Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20061101
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 301-791-3065 TDD/Hearing Impaired: 301-791-3070 FAX: 301-791-3017 AGENDA; HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM 1A & B WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET November 1, 2006 7:00PM M A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Minutes — October 4, 2006 D. Communications & Bills E. Unfinished Business 1. Ringgold Church of Christ (design review in Ringgold Rural Village) F. Budget G. New Business 1. Permit # 2006-08666, 6015 Dunker Church Road, barn demolition 2. Permit # 2006-08225 & 08226, 3604 Mills Road, sunroom addition and detached garage, Antietam Rural Village 3. Permit # 2006-07725, 21633 Kelso Drive, sunroom addition, Leitersburg Rural Village 4. Permit # 2006-08621, 5722 Tall Timber Lane, two story addition, Highfield Rural Village 5. PC -06-009, Williamsview, Kendle Road H. Other Business I. Executive Session J. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\Anovl06.DOC NOTICE IS GIVEN THATTHE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MAY MEET IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.508, STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CONTACT PERMITS DEPARTMENT AT (301) 791-3065 VOICEnDD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. RECYCLED PAPER WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006-08226 Applied: 10/03/2006 Project No: P2006-1878 Approved: Permit Type: RES-NEW Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B4 District/Acct No: 01020226 Job Address: 3604 MILLS ROAD SH Location: S-89-9 3604 MILLS ROAD Parcel No: 080-22-0331-00001 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: SEXTON JAMES L 11441 PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 Phone Number: 301-824-7000 Owner: SNYDER DALLAS E & BETTY W Contractor: SEXTON JAMES L Phone Number: 301-824-7000 Contractor Lic. No: MHIC-72709 Description: 676 SQ FT TWO CAR DETACHED GARAGE WITH STORAGE ABOVE, LIGHT STORAGE TRUSSES, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, STANDARD ATTIC ACCESS, CONCRETE SLAB RAY SNYDER, LOT 1 Foundation Size: 26 X 26 Type of Heat...: N/A Public Sewer...: N Public Water...: N Gas............: N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $70,000.00 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL C Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed 3.31 ACRES 3.31 ACRES 342 258 140 19 169 BRICK N EXISTING 10 YRS EXISTING 10 YRS GAR No. Of Bathrooms: No. of Bedrooms: 0 Minimum By Ordinance 40000 SQ FT 40000 SQ FT 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313.2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 J Pho}g240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006-08225 Applied: 10/03/2006 Project No: P2006-1878 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B4 District/Acct No: 01020226 Job Address: 3604 MILLS ROAD SH Location: S-89-9 3604 MILLS ROAD Parcel No: 080-22-0331-00001 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: SEXTON JAMES L 11441 PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD SMITHSBURG, MD 21783 Phone Number: 301-824-7000 Owner: SNYDER DALLAS E & BETTY W Contractor: SEXTON JAMES L Phone Number: 301-824-7000 Contractor Lic. No: MHIC-72709 Description: 400 SQ FT SUNROOM ADDITION TO REAR OF DWELLING, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, CRAWL SPACE, PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, BRICK EXTERIOR RAY SNYDER, LOT 1 Foundation Size: 20 X 20 Type of Heat...: ELEC Public Sewer...: N Public Water...: N Gas............: N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $60,000.00 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed 3.31 ACRES 3.31 ACRES 0 300 75 70 169 BRICK Y EXISTING 10 YRS EXISTING 10 YRS A/R No. Of Bathrooms: No. of Bedrooms: 0 Minimum By Ordinance 40000 SQ FT 40000 SQ FT 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Pope: 240-313-2460/7 /2Fax: 240-313-2461 loins Map 30 77'45.00' H J K 'i S \GNGS iF p\`m 0.• ; FflRNNiCS 4f�'".f T v s Qa u^t IV _. N. kkc�Nr I 90 , — P° I � � f A ' 9AILEY •0A �vipSHING�'TON JEFFERSON ` O `4m TN I • � O ° ° 7Hr H� Oq� 31 .RCS ao OLER '3ROWS Mnl.. 31 2 590.000 FT Joins) L.00APO N tzoo(@ -0i22� 6 // 1-S 10.0 RESERVE: E S \\ LOCA11ON PLAN - SCALE 1" = 80'-0 THE SNYDER RESIDENCE 3604 MILLS ROAD SHARPSBURG, MD 21782 RIFORNAIION PRESE711ED ON THIS HOUSE LOCATION PLAN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM SUWM%ON PLAT DATED FEBRUARY 10. 1989. THE RIFOR►IAT10N ON THIS LOCATION PLAN MUST BE VERIFIED BY TFiE / ^ \ IT IT IS DULOERS RESPONSSIIY TO CONFIRM THE LOCATION OF THE \ PROPOSED GARAGE TO ENSURE PROPER PLACEMENT & SET -BACK S.F. TIC AREA \ 3 \ a0- 0MB No. 1024001E NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service )ational Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking '5<" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word street & number Harper's Ferry Road not for publication N/A city or state Maryland code MD county Washington code 043 zip code 21872 vicinity N/A As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination — request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally _ statewide _ locally. (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property — meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. (.......See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting offlciaUTitle Cate State or Federal agency and bureau See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (etgtlain): Antietam Village Historic District Washington County MDCounty and State Named Property 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number nnot ecl depreviously-Heed resources s within Property he count) "eck as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) X private building(s) Contributing Noncontributing X public -local X district 25 3 buildings public -State site sites X public -Federal structure 1 structures object 1 objects 17 :; Total Name of related multiple property listing (enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure TRANSPORTATION/bridge AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding INDUSTRY/manufacturing facility COMMERCE/I'RADE/store Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure TRANSPORTATION/brill ge AGRICULTURE/a ricultural outbuilding VACANT/not in use (Enter categories from instructions) -"""'' LATE VICTORIAN/Italianate foundation STONE/sandstone BRICK NO STYLE walls BRICK; STONE; WOOD/weatherboard roof ASPHALT; SLATE other Refer to Continuation Sheet Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets) Refer to Continuation Sheets Antietam Villa e Historic District Name of Property Washington Counter MD County and State "?' in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property tional Register listing) ✓ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ✓ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. _ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. C a birthplace or a grave. D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years Narrative Statement of Significance (Fvnlain the significance of the property on one or more Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) ARCHITECTURE INDUSTRY Period of Significance c. 1763-c. 1930 Significant Dates Significant Person (Complete it Criterion B is marked above) Cultural Affiliation ArchitectlBuilder Crampton, Henry, builder Weaver, John builder ..may. —r.., (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: — preliminary determination of individual listing (36 — aHistoric Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested. Other state agency agency previously listed in the National Register genc y previously determined eligible by the National Register Local government designated a National Historic Landmark '— Universi ty recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Other # Name of repository: _ recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Antietam Village Historic District Name of Property Washington County MD County and State reage of Property 12 acres UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 18 263700 4366800 3 18 264020 4366100 2 18 263900 4366820 4 18 263820 4366080 N/A See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) name/title David L. Taylor, Principal organization Taylor & Taylor Associates Inc. date June 2001 street & number 9 Walnut Street telephone 814-849-4900 city or town Brookville state PA zip code 15825 Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) name Multiple owners refer to Continuation Sheet street & number city or town state zip code telephone Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominateproperties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend e>asting listings. Response tothis request is required to obtain a benefit in accordancewith the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden forthis form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including thetimefor reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service; P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Protect (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. 0MB Approval No. 1024-0018 NPS Form 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service .`iational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 1 7. Description Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD The Antietam Village Historic District is a primarily residential historic district containing twelve acres and lying along Antietam Creek in rural Washington County, Maryland, approximately seven miles southwest of the site of the Civil War -era Battle of Antietam (which took place closer to the community of Sharpsburg) and approximately twenty miles southwest of the county seat of Hagerstown. The Antietam Village Historic District retains integrity and contains a total of 32 resources, two of which (the Antietam Furnace Archaeological Site; NR 8/25/83) and the Antiet- am Iron Furnace (NR 6/26/75) were previously listed in the National Register and therefore are not included in the resource count which appears in Section 5 of the nomination documents. Of the 30 unregistered resources, in the district, 27 (90%) contribute to the character of the district and 3 (10%) are non-contributing. Non-contributing resources are buildings erected outside the c. 1763-c. 1930 Period of Significance of the district; the extent of alteration of some properties has resulted in a loss of historic architectural integrity and their classification as non-contributing resources. Of the 30 unregistered resources in the district, 25 are contributing buildings, three are non-contributing buildings, one --the Antietam Iron Works Bridge (Resource No. 27) is a contributing structure, and one —the "Indian deed" historical marker (Resource No. 28) —is a contributing object. Approximately eighty percent of the resources in the district pre -date 1900, approximately ten percent of the resources were constructed between 1900 and 1930, and the remaining approximately ten percent post-date 1930 and are non-contributing resources within the context of the nominated area. The predominating character of the district is that of a rural western Maryland hamlet which developed in association with an iron furnace adjacent to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal and in close proximity to the Potomac River. The architecture of the Antietam Village Historic District consists principally of modest vernacular residences and one farmstead, along with two more pretentious homes representing a higher degree of sophistication than is seen in most of the architectural resources of the district. The vast majority of the district's architecture is of wood construc- don, including one identified log house (3817 Harper's ferry Road; Resource No'. 