Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20090304
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay AGENDA HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM 1A & B WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET March 4, 2009 7:00PM M A. Call to Order & Roll Call B. Minutes — February 4, 2009 *. C. Communications & Bills 1. MD SHA — (x3) New guard rails on US 340,181 and I70 D. Unfinished Business 1. MOA(draft) re: Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove farmhouse at Hagerstown Regional Airport E. Budget . F. New Business 1. Permit #2009-00555, 21605 Leiter Street, new dwelling in the Leitersburg Rural Village* 2. Permit #2009-00571, 8225 Sharpsburg Pike, new residential garage in Fairplay Rural Village* 3. RZ-09-004, Zoning text amendments regarding small wind energy systems and solar collection systems G. Other Business H. Executive Session 1. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\amar09.DOC NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MAY MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.508, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CONTACT PERMITS DEPARTMENT AT (301) 791-3065 VOICE/TDD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. www.washeo-md.net ® RECYCLED PAPER Martin O'Malley, Governor Anthony G. Brown, Lt. Governor Mr. J. Rodney Little State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 John D. Porcari, Secrelar' Neil J. Pedersen, Aderini.stalor Maryland Department of Transportation Appendix 2 February 12, 2009 Documentation of No Effect Determination (under the Programmatic Agreement for Minor Projects) Project: I-70 MP 20 to MP 20.4 and MP 21.4 to MP 35.5 Funding Source: Federal Project Number: AX103A21 Description of work The Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) proposes upgrading existing traffic barriers and installation of new traffic barriers in the median and roadsides of dual roadways in various locations in District 6. All work will occur in the median and installation of new guardrails consists of driving in new posts in the median. All work will occur within the existing SHA right-of-way. Roadway spans Clear Spring, Mason Dixon, Williamsport and Funkstown quads. County: Washington 7.5' Topographic Map Name: Funkstown Project Type: 12 Actions Taken: SHA Architectural Historian Fred Shoken consulted the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database video footage and aerial photographs The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is confined to the limits of construction disturbance for upgrading and installing new traffic barriers within the existing SHA right-of-way along 1-70 from mile post 20 (near St. Paul Road) to the bridge over Black Rock Road (milepost 35.5). There are no standing historic structures located within the APE along this stretch of I-70. As part of the Interstate Highway System, I-70 is included in the Exemption Regarding Historic Preservation Review Process for Effects to the Interstate Highway System [Federal Register Page 11928-119311. The upgrading of existing traffic barriers and installation of traffic barriers within the SHA right-of-way is a minor alteration to the existing interstate highway. It will not be visually (410) 545-8540 PGantery ofp m h / My telephone number/toll-free number is / Maryland Relay Service for Impaired Hearing or Speech: 1.800.735.2258 Statewide Toll Free SlreelAddressr 707 North Calvert Street . Baltimore, Maryland 21202 . Phone: 410.545.0300 • wcvwmarylandroads.cont Mr. J. Rodney Little I-70 MP 20 to MP 20.4 and MP 21.4 to MP 35.5 Page 2 intrusive, impact the level of noise, nor alter atmospheric conditions for properties adjacent to I-70. No additional architectural investigations are recommended. SHA Archeologist Carol A. Ebright assessed the archeological potential of the project area through consultation of the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database, aerial photographs and prior survey reports, site forms, and MIHP forms. Portions of the project area have been previously survey Wesler et al. (1981), Fehr et al. (1996, 1997) and Millis (2003). Recorded archeological sites in the project corridor include 18WA462, 18WA463, 18WA500, and 18WA501, all of which have been determined not eligible for NRHP listing, Based on data from the MIHP form for WA -V-040, the Conococheague Church, the original 1740s church site was likely within SHA's right-of-way, and the original road trace was observed in the I-70 median west of Ridge Road (Stoner 1978). Consequently the section of EB and WB I-70 from Ridge Road west to the crossing of NB 1-70 by Meadow Brook Creek is excluded from this project. The proposed work will occur in previously surveyed or disturbed right-of-way, and is unlikely to impact any intact, significant archeological resources. No further archeological work is warranted. Very truly yours, Julie M. Schablitsky Assistant Division Chief Environmental Planning Division by: aI , 7 t -t Attachments cc: Ms. Chrissy Louloudis Mr. Fred Shoken (w/ Attachments) Ms. Carol Ebright (w/ Attachments) %Mr. Steven Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission (w/ Attachments) Dr. John F. Krowka, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. (w/ Attachments) Project Location Map 1-70 Median Crossover @ MP 20 to Bridge Over Black Rock Rd (MP 35.5) Washington County 4 0 4 8 Miles Clear Spring, Mason Dixon, Williamsport and Funkstown Quads 1:100,000 N S L USGS Topo Quad Index 0 County Cultural Resources Map 1-70 Median Crossover @ MP 20 to Bridge Over Black Rock Rd (MP 35.5) Washington County 4 0 4 8 Miles Clear Spring, Mason Dixon, Williamsport and Funkstown Quads 1:100, 000 Maryland Inventory of Historic Places ® National Register of Historic Places Archaeological Surveys ® Maryland Historical Trust Easements USGS Topo Quad Index O County E S a Ii r i 0 0 C N am E 0 5- `F. - Z 0 - IC W 0 • 7_ • O rHiid Ct L C) O CD 0 O N 0 E O 4- N a O C) C) 9 V T cz 0 z 0 w C) cc cci o Z a„ow ) 44 Yl j a /4z% ai ■tom 4 ',ne C O ® m. e_ Ip c 3 fi g8ad:iE r"��raWao 1 L 8t� i w W i o ro 591 B Wyk.. �� ,k I j� /o 1111�� •' _ rtiao, eT�. ' £ C E 0 O I 0 5 w 0 i� s 0 0 f+ C N am E 0 4- C ti I a .2 C) 0 A o 21 N R a � E U d y 0 9w N O (00 x-"20 o - I- c 6 O V N w ` O. p c o O t L N Ww>OLSQ K C a0= x 0 O N M• M "O - -O O C o a C aJ C I— O .c of C N N C5 N c m io m CI) 0 0 U) o Z �=C O MUMr110 N r C r cz �0 `.f.. C) O w Ct m ■■ w0 = S c O amp O N 0- 5 E 0 ti 5 E E a � E �aN O Uct W M O 2 N O = H C o o�2o Co O- a. C y_ s L N I/) > > Ol N x • -=0=00 - M M " O 'O O C o Q C F C — — o = It co m N , it 0 o U)(nit E z 0 O SILEI P[ i�U `moo ~ i L:7 ° lel 0 U o W z DO N O to yea. .o `L P Martin O'Malley, Governor John D. Porcari, Secretary Anthony G. Brown, Lt. GovernorI Neil J. Pedersen, Adminisunlor Administration Maryland Department of Transportation Appendix 2 February 17, 2009 Mr. J. Rodney Little State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 Documentation of No Effect Determination (under the Programmatic Agreement for Minor Projects) Project: IS 081 I-81 WV State Line (MP 0.0) to Median Crossover at MP 5.5 Funding Source: Federal Description of work The Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) proposes upgrading existing traffic barriers and installation of new traffic barriers in the median and roadsides of dual roadways in various locations in District 6. All work will occur in the median and installation of guardrails involves driving posts into the median. All work will occur within the existing SHA right-of-way. The roadway spans the Williamsport and Mason Dixon quads Project Number: AX103A21 County: Washington 7.5' Topographic Map Name: Williamsport Project Type: 12 Actions Taken: SHA Architectural Historian Fred Shoken consulted the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database video footage and aerial photographs. