The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20110601WASHINGTON COUNTY A HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION A Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay AGENDA HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM 1A & B WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET June. 1,_2011 7:00PM M REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - 7:00 PM A. Call to Order & Roll Call B. Minutes —May 4, 2011* C. Communications & Bills D. Unfinished Business 1, Additional NPS comments -Cell Tower at 2367 Harper's Ferry Road E. Budget F. New Business 1. Building Permit #2011-01937, 22932 Midvale St., New 1500 sf storage building in the Ringgold Rural Village * 2. Marble Quarry Road bridge replacement Section 106 determination.( effects of new bridge on adjacent National Register eligible sites) * G. Other Business H. Closed Session I. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\ajune2011.DOC NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MAY MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANTTO SECTION 10.508, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE. ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CONTACT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT (240) 313-2430 VOICFJTDD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. www.washoo-md.net RECYCLED PAPER WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2011-01937 Project No: P2011-0523 Permit Type: RES-ADD Inspector Area: B2 Job Address: 22932 MIDVALE STREET SM Location: LOR 22932 MIDVALE STREET Parcel No: 027-01-0104-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: Applicant: Phone Number: Owner: Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: VICKERY NORMAN C L/E 22932 MIDVALE ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 301-491-3213 VICKERY NORMAN C L/E Applied: 05/23/2011 Approved: Status: PENDING District/Acct No: 14010114 Description: DEMOLISH DETACHED GARAGE (OVERALL SIZE 64'X52') AND REPLACE WITH 1500 SQ FT (30'X50') POLE BUILDING Foundation Size: 30' X 50 Type of Heat...: Public Sewer...: Public Water...: Gas............: •N Electric.......: N Exterior Finish: METAL Air Conditioning: N Septic....................: EXISTING Time Existed: APPROX20 YEARS Well.......................: EXISTING Time Existed: 1995 Construction Type: A/R Construction Valuation: $20,000.00 No. Of Bathrooms: Code Enforced: 2009 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE No. of Bedrooms: Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed .75 ACRE .75 ACRE 25 140 12 260 0 Minimum Required 40,000 SQ FT 40,000 SQ FT 25 8 8 8 0 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Division of Plan Review and Permitting office and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2011-01938 Applied: 05/23/2011 Project No: P2011-0523 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING InspectorArea: B2 District/AcctNo: 14010114 Job Address: 22932 MIDVALE STREET SM Location: LOR 22932 MIDVALE STREET Parcel No: 027-01-0104-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: Applicant: Phone Number: Owner: Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: VICKERY NORMAN C L/E 22932 MIDVALE ST SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 301-491-3213 VICKERY NORMAN C L/E Description: REPLACE PORCH DECKING BOARDS AND JOISTS ON EXISTING COVERED 8' X 48' FRONT DECK WITH 8' X 36' WRAP, NO INCREASE IN SIZE. Foundation Size: Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: N Type of Heat...: Septic....................: EXISTING Public Sewer...: Time Existed: APPROX 20 YEARS Public Water...: Well.......................: EXISTING Gas............: N Time Existed: 1995 Electric.......: N Construction Type: AIR Construction Valuation: $9,000.00 No. Of Bathrooms: Code Enforced: 2009 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE No. of Bedrooms: 0 Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Pronosed .75 ACRE .75 ACRE 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Reauired 40,000 SQ FT 40,000 SQ FT 0 0 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Division of Plan Review and Permitting office and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 I Cu 0- C \ a / a E 3 .0 E j co §k4 Qw ,-Co 2222 )§§) 25> � j} ,0< q{§/§ < E Zto to Ei0OO a } I IF2 I .Z d 2 d .Z d &T — ,Z rn b X W J W a W J W a x I-- N O ro rn 2, M Ca) on O Z c O 0 E =wLc, yr' C L en C O a 2 W N Vt.