22); one late eighteenth -century house is of stone (3819 Harper's Ferry Road; Resource No. 21) and one property (the Antietam Iron Works Store, 3768 Harper's Ferry Road; Resource No. 29) is of brick. The bridge spanning Antietam Creek is of stone with a concrete deck or modem construction. Most of the homes retain front porches of varying scales and forms along with associated domestic outbuildings including sheds and garages. Larger dependencies are included in the resources count, while smaller outbuildings (sheds, small automobile garages, etc.) are treated as low -scale landscape features and are not represented in the count. The district retains integrity in each of its seven qualities: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 NPS Form 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 1ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 2 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD The Antietam Village Historic District consists of two sections, one on either side of Antietam Creek; portions of the area southeast of Antietam Creek were previously listed in the National Register (one as an archaeological site with a restricted address [NR 8/25/83] and the other the Antietam Furnace (Resource No. 32, NR 6/26/75). The portion of the district north of the creek is considerably larger than that south of the waterway. The district lies on both sides of Harper's Ferry Road, which is so named because it leads from Sharpsburg, Maryland to Harper's Ferry, west Virginia, which is on the south bank of the Potomac Rive, approximately sixteen miles southeast of the district. Har- per's Ferry Road is asphalt -paved. There are no sidewalks or other pedestrian amenities in the district. The building lots of the Antietam Village Historic District are irregular in plan, and reflect the historic sub- division of land many generations prior to the onset of uniform subdivision requirements. The topography rises considerably from Antietam Creek to the north and only slightly from the creek southward. Property setback lines are irregular throughout the district. The buildings in the district are rectilinear in form and generally vary in height between one and one-half and two and one-half stories. Most buildings are roofed with laterally -oriented gable roofs, clad in standing -seam metal or in asphalt shingles. Some historic chimneys have been retained, while others have been removed in the course of retrofitting heating systems and replacing roofs. Fenestration is flat-topped exclusively, with little ornamentation; some multi -light historic sash has been retained. The majority of the buildings in the district rest on substantial foundations of coursed limestone. As noted above, the architectural character of the Antietam Village Historic District is primarily vernacular, executed without reference to any particular building style. Some traditional house types are found in the district, including side -passage single -pile homes and single -pen log houses to which have been appended later additions. The properties designed with the most sophistication include vernacular adaptations of Gothic Revival -style homes at 3905, 3815, and 3800 Harper's Ferry Road (Resource Nos. 1, 21, and 26, respectively). These three are modest rectangular houses with laterally -oriented gable roofs with center gables on the facade ornamented with uncharacteristic lacy bargeboard. Near the center of the district is the 1832 Antietam Iron Works bridge, built by master builder John Weaver under a contract with the County Commissioners of Washington County. Weaver constructed the four -arch span of coursed limestone —the same material that was used in the local production of iron and for most building foundations throughout the district. One of the longest stone bridges crossing the Antietam, its arches are faced with upright cut stones. Like other Washington County bridges, the Antietam Iron Works Bridge rests on rounded piers. It is low in OMB Approval No. 1024-0010 NPS Forth 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service rational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD profile and arches only slightly as it spans the creek at its greatest width between the Iron Works and the associated village. The Antietam Iron Works Bridge is little altered from its original character, except for routine maintenance and the re -surfacing of its deck in conjunction with the maintenance of Harper's Ferry Road. The bridge is adjacent to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park. As noted in the introductory paragraph, the Antietam Village Historic District retains historic and architectural integrity. Although modest in its scale and detailing, the overall character of the district is intact and represents the early growth and maturity of this hamlet throughout its century and one -half -long Period of Significance. Limited demoli- tion has occurred and only a very small number of newer buildings —garages and one mobile home --have been built within the boundaries of the nominated area. Alterations to buildings within the district include the application of non - historic siding and the installation of replacement windows. These alterations are dispersed throughout the district and do not detract significantly from the ability of the nominated area to reflect its appearance throughout the Period of Significance. Viewed in its entirety, Antietam Village Historic District is an architecturally -cohesive settlement which grew up in the economic shadow of a late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century iron furnace whose surviving mid - nineteenth -century stack (Resource No. 31) itself remains an important physical reminder of the industrial significance of the village. The following properties lie within the Antietam Village Historic District. The numbering corresponds to the district map which was submitted with the nomination documents. All properties are assumed to contribute to the character of the district except those after whose description an "NC" appears; these properties are non-contributing to the character of the district, either because they date from outside the Period of Significance of the district or because their extent of alteration has significantly compromised their individual physical character in relationship to the district. Most dates of construction are approximate, and are based upon visual inspection, oral history interviewing, and/or property tax data; dates which appear in italics are confirmed. 3905 Harper's Ferry Road: 2'/a -story late nineteenth-century Gothic Revival -style wood frame farm house which is the anchor to a small farmstead including Resource Nos. 2-9. The house rests on a raised foundation of limestone and includes open porches on the five -bay facade and north elevation, with modest columns and turned balusters; hipped roof with center gables with elaborate bargeboard, similar to that found on Resource Nos. 9 and 14; windows flat-topped with simple surrounds and exterior operable louvered shutters. A limestone retaining wall along the roadway is a contributing feature to the overall character of the property. (c. 1880) OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 NPS Form 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 'Jational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 7 Page 4 2. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular agricultural outbuilding with vertical board cladding and laterally -oriented gable roof (c. 1900) 3. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story central aisle barn of wood construction with gable roof and gable -end orientation to the street; exterior clad in vertical boards (c. 1900) 4. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story, small-scale agricultural outbuilding with gable roof with parged exterior surfaces (c. 1920) 5. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road:1-story concrete block agricultural outbuilding with shed roofsloping downward from front to rear (c. 1930) 6. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: Large wood barn with gable roof, oriented laterally to the barnyard, with a parged foundation and narrow vertical board siding; painted onto the south facade is a sign bearing the legend, "Potomac View Farm —F. M. Stottlemeyer." (c. 1900) 7. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular agricultural outbuilding of wood construction with some exterior surfaces parged ands others clad in vertical boards; gable roof with gable -end orientation to the barn- yard between this building and the public road (c. 1900) 8. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: l-storyvernacular agricultural outbuilding ofrock-faced concrete block construc- tion, perhaps used as a milkhouse due to its proximity to the public road; laterally -oriented gable roof; flat- topped fenestration (c. 1930) 9. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: Coursed limestone well with gable -roofed superstructure(c. 1900) 10. Rear, 3905 Harper's Ferry Road: One-story vernacular outbuilding, with laterally -oriented gable roof, set on a partly raised foundation of coursed limestone; asphalt -shingled roof surfaces; fenestration flat-topped; modest in its overall proportions and detailing. (c. 1890) 11. Side, 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story privy of wood construction with vertical board exterior finish and front -to -rear sloping shed roof (c. 1900) 12. 3912 Harper's Ferry Road: l -story vernacular cottage of wood construction, with shiplap siding and laterally - oriented gable roof; additions at rear; open veranda extends across facade and a portion of north elevation, supported by turned posts and trimmed with a turned balustrade; a large stone chimney is on the gable end on the north elevation. A limestone retaining wall along the roadway is a contributing feature to the overall charac- ter of the property. (c. 1850) 13. 3839 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, set on a foundation of stone and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof clad in asphalt shingles; three -bay facade with offset entry door; one-story porch with hipped roof on facade. (c. 1880) OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 NPS Form 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 'rational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 5 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD 14. Rear, 3883 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story agricultural outbuilding of indeterminate use; wood construction, with gable roof and vertical board exterior finish; (c. 1900) 15. 3833 Harper's Ferry Road: 1½-storyvernacular residence ofwood construction, with laterally -oriented metal roof; appears to be of a "saddlebag" plan, with a large central chimney of brick; windows flat-topped, with some multi -light sash retained; 1 -story shed -roofed porch on facade; 1 -story dependency ofwood construction at rear of house. (c. 1856) 16. 