The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20200108AGENDA Washington County Historic District Commission January 8, 2020, 7:00PM Washington County Administrative Complex 100 West Washington Street 2nd Floor, Public Meeting Room #2001 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MINUTES NEW BUSINESS Permit Applications 1. Demolition Permit (2019-04830) – Doris Rankin – Permit to remove existing log cabin structure on property located at 14535 Marsh Pike; MHT Inventory ID: WA-I-212* 2. Demolition Request (Informal Review) – Review and Herald Publishing – Contract purchasers are seeking comment on a potential plan to demolish an existing house and barn on property located at 47 West Oak Ridge Drive; MHT Inventory ID: WA-I-378* 3. Addition/Renovation Permit (Informal Review) – Laura Apelbaum – Owner seeking comment on plans to renovate and expand existing house at 24812 Linden Avenue; MHT Inventory ID: Pen Mar Historic Rural Village* OTHER BUSINESS 1. Maryland Department of Transportation Review of Historical Impact – Replacement of concrete slab bridge over Toms Run, Clear Spring.* ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETINGS 1. Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Washington County Administrative Complex, 100 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor, Public Meeting Room #2001, Hagerstown, Maryland *attachments The Historic District Commission reserves the right to vary the order in which the cases are called. Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact the Washington County Planning Department at 240- 313-2430 to make arrangements no later than ten (10) days prior to the meeting. Notice is given that the agenda may be amended at any time up to and including the meeting. LEHMANS MILL RD M A RS H H AVE N LN M A R S H P I K E REIDTOWN RD Site Number:I233 Site Number :I220 Site Number:I215 Site Number :I209 Site Number :I211 Site Number:I345 Site Number:I207 Site Number :I212 Site Number :I523 Doris Rankin - Demo Permit 2019-04830 ® 0 0.06 0.12 0.18Miles WARNING!: This map is for internal use by the Washington County Planning Department. It is not forgeneral distribution to the public, and should not be scaled or copied. Sources of the data contained hereonare from various public agencies which may have use restrictions and disclaimers The parcel lines shown on this map are derived from a variety of sources which have their own accuracystandards. The parcel lines are approximate and for informational purposes ONLY. They are not guaranteedby Washington County Maryland or the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxations to be free oferrors including errors of omission, commission, positional accuracy or any attributes associated with realproperty. They shall not be copied, reproduced or scaled in any way without the express prior writtenapproval of Washington County Maryland Planning and Zoning Department. This data DOES NOT replacean accurate survey by a licensed professional and information shall be verified using the relevant deeds,plats and other recorded legal documents by the user. Legend Tax Parcel Railroad Road Historic Sites Resource Type[e HISTORIC BUILDING#HISTORIC DISTRICT \HISTORIC STRUCTURE 0 240 480 720 960 1,200Feet Printed: Monday, December 23, 2019 Printed by: jbaker W OAK RIDGE DR D O W N S V I L L E P I K E O A K R I D G E D R C O L O N E L H E N R Y K D O U G L A S D R M A R Y L A N D A V E INTERSTATE 70 INTERSTATE 70 P R E M I U M O U T L E T S B L V D Site Number :I378 Review & Herald Property - Demo Permit Review ® 0 0.05 0.1 0.15Miles WARNING!: This map is for internal use by the Washington County Planning Department. It is not forgeneral distribution to the public, and should not be scaled or copied. Sources of the data contained hereonare from various public agencies which may have use restrictions and disclaimers The parcel lines shown on this map are derived from a variety of sources which have their own accuracystandards. The parcel lines are approximate and for informational purposes ONLY. They are not guaranteedby Washington County Maryland or the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxations to be free oferrors including errors of omission, commission, positional accuracy or any attributes associated with realproperty. They shall not be copied, reproduced or scaled in any way without the express prior writtenapproval of Washington County Maryland Planning and Zoning Department. This data DOES NOT replacean accurate survey by a licensed professional and information shall be verified using the relevant deeds,plats and other recorded legal documents by the user. Legend Growth Area Boundaries Tax Parcel Railroad Road Historic Sites Resource Type[e HISTORIC BUILDING 0 210 420 