- Cp H r ) ft EE U � _ " � N I � N INFORMATION on typical wall panel layout Make sure you panels plumb L down so your < generated mea remain accurat lap starbnq panel J next panel overlays the ./ first panel at the lap Check your steel manufacturing company detail Illustrations for nailing patterns. Hampton Carpentry Estimate Number: 3980 6/16/2011 cross section view Steel Siding Panel Details Gable Side 1 77 112 In. I� 38 in. .I 89 1/2 in. 88 7/8 In. 221 1/2 in. F 38 in. Gable Side 2 2331/2 in. 232 13/16 in. Hampton Carpentry Estimate Number: 3980 5/16/2011 I- I k k § k C Co {2! k ) § k § I It ojo r O w O) M G q) N a d O Z r CO ) - O p N Z Cu J `) S W in 64 t : ROOF PANEL INSIDE CLOSURE FASTENER STITCH SCREW (EVERY RIB') TAPE SEALANT OUTSIDE CLOSURE WALL PANEL ROOF PANEL STITCH SCREW (1'-0" O.C,) TAPE SEALANT GABLE TRIM FASTENER OUTSIDE CLOSURE STITCH SCREW (EVERY RIB-) TAPE SEALANT metal salesCorp oration oianolaclur 0 DRIP EDGE (GUTTER APRON) FACIA OR / POST TRIM F & J TRIM ALUMINUM SOFFIT PANEL ANGLE BASE Ha pton Carpent%gLL PANEL Estimate Number: 3980 5/16/2011 WALL PANEL FASTENER TAPE SEALANT STITCH SCREW (l'-0O.C.) OUTSIDE CORNER WALL PANEL FASTENER TAPE SEALANT INSIDE CLOSURE ANGLE BASE (RAT GUARD) ANGLE BASE IS ALSO KNOWN AS RAT GUARD Hampton Carpentry Estimate Number: 3980 5/16/2011 `84T[1S L svz. 3-012" / PAINTED SIDE metal salesrra PAINTED SIDE /�� I'/i"1�f1• IaD• 11ne--fil�`� ale 510 SIDE OUTSIDE INSIDE (.— 2"x1/8LC I3/e" PAINTED SIDE Hampton Carpentry Estimate Number: 3980 5/16/2011 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FCF' 'ti- -- ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ''? "' �'/ WASHINGTON COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS 80 W. BALTIMORE STREET MAY .13 2'131 HAGERSTOWN, MD 21740 PHONE: (240)313-2400 WASHmlarr:>': t.. FAX: (240) 313 - 2401 PLANNING To: Tim Tamburrino RE: Additional Section 106 Effects Determination Preservation Officer, Project Review and Marble Quarry Road Bridge Replacement over Compliance Little Antietam Creek, Bridge No. W-6083 Maryland Department of Planning Washington County, MD Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032 ATTN: Mr. Tim Tamburrino DATE: May 11, 2011 WE ARE SENDING Shop Drawings Copy of Letter Prints ATTACHED o Change Order o Plans o Samples o Specifications o Agreement o Mylar Cover Sheet COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 5/11/11 Additional Section 106 Effects Determination Letter and Attachments A & B THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: 'I For Approval 4 For Your Use and Information o As Requested o For Review and Comment o Approved as Submitted o Approved as Noted 4 For Your Execution o Returned for Corrections REMARKS: Enclosed is a letter for the additional section 106 effects determination and corresponding attachments A and B. COPY TO: Ms. Elizabeth Scott Shatto, Frederick Historic Sites Consortium Mr. Stephen B. Bockmiller, Hagerstown Preservation Design District Commission Mr. Steven Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission Ms. Pat Schooley, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc Mr. Rick Adams, RK&K, LLP Ms. Helen German, RK&K, LLP Mr. Brian Hepting, RK&K, LLP SIGNED: C-{ Andrew Eshleman If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. May 11, 2011 WASHINGTON COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering and Construction 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone:(240)313-2400 FAX:(240)313-2401 Mr. Tim Tamburrino Preservation Officer, Project Review and Compliance Maryland Department of Planning Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032 RE: Additional Section 106 Effects Determination Marble Quarry Road Bridge Replacement over Little Antietam Creek, Bridge No. W-6083 Washington County, Maryland Dear Mr. Tamburrino: Washington County, in cooperation with the Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), would like to continue our Section 106 consultation with you for the Marble Quarry Road Bridge Replacement over Little Antietam Creek project. The project would widen Bridge No. W-6083 to two lanes and reconstruct its approach roadways (see Attachment A). This would result in the demolition of the existing bridge and replacement at its current location. The work would also include storm water management and drainage improvements. The County proposes to use federal monies for construction of this project; therefore the project is considered an undertaking per Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act as amended and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800. in a letter dated November 19. 2009. that the undertaking would have an adverse effect on a historic property due to the demolition of the National Register of Historic Places (NARY) eligible Bridge No W-6083 -- Marble Quarry Road over Little Antietam Creek (MIHP No. WA -HI -120). In addition, there would be no direct effect on any other historic properties, and that any indirect effect on them would not be an adverse effect. Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) correspondence on January 29, 2010, concurred with this effect finding. Based on further development of detailed engineering plans and for the purposes of making a Section 4(f) determination, the County would now, like to request MHT's concurrence that the undertaking would have no adverse effect on two historic properties located within the direct area of potential effects 9`h Century Farmstead lMB3P No. WA -III -003) and Late 19" Century Brick Farmhouse (MIHP No. WA -III - 005 (see Attachment B). These farmsteads were determined eligible for the NRHP during the 2006 identification and evaluation study for this project. In accordance with 23 CFR 774.5(b), prior to making a de minimis impact determination, FHWA must receive written concurrence from MHT in a finding of no