3831 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story vernacular residence ofwood construction, set on a stone foundation and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof; windows flat-topped, devoid of notable ornamentation. (c. 1852) 17. 3827 Harper's Ferry Road: one-story mobile home, built outside the Period of Significance of the district (c. 1985; NC) 18. 3823 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story vernacular residence of wood constriction, with stone foundation and laterally -oriented gable roof of standing -seam metal; 3 -bay facade with center gable; windows flat-topped, with no notable ornament; non -historic siding; 1 -story porch on facade with replacement supports; east of the house are several outbuildings of indeterminate age and use. A limestone retaining wall along the roadway is a contrib- uting feature to the overall character of the property. (c. 1881) 19. Rear, 3823 Harper's Valley Road: 1 -story two -bay automobile garage with gable roof and gable -end orienta- tion to the street; of modern construction built outside the Period of Significance of the District (c. 1980; NC) 20. 3819 Harper's Ferry Road: 2½-storystuccoed stone house, with laterally -oriented gable roof, three -bay facade and massing suggesting side -passage interior plan; interior gable -end brick chimney on north side; 1 -story shed - roof porch on facade; all windows are flat-topped with some historic six -over -six sash remaining. (c. 1763) 21. 3815 Harper's Ferry Road: 2½ -story residence of wood construction, Gothic Revival in style, with laterally - oriented gable roof and shingled centered gable on facade with unusually elaborate bargeboard similar to that found on Resource Nos. 1 and 14; three -bay facade with centered door suggesting a central -passage interior plan; windows flat-toppedwith non -historic paneled exterior shutters; one-story porch extends across the facade. The property is sited atop a bank overlooking Harper's Ferry Road and a high coursed rubble limestone retain- ing wall along the roadway is a contributing feature to the overall character of the property. (c. 1870) 22. 3817 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story log and wood frame vernacular residential building with parged exterior surface; laterally -oriented gable roof of standing -seam metal; four -bay facade, with flat-topped windows, 2/2, without notable ornament; one-story shed roof porch extends across facade with simple support posts and modest balusters. (c. 1845) 23. 3817 Harper's Ferry Road: One-story vernacular dependency of indeterminate use; gable roof with gable -end orientation to the street and shed -roofed addition on the west side (c. 1900) OMB Approval No, 1024-0010 NPS Form 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service :ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 6 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD 24. 3813 Harper's Ferry Road: 1 -story vernacular residence of wood construction, set on a stone foundation and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof clad in corrugated metal sheeting; 4 -bay facade; fenestration employs flat-topped openings devoid of notable ornament; 1 -story shed -roofed open porch extends across the facade, supported by plain wood posts and trimmed with a sawn wood balustrade oral sources indicate this to have been the work of a local; carpenter/housebuilder (1904; Henry Crampton, builder) 25. Side, 3800 Harper's Ferry Road: 2 -story modern automobile garage of masonry construction, with laterally - oriented gable roof; built into the side hill of this residential lot and dating from outside the Period of Signifi- cance of the district (c. 1980; NC) 26. 3800 Harper's Ferry Road: 21/2 -story Gothic Revival -style residence of wood construction, dad in shiplap siding and capped with a laterally -oriented gable roof of standing -seam metal highlighted by a center gable with elaborate bargeboard reminiscent of that found on Resource Nos. 1 and 9; partial return of the cornice on the gable ends; three -bay facade with centered entry, suggesting a central passage interior plan; ell wing at rear with 1 -story open porch on the west side; windows flat-topped, 2/2, with modest surrounds and heads; sited atop a hill overlooking the former Iron Works site and Antietam Creek (c. 1870) 27. Antietam Iron Works Bridge: Three -arch limestone bridge which carries Harper's Ferry Road across Antie- tam Creek; the bridge has masonry parapet side walls and a deck surfaced with modern materials (1832; John Weaver, builder) 28. State Roads Commission Historical Marker: cast metal marker commemorating the 1727 transfer of land from Native Americans to Israel Friend. The object is of a stylized rectangular form with a curvilinear upper edge with the State seal of Maryland in the center. The marker is set on an attenuated metal post and bears the following legend, all cast in upper-case letters: AN INDIAN DEED Israel Friend in 1727 secured a deed from the Indian chiefs of the five nations beginning "at the mouth of the Andietum [sic] Creek thence up the Potomack [sic] River 200 shoots as fur [sic] as an arrow can be slung out of a bow" thence "100 shoots right back from the river" then squared till it interceeds with the creek" STATE ROADS COMMISSION 29. 3768 Harper's Ferry Road (Antietam Iron Works Store): 2½ -story brick store building with three bay facade and a three -bay brick addition appended to its west gable end; built into a side hill site, with a foundation OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 NPS Forth 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service -:National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 7 Page 7 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD of coursed rubble stone which rises to a full story on the facade; the brickwork on the facade is laid in Flemish bond, while that on the secondary elevations is of common bond. (c. 1820) 30. side, 3768 Harper's Ferry Road: 1½ -story vernacular dependency of brick construction, with broadly sloped laterally -oriented gable roof (c. 1850) 31. 3768 Harper's Ferry Road (Furnace Stack, Antietam Iron Works): coursed limestone furnace stack with battered walls and three hearth openings on the north elevation (c. 1845; listed individually in the National Register as "Antietam Iron Furnace;" NR 6/26/75) 32. Antietam Furnace Archaeological Site: overgrown and untended area along Antietam Creek where the Antietam grist mill and hammer mill were located. All that remains visible are some sections of stone founda- tions. (late eighteenth century and after; listed individually in the National Register on 8/25/83) NPS From 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service •ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Section Number 8 Page 1 8. Significance The Antietam Village Historic District is significant under National Register Criterion A for industry and Criterion C for architecture. Evaluating the fabric of the district under these Criteria, the district's properties reflect primarily vernacular design in the rural reaches of western Maryland throughout the Period of Significance, which begins c. 1763, the approximate date of construction of the district's earliest extant buildings (Resource No. 21), and ends c. 1930, the approximate date of construction of the latest of the district's historic resources (Resource Nos. 5 and 8). The district's significance under Criterion A derives from its position as an important early center of iron - making in western Maryland, within the historic context of which are the extant stack of the Antietam Iron Works, an early store building, and homes associated with workers and supervisors at the furnace. The district is also significant as the site both of advance to and retreat from the Civil War battle of Sharpsburg (a/k/a Antietam) which occurred a short distance to the northeast. With respect to Criterion C, the district contains locally -distinctive examples of •vernacular architecture which, although executed without reference to formal design tenets, nonetheless represent the manifestation of local building traditions in this section of Washington County. The district's Criterion C significance is heightened by the presence in the district of the Antietam Iron Works Bridge, an 1832 stone structure built by master builder John Weaver. The Antietam Village Historic District retains its historic rural character along with the physical integrity necessary to reflect its physical appearance during its Period of Significance. The village of Antietam, located at the confluence of Antietam Creek and the Potomac River, was the site of extensive iron -working facilities during most of the one hundred twenty-five years following 1765. In that year, Joseph Chapline—the founder of Sharpsburg and the owner of the Antietam land -established the Antietam Iron Works along with Samuel Beall, Jr., David Ross, and Richard Henderson. Henderson and Ross built the first furnace and forge on the site (often referred to as "Frederick Forge" in contemporary accounts) which were likely in operation by 1775. Ore and wood for charcoal were obtained from the owners' extensive land holdings in the South Mountain area, to the northwest. Pig iron was the principal early product of the furnace and it was produced by the various forges operating at that time in Western Maryland. Just prior to the Revolutionary War, the ownership of the Antietam Iron Works shifted to brothers Samuel and Daniel Hughes, who gained control of this furnace and several other iron operations in the Antietam valley. • Under the direct supervision of Samuel Hughes, the Antietam furnace began producing cannon for the Balti- more Town Committee of Correspondence, for the Continental Marine Committee and, through an Act of Congress, directly for the Continental Army. Hughes' cannon -making suffered an inauspicious beginning: four of the first five NPS Forth 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service •ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 2 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD iron cannon cast by Hughes' operations exploded in the course of test -firing, killing George Matthews, a founder and would-be cannon maker from the Kingsbury Ironworks. Despite this, Hughes settled down to producing quantities of nine-, twelve- and eighteen -pounders and ammunition. His reputation spread to General George Washington, who wrote the Board of War Headquarters on April 2, 1779, "Upon consulting General Knox, it is our opinion that the contract with Mr. Hughes for the thirty eighteen -pounders should be renewed, as the cannon are absolutely necessary and it does not appear that they can be procured from any works so soon as from his ..." Antietam cannon were used to fortify Whetstone Point in Baltimore, and the Continental frigate Virginia was armed with 24 twelve -pounders and 6 four -pounders from the Antietam works. Cannon were cast, bored, and proved by Hughes at the Antietam Iron Works. They were then transported by wagon to Baltimore for delivery. The price varied from £36 10s to £40 per ton of finished cannon. At the end of the Revolutionary War, Samuel Hughes terminated his iron -making operations in Washington County. He