 0000 oo 000000'• 0 00000 0000 00 0000 0008000 0000 0000000000 0 00000 0000 00 0000 0000000 0000 A A A A A Ci A A A A ' A A G G G G A A A A flfl A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A x x. r r x r r r r x x x x x x r x r x x r x r r r x r r r r x x r r x r r 1`.+N NMM •0.+.+ 00 N O) N 10 P M M M'O10"-000H.40 C 1`1`001 NNC N.+.+NNO.+.40 CY C YON NO NON ONN-400. 4.+N.4.+N N 00.4.400 N.4000.4 1 .IN NNO NNNNOM MM.4 N 04 NN).+.yN .4.00 N.4H P P 0'NP NMC CN•OC CMMNCN 0'.4.41`.+N N0' •01-N.4 .100F) C N .4H 01010101` H04).4 00,.4.4.4.4000000000.4000000000.4.400000000.40.4.40000000000.4000 m�mto0mommm0wom,wowmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmtmrommmmMMMMODW 3 • 1 - a W Ca AW j , W WW ALi Iq�Li W W J A IW W .W WW W Z Z LL W 0 HJ 22 2 22 X W W WW W W -WW H W W W K W W WW H F H W W HIWW LiLi H W W J J J J J J A A Z J J x J J J \ O J J O J J A r C A r J J x r J J J J r DD G H H H H G H H O W W K H H G K H H G H G W� GI Z H H G Z H H G W K U W K H H A K K H H H H A K G H H G OF UU(N(J��UU'J HH4UU J4UU JUJU7tifri UUJGUU 7K-1 W. JIK4 UU7 W 4 U UJU U(NJ�4 7UUJCC HHCCWCC, H z H to H H H H H Cl) W W Z H MOH Z H H H to H H CO H H I H H H a H H H W Z Q W Z H H H Z Z H H M .41414 Z H H H H YI 00b NF-F-NN'NCCCO W M00000NIMM'0 N N NmmN WNNNNY0000N)N) 'HIIN NNN ON 47 10 0 Y C C r 1` r N N N Y C Y C C C 000.4.4.+000.4.4.+.4.+.4 N.4 -H NN O O H H.+N 00 O+4 H N 0.4.4.4.4.+.400 p III 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I till Ill II till I I I I I I III I I I I I I a aaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasasaasaasaaasaasaaa A A G A G A A A A A A A A A A G G A G A A G A A A A A A A A A A A A H G A A A G A A A G A A G A G A A I Ijl III1 11 C177 1 1 1 1'I I I I 1 I II I 111111 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I Ii M I 11 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 h 0'0 h m,m 1` 1`;m 'CNN mm F m.m 1') N W m W m to m m '0-ID' N m W '000 W m m m P F W r N m W M1 h O .4F - r W W m m f10.m m ,- 1 H F F W W W Y F W 1` r KKCC JJ J U K J CC CC F O O O z z z z z z J J J Z z Z Z z Z z o O o o Z z z z Z z z 0 Z z z J z o 0 K Z z Z Z z o O O z O Q O a a a 3 3 3 3 3 3 H H 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CC CC CC U 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a 3 3 3 H 3 a a 0 3 3 3 3 3 CC K K 3 CC ,t]tc_ NNN 000000 JJ J000 4 NW(00 000J07 z OOOOOOO(OOO JO N as OOOO 0 0 D 30 Q�C 0HHHCc KKK C(CLQCCCCCCCCCL 08 K K Kaaa K K CCCCCCCCCCHIXCCCCCHHLitCCCcCCCCCIXICC 222 J J J W W W W W W O O O W W W W U O W1tI W W K K K CC W W W W W W W J W W W O W J J 1- W W W W W F F F W 0 0 0 J J J O O O O O O J U(QQ'0 O O O Z Z LO O O Q Q¢¢ O O O O O O O J O O O O J J N O O O O O H H H O to Co1Z 3 3 3 2 S S S I,S CC L•Y S 2 I S I S S S I N N N z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 r 2 1414 3 3 3 2 2 2 Z S (x0 N N 2 a MIX m CCCCY zz z 4 W IKCCCCW HHH U .F 7 7 ((mC� CC 21 W O 0 0 3 06 6 222000 Q Q C H H 3 00 O O O 000000 >>> 000 N 0 O!W W 1` t»» J U W W W Y Y Y IKl' Kd' H H H K Z W W W W N N:,N NNNFF I-1-FI-NIL CO W W W QQ WWW W C U x xxx Z zZ Z W W W H H H H H.H X x x W W W O O N N N 222 F J Z 0000 SS ZZZ FY-1-FF-.I-J JJ CL CC 00 JJ J 000 C Y ZH I-F--I- O H H H N N N N N N J J J 000 000 H H H J U CC 0 Q C Q¢ O Qi JI G a a a Z S Z 2 ZZ l Y III 1- 1- F H Z C H 11112 .. ..Iv ..vvHHHHHH-0-0-0 CCUU KCC CQ CUOCCHx F ->-H Z WKCC W W O O WWW HHHZZO. H Z Z O. C J Y Y T I I I I JJJJJJfCKKOJJ J UU •F-1-1- UUUHH F -L Ka Z ZZ NNNN (i(CJJ0� (CCUO. CC CKC (IKC�J0 CCQQ6Q QOO OO'H IQ�Q 6`-�JZy+•ZUUUIII 000 I LLOZZZO C CCHHHH • U Q Q Q Q Q C H 0 0 U o:o J J -J N N Oi d S I H H 44 6 6¢ J¢¢¢ W W 3 U W O O O N 0 O Or LL • LL LL LL U H F F I- H H F- W W W 1 1 1 1 1 • • J J J N (ON 0 6 6¢ 0-0 U U U r x x r F- 0 0 0 C C Q Q C C U U U U U U J J J O 0 U' U) N N W CC K H H F- J H CC CC K ZZZZM F- F- F- F- I- F- W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z z 2 J W W w a x x C O O O N A Z Z Z F- F- F- F- W H H H W F F:1- F- F- F x a LC CC a CC 1- 1- F F- H H H H I I I CC F- F F- a a W F- CC a a s W W 0 0 0 CC fC CC CC x H W W W W W W K K K K K K W W W C¢¢¢ Q I=fIA I F F F¢¢ Q¢ K K LO W W CC K K x W N N N W W W W u •- CH *414 141414 C piO(i KKK UUU0UUJJ JNN W NNN HHH W W W 0333 I- I- W L,N UUUS W A AG J,O,..I1JJ JHHH CD C C C C C C HHH • W W W W W Z Z Z Y K Y CCCZZ W O I- W W W C C C C O r x'Z x x Z A G G A A G J J'J A 141414 Z z Z W W - O Z Z Z Z W z W N W C' ZZZZZZNNNJF F F1-F-4LLLL • ZI-F-F- NAH[CC'I MDU UU • • - CCCCC 2 Z Z Z Z Z C¢ C Q Q C S X Z Q F F- F -F -F- N N N CC W W W J JJ H 0 0 0 O H O C C C J J J J Z W W W H 14114 H H H J J J J J J Q C Q 200 0 O O J J Jut CC CC O Q C Q J J O K C to to s G r r r r J J J J W F- F- F - F FF F Fp F Y Y Y Y Y.T O O O O J J J J J Q Q Q W W W to W W I ,Y 0 0 0 C C 000W 0 W W W W J 222 A it K Ka K6Q pQQCC, r CC CC CC FY C» ) A JI� J J IJ,I F- FF- T T T J • .330 Y 0 2 2 Za CC I F- F- F-3 3 p3' 3 31414U1 H W x xSX �x xxZrzrZ CC ' Lx.tzzrSzzrrrz'Flrrzzzoi41Ql S(S40O.4Sdas a0ua'aasl IV -33 Q w m S. 0 .r 0' O S H N 3 loo 4 >O w0 M U 1141. s 0.r f H J O Z C}C H ID z H (000 00(00(00000 WWWWWWO00O00000000 O000ttiwOWOOWWO � I I I i ! ID- ID Y Y 0 M 0 CD .4f -h•0 M .+ O M•I PI` f+NNNN P<C o P M 0 N.4.+N O 0 Y)N 10 NNNN.+.4.1 -win O P N M m I7 M N 10D h ONO 000010,010 o< Y Id 0 'd NN4 •00 110 IC) '0 71MO..00 b) ) 70NNN N00 pO p0 0 0000 0 000 0000000 0 0 0 000 p o 000 0000 pp 0 pO P r q0 q0 CICIiZ ❑ L zrZr L r r rrr rrrrrrr rz m ON"+ONNOJOONO.O+N "I-frN.O-I0.1i.1MOON000o ONOO 1O00OO 00000 000.0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0� .I O O O O H O H O O O O i.+ 0 0 0 0 HI H H 1 .p N Mo0.0 mm momM P4)m PPP PNmm•0PPNO W PP PYH 1O 10NmmO01 .+.0 d mmmmm mmmmmmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmPmmmmmmmmmmmmPmmm W W P N W 0w W W W W Z Z Z W Z W Z ZZ U 0 H HW H 0: WW H WIC HW HH W WW WW H WW ZGr> ZOO. » r > 0.G r> Et O> CI' >> LG>> KW CCHGCC W ;AHHOO0:PH W GO:H GOP Ga CCGYHG W HHAHHGft WHH G W HWI-W W0:OWi-1-W W W W I-0CW WF W W W W W W WHI- WiCI-I-WI-FW WCCI-I W a� Z J U U J N a O U Z H> a U J O J J a a J P U H U U U U 1 u. H O U 4 Q W H O C Q W 'O C H a N Q W W W O f0 S Q N a Q C O Q C O 4.Cco) W O JC O lid) O W W Z Z W ICi O W Z W X O O Z W W W W O O W W S W X Z Z O Z Z O O X Z Z W Z W Z H H Y W UFH H 141111 2 H W W H Z H .411 H H 2 Z H a 1411 W H H H M H H Y W H H H U) I ¢ a IT1 .0 MMLO PP •M+m N'M6 6110 h•PO�Ip9 IYNP�N'f+f�hMrNL7 P 0.o C O1mW44.p1+.P-;.x+00 f M IAN 0 W Q.y NNQWPQ MMM MMQ 00 0m00N 10 MP Q Y<P 01000010 .010 NN 1010.p0 N .+.4 N 000 H N N.+.+.+ N 0 N.+.+.+ N.+ N NNN N .+ 0 N Cl .+.+.+a 0..i 000.+0p00 1 I 1 II III I III III I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I III 1 I I I I 1 I aaaaaaaO,aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa1CICOPaa 1 1 AG i GppCI A00p A Q Ap p p p Q G I I l i i I i 1.1 I g 11 ��1 IppI l 1 I I 1 1 0p I I I I II�II O rI i A G mr- hm,r NPlm P 1m',iW mFiN hOmNmim Nm m m m N m CMD rmmNm Or hhm� H H H!- HI -I- !-1414 H I: r Ipt IX It It u CC li LI t[ It 33Z Zg 3 3 3 u 3 0 3 COC S u iOC 3 J COC fmC u 3 Z 3 3 0 3 3 3 22222000 3 3 3 3 u u u Z Z Z 20090 Ou 4 u u O OOOOZF20JANS UOQ AO x O J O O� Z O O O OPOOOZZZOOOOZZZZ N UINNN¢O W W U)I W NQ N N CO CQ 0N0 NON NN C ¢¢ IX a IaI�0 ¢ C ¢ ¢ QW wIQW�¢W WJ W Z.W Kl0.1KKWIKI 12 -1x -J QWHW WJJ W W W W wwwW JJJJ>> WJJJ J 152II311 ININNN 2Z N(P31w SS 33 I 111111133333323333 f >} ¢aa U U H W W W H H H W i U H 2.2= U H H H • U �HJ • 002 Z M 3 C C C 3 J 3 Sp JJ,Jh ,(HC IHC 3 0003330 • IC F-111.0. 3• 'F= -F= -I- fYLUU 0.60.'CHHH IQ 3 - as a 3 U O Q S Z U J 3 J 0 11 11 E UW Z W 3 C C Q Z •0. 14 1 Z Z Z IX IX C' CC = H Q C C J II I WICC ZA Z Z a H 0 M Z W W H H H • H H H W 3 3 3 00000 W W W J C J cc C H 000 UI C O Z Z Z0: a zzzZz 0:0:0: Hz Oz Q CcH 1 •211 zZzwwW • • 1111111411 H .4a HH H .>w0.x x 0. CCH wOC Y > o00ZEZJF-UUU ¢ • 000 Or W Waa H • 0: Wa CC 0000.0.¢0. H I- O:cC > C W 0. 0 J K CICC W 0.(0 Z C J W W O OOH 3 G O❑ N O O O O Z • N W W G 3 0: H H r C W J J w 0 0.14(0(0 .-0 d J J J Y •0.C' 0. WW W WW W3 Hi -I --WO a HHHZOWA O:m WW W W3CCC H W W H H CC • CCCWJ CJ Y O H H H 0.4 140.4_i C C C> » r III Z CC IC10:0: 3 33.3YJJWO CZZZO J.0 Cr W W 333 W W W HUUU J Ha0.141 Y W %OH ppCC3 CCCCZC>CC • UUJISIAAA KHHH 0 OX X ON r Uyy� JOOO50>I Om02W JJ W U a QU H ZCC CC JOOO POCCCC CC U ?W W �J J JOOKKO: iC CC fC ,L OZ W W H W I X I0a CQOJJZ ZZZ u. H HAW O: HJJJJHO D IX HH Orin H O CCu.O.r000000 O S Y Y X Z J H I Y N 014 A G H X �Z U) C 2 J Z Z Z W H H H H Z r z z z H C C H H Q Z O O W O W H W W I O O H S O C' O J W G G} 0. 0: fL S it li 0. C 0 0 0 >- 33 I CC > W O.a 0. 0. CC J 12 W w H H J 0 0 0 U W a W W W 0 0 0 W W W W H W O O GGGOC tCH W AW 0: S SC'W rHOHHH[C OJQ JHHJHHH»> H JJJJ z W CCII 0 A Z-tC a CC ¢ a A HI-' C C C a W.Z 2>- .X 0.01111_I U U CC CC co J J J J Z J Y CU I SSS 2 1 2 H r r... . W W W W 11111-114 0 l+i ; i••i. .. i:;. 3333333 3 ;U HH'�H H H; J6WO0:.Z YQHNH 0,000s O: Z0. tCWmWO�Tm WOmWm 0)0) mm W.' WI -F- Hy-JJ»», . .' ... .._. IV -34 0 Ri 9 i Id cn crz 00 zZ W U' U U) W w CO d O a O C- 5 S 2 N C o W N O. C. O T 'C O LOa` xNXN x, x xxxXXX M 3 O T r O o u� 3 <I_i0® H I See I z a F 0 Z z z w F W F 0 Z p_ a w Ir 0 Cl) c z 0 N cc 4 cc 4 cccc 4 3 Z U)cc W U) z H W U W U O Z p W Z z tia J 30 N 3 — 1—--= ' a f /J/7i U © / nfl y s SEWAGE FLOW ALW ATION The following tables are intended to assit in the long-range planning of sewage flow allocation. This flow data is not intended to represent a commitment by Washington County or by any incorporated municipality to provide service to any particular development. The data is used for planning purposes only. Committments are made formally with sewer service providers by such means as are described in notes to these tables. The tables provide flow data from the general to the more specific. Table No. 12 compares flow allocations to available flow capacity of sewage treatment plants. Table No. 12 A compares flow allocations to available flow capacity of important collection facilities for the large sewerage service areas of Hagerstown and Halfway. Finally, Table No. 12 B lists existing and planned developments with flow allocations for each, and indicates the collection facilities to which these developments are expected to contribute sewage flow. IV -35 0 N- - 0 0O1D cc, aL ~ ) y N L N L O A.4-) a" 4)a) O\ tbp N ri rn 0 H ra L v L cd N cd cd 04.)a 0 00 0) 4-' ri � rII N W 6r4 <r-4 < P' 6 a) r -I E aa)o >+ rCC O,i- ,Oi 0 0 ri a) Ga 0< F 003 i 01 a) 4.) n +a 2W"or �� U U A N 9 O U N N l W H - ti In r4 N N I— N r-+ ri 0 rl O O 0 0 O O O' O O O If) 0Nl N .tllO i � O O O N- o o 0 O N- 0 nI 0 0 0 0 O3 r O L 0n CO +0) n) In L c oo 0 U 0 0 Ifl N 0 0 o O N ti M r 14 O m 0 0O Ill M r -I 0 O '.O o it -s '.O N i O 0 0 x N- - 0 0 M ON O O 0 r -I O O a0 ri O IV -36 in {to Jq O O ." v M in O 0 O ap O p) J in O n 0• O en M M •/1 N .y..4 •.i O O in 0 N - N. -•N000 1..; O O O 0 O 0 O O 000000 z<Wv V O N CC N n O M O 0 O W • O <20 0 w o I0 i M n O O M q M M O C 3 o N N P O inen in NI . IIIyy/O0� O O O O o O N O O O N O O - O N.rN t l OOO 000000 (0`W vl0 f VV O r O in b M in 0 •OD 0% O• r n n N y1y�J}b P O M O O O O . 00000 �Q11• O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 000000 O O O O O 0 O N N Mt0OOOO m o m o1 « R o IIi "o o N."..N+o00 1y {) O O O O O O O O O 000000 oy<.. N n N 0) t0 •O 0. W W 41 W 41 p1 41 O 'S1 V d 0 .0 0 .m1 •t ..88777 z z z z z z z M ry _ 0 N to M M W N M N N • • N to b O) WSJ1 W 0 N N N Y W W wZn • h W Y W • �y-�• o (0 - • a .1 r • .t • e0 N 0. C Ii O O W 0. W H M p - C> ■ C vl Y u Y Y y M 0 ■ ■ ,0 M M .1 •• O i • O (0 ■ • - O W • Y O 0 ...1 C 4 0 Y CMOS m 0 0 � 0 La .1 ~ 1. ■C C 0 .4 Y 0 00 C•u I. 5 C H C • O .i . H O C 11 O C u H O 0. 3 N W U ■ U C CC yII La Y ■ pl 0 O -4 .Wi Z M .1 v01 gg y�j al CO YS pa (0C M y 1,4 ��Iyy pp 10 W .1 10 C6 toId N .] N N N S < O o M t Sf to W U T\7_'7 N W of V y O .G O O en n ti t [oo[i.i O N N y N N O O N x 6 O O O O .a O O O O .I LL Oy aZ a d s S O N y n n 6 3 O - N M ... O O 0 Z W O O O O O 6 Ip6/'� O N N y N N O O O Vl O 6 W O O O O -. O O O O O q4� S 0 0 o d O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H U O N N 0 n N O O O .O O Paj O O O - .-. O O O O O O G :r -1 .y .5 N in N P .p y N II O O O O O O O Y. M O V O y .O `0 .o a .o e e .v .o v In .c O h w w W W W w13 w w W W w W o O H.Du... In N. .O N i �1 y en N. O. .n I'0 V In V v v v V O O v y 8 s .c .n .o .0 .c .o .o .e .e y .c .c n z z z z z z z z z z z z z 4 O 0o a F u C F M y N O a P4 O m 0. ..s C NI d n y P N O -I Y ' ll. - Y Y M M Y ! Y Y Y N y y y y y y y y y y y S p. W ti 0* W ti w M 0* w Ps W U N N Zto N t' m 0 O h A w m a m m ro to W U) 1 I I l% y y y y a 1V-_io NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 12 A (1) INTERCEPTOR OR PUMPING STATION, COORDINATE LOCATION, AND DESIGN CAPACITY (Million Gallons Per Day) - Are taken from Table No. 10 A. DESIGN CAPACITY does not represent the capacity for peak loads. Average daily flow capacity for Sanitary District facilities has been determined by applying peak pumping rates to the Standard Sanitary Sewer Design Peak Flow Curve. For City of Hagerstown facilities, peak pumping rates have been divided by a peak factor of 2.5. (2) CALENDAR YEAR AVERAGE FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Average flow rates are based upon records of sewer service providers. For the Halfway Sewerage Service Area, flow rates are based upon average daily flows which were measured over the last six months of 1979. For the Hagerstown Sewerage Service Area, flow rates are based upon electric meter readings to determine the length of time pumps are in operation in the course of a 24 hour period. (3) GROSS AVAILABLE FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - The numerical difference between DESIGN CAPACITY and CALENDAR YEAR AVERAGE FLOW. Where CALENDAR YEAR FLAW is greater than DESIGN CAPACITY the difference is shown as zero. (4) TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - These figures represent the allocation for planning purposes of excess capacity to existing and planned developments which are itemized in Table 12 B. TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW for each facility in Table 12 A is the summation of the allocated flows tributary to that facility listed in Table 12 B. For the Halfway Sewerage Service Area, allocations are FIRM when sewer construction drawings are approved by the Washington County Sanitary District. For the Hagerstown Sewerage Service Area, allocations are FIRM when the Sewer Service Connection Permit is approved by Water Pollution Control. In all other cases, TOTAL ALLOCATED FLAW is considered tentative and is listed as PENDING. Allocated flow for a planned development which has received an approval letter from a sewer service provider, for example, would be considered PENDING allocation. (5) NET AVAILABLE FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - This figure is the difference between GROSS AVAILABLE FLOW and the total of FIRM allocations. IV -39 i7 F Z O O O Y 0 U U o w w • « a u 0 o a s oma me M Y Y - O U �• C .',C U.' 0. N 0. a of O • O C N NN 6 • yaN • HU0to a a a a a A.A. 0, 0. O Y 14.06 0.• C C SC N 06 W 01 l'• a ma aria M C•.. MM Y Gy 0'4 0 p1.I O M pD{� Prim am ■ r ■ • 6 4 M 6 G M b 1t M M N - - - W ".'W '- W W 02W CI L' S�+5ol N a P 00 M m O �Zi ...]]] O O O N O O » O z W O 0 O 00 0 0 t.- C- 0 0 o a o 0 0 00 o 3 4 1 n n n n n n 0 s < LL0� Z N N N N N N • 1 N o W I In F 3 N ION °p N N O �IIZJ- 6 0 w nO Cl < N Ia <0 r o n Oct ON 0210 fm 100 S�SpO '00 inc Nn N.a b b b b b b '040 00 O0 p I ZW I I ZW I I 'Ld 1 I ZW I I ZW I I ZW > tl M O In < In < 4.. Z M t 0 - CL, O O m m M C O •-I o F o N C I O O Em u L u m N Co o N L M M Y < 1,U Co -C W 0 C O i 0 .4.I V o u O M H s L n o u C W •- no 7 °- a i n o z°c W U N TL M n n M Lu G a i a < I5 'O C'1 l0 •L•I Z IA m m c m m W IV -40 M 0 F O 0 O o F O YN Y • 0 - kit Mr. M- < •0 NN• u MN• MN• O N N C wN MM 6 ^•N 6 LL O O W O •w0 •0 p YI Y1 C 1 C 0 w c $$ c c 88M 000 00$ La.0 r•.°Sw ..�u� -#a1 CO N Mn MO LLZ p 0 00 O 00 fF GWd O O Odd 00 Pip. <a�� U l N N N N N N O V LL�Z N• N N N O§ O C U ~ r O Mc _ N W C1 N nn b b G 4 C to _ b b 2 41 o0 b b M +. w •01 b N MM 2 41 <O 't'0 MM Z W 00 b Z W V C r 0 0 M t1 O C. N O cm M O vi Mu on on • b� < •1-•.0 Ml b O C g41 •'1 Y' u t MM U M U 0 O 00 1O KO C 0 NC V G N O• C M V N C W C S L O on .] � u Z�� u LL M M " < u C C m o W N r 7 F W W N 'u m V d O U J O N on T\t-A 1 N ti ti N y N N • N 6 6 0.0.0. 6 pC M C C SM F •M+ •- Y h K M "C 8 M 6 K M M MD S. W W W '.SW o.Et LL .i� < U ti r N N O O LL 2 F W a o 0 I, N v < 6 o N n 33 6 L•O0 z N N vO L'] 0. G 0. CU W ` -r CO mm 00 a< IOU!) 1010 CU 8_ ZW I ZW O W W In W C u b 0 V O M C 6 W YI K o 0 M M '0 0 U U W U C v� NZG - W C U< < < Zy C O N C, S yLU V` N U J IV -42 N . I. O a C. S a .0 a a .0 n o CC d m C O O _ G- C C C a+ r 6 6 4■O. N C H OS OS SC OS 6 C 4J() 400 400 Oi OL Y+O. O- O-+ O O+ Y C •040 'Uu 'Uu 9u Ou C O O. n w aw a -s a.a a°.:a U FLL fO. aLL PaW Pali �pa o o - o O o 0 0 UI o 0 0 0 0 0 0 y n n n n n n n n V" N N N N Cl N N N 0 m y Z Pa i4 m o � U CO 54 54 N in O b O O a - N - m N nN 'flit On O Ma � N0 N0% q n O% a NO n 0 n 0 N O bo 0 C` '011% '0t4 bb bb aOb '011% 'Ob Q �OOOj ZG 261 Z W Z W ZW Z W Zm 0,1 u N Y m o m a M N O C 0 ry q M C o ZF C C N < O - E u U S - - - _o r Y J W W M H 0 60 o G I �.5 CO 14 Z C O O 'C C O 0 C ' d . w e CI M C $ O S N U uoy n tOzd5L n 44 O w< = T n f• C CI N V Vi N tTT I. I. 1V-YV O4* oI CA I I G CC a u Cry O O c ^... y o r y a a u m C C C _ Y C a u o a .t iC a O c G N O OY c C O u Y Y .J N .- . u .nl C a y y y enOJ u +) Y G u Y u y u .V y a. b a Y r m .., ..e mIC W: m J 0 a • I Y a a m YI .Y '.O• Y S u -. C c C C G {L oa y Co Y V] Co Co G V] Co C C G+ U - • •44 • .0O.O.a a .a •O m be tl. Y 0 a a wJ I.0 y L y s.0 0 a a S O C C C Y 0] Y C a a ®.4 a a 0 O O C G 0 O J J^ O J O G .- • O O .• .+ J. 00— 0 O. O. C 0.0. R y 0 0. 0 0 a R 0 0 0 -r .0 C) .0 d d 4)C d V d d- m J d O J 42 b J 0 .0. m 41 U G d Cl U .. R U Y Y Y 21 d 0. G O_ .^ C.) R U G. fL G. 0. 6 RL d a 4. 0 V L F. Q Y. .- y #. I. Y n_ 41 . 0 O 0 O Y d .> Cl d J P• 0. 4 8 V .d d d d� d •O d 9i .' 'V L a .C 0. Y a.. 0. M+^ /—I u •-4 � 1 u 4 rI W .d C C C m m m m OY'..n -I 04 C •-. ^+ 43 d ti_iH w!/ Iq ..C. .0 ~ IO I -C-1 .:O 000 'J' .-Ra } Y .0.. ? ,i:> O. C O._p ..-c .a m C m m rar"n b 4. C o S 0 U a U 'J .a N w.G O b m m-O.o 0 U C 0 5 C) U U C C a G`OC C O ..� G c .in c a .Y e a O. R R R,4 ba a G C C m I! it it it •1 m .-• r• m .I Y 040404 .,4 ..I ..r ..n m m m be V'.m m. 0 •. N d I! b 4400 - J 0 0 I d i J J 0 J =0 O Y O C - 4 O i c C Sc I! a O Y O M1`. edit r r a it a .'� a — -------en •--` .-• V .--• y y Co y V S — Z U .-+555555 U a. [. I Cr - I O O O O In O 00-0 O O O O O O O ti C) I ao IO ! N Co._O N Y 1°1 .+f -'?m � iN - '.� . 4- U I k� 5 A Pi N10 y d G. i G 000 o o O y, z 0 = N N N pwz HHO • uCA dl U a i O O - o ' � w c 00 000 N N N aOM Ca Ca el a O j N N N O 00 O O 00 .•to- .L _ 000 O N C • • G o . N • u _ •r G. d U I . .. r C C C U d . a a .-a d u b My h. i ' O O 4) 0. 5..1 O I •! r U m 4254,44 V 0 d a V _. V Y- n m q. a O 4444 Y O 0. r a C .-• 1•y y Ca a a b — a ac.— ~ o 1 o O. - m .. .i a G— 0.a0.... o S d I m .•.. I.1 mO o a m m CO E - c 4) 0 sa a s � toI bait - - at .t ca a c 01= a O 4413 O a O• I. i V I.+ a a woo 010 m .'.�≥≤t}z I O I a 42 44) n1 r V •p 4i •p 0 u J a 1-.I u Ca- Y w d d C ,•. • .0 n y a r a O a s Y .rl r.. U N 1.1 M M y u n u d i m -O. d - O S. W. S o aa� • 0 r4.5505 d.+ Cov- o r em d 4. d mr o- 'mi Y d •-y o S m t V N ...4.0 V iten 4 O a y ./. • y •n .-. a O •O a I` Y O 0 -it 'a •O C .YJ 0. •O Y J P. I r ^.I m •-- V a r r O G ... a 4,m s Cl Y r a 3 t - m a s -en • b V •.•. S V V .••I a n O -42.0 b d u Win u I.. • a Ci C S 4) a s .-.. CA O b 4. G. a Y. b] 4)0504; O - a 1 C _ G G V •O — S 0.it d CI C it G 4 •O 9 O. 0..-. m tl' •a a C m it it L O CCC n t G r L In C C I-+•i= Ocil ~ L •.. u b u u u Y O C CCC d Y O u O d a G d 00 • G a --COO G O_ O '.- O O m b u .p m C C C d O m- b t. •.� _ C M u O 5 u V a d J G 'J' `R t• J V P. a a. S `d 5440 I 140. a— [Or a. V S V O 430 Co V iJ C. S a. i V V S 00 V a Cl In O O — — N!N N N IN ['i _ _.N N N N N .•f �In SC .O sn hIa-i Ir. • J •1 at - IV -45 -" --- -- - - - a. € a C H 0- zo Zh4 OH 1 A Q 4 c OO F I I ZH £ 6 1- O p; d z w H M. a U,a 4°c, HH OH .[L'• o Z I a C P a a en C CCC 0000 0000 •N •N •.•1 to CoCa € W a1 [< [! [Y tl € ••.. 00 Co o a a Y a •> a s a d .-. VJ OJ W V] to W W W n` • a a [d € N b0 aO bu tY t b4 to to P. .r •y a a s a O C C C aaa P o'a to to to to tl a -_ m - e tl tl- tl en - P. {Y d d Z d d 4 O. C m P.•N P. G. W _ • -' A 0 a a a,.MJC Y C. ..1L11 .JY Ct0 P C C M -.K. -I-. Y C L Y YaM L d .+ YLrr•i of a JhwX�. .--1 •b o• ! a'O O C aC tl o 0 ..4 )..S 44 W 44 €4 tl;t.. C a .. . a y a y a a y a a a y -a a a L.Li •.C a t a a c a'W (G N a tow d CJ a by bo to V. toP C P o d o 0 P P •• C C N P. C i SR 3 a't I -C-. r [Y [J U • lYi: 0 O a t. O N O.O'O 0 tO C 3 V 447 N N c.nsn000 0. 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 a+l t•. O O -g y N W v O N - = o c = ci 4 o W mi O O O O O O O 00 00 e e *4 e 00 e e e e e N N N N N N N N N N Pi LI a- -. - 1 - L d O G N C• �.;�.. a i %.e' m ,yrl4'r;:.�_. .� w c C b c o. ' w i v o s bs v C v� m •-. o a+ Jb > u uS m p tl u . W W r! r ''W '•C1 'y O .Y • ,L)•C�Lb Aa - C C C .4 u.O N u'W s Cl Y P.K" V q 0,4) W Y u W. C• Oa W O€ W I•.' O m ••. O Y •p 19 M O O Ia CM - d IC H- •� O •� a 1� d tl a 4) O W U 4) j .a Ir - [ea W r —. W n q N Vf I.' a O o N .-• In ^ q •) O ^ N N I i� r.a NiN In [n lee'a In r c.fl In In e: IV -46 - NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 12-B (1) DEVELOPMENTS TO BE SERVED - include both existing and planned developments. (Note that Number of Dwelling Units are listed either EXISTING or PLANNED). Existing developments are existing residential developments which have been proposed for service by a 201 Facilities Plan or existing commercial or industrial developments which have re- quested additional allocations from the sewer service provider. Planned developments are those which have been submitted for develop- ment review to the applicable Planning Commission and have received at least Preliminary Approval and an approval letter from the service provider. (2) NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS - This column shows the number of dwelling units, both existing and planned, which are currently not served by public sewer and are planned to be served. A dwelling unit is one or more rooms in a residential building for use by one or more persons maintaining a common household. A dwelling unit may be an owned or rented apartment, town house, single family residence, mobil home, or any other arrangement which meets this definition. Numbers of dwelling units for existing developments are based upon estimates from facilities plans and design studies for imminent projects and upon County land use maps (1975) for projects to be done in the more distant future. Where known, vacant buildable lots within existing developments are listed under planned dwelling units. The number of dwelling units for planned development are based upon plans which have been submitted for approval to the applicable Planning Commission. (3) ALLOCATED FLOW PER DWELLING UNIT (Gallons Per Day) - This is an estimated figure which is used by the sewer service provider for planning purposes only and not for sizing such facilities as sewer lines. These figures are based upon metered water consumption readings for the various types of dwelling units within the two sewerage service areas. (4) TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - In the case of residential developments, this figure is determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units by the allocated flow per dwelling unit. For commercial and industrial developments, this figure is the total allocated flow as determined by the sewer service provider. For the Halfway Sewerage Service Area, allocations are FIRM when sewer construction drawings are approved by the Washington County Sanitary District. For the Hagerstown Sewerage Service Area, allocations are FIRM when the Sewer Service Connection Permit is approved by Water Pollution Control. In all other cases, TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW is considered tentative and is listed as PENDING. Allocated flow for a planned development which has received an approval letter from a sewer service provider, for example, would be considered PENDING allocation. (5) TRIBUTARY TO - This column indicates the major facilities listed in Table No. 12-A to which the development will be contributing sewage flow. Proposed facilities which are not listed in Table No. 12-A are shown in parentheses. IV -47 v v v v 'to v H M o0 o ° n w a a a, 4) N N 003 • bbo (C A A A O H w H w OriN w a° u° 4.) 00 U w�' H H '.'1 ki U N y y W 4H •ri OJ W Co Co Co r4 N 'ri U 4' l.4 CO U U U N N •r1 1.1 •.� ri M W 'r1 ri r1 ri r-1 ri 4+ H to '-1 M U Co 7 7 7 O V. 1d w w w w N M W 1.1 d 4+ --r+ CO Co Coto CO v w 4) q w u 4 410 +-' Co Co CO 0 0 L7v O CO CO Co Co L z¢ C H HM M o -r U3 t O_ 4+ 4+ 4H +J w c� < w w w3 o Z Co Co COW CO O w M. C 0 11 How H 4 .-1 ri r-1 A u .-1 o ...Z L" 03 N 00 7 71 N W W W 0 N W L] � O oz z z4<z O d 00 N .-� rn O <o Z^ UO L/,M V,O 00 M CU 030 00 -t O C 4 'o'0 '0'D � �c 'o �, V zw zw zw zw v It v-40) H M C, \ D .-i A .-+ ..00.. It 1 b l o U rn N .t ..y H'.4 V "" \p H O H I. H p M N F+ L 7 41 04 4) 4-) C.1 WCO WCo x N u1 N M NN •r1 v-1 •rNI w 0.'a y ? H b A A N M N tO .C to IO ✓ to w Cl)'-' w Cl)'-' IV -48 z m N O 0' 0 a'O •-10 O O)\r O` \ o,41 U N - N N C W V n 3) O U Z W 01 w M 4) —_ 01 v )1 v W a 0000 CC O Q CL CO 4J' m C V N U 0. V W N 0 p u a z w w w w w a o' w w u w y d w u Z __ C C K a $3 B W qq 6 B C u 6 C D. O 8 0 0 4 0 U U U O U V 04 U 'C m '00 O O O .00 J .0i ELL1 m6N o .w O.'N.-, Or,O •+6 m,•y��!+' Hv -I .r w$n o '0141400 rn IN O. W M q owogw Vt V i-IW '0'-..4 v .1 TNWv n w ✓lvyv Fi I4 -tq en N N G z 7 N F o o .-� O 0 F V a O O "+ T o 0 -Y ) N N 4 F O N m en O O o o en N O VNy Z it C o m y 41 w F 4' S 00 O G 3 .° I 4 m m LOU x C '.45 N N W W 00 H U M G 4 N •O N „Ow V N 'Ok, N IJ M N U M N N L M ..{ a 44 Ot 4 O N 4 -IC N 4 V M M M A C O N v O G 44 x 1-4 W 44 U ONO1 00. 00 0 u 0 0 O w u N C-4 ' 44 C w u W I N •. a C 01 u HO u 0) y C 41.-I U'� H m H 44 4 H )' 01 N u H.1 0 C .'-4'3 ri • N "i 44 G. O 1 -IN- U 0i4 H T H 44k, "' it'H 440 W N C d 'O N rl '4 -IC Y .y C u mM 'm° a g N S 3 y G .0 .C SC w C y 4 U 0) 00 0 N O on 00 8 W 4 U N U COO 0) (0,414 O) 8-4 N row W e a CC 01 '.i 0 Out ♦a) _H Z N ro !JT 0 N N H N 4 44 U y WC U T H N 044 'OC 4 H N _H WC N W .O ti � > H .O LOU M RJ 1-4.