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is confined to the limits of construction disturbance for upgrading and installing new traffic barriers within the existing SHA right-of-way along I-81 the West Virginia State Line to Mile Point 5.5 in the vicinity of Williamsport, Maryland in Washington Count There are no standing historic structures located within the APE along this stretch of I-81. As part of the Interstate Highway System, 1-81 is included in the Exemption Regarding Historic Preservation Review Process for Effects to the Interstate Highway System [Federal Register Page 11928-119311. The upgrading of existing traffic barriers and installation of traffic barriers within the SHA right-of-way is a minor alteration to the existing interstate highway. It will not be visually (410) 545-8540 PGentury of A e m. My telephone number/toll-free number is Maryland Relay Service for Impaired Hearing or Speec7h: 1.800.735.2258 Statewide Toll Free iy new x8.20, Street Address: 707 North Calvert Street . Baltimore, Maryland 21202 - Phone: 410.545.0300 • wwwmmylandroads.com Mr. J. Rodney Little IS 081 I-81 WV State Line (MP 0.0) to Median Crossover at MP 5.5 Page 2 intrusive, impact the level of noise, nor alter atmospheric conditions for properties adjacent to I-81. No additional architectural investigations are recommended. SHA Archeologist Carol A. Ebright assessed the archeological potential of the project area through consultation of the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database, aerial photographs, and prior project data. The southern project terminus stops prior to the C&O Canal NHP and the Potomac River, which is technically owned by Maryland. The I-81 corridor in the project area contains four previously recorded archeological sites (18WA472 473, 500 and 500), all of which were determined not eligible for NRHP listing. Undisturbed portions of the project area were previously surveyed by Balicki (1998) and Millis (2003, 2004). The proposed work will occur in previouslv_surveyed or disturbed right-of-way, and is unlikely to impact any intact, significant archeological resources. No further archeological work is warranted. Very truly yours, Julie M. Schablitsky Assistant Division Chief Environmental Planning Division by: Attachments cc: Ms. Chrissy Louloudis Mr. Fred Shoken (w/ Attachments) Ms. Carol Ebright (w/ Attachments) #fr: Steven Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission (w/ Attachments) Dr. John F. Krowka, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. (w/ Attachments) Project Location Map Mile Point 0.0 to Mile Point 5.5 Washington County 2 0 2 4 Miles Williamsport and Mason Dixon Quads 1:45000 USGS Topo Quad Index County L S Cultural Resources Map j-?/ Mile Point 0.0 to Mile Point 5.5 Washington County 2 0 2 4 Miles Williamsport and Mason Dixon Quads 1:45000 Maryland Inventory of Historic Places National Register of Historic Places Archaeological Surveys ® Maryland Historical Trust Easements USGS Topo Quad Index County E S Martin O'Malley, Governor Anthony G. Brown, LI. Governor Mr. J. Rodney Little State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 John D. Porcari, Secrelary Neil J. Pedersen, ilt/nrinisoafor Maryland Department of Transportation Appendix 2 February 17, 2009 Documentation of No Effect Determination (under the Programmatic Agreement for Minor Projects) Project: US 340 WV Stateline to MD 67 (MP1.0-1.5) Funding Source: Federal Project Number: AX103A21 Description of work The Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) proposes upgrading existing traffic barriers and installation of new traffic barriers in the median and roadsides of dual roadways in various locations in District 6. All work will occur within the existing SHA right-of-way, County: Washington 7.5' Topographic Map Name: Harpers Ferry (VA) Project Type: 12 Actions Taken: SHA Architectural Historian Fred Shoken consulted the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database, video footage and aerial photographs. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is confined to the limits of construction disturbance for upgrading and installing new traffic barriers within the existing SHA right-of-way along US 340 (Jefferson Pike) from the West Virginia State Line to MD 67. The southern terminus of the project is adjacent to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Park (MHIP No WA -VI -048), which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), but there are no standing historic structures within the APE The upgrading of existing traffic barriers and installation of new traffic barriers within the SHA right-of-way is a minor alteration to the road. It will not be visually intrusive, impact the level of noise, nor alter atmospheric conditions to adjacent historic properties. No additional architectural investigations are recommended. SHA Archeologist Carol A. Ebright assessed the archeological potential of the project area through consultation of the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database and aerial photographs. The southern project terminus stops prior to the NRHP listed C&O Canal National Historic Park, and US (410) 545-8540 � re m r My telephone number/toll-free number is y J Maryland Relay Service (m' Impaired Rearing or Speech: 1800.735.2258 Statewide Toll Free N "B / -qo SlreetAddress: 707 North Calvert Street • Baltimore, Maryland 21202 - Phone: 410.545.0300 • www.marylandroads.com Mr. J. Rodney Little US 340 US 340 VA Stateline to MD 67 (MP1.0-1.5) Page 2 340 bridge over the Potomac River, even though Maryland technically owns the river. The project area contains no recorded archeological sites, although the Potomac River bed at Harpers Ferry is the reported location of stone fish traps (HF quad File 6). One 0.5 mile long transect along US 340 was previously surveyed by Wesler et al. (1981) and the C&O Canal NHP underneath US 340 was previously surveyed by Larrabee (1962). The proposed work will occur in previously disturbed right-of-way, and is unlikely to impact any intact, significant archeological resources. No further archeological work is warranted. Very truly yours, Julie M. Schablitsky Assistant Division Chief Environmental Planning Division by: Attachments cc: Ms. Chrissy Louloudis Mr. Fred Shoken (w/ Attachments) Ms. Carol Ebright (w/ Attachments) 4'Ir. Steven Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission (w/ Attachments) Dr. John F. Krowka, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. (w/ Attachments) Project Location Map VA Statefine to MD 67 (MP 1.0 to 1.5) Washington County �t > u: PARK y,.: 4 ixaz � w pppp� a �Id�B MoMerd HARPERS FERRY—` } �s $ /i HAnona HISTORICAL Pro ect Location \ y( w e� s IT PARK 'T a40= ERVERTON ""^ 9 PROSPECT \- HILL R SPNOYHOOK py �V f% ' OTCN�AC :$,�-\ \ KNOXVILLE CS 0 R 9 ? 30 M AG� t r ` o i ' \ u�°N Goo >� r }: mso g LOUDOUN Q HEIGHTS \ 4 �ven Bua¢N �0 Rrck ? 1L8] 0.9 0 0.9 1.8 Miles Harpers Ferry Quad 1:24,000 1►1 USGS Topo Quad Index County E S Cultural Resources Map VA Stateline to MD 67 (MP 1.0 to 1.5) Washington County s Q m \& N&i 67 \OAF NSF N 0,0)00 KteP % PROSPECT \ SANDY HOOK �mr'm m��revav-.�=�mdi'Hitt4"L'ti.4E•�. %xrsmi mmm�^mmG. vmmm.