adverse effect for the historic properties. Where multiple Section 4(f) resources are present in the study area, de minimis impact findings should be made for each individual resource. The County is hereby notifying MET of FHWA's intent to make a Section 4(f) finding of de minimis impact for these two historic properties for which there would be no adverse effect. Mr. Tim Tamburrino May 11, 2011 Page 2 Please note that the determination of no adverse effect, and hence, the intent for finding of de minimis impact, only applies to the two properties described below. There would still be an overall Section 106 finding of adverse effect due to the demolition of the NRHP eligible Bridge No. W-6083. The following is the amount of land that would be taken from the two farmsteads as proposed right-of- ways (fee simple) and permanent easements (stormwater management): • 19t' Century Farmstead: 9,720 square feet/0.2 acres/0. 7 % taken from the 27.32 acre property. • Late 19th Century Brick Farmhouse: 15,482 square feet/0.4 acres/0.5 % taken from the 87.38 acre property. Two culverts shall also be constructed on the two farmsteads as part of this undertaking. There would be an effect to these two farmsteads since portions would be taken and there would be potential visual changes. However, the direct effect would only be sliver takes at the peripheries of these two historic farmsteads, which would not change the integrity of the properties, The culvert construction would also only be located on small areas of land located near the bridge. Visually, the NRHP eligible bridge from 1922 would be lost, and replaced with a new wider bride with wider road a roaches. Whereas the current bridge has one ane and is 14 feet wide, the new bridge would have two lanes and be about 30 feet w The new bridge would no longer have a center in -stream pier, and would be raised approximately two feet above the existing bridge elevation to reduce flooding so that Marble Quarry Road could pass a minimum 25 -year storm event. However, the existing two -span continuous concrete slab bridge is small and modest, with no trusses and other similar prominent features that would be visually missed as part of its replacement. Its most visually apparent character defin>'ng features are its closed concrete paneled ara ets. The new, wider bird e would have a generall com sThleappearance to the bridge that stands today. There ore, t e viewsheds from the historic farmsteads would not be significantly different. In addition, although the farmsteads' contributors have clear views of the bridge area, most are located far enough away so that their viewsheds would not change significantly. Therefore, their integrity would not be diminished. This includes the lime kiln and the two clusters of agricultural buildings associated with the historic properties, including the farm houses, located further east of the project area and a small springhouse on the Late 19t' Century Brick Farmhouse property, located over 600 feet to the south of the project area. The two proposed culverts would be located at the northern end of the archaeological remains of the foundation and raceway for Shifler Mill (Site No. 18WA316) which is part of the Late 19th Century Brick Farmhouse property. However, the undertaking would not physically alter the historic millrace and would not diminish the integrity of this historic feature. Therefore, although there is an effect, the undertaking would have no adverse effect on the two farmstead historic properties for the purposes of making a Section 4(f) de minimis impact determination. Please signify your concurrence by completing the signature block below and returning it to my attention. Feel free to contact me at (240) 313-2421 or aeshleman@washco-md.net should you have any questions. Thank you for your guidance and we look forward to continue working with you on this project. By copy of this letter, other consulting parties identified below are bein g invited to comment on this determination. We would like to receive MHT concurrence and any consulting party comments by June 10, 2011, which is thirty (30) days after the date of this letter. Mr. Tim Tamburrino May 11,2011 Page 3 Sincerely, Andrew Eshleman Structural Engineer Enclosures: Attachment A - 90% Marble Quarry Road Bridge Replacement over Little Antietam Creek Bridge No. W6083 Plan Sheets (May 2011) Attachment B - Map of National Register Eligible Farmsteads Within the APE cc: Ms. Elizabeth Scott Shatto, Frederick Historic Sites Consortium Mr. Stephen B. Bock miller, Hagerstown Preservation Design District Commission Mr. Steven Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission Ms. Pat Schooley, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. Mr. Rick Adams, RK&K, LLP Ms. Helen German, RK&K, LLP Mr. Brian Hepting, RK&K, LLP Understanding FHWA's intent to make de minimis Section 4(f) findings, the Maryland State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concurs that the historic characteristics of the 19"' Century Farmstead (MIHP No. WA -III -003) and Late l9`h Century Brick Farmhouse (MIHP No. WA -III -005) will not be diminished by this undertaking, and thus there would be no adverse effect to these specific properties. There would still be an overall Section 106 finding of adverse effect due to the demolition of the NRHP eligible Bridge No. W-6083. Tim Tamburrino Preservation Officer, Project Review and Compliance ny$n ne$mw an oN n^f onryn0 0�p 'Xn"ign �n n rryn ryfenxonm� n".d,Eu d tn��ow eg6 �I-�� &e b ee,eeee Os:wax.pjOw 'Iszwax.