Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFFY 2005 CLG Annual ReportWASHINGTON COUNTY, MD CLG ANNUAL REPORT JULY 2004 - JUNE 2005 CLG ANNUAL REPORT DATA SHEET PART I: SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES Category A: Enforcement of State and Local Legislation 1. Number of cases reviewed: Approved, Denied, Appealed a. Alteration 1 b. Demolition 3 c. New construction 1 2. Has the commission amended its historic area zoning ordinance since the last reporting period? The Historic Preservation zone has been amended twice since the last CLG report, first to adjust the time and response requirements for approval of permit applications and a second time to incorporate a new zoning district, Rural Village, that will generate Historic District Commission review of construction permits. The Rural Village zone was created and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on 7/12/05 as part of a comprehensive rezoning of the rural areas of Washington County to implement a 2002 Comprehensive Plan.(Current text of HP and RV districts enclosed) 3. Has the commission amended its design guidelines since the last reporting period? The Commission has not amended its design guidelines since the last report. Staff has created a draft of new design guidelines to compliment the currently used Secretary of the Interiors guidelines but other priorities have prevented their completion and adoption. 4. Has the commission amended its rules of procedure since the last reporting period? No, the HDC bylaws have not been amended, 5. Has the commission amended its criteria for the designation of sites, structures and districts? No the designation criteria have not been amended. The criteria for designation are included in the text of the HP zone included to address # 2 above 6. Can archaeological sites be designated under the Commission's ordinance? It is possible but has not occurred to date. 7. Number of new designations: No new HP zones have been designated: However, creation of the Rural Village district created new areas for HDC permit review. There are 10 RuralVillages where HDC permit review is required for new construction. Maps of those districts are provided. S. Number of cases given automatic approval through expiration of time limit for review: No cases were given automatic approval due to expiration. 9. Number of projects reviewed for compliance with the local governments historic preservation laws 2 cases were reviewed and approved under the Historic Preservation zoning district.(see #1 above) Category B: Qualified Preservation Review Commission 1. List of current commission members with their term expiration dates (Please identify the members on the commission that meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, noting what discipline they represent, and attach resumes for any new commissioners appointed during the reporting period.) 2. Has the Commission publicly adopted criteria for qualifying as a Commission member? Membership requirements are included in the text of the Historic Preservation zone in the zoning ordinance, They were amended in the 1990's to comply with requirements in Article 66B 3. Number of vacancies and the duration of each: There are currently no vacancies. When appointments expire the member remains until a replacement is appointed in order to prevent a vacancy of any duration. 4. Number of meetings held: 7 meetings held during this reporting period. See attached listing 5. Number of meetings attended by member: Each members' attendance is documented in minutes of each meeting. 6. Educational training attended by member: Hershey, Lakin, Viar, Izer and Stinson attend annual MD Preservation Conference. Stinson attends seminar on Vernacular Architecture in Harrisburg, PA. Category C: Survey and Inventory of Historic Properties 1. Number of survey forms produced: No additional survey forms were produced during this period. 2. Usability of survey: a. Where is it housed? Washington County's Inventory of historic properties is housed in the County Planning Department where staff to the HDC is located. Records of properties with the Historic Preservation overlay zoning district and coordination of plan review are also kept in the Planning Department. A copy of the inventory is also available in the Western Maryland Room of the Washington County Free Library. b. Is it accessible to the public? Yes, it is available to the public upon request. c. How and when is it updated? The inventory is updated when funds are available jointly from County Commissioners budget and matching CLG funding. Inventory can also be updated through property owner initiative. Historic Preservation zoning overlays are initiated by property owners and approved by the County Commissioners through the formal rezoning process 3. Exchange and update of data: a. Does the SHPO have a duplicate of the CLG survey? Yes b. Does the CLG have a duplicate of the SHPO survey forms? Yes c. Is the SHPO informed of changes to forms or copied on updated photos? Yes Category D: Public Participation 1. How are regular meetings advertised: The HDC regular meeting date (1st wednesday of every month) is included in the adopted bylaws which are on record among the Acts, Ordinances and Resolutions in the land records of Washington County. The regular meeting date is also posted on the County's website. Parties with business before the Commission are notified of meetings by letter. a. By what media? N/A b. How many times?N/A c. How far in advance of the meeting? N/A 2. How are special meetings advertised? The HDC does not hold special meetings 3. Minutes: a. How are minutes recorded? A recording secretary attends each HDC meeting, takes notes and operates a tape recorder. Summary minutes are prepared and provided at the following meeting for adoption by the HDC. b. Are transcribed drafts circulated for corrections? There is no transcription of the taped meeting. Minutes are presented to the HDC for revision and approval. c. Who reviews and approves the minutes? Staff prepares the minutes. The HOC can revise and approve. d. Where are the corrected minutes housed? On file with other commission documents in the Planning Department. e. Are minutes available to the public? Yes 4. Notification of Commission hearing to Applicants: HDC hold public meetings not hearings. a. When are notification letters mailed? Letters are mailed as soon as practical for items that the Commission will take formal action on during a meeting (building permits in HP and RV zones, demolitions, tax credits, NR nominations) b. Where are notification letters filed? With other Commission records in the Planning Department. 5. Notification of commission decision to Applicants: a. When are notification letters mailed? As soon as practical after the action by HDC b. Where are notification letters tiled? With other Commission records in the Planning Department. 6. How are the commission's rules and procedures made available to the public? They are always available upon request. Applicants for HDC approvals are provided guidelines upon application and also frequently counseled by staff. 7. Design Guidelines: a. What design guidelines does the commission use? The Secretary of the Interiors' Guidelines, Local design guidelines are under development. b. How are the guidelines made available to the public? Upon request, upon application or referral to the NPS website. Category E: Financial Assistance 1.Does the local government have a tax incentive program? YES a. What is the nature of the incentive (e.g. property tax abatement/freeze, property tax credit?) Property tax credits equal to 10% of the expenditure for restoration or preservation b. How many projects were assisted through the program? 