630 840 1,050Feet Printed: Monday, December 23, 2019 Printed by: jbaker From:John David Martinez To:Baker, Jill Cc:Eckard, Debra S.; smuse@musearchitects.com; Laura Cohen Apelbaum Subject:request for preliminary design review Date:Thursday, December 19, 2019 12:49:03 PM Attachments:1824_191218 HISTORIC PRELIM DESIGN REVIEW.pdf [EXTERNAL SENDER] Mrs. Jill Baker,We would like to request for a preliminary design review for an addition to andrenovation of the house located at 24812 Linden Avenue, Highfield-Cascade, MD 21719.On behalf of Laura Apelbaum, the owner, we have prepared the following narrative ofthe proposed scope of work for this project with drawings attached of the existing andproposed plans and elevations.This existing two-story wood frame cottage house with one-story wrap-around porch is aseasonal house that the owner’s family has owned for many years. We are proposing anaddition of approximately 500 SF, which is comprised of both a one-story addition at therear of the house and a two-story addition to the side yard of the house. this addition,which is minimal in scale to the existing residence, lies within the shadow line of theexisting residence. An existing rear one-story addition and rear screened porch would beremoved where the new addition is proposed. The addition would be clad with paintedboard and batten siding over a painted block foundation to match the existingfoundation. New windows and doors would be fiberglass clad wood and match theproportions and lite divisions of the existing windows and doors. The roof of the additionwould match the existing asphalt shingles and match the existing roof slopes. All newtrim would match existing profiles using painted synthetic trim boards.In addition, we propose to remove the existing asbestos siding currently wrapping theexterior house walls and replace with new painted synthetic siding to match the existingexposure. All other existing house elements would be protected and preserved. Should you require any additional clarification on the proposed design and scope of work,please do not hesitate to contact us. We kindly ask if our attendance is required at theJanuary 8 hearing.Thanks, John David Martinez M U S E A R C H I T E C T S 7401 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 500Bethesda, MD 20814T. 301.718.8118 F. 301.718.8112 W W W . M U S E A R C H I T E C T S . C O M N 8'-0" 2 5 '-0 " 1 SCALE: 1" = 10'- 0" EX001 EXISTING SITE PLAN STONE WALL EXISTING LOW EXISTING TIMBER EDGE LI N D E N A V E N U E LAWN STEPS CONCRETE EXISTING WALL & FENCE EXISTING LOW STONE DRIVEWAY EXISTING GRAVEL 8'-0"S E T B A C K S E T B A C K STONE WALL EXISTING LOW WALL & FENCE EXISTING LOW STONE SHED EXISTING DRIVEWAY GRAVEL EXISTING E XI S TI N G C O N C R E T E W A L K W A Y CONCRETE CISTERN EXISTING BURIED S E T B A C KLAWN PILLAR EXISTING BRICK 1.54'ï»¿ N 57î€€30' 1 0 .0 0 ' ï »¿S 3 2 î €€3 0 ' 8.00'ï»¿ S 57î€€30' 4.00'ï»¿ S 57î€€30' 10'-0" SETBACK ï »¿N 3 1 î €€0 1 '0 1 " E 9 ï »¿N 3 2 î €€3 0 '0 0 " E 9 ï »¿S 3 2 î €€3 0 '0 0 " W 8 ï»¿ S 57î€€30'00" E 4 ï»¿ N 57î€€30' 00" W 5 SEWER PUMP & TANK EXISTING BURIED S C A L E : 1 "=1 0 '-0 " E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N EX001 SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN EX101 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN EX101 N N CL. CL. CL. CL. CL. LIVING ROOM DINING ROOM BEDROOM KITCHENBEDROOM BATHROOM MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM PORCH REAR SCREENED ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF PORCH FRONT SCREENED CONCRETE STEPS CONCRETE PATIO CONCRETE WALKWAY EX101 E X I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N S S C A L E : A S N O T E D SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS EXISTING STONE COURSED FOUNDATION BALUSTRADE SCREENED PORCH, COLUMNS & EXISTING WRAP-AROUND FRONT EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW, TYPICAL EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" EX201 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION EX201 E X I S T I N G S O U T H E L E V A T I O N S C A L E :1 / 4 "=1 '-0 " SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS BALUSTRADE SCREENED PORCH, COLUMNS & EXISTING WRAP-AROUND FRONT EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY EXISTING DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW, TYPICAL 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" EX202 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING EXISTING CONCRETE WALKWAY FOUNDATION WITH CRAWL SPACE VENTS EXISTING PAINTED BLOCK WALL EX202 E X I S T I N G W E S T E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" EX203 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY COLUMNS & BALUSTRADE EXISTING REAR SCREENED PORCH, TYPICAL EXISTING DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW, EXISTING PAINTED BLOCK WALL FOUNDATION EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING E X I S T I N G N O R T H E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 / 4 "= 1 '-0 " EX203 SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" EX204 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION WINDOW, TYPICAL EXISTING DOUBLE HUNG BALUSTRADE SCREENED PORCH, COLUMNS & EXISTING WRAP-AROUND FRONT COLUMNS & BALUSTRADE EXISTING REAR SCREENED PORCH, EX204 E X I S T I N G E A S T E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1" = 10'- 0" A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN N 8'-0" 8'-0" 2 5 '-0 " LI N D E N A V E N U E LAWN REMAIN STONE WALL TO EXISTING LOW STEPS TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE WALL & FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING LOW STONE REMAIN PILLAR TO EXISTING BRICK REMAIN STONE WALL TO EXISTING LOW TO REMAIN CONCRETE CISTERN EXISTING BURIED S E T B A C K S E T B A C K S E T B A C KLAWN WALL & FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING LOW STONE REMAIN SHED TO EXISTING EDGE TO REMAIN EXISTING TIMBER TO REMAIN DRIVEWAY GRAVEL EXISTING LANDING & PAVERS PROPOSED CONCRETE REMAIN DRIVEWAY TO EXISTING GRAVEL 8.00'ï»¿ S 57î€€30' 1 0 .0 0 ' ï »¿S 3 2 î €€3 0 ' 4.00'ï»¿ S 57î€€30' 1.54'ï»¿ N 57î€€30' ï»¿ S 57î€€30'00" E 4 10'-0" SETBACK ï »¿N 3 1 î €€0 1 '0 1 " E 9 ï »¿N 3 2 î €€3 0 '0 0 " E 9 ï »¿S 3 2 î €€3 0 '0 0 " W 8 ï»¿ N 57î€€30' 00" W 5 TO REMAIN SEWER PUMP & TANK EXISTING BURIED S C A L E : 1 "=1 0 '-0 " P R O P O S E D S I T E P L A N A001 SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY CL. ENTRY LIVING ROOM BEDROOM BATH DINING ROOM/ KITCHEN "4315'-1 "4 1 1 3 '-5 "4310'-5 "4 3 3 1 '-5 "4 1 2 9 '-3 2 '-1 0 " "4126'-10 E X I S T I N G A D D I T I O N ADDITION ADDITION A D D I T I O N E X I S T I N G EXISTING "4315'-1 "4310'-5 ADDITION ADDITION "4 1 2 9 '-3 2 '-1 0 " A D D I T I O N E X I S T I N G "4 3 1 7 '-8 E X I S T I N G "2 1 1 0 '-6 A D D I T I O N A D D I T I O N "4 3 1 6 '-7 EXISTING "4126'-10 BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH HALL CL. CL. CL. BELOW TO REMAIN SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING ASPHALT MATCH EXISTING ROOF BELOW TO ASPHALT SHINGLE N 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" A101 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN N 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" A101 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN FRONT SCREENED PORCH S C A L E : 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " A101 P R O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N S SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" A201 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' TYPICAL @ ADDITION BOARD & BATTEN, PAINTED SYNTHETIC TO REMAIN EXISTING SCREENED PORCH EXISTING EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING TYPICAL TO MATCH ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN BE PAINTED EXISTING WINDOW TRIM TO ASBESTOS SIDING TO REPLACE EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC SIDING TO REMAIN EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY EXISTING FASCIA BOARD, TO MATCH PAINTED SYNTHETIC S C A L E : 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " A201 P R O P O S E D S O U T H E L E V A T I O N SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" A202 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' EXISTINGADDITION TYPICAL @ ADDITION BOARD & BATTEN, PAINTED SYNTHETIC BOARD, TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC FASCIA TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM, COUNTERS TYPICAL @ KITCHEN PANEL BELOW WINDOWS, PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM PAINTED SYNTHETIC BATTENS PORCH TO REMAIN EXISTING SCREENED REMAIN EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY TO REPLACE EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING PAINTED SYNTHETIC SIDING TO & LITE DIVISION WINDOW PROPORTIONS TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING FIBERGLASS CLAD WINDOWS, P R O P O S E D W E S T E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 / 4 "= 1 '-0 " A202 SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" A203 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' TO BE PAINTED EXISTING WINDOW TRIM ADDITION TYPICAL @ ADDITION BOARD & BATTEN, PAINTED SYNTHETIC TYPICAL ON ROLLING TRACK PAINTED WOOD SHUTTERS, TO MATCH EXISTING FOUNDATION, PAINTED CMU BLOCK TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM, TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, BOARD, TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC FASCIA TYPICAL @ KITCHEN COUNTERS PANEL BELOW