— —m c�� �i mmv •• pp��amm� 4 340 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles Harpers Ferry Quad 1:12,000 121 Maryland Inventory of Historic Places National Register of Historic Places EThIII Archaeological Surveys I II Maryland Historical Trust Easements USGS Topo Quad Index County E 9 Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment ofBrumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, THE MARYLAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMISSIONEI REGARDING THE TREATMENT OF THE BRUMBAUGH-KE FARMSTED AT HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL AIRP WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for completing the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C.` § 470 at Hagerstown Regional Airport, Hagerstown, Maryland pursuantto 49 U.S.C § 40101 et seq. 49 U.S.C. § 47101 et seq.; and WHEREAS, Hagerstown Regional Airport purchased 84.6 acres of the Brumbaugh-Kendle- Grove Farmstead (Farmstead) in April 1999 as part of preparation for the extension of Runway 27. The farmhouse and outbuildings are located east of US Route 11 outside the airport's security fence. The Farmstead includes a brick farmhouse, family cemetery, barn and approximately seven other outbuildings; and WHEREAS, the FAA has defined in consultation with the Maryland State Historic Preservation Officer (MD SHPO) the area of potential effect (APE) for the extension of Runway 27, as defined in 36 CFR Part 800.16(d), to include all the buildings on the Farmstead as shown in Attachment A; and WHEREAS, a Phase I survey entitled Terrestrial Archeological Survey and Historic Architectural Resource Survey for Runway 9-27 Extension and Relocation of US Route 11, in 2001, was completed and Architectural Site WA -1-480 (Brumbaugh Kendle'-Grove Farmstead) was identified based on criteria in 36 CFR 800.5(a)(2)(iv) and (v). The Farmstead was found to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A and C; and WHEREAS, the FAA has determined in consultation with MD SHPO pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5 that concluding the Section 106 process will have an adverse affect on the Farmstead; and WHEREAS, the FAA has consulted with Washington County Commissioners (COUNTY), as the Owner, pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(3) and has invited Washington County to be a signatory to this Memorandum of Agreements (MOA) pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6 (c)(2); and WHEREAS, the FAA has invited Hagerstown Aviation Museum to participate as a consulting party pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(5), and as a concurring party to this MOA pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(3), and Hagerstown Aviation Museum has (agreed/declined) to participate; and WHEREAS, the FAA has invited Hagerstown Preservation Design District to participate as a consulting party pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(5), and as a concurring party to this MOA pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(3), and Hagerstown Preservation Design District has (agreed/declined) to WHEREAS, the FAA has invited Washington County Planning Department to participate as a consulting party pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(5), and as a concurring party to this MOA pursuant Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment ofBrumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(3), and Washington County Planning Department has (agreed/declined) to participate; and WHEREAS, the FAA has invited Washington County Historical Trust to participate as a consulting party pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(5), and as a concurring party to this MOA to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(3), and Washington County Historical Trust has (agreed/declined) to participate; and WHEREAS, the FAA has invited Washington County Historical consulting party pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(5), and as a concur to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(3), and Washington County Historical Socie participate; and WHEREAS, the FAA has invited Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area to participate as a consulting party pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(e)(5), and as a concurring party to this MOA F to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(3), and Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area has (agreed/declined) to participate; and WHEREAS, the FAA has notified the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) of its adverse effect determination pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(1) with specified documentation and the ACHP has chosen not to oarticinate: and NOW, THEREFORE, the FAA and MD SHPO agree that concluding the Section 106 process shall be implemented in accordance with the followine stinulatinnc The FAA shall I. A. Treatment: The evaluation effort conducted in Stipulation l.A. determined that Architectural Site WA -I-480 (Farmstead) is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Consequently, the COUNTY will develop a plan to mitigate the adverse impacts to the site, in consultation with the FAA and MD SHPO. The Farmstead includes a brick farmhouse, brick washhouse, cemetery, stone smokehouse, barn, well, tool shed, chicken house, hog pen and silo. For all the alternatives the cemetery would be maintained by the COUNTY and remain in the current location. The well would be secured by the COUNTY and capped in accordance with local health department requirements. A history of the Farmstead and a list of alternatives are presented in Att L _La (erred mitigation action is to relocate the house, barn and other outbuildings )rt property by a third party. This alternative would require the third party to the entire structure(s) off airport property, The FAA and COUNTY will work with all parties to implement the preferred mitigation action. Should this alternative not be viable within four months from the date of signature of this MOA, the FAA, MD SHPO and COUNTY will move onto the second alternative. Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment ofBrumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland 2. The second alternative is to dismantle and preserve architectural elements of the Farmstead for re -use. This alternative would require a third party to remove all or parts of a structure off airport property. The FAA and COUNTY will work with all parties to implement the preferred mitigation action. Should this alternative not be viable within four months from the resolution of Alternative 1, the FAA, MD SHPO and COUNTY will move, onto the third alternative. 3. The third alternative is to relocate the house and/or barn and/or; outbuildings on. airport property. This alternative requires the COUNTY and FAA to determine whether the identified location and type of airport land is not needed for airport purposes. Develop a plan for relocation that would be comply with local requirements and submit this proposal and other required information to the U.S.' Department of Homeland Security to determine if this location would be a security risk. If not a security risk, proceed with federal process to release the land from federal obligations. Advertise for third party to purchase land and relocate structures. If the property is sold at Fair Market Value the proceeds would be returned to the FAA. II. The FAA and COUNTY mitigation action. Should 1 resolution of Alternative 2, fourth alternative. 