2 tax credit applications were approved during the reporting period c. What was the total investment generated by these incentives? The approved credit was based on $47,379 worth of restoration and preservation on two dwelling in the Hagerstown historic district 2. Does the local government have a local historic preservation grant or loan program? NO a. How many projects were assisted through a preservation grant? N/A b. What was the total amount of grant assistance? N/A c. How many projects were assisted through a preservation loan? N/A d. What was the total amount of loan assistance? N/A Category F: Historic Property Acquisition 1. How many historic properties were acquired in whole or in part by the local government through purchase, donation or other means? None 2. How many properties were acquired through easements? None 3. How many properties were acquired in whole? None Category G: National Register Recommendations 1. Number of nominations received: 1 nomination was received for review(Ridenour Farm) 2. Total number evaluated, rejected, approved: The 1 application was recommended for approval. 3. Number of meetings held: The NR application required review during 1 meeting. 4. Outside support solicited to meet Review Board standards, if necessary: N/A PART II: FINANCIAL SUMMARY A. Commission Funding 1. How is the commission funded? Routine Commission activities funded through small appropriation from County general fund (Staff, meeting.space, office supplies, travel expenses, memberships, training) There is also a separate line item in the HOC budget for the local matching funds for the yearly CLG project 2. Does the commission have its own budget and appropriation? Yes 3. What is the commission's current budget? The 04-05 budget amount was $11,260.00 B. Audit Report Entire County budget is audited at end of each fiscal year and includes HOC budget. A separate audit of HOC budget is not performed 1. Letter indicating approximate date SHPO may anticipate receipt of audit. N/A 2. Letter verifying auditor's awareness ofAttachment P requirements. PART III: APPENDIX OF REQUIRED SOURCE DOCUMENTS Category A: 1. Copy of new ordinance, if applicable. Enclosed 2. Copy of new design guidelines, if applicable. N/A 3. Copy of new rules of procedure, if applicable. N/A 4. Copy of new designation criteria, if applicable. In ordinance 5. Maps of newly designated sites, structures, or districts, if applicable. Rural Villages Category B : 1. Resumes of any new commission members appointed during the year. Category D: 1. Copy of advertisement of regular meeting. N/A 2. Copies of minutes from four consecutive meetings during the reporting period. Minutes of all meetings held during reporting period included. 3. Sample of notification to applicant of commission meeting. 4. Sample of notification to applicant of commission decision. Category G: 1. Copy of one owner notification letter, if applicable. 2. Copy of one general notice, if applicable. 3. Copy of all CLG/NR Recommendation forms; if applicable. Maryland CLG Procedures Manual (Approved September 2004) 31 Appendiv III' MHT CLG Cert flcation Agreement HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS COMMISSION MEMBER APPOINTMENT DATE EXPIRATION DATE Michael Gehr Oct. 19, 2004 Oct. 31, 2008 Jane Hershey Jan. 21, 2003 Jan. 21, 2006 Sandra Izer Dec. 21, 2004 Dec. 31, 2007 Eleanor Lakin Oct. 19,.2004 Oct. 31, 2007 Merry Stinson Oct. 19, 2004 Oct. 31, 2007 Carla Viar Oct. 19, 2004 Oct. 31, 2007 David Wiles Oct. 19, 2004 Oct. 31, 2006 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE July 2003 to June 2004 MEETING DATE MEETING HELD July 2, 2003 Yes August 6, 2003 Yes September 3, 2003 Yes October 15, 2003 Yes November 5, 2003 No December 3, 2003 No January 14, 2004 Yes February 4, 2004 No March 3, 2004 No April 1, 2004 No May 5, 2004 Yes June 2, 2004 Yes ✓July 2004 to June 2005 July 7, 2004 No August 4, 2004 No September 1, 2004 Yes October 6,2004 No November 3, 2004 Yes December 8, 2004 Yes January 5, 2005 No February 2, 2005 Yes March 2, 2005 - Yes April 6, 2005 Yes May 4, 2005 No June 1, 2005 Yes MINUTES HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY SEPTEMBER 1, 2004 A and B: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular monthly meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order by staff member Steve Goodrich on Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 7:02 pm. in Conference Room 1A of the Washington County Administrative Annex Building. Members present included: Michael Gehr, Frank Artz, Don Corbett, Jane Hershey, Merry Stinson and Carla Viar. Also present was Dori Nipps, County Commissioner and staff member Debra Eckard. C. MINUTES The minutes from the June 2, 2004 meeting were presented. A motion was made by Frank Artz to approve the minutes as presented and seconded by Jane Hershey. The minutes were unanimously approved without any corrections. D. COMMUNICATIONS AND BILLS — None E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Draft Design Guidelines for Historic Preservation Districts: Steve Goodrich opened the discussion stating that the funding from the Maryland Historical Trust was withdrawn because he was unable to meet certain reporting and schedule requirements; however, he will be developing the guidelines for the Commission's review. Mr. Goodrich has been reviewing guidelines from different communities, cities, and small towns to prepare a document that will be conducive to the needs of the Historic District Commission. Mr. Goodrich first stated that the purpose of the guidelines will help guide and support decisions made by the Historic District Commission when reviewing applications. These guidelines will • protect and enhance historic structures, help property owners and designers in planning projects, preserve the character of the structure, and protect property values. Specific documentation should be included in the application in order to give the Commission the correct information necessary to make a fair, reasonable and consistent decision on the appropriateness of changes to a structure. This information should include a scale drawing of the property, a scale drawing of existing buildings, and sufficient information detailing the exterior of the structure. Mr. Goodrich suggested that a change to the Commission's Ordinance needs to be made to include a Certificate of Appropriateness. All other guidelines that have been reviewed include this certificate. There was some discussion concerning the adoption of a priority level rating system similar to the one used by the City of Hagerstown. In the draft guidelines prepared by Mr. Goodrich, the language used suggests judging each property on its own merits and own variables. This item needs more consideration by the Commission. Other items that need further discussion and consideration include fencing guidelines, materials to be used in the renovation of a structure and the renovations as they pertain to the public's view of the structure. Mr. Goodrich stated that he will include a glossary and zoning maps showing the general boundaries of historic properties and their relationships to main roadways. There will also be graphics included in the guidelines. It was agreed that members could further review the material and report recommendations during the next meeting. F BUDGET There are no budget items to discuss at this time. • NEW BUSINESS 1. Interstate 81 widening: The following concerns were discussed with the impending widening of Interstate 81. a. The physical location of toll booths are not architecturally consistent with the historic character of the rural community. b• There will be a significant increase in noise from acceleration away from toll booths along National Historic sites. c. No studies have been completed to consider avoidance routes used by motorists and the negative impact these routes will have on historic sites and historic roads. A motion to include these concerns in a letter to the State Highway Administration was made by Jane Hershey, seconded by Merry Stinson, and unanimously approved. Steve Goodrich will prepare a letter to the State Highway Administration addressing these concerns. 