WINDOWS, PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM EXISTING WINDOW CASING, TO MATCH PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN SIDING EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING, TO REPLACE PAINTED SYNTHETIC TYPICAL @ ADDITION BOARD & BATTEN, PAINTED SYNTHETIC & LITE DIVISION WINDOW PROPORTIONS TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING FIBERGLASS CLAD WINDOWS, & LITE DIVISION WINDOW PROPORTIONS TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING FIBERGLASS CLAD WINDOWS, P R O P O S E D N O R T H E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " A203 SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0" A204 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION FIRST FLOOR LEVEL EL. 0.00' SECOND FLOOR LEVEL EL. 9.33' ATTIC FLOOR LEVEL EL. 18.08' TYPICAL @ ADDITION BOARD & BATTEN, PAINTED SYNTHETIC TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, BOARD, TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC FASCIA TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM, TYPICAL @ KITCHEN COUNTERS PANEL BELOW WINDOWS, PAINTED SYNTHETIC TRIM PROPORTIONS & LITE DIVISION TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING CLAD DOOR & WINDOWS, PAINTED FIBERGLASS TO BE PAINTED, TYPICAL EXISTING WINDOW TRIM PAINTED, TYPICAL EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE TO REMAIN EXISTING SCREENED PORCH ADDITIONEXISTING SIDING EXISTING ASBESTOS SIDING, TO REPLACE PAINTED SYNTHETIC & LITE DIVISION WINDOW PROPORTIONS TYPICAL TO MATCH EXISTING FIBERGLASS CLAD WINDOWS, P R O P O S E D E A S T E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " A204 SHEET NO. 7 4 0 1 W i s c o n s i n A v e n u e , S u i t e 5 0 0 P h o n e 3 0 1 . 7 1 8 . 8 1 1 8 w w w . m u s e a r c h i t e c t s . c o m B e t h e s d a , M D 2 0 8 1 4 M U S E A R C H I T E C T S , P C A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d I n t e r i o r D e s i g n A P E L B A U M C O T T A G E 2 4 8 1 2 L I N D E N A V E N U E H I G H F I E L D -C A S C A D E , M D 2 1 7 1 9 18.24 SUBMITTED 12/18/19 DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY 707 North Calvert St., Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.545.0400 | 1.800.206.0070 | Maryland Relay TTY 800.735.2258 | roads.maryland.gov December 17, 2019 Ms. Elizabeth Hughes State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 Dear Ms. Hughes: Introduction and Project Description This letter serves to inform the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) of the finding by the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) that there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed Project No. WA897A21, MD 56 over Toms Run, Replacement of Structure No. 21004X0. The project involves replacement of the existing small structure over Toms Run with a single span prestressed concrete slab bridge with a length of 23 feet, six inches and a clear roadway width of 32 feet, 8 inches. The proposed work also includes resurfacing of the approach roadway immediately to the east and west of Structure 21004X0, installation of traffic barrier, and construction of a grass swale. A temporary farm access road and bridge across the creek on the south side of MD 56 will be installed during construction to enable the property owner to reach crops on both sides of the creek. A detour will be required during construction. Additional right-of-way will be needed. A location map is included as Attachment 1. Funding State funds only will be used for this project. Area of Potential Effects In determining the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for this project, MDOT SHA considered possible visual, audible, atmospheric and/or physical impacts to historic properties, both archaeological sites and standing structures, which would diminish the integrity of any characteristics that would qualify a property for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The APE has been defined as the properties adjacent to the bridge project where right-of-way and/or temporary easements will be required, as indicated on the attached USGS quadrangle map for Clear Spring (Attachment 2). The archaeological project area is defined as the worst-case Limits of Disturbance (LOD). Ms. Elizabeth Hughes Page Two Identification Methods and Results Potentially significant architectural and archaeological resources were both researched as part of the historic properties investigation instigated by the proposed small structure replacement project. Architecture: MDOT SHA Architectural Historian Anne E. Bruder consulted the GIS Cultural Resources Database, county histories, census and Washington County land records and conducted field visits on April 5 and August 28, 2019. Four standing