The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090805WASHINGTON COUNTY 4 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 4 Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay AGENDA HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM 1A & B WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET August 5, 2009 7:00PM M A. Call to Order & Roll Call B. Minutes -- June 3, 2009 * C. Communications & Bills 1. Regulating New Construction in Historic Districts* D. Unfinished Business 1. Brumbaugh-Kendle—Grove Farmstead E. Budget F. New Business 1. PP -09-001 Callas Lots 6-11, 17618 Taylor's Landing Road* 2. SP -09-028 3204 Gapland Road, Proposed cell tower * 3. Permit#2009-03112, 4336 Main Street, Rohrersville Rural Village, master bedroom and bath addition. 4. Cell Tower Notice — 15322 Fairview Road G. Other Business H. Executive Session I. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\aaug09.DOC NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MAY MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.508, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CONTACT PERMITS DEPARTMENT AT (301) 791-3065 VOICE/TDD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. www.washco-md.net RECYCLED PAPER The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation Page 1 of I GI DELINES- F _ 3 t 1JTe! c;<cPi l + Exterior Materials Wood ((f nite r1 L'Id15 Exterior Features Rook 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. " ` " ti;Wreff on 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of Interior Features distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. 0ti;nn 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will Special Requiremen be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of Hoolli, craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. THE STANDARDS 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New adddiitioonn , exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy his orlcT' materials., features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such a manner manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. ?.uideiinos fve kehobllitation- rtH t RICF;L OV O _' OW -'RESERVING - rehabilitating - 1ZESTOR:toib - HF.CONSTRUCTINC o:: - c-cdto - L,si Modified: Ed. Seep 14 2001 01 :30 pv i =DT http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/rehab/rehab_standards.htm 09/27/2001 When more than one principal use occupies the same structure and there are minimum lot areas specified for each use in this section, the minimum lot area shall be the greater of the two minimums permitted plus 10%. b. Where residential and .non residential uses occupy the same structure all other zoning requirements for the non residential use such as parking, setbacks, screening, etc., must be accommodated on the site. In addition to the lot area determined necessary for the non-residential use, one-half of the minimum lot area specified for the residential use shall also be provided. c. Parking shall be provided at the rate specified in Article 21, Division I for the non-residential use plus a minimum of two spaces for each residential unit. 4. d. Signage shall be limited to one free standing sign structure, which may contain separate signs for each of the multiple uses on the site. One building mounted sign for each use, limited to 10 square feet is also permitted I e. Outside material storage areas including refuse or recycling containers shall be screened. f. All building mounted and parking lot lighting shall, be constructed so that light and glare are diffused toward the ground. 2. SETBACKS —Where more than one use occupies a parcel or structure the greater of the two required front, rear and side yard setbacks shall be provided. Where adjacent parcels contain residential uses, a solid screening buffer shall be provided according to the guidelines contained at Section 5D.3(b)3 above. Section 5D.4 Special Provisions When 50% or more of the existing parcels within the boundary of the Rural Village contain special amenities such as, but not necessarily limited to, sidewalks, fences, street lighting, etc., and the amenity exists on any one adjacent parcels, new development shall provide continuation of the amenity of a size, style and number consistent with the existing amenities. ______ Section 5D.5 Architectural Review It is the intention of the Rural Village designation to promote new development that is consistent in type, scale and appearance with existing development in the village. (a) In Rural Villages that are identified in Washington County's Historic Sites Inventory, individual parcels identified in the same inventory when the village is not identified, properties listed in Maryland's Inventory of Historic Places 43 OVER or properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the exterior appearance of new construction that requires a building permit, except uildings of 100 square feet or less, shall be subject to review and approval or disapproval by the Washington County Historic District Commission. The Historic District Commission shall use the adopted review guidelines as provided in Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. In addition to the adopted guidelines the Historic District Commission shall give consideration to the following in its determination of appropriate exterior appearance of new construction in the Rural Village district. a. the exterior appearance of existing structures in the Rural Village including materials, style, arrangement of doors and windows, mass, height and number of stories, roof style and pitch, proportion. b. Building size and orientation c. landscaping d. signage e. lighting f. setbacks g. accessory structures (b) All applications for new construction, except buildings of 100 square feet or less, shall provide accurately scaled and detailed elevation drawings of all sides of the structure for review as part of the building permit or site plan review, whichever is first applicable. (c) As other Rural Villages or individual properties within the Rural Village district are evaluated to determine their historic significance according to Maryland Historical Trust guidelines and are added to the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties, Washington County's Inventory of Historic Properties or the National Register of Historic Places, the exterior appearance of those structures shall also become subject to the review and approval or disapproval of the Historic District Commission. The requirement for Historic District Commission review of exterior appearance in Rural Villages added after original adoption of this Ordinance shall apply only after a public hearing during which the affected property owners have had the opportunity to provide input. Section 5D.6 Cluster Provisions and the Rural Village New development utilizing cluster design guidelines outside of the Rural Village district but within 1,000 feet of the district boundary shall be subject to Planning Commission review. The Planning Commission may require placement of clustered lots adjacent to the boundary of the Rural Village district. Gr The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation Page 1 of 1 GUIDELINES- ? y p' t,ix !�`_� r i -� X4'7 �,�..� e la ,..✓ Ti}{ ' - e 0`t 5"' r. �' k;t ` H f]L? Exterior Materials .11eilY ,.iJ tl (= '- I'1" -S0111` - b r 's �., � S�K --}'„IT-...dsaa. _.3F•-� 11f I11LPCi'C :`I':1!5 Exterior Features Roofs 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. " Ste r •fib 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of Interior Features distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that StrucLurd characterize a property will be avoided. c %"• i,., aieci Lan;r:�t 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. _r_t_ryg 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will special nequiremen be retained and preserved. ! ' Access h;I 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of I1 ,aun I-._=__ craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. THE STANDARDS 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New addition , exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy his orlT is materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and Its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such a m— anner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. c;uidel ines ice R;ohalzilitation--> Is I ORIC:AL i'=Vi, ; VV - PRESERVING - rehabilitating - RESTORING- f ECON STRUCTING n Ida - rredfto - 1Modified: Fri. ,op ii 2001 0501:30 t3s.) I'ru Sill http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/rehab/rehab_standards.htin 09/27/2001 a. When more than one principal use occupies the same structure and there are minimum lot areas specified for each use in this section, the minimum lot area shall be the greater of the two minimums permitted plus 10%. b. Where residential and non residential uses occupy the same structure all other zoning requirements for the non residential use such as parking, setbacks, screening, etc., must be accommodated on the site. In addition to the lot area determined necessary for the non-residential use, one-half of the minimum lot area specified for the residential use shall also be provided. c. Parking shall be provided at the rate specified in Article 21, Division I for the non-residential use plus a minimum of two spaces for each residential unit. I. d. Signage shall be limited to one free standing sign structure, which may contain separate signs for each of the multiple uses on the site. One building mounted sign for each use, limited to 10 square feet is also permitted I e. Outside material storage areas including refuse or recycling containers shall be screened. f. All building mounted and parking lot lighting shall. be constructed so that light and glare are diffused toward the ground. 2. SETBACKS — Where more than one use occupies a parcel or structure the greater of the two required front, rear and side yard setbacks shall be provided. Where adjacent parcels contain residential uses, a solid screening buffer shall be provided according to the guidelines contained at Section 5D.3(b)3 above. Section 5D.4 Special Provisions When 50% or more of the existing parcels within the boundary of the Rural Village contain special amenities such as, but not necessarily limited to, sidewalks, fences, street lighting, etc., and the amenity exists on any one adjacent parcels, new development shall provide continuation of the amenity of a size, style and number consistent with the existing amenities. Section 5D.5 Architectural Review It is the intention of the Rural Village designation to promote new development that is consistent in type, scale and appearance with existing development in the village. (a) In Rural Villages that are identified in Washington County's Historic Sites Inventory, individual parcels identified in the same inventory when the village is not identified, properties listed in Maryland's Inventory of Historic Places 43 OVER Maryland Historical Trust ( State Historic Sites Inventory Form Survey No. WA -111-025 Magi No. DOE yes no 1. Name of Property (indicate preferred name) historic and/or common Rohrersville 2. Location street & number Along Main Street and Rohrersville School Road _ not for publication city, town Rohrersville vicinity of congressional district state Maryland county Washington 3. Classification Category Ownership Status x district public x occupied building(s) x private unoccupied structure both work in progress site Public Acquisition Accessible — object in process x yes: restricted being considered yes: unrestricted x not applicable no Present Use agriculture museum commercial park educational x private residence x entertainment x religious government scientific industrial transportation military other: 4. Owner of Property (give names and mailing addresses of all owners) name Multiple ownership street & number telephone no.: city, town state and zip code 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Washington County Courthouse Liber street & number 95 West Washington Street Folio city, town Hagerstown state Maryland 6. Representation in Existing Historical Surveys title Washington County Historic Sites Survey date 1973-1978 federal x state county local depository for survey records Maryland Historical Trust city, town Crownsville state Maryland 7. Description Survey No. WA -III -025 Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered x original site x good ruins x altered moved date of move fair unexposed Prepare both a summary paragraph and a general description of the resource and its various elements as it exists today. Resource Count = 68 Rohrersville is a village located in southern Washington County, eighteen miles southeast of Hagerstown, the county seat. Surrounded by rolling farmland, the village is nestled in the fertile plain of Pleasant Valley between Elk Ridge and South Mountain. Extending from both the northern and southern points of the village's Main Street is Route 67 which was built to by-pass Rohrersville and leads to the former National TurnpikeToll Road to the north and the Shenandoah River to the south. Principally residential in character, Rohrersville's public buildings and sites include churches, a post office, a band hall, mill