Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20040114WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay AGENDA HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND CONFERENCE ROOM #2 WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ANNEX 80 WEST BALTIMORE STREET JANUARY 14, 2004 7:30PM M A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Minutes D. Communications & Bills 1. MD SHA — MD 68 over Conococheague Creek E. Unfinished Business F. Budget G. New Business 1. FFY 2004 CLG Project 2. PC -03-012 Powers/Smithsburg Development Corporation H. Other Business I. Executive Session J. Adjournment * = written material enclosed \HDC\AJAN04.doc NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT THE HISTORIC DISTRICTCOMMISSION MAV MMETINCLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.508, STATEGOVERNMRNTARTICL2, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIALACCOMTIODATIONS ARE REQUESTED TOCONTACTTH0 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CONTACT PERMITS DEPARTAIENTAT(301) 791-3065 VOIC&EDD TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THR MEETING. - www.washco-md.net RECYCLEDPAPER MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUBGRANT PROGRAM FFY 2004 SUBGRANT APPLICATION Information, Procedures, and Forms DEADLINES December 5, 2003 - Intention to Apply Due (post -marked) January 30, 2004 — Completed Application (post -marked) FOR GRANTS UP TO $40,000 Department of Housing and Community Development Contact: Nicole A. Diehlmann Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Governor Office of Heritage Planning and Outreach Michael Steele, Lieutenant Governor Maryland Historical Trust Victor L. Hoskins, Secretary 100 Community Place Shawn Karimian, Deputy Secretary Crownsville, MD 21032 www.dhcd.state.md.us 410-514-7625 www.marylandhistoricaltrust.net diehlmann@dhcd.state.md.us Maryland Relay for the Deaf: 1-800-735-2258 The Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) pledges to Foster the letter and spirit of the law for achieving equal housing opportunity in Maryland. PLICATION COVER SHEET MET USE ONLY FFY 1999 CLG SUBGRANT COVERSHEET DEADLINE: DECEMBER 10,1999 CLG SUBGRANT MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST $REQUEST. TOTAL COST 100 Community Place COUNTY: DIST: Crownsville, MD 21032 wnm rnn,rn. INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK I A. REQUESTED FROM Miff: $15,000 B. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ X28 Sm C. CITY AND COUNTY IN WHICH PROJECT IS LOCATED• Washington County, Maryland D. STATE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT & SUBDISTRICT OF APPLICANT (Ensure Accuracy): 2B and 3 E. PROJECT TITLE: Rural Community Survey Phase III F. WHAT OTHER MIT GRANTS ARE YOU APPLYING FOR IN THIS CYCLE, IF ANY? CLG Educ. set a side G. NAME AND TITLE OF OFFICIAL WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY TO OBLIGATE APPLICANT: Rodney M. Shoop County Administrator H. SIGNATURE (Required with full application only): APPLICANT INFORMATION: 1. Name of Certified Local Government: Washington County, MD. Washington Co Historic District Col 2. Mailing Address: Room 320 SVeetAddress: 100 west w..ti,;.,..«..- 3. 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. Name and Title of Project Contact Person:_ Stephen T. Goodrich, Chief Senior Plannerp Code 1740 Telephone: (Office) 301-791-3065 (Home) Fax Number. 301-791-3017 9. Email Address: Applicant's Federal Identification Number. 52-6001-037 Is the heritage resource affected by this application located in or part of a: (answer yes or i a. Certified Heritage Area No b. Recognized Heritage Area Yes (Sandy c. Museum Consortium No d. Designated Revitalization Area No e. Main Street Community Designated since 11/1997 No f. Locally zoned historic district part — Antietam Village Hook, Antietam Village p/o Ringgold) J. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Please describe purpose of the project and any project products. (DESCRIPTION MUST FIT INTO THIS SPACE ONLY). Washington County's FFY00 CLG project is Phase III of the Rural Community Survey. The project includes preparation of National Register of Historic Places Registration forms for each community including a summarized history and placement in the context of Washington County, proposed boundaries of the rural village, identification and brief descriptions of all contributing structures within the village and pictures. Villages targeted for Phase III include Highfield (history and boundary done in Phase II, needs contributing structures identification), Sandy Hook (individual site inventories in 1982, need contextual history, boundary, updated photos and determination of contributing status based on current condition), Antietam Village, Ringgold and Cavetown. Preliminary determinations