relocated to the Susquehanna River area and in 1786 entered the iron -smelting and cannon -casting Wusiness at Principio with what he called Cecil furnace. After Samuel Hughes' departure from Washington County, the furnace at Antietam may have been inactive for a time; Dennis Griffith's 1794 map of Maryland shows only a forge on the site at the mouth of Antietam Creek. In 1805, the entire ironworks, grist mills, stock, slaves, and property (between 7,000 and 8,000 acres) was advertised for sale. An 1808 map shows the site to have a furnace, forge and grist mill. In the nineteenth century, the original furnace and forge operation continued, perhaps as late as the 1850s. It was joined by a number of other, related enterprises, all utilizing the power of Antietam Creek. In 1831, a nail factory was established with twenty-five nail -making machines, followed by a small rolling mill which consisted of two heating furnaces and two trains of rolls. These enterprises employed over two hundred fifty people, including some sixty slaves. The role of African -Americans in the heritage of ironmaking in western Maryland cannot be overlooked. Jean Libby, in a study ofAfrican influences on charcoal ironmaking technology in western Maryland, described the traditions which were likely brought to American by slaves: The making of iron in West Africa is a sacred science of great ritual and power. It is an indige- nous and ancient process which propelled subsistence agricultural groups into civilizations using tools of iron . . . The chaos of the slave trade and colonialism caused technological regression of iron smelting in Africa. Many who were captures and brought as slaves to the Americas carried this knowledge with them. By the middle of the eighteenth century, the predominant labor group at southern iron furnaces were Africans and African -Americans.' 'Libby, Jean. "Workers of Catoctin Furnace and Antietam Ironworks," n. p. NPS Forth 10-900a UMU APPIOVal NO. 1044-0010 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service •ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 3 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD It is more than likely that some of the knowledge gained in West African ironmaking was passed on to the furnaces of western Maryland. In 1828, during the heyday of the Antietam Iron Works, President John Quincy Adams turned the first shovel- ful of earth in the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, which stretched from Georgetown, near the national capitol, westward to Cumberland, in Allegany County, Maryland. The Canal passed just west of the Antietam Village Historic District, and carried goods and settlers westward to Cumberland, where they embarked overland on the National Road. The construction of the Canal involved thousands of laborers and was plagued with misfortune, ranging from legal maneu- vering by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad over the rights -of -way, to illness, including cholera, which claimed more than five hundred canal workers who died in close proximity to the junction of Antietam Creek and the Potomac River. They were buried near to the district since Hagers- town officials denied permission for the burials out of fear of the disease. The nail works at Antietam, owned by John M. Brien, burned in April, 1841. It was rebuilt and increased in size, and continued to operate until about 1853, when Brien sold the ironworks to Wil- liam B. Clark for $54,500. A second charcoal fur- nace, fifty feet high and fifteen feet wide at the boshes, was erected at Antietam in 1845; it is likely this furnace which remains within the district. In a twenty -week period in 1857, this furnace is reported Figure 1 Thomas Taggert's 1859 map includes the area of the historic to have produced 1,465 tons of iron, a capacity sig- district which he identified as "Antietam Works." nificantly greater than that of the first furnace at Antietam two generations earlier. During the years preceding the Civil War, the entire works, in addition to the furnaces, included a sawmill which produced shingles, a nail factory which produced four hundred to five hundred bags of nails and spikes per week, a forge with six heating fires and a twenty -one -ton hammer, a rolling mill which produced plates, rods, nail stock and bar iron, three puddling furnaces and an air furnace which produced finished iron, and a grist mill. Antietam Creek had a head of water with at least twenty feet of fall, and all these enterprises were operated by no fewer than nine water wheels. During the late R50s and early 1860s, the Antietam Ironworks was owned by John Horine-who had other iron manufacturing NPS Form 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service •ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 4 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD interests --and the heirs of William B. Clark. The works apparently suffered some damage during the Civil War, but afterwards it was rebuilt and acquired by the Ahl family of Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. They traded as J. S. Ahl and Company, and are depicted as such on a nineteenth-century historic atlas map.2 The AMs converted the furnace to coke fuel and operated it until about 1880. In 1873, a flood broke the dam, and among the subsequent improvements was construction of an improved hot-air oven. During this period, the furnace was smelting ore mined near Harper's Ferry, transported to Antietam on the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, and likely from the canal to the furnace by means of a tramway or railroad which appears on the aforementioned atlas map. In 1862, during the Civil War, General Burnside's forces passed through the village en route 0o the area near Sharpsburg where the battle oc- curred which came to bear the name Antietam. An undated drawing depicts the furnace at this time, suggesting that by then it was in a dilapidated condi- tion. Local tradition holds that a house located atop the hill overlooking Antietam Creek (Resource No. 22) served as a field hospital during the battle.3 The Ahl family operated the iron works until 1882, when John Ahl died. The operation was sold to Messrs. Hunt and Derland for $100,000 and the newspaper from the county seat, Hagerstown, reported high hopes Figure 2 This drawing, entitled "Supply Train for Burnsicle's corps rassmg the Antietam Iron Works," appeared in an unidentified contemporary publi- Cation. [from the collection of the Western Maryland Room, Washington County Free Library, Hagerstown] for the furnace, noting that among other prospects discussed are the erection of an additional furnace and the. construction of a branch railroad from the works to connect with the Shenandoah Valley at Sharpsburg Station. Should all these improvements be inaugurated by the new proprietors, there will be abundant labor for all our working men, and the old prestige of Antietam Iron Works when the hands employed were numbered by the hundreds will be restored. There is no reason why • this state of affairs should not exist where ore is abundant and an excellent quality of iron is 2An Illustrated Atlas of Washington County, Maryland. Philadelphia: Lake, Griffmg, & Co., 1877. 3Oral history interview with owner, May, 2001. NPS FOM 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service •ational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 5 manufactured at comparatively little cost. Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD Such development never occurred, and the furnace and most of the closely -associated properties fell into further disrepair. The machinery was dismantled and the other mill buildings disappeared from the cultural landscape, leaving only the furnace stack, the store building, the bridge, some foundations, and a handful of houses to reflect the heyday of this major western Maryland industry along the banks of Antietam Creek. The Antietam Village Historic District is significant as the site of substantial iron -working en- terprise which spanned the period from the colonial years through much of the nineteenth century. Al- though company records from the various Antietam •operations have never been found, numerous refer- ences to the Antietam works exist in general local and regional history books, in histories of iron in the colonies, and in some primary documents from the Revolutionary period. With reference to the Revolu- tionary War era, the district was home to one of the operations conducted by the Hughes Bros., who were major suppliers of weaponry to the Continental forces. In addition to the significance of the district for its industrial associations, the Antietam Village Historic is also significance as a rural western Maryland village containing vernacular architecture dating from the late eighteenth century into the early years of the twentieth century. Within the village is domestic architecture associated with the ironworks, a small farmstead (Resource Nos. 1-10), a c. 1763 stuccoed stone house (Resource No. 20) which, according to local tradition, was used as a boarding house for ironworks laborers, and a stuccoed log house (Resource No. 22) reputed to have served as a field hospital following the Battle of Antietam. In addition to the domestic archi- tecture, a vernacular brick store building is also in the district; this building was owned by the Iron Works until 1888 when it was sold to Peter Otzelberger, whose descendants retain ownership at the time of the preparation of the nomi- £.q Figure 3 The 1877 county atlas published by Lake, Gritting, 6c Company, contained this map of the area which would become the Antietam Village Historic District. Much of the real estate is shown to be in the ownership of the Ahis, who ran the Iron Works at that time. NPS Fonn 10-900a VIM MPPIUVaI IV V. I Vt4V V to United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 6 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD nation documents. The 1877 atlas indicates that all of the property in the village at that time owned by J. S. Ahl & Company, who operated the furnace and grist mill, suggesting that Antietam Village was truly a company town (Figure 3). The village has home to the workers and managers who depended upon the furnace and iron- works for their livelihood and to the few merchants who served the hamlet. The community appears to have never enjoyed a particularly elevated standard of living, judging from the modest vernacular domestic architecture which characterizes Antietam Village and from the fact that the immediate village area did 01ot even contain a church; the closest house of wor- ship is on Harper's Ferry Road between Antietam Under Criterion C, the Antietam Village Historic District is also significant for its close asso- ciation with master builder John Weaver, who built the stone bridge known as the Antietam Iron Works Bridge (Resource No. 27), which carries Harper's Ferry Road across the Antietam near its juncture with the Potomac River. The Washington County Commissioners who were in charge of construction of the bridge were John Grove, John Miller, and Daniel Piper. Filed with the land records of Washington County is an agreement between the Commissioners and John Weaver which stipulates that the bridge would contain two arches of thirty-five feet and two arches of thirty feet and would be built to a uniform width of