HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210707_YavenerSupportDocumentsLloyd & Jennifer Yavener
240.838.0302
yav58@aol
8820 Huntmaster Road 4425 Main Street
Gaithersburg, MD 20882 Rohrersville, MD 21779
July 2, 2021
Historic District Commission of Washington County Maryland
100 West Washington Street
Suite 2600
Hagerstown, Maryland 21740
RE: Residential Addition-Alteration Permit Application
4425 Main Street, Rohrersville MD
MD Inventory of Historic Properties WA-III020; III140
Dear Members of the Commission,
In advance of the hearing, we would like to share our plans for the farm, including an update on
the previously approved front porch and the first-floor addition. Due to many factors associated
with the Covid-19 pandemic, we made the decision to move to the farm permanently this Fall
instead of waiting until we retire. The porch has been completed, with the exception of
installation of a few electrical outlets and ceiling fans, which are required for final inspection and
which have been delayed by the unusual demand for services of our electrician. Photos of the
porch are provided under separate cover.
Objectives
Our plans for the addition are guided by several core objectives:
• Improve the functionality of the home
• Locate the addition where it causes the least visual change to the home
• Solve the perennial water intrusion issues from the landing window
• Avoid any change to the interior floor plan and exterior features of the home
• Utilize design elements and materials similar to the existing structure
Improved Function
The proposed addition will provide a much needed first floor bathroom enabling us to age in
place on the farm and will serve as a second bathroom for the convenience of guests. The home
also is lacking a casual room off the kitchen, as the first floor only has a kitchen and a formal
parlor and dining room. Having a second bathroom and sitting room will greatly enhance the
functionality of the home. The wide center hall in the home will essentially extend through to the
new addition creating excellent flow to all areas of the first floor.
Location
We chose a location at the rear of the home that will cause the least disruption to the character
and architectural elements of the home. We opted against wings or other additions to the main
portion of the home The original concept for the bathroom addition was proposed by Doug Reed
of Preservation Associates, with whom our parents worked years ago for various restoration
projects on the home. The addition essentially widens the rear porch of the home with an
extension of the existing hip roof. The roof extension will have a shallower pitch that will mirror
the hip roof on both ends on the recently constructed porch. There are many examples in the
area of older homes with similar extensions of hip rooves to create additional space. The
bathroom will be against the back wall of the main part of the house enabling direct access to
the home’s plumbing, and will provide direct access to electrical supply and ventilation. The
positioning of the addition also intentionally contemplated the elimination of part or all the
landing window for reasons discussed below.
Water Intrusion
According to the architectural professionals our family has consulted over the years including
Doug Reed, Elanore Lakin, and others, the rear section of the home was constructed at the same
time as the main house, based on architectural features and the fact that the south side wall
where the rear section adjoins the main house having uninterrupted courses of brick. However,
the design lacked adequate forethought as to where the hip roof over the back porch would
intersect the window on the back of the main house opening to the staircase landing. As shown
in the photos in the landing window photo folder, the lower left corner of the window opening
is below the roof surface of the rear section of the home, resulting in persistent water intrusion
through the window, sill, casing, and surrounding brick that has compromised the whole center
section of the rear of the main house, both on the exterior and interior of the home. The rear
interior walls of the home below the landing window and at the rear of the first floor have mold
issues every year during wet periods and have been repainted countless times over the year.
Our family has replaced the landing windowsill 3 times since we’ve lived there and the window
casing on the side of the window at the bottom is non-existent. We replaced approximately 100
bricks on the back wall of the house last year as they had calved-off in a large sheet during a
winter freeze, and there are approximately 100 more missing or compromised brick around and
below the landing window that have been filled with mortar before our family purchased the
home. During the last sill replacement, it became evident that the brick walls and plaster below
the window were badly compromised. We also had to remove the interior wall section below the
landing window down to the brick, replace much of the brick that had crumbled, replaster the
wall and refinish all the trim and flooring below the wall. The water also had seeped to the stairs
over the years, requiring replacement of the stair string board and trim at the landing. We also
repaired the plaster wall in the dining room at the rear of the home and the small hall wall on the
first floor below the landing window and repainted the home interior. Despite all efforts to
replace brick last year, adding additional roof flashing that covers the sill and casing on the left
side, and applying copious amounts of roof sealant, there is clearly more water intrusion based
on the bubbling of the baseboard trim that was recently refinished and painted.