of eligibility will be made. The project will add sites and information to the MD and County inventories and more clearly define rural villages identified in the Comprehensive Plan to comply with Maryland's Smart Growth initiatives. Products include narrative reports, pictures and maps. The entire project will be conducted by a qualified consultant with County staff as project coordinator. n REVISED LIST - UNSURVEYED COMMUNITIES (32) WA - I - OO5 -- HALFWAY 311 FAIRVIEW 362 HIGH GERMANY WA -II - -- 32 - mrr+mrna eNW Tr T 166 MT. LENA 227 MT. PLEASANT 273 -- ' DOWNSVILLE 276 BAKERSVILLE 323 PORTERSTOWN WA -III- 009 BROWNSVILLE 024 LOCUST GROVE _- S'PE- 031 WEAVERTON-GARRETT'S MILL VICINITY 039 GAPLAND 054 ROHRERSVILLE STATION - TREGO II? WA - V - 074 WILSON 122 SLABTOWN 142 SHADY BOWER 162 ERNSTVILLE - BIG POOL 182 BLAIR'S VALLEY UNNUMBERED BEAVER CREEK •-r CHEWSVILLE MT. AETNA H:\HOME\STG\HDC\UNSURVEY.HS2 I. INTRODUCTION Since 1966, when Congress established a preservation program for the United States, the National Historic Preservation Program has operated as a decentralized partnership between the federal government and the states. In the simplest of terms, the federal government established a program of identification, evaluation, and protection of historic properties which the states, primarily, carry out. The success of that working relationship prompted Congress to expand the partnership to provide for participation by local governments (counties and incorporated towns). The National Historic Preservation Amendments Act of 1980 contains the legal basis of the new federal -state -local preservation partnership. The role of the "Certified Local Governments" in the partnership involves at a minhnum, (1) responsibility for review and approval of nominations of properties to the National Register of Historic Places, and (2) eligibility to apply to the State Historic Preservation Officer (in Maryland, the Director of the Maryland Historical Trust) for matching funds earmarked for "Certified Local Governments" (CLGs). In order to become certified, a local government must meet several requirements, chief of which is to have enacted a historic preservation ordinance and appointed a historic district (or preservation) commission. One of the benefits of certification is a local government's eligibility to compete annually for CLG subgrant funds. Every year, the State of Maryland makes at least 10% of its annual apportionment of the Historic Preservation Fund available to Certified Local Governments meeting minimum requirements. What follows is general information about the CLG Subgrant Program, application materials and instructions for completing the application. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR CLG SUBGRANT REQUESTS ONLY. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS All CLGs within the State are eligible to compete for CLG subgrant funds if they have continued to comply with the conditions of their Certification Agreement and State performance standards, including submission of CLG Annual Reports. Local governments receiving CLG subgrant funding become subgrantees of the State. All subgrantees must be provided with, or have access to, appropriate technical and financial management assistance in order to meet and maintain, for the period of the subgrant award, standards outlined in a grant contract drafted after the announcement of the awarding of funds and signed by the local jurisdiction. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES FOR FFY 2004 CLG funds may be used for a wide variety of heritage preservation activities. However, all CLG funded activities must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation, as well as the Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland or the Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Investigations in Maryland. In addition, principal investigators undertaking CLG-funded projects must meet the applicable minimal professional qualifications as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, 36CFR61, published in the Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 190, pages 44738-39 (available from MHT or on the Internet at www2.cr.nps.gov/laws/ProfQual83.htm) Activities most commonly supported by CLG subgrant funds include: Identifying, documenting and evaluating standing structures through broad -based comprehensive surveys completed by 36CFR61-qualified architectural historians; Conducting comprehensive, systematic regional archeological investigations to identify, evaluate and document the full range of prehistoric and/or historic archeological resources in a defined region of the state; C. Documenting oral traditions, cultural heritage, and related collections; The preparation of nominations to the National Register of Historic Places