historic structures are included in the APE: Small Structure No. 21004X0, the Sided Log House (site) [WA-V-031] the Martha Shank Weller Farm [WA-V-446)] and the William E. Smith Farm. MDOT SHA has previously consulted with MHT regarding the eligibility of Small Structure No. 21004X0 on February 16, 2016 and determined it not eligible for the NRHP. MHT concurred with the determination on May 2, 2016. MDOT SHA evaluated Sided Log House (site), Martha Shank Weller Farm and William E. Smith Farm using Determination of Eligibility (DOE) and DOE Short Forms. Through research, MDOT SHA determined that the former buildings at the Sided Log House originally belonged to Jonathan Weller who owned the property in the 1870s. The buildings were demolished in 2010 in order to develop the property as part of Ashton Knolls, an early twenty-first century residential community. As a result, the Sided Log House is not eligible for the NRHP. The Martha Shank Weller Farm and the William E. Smith Farm were also evaluated with DOE forms and each was determined not eligible for the NRHP due to a lack of integrity. The DOE forms along with photos and maps are included in Attachment 3. MDOT SHA has determined that the replacement of Small Structure No. 21004X0 will have no effect on historic properties. The eligibility and effect determinations are summarized in Attachment 4. Archaeology: MDOT SHA Archaeologist Carol A. Ebright assessed the archaeological potential of the project area through consultation of SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database, environmental and historic mapping, aerial photographs, MIHP forms, and field visits made in November 2017 and February 2019. The project is located in the Great Valley and is characterized by karst topography, with well-drained Hagerstown or Murrill loams on either side of Toms Run. There are no recorded archaeological sites or prior surveys, although MIHP resource WA-V-031 (Sided Log House) is mapped on the east bank of Toms Run, north of MD 56, and is in an archaeological state. A prior bank barn with a stone foundation and one or more outbuildings were present on the south side of MD 56 but were removed by 2010. A driveway entrance with no associated building is present on the west bank of Toms Run, north of MD 56. MD 56 is one of the oldest roads in Washington County, providing overland access to Fort Frederick, built for the French and Indian War in the mid-18th century, and early historic sites are likely to occur along it. The MIHP form for the Sided Log House indicates that the 1978 Ms. Elizabeth Hughes Page Three owner believed the building to have been a tavern until the late 1800's, though this function is not depicted on historic maps. Field visits in 2017 and 2019 showed that apparently intact soils with potential for both Native American and Historic period sites were present within the project limits. Phase I archaeological survey was conducted for this project. Enclosed for your review and comment are two hard copies and one digital copy of the report Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Replacement of Structure 21004X0 over Toms Run Project, Washington County, Maryland by Mikolic et al. (2019) of A.D. Marble (Attachment 5). MDOT SHA has no further comments and, pending your review, considers the report to be final. Remote sensing and shovel testing located anomalies and a wall associated with the former Sided Log house, but no outbuildings, wells, or privies were identified. Although artifacts were recovered and archaeological site 18WA625 was recorded, disturbance from demolition was deep and widespread, and the site lacks the potential to yield important information. The site does not meet any of the NRHP criteria for significance. A DOE form for 18WA625 was previously transmitted electronically to your office. Demolition debris from the former bank barn and outbuilding on the opposite side of MD 56 was entirely removed the property and no archaeological site was recorded at this location. The replacement of the MD 56 structure over Toms Run is unlikely to impact any intact, significant, archaeological resources. No further archaeological work is recommended. Review Request Please examine the attached maps, DOE forms, archaeological report, and Eligibility and Effects Table. We request your concurrence by January 19, 2020 that there would be no historic properties affected by the replacement of Small Structure No. 21004X0, MD 56 over Tom’s Run. By providing a copy of this letter, we invite the Washington County Historic District Commission, Washington County Historical Advisory Committee, Washington County Historical Trust, and Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area to provide comments and participate in the