2. The term of service for Commission members Michael Gehr, Frank Artz, Merry Stinson, Carla Viar, Eleanor Lakin and Donald Corbett will expire on October 31, 2004. Steve Goodrich asked the members that were present if they wish to be reappointed to serve another 3 year term. Members responses: Michael Gehr — yes; Carla Viar — yes; Merry Stinson — yes; Frank Artz — yes; Don Corbett — no. Steve Goodrich will contact Joni Bittner, Clerk, for any names on a waiting list. All members were asked for recommendations of any persons that may be interested in serving on the Commission. H. OTHER BUSINESS — None EXECUTIVE SESSION There were no items to discuss at this time. ADJOURNMENT On a motion made by Janes Hershey, seconded by Don Corbett and approved unanimously, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully.submitted, Stephen T. Goo ich Chief Senior Planner STG/dse MINUTES HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY NOVEMBER 3, 2004 A and B. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular monthly meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael Gehr on Wednesday, November 3, 2004 at 7:00 p.m in Conference Room 1A of the Washington County Administrative Annex Building. Members present included: Jane Hershey, Eleanor Lakin, Merry Stinson, Carla Viar, and David Wiles. Also present was Dori Nipps, County Commissioner and staff members Steve Goodrich and Debra Eckard. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA Steve Goodrich made a request to add three additional items to the evening's agenda. Items were as follows: 1) Update on French Lane property, 2) Rezoning application that has an inventory site on it, and 3) Election of Commission officers at the December meeting. Merry Stinson also made a request to add an additional item to the agenda: update on the Todd Bowman property. A motion to add these items to the agenda was made by Jane Hershey, seconded by Merry Stinson, and the motion passed unanimously. C. MINUTES The minutes from the September 1, 2004 meeting were presented. A motion was made by Merry Stinson to approve the minutes as presented and seconded by Eleanor Lakin. The minutes were unanimously approved. D. COMMUNICATIONS AND BILLS Steve Goodrich presented for the Commission's information the MAHDC Newsletter, "Forum Journal" and the "Preservation" magazine. E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1) Draft Design Guidelines Steve Goodrich distributed the second draft of the Design Guidelines dated November 2004. This draft includes several new items: a section addressing Routine Maintenance - definitions, examples and maintenance of exterior architectural features; a Glossary and Table of Contents have been added; and a section addressing Demolition has been added. Steve has asked the Commission members for their input concerning both the first draft and the second draft of the Design Guidelines. Items also suggested by the members that should be addressed in the Guidelines would be fencing and a section on the types of new engineered materials acceptable for restoration projects of historical sites. Maps and photos will also be included within the Guidelines once the text has been finalized. 2) Reappointments and Recommendations for new members The following members were reappointed by the Board of County Commissioners to serve the following terms: Michael Gehr (one year) and Carla Viar, Eleanor Lakin and Merry Stinson (three years). New appointment: David Wiles (two years). The Commissioners decided to stagger the appointments so that all members' terms would not be vacated at the same time. Steve Goodrich reported that we are still in need of one Commission member. All positions had been filled; however, John Kvach who had also been appointed to a two year term, has moved out of the state, thereby leaving one position unfilled. All interested applicants from the Commissioner's office have been exhausted. Merry Stinson had one suggestion for a new member, Sandy Izer, and will contact Ms. Izer to see if she would be interested in serving on the Commission. Commissioner Dori Nipps informed the members that candidates can apply on-line. Steve Goodrich reminded all members that there are certain background requirements within the Zoning Ordinance that must be met by Commission members. Steve included a copy of these specific requirements in the agenda package sent to the Commission members. At this time, Carla Viar expressed her concern for continuing education requirements. She has suggested training for Commission members on a yearly basis. Steve Goodrich stated that he does send out brochures on seminars and training sessions periodically to the members. There is however, a limited budget for such training and workshops. F. BUDGET FRENCH LANE — Steve began by reminding the Commission members that there is an item in their budget for the stabilization project on the French Lane property. Items that were to be completed came from the Historic Structural Report that was funded with CLG monies received in Fiscal Year 2002. With approval from the Board of County Commissioners, Steve applied for and received State grant monies for this project. One condition of acceptance of the money was for the State of Maryland to obtain an easement on the property thus allowing the State to approve any work or changes to maintain the historic integrity of the structure. When the grant agreement was presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their approval and signature a few weeks ago, the Board decided it no longer wanted to be restricted by the required easement, and therefore could not accept the grant funds. However, the BOCC will provide contingency funds equal to the amount of the grant so the project may continue as planned. Buildings, Grounds and Parks will be responsible for overseeing and/or performing the work necessary to stabilize the structure as outlined, Discussion then focused on a proposed use for the property. Commissioner Nipps felt that the County Commissioners would look to the HDC to provide some type of recommendations concerning the future use of this property. Some suggestions would be a small museum, a linear park, a restoration laboratory for training sessions for restoration at the site, an on -going demonstration project, office space, or headquarters for a county agency. Two more options offered was a curatorship whereby the tenants would restore the property using their own funds or selling the property. There is a major limitation on the property due to access (stream crossing in one direction or crossing private property in another direction). G. NEW BUSINESS 1) Demolition Permit #2004-08940, 11111 Lakeview Drive Steve Goodrich presented an application for a demolition permit for 11111 Lakeview Drive in Hagerstown owned by Lakeside Partnership. This structure is included in the County's Historic Site Inventory. Susan Grandville, Property Manager for Lakeside Partnership, presented pertinent information and photographs of the structure as it appears now. Ms. Grandville stated that three rooms on the first floor of the structure are currently used for offices by Lakeside Partnership. Plaster on the second floor is falling down and the roof is beginning to collapse thereby exposing the ceiling on the third floor. There are also numerous holes in the roof and ceiling. Debris from inside the chimneys of the nine fireplaces within the structure is falling thereby making the fireplaces inoperable, A minimal amount of asbestos was found in the basement around the pipes thereby making the basement unusable and traces of asbestos were also found in several layers of linoleum on the floors. Plans for the area where the structure now stands are to create a parking lot. The office would be moved to a new structure built elsewhere on the site. Lakeside Partnership has owned the property for approximately 15 years and has made only a minor investment to make access into the building safer by repairing sidewalks and installing railing. Lakeside Partnership was aware of the building's historical status when it was purchased; however, they have not put any money into the necessary maintenance or upkeep of the structure. The structure is architecturally beautiful and has many redeeming qualities. A motion to recommend opposition to the demolition of the structure was made by Eleanor Lakin, seconded by Jane Hershey and motion passed unanimously. The Commission recommended that the Lakeside Partnership develop a plan to re -use the building and begin to make repairs so that damage to the building does not get any worse due to unnecessary neglect. 