sixteen feet. The contract price for Weaver's work was $4,250. Weaver was a recognized master builder and between 1832 and 1840 was engaged by the County to build several other bridges over Antietam Creek as well as one at Hess' Mill bridge, spanning the Little Antietam. The Antietam Iron Works Bridge and the bridge at Hess' Mill were the first two bridges which Weaver erected for the • and Sharpsburg. Figure 4 In 1872 the publication PicturesqueAsuetica featured this drawing entitled, "Old Bridge and Mill, Antietam —Antietam Rolling Mill —Burnside Bridge" (not shown). The drawing indicates the high level of industrial activity which was present at the site at that time; only the bridge and tst stack of the furnace are extant. NPS Forth 10-900a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service eational Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page 7 Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD County.' The Antietam structure is important as a leading example of the type of bridge design which was favored in Washington County from 1819 to the 1860s. Some Washington County stone -arch bridges have been lost, but many are extant, carrying traffic on a daily basis. The Antietam Iron Works Bridge is additionally significant for the role it played during the Civil War battle of Antietam. According to Helen Ashe Hays in her book, The Antietam and its Bridges, Confederate troops crossed the Antietam Iron Works Bridge on their way to reinforce General Lee at Sharps - burg and retreated southward over the same road. In addition to the architectural and historical importance of the Antietam Iron Works Bridge, the area at the mouth of the Antietam is associated with a number of historical events. A state historical marker at the south end of the bridge commemorates a 1727 land transaction between pioneer settler Israel Friend and the chiefs of five nations of Native Americans. The tract began at the mouth of the Antietam Creek and led up the Potomac River "200 shoots as fur [sic] as an arrow can be slung out of a bow" then "200 shoots right back from the river then squared till it �tercedes with the creek." This site is marked by a Maryland State Roads Commission commemorative plaque (Re- source No. 28). The junction of the Potomac and Antietam is said to have been the site of a violent battle between the Catawba and Delaware Indians in 1736. Viewing the Antietam Village Historic District in the context of comparable nearby districts, this district is considerably smaller in size that the two nearest districts, at Sharpsburg and at Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, both of which contain a defined commercial area along with residential neighborhoods. These districts also contain more formally -derived architecture, which the Antietam Village district lacks. Contextually, Antietam Village, Sharpsburg, and Harper's Ferry all have dose ties to the Civil War—Harper's Ferry with the beginning of the War and Sharpsburg and Antietam Village with the battle of Antietam. Elsewhere in Washington County, the districts in the county seat of Hagerstown are far larger and more diverse than Antietam Village and contain architecture of a far grander scale. Like Antietam Village, the historic areas in the villages of Tilghmanton and Fairplay, between Sharpsburg and Hagers- town, are nearly exclusively residential in character and with homes of a scale of those found in the Antietam Village district. 0 'Michael, Mary, The Story of Washington County. Williamsport, Maryland: 1993, p. 90. NPS Pone 10-900a OMB Approval No, 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Stional Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number 8 Page S Antietam Village Historic District Washington County, MD' a' ' MAR7ZAND COMPREk N�1tORCPRESBRVAT70NPLAN IyATA .F �-d :eographic Organization Western Maryland Chronological Developmental Period(s) Rural Agrarian Intensification, A. D. 1680-1815 Agricultural -Industrial Transition A. D. 1815-1870 Prehistoric/Historic Period Theme(s) Economic Transportation Architecture, Landscape Architecture, & Community Planning Resource Type Category: District Historic Environment: Village, Rural Historic Function(s) and Use(s) - DOMESTIC/single dwelling DOMESTIC/secondary structure TRANSPORTATION/bridge COMMERCE/TRADE/store • INDUSTRY/manufacturing facility AGRICULTURE/agricultural outbuilding Known Design n Sources None WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006.07725 Applied: 09/13/2006 Project No: P2006-1767 Approved: Permit Type: RES-ADD Status: PENDING Inspector Area: B2 District/Acct No: 09005145 Job Address: 21633 KELSO DRIVE HN Location: S-73-431 21633 KELSO DRIVE Parcel No: 026-09-0315-00025 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: APPLEBY WINDOW SYSTEMS 1585 SULPHUR SPRING ROAD SUITE 113-116 BALTIMORE, MD 21227 Phone Number: 410-242-5970 Owner: LEONE MARY Contractor: APPLEBY WINDOW SYSTEMS Phone Number: 410-242-5970 Contractor Lic. No: MHIC-11145 Description: 12X22 SUNROOM ON THE REAR OF THE DWELLING, DECK FOUNDATON, CONCRETE PIERS, SINGLE SLOPE SHED ROOF WITH SHINGLED ROOFING, VINYL EXTERIOR. BLUE GRASS ESTATES LOT #25 Foundation Size: 12X22 Type of Heat...: NA Public Sewer...: N Public Water...: N Gas............: N Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $38,111.00 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed .92 .92 190 103 43 50 120 VINYL EXTERIOR N EXISTING NA EXISTING NA A/R No. Of Bathrooms: 0 No. of Bedrooms; 0 Minimum By Ordinance 40,000 40,000 25 25 A)isioeC(C - ✓ This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 V I=ORt I 4 � �� , / E\� p 805 �Leiterab Co 9 Ii t_ERER BURG 0100 I I I�i�O`;^ 20500 � 621 UJ i W v/P I F m House Location Survey for Anthony & Mary Leone 21633 Kelso Drive Hagerstown, MD NOTE: Parcel does not lie in the 100 year flood plain per FEMAFlood Insurance ZoneRate Map, Community Panel No. 240070 00858, dated February 1, 1985, Flood C. Parcel designated as Lot No. 25 on the Plat of Bluegrass Estates, recorded in Plot folio 607 among the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the dwelling and/or improvements shown hereon are within the metes and bounds of the lands conveyed to Dennis L. Kendall and Judith A. Kendall, by John R. Oliver Company, by deed dated October 7, 1975 and recorded in the Land Records of Washington County, Maryland In Liber 603, folio 231 and that the improvements shown hereon were located by accepted field practices and include permanent visible structures if any that exist on the subject property at the date of survey dated May 24, 2001. This plot is not for determining property lines, but prepared for exclusive use of present owners of property and also those who purchase, mortgage, or, guarantee the title there n' at this time of settlement and as to them I warrant the accuracy of jhis'plat. No title report,juthlshed. JUN 6C `�VNi ,�...,,�-,c._.- 7 /-',�:..'fir• MI° �mo 0 �r L 1 �. d 1p WWYY. +:0Hr1n�Pn I.P. FOUND N46'44'3E J �K ^I L A �I �'n' PLATTE 0 .IQIIIt SEPTIC A _413D'-*_ _ I.P. FOUND 8' fx 0 0 3 Ko/co1 — -octo In flOC zm xOOO>�mg va�ZIF �a-NO NZ VI A�oa° o c NNE�m Wom . n0cI+t> n0 1° O >1o° m0�<I z> mm nzmis O O 0 In mIn DEALER: APPLE-YK 06 W10899 PH. MOLTRUP 21633 KELSO DR HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 DRAWN BY: MICHAEL RANG DATE: 08/18/06 I SCALE: NONE 0 i // 0 I Of Mi m r- rTi H 0 z co APPLEBY SYSTEMS - YK \ O�E�fiI�w 1pgt? PE 2135 N. GEORGE STREET 18-8 MI 48038 (877) 218-8366 X287 MANCHESTER, PA 17345 LIC # 26665 C 2W73 3 oc r m zD mz o r _nU) >c/1 Cl, mm z mr (no z 0-U cc D m n cm �rn WO P1 z 2 C 2 H L J H It El O o m O O m O S z -➢I m • >0 S O m rr Z Z ? -IO 0 > O 0) O Z m m o m0 X0 K Z1 zJ oz 0 D 1n r 0 z >X X r m N Z 0 w Doo m on rn mX �r➢- N n m - C ➢ Zrx Iv O J (I)° 0 O c - 3 N,O rpo�m ;;0 nom= COxZ XXrn w G) DD m<OF Ox W� m C C- 00 0 0 Z G7 I> Z �1 on m� O fi ti C -n U1 m -10 1 0 O -0 0 D m m MA)? DEALER: APPLE-YK MOLTRUP 21633 KELSO DR ( 2135 N. GEORGE STREET HAGERSTOWN, MD 21742 DRAWN BY: MICHAEL RANG DATE:08/18/06 I SCALE: 1/4"."l' MANCHESTER, PA 17345 PH. APPLEBY SYSTEMS - PApOR ,A, WALZ, PE 204 0 HALL RD CLINTON TWP, MI 48038 (877) 218-8366 X287 LIC # 26665 WASHDNt TOCOUNTY BUILDING & ZONING PERMIT IVR/Activity No: 2006-08621 Project No: P2006-1962 Permit Type: RES-ADD Inspector Area: B2 Job Address: 5722 TALL TIMBER LANE CA Location: SI-91-26 5722 TALL TIMBER LANE Parcel No: 014-22-0437-00009 Zoning Dist: RURAL VILLAGE Floodplain: C Applicant: COOPER JAMES L JR & ANGELA M 5722 TALL TIMBER LN PO BOX 851 CASCADE, MD 21719 Phone Number: 240-818-0038 Owner: COOPER JAMES L JR & ANGELA M Contractor: Phone Number: Contractor Lic. No: Applied: 10/16/2006 Approved: Status: PENDING District/Acct No: 14012893 ECTJTJT I�CT 1 G 2006 NASHING�0Nr,yi,u ,' Description: - TWO STORY ADDITION ON SLAB, FRAME CONSTRUCTION, FIRST FLOOR TO BE USED FOR GARAGE AND 1/2 BATH, SECOND STORY TO BE USED FOR A FAMILY ROOM, TRUSS ROOF BURNS ADDITION, REMAINING LANDS Foundation Size: 441 Type of Heat...: GAS Public Sewer...: N Public Water...: N Gas............: Y Electric.......: Y Exterior Finish: Air Conditioning: Septic............ Time Existed: Well............ Time Existed: Construction Type: Construction Valuation: $20,000.00 Code Enforced: 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE Setbacks Lot Tract Area Lot Area Per Family Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Left Side Setback Right Side Setback Lot Width Proposed 1.12 ACRES 1.12-AQRES 64 239 25 0 123 STONENINYL Y A No. Of Bathrooms: No. of Bedrooms: 0 Minimum By Ordinance 30,000 SQ FT 30,000 SQ FT 25 25 5 5 This permit has been reviewed by the Washington County Department of Permits & Inspections and meets all applicable local and state codes and ordinances. Should you have any questions, please contact our department at 240-313-2460 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, MD 21740 Phone: 240-313-2460 Fax: 240-313-2461 TON 90 Qa Q`O I I ^ C ` h 7:J r Maryl I(s9 Sc' soul -D ulwh , '3 e 'k3ne3t1 At;\JS C It I _ got •--A - f r \ \ WFS r �o � MIIITgRY R q a qRY \ \ \ d,yG�/<ROq �G �� \ iNO R0 � d � \ 'i' J7 O © Ty��o 1 o O �N ' �rasldnStOn COW cA �Fced tt kCowzcY Oun4at Tall' he✓ y kf�f WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street , Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION NOTIFICATION DATE: 10-11-2006 TO : IISfori C o1 j&ki C'J C_rrv,7rYi FROM PLANNER : TIM LUNG SUBJECT : PC -06-009 WILLIAMSVIEW A Preliminary Consultation for the above referenced project will be held on 10/26/2006 at 9:30 in room # 1 at the Planning Commission offices in the Washington County Administrative Annex, 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, Maryland. The purpose of the consultation is to provide the owner/developer with information from the reviewing agencies that will enable him to proceed with the subdivision. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT EACH AGENCY BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. WITHOUT AGENCY REPRESENTATION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION CANNOT PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH ALL THE INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR PROCEEDING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL "CLUSTER" DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: NORTH SIDE KENDLE RD LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL `ACRES 137.7 LOTS 209 OWNER : WILLIAMSPORT VENTURES LLC SURVEYOR: DAVIS, RENN & ASSOCIATES, INC. cc: Planning Director: Michael C. Thompson Consultant: DAVIS, RENN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Owner/Developer: WILLIAMSPORT VENTURES LLC ATTACHMENT(S) TAL /DSE www.washco-ind.net RECYCLED PAPER 77'4]'30" 580,000 FT Joins Map 20 I 0 El F G H MAP 25 0 to m nla" IN RS ATE RAR — � a I 00,E I y, 2 F J _ I ss I I �I Q I, a �°s ' o� A I 68 Williamspart SDA / qN 3 `* . 