-I LO.4 P. 0 '� U 4 W O ro 4 444 ry 1~/) w V 3 a H q U W 0.14 C (/)_H Z M O h O W •O D. -4w HN 'Urn O 00 )O O 4040)O v1 <O 01 O Vlr Nl T <40 II II I O14O 4001 'Din 'Din Z Z W z w IIW Z k1 1 1 z w z w z w N qq it a u d - N C N 6 u y N u 0) H U 3 u C B ({a, t� W 8 N C . 0041 N W y 4 0 O (0 LLl row (OT H H 00 .01-4 OH W N M N £ ro w O • N it 01 L y3j 0 T U H Y 4-) 3 N 00 00C N it .44) b U N Co -it x 'UP. S — ti — UO3a 44 ( 44 S >. U N v0. O L u U N Q M o u R 01 U m M m a u CC H x i H a u T W 00 O Cro.. w C a 0 T .04400 in y c' 44 :30''-' .3. 3 3 0 F IV -49 0 .r O z 00 N F d d Y d d 0. 0. O O 0. 0 O O U -4 00 W V e Y l� d• 000 d• mm 41 Y Y p mm (ZJ d F F 03 03 M d d F F C r .1 •1 W Y 'O W 8 F F 0303 g 8 O o U 0:3 0:3 a O o 0 U w O'4 U U w ...1 O L ES ,� d d d d d d U •• d d Y d d d u ? a .r •-4 41 ti m d 23 e 0g '. 9 9 g U U U U U U U W O o o O�-�� O; P o. o 00 o H n O 0.-' N .-• o• •. �WMQ vw owe � mW� O S C o C O o o O n ' o o o n e hi N n -S z M N O u ,O W 031.4 4 L u 0303 041 4) l� -4-4 w "1 4143 u 0 d anl� d u> W Y W W m O '.441 w y C y w H .44) W Y C V W 038 00 0 T _4 .4 u m • u m C U C L g 0 0 0 m 0 C .Fi O W u H > d IN00 H u -403 W F o 03 0. o m m o .Wiw m 6 Y 0 0 H q d u 1(1 e L m .,.4 m 8 F d 030 d Y W V F 003 Y 0 L '.403 w p O C m u w 0. 41 m 0 m '1 N ,.4 W w 0.03 L0 0. W 1403 d w Y Y O Y Y Y m O d C• 01.4 u d N d l� 0 w m M u 00 E'-4 B• d 04 r0l u w • C O N 4103 u d 0 O d 0 C w d W m W rl Y 4 Y +03 x.01 4 d ••1 vi 4 .030 d V m Ym V H Y Y d rl O �V dm d 0 V d 0 0 u> W 000 .4 003 mm0 3 r0 u'41-4 15 0341 0314 0. r4 m r-414 .C 4343 N d 4 y T y 8 d d d H d ri 43 W rl N 4 C Q vi N W N v1 U a u a F z M 0 F V 0 m b 4n O- M O- 041 •o .o .VO e e •o •o 0 a II II .c •o •oo 40'0 'D.0 z� 2W zw II zw N 41!� R \ d m m m ni 4 4 O 4.4 O 0 0 0 O F .I 4 4 u W .0 p 10 O O N > W m ? m W Y u N C 4 C G ua0 F •O '-4 '.4 O 03 41 O 0 W N h .03W 00 000 4 0 00 0 } U m 04 0 F^ 4 C .0 .0 O H O 0 W L L m o u '0m q O .Y C 0 m J 0 6 B 0 0 0 a 4 N N o n a LL w 00 O V T W 00 o w OO O C 0 yO U CC F. qoq O O W C O O O E 0315 F F F H 3 N H H IV -50 v v Y Y a a Y H Hp. rn g U U U to C O H H W z ' Y Y Y C Z3 H u H C a v P. 6 a P. w F O C• U V U 0 W°1 C a Y top. u u u m z v P0 a a a C �z P. Ia 0 O C> 0 0 g0 C U O a 0.0 0 0 U V O U 0 U .- N O O O m O O O O r, O' mP.0 010 (ajJ o' W 'o C N N N CI -s Z . F yy�� S F O O O O O O O -4- O ^ ^ ^ <I- O O E" ^ UO O u1 N of tY^ ('1 O n an w C C C H 00 O a Y Y C Y H 0 u ro O Y O. Y a ro M M N 4)4' 0 o C m 0 3 110 110'.- ad a 0. u a ro 010 01 M H W N N 4 H?) O .I Cl B W C o W a'O a 00 Y b C N O w T N ro a 0. u Y 0 Cl a w m co m Y > - v v P.0 C 6 a w C W v u b e 0 W O N 13.0.-) a o O 0 0 O N O 0 0 C N A 'o C C. W a Y W . H 13p N H a 4a0) H O Y O Y a Y N w Y x p• C Iro0 N Y N H ri N W W H N ro .-I H P11 w pu w U M Y .0H N C340 O G • C 0 W C 7 a aL a m EO P.0 H u 0-00 g ro ro u ro Y Y . 4 a 00 td C '0.0 v'0 a o a o c u u V it a o u w Y N 4 0 1+ 0 a • a M a a N 'O 0 m Y• W ro my m H g ro.+• W0 w P13.O w b.C m o M w m U N a (j1<0 m Y NO Z M O 'n ^ V1 n COO) O0 .1 m V 'cm 'can m .O CO o• '4'c 0 'O'? 'VT 'O v1 'it '-� zw zw Zw zw ZN C 0 H Y Q U W to W M Y O H OP 0 H 00 a U N 11 M N LLI w p 1013 Cl) m 13 U N u W M 4 O H+ H OH In W u T Y N H H U U to b H H V T 6 0 m p. C Y m h u 3W J H W!• w ro Y u H O 0(013, ..] 1 ro O J a a G P OH v1 Y 6 V W Ox N L U y W O C W O S W ' o m Y w g P. U 6 O w O O O 'y W O 0 W W T O ,C (� •-OI Y a IV m v ❑ v -51 - F S H 'V 4J NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 14 (1) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY, OR DEVELOPER - Responsibilities may include project initiation and management but not necessarily financing. (2) SEWER SERVICE AREA - That area served, or potentially served, by a system of sanitary sewers connected to a treatment plant, or, in a very large system, sub -areas as delineated by the County. Sub - basins refer to drainage areas shown in the applicable 201 Facilities Plan. Subdistricts refer to Sanitary Subdistricts of the Washington County Sanitary District. (3) LOCATION - In accordance with the Maryland Grid System. (4) GRANTS ELIGIBLE - Dollar amounts indicate funds for which the project may be eligible from sources shown in parenthses. Source abbreviations represent agencies and programs as follows: EPA - Environmental Protection Agency MDE - Department of the Environment EDA - Economic Development Administration UDAG - Urban Development Action Grant CDBG - Community Development Block Grant FmHA - Farmers Home Administration ARC - Appalachian Regional Commission HUD - Housing and Urban Development Grant The local cost for any project may be assumed to be the total cost estimate less any amount shown for grants eligible. IV -52 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT' Sludge is defined as the solid residuals of sewage treatment. Primary or raw sludge is obtained in the primary stage of a treatment plant by collecting solids that have settled. Sludge is stabilized after the organic matter has been decomposed into a relatively stable material. A common method of stabilization is anaerobic digestion. Sludge management is an integral part of the sewage treatment and disposal process. The disposal of treatment plant sludge is regulated by the Maryland Department of the Environment in accordance with the Code of Maryland Regulations 10.03.48. Sludge disposal sites are approved after an analysis of such factors as the site surface drainage, soil type, depth to bedrock and sludge composition. Several methods of sludge disposal are described in the Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan. The methods include land spreading, incineration, ocean disposal, sanitary landfilling, and composting. The key methods of slude disposal in Washington County are land spreading and landfill. Land Spreading Land spreading refers to the process of sludge application to lands used for farming, forestry, or recreational purposes. Sewage sludge is generally not as easily handled nor as high in nutrient content as commercial fertilizers. However, it does greatly enhance soil physical fertility when applied to marginal lands. IV -53 Sludges may contain pathogenic bacteria or viral organisms. They may also contain heavy metals which could pose a threat to public health through transmission of toxic levels in crops grown on treated land or through leaching into groundwater. For these reasons, sludge must be stabilized prior to land spreading to reduce public health hazards and to prevent nuisance odor conditions. In order to ensure that harmful contaminants do not enter the human food chain, sludge application rates are controlled and crops grown on sludge treated land are restricted basedupon recommendations by the University of Maryland. The University of Maryland warns that "sewage sludge should not be considered an innocuous or harmless product. The implications of the uptake by plants of heavy metals and persistent organics from sludge, their intake by grazing animals, and their ingestion by humans are not entirely understood. Therefore, the University of Maryland cannot predict the long- term effects of sewage sludge on the environment and does not accept responsibility for any such effects."1 The Upper Potomac River Water Quality Management Plan describes further implications of land spreading. "When contemplating instituting a land spreading program, municipalities must consider the availability of land, the time frame within which that land can be leased or otherwise controlled and potential alternative sites. Should public pressure or public health considerations cause termination of land spreading activities, IV -54 municipalities must be prepared to undertake interim sludge disposal operations until more acceptable permanent solutions can be devised. Similarly, it must be recognized that land for sludge spreading may have a finite useful lifetime. Thus, additional land should be available nearby. Gaining access to large tracts of land is always difficult near urban areas. Hence, land spreading of sludges may not be a realistic alternative for most large metropolitan areas, especially on a long-term basis. "When land is to be leased, or sludge is to be sold to private landowners, municipal officials will have to deal with problems of general acceptance. The extra time and costs associated with transporting and spreading sludges, a natural reluctance to work with sewage sludge, and the limited nutrient value compared to commercial fertilizers may make it difficult to sell sludge to farmers. Where sludge spreading is an attractive sludge disposal alternative, wastewater officials will need to have the flexibility to offer additional incentives. These would be most effective in the form of indirect subsidies such as free delivery of bulk lots of processed sludge and low cost rental of spreading devices. Municipalities should also consider the possibilities for nutrient enrichment of sludges to enhance their value to the farmer. This could be contracted out to a private fertilizer concern."2 Sanitary Landfilling Sanitary landfill of sludge containing no free moisture, either separately or along with mixed municipal solid waste, is an environmentally acceptable method for disposal of sludge. The sludge must be stabilized as described for land spreading in order to prevent nuisance odors and reduce hazards to those working in the area. IV -55 The relative benefits of sanitary landfill disposal are discussed in the Upper Potomac River Water Quality Management Plan as follows: "Many of the considerations that must be taken into account in evaluating the land spreading option such as protection of groundwaters are pertinent to the discussion of sanitary landfills. Typically, however, sanitary landfills have less problems with surface runoff, and uptake by crops is generally not a prime consideration. Further, sanitary landfill obviously requires less land than land spreading. The trade-off required to obtain this added protection and decreased land requirement is the loss of most of the advantages of resource recovery realized in land spreading. Landfill offers little more than the use of a solid material to fill natural depressions or replace soils or gravel that can be used elsewhere. Areas where landfill has been practiced can be reclaimed for recreational or other purposes."2 NOTES: 1. From Sewage Sludge Procedures for Approval, Division of Solid Waste Control, January 25, 1977. 2. From Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan, Maryland Water Resources Administration, September 2, 1976 (Section 12). IV -56 Sludge Management Practices in Washington County Table number 15 provides an inventory of current sewerage sludge generation and how it is utilized. All municipal and non -municipal treatment plants that generate sludge and have a sludge utilization permit are listed. Sewerage treatment plants for the Towns of Boonsboro, Hancock and Funkstown utilize lagoons and therefore produce no sludge. The majority of the sludge produced in Washington County is disposed of in the Washington County sanitary landfill. The remainder of the sludge is disposed of by landspreading. Non -municipal treatment facilities which transport sludge to larger plants generally do not have the facilities to adequately de -water the sludge. De -watering is provided at the receiving treatment plant and is either disposed of at the Washington County sanitary landfill or landspread. All sludge transported to the Nicodemus (Halfway) treatment plant is disposed of at the landfill. Some non -municipal, package treatment plants produce insignificant amounts of sludge, however, these plants do have permits for disposal. The method for utilizing or disposing of sludge generated by proposed sewerage treatment plants is discussed in the narrative for each new project addressed in this Plan. IV -57 The City of Hagerstown is currently constructing a sludge pellitization plant. When completed, this plant will completely replace the existing anerobic digestion process. The new plant, which is to be completed by May 1990, will be operated and maintained by Enviro-Gro Technologies Inc. under a lease agreement with the City of Hagerstown. The following is a general explanation of the sludge pellitization process. Sludge produced by the treatment plant is gathered together and thickened in a holding tank. Specification grade sludge is delivered continuously to the pellitization plant during one shift per day. Once in the plant, the sludge is conditioned with a polymer additive. The conditioned sludge is pressed in a belt press and placed in a rotery kiln where it is heat dried. Sludge pellets are produced in the kiln and then deposited in a silo for storage. The pellets are then shipped to a fertilizer manufacture. The City of Hagerstown, Water Pollution Control, waste water facility currently produces 1179 dry tons per year of sludge which is disposed of at the Washington County sanitary landfill. Four hundred, fifty-two (452) dry tons per year is disposed of by landspreading. This will be eliminated once the sludge pellitization plant is placed on line. IV -58 O paq W� [c7] [pagj �QJ7 ((aq] W W k7 (D 6 C G G tL N O en .v ! W m N ti n Ol OD M N u7 0\ N r LAI• m M M 00 p o p0 ,O -$ .r-1 .-i ., .-i I I I I I f1 r 4 .i .-1 H rY 'i .Y H ti r-1 -I N N N NNI N N N N N N N N 00 e0 m a0 a0 00 m of m CD CD W ° C` I I I II I I I I I I I I CO In COCa N Ca y h h y N O1 OOA pNp Aa o� 0. .{ kg 1� a}NMI T W ,4) W 7 S '-4 fl pe L I'J 4 4 'O - Y 01 H L B B y y O 0 0 O y O O y°i sp p 2 4-) 4o • Cd Ca V V r° $ , 4 °' as ro o aim) a .y°1 a, y(a o, .-1 H H .-I L ( yy L �C4p poA (L. I L C ae y 4 yC H i-I fl Lz Y �-] 4� H H H [: El V Ca a '41-i a a a ro d N LA N a a a ^ 1nH O O a a a Vl N V1 b ifmpr(� yyN Gi m M ro N H .0 a u H m Q W N a h v a u a 00 A C '-4 A ,� Ca a Ca N W T yy� N y W s pNp 7 N W Ca y O N 0 W Ca A (Ul 7 N 01 N A IV -59 w W A A 44 W v W If 1 ti O O t-- M N a0 y n O O H1 1 H i u u Ci N 'i N N 1 N - N i N vV • 1.144 M 144 a0 W �O �4 co m m W v Mg 3 Yoo 0O a N Z N h to to to to W {W u 0 C O O) yy 4 H N U 0. o m 00 0 0 a a cL a q 0. In 3 00 U 0. i 8 $ F6 0 .C u 1„I yU U O. N .-NI O T! • R 4 s z z II U z• U 1.J b 0m w C O O H O 1tla EOp O= tOa C YCO O C C F 44 O M +i rl u p. •..4-1 R y Y 'O N ym Y a ..FI N '.I S - 'N H L 4 P. 6 o 0. o , M P. Cd 'o 'a0 'CCC C N T 'w0 'O N1 1l 'C r-1 aE a�-'C H4 HO 0 Zr 0 v - O'.N °" 01 a u N 00 00 00 00 00 H a a a N 'O 00 v 00 w a w 00 00 M CO 3 3 0 a '-I N N W ,4 N N a .O a u m u v w G N V L 44 N N m a a 0 00 00 00 F - 4 01 L N a 0 N L N CO v u a H V 0 N x m w w .. u . w y 3 q a C Ct N 01 x ° 0 LO w O 'O w '.I C) u P. 0 IV -60 Notes for Table No. 15 l.) Information provided by Maryland Department of the Environment, Solid Waste Management Administration, Sewage Sludge Division. Type of sludge produced, method of disposal and permit number are obtained from the applicable sewerage sludge utilization permit issued by the Department of the Environment. 2.) Information provided by the Maryland Department of the Environment, Solid Waste Management Administration, Sewage Sludge Division and is based on 1984 data. 3.) Indicates that very little sludge is produced. IV -61 POLICY FOR SEWER LINE INSTALLATION IN AREAS WHERE SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE In order to prevent street and other damage encountered in providing public sewer service to developed areas, and to provide for efficient and effective connection to public sewer service, the following policy is presented for sewer line installation in areas where public sewerage service is not available at the time of street and residential construction, but will be made available at some future time: 1. Requests for such installation will only be accepted where interim systems are permitted and public sewer service is programmed by the Water and Sewerage Plan (S-1, S-3, S-5). 2. Each application for a sewer construction permit must be accompanied by a letter from the County Health Officer requesting that such installation be permitted. 3. Building permits, subdivision plats, and septic tank approvals shall include a provision requiring the connection of the premises to community sewerage within twelve (12) months of announced availability. 4. Sewer lines shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable municipal or Commission specifications. 5. The connection of a "dry" system shall be plugged with a visible and readily inspected plug at the future point of connection to the existing system. IV -62 POLICY ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVE Individual On -Lot Systems The traditional septic system should not be discounted as a permanent means of individual, on -lot sewage disposal. Such systems must be properly designed, constructed, operated and maintained to ensure permanent, environmentally sound service. A number of alternatives to the standard septic system for on -lot sewage disposal have been identified and shown to be operationally sound under appropriate circumstances. Such systems include improved septic tank -tile field systems (multi -tank and alternating fields), aerated tank -tile field systems, mound systems, and systems with toilet sewage separated from wash water (composting toilets, incinerating toilets, and liquid recycling toilets). The high cost of central sewerage systems and the fact that on - lot systems are currently failing in some areas is sufficient justification to experiment with techniques that are not yet proven.2 Alternative on -lot systems should be preferred in rural areas where there are existing sewage disposal problems and where they are found to be economically and environmentally sound mehtods of correcting such problems. All plans for the correction of wastewater management problems in these areas should incorporate measures to assure adequate maintenance of new facilities and to reduce sewage generation. An important product of the Washington County Geohyrologic Study will be the identification and evaluation of environmental applicability of alternate subsurface disposal technologies practiced in other states or nations which may be applicable to the hydrogeologic conditions of Washington County. IV -63 Under authority of Health -Environmental Article Subtitle 9-14 and in accord with COMAR 10.17.16 Washington County now participates in Marylands Innovative and Alternative On -Site Sewage Disposal System Grant Program. The purpose of the program, as stated in the Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington County Commissioners and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene "is to make State grants to counties of this State who, in turn, will make grants to owners of improved properties with failed systems and owners of previously recorded land that has failed a soil percolation test, to install and experiment with new innovative and alternative on -site sewage treatment and disposal systems in order to develop additional types of on -site systems that can be utilized." Washington County was awarded a $37,500 grant which will be available to private property owners to pursue installation of these systems. Community Systems Every effort should be made to investigate the reliability and desirability of community sewerage systems which could serve as appropriate alternatives to conventional central sewerage systems. Such systems may be used as corrective measures to solve existing sewage disposal problems and as interim or permanent measure to serve new development under appropriate circumstances. Alternatives to conventional systems should be preferred where they can be shown to be more cost-effective or more compatible with the function of natural systems. However, in comparing the cost -benefit of conventional and alternative systems, consideration should be given to the contributions of federal and state grant funding to reducing not only local public costs but private costs of facilities to the housing consumer. IV -64 Within growth areas, pressure sewers and vacuum sewers may be more appropriate and cost-effective than conventional gravity sewers to provide permanent service to a given development. Such measures as dry sewers should be evaluated as an appropriate interim measureuntil sewer lines are extended to a given development. Within rural areas, community sewerage system alternatives acceptable to all approving State and County agencies should be used where they facilitate the clustering of rural housing and the preservation of agricultural land. Some alternative systems which are appropriate for on -lot disposal lend themselves to the clustering approach. In addition, such land application methods as spray irrigation and overland flaw may be appropriate where sufficient land is available to be permanently set aside as a community disposal area.3 NOTES: 1. See Report to the Congress, Community -Managed SeDtic Systems: A Viable States 2. See Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan, Maryland Water Resources Administration, September 2, 1976 (Section 12). 3. Land application techniques which are currently permissable are outlined in Site Selection and Evaluation Guidelines for Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters (Maryland Water Resources Administration) and Design Guidelines for Land Treatment of Domestic Wastewater (Maryland IV -65 POLICY ON INTERIM TREATMENT PLANTS* 1. An interim treatment plant is acceptable as long as it is an interim step in a regional long-range sewerage treatment plant with a specific date by which permanent facilities will be provided. No permit will be granted for an interim treatment plant which is planned to be in operation longer than five years. 2. The State will issue a permit for such a plant only if it has been included by the County as part of an approved 10 -year Water and Sewer Plan, and adequate measures have been taken by the County to assure that growth will be limited to the capacity of such treatment plant. The State will approve only a limited number of such plants and only where they are compatible with appropriate regional plans for such sewerage service. 3. Any such plant must meet all applicable health and water quality requirements. 4. Privately financed interim treatment plants must be publicly owned and operated. 5. When such a plant is proposed for a sewer system from which raw sewerage overflows are presently occuring or threatened, the State may require the capacity of the plant to be enlarged to provide capacity to alleviate or prevent the overflows, where practicable. Financing arrangements for such enlargements must be approved by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. * See also the Washington County Sanitary District's POLICY ON INTERIM AND PERMANENT COMMUNITY WATER AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS in Appendix D of this Plan. Policy on Interim Treatment Plants Adopted by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene - 2.5.73 Approved by Council on the Environment - 2.5.73 IV -66 PRIORITY AREA REQUIREMENTS The following requirements shall be applicable to each respective designated priority area. 1. S-1 Priority Areas (Existing Service) a. Individual on -lot disposal systems including approved alternate on -lot sewerage treatment systems shall not be permitted, except as follows: If an existing community sewerage facility is inadequate or is not available*, an interim individual sewerage system may be used subject to the following conditions: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations, including minimum lot ownership as set forth in Regulation 10.03.28.02 and .03; (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within 1 year or less after such system becomes available; (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner. b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall be permitted and encouraged. *The adequacy or availability of community sewerage service to a particular parcel of land is a judgement which must be made in each case through consultation among the responsible agencies and cannot be made of the basis of this Plan alone. IV -67 2. S-3 Priority Areas (Five Year Priority) a. Individual on -lot disposal systems including approved alternate on -lot sewerage treatment systems may be permitted on an interim basis provided that: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations, including minimum lot ownership as set forth in Regulation 10.02.28.02 and .03; (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regardiState may require the capacity of the plant to be enlarged to ng the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within one year or less after such system becomes available; (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner; b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall be permitted and encouraged. 3. S-5 Priority Areas (Five to Ten Year Priority) a. Individual on -lot disposal systems including approved alternate on -lot sewerage treatment systems shall be permitted. b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall not be permitted, except as provided by Policy For Sewer LIne Installation In Areas Where Service Is Not Available. IV -68 c. New, permanent coma unity sewerage systems shall not be permitted. 