4. The is demo) to implement the preferred within four months from the OUNTY will move onto the A. Professional Qualifications: The FAA shall ensure that all historic preservation work carried out pursuant to this MOA is carried out by or under the supervision of a person or persons meeting at a minimum the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards`(36 CFR Part 61). B. Standards and Guidelines: The FAA shall ensure that all historic preservation work performed pursuant to this MOA shall be conducted consistent with the principles and standards contained in the documents (and subsequent revisions thereof) listed below: • Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation (1983). ,• Recommended Approach for Consultation on Recovery of Significant Information fomArcheological Sites, ACHP 1999 (64 FR 27085-27087). III. Equal Opportunity/Non-Discrimination The signatories agree to comply with all applicable federal or state laws relating to equal opportunity and non-discrimination. 7 Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment of Drumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland IV. Confidentiality The parties to this MOA shall maintain the confidentiality of certain historic information+ia disclosure may cause a significant invasion of privacy, risk harm to the historic property, impede the use of a traditional religious site by practitioners as allowed under Section 304 National Historic Preservation Act. Therefore, the nature and location of certain historic properties discussed in this MOA shall be maintained per 36 CFR 800.1 l(c). V. Dispute Resolution Should any party to this MOA or member of the public proposed or carried out pursuant to this agreement, the to resolve the objection. The FAA shall notify the MD objection. If the FAA determines that the objection car documentation relevant to the dispute to the ACHP. W pertinent documentation, the ACHP will either: Provide the FAA with recommendations, final decision regarding the dispute or no 800.7(c), and proceed to comment. The F provided in response to such a request in the subject of the dispute. Any recommendations or comments the subject of the dispute; the FAA r not subject of the dispute will remaii VI. Any of the signatories may requ Any amendment shall be effecti The FAA shall ensure a copy of FAA shall take into A that it will commc ike into account any with 36 CFR 800.7 out y days to any actions with the objecting pt ring parties of any e FAA shall forward ys after receipt of all reaching a t to 36 CFR reference to erstood to pertain only to under this MOA that are be amended according to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(7). imended MOA is signed by all signatories. filed with the ACHP. In the event the terms of this MOA cannot be or are not being carried out, the signatories shall consult to seek amendment of this MOA. If an agreement cannot be reached on an amendment, the FAA, MD SHPO or COUNTY may terminate it pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(8). The FAA shall either execute a new MOA under 36 CFR 800.6(c)(1) or request and consider the comments of the ACHP pursuant to 36 CFR 800.7(a). with the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985, as amended The MD SHPO agrees that the fulfillment of the terms of this MOA will satisfy the responsibilities of any Maryland state agency under the requirements of the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985, as amended, State Finance and Procurement Article §§ 5A-325 and 5A-326 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, for those components of the project which require licensing, permitting and/or funding actions from Maryland state agencies. Memorandum of Agreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland IX. Duration The FAA, MD SHPO, and the COUNTY shall review this MOA every January for the next two (2) years from the year of the agreement's execution to determine whether the MOA needs to continue and whether any changes may be needed. The review and determinations may take place on a conference call, in a physical meeting or in writing as needed. Reviews of this MOA shall occur until the successful completion of the mitigation measures stipulated in this MOA. Execution of this MOA, filing of the agreement with the ACHP pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(b)(1)(iv), and implementation of its terms is evidence that the FAA has taken into account the effects on historic properties protected under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment pursuant to that Act. SIGNATORIES FEDERAL AVIATION By: Manager, Washington WASHINGTON Date: MARYLAND Date: Date: Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland ATTACHMENT B History of Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead As part of the 2002 Environmental Assessment the Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead was acquired. The Farmstead included a brick farmhouse, family cemetery, barn and approximately seven other outbuildings. The Farmstead was found to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A and C. The cemetery will be maintained by the COUNTY and remain in the current location. The well will be secured by the COUNTY and remain on the property. The farmhouse and outbuildings are located outside the airport's security fence. The FAA and Transportation Security Administration have expressed concerns over the location of the farmhouse and security for the airport. The rehabilitation of the farmhouse for non-residential use is not feasible since it is located approximately one mile from the terminal building, outside the perimeter fence and would require extensive rehabilitation and upkeep costs. Securing and mothballing the farmhouse would not alleviate the security concerns since it is located outside the perimeter fence. The Airport does not have a security or law enforcement staff that could monitor or protect the property from vandals. In addition, the farmhouse was not habitable when Washington County purchased the property. It did not have any sort of heating plant and as documented was mold laden. Carolyn Motz, the airport manager, has spoken to the, local Agricultural. Center regarding dismantling the structures and moving them to the Agricultural Center for people to see and/or use. They declined. She also talked to the Hagerstown Aviation Museum Board members, who were not interested in the The preferred alternate ate the house, barn and/or outbuildings off airport property. as all architectural elements would be preserved. )resented in Table 1. Memorandum ofAgreement Treatment ofBrumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland Table 1 Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Alternatives Hagerstown Regional Airport Alternative Description Benefits Cons 1) Relocate House, The house, barn and/or Architectural U.S. Department of Barn and outbuldings would be elements are Homeland Security outbuildings off relocated off airport preserved in new must be contacted to airport property. property by a third party, location, determine security risk. Entire structure would need to be removed under this Possible difficulty alternative, finding third party to fund relocation due to costs. 2) Dismantle & Architectural elements or Architectural Remaining structures Preserve portions of structure are elements are would be Architectural advertised for sale and re- preserved and re- demolished. Elements for re -use, use by a third party, used in another structure. Farmstead documented (Completed in 2005). 