Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080806WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 301-791-3065 TDD/Hearing Impaired: 301-791-3070 FAX:301-791-3017 AGENDA HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM 1A & B WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET August 6, 2008 7:00PM M A. Call to Order B. Roll Call Minutes — July 2, 2008 C. Communications & Bills 1. SHA — Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction I 68 Sideling Hill Interpretive Center D. Unfinished Business ✓1. Permit #2008-01556, 18518 Shepherdstown Pike, new construction in the AO -1 zone (revised drawings) * f2. PC -08-005 — Preliminary consultation summary Hagerstown Towne Center • 3. Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove house at Hagerstown Regional Airport — MHT correspondence E. Budget F. New Business ✓a. Permit # 2008-03609, 25437 Highfield Road, open deck addition in Highfield Rural Village 2. Permit # 2008-03675, 3768 Harper's Ferry Road, detached open carport in Antietam Village Rural Village ✓3. AP2008-037, Proposed Cell Tower Pen Mar Road, former Ft. Ritchie site 4. RZ-08-003, 10914 Dam 5 Road, proposed Historic Preservation Overlay(HP) 5. Potential Cell Tower — 9004 Old National Pike 6. Potential Cell Tower —16411 Fairview Road G. Other Business H. Executive Session I. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\aAUG08.DOC NOTICE IS GIVEN THATTHE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MAY MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANTTO SECTION 10.508, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT TEE WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CONTACT PERMITS DEPARTMENT AT (301) 791-3065 VOICEnDD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. RECYCLED PAPER Martin O'Malley, Governor Anthony G. Brown, Li. Governor John D. Porcari, Secretary Neil J. Pedersen, Adnrmist rotor Maryland Department of Trans'12, 21UU8 Re: Project No. AT743A21 IS 070 Eisenhower Memorial Highway Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction Washington County, Maryland USGS Funkstown and Myersville 7.5' Quadrangles Mr. J. Rodney Little State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 Dear Mr. Little: Introduction and Project Description This letter serves to inform the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) of the Maryland State Highway Administration's (SHA) finding that proposed Project No. AT743A21 will have no adverse effect on historic properties. The project involves Red Line revisions to the previously coordinated drainage improvement project along I-70 in Washington County. The proposed Red Line work consists of moving a fence from the existing location to the SHA right-of-way line. New fence posts will be installed. All work will be within the SHA right-of-way. These change are outside of the APE previously coordinated with MHT in a letter dated January 23, 2006. Project plans showing the red -line revisions are included as Attachment 1. Funding: Federal funds are anticipated for this project. Area of Potential Effects In determining the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the Red Line revisions, SHA considered possible physical, visual, atmospheric, and audible impacts to historic properties. The APE is defined as the area of direct construction impacts, as well as the immediately adjacent property, as indicated on the attached SHA quadrangle map for Funkstown and Myersville (Attachment 2). For archeology, the archeology survey area is defined as the limits of construction where ground disturbance would occur. My telephone number/toll-free number is Maryland Retail Service for Impaired Hearing or Speech: 1.800.735.2258 Statewide Toll Free Street Address: 707 North Calvert Street - Baltimore, Maryland 21202 - Phone: 410.545.0300 - www.marylandroads.com Mr. J. Rodney Little I-70 Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction Page 2 Identification Methods and Results Potentially significant architectural and archeological resources were both researched as part of the historic investigation instigated by the proposed highway improvement project. Architecture: SHA Architectural Historian Rebecca Crew consulted previous architectural investigations, inventory forms, the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database, aerial photography, tax maps, and digital video footage and conducted a field visit on June 4, 2008. The APE includes the Krotzer Home Farm (MIHP No. WA -II -0193) at 21228 Black Rock Road. The Washington County Historical Sites Survey documented the approximately 155 -acre property in 1978. The property contains a two -and -one -half -story stone house, stone spring house, a frame bank barn, and related domestic and agricultural outbuildings centered in a group surrounded by agricultural fields. A Determination of Eligibility (DOE) form for the Krotzer Home Farm is included as Attachment 3. SHA has determined the property to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C (architecture) as an example of German vernacular housing important to this region of Maryland that exhibits some elements of English acculturation. In addition, the arrangement of the original faun buildings on the landscape illustrates the requirements of subsistence farming, while the addition later buildings illustrate the shifts towards specialization that has allowed the continual use of the farmstead from the early nineteenth century to the present day. Research has not shown the farmstead to be associated with events (Criterion A) or persons (Criterion B) significant in American history, and the property has not been evaluated under Criterion D. While the farm retains integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, the setting has been significantly impacted by the construction of Interstate 70. The strengths of the other aspects of integrity overcome the visual, audible, and atmospheric impacts to the setting of Interstate 70. The proposed Red Line revisions include the change in location of a new six-foot galvanized chain link fence from approximately ten feet from the riprap ditch to one foot within the SHA right-of-way line. The original plans included the coordination of the removal of an existing farm fence with the adjacent property owner, and the Red Line revisions specify that the removal of the existing farm fence will be completed by others. The original plans also include the demolition of a contemporary aluminum and frame shed located in the existing SHA right-of- way. The contemporary shed does not contribute to the historic setting of the Krotzer Home Farm. The construction of the new six-foot galvanized chain link fence will alter the visual appearance of the agricultural fields associated with the Krotzer Home Farm. The fence will be over 150 feet from the nearest structure and separated by Black Rock Run, a utility line, and an existing wire and wood post farm fence. Therefore, the visibility of the fence from the structures will be minimal. The new fence will not be out of character with the existing interstate corridor that dominates the southwestern viewshed of the property, and its construction will not adversely impact the characteristics by which the Krotzer Home Farm is eligible for the NRHP. As a result, SHA has determined that the proposed Red Line revisions to SHA Project No. AT743A21 will have no adverse impacts to the Krotzer Home Farm. Condition photographs are included as Attachment 4. Mr. J. Rodney Little I-70 Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction Page 3 No other significant historic standing structures are located within the APE. SHA concludes that the project will have no adverse impacts on historic standing structures. Archeology: SHA Archeologist April Fehr assessed the archeological potential of the archeology survey area based on review of the SHA-GIS Cultural Resources Database, historic maps, as - built plans for I-70, aerial maps, and site file data. A field visit was made to the project location in January 2006. The proposed fence replacement is adjacent to the Krotzer Home Farm (MIHP No. WA -I1-193), a late eighteenth or early nineteenth century German farm complex. The historic standing structures are outside of the archeology survey area, which is confined to SHA right-of-way for I-70. This portion of SHA right-of-way was subject to extensive disturbance during construction of I-70 and the I-70 bridges over Black Rock Road, including re -channeling of Black Rock Run and relocation of Black Rock Road. It is unlikely that significant archeological resources will be impacted by this minor project and no additional investigation is recommended. Review Request Please examine the attached plans, map, Determination of Eligibility Form, Condition Photographs, and Eligibility/Effects Table (Attachment 5). Because the drainage improvement project is currently under construction, we request an expedited review of the Red Line revisions if possible. At your earliest convenience, we request your concurrence that there would be no adverse effects on historic properties by the Red Line Changes along Interstate 70 (Eisenhower Memorial Highway) at the Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction. By carbon copy, we are informing the Washington County Historic District Commission and the Washington County Historical Trust of this minor change to the project and we encourage them to provide any comments and concerns as soon as feasible. Pursuant to the requirements of the implementing regulations in 36 CFR Part 800, SHA seeks their assistance in identifying historic preservation issues related to this project (see 36 CFR §§800.2 (c)(4) and (6), and 800.3 (1) for information on consulting parties, and §800.4 and §800.5 for identification of historic properties and assessment of effects). For additional information regarding the Section 106 regulations, see the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's website, www.achp.gov, or contact the Maryland State Highway Administration or the Maryland Historical Trust. Please contact Ms. Rebecca Crew at (410) 545-2899 (or via email at rcrew2@sha.state.md.us) with questions regarding standing structures for this project. Ms. April Fehr maybe reached at 410-545-8848 (or via email at afehr@sha.state.md.us) with concerns regarding archeology. Very truly yours, Bruce M. Grey Deputy Director Office of Planning and Preliminary Engineering Mr. J. Rodney Little I-70 Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction Page 4 by: Julie M. Schablitsky Assistant Division Chief Project Planning Division Attachments: 1) Project Plans 2) Area of Potential Effects Map 3) Determination of Eligibility Form 4) Condition Photographs 5) Eligibility/Effects Table cc: Ms. Lauren Bowman, SHA-PPD Ms. Rebecca Crew, SHA-PPD (w/Attachments 2 and 5) Ms. April Fehr, SHA-PPD (w/Attachments 2 and 5) Mr. Wayne Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission (w/Attachments) Dr. John Krowka, Washington County Historical Trust (w/Attachments) Dr. Julie M. Schablitsky, SHA-PPD Ms. Polly Solliday, SHA-OHD JUN 2008 Concurrence with the MD State Highway Administration's Determination(s) of Eligibility and/or Effects Project Number: AT743A21 MHT Log No. Project Name: IS 070 Eisenhower Memorial Highway Beaver Creek Thermal Impact Reduction County: Washington County, MD Letter Date: June 12, 2008 The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the documentation attached to the referenced letter and concurs with the MD State Highway Administration's determinations as follows: Eligibility (as noted in the Eligibility Table [Attachment 5]): [ ] Concur [ ] Do Not Concur Effect (as noted in the Effects Table [Attachment 5]): [ ] No Properties Affected [] No Adverse Effect [ ] Conditioned upon the following action(s) (see comments below) [] Adverse Effect Agreement with FHWA's Section 4(t) criteria of temporary use (as detailed in the referenced letter, if applicable): [ J Agree Comments: By: MD State Historic Preservation Office/ Maryland Historical Trust Date Return by U.S. Mail or Facsimile to: Dr. Julie Schablitsky, Assistant Division Chief, Project Planning Division, MD State Highway Administration, P.O. Box 717, Baltimore, MD 21203-0717 Telephone: 410-545-8870 and Facsimile: 410-209-5046 r o, S. L N O Y () 4) N - m ova 2io c ®t w O N Ct 0. CL N Q a 'U rn 0 0 0 f'I O.(11.�i� e vrr `t left. upper Krotzer Home Farm house is visible in the background. The proposed fence will be built beyond the location of the shed. cc / \ 2 7 \ U \ \ / Cl § \ / - .. E a Ra Pt 5 5 2( /{/[ fj &S Cl /\{ s C 2/ Co{ $g: )$ ct) . \ Cl a -o ) k \ » ) \\\ a) C M a> u1 tU T UI ® a� S. C p 0 w Co (6 0 ( O n Q{ 'X t� �fi j51,Yy4""Y ...fE .71's �4-i>t r'₹' V3. 4i3{.. X Ctz ` 'v y, a° (✓' � w.�.-tie/ 7--- U F9 Q' GNrp� �i U x* s N y w t_. � Q 8 x ara iS x (I) J � pa4 'M wGg ��.srO �y� 1:t f°� 3�v-'�`m �I U�"F�'S '°i / f`�ktie� Pi.o (P4¢i�`r-. q'� p ,rE '&r . w� r "a .}� .r mou Pa 9 � rota W O cw.Pcx. P u 'O C'b. Q N NlJ' �8 �a 00 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM Property Name: Krotzer Home Farm Inventory Number: NR Eligible: yes no__..... WA -II -0193 Address: 21228 Black Rock Road Historic district: yes X no City: Hagerstown Zip Code: 21740 County: Washington USGS Quadrangle(s): Funkstown, Myersville Property Owner: Trustees of the Alfred C. Papa Testamentary Trust, c/o Carol Tax Account ID Number: 2216008060 Tax Map Parcel Number(s): 278 and 36 Tax Map Number: 59 and 64 Project: IS 070 Eisenhower Memorial Highway Beaver Creek Thermal I Agency: MD State Highway Administration Agency Prepared By: MD State Highway Adminstration Preparer's Name: Rebecca Crew Date Prepared: 06/04/2008 Documentation is presented in: MIHP form WA -II -0 193, Krotzer Home Farm Williams, Thomas J.C. "A History of Washington County, Maryland: From the earliest settlements to the present time." 1906. Reprint Baltimore, MD: Clearfield Company, Inc.,.. 1992.__ Preparer's Eligibility Recommendation: X Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B X C D Considerations: A B C D E F G Complete if the property is a contributing or non-contributing resource to a NR district/property: Name of the District/Property: Inventory Number: Eligible: yes Listed: yes Site visit by MHT Staff yes X no Name: Date: Description of Property and Justification: (Please attach map and photo) The Krotzer Home Farm is an approximately 155 -acre property adjacent to Interstate 70 with an exceptional collection of domestic and agricultural structures centered north of Black Rock Run, west of the interstate, and east of the intersection of Black Rock Road and Meadow Rock Road. Dating from the early nineteenth century, it is located in the Beaver Creek community of Washington County along with several other limestone houses from the same period, and the property includes a cemetery with German inscriptions. The Washington County Historical Sites Survey documented the property in 1978. The property has changed little since that date, and additional history and description of the property can be found in the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties form, WA -II - 0193. The property remains in the Papa family who acquired it in 1957. The historic boundary is established on the accompanying map as two parcels owned by the Trustees of the Alfred C. Papa Testamentary Trust. This includes the 131 acres of Map 64, Parcel 36 and the 41.2 acres of Map 59, Parcel 278, all located north and east of Interstate 70 between Mapleville Road and Ridenour Road. It does not include two parcels (1.03 and 1,85 acres in size) along Ridenour Road subdivided from Map 64, Parcel 36 that were deeded in 1999 and 2002 to Christopher Papa and Carol Ann and Robert L. Elliott, respectively, because new MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B C D Considerations: A B C .-- D E F _,.G MHT Comments: Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Date Reviewer, National Register Program Date NR -ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM WA -II -0193 Krotzer Home Farm Page 2 houses have been constructed on these properties. The farm complex consists of the two -and -one -half -story stone house; two-story stone spring house; frame and stone bank barn, frame smoke house, shed, and chicken house, and concrete masonry unit (CMU) garage. The two-story spring house is set on a hillside north of a small race of Black Rock Run. An approximately two -foot deep rectangular pool framed with a stone wall extends to the south and east of the spring house. An approximately four -foot tall stone retaining wall runs east from the spring house to the main house, which is also set in the hillside. The main branch of Black Rock Run flows west through the property, just south of the smoke house, which is situated southeast of the spring house and southwest of the main house. The garage is located to the northeast of the main house. The driveway, leading north from Black Rock Road and crossing over Black Rock Run, turns to the east past the garage and leads up the hill to the bank barn and chicken house. A frame shed is set diagonally on the hillside to the northwest of the springhouse, midway up the hill towards the bank barn. The two-story, two -bay, gable -roofed, limestone spring house has a standing seam metal roof and brick stove chimney on the north side. The wide open doorway at the south side provides a view into the interior of the first level; an interior stone wall at the northeast corner creates a five -sided room. No date is visible on the date tablet referenced in the original MIHP form, but it is probable that the spring house also dates to the early nineteenth century and possibly predates the existing house. Windows in the attic level of the east and west gables have arched openings. The two -and -one -half -story, four -bay, gable -roof limestone house has four entrances: two on the north side in the middle two bays; one on the south side basement level in the second bay from the west; and one on the south side first floor in the second bay from the east. The south, two level porch has a shed roof and is supported by frame posts extending from a concrete pad. The north single level porch also has a shed roof, frame posts, and a concrete pad foundation, Interior gable end brick chimneys are at the east and west sides of the house. The windows on the two main levels are nine -over -six double -hung wood sash. The basement level windows include three six -over -six sash, one three -over -three sash, and one small fixed square, mostly occupied by a dryer vent. The east gable end attic window is four -over -four sash, and the west gable end attic window is one -over -one sash. The frame gable -roofed smoke house is one -and -one-half stories tall, two bays wide, and clad in German siding; it has a massive stone chimney at the south end with a brick flue resting on top. It has board and batten doors and wooded sash on the north and south sides, and a small square window in the gable end of the west side, flanking the chimney. The cantilevered roof, covered in standing seam metal, extends significantly beyond the north and south walls of the smoke house. A one-story addition to the north end is brick, covered in plaster. It has a door on the north side. In the gable of the east end of the addition are five rectangular openings that form a vent. The flame shed to the west of the spring house is has a gable roof covered in standing seam metal roof and is clad in vertical wood siding. A stone wall west runs from the west side of the shed, and metal gate creates a fence between the shed and the spring house. The bank barn, located at the top of the hill, has a gable roof clad in standing seam metal. The barn walls are clad in vertical wood siding. The foundation is stone, and painted concrete masonry unit walls have enclosed three-quarters of the the original cantilevered opening on the south side of the barn. A single -story gable -roofed addition has been added to the east gable end, and a single -story gable -roofed addition has been added to the west gable end. A seven -bay frame chicken house is located to the northeast of the bank barn, northwest of the spring house. It has German siding and a low-pitched saltbox roof The chicken house represents the most recent agricultural building on the property. . 11TAY it i,.rnteA the northeast of the house, has a gable roof the ridge of which runs north -south, MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B -_. C D Considerations: MIFF Comments: Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services A B C D E F G Date .._....-..... Reviewer, National Register Program Date NR -ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM WA -II -0193 Krotzer Home Farm Page 3 and two vehicle bays on its west side. The south facade has a four -light fixed metal window on the main level and a nine -light fixed wood window in the gable end. The attic level is clad with asbestos siding. The garage is built into a slight slope, and limestone has been used for retaining walls against the driveway and the garage. As stated above, the changes since 1978 are minimal, limited to changes in roof material and fencing. Asphalt shingles replace the sheet metal as cladding for the roof of the house. The other structures retain standing seam metal roofs. The cross rail fence forming the south boundary of the yard has been removed. The cross rail fence running along the top of the retaining wall between the house and the spring house has been replaced with an open rail fence. Statement of Significance The Krotzer Home Farm retains a high level of integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The c. 1966 construction of Interstate 70 significantly impacted the setting of the farm through direct effects of loss of property, as well as indirect visual, audible, and atmospheric effects. However, the strengths of the remaining elements of integrity counteract the negative impacts to the setting caused by Interstate 70. The Krotzer Home Farm is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion C as an example of German vernacular housing important to this region of Maryland that exhibits some elements of English acculturation. In addition, the arrangement of the original farm buildings on the landscape illustrates the requirements of subsistence farming, while the addition later buildings illustrate the shifts towards specialization that has allowed the continued use of the farmstead from the early nineteenth century to the present day. Early German Americans built houses with significant storage areas; the construction into the hillside next to a spring allowed the first level to stay cool for storage. Houses of four bays in width are also typicap of early Gentian American vernacular building, often resulting in symmetry in the placement of the front door, as in the south side of the Krotzer house. The transom above this door seems to indicate the importance of this entrance above any other, but it is possible that the transom was a later alteration. The four -bay German style also often exhibits two front doors, as the Krotzer house exhibits on the north side. Other houses in central and Western Maryland with documented German associations are built into hillsides and oriented so that the front is on the uphill side. The ambiguity of the orientation of the house reacts against the clear orientation and symmetry of the Georgian houses built by those of English origins. The windows of the house, while mostly nine -over -six in Federal style, are not symmetrical, especially on the gable ends of the house; a window on the north side of the house relects the placement of a stair landing, halfway between stories and failing to line up with other openings. English houses of the time would not have had such an opening on the front of the house. The attic level windows and their placement directly below brick chimneys in running bond suggest that the chimneys were added later in attempt to add some symmetry to the house. With its asymmetrical window arrangements and door placements, in combination with symmetrical fireplaces and a front door with a transom light, the house exhibits the influence of English building traditions and fashion, as the Pennsylvania Germans became acculturated (1). Being laid in limestone, the Krotzer house, springhouse, batik barn foundation, and various stone retaining walls exhibit skilled masonry workmanship that is rarely found today. The fieldstone is native, and properties like the Krotzer Home Farm create a sense of the Cumberland Valley built heritage, as the early German settlers from Pennsylvania used the materials available to carve out farmsteads and establish permanent homes that reflected their success in farming. The arrangement of the house and outbuildings responds to natural topographic features, as the best fields were left for cultivation, while the rocky hillside was utilized for locating buildings. As time passed, newer barns and other structures were built farther from the main house, first signifying the specification of domestic and agricultural spaces and then signifying the specialization of agricultural practice, as shown by the twentieth-century chicken house and the rehabilitation of the bank barn to incorporate additional space for chickens. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B C D Considerations: A B -_.-C ..._D E F G MHT Comments: Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Date Reviewer, National Register Program Date NR -ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM WA -I1-0193 Krotzer Home Farm Page 4 The property is not associated with the lives of persons significant in our past that would qualify it as eligible for listing under Criterion B, Research has not found the property to be representative of the significant contributions and accomplishments of specific individuals that have played a significant role within a defined area of American history. The farm's original owners are unknown, but its earliest known owners are the Krotzer family, also known as the Kratzer or Kretzer family. In 1872, George Funk acquired the property. Funk is a common surname in Washington County, and according to "A History of Washington County, Maryland," George C, Funk owned four farms in the Beaver Creek area, and the year after he purchased this farm from , his son William E. Funk and his newly wed wife Catharine Virginia Funk began their housekeeping at "the old Kratzer place." William and Catharine purchased the farm from his father in 1880, although they only continued to live there until 1887 upon the death of George Funk when they moved to the house (also on Black Rock Road) where George had lived. (2) The Funk and the Krotzer families were both members of the Beaver Creek Christian Church. (3) This information fails to establish the property with lives of significant persons. Research has not indicated that the property is associated with events that have made significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; thus it is not eligible for listing under Criterion A. The property has not been evaluated under Criterion D. (1) Ed Chapell, "Acculturation in the Shenandoah Valley: Rhenish Houses of the Massanutten Settlement," in Dell Upton and John Michael Vlach, eds., Common Places: Readings in American Vernacular Architecture, (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1986) pp. 27-56. (2) Thomas J.C. Williams, "A History of Washington County, Maryland: From the earliest settlements to the present time." (1906, Reprint Baltimore: Clearfield Company, Inc., 1992) p. 996. (3) Williams, p. 472. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A B C D Considerations: A B C D E _._. F G MHT Comments: Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Date Reviewer, National Register Program Date -r Photos of Krotzer Home Farm (WA -II -0193), taken June 4, 2008. Black and white photographs are being developed and will be submitted when available. View facing north towards shed and bank barn. The spring house and chicken house are located in the right side of the image. !C � ' E ...,, CD UI C. 00 CD N '.4 T1 F\)7 O II O fD _ O m 3 CD O- O T (D 0 v En ≤ O ^C Q C �' D p o m a w WASHINGTON COUNTY��, BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2008-01556 Applied: 03/27/2008 Project No: P2008-0289 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B4 District/Acct No: 19004236 Job Address: 18518 SHEPHERDSTOWN PIKE KE Location: 18518 SHEPHERSTOWN PIKE Parcel No: 076-10-0170-00000 Zoning Dist: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Floodplain: A Applicant: KEFAUVER LEWIS M 18518 SHEPHERDSTOWN PIKE KEEDYSVILLE, MD 2 Z 21756 Phone Number: 301-432-2262 Owner: KEFAUVER LEWIS M Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Description: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 15X19 ONE STORY ADDITION AND CHIMNEY AND REPLACE WITH A 15X19 570 SQ FT TWO STORY ADDITION ON SAME FOOTPRINT. REPLACE AND ENCLOSE EXISTING COVERED PORCH FRAME CONSTRUCTION PREENGINEERED TRUSSES ON CRAWL SPACE FOR ADDITION AND SLAB FOR PORCH REPLACEMENT. I \ 111 Foundation Size: 15X19 Type of Heat...: HEAT Public Sewer...: N Public Water...: N Gas............: N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $50,000.00 Code Enforced: 2006 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed .40 ACRES .40 ACRES 37.5 0 0 0 130 VINYL Y EXISTING NEW EXISTING NEW A/R No. Of Bathrooms: 2 No. of Bedrooms: 0 Minimum Required 37.5 50 15 15 100 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 u /� _ aISMs°ier ETAM W1ThitttLt :FIELD Bridge 4 U W WW 4dvenlis C. 2 / Y ....� QO N . a F * 3 90 19a0Y Si i / Fi{4 1 NF Ff �q lP� QtpP1Ns nIs 9ELL Yin Iy a / R� Hick Bride O� 1 t alrvi O O N) �F NC 9 i kfFOYSUp a O FaflMS� ¢ onic a le e y - �A '� /- ��J O� td Me �1 845 e oMt fl0 1 x3�P be @ BC r c Wq N t Hekron o PUMFBSv 1 �4 C 4\2 00� o / a6 v OoGSTr p) a i9 � N P t as PI? 1860) o w os 18b(P POWEOSTOWN b E so S^ _ !t� 8 �Nq MCC ellans ® Look ut 21800^ ,y S I1 E IFl G H J K Joins Map 34 600,000 FT 1]'42'30 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 WA -1I-324 District 19 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Rap 76 Parcel 170 . » MACI # 2208865904 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY fl NAME 1 ,/,V d /fl /VY kX Q.7tY/4r!A( INSTOAIC ANDIOR COMMON � Toll Rouse, Porterstown ILOCATION SWEETS HUMAEA Route 34 CATEUOMV OWNERSHIP STATUS PAESENT USE _OISYIIICI _EV@LIC Xoccu,r(0 _AORICOLTUPR .a MUSWM. ivsUIWINITISI LP11IVATE _UNOCCUPIED —COMMEPCIAt. .PAPA _STRUCNRE _HOtI —WORK IN PROGRESS —EOCATIONAI X "'AwAr Ry$IFSI -._4NE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT _RELI61dVs _.REJECT _IN PROCESS —YES. REs'RICEEo _Od4EANNENE ,_SCIENInIC III INO caN91iilI 4, _YES. UNRESTPICTED _. INOUS,RIAI _TRANSPORTATION y q Y} —MIUTARY _OTHER. DOWNER OF PROPERTY NANE JQBeph H, Rahrerleley�houe 6; Siig4Y6NUMSEP __..` .-�_•.. Route 0 L f burw L x iuIv ur i.cvn W uaaa,nu Aav(v Liber N T 443 i COUPIROUSE ?olio N $ 691 REGISTRY OE UEtUtETC. Washington County Court House STREET S NUMBER West Washington Street OTY. TOWN STAB TION IN EXISTING StiR IOU I*DEPAL > STATE _COUNTY —LOOM DEPOSITORY EQR w �, wnyiy AEcoADS http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm 04/30/2008 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 VJA -It `3 ay 0 DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE x4AULuNT .-AETERIORATED .,.ANALnp4P Y-OAIONULSITE -000D _RUINS AALTEAEO -4 50`7.. -MOWD DALE JAI! _UwxM 590 DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This small log house is a throe bay, one and a half story German Bided structure. Built adjacent to the old alignment of the Sharpsburg-Soons- boro pike, it served as a toll house on this road during the 19th century CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=2 04/30/2008 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 I I wp a -say m SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE •. CHECK ANO JUSTIFY MOW _PAEHISIORIC _ARGHCOU .PRIHISIDNIC ,-.COMMUMIVPLANNING _.LANDSCAPEAPOHIllClft AttG10N _14W 1A90 ,.:ARCNEOLOGY]ERSTORIC _CONSERVATION __vw __SCIENCE ISpkI SS9 ADP+CUt1UNE ,.ECONOMICS J,LT{RA1IINt _SCULPTURE —AL141, 1644 X-ARCHITtcvURE _EDUCATION ,MILITARY—60CIAIJIMMANIIANAN —17W.1149 ..J.RT .-tNGINttAINO _MUSIC—1HRAFill L 19041999 Xfi0MMEPCE _El{Rtol1ATIONIEETREMENT _PInLOSOPHY XSRANSPORTATIDN —190. COMMUNICATIONS _INI7USTNY: _POU91LS DOflRNN}NP ..,OUHPISPECOY, _IMYEN110N SPECIFIC DATES BUILOERIARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE .--- This log toll house is a typical vernacular structure of the Western )Iaryland-area. As a functioning toll house during the 19th century, it is significant to thehistory of transportation and commerce, CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY 6 http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=3 04/30/2008 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 WA -IL- Say MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES EOGRAPHIGAL DATA ACREAGE OF N0MINOE0 PROBE RTY , VERB L BOUNDARY OESCRIPnfN L45T ALL STATES AN6 C6UNtIEs FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPINQ STATE On COUNTY BOUNOARICS SLATE COUNTY SUTE COIIIITY PREPARED BY NWE,IME Paula Stoner, Architectural Historian ONGANIZ4TiON GAIL Preservation Associates June 1978 STREET NUMfER TEIEFODNE 109 West Main Street, Box 202 301-432-5466 OItYWI TOWN WAIT Sharpaburg Maryland 21782. The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory wasofficially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 RA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights, RETURN TOE Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis,Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PI. I IS. http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=4 04/30/2008 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 1 of 1 Porterstown Toll House Jump Page Gol << PREVIOUS NEXT Keedysville, Washington County, to Pa a >> WA -II -0324 Page 6 of 7 available pages Return to search results C Add Single Image to Print C Add All Images to List Print List e http://www.mdihp.net/cfm/dsp_display.cfm?next_image=6 04/30/2008 ARTICLE 20A - "AO" ANTIETAM OVERLAY DISTRICT135 Section 20A.0 Purpose The purpose of the Antietam Overlay District is to provide mechanisms for the protection of significant historic structures and land areas by requiring development and land subdivision to occur in a manner that 1) preserves the existing quality of the viewshed of the Antietam Battlefield, and 2) ensures that development of certain lands adjacent to the major roads which provide public access to the Antietam Battlefield (i.e., Maryland Routes 34 and 65) is compatible with the agricultural and historic character of the area. The "AO" District is an overlay zone meant to enhance, not substitute for the existing underlying zoning designation, which regulates land use. Section 20A.1 Regulations (a) Subdistricts Established and Areas Delineated The Antietam Overlay District is comprised of these subdistricts: The Battlefield Buffer (AO -1), the Approach Zones (AO -2), and the Red Hill Area (AO -3). Lands zoned AO -1 (Battlefield Buffer) and AO -3 (Red Hill Area) are situated within the Battlefield Foreground and Red Hill Middleground, respectively, of the Antietam Viewshed, as determined by the National Park Service and documented in its April 1988 technical study entitled Analysis of the Visible Landscape: Antietam. The boundaries of the AO -1 and AO -3 zones conform to property boundaries except where manmade or natural features provide suitable boundaries. 3. Lands zoned AO -2 (Approach Zones) are situated within 1000 feet of the centerline of certain road segments, and do not necessarily conform to property boundaries. The length of the AO -2 (Approach Zones) are as shown on the zoning maps. Section 20A.2 AO -1 Battlefield Buffer Regulation (a) The regulations and criteria in this subsection are in addition to the conventional underlying zoning which regulates land use. (b) The following additional regulation shall apply: The exterior arrnearance of all uses, unless otherwise exe Ordinance, shall automatically be su iect to the provisions of 135 Revision 14, Article 20A replaced in its entirety 7126/05 (RZ-03.005) 141 FRo/v 3. The historic resource should be identified with a person or a group of persons who influenced society; qr The historic resource exemplifies the cultural, economic, social, political, or historic heritage of the County and its communities. (c) Architectural and Design Significance The historic resource embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or architecture; 2. The historic resource represents the work of a master artisan, architect or builder; 3. The historic resource possesses high artistic value; 4. The historic resource represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; 5. The historic resource represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or County, due to its singular physical characteristics, landscape or historical event. 6. The historic resource is the only example ever existing or remaining of a particular period, style, and material or construction technique. Section 20.6 Activity Within an "HP" Zone In the "HP" District, any activity w amendments as adopted for use in Washington County and the procedures of the epa Permits and Inspections shall be subject to review, approval or disapproval by the Historic District Commission of Washington County. Such activity can include but is not limited to construction, reconstruction. relocation, restoration, ehabilitation, modification, enlargement conversion or demolition of all or any portion of the exterior features of the subject site, structure or district. The purpose and intent of this Section is to provide an additional mechanism for the review of the appropriateness of proposed activity, not to change the building permit application procedure. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to exempt any activity from the requirement of a building permit or require a permit where one would not normally be needed, if the structure were not in an "HP" zone. The Commission shall develop and make available to all interested parties guidelines for activities constituting ordinary maintenance, and shall provide these guidelines to each applicant for an "HP" overlay zone. 137 The Commission shall consider only exterior features of a structure which would affect the historic, archeological, or architectural significance of the site or structure, any portion of which is visible or intended to be visible from a public way, and shall not consider any interior arrangements, although interior changes may still be subject to building permit procedures. All permits as required above shall be transmitted to the Commission by the Department of Permits and Inspections. The Commission shall render a decision on a completed application within 45 days of receipt of the completed appJication. Failure to act within the specified time period shall be considered an approval of the application by the Commission. The 45 -day review period may be extended upon agreement by the Commission and the applicant. (Ol 1. The proposal does not substantially alter the exterior features of the structure. 2. The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, archeological, architectural or cultural features of the site, structure or district and would not be detrimental to achievement of the purposes of this Article. 3. The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the site or structure, in a manner compatible with its historical, archeological, architectural or cultural value. 4. The proposal is necessary in order that unsafe conditions or health hazards be remedied. 5. as guidance only and are not to be considered mandatory. (b) In reviewing the plans for any such construction or change, the Commission shall give consideration to and not disapprove an application except with respect to the factors specified below. The historic or architectural value and significance of the site or structure and its relationship to the historic or architectural value and significance of the surrounding area. 2. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the remainder of the structure and to the surrounding area. 3. The general compatibility of exterior design, scale, proportion, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. Any other factors including aesthetic factors, which the Commission deems to be pertinent. (c) The Commission shall be strict in its judgment of plans for those structures, sites or districts deemed to be valuable according to studies performed for districts of historic or architectural value. The Commission shall be lenient in its judgment of plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures or the surrounding area. (d) The Commission shall deny a permit if it finds, based on evidence and information presented to or before the Commission, that the alteration for which the permit is sought would be inappropriate or inconsistent with, (a), (b) or (c) above, or detrimental to the preservation, enhancement, or ultimate protection of the historic structure site or district or the purpose of this Article as stated in Section 20.0. The use of the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" noted in §20.6(a)(5) above is advisory only and not mandatory. 1. If the Commission determines that the permit should be denied, it shall provide a written statement of the basis for denial with specific references to the goals of this Article. The Commission may also, at its discretion, provide the applicant with suggestions or recommendations for revisions to the proposal. 2. A building permit shall not be issued if the Commission has disapproved the application. 3. Nothing shall prevent the applicant from modifying the permit application to address suggestions made by the Commission to meet the purpose of this Article. (e) It is not the intent of this Section, nor is the Commission required, to limit new construction, alteration or repairs to any one period of architectural style. Section 20.7 Definitions (a) For the purpose of this article, the term "structure" shall mean a combination of materials to form a construction that is stable, the use of which requires fixed location on the ground including among other things, buildings, tanks and towers, trestles, piers, bridges, paving, bulkheads loading docks, smokestacks, cranes, booms, sheds, coal bins, shelters, fences, walls and display signs; the term "structure" shall be construed as if followed by the words "or part thereof." (b) For the purpose of this article, the term "scale drawing" shall mean a scale drawing is a graphic representation of the location of all the significant features included within the boundaries of the historic site or district. 139 The drawing should be "to scale", i.e. the features on the ground are reduced from their actual size according to a specific and constant ratio between the real distances shown on paper. (For example, 100 feet of distance on the ground is equal to 1 inch on the paper, or 1 "=100'.) The drawing should include accurate property boundaries plotted either from a deed or field survey. All existing buildings should be shown in their correct relationship to each other and the property lines. Driveways, septic areas, wells, large trees, and any other significant feature of the landscape should also be shown. Drawings of the site shall be drawn using an engineer's scale of at least 1 "=40'. Drawings of the building or other structural improvements shall be drawn using an architect's scale of at least 1/8"=1'. (c) For the purpose of this article, the term "site" shall mean all that space of grounds and structures thereon which surrounds an historic resource and to which it relates physically and/or visually. Site shall include, but not be limited to walkways, and driveways (whether paved or not), vegetation (including trees, garden, lawns), rocks pasture, cropland and waterways. This includes historical open spaces, e.g., setbacks, parks and public squares. Section 20.8 Appeals Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Commission may appeal to the Board of Appeals by filing a notice of appeal with the Permits and Inspections Department within 30 days from the date of the Commission's decision, which appeal shall be based upon the record of the proceedings before the Commission. 140 The Secretary of the Interior...: Choosing an Appropriate Treatment for the Historic Buildin Page 1 of 2 ccp,cit o y boos ntr rreah nlen Choosinr� an App_'giatu Treatment arnra 9ra it?dzir�_ fc r t}ie Hist:�ric L�vilctlilg _-i ruidelirsc=e; The Standards are neither technical nor prescriptive, but are intended to promote responsible Historical overvie preservation practices that help protect our Nation's irreplaceable cultural resources. For example, they cannot, in and of themselves, be used to make essential decisions about Exterior Materials which features of the historic building should be saved and which can be changed. But once Ma.onry a treatment is selected, the Standards provide philosophical consistency to the work. Architectural Metals The four treatment approaches are Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, and Reconstruction, outlined below in hierarchical order and explained: Exterior Features Roofs Win (w - The first treatment, Preservation, places a high premium on the retention of all historic Entrances : Porches fabric through conservation, maintenance and repair. It reflects a building's continuum Storefronts > over time, through successive occupancies, and the respectful changes and alterations that are made. Interior Features Structural 3vsrern Spac<_/FecrtoreSiH its Rehabilitation, the second treatment, emphasizes the retention and repair of historic J±rshonicnt SV5terIIS materials, but more latitude is provided for replacement because it is assumed the property is more deteriorated prior to work. (Both Preservation and Rehabilitation Site standards focus attention on the preservation of those materials, features, finishes, spaces, and spatial relationships that, together, give a property its historic character.) setIwl Special Requiremen Restoration, the third treatment, focuses on the retention of materials from the most Ftio,tl, eri;-ensy significant time in a property's history, while permitting the removal of materials from Act esslbl'hv other periods. Health + SR"rety New Additions __, Reconstruction, the fourth treatment, establishes limited opportunities to re-create a non -surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object in all new materials. Choosing the most appropriate treatment for a building requires careful decision - making about a building's historical significance, as well taking into account a number of other considerations: Relative importance in history. Is the building a nationally significant resource --a rare survivor or the work of a master architect or craftsman? Did an important event take place in it? National Historic Landmarks, designated for their "exceptional significance in American history," or many buildings individually listed in the National Register often warrant Preservation or Restoration. Buildings that contribute to the significance of a historic district but are not individually listed in the National Register more frequently undergo Rehabilitation for aceompatible new use. Physical condition, What is the existing condition --or degree of material integrity --of the building prior to work? Has the original form survived largely intact or has it been altered over time? Are the alterations an important part of the building's history? Preservation may be appropriate if distinctive materials, features, and spaces are essentially intact and convey the building's historical significance. If the building requires more extensive repair and replacement, or if alterations or additions are necessary for a new use, then Rehabilitation is probably the most appropriate treatment. These key questions play major roles in determining what treatment is selected. Proposed use. An essential, practical question to ask is: Will the building be used as it was historically, or will it be given a new use? Many historic buildings can be adapted for new uses without seriously damaging their historic character; special -use properties such as grain http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/overview/choose_treat.htm 09/2712001 The Secretary of the Interior...: Choosing an Appropriate Treatment for the Historic Buildin Page 2 of 2 silos, forts, ice houses, or windmills may be extremely difficult to adapt to new uses without major intervention and a resulting loss of historic character and even integrity. Mandated code requirements. Regardless of the treatment, code requirements will need to betaken into consideration. But if hastily or poorly designed, a series of code -required actions may jeopardize a building's materials as well as its historic character. Thus, if a building needs to be seismically upgraded, modifications to the historic appearance should be minimal. Abatement of lead paint and asbestos within historic buildings requires particular care if important historic finishes are not to be adversely affected. Finally, alterations and new construction needed to meet accessibility requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 should be designed to minimize material loss and visual change to a historic building. GUIDELINES historical overview - PRESERVING - REHABILITATING - RESTORING - RECONSTRUCTING main - credits - Last modified: Fri. Sep 14 2001 0C26:P4 pm For http://www2,cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/overview/choose_treat.htm 09/27/2001 Standards for Preservation and Guidelines for Preserving Historic Buildings: Home Page Page 1 of 1 Lit t day, f I �i�v Preservation is defined as the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity, and materials of an historic property. Work, including preliminary measures to protect and stabilize the property, generally focuses upon the ongoing maintenance and repair of historic materials and features rather than extensive replacement and new construction. New exterior additions are not within the scope of this treatment; however, the limited and sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and other bode -required work to make properties functional is appropriate within a preservation project. (t TTANDARD5 GUIDELINES PIYSTORICAL. OVL iu1 VV/ - preserving - REHA6ILITATING - IESTO{UNc - 10,C_ONSI"RUCT.L MG Last Wlodifiod: Fd. .Sop 74 2001 01:2'8:24 pa EDT http://www2. cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/preserve/preserve_index.htm 09/27/2001 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Page 1 of 2 -GUIDELINES- r�. f gry eExterior Materials Iia t r .ter~` i'I'1"otIIv . Iood Archite. ,I! I 'li tril� Exterior Features Rots; 1. A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use that maximizes �^/Indova; the retention of distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Where F❑lance„ ! :; ,dhwc a treatment and use have not been identified, a property will be protected and, if Stnrefro"'`'' necessary, stabilized until additional work may be undertaken. Interior Features 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The replacement Ituctt❑ 1 '!!l ! v i, 'r urc Pmis of intact or repairable historic materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial r-iech. m. o , zsee,ns relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. site 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. setting Work needed to stabilize, consolidate, and conserve existing historic materials and features will be physically and visually compatible, identifiable upon close inspection, special Requiremen and properly documented for future research. enerci_EfneJenry Accessibilih- 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will 1111 r S :Pets be retained and preserved. THE STANDARDS 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6. The existing condition of historic features will be evaluated to determine the appropriate level of intervention needed. Where the severity of deterioration requires repair or limited replacement of a distinctive feature, the new material will match the old in composition, design, color, and texture. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. Guidelines for Pr enervation--> i1SSTORICAL oyi:Wv ;2w - preserving - REHABILITATING - RESTORING - RECONSTRUCTING n ti credit - Lags! Modified: Fn, Sep M 2001 01:20L ! pm EDT http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/preserve/preserve_standards.htm 09/27/2001 Standards for Restoration and Guidleines for Restoring Historic Buildings Page 1 of 1 fl .cno YnO r€ xb t Restoration is defined as the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. The limited and sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and other code -required work to make properties functional is appropriate within a restoration project. STANDARDS t GUIDELINES III ST{:ORICAl. OV! RV+ i'!'V - PRESERVING - R33HAt3ILI IATING - restoring - RECONSTRUCTING Last Mocif ec: Fri, Se4 14 2001 01.34:04 http://www2.cr.nps.gov/TPS/STANDGUIDE/restore/restore_index.htm 09/27/2001 Standards for Restoration Page 1 of 1 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use which reflects the property's restoration period. 2. Materials and features from the restoration period will be retained and preserved. The removal of materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize the period will not be undertaken. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Work needed to stabilize, consolidate and conserve materials and features from the restoration period will be physically and visually compatible, identifiable upon close inspection, and properly documented for future research. 4. Materials, features, spaces, and finishes that characterize other historical periods will be documented prior to their alteration or removal. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize the restoration period will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated features from the restoration period will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. 7. Replacement of missing features from the restoration period will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. A false sense of history will not be created by adding conjectural features, features from other properties, or by combining features that never existed together historically. 8. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 9. Archeological resources affected by a project will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 10. Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed. Guidelines for Restoration--> HISTORICAL OVERVIEW - PRESERVING - REHABILITATING - restoring- RECONSTRUCTING Last Modified: Fri. Sep 14 2001 0134:26 pin EDT Exterior Materials Nftsonr v AI"fillteCl_U -ui =qe Gals Exterior Features It Or IS Windo'5 I rill :P r'ojchcs ShxefI orlr, Interior Features Storrfurai S pry ce's %I=ea �. � resi Pi i � i s Mechariicai Systems Site. <`;et-l:ina Special Requiremen Enerm Ftfir enn, Accessibility Health -I- Sa;isxy THE STANDARDS mold - Fredi1:s - http://www2.cr.nps.gov/TPS/STANDGUIDE/restore/restore standards.htm 09/27/2001 Standards for Reconstruction and Guidleines for Reconstructing Historic Buildings Page 1 of 1 Reconstruction is defined as the act or process of depicting, by means of new construction, the form, features, and detailing ( STANDARDS of a non -surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. GUIDELINES HISTORICAL OV it?iizW - PRESERVING -_REHABILITATING - RES MRHIG; - reconstructing :I'ts - IAS1 iAalifiod i ii_ Sep 14201 01.2 a Ai! pny r=U 1 http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/reconstruct/reconstruct_index.htm 09/27/2001 guide_template.gif Page 1 of 1 £L! + 41 1. Reconstruction will he used to depict vanished or non -surviving portions of a property when documentary and physical evidence is available to permit accurate reconstruction with minimal conjecture, and such reconstruction is essential to the public understanding of the property. 2. Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure, or object in its historic location will be preceded by a thorough archeological investigation to identify and evaluate those features and artifacts which are essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 3. Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any remaining historic materials, features, and spatial relationships. 4. Reconstruction will be based on the accurate duplication of historic features and elements substantiated by documentary or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different features from other historic properties. A reconstructed property will re-create the appearance of the non -surviving historic property In materials, design, color, and texture. 5. A reconstruction will be clearly Identified as a contemporary re-creation. 6. Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed. 6kiidellnes for Rofr(t :'hru Aton--� HISTORICAL OVI i i' V,[ - PRESERVING - REHABILITATING - RESTORING- reconstructing Lest Modified: Fri. Sop 14 20O1 0i:29;E pro G61 uuilrli r,, :orterlor Si tc So It inn Special Requiremen Eneryv_ EI ic-e ry A(cessibil is v 1-I 05111:11 to THE STANDARDS rear credit:, - http://www2.er.nps.gov/tps/standguide/reconstruct/reconstruct standards.htm 09/27/2001 Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildi...: Home Pag Page 1 of I rhATf01 pA16K 4f. ` et v Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. ,.i STANDARDS `1) GU1DELINL8 HISTORICAL avr:lavr W - "RESERvINC - rehabilitating - RESTORING - RECURS RUCTINGi Last wio(Fi C'd: 16 Sop 1: 200101 -2?ion, n1 http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/rehab/rehab_index.htm 09/27/2001 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation Page 1 of 1 -GUIDELINES- Exterior Materials '^„ 4 a k l • n 1 4 -. "v a Ynif`CI Exterior Features Roofs 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. for errs. v.::: 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of Interior Features distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that Srrucr!i__!_;_:_f characterize a property will be avoided. r,cev F, ri_ii!ir�, 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. sco,t;,,!, 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will special Requiremen be retained and preserved. ,....civ.... New AduI ,o; Access i'M!I1. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of Health + sdarvPr craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. THE STANDARDS 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. the new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Cufdolines for Reha hilitation--> I1IsTORIChL Ol, i ' CVf - PRESERVING - rehabilitating - RESTORING RECONSTRUCTING rna- n-ec ite - I as[ Modi ied- Fri, Se•p 19 2001 01 31 :�0 pm LD f http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/standguide/rehab/rehab_standards.htm 09/27/2001 May 19, 2008 Mike Kefauver P.O. Box 337 Keedysville, MD 21756 Dear Mr. Kefauver During its May 7, 2008 meeting the Historic District Commission (HDC) reviewed your building permit application for partial demolition and additions to an existing building located in the Antietam Overlay zoning district at 18518 Shepherdstowr Pike. The HDC approved the demolition of the existing 15 foot by 19 foot one story addition on the east side of the original structure (Permit #2008-01557). The HDC is of the opinion that this addition to the log building was poorly constructed originally and has no historic significance or character defining features that are in need of preservation. However, the HDC voted unanimously to continue the application for construction of the two-story addition and porch enclosure until revisions are made (Permit #2008-01556) because the design is not consistent with Standard #9 of the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines. Standard # 9 says: "New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment." More specifically, it is the HDC opinion that the proposed additions and changes are not compatible with the existing building because the addition is not compatible or consistent in size, scale, proportion or materials. Existing historic character defining features will be hidden, removed or overwhelmed by the current design. The HDC stated specifically that because the addition is taller than the original building, it would detract from and overpower it. The HDC also said that the size of the windows in the addition are inconsistent with the existing window sizes. The HDC recognized the need to meet building code requirements for egress but also suggested that new window sizes in the addition could have a proportional relationship to the existing Mike Kefauver May 19, 2008 Page 2 windows. The HDC determined that the existing siding on the building was a character defining feature and should not be removed or covered and that the exterior covering of the addition should be consistent. This might be addressed by specifying a similar covering for the addition or one with a proportion similar to the existing. Finally, the HDC felt that the open porch is also a character defining feature of the original structure and to enclose it as proposed would hide an important and significant design element. It recommended further study and design revisions to resolve the entry door height issue by relocating the entry door or changes to the porch design to retain the open porch appearance. It should be understood that the commission described the areas where it feels the proposed design does not meet the design guideline and offers only general design guidance for revision. There may be many other ways to revise the design that were not specifically mentioned in the discussion that could also address the stated concerns. If you plan to continue towards permit approval for the addition, the plans should be revised to address the HDC concerns and resubmitted so they can be scheduled on the next available meeting for approval. The next meeting will be held on June 4, 2008. If there are additional questions, please feel free to call me, 240-313-2438. Sincerely, Stephen T. Goodrich Chief Planner enclosure STG/me SL4A,f "AdminiStratI0TI JohnJ. edersri, enSedn,inis,Martin O'Malley, Gmvern°r Neil 1. Pedersen, Adnrinistrarm' Anthony G. Brown, Lt. Governor Maryland Department of Transportation Appendix 2 July 24, 2008 Mr. J. Rodney Little State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 Notification of No Effect Determination (under the Programmatic Agreement for Minor Projects) Project: IS 068 Eastbound at Sideling Hill Interpretive Center Funding Source: Federal Description: Project Number: AT829B27 County: Washington 7.5' Topographic Map l�antn. .. b Project Type: Actions Taken: 12 ---- architectural investigations are recommended. (410) 545-8540 My telephone number/toll-free number is Maryland Relay Service for Impaired Hearing or Speech: 1.800.735.2258 Statewide Toll Free c...,.,,. eddrecc: 707 North Calvert Street • Baltimore, Maryland 21202 • Phone: 410.545.0300 . www.marylandroads.com Mr. J. Rodney Little IS 068 Eastbound at Sideling Hill Interpretive Center Page 2 archeological resources will not be impacted by the proposed work. Very truly yours, Bruce M. Grey Deputy Director Office of Planning and Preliminary Engineering by: A L%-'_- slie M. Schablitsky Assistant Division Chief Project Planning Division Attachments cc: Ms. Lauren Bowman Mr. Fred Shoken (w/ Attachments) Ms. April Fehr (w/ Attachments) Mr. Steven Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission (w/ Attachments) Dr. John F. Krowka, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. (w/ Attachments) C 5 Co a > O LO 0) 0 N N Or" irq C C U c 0 0) C t m ?� a. m tn we c.i 00 N V I- to 0 L .FJ 0) C C 0 w co z rjj 0 C It cc 2 I C O C.) Ct m C >o O)O O O N . m � C O 4f a) C U) It L a) C a, � J J C) C 0) U) 1 �J a 2 w 0- C O m O -j C O Cn It w Co CO 0 0 0 0 U, Martin O'iVla/ley Goverebr Anthony G. Brown Lt. Governor July 16, 2008 Maryland Department of Planning Maryland Historical Trust Jennifer Mendelsohn Washington Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210 Dulles, VA 20166 Re: Proposal for Preservation and Rehabilitation Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead Section 106 Review for Effects on Historic Properties Dear Ms. Mendelsohn: JUL 2 , 2GC Richard Eberhai t Hall Secretmyy Matthew' j Power Deputy Se,,rtary The Maryland Historical Trust (Trust), the State's Historic Preservation Office, was recently provided with a copy of the report Proposal for the Preservation and Rehabilitation of the Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead (Proposal). It is our understanding that the report was previously presented to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Hagerstown Regional Airport (HGR), and the Washington County Commissioners. Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the Trust, the FAA, and HGR have been consulting about the potential effects of FAA actions on the historic Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farm (Farm) since at least 1995. Specific discussions about how the FAA -assisted runway expansion and protection zone at HGR will affect the Farm have been ongoing since before the 1999 acquisition of the property by the airport. The Farm, Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties number WA -I-480, is significant for its association with agricultural history and for architecture that reflects late nineteenth and early twentieth century vernacular construction practices. The property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A, association with significant historical trends, and Criterion C, architectural significance. Because the FAA assisted with the acquisition of the Farm by HGR and with other projects that continue to affect the Farm, the FAA has unresolved obligations under 36 CFR 800. These obligations include considering prudent and feasible alternatives to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to the Farm and ensuring that the buildings do not significantly deteriorate during this process. The Proposal calls for the FAA, HGR, and the Washington County Commissioners to stabilize the Farm, nominate the property for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, acknowledge and protect the significance of the Farm with a zoning overlay, and find a use or tenant that can rehabilitate and maintain the property in accordance with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Standards). Stabilizing and restoring the exterior of the buildings will avoid possible "demolition by neglect" adverse effects under 36 CFR 800.5(2)(vi), and locating a use or tenant that can rehabilitate and maintain the 100 Community Place • Crownsville, Matyland 21032-2023 Telephone: 410.514.7600 , Fax: 410.987.4071 - Toll Free: 1.800.756 0119 • TTY Users: Maryland Relay Internet: www.mwrvlandhistoricaltrust.net Jennifer Mendelsohn Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farmstead July 16, 2008 Page 2 of 2 buildings in accordance with Standards will satisfy the FAA's long outstanding obligations under Section 106 for this undertaking. In addition to the possible sources of rehabilitation assistance listed in the Proposal, a private party may be eligible for federal and state rehabilitation tax credits. We are writing the FAA, the responsible Federal agency under Section 106, to ask that you take prompt action to ensure that this property is safe and secure, avoid further deterioration of the property, and continue to seriously consider all feasible alternatives for this important historic property including the alternatives recommended in the Proposal. We look forward to consulting with you to find successful solutions for the treatment of the Brumbaugh-Kendle-Grove Farm. If you have any questions or we may be of assistance, please contact Jonathan Sager at 410-514-7636 or isagerpmdp state and us. Sincerely, J. Rodney Little Director \ State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust JRL\JES 200801242 CC: George Anikis (Washington County Planning Commission) Sandra Izer (Washington County Historic District Commission) Carolyn Motz (Hagerstown Regional Airport) Patricia Schooley (20702 Old Forge Road, Hagerstown) /4catau D'j*/tLtfr Comm / Ph � WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2008-03609 Applied: 06/27/2008 Project No: P2008-0176 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B2 District/Acct No: 14009256 Job Address: 25437 HIGHFIELD ROAD CA Location: LOR 25437 HIGHFIELD ROAD Parcel No: 014-21-0190-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE - PINK Floodplain: C Applicant: SMITH CONNIE LOUISE & 25437 HIGHFIELD RD CASCADE, MD 21719 Phone Number: 301-241-3354 Owner: SMITH CONNIE LOUISE & Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Description: 12' X 16' OPEN DECK ADDITION TO REAR OF DWELLING (192 SQ FT) AND 8' X 10' PORCH WITH ROOF TO WEST SIDE OF DWELLING (80 SQ FT), PRESSURE TREATED FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSS ROOF WITH SHINGLES Foundation Size: 12'X16' 8,x10, Type of Heat...: Public Sewer...: Public Water...: Gas........... Electric.......: Construction V Code Enforced Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic........... Y Time Existed Y Well............ Time Existed: Y Construction Type aluation: $5,400.00 2006 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Pr000sed .75 ACRES .75 ACRES 72 144 70 57 185 PDS No. Of Bathrooms: No. of Bedrooms: 0 Minimum Required 20,000 SQ FT 20,000 SQ FT 25 25 5 25 100 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313.2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 Fr m ROWUN a r I VICIA ( Myy 25W37 1/4% lie/d RI Ih,hTh/I t/,t / li//a9 z r yi A I If I // nRi NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (11ev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service j' ional Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Highfield/Cascade Historic District other names/site number 2. Location portions of Military, Highfield, Hilltop, Water Company, and street & number Rowland Hill Roads, and Third and Eyler Avenues N/A not for publication city or N/A vicinity state Maryland code MD county Washington code 043 zip code 21719 3. State/Federal Agency Certification �w the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property — meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant_ nationally — state'Mde_ locally. (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date or Federal In my opinion, the property _ meets does not meet the National Register criteria. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action entered in the National Register See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register _ See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): Highfield/Cascade Historic District Name of Property Washington County, MD County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) private building(s) _ public -local X district public -State _ site _ public -Federal — structure — object Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) Resources (Do not include previously -listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites shichres objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/ single dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure DOMESTIC/secondary structure DOMESTIC/multiple dwelling COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store DOMESTIC/hotel DOMESTIC/multiple dwelling categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) foundation STONE/ sandstone; CONCRETE walls WOOD/weatherboard; BRICK; WOOD/shingle roof SYNTHETICS/asphalt STONE/slate; METAL other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets) Refer to continuation sheets Highfield/Cascade Historic District Name of Property Washington County, MD County and State licable National Register Criteria "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property 'onal Register listing) A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. _ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ✓ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: _ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. _ C a birthplace or a grave. _ D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. _G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) ARCHITECTURE Period of Significance c. 1890-c. 1940 Significant Dates N/A Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A Cultural Affiliation N/A Architect/Builder unknown articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested. previously listed in the National Register previously determined eligible by the National Register designated a National Historic Landmark recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Primary location of additional data: State Historic Preservation Office Other state agency Federal agency Local government University Other Name of repository: Highfeld/Cascade Historic District Name of Property Washington County, MD County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 70 acres Ur.., References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 18 287460 4399300 3 18 288400 4399180 18 288440 4399340 4 18 287400 4398760 5 18 287280 4398940 N/A See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By nameltitle David L. Taylor, Principal organization Taylor & Taylor Associates Inc. date July, 1999 street & number 9 Walnut Street telephone 814-849-4900 city or town Brookville state PA zip code 15825 Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7,5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) or street & number telephone city or town state zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or nnine eligibilityfor listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response tothis request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic ,ervation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated toaverage 18.1 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form tothe Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. OMBAppm%W W, 1024-0011 NPS Form 10-900-a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service h .zonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 7. Description, Page One Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD The Highfield/ Cascade Historic District is a primarily residential area 01 70 acres, located on the slopes of South Mountain, in the Blue Ridge range, in rural Washington County, Maryland. The Mason-Dixon Line (which serves as the boundary between Pennsylvania and Maryland) forms a portion of the north boundary of the area, which is approximately twelve miles northeast of the county seat of Hagerstown. The area encompasses parts of two interconnected, unincorporated settlements, Highfield and Cascade, which lie immediately east of the former U. S. Army installation of Ft. Ritchie,' in Washington County Election District 14, which is known as the Ringgold District. The communities essentially run together, with neither political nor natural differentiating bound- aries to separate them. Approximately sixty resources are found within the documented area, of which approximately 5n (c. 80%) contribute to the character of the district and the remaining are non-contributing fea- es. Contributing resources were built within the approximately half -century Period of Significance of the district (c. 1890-c. 1940) and retain physical characteristics which reflect their historic appear- ance. Non-contributing resources date from outside the Period of Significance and/or have been physically altered to the extent that they no longer convey a suitable sense of historicity. Non- contributing resources are dispersed widely throughout the area and fail to detract from the overall character of the district as a cohesive unit. As noted above, the vast majority of the properties within the Highfield/Cascade Historic District are domestic in character. Among these are single-family residences of varying scales, as well as larger buildings suggesting previous uses as boarding houses or modest hotels. Most build- ings are of wood construction, built upon foundations of stone and capped with gabled or hipped roof systems; Dutch Colonial Revival -style buildings exhibit the distinctive gambrel roof which defines that particular design mode. Fenestration incorporates flat-topped windows with double -hung sash. Variations on the flat-topped window form are found in some Colonial Revival -style properties which incorporate Palladian windows. Many buildings retain their historic brick chimneys; the Queen Anne -style "Stone Manor" at 25624 Military Road, built of ashlar stone, features tall brick chimneys with corbeled ornament. Chimneys on other properties have been removed, likely with the installa- tion of central heating systems. Typical of mountain resort communities, many of the homes retain broad wood verandas which often extend across more than one elevation. Due to the topography, many of these are found along the south side of Military Road, including the Hilltop Apartments at 25625 Military Road, as well as 25461, 25502, 25613, and 25461 Military Road, and the aforemen- ned "Stone Manor." (When the Army closed Ft. Ritchie, the property was transferred to a private -sector community development corporation for re -use. NPS Form 10-900-e (9-S6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service FL .tonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 7. Description, Page Two OMBAppmua(Ab 1024-0O11 Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD The topography of the district is somewhat rugged, since the communities are situated on the side of the Blue Ridge. Many of the buildings are on spacious lots with well -maintained lawns, mature trees, and other landscape features. Building setbacks vary considerably, ranging from large expanses of setback from all sides to others lots with comparatively little setback. Several properties have stone walls around the perimeter of their respective building lots; features such as these contribute to the overall character of the district but are treated as background landscape structures and are not included in the estimated resource tabulation. Throughout the district are diverse dependencies, ranging from automobile garages from the first third of the twentieth century to mass- produced outbuildings from the latter decades of the century. These buildings are also treated as landscape features and are not included in the resource tabulation. The streets within the Highfield/Cascade Historic District are arranged in a grid. Military Road (, .ryland Route 550) is the principal roadway and bisects the district, entering near the southwest corner and running in a northeasterly direction. Perpendicular to Military Road are Highfield and Hilltop, and Rowland Hill Roads and Eyler Avenue. Interspersed among the major roadways are a series of unnamed and in some cases, unopened alleys. The principal roadways have cartways of between twenty and twenty-five feet in width and are paved with asphalt. Most alleys are unpaved and have cartways of approximately ten feet in width. The dominant character of the Highfield/Cascade Historic District is that of a late nineteenth - and early twentieth-century rural mountain resort community. With reference to the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, the district retains an acceptably high degree of physical integrity. NPS Form 10-908-a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service (S__ional Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance. Page One OMBAPpmwdNo. 1024-O01( Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD This documentation of the Highfield/Cascade Historic District was undertaken with reference to National Register Criterion C, for architecture, characterizing the investigated area as an intact Western Maryland mountain resort community, residential in character, dating from the late nine- teenth and early twentieth century. This document supplants Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. WA -IV -057, which included minimal narrative and photographic documentation of the area. The district is of particular significance to Washington County and to western Maryland as the tangible reflection of technological advance (namely, the development of the railroad) upon the growth of recreational and leisure activities, evidenced in the predominating character of the documented area as a resort community. The Period of Significance for the district begins c. 1890 and ends c. 1940, dates which span the approximate dates of construction of the area's historic resources and encom- pass the formative years of popularity of the area as a summer resort. The district consists of small - a -4 medium -scale domestic architecture executed in several of the architectural styles popular L Ang the Period of Significance, including Queen Anne, Colonial Revival, Dutch Colonial Revival, and Bungalow. Little information exists regarding either the genesis or the subsequent development of these two communities, portions of which were referenced on early maps as "Germantown." The settle- ments were never incorporated and are typical of a series of similarly -sized Blue Ridge Mountain communities which straddle the Pennsylvania -Maryland border within five miles of each other: Pen Mar, Blue Ridge Summit, Monterey, Charmain, Cullen, Highfield, and Cascade. Among these, Cascade, Highfield, and Blue Ridge Summit spill over into each other without regard for political jurisdictional boundaries, and, according to a local newspaper article, have stories and "exact histories and boundaries [which] are so diverse as to be legendary."2 In 1872, the Western Maryland Railway, under the inspired presidency of former Confederate Army engineering officer John Mifflin Hood, completed its line into this portion of Washington County. Stations were established at nearby Pen Mar (site of the WMRR's celebrated resort/ park) and at Highfield; both of these stations were across the Mason-Dixon Line in Pennsylvania and neither are extant. In the 1877 Illustrated Atlas of Washington County,3 very few buildings are depicted on the future site of Highfield and Cascade (See Fig. 1); it is likely that few, if any, of these early buildings survive. In August, 1877, the railroad opened Pen Mar Park, about one mile west of the nominated area, and the development of this regionally -famous outdoor attraction, combined 2Minnick, Rosemary, "Why Some Washington County Towns Were Named," unattributed clipping in the files of the Washington County Historical Society, Hagerstown, Maryland. 3An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland (Philadelphia: Lake, Gritting, & Stephenson, 1877). OMB Appo ra' No. 1024001 E NPS Form 10-900-a (e-6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service N..ional Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance. Page Two Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD with the marketing of the slopes of the Blue Ridge as a summer retreat, contributed significantly to the development of the Highfield/Cascade area. In chronicling the history of Pen Mar, Judith Schlotterbeck reproduced an unattributed late nineteenth-century newspaper comment regarding the flurry of activity in the entire area: A building boom has hit the Blue Ridge Summit! The entire slope between the Summit and Highfield is just specked with new buildings. Quite a village has sprung up in the last few months and the sign [sic] looks as though this trend will continue.^ An unattributed 1903 regional map, (Figure 3), reproduced in a Washington County historical magazine,5 shows major development along the slopes of the mountain, suggesting that many areas he two communities were fully developed by that time. Schlotterbeck reported that "by the early 1. J0s there were over one hundred hotels and boarding houses in the Pen Mar vicinity [within which is the nominated area] serving thousands of summer guests."6 Most of these hotels were of wood construction and either burned or were demolished after the railroad razed Pen Mar park in the early 1940s and passenger service was discontinued to the area shortly thereafter. Post Offices were established at Highfield and Cascade in1890 and 1898, respectively; the Highfield Post Office was closed and at the time of writing the Cascade Post Office serves both communities from a modern building on Military Road, outside the district to the east. As the popularity of the area increased, the Western Maryland Railroad instituted excursions into the Blue Ridge from Baltimore and similar urbanized areas. To serve the throngs which began to visit, the Buena Vista Ice Company acquired 638 acres and created two lakes just west of the district, on the eventual site of Ft. Ritchie. During the first forty years of the twentieth century, the area remained popular with a broad spectrum of vacationers, some of whom came to take up resi- dence in the area's boarding houses, while others occupied their own summer homes, with spacious lawns and magnificent mountain viewsheds. The Hagerstown newspaper commented on the charac- ter of the area, noting, "If ever a town could be successful at hiding from the world while sitting in the middle of it, it will be Cascade"7 4Schotterbeck, Judith A. The Pen Mar Story (Funkstown: Tri-State Printing, 1977), p. 105. ] 5Maryland Cracker Barrel 27:2 (August -September, 1998), p. 5. 6Schlotterbeck, op. cit., p. 105. 7Undated newspaper clipping in "cascade" vertical file, Washington County Historical Society, Hagerstown, Maryland. OMBApprove'Mi 1024-601E NPS Form 10-900-a (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service K —tonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page 8. Significance Page Three Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD The majority of the architecture of the district reflects its position as amountain resort commu- nity. Within the historic district were two hotels, the Hotel Maryland and Highfield Springs, with a combined capacity of one hundred seventy-five guests. A series of cottages in Highfield could accom- modate an additional two hundred fifty. These include the Afton and Pine Hill Cottages, the Mary- land Inn, Quirauk View, Chestnut Grove, Mountain View, Maple, Wantz's, Chestnut, Midview House, Rose Villa, Laurel Grove, Jester, and Fox House.8 The status of these facilities has not been deter- mined. The heyday of the Highfield/Cascade Historic District matched that of the nearby Pen Mar Historic District, whose fortunes rose and ebbed with those of the Western Maryland's playground - park at Pen Mar. The Highfield/Cascade Historic District was inextricably linked with the passenger s' vice of the Western Maryland Railway. With the rise of the automobile in the 1920s and 30s, the 1. 1ularity of rail passenger travel faded. Passenger service to the area was discontinued in the 1940s, Pen Mar Park was dismantled 1943, and the entire area, including the Highfield/Cascade communities, shed its shared character as a seasonal railroad resort. While some seasonal occu- pancy continues at the time of writing, after the 1940s the area settled into a subdued existence as a primarily year-round rural residential community nestled into the mountains. Due to its relatively isolated location atop the Blue Ridge range, the documented area nonetheless continues to convey its historic sense of a nineteenth- and early twentieth-century resort community. With reference to Criterion C, the Highfield/Cascade Historic District is significant because of its concentration of historic resort architecture, large and small, representing many of the styles of design which were in vogue throughout the Period of Significance. Within the historic district, the Queen Anne style, with a typically irregular plan, multiple roof system, and corner tower is repre- sented by the "Stone Manor" at 25624 Military Road. The Dutch Colonial Revival style -represented by 25625 Military Road --incorporates design features from the pre-Revolutionary War Dutch settle- ments in and around New York and always includes a distinctive multiple -pitched gambrel roof. The Bungalow is a purely twentieth-century American design style, and is typically one- to one and one- half -stories in height and incorporates a recessed front porch shielded by an integral sloping roof which is often punctuated by dormers; within the district, Bungalows include 25459 Military Road, 25501 Military Road, and 14614 Hilltop Road. Viewed in its entirety, the Highfield/Cascade Historic District stands as a generally cohesive lection of largely domestic buildings dating from the fifty-year period between c. 1890 and c. 1940 which represents specific architectural styles and associated with the communities' ties to the rail- 8Schlotterbeck, op. cit. p. 122. OMB Appmva' Ab. 10240014 NPS Farm 10-900-a (8-06) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I\_ .tonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number Page 8. Significance, Page Four related recreational/leisure history of Maryland. NS Form 10-000-a (886) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service h_ .tonal Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number Page OMBAppmva a 1024-004 Highfield/Cascade Historic District Washington County, MD MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN DATA Geographic Organization Western Maryland Chronological/Developmental Per- Industrial/Urban Dominance A. D. 1870-1930 iod(s) Prehistoric/Historic Period Themes(s) Architecture/Landscape Architecture/ Community Planning Social/Educational/Cultural Resource Type Category: District Historic Environment: Village Rural Historic Function(s) and Use(s) Domestic/Single dwelling Domestic/ Secondary structure Domestic! multiple dwelling Domestic/hotel Known Design Sources None 42 Cu 0 a w O-' Z y N E w°' 0 V a. N .n 2' o 'a'cya�9w ors mrn 0.O 9 a V 000 Fa—oa a> o od r- m at H 0 C- C) 0 N_ S �, wy Q 2 i,tT I I 4 e /-4 ft&0Wril 14i14(4JtiL WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2008.03675 Applied: 06/30/2008 Project No: P2008-0800 Approved: Permit Type: RES-NEW Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B4 District/Acct No: 01009443 Job Address: 3768 HARPERS FERRY ROAD SH Location: LOR 3768 HARPERS FERRY ROAD Parcel No: 080-21-0018-00000 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: A Applicant: MCCROSSIN WAYNE 3768 HARPERS FERRY ROAD SHARPSBURG MD 21782 Phone Number: 301-465-4449 Owner: OTZELBERGER JERRY DONALD Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Description: 30 X 24' DRIVE-THRU DETACHED CARPORT, PIER FOOTINGS, FRAME CONSTRUCTION WITH BARN SIDING EXTERIOR, PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSS ROOF WITH STEEL ROOFING (GREEN) Foundation Size: 30' X24' Exterior Finish: BARN SIDING Air Conditioning: Type of Heat...: Septic............: EXISTING Public Sewer...: Time Existed: Public Water...: Well .............EXISTING EXISTING Gas............: Time Existed: Electric.......: Y Construction Type: GAR Construction Valuation: $4,000.00 No. Of Bathrooms: Code Enforced: 2006 INT'L RESIDENTIAL CODE No. of Bedrooms: 0 Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width This permit has been reviewed and meets alt applicable local - please contact our depart nt Monday through Frida 80 West Baltimore Str t, Hagerstowrr, MD 21740 Proposed 3 ACRES 3 ACRES 114 240 114 390 500 Minimum Required 40,000 SQ FT 40,000 SQ FT 25 25 5 100 by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections nd state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 0 z a 0 ^o 0 z 0 o 0 a N R ff If 0 -it Si j ..... -S N Or ii ��i �'� ` � � � X NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) OMB No. 1024001E United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ;ational Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Antietam Village Historic District other namesJsite number WA -II -031 032 033 2. Location street & number Harper's Ferry Road not for publication N/A city or vicinity N/A state Maryland code MD county Washington . code 043 zip code 21872 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property_ meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally _ statewide_ locally. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property_ meets does not meet the National Register criteria. ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action entered in the National Register See continuation sheet. deter mined eligible for the National Register See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): Antietam Village Historic District Name of Property 5. Classification Ownership of Prol 'heck as many boxes as X private X public -local public -State X public -Federal Category of Pr< (Check only one box) building(s) X district site structure object Name of related multiple property listing (enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) Washington County. MD County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously -listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure TRANSPORTATION/bridge AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding INDUSTRY/manufacturin facility acility COMMERCE/TRADE/store DOMESTIC/secondary structure TRANSPORTATION/bridge AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding VACANT/not in use 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) LATE VICTORIAN/Italanate foundation STONE/sandstone BRICK NO STYLE Refer to Continuation Sheet walls BRICK: STONE; WOOD/weatherboard roof ASPHALT; SLATE other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets) Refer to Continuation Sheets Antietam Village Historic District Name of Property V3 lark "X' in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property National Register listing) Washington Count MD County and State Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) V A Property is associated with events that have made ARCI-HFECTURE a significant contribution to the broad patterns of INDUSTRY our history. B Property is associated with the lives of persons Period of Significance significant in our past. c. 1763-c. 1930 ✓ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. — D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Mark "X' in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: _ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. _ C a birthplace or a grave. D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years Narrative Statement of Significance Significant Dates Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder Crampton Hence builder Weaver, John builder (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: preliminary determination of individual listing (36 _ State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested. _ Other state agency previously listed in the National Register _ Federal agency _ previously determined eligible by the National Register Local government designated a National Historic Landmark _ University recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Other # Name of repository: recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Antietam Ville Historic District Washington County, MD Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data ( creage of Property 12 acres UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 18 263700 4366800 3 18 264020 4366100 2 18 263900 4366820 4 18 263820 4366080 N/A See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11 Form Prepared By name/title David L. Taylor. Principal organization Taylor & Tamer Associates, Inc. date June 2001 street & number 9 Walnut Street telephone 814-849-4900 city or town Brookville state PA zip code 15825 Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) name Multiple owners (refer to Continuation Sheet) street & number city or town state zip code telephone Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 at seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including thetime for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NPS Form 10.900. OMB Approval No. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Jational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 7 Page 1 7. Description The Antietam Village Historic District is a primarily residential historic district containing twelve acres and lying along Antietam Creek in rural Washington County, Maryland, approximately seven miles southwest of the site of the Civil War -era Battle of Antietam (which took place closer to the community of Sharpsburg) and approximately twenty miles southwest of the county seat of Hagerstown. The Antietam Village Historic District retains integrity and contains a total of 32 resources, two of which (the Antietam Furnace Archaeological Site; NR 8/25/83) and the Antiet- am Iron Furnace (NR 6/26/75) were previously listed in the National Register and therefore are not included in the resource count which appears in Section 5 of the nomination documents. Of the 30 unregistered resources, in the district, 27 (90%) contribute to the character of the district and 3 (10%) are non-contributing. Non-contributing resources are buildings erected outside the c. 1763-c. 1930 Period of Significance of the district; the extent of alteration of some properties has resulted in a loss of historic architectural integrity and their classification as non-contributing resources. Of the 30 unregistered resources in the district, 25 are contributing buildings, three are non-contributing .)uildings, one --the Antietam Iron Works Bridge (Resource No. 27) is a contributing structure, and one —the "Indian deed" historical marker (Resource No. 28) —is a contributing object. Approximately eighty percent of the resources in the district pre -date 1900, approximately ten percent of the resources were constructed between 1900 and 1930, and the remaining approximately ten percent post-date 1930 and are non-contributing resources within the context of the nominated area. The predominating character of the district is that of a rural western Maryland hamlet which developed in association with an iron furnace adjacent to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal and in close proximity to the Potomac River. The architecture of the Antietam Village Historic District consists principally of modest vernacular residences and one farmstead, along with two more pretentious homes representing a higher degree of sophistication than is seen in most of the architectural resources of the district. The vast majority of the district's architecture is of wood construc- tion, including one identified log house (3817 Harper's ferry Road; Resource No. 22); one late eighteenth -century house is of stone (3819 Harper's Ferry Road; Resource No. 21) and one property (the Antietam Iron Works Store, 3768 Harper's Ferry Road; Resource No. 29) is of brick. The bridge spanning Antietam Creek is of stone with a concrete deck or modem construction. Most of the homes retain front porches of varying scales and forms along with associated domestic outbuildings including sheds and garages. Larger dependencies are included in the resources count, while smaller outbuildings (sheds, small automobile garages, etc.) are treated as low -scale landscape features and are not represented in the count. The district retains integrity in each of its seven qualities: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. NPS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024.0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 2 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD The Antietam Village Historic District consists of two sections, one on either side of Antietam Creek; portions of the area southeast of Antietam Creek were previously listed in the National Register (one as an archaeological site with a restricted address [NR 8/25/83] and the other the Antietam Furnace (Resource No. 32, NR 6/26/75). The portion of the district north of the creek is considerably larger than that south of the waterway. The district lies on both sides of Harper's Ferry Road, which is so named because it leads from Sharpsburg, Maryland to Harper's Ferry, west Virginia, which is on the south bank of the Potomac Rive, approximately sixteen miles southeast of the district. Har- per's Ferry Road is asphalt -paved. There are no sidewalks or other pedestrian amenities in the district. The building lots of the Antietam Village Historic District are irregular in plan, and reflect the historic sub- division of land many generations prior to the onset of uniform subdivision requirements. The topography rises considerably from Antietam Creek to the north and only slightly from the creek southward. Property setback lines are irregular throughout the district. The buildings in the district are rectilinear in form and generally vary in height between one and one-half and two and one-half stories. Most buildings are roofed with laterally -oriented gable roofs, clad in standing -seam metal or in asphalt shingles. Some historic chimneys have been retained, while others have been removed in the course of retrofitting heating systems and replacing roofs. Fenestration is flat-topped exclusively, with little ornamentation; some multi -light historic sash has been retained. The majority of the buildings in the district rest on substantial foundations of coursed limestone. As noted above, the architectural character of the Antietam Village Historic District is primarily vernacular, executed without reference to any particular building style. Some traditional house types are found in the district, including side -passage single -pile homes and single -pen log houses to which have been appended later additions. The properties designed with the most sophistication include vernacular adaptations of Gothic Revival -style homes at 3905, 3815, and 3800 Harper's Ferry Road (Resource Nos. 1, 21, and 26, respectively). These three are modest rectangular houses with laterally -oriented gable roofs with center gables on the facade ornamented with uncharacteristic lacy bargeboard. Near the center of the district is the 1832 Antietam Iron Works bridge, built by master builder John Weaver under a contract with the County Commissioners of Washington County. Weaver constructed the four -arch span of coursed limestone -the same material that was used in the local production of iron and for most building foundations throughout the district. One of the longest stone bridges crossing the Antietam, its arches are faced with upright cut stones. Like other Washington County bridges, the Antietam Iron Works Bridge rests on rounded piers. It is low in NPS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024-O010 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Jational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD profile and arches only slightly as it spans the creek at its greatest width between the Iron Works and the associated village. The Antietam Iron Works Bridge is little altered from its original character, except for routine maintenance and the re -surfacing of its deck in conjunction with the maintenance of Harper's Ferry Road. The bridge is adjacent to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park. As noted in the introductory paragraph, the Antietam Village Historic District retains historic and architectural integrity. Although modest in its scale and detailing, the overall character of the district is intact and represents the early growth and maturity of this hamlet throughout its century and one -half -long Period of Significance. Limited demoli- tion has occurred and only a very small number of newer buildings —garages and one mobile home --have been built within the boundaries of the nominated area. Alterations to buildings within the district include the application of non - historic siding and the installation of replacement windows. These alterations are dispersed throughout the district and do not detract significantly from the ability of the nominated area to reflect its appearance throughout the Period of Significance. I Viewed in its entirety, Antietam Village Historic District is an architecturally -cohesive settlement which grew up in the economic shadow of a late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century iron furnace whose surviving mid - nineteenth -century stack (Resource No. 31) itself remains an important physical reminder of the industrial significance of the village. The following properties lie within the Antietam Village Historic District. The numbering corresponds to the district map which was submitted with the nomination documents. All properties are assumed to contribute to the character of the district except those after whose description an "NC" appears; these properties are non-contributing to the character of the district, either because they date from outside the Period of Significance of the district or because their extent of alteration has significantly compromised their individual physical character in relationship to the district. Most dates of construction are approximate, and are based upon visual inspection, oral history interviewing, and/or property tax data; dates which appear in italics are confirmed. 1. 3905 Harper's Ferry Road: 2½ -story late nineteenth-century Gothic Revival -style wood frame farm house which is the anchor to a small farmstead including Resource Nos. 2-9. The house rests on a raised foundation of limestone and includes open porches on the five -bay facade and north elevation, with modest columns and turned balusters; hipped roof with center gables with elaborate bargeboard, similar to that found on Resource Nos. 9 and 14; windows flat-topped with simple surrounds and exterior operable louvered shutters. A limestone retaining wall along the roadway is a contributing feature to the overall character of the property. (c. 1880) NPS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 7 Page 4 2. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular agricultural outbuilding with vertical board cladding and laterally -oriented gable roof (c. 1900) 3. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story central aisle barn of wood construction with gable roof and gable -end orientation to the street; exterior clad in vertical boards (c. 1900) 4. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story, small-scale agricultural outbuilding with gable roof with parged exterior surfaces (c.1920) 5. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story concrete block agricultural outbuilding with shed roofsloping downward from front to rear (c. 1930) 6. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: Large wood barn with gable roof, oriented laterally to the barnyard, with a parged foundation and narrow vertical board siding; painted onto the south facade is a sign bearing the legend, "Potomac View Farm —F. M. Stottlemeyer." (c. 1900) 7. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular agricultural outbuilding of wood construction with some exterior surfaces parged ands others clad in vertical boards; gable roof with gable -end orientation to the barn- yard between this building and the public road (c. 1900) 8. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -stow vernacular agricultural outbuilding of rock -faced concrete block construc- tion, perhaps used as a milkhouse due to its proximity to the public road; laterally -oriented gable roof; flat- topped fenestration (c. 1930) 9. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: Coursed limestone well with gable -roofed superstructure(c. 1900) 10. Rear, 3905 Harper's Ferry Road: One-story vernacular outbuilding, with laterally -oriented gable roof, set on a partly raised foundation of coursed limestone; asphalt -shingled roof surfaces; fenestration flat-topped; modest in its overall proportions and detailing. (c. 1890) 11. Side, 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story privy of wood construction with vertical board exterior finish and front -to -rear sloping shed roof (c. 1900) 12. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular cottage ofwood construction, with shiplap siding and laterally - oriented gable roof; additions at rear; open veranda extends across facade and a portion of north elevation, supported by turned posts and trimmed with a turned balustrade; a large stone chimney is on the gable end on the north elevation. A limestone retaining wall along the roadway is a contributing feature to the overall charac- ter of the property. (c. 1850) 13. 3839 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, set on a foundation of stone and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof clad in asphalt shingles; three -bay facade with offset entry door; one-story porch with hipped roof on facade. (c. 1880) NPS Form 10-9008 0MB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Jational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 7 Page 5 14. Rear, 3883 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story agricultural outbuilding of indeterminate use; wood construction, with gable roof and vertical board exterior finish; (c. 1900) 15. 3833 Harper's Ferry Road: 1½-storyvernacular residence ofwood construction, with laterally -oriented metal roof; appears to be of a "saddlebag" plan, with a large central chimney of brick; windows flat-topped, with some multi -light sash retained;1-story shed -roofed porch on facade; 1 -story dependency of wood construction at rear of house. (c. 1856) 16. 3831 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, set on a stone foundation and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof; windows flat-topped, devoid of notable ornamentation. (c. 1852) 17. 3827 Harper's Ferry Road: one-story mobile home, built outside the Period of Significance of the district (c. 1985; NC) 18. 3823 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story vernacular residence of wood constriction, with stone foundation and laterally -oriented gable roof ofstanding-seam metal; 3 -bay facade with center gable; windows flat-topped, with no notable ornament; non -historic siding;1-story porch on facade with replacement supports; east of the house are several outbuildings of indeterminate age and use. A limestone retaining wall along the roadway is a contrib- uting feature to the overall character of the property. (c. 1881) 19. Rear, 3823 Harper's Valley Road: 1 -story two -bay automobile garage with gable roof and gable -end orienta- tion to the street; of modern construction built outside the Period of Significance of the District (c. 1980; NC) 20. 3819 Harper's Ferry Road: 2½ -story stuccoed stone house, with laterally -oriented gable roof, three -bay facade and massing suggesting side -passage interior plan; interior gable -end brick chimney on north side;1-story shed - roof porch on facade; all windows are flat-topped with some historic six -over -six sash remaining. (c. 1763) 21. 3815 Harper's Ferry Road: 2i/2. -story residence of wood construction, Gothic Revival in style, with laterally - oriented gable roof and shingled centered gable on facade with unusually elaborate bargeboard similar to that found on Resource Nos. 1 and 14; three -bay facade with centered door suggesting a central -passage interior plan; windows flat-topped with non -historic paneled exterior shutters; one-story porch extends across the facade. The property is sited atop a bank overlooking Harper's Ferry Road and a high coursed rubble limestone retain- ing wall along the roadway is a contributing feature to the overall character of the property. (c. 1870) 22. 3817 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story log and wood frame vernacular residential building with parged exterior surface; laterally -oriented gable roof of standing -seam metal; four -bay facade, with flat-topped windows, 2/2, without notable ornament; one-story shed roof porch extends across facade with simple support posts and modest balusters. (c. 1845) 23. 3817 Harper's Ferry Road: One-story vernacular dependency of indeterminate use; gable roof with gable -end orientation to the street and shed -roofed addition on the west side (c. 1900) NPS Forth 10-900. OMB Approval No, 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 6 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD 24. 3813 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, set on a stone foundation and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roofclad in corrugated metal sheeting; 4 -bay facade; fenestration employs flat-topped openings devoid of notable ornament; 1 -story shed -roofed open porch extends across the facade, supported by plain wood posts and trimmed with a sawn wood balustrade oral sources indicate this to have been the work of a local; carpenter/housebuilder (1904; Henry Crampton, builder) 25. Side, 3800 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story modern automobile garage of masonry construction, with laterally - oriented gable roof; built into the side hill of this residential lot and dating from outside the Period of Signifi- cance of the district (c. 1980; NC) 26. 3800 Harper's' Ferry Road: 2'/2 -story Gothic Revival -style residence of wood construction, clad in shiplap siding and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof of standing -seam metal highlighted by a center gable with elaborate bargeboard reminiscent of that found on Resource Nos. 1 and 9; partial return of the cornice on the gable ends; three -bay facade with centered entry, suggesting a central passage interior plan; ell wing at rear with 1 -story open porch on the west side; windows flat-topped, 2/2, with modest surrounds and heads; sited atop a hill overlooking the former Iron Works site and Antietam Creek (c. 1870) 27. Antietam Iron Works Bridge: Three -arch limestone bridge which carries Harper's Ferry Road across Antie- tam Creek; the bridge has masonry parapet side walls and a deck surfaced with modern materials (1832; John Weaver, builder) 28. State Roads Commission Historical Marker: cast metal marker commemorating the 1727 transfer of land from Native Americans to Israel Friend. The object is of a stylized rectangular form with a curvilinear upper edge with the State seal of Maryland in the center. The marker is set on an attenuated metal post and bears the following legend, all cast in upper-case letters: AN INDIAN DEED Israel Friend in 1727 secured a deed from the Indian chiefs of the five nations beginning "at the mouth of the Andietum [sic] Creek thence up the Potomack [sic] River 200 shoots as fur [sic] as an arrow can be slung out of a bow" thence "100 shoots right back from the river" then squared till it interceeds with the creek" STATE ROADS COMMISSION 29. 3768 Harper's Ferry Road (Antietam Iron Works Store): 21/2 -story brick store building with three bay facade and a three -bay brick addition appended to its west gable end; built into a side hill site, with a foundation NPS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No, 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service dational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 7 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD of coursed rubble stone which rises to a full story on the facade; the brickwork on the facade is laid in Flemish bond, while that on the secondary elevations is of common bond. (c. 1820) 30. side, 3768 Harper's Ferry Road: 1½ -story vernacular dependency of brick construction, with broadly sloped laterally -oriented gable roof (c. 1850) 31. 3768 Harper's Ferry Road (Furnace Stack, Antietam Iron Works): coursed limestone furnace stack with battered walls and three hearth openings on the north elevation (c. 1845; listed individually in the National Register as "Antietam Iron Furnace;" NR 6/26/75) 32. Antietam Furnace Archaeological Site: overgrown and untended area along Antietam Creek where the Antietam grist mill and hammer mill were located. All that remains visible are some sections of stone founda- tions. (late eighteenth century and after; listed individually in the National Register on 8/25/83) NPS Form 10-900A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 8 Page 1 8. Significance The Antietam Village Historic District is significant under National Register Criterion A for industry and Criterion C for architecture. Evaluating the fabric of the district under these Criteria, the district's properties reflect primarily vernacular design in the rural reaches of western Maryland throughout the Period of Significance, which begins c. 1763, the approximate date of construction of the district's earliest extant buildings (Resource No. 21), and ends c. 1930, the approximate date of construction of the latest of the district's historic resources (Resource Nos. 5 and 8). The district's significance under Criterion A derives from its position as an important early center of iron - making in western Maryland, within the historic context of which are the extant stack of the Antietam Iron Works, an early store building, and homes associated with workers and supervisors at the furnace. The district is also significant as the site both of advance to and retreat from the Civil War battle of Sharpsburg (a/k/a Antietam) which occurred a short distance to the northeast. With respect to Criterion C, the district contains locally -distinctive examples of vernacular architecture which, although executed without reference to formal design tenets, nonetheless represent the manifestation of local building traditions in this section of Washington County. The district's Criterion C significance is heightened by the presence in the district of the Antietam Iron Works Bridge, an 1832 stone structure built by master builder John Weaver. The Antietam Village Historic District retains its historic rural character along with the physical integrity necessary to reflect its physical appearance during its Period of Significance. The village of Antietam, located at the confluence of Antietam Creek and the Potomac River, was the site of extensive iron -working facilities during most of the one hundred twenty-five years following 1765. In that year, Joseph Chapline—the founder of Sharpsburg and the owner of the Antietam land -established the Antietam Iron Works along with Samuel Beall, Jr., David Ross, and Richard Henderson. Henderson and Ross built the first furnace and forge on the site (often referred to as "Frederick Forge" in contemporary accounts) which were likely in operation by 1775. Ore and wood for charcoal were obtained from the owners' extensive land holdings in the South Mountain area, to the northwest. Pig iron was the principal early product of the furnace and it was produced by the various forges operating at that time in Western Maryland. Just prior to the Revolutionary War, the ownership of the Antietam Iron Works shifted to brothers Samuel and Daniel Hughes, who gained control of this furnace and several other iron operations in the Antietam valley. Under the direct supervision of Samuel Hughes, the Antietam furnace began producing caution for the Balti- more Town Committee of Correspondence, for the Continental Marine Committee and, through an Act of Congress, directly for the Continental Army. Hughes' cannon -making suffered an inauspicious beginning: four of the first five NPS Form 10-9008 OMB Approval No. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD iron cannon cast by Hughes' operations exploded in the course of test -firing, killing George Matthews, a founder and would-be cannon maker from the Kingsbury Ironworks. Despite this, Hughes settled down to producing quantities of nine-, twelve- and eighteen -pounders and ammunition. His reputation spread to General George Washington, who wrote the Board of War Headquarters on April 2, 1779, "Upon consulting General Knox, it is our opinion that the contract with Mr. Hughes for the thirty eighteen -pounders should be renewed, as the cannon are absolutely necessary and it does not appear that they can be procured from any works so soon as from his ..." Antietam cannon were used to fortify Whetstone Point in Baltimore, and the Continental frigate Virginia was armed with 24 twelve -pounders and 6 four -pounders from the Antietam works. Cannon were cast, bored, and proved by Hughes at the Antietam Iron Works. They were then transported by wagon to Baltimore for delivery. The price varied from £36 10s to £40 per ton of finished cannon. At the end of the Revolutionary War, Samuel Hughes terminated his iron -making operations in Washington County. He relocated to the Susquehanna River area and in 1786 entered the iron -smelting and cannon -casting business at Principio with what he called Cecil furnace. After Samuel Hughes' departure from Washington County, the furnace at Antietam may have been inactive for a time; Dennis Griffith's 1794 map of Maryland shows only a forge on the site at the mouth of Antietam Creek. In 1805, the entire ironworks, grist mills, stock, slaves, and property (between 7,000 and 8,000 acres) was advertised for sale. An 1808 map shows the site to have a furnace, forge and grist mill. In the nineteenth century, the original furnace and forge operation continued, perhaps as late as the 1850s. It was joined by a number of other, related enterprises, all utilizing the power of Antietam Creek. In 1831, a nail factory was established with twenty-five nail -making machines, followed by a small rolling mill which consisted of two heating furnaces and two trains of rolls. These enterprises employed over two hundred fifty people, including some sixty slaves. The role of African -Americans in the heritage of ironmaking in western Maryland cannot be overlooked. Jean Libby, in a study ofAfrican influences on charcoal irorunaking technology in western Maryland, described the traditions which were likely brought to American by slaves: The making of iron in West Africa is a sacred science of great ritual and power. It is an indige- nous and ancient process which propelled subsistence agricultural groups into civilizations using tools of iron. . . The chaos of the slave trade and colonialism caused technological regression of iron smelting in Africa. Many who were captures and brought as slaves to the Americas carried this knowledge with them. By the middle of the eighteenth century, the predominant labor group at southern iron furnaces were Africans and African-Americans.1 'Libby, Jean. "Workers of Catoctin Furnace and Antietam Ironworks; n. p. NPS Form 10-900a 0MB Approval No. 1024-0018 Figure 1 Thomas Taggert's 1859 map includes the area of the historic district which he identified as "Antietam Works." United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 3 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD It is more than likely that some of the knowledge gained in West African ironmaking was passed on to the furnaces of western Maryland. In 1828, during the heyday of the Antietam Iron Works, President John Quincy Adams turned the first shovel- ful of earth in the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, which stretched from Georgetown, near the national capitol, westward to Cumberland, in Allegany County, Maryland. The Canal passed just west of the Antietam Village Historic District, and carried goods and settlers westward to Cumberland, where they embarked overland on the National Road. The construction of the Canal involved thousands of laborers and was plagued with misfortune, ranging from legal maneu- vering by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad over the rights -of -way, to illness, including cholera, which claimed more than five hundred canal workers who died in close proximity to the junction of Antietam Creek and the Potomac River. They were buried near to the district since Hagers- town officials denied permission for the burials out of fear of the disease. The nail works at Antietam, owned by John M. Brien, burned in April, 1841. It was rebuilt and increased in size, and continued to operate until about 1853, when Brien sold the ironworks to Wil- liam B. Clark for $54,500. A second charcoal fur- nace, fifty feet high and fifteen feet wide at the boshes, was erected at Antietam in 1845; it is likely this furnace which remains within the district. In a twenty -week period in 1857, this furnace is reported to have produced 1,465 tons of iron, a capacity sig- nificantly greater than that of the first furnace at Antietam two generations earlier. During the years preceding the Civil War, the entire works, in addition to the furnaces, included a sawmill which produced shingles, a nail factory which produced four hundred to five hundred bags of nails and spikes per week, a forge with six heating fires and a twenty -one -ton hammer, a rolling mill which produced plates, rods, nail stock and bar iron, three puddling furnaces and an air furnace which produced finished iron, and a grist mill. Antietam Creek had a head of water with at least twenty feet of fall, and all these enterprises were operated by no fewer than nine water wheels. During the late l50s and early 1860s, the Antietam Ironworks was owned by John Horine-who had other iron manufacturing NPS form 10-800. OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Jational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 4 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD interests --and the heirs of William B. Clark. The works apparently suffered some damage during the Civil War, but afterwards it was rebuilt and acquired by the AM family of Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. They traded as J. S. AM and Company, and are depicted as such on a nineteenth-century historic atlas map.' The Ahls converted the furnace to coke fuel and operated it until about 1880. In 1873, a flood broke the dam, and among the subsequent improvements was construction of an improved hot-air oven. During this period, the furnace was smelting ore mined near Harper's Ferry, transported to Antietam on the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, and likely from the canal to the furnace by means of a tramway or railroad which appears on the aforementioned atlas map. In 1862, during the Civil War, General Burnside's forces passed through the village en route to the area near Sharpsburg where the battle oc- curred which came to bear the name Antietam. An undated drawing depicts the furnace at this time, suggesting that by then it was in a dilapidated condi- tion. Local tradition holds that a house located atop the hill overlooking Antietam Creek (Resource No. 22) served as a field hospital during the battle .3 Figure 2 This drawing, entitled "Supply Train for Burnside's Corps Passing the Antietam Iron Works," appeared in an unidentified contemporary publi- The AM family operated the iron works until cation. [from the collection of the Western Maryland Room, Washington County Free Library, Hagerstown] 1882, when John Ahl died. The operation was sold to Messrs. Hunt and Derland for $100,000 and the newspaper from the county seat, Hagerstown, reported high hopes for the furnace, noting that among other prospects discussed are the erection of an additional furnace and the construction of a branch railroad from the works to connect with the Shenandoah Valley at Sharpsburg Station. Should all these improvements be inaugurated by the new proprietors, there will be abundant labor for all our working men, and the old prestige of Antietam Iron Works when the hands employed were numbered by the hundreds will be restored. There is no reason why this state of affairs should not exist where ore is abundant and an excellent quality of iron is 2An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland. Philadelphia: Lake, Grilling, & Co., 1877. 3Ora1 history interview with owner, May, 2001. NPS Forth 10-900a 0MB Approval No. 1024-0010 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Jational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 manufactured at comparatively little cost. Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Such development never occurred, and the furnace and most of the closely -associated properties fell into further disrepair. The machinery was dismantled and the other mill buildings disappeared from the cultural landscape, leaving only the furnace stack, the store building, the bridge, some foundations, and a handful of houses to reflect the heyday of this major western Maryland industry along the banks of Antietam Creek. The Antietam Village Historic District is significant as the site of substantial iron -working en- terprise which spanned the period from the colonial years through much of the nineteenth century. Al- though company records from the various Antietam operations have never been found, numerous refer- ences to the Antietam works exist in general local and regional history books, in histories of iron in the colonies, and in some primary documents from the Revolutionary period. With reference to the Revolu- tionary War era, the district was home to one of the operations conducted by the Hughes Bros., who were major suppliers ofweaponry to the Continental forces. In addition to the significance of the district for its industrial associations, the Antietam Village Historic is also significance as a rural western Maryland village containing vernacular architecture dating from the late eighteenth century into the early years of the twentieth century. Within the village is domestic architecture associated with the iron works, a small farmstead (Resource Nos. 1-10), a c. 1763 stuccoed stone house (Resource No. 20) which, according to local tradition, was used as a boarding house for ironworks laborers, and a stuccoed log house (Resource No. 22) reputed to have served as a field hospital following the Battle of Antietam. In addition to the domestic archi- tecture, a vernacular brick store building is also in the district; this building was owned by the Iron Works until 1888 when it was sold to Peter Otzelberger, whose descendants retain ownership at the time of the preparation of the nomi- contained this map of the area which would become the Antietam Village Historic District. Much of the real estate is shown to be in the ownership of the Ahis, who ran the Iron Works at that time. NPS Forth 10-900a OMB Approval No, 1024-0019 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service lational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 6 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD nation documents. The 1877 atlas indicates that all of the property in the village at that time owned by J. S. Ahl & Company, who operated the furnace and grist mill, suggesting that Antietam Village was truly a company town (Figure 3). The village has home to the workers and managers who depended upon the furnace and iron- works for their livelihood and to the few merchants who served the hamlet. The community appears to have never enjoyed a particularly elevated standard of living, judging from the modest vernacular domestic architecture which characterizes Antietam Village and from the fact that the immediate village area did not even contain a church; the closest house of wor- ship is on Harper's Ferry Road between Antietam and Sharpsburg. Under Criterion C, the Antietam Village Historic District is also significant for its close asso- ciation with master builder John Weaver, who built the stone bridge known as the Antietam Iron Works Bridge (Resource No. 27), which carries Harper's Ferry Road across the Antietam near its juncture with the Potomac River. The Washington County Commissioners who were in charge of construction of the bridge were John Grove, John Miller, and Daniel Piper. Filed with the land records of Washington County is an agreement between the Commissioners and John Weaver which stipulates that the bridge would contain two arches of thirty-five feet and two arches of thirty feet and would be built to a uniform width of sixteen feet. The contract price for Weaver's work was $4,250. Weaver was a recognized master builder and between 1832 and 1840 was engaged by the County to build several other bridges over Antietam Creek as well as one at Hess' Mill bridge, spanning the Little Antietam. The Antietam Iron Works Bridge and the bridge at Hess' Mill were the first two bridges which Weaver erected for the i , yy waa �n 4 ri •I`rn�., 3 x 1≥'�"', wn{n 1 eyti�"pce r 5 p� },n °? : y Sk d n tyk !d lVk qkd Ill A - �h Figure 4 In 1872 the publication PicturesqueAmerica featured this drawing entitled, "Old Bridge and Mill, Antietam —Antietam Rolling Mill —Burnside Bridge" (not shown). The drawing indicates the high level of industrial activity which was present at the site at that time; only the bridge and tst stack of the furnace are extant. NPS Foram 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ]ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 7 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD County.4 The Antietam structure is important as a leading example of the type of bridge design which was favored in Washington County from 1819 to the 1860s. Some Washington County stone -arch bridges have been lost, but many are extant, carrying traffic on a daily basis. The Antietam Iron Works Bridge is additionally significant for the role it played during the Civil War battle of Antietam. According to Helen Ashe Hays in her book, The Antietam and its Bridges, Confederate troops crossed the Antietam Iron Works Bridge on their way to reinforce General Lee at Sharps - burg and retreated southward over the same road. In addition to the architectural and historical importance of the Antietam Iron Works Bridge, the area at the mouth of the Antietam is associated with a number of historical events. A state historical marker at the south end of the bridge commemorates a 1727 land transaction between pioneer settler Israel Friend and the chiefs of five nations of Native Americans. The tract began at the mouth of the Antietam Creek and led up the Potomac River "200 shoots as fur [sic] as an arrow can be slung out of a bow ° then "200 shoots right back from the river then squared till it intercedes with the creek." This site is marked by a Maryland State Roads Commission commemorative plaque (Re- source No. 28). The junction of the Potomac and Antietam is said to have been the site of a violent battle between the Catawba and Delaware Indians in 1736. Viewing the Antietam Village Historic District in the context of comparable nearby districts, this district is considerably smaller in size that the two nearest districts, at Sharpsburg and at Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, both of which contain a defined commercial area along with residential neighborhoods. These districts also contain more formally -derived architecture, which the Antietam Village district lacks. Contextually, Antietam Village, Sharpsburg, and Harper's Ferry all have close ties to the Civil War—Harper's Ferry with the beginning of the War and Sharpsburg and Antietam Village with the battle of Antietam. Elsewhere in Washington County, the districts in the county seat of Hagerstown are far larger and more diverse than Antietam Village and contain architecture of a far grander scale. Like Antietam Village, the historic areas in the villages of Tilghmanton and Fairplay, between Sharpsburg and Hagers- town, are nearly exclusively residential in character and with homes of a scale of those found in the Antietam Village district. 