2) PC -04-006 — The Preserve at Glen Erin (WA -I-248) There will be consultation on Friday, November 5, 2004 concerning the proposal sent to the Washington County Planning Department. There is an inventory site on the parcel but not within the area that is proposed to be developed. The inventory site has a good buffer area from the development. The Commission did not feel there was any negative effect to this site. No other comments at this time. 3) RZ-04-008 — H. B. Mellott Estates (WA -H-149) Steve presented a rezoning application from H. B. Mellott Estates for an Industrial Mineral Overlay designation to be placed on 50 to 60 acres of additional property acquired for their quarry at Beaver Creek. An historic inventory site is located on this property, but has been abandoned for at least 5 years. The inventory form (WA -H-149) was distributed during the meeting. A rezoning hearing before the Washington County Board of County Commissioners is scheduled for Monday, November 15, 2004, with a 10 day written comment period after the hearing. Merry Stinson would like the Commission to be able to visit the site before the house is torn down and asked Steve to make the necessary arrangements. A motion was made by Merry Stinson to recommend that the structure should be documented, and if eventually removed, H. B. Mellott Estates would re -use the materials or offer them for sale. The motion was seconded by Carla Viar and unanimously passed. H. OTHER BUSINESS — None EXECUTIVE SESSION — None J. ADJOURNMENT On a motion made by Jane Hershey, seconded by Carla Viar, and unanimously approved, the meeting was adjourned at 8:48 p.m Resp . tful s ed, , Stephen T. Goo ch Chief Senior Planner STG/dse MINUTES HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY DECEMBER 8, 2004 A and B. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular monthly meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order by Chief planner Stephen T. Goodrich on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 720 p.m. in Conference Room lA of the Washington County Administrative Annex Building. Members present included: Jane Hershey, Merry Stinson, David Wiles and Eleanor Lakin (via telephone). Also present was Dori Nipps, County Commissioner and staff member Debra Eckard. Chairman Michael Gehr, and Carla Viar were absent. C. MINUTES The minutes from the November 3, 2004 meeting were presented. A motion was made by Merry Stinson to approve the minutes as presented and seconded by Jane Hershey. The minutes were unanimously approved. D. COMMUNICATIONS AND BILLS I) WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL TRUST LETTER RE: BARNES ROAD BRIDGE Steve Goodrich presented a letter for the Commission's information that was addressed to Gary Rohrer, Director of Public Works, from the Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. concerning the Barnes Road Bridge. WCHT offered its opinions on retaining and repairing the Barnes Road Bridge based in part on evaluations of Dr. Abba Lichtenstein, a consulting bridge engineer. The copy was apparently provided for the HDC. According to Commissioner Nipps, there are several issues addressed within this letter which are in question at this time. Commissioner Nipps explained that the County would like to replace this bridge to make it wider to accommodate larger vehicles (such as farm equipment) and to eliminate the weight limitations currently in effect on the bridge. There was discussion on the purpose of the Commission receiving the letter and it was noted that there is no request for support or approval. It was also noted that if, in the permitting process prior to construction the MHT would need to determine National Register eligibility, the HDC would be asked to comment on the matter at that time. Steve Goodrich suggested that Gary Rohrer would have more information on the project and the factors that lead the County to determine that the bridge should be replaced. Members requested contact with Mr. Rohrer to determine if he would be available to attend an.upcoming meeting and provide this information. Merry Stinson asked if the 106 assessment has been conducted to determine the bridge's eligibility in the National Register. Steve will contact Mr. Rohrer and if the Assessment has been completed it will be provided. E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS i) STATUS OF BOWMAN PERMITS #2002.09083 AND 09084, PORCHES AT 7202 DAM #4 ROAD Steve Goodrich presented a brief history for new members concerning this item. These permit applications as well as drawings for two proposed porches were brought to the HDC for approval. The property located at 7202 Dam #4 Road is located within an Historic Preservation zone where building permits require HDC approval. The first drawings were incomplete and the HDC requested more information before it could determine if the proposed construction should be approved. At a later date the Commission was advised that the porches had already been constructed. When notified the applicants presented photographs of the porches as constructed as a substitute for the requested drawings to approve the building permits which had not been issued. In October of 2003 the applicants were advised that building permit enforcement proceedings would begin if the requested information was not provided. No further action was taken by the building permits department. Steve Goodrich reported that the Permits & Inspections Department has been requested to inspect the site to determine if the porches have been removed or remain. 2) RZ-04-008 - H, B. MELLOTT ESTATES A letter was sent to H. B. Mellott Estates following the November meeting indicating the HDC 'S recommendation that if the house located on this site of proposed additional mining needs to be demolished, that it should be thoroughly documented and photographed. HDC also recommended that the structure should be dismantled and parts made available to interested parties for use in restorations of other historic buildings. Steve Goodrich reported that a furnace of archeological interest was reported to be located on the site also and he included in the letter a reservation of rights to further comment on the application. A few members of the HDC would like to tour the site to visit the furnace and also the historic house located on the site. Arrangements for. a site visit will be made F. BUDGET No items at this time. G. NEW BUSINESS DESIGN REVIEW FOR PERMIT #2004.11073, 5834 DUNKER CHURCH ROAD Owner Eleanora Poffenberger was present for the review of this permit application., Mrs. Poffenberger proposes to enclose an existing lean-to built on a concrete slab. The structure is located in the Antietam Overlay -1 zone which requires building permit approval for all structures. The building is not considered an agricultural building and not exempt from HDC review. Mrs. Poffenberger proposes to cover the building with T- 111 siding and add three garage doors to the side of the building facing south toward the Sharpsburg Pike. The building will be used to store farm machinery and will not have a driveway coming into the building. Members were provided location maps of the site, photographs of the existing building and drawings to show the proposed siding and garage doors. During a brief discussion Commission members indicated the siding would be compatible with the vertically oriented board siding of other enclosed portions of the building. The current metal roof would remain unchanged. The Commission suggested that a different style garage door, rather than the proposed one which had a residential appearance, would be more appropriate. Mrs. Poffenberger had no objection to this change. An appropriate substitution was found in the Holmes garage door catalogue catalog. Merry Stinson made the motion to approve the application as proposed using the T-111 siding but to change the doors.