��ow 0nzudx..rc�uw ulzwax�p��w •O s • P ono O oo .0 eW'ZF o G 00 rc„* - p ; rn hkn� g g P n z n nn0N ' F' �Ai�Gh�n�Y�n G •Ci ��n?axarvnada 4 +++ ++ m G s X s G X s Ci' s K g Yo t e t I 3O )r led 4 } F Q / N Oo'"L 6Zi x 2 ps�x �®a�a SxORN]tl 0 u. ^'ImW�v\mn-rt:myVM<T,mNr�Y.�. a: vra Al 1000000 rox r O v:a ptlM]3xJ .w≥".nr1•l0O0 :tin-00l!0A�,. l0 ON 00000011100041 a wn^nlwwwi^ ♦e even 101100.00101 10003 ' 100Wr.w 031CCi1101 I]Ni UC i<IOb,l:N3 - Ili 0ONV1A8VCi IUNf103N010NINStlM��CV0 I Ail21tlf10 0 SNN0M OilBfld d0 N0ISIAI0 fl 3lei1VW aIll z o id. s . oar o 8 G�m� aZW o=o b F g8 Gfli 0104 s �Y� 800_ 0010 ?o o sp o S rc 8� MG z g s zw � G m BrG phi a 0 o31 8 €oria X04 gc 8 5 8 33 G m 10 lb n- 1 is • In L3LYO xe I PLdI SO 'ax wvea Mra uq a..in Ian .n v.0 fyu#9 l wavi caW.YiWnAnp l�•�+%d & fl wiemnwv£I u�hm.x Opinzllmtl XW aa-2!Z AB (IiN CI 3tlOIIUNO 3]HIS N31Is0YI 1B xuvua 1N3WIWd3Q SNIN33NI`JN3 f' dll'IyeH q Jadde m�' ° ONV NVW' NOOO NOlONIHSVM 'N 'lewwny a�NO2J Ai121'dfib 3� ?JIVW unxam S)IHOM Oll8fld rIO NOISING %�[ z yi 6 ≤ z O W CR A zzg3z r M iDyALL n a I (Rev. cited States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See Instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Ringgold Historic District other names/site number WA -N-007 2. Location street & number portions of Barkdoll Midvale and Misty Meadow Roads not for publication N/A city or town_ Ringgold vicinity N/A state Maryland code , MD county Washington code 043 zip code 21742 3. As the designated authority under the National' Hlstgric Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _ nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally_ statewideT, locally. (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments,) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property_ meets — does not meet the National Register criteria. (T See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of corivnenting official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): Ringgold Historic District Washington County, MD Name of Property - --. ----county-and-State _-... Ownership of Property Category of Prop ,;;.3heck as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) ilL.X private _ building(s) public -local X district public -State site public -Federal structure _ object Name of related multiple property listing (enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) [.]j (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwellini DOMESTIC/secondary structure RELIGION/church AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding FUNERARY/cemetery (Enter categories from instructions) EARLY REPUBLIC/Federal MID -19TH CENTURY/Gothic Revival LATE VICTORIAN/Italianate LATE 19m & EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN MOVEMENTSiTungalow/Craftsman LATE 19TH & EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN MOVEMENTS/American Foursquare LATE 19m & 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS/Colonial Refer to Continuation Sheet Number of Resources within Property (Do not include preNously-listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing 41 4 buildings 1 sites structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register Current Functions (Enter categories from Instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure RELIGION/church AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding VACANT/not in use (Enter categories from Instructions) foundation STONE/sandstone BRICK walls BRICK; STONE; WOOD/weatherboard roof ASPHALT; SLATE other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets) —_R' mold-listoricDisteict Washineton County MD Name of Property County and State rplicable National Register Criteria irk "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property National Register listing) _ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ✓ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. — D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) operty is: A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. C a birthplace or a grave. D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. _ G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years Narrative Statement of Siqnificance Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) ARCHITECTURE Period of Significance c. 1825-c. 1920 Significant Dates Significant Person (Complete If Criterion 8 Is marked above) Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used In preparing this form on one or more continuation sneets.) Previous documentation on file (UPS): Primary location of additional data: preliminary determination of individual listing (36 ___ State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested. Other state agency previously listed