8(e I / ; ci I 3 � NG ebt� v,. WSaint �� James _ 24i952 Founf in ` e hqs 68 291 7 9'� BYER & MEAD WS 6 GQ s '^s vE �tP $ 0�P o 63 Y � rti 5 Downsvill 'y owns M / O of the r n ____ N 0El11NGEe qa onAO J�IV�C copy I MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST WORKSHEET WA -I-017 NOMINATION FORM for the NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, NATIONAL PARKS SERVICE w at Vr (Check One) ❑ Excellent ® Good ❑. Fair ❑. Deteriorated O Rain O Unexposed CONDITION (Check One) i(Check One) U Altered O Unaltered ❑ Moved ® Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT 14D ORIGINAL (It known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This house is located about one mile southeast of Williamsport a short distance north of old Route 68 in Wasington County, Maryland. It faces south. The house is a two-story four bay log and frame dwelling painted white. The log portion of the structure, containing the two east bays has been encased with brick which has been laid in common bond. A 20th century frame addition is connected to the west end of the house. The windows contain modern single pane sashes. The original framing has been replaced. One story enclosed porches are present at the front and rear of the house. Small exterior brick chimneys rise along each gable end. The roof is covered with corrugated sheet metal. The house stands on property containing 140 acres. It is in good condition and is at this time in no danger of destruction. (Check One or More as Appropriate) ❑ 181h Century ❑ 20th Century Columbian 0 16th Century ❑ ❑ 17th Century 19th Century 15th Gntury N Z O U M N Z W W N SPECIFIC DATE(S) (If Applicable and Known) AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Check One or More as Appropriate) Aboriginal ❑ Education ❑ Politicdl ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Engineering 0 Religion/Phi. ❑ Historic 0 Industry losophy ❑ Agriculture ❑ Invention 0 Science Architecture 0 Landscape ❑ Sculpture ❑ Art Architecture ❑ Social/Human• ❑ Commerce 0 Literature itarian ❑ Conmunlcatians ❑ Military ❑ Theater 0 Conservation 0 Music 0 Transportation TEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ❑ Urban Planning ❑ Other (Specify) The significance of this house has been diminished by extensive Alteration. However, it is a log house and thus represents one of Washington County's major early building traditions. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES 0 DEFINING THE CENTER POINT OF A PROPERTY DEFINING A RECTANGLE LOCATING THE PROPERTY e OF LESS THAN TEN ACRES CORNER LATITUDE LONGITUDE R LATITUDE ' LONGITUDE Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Seconds NW o o D o NE o o SE o o .. . a o APPROXIMATE ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY: • 140 acres Acreage Justification: [LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTYeOUNDARI BOUNDARIES COUNTY STATE: COUNTY: STATE: COUNTY: STATE: STATE: COUNTY: sip- �oaartEanar, eY" NAME AND TITLE: Paula Stoner Dickey, Consultant DATE ORGANIZATION .197/. Washington County Historic Sites Survey February, Y STREET AND NUMBER: Court House Annex STATE CITY OR TOWN: to Liaison Officer Review: (Office Use Only) Significance of this property is: National ❑ State 0 Local 0 Signature l I� ' 4 � 1 I I r —� 1 4 n, tl�. •.�, �`�% ♦j�ii. � I I. 4• f "� l� f1 /. '"1'.i t yr ice tl L r, 1dY rf� .gyp %s. 1:3 •- •-:•"- i ♦ r • I. .ft .11 I I , it A i1� a yyG � <. nJi:a_l ,� 1s7 fl t&M� 1. ;.76 o n/ .vrcx a�•� Qla __ � nM 11 _,/ 3 Li Y k:. I .y' A i I� 1i LI L ___ L __ sH�"a I a y' o -a it F' \'« 2- 2 c '��: ^ kt�y. ;%:'/-Y ,r'r41� 'I J•�:�� jv } '(� a ),,�� 1° U 1 n�: 4 t,y,jt�j ^ p v ,I r4f �% ^ iNF �5 of t:EJry5 y> r F+ P x: s r x ffffff��� cd 2'Zak. rra J y iIN r,, `a 1�r cy p s . ^ a . '�'�d1i�� � 1 F� r 1 � i 3` y rr(rS -y. 0 C' - �1AJ.i Lei_ f 4� IIE. 4rr • 2 .. ,.; y�y i k a"t°JaR • 1 ih .t`''.a�bra" rl� II Ni i . e . r J,. 4 . M : . ar fl&' 1:. h Qfoua tjtiE i6 31d ��n a V9 �i a,• r {im v���' PG �" r ri1�; y' N'l�12a4`FS v✓.R y ��' ___ a i37 a, t c2� ��. .R9i1 �� °.'•JI �,n '4J a � t i• 5P ;� r � K it1} Q�b�9a p.� ��at'".i 4 �r r 1's'Ay' (�1 i• ; �,„_� _ pJ �p1 a' 'ay Ifs v__ r+ja :yj W}✓ u ;i`'�A ,ter 9• v "" �'- Te' IveA .iC �ti�ltF<"r`' N !n rs .. tns� 'iC• .rP4 i �l[ a f 5. r, r ¶,. 7 __ ___ If I� II 1 I ,N. Ivl J17 If lily u I ii r I. / a I'; �' a c- -* l!yy��jj t 3 r �f. rta r a: i 1 4 1_' , ,' �3N3_ � • I —. .4 y ._� 1 — _ 1 K a, r; ,� Er : : L r ra 'JJ ti, r �M'•lO/' r Iry , I 1.1� ! l l ppgIIYY�.. . : ,`. J• 1. nN', ' �, .;,.- 7. �: �: R�r�w �� �9�.r...air • �.K�J;. � 0 9r. i� Q � � � f y rf wr i.. ,, rT ..,� pi's I 4 r�l��r>r s, e,r 4 ' •�yik .i • I - !, 4' i 44�V I i • N a l a i. r ro}'t9A Y.� a .. +y. ul 115 ,'.�. �'� 1V-.\yy^�,,. �' r 1 I r t T , W 4• ff si rd�iw �2 {".1 +, ��pi f c= 'In llt ,y,t Y Ana'r t V +�wr s d. Ya te• , iii si- Y"R T. .T ,.�a ,n 'ffl lilt° `\iS +ate f w 1• h Ii Ia � `a t AM! fl n C ( i CrQ 1O is Ly 64 Q Bio�-o ke 1 0 N O O C' Proposed Ministry Complex — Phase #1 (Front View) Proposed Mloistrc Compie:c - Phase 4r (Front View) r. I, If iJ (malA [uoag) xe asei[d - xa[dmoo ,Lgsirnp pasodo.Id 0 Z EC W 0 Z W of U) 0 U, N 0) 3. 3 1 0) N N U, N IL E <_ 0 0 0 a EX/SL 1a000SF. RESERVED SEPPC AREA PLAT NO. 7085 T.M. 13, P. 118 LANDS OF DON & DANA CONLEY L. 1724, F. 287 LOT 18 T T - eN FOREST CONSERVATION EASEMENT iz `\ \ OLAT N0. 7466 \6*U - - -........ EXIST. FOREST CONSERVATION EASEMENT PLAT NO. 7466 STEEP SLOPES \ �\ U INDICATED BY SHADING PLAT N0. 8320 - -- - FOREST CONSER. EASE. - . ----0.264 AC. - . --.--PLAT NO. 7085 EXIST NEIL 9 T.M. 13. P. 3 LANDS OF RINGOLD CHURCH OF CHRIST L. 2332, F. 163 REMAINDER PLAT ND. 8320 K GT , N l EXIST 70,000 .SF. RESERVED SEP77C AREA / / / .-- i L e S 02'23 I • I. /'- i a N. a i - 1' - - In — —. . } N Iktr1t*I$1iI1 MIi _I -s-I r m ,� IIIIIIIII�'_ Al _ • III Ap�' IIIIIIIIIII __a;! iu4k liii I I " — — — ® xELc I [At_ — EDGE GRAVEL PARKING — / l P. 111 I P. 95 L. 899, F. 414 _ I L 637. F. 392 1` PLAT NO. 2577 r ° .. GRAVEL PARK/NG AREA I/IN/F I F ARTHUR F. BAYER I ° O RINGOLD CHURCH OF CHRIST - - L. 637, F. 398 P. 70, 71, 76, 95, 97, 111 ...,Ill ! � I '-_ ,� - -- �, _. I __H' II CREAI SFIED l / (II I L. 1195. F. 993 I l �' P.97 / GRA{2Z PARKING AREA /I IO L 573. F. 4 2 a` I I. \ L710F�1046 / 1 CLASSROCIVS _�,•,: i ,: SHED l [.lA AtVraW M CHURCH AUDITORIUM 9. �XJ7H I Op L 109. F. 690 I BU/LD/NC ADULT _ _ _ 7090 7092 7088 - - - _ _T - — — — ___ — _- -—___ ___ ___ __ BARKDOLL ROAD N/F GERALD L. VIRDEN L. 817, F. 525 AR RINGOW CHURCH Of CHRISTJ UDER 1446, FOUO 802 10.1331 ACRES LOT 1A PLAT NO. 8320 : I PROPOSED FOREST .,\. / CONSERVATION EASEMENT `, 0.283 AC. \:<---- PR0P06ED UGHT (TYP.) SEE DET. SHT. 9 i) o / / / /-SSCREENING BUFF 10' APART / 321.76' a I / N CARL L.. DILLER L. 943, F. 791 /c PROPOSED FOREST CONSERVATION EASEMENT 0.457 AC. N/F N/F DOROTHY R PRYOR L 622,N F. 655 L. 240. F. 555 / N/F YINIFRED G. MEDCAIF L 1067, F. exs 0 of m o , 4 en cu W W Q Lu oW ZVa o `^ Z N -� to f] WND z J '-Z W V) vj Yan Z n wo Wo ... M4R __c, -.J U V) I ^ O VI La N W Cu L N d o O prN LU o0_NN r O � N W L• I� . L O C u W `.M ON 01 �� N 01 �' W Doti O 7 O W =' W -._O ti d y < U Y V) (L f N W 0 0 0 d H to O // / ry GRAPHIC SCALE (INS) 1 inch = 40 ft jZ_WD JOB NO. 4729.C SHEET NO. 1 GENERAL NOTES: 01. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. STAIRS: ALL STAIRS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT CODE. STAIR INFORMATION - MAXIMUM STAIR RISER 8-1/4", MINIMUM STAIR TREAD 9" WITH A 3/4" - 1 1/4" NOSING ON STAIRS WITH SOLID RISER. MINIMUM STAIR HEADROOM 6"-8" CLEAR MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE STAIR NOSING OR FROM THE FLOOR SURFACE OF THE LANDING OR PLATFORM. MINIMUM CLEAR STAIR OPENING WIDTH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 36 INCHES. STAIR WITH OPEN RISERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO PREVENT THE PASSAGE OF A SPHERE OF 4" INCHES OR MORE IN DIAMETER THROUGH THE RISER OPENINGS. THE GREATEST RISER HEIGHT WITHIN ANY FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE SMALLEST BY MORE THAN 3/8 INCHES. THE GREATEST TREAD RUN WITHIN ANY FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE SMALLEST BY MORE THAN 3/8 INCHES. 2. HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS: HANDRAILS MUST HAVE A MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES AND 38 INCHES, RESPECTIVELY, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE NOSING OF THE TREADS, AMID SHALL BE PROVIDED ONE AT LEAST ON SIDE OF STAIRWAYS OF FOUR OR MORE RISER. HANDRAILS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS THE FULL LENGTH OF THE STAIRS. ENDS SHALL BE RETURNED OR SHALL TERMINATE IN NEWEL POST OR SAFETY TERMINALS. ALL STAIRWAYS HANDRAILS SHALL HAVE A CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION WITH AN OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF AT LEAST 1 1/4 INCHES AND NOT GREATER THAN 2 5/8 INCHES. OR APPROVED RAILS OF EQUIVALENT GRASPABILITY. HANDRAILS PROJECTING FROM THE WALLS SHALL HAVE A SPACE OF NOT LESS THAN 1 1/2 INCHES BETWEEN THE WALL AND THE HANDRAIL. GUARDRAILS NOT LESS THAN 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL PORCHES, BALCONIES, OR RAISED FLOCR SURFACES LOCATED MORE THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR OR GRADE BELOW. 3. WINDOW SUPPLIERS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WINDOWS PROVIDED FOR BEDROOMS MEETTHE GOVERNING BUILDING CODES EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. IF LAGER WINDOWS ARE REQUIRED THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THE SUPPLIER SHALL NOTIFY THE BUILDER AND THE BUILDER SHALL SUBSTITUTE THE LARGER WINDOWS FOR THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE BUILDER SHALL CONFIRM WINDOW SIZES BY COMPLETING THE ROUGH FRAME OPENINGS BEFORE THE WINDOWS ARE ORDERED. GLAZING AT ALL WINDOWS, DOORS, TUBS, FIXED GLASS PANELS, SIDELIGHTS, ETC. MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOVERNING CODE WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION PAID TO GLAZING AT HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS. 4. ALL CRAWL OR ATTIC SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH VENTS TO ALLOW A FLOW OF AIR THROUGH THE SPACE FREE VENT AREA IS TO BE AS FOLLOWS: CRAWL VENTS SHOULD EQUAL 1/150 OF GROUND AREA, ROOF VENTS 1/300 OF CEILING AREA WITH VENTS DISTRIBUTED PER THE GOVERNING BUILDING CODE. PROVIDE ACCESS OPENING TO CRAWL (18" X 24" MIN.) AND ATTIC (22" X 30" MIN. WITH 30" HEADROOM). 5. GARAGE SEPARATION: INTERIOR WALLS AND CEILING: ONE LAYER 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD ON GARAGE SIDE. 6.WHERE DRAWINGS OR INFORMATION IS IN CONFLICT WITH OTHER DRAWINGS OR DETAILS, THE BUILDER SHALL NOTIFY THE DESIGNER IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER THAT CLARIFICATION NOTICE CAN BE ISSUED. 7. ALL COMPONENTS AND CLADDING SHALL BE ATTACHED FOR LOCAL WIND SPEED REQUIREMENTS. 