4. S-7 Priority Areas (No Planned Service) a. Individual on -lot disposal systems including approved alternate on -lot sewerage treatment systems shall be permitted; b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall not be permitted; c. New, permanent community sewerage systems shall not be permitted. In all cases where interim or permanent community sewerage systems are permitted, they shall be subject to the standards and regulations of the applicable State and Federal agencies. Adequate documentation that the State and Federal standards and regulations can be compiled with shall be evidenced prior to County Plan amendment consideration. ALL INTERIM OR PERMANENT COMMUNITY SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, OR MULTI -USE SEWERAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE APPROVED BY AND DEDICATED TO THE APPLICABLE AGENCY FOR OWNERSHIP, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED COUNTY AND STATE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES. SEWERAGE SERVICE PRIORITY AREA MAPS (1" = 2000') The maps on the pages that follow show existing and planned facilities and service priority areas which are based upon a ten-year planning period. These maps utilize a 1" = 2000' scale base taken from the Washington County Zoning Ordinance. Letter designations shown on the maps are zoning districts for which more information may be found in the Zoning Ordinance. IV -69 While every effort was made to insure accuracy in the preparation of these maps, errors may have resulted from the transfer of information from maps at different scales. The classification of parcels of land as having either existing service or planned service was based upon the location of existing service lines and upon the best estimates for future service by the service providing agencies. Because of these inherent accuracy limitations, the maps should be used for general planning purposes only. For certainly as to the exact location of facilities or to the status of particular parcels of land, service providing agencies should be contacted. Changes to these maps which may be required by errors or inaccuracies may be made in accordance with the administrative procedures set forth in Appendix B (Page B-11) of this Plan. IV -70 3c , � 7 t § " k k S. ; ;S. f , k § ci I- k ( Fe k § _ , _ _ , : e ., o .p O . � 2 _ ° 0 & § • ■ x_§ oa)- -}�0 - —— ■ \ _ _| C gk� aI I ) t! -; '- . ,' co`e ;�� ■\§ §■,� _ §§ . _ fig§ E $ ' Z 0 ' . [ _____ O . � 0 >- 0- 4 L 'w V Q w w U) >- Ltz OO OF - LL Q Z W V U (n ≥ W W Cl) 0) d O O O 2 a C (0 X W ..... ii a D ■ ■ J O H H Z W � N O Z O D Z Q Iii I- o- 0- Z W U W Cl) Cr w z _ 0 W 2" cr O t V 0 ' ,,U) W IL) d z 0 Ui 2 z Cl) Ln IL 0 a_ w ix w w ctz OO as z W V' S25 N> w LL Li t d C C E a 0 C w C W 0 .... .... N C N � " N Y " N • N """ • N T N M NN N N N i Y N Q '" NN NN N N N N N "NNN in a. N NNN N N N N N N N N N R " N N NN N M N " N " MN N IN N N N a a 0 a LL D ~ z w N O z O 0 z Q � Ui a M a y O a a w w w U H z o U) U w O J+ .. > 0 0 • O N in a:•: Zw a a V cO0_ F a 1)4 U.// Jo jyly I , ___ __ i v• •.. I I � � U •� E r Ltz OO as Z W U 25 >w w a o w U) 4) O O O a` ►� a 0 C N W 'w V cc w w a D ■ a a zz w Cl) z 0 o Q Iii 20 a. n 0 z a W CD W U) W CD W U) U z Li 0 U. O :•: 0 cn In d :: Z a Li z z N N H Q j —Q N •.11 x M Y R x E R R A % " -R x -r -x- Y RRYR .N: "n ... . - . ..:: ... ..`........ z.... .. a... 0. . Q N a a s I ur 4• rf ( f• � 1 T1__ � r 4l - b c 00 aQ z W a' U Fn j W co W (n V d 0 0 O a` 0 C N X W w CD a cc w w _ I ■ a D - z z wCD N z 0 Iii F- D c- o Z a � w a Cl) w CD a C/)? w iii It o 5 O Lii t O :: fn In a z a Lii z z N N a V LJa- r xx F F X\x M XY fL�J( I� 'Tx z�' X %' / XX K %-�Xrr XaY�'%Y Xxa A% %.X x xX�p ix x YXwI,X I i MMX��// X Y x x Y X A; . x. X x •. w �xw'k Yxlsk "% x X !% .•x X% xY % K K. N "XX Y% '. Xi i z # x'.F ]tx%x Y' x ..q } Y •a'. X ax x x • M ' A I% I I 1 \ of m' ' A.:1E: 4 .i yam'•, 1 � i U '0 0 In >-" 0- W Q / II: W W } 00 a ,z^ W V > w N LL w N 1, N O a` C o ..... C a. C _ I- Q a O a vI Ua. D I— z wCDa co z z O a z Ui a N O w CD W U) CD w0 co U — O lL 2>' t 5 c o CU) a`:• zw z z Cl) N a V s O. )//'jrtkJjx urcV '� U � i .'i0 i ' ---, b —1 r'?ti's::?•}}>{:'''r,:%.: N ≥sa#rlal II •r• i ° V rc xl ••• - - i I u o � '\/<j L rz OO aQ z W U U � w c o w V/ V d N 0 G a` a C N w 'w V It w w a E ■ F- J a o a J H z w z z a M O a w CD a w w 2 w z ui a 0 U) Cl) Z U. •' O to a` zw Z z N N a >- 00 d Q z W C7^ `V 1v/ N/ W LL 0 W N v d O G O 0 a - rn C W /W V Q/y LL W W ■ F- a a J J H z w N z z O G z a w F- a a z Q W U) W U) w U W Z — 0 U. 0 o O O Z Z J t t a Li >- cz 00 az w (D U Co >w w (I) t C O O a` 0 (0 w W 0 a w Iii C a. a r C C N vo w ... ,i• • N •. N N N• i N N NNNN MN N N •0 N1NN N1{ • N O NN N N N to a NNNNNN NNN N N NN N NN NN N NN N M N N N N N N N N • N i N NY _ I- I ■ a � z w a N z a o o z a N C !- 0 o a w U z Q CD W U) CD W Cl) Z _ Cr 0 LL O :. > O O : fn 0 a ::: z a Lii a (• z z l/) !n a ccz 00 as z W 0 `I U_ Fn / .. CE 0 W v m O a a ` a C x W a ❑ . z a z a tai. z z a LU 2 w z � CD W Cl) CD W U) W Z _ 0 W *n Q.. w z N N a • � N X• Y k % • • X Y Y Y x •'� \ 1 C X M � x X x X • • i •F • X • y% ; xx\ �•yI :i7 m O �•, % X%Y•%XX X�Y Y Y ; % ' ; Y X Y Y • • k X M XY • k• Y X•Myk •Y /I X k y X X M •X �y x% • xY� xYxx X •xx IC X X X Y i • pp O X \ x •x z X ski F T _om___ T +•�h a, 4�hh•17^y��� +♦ ter, •��..' O } 00 aQ z w U U � j w w U) 0 In >- U) d U w ' V Q / /y Yc w Lu U) :1 C N i C <H: _ I ■ - z a z a !ai z z w 2 z o z a IL 2 a o a z a w w w U r C.) Cl) U) z w F 4 }: W W In a` za z z In W } N Q J 1 N I rn a E } N cn OO as z WO O N >w W U) t Ii C C a 0 C X W w (9 Q w Ui U) a. O - •- C C N ,a. O T a aT a �a a� Q•aaaa aT ` aT aa . U) I. T a ai a a a aaa aa a aa a a aa * a M aaaT" as aaT C')aaa as <II: i Q a O ~a D z w O z a w O a O a z a CD Q W U) CD Q WO N w W Z U O U - It o V W w Z P to N a n s a..ry '.21/F IJ .!:... % A � I •x+x I � `•'•,'•Z : :; -v: � � ice.%'•=�:a xMx n z *:: Cv:•:titi':. "tip: �: �::ti a � 0 >— a. w ' V a ir w w U) } bcn ccz OO aZ W U >w O W N O O O a a in w ■ M ~ z w N Z Z Q H U a D N O w CD w cn o w Cl) U H z o U. 5 0 (A z 0 Iii z M } N J CO cn C u U) In 0cc w / V //Qy w w U) >- 00 aQ Z W V O E5 5W (to W (!) C G a aa.= ■ z °' z tai o F- z w Cl)c a z z a Iii H 2z a a w w Cl) w Cl) U ? Iii o Is. 9', lx O Il.I O tea:'' 20 LU U) a 'Ii Va hi Yl 0 to U) 0- w ' V //QLu w U) } ln Qz OO 0- z w O U N > w 'to w N v O G O a. <'I U. I z a z ~a 4Q D z w U) z O G z a a Iii a o. N O CL U) z a Q W U) Q jr U) w c . z a 0 U - O is Ow In a>' as Iii L l a a d � Q to • a /W V a w Lu U) } U) crz ^OO 0 Q z W V' W a0 Lu (I) 0 d N O D O C- <' ■ ■ ■ z aJ. z a lai z z 0 z a F- a 0 w 0.CD ca z w Cl) CD w CO w z _ Iii 0 w 0 0 rn n o_ z0 z Z IA d r. r, N a 1W'I,� i , • / 0 In } h ctz 00 nom. Q z we' U � w 0 w V) d In 0 0 4 0 ..... c6 N CII: _ I- I ■ z a z Q J laa. : z w co z 0 0 z Iii F- J a 0 a w z Q IC w C/) Ccc w ~ z 0 w tai O 5 O O N O 1() o`. z W 2 2 N a 0 2 }- U) a. 2 w Q Lu Lu U) } az 00 z w 0 5 w w U) C, C, O O O a ` C a W O) a _ I - Z a z a z z w o o z a w H a o a z Q w Q W w CD Q WO � z U O N U) LL O _. co U) a Z a Lii in I N >- :.: :; N Q cn I a 0 GD U) a w ' V /Q w LU H c 00 az w U U N >04 w U) N 0 O O 0 O H w No C W J NNN T N NNNNN . N N NN N• N Q N N N NN N XXX NNNN IL) LL N N N N N . N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N " N N N N N N N N _ I ____I - a Q ~ z w cco z 0 z 4 a~ a a M (L N o a w y _z a Q W U) Q W co fl ~ z 0 0 U. O O fi In a:: ZO Lii Z Z J trz 00 as z w U U �5 >W 0 W ^ ' U) 0 In V^/ a C N W W ' V a Ir w Iii 0) " N N NN N . C > N"N N X " X N " NN N 'O NY NII "NNN" N N N N It) a. NXNNNNNX N N N N NN N NN N N N N N N M NN N N N N I N Y N N" a ■ z w z z a � lii H a a N ~a z_ a a w a w (3 w Ui n c U) z a " o n a z W z Cl) rna o w r • 1� 9 r r be ctz OO as z W V W O W U) N O O A••A AFA - II •a F A II M A A Y O FA FA F A F A AMA A A R A M A A A R AR M A F AM A AA A I A N AMA AMA E IM :1 Hg I O w z Q w V) a W U) w F z w U 0 LL Ui n a` 0 z w z Ili N % N Q J I 1 N 0 In >- a (W V Q y // LL W LU az VI 00 cci- d Q z W 0 U_ N >w W U) O a <'I: _ Z o0. z V/ ~ z w co z 0 z Q cc n. D n, N O ~a w z Q w U) w U ~ z 0 w 0 f cc W O ::: o '° In ` zw Z Z a. rn y b ccz 00 QF- a. a z W (J U 1N LL w C d C C C 2 a 0 C 4- 1 n w Q W Lii U Y C C U W .... 1 C .... N NNNNN T NNN Na xx x N 0 xxx xxx xx x x N to a. N NN NNNxNM M \ N N N N N N x N N N1 N x x N M N x x N NN N x N N N N 1 Cl) x N ■ z z O CO (L z w O 0 o z � U H z a CL a � O d z Q Q W Q WO w tr U V) Cl) ? O tL 0 a;•: zw z z a EA 0 CL 'w V It w �i w U, crz 00 a Q z W 0 U Fn >W 0 Iii U) t d N 0 O d ci': I- I_ ■ H a I- J D z z w Cl)G z a I H a o a z_ Q � 3o w U z o N w O O V) y z V) N a i/ ark \ . c/� a^' ci I !k/ a a 4 a a 0 >- a- rCI) ctz OO LL Q z wcD S2&5 W 0 W N C, O O a` c C X a D ■ ■ ■ ■ H a a vI J z w N CD z 0 0 z Lii w U OCD w Cl) w N z Lii 0 w � �T• is d' •i W 2O :•: 0 C1) In a.. a Z z P Q C') a tr a a UI MII i�'' � • • �._ �■ � YUq/1/� __..._ :het. e•e O�� 1 *7 1' ' 4 <r } ccz 00 04 z W U N >w LL O W N Y C C 4 C C w /W V a w Iii U) a° ■ Q O tai z z W � N Vr z a O O z Q � a a z a (9 Q W CD Q W Cl) w ~ z Lii U Cr 0 W C a � \ $ •cam--�Q S g g N .aM a " a XOOO �....: ::�::. ;• �, 02 • i 0 }- 0- W ' V Q / LL. W LU CA } crz 00 a Q z W C9 9a5 >w E W V/ <'ii_ I- ■ F— J a O J ~ Z W � Q O Z O O Z Q w F- O a n~ Z Q a w a w ci Cr cn v) ? W It) d z a Lii z z y a ` � U 9 VI V- flH b 1 S k IL { y x ` { t y{{ t I •a ; 4 y {. { / WN L ^ I N„ %7 `......... `:T i O 03 V) 0- NC �U) 00 04 z W 0 U W cr o Iii V/ 0 C N N W Y N Y • t I{ • • v a A I N I X • M • iN N Y •Y MY •• 'Y k El t■ _ Z d Z Q 4 D I- Z W Cl) CD Z O o Z Q Iii D O W (I) W U) w U z _ cr 0 tL Un a;' zw z z Nj N a E3 V E A d O C a` a C X W /W V AC LL W Lu (1) Q W .... C H CO .... MAX A Y• Y A A A AA A a i A A A A A A O M FF, AAA A • AA Y Y In a A9 AA AA A •FY A Y A A F A • , A A A A A A A AA MA A 1 A ' A (II A <'':1 _ I- z z tai a � z w a � 0 M 0 o z a � Iii0 I- z a n. U a z 4 CD 4 W CD 4U W tr W Ui Cl) U) z _ 0 tL C i t C W 0 IL `' Z W z z N to a. a 0 ft >- U) a 'W V Q a:: W W U) } ►— a. Z 00 aQ Z W (-)e:;5 5W cro w w C ° ° a a ° .X (6 ..... V W a''■ � Z Z J to I Z wCD z Z o Z Q Iii w F- O d O d Z Q w w0 w cr w 0 U) cn _ w ° v o' W n o > z w Z z C/) �o_ e i a e n n �� a o V P 0 P n i 0 Wi U) a. w ^ ' V a Ir w W U) 00 aQ z W C7 / W 0 O W (I) rK o :.:. _ I - a I— I— z w N z z G z Q w a 2 o z o Q N Q N w w W h- Z U U. O O In a O z0 Iii 1A N W ti N z z a 0 S >— U) a- 2 hci, crz 00 as z W U U 1C •.. 0 W N a C to W II y .... a❑ ■ z a z a lQ wCD coz z 0 I D o CD w cn CD w U) w U W ? Ui O u_ 0 >- U) 0- w C9 a w w OO aQ z WO U U ≥ W ct 0 W N C, In C C a` aD ■ ■ ■ Z d Z Q 2 Z O Z Q f- D n. O a w z Q a w a w CO w ? 0 CE U.. Q •• O U) LzJ i a a y '• `...` to a Sr CHAPTER FIVE ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION INTRODUCTION The key to the on -going success of providing adequate water and sewerage facilities in Washington County is the positive, cooperative action between the County and the governmental bodies of the incorporated municipalities -- particularly the City of Hagerstown. Because of the significant role planned for the water and sewerage facilities of the City of Hagerstown in the realization of this Plan, it is paramount that an equitable, clearly defined management structure between the City and County be established. At the basis of the eventual management agreement should be the fundamental purpose to adequately and effectively serve those residents and those areas where water and sewerage facilities are needed. In this pursuit, it is important to recognize that we no longer live in an era where governmental responsibilities abruptly terminate at corporate boundaries. Both subtle and overt municipal interrelationships demand a high degree of communication and cooperation between governments in an effort to achieve the best possible communities. To further this objective, it only seems realistic that limitations resulting from either statutory restrictions or long standing precedents must be actively resolved. With this in mind, the following ownership and operational structures are strongly recortmiended. WATER FACILITIES As previously discussed, the City of Hagerstown supplys water to approximately 38,000 residents outside its corporate boundaries. Since the majority of these residents reside in the County, the City does not have the V-1 necessary voice in terms of plumbing codes, guaranteed users, or comprehensive service area formations. Nevertheless, the City has embarked upon an aggressive program to increase plant capacity to meet the water needs largely brought upon by the growing demands in the County. However, it is rather inequitable for the Water Department to ask the City to bear the total bonded indebtedness for improvements which will proportionately serve more residents outside of the City. Furthermore, the County without having any direct role in the implementation of water facilities other than through zoning and subdivision provisions cannot achieve a thorough coordination of development activities. In an effort to achieve a high level of cooperation between the City and County and proportionate obligations for bonded indebtedness, it is recommended that future distribution systems be financed by the County and constructed, operated, and maintained by the City. Additionally, supply and transmission expenditures should be proprotionately financed by City and County as well as outstanding indebtedness on existing transmission. More specifically, the County's involvement would be essentially for appropriate funding responsibility. Design and construction would be performed by the City with County review and approval. Rates would be jointly established by the City and County to cover bonded indebtedness and operation and maintenance costs. The actual operation, maintenance, billing and collection functions would be performed by the City. Ownership of the system should eventually be under a unified agency so that the system would remain more comprehensive rather than fragmented. To further the degree of cooperation and mutual decision -making the Hagerstown Board of Water Commissioners should have County representation. V-2 For those portions of the County outside the Hagerstown service area, and adjacent to the other incorporated municipalities, the County should cooperate with the towns in extending water service based upon adopted plans and policies. SEWERAGE FACILITIES The City of Hagerstown's sewerage facilities are essential to effective plan implementation. The strategic location of the City's sewerage treatment plant enables the County to achieve most economically a concentrated development pattern around the northern and eastern quadrants of the City while correcting significant environmental concerns and health hazards. Obviously, this achievement requires a high degree of cooperation between the City and County in a manner which equitably addresses the needs of all residents. Furthermore, it should be well apparent that the Environmental Protection Agency is becoming increasingly more involved not only in establishing design criteria but also in determining rate schedules and operation and maintenance procedures. Consequently, local governments --both the County and the City —should not become too preoccupied with the concern for complete and ultimate control in the sense that it hinders adequate service to its residents. To this end, it is recommended that the County shall be responsible for the feasibility studies, designs, rights -of -way acquisition, construction, and financing of the proposed interceptor and collector systems in those areas planned to be serviced by the Hagerstown sewerage treatment plant. The City shall have the benefit of review, inspection, and approval of all phases of the planning, design, and construction of the proposed systems in order to assure consistency with the engineering and construction standards of the City. V-3 Although the County shall retain ownership of its portion of the system, operation and maintenance responsibilities shall be accomplished by the City through a management agreement mechanism. Obviously such a management agreement must be established in a manner to assure that all portions of the system both in the County as well as in the City receive thorough, efficient, and prompt operation and maintenance service. One method to be considered would be for the County to be responsible for the operation and maintenance of its portion of the system and to perform this function by subcontracting the services of the City's Water Pollution Control Department. Theoretically, in the event the Water Pollution Control Department personel would be unable to respond to a specific service need, because of scheduling or other prior commitments, the County would have the alternative of seeking assistance elsewhere. Regardless of the final contractual agreement for operation and maintenance responsibilities, both parties should cooperatively attempt to assure a high degree of service so as to maintain the integrity of the complete system. The County shall be responsible for establishing its rates based upon its financial obligations; conveyance to and treatment by the Hagerstown facility; the City's operation, maintenance, and administrative services; and other equitably related costs. The City's administrative services shall also include billings and collections which would be further refined in the management agreement with the County having auditing privileges. To further the degree of cooperation and mutual decision making, the Hagerstown Sewer Board should have County representation. V-4 For those portions of the County outside the Hagerstown service area, and adjacent to other incorporated municipalities, the County should consider similar arrangements in extending sewerage service based upon adopted plans and policies. MANAGEMENT OF CONNECTION ALLOCATIONS This plan proposes an aggressive program of immediately sewering considerably large portions of the County. However, it is not intended that the availability of sewerage facilities be solely a commodity which can be secured and controlled by the private sector. Consequently, efforts shall be made to allocate and assess connections based upon both prevailing zoning and the entire service area. Sanitary Sewerage Connection Permits, Industrial Waste Permits and any Benefit Charges should be carefully administered to assure equitable development opportunities. Additionally, users should be required to connect to the system within one year from application approval so that permits do not become a speculative resource. COUNTY -WIDE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY Recommendations have been made in this plan to evaluate the feasibility of community water systems in water problem areas throughout the County. Recommendations have also been made to consider the use of alternative on - lot and alternative community sewerage systems to serve areas of failing septic systems and to serve new development utilizing the cluster concept. The key to both recommendations will be the efficient management and operation of such systems by a public agency. Participation by the Washington County Sanitary District in the management and operation of water and sewerage systems is presently limited to areas within established Sanitary Subdistricts Under the current practice, a new V-5 Sanitary Subdistrict must be established for each new water or sewerage system for which the Sanitary District assumes responsibility. As the number of such systems increase per the recommendations above, so increases the administrative complexity and cost of managing an increased number of relatively small, geographically unrelated, and financially independent Subdistricts. Because Sanitary Subdistricts are established to be financially self- supporting, the costs of providing water and sewerage service to some areas of the County may be prohibitively expensive to consumers in those areas. It is often the case that those areas with the greatest need may also be the most expensive to serve. For this reason a County -wide approach which provides for a wider distribution of costs by means of a uniform rate schedule may facilitate service to many areas of need. The Sanitary Subdistrict law should be evaluated and amended as necessary to allow for a more efficient and cost-effective approach to the management and operation of public water and sewerage systems throughout the County. Ultimately, the creation of a County Public Works Department should be considered as a means to this end. V-6 k APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS The terms defined below are used throughout this plan. Definitions are consistent with those in Maryland Agency Regulation 10.17.01 except where indicated (*) as peculiarly applicable to Washington County. 1. "Approving authority" means one or more officials, agents, or agencies of local government designated by the local governing body or specified by other provisions of Article 43, 387C to take certain actions as a part of implementing these regulations. 2. "Board" means The Board of County Commissioners for Washington County 3. "Community sewerage system" means any system, whether publicly or privately owned, serving two or more individual lots, for the collection and disposal of sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, including various devices for the treatment of the sewage and industrial wastes. 4. "Community water supply system" means a source of water and a distribution system, including treatment and storage facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, serving two or more individual lots. 5. "County plan" means a comprehensive plan for the provision of adequate water supply systems and sewerage systems, whether publicly or privately owned, throughout the County and all amendments and revisions to it. 6. "Department" means the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. A-1 7. "Existing or under construction" means the service priority designation which is assigned to an area that is currently served or where actual work is progressing or where a notice to proceed with a contract for this work has been let as of the effective date of the plan. 8. "Five year priority" means the service priority designation which is assigned to an area for which it can be reasonably expected that water or sewer service will be provided within a five year period from the effective date of the plan. 9. "Five to ten year priority" means the service priority designation which is assigned to an area for which it can be reasonably expected that water or sewer service will be provided within a period from five to ten years from the effective date of the plan. 10. "Individual sewerage system" means a single system of sewers and piping, treatment tanks or other facilities serving only a single lot and disposing of sewage or individual wastes of a liquid nature, in whole or in part, on or in the soil of the property, into any waters of this State or by other methods. 11. "Individual water supply system" means a single system of piping, pumps, tanks, or other facilities utilizing a source of ground or surface water to supply only a single lot. 12. "Marina" means a dock, wharf, or basin providing mooring for boats which contain on -board toilet facilities, operated under public or private ownership, either free or on a fee basis, for the convenience of the public or club membership. A-2 13. "Multi -use sewerage system" means a single system serving a single lot, whether owned or operated by an individual or group of individuals under private or collective ownership and serving a group of individuals for the collection and disposal of sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, including various devices for the treatment of sewage and industrial wastes having a treatment capacity in excess of 5,000 GPD. 14. "Multi -use water supply system" means a single system of piping pumps, tanks, or other facilities utilizing a source of ground or surface water to supply a group of individuals on a single lot and having a capacity in excess of 1,500 GPD. 15. "Non -point source" means pollution originating from land run-off where no specific outfall can be identified. *16. "Service priority classification" is a designation assigned to an area indicating the general time frame in which it can be reasonably expected that water or sewer service will be provided by means of a community or multi -use system. 17. "Sewerage service area" is that area served, or potentially served, by a system of sanitary sewers connected to a treatment plant, or, in a very large system, sub -areas as delineated by the county. 18. "Water service area" means that area served, or potentially served, by a single distribution system under control of a single utility, or, in a very large system, sub -areas as delineated by the county. *19. "Major Facilities" mean the principal components of a community or multi -use water or sewerage system. The characteristics of various systems may differ in size, capacity and method of conveyance and treatment of water or wastewater. However, generally, the term is A-3 meant to exclude house connections, smaller water distribution lines, and sewer laterals designed as part of a residential development. Examples of major facilities include: a. Interceptors, trunk and outfall sewer lines; and water transmission, feeder mains and storage facilities. b. Community or multi -use wells or impondments, water storage or treatment facilities. c. Sewage treatment plants (permanent or interim). d. Pumping stations or water filtration plants. A-4 APPENDIX B POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY PLAN FOR WATER AND SEWERAGE I. GENERAL POLICIES A. An application for amendment to the County Plan for Water and Sewerage shall be initiated whenever any person, firm, private agency, or municipal corporation wishes to: 1.) create major new water or sewer facilities; 2.) change the location, type, size or capacity of existing or planned facilities, 3.) establish new water or sewerage service areas or change the boundaries of service areas; 4.) change the priority classification of an area for water or sewerage service. Modifications in facilities design by public agencies should be reported at the Biennial Review, rather than by individual application. B. Applications for amendment of the County Plan shall be made to the County Planning Commission. Required information to be included in the application may be obtained from the Planning Commission. C. Applications may be accepted by the Planning Commission at any time and shall be reviewed according to criteria of eligibility established in these procedures. Copies of adopted criteria for amendment may be obtained from the Planning Commission. D. The Planning Commission staff shall coordinate the review and amendment process, in cooperation with other agencies and affected municipalities. f:'n E. The Planning Commission shall prepare recommendations for approved amendments to be considered by the County Commissioners for their approval. F. The Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing in the Biennial Review year for the purpose of reviewing proposed amendments and revisions to the Water and Sewer Plan. G. The Board may at its discretion initiate amendments to the County Plan at any time. H. Before the Board adopts any revision or amendment to the Plan, it shall conduct a public hearing on the Plan, revision, or amendment that may be conducted jointly with other public hearings or meetings. Notice shall be given to the principal elected official of each municipal corporation that is affected by the proposed change to the Plan at least 14 days before the hearing. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing, together with a summary of the Plan, revision, or amendment, shall be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the County once each week for 2 successive weeks, with the first publication of notice appearing at least 14 days before the hearing. I. The Planning Commission shall certify that the Plan, revision, or amendment is consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan. J. Upon adoption of proposed changes by the County Commissioners, five copies of amendments, in the form of text, maps, tables, charts, and other explanatory information shall then be sent to the State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for review and final approval. The amended Plan will become effective only upon notification of final approval from the State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. FM II. CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT OF SERVICE AREA AND SERVICE PRIORITY CLASSIFICATIONS A. Existing Service Areas 1. The Water and Sewerage Plan shall define the areas planned to be served within ten years by public, community or multi -use water and sewerage systems. The definition of these areas shall be consistent with service areas established in '201' Facilities Plans and with Comprehensive and Land Use Plans of the County and within municipalities. Within the boundaries of the defined service areas, assignments of priority classifications fran W-5 and S-5 to W-1 and S-1 will be made. Priority assignments shall reflect the time at which service is anticipated to be available. Lands will be classified as S-5 or W-5 until such time as plans to provide service are initiated, either in response to request fran private developers or by public agencies. Priority classifications from S-3 and W-3 to S-1 and W-1 will be assigned based upon the project schedule and satisfactory compliance with procedural requirements described in Item 3 below. B. Planned New Service Areas 1. Proposals to establish new service areas or to extend collection or transmission facilities beyond the boundaries of existing ten-year service areas, shall be submitted to the Planning Commission in the form of a development proposal. The development proposal shall be submitted with an application for establishment of new service area boundaries. The proposal shall describe the facilities proposed and define the drainage area which B-3 could potentially be served if the proposed facilities were established. If the proposal is initiated by a private developer, the development project area shall be identified as well, with a description of the proposed land use, density and location of the development. Following receipt of an application for the establishment of new service area boundaries, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing for the purpose of formulating a recommendation to the County Commissioners pertaining to amendment of the Water and Sewerage Plan. The Planning Commission shall consider the impacts of the proposal on the potential service area, including compatibility with other plans for services, and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the County. The Planning Commission shall also consider the impacts which a proposal to establish new service areas within the County may have on existing service areas, and municipalities shall be given the opportunity to review and comment. Proposals for the establishment of new service areas within municipal limits should be referred to the local jurisdiction prior to the public hearing for review and comment, with all available information which can be provided by the County. The comments of municipalities should be considered at the public hearing to be held by the County Planning Commission. Recommendations shall then be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for review and public hearing, following which a determination shall be made pertaining to the proposed amendment. No more than 120 days shall pass from the time application is made until a determination is made by the County Commissioners. When a new service area is established, lands which can be potentially served by planned facilities shall be assigned priority classifications from S- 5 and W-5 to S-1 and W-1 as appropriate. The classification assigned shall reflect the status of plans for service within the area, and the satisfaction of procedural requirements described in Item 3 below. C. Service Priority Classification 1. The criteria listed below shall apply to requests for amendment of priority classifications for water and sewerage service where community water and/or sewerage facilities are proposed by developers. It is the intent of these procedures that, within service areas established by the '201' Facilities Plans and/or Water and Sewerage Plan, satisfactory compliance by developers with the established criteria should result in appropriate changes in the Water and Sewerage Plan; if criteria are met, existing classifications will not preclude development of community water and/or sewerage facilities prior to the time periods indicated. Once eligibility requirements have been met for a priority classification of S-3 or W-3, it shall not be necessary to wait for the Biennial Review to the Plan before proceeding with the development of facilities. A letter of intent to the State will satisfy interim approval with formal amendment of classification being made at Biennial Review, provided all criteria have been satisfied. It is the responsibility of the developer to satisfy the criteria in each step of the process. I.. a. Eligibility for S -5/W-5 Classification: 1) The method of service (public or private, permanent or interim, conventional or alternative) has been determined satisfactory and has received written acknowledgement by the appropriate public agencies such as the Health Department, Sanitary Commission, and municipalities. Agency acknowledgement will be for the method of service in concept and not in design. 2) A preliminary consultation has been held with the Planning Commission. 3) Any capital costs to be incurred by public agencies should be included in the Capital Improvements Program of the appropriate jurisdiction. 4) Development proposal with required information has been 46 submitted. 5) Construction of facilities is anticipated to begin within ten years. b. Eligibility for S -3/W-3 Classification: 1) All the requirements for S -5/W-5 have been met. 2) Arrangements have been made with the appropriate public agency for acceptance of facilities, operating and maintenance responsibility, allocation of capacity, and/or connections to the public system. 3) Preliminary plat or site plan approval has been obtained fran the Planning Commission and other appropriate public agencies responsible for approval of plans, or future operating maintenance costs of sanitary facilities. 4) Construction of facilities is anticipated to begin within five years. c. Eligibility for S -1/W-1 Classification: 1) All requirements for S -3/W-3 have been met, and 2) Facilities are under construction or completed. III. DATA TO BE INCLUDED IN APPLICATIONS FOR AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY PLAN The following data, as applicable, shall be included in an application for amendment of the County Plan for Water and Sewerage for establishment of priority of S-5 or W-5 or higher classification. Applications for amendment shall address the interrelationship of water supply and waste water disposal. Applications for the establishment of new service areas or the creation of new or improved major facilities must include the following as appropriate to the project: 1. Proposed type, capacity, size and location of facilities (new or proposed for use) and map. 2. Name and location of development or service area (boundary, drainage area, acreage and map). 3. Number of people (existing in drainage or service area, density of development). 4. Number of people to be served in drainage or service area by planned staged development. 5. Design, average and peak flows. 6. Degree and type of treatment given. 7. Sludge disposal plans. 8. Transmission facilities (size of pipe). 9. Effluent disposal plans (spray irrigation, discharge to stream, etc.). 10. Classification of stream receiving discharge. 11.- Operation and maintenance costs. 12. Proposed means of financing improvement. 13. Description of ground and surface water resources within the service or development area, including the quantity and quality of these resources. 14. Sources of pollution or contamination of groundwater resources within the development or service area. 15. Source and amount of water to be withdrawn. 16. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan. 17. Relationship to Water and Sewer Plan. 18. Reason for change. 19. Alternatives and the rationale used in determining the means of providing water supply. 20. Rationale for selecting a particular design and alternatives for any proposed treatment facility, pumping station or interceptor. Applications which would extend collection or transmission facilities beyond the boundaries of existing ten-year service areas, should include: 1. Location of the proposed development or service area (boundaries, acreage, map) and relationship to existing service area and facilities. 2. Number of people existing in development or service area. 3. Number of people to be served in development or service area by planned staged development. 4. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan. 5. Relationship to Water and Sewerage Plan. All maps included in applications for amendment which delineate the boundaries of the service area, or show the location of facilities shall be prepared at a scale of 1"=2000' on a base provided by the Planning Commission. RM IV. PROCEDURES FOR BIENNIAL REVIEW AND REVISION OF THE COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN 1. Following final approval of proposed changes in the Water and Sewerage Plan, any subsequent change in the use, density, location or scheduling of a development planned for service shall be reported to the Planning Commission. In the event a revision is required, a letter of intent will be forwarded from the County Commissioners to the State and revisions will be incorporated in the Water and Sewerage Plan by amendment during the Biennial Review. 2. If there is a change in the location, type, size, capacity, method of service or staging of approved facilities, this information should be submitted to the Planning Commission. If changes in water consumption, sewerage flow, or service area will occur, the Planning Commission shall review priority classifications within the development or service area and they may be revised. In the event revision is required, a letter of intent will be forwarded from the County Commissioners to the State and the Plan amended during the Biennial Review. 3. In cooperation with County and municipal service agencies, the Planning Commission shall review the status of planned and programmed facilities every two years following which a report with recommendations for Plan amendment shall be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for Biennial Review and public hearing. The Planning Commission shall recommend appropriate public policy action to minimize delays in the development of programmed facilities. B-10 V. ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS This Plan may be amended administratively to correct errors, omissions, or inaccuracies which may be discovered from time to time in the Plan text or Plan maps. Such adminstrative amendments may be made by the Planning Commission based upon the presentation of more accurate information by the service providing agency. Copies of amended maps or text will then be forwarded to all applicable agencies to replace maps or text which have been found to be in error. Administrative amendments need not be formally adopted by the Board of County Commissioners via the public hearing process, since such amendments are for informational purposes and do not represent changes in policy or in future plans. Administrative amendments should generally be limited to existing conditions which fall within the following categories: 1. To correct omitted or inaccurate locations of existing facilities on the Plan maps. 2. To correct erroneous service priority classifications which indicate no service provided when in fact service is being provided to a particular area. 3. To correct erroneous data on existing population served, flow and capacity data on existing facilities, and similar information which is simply a matter of record. B-11 I- APPENDIX C GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT 26 APRIL 1978 This GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT, made this /_day of ,1978, by and between the City of Hagerstown (hereinafter called the CITY) and the Washington County Sanitary District (hereinafter called the DISTRICT) is aimed at establishing the general terms and responsibilities for the provision of sanitary sewer service to that area (hereinafter called the DESIGNATED AREA) which Is delineated in the Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan to be served by the sewerage facilities of the CITY and which are outside the corporate limits of the CITY and outside the service area of the existing sewer system of the CITY, and outside the Fountain Head area as described in the agreement by and between the CITY and DISTRICT dated 5 December 1977. The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan shows that the most cost effective way to serve the DESIGNATED AREA Is by connection with the CITY'S sewer system with sewage treatment to be accomplished at the CITY'S plant. Upon recommen- dations of the CITY Board of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners, the CITY by resolu- tion dated 7 March 1977, and the DISTRICT by resolution dated 14 March 1977, accepted the Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan, and each expressed its intent to enter into negotiations for the establishment of arrangements between those two governmental entities for the implementation of the Plan, based on a conceptual agreement endorsed a.longwith the resolutions. The Board of Washington County Commissioners by resolution dated 8 March 1977, manifested Its support for this concept, as well as for the Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan itself. Both the CITY and the DISTRICT recognize the urgency for providing sewer service to the DESIGNATED AREA at the earliest possible date. The CITY and the DISTRICT shall establish DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS specifying the exact terms for the provision of sanitary sewerage services to the present and future Sanitary Subdistricts within the DESIGNATED AREA consistent with the general intent established by this agreement under the following basic terms: C-1 26 APRIL 1978 I. The CITY shall accept for transport, treatment and disposal, the wastewaters generated In the DESIGNATED AREA, consistent with the population projections, land uses, and other considerations ad- dressed in the Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan, and In accordance with a controlled capacity allocation system established and equitably managed by the CITY, and in accordance with the provisions of the DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS. 2. The provision of sanitary sewer service to the DESIGNATED AREA shall be pursued by the CITY and DISTRICT in a cooperative and non-competitive manner. It is mutually understood and agreed that the CITY will continue Its present practice of providing sanitary sewer service to areas outside Sanitary Subdistricts by negotiating individual service agreements with each property owner who requests sanitary sewer service. It is mutually understood and agreed that the DISTRICT :hall concentrate on and give priority to providing sanitary sewer service to presently developed portions of the DESIGNATED AREA in accordance with Sanitary District law, unless agreement for the provision of sanitary sewer service by and between the CITY and the individual property owners in any part of that developed portion of the DESIGNATED AREA is established prior to the creation of a Sanitary Subdistrict in that portion. 3. In areas where sewer service is to be provided under the DISTRICT'S jurisdiction, the CITY and DISTRICT shall cooperate in a joint pursuit of the design and construction effort. The primary work effort and responsibility for these two phases shall be with the DISTRICT. Construc- tion contracts shall be awarded and managed by the DISTRICT with appropriate assistance by the CITY. Upon completion of construction, the DISTPICT shall retain ownership of all sewerage facilities constructed under the DISTRICT'S jurisdiction. ti. The CITY shall perform the operation and maintenance of all sewerage facilities in the DESIGNATED AREA at the Users' expense. The CITY shall have the authority to monitor water and waste flows to determine volume, flow delivery rate and/or strength of same. Furthermore, all C-2 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING 33 WEST WASHINGTON STREET HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND 21740 MEMO TO: Jim Steve Lisa Bud Eric FROM Tim The Court House SERVING WASHINGTON COUNTY SINCE 1873 DATE April 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Water and Sewerage Plan Updated (1989) Text The revised and adopted text of the 1989 Water and Sewerage Plan is attached. Follow these steps to update your old plan with the new text. 1.) Remove and save the six (6) colored chapter dividers and the 11 fold -out maps in Chapter 2. 2.) Remove and discard the folded maps in the front pocket of the binder and all of the remaining pages of the text. Save the blue binder. 3.) Insert the new text in the binder. 4.) Insert the chapter dividers in the appropriate locations between the chapters. 5.) Use the List of Maps on page XV to replace the 11 fold -out maps in their new locations in Chapter 2. 6.) Insert the large folded maps (three blueprints) in the pocket of the inside of the front cover. A copy of the old (1987) text will be kept on file in the Library for reference purposes. A copy of the updated Plan will also be kept in the Library and conference room. Please let me know if you have any questions. TAL/jlw attachment G SAL SERVICE AGREEMENT 26 APRIL 1978 sewerage facilities in the DESIGNATED AREA shall be monitored to assure compliance with the applicable Inflow/infiltration requirements. It is Intended that all costs incurred by the CITY in connection with the CITY maintaining and operating the DESIGNATED AREA sewer systems, shall be included In charges established in the DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS. 5. The charge by the CITY for transporting the sewage emanating from the DESIGNATED AREA through the CITY sewer lines, for treating the sewage at the CITY'S Plant, and for maintaining and operating the sewerage system within the DESIGNATED AREA shall be based on metered water con- sumption and shall be In accordance with the provisions of the CITY Code for such services. This charge shall be based on the CITY rate multiplied by a factor mutually acceptable to the CITY and DISTRICT. Unless otherwise specified in the DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS, the CITY shall bill the DISTRICT'S sewer customers In the DESIGNATED AREA. The user charge rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the residen- tial, commercial and industrial users of the system located within the DESIGNATED AREA shall be established in the DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS and shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations. 6. In addition to the charges described in Section 5, there shall be a one-time Benefit Charge per connection equitably assessed by the CITY based on capacity allocation. The Benefit Charge shall be established in the DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS. 7. The CITY shall include in its billing to the DISTRICT sewer customers, that amount determined by the DISTRICT to be required to cover DISTRICT administrative costs and any amount that may be required to cover debt service for sewerage facilities installed within the DESIGNATED AREA i under :he DISTRICT'S jurisdiction. 8. Capacity for wastewater contributions to the CITY Water Pollution Control Plant shall be allocated to each customer account when the prospective customer receives approval of an Application for Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit. The CITY assures that adequate capacity will be made available for those prospective residential and commercial customers, present and future, within the DESIGNATED AREA consistent with the Antietam Basin 2011 Facilities Plan. C-3 GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT 26 APRIL 1978 9. The CITY shall provide the DISTRICT with a list of delinquent accounts on a quarterly basis for DISTRICT customers In an established subdistrict and shall assjst the DISTRICT In the collection of these accounts through discontinuance of water service or any other lawful means. If these means of collection fall, then the DISTRICT shall exercise its statutory rights and enter suit against all offenders in accordance with prevailing collection policies of the DISTRICT. Likewise, the DISTRICT shall by suit seek to enforce connection against all property owners who fail to connect to the sewer system In the time allowed therefore. 10. The CITY shall operate and maintain all sewerage facilities in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines, and other criteria of any Federal, State and Local agencies and jurisdictions. The cost of any future upgradings or other alterations made to the CITY Water Pollution Control System constructed to meet future applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines, and other criteria of any Federal, State and Local agencies and jurisdictions, shall be borne by all users of the system in accordance with a system of charges to be established under DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS. The cost of any future expansions of, or extensions to the CITY Water Pollution Control System constructed to provide sanitary sewer service to the DESIGNATED AREA shall be borne by the users of the system for whom such expansions or extensions are constructed. 11. The DISTRICT shall not make any expan.i,'ns or other alterations to the boundaries of Subdistrict No. 6 nor establish any other subdistrict within the area proposed by the Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan to be served by the CITY Water Poilution Control Plant without prior negotiations with the CITY. (SEAL OF in) ATTEST: oseph V. wa1z34 CITY CLERK (DISTRI SEAL 99J ATTES : ; k -€. •-i, --s--' Palper J. Dawson SECRCTARY-TREASURER CITY OF HAGERSTOWN A BY:I�'1 Vainer L. Paddack Mayor WASHINGTOjCjOU�NTY SANITARY DISTRICT BY:—��7 Ja ta James L. Eckel iCHAIRMAN C-4 APPENDIX D Washington County Sanitary District POLICY ON INTERIM AND PERMANENT COMMUNITY WATER AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, April 27, 1976 The District shall own and operate all interim and permanent water and sewerage system facilities within the County, except those within an incorporated area or approved existing system, under the following conditions: 1. The District shall be the sole judge as to whether a community water or sewerage facility can be approved and accepted for ownership and operation by the District within the framework of the Sanitary District law. It shall have the sole right to determine the conditions of approval and acceptance necessary to satisfying the provisions of said law. The District shall have the sole right to determine what facilities are interim or permanent; as to when the installed facilities shall be modified, enlarged or abandoned; and who may use said installed facilities. However, in making such determinations, the District shall be governed by all applicable County and State regulations and requirements. 3. All applications for community water or sewerage facilities shall be filed with the Washington County Planning Commission. All such applications must include an engineering report prepared by a Maryland registered professional engineer with sufficient experience in sanitary work satisfactory to the District. This report must include estimated construction and operation costs, together with all necessary design and technical data required by the State for effluent discharge and/or water appropriation permits. 4. No community water or sewerage facility will be approved for ownership, operation or maintenance by the District unless such ownership, operation and maintenance jurisdiction encompasses the entire system, including treatment, collection, distribution, storage, etc., except as may be covered by special arrangement with the applicant at the discretion of the District. 5. Construction plans and specifications for all interim and permanent community water and sewerage systems must be prepared in accordance with State requirements but must be reviewed and approved by the District prior to submittal to the State for a construction permit. All construction shall be in compliance with applicable Sanitary District standards. D-1 6. Interim and permanent sewerage and water facilities shall be designed and constructed at no cost to the District. Construction costs to be borne by others include that inspection during construction deemed necessary by the District to protect its ownership and operational interests in the project. 7. No water or sewerage facility will be accepted by the District for ownership, operation and maintenance until a mutually acceptable agreement or contract between the District and the applicant has been consummated and put into effect. 