3) Relocate House, Portion of airport property Architectural U.S. Department of Barn and/or released and sold at Fair " elements are Homeland Security outbuildings on Market Value. FAA preserved in new must be contacted to airport property reimbursed the Fair Market location. determine security subject to federal Value for the land, risk. release and relocate structures to this site. Third party relocates Possible difficulty structures to new location, finding third party to fund relocation due This alternative will require to costs. coordination with the Washington County Planning Department to determine if site would be suitable and in compliance with local requirements. 4) Demolition. Farmstead demolished. Farmstead Farmstead documented demolished and no (Completed in architectural 2005). elements are preserved. /1t5 Mn c WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2009-00555 Applied: 02/18/2009 Project No: P2009-0095 Approved: Permit Type: RES-NEW Status: PENDING Inspector Area: 62 District/Acct No: 09003010 Job Address: 21605 LEITER STREET HN Location: LOR 21605 LEITER STREET Parcel No: 026-09-0011-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: RMD CONSULTING LLC 21912 BEAVERBROOK DRIVE SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 Phone Number: 301-964-7002 Owner: FOLTZ ROBERT L & IRENE E L/E Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Description: 28 -FT X 44 -FT (1232 SQ FT) ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, CRAWL SPACE, BLOCK FOUNDATION, 4 -FT X 5 -FT CONCRETE SIDE STOOP, 5 -FT X 4 -FT CONCRETE REAR STOOP(BOTH WITHOUT A' ROOF), 6 -FT X 44 -FT COVERED FRONT PORCH, BRICK CHIMNEY FOR WOOD STOVE, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, BRICKNINYL EXTERIOR, SHINGLED ROOF Foundation Size: 28 X 44 Type of Heat...: HEAT Public Sewer...: N Public Water...: N Gas .............N N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $100,000.00 Code Enforced: 2006 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width ProDosed .46 ACRES .46 ACRES 73 42 34 20 BRICKNINYL Y EXISTING 20 YEARS EXISTING 20 YEARS STIC No. Of Bathrooms: 2 No. of Bedrooms: 2 Minimum Required 40000 SQ FT 40000 SQ FT 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313.2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 A (Et) Lae" flap vboofLa;ttr . / fu/sh ty R`�r,l �Il' e MAP it.Rq 7 \\\ MAP it. JOVE T. ERICKSON, L/E\ p - P w. cone 6 e. MARTIN 0/347 6.64 A. P.2 1aa- /]IPT1� 1PAIL i AB] 0 � v a P.3 SJg �//yw \\ .. / 3 z a4Pv / P.los V n ra-Pfi!Q/371% ' 529 / '✓ /mil v.1, 45P 78�13aN bG H +y 23,BtA / P/0 P.S' IE/T*RSBURt °' .4 ,/': ex -16 // "44 r 4e l ' P.52 P.2J0 x I / ea� P.414 v 79 9 a PL —7 / 119 3 2 v/ C �f Pb IPi l9 a P. f / r!✓ 6B R Y RB-N 6 a41 V.7 324 99 JEFH44/146 ER P.65 ~ N r , A 894/146 _ '� / _J____ -. 62000. P3o'I P. 306 j .2'19 'LR':t vi f\/ y,\ \... 1I F3i6 RI 4�. {• flo6 � � �`a 6 3]9 P.103 \ Q ,36 P.260f+. R % Rf0 1 e• .. `-Y P.93 •1J R91 "' � A I 4.330 43 /\ P396 f /1 � � P13o s-per'—d� (i• I \{qp�\ ALLEN 6 ORUMfiAU6H / ' i aP pee ' P. 327 P.366 /` a P. 109 I bl° aCeoK LAN ° srov r P- Cl / sans• 1 3 Jw 1J Q fl3 « *, 9 (9 '' P. by �'3s 243 P3b 30 P oz/loO5 $T. t p3. 4� •i Q P. /�., p 6 14 l a 3 LLF/7E1 sr P239 a�s6 P. GEORGt A. tt -O p41 CLOPPER SR P!344 51 / 138 Z 4. 23.2 A. 45 N fr P. 2`16 S.- (a \\0 7. P.3 F I WILLIAM S. H uNSeERGER r,. r, r_ t r C A N z n LEI T E R S. r O � of z zo+ c�Z z L0> M Y^ 70 '-< ZN F 1 tt -�i >� t x70 C o frl O ��y N STREET N 28°32'13' E 100.00' N 28°32'13' E 75,00' DASHED LiNB RD. CDRA9'Y *4' p z VMb C,-) �' £ �bN �R> I p. )n1mar4cA15%j fib #, SZ r 1 o h h o SU-02'13' , W 100.00' sy _d F, S 28°32'13' W 75,00' "DORIS WARFIELD -.s^z M r 1 S 0 Lt N ti 8�O �� . ^ «. _ -§■■ ________� - �v •■ } $ M a . ., ..�.. : - sE S 61°2147' _ 1 0.00' 0 o p WANDA FOLTZ-ENGLISH 1363/992 PARCEL I 11250.0 SQ. FT. 0.2583 AC. Do N ao N Z F.t N 61°27'47' W 150.00' �t EX. CONG ➢RIVE {, 'Nn I CARPD T o s o w w I . W o v 0.3444 AC. ISES INC. RD S L�� 132.69' WANDA FOLTZ—ENGLISH ct 1363/992 PARCEL 3 4668.4 SQ.FT. 0.1072 AC. a2' aZiCoo �Gu �oU5- X05 � LINE BEARING DISTAN Li S 28.32'13' W 11.i L2 N 28'32'13' E 22.3 RIGHT OF WAY L1N6 OF MD. RT. 418 STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION PLAT #52911 NGG�L� A1$ BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE WANDA FOLTZ-ENGLISH PROPERTI. SITUATED ON LEITER STREET ELECTION DISTRICT # 9 WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND 57 L Vii&oC 7iL9Z r 0 In' ____I _ __ -'ff# x J LOkL, `Te — LI Es _-. �inuiu (aoc Pt VP! •1d4III1L4. qyl i. I::is � � o►umr�minn)e�. - ,. Pl+t'� li�! msi+lrll - --,_ �I�I[ait;�sRs�tyirrax[' ; t ' Ilil�! e.�w 1 !l iHirt 111 IN" f� III �1l.. �..: » �e.,7.�a gG�k7Ci_1 d1 ax...... ..` _fir?{J_'_. G.rJlff� (� ,TL1L. RIN111.t/ 714 ph�j ID1a_lpp�i iiFA�UA- ily'��►w+�w 714ffi 12I'! lsli' • t••ui1l•i '- (mN'T,q; Xb N C'-n- 9J /I,lcRV - P/ .k WASHGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVRIActivity No: 2009-00571 Applied: 02/18/2009 Project No: P2009-0097 Approved: Permit Type: RES-NEW Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B3 District/Acct No: 12002548 Job Address: 8225 SHARPSBURG PIKE FR Location: S-96-084 8225 SHARPSBURG PIKE Parcel No: 067-03-0016-00007 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: POFFENBERGER ROBERT C & ELIZAB 8225 SHARPSBURG PIKE FAIRPLAY, MD 21733 Phone Number: 301-582-1169 Owner: POFFENBERGER ROBERT C & ELIZAB Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Description: 28'X28' DETACHED TWO BAY RESIDENTIAL GARAGE (784 SQ FT), CONCRETE FOOTER, FRAME CONSTRUCTION WITH VINYL SIDING EXTERIOR, PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSS ROOF WITH SHINGLES, NO ELECTRIC AT THIS TIME THE ESTATE OF PEGGY LOU GOWER, LOT 7 & PARCEL B Foundation Size: 28'X28' Exterior Finish: VINYL SIDING Air Conditioning: Type of Heat...: Septic............: EXISTING Public Sewer...: Time Existed: Public Water...: Well............: EXISTING Gas............: Time Existed: Electric.......: Construction Type: GAR Construction Valuation: $5,200.00 No. Of Bathrooms: Code Enforced: 2006 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE No. of Bedrooms: 0 Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed 5.46 ACRES 5.46 ACRES 90 150 190 230 445 Minimum Required 40,000 SQ FT 40,000 SQ FT 25 5 5 5 100 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313.2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240.313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 (>.oc°n M�cp �ZZ'SS�t�•r�Oswr \R'k4 t7coi wooS'7 / RV bound ry 39 19 37 36 7.. 42 34 14 AP63 - 18s 43�>q, T/� � 17 40 6q P f 2 16 43 35 19 18 17 164 •::; '7 33 15 41 16 117. a w p N 32 31 30 20 15 ALEXANDER MILY 29 P382 14 21 15 A. 28 27 15 22 3 X28 23 P347 h 24 12 4-i R16 2 26 65 P.415 11 P. 0) 386 3 7 8 9 10 1.) C I -• m N 6 1 M I 4 5 25• I P,17 p g P. ` 407 3601361 P 7 1 P.191 P 356 2' 21 B149O 0 8 3 6 R94 � P,120 2 1 P/0 P,402 �-- P,407 P. P.13 �s952 4 P•404 / 1 Pat 1,406 o'' ! P. 23 o� p53 5iit Oh �F A•2o C ^? 1 2a4p P '4 04 .EN 10 .219 PSI p��p 2.O7 ¢ I >266 I1 `j'1 s 227 132 ? e, 6 9 25 P 266 =12 .. T/LGHMANTON Z,7 21 r 12. Zy us _p \ FSIs 1 A�°a 3 ► P'm 14 �e 21 14 179 t2 P,111 2.0 L 15 aP P388 P.P701 4 3 v P. 1 P,331 9 P315 6 P. P319 94 3 j j/ P.99 2 � Q9h / LEW IS E.WINGERT P.337 517/201 132..43• P. I l \F' •4•L , \\ 7+ ,g \ Nis• , V i x } v c t?v&s. $? ' \ s7rn.d C `' \\ , . \ ` $?N x t _.\"moo / / A I ,. ° \ \ ., Lrx;1O 1 ° e�� r+w`$`n,n `p I �• I , l0<..l. f6L£ 7 \+ _ Asa . m2 ��`,% ,p ��1 ;b3\10.