Section 106 process. Pursuant to the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985, as amended, State Finance and Procurement Article §§ 5A-325 and 5A-326 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, MDOT SHA seeks their assistance in identifying historic preservation issues as they relate to this specific project. For additional information regarding historic preservation consultation for State funded projects see the Maryland Historical Trust’s website, www.mht.maryland.gov, or contact the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration or the Maryland Historical Trust. If no response is received by January 19, 2020, we will assume that these offices decline to participate. Please contact Ms. Anne E. Bruder at 410-545-8559 or abruder@mdot.maryland.gov with questions regarding standing structures forthis project. Ms. Carol A. Ebright may be reached at 410-545-2879 orcebright@mdot.maryland.gov with concerns regarding archaeology. After Dec. 30, 2019, Dr. Ms. Elizabeth Hughes Page Four Lisa Kraus may be contacted at 410-545-2884 or lkraus@mdot.maryland.gov for archaeological issues. Sincerely, Julie M. Schablitsky Chief Archaeologist/Assistant Division Chief Environmental Planning Division Attachments cc: Mr. Stephen Goodrich, Washington County Department of Planning and Zoning (w/ Attachments 1-4) Ms. Pat Schooley, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. (w/ Attachments 1-4) Ms. Elizabeth Scott Shatto, Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area (w/Attachments 1-4) Mr. Ralph Young, Washington County Historical Advisory Committee (w/Attachments 1-4) Ms. Anne E. Bruder, Architectural Historian (w/Attachments 1-4) Ms. Carol A. Ebright, MDOT SHA-EPLD (w/Attachments 1-4) Dr. Lisa Kraus, Archaeologist, MDOT SHA-EPLD (w/Attachments 1-4) Mr. Bob Maimone, Environmental Manager, MDOT SHA-EPLD Mr. John Narer, Project Manager, MDOT SHA-OOS Dr. Julie M. Schablitsky, MDOT SHA-EPLD Concurrence with the MDOT State Highway Administration’s Determination(s) of Eligibility and/or Effects Project Number: WA897A21 MHT Log No._________________ Project Name: MD 56 over Toms Run Replacement of Small Structure No. 21004X0 County: Washington Letter Date: December 17, 2019 The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the documentation attached to the referenced letter and concurs with the MDOT State Highway Administration’s determinations as follows: Eligibility (as noted in the Eligibility Table [Attachment 3]): [ ] Concur [ ] Do Not Concur Effect (as noted in the Effects Table [Attachment 3]): [ ] No Properties Affected [ ] No Adverse Effect [ ] Conditioned upon the following action(s) (see comments below) [ ] Adverse Effect Comments: By: ______________________________________ _____________________ MD State Historic Preservation Office/ Date Maryland Historical Trust Return by U.S. Mail or Facsimile to: Dr. Julie M. Schablitsky, Assistant Division Chief, Environmental Planning Division, MDOT State Highway Administration, P.O. Box 717, Baltimore, MD 21203-0717 Telephone: 410-545-8870 and Facsimile: 410-209-5046 A_Proj No. 3254 cc: Bruder Kraus Maimone Project LocationStructure 21004X0 MD iMAP, SHA Project Location MapMD 56 Over Toms Run Str 21004X0Clear Spring QuadWashington CountyFebruary 21, 2019 Scale: 1: 12,000 0 0.15 0.30.075 Miles Ü77°55'5.215"W 39°38'0.105"N Sided Log House (site)WA-V-031 Small Structure No. 21004X0WA-V-435 Martha Shank Weller FarmWA-V-446 William E. Smith Farm APE Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Attachment 2: APE Map (USGS Clear Spring 7.5' Quadrangle)MD 56 over Tom's Run Replacement of Small Structure No. 21004X0Clear Spring Washington County Attachment 3: Hybrid Eligibility/Effects Table Project Name: MD 56 over Tom’s Run Replacement of Small Structure No. 21004X0 December 17, 2019 Resource Type SHA NR Det. SHPO Opinion Impact SHPO Concur Attachment Remarks Small Structure No. 21004X0, MD 56 over Toms Run, WA-V-435 S X X None Requested 12/2019 Sided Log House, WA-V-031 S X Requested 12/2019 None Requested 12/2019 Sided Log House 18WA625 A X Requested 12/2019 None Requested 12/2019 Martha Shank Farm, WA-V-446 S X Requested 12/2019 None Requested 12/2019 William E. Smith Farm S X Requested 12/2019 None Requested 12/2019 Effect NPA Requested 12/2019 Codes: Resource Types: S (Structure), A (Archeological Site), HD (Historic District), NHL (National Historic Landmark) NR Determination: ND (Not Determined), X (Not Eligible), NR (Eligible), NRL (Listed), NHL (Landmark) SHPO Opinion: (B) designates opinion regarding boundary, Code following date signifies SHPO opinion Impact: None, No Adverse, Adverse Effect: NPA (No Properties Affected), NAE (No Adverse Effect), AE (Adverse Effect) Bold rows indicate review action requested