8. The effective date of this policy is April 27, 1976 and it shall apply to all appications submitted consequent to that date. D-2 APPENDIX E AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR THE MAUGANSVILLE/ORCHARD HILLS AREA BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT SUBJECT: MAUGANSVILLE/ORCHARD HILLS SEWERAGE FACILITIES THIS Detailed Service Agreement (hereinafter called "AGREEMENT"), made this�5"day of ,'44 c' 1982, by and between The City of Hagerstown (hereinafter called the "CITY") and the Washington County Sanitary District (hereinafter called the "DISTRICT") is aimed at providing sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area extending from Longmeadow Road north along the U.S. Route 11 Corridor to the Mason- Dixon Line, Maugansville, Orchard Hills and a. portion of Paramount in the vicinity of Roland Avenue and High Street, under a joint cooperative effort. The 'Maugansville/Orchard Hills area' as used herein includes Maugansville, Countryside, Orchard Hills, Northridge Manor, U.S. Route 11 Corridor, Airport Complex, Fairchild - Republic Company, a portion of Paramount in the vicinity of Roland Avenue and High Street and other areas identified by the special boundary shown on a plat titled "Plat of Subdistrict No. 15 - Maugansville/Orchard Hills" which is hereby appended H. to and made part of THIS AGREEMENT. The Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan shows that the most cost effective way to serve the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area is by connection with the CITY'S sewer system with sewage treatment to be accomplished at the CITY'S plant. -E-1- Upon recommendations of the City Board of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners, the CITY by resolution dated March 7, 1977, and the DISTRICT by resolution dated March 14, 1977, accepted the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan, and each expressed its intent to enter into negotiations for the establishment of arrangements between those two (2) governmental entities for the implementation of the Plan, based on a conceptual agreement endorsed along with the resolutions. The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County by resolution dated March 8, 1977, manifested its support for this concept, as well as for the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan itself. A General Service Agreement, dated 26 April 1978, was drafted and formerly adopted by the Washington County Sanitary District and the City of Hagerstown on May 1, 1978. Both the•CITY and the DISTRICT recognize the urgency for providing sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area at the earliest possible date. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The exact area to be provided with sanitary sewer service under THIS AGREEMENT shall be that area identified by a special boundary shown on a plat titled "Plat of Sub- district No. 15 - Maugansville/Orchard Hills", which is appended to THIS AGREEMENT. 2. The DISTRICT shall not make any expansions or other alterations to the boundaries of Subdistrict No. 15 nor establish any other subdistrict within the area proposed by the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan to be served E-2 by the City of Hagerstown Water Pollution Control Plant without prior negotiations with the CITY. 3. The CITY and DISTRICT shall cooperate in a joint pursuit of the work involved in the current grant for Step 2 -Design (C-240446-03) work in the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area, and they shall likewise work jointly toward obtaining and carrying out the subsequent grant for Step 3 -Construction (C-240446-06) with the DISTRICT to be the applicant and grantee on the grants for Step 2 -Design and Step 3 -Construction. The primary work effort and responsibility for these two (2) grants shall be with the DISTRICT. 4. The CITY shall assist the DISTRICT, with official representation, at any public hearing to be held pursuant to the requirements of the Sanitary District law, to the extent necessary to present and to explain the charges being levied by the CITY for the sewerage services it is to furnish to the residents of the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area. 5. The CITY and DISTRICT shall jointly review in a spirit of full cooperation the construction plans prepared for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills project. In drafting specifications there shall be adopted whichever of the two entities' current sewer specifications is the more stringent, unless the parties hereafter agree to the contrary. It shall also include, but may not necessarily be limited to, such considerations as hydrogeology, sewer line and manhole location, easements, rights -of -way, type of pipe, bedding details, lateral sizes, infiltration/inflow prevention, types of pumps, warning devices. E-3 6. Construction contracts for the Step 3 -Construction work shall be awarded by and managed by the DISTRICT, and construction inspection shall be under the.DISTRICT'S manage- ment with full authority to issue orders,change orders and other construction procedures, utilizing DISTRICT inspection personnel. 7. Upon completion of the Step 3 -Construction work in the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area, the DISTRICT shall retain ownership of all sewerage facilites; e.g. interceptors, collection lines, pumping stations constructed under Step 3. In areas of design and construction where the CITY and DISTRICT cannot agree, the DISTRICT'S decision shall prevail. 8. The CITY shall act as the DISTRICT'S agent in operating, repairing and maintaining at User's expense the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills Sewer System and in billing the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills sewer customers. The CITY shall have the authority to monitor water and waste flows to determine volume, flow delivery rate and/or strength of same. Further- more, the Maugansville/Orchard Hills Sewer System shall be monitored to assure compliance with the applicable inflow/ infiltration requirements. Upon request by the CITY, the DISTRICT shall permit the CITY to examine and make copies of all the DISTRICT'S records to effectuate the purpose of THIS AGREEMENT. It is intended that all costs incurred • by the CITY in connection with the CITY acting as the DISTRICT'S agent in maintaining and operating the Maugansville/Orchard Hills sewer system shall be included in charges established under Section 9 of THIS AGREEMENT for the Maugansville/ E-4 Orchard Hills area. All utility bills (including minimum charges by utility companies) in connection with pumping station operation, shall be included as part of the user charge- rate as charged by the CITY. 9. The charge by the CITY for transporting the sewage emanating from the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area through the CITY sewer lines, for treating the sewage at the CITY'S Plant, and for maintaining, repairing and operating the sewerage system within the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be based on metered water consumption and shall be in accordance with the provisions of the CITY code for such services. The DISTRICT shall be kept advised by the CITY of any proposed changes in the Code or any other policy affecting such charges so that the DISTRICT may have the opportunity to comment on same. The user charge rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the DISTRICT residential, commercial and industrial users of the system located within • the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be one and two- thirds (1 2/3) times the rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the CITY residential, commercial and industrial users of the system situated within the Corporate Limits of the CITY. The present user charge rate for domestic type wastes to be charged by the CITY for providing the abovementioned service shall be $1.50/1,000 gallons of water used, with 10,000 gallon/quarter minimum. A commercial and industrial rate system meeting all applicable requirements of Federal, State and local regulations shall establish, E-5 the surcharges and other additional rates to be charged to all commercial and industrial users of the system. Surcharges for loadings and flow delivery rates in excess of domestic type wastes shall not be subject to a one and two-thirds (1 2/3) multiplier. The commercial and industrial rate system shall not alter the provisions of this Section estab- lishing a one and two-thirds (1 2/3) multiplier. 10. In addition to the charges described in Section 9, there shall be a benefit charge per connection assessed by the CITY based on capacity allocation. The present benefit charge shall be $420.00 or shall be equal to the product of the allocation (in gallons per day) multiplied by $2.10 per gallon, whichever is greater. The final benefit charge shall be the same as the benefit charge applied to CITY users of the system located in the corporate limits of the CITY. The DISTRICT shall be kept apprised of any user or benefit increase proposed by the CITY. 11. The CITY shall include in its billing to the Maugans- ville/Orchard Hills area sewer customers, that amount determined by the DISTRICT to be required to cover DISTRICT administrative 'costs and any amount that may be required to cover debt service for sewerage facilities installed within the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills area. These monies shall be forwarded to the DISTRICT upon receipt in accordance with a schedule mutually acceptable to the DISTRICT'S Secretary -Treasurer and the :CITY'S Finance Director so as to enable the DISTRICT to meet its financial obligations pertaining to the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills area. E-6 12. The CITY and the DISTRICT have prepared and have adopted a standarized application/allocation/permitting system and sewer use ordinances... Capacity for wastewater contributions to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control System shall be allocated to each customer account when the prospective customer receives approval of an application for sanitary sewer connection permit. The CITY assures that adequate capacity will be made available for those prospective residential and commercial customers, present and future, within the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area, consistent with the: Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan with a maximum total allocation to the DISTRICT users located in the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area of gallons of equivalent domestic concentration per day, based on the calculated usage rate used in Section 10 of THIS AGREEMENT. 13. The CITY shall provide the DISTRICT with a list of delinquent accounts on a quarterly basis and shall assist the DISTRICT in the collection of these accounts through discontinuance of water service or any other lawful means. If these means of collection fail, then the DISTRICT shall exercise its statutory rights and enter suit against all offenders in accordance with prevailing collection policies of the DISTRICT. Likewise, the DISTRICT shall by suit seek to enforce connection against all property owners who fail to connect to the sewer system in the time allowed therefor. E-7 14. The City shall operate, repair and maintain all sewerage facilities in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines, and other criteria of any Federal, State and local agencies and juris- dictions. The cost of any future upgradings or other alterations made to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control System constructed to meet future applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines, and other criteria of any Federal, State and local agencies and jurisdictions,shall be borne by all users of the system in accordance with a system of charges to be established under Section 9 and/or 10. The cost of any future expansions or extensions of any kind to provide sanitary sewer service for allocations in excess of that provided by Section 12 for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be borne by the DISTRICT. The cost of any future expansions of or extensions to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control System constructed to provide sanitary sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be borne by the users of the system for whom such expansions or extensions are constructed. E-3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The CITY and The DISTRICT have caused these presents to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized. Approved as amended by letter dated 20 April 1981 by City of Hagerstown Board of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners and Water Pollution Control.. To be ratified at a later date by the Mayor and Council. CITY OF HAGERSTOWN BOARD OF SANITARY SEWER COMMISSIONERS BY: 7 Max C. Fiery CHH AIRMAN (SEAL OF CITY) ATTEST ar Nolte, Jr., CITY CLERK (DISTRICT SEAL) ATTE a m J. Dawson SEC TARP -TREASURER CITY OF HAGERSTOWN WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ' fl1 G." McGauhey ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF HAGERSTOWN BY: Donald R. Frush MAYOR WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT BY : y� , �G� �✓�f #' Patricia W. Wolf&d WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARI COMMISSION SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR THE MAUGANSVILLE/ORCHARD HILLS AREA This Supplemental Agreement No. 1, dated June 22 , 1982, by and between the City of Hagerstown (hereinafter called the City) and the Washington County Sanitary District (hereinafter called the District). WHEREAS, the City and the District entered into a service agreement dated March 25, 1982,concerning the providing of sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area; and WHEREAS, said initial agreement was modified in some respects by a letter from the City acting through its Board of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners, set forth in a letter from the City to the District dated April 20, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City and the District have held further negotiations concerning certain aspects of the proposed sewerage project, and the parties now desire to revise in some respects the aforementioned documents to the end that this Supplemental Agreement No. 1 shall set forth all of the provisions agreed upon by the City and the District as regards said sewerage project; and NOW, THEREFORE, the aforementioned two contractual documents are hereby superseded by the provisions as hereinbelow set forth: This Detailed Service Agreement is aimed at providing sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area extending from Longmeadow Road north along the U.S. Route 11 Corridor to the Mason-Dixon Line, Maugansville, Orchard Hills and a portion of Paramount in the vicinity of Roland Avenue and High Street, under a joint cooperative effort. The 'Maugansville/Orchard Hills area' E-10 as used herein includes Maugansville, Countryside, Orchard Hills, Northridge Manor, U.S. Route 11 Corridor, Airport Complex, Fairchild - Republic Company, a portion of Paramount in the vicinity of Roland Avenue and High Street and other areas identified by the special boundary shown on a plat titled "Plat of Subdistrict No. 1S - Maugansville/Orchard Hills (Rev. 1)", which is hereby appended to and made part of This Agreement. The Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan shows that the most cost effective way to serve the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area is by connection with the City's sewer system with sewage treatment to be accomplished at the City's plant. Upon recommendations of the City Board of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners, the City by resolution dated March 7, 1977, and the District by resolution dated March 14, 1977, accepted the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan, and each expressed its intent to enter into negotiations for the establishment of arrangements between those two (2) governmental entities for the implementation of the Plan, based on a conceptual agreement endorsed along with tha resolutions. The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County by resolution dated March 8, 1977, manifested its support for this concept, as well as for the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan itself. A General Service Agreement, dated April 26, 1978, was drafted and formerly adopted by the Washington County Sanitary District and the City of Hagerstown on May 1, 1978. Both the City and the District recognize the urgency for providing sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area at the earliest possible date. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The exact area to be provided with -sanitary sewer service under this Agreement shall be that area identified by a E-11 special boundary shown on a plat titled "Plat of Subdistrict No. 15 - Maugansville/Orchard Hills (Rev. 1)", which is appended to this Agreement. 2. The District shall not make any expansions or other alterations to the boundaries of Subdistrict No. 15 nor establish any other subdistrict within the area proposed by the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan to be served by the City of Hagers- town Water Pollution Control Plant without prior negotiations with the City. 3. The City and District shall cooperate in a joint pursuit of the work involved in the current grant to Step 2 - Design (C-240446-03) work in the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area, and they shall likewise work jointly toward obtaining and carrying out the subsequent grant for Step 3 -Construction (C-240446-06) with the District to be the applicant and grantee on the grants for Step 2 -Design and Step3-Construction. The primary work effort and responsibility for these two (2) grants shall be with the District. 4. The City. shall assist the District, with official representation, at any public hearing to be held pursuant to the requirements of the Sanitary District law, to the extent necessary to present and to explain the charges being levied by the City for the sewerage services it is to furnish to the residents of the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area. 5. The City and District shall jointly review in a spirit of full cooperation the construction plans prepared for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills project. In drafting specifications there shall be adopted whichever of the two entities' current sewer specifications isthe more stringent, unless the parties hereafter agree to the contrary. It shall also include, but may not necessarily be limited to, such considerations as E12 10 hydrogeology, sewer line and manhole location, easements, rights -of -way, type of pipe, bedding details, lateral sizes, infiltration/inflow prevention, types of pumps, warning devices, alarm and flow monitoring systems compatible with the systems of the City of Hagerstown. 6. Construction contracts for the Step 3 -Construction work shall be awarded by and managed by the District, and construction inspection shall be under the District's management with full authority to issue orders, change orders and other construction procedures, utilizing District inspection personnel. 7. Upon completion of the Step 3 -Construction work in the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area, the District shall retain ownership of all sewerage facilities; e.g. interceptors, collection lines, pumping stations constructed under Step 3. In areas of design and construction where the City and District cannot agree, the District's decision shall prevail. 8. The City shall act as the District's agent in operating, repairing and maintaining at User's expense the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills Sewer System and in billing the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills sewer customers. The City shall have the authority to monitor water and waste flows to determine volume, flow delivery rate and/or strength of same. Furthermore, the Maugansville/Orchard Hills Sewer System shall be monitored to assure compliance with the applicable inflow/infiltration requirements. Upon request by the City, the District shall permit the City to examine and make copies of all the District's records to effectuate the purpose of this Agreement. It is intended that all costs incurred by the City in connection with the City acting as the District's agent in maintaining and operating the Maugansville/Orchard Hills sewer system shall be included in charges established under Section 9 of this Agreement E-13 for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area. All utility bills (including minimum charges by utility companies) in connection with pumping station operation, shall be included as part of the user charge rate as charged by the City. 9. The charge by the City for transporting the sewage emanating from the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area through the City sewer lines, for treating the sewage at the City's Plant, and for maintaining, repairing and operating the sewerage system within the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be based on metered water consumption and shall be in accordance with the provisions of the City code for such services. The District shall be kept advised by the City of any proposed changes in the Code or any other policy affecting such charges so that the District may have the opportunity to comment on same. The user charge rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the District residential, commercial and industrial users of the system located within the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be one and two-thirds (1 2/3) times the rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the City residential, commercial and industrial users of the system situated within the Corporate Limits of the City. The present user charge rate for domestic type wastes to be charged by the City for providing the above -mentioned service shall be $1.50/1,000 gallons of water used, with 10,000 gallon/ quarter minimum. A commercial and industrial rate system meeting all applicable requirements of Federal, State and local regulations shall establish the surcharges and other additional ra:_;s to be charged to all commercial and industrial users of the system. Surcharges for loadings and flow delivery rates in excess of domestic type wastes shall not be subject to a one and two- thirds (1 2/3) multiplier. The commercial and industrial rate system shall not alter the provisions of this Section establishing E-14 a one and two-thirds (1 2/3) multiplier. 10. In addition to the charges described in Section 9, there shall be a benefit charge per connection assessed by the City based on capacity allocation. The present benefit charge shall be $420.00 or shall be equal to the product of the allocation (in gallons per day) multiplied by $2.10 per gallon, whichever is greater. The final benefit charge shall be the same as the benefit charge applied to City users of the system located in the corporate limits of the City. The District shall be kept apprised of any user or benefit increase proposed by the City. The District shall use its best efforts to collect the said benefit charge as soon as practicable after connections may be made by customers, and the District shall transmit those funds promptly to the City after receipt thereof. 11. The City shall include in its billing to the Maugansville/ Orchard Hills area sewer customers, that amount determined by the District to be required to cover District administrative costs and any amount that may b<. required to cover debt service for sewerage facilities installed within the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area. These monies shall be forwarded to the District upon receipt in accordance with a schedule mutually acceptable to. the District's Secretary -Treasurer and the City's Finance Director so as to enable the District to meet its financial obligations pertaining to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area. 12. The City and the District have prepared and have adopted a standardized application/allocation/permitting system and sewer use ordinances. Capacity for wastewater contributions to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control System shall be allocated to each, customer account when the prospective customer receives approval of an application for sanitary sewer connection permit. The City has allocated to existing residential and commercial E-15 customers of the Maugansville/Orchard Hills per day. The City shall reserve for future allocation for this area of 309,000 gallons this additional reserve allocation shall be December 31, 1986. 13. The City shall provide the Distric area 373,000 gallons growth an additional per day, except that effective only until t with a list of delinquent accounts on a quarterly basis and shall assist the District in the collection of these accounts through discontinuance of water service or any other lawful means. If these means of collection fail, then the District shall exercise its statutory rights and enter suit against all offenders in accordance with prevailing collection policies of the District. Likewise, the District shall by suit seek to enforce connection against all property owners who fail to connect to the sewer system in the time allowed therefor. 14. The City shall operate, repair and maintain all sewerage facilities in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines, and other criteria of any Federal, State and local agencies and jurisdictions. The cost of any future upgradings or other alterations made to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control System constructed to meet future applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines, and other criteria of any Federal, State and local agencies and jurisdictions, shall be borne by all users of the system in accordance with a system of charges to be established under Section 9 and/or 10. The cost of any future expansions or extensions of any kind to provide sanitary sewer service for allocations in excess of that provided by Section 12 for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be borne by the District. The cost of any future expansions of or extensions to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control System constructed to provide E-16 sanitary sewer service to the Maugansville/Orchard Hills area shall be borne by the users of the system for whom such expansions or extensions are constructed. 