We’ve consulted several contractors about the landing window issues in the past and all indicated
there’s no way to solve the problem with a window that is located below an intersecting roofline.
The options have all been either to remove the roof section over the rear porch in its entirety or
brick over all or part of the landing window. While we have tried for many years to protect and
preserve the home, the ill-conceived landing window and adjacent roof have caused considerable
structural and other damage to the home and will continue to do so unless it is addressed.
There is a second serious design flaw in the home where main staircase above the landing adjoins
the second floor in the middle of a doorway. While the staircase issue presents a potential hazard
when entering that room, it has no impact on the integrity of the home. By contrast, the landing
window has resulted in ongoing structural and cosmetic damage to the home and can only be
remedied by partial or total elimination of the window. We designed the addition with plans to
brick over the window above where the addition roof line will be, and possibly keep the top half
as a fixed window to preserve what we can while eliminating the water intrusion issue.
Interior Floor Plan
The attached floorplan drawing shows the original house interior with just 2 rooms and a kitchen
on the first floor. The rooms are generously proportioned, have high ceilings, and have the
original chair rail throughout. It was suggested that we locate a downstairs bathroom in one of
the rooms instead of building an addition, however, we believe the character of the home would
be disrupted too much with this approach, as the large rooms (each with a fireplace) are unique
to the home and important design elements.
Exterior Features
The home is a classic Federal design with a 5-over-5 bay front façade and 2-over-2 sides, hip roof,
and an L-shaped rear section with a porch on one side of the rear section. There were several
options to build the addition for the bathroom on either side of the main section of the house.
While it’s not uncommon to see additions as “wings” on the side of homes, Federal-style homes
are principally known for their simple square or rectangular box shape with two or three stories
high and symmetrical window placement. We’re of the opinion that an addition to the main
section of the home would disrupt the essence of the Federal-style and change the character of
the home. By contrast, the proposed addition to the rear of the home is basically an extension of
the existing rear porch and preserves the architectural integrity of the home.
Design Elements and Materials
The home has strong elements of Flemish bond brick and solid white trim and a symmetrical
layout of windows (with the exception of the landing window). The windows have soldiered
bricks along the top edges and have consistent use of trim on the outside and inside of the home.
When designing the addition, we wanted to maintain the strong and simple and symmetrical
essence of the home and avoid any elements that would clash with the main home. We designed
the addition with French-style doors to being light into the room as it sits on the north side of the
home, and all but the rear entry door are identical in size. We also felt it was important for the
wall sections between the doors the be identical in width to replicate the symmetry of the main
house. We designed the roof of the addition as a hip roof and replicated the horizontal siding on
the opposite side of the rear section, as we did on the ends of the porch. We believe the
consistent use of these elements will avoid the addition fighting the look of the main home.
The materials we chose for the addition are similar to the home with brick walls around both
sides and soldiered brick above the doors. We’ll source either old used brick or a modern
equivalent so that the edges are soft and rounded like those on the main house. We’ll make every
attempt to match the original trim used on the home and will use the same standing seam metal
roof. In order to optimize the energy efficiency of the addition, the French doors will be true
divided light mahogany doors with insulated glass and painted white to match the trim on the
home. On the interior, the existing brick porch wall will stay exposed, and we’ll make no changes
to the door and window openings, thereby preserving the back porch look and feel in the room.
Preserving the character and integrity of the farm has always been important to us, and the
planned projects were designed to have minimal impact to the structure and architectural
elements of the home, while providing much needed functionality to our family.
We have no other planned changes to the home with the exception of adding back the shudders
that were partially on the home when we moved there. The windows all have the original pintle
hardware intact and we’ll try to source old shudders as the original ones we have are in poor
condition. We plan on installing an in-ground pool in 2022, and have designed a simple, dark
bottomed rectangle pool with grass surround and minimal decking.
We value and appreciate the mission of the Historic District Commission and look forward to
discussing the proposed addition at the hearing. Please let us know if there’s any additional
information that will enhance the review process.
Sincerely,
Lloyd Yavener
Floor Plan
Side Elevation
Rear Elevation