(as shown on the drawings provided by the owner) and to substitute the doors shown on page 9, design # 5 or 6 of the Holmes garage door catalog (supplied by the owner). The motion was seconded by Eleanor Lakin and unanimously approved. H. OTHER BUSINESS 1) ELECTION OF OFFICERS Jane Hershey made the motion to retain Michael Gehr as Chairman and Eleanor Lakin as Vice -Chairperson for the year 2005. The motion was seconded by'David Wiles and unanimously approved. I. EXECUTIVE SESSION - None J. ADJOURNMENT On a motion made by Jane Hershey, seconded by Merry Stinson and unanimously approved, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted Steph T. Goodrich Chief Senior Planner STG/dse MINUTES HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY FEBRUARY 2, 2005 A and B. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular monthly meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael Gehr on Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 7:05 p.m. in Conference Room 1 of the Washington County Administrative Annex Building. Members present included: Jane Hershey, Eleanor Lakin, Merry Stinson, Carla Viar, David Wiles and Sandra Izer. Also present was Conunissioner Dori Nipps and staff members Steve Goodrich and Debra Eckard. C. MINUTES The minutes from the December 8, 2004 meeting were presented. A motion was made by Eleanor Lakin to approve the minutes as presented, seconded by Jane Hershey and unanimously approved. - D. COMMUNICATIONS AND BILLS Steve Goodrich presented a letter, for the Commission's information, from the State Highway Administration addressing the proposed improvements on Maryland Route 66 at the CSX Railroad crossing. It is the determination of the SHA that the implementation of this project will have no impact to standing historic structures since there are none within the Area of Potential Effect or APE. No action was necessary. E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS BARNES ROAD BRIDGE At the December 8, 2004 meeting, Steve Goodrich presented a letter to the Commission (for informational purposes only) from the Washington County Historical Trust regarding the Barnes Road Bridge project. This letter expressed the opinion of Dr. Lichtenstein, an engineer hired by the WCHT, that the bridge could and should be rehabilitated and preserved on B ames Road. A discussion developed and many questions were unanswered due to information that the HDC did not have concerning the project. Mr. Gary Rohrer, Director of the Department of Public Works, was present at this meeting to give the Commission more information and answer questions regarding the Barnes Road Bridge project. Mr. Rohrer began by explaining that the County does give serious consideration to retaining historic structures whenever possible. He discussed the process for determining which historic structures can be rehabilitated and which structures need to be replaced. A detailed analysis based on the uniqueness of each structure as well as the financial aspects of each project is examined very closely. If a structure is rehabilitated, determinations are made as to how long the structure will last, future maintenance costs and will the repairs solve the problem. Many other agencies are also involved in this decision such as the State Highway Administration, Federal Highway Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. At this point, Mr. Rohrer presented materials (attached) in the form of a power point on paper as well as photographs of the bridge. For this particular bridge, a critical factor in the analysis was the inability of the bridge to carry the load that is expected of it and to handle the increased traffic projected over the next several years. Projections concerning the amount of increased traffic use are in dispute. Other concerns and differences of opinion between the County and Dr. Lichtenstein include the pronounced vertical hump in the bridge deck, the substandard geometric approaches, inadequate clearances, crash worthiness of the parapet walls to sustain the impact of a vehicle and the ability to attach barriers to the bridge. Mr. Rohrer believed that many of these factors could not be adequately addressed to maintain public safety with retention of the existing bridge. Extensive evaluations have been done and there are no known cures that will provide a cost effective extension of usefulness and provide the needed level of public safety. After Mr. Rohrer's presentation, some discussion and questions developed. Commission members asked about core testing, other concrete arch bridges in the County , the deterioration of the concrete Mr. Gehr ended the discussion by stating that no comments and/or recommendations have been requested from the Commission at this time. No action was needed or taken. _ ,unnnnnoa A,.m n90Rd - PORCHES AT 15910 The discussion began with Steve Goodrich giving a brief history of this case. In 2002, the Bowmans submitted permit applications for construction of two porches on the rear of the house which is located in the Historic Preservation tone and therefore needed Historic District Commission approval for the building permit applications. After the first review of these applications in January 2003, the Commission requested more detailed and accurate information from the Bowman. This information was not provided. In July 2003, the Commission was advised that the porches had been constructed without the Commission's approval and without building permits. Photographs were provided of the porches. The Commission used those photographs as substitutes for the detailed drawings it had previously requested and disapproved the designs because they were not an appropriate for this building. The owner was advised of the disapproval and the need for additional submittals for design review and approval. In November 2004, Merry Stinson questioned the status of these porches. An inspector from the Permits and Inspections Department visited the property and photographed the porches that are now existing on the building. The porches that were constructed without approval and subsequently photographed and disapproved had been reconstructed with revised balusters and hand rails. The Commission has never given their approval to this construction; however, the permits have been closed out since all building codes have been complied with. Merry Stinson requested contact with the Maryland Historical Trust to see if the B owmans have applied for a state tax credit. Carla Viar made a motion that the Commission again disapprove the permit applications #2002-09083 and 2002-09084 for the porches at 15910 Chaney's Neck Road because the new construction is not consistent with the HDC's adopted guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. As new construction there was no evidence provided that they are an accurate duplication of an historic features that did or would have existed on the building. The new construction is also not clearly distinguished as a contemporary addition. The motion to disapprove is also based on the lacktmpliance from the owners with the permitting procedures and HDC approvals as evidenced by the photographs of the existing porches. The motion was seconded by David Wiles and unanimously approved. LAKESIDE DEMOLITION Steve Goodrich reported that the Planning Commission also recommended denial of the proposed demolition. F. BUDGET Steve Goodrich presented a copy of the proposed budget for FY '06. The budget shows a decrease of $9,590. Mr. Goodrich has taken out the $10,000 for the French Lane rehabilitation because it will not be needed in FY 06. Mr. Goodrich increased the item for dues and subscriptions to $400.00 from $290.00; travel expenses increased from $100.00 to $200.00 to help defer the costs of travel to training workshops; and an increase in the tuition assistance from $400.00 to $600.00. Total budget request for this year is $11,260. Jane Hershey made a motion to approve the budget as presented, seconded by Carla Viar, and unanimously approved. G. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Goodrich began by providing the Commission with a copy of the Tax Credit Ordinance for Washington County. The County provides a credit on property taxes based on the amount of money spent on the restoration or preservation or improvements to historic properties. The criteria for reviewing tax credits are: 1) location in an historic district (Historic Preservation zoning in the County or a town designated district), 2) determination that the expenses are for improvements, restoration, or preservation rather than maintenance and 3) completion according to the secretary of the Interior's standards. TC-05-001: 102 WEST IRVIN AVENUE, HAGERSTOWN- PHILIP BIKLE Mr. Goodrich presented before and after photographs of the property. Mr. Bide informed the Commission that they have restored the roof to its original form after contacting 11 contractors. The cost of this item was $18,017. They have received a tax credit from the Maryland Historical Trust. A copy of this approval was requested by the Commission for their records. Merry Stinson made the motion to approve the request for a tax credit indicating that is qualified as restoration and was done according to the guidelines asthe applicants has replaced the roof with like materials and design.. The motion was seconded by Jane Hershey and unanimously approved. TC 05 002 112 BROADWAY HAGERSTOWN — JUDITH AND MARK MCLEAN Mr. Goodrich reviewed materials presented to the Commission at the beginning of the meeting for their use in reviewing the tax credit application. The first document is from IRS Publication Form 530 describing the definition for improvements, a copy of the Secretary's Standards describing the treatment for preservation, restoration, reconstruction and rehabilitation with detailed definitions, and the three pages from the applicant's Maryland Historical Trust "Certification of the Completed Rehabilitation". The State has approved tax credits for this property, their file numbers 2000-202; 2002-520 and 2003-604. All 13 items need to be examined individually for approval. Photographs were also provided. 1) Retaining wall restoration - approved 2) * Replacement of chain link fence to a wooden fence - approved 3) Screen Door replacement - approved 4) Painting of trim - approved 5) Garage door replacement - approved 6) Installation of flood lights — approved (determined to be needed for safety) 7) Replacement of floor on rear porch and columns - approved 8) Replacement of front columns — approved (from wood to fiberglass) 9) Replacement of roof - approved 10) Rehab of front porch floor - approved 11) Painting on garage and shed - approved 12) Faucets - approved 13) Installation of electrical outlet on front porch - approved Sandra Izer made the motion to approve all 13 items on the tax credit application. These items have been determined to be improvements and restoration and completed according to the adopted guidelines, Secretary's Standards, The motion seconded by Carla Viar and unanimously approved. FFY '05 CLG PROTECT - PHASE IV RURAL COMMUNITY SURVEY The application for CLG funding was due on December 31, 2004. Steve Goodrich re -submitted last year's application for Phase IV — Rural Community Survey. The funding scheme is the same as the previous submittal, $15,000 from the Trust and a commitment of $10,000 locally in cash, and $3,500 in in -kind money which is for monitoring the project consultant and for the Purchasing Department for the bidding process. Total Project cost is $28,500. Jane Hershey made a motion to approve the CLG budget and project as presented, seconded by Sandra Izer, and approved unanimously. H. OTHER BUSINESS - None I. EXECUTIVE SESSION — None ADJOURNMENT Jane Hershey made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 PM, seconded by Carla Viar and unanimously approved. Respec lly s , tted, Stephen T. Goodrich Chief Senior Planner STG/dse Attachments: As noted MINUTES HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY MARCH 2, 2005 A and B. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular monthly meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order by Stephen T. Goodrich on Wednesday, March 2, 2005 at 7:05 p.m. in Conference Room 1 of the Washington County Administrative Annex. Members present included: Jane Hershey, Sandra Izer, Merry Stinson, Carla Viar and David Wiles. Also present was County Commissioner Dori Nipps and staff member Debra Eckard. Absent members: Michael Gehr, Chairman, and Eleanor Lakin. C. MINUTES The minutes from the February 2, 2005 meeting were presented. A motion was made by Sandra her to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Merry Stinson. Unanimously. approved. D. COMMUNICATIONS & BILLS 1) S.H.A. Maintenance Facility — Parkhead Mr. Goodrich presented a letter and maps from the State Highway Administration proposing the construction of a new salt barn at their maintenance facility at Parkhead, near Pecktonville. The State Highway Administration has determined that the construction of this facility would have no effect on historic resources in that area. After some discussion, Merry Stinson made a motion to have Mr. Goodrich prepare a letter to be sent to the State Highway Administration expressing the HDC's concern for construction on previously undisturbed areas and to recommend that if any archaeological resources are encountered during construction that they be recovered and curated. Copies of this letter should also be sent to the Maryland Historical Trust and the Hagerstown Historical Trust. Seconded by Carla Viar. Unanimously approved. 2) Training Resources Mr. Goodrich presented a copy of the "Historic Preservation the Process and the Profit" seminar brochure for the Commission's information. He also presented a copy of the Maryland Association Historic District newsletter detailing the Annual State Conference to be held in May. Both of these seminars would provide the required training for HDC members. If there are any members interested in attending the State Conference, there are funds available in the Commission's budget. G. NEW BUSINESS 1) Permit #2005.01655, 4621 Harper's Ferry Road Mr. Goodrich presented Permit #2005-01655 for construction of a garage at 4621 Harpers Ferry Road, Sharpsburg, Maryland to the Commission. This property is' located in the Antietam Overlay District as described in the Washington County Zoning Ordinance under Article 20A and is subject to the regulations of Article 20, Historic Preservation District, Section 20.6. Mr. Albert L. Hetzel, Jr., the applicant and owner of the property was present. Mr. Hetzel presented photographs of the existing house constructed in 1999. He stated that the garage will be constructed using the same color and type of siding and shingles to match the house. Mr. Hetzel presented the proposed product specifications from 84 Lumber showing the windows (30 x 30", manufactured by MW Windows), garage doors (manufactured by GADCO), siding (manufactured by CertainTeed), and roof samples (rustic Virginia slate). The Commission received the plan and all four elevation drawings with the Agenda. Carla Viar made a motion to approve the permit application based on consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the recommendations for new additions and that the construction will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district and its environment. Seconded by Jane Hershey. Unanimously approved. 2) PC -05-003, Mt, Aetna Farms PUD (revised concept plan) Mr. Goodrich presented information for the proposed Mt. Aetna Farms PUD located north of Robinwood Drive and Yale Drive. This concept plan is proposing 1,431 dwelling units on 220 acres. This application was previously reviewed by the Commission in June 2003; however, the concept plan has been revised and several changes have been made to the plan. There is an existing historic structure (WA -I-439) located on this site. In 2003, the HDC recommended that the concept plan be adjusted to provide an appropriately sized lot on which to retain, rehabilitate and re -use the existing buildings and that they be secured from the weather and vandalism to be protected until such time as the structure can be re -used. Commissioner Nipps stated that sewer service for this development is a serious issue. Sewer service would need to be approved by the City of Hagerstown which is currently under a consent order from the MDE. The developer has requested that this site be annexed into the City of Hagerstown; however, this development is not contiguous with the City and therefore cannot be annexed at this time. School capacity issues are another major concern for this development. Jane Hershey made a motion that the Commission reiterate its position from the June 2003 comments. Seconded by David Wiles. Unanimously approved. H. OTHER BUSINESS 1) Barnes Road Bridge Mr. Goodrich provided Gary Rohrer's response to Merry Stinson's request for information on the next oldest concrete arch bridge (after Barnes Road Bridge) in the County. Mr. Rohrer's response stated that the County's inventory of structures does not include an accumulative list of dates, but he referenced the book "Historic Bridges of Maryland" which lists the 1907 concrete arch structure over the Conococheague River. 