15. Standard operating procedures for Preventative Maintenance and Minor Maintenance/Repair Items for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills Sewerage Facilities shall be as outlined in a publication titled "City of Hagerstown, Maryland - Water Pollution Control Department - Collection System Sewer Maintenance Programs", as amended, which is incorporated herein by reference, and includes the following articles I & II. I. Preventative Maintenance shall include, but not limited to: flushing (scheduled), televising (when needed), equipment lubrication, packing pumps, checking force main air relief valves, painting (when needed), lawn maintenance, snow removal, visits to pumping stations compatible with WPC schedule(s), and response(s) to alarm. II. Minor Maintenance/Repair shall include, but not limited to: small electrical items [i.e. switches, circuit breakers, fuses, light bulbs, motors (two (2) H.P. and smaller)], alarm system, clean comminutor, normal manhole repair, and shall be limited to an expenditure of not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300.) for any one (1) incident. Said amount is subject to periodic review. If there is a series of related minor maintenance/repair items, exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.), it becomes major maintenance/repair as described in Article III, hereinafter. Items denoted under the following articles III $ IV shall be considered District responsibility. Revenues to fund same shall be set by the District and included in the City's billing as part of the Debt Service and Administrative cost payable to the District. E-17 III. Major Maintenance/Repair shall include, but not limited to: line replacement, manhole replacement, pump, motor and misc. pumping station equipment replacement, manhole rim adjustments, replacement of bearing/shafts, repair depressed areas over trenches including paving, repairs to structures due to normal wear and tear and shall be based on expenditures greater than three hundred dollars ($300.) for any given item. All major repairs and/or equipment replacement may be handled by the City at District cost upon mutual agreement and proper notification from the City that any such work is necessary. The City may employ outside contractor(s) to perform certain repairs, such as electrical. A field decision shall be made regarding emergency repairs, depending upon time of day or calendar day (weekend or holiday) if District staff cannot be reached. The District shall be properly notified as soon as possible thereafter, that they can be reached. IV. Vandalism - all damages done to stations will be covered under the District's Business Comprehensive Policy. Any portion of the damage not covered by the insurance to be borne by the District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the District have caused these presents to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized. (SEAL OF CITY) ATTEST : __ _ R I. errim CLERK (DISTRICT SEAL) \.1 uI alme Dawson SECRE ARY-TREASURER CITY OF HAGERSTOWN BY: - i/ Donald R. Fru ��y MAYOR G4 gd,,�.n7tiZ WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT Patricia W. Wolford, Chairwoman WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY COMMISSION � ~ W J 0 � • - J r 'iii wFh_ 'OOO NV J�mO~Z C i` p ¢ mozX wa S~fOp E �'w^3riw a NNWG H .W LdZ_ E sW z W—�F- - wi w ai< x o rc =¢ z Fti z s> F-ro�Or u x w r o z ¢¢ y x��= _ i'^ m F a¢ u f- ai¢¢ aZ oF¢W W E ¢ m F Z z¢ OFF ai m-+PW Ha'W_�% w"QW N lImN do3NooT -� ¢ I z w¢ o Q z s a w J u¢ r m o w O ym ¢ Illjj J I I t�.: 6 a x¢ , J J W W T W> W O 2 K J NYOW W Jp,yOp Q �� C..: Q ? x a x¢ o o ' w Q a �aN ZOa -d> F ¢ J z i= ¢ H a J 3 u o w a 3 Z Q OOOOOOO00m®O©®®OOw-O'-OmO®Wa}w aNY wll`���da= vV � I NOON UZJ o x-j�3 Jo maQ JJO<czw Oz r. o?do r-\ / L� ' � i�\ r I ,0091I 31YJ5 ((y / N n o ,j P: to zNn 03 J �� IJ [� ♦ _r� '�� W z K mf V N ¢ w ? � maroN��a t�ra si � ,-t._ � � TI a Qs •O o9�s u 1 8 i o 0 so E-19 AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR FOUNTAIN HEAD AREA • BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN AND •THE WASHIIIGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT SUBJECT: FOUNTAIN HEAD SEWER PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of t sill 1r• , 1977,by and between the City of Hagerstown (hereinafter called the CITY) and the Wash- ington County Sanitary District (hereinafter called the DISTRICT) is aimed at pro- viding sewer service to the Fountain Head area extending from the Northern Avenue City corporate limits northward to Long Meadow Road, under a Joint cooperative effort. The 'Fountain Head area' as used herein includes Fountain Head Heights, Rolling Hills, Orchard Grove, Falrgreen Acres and other areas Identified by the special boundary shown on the Plat of Subdistrict No. 6 attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. The Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan shows that the most cost effective way to rve the Fountain Head area is by connection with the City's sewer system with sewage treatment to be accomplished at the City's plant. Upon recommendations of the City Board of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners, the City by resolution dated March 7, 1977, and the District by resolution dated March 14, 1977, accepted the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan, and each expressed its intent to enter into negotiations for the establishment of arrangements between those two governmental entities for the implemen- tation of the Plan, based on a conceptual agreement endorsed along with the resolutions. The Board of Washington County Commissioners by resolution dated March 8, 1977, m4nl- fested its support for this concept, as well as for the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan itself. Both the city and the District recognize the urgency for providing sewer service to the ountain Head area at the earliest possible date. F-1 AGREEMENT PUFUk i9I p SAN Y SEWER SERVICE BY AND BETWEEN TTTHE CITY OF OHAGERST0WN AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT • NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The exact area to be provided with sanitary sewer service under this AGREE- MENT shall be that area within the following boundaries: (1) Western Maryland Railroad Tracks; (2) Long Meadow Road from the Western Maryland Railroad Tracks to Pennsylvania Avenue (U.S. Route Nil) Including all parcels fronting on the north side of Long Meadow Road between Paradise Church Road and Porter Chemical Road; (3) Pennsylvania Avenue (U.S. Route #11) between Long Meadow Road and the intersect point of the north boundary of parcel #452 on tax map #24; (4) North boundary of parcel 1452 on tax map #24; (5) Westerly and southerly boundary of Subdistrict 16 as platted and recorded on September 16, 1970 from the north boundary of parcel 1452 on tax map #24 to the Western Maryland Railroad Tracks. Furthermore, the District shall revise its Subdistrict 16 boundaries as platted to. include all properties fronting on the north side of Northern Avenue from Pennsylvania Avenue to Fountain Head Road, as well as those properties fronting on either side of Pennsylvania Avenue between Rest Haven Cemetery and Crestwood Drive that, as of the effective date of this AGREEMENT, are not city of Hagerstown sewer customers. 2. The District shall not make any expansions or other alterations to the boundaries of Subdistrict No. 6 nor establish any other subdistrict within the area proposed by the Antietam Basin '201' Facilities Plan to be served by the City of Hagerstown Water Pollution Control Plant without prior negotiations with the City. F-2 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AND WASIIINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT DRAFT AGREEMENT - 11/30/77 SUBJECT: FOUNTAIN HEAD SEWER PROJECT 3. The City and District shall cooperate in a joint pursuit of the work involved In the current grant for Step 2 Design (C-240446-01) work in Fountain Head, and they shall likewise work Jointly toward obtaining and carrying out the subsequent grant for Step 3 Construction (C-240446-02) with the District to be the applicant and grantee on the grants for Step 2 Design and Step 3 Construction. The primary work effort and responsibility for these two grants shall be with the District. 4. The City and District shall cooperate in a joint pursuit of the work involved in the current grants for Step 2 Design and Step 3 Construction for the City's Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements project (C-240335-02 and 03), and the City's Water Pollution Control Plant Improvements project (C-240335-04 and 05), with the City as the applicant and grantee on these grants. The primary work effort and responsibility for these grants shall be with the City. 5. The City shall with official representation assist the District at any public hearing to be held pursuant to the requirements of the Sanitary District law, to the extent necessary to present and to explain the charges contemplated to be levied by the City for the sewerage services it is to furnish to the residents of the Fountain Head area. 6. The City and District shall jointly review in a spirit of full cooperation the construction plans prepared for the Fountain Head project. In drafting speci- fications there shall be adopted whichever of the two entities' current sewer specifications is the more stringent, unless the parties hereafter agree to the contrary. It shall also include, but may not necessarily be limited to, such considerations as hydrogeology, manhole locations, and easements or rights -of -way. F-3 At,RtEMLNI FOR PROVISION OF ZIANIIAKY StWtK StRVICE FOR FOUNTAIN HEAD AREA BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT 7. Construction contracts for the Step 3 Construction work shall be awarded and managed by the District, except that construction inspection shall be under Joint City/District management with full authority to issue orders, change orders and other construction procedures, utilizing City and/or District Inspection person - net or outside inspection services as mutually agreed upon by City and District. No duplicatn of inspection services, either on the part of the City or District, shall be charged to the project. S. Upon completion of the Step 3 Construction work in Fountain Head, the District shall retain ownership of all sewerage facilities; e.g. interceptors, col- lection lines, pumping stations constructed under Step 3. The District shall save and hold harmless the City from any liability directly and indirectly incurred there- with in the design and construction inspection of the Fountain Head sewer system, pro- vided that in areas of design and construction where the City and District cannot agree, the District's decision shall prevail. 9. The City shall act as the District's agent in operating and maintaining at Users expense the Fountain Head Sewer System and in billing the Fountain Head sewer customers. The City shall have the authority to monitor water and waste flows to determine volume, flow delivery rate and/or strength of same. Furthermore, the Foun- tain Head Sewer System shall be monitored to .assure compliance with the applicable inflow/infiltration requirements. Upon request by the City, the District shall permit the City to examine and make copies of all the District's records to effectuate :?:_ purpose of this AGREEMENT. It is intended that all costs incurred by the City in connection with the City acting as the District's agent in maintaining and operating the Fountain Head sewer system shall be included in charges established under Section 10 of this AGREEMENT for the Fountain Head area. F-4 rv„tiK ANU 611Y LUUNI.IL AND WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT DRAFT AGREEMENT - 11/30/77 SUBJECT: FOUNTAIN HEAD SEWER PROJECT 10. The charge by the City for transporting the sewage emanating from the Fountain Head area through the City sewer lines, for treating the sewage at the City's Plant, and for maintaining and operating the sewerage system within the Fountain Head area shall be based on metered water consumption and shall be in accordance with the provisions of the City Code for such services. The District shall be kept advised by the City of any proposed changes in the Code or any other policy affecting such charges so that the District may have the opportunity to comment on same. The user charge rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the District residential, commercial and industrial users of the system located within the Fountain Head area shall be one and two-thirds (1 2/3) times the rates for domestic type wastes to be charged to the City residential, commercial and industrial users of the system situated within the Corporate Limits of the City. The present user charge rate for domestic type wastes to be charged by the City for providing the abovementioned services shall be $1.50/1,000 gallons of eater used, with 10,000 gallon/quarter minimum. A commercial and industrial rate system meeting all applicable requirements of Federal, State and local regulations shall establish the surcharges and other additional rates to be charged to all commercial and industrial users of the system. Surcharges for loadings and flow delivery rates in excess of domestic type wastes shall not be subject to a one and two-thirds (1 2/3) multiplier. The commercial and industrial rate system shall not alter the provisions of this Section establishing a one and two-thirds (1 2/3) multiplier. 11. In addition to the charges described in Section 10, there shall be a benefit charge per connection assessed by the City based on capacity allocation. The present benefit charge shall be $420.00 or shall be equal to the product of the allocation (in gallons per day) multiplied by $2.10 per gallon, whichever is greater. The final 'enefit charge shall be the same as the benefit charge applied to city users of the system located in the corporate limits of the City. The District shall be kept apprised of any user or benefit increase proposed by the City. F-5 AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ..:',,'. FOR FOUN[AIN HEAD?REA BY AND BETWEEN THECi'o:bFT;HAGERSTOWNAND :. THE 7, WASHINGTON .000NTE SANITARY+'QISTRICT.,,. 12. The City shall include in` its.billingto"the Fountain` Head area sewer cus- tomers, that amount determined by the Dtstriet to. berequtred.to cover District admin- 1 istrative costs and any amount that: may berequired §to cover debt service for sewerage facilities installed within the Fountald Head area.v.:These monies shall be forwarded to the District upon receipt in accordance with i,schedule mutually acceptable to the District's Secretary -Treasure' and the City's FinancexDirector so as to enable the District to meet its financial obligations pertaining to the Fountain Head area. 13. The City and the District shall Jointly prepare for adoption by both enti- ties, a standardized application/allocation/parmltting system and a sewer use ordi- nance for the Fountain Head area.: Capacity for, wastewater contributions to the Hagers- town Water Pollution Control Plant shall be allocated to each customer account when the prospective customer receives approval of an Application for Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit. The City assures that adequate capacity will be made available for those prospective residential and commercial customers, present and future, within the Foun- tain Head area, consistent with the Antietam,Basin '201'"Facilities Plan with a maxi- mum total allocation to the District users located in the Fountain Head area of 318,000 gallons of equivalent domestic concentration per day, based on the calculated usage rate used in Section 11 of this AGREEMENT. 14. The City shall provide the Distri+et with a list of delinquent accounts on a quarterly basis and shall assist the District in the collection of these accounts through discontinuance of water, service or any other lawful means. if these means of collection fail, then the District shall exercise its statutory rights and enter suit against all offenders in accordance withprevaiitng collection policies of th'e District. Likewise, the District shall by suit seek to'enforce connection against all property owners who fall to connect to the sewer'syftem.in the time, allowed there r s • AGREEMENT FOR PRUVIS4ON OF MNIIMKV StWLK StKVILt • FOR,FOUATAIN�HEAD AREA�1,. BY AND BETWEEN 1HECItY,OFHAGERSTOWN AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY.. SANITARY, DISTRICT,,, 15. The City of Hagerstown shall operate and maintain all sewerage facilities in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guide- lines, and other criteria of any Federal*¢rStatexand local agencies and Jurisdictions. The cost of any future upgradings'or oche alterations made to the Hagerstown Water (ti4 Pollution Control System constructed to meet future applicable rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, guidelines. and othereriterla of any Federal, State and local agencies and Jurisdictions, shall be borne by all users -of the system in -accordance with a system of charges to be established under Section 10 and/or 11. The cost of any futureexpansions or extensions of any kind to provide sanitary sewer service for allocations in excess of that provided by Section 13 for. the Fountain Head area shall be borne by the District. • The cost of anyifuture'expansions of or extensions to the Hagerstown Water Pollution Control. System constructed to provide sanitary ;r service to the Fountain Head area shall be borne by the users of the system for who such expansions or extensions are constructed. • 16. The District shall assist the City. in a spirit of full cooperation to develop institutional agreements for such areas which are located outside the City corporate limits where sanitary sewer service is presently, provided by the city and for which the City desires such agreements. ^w% LLxtl.tlt rut( , _. .... .. .... ..�...,. ��....6- FOR FOUNTAIN HEAD AREA BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the District have caused these presents to be executed by their respective officers, thereunto duly authorized. (SEAL OF ) CITY OF GERSTOW.�N �w- A ATTEST: •l/C„ oseph. V. Walzi j7 Varner L. Paddack CITY CLERK MAYOR (DISTRICT EAL) ATTEST: Palma J. Dawson SECRETARY -TREASURER WASHING N COUNTY SAN TAR�Ir.T BY: James L. Eckel CHAIRMAN F-8 REVISION OF FOUNTAINHEAD SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN (WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DEPARTMENT) In accordance with discussions between duly authorized representatives of the Washington County Sanitary District (hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT") and the City of Hagerstown's Water Pollution Control Department (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") it was recognized that the Fountainhead Service Agreement between these parties, dated 5 December 1977, should be amended to set forth specifically what utility charges are applicable and to define the Standard Operating Procedures for Preventative Maintenance and Minor Maintenance/Repair Items. Since the Fountainhead Service Agreement was drafted and finalized, a Service Agreement was drafted and subsequently approved for the Maugansville/Orchard Hills Area, Subdistrict No. 15. Within that document (i) there are specifically recited what utility charges are applicable, and (ii) Standard Operating Procedures for Preventative Maintenance and Minor Maintenance/ Repair Items are defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that General Conditions Number 8 and Number 15 from the SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR THE MAUGANSVILLE/ ORCHARD HILLS AREA, dated June 22, 1982, are hereby incorporated by reference into the Fountainhead Service Agreement. The text of General Condition Number 8 of the Maugansville Agreement shall supersede and replace General Condition Number 9 of the Fountainhead Service Agreement. The text of General Con- dition Number 15 of the Maugansville Agreement will then con- stitute a new Condition Number 17 in the Fountainhead Service Agreement. The effective date of this revision is September 1, 1983; it shall not have any retroactive force. Nothing in this Revision shall be deemed to alter the said Fountainhead Service Agreement, except as hereinabove stated. WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT By : _ //--S*: arold B. Nunamaker, Administrator Date: f -3o-23 CITY OF HAGERSTOWN Water Pollution Control Dep�lent 3z rator Date: CI RESOLUTION • The Chairman presented to his fellow Commissioners the contract between the City of Hagerstown and the Washington County Sanitary District dated December 5 , 1977, whereunder the City is to provide treatment service for sewage emanating from the Fountain Head portion of Subdistrict No. 6 on terms set forth in that document.. All members expressed themselves as having read the contract and being familiar with same. Upon Motion made by Commissioner spickler and seconded by Commissioner Hebb , and with all Commissioners voting in favor thereof, it was RESOLVED: �;.• That the Washington County Sanitary District enter into the above -mentioned contract with the City of Hagerstown and that the Chairman of this Commission is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Contract on behalf of the Washington County Sanitary District and that Palmer Dawson shall attest same as Secretary -Treasurer of the Washington County Sanitary • Commission, and that a copy of that Contract be appended to these Minutes. F-11 CITY- O xOERSTOw\ RESOLUTION O ADOPT AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DIST.-t.CT \D THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN WHICH PROVIDES FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THE DESIGNATED FOUNTAIN HEAD AREA LOCATED WITHIN WASHINGTON COUNTY .E,'.S: ::.e Mayor and Council of the City of Hagorstown is cognizant of an cxistiing 4. Catf. nazard in the Fountain Head area of Washington County-, and .E.REAS: t e City of Hagerstown has the capability to provide such sanitary sewer service to t,ne Fountain Head area; and . REAS: the City elected officials have been offered the opportunity and are desirous of providing sanitary sewer service to the Fountain Head area to abate a health nazarc ich has grown in recent years to serious proportions adversely affecting ground water in both the City and County; and SEAS: the Washington County Sanitary District is the responsible authority for sewerir.g the fountain Head area; and nEREAS: zr, AGREEMENT to provide sanitary sewer service to the Fountain Head area has ,:een negotiated by the representatives of the City of Hagerstown and the Washington County S?nirary District with the concurrence and approval of the City of Hagerstown 3oarc of Sanitary Sewer Commissioners; and :EREAS: this AGREEMENT protects the interests of the City of Hagerstown, the Washington County Sanitary District, and the potential customers to be served under this said AGREEMET. OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown do heraay enter into the following AGREEMENT, contained herein, which provides for sanitary sewer service to the Fountain Head area located within Washington County; and 1E IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor of the City of Hagerstown, Maryland shall have the authority to sign the subject. AGREEMENT in behalf of the City of Hagerstown. r f7 , IATE INTRODUCED:• U' $ % SIGNED: - _ Varner L. Paddack "TC ADOPTED: A' ^n,, ny / /'±7 MAYOR F-12 APPENDIX G AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE TO THE SHARPSBURG PIKE AREA Tllt S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF 1IAGE:I1STOWN, HERE! NAI TER CALLED THE "CITY", AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT, HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "DISTRICT", DEFINES THE TERMS ANT) CONDITIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE TO THAT AREA OUTLINED ON THE ATTACHED PLAT, HERE INAFTEIt CALLED TIIE "SE:ItVICIi AREA" BOTH THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT AGREE: THAT TIIE: SLRVIci: AItE:A WILL BE SERVED BY CONNECTION TO THE CITY'S EXISTING WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM, TIIE CITY WILL ACCEPT OWNFRSDII'OF A PUMP STATION, FORCE MAIN AND COLLECTOR LINES AS DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED BY THE DISTRICT, CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED: PROVIDING THAT TIIE FOLLOWING 1. TIIE DISTRICT WILL COMPLETE ALL DESIGN WORK ON Tilt? SEWER EXTENSION FOR THE SERVICE AREA, OBTAIN ALI, PERMITS AND EASEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, AWARD AIJ. CONTRACTS, AND MANAGE AND INSPECT CONSTRUCTION. Till? CITY RESERVES THE ItIGHT TO ALSO INSPECT CONS'THUCTION FOIL CONFORMANCE TO THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AT NO EXPENSE TO THE DIS'1'lt1C1'. G-1 2. TIIE DISTRICT WILL OBTAIN AS MUCH FINANCING AS POSSIBLE IN THE FORM OF GRANTS AND CONTFt1UUTION� FROM VARIOUS SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWER EXTENSION. 3. TIIE 1)ISTRICT WILL MAINTAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE SEWER EXTENSION FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM TIIF DATE OF ACCEPTANCE FROM TIIE CONTRACTOR. THE WARItAN'i'Y, GUARANTY AND CONTRACTOR' S PAYMENT BOND SHALL EXTENT) ONE (1) YEAR FROM TIIE_DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. AFTER THAT TIME, OWNERSHIP WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO TIIE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN. 4. TIIE CITY SHALL ACCEPT OWNERSHIP OIT111? SEWER EXTENSION AND ASSUME A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE SYSTEM PROVIDING 'ALAI THE CITY'S TOTAL FINANCIAL LIABILITY AND OBLIGATION IS NOT MORE TITAN $200,000.00. TIIE CITY'S FINANCIAL, LIABILITY WILL BE CALCULATED AS TIIE? DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TIIE TOTAL ACTUAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COST LESS THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF GRANTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED BY TIIE DISTRICT. IF THIS CALCULATED AMOUNT IS GREATER TITAN $200, 000.00, THE CITY WILL. HAVE THE OPTION WHETHER TO ACCEPT OWNEIISIIIP OF THE SEWER SYSTEM AND TIIE GItEATEIt AMODN1' G-2 OF FINANCIAL LIABILITY. AT TILL COMPLETION (Hi Ill' PROJECT AND UPON INVOICING THE CITY OF IIAUEIRSTOIV;;, TILE CITY WILL PAY THE INVOICED SUM UP '1'O $20(I, UUU, O(1 WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS. 5. IF THE CITY WILL ASSUME OWNERSHIP OF TILE SIIAIiI'SINIk(; PIKE SEWER SYSTEM, TILE CITY WILL UI'EItA'I'E A,NI) MAINTAIN THE SEWER SYSTEM CONCURRENTLY WITH S1'SII.