�%10h.(JJd'jQ t\ . , . `t �N , I t ` n\' /t\.,w C \ �:, \ \N, �. '. ..` *\ \�.-`' ® m`"Ni7 o�,N tn� sC , f `.x•? P9�oN oq' a+ '��;.' N % o -'` ' r' \ r`�Y ' ITYI .F ' l / Y ,1• \ ' �Q$' 0➢ir ��\ I 1 x/ / \ � V- " `. J dA \'S'" , �Vr' �•`, y$ _ ,'8 'U N� t-�•�y,' .. NO N�yN m7\� �,\ � r % � -9 l \'' � � .. � � , � "1 N. / Y �{ T � rl it%\ . o�.gN � • '7 1 ` �•br" ,y / ,...\ - - . al ) ,. �`l; I,.' / art, tom` i9,rN` •,9. ,j,',jc. `�� % //A'•g�" 't1� tdall `N barWt+. a,\ 1 \ ' :dB \ ? 1 o 3.n a \J"'% ` 1� \ l c \`. `"Ti .x FlI�.. .(YC1DI - i>i' ' p .,�-\®H ..:� I \ 11 ''>\ '' ' ' :' :' \ II sq \\\ Ik I , l7 d stf '7 I I /�; b'3M09 /107 ,1.993d j0 31 f/1S3 3HL 1 I�,II\II W I 3It r1 p 'q� e� mI ~ova$ ml 9 n` `— ----------- -�' --- - - - - - Al os in [V C 4 g jL7d n It Ip oh i l io I W 1 I J� J9 ------ y WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION• WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND ORDINANCE AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETE THE APPROPRIATE SECTIONS AND SIGN THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE APPROPRIATE FEES. (PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: "WASHINGTON COUNTY TREASURER".) Washington County Planning Dept. and Washington County Permits & Inspections Dept. Same APPLICANT To be completed by the Planning Commission Case No. iii o -OO4 Date Filed: I -Id Fee Paid: Hearing Date: 800 W. Baltimore St., Hagerstown, MD ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS Type of Amendment requested: MAP AMENDMENT 1) Zoning Ordinance: The applicant hereby petitions for the reclassification of land Located at Street Name and Number or N S E W side of road, distance N S E W from nearest Intersecting road Consisting of Area in square feet if less than one (1) acre, or in acres if one (1) acre or more From the District to the Present classification Requested Classification Tax Map: Grid: Parcel No.: Explanation (As described in the "Administrative Procedures for Rezoning Applications"): If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet of paper) REASON FOR THE REQUEST: (Please check one) ❑ Change in the character of the neighborhood ❑ Mistake in Original Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Page 2 TEXT AMENDMENT Please check one: Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Comprehensive Plan Forest Conservation Ordinance Solid Waste Plan Subdivision Ordinance Water and Sewer Plan Zoning Ordinance X Proposed Text: Deletions should be in brackets, unchanged wording in lower case, and new wording in caps. Section No. Aritcle 4, Section 4.24 and 4.25 and Article 28A SEE ATTACHED Attorney or Agent Address Address Applicant's gnature Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 20. My commission expires on Public REZONING CASE NO. RZ-09-004 Proposed text shown in BOLD Section 4.24 Small Wind Energy Systems A Small Wind Energy System, as defined in Article 28A, shall be considered as an accessory use in all zoning districts. The purpose of •this section is to establish regulations to facilitate the installation and construction of small wind energy systems in Washington County for private landowners, subject to reasonable restrictions, which will preserve the public health and safety. (a) The following standards shall apply to the development of Small Wind Energy Systems. Setbacks. A wind tower for a Small Wind Energy System shall be set back a distance equal to its total height plus an additional 20 feet from: a. any State or County right-of-way or the nearest edge of a State or County roadway, whichever is closer; b. any right of ingress or egress on the owner's property; c. any overhead utility lines; d. all property lines; and e. any existing guy wire, anchor or small wind energy tower on the property. 2. Access. a. All ground mounted electrical and control equipment shall be labeled and secured to prevent unauthorized access. b. The tower shall be designed and installed so as to not provide step bolts or a ladder readily accessible to the public for a minimum height of 15 feet above the ground. 3. Electrical Wires. All electrical wires associated with a Small Wind Energy System, other than wires necessary to connect the wind generator to the wind tower wiring, the wind tower wiring to the disconnect junction box, and the grounding wires shall be located underground. 4. Clearance. The blade tip or vane of any Small Wind Energy System shall have a minimum ground clearance of fifteen (15) feet as measured at the lowest point of the arc of the blades. 5. Lighting. A wind tower and generator shall not be artificially lighted unless such lighting is required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Lighting of other parts of the Small Wind Energy Systems, such as appurtenant structures, shall be limited to that required for safety purposes, and shall be reasonably shielded from abutting properties. 6. Appearance, Color and Finish. The wind generator and wind tower shall remain painted or finished the color of finish that was originally applied by the manufacturer. 7. Signs. All signs, other than the manufacturer's or installer's identification, appropriate warning signs, or owner identification on a wind generator, wind tower, building, or other structure associated with a Small Wind Energy System visible from any public road shall be prohibited. 8. Code Compliance. A Small Wind Energy System including wind tower shall comply with all applicable construction and electrical codes. 9. Utility notification and interconnection. Small Wind Energy Systems that connect to the electric utility shall comply with the Public Service Commission regulations. 10. Small Wind Energy Systems attached to any building shall not exceed the permitted height for principle structures within the zoning district. 11. Met towers shall be permitted under the same standards, permit requirements, restoration requirements, and permit procedures as a Small Wind Energy System. 12. Each property is eligible for two Small Wind Energy Systems only. (b) Abandonment A Small Wind Energy System that is out -of -service for a continuous 6- month period will be deemed to have been abandoned. The Zoning Administrator may issue a Notice of Abandonment to the owner of a Small Wind Energy System that is deemed to have abandoned. The Owner shall have the right to respond in writing to the Notice of Abandonment setting forth the reasons for operational difficulty and providing a reasonable timetable for corrective action, within 30 days from the date of the Notice. The Administrator shall withdraw the Notice of Abandonment and notify the owner that the Notice has been withdrawn if the owner provides information that demonstrates the wind energy system has not been abandoned. 