in the National Register Federal agency previously determined eligible by the National Register _ _ Local government designated a National Historic Landmark University recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Other # Name of repository: recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # 10. reage of Property 43 acres UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 18 279900 4399220 3 18 280160 4389480 2 18 280040 4399200 4 18 279820 4398280 N/A See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title David L. Taylor; Principal organization Taylor & Taylor Associates Inc date July, 2001 street & number 9 Walnut Street telephone 814-849-4900 city or town Brookville state PA zip code 15825 Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items name Multiple owners (refer to Continuation Sheet street & number city or town state _____ zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This Information Is being collected for applications to the Natic listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response tothis the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 at seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18,1 hours per response including the time for reviewing Instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, 00 20503. telephone rr of Historic Places to nominate propertlr or required to obtain a benefit in accbrdanc NPS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior .ational Park Service :.;rational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 7. Description Ringgold Historic District Washington County, MD The Ringgold Historic District is a primarily residential historic district of forty-three acres located in the ,.T unincorporated village of Ringgold in the northwestern quadrant of Election District No. 14 (the Ringgold District), in rural northern Washington County, Maryland, approximately twelve miles northeast of the county seat of Hagers- town and less than one-half mile south of the Mason-Dixon Line and the Franklin County, Pennsylvania border. The district includes portions of Barkdoll Street (Maryland Route 847), Midvale Street, and Misty Meadow Road. The Ringgold District contains a total of 46 resources, 42 of which (90%) contribute to the character of the district and 4 (10%) are non-contributing. Non-contributing resources are buildings erected outside the c. 1825-c. 1920 Period of Significance of the district and others, the extent of whose alteration has resulted in a loss of historic architectural integrity and their classification as non-contributing resources. All of the properties in the district are buildings except the Springfield Cemetery (Resource No. 31), which is a contributing site within the context of the nomination. Approximately seventy-five percent of the resources in the district pre -date 1900, approximately fifteen percent of the resources were constructed between 1900 and the end of the Period of Significance c. 1920, and the remaining approxi- mately ten percent are of modem construction and are non-contributing to the character of the district. The predomi- nant character of the district is that of a rural western Maryland hamlet located atop a hill overlooking a spacious valley and consisting primarily of a single linear thoroughfare. The architecture of the Ringgold Historic District consists principally of modest vernacular residences of two stories in her t, located on either side of Barkdoll Street- and on parts of Midvale Street and Misty Meadow Road.' A relatively small number of more pretentious homes represent a higher degree of sophistication than is seen in most of the architectural resources of the district. The vast maiorityof the district's architecture is of wood construction. Most of the homes retain ft porches of varying scales and forms along with associated domestic outbuildings including sheds and garages. Larger dependencies are included in the resource count, while smaller outbuildings (sheds, small automobile garages, etc.) are treated as low -scale landscape features and are not represented in the count. The district retains integrity in each of its seven qualities • location, design, setting, materials workmanship, feeling and association. The building lots of the Ringgold Historic District are irregular in plan, and reflect the patterns of traditional, Manned, and unregulated subdivision of land generations prior to the onset of uniform formal subdivision require - Alterations to Maryland Route 64 include a large cut and the bypassing of much of Ringgold, which left a portion of the community south of Route 64, including the District 14 School, a Colonial Revival -style brick school building, which appears to be minimally altered but is outside the district, separated by the expanse of the Route 64 cut. The school appears to meet National Register eligibility requirements as an individual property under Criteria A and C. OMB Approval No. 1024-8018 NPS Form 10-000a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places continuation Sheet Ringgold Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 7 Page 2 ments. The