02. SITE WORK 1. PRESUMED SOIL BEARING CAPACITY IS 2,000 PSF ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. THE BUILDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THIS BEARING CAPACITY. ALL FOOTING SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ENGINEERED FILL. 2. THE BOTTOM OF ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BE BELOW THE FROST LINE AS DEFINED BY THESE SPECS, THE DRAWINGS OR THE GOVERNING CODE AND OR 12" MINIMUM. 3. FOR BASEMENT CONDITIONS, THE MAXIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF A BASEMENT FLOOR TO THE OUTSIDE FINISHED GRADE SHALL NOT EXCEED DISTANCES FOR THE WALL THICKNESS AS SHOWN IN IRC TABLES R-404.1.1(1) OR R-404.1.1(3) BASED ON WALL TYPE AND SOIL CLASS. 4. DO NOT BACKFILL UNTIL WALLS HAVE BEEN CURED AND THE ENTIRE BUILDING STRUCTUREABOVE IS IN PLACE. BACKFILL SHALL BE CLEAN GRANULAR FILL, FREE OR ORGANIC MATERIAL, PLACED IN 8" LAYERS EQUAL ON ALL SIDES, COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM D-1557. 5. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF I" PER FOOT FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 8 FEET FROM THE BUILDING. 6. TERMITE TREATMENT- POISON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR EARTH AT PERIMETER WITH EPA APPROVED TERMICIDE PER HUD MPS. PROVIDE TERMITE SHIELDS WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS. 7. PROVIDE DAMP PROOFING OR WATERPROOFING APPROVED BY THE LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIAL AT ALL BELOW GRADE BASEMENT WALLS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. PROVIDE FOUNDATION DRAINS AND SUMP PITS WITH PUMPS WHEN SHOWN ON PLANS OR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIAL. 03. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE 1. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 -DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2,000 PSI. EXTERIOR SLABS AND GARAGE SLABS TO BE 3,500 PSI. 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF ACT 318. 3. CONCRETE SLABS SHALL HAVE POLYPROPYLENE FIBER ADDITIVE (1.5LB/CY) OR WWF REINFORCEMENT 6X6, W1.4 PER ASTMD-2103 LOCATED MIDWAY THROUGH THE SLAB THICKNESS. ALL SLABS TO BEAR ON GRANULAR FILL. 4. REINFORCING STEEL WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM-A615. GRADE 40 OR 60, DEFORMED. 5. PROVIDE A 6 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR RETARDER MEMBRANE PER ASTM D-2103 UNDER INTERIOR CONCRETE SLABS AND WHERE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. LAP SHEETS 6" MIN. AT JOINTS. OVERLAY VAPOR RETARDER WITH 3" OF COMPACTED SAND. 6. EXTERIOR PORCH AND PATIO SLABS SHALL SLOPE AT A MINIMUM OF 1/8" PER FOOT TO DRAIN WATER AWAY FROM EXTERIOR WALLS. 04. MASONRY 1. CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CMU) SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-90, GRADE N, NORMAL WEIGHT UNITS. 2. MORTAR TO BE TYPE 'M' WITH A 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2,000 PST. PROVIDE CONTNUOUS HORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCING EVERY OTHER COURSE. MORTAR TO MEET ASTM C270 STANDARDS. 3. GROUT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C 476 WITH A 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENCTH OF 2,500 PST. GROUT ALL CELLS RECEIVING ANCHORS AND THE TOP COURSE OF ALL BEARING WALS. 4. FACE BRICK SHALL BE STANDARD SIZE AND COMPLY WITH ASTM C 216, RUNNING BOND WITH -OOLED JOINT APPLICATION. SECURE BRICK VENEER TO WALL STUDS WITH GALV. METAL TIES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 5. APPLY A CEMENTIOUS PARGING COAT TO THE EXTERIOR OF ALL CMU BASEMENT WALLS. 6. MANUFACTURED STONE OR EIFS- WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS. 05. STRUCTURAL STEEL 1. STEEL BEAMS AND PLATES SHALL CONFORM WITH ASTM SPECIFICATION A-36. STEEL COLUMNS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-53. 2.ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AISC SPECIFICATIONS AND "CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICES." ALL PIPE COLUMNS SHALL BE FILLED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL COLUMNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A 501, FY=50 KSI, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. STEEL COLUMNS SHALL BE SECURED TO BEAMS WITH WRAP AROUND STEEL CLAMPS OR BY TACK WELDING BEARING PLATE TO BEAM. STEEL COLUMNS AT BASEMENT LOCATIONS SHALL PENETRATE THE BASEMENT SLAB DOWN TO THE TOP OF THE COLUMN FOOTING BELOW SLAB 3. ALL LINTELS SUPPORTING BRICK OR STONE TO BE PRE -PRIMED 3-1/2" X 3-1/2" X 1/4" MIN. U.N.O. 1. FRAMING LUMBER SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A GRADEMARK OR CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION WHICH PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM DESIGN VALUES: JOISTS, BEAMS, HEADERS GRADE FB=1,000 E=1,600,000 STUDS #1, #2 FB= 775 E=1,300,000 BLOCKING #3, STUD. STANDARD FB= 300 E=1,300,000 2. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "MANUAL FOR WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION" NATIONAL FOREST PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION, LATEST EDITION. 3. DESIGN LOADS FOR WOOD TRUSSES ARE AS PER THESE SPECS. THE GOVERNING BUILDING CODE AND ANSI/WI 1-2002 AND NDS-97. THE TRUSS MANUF. SHALL PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS, SEALED BY A STATE - LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. INSTALL TRUSSES AND ENGINEERED LUMBER IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOP DRAWINGS AND WTCA- BI AND WTCA- B2. ALL POINT LOAD, PARTIAL UNIFORM LOADS PR COMBINATIONS THEREOF SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER AND ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE DESIGN OF THE TRUSSES. 4. PREFABRICATED WOOD I -JOIST SHALL BE RATED PER ASTM D 5055. STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE LUMBER SHALL BE RATED PER ASTM D 5456. LVL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH NES REPORT NO. NER-126. 5. HANGERS, ANCHORS AND FASTENERS, WHEN CALLED FOR IN SHOP DRAWINGS OR THESES DRAWINGS, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS. USE FASTENERS RECOMMENDED OR PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. ALL HANGERS, FRAMING ANCHORS AND FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESSURE TREATED WOOD TO BE STAINLESS STEEL OR GALVANIZED PER Gl 85 RATING 'Z -MAX' COATING BY SIMPSON OR TRIPLE ZINC BY USP. 6. BEAMS AND HEADERS ARE TO BEAR ON JACK STUDS AS NOTED PER PLAN, SHOP DRAWINGS, OR PER CODE. PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING BELOW ALL JACK STUDS FORMING A CONTINUOUS BEARING LINE TO THE FOUNDATION. 7. ALL LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH EARTH, CONCRETE OR MASONRY SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. FIELD TREAT SAWED. DRILLED OR NOTCHED TREATED LUMBER PER AWPA A M4. 8. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL SHEATHING WHERE NOTED ON PLANS. ALL WOOD SHEATHING SHALL BE APA RATED FOR INTENDED USE AND SUPPORT SPANS. INSTALL ROOF SHEATHING WITH H CLIPS BETWEEN TRUSSES. 9. INSTALL FIREBLOCKING TO CUT OFF DRAFT OPENINGS AT ALL INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES, BETWEEN STORIES, AND BETWEEN TOP FLOOR AND ROOF. 10. EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2 X 4 @16" O.C. (BELOW 10' CLG. HT.), 2 X 4 @ 12 " O.C. (10'-14' CLG. HT.), 2 X 4 SS @8' O,C. (ABOVE 14' CLG. HT.) OR AS NOTED ON PLANS. 11. ALL NOTCHES AND CUTS IN FRAMING SHALL NOT EXCEED MAX. DIMENSIONS AS DEFINED IN THE BUILDING CODE PROTECT PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL AND REINFORCE STUD WALL NOTCHES WITH 16 GA. METAL PLATES. 07. THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 1. PROVIDE AND INSTALL FIBERGLAS INSULATION WITH VALUESAS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. FIT INSULATION TIGHT INTO SPACES AND LEAVE NO GAPS OR VOIDS. PROVIDE RIGID INSULATION WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS. AT WALLS TAPE JOINTS OR PROVIDE HOUSE WRAP OVER. 2. INSTALL FIBER GLASS / ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS. SHINGLES ARE TO BE UL. CERTIFIED TO MEET ASTM D 3462. INSTALL -#15 FELT UNDER EXTERIOR TRIM AND ROOFING SINGLES. OVERLAP EACH COURSE 2" HORIZONTALLY AND 4" VERTICALLY. NAIL TO HOLD IN PLACE. 3. INSTALL FLASHING AND SHEET METAL IN COMPLIANCE WITH "ARCHITECTURAL SHEET METAL MANUAL" BY SMACNA INSTALL FLASHING AT ALL ROOF TO WALL CONDITIONS, EXTERIOR OPENINGS AND ELSEWHERE WHERE REQUIRED. 08. DOORS, WINDOWS AND GLASS 1. DOORS SHALL CONFORM TO AAMA/WDMA MIN. STANDARDS AS PER APPLICABLE DOOR TYPES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 2. ALL ALUMINIJM AND/OR VINYL (PVC) AND/OR WOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE R-25 VOLUNTARY SPECIFICATION(S) IN ANSI/AAMA/NWWDA 101/LS 2-97 PER THE APPLICABLE WINDOW AND DOOR TYPES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. INSTALL TEMPERED GLASS WHERE NOTED ON PLANS OR AS REQUIRED BY CODE THERMAL TRANSMITTANCE TO BE U 0.45 OR BETTER PER NFRC 100. 3. INSTALLATION OF WINDOWS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AAMA 2400-02 AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS WITH CAWM 410-97. INSECT SCREENS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSVSMA 2005, OR ANSUSMA 3001. 09. FINISHES 1. PROVIDE AND INSTALL GYPSUM WALLBOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH "GA 253-1993, RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF GYPSUM SHEATHING." 10. SPECIALTIES ].PROVIDE BATH ACCESSORIES, FIREPLACE, HARDWARE AND MISC. ITEMS PER OWNERS SCHEDULE. ALL ITEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHED INSTRUCTIONS AND INSTALLATION DRAWINGS. FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES TO BE UL LISTED AND COMPLY WITH UL 127. 11-14. N/A 15. MECHANICAL 1. INSTALL PLUMBING, RELATED FIXTURES, VENTILATORS, HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AS SHOWN. SIZE ALL EQUIPMENT PER ACCA MANUAL J AND INSTALL FOR FUTURE ACCESS SERVICE AND REMOVAL. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR WHEN REQUIRED PER M1701. ALL NOTCHES AND :UTS IN FRAMING STALL NOT EXCEED MAX. DIMENSIONS AS DEFINED IN THE BUILDING CODE OR MANUFACTURERS LITERATURE. PROTECT PLUMBING AND REINFORCE STUD WALL NOTCHES WITH 16 GA. METAL PLATES. ALL DUCTWORK AND PIPING LOCATED IN UNCONDITIONED SPACES SHALL BE INSULATED (R-5). INSTALL DRYER DUCT TO OUTSIDE WITH SMOOTH METAL DUCTING WITHOUT SCREWS AND WITH MINIMUM BENDS, MAXIMUM DUCT LENGTH PER M1501.3\ 2.VENTING: ALL DRYERS, BATH EXHAUSTS, AND RANGES MUST BE VENTED DIRECT TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT CODE. 16. ELECTRICAL 1. TERMINAL HOOK UP IS REQUIRED FOR ALL FIXTURES, APPLIANCES, MOTORS, FANS AND CONTROLS. LOCATION OF OUTLETS AND EQUIPMENT ON PLANS IS APPROXIMATE, EXACT ROUTING OF WIRING AND OUTLETS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS AND OBSTRUCTIONS. WIRING FOR EQUIPMENT REQUIRING MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. 2. ALL ELECTRICAL BREAKERS AND CONTROLS SHALL BE PROPERLY LABELED. INSTALL GFCI PROTECTED OUTLETS. DRAWING INDEX CS -1 NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS 4 SYMBOLS A-1 ELEVATIONS A-2 IST, 2ND i FOUNDATION PLANS A-3 CROSS SECTION ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS T.V. CABLE OUTLET SMOKE DETECTOR DIMMER SWITCH $ SWITCH t LAN CONNECTION 13 3 PHASE SWITCH LIGHT 4 TELEPHONE JACK O OUTLET 0 EXHAUST FAN 411 220V OUTLET ETAIL NUMBER SHEET WHERE DETAM APPEARS O GFCI OUTLET S ELEVATION MARKER PULL CHAIN LIGHT O DOOR NUMBER , 0 WINDOW LEVIER CD ATTIC ACCESS MATERIAL ]DESIGNATIONS EARTH WOOD ROUGH LA I 0 U u 4) ` - ` GRAVEL ® BRICK & INTERIOR WALL CONCRETE INSULATION �� STUCCO u.15I CAST SLATE CLASS A FIBERGLAS SHINGLES mLII Ji STAND & SEAM ROOF STRUCTURAL SYMBOLS N N J L� >zK d d1 A EXIST. 