ruins with a cooper's building, a former school, and a cemetery. The Rohrersville district contains 42 contributing buildings and sites. The village portrays the architecture and development of an early 19th to early 20th century rural trading center in southern Washington County. The villages of Washington County grew to service surrounding farms to meet their marketing and daily needs, and generally evolved as either crossroads or linear plans. Reasons for development included locations along a major transportation route or near a grist mill or tavern. Rohrersville is the largest village in the Rohrersville District, however it is smaller than some of the other villages in the county such as Keedysville and Maugansville. It developed as a linear plan adjacent to a grist mill. Rohrersville is rather unique in the county in its size and establishment of a number of cultural institutions without being located along a major transportation route. The present town plan is composed of Main Street, and a short cross street, Rohrersville School Road. Main Street curves gently through the community on a slight slope that rises north to south. The Antietam Creek flows east of, and passes through the district at its northern end where a concrete bridge crosses Main Street. The majority of the lots are generally long and narrow. Some properties have, in addition to a house, one or more support structures. Most of these are of frame construction and are small barns and garages. Buildings have small side yards and are set back a few feet from the public right-of-way. Building placement generally is spaced farther apart on the north and south ends of Main Street with a tighter cluster of buildings in-between. Flanked by human -scale architecture, the street has a pedestrian environment. Trees are a common feature of the village with some trees lining the street and others located on the lots. Sidewalks traverse most of the district, particularly in the central portion along Main Street and some properties contain stone retaining walls. The Rohrersville Ruritan Club maintains a park with picnic grounds along the north side of Rohrersville School Road, opposite the school. The district is basically surrounded by farm land on all four sides with some mid- to late twentieth century residential buildings to the south. These buildings are located on larger lots than those in the village. Despite the addition of the new Route 67 in the 1960s the surrounding environment retains the historic rolling farmland appearance. The overall appearance of the village was formed in the early 19th to the early 20th century. The character of the town is a mixture of residential and institutional. Buildings of different time periods are interspersed throughout the village, with the exception of a group of turn -of -the -century buildings south of Rohrersville School Road, and it appears that properties may have been subdivided overtime to create this mix. A significant portion of the buildings are three or four bay -wide vernacular brick or frame houses. Other types of dwellings include Gothic evjyaL Second Empire and two American Foursguares. Only three one-story dwellings exist from the post 1950 period. There are no commercial buildings. The principal industry was the grist mill which is in ruins, however a cooper's shop associated with the site and the Miller's house exist. Rohrersville's cultural and social character is seen in three churches dating from the late 19th century, an early 20th century school, and the 1916 band hall which also served as the town hall. Maryland Historical Trust SurveyNo. WA -III -025 State Historic Sites Inventory Form Magi No. DOE yes no Section Number 7 Page 2 Rohrersville development began in the early 19th century and grew up around its grist mill, later known as Barkman's Mill. Varie's 1808 map shows two grist mills in the approximate location of Rohrersville, one of which may be Barkman's Mill and the other located about a mile away from the village. Continuing into the mid -19th century, maps from 1859 and 1877 indicate that close to three-quarters of the village existed. Buildings appear from the mill at the north end of town, up the west side of Main Street to include three of the existing buildings at the intersection of School House Road, thence traveling south on the east side of the street to include seven buildings. A side street known as Pig Alley contained four dwellings, of which only one remains today, and a school at the south end of town which no longer exists. Rohrersville's first phase of building is represented in its buildings constructed between 1810 and 1870. It is estimated that 16 buildings and the mill (WA -III -139), were built during thisii�i74Th the mi being the oldest. These buildings illustrate what is known as a vernacular, or traditional, style of building that is common to a region. Of these buildings at least eleven are of log construction (WA -III -126, 128, 130, 141, 143, 150, 151, 152, 156, 157, and 164). Most houses are frame or brick, three- or four -bays wide,_ side gabled, with 2/2 light sash, some with additions and rear shed extensions. Porches have simple f made elaborate etailing avai able. One of the village's three churches (WA -III -125) and (WA -III -124) existed. Rohrersville's second phase of building in the later 19th century include the traditional style as well as the popular styles of the Victorian period. Victorian buildings are represented by one Second Empire (WA -III -163) and five Gothic Revival (WA -III -132, 140, 146, 160, 162) dwellings. Building characteristics of the Victorian period include decorative features that became popular after the advent of the railroad and industrialization made mass production of design elements available to a wide market. Porches on Rohrersville's Gothic Revival houses generally feature Victorian influenced characteristics in their turned columns fancy posts and gingerbread brackets. Late 19th century public buildings include three Gothic Revival style churches. All of the dwellings in the village, regardless of age, have front porches (only one has been enclosed) or built-in two-story porches. Besides dwellings, two churches were added (WA - 111 -131 and 144), one on each side of Main Street, and the extant Colonial Revival school (WA -III -124) was built at the west end of School House Road in 1919. RohrersviIle'sjt.pbae of building in the early 20th century is represented by two American Foursguares, examples of a type that was popular from 1910-1930 (WA -III -138 and 152). Early 20th century public buildings include the 1916 vernacular band hall (WA -11-129) and the 1919 Colonial Revival school (WA -III -166). Only three contemporary mid- to late -20th century one-story dwellings have been constructed within the district. Rohrersville no longer has some buildings associated with its historic commercial activities including blacksmith shops, a wagon maker shop, and the marble works which was demolished for construction of the band hall. The former stone millhouse is in ruins, however the cooper's shop and the Miller's House associated with the mill remain. Two buildings that housed stores (a millinery and a general store) and residences have been converted to all residential. the small number of modern surtace treatments of aluminum and vinyl siding and 1940s asbestos shingles. Changes to public buildings vary, but are generally limited. The two-story frame post office has been altered over time with an enclosed porch and vinyl siding. An. earlier post office was at one time part of one of the Maryland Historical Trust SurveyNo. WA -III -025 State Historic Sites Inventory Form Magi No. DOE yes no Section Number 7 Page 3 stores that has been converted to a residence. Architectural elements of the band hall have been covered over, but remain intact. Rohrersville School, built in 1919, appears to be relatively unaltered on the exterior. Two of the churches have replaced their steeples, the St. Mark's Evangelical Lutheran Church may have modified its tower, and an addition was added to the rear of the United Brethren Church at the corner of Main Street and Rohrersville School Road; however their integrity remains intact. The overall character of Rohrersville is conservative and traditional in keeping with the rural character of its surroundings. Due to limited demolition and alterations, the entire spectrum of Rohrersville's architectural past can be viewed. Despite the loss of its commercial support activity, Rohrersville retains a cohesive and intact village atmosphere. The Rohrersville District with its residential and public buildings, winding tree -lined rural road, and stone walls retains the character and feeling of a rural historic village that grew from the early 19th to the early 20th century. Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form Section Number 8 Page 6 Survey No. WA -III -025 Magi No. DOE yes no the 1960s.20 Since the Depression, the physical fabric of the village has not changed significantly. Rohrersville developed very little during this period with only three one-story contemporary dwellings built along Main Street. Main Street through Rohrersville became Route 67 by 1953. The development of Rohrersville remained stable up to 1953 with no new road additions. The 1990 US census shows 191 people living in Rohrersville which may be attributed to construction just outside the district boundary to the south.21 Long time residents of the village remark that people living in town no longer work on the railroad or work the farms, but rather commute to Washington DC via carpool or train from Brunswick. All the general stores and businesses have been converted to residential use, but the buildings remain. A new Route 67, built in the 1960s, is located east of Rohrersville and the old Route 67 has once again become Main Street in a serene setting. Rohrersville remains pristine in character both within the village as well as the surrounding rural countryside. HISTORIC THEMES Architecture Rohrersville's architecture portrays the development of the village. The architecture reflects both the modest rural farming influence of the surrounding community as well as the trends and styles of the later Victorian era and the American Foursquare. The prosperity of the community in the 19th century is seen in the abundance of the early log buildings and the popular vernacular architecture. Buildings reflecting the industrialization age brought on by the railroad are seen in the Victorian styles of the late 19th century that In part developed as the railroad transported mass produced components such as windows and decorative detailing at relatively low cost. Economics Rohrersville's economic development was dependent on the surrounding farms and also a nearby marble quarry and reflects broader patterns of development and Industrialization in rural areas of Western Maryland. Businesses existed in Rohrersville from the early 19th century to the mid -20th century. Industrial economic activity was evidenced in Rohrersville in its grist mill followed by a marble works. Commercial activity included at least two stores and a millinery. Social/Educational/Cultural This theme is very significant to the overall quality that made Rohrersville a rural village and a place where people lived, worked, and played within a concentrated setting. The small village supported three churches of German heritage that is an indication of the German heritage of the settlers In the village and the surrounding area. The construction of three schools in the village over time reflected the growth of the community. Lastly, the time honored tradition of the band is today represented by not only the continued existence of the band, but the existence of the hall built by the band. Transportation Rohrersville was profoundly affected by transportation systems dating back to the early 18th century. According to Varies1808 map, Rohrersville was in the vicinity of early roadways leading south through the valley to the river, east across South Mountain through Crampton's Gap and Fox's Gap as well as west. In 1859 it was located on the major roadway through the valley and was in close enough vicinity to the future train station at Trego that it was called the Rohrersville Station. The National Pike was close by to the north, forging a link between Baltimore and the lower Cumberland Valley. The B&O in its heyday had three to five trains a day. By 1872, however, the Western Maryland Railway was providing direct service from Hagerstown to Baltimore, and the B&O spur became more of a local service route. It was Rohrersville's location along a major early road that allowed access to its early 19th century grain mill and the railroad which brought new jobs and a new market to farmers, in turn bringing prosperity to Rohrersville. 20 Ibid, p. 14. 21 Ernde, Laura. "The House was Rohrer's." The Daily Mail, March 25, 1994, n.p. WASHINGTON COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay SUBDIVISION TRANSMITTAL FORM TYPE OF SUBDIVISION : PRELPLAT VERSION : 802 DATE : 07- 4-2009 TO /T/p TO --+➢ �L^�1 ± FROM PLANNER ,. MISTY WAGNER-GRILLO ATTACHED HEREWITH : PP -09-001 NAME : CALLAS - LOTS 6-11 ?? DESCRIPTION : PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LOTS 6-11 REV 1 .