\t CIIECK•-our AND START-UP. THE I)1S'1'It I CT SHALL Itt: RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING AND START UP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SI'ECIF1CATI(INS AT NO EXPENSE '1O TIIE t:]'1'Y. '111E CITY SHALL ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF REGULAR OI'h:ICAI'IU,N AND MAINTENANCE UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE SYS'T'EM FROM THE CONTRACTOR AND ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY (I ION COMPLETION OF THE ONE (1) YEAR WARRANTY I'Elt 1 UU Olt UPON CORRECTION OF ANY CONTRACTOR PUNCH LIST I'T'EMS WIIICIIEVER OCCURS LAST. 6. REVISIONS TO THE GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT DAT1:1) APRIL 26, 1978 AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A OF '1111S AGREEMENT ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED BY BOTH '1'IfE U1 S'I'U i t f AND THE CITY. 7. REVISIONS TO TIIE DETAI LED SERVICE AGREEMENTS rot: SANITARY SUBDISTRICT 6 AND 15 AS SHOWN ON EXIIIL'I'f is OF THUS AGREEMENT ARE HEREBY ACCEP'T'ED 151 1111( DISTRICT AND TILE CITY. G-3 S . IN TIIE EVENT THAT THE CITY EXERCISES 'TIE; UHT I UN ID REFUSE OWNERSHIP AND FINANCIAL LIABILITY 1`(IIt 'IIlE SEWER EXTENSION INTO THE SERVICE AREA, 111E CI TV AN!) TIIE 1)1 STRICT SHALL NEGOT I ATE A DETAILED St:t(V I CL; AGREEMENT SIMILAR TO THOSE AGREEMENTS ALI(E.AI)Y IN EFFECT FOR SUBDISTRICTS 6 AND 15 AS MOD III El) i(Y' SECTIONS 6 AND T OF THIS DOCUMENT. TIIE I'Hl'I,IMf1.1ItY DRAFT OF AN AGREEMENT FOR PROPOSED SUBDISTRICT NO. 14 (EXHIBIT C) WILT. SERVE AS THE GENERAI, ItASIS I DC THIS DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENT, T'HE CI'LY' AND DI STItI CT AGREE THAT IF OWNERSIII P U1' TIIE SIIAitI'L'UI" I'IKE SEWER SYSTEM ULTIMATELY I(EMAINS WITH 'IliE DISTRICT, TIIE DISTRICT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OPERATION AND, MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM. IT I S FURTIIEIt AGREED THAT THE CITY'S RATES FOR SERVICE Fflt CUSTOMERS CONNECTED TO THE SIIAItPSB111{G PIKE SEWER SYSTEM WILL BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL COST OF SERVICE. PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND NO (;IIARGE WI Li BE MADE FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE SIIAHI'SDD1t(; PIKE SEWER SYSTEM UNLESS COSTS ARE ACTUALLY INCUH1(EI) FOR THIS PURPOSE BY THE CITY. COST OF SERVICE SIlAlA, INCLUDE OPERA'I'1 NO EXPENSES, DEI'Rt:CI AT I ON, ItETU1tN ON INVESTMENT AND CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS. G-4 THIS DOCUMENT, ALONG WITH EXHIBITS A, B, AND C, CONSTI'1'U'1'E THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT REGARDING THE SEWER EXTENSION TO THE SERVICE AREA. NO OTHER TERMS Olt CONDITIONS, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ARE APPLICABLE. (SEAL OF CITY) ATTEST: 7EORG1 ANN N. LUCAS, CITY CLERK DATE: January 11, 1988 (DISTRI(;T SEAL) ATTEST: 7/, GERRIANNM. HAMMOND, SECRETARY/TREASURER DATE: December 28, 1987 CITY O1• IIAGERSTOWN DATE: January 11, 1988 WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY COMMISSION BY/a. It( ERT E. HOLSING' , CIIA 1 ItMAN DATE: December 28. 1987 G-5 EXHIBIT "A" REVISIONS TO THE GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT THESE SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF THE GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 26, 1978 AND EXECUTED ON MAY 1, 1978 SHALL BE MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 8 - THE SECOND SENTENCE SHALL BE DELETED AND THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE SHALL BE ADDED: "THE CITY WILL RESERVE A CAPACITY ALLOCATION FOR ALL NON -CITY CUSTOMERS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED AREA IN AN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO 100,000 AVERAGE GALLONS PER DAY OF DOMESTIC STRENGTH WASTE WATER. THIS RESERVE WILL BE REDUCED BY THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF INDIVIDUAL ALLOCATIONS APPROVED FOR FUTURE COUNTY CUSTOMERS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE FUTURE CUSTOMERS LOCATED IN THE SHARPSBUHG PIKE AREA AND THE AREA IN AND AROUND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT. IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT 30,000 GALLONS PER DAY WILL BE ALLOCATED FOR THE SHARPSBUHG PIKE AREA AND 45,000 GALLONS PER DAY WILL BE ALLOCATED FOR THE AREA IN AND AROUND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT. THESE ALLOCATIONS FOR THE SHARPSBURG PIKE AREA AND THE AREA IN AND AROUND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT ARE IN ADDITION 'L m THE 100,000 GALLON ALLOCATION DESIGNATED FOR NON -CITY CUSTOMERS IN GENERAL." "THIS CAPACITY ALLOCATION SYSTEM REPLACES THE RESERVE CAPACITY ALLOCATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SANITARY SUBDISTRICTS. RESERVE CAPACITY ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS OF ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED NULL AND VOID. UNLESS MUTUALLY AGREED BY BOTH PARTIES, TOTAL RESERVE CAPACITY ALLOCATIONS FOR NON -CITY CUSTOMERS IN GENERAL WILL BE REDUCED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS TO NOT MORE THAN 25% OF THE TOTAL WPC PLANT RESERVE ALLOCATION AS DETERMINED BY THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT. IT 1S THE INTENT OF THIS SECTION TO ASSURE THAT THE CITY MAINTAINS A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE WPC PLANT CAPACITY AT ALL TIMES. IT IS NOT THE INTENT OI THIS SECTION TO LIMIT OR HINDER DEVELOPMENT IN NON -CITY AREAS. AS NEEDED, THE DISTRICT OR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAY REQUEST INCREASES IN CAPACITY ALLOCATION. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL SHALL HAVE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE OR DENY ANY SUCH INCREASE IN CAPACITY ALLOCATION. IT IS MUTUALLY ACCEPTED THAT, IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY CANNOT PROVIDE SEWER SERVICE TO FUTURE COUNTY CUSTOMERS, THE DISTRICT AND/OR THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROVIDE SEWER SERVICE WITHIN THE DESIGNATED AREA BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS." SECTION 11 - THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE SHALL BE ADDED: "THE DISTRICT SHALL NOT COMMENCE ANY DESIGN WORK FOR SEWER EXTENSIONS INTO ANY PROPOSED SUBDISTRICT IN THE DESIGNATED AREA G-7 EXHIBIT "B" REVISIONS TO DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY SUBDISTRICTS NUMBERED 6 AND 15 THE DETAILED SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR SANITARY SUBDISTRICTS 6 AND 15 DATED DECEMBER 5, 1977 AND JUNE 22, 1982 RESPECTFULLY ARE HEREBY MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT FOR SANITARY SUBDISTRICT 6 - SECTION 13: DELETE THE LAST SENTENCE OF THIS SECTION. AGREEMENT FOR SANITARY SUBDISTRICT 15 - SECTION 12: DELETE THE LAST TWO SENTENCES OF THIS SECTION. ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS FOR BOTH AGREEMENTS - A. THE DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS SHALL BE $1,000 AND THE DEFINITION FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME. B. THE DISTRICT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS FOR ALL LINES AND APPURTENANCES OWNED BY THE DISTRICT FOR CONTRACTORS, OTHER UTILITIES, CABLE TELEVISION COMPANIES, ETC. C. THE CITY WILL MAINTAIN ALL CLEANOUTS OWNED BY THE DISTRICT INI SUBDISTRICT 6 AND 15. D. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 13 OF THE GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT, THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT AGREE TO RENEGOTIATE T'HIS AGREEMENT SO THAT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DISTRICT OWNED SEWERAGE FACILITIES ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT. r_x UNTIL PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL." TILE PHRASE "PRIOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CITY" SHALL BE REPLACED WITH, "PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL." SECTION 12 - THE FOLLOWING SECTION SHALL BE ADDED: "SECTION 12. THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT SHALL JOINTLY COOPERATE IN MATTERS RELATING TO ANNEXATION OF LAND INTO THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN." SECTION 13 - THE FOLLOWING SECTION SHALL BE ADDED: "SECTION 13. THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT MUTUALLY AGREE TOTHE CONCEPT THAT THE DISTRICT WILL ASSUME OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SEWERAGE FACILITIES OWNED BY THE DISTRICT. THE CITY AND DISTRICT WILL JOINTLY COOPERATE IN RENEGOTIATING EXISTING SERVICE AGREEMENTS TO TRANSFER THESE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE DISTRICT. IT 1S MUTUALLY AGREED THAT THE RATE FOR SERVICE IN ALL SUBDISTRICTS SHOULD BE CALCULATED GIVING CONSIDERATION TO THE FACT THAT THE DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. IT IS ALSO AGREED THAT THE CITY SHALL RECOVER THE ACTUAL COST OF SERVICE THROUGH THE RATES CHARGED TO DISTRICT CUSTOMERS. COST OF SERVICE SHALL INCLUDE OPERATING EXPENSES, DEPRECIATION, RETURN ON INVESTMENT, AND CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS." G-9 w APPENDIX H Date: 1 November 1984 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Industrial Waste Pretreatment under the GENERAL SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT dated May 1, 1978 A. It is hereby understood and agreed by the CITY and the DISTRICT that the General Service Agreement dated May 1, 1978 was originally intended to provide for an adequate, reasonable, and controlled industrial waste pretreatment program that would be implemented jointly by both parties. This general intent is substantiated by the following excerpted sections of the original agreement: 1. "The CITY shall accept ... the wastewaters generated... consistent with population projections, land uses, and other considerations addressed in the Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan, and in accordance with a controlled capacity allocation system established and equitably managed by the CITY..." Interpretation: This should be construed to include Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program because -- a. Excessive industrial loading impacts reserve capacity for population projection b. Industrial Pretreatment is a consideration _ .. addressed in the Antietam Basin Facilities "'• ' Plan c. A controlled allocation system must necessarily provide for acceptable limitations on industrial wastes. H-1 4. "The CITY shall perform the operation and maintenance of all sewerage facilities in the Designated Area at the user's expense. The CITY shall have the authority to monitor water and waste flows to determine volume, flow delivery rate, and/or strength of same." Interpretation: Joint implementation of an Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program is authorized here by virtue of: a. The Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program is an integral part of operation and maintenance. b. The CITY'S authority to monitor waste flows for both volume and strength is related to industrial waste as well as other considerations. 5. "The charge for ... treating the sewage ... shall be in accordance with the City Code" ... "The user charge ... for industrial users ... shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations." Interpretation: Since the City Code provides for surcharges for high strength industrial waste, the Industrial Pretreatment Program is implied by this section. Also, the Industrial Waste Pretreatment. Program and User Charge Systems are federal and state requirements. 8. "Capacity for wastewater contributions shall be allocated ..." "The CITY assures that adequate capacity will be made available ..." Interpretation: a. Capacity is not necessarily limited to gallonage but also strength of wastewater. IMa b. In order for the CITY to assure capacity, an Industrial Pretreatment Program is necessary. The foregoing provisions indicate that an Industrial Pretreatment Program is generally in accordance with the existing General Service Agreement and this Memorandum of understanding documents a mutual understanding that Industrial Pretreatment is specifically a joint responsibility within the Designated Area. B. To further define the CITY and DISTRICT responsibilities regarding Industrial Waste matters, the following terms and conditions are accepted by both parties: 1. .The DISTRICT will formally approve and adopt the Hagerstown Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program after it has been approved by the Maryland Office of Environmental Programs. The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and comment on the document prior to submittal to the state. 2. All industries in the Designated Area will be subject to the provisions of the City Code regarding industrial waste discharge limitations, permits, user charges, fines, testing, monitoring, pretreatment requirements, or other ordinance provision. The CITY will have primary responsibility for the conduct of the Industrial Pretreatment Program and the DISTRICT will use its legal authority to insure enforcement and fines. The DISTRICT will adopt whatever legal authority is necessary to jointly assist the CITY in Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program enforcement. All legal fees to be paid by the CITY of Hagerstown. 3. The CITY will have the authority to issue Industrial Waste Discharge permits to industries in the Designated Area in the same manner that such Permits are issued to industries located within the City. The CITY will exercise control of industries in the Designated Area , in the same manner that all industries connected to the W.P.C. system are controlled, except that the DISTRICT'S authority will be used for this purpose. 4. This Memorandum of Understanding is applicable to all Sanitary Subdistricts in the Designated Area including existing and future Subdistricts. The terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding are hereby accepted: Palmer Dawson, Executive Director Washington County Sanitary District Date: //-2--J' Ric Thomas, Manager Water Pollution Control Department City of Hagerstown, Maryland Date: $ 3 /7r7 Paul C. Waggoner, Chaifm4 ill am M.reichner, City Administrator Washington County Sani'taJ>YJistrict City of Hagerstown, Maryland Date://26J% Date: UO . i; /980' H-4 APPENDIX I Compilation of Financial Management Statistics, "FS Schedules" for publicly awned community sewerage systems. I-1 SCHEDULE FS FINANCIAL M'NAI,eENT STATISTICS Muff WATER & SEWER PING County Nate Washington Fiscal Year #1 1986/87 System Nate See "U" Washington County Sanitary District Fiscal Year #2 1987/88 FISCAL YEAR # FISCAL YEAR B Server charge revenue 813,164 Sewer charge revenue 882,954 C Connection charge revenue 87,026 Connection charge revenue 110,863 D Front ft assessment revenue 33,.264 Front ft assessment revenue 33.509 E Other revenue (complete schedule 813,066 Other revenue (complete schedule on 2 on e 2 898,009 F Total revenue 1,746,520 Total revenue 1,925,335 G Operation expense 959,109 Operation expense 1,055.,163 H Maintenance expense Maintenance expense 12,446 29.293 I Replacement costs Replacement costs J Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions K ,otal CM & R 971, 555 Total ctl & R 1,084,456 L Interest expense 426,624 Interest expense 438,662 M Depreciation expense 341,124 Depreciation expense 347,834 N Total expense 1,739,303 Total expense 1,870,952 O Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 7,217 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 54,383 P Debt principal 8,608,186 Debt principal 8,054,771 Q Total flow volume 465,101,200 Total flaw volute 472,313,100 R Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to he hevmd thorn rcna;rc ant;rinatam in the annual budget. Examples of "extraordinary" breakdoms might include a blower breakdom in the aeration system, large pump system motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this sewerage system. Generator SIApproximate cost of this potential repair (over) 1-2 i -2- TI Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary item (a bad, line of credit, escrow accou►t, working capital, etc.) Capital Reserve or line of Credit Additional ca fits Halfway & Highland Manor WWTP Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Year 2 Description Amount Amount Debt Service Fees—Admin Fees 504,474 522,710 Interest From Labor Charges 257,000 307,144 Penalty Charges 2,379 1,140 Interest 25,913 39,714 Miscellaneous 23,300 27,301 813,066 898,009 Contact Person: Capacity: 1.6 iro Gerrianne M. Hammond, CPA—Secretary/Treasurer N*E Users: residential 3623 33 West Washington Street ADDRESS ctmnercial 1142 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 (301) 791-3083 TELEPH0W N I-3 SCIIEDU.E FS FINANCIAL KIMITU4T STATISTICS UMI Y WATER & SEHfR PLANS County Mane Washington Systan Nane Hagerstown WWTP Fiscal Year #1__6-30-87 Fiscal Year #2 6-3-88 FISCAL YEAR #1 COLU4I 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COL" 2 i Steer charge revenue 2,914,687 Serer charge revenue 3,112,081 Connection charge revenue 37,020 Connection charge revenue 48 627 I Fr[%Deneti es�haar r2verlue 181,614 Fro? ft asstes r�rep1 ieelvpnue 364,264 Other revenue (ccirplete schedule Other revenue (cuiplete schedule on age 2 220,031 on page2) 415,100 Total revenue 3,353,352 Tota revenue 3,940,072 i Operation expense 2,314,409 Operation expense 2,798,437 1 Maintenance expense 200,534 Maintenance expense 146,182 Replacarent costs Replacement costs 0 0 1 s paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions 0 0 Total CM & R 2,514,943 Total CM & R 2,944,619 _ Interest expense 103,980 Interest expense 99, 517 I Depreciation expense 262,958 Depreciation expense (Net)** 519,353 Net)** I Total expense 2,881,881 Total expense 3,563,489 :) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 471,471 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 376,583 P Debt principal 38,480 Debt principal 38,560 Total flay volume 6.56 MGD Total this volUlle 6.16 MGD R Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those thich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraordinary" breakdowns might include a plower DreaKUUA" in the aeration syscal% large pulp systan motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this sewerage system. or electrical panel SI Approximate cost of this potential repair $l0000 - $15000 (over) * BENEFIT CHARGE is a capacity charge for Plant & Collection Systems. 4c'„ nFPRFr.TATTnN on city investment (Local share). Does not include DEPR. OH grant contribution -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary item (a bond, line of credit, escrow account, worming capital, etc.) Budgeted operating fund, balance at 4-27-89 1.7 million. Additional ccn nts Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Year 2 Description Anamt Pnuunt Interest Earned 140,634 148,910 s Other Income 15,798 2,755 Purchase Discounts 241 168 Lab Testing 2,455 1,255 Treatment Transported Waste 3,806 ----- Industrial Surcharges 57,055 261,613 Miscelleanous 42 399 220,031 415,100 Contact Person: ' Capacity: 8 4 ) Rick Thomas RE Users: residential 10107 1 Clean Water Circle ADDRESS • conllercial 2393 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 • (301) 791-4528 _ TELEPHONE N I-5 SO ETOLE FS FINANCIAL t4WCB I{t STATISTICS COUNTY WATER & SE3ifR PLANS County Nate WASHINGTON Fiscal Year #1 6/30/87 Systan Nate THE TOWN OF WILLIAMSPORT Fiscal Year #2 6/30/88 FISCAL YEAR 41 COLUMN 1 7/1/86 - 6/30/87 FISCAL YEAR ,42 COLUMN 2 7/1/87 - 6/30/88 Serer charge revenue 126 299 Serer charge revenue 131,237 Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue 4 .500 Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (ccrplete schedule on page 2) 2,678 Other revenue (catplete schedule on page 2) 2,884 Total revenue Total revenue 1 Operation expense a Operation expense Maintenance expense Maintenance expense Replacatent costs Replacetent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions 73,393 Fees paid to other jurisdictions 85,103 Tot,ii C4&R 40 110 R Total GI&R 43,067 Interest expense 16,403 Interest expense 15,873 Depreciation expense 32,512 Depreciation expense 34,100 Total expense 162,418 Total expense 178,143 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (31, 441) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (39,522) Debt principal 11,800 Debt principal 13,750 Total floe volute 70,270,000 Total floe volute 106,580,000 Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraordinary" breakdans might include a bloner breakdavt in the aeration syste large pulp systeninotor and control, clarifier sludge scraper am and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the nest costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this seherage system. LARGE PUMP SYSTEM MOTOR AND CONTROL Approximate cost of this potential repair g25 nnn (over) I-6 -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a band, line of credit, escrow account, harking capital, etc.) WORKING CAPITAL AND BORROWING FROM THE TOWN'S GENERAL FUND IF NECESSARY Additional caments THE TOWN OPERATES ITS WATER AND SEWER AS ONE FUND FOR BOOK PURPOSES. THE SEWER CHARGE REVENUES AND CONNECTION CHARGE REVENUES REPORILU ON PAGE 1 UI hUb SCHEDULE ARE IHE ACTUA REVENUES FOR THE SEWER OPERATION. THE OTHER REVENUES AND EXPENSES WHICH COULD NOT BE SPEC[FICAL IDENTIFIED AS RELATED TO THE SEWER OPERATION WERE ALLOCATED TO THE SEWER OPERATION BASED ON THE PERCENTAGE OF SEWER REVENUE TO TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND REVENUE. Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Year 2 Description Amount Mnint DIVIDEND INCOME 26 23 INTEREST INCOME 2,646 2,859 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 6 2 2,678 2,884 Contact Person: city: s: residential 622 camiercial 102 PATRICK E. KLINE NAPE PARK. KLINE AND COMPANY. P.A. ADDRESS 28 WEST WASHINGTON ST.. HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND 21740 301-733-0350 TELEPHONE M 1-7 SCIEDIA.E FS FINANCIAL MMUWGEMENT STATISTICS COMITY WAIER & SEWER inc County Name WASHrNr,TON Systen Name THE CORPORATION OF CLEAR SPRING Fiscal Year #1 6/30/87 Fiscal Year #2 6/30/88 FISCAL YEAR #1 COL" 1 7/1/86 - 6/30/87 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLLtN 2 711/87 - 6/30/88 Seger charge revenue 58 160 Seer charge revenue 58,562 Connection charge revenue 2 2 Connection charge revenue 550 Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessrment revenue Other revenue (complete schedule cn page 2) 7,946 Other revenue (carplete schedule on page 2) 4,816 Total revenue 68,306 Total revenue 63,928 Operation expense Operation expense 25,055 Maintenance expense 46 651 Maintenance expense 41,683 Replacement costs Replacement costs 4'749 Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions I GI&R R 9 15 Total CM & R 71,487 Interest expense 12,731 Interest expense 12,335 Depreciation expense 29 333 Depreciation expense 29,576 Total expense 111,679 Total expense 113,398 increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (43,373) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (49,470) Debt principal 8,375 Debt principal 8,709 Total flow volume 29,102,000 Total flow volume 27,840,000 Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipab in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraorarnary" oreaKuo ns nngnc inciuue a muter ureaKUUMm m uie GeioLiui rya large pump systen motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this segerage systen. Blower Unit AF, ,xinate cost of this potential repair $3,000 (over) EII -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bcnd, line of credit, escrow account, rking capital, etc.) WORKING CAPITAL Additialal cannents The system is managed by the Maryland Environmental Service. (MES) All fees paid to MES are included in the maintenance expense. Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description PENALTIES AND INTEREST ON DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS INTEREST INCOME t Year I Aimnt $ 777 7,169 $7,946 Contact Person: Year 2 An mt $ 886 3,930 $4,816 acitY: .2 K D PATRICK E. KLINE NAME rs: residential 251 PARK KLINE AND COMPANY, P.A. PODRESS camiercial 106 28 WEST WASHINGTON STREET. HAGERSTOWN MARYLAND 21740 301-733-0350 TELEPHONE N I-9 /A SCIE FS F114°NCIAL WM3U4T STATISTICS cixuri TER & sau'R iva County Name Washington System Nave Town of Funkstown - Sewer System Fiscal Year #1 1987 Fiscal Year #2 1988 Ju y 1 o une 30 1987 u y 1 to June 30 1988 t r charge revenue 50,390 Saer charge revenue 59,983 Connection charge revenue 3,712 Connection charge revenue 746 Front ft assessment revenue ---- Front ft assessment revenue -_-_ Other revenue (complete schedule 8,224 Other revenue (canplete schedule 7,310 Total revenue 62 , 326 Total revenue 68.039 Operation expense 40,488 Operation expense 41.123 i Maintenance expense ---- Maintenance expense ---- I Replacement costs ___- Replacement costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions _--- Fees paid to other jurisdictions _--- ( Total CM & R 40,488 Total CM & R 41,123 Interest expense 5,231 Interest expense 4,793 .1 Depreciation expense 16,160 Depreciation expense 15,275 I Total expense 61,879 Total expense 61,191 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 447 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 6,848 I' Debt principal 13,234 Debt principal 13,460 1 Total flow volume 27.2 mg Total flay volume 12.5 mg R) Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those Wmich are or sucn a nature as to tie ueyaw uVm rqJaln in the annual budget. Examples of "extraordinary" breakdowns might include a blower breakdcvm in t aeratic large pump system motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Plea: identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this sewerage system. Install floating aerators to lagoon # 1 and # 2 (to replace defective defused aeration cvcteml & chlorine detector in the control building S Approximate cost of this potential repair $.71,000 (over) I-10 -2- Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary item (a bond, line of credit, escrow acco nt, wring capital, etc.) CDBG monies from Washington County - $65,000 Town monies - 6,000 Additional ccments Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Year 2 Description hrount Ano nt Income 8,224 7,310 :opacity: .15 WAD hers: residential 360 camercial 38 Contact Person: Fay L. Smith, Town Clerk wit Town of Funkstown S P.O. Box 235, Funkstown, MD 21734 301-791-0948 TELEPHOWE M SCTIQXIIf FS FINMICIAt f• iNiIMTII STATISTICS (Billy WI11Ut & SLWUI PAWS County Nam Washington Fiscal Year #1 86/87 Systan Nate Hancock Water/Sewer Dept. Fiscal Year #2 87/88 — i ISC11t YEIUt bl tULtMJ 1 FISCAL YEM #2 1987-88 CULthN 2 7/I/87-6/30/88 7/1/86-6/30/87 Saner ctarge revenue 136,805 Serer crarye revenue 131,017 Connection charge revenue 1,000 Connection charge revenue 1,000 Front ft assessment revenue -0- Front ft assessment revenue -0- Other revenue (catpleLe schedule Other revenue (cagtlete schedule a1 2) 91,413 on page 2) 5,'380 page Iola{ revenue iota revenue 229,218 Operation expense 97,334 Operation expense 133,029 Maintenance expense Maintenance expense Replacattent costs Replacettent costs r( paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0_ K, _0 Total• CM & R 97,334 Total t11&R R 133,029 Interest expense -9,782 Interest expense $ 745 Depreciation expense 34,583 Depreciation expense 35,042 2 Total expense 141,699 Total expense 176,816 Increase (Decrease) FundBalance / \ Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 52 402 Debt principal 105,967 Debt principal 28,274 Total flaw volume 59,784,000 59;ra4;ooa Total flew volute are these which are of'such nature as be behyond te h�n Extraordinary repairs and maintenannce ta rry krlaut in thetaerationtSyst da in the annual DUn(JeC. txmpies vu eA6,av,uniary .