2. If the Small Wind Energy System is determined to be abandoned, the owner of a Small Wind Energy System shall remove the wind generator from the wind tower at the Owner's sole expense within 3 months of the date of Notice of Abandonment. If the owner fails to remove the wind generator from the wind tower, the Administrator may pursue a legal action to have the wind generator removed at the Owner's expense. (c) Public Service Commission In accordance with the Maryland Annotated Code, Public Utilities Companies, Section 7-207.1, any property owner seeking to construct a Small Wind Energy System and connect such system to the main power grid with the capability of transporting energy back to their main power company shall apply to the Public Service Commission (PSC) for approval and provide documentation of such approval to the County prior to construction and being issued a building permit. (d) Variances Variances to the distances, restrictions, and standards contained in this Article are not permitted. (e) Noise All Small Wind Energy Systems shall comply with the limitations contained in the Code of Public Local Laws and Ordinances, Chapter 146, Noise. (f) Violations It is unlawful for any person to construct, install, Energy System that is not in compliance any condition contained in a building permit chapter. • Wind Energy System des Ok" sQ Generaur ` ' a lD 3 a c. a Tower I or operate a Small Wind with this chapter or with issued pursuant to this Section 4.25 Solar Collection Systems Solar Collection Systems as defined in Section 28A shall be considered an accessory use in all zoning districts. The purpose of this section is to establish regulations to facilitate the installation and construction of Solar Arrays. The following standards shall apply to the development of solar Collection Systems: Collection systems, including solar arrays shall be classified as accessory structures and shall not be located within a front yard. 2. Setbacks: Six feet from all property lines and other structures. 3. Height: Freestanding Collection systems shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height. 4. Size: Collection systems on residential properties shall not exceed the greater of one half the footprint of the principle structure or six hundred square feet, whichever' is greater. Non-residential properties size of arrays shall not exceed one-half of the footprint of the principle structure. 5. Solar Collection Systems are permitted to be located on the roof of a structure subject to the following: a) Collection systems shall not extend more than twelve (12) feet above the roof line; b) Collection systems shall not exceed the maximum height permitted in the zoning district in which it is located; and c) Collection systems shall be limited in size to 15% of the cross sectional area of the roof. 6. Code Compliance: Solar Collection Systems shall comply with all applicable building and electrical codes. SOLAR ARRAY Ax B =square feet of solar array p I •j jB it II Lot Line ' FrontYard r L Setbaack J Area defined by drawing a line around the exterior limit of any, igdlyidual component of the solar collectiori'systern may. not exceed one�half of the footprint of the principal structure or 600 square feet, whichever is greater. Side View I "--�; Front View I Article 28A - Definitions Meteorological Tower (Met Tower) Defined to include the tower, base plate, anchors, guy wires and hardware, anemometers (wind speed indicators), wind direction vanes, booms to hold equipment, anemometers and vanes, data logger, instrument wiring, and any telemetry devices that are used to monitor or transmit wind speed and wind flow characteristics over a period of time for either instantaneous wind information or to characterize the wind resource at a given location. Solar Array • A ground mounted solar collection system consisting of a linked series of photovoltaic modules. Solar Collection System A panel or other solar energy device, the primary purpose of which is to provide for the collection, inversion, storage, and distribution of solar energy for electricity generation, space heating, space cooling or water heating. Wind Energy System Equipment that converts and stores or transfers energy from the wind into electricity or other usable forms of energy. This equipment includes any base, vane, blade, foundation, generator, alternator, tower, transformer, tail, wire, inverter, batteries, guy wire or other component used in the system. Wind Energy System, Limited A single -towered wind energy system that has a rated nameplate capacity of 50 kilowatts or less; and has a total height of 150 feet or less. Wind Energy System Owner The individual that owns, or intends to own, the property upon which a Small Wind Energy System will be operated. Wind Energy System Rotor Diameter The cross sectional dimension of the circle swept by the rotating blades. Wind Energy System (small) Means a single -towered wind energy system that: A. Is used to generate electricity B. Has a rated nameplate capacity of 50 kilowatts or less; and C. Has a total height of 150 feet or less. Wind Energy System Total Height The vertical distance from ground level to the tip of a wind generator vane or blade when the tip is at its highest point. Wind Generator Blades and associated mechanical and electrical conversion components mounted on top of the tower. Wind Tower The monopole, freestanding, or guyed structure that supports a wind generator. %L2, � '�J" - tradition....... r 0 0 .4 It can be said that the winds in Carroll County are withstanding the test of time ... and are the first In Maryland to do so, at least from a regulation standpoint. More than two years ago, the Maryland Department of Energy Introduced a grant for measuring wind speed. According to Gabe Zepp, agriculture industry specialist in Carroll County's Office of Economic Development, there was Interest In the county for small wind energy, looking at it as an alternative to generating electricity via wind turbines. But getting permits to erect wind turbines was illegal and still is in many The winds of change began to blow, however, and Carroll County is the first county in the state to test their permitting ordinance to county government and win approval. Now, more than 20 wind turbines dot the countryside in this central Maryland county. Through the efforts of many, Including Michael Maring, bureau chief of the county's permitting office and head of inspections, it has been a "painless process ever since," as long as all the necessary requirements are met. Mr. Zepp said the initial obstacle in erecting wind turbines was due to the height restrictions, as well as meeting code with setbacks in residential settings. "Property owners who had an interest in the turbines kept calling Carroll County government officials," Mr. Zepp said. "And the officials kept looking at being reasonable .. trying to figure a way to tell land owners what they can and can't do with -their land," 26 tradition....... ,5: .iLf'\ -dye That s when Carroll pbnty governme o ked tcj becornj more proacb} e <b Ith vanous'OePartmentis #o get the prq ess rol r c } Mr Manng aai'WEt the over 20 PP 0c7 turbi alread m lace.throu s at rt § a count that ftuiiiJ8j j4Kely to rise es5ially asl ao le Took to offset ih< !.COSTS y� E R36,Yi..ty-,Ft�s• i� 4 ps i --f Mr Zepp agfeSekaffd nptttfst tor single home d elin lgs but ag fell 17 lions restaurai}ts �hnusinesses. V'e seeingWore i ��ines all the tir wind turbine per hndtir{stahatior processes as horn pyvners agncu f ers and bush Ve{s look to redue their use of elects (ty on the grid "r feducg costs Fl7es� 3 /i One suoh Pis ntw$n y l e in aYlahon to place jl!err6 Valley FE 2�rlge Rok dy{t�Jt out Sr 7) j ear Mot, Ylry Mr �vlarJrgg sa the twoturbin horse7a(m dre Ff 50 feet tall the fria4ptim heighpptttia lo?able' The average s energy turbines are' et g}t 5 to $ feet tallr4,ffd e$Etaura is like Brick ft located along �D Rque27 arel3Jt o geth {g n oo'renewgble energy sa s a µY Fd PAfd7S eevY'r�F e.ki.z , M I�`�:7T #} b� Ge .Sold Banneftome Soutions band ut%f Mo�f Airy Is c Y le ePqt3 nd turbine f stalfations agii Imprown oVrail ho a and busme: efh Irn��fac( fher8r�hsouch mteresffr"m the Co'tys agncultUr, rgy puj ,Yr ''tt yy my a 1 Flatrye ¢nee a le anergy squlces tha1 Ar Zepp. ietcently had co} rt} U'x ofR1Wv#1;3d �k Y�Y ti x ! rl r-i9s i y., reP a. ves sp8a1 i n� of the g�tnty s a rlb �g Hess events .