for districts or groups of heritage resources, or for highly significant individual resources facing imminent threat; Thematic research supporting historic context development for more effective evaluation and protection of heritage resources; C. Developing preservation plans as part of the comprehensive growth management planning process; Developing design guidelines for local historic districts; Producing heritage education materials, ranging from publications to videotapes and curricula; and Studies determining the fiscal impact and potential of heritage preservation activities and resources; This list is not exhaustive. If you have a question about the eligibility of any proposed activity, please contact Nicole Diehhnann at the Maryland Historical Trust, 410-514-7625 or diehhnann(a�dhcd.state.md.us. Funding priorities for FFY 2004 include projects that research and document Maryland's architectural, archeological or cultural resources according to MHT-approved standards and guidelines. Applications for projects that address these priorities will receive special consideration in the application ranking process. 5. Two letters of support for the project. Each application must include at least two (2) letters of support from local preservation organizations, planning agencies or other interested organizations that may benefit from the project. It is highly recommended that a support letter be submitted from the highest-ranking official(s) of the applicant jurisdiction. Letters of support may be addressed to J. Rodney Little, Director, Maryland Historical Trust, 100 Community Place, Crownsville, MD 21032. Because this is a federally funded program, letters of supportfrommembers of the Matyland General Assembly are not necessary. 6. Proof of matching funds. This documentation may consist of a financial statement, commitment letter or other proof that the applicant has matching funds or in -kind support dedicated for the project. 7. Required Certifications. Each application package must include a signed copy of the Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters, Drug -Free Workplace Requirements and Lobbying. These certifications are attached as Appendix VI. The grant application package must be stapled or clipped in the left-hand comer and have the CLG Application Cover Sheet as the first page. Do not submit applications in binders or as spiral bound books. Do not include a table of contents or separator pages between sections. Applicants must submit one (1) original and four (4) copies of the application to the Maryland Historical Trust. PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA Subgrant proposals will be reviewed using the thirteen criteria outlined below. A committee of MET staff evaluates each proposal on the merits of its method, goals, and products, with careful attention to the budget and demonstrated experience of the applicant in managing grant funds. Typically, a successful application clearly demonstrates that the project will make a significant contribution to meeting the stated goals of both MHT and the local preservation community, and that it will be managed carefully in a professional manner. I. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROJECT: Does the affected resource possess architectural, archeological or cultural significance to the nation, state or local community? Will the project's completion lead to a better understanding of the state's architectural, archeological or cultural heritage? 2. URGENCY: Is the architectural, archeological or cultural resource imminently endangered (i.e., by development pressures, erosion, neglect, age, illness) or is there a unique window of opportunity for the completion of the project 3. PROJECT DESIGN: Are project goals realistic within the proposed time frame and budget? Will the project provide a complete product (if one phase of a multi -year project, this refers to the completeness of this year's phase alone)? Does the project address the most pressing needs and assure continued viability of the architectural, archeological or cultural resource(s)? Does the proposal articulate a cohesive, stand-alone project which addresses specific goals or research questions? Can the results of this project be built upon in successive phases? Is the project consistent with the mission and goals of the Maryland Historical Trust? 4. PROTECTIVE VALUE: Is the proposed project of value to the long-term preservation, conservation or documentation of the architectural, archeological or cultural resource(s) or Maryland's heritage overall? Does the project provide concrete action to protect, conserve or document the resource(s)? Are results of the project being used as part of local, state or federal planning efforts? 