�. •••• large pulp systen rotor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the host costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this set rage systen. Replacement of electrical: machine following flooding I Ppproximate cost of this potential repair tino.000 (over) I-12 -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a bond, line of credit, escrow accont, working capital, etc.) Cash reserve from General Fund and excetlant history with the Town's Bank. Additional convientS The Town's water and sewer record keeping is combined. 48% of the total expenditures are assigned to sewer. Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Year 2 Nnount Poount Description Interest 4,339 5,680 Adjustments (196) Interest 155 Grants 87,048 Miscellaneous Assets - ( 455) Misc. 222 Loss on Sale of 91,413.00 5,380.00 Contact Person: opacity: PWD sers: residential cunlercial Mr. Peter J. Sheehan Town Manager/Clerk-Treasurer 116 West High Street _SS Hancock, Maryland 21750 (301) 678-5622 TELEPIIDNE if I-13 SUILAU IS FINCI t I $NI SIATI_SlICS uXmn WAA i %WRMs xnnty Na, Washington System Rare Boonsboro Wastewater Treatment Plant Fiscal Year 11 7/1/86 - 6/30/87 Fiscal Year #2 7/1/87 - 6/30/88 FI YEAR IT COC YEPR #2 U11J41 2 —Seher Marge revenue 92,251 Se.er c targe revenue 94,278. Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue 10,980 —0— connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue other revenue (complete schedule __.._T.pa.l) . total revenue 22,727 -o- Other revenue (complete schedule 2 iota) revenue — —at PAL_ 13,857 .— — 20,.335 137,340 117,088 operation expense maintenance expense Replacement costs 49,358 Operation expense 60,925 9/ 110 f4aintenaice expense Replacement costs 8,777 Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0- Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0- total U1 & R 58,468 Total'U4 & R 69,702 Im_:est expense 10,686 Interest expense 9,757 Depreciation expense 23,806 Depreciation expense 44,921 Total expense 92,960 total expense 124,380 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Debt principal 24,128 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 12,96(3 22,399 Debt principal 22,534 Total ficwvolune . 99,912,000 Total flovvolune 75,350,000 Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Examples of "extraordinary" breakdowns might include a bloMer breakdonn in the aeration systeR large pup system motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and hearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this sewerage system. Floating aerators and motors iacity: lU) !rs: r^eidential 696 82 commercial e (over) I-14 _2_ Ppproximate cost of this potential repair $5,000 Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a bond, line of credit, escrow account, working capital, etc.) Working capital, financing if necessary Additional camrnts Improved efficiency of wastewater treatment plant indicated by reduction in total flow. Increase in O & M costs due largely to sewer fund's assumption of 1/2 of all meter and meter reading expenses (metered sewer rate initiated in April 1987). Detail of other revenue a: Line E (if applicable): Year i Year 2 Description Aunt - Pntunt Rental Income 1,920 1,990 County share - engineering study -0- 2,934 Escrowed inspection fees -0- 1,225 Interest income 11,832 13,790 Miscellaneous 105 396 Scheduled FS prepared by: Judith R. Chambers Town Manager 11 St. Paul Street Boonsboro, Maryland 21713 (301) 432-5141 SCiMA-E FS FINANCIAL M4NPGEJ4INT STATISTICS COUNTY WATER & SEWER PLANS County Nara LAJcLsV01-1 System Nave /a CO 1 rC'G /v/) PV L n it Fiscal Year #1 Tu 0$�kr`+ Fiscal Year #2 June- 30 1988 FISCAL YEAR #1 COLUMN 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLtNN 2 Sewer charge revenue Sewer charge revenue Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (caiplete schedule on a e 2) JOS 90 p Other revenue (ccnplete schedule on a e 2) Total revenue Operation expense 39C,554. _ Total revenue O ,3 90 SSA _ SS6 Operation expense 6 4; qG0 Kaintenance expense Maintenance expense Replacement costs Replacement costs Gees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions —� -jl CM & R Total CM & R Interest expense Interest expense I Depreciation expense Depreciation expense I Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance ,3S 902 _ Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 3 9 p p Debt principal Debt principal Total flow volute Total floe volute Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those vdiich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraorai nary ureaKacMls mignc inc iuue a mower ureanuwai III uie aelab lull >yat.aly large purp systen motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this severage system. Ap, ximate cost of this potential repair (over) I-16 -2 - Additional camEnts Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description l'cyme,n f - Year 1 Amunt For 5 rvjcP $ � ✓5 clop Contact Person: apacity: I , a.3 NI D Isers: residential Year 2 anoint ,39955' p cannercial 2-D d L.�ofa 2- u % �iiJr�ov�ao/12iy4/ TELEfl E H cl7<f-7oZ 7T I-17 SCIIEIXILE FS FINMICIAL MAW EMENT STATISTICS CO I{Ft WATER & SEWR PLPNS County Nave CL Y Syston Ma J C0rr✓/a'V / t�Y}y4Y Ys' ,•q e.,3 is Fiscal Year #1 T wn e_ 3 OI$7' IM' Fiscal Year #2 June. 30 1988 FISCAL YEAR #1 COLIW 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLIIN 2 Se er charge revenue SExer charge revenue Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (coiplete schedule on page 2) 30S 90 p Other revenue (ccuplete schedule on page 2) 3 9O SSA _ Total revenue 0 Total revenue 3 9' S _ Operation expense 6 9t 0 Operation expense 3 gQ SSG_ Maintenance expense Maintenance expense Replaconent costs Replace unt costs lees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions ail &1&R Total CM & R Interest expense Interest expense Depreciation expense Depreciation expense Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance SOS DO a _ Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 3 _ O Debt principal Debt principal Total flow volute Total flaw volume Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those Mich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraordinary" breakaaans mtgnt incivae a oioner oreaKaonn in the aeranon syss.tlo large pulp systan motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the east costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this seierage syston. SI Ai., ximate cost of this potential repair (over) I-18 -2- Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a bond, line of credit, escr,ow'.acc -ount ,i.orking capital, etc.) Additional contents Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description �0-ym&n f Year I Pmcunt For ServlcP,5 ,30y91,00 Contact Person: rapacity: ( �,3 MID Isers: residential Year 2 Mount 39955' w camercial �O ZO L�v/.t S tr/1 / .L9r' TELEPHDNE d r1 7 y — 7 off- 7D SCIIFDIII.E FS =FINMICIAL I4WGEMINT STATISTICS caw WATER & SEWER PLANS County Na re sh n fo f Systen Naner± `r& eric/i §{w7 /&rlf Fiscal Year #iT0 wrl e.. 3o i`i$7` Fiscal Year R2 J u.ne 30 )q$$ FISCAL YEAR #1 COLLFIJ 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLLMI 2 Se^.er char,; revenue Seer charge revenue Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (ccuplete schedule on a 2) /3039 Other revenue (caiplete schedule on ae2) /31o77 Total revenue D Total revenue �D i Operation expense Operation expense j3 C)77 I Maintenance expense Maintenance expense Replaceient costs Replaceient costs I Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions Total CM & R Interest expense Interest expense .: I Depreciation expense Depreciation expense I Total expense L3 0 3 9 Total expense i3 O i I Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance _ Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance _0 Debt principal Debt principal Total flow volume Total flow volur Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraordinary" breakdons might include a blower breakdonn in the aeration systen, large pulp system untor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the nest costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this sewerage systen. k IA},raximate cost of this potential repair (over) I-20 2 - Describe the source of funds to cover,�this extraordinary item (a bond, line of.icredit`, escr capital, etc.) Additional ccrments Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Description Ainunt /3 039 yn,�n f For Serv/c-%,5 rapacity: .oO! ! NGD isers: residential camercial Contact Person: Year 2 Nmunt /3 077 F 2O.2o L.7dt1 4><r. / ,sir' TELERME # y p y_ 7 7, I-21 SCHEDULE FS FINANCIAL MWFGEMENT STATISTICS COUTTY WATER & SEWER PLANS County Nare ci fl f0 it System Nave, r1 Fr&per` / c 7 *GZ f /&! Fiscal Year HI T wrl e, o I$7 Fiscal Year #2 Jwne- 30 1988 FISCAL YEAR N1 COLLMI 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLUMN 2 Seer charge revenue Serer charge revenue Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (caiplete schedule on a 2 /3039 Other revenue (caiplete schedule on ae2) /3)O77 Total revenue Q Total revenue 077 Operation expense O3 Operation expense 1y 077 I Maintenance expense Maintenance expense Replacaient costs Replacarent costs I Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions .,dl CM & R Total CM & R Interest expense Interest expense 1 Depreciation expense Depreciation expense I Total expense !3 o3' Total expense /3 49 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance — O _ Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance P Debt principal Debt principal Total flow volure Total flow volune R Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those vAiich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaiples of "extraordinary" breaxdoms might incivae a oioner oreaKU(W1 un tile der[itlU1 yaII, large pulp systen motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the east costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this severage systen. 4. SI Apt )ximate cost of this potential repair (over) I-22 -2 'F M1,, Describe the source of funds to cover,this extraordinary item (a bond, line of . credit; escrr�ry account scw capital, etc.) Additional conments Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Description Amuntt ForVJGPis ppacity: .(?0 I i+GD iers: residential cam:ercial Contact Person: Year 2 ,Mrount /3077 a -02d _L>t?o'p 5 )frj. / .f 2r- TELEPHONE N y 7 7 oZ 7T I-23 SCIIELIILE FS FINANCIAL NW'1PGUfNT STATISTICS COIAfIY WATER & SEWER C4.AIl.S County Nane �i LOCX Ion Fiscal Year #1 d wn e,. 30 . fl87 Systen Nane�rP e-Z2L1er Sf�fe Fiscal Year #2 Jwne- 30 1988 7i34[7F7F COLLNN 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLLMV 2 Seer charge revenue Serer charge revenue Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (caiplete schedule on ae2 3/ y� Other revenue (completeschedule a Total revenue Total revenue Z 4 9/ Operation expense 0 Operation expense 3a cy/ N%untenance expense Maintenance expense Replacement costs Replacement costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions it CM & R Total CM & R Interest expense Interest expense Depreciation expense Depreciation expense Total expense ,y,, Total expense a !f -- Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance _ 0 _ Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance _ Debt principal Debt principal Total floe volum Total flow volume Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exaipies or ••extraorumary uredKuuMm uuy" iIILIUUC a u �� ��.,� ,, ••--•••-•_.. _,___, large pulp systen motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the Bost costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this seAerage systen. y, S I F! iximate cost of this potential repair (over) I-24 -2 - Describe the source of funds to coverthis extraordinary item (a bond, line of credit; escrow account, narking• capital, etc.).. r + Additional cannents Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Year 2 Description Aibunt Anoint /°cy i o f- For- Se r v! Contact Person: opacity: , QJ` NED sers: residential camiercial 2D / .[Jr -.4572t2a700//tA -d TELEME N 7 _ 7 oZ %� I-25 5 r FIFW CIAL WWGUIINT STATISTICS cIUlTY WATER & SERER PLANS County Nare \p cx Ton Fiscal Year #1 J un e, 3 0 . J B7 System Naretre e nAr/e r ckaf& 'r' Fiscal Year #2 June, 30 )958 FISCAL YEAR #1 COLA 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COL" 2 ;wen charg7enue Seer charge revenue Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue (coplete schedule on ae2) Other revenue (complete schedule pae2) 3� Total revenue _ , iota revenue ' 9/ Operation expense Operation expense 3& Cy/ l'% intenance expense Maintenance expense Replacorent costs Replacetent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions -al CM & R Total CM & R Interest expense interest expense i Depreciation expense Depreciation expense 1 Total expense 3 Total expense a 6 J Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance _ O _ Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance P Debt principal Debt principal Total flow volute Total flow volume Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated L1L...�I..l.-_-. - •k._ .+:4-4M c..ctan in the annual budget. txanpies or --exuraorulnary UrtdIUUMIJ IlllylIL IlIVI ULc u u.'nn. "•""•.""•••• ••• - - `---- -- -� large pulp system motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this senerage system, S 14,_ )ximnate cost of this potential repair (over) I-26 s acs, Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a bond, line of credit, escrow account, v rking; capital, etc.).. Additional cannents Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Year 1 Description Pmount /�Qyme,n f For S&rv/CP�y apacity: , g3 NED sers: residential cameerci al Contact Person: Year 2 P nount 2-Oaa SApLam: / .Jr 97,1a oc//r /old Z��lol TELEPHONE # r7 r— 7 a 7a 1-27 APPENDIX J Memorandum of Understanding Between Washington County Commissioners and The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene This Memorandum of Understanding, by and between the Washington County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "County") and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (hereinafter referred to as the "Department") shall take effect as of ZCA_nP_ / /%Rand will continue until Witnesseth: WHEREAS, the 1984 General Assembly approved legislation establishing a State "Innovative and Alternative Septic System Grant Program", as set forth in Health -Environmental Article, Subtitle 14 of Title 9 (hereinafter referred -to as Subtitle 14). WHEREAS, the purpose of the Program is to make State grants to counties of this State who, in turn, will make grants to owners of improved properties with failed systems and owners of previously recorded land that has failed a soil percolation test, to install and experiment with new innovative and alternative on -site sewage treatment and disposal systems in order to develop additional types of on -site systems that can be utilized. WHEREAS, Health -Environmental Article, Subtitle 14, charges the Department with responsibility for management and supervision of the Program to include selection of qualifying Counties to receive Innovative/Alternative Septic System Grant Assistance. WHEREAS, the County Commissioners have expressed a great interest and regulatory support for Innovative/Alternative experimental systems to be installed and monitored in the County to offer solutions to problems J-1 pf shallow soils developed in carbonate and terrestrial sedimentary bedrock, seasonally high water tables and soils with low permeabilities. WHEREAS, the Department supports these initiatives and has determined that results from these experiments may Offer possible solutions to similar problems being experienced in neighboring counties and other counties within the State having the same similar soil-hydrogeologic conditions. WHEREAS, the 1985 State budget has provided one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to be distributed among counties for developing and enhancing local efforts and experiments with innovative/alternative on -site sewage treatment and disposal system technologies. WHEREAS, the County and the Department agree to conduct a jointly administered innovative/alternative on -site sewage treatment and disposal system experimental program in the County and enter into this Memorandum of Understanding as a foundation for a cooperative working arrangement; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Department and the County agree as follows: The Department shall: 1. Provide the County with program funds of $37,500 to be used by the County to make grants to property owners pursuant to Health -Environmental Article, Subtitle 14, and to the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding. 2. Review the County's list of potential grant applicants and approve each project prior to the County awarding the project grant. In reviewing and approving each project grant, the Department shall: • review County screening, prioritization and site evaluation results; • consider the ability of proposed technologies to meet project site constraints; J-2 . consider the type, expense and appropriateness of any proposed monitoring systems and determine the usefulness of the data to be generated; • consider each project's ability to address special soil hydro - geologic problems experienced in the County and the transferability of project results to other areas of the State. 3. Provide technical assistance to the County with regard to selecting appropriate innovative/alternative technologies for individual properties including technical assistance in the development of site evaluation testing procedures, appropriate design criteria, monitoring programs and preparationof project.evaluation reports. The County shall: 1. Evaluate properties which meet eligibility requirements of Health -Environmental Article, Subtitle 14, and determine their suitability for participation in the State innovative/alterna- tive experimental testing program. 2. Assure that property owners' grant applications will include the following information: • applicant's name; • plat description or tax map of property to be served; . description of property improvements; • number of bedrooms in house; . estimated sewage flow; • description of site characteristics (slopes, soil data from soil survey and previous testing data, surface and subsurface drainage, vegetation, well location, etc.); J-3 a site location map which locates the property relative to nearby roads, wells and topographic features. 3. Prepare a site evaluation of each property for which a grant is proposed which includes: . measurements of soil depth to ground water or bedrock, or both;' soil profile descriptions; • identification of soil types and characteristics from soil survey; • soil percolation test and permeability measurement; • surface drainage information; • description of proposed innovative/alternative technology; . description of any characteristic which may affect performance of innovative/alternative technology proposed. 4. Indicate for each proposed project: . the project purpose (i.e., to correct existing failure or to support new building project); . the project benefits (i.e., to 2xamine systems installed in high water table situations or restricted soils); . the type of monitoring system to be installed 5. Prioritize grant applications giving preference to projects which best meet the following criteria: • correction of existing septic system failure; • ability of project to address local soil-hydrogeologic problems; • ability of test results to be used in neighboring counties and similar soil -landscapes and hydrogelogic areas throughout the State; ability of County to monitor the project (number of site visits required, number of tests to be performed, number of reports to be written, etc.). J-4 6. Submit county list of potential grant applicants to the Department in priority order for approval prior to making grant awards to individual property owners. 7. Establish grant funds to projects so as to allow up to but not to exceed 50% State participation. 8. Develop a Model Agreement acceptable to the Department to be ,,used in making grants to property owners which describes conditions under which the State grant award is made. County Agreements with applicants shall be signed by the applicant, the County and the Department and shall, as a minimum, include conditions which: . identifies project elements, estimates costs for equipment and installation and sets grant participation at an amount that does not exceed 50% of the estimated project cost; . establishes financial and recordkeeping responsibility of homeowners for: (a) any costs incurred in installation above the grant amount; and (b) all operating and maintenance costs; limits the State's share of the project installation costs to $10,000 or less; establishes applicant repayment requirements for the full amount of funds provided under this agreement, if for .reasons of neglect, the innovative/alternative system is not adequately maintained or is substantially damaged; establishes the applicant's financial responsibility for system modification which may be required by the Department or the County where failure of the system to operate J-5 satisfactorily poses a threat co the public health, safety • or comfort. In such cases,. necessary system modifications ,,i shall be in, accordance with the requirements established by the Department or the local health department„ which may include requirements for installing holding tanks and regular pumping and hauling of sewage wastes from the holding. tanks,; • establishes salvage rights of the State upon default of the applicant; . establishes access for the County and, the Department to enter the applicant's land in order to make periodic inspection and to monitor the system for at leasttwo years from the construction pf, the system or for the duration of the study; • requires installation by the applicant -of either a -water; meter or cycle counter (for effluent pumping systems); • states that the proposed innovative/alternative sewage system is experimental and that the applicant's participa- tion is voluntary; • states that the County, the Department and any of their agents or employees do not, either officially or individually, underwrite the operation of any innovative/alternative system approved under this Program or incur any liability to the applicant if the innovative/alternative system fails; A J-6 • . requires that the applicant assure continued, efficient, and effective operation,ot the system; • requires the terms of this agreement'to run with the land' and bind the applicant, his heirs, successors or assigns; and that this agreement shall be recorded in the land records of the County where the property is located; • provides that the agreement may be voided at the diseretion'" of the Department if the system construction is not completed within six months of the grant award and requires the applicant to repay all funds with interest; and . establishes any special requirements or conditions deemed necessary by the Deipartm4rit and the County. 9. Submit payment requests to the'be artment eve q p ever' sixty daji§ with statements''ind'icating grant projects approved for funding'` during the period. No payment will be made without an inspection of system consttuction`bp the Department. 10. Prepare and submit to -the' Department progress reports once every ninety days describing the"status of overall program, including the status of individual projects.'' Each program report shall include: 1 .. • number of grant applications reviewed; • name and number of projects approved; • funds expended to date; • number of experiments under way; • number of experiments completed, including the final • project report; J-7 • start date of any projects; • completion date of experiments; 11. Maintain adequate accounting records. 12. Return funds. to the Departmentlwhich have:}been granted to a project if the project does not proceed within six months of grant award or, upon approval of the Department, reallocate .:....1.....,.. these funds to another project.' Both parties agree and understand as follows: 1. The Department and the County Health Department will work cooperatively -with the County in administering the State/ County Innovative/AlternatiVE".Program iiiaccordance with • legislative mandates of Health -Environmental Article, Subtitle 14c- The`Depa'rtment'and'the County Health Department will meet on a continuing basis and sharp responsibilities in mana ih the overall -program g g+ 2. The Department and the County Health Department will jointly prepare evaluation reports at the conclusion of each experi- mental r3 project to be used by the Department in assessing the m,;i •, success or failure of innovative/alternative technologies for statewide application. 3. The Department and the County Health Department will meet at least twice yearly with the County in order to assess program achievements and to determine whether or not changes to the program are warranted. 4. This agreement may be amended or terminate& at any time by mutual agreement or by any party giving ninety (90) days notice in writing to the other party.' Upon termination, the County J-8 shall make adequate provisions to complete.anrbject'or _ experiment initiated under the terms of this'"a4"reement. STATE OF MARYLAND,,'- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Date Date ..a.,saa . a'...acaiaia) uc.• Y1 tCLUL Water Management Administration w J-9 It