�rtS 'P >fiY, ii-v^ni tTCRi r '�t,2 I a 3 n. y„ ;, 1Fy�rmfs,a�re,'�`itk �atl�',pge e se'AYey,aojrfereted to#tie #echnology t rtlds [ha1'f er{y,av, ''tb 1hil J t�f,O ,a A see =its cost a (ec�ve' Mr Zepp added ''Re e}gy cy@G n�s { i �t`es e+msta1lcd forTdential 1e`s �$e farm use o et 1,'k�i t pp �i 'h< i' se, {pe pt8iare sill' �Iges �g he ier�or not it s iyorth the $ I 000 to`r$25 op a ChVD/([1B`fthV s fllent'': i Erj :"j } 1� Esc((, xi,+ .3 , �, rk p {.FY'"—, siP {a 3 , n lY f ..i"f� 4i�1ti •+ i t e Jl ab 4 �t4- {? Q ne Pressimore ;alte na, �e ener ti¢pe ihltat With Bpone Ho e Sotufii G� f f 3 W N1 l�4 yy 'al}r�• p S 's ttf `E 4£ r a ,: 1 t ,? c mpagy A ne;`h1m elf J se htbcarlhas apstalfed two tvmd turbines P M,, gll ouhtylpfoR t a �ee Flitfs y?ttthwhile mvestmenl : e„ra,7rt � �. e -.s s A{tlhe tln{ a�rrbls otlq vas tooktpcfJn`#R:the perrriittmgrocess F�ere rule hat sate o co ld p Windrtuabines ) , the county, Mr. PressimorE y dde�t hat hl oss Went ( rough all of the Initial steps he neeried to see if the t+ys'ir�,�,'�µ:tV a wou1 e e sjbl I f l7i{spe ojf I situatJpn, first going through the area s poee o ge(he wE; d fnetenng stu4�o),e ;TherbeaU,t of wtrfd tu�jnes issthat you can put them up anywhere . and iifference in the' electric bill. ' �o realize is that wind turbines or any other alternative ncity use from power companies ... and the reason Eecause people have to change their ways of life," solar panels on my house. We burn compact fires but my home is still not 100 percent non-:. trtcal use r 'ecar s turbines during a.bike ride last ..year .:"I'm -, son myself, so naturally I had an Interest in the. ark. 5 turbines. I rolled my bike up Joe's driveway one day to see what the turbines were all about and the rest has been history as he (Mr. Pressimore) is now a consultant for Banner Home ra •' Solutions, though his specialty is in solar re< .i panels," he explained. fuc Mr. Pressimore is quick to point out and > that wind turbines are not to be confused '`. with windmills that once dominated many i : farm settings across the country. "Windmills were and are used to pump 1 water, where as wind turbines are strictly for generating electricity ... no connec- tion between windmills and wind tur- bines. es "In Maryland there is a certain y , amount of wind," he explained. "It's not a E j' ' perfectwind state for turbines, except for on Maryland's Eastern Shore ... but 8 fit miles per hour (mph) winds are needed," St 4 r' he said. "The key is to place them at high iw..;.` points with no obstructions around them 1R1 in at least a 300 foot diameter. Place- ment is important ... and even with that Ear} you never place two turbines together T Pa because they would act as obstructions h tl 0V to each other." zY Tr Wind turbines generally range from rr 30- to 70 -foot towers, though Banner Home Solutions mainly installs 50 ' footers to make the structure cost more '4) feasible. The towers are made of ' - galvanized steel with no wire and they have three blades. �. • Since Carroll County's green light, Banner Home Solutions has installed more than a dozen of the gigantic power generating systems. "There's power in the wind and that iZD can do the work for us," Mr. Pressimore tj said. z ri 27 N H f°!N pug i LA)lt N* w 1 +�, bra r� �t � I �. ____ I V __ _ _ k - + ____ lad` h A 1T1 - , ULtE_ 2 -z x.12 �l)1 1r, -L\- ` -r _ ItO '4] 1 ti P p1 ppy e�� ��Y ; --� C Zb_ { I1 II 44i?#aP.�r''`A�i1= '✓� �''",, -" 'I� �II?�t\li��ch(. �`1y r _ —_. T ILIA o _. _ _ t� F H r � Y to DNG, -i n Lf% f 5��I?nl n �.I TITLE: RESIDENTIAL PLAN SER VICE ��..-_ _. \I SCALE - '-'7 L -M 4 --/2 5 del DRAWN BY: LLL III \J/LiSL DATE: n7 7 }� _ y d� NOTE: EV RY A TEMPT HAS BEEN MADE IN THE PREPARATION DRAWING NUMBEROF THESE PLANS FOR ACCURACY OF S AND PRAFTINGHHE C DESIGN. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR OWNER MUST BARRY E. NYE 1324 wOoODLAND WAY VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, BUILDING CODES, OR ANY SHEET 301-766-9200 HAGERSTOWN, MD21742 STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE k/j ©G JOB AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. !. T 1 -- (_VN(-' 1 V II r3. � 200 - oo9c ---......_,... _ TITLE " �P. �� � j - RESl1)ENTlAL PLAN SERVICE �..� .. -. DRAWN BY: DATE: Z 1 r, q GL�C • K NOTE: EV RY TEMPT HAS BEEN MADE IN THE PREPARATION DRAWING NUMI Dp e CIA' SGOF THESE PLANS FOR ACCURACY OF DIMENSIONS AND AfN M1_ DESIGN. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, BUILDING CODES, OR ANY SHEET aax x9200 QERSTO1344 WN,MD WAY STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE uz•;s5-v?co HAcRsrowN MD 21742 JOB AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. 28'-0r .o I I I I I NOTCH STEM WALL • I m e6' FOR DOOR I ° I LeEXCAVATED I. e I 4' x RAVEL BAV SE W/ I I 6k8' -2.9x2.9 W.WF. I I H TOP OF STEM WALL I O'-0' ELEVATION I I o ANCHOR BOLT LOCATION I I e I I •o I It Q I I e I P I I ° 1W (TYPICAL) FOR I o I ANCHOR BOLT SETBACK I 4 I I o I Q P I I oI Nr • I SOLID LINE SHOWS EDGE OF I. FOUNDATION WALL -DASHED LPE I - SHOWS EDE OF FOOTING. II I MOST MT. ONLY) I 4 I TOP OF COMCAETF S AR I FROST CO STRUCTION 0'-0' I. I I I . 4 o I NO-fROST COSTRUCTI0N 0'=4' I o I I i 4 I L- - - - - - - - - - - - r -J--- - - - - - - - - - J NOTCH STEMI WALL 8' FOR GARAGE DOOR --- WBOVE) 12 8. 3'-4 •9'-0' 3'-4' 9'-0' 63' 4' ll�OUIIVDfr.1 l7 D Lr.1UV SCALE: 1/4%1'-0' (FROST CONSTRUCTION SHOWN) 1i�OO� 1i LT��L=.1UV SCALE: 1/4'-1'-O' d I'1 784 SQUARE FEET _GTE: GREAT CARE AND EFFORT HAVE GONE INTO THE CREATION OF THE DESIGN AND ENGIN€ERING OF THESE PLAN AND BLUEPRINTS HOWEVER. BECAUSE OF THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF PROVIDING ANY PERSONAL AND/OR 'ON-TRE-SITE' CONSULTATION. SUPERVISION. AM) CONTROL OVER THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION, AND BECAUSE OF THE GEAT VARIANCE IN LOCAL BUILDING CODE REOUIRR3v84TS AND OTHER LOCAL BUILDING AND WEATI-ER CONDITIONS, 84 LUMBER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING STRUCTLRAL FAILURES DUE TO ANY DEFICIENCIES, OxMISSIONS. OR EWO%S IN THE DESIGN OR BLUEPRINTS. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU CONSULT A LOCAL ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF YOUR CHOICE. AND CHECK WITH YOUR LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIALS. PRIOR TO TIE START OF ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. NK7990Oa RL[oMQTOUNR _....=.... _� U NO -FROST —au " u v CONS FROST CONSTRUCTION FQODVT PLL� V Q 11 D9dIV VINYL SIDING NO-FRI CONS. ------------------- ------- FROST CONSTRUCTION 15x4' TRIM SCALE' V8''1' —O' F -99U T 1 IE MLl400fn1 VINYL SIDING SCALE: 1/8'-1'-0' 15x6' BOAR it -WI :dr 45(8' G;0( SIDING CONS. r-------------------—--------� ------------------- ---- FROST CONSTRUCTION U"'Rr—t1011Vy C = EVTIIOH (45(8' GROOVED SIDING SHOWN) SCALE: V8' -l'-0' U9 19 AE ELSE V li--�) U 0O Y V 45(8' GROOVED SIDING VINYL SIDING HARDBOARD SIDING SHINGLES m 15B' RAKE 30AFO W/ALLMINU.M =ASCIA VINYL CORNER TRIM 15(4' TRIM STARTER STRIP 1ASHING )i GABLE TRIM EXTERIOR SIDING (SEE FRONT ELEVATION FOR SPECIFIC SIDING APPLICATION NOTES) SCALE: V8' -T -O EXTERIOR SIDING (SEE FRONT ELEVATION FOR SPECIFIC SIDING APPLICATION NOTES) j---------------------------1 1UIJU'ff L 0A V QW0ODV 4'x8' GROOVED SIDING SCALE: V8%1'-0' VINYL SIDING HAFCOOARD SIDING SHINGLES fl EXTERIOR SIDING (SEE FRONT ELEVATION Ili 3032 FOR SPECIFIC SIDING APPLICATION MOTES) IBC FT C L EWA70OH 4k8' GROOVED SIDING VINYL SIDING HARDBOARD SIDING SCALE: VB"P-O' _0