5. EDUCATIONAL VALUE: How permanent and far reaching is the educational component of the project? Does the project offer architectural, archaeological or cultural site interpretation? 6. DEMONSTRATION VALUE: Does the project utilize methods or techniques that are transferable for statewide, regional or local application? Does the project have value as a "model" (i.e. will it produce a product unique for quality and innovation?). 7. PROFESSIONAL CAPABILITY: Do the personnel for the project have the necessary training, education, and experience to cany out specific project goals? (i.e. recognized in field, does high quality work, accomplishes work on time, experience applicable to the subject.) 8. ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY: Do the project sponsor and administrative personnel have a record of successfully administering grant monies, meeting project deadlines and following established procedures? 9. PROJECT READINESS: Can the project begin on schedule and will match be in hand when needed? Will the project be completed by June 30, 2004? 10. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY: Does the sponsoring group provide any match for the project? How much cash and/or in -kind match is being offered by the sponsor? 11. LEVERAGE: Will the project stimulate or prompt other architectural, archeological or cultural resource preservation, conservation, documentation or educational projects or programs throughout the community and/or professional preservation support? 12. EQUITABLE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION: (determined by MHT staff) Will the project contribute an equitable geographic distribution of funds based upon the distribution of previous awards? APPENDIX III: PROJECT NARRATIVE The project narrative that you include with your CLG Subgrant application package must address all items listed in the following outline completely and concisely. The project narrative must not exceed five (5) pages. PROJECT PLAN I. Significance of Project Describe the project's significance within the historic and contemporary context which informs our current understanding of the resource or subject. What previous research has been conducted? Why is this project important? How will this project provide new information and build on our current understanding? II. Project Methodology Describe the purpose and methodology of this project, outlining each step you will use to achieve your goals. III. Project Timetable List specific deadlines for each step in your project plan. IV. Project Products What tangible products will you generate? (e.g. National Register Nomination, oral history archive, historic preservation plan, forty MHT Inventory Forms, manuscript for publication, etc.) V. Project Selection Criteria Describe specifically which of the Project Selection Criteria (listed on page 4 of this application) the proposed project will meet, preparing a brief statement for each criterion that applies. VI. Special Considerations All CLG funded activities must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation. In addition, the Maryland Historical Trust requires that when archeological projects involve the recovery of artifacts or other archeological materials, the applicant must provide written documentation demonstrating all recovered materials will be permanently curated in accordance with the Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Investigations in Maryland, Technical Update No. 1: Collections and Conservation Standards. Architectural survey projects must also comply with the Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Historical Investigations in Maryland. These documents are available on the MHT website at www.marylandhistoricaltnist.net under "documents." If applicable, describe what provision will be made for physical or programmatic access by disabled persons and what benefit the project will provide to minority individuals or groups. PROJECT PERSONNEL VII. Project Coordination Who will direct the project and who will be responsible for the various components of fieldwork, writing analysis, etc.? Describe the qualifications of the project staff and attach resumes of potential project personnel. VIII. Grants Management Describe your organization's administrative and financial experience and ability to manage a grant of this type. List the name, title, address, and daytime phone number of the individual(s) who will be managing this grant, if awarded. PROJECT SUPPORT IX. Sources of Funds (the application package must also include a separate budget as described in Appendix IV) A. Identify and describe the source, type, and amount of funds currently in hand by your jurisdiction for this project. Documentation that these funds are in hand must be submitted as part of this application. B. Identify and describe the source, type, and amount of funds your jurisdiction reasonably expects to have available for this project prior to June 1, 2004. Provide the names, addresses, and daytime phone numbers of these sources. C. Identify and describe the jurisdiction's efforts to fund this project from sources other than the CLG Subgrant Fund. X. Letters of Support Identify and describe support for this project by state, county, or local governments, private, non-profit preservation organizations, or other project partners. It is highly recommended that a support letter be submitted from the highest ranking official(s) of the jurisdiction in which the project will occur. Submit letters of support as part of this application. 