4Michael, Mary, The Story of Washington County. Williamsport, Maryland: 1993, p. 90. NPS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024-0010 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ii.ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 2 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD` MARYLAND COMPREFZ(31i7SJV13'$ISTORICFRESERVATIONPLANpATA Geographic Organization Western Maryland . Chronological Developmental Period(s) Rural Agrarian Intensification,. A. D. 1680-1815 Agricultural -Industrial Transition A. D. 1815-1870 Prehistoric/Historic Period Theme(s) Economic Transportation Architecture, Landscape Architecture, & Community Planning Resource Type - Category: District Historic Environment: Village, Rural Historic Function(s) and Use(s) DOMESTIC/singlc dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure TRANSPORTATION/bridge COMMERCE/TRADE/store INDUSTRY/manufacturing facility kt���Di AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding n Sources None WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1.1 for Maryland Relay DATE : July 30, 2008 4JJ. TOe ��) eMtI• FROM: Stephen Goodrich, Chief Planner SUBJECT: RZ-08-003 — Map Amendment Please find attached for your review and comments the proposed map amendment to, the Zoning Ordinance for Case Number RZ-08-003 that has been filed with the Planning Commission. The amendment request will be heard at a public meeting with the Washington County Planning Commission on Monday, September 15, 2008 at 7:00 PM. This public meeting will be held in the Washington County Court House, 95 West Washington Street, Court Room #1, Hagerstown, Maryland. Please review and return your comments by no later than August 15, 2008. Comments may be returned via e-mail to sgoodrich@washco-md.net or by mail to the above address. If you have any questions, please contact me via e-mail at the above address or by phone at 240-313-2430. stg/dse Attachments www.washco-md.net A H C H 1540 W' ,000 FT F Jls5Joins FMap 7 i5wP OFF MAP H J L I( drview N ldoari 4 GM0`(•' P Y E ucau it Clr no neN SpdnA PO I n 0 ASR ! n� IM PIKE a� < Ool Ch in �g:fi IeaF SPdae r \ P `0t0F)W 3 ONP ^� E 9 laNjHAD, oX0 il I . AS NSA c dial EPIsNA'T psve lose Hove Hill 50vYE1 oe 3 fII1JPCl' 5 Hnp�E/ axp axoa eBrS sux 0000 Heave a C R o �O J` NI1 Af1OIINS!'.1 JOGS C� -0v I. ate d . _ Pete 8 Wlheran heI Chrlat o `�xt418 OG Pc eO 1Clear p9 Padt&flecrealioe Spring 1' @ G OWIGHT O EISEN OWER g a aa° N } 68 Y e aA D (C9 oe a 4 � a P P lacy sap G yQe °e 68 s o Inm ROpO N 56 tarp 8 9lc tma I nrvn ally 4ro � tl 6 f// rr EIG • P.IL `�• Cl /iP TL" SNIP'.C, yd g } 61- +0e s � = ro Tp tOCll av p`` trero. —a a 11 . L45 J 1 1., ng c 1� I f N �CL y6 a �y°vy\ p used ek ₹ yyq�r /1+ S D 1 ______ 00 00 6 L 11 12 I3 4.2180/ o peetunuxxao FrinaC0. 23 MD GRID 550,0!0 FT 0 4 u 1 Joins Inset 19 —'� 540.000 rr ` I77•55W' WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND ORDINANCE AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETE THE A®Ri( ATE SECTIONS AND SIGN THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE APPROPRIATE FEES. (PLEASE MAKE OMECKS PAYABLE TO: "WASHINGTON COUNTY TREASURER".) XoN,44.4 t T9AN ToLAAy APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Type of Amendment requested: i/ MAP AMENDMENT 1) Zoning Ordinance: applicaAnt hereby VA ocated at i o 5 To be completed by the Planning Commission Case No. �i oQ 00 3 1 Date Filed: .y�l)iL Fee Paid: /a9iN X44 wsi�b ADDRESS ADDRESS jz4ab-&4Ctwtait og" #tdd(g. AaWMId n ONQ4 for Jt}�hea ,AAV�AI/a All AA ... ...n•:. P mn-eae Street Name and Intersecting road From the t�C- Present classil Tax Map: CV orNSEWside (1) acre or more of RQygaf CQ1t0A/t/tMi j(p►, District to the cc tq //P OWRIAykequested Classification Grid: .S Parcel ' No.: A Explanation (As described in the "Administrative Procedures for Rezoning Applications"): If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet of paper) REASON FOR THE REQUEST: (Please check one) ❑ Change in the character of the neighborhood ❑ Mistake in Original Zoning 0.5*,4,BusN A,v ,1isrotfr WESE,e V fl/aN ovE.e.L 4y roA) E Ordinance Amendment Application Page 2 TEXT AMENDMENT Please check one: Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Comprehensive Plan Forest Conservation Ordinance Solid Waste Plan Subdivision Ordinance Water and Sewer Plan Zoning Ordinance Proposed Text: Deletions should be in brackets, unchanged wording in lower case, and new wording in caps. Section No. Attorney or Agent Address Subscribed and wp9rn before me this l / day of , 20 0?. My commissior expires on (.23/, o'/ Notary Public July 10, 2008 Applicants request a map amendment establishing an Historical Property overlay ("HP overlay") zone for the house and immediate surrounding area at 10914 Dam Number 5 Rd., Clear Spring, Md. 21722 which we refer to as Cliff Springs'. Section 20.5 of Article 20 of the County's zoning ordinance provides that The Planning Commission shall consider the following criteria when reviewing an application for an "HP" overlay zone: (1) if the subject structure has historical, cultural, architectural and design significance as set forth in Section 20.5 (b) and (c), or (2) if the structure is listed in the Maryland Historical Trust's Inventory of Historic Sites, then (3) it may be classified as an historic structure. Cliff Springs satisfies both criteria (1) and (2), as described below. (1) THE SECTION 20.5 (b) and (c) CRITERIA development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the County, state or nation? Cliff Springs was part of what was once a milling complex established shortly after 1800, reflecting the importance of flour milling to the 18 and 19th Century economy in Washington County. A mill at the site first appears on a map in 1808. (Reed, at 7-8)). The Inventory of Historic Sites describes Cliff Springs as a significant farm and milling operation. (Attached). The C&O Canal Companion (2000 ed.), at page 200, states that the mill predated the canal and used the water power generated by the Little Conococheague Creek as it flowed over the dam that still exists on the grounds of Cliff Springs. Washington County was part of the breadbasket of the United States (also including South Central Pennsylvania and Virginia) until the Civil War when cheaper and more fertile land in the Mid -west left the County less competitive.(Architectural and Historic Treasures of Washington County at ix -x (2002)). By 1900, flour milling was a declining industry, as manufacturing became more important to the County. Id. Until then, Cliff Springs and other mills along the Potomac were important to the development of Washington County. The homes and mills (now mostly ruins) remain as living reminders of that heritage and our agricultural past. (2) Is Cliff Mills the site of a significant historic event? In 1834, the hill overlooking the waterfall next at Cliff Springs was the scene of the canal's worst labor riot when two factions numbering almost a thousand met in a violent confrontation that left several dead. State militia and federal troops were called to quell the riot. (The C&O Canal Companion, (2000 ed.) at page 200). In 1861, Stonewall 'In 1990, Paula Reed, of Preservation Associates, Inc., evaluated the property and commented on its historic, cultural, architectural, and design significance. (Attached) In her report, she referred to the property at 10914 Dam # 5 Rd as "Cliff Springs Flour Mills Property." We have used a shorter version, referring to it simply as "Cliff Springs." Reed's report is the source of much of the commentary supporting the request for the HP overlay. Citations to Reed's report and any other source material appear as "[Source,] at [page]." Jackson used cannon to shell Dam #5, just upstream from Cliff Springs, to disrupt canal traffic. (3) Is Cliff Springs identified with a person or group of persons who influenced society? An early owner of Cliff Springs was Peter Middlekauf, who bought the property in 1806. The Middlekaufs were an important family in 19a' Century Washington County. In 1877, Lewis Charles reportedly owned and operated a mill complex at Cliff Springs. He was a member of the same Charles family that operated another mill about a mile up the Potomac River. (Reed, at 7-8 and attachment to the Reed Report.) (4) Does Cliff Springs exemplify the cultural, economic, social, political, or historic heritage of the County and its communities? As explained in Section (b)1 above, Cliff Springs exemplifies the economic heritage of the County because flour mills and millers were important to the County's economy when it was part of the country's breadbasket. ( Reed, at page 9.) The house at Cliff Springs reflects the wealth of the millers who lived and conducted business there. The formal appearance and size of the house, the spacious rooms (especially upstairs), and the remains of the outbuildings tell us that this was the home of one of Washington County's early business elite. (c) Architectural and Design Significance. (1) Does Cliff Springs embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or architecture? According to the Reed report, Cliff Springs reflects a vernacular interpretation of the Federal Style, most clearly seen in the smooth, expertly finished brick facade, the interior finishes with delicate, reeded trim and thin, flat paneled doors. (Reed, at 7) The house appears formal and imposing with its symmetrical facade and end chimneys. (Reed, at 1) An important feature of Cliff Springs is the high quality original masonry work displayed in the brick construction. (Reed, at 1) At the entrance to Cliff Springs is an 1880's High Victorian porch which is not contemporary with the rest of the house, but is an excellent example of its type and times. (Reed, at 3). Despite unfortunate changes in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the house still contains much original fabric. For example, many of the rooms have original mantles, chair railings, baseboards, doors, and very old, if not original, floors. Most of the window frames are original and three upstairs still have their original chimney cupboards. (Reed, at 4-7) And much original horsehair plaster remains. The Inventory of Historic Sites describes Clifton Springs as a "stately and a good example of period brick vernacular architecture." (Attached) (2) Was Cliff Springsthe work of a master artisan, architect or builder? We don't know who built Cliff Springs, but the quality external brickwork, and large rooms (especially upstairs) suggest a skilled builder with a wealthy patron. (3) Does Cliff Springs possess high artistic value? See section (c) (1) above. (4 )Does Cliff Springs represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction? As described above, Cliff Springs is a significant and distinguishable entity. See, for example, sections (b) 1, (c) 1, and the Inventory of Historic Sites. (5)Does Cliff Springs represent an established and familiar visual feature in the County due to its singular physical characteristic, landscape or historical event? Absolutely. No matter which approach one takes, the view of the house is imposing, especially coming South on Dam Number 5 Road through the "S" curve over the creek. The dam and waterfall just north of the house attract many passers-by who stop and photograph the scene. (6) Is Cliff Springs the only example ever existing or remaining of a particular period style and material or construction technique? Not applicable. (2)THE INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES In 1978, the house at Cliff Springs was listed in the Maryland Historical Trust's Inventory of Historic Sites. (Attached) The Inventory form describes the house and the ruins of the barn and mill as "significant as a farm, milling operation and for the family cemetery on the property [no longer on the property]. The house ... is a stately and a good example of period brick vernacular architecture (3) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Recently, the Commission added requirements for applicants seeking a map amendment. We respond below. 1. A completed application form accompanies this package. 2. A copy of the deed showing proof of ownership is attached. 3. A copy of a boundary description prepared by a Maryland surveyor is attached. 4. A list of names of adjoining or confronting property owners appears at Tab_ 5. A copy of a vicinity map showing the zoning classification of all property within 1,000 feet of the property subject to the application is attached. 6. A scale drawing showing the boundaries of the proposed HP overlay is attached. 7. We are applying for the HP overlay to preserve the property and to qualify for tax credits. Once we receive the map amendment, we intend to apply for to the Maryland Historic Trust to qualify for state recognition and the state tax credits. We understand that obtaining the HP overlay carries obligations, namely, getting prior approval of any building permits for exterior work. In fact, we are already subject to a federal scenic easement because of the proximity of the house at Cliff Springs to the C&O National Historical Park across the road. The scenic easement requires us to obtain prior approval for the Park Service for any external improvements within the easement. a. We understand that subsections 7(i) and 7(ii) still do not apply to an application for the HP overlay. We discuss only sections 27.3(e) and (f), respectively. Section 27.3(e) requires the Commissioners to consider the compatibility of the HP overlay with existing and proposed development in the area, including indication of neighboring sites that appear in the Washington Historic Sites Survey. As the vicinity map reveals, the adjacent and confronting properties in the area are zoned agricultural, environmental, or preservation, or a combination of the three. The HP overlay will not affect the rights of adjacenticonfronting property owners. They will remain free to exercise their full rights of ownership subject to the relevant zoning that encumbers their property. So far as we know, the nearest dwelling on the Historic Sites Survey is over a mile away. Section 23.7(f) asks if the proposed HP overlay furthers the policies of the Adjusted Plan for the County, Development Analysis Plan Map and Policies (Comprehensive Plan). Of course the HP overlay furthers the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan promotes preservation which is exactly what the requested HP overlay will achieve. Since the house satisfies all relevant criteria, the applicants request the Commission to create the HP overlay zone for Cliff Springs. � S 1 i t _ `.� _- The Middlekauff farmhouse and mill site are located along the west side of Dam #5 Road, where the Little Conococheague Creek meets the Potomac River and the C & 0 Canal. The house is a two story, five bay brick structure which rests on high, coursed stone foundations. Walls are laid in Flemish bonding at the front elevation and at the north end wall to the height of the tops of the first story windows. Other elevations are laid in common bonding with a ratio of five stretcher courses between rows of header bricks. Ground and first story openings are topped with splayed jack arches. An important feature of the house is the high quality original masonry work displayed in the brick construction. Most of the surface of the building retains its original pointing with smooth mortar tooled with a strike line. Evidence remains in protected areas of red iron oxide staining and striping of the joints, as well. The mortar is hard -surfaced and firm, typical of 18th century masonry construction, although the house probably dates from the early 1800s. The house appears formal and imposing with its symmetrical facade and end chimneys. Closer inspection reveals, however, greater spacing between openings at the south half of the facade than at the north portion. This is simply a particular feature of this house and does not indicate multiple periods of construction for the brick portion of the house. The house rests on coursed limestone foundations which extend above the ground for several feet at the south and east elevations. Much of the original pointing remains in the foundation stones. Openings in the foundation have massive framing, mortised, tenoned and pegged. One of the most notable aspects of this house is the construction of the foundation and cellar which is divided end to end by a stone wall creating two separate spaces in the cellar with no access from one to the other. The rear portion of the cellar, beneath the west half of the house is divided into two rooms on an axis, the south room containing original vent windows with vertical wood bars and a door to the exterior on the south and one to another room on the north. The second room is a barrel vaulted root cellar with a vent in its north end. This two room portion of the cellar would appear to be a foundation and basement for an earlier building that predated the present early 19th century brick house. This conclusion is supported by the absence of any means to pass directly from the front to rear sections of the basement, and by the exterior face of openings and masonry on the south surface of the wall dividing the present basement in two. A preliminary conclusion would be that there was an 18th century long, narrow two -room log or frame house which was dismantled to the foundation and replaced with the present, much larger brick house about 1810. Some time after the brick house was built, a one story addition was attached to the south end wall. Its profile remains on the south wall acid it was removed or destroyed prior to the insertion of two windows in the end wall, which may have occurred 3 in the 1920s or '30s. Other windows have two over two double hung sash which are early 20th century replacements of the originals. Original window frames, however, remain. They are narrow with cavetto molding and beaded edges. Openings in the foundation retain older style massive framing with pegged joints, even on the portion of the foundation that is contemporary with the brick house. The main entrance is located in the central bay of the front elevation. The door is framed similarly to the windows and has a rectangular transom. At the entrance is an 1880s period one -bay High Victorian porch. Although it is not contemporary with the rest of the house, it is an excellent example of its type and times and retains its original paint scheme featuring dark red - brown and white trim. Interior The main entrance opens into a wide stair hall which provides access to two rooms on each side. Portions of the original material inside the house have been removed and replaced, mostly due to flood damage in 1936. The principal feature of the entrance hall is the staircase which is consistent in its design with the presumed early 19th century construction date. The stair has delicate turned newel posts, two rectangular balusters per step and chair rail paralleling the hand rail with cavetto molding at the top and a small double bead at the bottom. The northeast room, originally a parlor, has the most highly 4 decorated woodwork remaining in the house. The focal point of this room is the mantlepiece which includes reeded pilasters, reeded oval tablets and a reeded frieze band beneath the mantle shelf. Vestiges of the original dove -rose -grey paint are visible beneath the later blue-green. In the southeast room, most of the original interior finishes have been removed or replaced at various times during the 20th century. The fireplace has a 1960s or 70s brick face. Earlier in the 1890-1900 period, a door was added in the south wall, replacing an original window. It once led onto a porch which extended along the front of the addition. It apparently provided the most direct access from the house into the addition. Behind the southeast room, the southwest corner of the house is the original kitchen. The absence of cooking facilities in the basement suggests that this was the main cooking area for the household. Although domestic outbuildings no longer remain, there would probably have been a separate out -kitchen for the more messy chores like butchering and soapmaking. The fireplace in the kitchen is larger than the others and has flanking cupboards. The mantle piece has a double fielded architrave beneath a molded shelf. The cupboards have flat paneled doors with small ogee molded trim. In the southwest corner of the room is a winding stair leading to the second floor room immediately above the kitchen. The northwest room on the first floor was damaged during the 1936 flood and never repaired. Water marks remain on the plaster 0 near the ceiling. Original chair rail and much plaster remains as well as window and door trim, consisting of single fielded architraves with cavetto trim on the woodwork. Original dove -grey paint remains On the second floor, the floor plan is a variant of that found on the first floor. At the upper level, the hallway does not pass from front to back of the house. Instead, the two front rooms meet at a partition between the two and the larger room in the northeast corner contains three of the second story front windows. Doors to all four of the second floor rooms are placed side -by -side near the head of the stairs. The two more southerly rooms on the second floor are particularly significant because they retain their original architectural elements and original or early finishes.. The northeast room is the largest and most original of the rooms in the house. It has its original mantlepiece with a double fielded architrave, chimney cupboard with doors with ogee trim, chair rail, baseboard and window frames. The door with its six raised panels, more consistent with 18th than 19th century construction, is also original along with its cast iron box lock and hinges. Perhaps the most significant feature of this room is the preponderance of original finishes. Most of the woodwork is light grey, a color that was quite popular in the early 19th century. The baseboard has been finished with stylized marbleizing. The interior surface of the door is painted with a gold stain which could have been a base for graining or a 9 finished treatment. The plaster walls also show early painting techniques with white paint applied with vertical brush strokes, placed neatly on the wall. This was a typical paint finishing technique of the 18th and 19th centuries, although very few examples of this workmanship remain visible today. On the south and east walls of the room is wallpaper with a vertically striped floral pattern and a grey and black floral border. Although closer examination of the paper is necessary to determine its age, it may be a late 19th century example. An odd and unexplained feature of this room is the different finish on the baseboard of the south wall. Although an attempt was made to match the marbleizing of the rest of the baseboard, the west baseboard was obviously done by another person with a slightly different technique. Other Puzzling features of this wall are its mismatched alignment with the intersecting walls. Further investigation of the building should resolve these questions. The northwest room on the second floor retains similar architectural elements as those described in the preceding room. This room also has a peg rail for hanging clothing in addition to the other typical elements. Woodwork is finished in dark red iron oxide paint, also known as "Spanish Brown," a popular color of the 18th and 19th centuries. Although this is an early color, beneath it is a yellowish brown paint that could have been a primer or an earlier finish color. finished treatment. The plaster walls also show early painting techniques with white paint applied with vertical brush strokes, placed neatly on the wall. This was a typical paint finishing technique of the 18th and 19th centuries, although very few examples of this workmanship remain visible today. On the south and east walls of the room is wallpaper with a vertically striped floral pattern and a grey and black floral border. Although closer examination of the paper is necessary to determine its age, it may be a late 19th century example. An odd and unexplained feature of this room is the different finish on the baseboard of the south wall. Although an attempt was made to match the marbleizing of the rest of the baseboard, the west baseboard was obviously done by another person with a slightly different technique. Other Puzzling features of this wall are its mismatched alignment with the intersecting walls. Further investigation of the building should resolve these questions. The northwest room on the second floor retains similar architectural elements as those described in the preceding room. This room also has a peg rail for hanging clothing in addition to the other typical elements. Woodwork is finished in dark red iron oxide paint, also known as "Spanish Brown," a popular color of the 18th and 19th centuries. Although this is an early color, beneath it is a yellowish brown paint that could have been a primer or an earlier finish color. 7 The two southern rooms on the second floor have received more alteration over the years, but retain their original configuration and major elements. The southwest room, above the kitchest has been divided into two modern bathrooms. In addition to the house the property includes a mill dam, foundation ruins, most likely of the mill building, ruins of a stone foundation of a bank barn, agricultural outbuildings, an old road trace and a cemetery of the Middlekauff family who owned the property in the early 19th century. Historical Analysis The house as it presently stands reflects vernacular interpretation of the Federal Style, most clearly represented in the smooth, expertly finished facade, the interior finishes with delicate reeded trim and thin, flat paneled doors. The color schemes chosen for original finishes are typical of the Federal period with emphasis on subdued hues, particularly dove grey and white. Evidence from the basement suggests that a smaller, earlier structure stood on the site of the present house, but not enough remains to provide clues as to its appearance. The present house is transitional with combined 18th and 19th century features, typical of construction in the first decade of the 19th century. Among the 18th century features are raised panel doors at the second story and massive pegged framing of cellar windows, even in the 19th century portion of the cellar. The house is part of a milling complex that was apparently established shortly after 1800. Dennis Griffith's map of Maryland made in 1794 does not show a mill at this location, but Charles Vane's 1808 map of Frederick and Washington Counties does show a mill near the mouth of the Little Conococheague Creek. By 1877 when An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland was published, a mill complex at this site was owned and operated by Lewis Charles. He was a member of the same Charles family that operated another mill about a mile up the Potomac River. Lewis Charles is listed in the atlas as owning 185 acres, being a miller by occupation and having been born in Washington County in 1826. In Clear Spring's business references in the 1877 atlas, Lewis Charles is listed as proprietor of "Cliff Spring Flour Mills" and as a "dealer in grains of all kinds." Being located on the C & 0 Canal, Mr. Charles would have had a canal boat wharf and probably a warehouse for direct canal transportation of goods. According to Joan Hull, a Clear Spring area historian who is familiar with the Middlekauff-Charles mill site, the flour mill sat north of the house, along the south side of the creek. The stone foundation ruins still visible adjacent to the dam are from the mill. Mrs. Hull also recalls that the course of the Little Conococheague Creek was altered when the present bridge on Dam #5 Road was installed. The 1877 atlas also shows a second house on the north side of the creek, listed under the name of Lewis Charles. Another unidentified building was also shown on the map, closer to the --anal than the other structures. It may have been a warehouse or another building related to the mill V] operation. The 1877 map also shows that at that time Dam #5 Road ended at the mill. The Cliff Spring Flour Mills property reflects the importance of flour milling to the 18th and 19th century economy in Washington County and relates this economic activity to a significant transportation system of the 19th century, the C & 0 Canal. The house, despite the battering it has received from multiple floods, stands in remarkably good condition with a large portion of its original fabric and finishes in place. Further research may reveal the origin of the earlier foundation in the basement of the present structure and more detailed information about the appearance of the house and mill during and possibly prior to Middlekauff ownership. tJilu Coufc All(m ff S4g q/1/n7 LJilbu- /3 rt5t,. ( A) 4/a a 37 S � 46 3J'zJ18 Rai 59 N4., 45� j0 4l3/l3 ur'�z �r ( {tRrlte f /z 35/ sor ill 312.0 J/ i �eo u� `Y r� rosk' 8/13a4u4' lfr N7 I_ . 3ee-at Ea-i;J,u,I c lefec keata i 1.r6u�Aa �fl-av'� 1rta- Y Jb 6 f SG ya, ap, � 7ov 144 41t. �� �11� �Llra I<i , iL .(ia1 ) d.Yz. Will Co�ivY t3-Gtk o� �`A' ILI G�fT Ja y"uel 0 Gfecrec. Itz7 G.Ii kl4Ci L,( 21131L/6 ,� ( J�r�ruL lw.. ,JyScpivJtti.neli� �' f 70 J:7 J1P" i..✓ . __..'l'tt l�f3 yea._ ,2 t1---_�dsru Ir _. /t4' IQdI %k wla,, �rtV ttdcr Ac 5,/HHf '{/2/)/ta6 7ssa yoa4W �o f cY / ? So a, ln,dd/�/�4t�N ote aoA., ICI b u w f _ Z c `¢ V 4w�yy. I is W EI w 5 r 3 tyI I O Q al S N .. _) K K O K C P g PcI 2 o z It to ¢ K U ! n U a f ° E JN_ K a C 3 =m O ° diet -E- w z 7 U ULC ^ 'Q N� Cl ¢ I Iz ct to 0 z ID Ic I `C. Y ii Cr z F Cr R1 z z C ¢ Cr � I , It, - OS < =1 p. C -I C C o C Cc 5.55 53- U U. NCV acn 010 my -'_ cool U COOS C Y q V O W LS C . f CCN c _ C I- r oGE S G C C, vW u �q. w ,Y i8 u m _ _ $4. w ro _ 4 T m 04 wya II.. g. w _ _ ft = 4 9 W .C 4•9 0 u e 9 , of=41 9 4 d i z w uy (y Y Gg 5 W ,Z - So . tl pp p° qy 0 � it 11:!t I qe C p o'5 u M S W p 00 p e o u q°S Tti .40 °s y$ I a u W L f u 9 V o t.4 p OACIZ ^ x' o m o n V y Li C 9 . V 4 .444 °_yyy 9 > gyp g V Y y: r� Ol M I a Z ° A p mc .y F 2 g x (° wp O V O O w w o it p o a Y O pV 1440 V ° ywa e Y O a P e e O®sp ti 0 S aroro 0 ° • YAw pOp °Nb g p w e 4 e` o Li I .t4 up ,+ o ywe[� a u • oea i piYi 4 e 7 ^ W a . a i q y 0I ,. Y Y ayp MII p>> SI u i Y Y. O i 32491 0531 LERtt QF_l;IRGUIT COURT WASS'$tRGi?OW COuHTY THIS DEED, made this fI day of March, 2007, by BILLY H. LAY AND ELIZABETH A. LAY, his wife, Grantors, of Washington County, Maryland. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Seven Hundred Thirty-seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($737,500.00), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, we, the said Grantors, do hereby grant and convey unto RONALD J. DOLAN AND JEAN M. DOLAN, his wife, all that property situate in Washington County, Maryland, Election District No. 4, and more particularly described as follows: Lot 3, containing 8.5084 acres, and Remaining Lands, containing 1.5799 acres, as shown on the plat entitled, "Preliminary/Final Plat, Lots 2 & 3, Mill Pond House" as prepared by Loiederman Associates, Inc., dated March, 1992, and recorded June 1, 1992, said plat recorded among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland, in Plat No. 3713. BEING the same property which was conveyed to the Grantors herein by Marco C. DiChiro, by deed dated January 7, 2000, and recorded among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland at Liber 1548, folio 3. TOGETHER with the buildings and improvements thereon, and the rights, roads, waters, privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining. SUBJECT to all easements, rights of way, covenants, conditions and restrictions of record, if any, applicable thereto. AND WE, the said Grantors, do hereby covenant that, except as to any applicable conditions, restrictions or easements, we will warrant specially the property hereby conveyed and that we will execute such other and further assurances as may be requisite. 3249, 0538 i:LERK Or CIRCUIT COIJR WASHIM ONCOUNtiY WITNESS our hands and seals. WITNESS: /r r (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF MARYLAND, WASHINGTON COUNTY, To -wit: I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day of March, 2007, before me, a Notary Public of the State and County aforesaid, personally appeared Billy H. Lay and Elizabeth A. Lay, his wife, known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same for the purposes therein contained. WITNESS my hand and Official Notarial Seal. aAs ffliA- Notary Public Ci My Commission Expires:-`-`€ AFFIDAVIT OF GRANTEES AS FIRST-TIME MARYLAND HOME BUYERS The undersigned each state under oath and the penalties of perjury that the following is true to the best of the knowledge, information, and belief of each individual: 1. Each of the undersigned is a grantee of residentially improved real property located at 10914 Dam No. 5 Rd., Clear Spring, MD 21722, and being more particularly described as Tax ID number 04-014081, Washington County, Maryland. 2. Each of the undersigned is a first-time Maryland home buyer (defined as an individual who has never owned in the state 32491 (J539 CL.En)(Q1 U CUI(C0Ut WASHI Gi1fl UDUHTY residential real property that has been the individual's principal place of residence) who will occupy the property as Grantee's principal residence. ?3t2,Q (SEAL) Ronald J. Dora , rantee c7t1 (SEAL) an M. Dolan, Grantee The above oath or affirmation was given under the penalties of perjury before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Maryland, County of Washington, this J441 day of March, 2007. Jwti3. / 1 (SEAL) Notary Public My Commission Expires: THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the within instrument was prepared by or under the supervision of the undersigned Maryland attorney, or by a party to this instrument. William C. Wantz Mail to: Mr. and Mrs. Ronald J. Dolan 10914 Dam No. 5 Rd. Clear Spring, MD 21722 TENNIS J WEAVER CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT i� nrWASH{NGTON COUNTY =14 ?ROVEMENT FEE 0 , 06 RECORDING FEE C 1.=COkEANC TAX `)UNTV "iR;.ANSFERTAX 1/37.56 4ANSFEF TA(___ f_ y1TAL .,..J© 9'.;14 5 TODD L. HERSHEY, TREASURER TAXES PAID^i22tMctL4/4�uo Zoning Map 34 4:91zi r ! /_r --- \\f ;°r0. 4L 'K Y n e iry /n M to \ I P4Y 4t SW. x\ Pal, / 4aiwoa lvOQ. 696/166 __;-----L---____ ate.. f�1`1�•. ' I 26 )•n4>S � e 4586/6 RB-E \ a =eU 1 y � 90. ael 7 _r ,Ifir r -T __ - -r h.. //�w.4svnix•z .>< /? f _ ,J L 1 nI PJD 81.130. 52 Pt/ / Paa c.aO. CANAL I Imo' POTOMAC 1 P60 • � . F / ', _ / ST VIRGINIA R FOOR LCCS2 / s4 Prepared by the Washington County Planning Department GIS 11-16-2006 1000 0 1000 21 ,,. s:\policy\zone\zonebookllxl7.apr Zoning Map 34 tee;, 11 q <` l`- / ` l 1- \/ 5\ dDxN P 0 PPS ,P]/65 ].25 'LPL El \ Y 1+ \\ P.2]r/ P28 I ! (R) R ay H II - — _ I Q roors J.. A WON I \\ I v fel +/=van I ,.• I --"----_— ^ I �1/ mws 1 ` 600/681 flu ?e!' \ 0 R[N f 3 xE xNETN P 60 1060 47 / r T3� w �(\\ 1 ]05/500 / \ Ifi112P u PiD10vt: NPLI. rPRM ! j- \ 012 1055/]99 to I I 16]aBP. Y z / / l P55 I$ � l / /per' .L \EJ y/ c P]t ..➢4 t 3 \ e f f I 1 s / / R ��� fN r 54 Copyright -by State of Maryland All Rights Reserved N 1000 0 ]000 2000 3000 Ft A portion of this map may be reproduced for IS71QIyllOo the purpose of including a section of a map in a w a MAP NO. report or publication and must include a credit to the Maryland Department of Planning 46 ma.p&&4 53 P 9P I Zoning Map Prepared by the Washington County Planning Department GlS 11-16-2006 1000 0 1000 2- �,, ., s:\policy\zone\zonebaokllxl7.apr Zoning Map M1. ».P.m NR .-P205 / \ ,. MI.V it-V.I POTOMAC / WEST RlVej�, c=_�--�e Copyright-by State of Maryland All Rights Reserved N A portion of this map may be reproduced for 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet the purpose of including a section of a map in a W e MAP NO. report or publication and must include a credit to S the Maryland Department of Planning I 54 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS Evelyn Jane Coe 1082 Dam No. 5 Rd. Clear Spring, 21722 Janice Gearhart 11036 Dam Not 5 Rd. Clear Spring, 21722 Rosalie S. Rhodes 10940 Dam No. 5 Rd. Clear Spring 21722 Jack Slick 116 Winner Lane Clear Spring 21722 C&O Canal National Historical Park 1850 Dual Highway, Suite 100 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 4 , II 83, 15' ° c \� NSF y„ N I/T: ........_.._ ........ ......... _ iS ° �N°Cqp `eN LOT. 3 °o ' LANDS OWNED-_ -BY-- 37 14%' W BILLY H. AND ELIZABETH A. LAY N r \ LIBER 1548. PAGE 3 / ` N 384.10 1GNE l�• ' EX. GROUND ELEVATION AT A 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE o, I l /SQ X L nt��nC +/ PIAT FoLio _ N81.51'27"ty / 0 FXISTING FOUNDATION e4t j DRI K r N243501"E 46.53 NUMBERj DELTA DIRECTION TANGENT RADIUS ARC CHOF Cl 3521'40" S 73'32'46" W 52.83 165.73 102.26 100.E C2 66'28'59" S 56'02'12" W 74.0600 113.00 131.12 123.E C3 7333'32" S 61'21'47" W 41.8600 56.00 71.90 67.0E 'loo Po sE� jtt a ue,e / AY 42 NOTES 1. THE CONTOURS SHOWN ARE FIELD RUN BASED UPON VERTICAL DATUM NGVD 29 FROM NGS BENCHMARK C AT DAM NO. 5. 2. LOT DESCRIPTION TAKEN FROM PLAT 3713. 3. 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE WAS PLOTTED FROM COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 240070 0070 A OF A FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATED 5/1/1978. NO FIELD SURVEYING WAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINED THIS LINE WHICH REPRESENTS ZONE A - AREA OF 100 YEAR FLOOD. fHE_PROPOSED--DWE G IS -T0 BE -BUU- UP0WT OLD BARN FOUNDATION USIN / ADDITIONAL SUPPORT COLUMNS. THE FINISHED FLOOR IS TO BE NO LOWER THAN -THE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST EXISTING CORNER WHICH IS 2.7 FEET ABOVE THE ELEVATION OF THE NEAREST FLOOD LINE AS DETERMINED BY THE POINT —ON —THE —BOUNDARY METHOD. N ROAD S74.0% S`E ,8 OWNER BILLY H, AND ELIZABETH A. LAY 10914 DAM NO. 5 ROAD CLEAR SPRING, MD. 21722 301-842-3473 a�•�rocs, I.. OF •. L T SUfiE 206, 14 N. MAIN ST. LE CHAMBERSBURG, PA. 17201 IATES 717-263-3902 717-328-5662 SURVEY/NG (NG/NEER/NO 5)71 DEY£LOPMENT SITE PLAN FOR BILLY H. & ELIZABETH A. LAY S/TUATED ALONG 7HE NORTH S/DE OF DAM NO. 5 ROAD WASHINGTON COU.NP; MARYLAND O/STR/CT 4 14x MAP 54 PARCEL 22 DATE 7/31/2000 DRWN BY S.M.G. JOB NO. 2000-19 SCALE 1 X100' CH/CD BY R.EA. FM 0002 a.e c %'N p..i NI '\ /t/ r'pb1 �/ tr€ z00h. /\. % Q � N § �OE d § f OjE t Rg �ff W pppp G Nb- W N a Rb S 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 Phone (540) 667-9300 Fax (540) 667-2260 Mr. Tim Lung Chief Senior Planner Washington County Planning Department 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 flIAD Triad Engineering, Inc. _June 2008--- - 1... RECE1VLD 4 2008 WA li N@TF.i'I „rpT. RE: Section 106 Review: Proposed Cellular Antenna.Collocation•Site Shenandoah Mobile Company Site No. 137 9004 Old National Pike Boonsboro, Maryland 21741 Dear Mr. Lung: Triad Engineering, Inc. (TRIAD) has been retained by Shenandoah Mobile Company in order to obtain compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as part of the Section 106 review process, for the proposed installation a collocated cellular communications antenna atop an existing 40 - feet tall concrete silo. The silo is located in a barnyard with associated outbuildings and a dwelling that have the above stated physical address. As part of this process, the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) requires this letter officially informing the government of Washington County of the proposed project. The location of the site is depicted on the attached portion of the Funkstown, Maryland 7.5 -minute quadrangle topographic map. The approximate coordinates of the site are: N Latitude — 39.562220; W Longitude -77.689440 The proposed improvements will consist primarily of a 13.5 -foot pole extension with two antennas and a 12 -foot by 18 -foot lease area that will contain associated equipment and which will be surrounded by chain link fencing. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) will be confined to the silo and the small enclosure area near its base that will adjoin the northeastern side of an existing 35 -foot by 100 -foot barn. Design drawings of the proposed improvements and photographs of the site are also attached. It should be noted that antennas owned by AT&T currently exist placed on another silo in the barnyard. In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), this project is being evaluated to consider its potential effect on districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The dwelling associated with the farmstead was reportedly constructed in 1920, and a stone bank barn adjoins the dwelling to the northeast. Neither of these structures were identified during a search of the national or state historic register databases. The Cool Practical Engineering and Science Solutions Since 1975 West Virginia Pennsylvania Maryland Virginia Proposed Cellular Antenna Collocation Site No. 137 Boonsboro, Maryland June 23, 2008 Page 2 Hollow House (WA -II -195) is located approximately one-half mile north of the site and is the only known registered historic property located within a one-half mile radius of the Site. The existing silo and associated farmstead are apparently not visible from the Cool Hollow House due to the view angle and a hill located between the house and the site. The location of this architectural resource is depicted on the attached portion of the Funkstown, Maryland 7.5 -minute quadrangle topographic map. TRIAD has also contacted various other state, tribal, and local agencies regarding potential effects to endangered species, critical habitats, historical sites, and cultural sites as part of this review process. There is no direct effect anticipated to the site other than the proposed improvements, and it is not anticipated that the tower will be visible from any national or state architectural resources. Based on our preliminary research and site visit, it is TRIAD'S professional opinion that the proposed construction of the cellular tower antenna will have "no effect" on potentially existing endangered species, critical habitats, historical sites, and cultural sites. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me by phone or via email at parker(altriadena.com, or Mr. Lynn Koerner of Shenandoah Mobile Company at 540984-5237; lynnk@shentel.net. Sincerely, TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Thomas A. Parker Environmental Scientist Attachments Ref. No. 07-08-0250-04 AM 3 NOR ii Joins RUC#Y snalmc mi MARYLAND OHRECTIONAL TRAININ CENTER /floc_ RO7( URY CORRECTIONAL NSTN ON MA LAND CORREC N INSTITUTION HAG RSTOW 'NV 4 d p MAP 26 C N S. tN l �13 °N� kNnETAPf ° �UVLRI OUK 4-RIeW nl RTNra H Joins Map 31 E Mo saiocao,000 n� fn'42w C on�E..nowu o .�,ixo ao. 31 A (R) C � ' �� �•� a �\ i 1( :e f )fir%x � t .. Jc P.NY CfEflfllL Rt \ \ \V IjPo I )[ 9PL /9 y XtK18 iaL ILwr 'i /, \, ` P lwl„• 4a VEII-, 11 L %((/ ,• 11195 PP9P �. I I !/ y �1 IN flR'kti.°° $� mid 1'J+./9' P le tllI LN \\ l\ 7*" iL I hl '�\.., Pa9fi 0� P M IN: rJe : '���'.\��'�'' .�wwPs"m/ 1+ ' `.r'� T S. a 9e �l ...<,✓ U•V•P. Figure 1 Shentel Mobile Company Site No. 137 9004 Old National Pike Boonsboro, Maryland 21741 Source: U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 -Minute Topographic Series, Funkstown, MD 1985. Latitude: 39.562220, Longitude 77.689440. TRIAD Project No. 07.08.026004 VVIAD N Triad Engineering, Inc. SKENTEL - Site Candidate Information Packet (SEEP) O+�[YASLIIG SPLIT BAIL f[,IOL P8020850 Iz'118 sOnnEL L[ss[ +e EA (cnuu-uud rtucq� +\ P8020350 S..Ell151 AIIIE@A5 81011150 011 [X1411,10 +0SILO [x151nm GRAIl 01n � LpcnopiE O s'\,r [X1511110 BMI!-� \ P00P0'_CO 5HCIREL 0n1ft ADOFIR0 CX511NG 51t0 \ 10 AL Mil POLE N, 1M114pllvrn �I (E40t U11111Y 50u0CC5 00 85 \li OCT[L141P(O AT A N1ER ON[) i\ \'v1S1u10 OAflH SOISlI110 POY(C11 lot C \1'/ i1W,5ron EII SUBMITTALS snelp: 137 -Greenbrier Dytzatek n1POOH 883151014 ml Sr SITE PLAN DATE oASC 3/13/04 PRELIBRAW a 3/25/00 1N. LEASE ME COO. _ 1 01'I+Ai01: 001 010 so,tEt[toPONnu11m):nNrli .. 3/IT 08 115v. SASS APE 100. z ;gttaapw [ g161u 0/01107 REV. LEASE ARE lOG J 0CA\O10R. LALI "•1w' � �`r,� I'nl Iii Ay^HInII,Mum 0850- III, IIG\'. sI.R,REEBAM,LE,OA N rw..unman, L-3 3 OIEER[(Inl` Ptn. rn binPnmH v elwlwRw.in 137 5 SCIP 080505 [0. Site Sketch] Proprietary Printed: 5/6/2008 Pane 9 or 22 8:24 AM SHEEKT'EL - Site Candidate Information Packet (SLIP) [L,Slll,X 5c111 O lllit[ raow OLI L -Iv CUE POCro5[o IL'.Ia• coricoLIPIONP16,0 PAX 0_110111 f11P'OSLV SIWIIEL OIILICT notjltpio PIIVPO:LO lido SIID114 10 POIIIII POLE N/ 1hNISP00000 USL I.4[/. (<luvl-IHP: ECU CUjOVI[0 AI A LATEIS 0[rE) usmaei OII lrti�) •-'10 \\ PI09OUsLmEL )-SOLO^ H .\ NII[II'IA5 OMITTED 10 £0,51010LO SILO NLLlgll + A Pn04prt0 LOJIILL ON 00011110 1LOIN Mll OL pAN1 I ! V 5110 40\ I b / CO,I[O[IELOISIYI LAO LOG11OII I [A1Lfni0 CON,1 Gut IOCAI1011 SUBMITTALS 'nElo; 137 - Greenbrier Dyrlatek u13/ orsnulRlPN lleealDN inLL: ENLARGED SITE PLAN .tom J J/O/DO POEUDIIL E D 3/20/50 11 LV. LEASE ME [LIE. 1 D1•NAIT.I: j� �^ lEl£COyLIVITCAlIp11SlM\'Irf5 / at.l:D.: SILL Yt'S'S�@$.^�+E ]/21/04 ACV. OUSE ME LPL. t N @ �✓ Ovd544kk�l1Ol1 D\1GJfn OEV. 0 SG /0] pLV. LCASC ME LDC. ] DIN\\'II p1': LAI L. �S :[ ILIICLIIIC+VHIII AI;ODAII M1IOIIILL M\IPM'1' L\L1'101NHIII L-1 3 WCCUDIM LxC.O. 137 5 SLIP 080505 [D. Site Sketch] Proprietary Printed; 5/6/2008 Page 10 of 22 8:24 AM SHENTEL - Site Candidate Information Packet (SLIP) iN � PROPOSED SHOIIEL MREIIIIA IOCAION (2) PROPOSED SHEIIIEL CABLE LOCATION b tbG 35' X 100' eARH tl i LOCATII0 GRARI pelt [050'. SILO pp� CMOE nn� PROPOSED SHCHICL 12'XIR' LEASE AREA MID rERCE LOCATION S(JBMITMALS EITIND. 137 - Greenbrier T''\ +-ek DATE PESCIIIPItON REVISION III;C ELEVATION 3/13/asmEOMIIWtr o s x/a REV. 1(151 ARE Loa 1 UTNnNLI: {p¢[n4 ulwlfAlmK5lfRgfrs -- 3/2%/OS PI101. KKx: fll4 ]/x5/06 REV. LEASE ARE LOL ] tlit.{lVll tll': SHE TEL p,8fd;OVL l ORG. I:o: IIC1'. 0/OG/0] REV, LEASE ARE LOF ] LILL "`EIIIPUo.D0AIt ItEsar VONM1O' 6, 1wnWlll L-2 3 - CIIECACL RI'r. DER. hc. LIIVY51+A1 uhuLv 137 5 SLOP 080505 [D. Site Sketch) Proprietary Printed: 5/6/2008 Page ii of 22 8:24 AM Photograph # 1: View facing southeast of the existing 40 -foot silo that the antennas are to be placed upon (at the top right). The enclosed lease area will be located adjoining the barn in the center of the photograph. Photograph # 2: View facing west towards the site farmstead from Old National Pike. The subject silo is visible to the right behind the tree. The closest off site structures to the proposed location are located in this area. SIAD Triad Engineering, Inc. JOB #: 07.08.0250-04 DATE: 6/5108 loft I CLIENT: Shenandoah Personal Communications Site No.137 9004 Old National Pike Boonsboro, Maryland 21741 Copy 1 STREET AND NUMBER! Route 40A at Cool CITY OR TOWN: CATEGORY (Check One) ❑ District ❑ Building ® Public ❑ Site ® Structure O Private ❑ Object ❑ Both PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appn ❑ Agricultural ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Educational ❑ Military ❑ Entertainment ❑ Museum WA -II -131 District 6, Map 63 TV: OWNERSHIP STATUS ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC Public Acquisition: O Occupied Yes: O In Process ❑ Unoccupied ❑ Restricted ❑Being Considered ❑ Preservation work ® Unrestricted In progress ❑ Na ❑ Park ® Transportation ❑ Comments ❑ Private Residence ❑ Other (Specify) ❑ Religious ❑ Scientific Maryland State Highway Administration STREET AND NUMBER: 301 West Preston Street CITY OR TOWN: STATE: Baltimore Maryland STREET AND NUMBER: - CITY OR TOWN: STATE TITLE OF SURVEY: DATE OF SURVEY: ❑ Federal ❑ State ❑ County ❑ Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS, STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN! STATEI (Check One) (� Excellent ❑ Good ❑ Fair CONDITION __ ❑ Deteriorated O Ruins ❑Unexposed (Check One)I (Check One) ® Altered> 50% O Uncltared ❑ Moved IXI Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT 0 AB ORIGINAL (II known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Cool Hollow Culvert, on Route 40-A, is located over a small run which joins the Antietam just south of Cool Hollow Road, about three miles south of Funkstown in Washington County, Md. The culvert, consisting of a single horseshoe arch is constructed of roughly coursed native fieldstone. Its arch is lined with carefully cut radiating voussoirs which have been partially obscured by a coating of modern concrete. The walls appear relatively straight and terminate at the abutments with slight projections or modified pilasters. Only the west face of the culvert is visible, its width having been extended with concrete at its east wall. Its walls have also been heightened with modern concrete parapets. The remaining masonry shows evidence of re - pointing. The culvert appears to be in good to excellent condition. m m z C r) -i 0 z N 2-A W W N PERIOD (Check One or More as Appropriate) ❑ Pre-Columbian O 16th Century ❑ 15th Century ❑ 17th Century ❑ 18th Century ® 19th Century ❑ 20th Century SPECIFIC DATE(S) (If Applicable end Known) AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Check One orMore as Appropriate) - Aboriginal ❑ Education O Political O Urban Planning ❑ Prehistoric l Engineering O Religion/Phi- O Other (Specify) ❑ Historic L] Industry losophy ❑ Agriculture ❑ Invention O Science ® Architecture ❑ Landscape ❑ Sculpture ❑ Art Architecture O Sociol/Human- Commerce ❑ Literature - itorian ❑ Communications ❑ Military O Theater ❑ Conservation ❑ Music ® Transportation EMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The Cool Hollow Culvert is significant for its architecture, for its contribution to commerce and transportation in Western Maryland and as an example of the engineering abilities of the early bridge builders. Architecturally, the culvert is an example of some thirty stone arch. structures present in Washington County. Most of the stone arched bridges and culverts were built between 1820 and 1850 and appear to reflect a major early 19th century trend of building with stone. No evidence has been found to indicate the.construction date or.the builders of this culvert, but, it is possible that it was erected during the 1820's as part of the construction of the National Pike. According to historians, stone arched bridges because of their greater durability were constructed as part of the National Pike at the insistence of the Maryland legislature. The bridges and culverts in the county survive as significant relics of an important tradition in building with stone in Pennsylvania and Western Maryland. The Cool Hollow culvert is also important for its aid to transpora- . Lion and commerce. As part of the National Pike, the culvert facilitated the movement of goods and travelers along a major east -west highway. 49cerding to a catalog prepared for a photographic exhibit of the coun- ty's stone arched bridges for the Washington County Museum of Fine Arts in 1965, the Cool Hollow culvert is near the site of a fulling and dyeing mill operated by Henry Funk. No information is given to indicate when the mill was in operation. The culvert is also significant as an example of the engineering abi- lities of the'19th century bridge builders. Still in use, carrying heavy daily traffic, the culvert appears sound and remains as a monu- ment to the engineering capability of its builder. Several names are associated with the construction of Washington County's bridges. Among them are the Lloyds, a Pennsylvania firm, Charles Wilson who upon occa- sion acted as an agent for the Lloyds, Silas Harry and George and John Weaver. rn rn n 0 z Copy I WA -II -195 District 6 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Map 63 Parcel 1 MAGI # 2207795404 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC Cool Hollow House LOCATION STREET& NUMBER Route 40-A CITY, YOWN - - CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Cool Hollow - X VICINITY OF Funkstown' 6 STATE - - COUNTY Maryland Washington CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE -DISTRICT _PUBLIC - X_OCCUPIED' - -AGRICULTURE- -MUSEUM X_BUILDINGISI 'X PRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL __PARK _STRUCTURE _BOTH -WORK IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL xPRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE -ENTERTAINMENT -RELIGIOUS -OBJECT _IN PROCESS - -YES: RESTRICTED -GOVERNMENT, _SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED _YES UNRESTRICTED -INDUSTRIAL - -TRANSPORTATION -MILITARY -OTHER: D OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME .- -• . Leroy E. Smith Telephone #: STREET & NUMBER - Route t 9 CITY, TOWN STATE , zip code Hagerstown VICINITY OF Maryland 21740 ®LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber #:603 COURTHOUSE. Folio #:415 REGISTRY OFDEEDS;ETC.Washington County Court House STREET & NUMBER West Washington Street CITY.TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 SENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Maryland Historical Trust Survey #2027 DATE Summer 1967 _FEDERAL ESTATE _COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Maryland Historical Trust CITY. TOWN STATE Annapolis Maryland 21740 SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD -PREHISTORIC _1400-1499 _1500-1599 -1600-1699 _1700- 1799 )L1800. 1899 _ 1900- :ed -ARCHEOLOGY- PRE HISTORI ._ARCHEOLOGY -HISTORIC _AGRICULTURE X ARCHITECTURE -ART _COMMERCE _COMMUNICATIONS AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW C _COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _CONSERVATION -ECONOMICS -EDUCATION -ENGINEERING -EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT -INDUSTRY -INVENTION _LAW _LITERATURE -MILITARY -MUSIC -PHILOSOPHY -POLITICS/GOVERNMENT -RELIGION -SCIENCE -SCULPTURE _SOCIA L/HU MANITARIAN _THEATER -TRANSPORTATION -OTHER (SPECIFYI SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT :ire STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE -a= to I Cool Hollow House, a two story brick dwelling five bays wide with a central entrance is rep- resentative of a major regional type. ,Such features of its construction as the use of Amen' '.n can bond at all elevations; the presence of prominent wooden lintels with cornor blocks above I the windows; the entrance treatment and the interior woodwork all suggest construction during the middle third of the 19th century and influence of the Greek Revival style which was popu- lar in the United States during that period. :1 :nst ,all; FO For the second half of the 19th century at least,, this property, then a farm of more than 175 acres was owned by the Schindel family. , The oldest reference was to a Philip Schindel after whose death the farm was sold to David Schindel in 1856 (IN11/252). See also deeds 77/231, 92/41, 133/405, 148/663, 184/608, 223/430, 271/503. The land was named "Emmert's Home," "Cadiz" and "Strife." A very small tract which contained about one acre of land alon; the Antietam Creek, possibly part of this farm was sold by Elias Cheney to Benjamin Emmert is 1838 (TT/681)„ Whether other land comprising this farm vas acquired by the-Emmerts to becom "Emmert's Home" cannot be..determined from information available at this time. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY ® DESCRIPTION CONDITION X_EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED —GOOD _RUINS _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIG CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —UNALTERED X ORIGfNAL SITE XALTERED .c 50% _MOVED DATE (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Cool Hollow House is located on the west side of U.S, Route'40-A just south of Cool Hollow Road at Cool Hollow south of Funkstown in Washington County, Maryland, The house is situated on sloping ground on a narrow strip of land between the Antietam Creek and the highway and faces east, It is a two story, five bay brick structure resting on low fieldstone foundations. Its entire surface is painted white. Bricks are laid in American bond at all elevations with no decora- tive masonry associated with the wall construction, Attached to the north end wall is a one and a half story wing with small gable roofed dormers, Windows and doors are arranged symmetrically in the walls, Openings in the front elevation have wide wooden lintels with projecting corner blocks, Six over six pane sashes are held within narrow frames finished with a bead at the inside edge. The front windows and some in other walls have pairs of three panel shutters at the front elevation and louvered shutters with stationary slats at the second story level. The main entrance is located in the central bay of the front elevation, Above the six po'-l. door is a transom. with diamond shaped panes, The entrance is sheltered by a one bay, on/ story pedimented porch supported by square posts, Another entrance with a high transom is located in the south end wall, Standing seam sheet metal finishes the roof terminating with barge boards set directly against the end walls, Brick chimneys are located inside the end walls, The house appears to retain much of its original interior woodwork which includes symmetrical] molded door trim with decorated corner blocks in the major rooms, The main entrance opens into a central stair hall, Behind the house is a stone springhouse and ruins of a barn foundations, A dug well in the front yard is said to open into a cave which was recorded by the Maryland Geological Survey. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY iMAjOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Washington County Land Records. CONTINUE ON $EDARA.TE SHEET IF NECESSARY rGEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 6.27 acres VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE.;.: COUNTY ®FORM PREPARED BY .-NAME/.TITLE- _ _ __ _. it C . Paula -Stoner Dickey, Consultant ORGANIZATION DATE Washington County Historical Sites Survey March 1978 STREET& NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street Al -3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS- 1108 Copy I WA -II -206 District 16 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Map 63 Parcel 77 MAGI # 2207905935 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC Frame House and Stone Barn LOCATION STREET& NUMBER Route 40-A at Cool Hollow CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT South of Funkatown X VICINITY OF Funkstown 6 STATE — -- COUNTY CLASSIFICATION - -CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT _PUBLIC XOCCUPIED AGRICULTURE - -MUSEUM XBUILDING(S) X PRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL -PARK -STRUCTURE - -BOTH - -WORK IN PROGRESS - -EDUCATIONAL XPRIVATE RESIDENCE -SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS _ —OBJECT -_IN PROCESS, —YES: RESTRICTED __GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIF,IC _BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION XNO —MILITARY —OTHER: N OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Limit Telephone #: STREET& NUMBER C/O Edward H. Dombalagian 3712 Charlton Drive CITY. TOWN STATE , zip code Mitchellville VICINITY OF OCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber #: 489 COURTHOUSE. Folio #: 625 REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC. Washington County Court House STREET & NUMBER West Washington Street CITY. TOWN STATE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE _FEDERAL _STATE _COUNTY _LOCAL SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE _EXCELLENT -DETERIORATED _UNALTERED X ORIGINAL SITE .GOOD _RUINS X_.ALTERED L' 50% -MOVED DATE _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This frame house and stone barn are located on the west side of U.S. 40-A at Cool Hollow, sol of Funkstown in Washington County, Maryland. The house is situated on a slight hill and fac'I east. It is a two story, three bay balloon frame building with a two story, two bay ell ex- tending to the rear. It is sheathed with German siding. Windows have early 20th century style flat topped architraves with two over two pane sashes. At the front elevation, windows are not aligned with each other and there are only two winder; at the upper story level. The main entrance is located in the center bay of the front eleva' tion. A hipped roof porch supported by square posts and partially enclosed by a plain balus trade is present at the two north bays of the front wall. The roof is sheathed with standing seam sheet metal and extends beyond the end walls. A ama: brick chimney is located at the interior of the front section of the house and another is lo. cated inside the end wall of the ell. North of the house is a large stone bank barn which appears much older than the house. The buildings seem to be in good condition and stand on a tract of land planned for resS tial development. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC -ARCHEOLOGY. PREHISTORIC _COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION _1400-1499 __ARCHEOLOGY -HISTORIC -CONSERVATION _LAW _SCIENCE _1500.1599 XAGRICULTURE _ECONOMICS -LITERATURE -SCULPTURE _1600-1699 LARCHITECTURE _EDUCATION _MILITARY -SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN _1700.1799 -.ART _ENGINEERING _MUSIC -THEATER X.1800.1899 _COMMERCE _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY X _TRANSPORTATION mud 1900- _COMMUNICATIONS —INDUSTRY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHER ISPECIFYI ' —INVENTION ices SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 7o lows ram S - This complex consists of a typical early 20th century balloon frame house and a stone bank 1aY1 barn which could date from the early 19th century, They are examples of ?dashington County°s .O- rural vernacular architecture representing two distinct periods, t\jL"oa BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET I' NECESSARY Di GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 78.95 acres ,, ., VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION .., LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY FORM PREPARED BY NAME /TITLE Paula Stoner Dickeys Consultant ORGANIZATION DATE Washington County Historical Sites Survey •March 1978 STREET & NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street 791-3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS• 1100 ABSTRACT - WA -II -206 19th -20th Century Frame House and Stone Barn Punkstown Vicinity private This complex consists of a typical early 20th century balloon frame house and a stone bank barn which could date from the early 19th century. 