--- LOCATION : FAIRPLAY ROAD, EAST SIDE, NORTH OF TAYLO DISTRICT : 12 LAND USE : Agriculture ZONING : ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PARCEL : 072-01-0015-00REM ACRES 0 LOTS 6 OWNER : CALLAS GEORGE & TAMARA SURVEYOR FREDERICK SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES SUBMITTED BY THIS OFFICE FOR YOUR: WCSCD SENSITIVE REVIEW NEEDED A PROVAL SERVATION & COMMENT (V/ INFORMATION ATTACHEMENTS(S) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS _ROAD ADEQUACY WORKSHEETS _FOREST CONSERVATION PLAN _OTHER: MAWG www.washco-md.net RECYCLED PAPER Joins Map 25 580,000 FT n'4s oo MAP E F H "1 r II t?!0q)U RN ESTS 0 0 O F; A 0 0 0 0 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 A -LL -45 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST rap 72 12 Parcel 15 MAGI 0 2210135435 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC ANOIOR COMMON Mid 19th Century Farm Complex n1or`s Landing Roach CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS. PRESENT USE. _OISm1CT _PVbmC ?LOCCUPIIL) Xl.4RICVLTVRE _MUSEUM .}bUIL0INGISI X_pRIVATE _UkOCCUPIEO _COMMERCIAL . EARS _STRVCIURE —ROTN WQRR INp(IOOAESB —ED0CAl10NAI XPRNAIE NESIOENCE $RE PURI.IC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERIAINMENr .ACLlGIOQS _OAIECT _iN Rk0q NS _ITS. RESTRICTED —4ORTRAMENT _SCIEkT41t _REJNB CONSIOIII 0 YES' UNRESTRMTED JNOUSIRIAL , INANSPOATATIVN MILITARY _OT1Pfl QOWNER OF PROPERTY NAµE Orville J._Shinljam TCie1)h0110 t TNEE1 N NUMvve _ _ COURTHOUSE Polio 9131414 A415TRYOF DfEO$,fl0. Washington County Court Houso STREETA Ni1MSER — "" West Washingion Street OTY.TOWN STATY xsgfir_atown Matpl -717/p (REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS IIYLE OWECO RD6 ,�NlEHAAL. STATE —COUNTY _LOCAL PIP VSUOECT an lY.TOWN 6 -yams http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 0 DESCRIPTION /4-2- q S 3 CONOIYION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE iXCELLENT—VCTPIIOeATto—UNMIEAEO XOP*INM9flt *000 -.Nul" LALTENEO 4 }ptb —MOVED CIAW _MIN—UNE6Posto OESCKIO E THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL OF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This farmstead features a large to story, seven bay brick house. The two more easterly bays of its south or front elevation are recessed beneath a double porch which has been partially enclosed. The five bays of the main. facade have a central entrance, The building appears to have been painted white at one time. Also on the property some distance from the house is. a 20thcentury. gambrel roofed frame barn. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=2 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 Q SIGNIFICANCE GdAzL-953 PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE ., CHECK ANO JUSTIFY BELOW _PMIMStORIC _AACNEULUUY,PRENFST0RIC <.00MNIUNITYPUNMNG: ,..AANOSLAFEAACNITECTUNE _.KtLHLON —140 -t4*9 _LRCNEOl06Y XISTORIC _CONSFRVA8ON _NW 9CIRNCC -.,Idpi.I5$$ Rd4XILUlIURF _ECONOMICS _UTEMTVN( 3CVLPTGRF 1990.1949 XARCNHFCTURE _EDUCATION ,,,MILHAtlY _SDI.IA%HUM*NITARIAN _VDU)199 _ART ENGIHitRING _MUSIC —THEATER ]t.IiO0. q49 ,COMMERCE _,ERPLOOATIOWSETTLIMENI _PNILOSORak _WTIIE PONTATIDN J 906 _COMMUNIOATIONd .„dNO4STM _POUTIC9!GOVEXNMFNT . .DiIIER LSPECIFY _JNVENUON SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The house on this farmstead is a large structure which, from a distance would appear to date from the second quarter of the 19th century, CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IE NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=3 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 WA-aL-y 5'3 13MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTXNUE ON pEVARATE $HEET 11t NECESSARY WGEOGRAPHICAL DATA yy /�11 ACREAGEOf NCMINATEO PROfRtt �_.yy 33 J.49 acres VERBAL B ARY-0ESCRI ION LIST ALL STpT:5ANPCOUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVEITLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY RDUNAARIES STATE COUNTY 4TAYE OOUNIY FORM PREPARED BY NAME I TITLE pains Stonat Arottitactu>'al Itiatorinn ..n.; ...._..nu. GATE Sharosburg e7arvj-anu The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record: purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN To: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1498 PS. Ew, http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=4 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 1 of 1 Mid 19th Century Brick Farm Jump to Page J Got; « PREVIOUS NEXT Complex >> Sharpsburg , Washington County, WA -II -0453 Page 6 of 9 available pages Return to search results O Add Single Image to Print C Add All Images to List Print List PLEASE NOTE: Printing inventories requires the use of the Prizm viewer. [DOWNLOAD] http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=6 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 1 of 1 Mid 19th Century Brick Farm Jump to Pager .:doil « PREVIOUS NEXT Complex >> Sharpsburg , Washington County, WA -II -0453 Page 8 of 9 available pages Return to search results C Add Single Image to Print C Add All Images to List Print List PLEASE NOTE: Printing inventories requires the use of the Prizm viewer. [DOWNLOAD] http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=8 07/30/2009 \Je w t0-5 % -1 I I ocSiov► N/F eorge J. & Tanara E. Callas Liber 1253 FoUo 50 Lot 5, Plat 8362 VICINITY MAP SCALE 1"=2000' icey Platte " C` 10,000 S.F. \ `Septic Reserv' \ Area PP` a !2'1 x O min 2c a m m s .c.ess m b O nO�dr SO O_<�qf m K Nx- r O O C n J' A h . p �. ^ p' R m N Z N d r N n `� rt ;p1Ae #I')�Y.. �`I' T� L, s .� �, z W Z amom,°°,3m" N plvatra , - r ..njTu o 3 m-... m 0 m n o a m o m fg, n N `� sf✓`# -» a r O O +,x,'T`-F1F.-.cmayy 9 �• t o d d A= __ 3 w .. furl.y8`� 3 flq o f`I -� do c m rn S0o0 0 o Q W P O 5 m'O m -� o UO' N dA p D p 0 D A �_ r z Z Z VI O O'< N N p 0 o rfli p cn a0-° J (f� Irn m T t c m< / 'ScnaA ,o� - omz �o o,� o`° D £ (� frl TJ oA,».sosmw \ x� wo 2 `zI "' v'crrl b7 ;� d3n00°n�oyo,co x rn o m m o m C -i z O d 0 0_ F. can o ,x m x -r in o y a0 oo 0OS.�.«oS. 012 :xn o� O >-0z F--4 7J Z7 _ m _ x - m D --I m '� m m ,98.09£ 4L_x-x- m`_, m -H c < o m CD7 C (4 V N� I Z N ut y N A U z z O N S \ l NN VI a O O Z ^,9 C Z s W ONO `^ m r .TI A m H r?I N o N dR'O f, :3-0 m m m lm� o Z u y Ii �ITIz mQN- O u2z _ o O > TPm m N i° z z ML£,Sb.89S — ` 2 in � Ci a .0 N� oz N m fn n E m Z o 2 - Im F V rz D by ono 3 A O m r> w1 x van = g m A = m < a zZ r f'Zl m m x rty N o,0 < J C b+ w DNr 01(J) Z J D v D a Z O m W O d O 2. m r N D N Z m N JOB NUMHERi 5790.0 - (11 %CMX June 30th, 2009 Washington County Historic District Commission Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, MD 21740-6003 RE: Leitersburg - # 369D RECEIVED Proposed 153' Monopole LeitersburgSmithsburg Road JUL - 6 2009 Hagerstown, MD 21742. Washington County WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Shentel the following information is provided regardingthe proposed construction of a 153' monopole telecommunications facility. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations require Shentel to consider the effects of the proposed monopole tower on historic properties. Shentel is complying with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), by requesting that CMX compile a Section 106 Report and render an opinion regarding the potential effects of the proposed telecommunications facility. The Section 106 Report will be submitted to the Maryland State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) for review. Shentel proposes to construct a 70' x 70' fenced compound to contain the proposed 153' monopole tower and associated equipment. Shentel plans to access the site via an existing paved driveway and proposed gravel -covered access road leading northeast from LeitersburgSmithsburg Road. A historic properties search was conducted for all sites within the Area of Potential Effect (APE), as per the 2004 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement. Review of the historical and archeological files at the Maryland Historical Trust library identified two (2) National Registered sites and no determined eligible historic sites within the th mile APE: Map Site Name SHPO Ref No. Street Address istanc Dom e visibility Site 1 Leitersburg Historic District WA -1-174 See Attached Map Approx. Partially Visible National Register 0.18 mile 2 Rockledge WA -I-142 13535 Foxflre Lane Approx. Not Visible National Register Hagerstown, MD 21742 0.31 mile No other historical resources were identified through any comments received by Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), local governments, or members of the public. The proposed 153' monopole tower will be partially visible from a limited portion of the Leitersburg Historic District, and will be potentially not visible from the Rockledge historic property. The nature of the activity will not adversely detract from the characteristics that make these properties listed WORKING TOGETHER FOR A BETTER TOMORROW 910 CENTURY DRIVE I MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055 TEL 717.458.08001 FAX 717.458.0801 WWW.CMXENGINEERING.COM ARIZONA FLORIDA MARYLAND NEVADA NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA MEXICO //- Washington County HDC June 30th, 2009 Page 2 of 2 on the National Register. Therefore, there will be No Adverse Effect to these historical resources. No other historical resources were identified through any comments received by Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), local governments, or members of the public. Attached is a topographic map depicting the site and ½ mile APE along with the detailed site plan and photographs for the above referenced project. Please review the enclosed information and submit any comments to CMX within thirty (30) days. Sincerely, CMX Adam Bower Senior Environmental Specialist Cem, 52z1i L' / O Ia � � � u �// ' •/ B ..�� \ r' / i� � Top Copyright (C) 1999, Maptech, Inc. LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 1: Proposed tower site looking north. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Photo 2: Proposed area for compound looking west. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 3: Looking north from the site. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Photo 4: Looking south from the site. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 5: Looking east from the site. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Photo 6: Looking west from the site. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 7: Intersection of Leiter St. and Leiters Mill Rd. within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1) looking toward the site. Proposed tower will not be visible. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Photo 8: Intersection of Red Brick Ln and Leitersburg Smithsburg Rd. within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1) looking toward the site. Proposed tower will be potentially not visible. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 9: Looking southeast along Leitersburg Smithsburg Rd within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1). Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Photo 10: Looking toward site from Leitersburg Smithsburg Rd within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1). Proposed site will not be visible. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 11: Looking southwest at intersection of Ringgold St and Windy Hill Ln within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1). Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Photo 12: Looking toward site from intersection of Ringgold St and Windy Hill Ln within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1). Proposed site will be potentially not visible. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm LEITERSBURG #369D SITE PHOTOS Photo 13: Looking southwest at intersection of Ringgold St and Ringgold Pike within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1). Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm Proposed Site Photo 14: Looking toward site from intersection of Ringgold St and Ringgold Pike within the Leitersburg Historic District (Map ID #1). Proposed site will be potentially visible. Photo Date: 6.24.09 Focal Length: 35mm 'T T li..fr - 13g¢�¢zEYM A��€o 3x30 s IJ� w r e 's€�x$ffi 8 �.S6Ee[Fr £FRS a�EL i I44 R� GG Yi CFi N� 9 555ga gg gg $@ R 99$g g A € $$gg$p 9� 4 i �ig��/� x��hc Jjjj 1/ 3y;� �3Y y � .i � fAll d b U X ley, �. ii: HH : � • � Ii[' | '� .