topography rises considerably from Route 418 (which bypasses the. district) to Barddoll Road, which is the principal north -south thoroughfare in the district. Property setback lines are irregular throughout the district and landscaping includes lawns both large and small. The bull ' sin the district are rectilinear ar in form and generally vary in height between one -and -one-half and two -and -one-half stories. Most buildings are roofed with laterally -oriented gable roo s, clad in standing -seam metal or in asphalt shingles. Some historic chimneys have been retained, while others have been removed in the course of retrofitting heating systems and replacing roofs. Fenestration is nearly exclusively flat-topped; in several instances, a pointed -arch window suggests design influence from the Gothic Revival style of architecture; for the most part, win- dows are generally sparsel ornamented; some multi -light historic sash has been retained. The majority of the buildings in the district rest on substantial foundations of coursed rock -faced limestone. As noted above, the architectural character of the Ringgold Historic -District is primarily vernacular, with most buildings executed without reference to any particular formal building style. Some traditional house types are found in the district, including side -passage single-plle homes and central -passage double -pile houses to which have been appended later additions. Some properties exhibit more design sophistication than others. Among these are 14510, 14321, 14527, and 14537 Barkdoll Road (Resource Nos.13, 24, 31, ands 34, respectively), which are Federal -style houses. The Federal -style homes are of two stories, some with three -bay facades and others with five -bay arrangements. All are of brick construction, and some employ Flemish bond brick treatment while others are of common bond. One Italianate property is in Ringgold; it is a two-story brick building which appears to have been a commercial property which has been converted to residential use. Vernacular adaptations of the Gothic Revival style are located at 14528, 14432, and 14410 Barkdoll Road (Resource Nos. 7, 14, and 18, respectively). The Gothic Revival influence is seen in centered gables on facades and pointed -arched pedimental windows. The Colonial Revival style is represented in a vernacular adaptation seen at 14420 Barkdoll Road (Resource No. 17), which is two-story wood residence with a centered gable on the facade and a Palladian window in the pediment of the gable. One Bungalow is in the district (14541 Barkdoll Road; Resource No. 35) and an American Foursquare is located at 22901 Midvale Road (Resource No. 22). Near the center of the Ringgold Historic District is the only contributing site, the Springfield Cemetery source No. 31), which lies along a hillside east of Barkdoll Road, Near the foot of this hill immediately inside the district's eastern boundary, is the River Brethren Church Meeting House, an 1871 vernacular church building of brick construction, with a laterally -oriented gable roof and five -bay lateral elevations punctuated by flat-topped fenestration vrvi nYNt°ver nu. rvaworu NPS Fonn 10-900o United States Department of the Interior ..tional Park Service ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet• Section Number. 7 Page 3 with operable exterior shutters. Ringgold Historic District Washington County, MD As noted in the introductory paragraph, the Ringgold Historic District retains historic and architectural integ- rity. Although modest�cale and detailing, the overall character of the district is intact and represents the early growth and`maturity of this hamlet throughout its Period of Significance. Very little demolition has occurred and only a very small number of newer buildings —modern residences and garages -have been built within the boundaries of the nominated area. Alterations to buildings within the district include the application of non -historic siding and the installation of replacement windows. These alterations are dispersed throughout the district and do not detract signifi- cantly from the ability of the nominated area to reflect its appearance throughout the Period of Significance. Viewed in its entirety, the Ringgold Historic District is an architecturally -cohesive settlement which grew up Jng Barkdoll Road after the initial 1825 settlement of the community by pioneer Joseph Creager. The nominated area retains integrity and contains forty modestly -scaled historic residential properties, one historic church, and one "contributing site. The following properties lie within the Ringgold Historic District. The numbering corresponds to the district map which was submitted with the nomination documents. All properties are assumed to contribute to the character of the district except those after whose description an "NC" appears; these properties are non-contributing to the character of the district, either because they date from outside the Period of Significance of the district or because their extent of alteration has significantly compromised their individual character with reference to the district. The dates of construction are generally approximate and are based upon physical examination, upon the scant written documenta- tion which exists for the district, and upon oral interviews conducted in the course of the preparation of the National Register documents. 