70.000 S.F. RESERVED SEPTIC AREA PLAT NO 7085 L - - - - T.M. 13. P. 118 LANDS OF DON & DANA CONLEY L 1724, F. 287 LOT iB PLAT NO. 8320 .\ I FOREST CONSER. EASEMENT 0.365 AC. Liri2 PLAT NO. 7085 FOREST CONSER. EASE. 10 -� 0.264 AC. - .. PLAT NO. 7085 \/ (( 73 SUBGRADE PREPARATION z W \ �"\ �� \ '�Fq, � � • \ 6'A \ \ PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION QF FOUNDAl10NS, F100R SLABS, OR PAVEMENTS, OR THE � U \ \ PLACEMENT OF FILL IN ANY STRUCTURAL OR PAVEMENT AREAS, ALL ORGANIC MATERIALS, V J a \ O' FROZEN. WE7 SOFT OR LOOSE SdLS, AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS SHOULD BE \ \ EXIST: OREST'CONSERVAII EASEMENT !a ` \ \ N _ REMOVED ANO WASTED. IF ROCK IS ENCOUNTERED IN THE SUBGRADE, REMOVE AN LIJ IO 0.445 AC. T- .,, \ \ \ ADDITIONAL 8 INCHES BELOW SUBGRADE AND BACKFlLL WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL TO Z C.) Q -\ \ CAT NO. 7466 \ = J \ sRo \ \ 1HE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. — Z N Fn \ \' \ AFTER THE SUBGRADE IN CUTS AND FILLS HAS BEN FINALLY SHAPED TO THE SPECIFIED Z m \ \` - So\ �; CROSS N,, IT SHALL BE CAREFULLY AND THOROUGHLY PROOF ROLLED WITH A 20 TON Z z \ \ \^ _` _ SECTI AREAS. PRIOR TO PAVING �° \ \ s 1' SOFT OR UNSUITABLE AREASDElER SHALL BE REMOVED U AND I BAgCFlLLED WITH SUITABLE L1,I 0' EXIST. FOREST CONSERVATION EASEMENT \ ENGINEER PRIOR REMOVE ITORED AND Lid w Qom, °per �\ \ TO THE SPECIFIED DENSITY. \ �� \ MAPPROVED BY OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL ). w •o PLAT NO. 7466 vF \ \ \ 7o y \ rj �FlLi IN STRUCTURAL AND PAVEMENT AREAS SHOULD PLACED IN UFfS WHICH ARE N \ \ GHT INCHES OR LESS N L I \ \ \ LESS THAN 92% OF THE MAXIM M�DRY DENSITY AS SPECIFIED W W SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT IN T 180. MATERIAL IN THE TOP 1 FT. SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 97% OF — _ WATER QUALITY VOLUME (WQv) REQUIRED 873- 9C.F. -- "C'THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. IN BUILDING AREAS, THE FILL SHOULD EXTEND A MINIMUM OF <05 RECHARGE VOLUME (Rev) REQUI _ TFN FEET BEYOND BUILDING ONES WHERE FLOOR SLABS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON FILL (1) V 00 _-� `t'«6 C.F. (TOTAL DIST. AREA) -� \ �,\ PROVIDE 20'x2O'x1' STI NG`\ \ SOT.702.0 \ s . TOP OF CONSTRUCTED BERM 711.5 BASIN SEE DEL SIT 6 ` \ NOTES: o TOP OF SETTLED BERM 714.$ - .. - .. - . - - -- - - - -\ 1. IF R0OK IS ENCOUNTERED. UNDERCUT POND 18" AND > \ \ BACKFILL WITH CL TYPE SOIL �'0o 2. CORE TRENCH AND EARTH DAM TO BE COMPACTED \ 70 \ DRY DENSITY Q (ti _ _fDLND710N CUB OFf 7RLH - - - --- TO MINIMUM 95X MAXIMUM \ N/F 3. ALL PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. 5.0 \ I \ \ / L. CARL L. DID ER \ 1 ( \ 943. F. 791 4. NO TREES OR SHRUBS PERMITTED ON THE EMBANKMENT. h SWM. BASIN S WM. EASM 82 \ \ ° . ENTIRE POND AREA SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS SEE_DET. SHT. 6 _ _ u 1 \ ., 05 1 \ EXCEPT FOR BIORETENTION PLANTING AREAS. - I 110 BID -RETENTION AREA - r . '!O t \ L DET. SHT. 7 ' \ \ 7 \ > �. o c 83 : LANDS OF a RINQpGD CHURCH OF CHRIST 0„- 9.2 eh m O I \ US R 1446, FOLIO 802 / °r z9 ta' o LLIJ PP 3:� 110 SEESWALEDETTHISSHT\ ./Q , - / SW S IOUTH LINE ALL ALE ' `-. ~..-- MoD 't ` N I j STEMPORARY EROSION CONTRO L� !/ ti. 1 .6 \ MATTING APPROX. 7.0' WIDE \ a� sN D '.3 as S � 1 9.0 /.'\ SWALE DETAIL _ \ SCALE: N.T.S. T.M. I}. P. 3 _ -' / LANDS OF 0. 2 .7 2 .5 .`, r-�. ` L .... RINGOLJ] CHURCH OF CHRIST �; L. 2332. F. 163 \_ - e — _—_ _—__ 0.0 29.0 26. / \ REMAINDER h I - w PLAT NO. 8320 �� �0 ,\ � • . aoao \\ Z REBAR II 85 17.5 8.M p N 7 64B M. REBAR I ^ W 1 8 HALNUT \ / �`1 / ' I o 740.00 r 3.0 10.000 S.F. RESERVED` J -4 SEPTIC AREA o V d / I CH 29C5 FA LI 3 Q PLAT N0. 8320 - LI 42 S . 88 111 0, 610 RET. WALL. 0 SEE DET.' SHT. 8 W �' B.F.E. 0 18 14.0 I I z, a d EXIST 10.000 SE I1S- } �' o RESERVED SEPTIC AREA ' z F.F E. 730:0 99 \ 16.8 I ! 1 R /9 o / Q LL w Tl 0 // _ a y•NcT 30. Q y o /' / / li 20.3 i Q210 m 3O DRAINAG i / _ 15MA E CONC. Cu READ __ .-!'.`' V ' LY�1 MAPLE OR OR AGE - % F PROPkD 7z 16.5 WELL _ N /L_0 7 II / — �^ — — _ /_ 1 EDGE OE GRAVEL PARgNG- // j - �� ! it S N� Y� P 95 I L 899 F 414 GERALD L. MR[ OROTH J. PRYOR 1 ! ROBERT 655N I I / L. 637, F. 392 !/ / / / D L. 240, F. 565 / F. PLAT N0.2577 L 817, F. 525 I 1 ° GRAVEL PARK/NC AREA ° - - SN£J ' l N/F ' LANDS OF -� ARTHUR F. BAYER o - — — — L. 637, F. 39a IA - kJNCcCHURCHOFCHRIST -. - _ _ . - 70, 71,- 76, 95, 97, tt1 21VEE DITCH / I L' _ — / to i I 0>5iIfEEP. 3:1, 2.1 SSI I ' / �/// / of - .'�---710— — V,o�3,6FPS IS 1 I f LINE WITH STABILIZAi 1I .�,�jT�v-4° YAOE / / I SHED! / l Z X73°'N/ / P76 II I I /`/ PARK/NG AREA - //'-� J O I L 1195. F. 993 . . / I ; / II. ' ;EQ /l l / �/ / m I� L573F4/2 J. F GRAVEL P EA / / 7 4 2 ARK/NC AR rn I F. 1046 \7Z0� - CLASSROOMS �'I I I 1O SHED ;.. _ I OCO AUD/TORiUM CHURCH AUDITORIUM � /' I o I i-.-1 L. 109. F� 690 I[JA-1k BUlL00/NG / 1/AOUL /l N o I I / cLAssRooas 4 V 704 8 ` \ - ' 1 _ __ 7078 _ — -- tea_— _-- O� c 709.0 709.7 7088 �1 0 _ _ _ _ -r--sJ- j1- _I RKDOLL ROAD PROGRESS PRINT t�JT I._ CONSTRUCT!'' "•' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 40 ft. 0 = m a Y Z Q a J Z JOB NO. I 4729.C SHEET NO. 3 , 6L .L, L w 00 ___ N- BUILDER TO VERIFY PITCH FIBERGLASS/ASPHALTo Z DOES WIT NOT CONFLICT H RIDGE VENTING PGc Mawv p. THE EXISTING FEATURE WINDOW SHINGLES W if N �l AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN PITCH RAKE TRIM CLAD AS REQUIRED Z z 0 W/ ALUMINUM OR MATCH EXIST. FINISH - Q w ' ^ V' FIBERGLASS/ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH 0FE ' V EXISTING HOUSE FEATURE WINDOW O W w Lc BRICK SURROUND Ln 0 & SOLDIER COURSE j z0 7.5 (- j Z CORBELLED BRICK VENEER 0 > z V m ,^ 7 5 CORNICE 0 a N O V I m RETURN GABLE O.H. TOI MATCH EXIST. DRYER VENT TO BE RELOCATED W CL (� _. _... ~ VCJN IIINV -... �.. _. RIDGE VENTING FGA - a u f. P aiEuuI;..u.s__JEIiE: tILL9IliiEE!I[1Iliu_ - iui o.unn.00nnnn.... �ZJQJT SIDE El EVATIONJ PlZOPO�EI7 1/4" = APPROX. GRADE 1ZL4 Z EV4TION FIBERGLASS/ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE FASCIA TRIM CLAD W/ ALUMINUM OR MATCH EXIST. FINISH ALLUM. GUTTERS W/ DOWNSPOUTS BRICK VENEER OVER WOOD FRAME LANDSCAPE BLOCK WALLS & PATIO BY OTHER BUILDER TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSINS PRIOR TO STARY OF CONSTRUCTION AND COORDINATE ADJUSTMENTS AS REQ'D. TRUSS BEARING SUBFLOOR `�- U.OJ. _ GRADE @ CRAWL FIBERGLASS/ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE FASCIA TRIM CLAD W/ ALUMINUM OR MATCH EXIST, FINISH ALLUM. GUTTERS W/ DOWNSPOUTS BRICK VENEER OVER WOOD FRANE LANDSCAPE BLOCK WALLS & PATID BY OTHER X RIDGE VENTING Pc.t MwwuF. APPROX. GRADE L L = = = - -- APPROX. CRAWL PROVIDE FOR 30' BELOW JOISTS AREAWAY ACCESS PIZOPO6ED EXISTING EXISTING 1/4" = 1'-o" - NGEXISTING 2 -STORY I / STRUCTURE IC I I r------ L— — — — — — — ILV HI APPROX. GRADE CRAWL VENT BEYOND PROVIDE RETAINING WELL PARTIAL ,4.5-E'UIL J� V4TION T = I' -o" C m cu c i U � V � L • as is OrLo Z ILL_ CV O N o N C o J z 0 F- >< uJ (/) J w 0 O 0 F -M O I�V1 N0 N I- z O 00 U Q < cw (� O, O m O N U m N H W U O _ s / 1 ' wi PARCEL 143 PARCEL 157 ELMWOOD REALTY LLLP L. 2674, F. 655 SITE DATA EXISTING PARCEL 142 ........... .._.._........... 137.7 ACRES± EXISTNG ZONING ..... "A", AGRICULTURAL DISTRI GROSS ACREAGE ROAD R.O.W. AREA...........................................18.2 ACRES± MINIMUM BUILDING RESTRICTION LINES: (M.B.R.L.) F. 30', S. 10', R. 40' S.W.M. AREA........................................................5.8 ACRES± 't NET SITE AREA ................................................ 113.7 ACRES± NUMBER OF LOTS _.................._.. __..__ ._._.....209 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 209 ACRES± .............................. �•nl MINIMUM LOT AREA....... ..._............__ .. _.14,000 SO. FT. GROSS DENSITY..................................................1.5 ACRES± NET DENSITY ........_.............................................. "I 1.81vACRES± WATER AND SEWER........._.__.........................PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ACRES± ........................................................21.2 SOIL LINES AND TYPE ••••••••••'•"•""" RETAINED FOREST..............................................7.4 ACRES± PLANTED FOREST ......_.__..........._........_..._....... 32.7 ACRES± THERE IS NO 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, TOTAL ON -SITE FOREST ...._....................._.._. 40.1 ACRES± PER FEMA F.I.R.M. PANEL NoS. 240070 0090A AND 240070 0155, DATED MAY 1, 1978. THERE ARE NO WEThMJDs THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES PER THE U.S. DEPT. OF INTERIOR WETLANDS MAP WILLIAMSPORT, MD.-W.VA. NOTE: WHEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS ARE DONE AND PONDS SIZED, LOT LINES MAY BE READJUSTED TO MAKE ROOM FOR PONDS. NOTE GRAPHIC SCALE ALL FOREST PLANTING SHALL BE ON -SITE. 200 0 100 200 400 NOTE: SCALE IN FEET CONTOURS AND TOPOGRAPHY FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY. 1' - 200 Ft. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON U.S.G.S. DATUM. NOTE: PLANNING COMMISSION HAS CONFIRMED LIMITS OF DEVELOPMENT ARE WITHIN THE URBAN GROWTH AREA. NOTE: A FOREST STAND DELINEATION HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ON THIS PROPERTY. "ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS" NOTES THERE ARE NO FLOODPLAINS, STEEP SLOPES, STREAMS AND. RELATED BUFFERS, OR HABITAT OF THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES IDENTIFIED BY THE U.S. FISH AND: WILDLIFE SERVICE PER 50 CFR 17 AS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN BY SECTION 314 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND SECTION 4.21 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. II OWNER WILLIAMSPORT VENTURES LLC 0/0 TIM FEAGA 15950 NORTH AVENUE LISBON, MARYLAND 21765 EBERSOLE—CONCEPT.dw 9 4 DRANK BY M.E.R. 09/28/06 06 DAVIS, RENN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SURVEYORS P.O. BOX 246 HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND 21741 TELEPHONE 301-739-5660 8 3 cNECMED Br CHE DATE 7 2 APPROVED BY 6 1 SCALE 1 = 200' 5 No. REVISION BY DATE APP'D REGISTRATION NO. DETAILED - SOIL MAP UNITS DsA — DUFFIELD SILT LOAM, 8 TO 15% SLOPES, VERY ROCKY DsB — DUFFIELD—ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX, 8 TO 15% SLOPES DuC — DUFFIELD SILT LOAM, 8 TO 15% SLOPES, VERY ROCKY Ft - FUNKSTOWN SILT LOAM HaA - HAGERSTOWN SILT LOAM, 0 TO 3% SLOPES b HaB — HAGERSTOWN SILT LOAM, 3 TO 8% SLOPES HbB — HAGERSTOWN SILTY CLAYLOAM, 3 TO 8% SLOPES, VERY ROCKY HcB — HAGERSTOWN—ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX, 3 TO 8% SLOPES HcC — HAGERSTOWN-ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX, 8 TO 15% SLOPES HgB - HAGERSTOWN-OPEQUEN-ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX, 0 TO 8% SLOPES SpA - SWANPOND-FUNKSTOWN SILT LOAMS, 0 TO 3% SLOPES SsA — SWANPOND-FUNKSTOWN SILT LOAMS, 0 TO 3% SLOPES W - WATER SOURCE: SOIL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND, ISSUED OCT., 2001. CONCEPT PLAN FOR WILLIAMSVIEW EBERSOLE PROPERTY POTOMAC ESTATES SITE N SCALE: 1" = 2000' SHEET NO 1 OF. 1 PROJECT NO. 041 037 FILE NO. B-1742