[)� ©��, � � `P! '/ k4g / Martin OAlalley Governor Anthony G. Brown Lt. Gonenwr June 23, 2009 Mr. Terry Page, Manager Washington Airports District Office 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210 Dulles, Virginia 20166 Maryland Department of Planning Maryland Historical Trust Re: Treatment of the Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead (WA -I-480 / 18WA496) Hagerstown Regional Airport, Washington County, Maryland Dear Mr. Page: Richard £Gerhart Hall Serrenvy Matthew J. Power Deputy Secretary Thank you for your recent letter which provided the Maryland Historical Trust (Trust) with a copy of a draft Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) the FAA prepared for the above -referenced project. The MOA reflects the results of FAA's efforts to resolve the effects of its disposition of the historic Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead (WA -I-480 / 18WA496) at the Hagerstown Regional Airport, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966. The Trust appreciates the FAA's efforts to meet its historic preservation responsibilities for the proposed undertaking. Trust staff members welcomed the opportunity to participate in the FAA's meeting of the various involved agency and interested parties on April 22, 2009 to discuss the undertaking. The meeting offered an open forum for all parties to share information, express concerns, and discuss relevant alternatives regarding the Farmstead's disposition and treatment. Since a decade has transpired since the County acquired the historic property with federal funds and the farmstead has remained vacant and uninhabited, all parties share a desire to resolve the ultimate reuse and handling of this historic property. The Trust remains committed to working with all parties to ensure that the undertaking provides for the appropriate stewardship of this significant farmstead while addressing the Airport's security and reuse issues. Based on the dialogue at the April 22nd meeting, the Trust has revised the draft MOA (see enclosure). The modified draft agreement provides further specificity regarding the process the FAA and the County will implement to: seek appropriate treatments for the historic property, involve the various interested parties in the consideration of alternatives, and complete relevant documentation on the property to mitigate its loss if the marketing and reuse alternatives prove unsuccessful and the property is slated for demolition. By copy of this letter, we are circulating copies of the revised draft to all the various parties for further review and comment. Parties should direct their comments on the MOA back to the FAA, as the responsible federal entity for this undertaking. We have also emailed an electronic version of the revised document to the FAA to facilitate completion of the final document, O9 100 Community Place Ovwnsville, Maryland land 21032-2023 Telephone: 410.514.7600 Fax: 410.987.4071 Toll Free: 1.800.756.0119 TTY Users: Maryland Relay Internet: www.maiylandhiswricaltntst.net Terry Page Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport June 23, 2009 Page 2 of 3 If you have questions or require further assistance, please contact Beth Cole at 410-514-7631 / bcole mdp.state.md.us or Amanda Apple at 410-514-7630 / aapple(Zi)mdp.state.md.us. We look forward to working with FAA and the other parties to execute the agreement and implement its stipulations. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, J. Rodney Little Director / State Historic Preservation Officer JRL/EJC/200900822 Enclosure — Revised Draft Memorandum of Agreement cc: Jennifer Mendelsohn (FAA) Carolyn Motz (Hagerstown Regional Airport) James Kercheval (Washington County Commissioners) Steven Goodrich (Washington County Historic District Commission) Sandra lzner (Washington County Historic District Commission) Patricia Schooley (Washington County Historical Trust) Names Neville (Washington County Historical Society) Marilyn Benaderet (Preservation Maryland) DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, THE MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGARDING THE TREATMENT OF THE BRUMBAUGH-KENDLE-GROVE FARMSTED AT HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL AIRPORT WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) assisted the Washington County Commissioners (County) with purchasing 84.6 acres of the Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead (Farmstead) in April 1999 as part of preparation for the extension of Runway 27 at the 1 -Hagerstown Regional Airport (Airport), located in Washington County, Maryland; and WHEREAS, the Farmstead includes a brick farmhouse, family cemetery, barn, approximately seven other outbuildings, and associated archeological resources located east of US Route 11 and situated outside the Airport's security fence; and WHEREAS, the Farmstead was not inhabited at the time the County purchased the property, the farmhouse has remained uninhabited, and the County has leased the Farmstead property for continuing agricultural purposes since it acquired the parcel; and WHEREAS, the FAA and the County considered alternatives for the disposition of the Farmstead and have not established any identified Airport use for the Farmstead; and WHEREAS, the FAA and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security identified constraints regarding the reuse of the Farmstead on Airport property given security, location, and functional issues; and WHEREAS, the FAA proposes to resolve the disposition and treatment of the Farmstead (Undertaking) by following the deliberative process set forth in this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA); and WHEREAS, the FAA established the Undertaking's area of potential effects (APE), as defined in 36 CFR Part 800.16(d), to include all the Farmstead complex as shown in Attachment A; and WHEREAS, in 2001 the FAA completed a survey, entitled Terrestrial Archeological Survey and Historic Architectural Resource Survey for Runway 9-27 Extension and Relocation of US Route 11 (Survey), which identified the Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead (Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties WA -I-480) and determined that the Farmstead is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) under Criteria A and C; and WHEREAS, the Survey also identified an archeological component of the Farmstead (recorded as MIHP archeological site No. 18WA496); and WHEREAS, the FAA determined that the Undertaking may have an adverse affect on the Farmstead, including its archeological component; and Memorandum of Agreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Crone Farmstead Hagersrown Regional Airport, Adaryland Page 2 of 13 WHEREAS, the FAA consulted with the Maryland State Historic Preservation Office (MD SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. § 4701); and WHEREAS, the County participated in the consultation, the County has responsibilities for implementing stipulations under this MOA, and the FAA invited the County to be a signatory to this MOA pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6 (c)(2); and WHEREAS, the FAA identified and consulted with the following parties (Patties) pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(2): the Washington County Planning Department, the Washington County Historic District Commission, the Washington County Historical Society, the Washington County Historical Trust, the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area, and Preservation Maryland; and WHEREAS, the FAA invited the Parties to concur in the MOA and the following Parties agreed to sign as a Concurring Parties to the MOA: [name the Concurring Parties]; and WHEREAS, the FAA notified the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) of its adverse effect determination pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(1) with specified documentation, and the ACHP declined to participate in the consultation as stated in its letter dated April 8, 2009; NOW, THEREFORE, the FAA, the MD SHPO and the County agree that the Undertaking shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the Undertaking on historic properties. STIPULATIONS The FAA shall ensure that the following stipulations are implemented: I. Working Group A. Purpose: Within three (3) months of executing this MOA, the County will establish a working group (Working Group) to provide guidance, oversight, and advocacy regarding the implementation of the stipulations specified in the MOA, B. Membership: The County will invite the following parties to designate a representative(s) to serve on the Working Group, if they choose to participate: the Airport, the Washington County Planning Commission, the Washington County Historic District Commission, the Washington County Historical Trust, the Hagerstown - Washington County Chamber of Commerce, and [specify any other parties]. C. Procedures: The County will establish written procedures regarding the Working Group's responsibilities, meetings, schedule, and general operations. The County will provide a copy of the procedures and list of members to all members of the Working Group, the FAA, and the MD SHPO. Memorandum ofAgreentent Treatment of 6rambaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland Page 3 of 13 D. Duration: The Working Group will remain in place until the County has implemented the Stipulations of the MOA or the MOA has expired or been terminated. II. Preservation of the Farmstead's Family Cemetery The County shall maintain and preserve the Farmstead's family cemetery in its current location in perpetuity. The County shall ensure that the cemetery is protected and preserved in -place during implementation of the stipulations of this MOA and as part of any future reuse of the Farmstead property at the Airport. III. Marketing Plan for the Farmstead (WA -I-480) A. The County with the Working Group shall develop and implement a marketing plan (Marketing Plan) to identify an appropriate reuse and treatment for the Farmstead, consistent with the FAA's policies and use constraints for Airport property. B. The Plan shall request qualified proposals for one of the following three treatment options, listed in order of preference: • Option 1 - Adaptive reuse of the farmhouse, barn, and other outbuildings in their present location for an aviation related business. This alternative would require a third party to occupy the buildings in their current location and rehabilitate them in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR 68). The third party would develop a plan for reuse and security of the site that complies with local and Airport security requirements. The County must receive Fair Market Value rent for use of the buildings and site. • Option 2 - Relocate the farmhouse, barn and some or all of the outbuildings elsewhere on Airport property and adaptively reuse them for a specified purpose. This alternative requires the County and FAA to determine whether the identified location and type of airport land is not needed for Airport purposes. A third party would develop a plan for relocation and rehabilitation that would comply with local and Airport security requirements. The County must sell the property at Fair Market Value. [is this relevant if they stay on airport property are they being sold orjust rented?] • Option 3 - Relocate the farmhouse, barn and some or all of the other outbuildings off airport property and adaptively reuse them for a specified purpose. This alternative would require the third party to move the structure(s) off Airport property. C. The County shall ensure that the Marketing Plan includes the following elements: • An information package about the Farmstead; • Photographs of the farmhouse, barn, outbuildings and grounds; • A parcel map; • Information on the Farmstead's historic significance; • Information on the Farmstead's cost (Fair Market Value rent or purchase) for Options 1, 2 or 3; Alenrorandtun ofAgreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland Page] gf13 • Information on eligibility for federal, state, and local tax benefits for rehabilitation of historic properties; such tax benefits which would only be applicable to Option 1; • Notification that the successful offerer shall be required to rehabilitate the Farmstead's buildings and grounds in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR Part 68); • A distribution list of potential purchasers or transferees; • An advertising plan and schedule; • A schedule for receiving and reviewing offers; • Discussion of any relevant local requirements and incentives; and • A detailed description of relevant Airport requirements and security issues. D. The County shall submit the draft Marketing Plan to the MD SHPO and FAA for review and comment. Upon the MD SHPO and FAA's agreement with the Marketing Plan, the County shall implement the Marketing Plan. [specify time frame for marketing period?] E. In consultation with the MD SHPO and the FAA, the County shall review each offer it receives in response to the Marketing Plan and the County shall select an offer that meets the following requirements: • The offer provides for rehabilitation and maintenance of the Farmstead as stipulated in the Marketing Plan, giving preference to qualified proposals that fulfill Option l; • The offerer has the financial and technical ability to carry out the terms of the offer; and • The offerer meets the Airport's security and use requirements. F. Prior to making a final decision on the submitted proposals, the Airport will submit the preferred proposal(s) and other required information to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to determine if the proposed reuse would be acceptable for security purposes. G. If the County receives no offer that it determines conforms to the requirements of Stipulation III.E, the County, in consultation with the MD SHPO and the FAA, may select one of the following courses of action: • Modify the Marketing Plan requirements and re -offer the Farmstead pursuant to Stipulations III.A through III.F; • Mothball the property in accordance with Stipulation V until such time as a viable reuse for the Farmstead occurs or should the Airport propose a future project that may impact the property at which time the County, the FAA, and the MD SHPO would consult pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800; or • Demolish the property in accordance with Stipulation VI. H. Should the MD SHPO or the FAA not agree with the County's decision regarding the property, the parties shall seek to resolve the disagreement pursuant to Stipulation XII. Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstoirn Regional Airport, Maryland Page 5of13 IV. Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of the Farmstead A. If the County selects a successful offer that addresses Option I of the Marketing Plan, the County shall ensure that the Farmstead house and outbuildings are rehabilitated for adaptive reuse and that the design of the project is consistent with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR Part 68). The County shall ensure that the offerer develops the design and specifications for the rehabilitation in consultation with the MD SHPO and submits the plans, along with a schedule for implementation, to the MD SHPO for review and approval prior to implementation. V. Mothballing the Farmstead A. If the County receives no successful offer in response to the Marketing Plan and decides to mothball the property, the County will secure, maintain, and safeguard the Farmstead house, outbuildings, and archeological site to ensure that they are protected against damage and deterioration until such time as a viable offer for reuse has been identified or project planning occurs for a future Airport undertaking that may impact the Farmstead property. B. The County shall prepare an Interim Protection Plan for the Farmstead consistent with the recommended approaches outlined in the National Park Service's Preservation Brief #31 Mothballing Historic Buildings. The plan shall identify all current and foreseeable threats to the integrity of the Farmstead and its associated outbuildings, contain a schedule outlining the specific steps that have been or will be taken to remedy each individual threat, and provide a timeframe during which each action will be completed. Immediate threats shall be corrected as soon as possible. Examples of current and foreseeable threats to the integrity of the property include roof leaks, unsecured entrances, inadequate ventilation or security, and temporary uses of buildings and the surrounding landscape that may damage historically significant architectural elements, historical materials, or archeological resources. The Interim Protection Plan shall also address relevant requirements of Airport security and appropriate uses of the property. C. The County shall provide the Interim Protection Plan to the MD SHPO and the FAA for review and comment. D. Upon approval of the MD SHPO and FAA, the County will implement the steps outlined in the Interim Protection Plan in accordance with the specified schedule. VI. Documentation of the Farmstead (WA -I-480) and Archeological site (18WA496) A. If the County receives no successful offer in response to the Marketing Plan and decides to demolish portions or all of the Farmstead, it will implement the following documentation measures to mitigate the destruction of this historic property, prior to the initiation of demolition actions. If the County selects a reuse offer consistent with III B. Option 1, it does not need to complete the documentation requirements specified in this Stipulation. ddemorandmn ofAgreemenl Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead flagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland Page 6of13 B. Recordation: The County shall ensure that the following recordation measures are carried out in consultation with the MD SHPO before the Farmstead building(s) are demolished and in accordance with the relevant performance standards in Stipulation VIII. A and B: • Large -format perspective -corrected 5"x7" photographs will be made depicting the present condition of all Farmstead building elevations (2 photographs per building) and setting; • Sketch -plans will be made, on acid -free paper, of all Farmstead buildings including all floors, basement, and attics; • 35 mm black and white photographs will be made of other historical significant spaces and elements; and • The County shall ensure that copies of this documentation are made available to the MD SHPO and the Parties. C. Salvage: The County shall provide written notice regarding the planned demolition of the Farmstead to at least three 501(c) 3 salvage organization, such as the Baltimore -based Second Chance Inc. This written notice shall be provided at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of removal. If any 501(c) 3 salvage organization responds within thirty (30) days of written notification, the County shall provide them at least thirty (30) additional days to recover building components. During this period the County shall provide the salvage organization(s) with supervised access to the Farmstead site so that the salvage of components can be carried out, The County shall ensure that items thus selected are removed by the County's demolition contractor in a manner that minimizes damage and are given over with legal title to the salvage organization(s). D. Archeological Data Recovery: The County shall develop a plan for the recovery of archeological data from the Farmstead's site I8WA496. The County shall ensure that the plan is developed in consultation with the MD SHPO and the work accomplished in accordance with the relevant performance standards in Stipulation VIII. The plan shall specify, at a minimum: • The property, properties, or portions of properties where data recovery is to be carried out, and any property that will be destroyed without data recovery; • Research questions to be addressed through data recovery, with an explanation of • their relevance and importance; • The research methods to be used, with an explanation of their relevance to the research questions; • The methods to be used in analysis, data management, and data dissemination, including a schedule; • Proposed disposition of recovered materials and records; • Proposed methods for involving the interested public in the data recovery, and for disseminating the results of the work to the interested public; and • A proposed schedule for the submission of progress reports to the MD SHPO. The County shall submit the data recovery plan to the MD SHPO for review. Unless the MD SHPO objects in writing within 30 days after receipt of the plan, the County shall Memorandum ofAgreentent Treatment ofBrumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland Page 7 of 13 implement the plan prior to and in coordination with project ground disturbing activities within or immediately adjacent to the site area. The County and the MD SHPO will meet on -site to evaluate the success of the fieldwork phase of any data recovery program, near the end of the fieldwork efforts. The County shall submit a management summary to the MD SHPO documenting the completion of fieldwork for IS day review. Upon receipt of the written concurrence from the MD SHPO, the County may proceed with demolition activities in the site areas concurrently with completion of the remaining laboratory, analyses and reporting phases of the data recovery work. VII. Ongoing Consultation The County, MD SHPO and the FAA shall continue to consult regarding the appropriate treatment of the Farmstead and archeological site, and shall coordinate any change, modification or refinement of the current Undertaking and implementation of this MOA. Should the signatories decide that amendments to the MOA are warranted, the signatories shall follow the amendment process specified in Stipulation XIII. VIII. Performance Standards A. Professional Qualifications: The FAA shall ensure that all research and documentation carried out pursuant to this MOA is conducted by or under the supervision of a person or persons meeting at a minimum the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61). B. Standards and Guidelines: The FAA shall ensure that all historic preservation work performed pursuant to this MOA shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the principles and standards contained in the documents (and subsequent revisions thereof) listed below: • Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation (1983). • Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Investigations in Maryland (Shaffer and Cole 1994); • Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland (Maryland Historical Trust, 2000); and • Advisory Council on Historic Preservation —Section 106 Archaeology Guidance (ACHP 2007). C. Curation: The County shall ensure that all materials and records resulting from cultural resources investigations conducted for the project will be curated in accordance with 36 CFR 79 at the MD SHPO's Maryland Archeological Conservation Laboratory. IX. Unexpected Discovery of Historic Properties Should historic properties be unexpectedly identified during the implementation of the Project, the County shall ensure that reasonable efforts are made to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects to such properties, and shall consult the MD SHPO and FAA to Afemorandum ofAgreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Pa; us/cad Hagerstown Regional Airport, Adaryland Page 8 of 13 resolve any unavoidable adverse effects pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.6. The County and FAA shall ensure that any resulting cultural resources work is accomplished in accordance with the relevant performance standards in Stipulation VIII. X. Equal Opportunity/Non-Discrimination The signatories agree to comply with all applicable federal or state laws relating to equal opportunity and non-discrimination. XI. Confidentiality The parties to this MOA shall maintain the confidentiality of certain historic information as allowed under Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Therefore, the nature and location of certain historic properties discussed in this MOA shall be maintained per 36 CFR 800.11(c). XII. Dispute Resolution Should any party to this MOA or member of the public object within thirty days to any actions proposed or carried out pursuant to this MOA, the FAA shall consult with the objecting party(s) to resolve the objection. The FAA shall notify the MD SHPO and concurring parties of any objection. If the FAA determines that the objection cannot be resolved, the FAA shall forward all documentation relevant to the dispute to the ACHP. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of all pertinent documentation, the ACHP will either: Provide the FAA with recommendations, which the FAA shall take into account in reaching a final decision regarding the dispute or notify the FAA that it will comment pursuant to 36 CFR 800.7(c), and proceed to comment. The FAA shall take into account any ACHP comment provided in response to such a request in accordance with 36 CFR 800.7(c)(4) with reference to the subject of the dispute. Any recommendations or comments provided by the ACHP shall be understood to pertain only to the subject of the dispute; the FAA responsibility to carry out all actions under this MOA that are not subject of the dispute will remain unchanged. XIII. Amendment Any of the signatories may request that this MOA be amended according to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(7) and that signatory shall consult with the other signatories to develop amendments. Any amendment to this MOA shall be effective on the date the amended MOA is signed by all signatories. The FAA shall ensure a copy of amended MOA is filed with the ACHP. XIV. Termination In the event the terms of this MOA cannot be or are not being carried out, the signatories shall consult to seek amendment of this MOA. If an agreement cannot be reached on an amendment, the FAA, MD SHPO or County may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR Menrorandtun ofAgreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, A4atydand Page 9 of 13 800.6(c)(8). The FAA shall either execute a new MOA under 36 CFR 800.6(c)(1) or request and consider the comments of the ACHP pursuant to 36 CFR 800.7(a). XV. Coordination with the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985, as Amended The MD SHPO agrees that the fulfillment of the terms of this MOA will satisfy the responsibilities of any Maryland state agency under the requirements of the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985, as amended, State Finance and Procurement Article §§ 5A- 325 and 5A-326 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, for those components of the project that require licensing, permitting and/or funding actions from Maryland state agencies. XVI. Annual Review The FAA, MD SHPO, and the County shall review this MOA every January for the next two (2) years from the year of the agreement's execution to determine whether the MOA needs to continue and whether any changes may be needed. The review and determinations may take place on a conference call, in a physical meeting or in writing as needed. Reviews of this MOA shall occur until the successful completion of the mitigation measures