2) Bowman Property Mr. Goodrich has contacted the Maryland Historical Trust regarding the Bowman property. A written formal request must be made in order to receive copies of any information submitted to the Trust for tax credits but he was informed that there have been applications on Maryland tax credits. Mr. Goodrich has also sent a letter to the Bowman's regarding the non-compliance with HDC standards and specifications for rehabilitation of an historic structure within an HP zone. Discussion: Commissioner Nipps suggested implementing fines for non-compliance of the Zoning Ordinance regulations for the construction/rehabilitation of properties designated within an HP zone. 3) 112 Broadway Tax Credit Application Ms. Izer expressed concern regarding the approval of some items listed on the tax credit application presented,. for the property located at 112 Broadway in February. Ms. Izer stated that she has contacted the Maryland Historical Trust regarding the replacement of the front wooden columns with fiberglass columns. The applicant stated on the application sent to the Maryland Historical Trust that the columns were replaced with "in -kind" columns. The Maryland Historical Trust is investigating the application at this time. Mr. Goodrich stated that Staff will review the minutes and tapes from the February meeting. J. ADJOURNMENT_ Jane Hershey made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m. Seconded by Carla Viar. Unanimously approved. Resp�$tf1lI nutted, Stephen T. Goodrich Chief Senior Planner STG/dse MINUTES HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY April 6, 2005 A and B. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL The regular monthly meeting of the Historic District Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael Gehr on Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 7:05 p.m. in Conference Room 1 of the Washington County Administrative Annex. Members present included: Jane Hershey, Sandra Izer, Merry Stinson, Carla Viar and David Wiles. Also present was County Commissioner Dori Nipps and staff members, Stephen T. Goodrich and Debra Eckard. Member Eleanor Lakin was absent. C. MINUTES The minutes from the March 2, 2005 meeting were presented. A motion was made by Ms. Izer to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Mr. Wiles. Unanimously approved. D. COMMUNICATIONS AND BILLS None E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Cheney's Neck Road Mr. Goodrich presented a copy of the letter that was sent to Todd and Tracey Bowman in February 2005. Mr. Goodrich also stated that he has had several discussions with Mr. Dan DiVito, Director of Permits and Inspections and Ms. Angela Smith, Deputy Director of Permits & Inspections regarding the course of actions that can be taken to resolve this issue. They have stated that court proceedings would be the next step to resolve this matter; however, due to the lack of significant documented evidence and the length of time that has passed, this course of action is not recommended. Mr. Gehr recommended sending a certified letter to the Bowman's stating that the correspondence of February 15th is the Commission's final decision unless new plans are submitted before the next HDC meeting on May 4, 2005. Copies of the correspondence should be sent to the Board of County Commissioners and the Maryland Historical Trust, Ms. Viar made a motion to recommend that the Bowman's property records be "flagged" so if historic district property tax credits are applied for in the future this issue will arise again. Seconded by Ms. Izer. Unanimously approved. Barnes Road Bridge Correspondence Mr. Goodrich presented a copy (for informational purposes only) of the letter written by Mr. Gary Rohrer responding to the Washington County Historical Trust's letter of November 5, 2004. This correspondence is for informational purposes only. TC-05.001,112 Broadway (Follow-up) Mr. Goodrich stated that he has contacted Mr. Colin Ingraham of the Maryland Historical Trust regarding the column replacement issue at 112 Broadway. Mr. Ingraham stated that the trust believed the columns were going to be replaced "in -kind" and if they had known they were • replaced with fiberglass columns, the credit would have been denied. However, sihce this application was reviewed three years ago, the time limit has passed for the Trust to pursue any kind of action. F. BUDGET Mr. Goodrich presented information for the Annual State Conference stating that there are funds available for any member planning to attend. G. NEW BUSINESS Demolition Permit #2005-02780, 21101 Twin Springs Drive Mr. Goodrich presented Demolition Permit #2005-02780 for property located at 21101 Twin Springs Drive and identified in the Washington County Historic Sites Survey as site #WA -I-095. When a permit is applied for on a property listed in the Inventory, the application must be presented to the Historic District Commission for review and comment. If the Historic District Commission recommends denial of the permit application, it must then be presented to the Washington County Planning Commission for their review and comment. Mr. Goodrich introduced Mr. Sandy, the contract purchaser, and Mr. Palmer, owner of the property. Mr. Sandy presented photographs of the property proposed for demolition and photographs of the houses in the surrounding area. Mr. Sandy owns and lives in the adjacent property to the east. He plans to demolish this structure and is proposing to construct a cape cod or a colonial style house on the property. Mr. Sandy stated that the original logs within the current structure are infested with termites. No report was available. Mr. Sandy also stated that he has not had the structure inspected by a structural engineer. Ms. Izer presented information regarding the history of the structure, which served as Luther Bett's general store from 1863 until the early 1900's. Ms. Izer and Ms. Stinson recommended that Mr. Sandy obtain information regarding tax credits for rehabilitation of historic properties. Mr. Goodrich stated that the County offers a 10% credit on property taxes for any work done on the outside of the structure according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Maryland offers a 20% income tax credit for interior and exterior rehabilitation. There are also Federal tax credits available. In order to receive the County and State tax credit, the property must have the Historic Preservation zoning. Ms. Stinson volunteered to visit the property with Mr. Palmer to obtain more information regarding the architectural history and current condition of the structure. Mr. Gehr suggested selling or donating the historic components of the structure. Commissioner Nipps stated that Rural Heritage Museum is organizing a Rural Village at the Ag Center using donations of historic structures. Ms. Stinson made a motion to recommend denial of the demolition permit based on the significance of the structure as stated in the Washington County Historic Sites Survey for Site WA -I-095 and its importance in maintaining the character of the Rural Village of Chewsville. Mr. Gehr added to the motion that if the demolition permit is issued, the structure should be documented before it is demolished and all parts should be donated for re -use. Ms. Viar added to the motion that this recommendation is made based on the lack of significant information to justify demolition. The motion and its additions were seconded by Ms. Izer. Unanimously approved. PC -05-011, Artz Property Mr. Goodrich presented a preliminary consultation for the Artz property located on Rench Road. There are inventoried historic structures located on adjacent properties and a forest buffer between these two properties. Ms. Izer made a motion to recommend that the planting area between the Artz property and the former Brethren Church be maintained as a buffer area. Seconded by Mr. Wiles. Unanimously approved. DP -05-001 Black Rock PUD Final Development Plan Mr. Goodrich'presentedthe final development plan for the Black Rock PUD located on the north side of Mt. Aetna Road. Mr. Goodrich stated that the Snavely Farm houses, previously proposed for demolition, have been retained on their own lots. Ms. Stinson made a motion to commend the developer for setting aside the two historic houses on their own lots for purchase and rehabilitation and to recommend that the existing barn be set aside on its own lot, Seconded by Ms. Viar. Unanimously approved. H. OTHER BUSINESS None. I. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. J. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Hershey made a motion to adjourn the meeting a 9:00 p.m. Seconded by Ms. Izer. Unanimously approved. Respe fully tt�tedC Stephe T. Goodrich Chief Senior Planner STG/dse SUMMARY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION June 1, 2005 The Historic District Commission held its regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in Conference Room 1 of the Washington County Administrative Annex. The following members were present: Jane Hershey, Sandra Izer and David Wiles. Also present was County Commissioner Dori Nipps and staff members Stephen T. Goodrich and Debra Eckard. The following members were absent: Merry Stinson, Eleanor Lakin, Michael Gehr, and Carla Viar. Because a quorum was not present a formal meeting could not be held. However, the members who were present gave their recommendations for the Agenda items that were presented. Demolition Permit #2005-03008 -13722 Village MM Drive Mr. Goodrich presented a demolition permit for a barn located at 13722 Village Mill Drive, located within the Freedom Hills development. The previous owner, Mr. Gene Albert, had a preliminary consultation for the development of this property several years ago. At that time, the HDC reviewed the concept plan that showed proposed lot lines going through the existing house and a road going through the existing barn. The Commission recommended a new lot layout to retain all of the farm complex buildings on individual parcels so they could be sold and rehabilitated. Mr. Albert changed the concept plan and put the farm house on a separate lot and the first phase of the development was started. The property has recently been sold to Mr. Farhad Memarsadeghi, Admar Custom Homes. The new developer is ready to move forward with the next phase of development which includes construction of the proposed road through the barn. The developer is also proposing to demolish the farm house; however, a formal permit application has not been made. Comments: Ms. Izer noted that the post and beam construction of the barn is a significant architectural i feature for structures within Washington County. She would like to see the proposed plan be revised to retain both the house and the barn. Ms. Hershey stated her recommendation for denial of the demolition permit. Mr. Wiles stated his recommendation to save both the house and the barn and to deny the demolition permit. Commissioners Nipps stated that the HDC has made recommendations to other developers to save structures listed on the Historic Register. Numerous developers have restored historic homes within their developments. She recommended that the developer reconsider renovating and rehabilitating the structures within this development. Mr. Goodrich stated that he will present to the Planning Commission, the opinions of the HDC members present this evening and reiterate the previous recommendation to save the entire farm complex. National Register Nomination — Ridenour Farm Mr. Goodrich presented an application for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places for the Ridenour Farm located on Hopewell Road. Ms. Hershey, Ms. Izer, and Mr. Wiles recommended approval of the nomination based on criteria "c" of the Registration Form which states the following: "Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction." September 28, 2004 Lakeside Partnership C/o the Morris Weinman Co. P.O. Box 5992 Baltimore, MD 21282 RE: Demolition permit # 2004-08940 Dear Sir or Madam: You have applied for a permit to demolish a three story dwelling being used as an office for Lakeside Park, located at 11111 Lakeview Drive, that is identified in the Washington County Historic Sites Survey as site # WA -I-370 (a copy of the information is enclosed for your use). In accordance with Washington County policies, the Historic District Commission (HDC) must have the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed demolition prior to the permit issuance. The Planning Commission may also be provided the opportunity to comment if the HDC is opposed to the demolition. This letter is to inform you that the application has been scheduled on the Historic District Commission's October 6, 2004 agenda. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm in Conference Room "A" in the Washington County Administrative Annex Building located at 80 West Baltimore Street in Hagerstown. You are encouraged to attend. The Commission is likely to have questions regarding the need for demolition. If you are not able to attend you may provide written material that would explain and support the need for demolition or send a representative. If the Historic District Commission is opposed to the demolition it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to review the application also. The next available meeting is scheduled for November 1, 2004 at 7:00 pm in the same location. Please feel free to call me at 240-313-2430 between 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. if you have questions. Sincerely, Stephen T. Goodrich Chief Planner enclosure STG/me Cc: Karen Dickie C/o Lakeside Park office 11111 Lakeview Drive Hagerstown, MD 21740 \hdc\200408940.DMO.doc November 5, 2004 Susan Grandville, Property Manager Lakeside Park 11111 Lakeview Drive Hagerstown, MD 21740 Dear Ms Grandville: In late September you applied for a permit to demolish the two story brick building that serves as the offices for Lakeside Mobile Home park. The structure is listed in Washington County's Historic Resources Inventory as site # WA -I-370. As required by County policy, the application was referred to the Historic District Commission and reviewed during its November 3, 2004 meeting. At that time you provided the Commission with current photographs of the building and described its current state of disrepair. You mentioned specifically the sagging roof, holes in the roof, deteriorating chimneys, falling plaster and asbestos in the insulation and flooring materials. You also mentioned it was the owners intention to remove the building and install parking in the location and that the office would be established in a new building elsewhere on the site. The HDC expressed its concern for the proposed demolition of the structure listed in the resource inventory with obvious architectural value and an apparent lack of maintenance that has lead to the current state of disrepair. The Commission unanimously passed a motion to recommend opposition to the demolition permit. According to the adopted policy, when the Commission recommends opposition there is additional review by the Planning Commission. This review has been scheduled for the Planning Commission's December 6, 2004 meeting to be held in the conference room of the County Administrative Annex building located at 80 West Baltimore Street in Hagerstown. The meeting begins at 7 pm. It is advisable that a representative for Lakeside Partnership be present for the discussion in the event the Planning Commission may have questions regarding the application. Please feel free to call if you have questions before the meeting Sincerely Stephen T. Goodrich Chief Planner