12 Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Governor Michael S. Steele, U. Governor Robert L. Flanagan, Secretary Nell J. Pedersen, Administrator MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Mr. J. Rodney Little State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD 21032-2023 Dear Mr. Little: November 28, 2003 Re: Project No. 2380221-B MD 68 over Conococheague Creek Bridge No. 2103600 Washington County, MD USGS Williamsport 7.5" Quadrangle RECEIVED DEC ' WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. Introduction and Project Description This letter serves to inform the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) of our finding that proposed Project No. 2380221-B will have no adverse effect on historic ro erties. The project invo ves repairing the entire engt o t e longitudinal joint on the spandrel wall side of Bridge No. 2103600 (WA -I-020) by embedding anchors into the deck and repointing the stone masonry along the spandrel walls. All work will occur within the existing State Highway Administration (SHA) right-of-way. Funding State funds will be used for this project. Area of Potential Effects The area of potential effects (APE) is restricted to the area of direct construction impacts within the existing right-of-way. Bridge No. 2103600 (WA -I-020) is the only historic property within the APE. The APE is illustrated on the attached SHA - GIS quadrangle map (Attachment 1). Identification Methods and Results Potentially significant architectural and archeological resources were both researched as part of the historic investigation instigated by the proposed repairs to Bridge No. 2103600. Architecture: SHA Architectural Historian Liz Buxton consulted SHA and MHT files and the SHA-GIS cultural resources database. A field visit was deemed unnecessary due to the minor scope of the undertaking. My telephone number/toll-free number is Maryland Relay Service for Impaired Hearing or Speech 1,800,201.7165 Statewide Toll Free Street Address: 707 North Calvert Street • Baltimore, Maryland 21202 • Phone 410.545.0300 • wnnvmarylandroads.eom Mr. J. Rodney Little MD 68 over Conococheague Creek Bridge No. 2103600 Page 2 Bridge 2103600 is a stone arch bridge built in 1829 that carries MD 68 over the Conococheague Creek. The bridge was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1996. It is located within the Williamsport Historic District (WA -I-481) and the C and O Canal National Park (WA -VI -048). Bridge No. 2103600 is the only historic structure located within the APE. The Jacob Friend's Burial Site (WA -I-021) is located south of the bridge; however, this site is not located with the APE. Although the bridge will be impacted by the proposed repair work, the proposed project would not significantly alter the qualities of the structure that make it eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The work is required to preserve and extend the useful life of the structure, and will be done in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Archeology: SHA Archeologist Carol Ebright assessed the potential of the project area through consultation of the SHA - GIS cultural resources database, historic mapping, and prior archeological studies. There are no recorded archeological sites in the APE, which is confined to the bridge structure itself. The APE and its environs were included in a prior archeological reconnaissance by Curry (1978) for MD 68. Curry (1978) recommended the Jacob Friend's Burial Site (WA -I-021) immediately adjacent to the southwest end of the bridge as being potentially significant, but did not record it as an archeological site. Because the proposed work is confined to the bridge itself and involves no ground disturbance, the undertaking has no potential to impact any intact, significant, archeological resources. No further archeological investigation is recommended. Review Request Please examine the attached map and Effects Table (Attachment 2). We request your concurrence by December 31, 2003 that there would be no adverse effect on historic properties by the proposed remedial repairs to Bridge No. 2103600 on MD 68 over