1. 14606 Barkdoll Road h/z-storyvernacularcottage ofwoodconsttdctionwith a laterally -oriented gable roof and intersecting gabled pavilion entrance projecting at the right side; win- dows flat-topped without notable ornament (c. 1900) 1) 14548 Barkdoll Road two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with laterally -oriented gable roof and gablet on the facade; shiplap siding; two -bay facade; windows 2/2; single -story hip -roofed roof veranda wraps around the facade and side elevation (c. 1900) 3. 14542 Barkdoll Road two-story vernacular residence of brick with.a five -bay facade and laterally -ori- ented gable roof of standing seam metal, with interior gable -end chimneys; UPS Forth 10-900a OMB Approval No, 10244010 United States Department of National Park Service stational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 4 Ringgold Historic District Washington County, MD some multi -light sash has been retained, although most historic sash has been replaced; one-story porch on the facade set on a foundation of concrete block; in front of the house is a well with an hand pump, which is a contributing fea- ture within the context of the resource (c. 1830) 4. rear, 14542 Barkdoll Road 1½ -story two -bay automobile garage with gable roof (c. 1920) 14538 Barkdoll Road 11h -story residence of indeterminate age considerably altered with the installa- tion of non -historic siding, with a resultant loss of integrity (c. 1900; NC) 6. 14532 Barkdoll Road two-story vernacular residence of wood frame construction built on a raised foundation with a two -bay facade and the main entrance offset on the right side, suggesting a side -passage interior plan; laterally -oriented gable roof; single -story addition on the right side with modern bay window (c. 1850) 1 7. 14528 Barkdoll Road two-story Gothic Revival vernacular residence of wood with laterally-orie,_ .3 gable roof and center gable on facade; three -bay facade with a one-story bay window on the right side; one-story wrap -around veranda; non -historic siding (c. 1880) 8. rear, 14528 Barkdoll Road wood frame dependency of indeterminate age and function 9. rear, 14528 Barkdoll Road wood frame dependency of indeterminate age and function 10. 14524 Barkdoll Road two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with laterally -oriented gable roof; four -bay facade; windows 2/2, flat topped; paired entry doors on the facade; interior gable end chimneys; one-story shed roof porch (c. 1830) 11. rear, 14524 Barkdoll Road two-story dependency of wood construction at rear of main house (c. 1870) 12. 14520 Barkdoll Road two story vernacular residence of wood construction with a laterally oriented - gable roof of standing seam metal; two -bay facade with the main entrance offset on the right, suggesting a side -passage interior plan; non -historic siding (c. 1850) 13. 14510 Barkdoll Road 2½-storyFederal-style brick residence with a three -bay facade, laterally -oriented gable roof with shed -roofed wall dormers; some 9/6 sash remains; original' floor entryway with side lights and distinctive six -panel wood door; two-story gallery porch on facade (c. 1830) 14. 14432 Barkdoll'Road 2½ -story Gothic Revival vernacular residence of wood construction with laterally -oriented gable roof and centered gablet on the three -bay facade; cen- RINGGOLD HISTORIC DISTRICT WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND Prepared by TAYLOR & TAYLOR ASSOCIATES, INC. ..'storic Preservation & Community Development Specialists 9 Walnut Street Brookville, PA 15025 814.849-4900 July, 2001 DISTRICT MAP Scale: 1" = ± 300 Legend: District Boundary: Contributing Resources ❑ 1111 Non-contributing Resources O Numbers correspond to the indi- vidual properties which are list- ed in the Resource Inventory prepared in conjunction with the National Register documents. ZZ�3Z M �DY��C Tzl LI mm [J O EI pro rOrn to-Uuuu UMP HPPrOVal NO. l VZ4-JV1U United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 'lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Ringgold Historic District Washington County, MD tered entryway with transom and sidelights; extending across the facade is a highly ornamented locally distinctive porch with a square balustrade. (c. 1850) 15. 14426 Barkdoll Road 2 -story vernacular Italianate brick building with three -bay facade; flat -roof with a stylized cornice; windows 2/2 (c. 1870) 16. 14422 Barkdoll Road vernacular wood frame church with a large modern addition dated 1978 which eclipses the original historic building, with a resultant lost of integrity (NC) 17. 14420 Barkdoll Road 2½ -story Colonial Revival vernacular residence of wood construction with a laterally -oriented gable roof and a large intersecting gable with a Palladian win- dow in the pediment; three -bay facade; two-story bay window; windows flat topped; stone retaining wall with ball finial ornamentation (c. 1910) 18. 