200 Aviation Drive _ Winchester, VA -91 Phone (540) 66 667-9300 Fax (540) 667-2260 TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. www.triadenq.com June 17, 2008 Mr. Tim Lung Chief Senior Planner Washington County Planning Department 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 RE: Section 106 Review: Maugansville - 040 16411 Fairview Road Proposed Cellular Antenna T1ehwa Hagerstown, Washington County, Maryland 21740 Dear Mr. Lung: RECEIVED JUN 2 4 2008 rl`_�; P COUNTY PLANNING DEPT Triad Engineering, Inc. (TRIAD) has been retained by Shenandoah Mobile Company in order to obtain compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as part of the Section 106 review process, for the proposed installation of a 195 -foot tall lattice self-supporting cellular communications tower at the above -referenced property. As part of this process, the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) requires this letter officially informing the government of Washington County of the proposed project. The proposed structure will be located on a rawland portion of the Site that is currently a portion of cattle pasture. The proposed antenna Site is located approximately 500 feet northwest of an existing residential dwelling (Eby-Barnett-Nissley Farm WA -I-115) and approximately 2,100 feet south of Fairview Road. The proposed square shaped compound will be 4,900 square feet in size, will be constructed on a poured 160 square foot concrete slab, and will be protected by an eight foot high chain -link fence enclosure. The direct Area of Potential Effect (APE) will be confined to the 4,900 square foot compound area and the approximate 74,086 square foot linear ingress/egress and utility easement. The access road will be developed primarily from currently existing driveway and will improve an existing farm use dirt road with a gravel access road starting at the farm complex area, around a series of farm barns, through a small access -way to the northeast fields, turning right upon entry into the field and up the hill, along an existing fence line, through a metal cattle gate to the project location. There is no direct affect anticipated to this property other than the improvement of the proposed access road. The historical structure should have no direct affect other than a visual site of the tower. There were no other historical structures identified on the parent parcel. The proposed project location is depicted on the attached portion of the USGS Mason-Dixon, MD, PA, 7.5 -Minute topographic quadrangle attached as Figures 1 and 2. The proposed tower construction details are attached as drawings C-1, A-1, and A-2. A copy of an aerial photograph showing the proposed tower location to surrounding properties is also attached as Figure 3. TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. West Virginia Pennsylvania Maryland Virginia Proposed lattice Tower No. 040 Hagerstown, Washington County, Maryland June 17, 2008 Page 2 The approximate coordinates of the site are: N Latitude —39° 41' 45.8" W Longitude 77° 48' 10.5" As part of this assessment and as required by the MHT, a Determination of Eligibly (DOE) for inclusion of the Eby farm on the National Register of Historic Places (NHRP) was performed by EAC Archaeology, which found the property (dwelling) eligible for the National Register under Criteria A for its connection with the history of agriculture and Criteria C for its intact late eighteenth and early nineteenth century vernacular log house which exhibits important regional features. In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), this project is being evaluated to consider its potential effect on districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects that are listed in the NRHP. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me by phone or via email at bmikalik@triadeng.com, or Mr. Lynn Korner of Shenandoah Mobile Company at 540-984-5237 — lynnk@shentel.net. Sincerely, TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. William J. Mtt alik, CPG Senior Environmental Geologist Attachments Ref. No. 07-07-0598 xr to 6 C n•drnoH- 6se0000 IT F G H J 714T00- sso.K vi 1 r hit Pine±:fi:iH7" n- 2 _ 2 __ry __ i3 p� 'tee dull® 41 ®lull• 1 ANK IN UN Y e , mgsoru mzom 163 Rogo pCsN SY-3wK 0N':._ V� axmt ._.:� .,..,'fl .•ttsrtt -.z' ..., 7 / / c ,61M CI pravY )/. 5 c�N�COCHE UE p , NYN e %�OYnf Zen 2 T LY y S 6 �3s rF he 7 RO / AP N 49 ? i 4 ]hRC. C nrm u[c r : Aei . u TI f •3";r BmadloN n9'+t 6tIY� ! I It euxrtr Choi�en .III/I( L 6re1M1 `� � n 6 02 X ' e io �JL ILN vc Hf �:� � �."m MAUGAN VILL u�c a ��G FRcPL ,n, oodri LLCo 11 aos d4 NiL' cRElif y - 0 OOEN r v1Ew` Rogo g a OA aw smewsve, _ _oe_ 3 ndferdin �..__ $'.j cad ons �Cf r^ '8 a,m ronoac is }.. qm elan uur u 1111 Coil I ill 10 Too/' ni 1 , m i 1 t : 58 [xx ru v o rid__ p a q V @g "il a) A T } 11 (Closetll h'ngfon *o e Y.n R -fib g9 _V(q 'e ' • -_ 12ci fROUH samNas F Oil 41 rc7_ Run _\ la ° Tabor a+". 8W p 4 n.,.....,p,* 000cohoho 704/fl WI 000005nnfxNR r_._F...._1fl1 77.e Ml 100-000 Fl H:b L. /A J777 77'fffft11JIffffflffl'Nffl = CCJ oast ____ tihY \ -7.7,i /iiii le / I h�... 'sn ______ /1 ➢ x% l. aPte, .� +' a" i_���"-- 4�i�a F y I r F >.9•m , I/ �H\ t '� asx ' \a II I` .ate /A+9Al„ i /ice l o rz .Y / s —, /'� / 4� i e l ({.It®"•'� -us'� 5 RB-E NN l%� a.IP5 x wF. Y ' J -' t Ono: rss+ Jf ( ' J •� l B:1115 a- c:tP,= ~� N2A 9 v/(/ fle„ Yz ,\ •ie� \\\%/ ;ca hIA> / \\. \/ /y/ ✓� w 7. / �, �/ Lrt_I 1 rHHl7c I\ / / a u — ,('Q/,%4AL4 ® - Figure 1 Wayne Horst Property (Eby Farm) 16411 Fairview Road Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Site Vicinity Topographic Map Farm House ,1 / \ ✓ C . `. �`�t� ��\..f� Site Location J f Source: U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Series, Mason-Dixon, MD, PA, 1971 Scale: 1:24,000 flIAD Triad Engineering, Inc. Figure 2 Wayne Horst Property (Eby Farm) 16411 Fairview Road Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 Site Vicinity Topographic Map /r Im . R Q pr D C L -7)U c -J r Eby a \ h (Jt.I) FarmHouse _a c / Proposed Tower Location ro►o yti`( . 566 O % C• Source: U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Series, Mason-Dixon, MD, PA, 1971 Scale: unknown flIAD Triad Engineering, Inc. {I ± 11r'. F' • k E i /�, Y Y rV l9y lY 1W', ,TTa� �n8'lI"' �'• d �1 ] 61i H - rin ear 11 JI&PC ₹J�m gij'§ZT M � �g� �m � y " 5 fie; s s s`gg"s € s Jill-$ hh'J& �9 g9F ¢Sg`BBB5CCkesspSK aEc`s₹ $₹�sgr, @6'H6H�gB§5%b�3 k= gg%6%'s j $ gi1I!ikIi1iiMN, 3JiJi Owe¢ ObIJiffh %SE o ski o:e � b� \ /- �g_ \ � g� ggg. s"i"€ ¢sY Pr y e 3 m�cl ° O _o Wo\ , S7YJi .(� /\ !!ifl:!b e�z;sQ��S € 1\ SIRE �o in � _'_.�_________ _ fit` � Rro U K w m a 4-J a V oag o s z w egg_ & :oadpp 5 wS (\ o9! aE li r �& € s z U Rq o of O8ac 09 awe rco arc 5i xwoa .ttz o' Wz O 1J 0Vd ,661 0 SVNN3INV 131N3HS 0350d08d 113001 180dd0S-313S ,661 03S0d011d 661 0330X3 01 1011 008 ONINIHOf 01110010111 1131101 i0 11101311 1V101- O H Aso J .C� _ g o � L t4n !� Y ag fi F � r � w Copy I WA -I-115 District 13 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Map 23 Parcel 14 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY MAs1 t 222/825904 NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON fF'6ps^. ii! ^IJ!'!J fIB en _ ;✓'3'i ..iC cpio1• -:©LOCATIONjr ovoic- . r,, a no STREET&NUMBER . )ITS) 5i'.'. 'tom ._t. C: J pi IC-TffCO fTS, .[ ? jY° _.f,T • 51cc I v,_'00 nos' a_ CONGT1ESSIONAL DISTRICT "` - OCLASSIIICA'I110/N = . ,'•. ) ',: x12 [ r)J . rj7 ,A. ,__1... :c: C'' ;!.: Ali( ;2CATEGORYDt:,=-;OWNERSHIPCW+ I!-XO:`STATUS ,_. ' 1 t ns-PRESENTUSE oJ2 5[0 s. C i_LDISTAICT:'c 9 rcpUBL1¢ 0' �'.�: C=.".': '. :; R OCCUPIED ICY- Jr?J ^:i AGRICULTURE T `_MUSEUM cc'• UILdING151 1? !ff XRRIVAiE -.. I, l!: or _UNOCCUPr D :If!:0-.:- i . .... =COMMERCIAL .'PARK.li :9 i` JO. ?1':1 STRUCTURE:n .r ^_BOTH -' '.. � - ..' - LLWORKIN PROGRESS` ; •- .. Yc_''EDUCATIONAL:.I'•X :PRI ... VATE�AESLOENCE''' '''SITE" 2--, _. P,URLIC-.ACOUISITIOW )'i -' ACCESSIBLE:`' '^c '.'=:'_(ENTERiiiNMENT)"_RELIGIO(JS"_', Z. _O&IECTa_S 1:) :cJNrpDcSs O"" '_YESNRESTAICTED. 1? , .:. JGOVEflNMENT ';_SCIENTIFIC :% -_ —BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL JTRANSPORTATrON-1 - X NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY , NAME -'cc,. Harold E. Eby Telephone # : STREET& NUNABEI - i_• _; [ -rn:.;- , cc;: :[ :._i::. Jc' --C ., ... ..-.--._ Route # 4, Box 215 CITY, TOWN - STATE, Zip code e VICINITY OF ©LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber It: 544 COURTHOUSE. Folio #: 470 - REGISTRYOFDEEDS;ETC. Washington County. Court House - STREET&NUMBER West Washington Street CITY. TOWN STATE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE _FEDERAL —STATE, _COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE U DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED --UNALTERED ORIGINAL SITE -GOOD _RUINS XALTERED 4 50% -MOVED DATE _FAIR -UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This farm complex is located at the end of a long private lane which extends in 4,sogtherly direction from Maryland route 494, the Fairview Road, about two miles west of Ceartos, in Washington County, Maryland. The house is situated on a bluff above a tributary of the.Cono- cocheague Creek and faces north. The dwelling is a two story, six bay, two part log house sheathed with German eidiiig'and resting on stone foundations. The eastern three bays ,of the front elevation are recessed behind a double porch which is includei under the main roof span. Windows and doors are not arranged symmetrically in the walls. The windows at the first story appear to have been enlarged, probably around the turn of the century. These have single pane, double hung sashes around which are plain architraves with flat top pieces. Second story windows are small with narrow frames holding two over two pane double hung sashes. In the front elevation, doors are located:in the second bay from the east end of the house and in the third bay from the west end. Both entrances are trimmed similarly to the windows. A`six panel door is also present between two windows at the second story level. In addition to the double porch, a one story shed roofed porch extends along the front ele- vation of the west section of the house. All porches at the front elevation are supported by square posts. The roof of the house is sheathed with modern asphalt shingles and terminates with barge boards set directly against the end walls. Plain boxing finishes the eaves. A modern con- crete block flue is located outside the west gable end. The house appears to be in good to excellent condition and stands on a tract containing 156.07 acres. Barns and outbuildings are located north of the house.-,' CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY fl SIGNIFICANCE 7 10 - PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC _ARCHEOLOGY -PREHISTORIC _COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION -1400.1499 -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC -CONSERVATION -LAW -SCIENCE XLGRICULTURE _1500.1599 -ECONOMICS -LITERATURE _SCULPTURE _1800-1699 &ARCHITECTURE _EDUCATION -MILITARY _SOCIAUHUMANITARIAN _1700-1799 -ART _ENGINEERING -MUSIC -THEATER;., X 1800.1899 -COMMERCE _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY - _TRANSPORTATION _1900- _COMMUNICATIONS _INDUSTRY ...POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHER(SPECIFYI ` - --_'_. C". -INVENTION SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE This large two story log house located on a bluff above the Conococheague Creek is part of a farm complex and is typical of 19th century vernacular building in Washington County. Charac= LIi teristically it is built of log as are innumerable 18th and 19th century houses in the Cumber- land Valley. The recessed double porch which -is present along part of the front elevation is ,1, another important regional feature. MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET fl' NECESSARY OGEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 156.07 acres VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ;s3 s:c.sr`Qno-,J ,... `.- cd 1rt., �, no fz��:;roo,f &. ,o .. : -�'�cni o ( FL: c no SY _S'.a ._. "r 1.: f'd9::'. .UD.'i^.')'; v';;lj❑^D crier °i.O 1BDSNi BJ him .o.rgMoo P'':'- ,..,�cror' Ya..,n.;..:;i'1 5.:._, r;:.3i 11ds.,n:T;xi s:.., a. •ooh 30 :JI±,ci ii: rJlati: - cc is : LIST:ALCSTATES AND COUNTIES:'FOR PROPERTIES O EERLAPPING'STATE'OR=COUNTY"BOUNDA IES'X0!Is' STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY ®FORM PREPARED BY NAME/TITLE Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant ORGANIZATION DATE Washington County Historical Sites Survey July 1977 STREET& NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street 791-3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS- 110$ ABSTRACT WA -I-115 19th Century Eby Farm Cearfoss Vicinity private • This large two story log house located on a bluff above the Conococheague Creek is part of a farm complex and is typical of 19th century ver- nacular building in Washington County. Character- istically it is built of log as are innumerable 18th and 19th century houses in the Cumberland Valley. The recessed double porch which is present along part of the front elevation is another important regional feature. i-r Copy I MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Probable Log House, Broadfording Road LOCATION STREET&NUMBER Broadfording Road CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT West of Conococheague Creek X-VICINITYOF Hagerstown .. WA -I-308 District 13 Map 23 Parcel 275 STATE .. - wow„ .Washington Maryland CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY ,OWNERSHIPS :- : STATUS PRESENTUSE'- -DISTRICT .PUBLIC ?OCCUPIED _ X AGRICULTURE -MUSEUM ' - XLBUILDINGISI. XPRIVATE : -" -UNOCCUPIED "' ""H -COMMERCIAL; -' _PARK' - -- _STRUCTURE ;. _BOTH..'. - =.WORK'IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL XPRIVATE RESIDENCE. _SITE _ PUBLIC ACQUISITION - ACCESSIBLE - - TENTERTAINMENT - —RELIGIOUS_ —OBJECT;` ': ,—IN PROCESS . _ "'—YES: RESTRICTED '.. "' -=GOVERNMENT .- -SCIENTIFIC - - .... ,.BEING CONSIDERED - -' •' —YES: UNRESTRICTED ; —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION XNO •_MILITARY -_OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY .,.._ ' . NAME • Donald. E. Faith ... . , . Telephone #: STREET&NUMBER 4 Route#4 CITY.TOWN - : STATE,. zip code Hagerstown VICINITY of Maryland 21740 ®LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber #: 406 COURTHOUSE. 'olio #: 375 REGISTRY OF OEEDS;ETC. Washington County Court House -- STREET&NUMBER West Washington Street CITY. TOWN STATE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE -FEDERAL _STATE .COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE Q DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT _DETERI0RATED -UNALTERED XORIGINAL SITE &G000 _RUINS XALTERED C 507. -MOVED DATE -FAIR _UNEXP0SED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE house and barn are located on the south side of Broadfording itoad about one half mile west of the Conococheague Creek, northwest of Hagerstown in Washington County, Maryland. The house stands on an area of level ground with its north elevation facing the road. North of the house near the edge of the road is a small frame bank barn. The_ original_ front. elevation of the house may be its south wall which faces away from the road. The dwelling is a two story, five bay structure which may have been built in two parts. Sheathed with German siding it rests on low fieldstone foundations. Thickness of_the exterior walls as observed at the door and window jambs suggests that log construction may be concealer beneath the siding. A double porch included under the main roof span extends along part of the south elevation. A one story wash house or outkitchen also sheathed with German siding has been built against the south elevation of the house at the east end. In the north elevation, three windows are grouped toward the west end of the building and two toward the east. Here, two over two pane double hung sashes are held within casings with simple architraves. Six over six light sashes are retained in the gable end walls. A one story hip roofed porch extends along part of the north elevation. At the time this house was visited the porch was enclosed with temporary weather sheathing, obscuring the locatir- of doors in the north elevation. The roof of the house is sheathed with sheet metal and extends beyond the end walls. The west end wall has a decorative scalloped barge board. Brick chimneys with corbeling at their tops are located inside the east end wall and at the interior of the house several feet east of tha west end wall. A small stone outbuilding is located southwest of the house. The buildings appear to be in good condition and stand on a small farm containing 18.52 acres. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY a SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW -PREHISTORIC _ARCHEOLOGY -PREHISTORIC -COMMUNITY PLANNING -LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION -1400.1499 -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC _CONSERVATION -LAW _SCIENCE _1500-1599 X_GRICULTURE -ECONOMICS _LITERATURE _SCULPTURE _1600-1699 LARCHITECTURE -EDUCATION _MILITARY -SOCIAUHUMANITARIAN _1700.1799 -ART —ENGINEERING _MUSIC —THEATER X 1800-1899 —COMMERCE _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY _TRANSPORTATION _1900- _COMMUNICATIONS _INDUSTRY —POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHERISPECIFYI _INVENTION Le SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT In STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ,ior zled This small farm is improved with a two story five bay house sheathed with German siding whici may cover log construction, a small frame bank barn and several outbuildings. If the house I log it is one of many such structures in Washington County and reflects a prominent vernaculE building tradition. two a aest Ops the a CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 18.52 acres VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE ®FORM PREPARED BY NAME/TITLE Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant ORGANIZATION DATE Washington County Historical Sites Survey July 1977 STREET& NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street 791-3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 Ps. 1108 '71c':- ue. • r -,d` I .. ,� ittZtP4sE %ff'/%�1,� tV4i! x, S k1 k'! s1 Copy I MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY AME HISTORIC WA -I-315 District 13 Map 22 Parcel 344 Broadfording Church of God., LOCATION STREET& NUMBER Broadfording Road CITY MOWN - - -- CONGRESSIONAL, DISTRICT X VICINITYOF.Clear ring STATE "- -_ '" - COUNTY et or; .- .r --- ....:Waahinetnn CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS : PRESENTUSE - -DISTRICT _PUBLIC X OCCUPIED -AGRICULTURE -MUSEUM XBUILDING(S).-_PRIVATE •.--- UNOCCUPIED "•') :' --COMMERCIAL' -_PARK •. -STRUCTURE X BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE -ENTERTAINMENT XREUGIOUS .-, -OBJECT - -r -IN PROCESS .;I - ... -. •X_YES: RESTRICTED - ; .. __GOVERNMENT•+- -' _SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED •'.. ,.. •,:-YES: UNRESTRICTED - -INDUSTRIAL- . _ _TRANSPOPTATION _NO -MILITARY _OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY nroaarora STREET & NUMBER Resh Road CITY. TOWN ,g"Church of God /0 David L. Resh, Sr. Route # 4 VICINITY OF OCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS;ETC. Washington County Court House STREET & NUMBER West Street REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Telephone #:" Liber #: 480 Folio #: 586 STATE _FEDERAL -STATE -COUNTY -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE ® DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X EXCELLENT -DETERIORATED UNALTERED x ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD -RUINS ALTERED 4 509 -MOVED DATE -FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadfording Church of God is located on the south side of Broadfording Road about 3/4 mile west of the Conococheague Creek between Clear Spring and Hagerstown in Washington Count; Maryland. It is situated on a high bluff and faces north, toward the road. The church is a one story brick building, three bays in length and three wide. It is of brick construction displaying American or. common bonding with eight courses of stretchers between header rows. The building rests on stone foundations and has a corner stone indi- cating that the Bethel Church of God was rebuilt in 1915. Decorative exterior brickwork includes projecting piers or pilasters between the bays, corbeling above the foundations and below the eaves and double courses of header bricks lining the gothic arched windows. The windows themselves are plain. In addition to the gothic style windows, small diamond shaped windows are located in the gables. The main entrance is centered in the north end wall. A small projecting entrance bay has been added. The roof is sheathed with modern asphalt shingles and extends beyond the end walls of the building. A small modern steeple extends from the roof of the building near its north E! A brick flue extends up the north wall of the church. A modern addition dated 1974 is attached to the east elevation of the church. The structure appears to be in excellent condition. It is adjoined .!by a cemetery in which the oldest graves date from the 1840x. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY I SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC _ARCH EDLUGY. PRE HISTORIC -COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ) RELIGION _1400.1499 -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC -CONSERVATION -LAW -SCIENCE _1500-1599 _AGRICULTURE -ECONOMICS _LITERATURE _SCULPTURE _1600.1699 XARCHITECTURE -EDUCATION -MILITARY -SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN _1700.1799 -ART -ENGINEERING -MUSIC ,THEATER _18001899 -COMMERCE -EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY _TRANSPORTATION 1900- _COMMUNICATIONS _INDUSTRY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHER (SPECIFY) -INVENTION SPECIFIC DATES Rebuilt 1915 BUILDER/ARCHITECT Addition 1974 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE This one story three bay brick church rebuilt in 1915 is one of many small rural churches whi, dot the Washington County countryside. This building is not as old as many of these struc- tures, but the cemetery with its graves from the 1840's indicate that a church (probably not Church of Cod) was established here during the 19th century. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET Ik' NECESSARY ri GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 1- acre + VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY FORM PREPARED BY NAME / TITLE Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant ORGANIZATION DATE Washington County Historical Sites Survey July 1977 STREET& NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street 791-3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS- 1108 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of nearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay July 31, 2008 Mr. Thomas Parker, Environmental Scientist Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 Re: Section 106 Review - proposed cellular antenna 9004 old National Pike Dear Mr. Parker Thank you fr the opportunity to on for installation of the proposed cellular antenna provide at the above consideration in the noted location According to the Washington County and Maryland Inventories of Historic Prope ties there are several other identified sites within the 1/2 mile radius that includes the Cool Hollow House site (WA II -195) you acknowledged in your June 23 letter to Tim Lung in this department. Those sites are listed below and the related inventory material is enclosed for your use. WA -11-131 Cool Hollow culvert WA -R-206 Frame house and stone barn WA -II -725-730 National Pike milestones 59-65 There are many other County and State inventory sites just beyond the 1/2 mile radius. Those sites are shown on the enclosed map and identified by their inventory numbers. The inventory information for those additional sites is available from the MHT website utilizing the inventory search function. The nature of the proposed installation, a 13.5 foot pole with attached antennas that will be installed on an existing 40 foot silo, appears to be permitted in this location per the text of section 4.22 Commercial Communication Towers which states: `Equipment proposed to be located on an existing tower or antenna support structure as defined in Article 28A shall be allowed in any district provided that the height from grade of the equipment shall not exceed the height from grade of the antenna support structure by more than twenty (20) feet." W W W. W3st1Co-❑1(t. net aF' RECYCLED PAPER J S Mr. Thomas Parker July 31, 2008 Page 2 e area where equipment will be A usite plan must be subted and aproval fornd. You should contactt TimLu gP n the plan installed review section of this department for on the gro those requirements (240-313-2443 or Tlung@washc01net) The proposed location will be reviewed by the Historic District Commission during its regular meeting on August 6. Any additional comments will be forwarded to you. Thank you for the opportunity to review the effects of the proposed antenna on historic sites. Sincerely, Stephen T. Goodrich Chief Planner Enclosure STG/me Cc: Tim Lung, Chief Planner Kathy Kroboth, Zoning Coordinator Jonathan Sager, MHT copy 1 WA -II -131 District 6, Map 63 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST WORKSHEET NOMINATION FORM for the NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, NATIONAL PARKS SERVICE Cool Hollow Culvert ID/OR HISTORIC: STREET AND NUMBER: Route 40A at I CITY OR TOWN: Fnnkstowf vic: CATEGORY (Check One) ❑ District ❑ Building ® Public ❑ Site ® Structure ❑ Private ❑ Object ❑ Both PRESENT USE (Check One arMore asAppn ❑ Agricultural ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Educational ❑ Military ❑ Entertainment ❑ Museum STREET AND NUMBER, 0 COUNTY: ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS TO THE PUBLIC Public Acquisition: ci Occupied Yes' O RerfActed ❑ in Process ❑ Unoccupied ® Unrestricted ❑ Bring Considered ❑ preurva lion work In Progress ❑ No ) ❑ Park f Transportation ❑ Comments ❑ Private Residence O Other (Specify) ❑'Rel)gious ❑ Scientific STATE TITLE OF SURVEY: DATE OF SURVEY: ❑ Federal ❑ State ❑ County ❑ Local b EPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDl1 STR T AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: - STATE. .- (Check One) SCRt?'1•{ Rnin. ❑`Un.xp°..d Good ❑ Foir ❑ Del.ri aro led ❑ E.x calenl ❑ (Check Ona) CONDITION (Check One) ❑ µQuad ($� Od vl°°I Siro ® Alrored> 50% ❑ Unclb red SCEI6E THE PRESENT �D ORIGINAL (I1 known) AL AN CE on Route 40 --AA, , is located over a small run The Cool Hollow Culvert, about three which joins the Antietam just south of Cool Hollow Road, miles south of Funkstown in Washington County, Md. The culvert, consisting of a single horseshoe arch is constructed of artially obscured by a coating roughly coursed native fieldstone. Its arch is lined with carefully cut radiating rete. iTh which havebeenstraight and terminate at or modified pilasters. Only the of modern concrete. The walls app been extended with the abutments with slight projections its width having west face of the cutvwall. l is Ivts evidence of re concrete at its earn parapets. have also been hshows evidenedce with modern concrete p p po citing good to excellent condition. The culvert appears to be in g N M m z N y C n 0 z U, W w N 2-A P... ...._. _.. PERIOD (Chock One or More ad Appropriate) ❑ 18th Century ❑ 20th Century ❑ Pre-Columbian ❑' 16th Century ... 19th Century ❑ 17th Century ❑ 15th Century SPECIFIC DATE(S) a(Appticabre end Known) SIGNIFICANCE (Check One or More as Appropriate) ❑ Urban Planning AREAS OF O Education ❑ Poliricdl ❑ Other (specttr) Aboriginal ❑ Religion/Phi- ❑ Pnh{storic ® Engineering ❑ Historic 'I Industry losophy ❑ Agri culmro O Invention ❑ Science Architecture ❑ Landscape ❑ Sculpture Architecture ❑ Social/Human• ❑ Art ❑ Literature itaran Commerce ❑ Communications ❑ Mil nary ❑ Theater ---�— ❑ Conservation ❑ Music ® Transportation TATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE for The Cool Hollow Culvert is significant far' its architecture, l its contribution to commerce and trantnofntheste early bridged and as an example of the engineering abilities builders. Architecturally, the culvert is an exampleof some tstone stonedarch.. structures present in Washington County. Most of arc and bridges and culverts were built between 1820 and 1850with sappear one. to reflect a major early 19th century trend of building No evidence has been found to indicate the. construction date or the builders of this culvert, but, it is possible that it was .erected during the 1820's as part•of:the construction of the National Pike. According oconstruc, s arched thedges Nationalbecause Pikefattheir the insistenreater cerofllity the' were constructed tus p Maryland legislature. The bridges and culverts in the county survive as significant relics of an important tradition in building with stone in Pennsylvania and Western Maryland. The cool'Hollow culvert is also important for its aid to transpora- tion and commerce. As part of the National Pike, the hesculverthfacilitated amajor the movement of goods and travelers along A&cord.ing to a catalog prepared for a photographic exhibit of the coun- ty's stone arched bridges for the Washington County Museum, of Fine Arts in 1965, the Cool Hollow culvert is near the site of.a fulling and dyeing mill operated.by Henry Funk: No information is given to indicate when the mill was in operation. The culvert is also significant as an example of the engineering abi- litiesof the 19th century bridge builders. Still in use, carrying s a heavy daily traffic, the culvert appears sound remains severalanamesmonu- ment io the ih' erincapability g associated with the construction of Washington county's arles bridges. occag them are the Lloyds, a Pennsylvania firm, ChCh Harry and George anccn sion acted as an agent for the Lloyds, Silas Weaver. Hays, Helen Ashe, The"Antietam"arid Its Bridges, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1910. Herstown, Md., "Bridges: Our Washaington County Museum of Fine Arts, Aggust-September, 1965. Legacy in Stone," exhibition catalog, OVRAPHRALOAT �- LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE cOOR DINATE5 V LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES 0 DEFINING THE CENTER N TEN OF A PROPERTY OF LE55 THAN TEN ACRES DEFINING A RECTANGLE LO<A TING THE PROPERTY R LONGITUDE ATITUDE' LATITUDE ILON GITUDE a ORNER. - roes Minutas SecoFl"s De roes Minutes Seconds .Deg- o Degrees MinUPoz Seconds Degrees Minutes $e condz 9 D r " d SE o N g r APPROXIMATE ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY: m ---_ rn iAcreage Justification: z. Nx C n -4 N NAME AND TI t E: Consultant DATE Paula Stoner Dickey, April, 1975 ORGANIZATION ___ _ , __.1 04r -o Rs1rVPV IEET AND NUMBER: Court House Annex STATE Y OR TOWN: Mary Hagerstown. ;tare Liaison Officer Review: (Offi Significance of this property is: National E] State Cl Local ❑ Signature Copy I WA -II -195 District 6 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Map 63 Parcel 1 MAGI # 2207795404 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Cool Hollow House LOCATION STREET& NUMBER Route 40-A CITY. MOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Cool Hollow "' X VICINITY OF Funkstown' - 6 STATE COUNTY Maryland Washington #CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT _PUBLIC - - X_OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE- _MUSEUM X_BUILDINGIS) X PRIVATE ..UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL _.PARK _STRUCTURE _BOTH -WORK IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL XPRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE -ENTERTAINMENT -RELIGIOUS -OBJECT -IN PROCESS - -YES: RESTRICTED -GOVERNMENT. -SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED -YES; UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL . - -TRANSPORTATION ENO _MILITARY - -OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Telephone #: Leroy E. Smith .. P STREET& NUMBER:: Route t9 CITY, TOWN STATE / zip code Hagerstown _ VICINITY OF Maryland 21740 ®LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber #: 603 COURTHOUSE. Folio #: 415 REGISTRY OFDEEDS;ETC.Washington County Court House STREET& NUMBER - - West Washington Street CITY. TOWN STATE ' v '---1 qY 7LA 13 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Maryland Historical Trust Survey #2027 DATE Summer 1967 —FEDERAL _XSTATE —COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Maryland Historical Trust CITY. TOWN STATE Annapolis Maryland 21740 SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE-- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW -PREHISTORIC -ARCHEOLOGY-PREHISTORIC _COMMUNITY PLANNING-IANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION _1400-1499 _ARCHEOLOGY -HISTORIC _CONSERVATION -LAW -SCIENCE . 