stipulated in this MOA. XVII. Duration This MOA shall be null and void if its terms are not carried out within seven (7) years from the date of its execution, unless the signatories agree in writing to an extension for carrying out its terms. Execution of this MOA, filing of the agreement with the ACHP pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(b)(l)(iv), and implementation of its terms is evidence that the FAA has taken into account the effects of the Undertaking on historic properties and afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment. A4ennorandam ofAgreenrent 7i eatrnent ofBreanbangh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Ma yland Page 10 of 13 SIGNATORIES FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION By: Date: Terry J. Page, Manager Washington Airports District Office MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER By: J. Rodney Little, State Historic Preservation Officer Director, Maryland Historical Trust WASHINGTON COUNTY By: Date: John F. Barr, President Washington County Commissioners Ademorandam of Agreement Treatment ofBrumhaugla-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerslororn Regional Airport, Maryland Page II of 13 CONCURRING PARTIES [Revise list as needed] WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT By: WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION m WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL TRUST Lo PRESERVATION MARYLAND Date: Date: Ademorandtan ofAgreemenl TrealmenlofBrumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagersloivn Regional Airport, Adayland Page 12 of 13 Ademorandum of,4greemenl Treatment of 6rmnbaagh-Kendlc-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional ti irporl, A4ayland Page 13 of 13 ATTACHMENT A Area of Potential Effect COMM 4, Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 J S Informational Notice of Section 106 Filings Date: 07/15/2009 Reference Number: 628494 Steve Goodrich Washington County Historic District Commission 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted: FILE NUMBER: 0003894915 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 07/10/2009 Applicant: Liberty Towers, LLC Consultant: R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Site Name: Fairview Road Site Address: 15322 Fairview Road Site Coordinates: 39-42-47.1 N, 077-50-05.8 W City: Clear Spring County: WASHINGTON State: MD Lead SHPO/THPO: Maryland Historical Trust• I M Applicant Contact Information: Name: Edward Richardson Title: Senior Project Manager PO Box: Address: 51 Monroe Street, Suite PE 7 City: Rockville State: MD Zip: 20850-2456 Phone: (202) 420-7303 Fax: Email: eichardson@libertytowers.com RECEIVED JUL 202009 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. Page 1 of 1 FCC 813 September 2008 560,000 fi ]]°50'00" to Mcrteisduig 570,000 FT MAP - 8 3 t pp fR t.'�,t lU P\8x I A 5 en en en 6 n To To e q0 y � KF yl(o i� 3j5 t ;tie 0 15 3z2 /wvrt 65B �Iq 6 ■o N �I a vn. ■ - / I SPIt 017k 1312 ,E 1092 5 R i �■o 1310 a ■ ■ ■ [ ■y 1311 L xeS ■ ■ ■ 4 >16■ 1309 FEa ■■■■■■■■■s■ ■ ■ MA.-P3R� 1313 I r ■� ■ ■ ■ U.:: ■ ■ ■\y I,\" + W`/ 136 1) P� U_:___: ■ \ ■ 7 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ La ■]sl J) ■0 1 � 50 H ■ _ ■ as � � __- � i... Rve F5 ■ ■ I _—r r.lan� ■ ■ i 1 )� p1 ■ ,30 \ li 11 rc] ■■ i Lz ■ y.�1 \\ 11 orz ■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■�a�� 1■19 rob ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ '�N�➢ERS0i tI ■ to 10 11 12 13 \ arnuc rnevUpl 11 ass _ f R® - RERSVIL� B Rohr sv,UeComm Comm hr sNBlq _ �- �s !,^/ ��-. Ce U T� A I iocesr c e O mile v ,..1,p (4 d 1 A� 2zo F` ✓ ij (l i iW o ry9pe $ 6] z I lalaa �, O S It O I cr a i ss't$ �'�l J � Aa46i �f rrf tl r, 0011 war w la Grp , f: l p� ) =o xscla�� ox pe wpVVPNO losop .+p Maple i L qU 6 Tree G LAND Be rersville ' \` Rod Wa C`QrreIT Go nts �/> e otial Arch Brownsville Pond 3'r" t - R __ IalQey Park Fish Management Are alley GP W ,p Guano cr ATHLAND 4 TE 0, T0500JG- o VIEW Ci u dPG v — U ' �y saint Paals Q y i I F. 67 O 6 ! ], 5 ( p p�y� ry?JQf. OUN A�N � Sl F6*{Y STA Q ao P ` ^Ea JqE� ANSVI LE G Sark 4-21000 Brownsville 4sq c'� 40® ALE%ANDRIADRAGTING !, I77'400O C 0 E F 620,000rr G u MD GRID 610000 FT Joins Map 37 84-10-33 N/F CHO GRANDE LLC 2274/569 4996.9491 3228.968.96 2 462 ;EMENT-6 WOODS FND BARN / GENERAL NOTE` FND 1 • PROPERTY IS CURRE KOUGH - - IP AS RECORDED VOLUME 1379 Al PROPOSED Na 84 16-34. -CELLULAR TOWER LEASE SITE 2. THE PURPOSE OF TI LEASED BY LIBERTY TOI FOR THE PURPOSES Of CELLULAR TOWER. WOODS 3. PROPERTY AND RICH OF RECORD, RECORDED NOT THE RESULT OF A 4. THE DEVELOPMENT I! 5. EXISTING USE - AGF PROPOSED USE - I' 6. TOWER SETBACK DISI HOUSE 110' FROM THE NEARI 7. PROPOSED TOWER HI 084RN 84-16-34' N/F DAVID B. & LINDA 1C 3067/382, 1379/649 N:629020.0889 E: 1 123971.5355 84-22-39 N/F ✓ERALD E/ARMSTRONG & REGINA Al. CASSADY 1753/920 , _�IEPIp� n cT xP, S � IL ! v/�\ 51 •e P.10• ✓ PSPI �P.Y6. N 1 PIYa RN99 2 • '. �x•� P II P] _ rx:. ° P.]q2 P.311 / � i9 � WVIp P.Y63 NBFPY .. �_. 91x18 A 1�... �i_� . �-.. � - ... P.201 a . f,^ P329 "\ ] 6] \ 2'30Ra nN` e \ II PPs1 i/ o � \` " + n FP !03 1 33 Y/ P10 P12 111039 h,3 111055 9142 pT. GAR AND nil Pzgz 16 R.tl ,98 .9 /y P\ / + P339I 11 N;/1M —�. /a + 111028 '= N 111068 ✓ ] 4/ v -N' w �/ 111046 + P36 • J Y P,351 / 13 't 23k /11/ 2331 rxz / 111065 9 JOfiERI W. MEWIii - � O O � Yi /a Pa]- ^"rnn m 0.5/1!1 -' G0E 0.lflEEKN,A 6/ �P.191 ' PLS 4'Wry.t. Pxlx Zip _ P. 5 P303 5 / / 5 ��` �/ P213 f1Y , OnoA '41, , 7 4 rRr P N]P101 i \N r rL≤tTh.9p0 \ � r1. ai , 1 P39 rani +B \• O +�\' R119 , nn / P—_ 31 0 HERBERT %9!P N ` PW1 xix 6y fira lv i` �•' ' 1 W ^FREDERICK CO. 111019 MAP 73 .0.R a� P,« PIfi I] V1 -- P.a1B I \ • P.PB6 JGNF.WI _ +f I \] 91.11/1. P.33] w.� �� G�1 P.SB 1�1 Ot\ q'>. P.IiO / 1.121 P]35/ I rt I.PPq (dP.Yi.&yam/ N� rtV 40 1 �,1 E°6 I � `�1d I P. s6 . / BROWNSV'L / er 1/ rRV }yosml (l/ T tc 3Zoy Ca/a n 4 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES .....NAME ID5toAic TION Road and Brown TION WA -:III -065 trig Parcel 230 MALT # 2210835535 SURVEY CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE DlSTRICR _RUytlC x-beCUPlia :LAGnICULIUAE _MUSEUM fl 1L11NG151 XPAIYAI£ _Uh*CCUP,ED _COMMENCIAL kwpK -ST ltLOE _BOTH WORKINANUGAESS _EDUCAlWNAL p,. 4.VRWAlt RESIDENCE M -r51tE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE -ENTERTANMENE -014LCT IN PKOCE5h: ,YEE RESTNIC/E0 ..0VYRNMENT _AEEIGIOUS 3GN[ISIC -REINOW$MOERED _YES UNAESTNICTED _JNDUSTRIAI. _TRANSPON4tON $:.b0 _MILITA0V _OTHER QOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Norman G, PaUl Tel¢houo #1 /AEU S NUMNIA ®LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber M : 527 tw#TmUI%E. Polio Y E 291 ntGI nYOV£Eo£tc. Washington County Court House AtREETa MIMSER WesC Washineton SCreec OTY. TOWN 5rATE. Hrprgtpwn r lapd 21740 Q REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS IDLE . UAAAL http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 tA;41r -O65 B DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECKOKS CHECK ONE X.EACEELENT-DENAIOAATEQ UNAATIAED X—ON.aINAE SITE. _0000 �AU,NS XXAtTEAE0 4 50% ..-MOVED DATE _FAIII ...UNEXPO$ED. DESGNIDE THE PRESENT AND ORIOINAL OF KNOWNPHYSICAL APP£ RANG This Farmhouse is a two story, five bay brick structure with a two story. two bay frame extension. The brick section is constructed in common bond at all elevations and has wide wooden lintels above sixover six windows. The main entrance is in the central bay of the front elevation of the brick section. Below the main dwelling is a stone spring house. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=2 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 U SIGN9e+ICANCE W �7IT`065 PERIOD AREAS pF SIGNIFICANCE" CHECK ANOJUSTIFY BELOW —PREHIRTORIC ARCH/UU4iY.PREW5TbglC _COMMUMWITANNING .,,LA4$CA6 ARCNtlEIRIRE _REVGDN 1400•:1449 ._ARCHLQLQ v.N15t0n1C _CONSERWAT10N _LW —SCIENCE _15110-I*$9 )LAGgNA7t1URE -FCDNOMICS. _LITERATURE —SCULPTURE _.14001549 X.ANCHITECIUIE -EoUCATI00! _MILITARY -. OCiAl11NMANITARNN _T 700-1199 .-ARP ,.,5NOINIERINq __MUME —TNEATFR $I9cO logo .-COMMERCE _E$PEORATION/SETHEMENT „Y,IL050P11Y _LR0.rybW7gTAi1DN ,-.1400 _COMMUNICATIONS JNDUSERY- _POUIICAOOV(ANMENr _OTHE RISVl L1ip _INVEHTrON SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE This house LB a well maintained example of a mid 19th century brick farm dwellLng. .r - CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET Ti" NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=3 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 R'Rfl %; 1> (MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEyMATE SHEET IR NECESSARY Ci GEOGRAPHICAL RATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 111.40 acres VERBAL BOUNDARYa€SCRIPTION LIST ALL STATES AN O COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING SPAT€ OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE TITLE BY COUNTY The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory wasofficially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section. 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and. Inventory are being prepared for information andrecord purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights, RETURN 'to: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267.1438 P.. IV. http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=4 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 1 of 1 Mid 19th Century Brick Farmhouse Jump to Page J Gol; << PREVIOUS NEXT Gapland , Washington County, WA- >> III -065 Page 10 of 13 available pages Return to search results C Add Single Image to Print C Add All Images to List Print List PLEASE NOTE: Printing inventories requires the use of the Prizm viewer. [DOWNLOAD] http://www.mdihp.neticfm/dspdisplay,cfm?nextimager 10 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 WAIII-068 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Dstoic Parcel 52 MAGI {1 2210865535 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTOWC STREETS NUMBER CATE60AY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE. ..:PISTNICT ,_PUBLIC X—QCCOPIEa x_AGRIEULIURI __MUSEUM X_6ui1OINGIEI XINIIVAtf UNPCCUPfid —COMMEIICIAI, PAR. �.SifUCYUIIE .. OIH —WORRINPROGPE5S —EOUCATIONAU XPPOYATE ft5IOENCE _SYTL RUSUCACOUISITIUN ACCESSIELE —ENTENTAINMEN1 _IttLNi TOPS _OBJECT _3N PRPU$5 —YES,REdTRICI1O _ GOYkRNME:NI _SCIENTIFIC —bON6 CUNSIPESEO —Y!5 UNRESTNItttP —INPUETRIAL _1rIAN5PORTATPN JMLITABY _U1Hfn' OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME JOse h W. Sicr ...A.. Tale y�honEx A: �, ,.. STREETS NUNnfO — VCINTn op ©LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liher it 333 CPURMH E. polio M E 146 PlO16TRYOFPtEOSETC. Washington County. Court House STREETS NUMBER West Washington Street 61TY. TOWN STATE TITLE PATE.�..W.,,.�.«....�,.. _JE[MAAL , STATE ,.SOUNn _LOCAL 5UWVEY SUIEY RRYEPA PECOPdS 736 http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 Q DESCRIPTION WA=M-06I CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X..EACEElENI OIIEP10FATE0 ONALTEPEO x_opIQHNLUTE _00OO m.KNNE y'AIfEAEQ Q. 503;. 4NOVEO PAYE _FAIR _UNE%/OEED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWNI PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This two story, three bay stone farmhouse is an L-shaped Structure built in two parts, The ell extension to the rear would appear to be an addi- tion, Large flat pieces of stone form the lintels for most doors and windows of the front section. The stone is the brownish grandular rock found in Pleasant Valley.. The main entrance is located in the center bay of the front elevation.' CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=2 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 WA Z of m SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW PflEHI6iOPoC _FICN10lNfl. NIN16TOAIC _C06EMUNYIV PLANNING ,.lNpSCAPE ABCHITEGDUAE .R[UGIpN IRCQ1188 _ARCHEO₹OOY•$4TOAIC CO$IERVAIiON _IAW �6CIENCL —1(001689 XAORN:ULTURF ECONOMICS _LI!ENATUAE _GCULPTURE DEO0169 XAReHIUCtVAE _EWCATION —MILITANV -.,NOPAUHUMANITAR,AM _I]pStlW _MT .r4MGIN₹EAINO _MVfi10 _TAAAIEA X,ta ., ss .tPMMERCE _IXPl0AAT10Ne6EIIIEMLNI „l mws 711Y _TN4N6P0RDAIION JCOMMVNIOAIFON$ _INDVST9T _PQUAC$,OOVEANM₹NI _OI11th,NtldEV) JNVCNTION SPECIFIC DATES SU LOERIARGNITECT STATEMENT OF SIONIFLOA$CE This house 18 typical of stone construction in Pleasant Valley. The owner remembers seeing a date on the structure from the mid 19th centur , either 1848 or 1858. The house would appear to have been built within this period CONTINUE ON . SEPARATE SHEET TG NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=3 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 f MA)OR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES EOGRAPHICAL DATA ACEEAOE OF 4OMIR.TEDPROPENiy 7.