Conococheague Creek. By carbon copy, we invite the Washington County Historic District Commission and the Washington County Historical Trust to provide comments and participate in the consultation process. Pursuant to the requirements of Article 83B of the Annotated Code of Maryland, Sections 5-617 and 5-618, SHA seeks their assistance in identifying historic preservation issues as they relate to this specific project. For additional information regarding historic preservation consultation for State funded projects see the Maryland Historical Trust's website, www marylandhistoricaltrust.net, or contact the Maryland State Highway Administration or the Maryland Historical Trust. If no response is received by December 31, 2003, we will assume that these offices decline to participate. Please call Ms. Liz Buxton at 410-545-8698 (or email lbuxton@sha.state.md.us) with questions regarding standing structures for this project. Ms. Carol Ebright (or email cebright@sha.state.md.us) may be reached at 410-545-2879 with concerns regarding archeology. Mr. J. Rodney Little MD 68 over Conococheague Creek Bridge No. 2103600 Page 3 Very truly yours, Cynthia D. Simpson Deputy Director Office of Planning and Preliminary Engineering by: An B6ce M. Grey Deputy Division Chief Project Planning Division Attachments: 1) SHA-GIS Williamsport Quad with APE Indicated 2) Effects Table cc: Ms. Mary F. Barse, SHA-PPD (w/ Attachments 1 and 2) Mr. Don Brinser, Washington County Historical Trust, Inc. (w/ Attachments 1 and 2) Ms. Liz Buxton, SHA-PPD Ms. Jennifer Callaghan, SHA-OBD (w/ Attachments 1 and 2) Ms. Carol Ebright, SHA-PPD (w/ Attachments 1 and 2) Mr. Steve Goodrich, Washington County Historic District Commission (w/ Attachments 1 and 2) Mr. Gary Green, SHA-PPD (w/ Attachments 1 and 2) Ms. Cynthia Simpson, SHA-PPD Mr. Donald H. Sparklin, SHA-PPD Mr. J. Rodney Little MD 68 over Conococheague Creek Bridge No. 2103600 Page 4 Concurrence with the MID State Highway Administration's Determination(s) of Eligibility and/or Effects Project Number: 2380221-B MHT Log No. Project Name: MD 68 over Conococheague Creek Bridge No. 2103600 County: Washington Letter Date: November 28, 2003 The Maryland Historical Trust has reviewed the documentation attached to the referenced letter and concurs with the MD State Highway Administration's determinations as follows: Eligibility (as noted in the Eligibility Table [N/A]): [ ] Concur [ I Do Not Concur Effect (as noted in the Effect Table [Attachment 2]): [ ] No Properties Affected [ ] No Adverse Effect [ ] Conditioned upon the following action(s) (see comments below) [ ] Adverse Effect Agreement with FHWA's Section 4(f) criteria of temporary use (as detailed in the referenced letter, if applicable): [ ] Agree Comments: By: MD State Historic Preservation Office/ Date Maryland Historical Trust Return by U.S. Mail or Facsimile to: Mr. Bruce M. Grey, Deputy Division Chief, Project Planning Division, MD State Highway Administration, P.O. Box 717, Baltimore, MD 21203-0717 Telephone: 410-545-8540 and Facsimile: 410-209-5004 z C) -cc ai a a a! 0 CC 14 \ j }) I \ � \ � } � A � } � \ � � } I} : :' \ t C fni Ad �\ \)}\ \ WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Washington County Administrative Annex 80 West Baltimore Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-6003 Telephone: 240-313-2430 FAX: 240-313-2431 Deaf and Hard of Hearing call 7-1-1 for Maryland Relay PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION NOTIFICATION DATE: 12-17-2003 TO /L/' :(fl FROM PLANNER : TIM LUNG SUBJECT : PC -03-012 POWERS/SMITHSBURG DEV. CORP. A Preliminary Consultation for the above referenced project will be held on 01/22/2004 at 10:00 AM in room # 1 at the Planning Commission offices in the Washington County Administrative Annex, 80 West Baltimore Street, Hagerstown, Maryland. The purpose of the consultation is to provide the owner/developer with information from the reviewing agencies that will enable him to proceed with the subdivision. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT EACH AGENCY BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. WITHOUT AGENCY REPRESENTATION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION CANNOT PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH ALL THE INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR PROCEEDING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT PLAN FOR 118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATION: W/S MD RTE 63, N OF US RTE 40 LAND USE: S/F RESIDENTIAL ACRES : 2.16 LOTS 118 OWNER : POWERS H L III SURVEYOR: FREDERICK SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES cc: Interim Planning Director: Stephen T. Goodrich Consultant: FREDERICK SEIBERT & ASSOCIATES Owner/Developer: POWERS H L III ATTACHMENT(S) TAL /SAC www.washco-md.net RECYCLED PAPER