14410 Barkdoll Road 2½ -story Gothic Revival vernacular residence of wood built on a raised founda- tion with a laterally -oriented gable roof; three -bay facade with a center gable with a pointed -arched window in the pediment; non -historic siding (c. 1860) 19. 14402 Barkdoll Road two-story vernacular residence of wood construction with a three -bay facade; windows flat-topped 2/2; laterally -oriented gable roof, non -historic siding (c. 1850) 20. rear, 14402 Barkdoll Road within the context of this district, this is a large two-story barn of wood con- struction, with a gable roof and clad in corrugated metal siding (c. 1900) 21. 22932 Midvale Road in the context of this district, this is a comparatively large-scale brick residential building with five -bay facade and laterally -oriented gable roof with interior gable -end chimneys; windows flat-topped; decorative brick eave treatment; a broad early-twentieth-centuryveranda extends across the facade and wraps arou- nd a portion of the right side (c. 1840) 22. 22901 Midvale Road 2½ -story American Foursquare of wood construction, with a two -bay facade with the entry offset on the left side; hipped roof with intersecting gable with original slate cladding retained; a hip dormer is on facade; non -historic siding; several out buildings of undetermined age and usage (1908) 23. 22905 Midvale Road utilitarian outbuildings, clad in non -historic siding with a variety of other alter- ations and additions, with a resultant loss of integrity (NC) 24. 14321 Barkdoll Road 21/2 -story, three -bay Federal -style residence of brick with some non -historic siding; three -bay facade; windows flat-topped with jack -arched lintels; a one- story Victorian -era porch extends across the facade (c. 1840) P.003 ATTIC ID:OICNGsYRTC0FbblvPz_xH9yRuGD-ULD_4vod=EbQa?oz41wBSwDYnnaeg bPZOOfnDz 1-0- 3-4-4 6-10-4 23-1-12 26-7-12 30-0-01-0-10 -0- 3-0-- 3-6-0 16-3-8 F_ 3-6-0--�..�._. 3-0-4 Scab sxs = 050 21 .i12 tsx4 II \ s 0 15.08 12 3x.1 \\ n1 a -_ 5x8= 1a 19 7x12 W1UH= 1, IU 5xq o� 3x611 10x12= 10x12= dx6 II 1ADING (pst) SPACING 2-0-0 CSI DEFL in (toc) I/defl Ud JLL 30.0 Plates Increase 1.15 IC 0.22 Vert(LL) -0.2711-13 >999 360 TCDL 7.0 Lumber Increase 1.15 BC 0.49 Vert(TL) -0.3711-13 >963 240 BCLL 0.0 ' Rep Stress incr YES WB 0.27 Horz(TL) 0.02 8 n/a n/a BCDL. 10.0 Code IRC2009/TPI2007 (Matrix) Wind(LL) -0.0611-13 >999 240 LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 6 SYP DSS SOT CHORD 2 X 10 SYP DSS WEBS 2X4SYPNo.2 OTHERS 2 X 4 SYP No.2 BRACING TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 5-3-0 cc purlins. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 7-9-4 oc bracing. WEBS 1 Row at midpt 4-15, 6-15 JOINTS I Brace at Jt(s): 15 REACTIONS (lb/size) 2 = 1926/0-3-8 (min. 0.2-5) 8 = 1926/0-3-8 (min. 0-2-5) Max Horz 2 = 215(LC 10) Max Gray 2 = 2303(LC 2) 8 = 2303(LC 2) FORCES (lb) Max. Comp./Max. Ten. -NI forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-16=-2451/7, 16-17=-238717,3-17=-2342126,3-18=-2719/34, 4-18=-2555/55, 6-19=-2555155,7.19=-2719/34,7-20=-2342/26, 8-20=-245117,4-21=-1312228, 5-21=-1220/243, 5-22=-1220243, 6-22=-1312/228 'OT CHORD 14=011366, 13-14=0/1361, 12-13=0/1667, 11.12=0/1667, ,0-11=0/1361, 8-10=0/1366 WEBS 4-15=-717/0, 6.15=-717/0, 4.13=0/1369, 6-11=0/1369, 3-14=-1026/102, 7-10=-1026/105,3-13=-149/750, 7-11=-151/750 PLATES GRIP MT20 2441190 MT18H 244/190 Weight; 293 lb FT= 20% NOTES 1) Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. 2) Wind: ASCE 7-05; 90mph; TCDL=4.2psf, BCDL=6.0psf; h=25ft; B=4511; L=30it; eave�lft; Cat II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (all heights) and C -C Exterior(2) zone; Cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber DOL=1.33 plate grip DOL=1.33 3)' TCLL: ASCE 7-05; Pr -30.0 psf (roof live load: Lumber DOL=1.15 Plate DOL=1.15); Pg=30.0 psf (ground snowy; Ps= varies (min. roof snow=13.2 psf Lumber DOL=1.15 Plate DOL=1.15) see load cases; Category Ii; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Ct=1.1 4) Roof design snow load has been reduced to account for slope. 5) Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for this design. 6) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 12.0 psf or 2.00 times flat roof load of 23.1 psf on overhangs non -concurrent with other live loads. 7) All plates are MT20 plates unless otherwise indicated. 8) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 9) This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.Opsf on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. 10) Ceiling dead load (5.0 psf) on mernber(s). 4-15, 6-15; Wall dead load (.5.opsf) on member(s).4-13, 6-11 11) Bottom chord live load (40.0 psf) and additional bottom chord dead load (0.0 pst) applied only to room. 11-13 12) This truss is designed in accordance with the 2009 International Residential Code sections R502.11.1 and R802.10.2 and referenced standard ANSI/WI 1. 13) "Semi-rigld pitchbreaks with fixed heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. 14) Attic room checked for U360 deflection. LOAD CASE(S) Standard 1) Snow Lumber Increase=1.15, Plate Increase=1.15 Uniform Loads (plf)