-Z6 HCrea VE eAL.aOUNOAHY DE$RIP1ION STALL VA1tS ANO COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY SOUNDAHIES STATE COUNTY WFORM PREPARED BY NAMI t1ITLZ Paula Stoner Architectural Historian DPGF.HIZAHPK DATE the Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of. the Maryland Legislature, tobe found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181. KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and inventory are being prepared for information and record purposesonly and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw. House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 e PA. no. http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=4 07/30/2009 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 1 of I Mid 19th Century Stone Farmhouse Jump to Page I — Gol < PREVIOUS NEXT Gapland, Washington County, WA - III -068 Page 6 of 9 available pages Return to search results C Add Single Image to Print C Add All Images to List Print List PLEASE NOTE: Printing inventories requires the use of the Prizm viewer. [DOWNLOAD] http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next image=6 07/30/2009 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland.21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX:240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call: 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL FORM DATE TO FROM PLANNER ATTACHED HEREWITH NAME DESCRIPTION LOCATION DISTRICT LAND USE ZONING PARCEL ACRES LOTS OWNER SURVEYOR TYPE : SITEPLN VERSION 901 07-15-2009 _ LISA KELLY SP -09-028 GAPLAND MD-100'CELL TOWER PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY GAPLAND ROAD SOUTHWEST SIDE NORTH OF 2 : PRESERVATION : 084-16-0034-00000 45.6 1 LIBERTY TOWERS : TRIAD ENGINEER SUBMITTED BY THIS OFFICE FOR YOUR: WCSCD SENSITIVE REVIEW NEEDED ____APPROVAL V OBSERVATION & COMMENT INFORMATION ATTACHEMENTS(S) _CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ROAD AbEQUACY WORKSHEETS _FOREST CONSERVATION PLAN _OTHER: LAI( www,washco-md.nef ® RECYCLED PAPER BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CHESAPEAKE TOWERS, LLC 51 Monroe Street Plaza East 7 Rockville, MD 20850-2403 Appellant OPINION APPEAL No.: AP2007-033 This action is a request for a special exception to erect 10 ' stealth -design monopole communication tower. The subject property is located at 3204 Gapland Road, is owned by David & Linda Kough, and is zoned Preserva ' A public hearing was held before a full Board n May 9, 2007 The Appellant offered evidence and testimony in support of the appea . pponents offered evidence and testimony in opposition to the appeal. Because the members of the Board needed additional time to consider and deliberate the application, the Appellant waived the 30 - day requirement set forth in Section 25.55 of the Zoning Ordinance. FINDINGS OF FACT The following findings of fact are made by the Board, based upon the testimony given and all data and other evidence presented, and upon a study of the specific property involved, as well as the neighborhood: 1. Cellular One currently has twenty sites in the County. 2. A gap in coverage exists in this area of the County that will be substantially filled by the coverage provided by this tower. 3. The tower is a stealth monopole, meaning that its antennas will be placed inside of the pole structure. 4. The tower will be 105' in height with a 4' lightening rod, thus totalling 109'. -1- 5. The tower will be located downhill from a ridgeline amongst mature trees. 6. No existing structures provide co -location opportunities or adequate coverage so as to obviate the need for this proposed tower. 7. The tower will provide opportunities for co -location so that the future need for additional towers will be minimized. 8. The tower will be of no hazard to air navigation. 9. No historic structures exist on the subject property, but an adjacent property is improved with a historic home. 10. Received and filed with the Board was a memorandum from Kathy A. Kroboth, Washington County Zoning Coordinator, advising that the appeal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and we find that the proposal is compatible with the neighborhood. 11. Numerous citizens testified in opposition to the appeal, citing the historic and scenic nature of the area, stating that the proposed tower will mar the viewshed, and asserting that other locations in the area would be more appropriate. RATIONALE The Board has authority to grant a special exception pursuant to Section 25.2(b) of the Zoning Ordinance for Washington County, Maryland. A special exception is defined as "a grant of a specific use that would not be appropriate generally or without restriction; and shall be based upon a finding that the use conforms to the plan and is compatible with the existing neighborhood." § 28.62. The Ordinance specifically acknowledges the need for wireless towers while seeking to minimize their obtrusive visual impact. "It is the intent of these regulations to minimize the visual impact of towers and equipment, to minimize the number of towers through shared use and co - location, to encourage utilization of technological designs that will either eliminate or reduce the need for new towers to support equipment and to ensure that all towers and equipment are compatible with surrounding land uses while assuring wireless communications service to the citizens of Washington County." § 4.22. "In order to protect the natural skyline, towers should be sited within areas of mature vegetation and should be located down slope from ridge lines, and toward the interior of the parcel -2- whenever possible. Placement should only be considered elsewhere on the property when valid technical data supplied by the applicant indicates that there is no other suitable location." § 4.22.A.10. Modern life is such that wireless cellular communication is a technology that is integral to the functioning of this community. It serves individuals, businesses, and governments with data and voice capabilities. Its growing dispersion is similar to the growth of the electrical power grid in the early 20"' century. While utility poles are not the most attractive structures in the human environment, they are necessary. So to are communication towers, and they are a permitted special exception use in this district. The need for this tower is clearly established by the evidence. Failures, or gaps, in cellular coverage are costly, inconvenient, and hazardous. They disrupt the provision of voice and data services that have become an expectation and need of modern society. Reasonable efforts have been made by the Appellant to first find a co -location opportunity and then to select a site that is least intrusive to the neighborhood and the surrounding viewshed. Appellant has exhausted all feasible alternatives to constructing this tower. The Appellant's proposed tower is compatible with and not adverse to the character and integrity of surrounding properties. The tower will use stealth technology to minimize its visual impact. Moreover, it will be situated downhill from a ridgeline and sited amongst mature trees, further minimizing its visual impact. Examinations of the photo simulations reveal that the tower will not be very visible when constructed. While we share opponents' concerns regarding any change in the viewshed that might affect the scenic beauty of the area, there is no other location in this area of the County that would be less impacted by erection of a tower. In short, the placement of the tower at the proposed site will have no greater "adverse effects above and beyond those inherently associated with such a special exception use irrespective of its location within the zone." Schultz v. Pritts, 291 Md. 1,15 (1981). No evidence was presented that the proposed use was incompatible with the neighborhood; disruptive of neighbors' quiet enjoyment of their properties; detrimental to surrounding property values; generative of excessive odors, dust, gas, smoke, fumes, vibrations, or glare; generative of traffic that would exceed the capacity of existing infrastructure; or that the proposal was an inappropriate use of land or structure. The tower would create minimal traffic, as maintenance would occur approximately once per month. Moreover, the operation of the site would not create excessive noise, dust, vibrations, smoke, or fumes, and the tower would not be lighted. As the tower will be surrounded by mature trees, its presence will have little effect on the viewshed and -3- surrounding property values. Based upon all of the testimony and evidence presented, this Board finds that the requested special exception will not have an adverse effect upon the public health, safety, security, morals or general welfare, nor would it result in dangerous traffic conditions or jeopardize the lives or property of people living in the neighborhood. Accordingly, on this 6th day of July, 2007 and for the reasons set forth herein, this appeal is hereby GRANTED. BOARD OF APPEALS By: Bert Iseminger, Chair -4- A , N/F Richard G. & Marilyn G. Hembrock / Liber 906 Folio 1068 N/F '-`'" / George J. & Tamara E, Callas `- / Liber 1253 Folio 50 b Lot 5, Plat 8362 0 of VICINITY MAP \ SCALE 1"=2000' / ✓ Platte 10,000 S.F. \ Septic Reserv' ' T \ Area PP \ / Owners: George & Tamara Callas 17618 Taylors Landing Road Sharpsburg, MD 21787 _ 77 Arv+onno TnhiP Lot 6 (Family Member Lot) 1.69 Ac. (73,768.5 S,F,) -0.04 Ac. (1944.6 S.F.) Ded. R/V 1.65 Ac. (111,823.9 SF.) Net Lot 7 (Family Member Lot) 4,81 Ac. (209,415,3 S.F.) -0.23 Ac, (9907.7 S.F.) Ded. R/W .58 Ac. (199,507.6 S.F.) Net Lot 8 (Family Member Lot) 2.74 Al (119,279.9 S.F.) -007 Ac. (3,189.3 S.F.) Ded. R/W 267 Ac. (116,090.6 S.F,) Net Lot 9 (Family Member Lot) 2.20 (95,855.4 S.F.) -0.13 Ac(5740.2 S.F.) Ded. R/W 2.07 Ac. <90.115.2 S.F.) Net Lot 10 1.72 Ac. (74,859.3 S,F,) -017 Ac. (7,618.3 S.F.) Ded. R/W 1.55 Ac. (67,241.0 S.F.) Net Lot 11 1,56 Ac. (67,797.5 S.F.) -0.09 Ac, (3877.8 .F.) Ded, R/W Land Surveyor's Certification I hereby certify that the plan shown hereon is corrects that it is a subdivision of part of the lands conveyed by William George Shinham, Eleanor Jane Keller, and Rose Marie Wilhlde, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Eleanor Shlnhom to George J. Callas and Tamara E. Collas, by deed dated November 22, 1995 No. le", folio 50 and that stones marked and/or bars nmarkedrds h ve been gplac dOMt n/;4t"i onc ubly, Mar�hnd in Liber roftasicoal Land Aeve)or General Notes 1. 10,000 square feetis hereby reserved for sewage disposal. No permanent physical objects are permitted in this area. 2. There is a 10 ftwide drainage and utilities easement along all front lot lines and an a ft, wide drainage and utilities easement along all side and rear lot lines hereby reserved unless otherwise shown hereon. 3. Bearings based on deed North, 4, Sol types are as shown hereon, 5, Minimum Building Setbacks front yard -40h side yard -15'1 rear yard -50'. Minimum Building Setback Lines are based on the current Washington County Zoning Ordinance, Frontage of panhandle lots at owner's option per Section 2878(¢). Accessory structures may be constructed In accordance with Section 4,10 and Section 23,5 (b). Accessory Structures are not permitted without the placement of the principal permitted structure. Zoned P -Preservation, 6, Total upstream watershd affecting this subdivision, is less than 400 Acres. 7, Parcel does not Ue in the 100 year flood plain per FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No, 240070 0165A dated May 1, 1978, Flood Zone C. 8. Contours bsed on field survey and supplemented with County aerials. Serviceepere50 CFR 17pas r qul ed itot bef shownabyn Sections d306 e307 ¢ dc314 of theeY shington C unty S bdivision Ordinance and Section 4,21 (00) of the Washington County Zoning Ordinance. This subdivision Is not within 1000' of the Appalachian Trsh 10. An additional right of way 25 feet In width as measured from the centerlines of Falrplay Road and Taylor's Landing Road is hereby dedicated for the purpose of future road widening of said roads. 11, No other wells or septics lie within 100 feet of the Lot Lines, 12, All grading on each lot, done either before or after the construction of a dwelling or their appurtenances, shall be the fall responsblity of the lot owner, 13. No permanent structures (fences, sheds, play equipment, retaining walls, etc.) shall be permitted within any storm drainage easement, either shown or described, on the Final Plat of Subdivision, 14, Please see approved Forest Stand Dellnatlon FS07-040, 15. Please see approved Pre Consultation PC -07-066. `,.t "^^-., ( 919. S.FNet 16 Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9 ore till in exe,ptlon 4.1,2 of the A / PFO. ^ ..,. ., 1.4 M. J 17. On March 28, 2009 the Washington County Board of zoning Appeals granted AP2009-011 to reduce the development y �( density on Remaining Lands to 1 new Lot Per 17,61 Ac. plus Remaining Lands. RmC C9 ' —� \ 'N ac P . `a / , t. , w , , `.. ^k .4 'y qa y` .` �. yr •rr9 / 'N t - 'N + // ?: / ,/ / — .c 4 \ Approved ` / Forest Retention ° \Folio 357 N/F and Conservation ', / ^\, Liber 634 o Gerald W. Hubbard Easement Area hx 1.57 Ac / \'c'e `\ . moo, ° � �� o / s \•••• / X10/,0001O \'\ / LoSet 7 lyyReserve Judith A. & Thomas E. Shaw 14r�a ,/ Liber 1924 Folio 297 • �`' Liber 552 Folio 92 J- Prop. 100' Welt ! \// $ \ (u / Prop. p \. \ ...;;.::t'/ a Dwelling p0 yyq / \ \ I / / ! -•`". off,'' 0 VI 00 0 0 Z Cl) c I 0 W Q m cc' U^J LLYl< if) N Ceon W fir- M Z n N NZ in Z Z gN g �Z N Q W t Z4; 8 _ 3i J i CroN a v~ia Lii CEO d W Z n 0 d' z W I - W W w fXW ac F- IY i n_ w 0 U wo0 w cx a~ W J Z 20xO c Z O V)) W yW W _J V 040 In o Z Z M I m m ci m xN Z 14 o ° 0 O ii / LG r 4 10' �// / Oj - ®^ .me! \ t5 \ W ell Shed / / Remaining Lands � N/F Of Callas \ / 10SDe00 F Ex, Robert J. & Emily E, Demartln s _ fiber 1323 Folio 188 lo,000 s.F� Q /� © Liber -1253 Folio 50 sn a '< a Shgd �^ \ p \Sepik ReserOve Are -1.69 Ac. Lot 6 \ / Existln Z {// / / h \ 1 n yp 15' / o �,_ 00 _ — Pro n 10' 45.28 Ac. Net \ \c'j \ 1 M c / Dwelling / . / h - _... ._ 24' Stream BufferileG h- ...,...... _.,. - \ SJ \ w o \ AJ q� o PA�� oa \ '0' Slope less than 6% Possible '<. S/ �� /C f O•.A. `95, �,.,.._ Access o9 / ti°" / \ p <,. \ v- / Ingress/Egress \ y y 10,000 S.F.