1500-1599 -AGRICULTURE .ECONOMICS _LITERATURE -SCULPTURE 1600-1699 ARCHITECTURE -EDUCATION -MILITARY-SOCIAL/HUMANITARIAN 1700-1799 .ART -ENGINEERING _MUSIC -THEATER )L1a0o-1899 _COMMERCE —EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY _TRANSPORTATION 1900- _COMMUNICATIONS -INDUSTRY -POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHER )SPECIFY) .. - .. _INVENTION :ed SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT -ire STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE :e 1 Cool Hollow House, a two story brick dwelling five bays wide with a central entrance is rep- resentative of a major regional type. Such features of its construction as the use of Ameri• '.n can bond at all elevations; the presence of prominent wooden lintels with cornor blocks above I the windows; the entrance treatment and the interior woodwork all suggest construction durin£ the middle third of the 19th century and influence of the Greek Revival style which was popu- lar in the United States during that period. For the second half of the 19th century at least, this property, then a farm of more than 175 acres was owned by the Schindel family. The oldest reference was to a Philip Schindel after whose death the farm was sold to David Schindel in 1856 (IN11/252). See also deeds 77/231, 92/41, 133/405, 148/663, 184/608, 223/430, 271/503. The land was named "Emmert's 'nst Home," "Cadiz" and "Strife." A very small tract which contained about one acre of land alon; the Antietam Creek, possibly part of this farm was sold by Elias Cheney to Benjamin Emmert is 1838 (TT/681)„ Whether other land comprising this farm was acquired by the-Emmerts to becom all; "Emmert's Home" cannot be determined from information available at this time. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY DESCRIPTION CONDITION XEXCELLENT -DETERIORATED _GOOD -RUINS -FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORI CHECK ONE CHECK ONE _UNALTERED X ORIGINAL SITE XALTERED C 50% -MOVED DATE (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Cool Hollow House is located on the west aide of U.S, Route -40-A just south of Cool Hollow Road at Cool Hollow south of Funkatown in Washington County, Maryland, The house is situated on sloping ground on a narrow strip of land between the Antietam Creek and the highway and faces east, It is a two story, five bay brick structure resting on low fieldstone foundations, Its entir surface is painted white, Bricks are laid in American bond at all elevations with no decora= tive masonry associated with the wall construction, Attached to the north end wall is a one and a half story wing with small gable roofed dormers, Windows and doors are arranged symmetrically in the walls, Openings in the front elevation have wide wooden lintels with projecting corner blocks, Six over six pane sashes are held within narrow frames finished with a bead at the inside edge, The front windows and some in other walls have pairs of three panel shutters at the front elevation and louvered shutters with stationary slats at the second story level, The main entrance is located in the central'bay of the front elevation, Above the six pa -4 door is a transom. with diamond shaped panes, The entrance is sheltered by a one bay, ont story pedimented porch supported by square posts, Another entrance with a high transom is located in the south end wall. Standing seam sheet metal finishes the roof terminating with barge boards set directly against the end walls, Brick chimneys are located inside the end walls, The house appears to retain much of its original interior woodwork which includes symmetrical] molded door trim with decorated corner blocks in the major rooms. The main entrance opens into a central stair hall. Behind the house is a stone springhouse and ruins of a barn foundations, A dug well in the front yard is said to open into a cave which was recorded by the Maryland Geological Survey. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY 'MAjOIt BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Washington County Land Records. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY Oi GEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 6.27 acres .. VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY COUNTY ®FORM PREPARED BY -NAME/TITLE- -.. ".. ... _. _ Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant ORGANIZATION .. DATE Washington County Historical Sites Survey March 1978 STREET & NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street 791-3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland. 21740 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 P5- 1108 Copy I WA -II -206 District 16 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Map 63 Parcel 77 MAGI # 2207905935 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Frame House and Stone Barn LOCATION STREET& NUMBER Route 40-A at Cool Hollow CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT South of Funks tOWR X VICINITY OF FUn1GstOWn 6 STATE COUNTY Waah{natnn CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS - _, _ PRESENT USE _DISTRICT -PUBLIC XOCCUPIED AGRICULTURE -MUSEUM X.BUILDINGIS) X PRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED _COMMERCIAL -.PARK _STRUCTURE _ROTH -WORK IN PROGRESS - -EDUCATIONAL XPRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT IN PROCESS, —YES: RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _ BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION XNO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Hagerstown Limited Partnership Telephone #: STREET & NUMBER C/O Edward H. Dombalagian 3712 Charlton Drive CITY. TOWN _ STATE , zip co e VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESURIF IIUIN Liber #: 489 COURTHOUSE. Folio #: 625 REGISTRY OF DEEDS; ETC. Washington County Court House STREET & NUMBER West Washington Street CITY. TOWN - STATE Mnrvl anA 21.740 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE _FEDERAL -STATE -COUNTY -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN _ STAIN DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE _EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED ,ORIGINAL SITE XGOOD -RUINS X_ILTERED C 50% -MOVED DATE _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This frame house and stone barn are located on the west side. of U.S. 40-A at Cool Hollow, so of Funkstown in Washington County, Maryland. The house is situated on a slight hill and fan east. It is a two story, three bay balloon frame building with a two story, two bay ell ex- tending to the rear. It is sheathed with German aiding. Windows have early 20th century style flat topped architraves with two over two pane sashes. At the front elevation, windows are not aligned with each other and there are only two windcv at the upper story level. The main entrance is located in the center bay of the front eleva tion. A hipped roof porch supported by square posts and'partiallyenclosed by a plain balus trade is present at the two north bays of the front wall. The roof is sheathed with standing seam sheet metal and extends beyond the end walls. A'sma'. brick chimney is located at the interior of the front section of the house and another is to cated inside the end wall of the ell. North of the house is a large stone bank barn which appears much older than the house. The buildings seem to be in good condition and stand on a tract of land planned for res: tial development. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY SIGNIFICANCE 10utl ices PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE --CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW _PREHISTORIC —ARCHEOLUGY-PREHISTORIC —COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION .. _1400-1499 ARCHEOLOGY -HISTORIC _CONSERVATION _LAW —SCIENCE _1500-1599 AGRICULTURE —ECONOMICS —LITERATURE _SCULPTURE _1600-1699 XARCHITECTURE -EDUCATION -MILITARY -SOCIAVHUMANITARIAN _1700-1799 _ART -ENGINEERING _MUSIC -THEATER X 1800-1899 _COMMERCE _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY _TRANSPORTATION X 1900- -COMMUNICATIONS -INDUSTRY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _OTHER (SPECIFY) _INVENTION SPECIFIC DATES BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE t0 lo=7s lam IS - .This complex consists of a typical early 20th century balloon frame house and a stone bank lari barn which could date from the early 19th century. They are examples of Washington County°s .o- rural vernacular architecture representing two distinct periods. �iiAIUR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET 3F NECESSARY WGEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY 78,95 acres ... VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ... _. > - LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STATE COUNTY STATE COUNTY FORM PREPARED BY NAME/TITLE Paula Stoner Dickey9 Consultant Washington County Historical Sites Survey •March 1978 STREET & NUMBER TELEPHONE County Office Building, 33 West Washington Street 791-3065 CITY OR TOWN STATE Hagerstown Maryland 2174O The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe- ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS. 1108 ABSTRACT WA -II -206 19th -20th Century Frame House and Stone Barn Funkatown Vicinity private This complex consists of a typical early 20th century balloon frame house and a stone bank barn which could date from the early 19th century. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 HA -T1-725 - fttescone 8`a9 WA -IL -326!- MtlestOne fififf WA�11-727 - Hilestone 4bk WAIL -728 - Milestone 663 �y� TT } q }�{teRione :G.---ran-,:ryOO-SItnYr¢T 867 Po �>*i4.7tltl UNflC01T.Yi¢5 tlEPANTREN IRFTI{[�pTf410R fP.r. b]xi NAYICNc6 PARYtdRnGEUryinl NATIONAL REGISTER Of HISTORIC PLACES I �, INVENTORY NOMINATION FORM t (Type all enlrieF W W e 49pL LO!l4TY+ 7 C90! J. CLASSIfICA ION. A[CE;NRLE GATEGp5Y QNER5NIF STATUS Ttl LN7 eUH41C 2AFc. On.1 Q P Yragr @al limp Pdlit Pubge ACAr+nI .1 CT Gurp.d ❑ R...Q[4d [j Sir. iauerur. 0 Pr�.e+. Q I. P+.t. q IMIrwlla - ' '+y-} '1 # .n.4 6.In ca+.;1.r.4 t (� f T1 ly OilLf+ n •r i..wt In P9s..1 U N6 Nwk.LNT U% fCN.rA 4n..Ne k.....AJ*1Pf.11 o AKiIw.5 0Gi*.r.,-n• Q Pe!Y j,7 TIin�Ilxlbllm 0C...>,...r . Cwrrri.ei.l 0 IM.r11R1 [} P i pr. NniNnn &] WM fFA¢Wf1 o. t....H I C MIlf...T 4, OWNER. Of: PROPERTY •N..r¢' Adeain LStratioO r Maryland. O�nrrm..nr ,.e �.rt'�__.-t._�.�__.N;lghl'^ 1TNRCT .. ....... ,.F rt+MGFFr')-"'r!Yi9itildtlLS eT.:4� - •oua L rY'4N IONHr S. LOO. ION Of 1,0 LOES�RIPTICN o -.a C 94XYMOU iC, 110616Y NY -Of UCCCI¢. LIC: r+ U 15N CYY ca pc n N r•� O. 0NLPNN� \THY. mi• N IN E%ISYiNc SURVEYS -- Tint 9r.;a :raY. .: y a ,< Q FN.lal ❑ Sau Q Gkw\Y Q. L1L¢I c � frn pr LUNFCY: (9R.VRVP.'r M.rvbM¢ti j yy OIrpATUPY N`v n N C!TT oN.TaNN: P MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 cn.eF enq GkN ( FHr DP'*'"" ❑ RWna co$nlll00 is The stones were located beginning at the Baltimore courthouse, spaced 144 one mile a)art-and placed on the north side of Maryland Route primarily, but found also along sections of Route 40, Alternate Route do, Maryland Route 165, and scenic d0" west of Hancock. owned by thestate of Maryland on the edge of the right-of-way they are completely accessiblo to the public, Dimensions of ,:the stores vary from section to section- Generally eight inches deep and protect about they are about twelve inches aide, inches, grade. The distance of the stone's facing the road; thirty above 'r55 M to B^ (3B miles to Baltimore), The Other three faces bear no inscription, The stone material also varies. 'I'ite first thirty-nine. stonees are of Baltimore gneiss from the Fllicott City area, From West is m Friendship through Frederick to Baonesboro, the material quartti{e, plentiful along the Monocacy R7voT. From BoonesboTo to Funkstoh'n, a !rl very <white limestone was used and also a different stone Cutler whose — lettering is very distinctive, West of Hagerstown, the stones ate at - a . grey itmostone. Sixty-nine stories remain on the . route. .T! n —r O z e MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 w w N e ZUa ray ?I 1a7,7ay77, 9,73a. A,M�M+�a711.F t.M:NY O 1tl h Crni✓r O 146 C.niNY p nntlM 4>.,aH, rIc* s• CIS,kO ea Y.nu ApY.'?Pn.w, � 0+k•Plei.iq AS.. y..I ❑ 4dae.w� p P.nq,�I Q. e.F.. P ' hip p P»FI+d�I. �] t!:pr .'t L7 kNG1inAIPFf. N:p,w:e O Indm NY L.npFY' o A1liwlvtl O IxxjNon ❑ Sd+eia Q A4F±w5W[. ❑ l,..d,uds 00Smtpw!w p Ad AaMF.mM ❑. S.ag4Mlwnen- p La n,,, i [J lw,.aq Uadon ConmunlrNl.n.. C) md,—, (} T. p Cm,«*ae.n ❑ watir li3 t, .pvrw,fw aY1.6,.Fnlp„.�tid,FlC Wee These milestones mark the original route, of the old National Pike from Baltimore to Cumberland,. Maryland. The Aaltimare.Fredoricktown Turnpike Company was franchised by the state. in 1808 to construct, maintain 3 : collect tolls on sixty-two miles of tall road from Baltimore to Boonesboro, Maryland. The first tollgate was oponed April, 1807. Jonathan Ellicott, President of this company, was instrumental in having three other turnpikes formed which extended the road over the mountains to Cumberland where it met the federally funded National Road, opened in. 1818. A group of banks;mostly from Baltimore, provided the. capital for the constrtlition. This made possible overland transportation all the way from Baltimore to St'. Louis :with the result that through the Cumberland Nerrows passed over half of the eaigrants and freight of our westwardmigration in its early days. It.. is significant that Maryland was the first ofthe- mid -Atlantic states to financeand maintain its roads with the turnpike system,. and the method quickly spread throughoutthe eastern seaboard. za t974 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 E Wti ff 't)s )4`7.?7,1df M,,:13a ourTonhergor, Joseph A. Turn ikcs A Stud of the Toll Read Movement; New York: John Editor s, 19 1 LAus of Maryland. 1804. chapter $1. Nye, Edwin Darby. !,Rewards of a Roadside Quest." Tha Sunday Sun Magazine, Raltinore, (June 17, 1973), 8-12. sec continuation sheet. o..,N. G F AFCTFNA LA LOGATIN6 iµC YX6•C PiY R P EfF TNFN. 1 CO#MC,r I�FTIrVO[ LbN 1i1TUOC LA TI t.M' IONGVO(: .. o• M�FM• SI : 0•vi••i AHnul+a S+I+Fd+ [M7••+(InuriF5•aaMr 0+gre•T MlnNaa SraGn11 V ♦•a t --� Sao continwtivn aet AirNOT MFTY ♦N 14G Pr NOMINITNP PRO- -- TTY ♦ . = iTFf# O#SOIINTT irW�'YF• M fYIT[f FNO [OtW TII{F rP# R#OF[11 i1f30Y[IILFPPtN6 m {.1{i FLL STFTCCBOC COVNT OOC -,�3Zt�CWi1 - - CODE cPP[ cauNv v. rTF+r✓' [OVN4Y. COOL •'I CODE COVNTYI=she t) ^� STOVE r t FQM REPA4E Nlw[ FNO T,TLC, oNFANr1F i1*N - !IjNCri ANO MVMCNI YRMNL-f ♦a w si•ic CODE A• thr dr.LfnrtM &NP L41r.O t(1k•r for th• ti. ei 1#KbY -.Ally thrl tN# Ptap•rts la b,Plubs4 t!r r io•1 fllnodi Prrr1Willoi Ad of 1966 CFNl c L•w ].harrbf PPgwrG1e 14ti PTPP•pM for loclurk# N•Lions l n•¢1•NM1 in iar natlolsat (•{ to th cc#n,fy 1 pwk'ttW Sol nv lbt, randnC fP Yh• o-fiw1+ Grt4 PrMid+Kr iel Ci.�j+(�,�. toNl by {t, N#ti.1 P#rk anv1w. r1vF recommerdia uP•F,ar Ma• N KrCF+eAVY +�° wr•1•#c PK•FKNNm Nwl of rlfAflfune• of taw a.S .tion 1r; fi•LLwu1 51T.b ❑ Lc i,L CI (tier .'4f 1t: .T. Yt (: •' U-'. J . Ki'exr{ Otlandil Rlddui, 1V Tit]State Historic Rreaelxation Qf car too ` / 4rto ¢iarc)y11974 ire o MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 j -- cfl6 729?7Y,i; 3r !q 1e-]eee UNI STATES E F T"k INTERIOR. TATl U.Ir ttt$I NATIONAL SER CS G.. TV NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES SWg ;',I 571. INVENTpRY . NOMINATION PORN FOR MPS USE ONLY. [M}r1V XUM\Cil OAfl (Ceefin"doI, :Sheet) Y1. ..- lMn.4F •rr w,.64A1 Old National Pike. Milestones Number 2. Location county - Congressional District - Code Baltimore Second - 00$- Hovatd - Sixth - ,027t Carroll - Sixth. - 013 rrederiek - Sixth - 021 Washington - Sixth -. 043 Allegany - sixth - 001 Number 9. Major Bibliographical References continued. Scharf, -John Thomas. Chronidles of Baltimore.. Uattimere: Turnbull, Brothers, 1874. NLmher 10;: Geographical Data Continued. State Code County Code. Marylanli 24 aF`i 5151ngton. 043 ?Iaryland 24 Allegany Got Number 10. Geographical Date. Milestone 7 Milestone 6 Lat, 39' 16' 12,5', Lat. :39" 16' 23" Long. 76 44' 25" Long. 76" 43'-3B" �/.,� c io �r V/' EiG Milestone 5 Mil estane 4. Let. 39° 16' 14 Lat, 39° 161 54" Long. 76\ 42' 35" Long: 76° 4:I' 30" MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 'U'h17jc - 6 7 7,7-3S', •7. F. ON, $TAtESGLP&R1M[NT. OF THE INTERIOR JT&Tt Hoff 'St - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1 , _ '°u"" - _ - NATIONAL REGISTER OP HISTORIC PLACES _ _ INVENTORY - MOM(NATIQN PORM (Ca'tinmtion 5n'/ Old4ati0na) P1be Milestones Muiilter 10. ,c:ngxaphitAl ()ata. continued. Milestone 3Milestone 14 Lilt, 39° 16' 54" Lat. 39° 16' 45.5" Long. 760 40' 36" L0ng.76° 51! 57" $ilestana 13 Milestone 12 Lat. 39' 16' 30" tat. 390 16' 21" Long, 76°.50' 54" Long -76° 49' 48" %t Milestone 11 Milestone 10 bat. 39° 16' 10.5" lat. ,t9° 16' 04" Long.76° 471 43" Lang, 76° 461 46" Milestone Tl Milestone 20 Lat. 3V° 1.6' 44" Lat. S9° 18' 78" Long. 76'. S9'-20" Long.76° 58' 18" �' llestone7 i8 Milestone 17 Lat, 39°' 17' 54.5" Lat, 3J` 17' 34.5" Long. 76° 56',10" tong 76°. 55' OS" / Milestone 16 Mile5tone 15 LAt. 39° 1'1' 1711 Lat, 39° 17' 01" Longr. 7654` OS" Long.76° 53' Milestone 2S Milestone 27 Lat. 39" 2O' 49.5" Let. 39° 20' 34" ° Long,71' 05' 37" long. 77 06 -0Z" /?/4/.'i '/t•/'%' ?r - a °Pa FE1..-+ MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 ° n WA -U- las, !° I -- 1!!n 5tAT[st[PANTWINT of Tilt INTtk10R i"tA bLy.1949) NATIONA6 VAnn 5IAY16t NATIONAL REGISTER Of HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY- NOMINATION. FORM (Cat((nuaban Shand) R3 Did National]' Re Milestones Nunber 10Geographical I)ata continued. Milestone 26 Milestone 25 Lat, 390 20' 15" Lat. 39° 19! 5811 Long, 77° 04' 35" Long, 77° 03' 29,5" nfl Milestone 24 Hiiestone,23 Let. 59° 19' A2" Long, 77° 02' 25" Milestone. 23 last.39° i9' " Long. 77° 01' 25" Milestone 33 Lat. 39° 22' 06" Long. 770 11' 55" if/9'G GOn/133'1. 21<0 Milestone 36 Lat. 39° 22' 54" Long. 77° 141 5511 ,p/a6 no/9b/3'o Milestbne42 Lat 39' 23' 48" Long. 77' 21' 30" t?/«4G nc/t' n'27U Milestone 40 Lat, 39° 23' 34" Long,77° 19' 19" /. rce a/t/i6it 7`GC Lat. 39° 19' 50" Long, 77° 01' 25" Mileston` Lat. 39' l9' 02!' Long. 77' 00' 25" iP/s27cS;/�'-!r .trL Milestone 31 Let. 39° 21' 50" Long. 77° 091 39" Milestone 35 Lat, 39' 22' 35" Long, 77' 13' 52" Milestone 41. Lat, 39°23' 45" Long. 77' -20' 23" Milestone 39 Lat. 59' 23' 11.5" Long. 77° 18' 15" no °eI'e. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 I iinaL-725. 716, 727, 77;r, W, 73o Psrw IG.** U$ j STATES DEPARTMENT PE THE INTERIOR EY•"[ LOY It* $ NATIONAL PARK SERVICE d NATIONAL REGISTER OF NISTORICPLACES c°uu*Y INYENTORT - NOMINATI0M FORM Se ` .-� PPR NPS USE ONLY iMTRY YM�4R Y TI tCanllawtioN Shzt{I�p4 Old National Pike Milestone Nuaber 10. Gdagraphical Data continued. Milestone 38 Milestone 37 Let, 39" 23' 04" Lat, 39". 23' Long. 77' 171 00" Lang. 77' 15' 59" ir/ m /tc 7 72c Milestone so Milestone 48 Lat, 396 25' 7.5" Lat. 39°.25'.11'! Long. 77' 29' 59" Long 77°: 27' 47" /. ...- r7c Milestone 6 Milestone 45 Lat. 39" 24' 50" Let. 39° 24' 50.S" 77""-.25'40" Long. 77° 241 34" Milestone 44 Milestone 43 Lat. 39' 24' 34" bat. 39'-24' 07" Lang, 77° 23' 32" Long. 77' 22' 34" Milestone 58 Milestone Si Lat. 39' 29' 32" Lot. 39° 28'. 31" Long. 77° JI1 09' Long. 77' 36 23" Milestone 56 Milestone 54 Let, 39° 27' 55" bat. 39' 27' Long. 77' 3S' 25" Long. 77' 35' 42" ie/t'I7 /.4'0/,/37196L' Milestone 53 Milestone 52 Lat. 39' 26' 38" Oat. 39' 26' 17.5" Long. 77' 32' 42" Long•77° S1'" 40" 7r/X r, Y; 6/✓�G 9i J Ora *161'4 6 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 EJ4`it 7lt.7 F la -% A 514. . STAtES 0ENA$TMEHT UP INE INTERIOR .1*TS G ira1W1 NATIONAL PARK EEaVICE NATIONAL NEGISTEk OP HISTORIC PLACES c4"""' SaB 1448 Y P t41# INVENTORY • NOMINATION PORM (Cwtlnuaflan 5haafl AS Old National Pike Milestone Number 'O;; Geographical Gate continued. Milestone 51: Milestone 60 Lat. $9 25' 51" Lat. 39' 29' 59" Long. 77' 30' 40.5511 Long, 77* 38' 52" )lilestone9 "...39'.291 Milestone 68 La. €1" Lat. 39" 36' 20.5" Long-. 77' 38' 04,5" Long. 77 42' 441" j_, _' jf '1y 1% Milestone 67 Milestone 65 Lat. 393S' 30.5" [at, 39' 33' $2: ,.._ Long, 77':41' 59" Long. 77'" 41' 15" ft/ti. 1t/q'fi 720 Milestone 64 Milestone 63 Lat, 39' 33' 06" Lat. $9' 32' 19" Long, 77;40' 50" Long. 77 40' 19" /,:0172 -/ON --220 ,t Milestone 61 Milestone 78 Lat. 39"..301.48" tat.. 39' 39' 2$" Long. 77' 391.2z" - Lang.??' Si'.07" 7p/3-%i G G O/'/.1.7k 7fO Milestone 77 Milestone 76 tat-. 39' 39' z2" Lat. 39` 39'. 0a" Loo/ng". 77' 50' 01" Long. 77' 481 54.5 # C/2 5G Y101,1.8 Ti 23'. Milestone 83 Milestone 82 Lat.. 39' 39' 1811 Lat, 39' 391 36" Lang. 77' 56' 46" Long. 77' 54' 29" 1 /�V71:0/*13f9t1c e Page 2 of 2 7.27, 778, 7,17, 73a ntinuatiolk sheet 1 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 F., 10,110: UN. a STATESOEPARTMtNT Of THE INTERIOR (J0, 1919) NATIONAL PARK SERVILE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY. NOMINATION FORM (Cmd"Wlian Shear) N6 Old National Pike Milestones Number to. Geographical Data continued. Milestone 80 Milestone 98 Lat, 39°.39'.31" tat. 39° 41'.57" Long. 77°'S3' 22" Long, 7V 11' 24" ,, ci/n/.9a.1a iiL Milestone 9S tat, 39° 4t' 33" L9ng.78° 8' 22" Milestone 93 Lat. 39°' 41' 1011 Long. 78'06' 16" iy{1fY�{ yr, 7rn Milestone 110 tat. 39° 42'..19$5" Long. 78^21' 44" Milestone 102 Lat. 39°. 41' $311 Long. 78°,15'' 27" �f7 f ikb y3j745° e I Milestone 94 Lat. 39°. 41' 18" Long, 78° 7' 18" Milestone 125 Lat. 39° 42' 27" Long. 78' 35'35" 77`7ee Esc 12r7�20 Milestone 104 Lat.. 390.41'.25" Long. 78° 17' 55.5" 72f, ?i7 °,O ,a" MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 Tv, RewurceType: Inventory No, WA:R- PRESERVATPON VISION 30001 TIM MARYI:A.NI) PLAN STATEWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXTS L Geographic Region: Pastern Shom (all Eastern Shore eountic , and Cecil) _ Weslem Shore (Anne ANndd, Culwrt, Charles, Prince Ceurge's and Sr M., y½) Piedmont (Beltilttore Cit), Baltimore, Carroll, Iredcriek, I larford, Howard, Monl,;romery) ___X-,,,.,, Western Maryhurd (AIIWny, Garrett and WvshinPtol1) H. Chrunolug(OOYDtveiopmen a1 Periods: X kumlAgrarianimensifcatign AD. 1680-1$15: Ap ullurnl.i❑dn.nrtaE'1mn,.rtion A.D. 1815-I&70 Industrial/Urban Dunllnant, A.D. I8704930 Modem Period A -D. l93(i Present 13nkAowr Period (_prehistoric .historic) Ill, ITls*otie PerlodThermo olritccturo, and. Community Planning F 1hdusitial} Catcgory; Ghicet Histotie Environment X.i1laae Historic Functioa(s)pnii Ilsc(s}: 7'kANSPORTAT19.z j cLt 1,Iied hnilcsmnul Known Design Source:,ncnw MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 1 of 1 Old National Pike Milestone No. 59 Jump to Pagej << PREVIOUS NEXT Boonsboro , Washington County, WA -II -0725 Page 14 of 20 available pages C- Add Single Image to Print List 0 C Add All Images to Print List MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 Portion of Washington Co., MD Tax Map 601 showing. the location of WA-li.7Z6, Milestone 60, South Main Struct, Boonsboro, MD e MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 Invenuay Nn wA ri,27 PRYS'ERVA'nON VISION 200O THE MARYLAND PLAN STATEWIDE HISTORIC CONVEX` 9 L GwrgrapWCRegtnn:• &ctem f erc (all Cttsicm Shore counties,an4 Cmil) _......_„ Wisstem Shore (Mnc Arundel, Cah'eM Charles, Prince George's told St, Maty's) _Piedmont (A3ltimoru City, Enldmore,C ann11, Frcdcrirk, Hanford, Howard, Montgomery) Wcstenf Miryhu(d (Ailcajany, Canctt and Waching(rm) IL Chmnnlag(eatn)e elnpntentit Peilodst. X Rural Agrarian intenswficgtnon Ad); 1680 ISIS Agriurltatal•Ldu3idnl Trun,ition A.D, 1815-1879 Induslrial/UrtwnMiiminance A.D. 1870.1930. Mokni•Pcciod A,I), 1931-Presdn( Lnknow n Period (Tpcehistwic _. historic) In. Illstnria POW Theme: Apun411bre f. )� Architcoturc, Lnndscapc Architcctum and i onmun icy Planning _Fconomic (Coinnwrclal acid hnitistrial) Gov rnmcni/Law A9iliuy Rclibion _SociiVCliuuiiiuiiaUCultuml •rrahc"tmi A ry. Reaonrce Type: Cnicgoiy t)tiieet IiiacorioEavirnnmenL VII, lace Historm Funcuun(s)anuse(s) ',I!3c11:1 I',4RTAnQWm, (ti9J.Crlest(!'r tg11S) Ktianan Design Source: nnnc MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST (Historic Sites Survey) SE 5 Page 2 of 2 Portion of Wmhingtan Co., ME) Tax Map 601 showing thtioQation of WA I1427, Miicetone 61.. North Main Street, Iinunsboro, MD r1-�-- Re 7> tt [t N b a tP ro �tl Y it A • 'E ANtT p Oi'nns adj Lf.`.• k, WA -II -727 14 It r R4 O p T`- q'ssE • 4 0� R 351 s� i 4 _ V I P 34a t 3497 p r • t Q r�A IA P. 'J16 3f6 !! 523 P 34�. ... �•P, 324 P. 343 r i 'e _,FF'M _AVE. 34$ 4ROVE B P 41 — P. 4a6 4tl9 P 334Q% R 1 1°q P335 -E P:44 a 1/2" NOTE: SHEETING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY ELEVA110N 2x6 P.T. WOOD PLATE CONC. BEAMm C (3)1 1/2" LVL OR (3`)2x12 (3)STUDS SIMPSON PHD2 DOUBLE STUD (MINIMUM) FULL HEIGHT. SIMPSON PHD2 5/8"G ANCHOR SECTION - SHEAR WALL AT CORNERS 3/4"=1'-0" COORDINATE ROOF SLOPE w/ OWNER 2x4 ® 3'-0" O.C. 12 � 14 WOOD TRUSS © 2'-0" O.C. COORDINATE ROOF SLOPE w/ OWNER TRUSS BEARING SIMPSON MODEL-' SIMPSON MODEL H10 HURRICANE TIE AT EACH TRUSS H10 HURRICANE TIE AT EACH TRUSS OR AS REQUIRED OR AS REQUIRED BY TRUSS DESIGN 6"x6" P.T. COLUMN SIMPSON ACS POST 1/2" CDX EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD OR CAP (2500#) EXTERIOR GRADE OSB w/NAILS ® 4" O.C. ® TOP AND BOTTOM PLATE, 6" O.C. AT SIMPSON ABU 6x6 STUDS OR EQUAL 5/8"0 ANCHOR BOLT 1/2"0 ANCHOR BOLT - fDAMC @12" O.C. PER PLAN (4)#5 BARS .y. 30" OR INSTALL TOP & BOTTOM H &)/"TO ROCK SURFACE a w #4 TIE BAR ,. ® 18" O.C. MAX. ° / ROCK SURFACE 1'-6" SECTION - WOOD TRUSS BEARING SW 4 U O O I CV Li W U-' 0 LVL BEAM 3/4"=1'-O" * OR (3)2x12's 2x4 0 3'-0" O.C. 12 ]4 (4)#5 BARS TOP & BOTTOM Aa #4 TIE BAR ® 18" O.C. MAX. a d U) WOOD TRUSS ® 2'-0" O.C. TRUSS BEARING 2x6 WOOD STUDS 0 16" O.C. 30" OR INSTALL TO ROCK SURFACE ROCK SURFACE L. 1'-6" SECTION - WALL AT CORNERS 3/4"=l' -O" ROOF FRAMING PLAN 1/4"=1 '-0" 1) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES. 2) ALL CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE A.C.I. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE (ACI 318-02). CONCRETE FOR SLABS/FOOTINGS 3000 PSI 3) REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM DESIGNATION A-615, GRADE 60. TIES AND STIRRUPS MAY BE GRADE 40. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM WITH ASTM A-185. 4) ANCHOR BOLTS ARE ASSUMED TO COMPLY WITH ASTM A-36 OR BETTER. 5) SOIL BEARING PRESSURES ASSUMED ARE AS FOLLOWS: BOTTOM BEARING 2000 PSF 6) TEMPORARY SUPPORT AND LEVELING SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7) ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINIMUM STANDARDS LISTED IN THE GOVERNING CODE OR AS INDICATED HEREON. GOVERNING CODE SHALL BE I.B.C. 2006. 8) THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE, THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ALL BRACING AND SHORING REQUIRED TO RESIST THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION LOADS. 9) DESIGN LIVE LOADS: ROOF LIVE LOAD 30 PSF (NON -REDUCED) PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSS NOTES DESIGN CERTIFICATIONS FOR ROOF TRUSSES SHALL BE SUBMITTED CERTIFYING TRUSS CAPACITY FOR THE BELOW LISTED LOADS: TOP CHORD= 30 PSF L.L. TOP CHORD= 7 PSF D.L. BOTTOM CHORD= 10 PSF D.L. 2) LIMIT ROOF DEFLECTION OF TRUSSES TO L/360 UNLESS NOTED. 3) TRUSS CONFIGURATIONS ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. 4) PROVIDE TRUSS/WALL FASTENERS WITH MIN. 400 POUND UPLIFT CAPACITY OR AS REQUIRED BY DESIGN (TYP. ALL CONNECTIONS) NOTE: AL.L CONNECTIONS TO BE SPECIFIED BY TRUSS DESIGNER. 5) FRAMING LAYOUT IS SCHEMATIC - TRUSS SUPPLIER SHALL SUBMIT DETAILED PLAN LOCATING TRUSS GIRDERS AND SUPPLEMENTAL FRAMING TO COMPLY WITH DESIGN INTENT AND BRACING REQUIREMENTS. 6) COORDINATE ROOF SLOPES WITH OWNER. FOUNDATION PLAN 0" d N N NO 0 o 3 O rn V o Q o r J r 0 i_ (V 30 o M N Z c M rn DRAWN BY JCP DATE 5/19/08 CHECKED BY DATE APPROVED BY SCALE AS NOTED w Q m I- w I — W CD z Kmw 'z< 'C U V biDO Z V O W u Z Z o mow > !n~owPN W wQLsJ tn� w ww� o00 ¢ W a to r>- az -Oc I _ H a.m<a.= cnZIw In U) W ® 06 Z FD W SHEET NO. S1 DE 1 PROJECT NO. O8-100 DATE 6/11/08 1mx 24 RnAlte t41 MQ. Wt 175- Mtw REVISIONS BY r Date Scale =1 it Drawn Job Sheet Of Sheets "1 a) E Cnd m i CLASS I RIPRAP STATION QUANTITY STA. 54+63 TO STA. 56+50, LT. 283 SY BOTTOM CUTOFF WALL FOR CLASS IRIPRAP STATION STA. 54+63, LT. REMOVAL OF EXIST STATION STA, 54+63 TO STA. 56+5C -4 RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL CONSULTING ENGINEERS BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE STATION QUANTITY STA. 54+65 TO STA. 56+50, LT. - 9-V- EF ❑1 210 LF REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FENCE TRAVERSE POINTS POINT NO. NORTH EAST ELEVATION 14 697352.4747 1134837.5298 554.58 NOTES: 1. SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHEETS FOR GRADING REQUIREMENTS. 2. SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR COMPONENTS OF GRASS -LINED CHANNEL, 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMOVAL OF EXISTING FARM FENCE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. REMOVAL TO BE COMPLETED BY OTHERS. �1 4. REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT IN THE CONCRETE f]ITC:H Wit I AInT RI= PROPOSED CHANNEL COORDINATES STATION OFFSET CI OF CONSTR.) ELEVATION 55+00 67.23 LT 524.92 55+50 70.13 LT 525.64 1 56+00 71.29 LT 526.49 56+50 70.62 LT 527.21 ;ROSS REFERENCE SW PLAT NUMBER SHEET TYPICAL SHEETS--------- ----------------------- 2 SUPERELEVATION SHEETS PIPE & DRAINAGE SCI FOULE,------------------ GEOMETRIC LAYOUT S ErS ---------------- 3-20 ROADWAY PLAN SHE! --------------------------3-20 DRAINAGE DETAIL SHETS -------------------- 21-22 TRAFFIC CONTROL SHFJETS --------------------- 23-28 EROSION & SEDIMET ;ONTROL-------------- 29-47 SIGNING & MARKING °._ANS__-________________ AND PORTATION ISTRATION )VISION (BEAVER CREEK I nI=MMF I. IMt'AU I HEUUGTION PROJECT REVISIONS CHANNEL PLAN SHEET [j]REDLINE NO. I SCALE 1 "=20' DATE 2/22/07 CONTRACT NO. (A4395174 O5/14/O8 DESIGNED BY REP COUNTY WASHINCTOK DRAWN BY _ DEA LOGMILE CHECKED BY SAS FAP. NO, SEE TITLE SHEET DRAWING NO. P5-09 OF 18 SHEET NO. 11 OF 65 PLOTTED: Ntdiaedey, May 07, zoos A: 07:6:: AM FILE: M:\prolc3ln00ti\o6166ahgjih',T? YO ;.7o cac awJ Prm. Y\CADD\Plain\pSR O0WREDLNI_n0-eeavercx.apn J( _ /,.; , !'f ^ 1 LEGEND PLACE FURNISHED TOPSOIL 4" DEPTH STATION QUANTITY STA. 60+15 TO STA. 61+50, LT. j_ 232 SY SOIL STABILIZATION MAT !1N -TYPE B STATION QUANTITY STA. 60+15 TO STA. 61+50, LT. 232 SY REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVED DITCHES STATION QUANTITY STA. 56+50 TO STA. 57+97, LT. 28 CY STA. 58+72 TO STA. 61+50, LT. 51 CY CLASS I RIPR °\P STATION QUANTITY STA. 56+50 TO STA. 57+97, LT. 223 SY x COF'STRUCT 6GALV. Lii CHAIN LINK FENCE I STEP POOL SYSTEM STATION QUANTITY STA. 58_-88 TO STA.60+15, LT. 290 TONS 6' GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK FENCE STATION QUANTITY STA. 5E 50 TO STA. 57+83, LT. J N 7R y _±JL 154 LF /11 RIO`' T OF WAY LINE / / REMC\VE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FENCE STATION QUANTITY _ STA. 5f. +50 TO STA. 57+83, LT. 135 LF O CONTRACTOR TO MOVE EXIST. ELECTRIC FENCE AND GATE AND PROVIDE TIE-IN WITH CHAIN LINK FENCE. N RIGHT OF WAY LINE H NOTES: 1. SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHEETS FOR GRADING REQUIREMENTS. 2. SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR COMPONENTS OF GRASS -LINED CHANNEL. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMO'/AL OF EXISTING FARM FENCE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. 4. REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT IN THE CONCRETE DI''CH WILL NOT BE MEASURED BUT WILL BE INCIDENTAL TO REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVED DITCHES ITEM. RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL CONSULTING ENGINEERS BALTIMORE. MARYLAND PROPOSED CHANNEL COORDINATES STATION OFFSET (I� OF CONSTR.) ELEV TION 56+50 70.62 LT 527.21 57+00 71.37 LT 527,83 57+50 78.74 LT 528.5 59+00 90.15 LT 531.3 59+50 85.31 LT 535.60 60+00 81.77 LT 538.3 60+50 80.93 LT 540.1 61+00 80.80 LT 540.31 61+50 78.55 LT 540.5' REMOVE AND RESET EXISTING FENCE STATION QUANTITY STA. STA. 57+83, 57+83, 47' LT. TO 105' LT. I 58 LF STA. STA. 59+17, 59+21, 52' LT. TO 104' LT. 52 LF T PAVING OF CU SfAJtON- UANTITY :5 1 TO STA. 58+72, LT. its.... CLASS II RIPRAP STATION QUANTITY 48 SY STA.57+97 TO STA.58+.'6, LT. , STA. 58+72 TO STA. 58+88, LT. 47 SY f :E' fIAI.At nc ..r... , ,.,l TRAVERSE POINTS POINT NO. NORTH EAST ELEVATION 12 697027.0420 1135075.8650 558.82 CROSS REFERENCE TYPICAL SHEETS.--..__....---^-,.._......_.._....__....__ 2 SUPERELEVATION SHEETS_-.._ ____ PIPE & DRAINAGE SCHEDULE_-_-.-__._. GEOMETRIC LAYOUT SHEETS _....--___-_-___, 3-2O ROADWAY PLAN SHEETS _ 3-2O DRAJNAGE DETAIL SHEETS 21-22 TRAFF-1C CONTROL SHEETS...________.__ 23-28 ESOS ON & SEDIMENT CONTROL _--__-_-_-_- 29-47 SIGNING & MARKING PLANS ._.--------__.�._.._. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEETS _- __.--_..----_. 48-65 UTILrES __..__._......._.-__--------. NOs. R'W PLAT NUMBER REVISIONS 01 ADDENDUM NO. 1 04 /03/07 J REDLINE NO. I I 05/14/08 RIPRAP CHANNEL /OUTLET PROTECTION LIMITS OF CONCRETE DITCH REMOVAL BOTTOM OF EXISTING CONCRETE DITCH PROPOSED STEP POOL -C- CUT -F- FILL - LOD - LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE f-- FLOW DIRECTION EXISTING TRAFFIC BARRIER STATE OF MARYLAND S'A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION HIGHWAY HYDRAULICS DIVISION 1-70 WASHINGTON COUNTY BEAVER CREEK THERMAL IMPACT REDUCTION PROJECT CHANNEL PLAN SHEET SCALE 1"=20' DATE _ 2/22/07 CONTRACT NO.....P4395 DESIGNED BY REP COUNTY WASHINGTON _ DRAWN BY - DEA LOGMILE CHECKED BY SAS FAP.NO. SEE TITLE SHEET DRAWING NO. PS -10 OF 18 SHEET NO. 12 OF 65 PLATTED: TNNoday, May 01, 2008 AT 11:11 AM FILE: M:\proJact8\2'006\0EI56_ehe_M\TO_10_I-?0 Cmc CMi Phase II\CADD\Rana\P;R-PoIDFiEDDfl 17D-Beeve,Ckdgn