- �$ /// , Iv 5 welling Lilt 8 ~/� \ 11 zese e/)T \ 1 �, \\\�\\ C�.7 possible o o Septic ve/ Future \ �co6.\\ <� too' Prop •/ Aren / zyi• MBSC' \ \\ - - �„ Well / / Access \S&, \ (" jj �00 1 J ,9 V / _Wei ,g 5A. I i' ,' e� ,i (a O � Prbp. li 15' \bin / Lilt 9 Dwellln \P�° /}i / m M.B.S.L O tdeo+ D(typ) \ O '" ✓ CLQ v s' G L42 J "R% 15'30'49 W 181 77' -- — 2j �" Spez \ NvN __ __ - Prop, j —— --- L26 L12 — — / 'a1' \49\ CI 40' L38 — y ----- ---- ------------- e 16' n � — — — S15 37 52 E 236,95' 5 ----- 226.32' S16 25'E 208°'- - - S16'48'58'E 10 - :- N Ji1i-ItiiL/ N/F, P Septic Keser �/ HEET NO Jars T, & Betty L. Wnthne Liber 1674 Folio 1038 `` \�\ OArea// S ; / / / 25' /� /// — - f �ECEIoeE® � GRAPHIC SCALE NOTE, The lot owner Is solely responsible for all on -lot (grading to Insure that the intent of the rooftop 1N FEET disconnect credit end non -rooftop disconnect credits, Inch = 100 it_ as approved hereon, are maintained in perpetuity. 1 v /�i/ .r� JUL 21 2009 2 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IA -H 0 to G 2" CROWN (TYP.) ° d I ° V ° v SUPPORT ARM \AI /n Annrn 1A/I InC ,-. END OR CORNER POST (TYP.) 2" MESH, 9 GAUGE GALV. WIR 1 '-2„ TYP. FOR END, CORNER, & GATE POSTS 1 1/4"� BRACE RAIL FINISH GRADE 10'-0" MAX. SPACING (TYP.) 14„ SUPPORT ARM W/BARBED WIRE LINE POST (TYP.) TOP RAIL (TYP) 3/8"� TRUSS ROD WITH TURN BUCKLE. 2 1/2" O.D. POST #7 GAUGE BOTTOM TENSION WIRE -9" 0 FOR LINE POST % CONCRETE FOOTING, TYP. C9 CHAIN LINK FENCE (ELEVATION) 45' ol FENCE NOTES: 1. FENCING MATERIALS SHALL BE OF GALVANIZED STEEL. 2. POST, BRACES AND GATE FRAMES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 (STANDARD WEIGHT) PIPE. SIZES SPECIFIED ARE NOMINAL DIAMETER. 3. DOUBLE SWING GATE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH TUBULAR PLUNGER BAR, 1 LOCK KEEPER, 1 LOCK KEEPER GUIDE, 2 LATCH FORKS, 2 FORK CATCHES, 1 CATCH FOR PLUNGER BAR, AND 2 GATE STOPS LOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. POSTS, CAPS AND OTHER NECESSARY FENCE FITTINGS SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY THE FENCE MANUFACTURER OR EQUAL HINGES SHALL BE CF GALVANIZED STEEL. 5. POSTS SHALL BE SFACED EQUIDISTANT BUT NOT MORE THAN 10' O.C. 6. BOTTOM OF FENCE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 3" ABOVE GRADE AT ANY SECTION. 7. INSTALL EMERGENCY IDENTIFICATION SIGN ON FENCE. L ANTENNA SITE c9 WAVEGUIDE ICE BRIDGE -2" CONC. CROWN (TYP.) 2 iE COVER ROUNDING KIT pI WIDTH VARIES 3 TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD © 109' A.G.L. TOP OF TOWER © 105' A.G.L. AT&T PROPOSED ANTENNAS © 99' A.G.L. AT&T PROPOSED ANTENNAS © 89' A.G.L. FUTURE ANTENNA LOCATION © 80' A.G.L. FUTURE ANTENNA LOCATION © 71' A.G.L. Al FUTURE ANTENNA LOCATION © 62' A.G.L. FUTURE ANTENNA LOCATION © 54' A.G.L. NOTE: I FOR DETAIL ON UNIPOLE CONSTRUCTION SEE PLANS BY OTHERS. .• \-GROUND ELEVATION 698.00' (NGVD29) c9 UNIPOLE TOWER ELEVATION (SCALE: NTS) EXISTING GROUND COMPACTED SUBGRADE ` GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LAYER c9 GRAVEL COMPOUND 3 4„ AASHTO #57 AGGREGATE NOTE: A11 FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL APPROVALS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN ANY WETLAND, STREAM, OR 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN AREAS. Cl 51 MONROE STREET, SUITE PE 007 ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-2456 202-420-7300 YELLER ENGINEERS, INC. 420 ALLEGHENY STREET HOLLIDAYSBURG, PA 16648 PHONE: 814-696-7430 FAX: 814-696-0150 PROJECT NO.: 2369-1 FILE NAME: DESIGN.DWG DATE: 01/07/09 DESIGNED BY: RGK DRAWN BY: RGK CHECKED BY: PEK KELLER ENGINEERS, INC. EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER RIGHTS CONTAINED IN THESE PLANS AND DESIGNS. THEY ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, ALTERED OR COPIED IN AN' FORM OR MANNER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED WITHOi-T WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF KELLER ENGINEERS, INC. /\�`S� RETT kytq % Ui :Sat mcCc ennnllllnnnmaw o PAUL EVERETT KIRBY, JR. PE# 35422 2 06/24/00 CO. ENOR. COMMENTS 1 04/23/00 CO. ENOR. COMMENTS REV DATE DESCRIPTION GAPLAND SITE NO.: MD -100 3204 GAPLAND ROAD GAPLAND, MD, 21779 WASHINGTON COUNTY SHEET TITLE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C9 /5322 Fair✓ie& F 0 ii 2j 3f NOTE: ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL APPROVALS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN ANY WETLAND, STREAM, OR 100 -YEAR Fl.,CODPLAIN AREAS. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIESD, OWNER/DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATION " I/we certify that all clearing, grading, construction and/or development will be done pursuant to this plan and in accordance with the stormwater management ordinance of Washington County and the policy on construction of subdivision infrastructure for acceptance and ownership by Washington County (S-3)" & Tut- 114 tca*et &e.I4s cta . PROJECT SUMMARY PROPERTY OWNER: DAVID & LINDA KOUGH (3O1) 432-7OO6 DEED BOOK & PAGE: 1379/649 GAPLAND, MD 21779 Lk'i I I IiIiJttJs1 J w SITE ADDRESS: 32O4 GAPLAND ROAD j� GAPLAND, MD 21779 ni T Li _ SITE NAME: GAPLAND SITE NUMBER: MD -100 COUNTY: WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP NO.: LOT SIZE: t 45.6 ACRES I ] i - LATITUDE: 39 23 40.83 N LONGITUDE: 77 39 54.71 W f r GROUND ELEVATION: 698.0' (NGVD29) 4 a k HEIGHT OF TOWER: 105' I c ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PRESERVATION ZONING JURISDICTION: WASHINGTON COUNTY PERMITTING JURISDICTION: WASHINGTON COUNTY AREA OF DISTURBANCE: t 2.2 ACRES ENGINEER: KELLER ENGINEERS, INC. 420 ALLEGHENY STREET HOLLIDAYSBURG, PA 16648 P: 814-696-743O F: 814-696-O15O APPLICANTS: LIBERTY TOWERS LLC 51 MONROE STREET, SUITE PE 007 ROCKVILLE, MD 2O85O-2456 CONTACT: ED RICHARDSON (202) 420-7303 A.D.A. COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION The stormwater management plan shown hereon is approved. Washington County, Division of Public Works Date Land Development Engineering Approved or Con ction. Washmaton' County. Division of Public Works Date DRIVING DIRECTIONS MD RT 67 SOUTH OF GAPLAND. TURN WEST ONTO BROWNSVILLE ROAD. TURN RIGHT (NORTH) ONTO TAULTON LANE AFTER CROSSING ISRAEL CREEK. LOCATION 1000 0' 1000' MAP OWNER/DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATION I/we certify that all clearing, grading, construction and/or development will be done pursuant to this plan and that any responsible personnel involved in the construction project will have a Certificate of Attendance at a Maryland Dept. of the Environment approved training program for the control of sediment and erosion before beginning the project. /fb e`:y.. >f J„'S' : rc' y ",' : fir._ ENGINEER'S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION I verify and affirm that the Construction for the Stormwater Management Facilities as performed either meets or exceeds the requirements and design intent of this plan, including all specifications and referenced standards, and has been completed in accordance with good construction practices. I also verify and affirm that I have reviewed the construction inspection documentation and tho as —built information; that it has been done in accordance with Washington County requirements and at a level deemed necessary to assure the Verification made herein; and all discrepancies between the as —built information and approved plans have been noted and are considered acceptable to the Consultant. SIGNATURE DATE SEAL DRAWINGINDEX - DRAWING NO: DRAWING TITLT REV. NO. REV° DATE Ti TITLE SHEET 3 06/24/09 Cl INDEX & GENERAL NOTES 2 06/24/09 C2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 O4/23/O9 C3 LEASE PLAN 1 06/24/09 C4 SITE PLAN 2 O6/24/O9 C5 GRADING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 06/24/09 C6 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN 4 06/24/09 C7 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS 3 06/24/09 CS DETAILS 3 06/24/09 C9 DETAILS 2 1 06/24/09 O6/24/O9 do DETAILS C11 CULVERT PLAN AND DETAILS 3 06/24/09 C12 STORMWATER ACCESS EASEMENT PLAN_ . 2 06/24/09 Z1 ZONING EXHIBIT 0 01/07/09 El ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING PLANS 0 O1/O7/O9 ELECTRICAL NOTES & DETAILS 0 01/07/09 E3 ELECTRICAL DETAILS 0 O1/O7/O9 E4 ELECTRICAL DETAILS 0 01/07/09 I DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS DISTURBED AREA QUANTITY The total area to be disturbed shown on these plans has been determined to be approxinately t 2.2 AC. and the total amount of excavation and fill as shown on these plans has been computed to be approximately 1420 cu. yds. of excavation and approximately 870 cu. yds. of fill. (For Soil Conservation Use Only. Not To Be Used For Bidding Purposes.) ENGINEER / ARCHITECT DESIGN CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the plans have been designed in accordance with local ordinances, Comar 26.17.01.07 and 1994 Maryland Standards and Specific do s for Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls ,;/ - CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE. JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NO11FY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME MISS UTILITY CALL TOLL FREE 800-257-7777 48 HOURS 8U t≤E YOU DIG This plan has been reviewed by the Washington County Soil Conservation District for conformance to standards and specifications for erosion and sediment control facilities. WASHINGTON COUNTY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT By: ttirr Date: 7/_f. 3 I JUL - 92009 A e E6 TOWERS 51 MONROE STREET, SUITE PE 007 ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-2456 202-420-7303 51 MONROE STREET, SUITE PE 007 ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-2456 202-420-7300 KELLER ENGINEERS, INC. 420 ALLEGHENY STREET HOLLIDAYSBURG, PA 16648 PHONE: 814-696-7430 FAX: 814-696-0150 t at&t PROJECT NO.: 2369-1 FILE NAME: DESIGN.DWG DATE: 01 /07/09 DESIGNED BY: RGK DRAWN BY: RGK CHECKED BY: PEK KELLER ENGINEERS. INC. EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COP[RIGHT AND OTHER ROM CONTAINED IN THESE PLANS AND DESIGNS. THEY ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, ALTERED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER, NOR ARE THEY To BE ASSIGNED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF KELLER ENGINEERS, INC. bJ d lbwc 4 'v O� z 0 o JI �3si5 0 PAUL EVERETT KIRBY, JR. &3°c PE# 35422 3 06/24/09 CO. ENGR. COMMENTS 2 O4/23/O9 CO. ENGR. COMMENTS 1 02/09/09 SOD COMMENTS REV DATE DESCRIPTION J SITE NO,: MD -100 3204 GAPLAND ROAD GAPLAND, MD, 21779 WASHINGTON COUNTY SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER Ti r�irvteu/ 1 2 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5 p (_ O3 REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - I' -O" RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - '-O" LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-O" CHARLSE HOLDER._ 2 SCALE DRAWN BY 1/4" = I' MOUNTAIN MASONRY DATE JULY 15, 2009 I RIGHT ELEVATION 12 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" . I' O" UTILITY ROOM 22'-O" BATH FAN VENT DRYER VENT WALK IN BATH TUB 0854 WASHER DRYER •MODEL = 5'_p NEUJ CONCRETE PATIO ° 4 SIDEWALK 0 2'- INSTALL STEPS UP 5�s TO THE EXISTING PATIO 1-4" 9 MASTER BATH AS NEEDED EXISTING CONCR T PATIO /'i x (1 to O Q 0 v x � ' 12-O" m N3'-O" x 4'" '" x 4-6" ' O" yv 2X6 WALL 5h 8' CEILING jj p o =; x n SUNROOM MASTER BEDROOM N BREAKER SOX�3 3' 0 2'-6"x4'-6" 2'6° x46° 3'-O 11 f 26'-2%4" L_ - x EXISTING HOUSE '9 I EXISTING BRICK STRUCTURE v N 3-o' ii ii 76" x 4'6" 216u1 x 4's" 2'-6" x 4'-6" 2'-6" x 4'-6" THE I-1OLDERG SCALE DRAWN St 1/4" = 1 MOUNTAIN MASONRY DATE MAY 30, 2009 FLOOR PLAN 3' 2x1O LO R JOISTS 16" o. 'FOUNDATION VENTS' 3' FROM EACH CORNER ft 1O" CONCRETE BLOCK 2O" WIDE x S" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING c/w 2 - RUNS 15M RESAR IF DOUBLE 2X12 BEAM 16X16 CMU PIER 24X24X 12 PIER FOOTING EXISTING HOUSE FOUNDA CROSS SECTION A -A SCALE: 114" . I'-0" ENGINEERED TRUSSES RIDGE VENT 40 YR ASHPALT SHINGLES ZIP ROOF SHEATHING VENTED SOFFIT ro" FACIA 5" GUTTER WALL FRAMING 2X6's 24" O.C. Z/16" ZIP WALL SHEATHING VINYL SIDING SPRAY FOAM INSULATION R VALUE IS R4 PER INCH 1/2" DRYWALL TAPED AND SANDED 2 COATS OF PAINT 3/4 ADVANTEC SUBFLOOR GLUED 4 NAILED 2X1O FLOOR JOISTS 16" O.C. 2X8 PRESSURE TREATED PLATE I/2"XI8" GALV. ANCHOR BOLTS SPACED 4' APART 4 12" OFF CORNERS ALL INTERIOR WALLS 2X4's 16" O.C. ----------------!--------- ------------------------------ ------ ----------- ---------------------------- t I • CRAWL SPACE FOUNDATION 1O" CONCRETE BLOCK MINIMUM 4' UNDER FLOOR JOISTS FOUNDATION WALL I I I 24X24XI2" PIER FOOTINes I 1 16X16 PIER ------------------------------I DOUBLE 2X12 BEAM 1 • FOUNDATION VENTS i MAX 3' FROM CORNER ' 2O" WIDE x $" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING c/w II 2 - RUNS 15M REBAR 1 EXISTING HOUSE FOUNDATION 1 I Hi FOUNDATION PLAN I