Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_1998_AnnaulReportWASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION County Administration Building 100 West Washington Street, Room 320 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-4727 Telephone: 301-791-3065 TTY/Hearing Impaired: 301-791-3070 FAX: 301-791-3017 Board of County Commissioners for Washington County, Maryland 100 West Washington Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 Dear Commissioners: omitted pursuant to the provisions of Article bbB of the 3� 1998. This report su Code summarized the activities of the Commission from July 1, 1997 throe Code, mroyal of subdivisions and site pians, the in addition to the routine review and appThe ued to im lement the Comprehensive Plan that was adopted this fiscal t d in81. 19 998 are Commission Contin p the Commission in Fisc Yea various elements of the Plan worked on by ort alon with the numerous other tasks undertaken during described m this rep g year. As in the past, am that has been formally adopted by the Planning w Work Commission lists all the ethose the C Program plans to address_ BLIldsk Sincerely, L Iseminger, Chairman Lon County Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Planning Organizational Chart ........................................... Aaencv Inter -Relationships .............................................. The Comprehensive Plan ............................................... 1 Planning Commission Work Program ...................................... 3 Agricultural Land Preservation Program .................................... 4 Metropolitan Planning Organization ....................................... 7 Town Planner Assistance Program ....................................... 8 Forest Conservation Program ............................................ 10 Water and Sewerage Plan ............................................. 14 Highway Interchange Study ............................................ 15 Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance ..................................... 16 Park Planning....................................................... 17 Historic District Commission ............................................ 19 Community Development .............................................. 21 Housing Repair Loan Programs .................................... 21 Technical Assistance ............................................. 22 Elderly Rental Housing Development ............................... 22 Development Activity ................................................. 23 Rezoning Cases ..................................................... 24 Board of Zoning Appeals Statistics ....................................... 26 Agriculturally Significant Land Converted to Development ..................... 27 Agricultural Preservation Districts ........................................ 28 FY 1996 Subdivision Summary ......................................... 30 FY 1996 Subdivision Detail ............................................ 31 Subdivision Trends ................................................... 34 Planning Sector Map ............................................ Appendix FY 1997 Development Map ....................................... Appendix FY 1997 Rezoning Map ..........................................Appendix Agricultural Preservation District Map ................................ Appendix Washington County Planning Commission 1998 Annual Report Board of County Commissioners Gregory 1. Snook, President John S. Shank, Vice -President Ronald L. Bowers R. Lee Downey James'R. Wade Planning Commission Bertrand L. Iseminger, Chairman Bernard L. Moser, Vice -Chairman James R. Wade, Ex -Officio Robert E. Ernst, II Paula Lampton Don Ardinger R. Ben Clopper Published June 30, 1999 Washington County Planning Commission 100 West Washington Street Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 C9 W F t, U H 0—aNu F H C W W FA O UWrA U 04 `r Gast ASR �..� W 0 x 0 H H p�q H W U )-4 1:4 W M4 P4 H u 4 UUu W C7 N . W A A FF*4m A x .0 a A f -a O U= X C4 "W, Ri Cs M H O W U O U 4 Za W W 0 t NHWJ-i LOO 0N a t� N MW W Z A4 u (n A4 ul N a � F can 1-4 Ln Ln z x � � H W � U u Z Lo zw�P4� ow zea LO F .4 tFli134 M 134 Q N F W W u134 Hc90wH p��s+Fy x NF O W 0 x U H M F 0 W ,x E 0 w N , N G x m Ota U 0xu ks E x x A ' dE- i E F I., • ' 11""-w�"„11 Z0 U) H r C7 U A H O ' W a - - - - - - - - - - 1 • r � i ~ i c • e w Qm =MME 0. *so= 4L ��� _ !v �e at °y i� p W p !' r 41, ow 8kI pa Jy OPI Olt / 4 as I OO �aE OflJ \ ,rr���g iCA t TOURISM z .� pEPART we TJ �a 4Cf) m i fh��A�K t cr)Tµ t OETAR StO� / OSe�J i EOE 6fl v �� O• � R �o es 'ii r+) / t 6 04v } c w a E4*� �' ! 49" e s rd t u 0 r =� s AV am Olt l�Oi + e O/ �j'Dpa \ 0 �, e7 / ~�?`� Cdr ra C ! i x G- -T7 s LO ?e c e u o o m s '� ® M 6 1 Z THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Implementation of policies associated with the Comprehensive Plan continued through FY 1998. Many items which are outlined in greater detail in other sections of this report are directly related or reflect some aspect of the implementation of the policy and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. During FY 1998, the Planning Commission worked to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Pian through adoption of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan were adopted in FY 1998. The first was the adoption of a new "Transportation Element" for the Comprehensive Plan. This element addresses both road improvements as well as transit over a twenty year period. It identified improvements both inside and outside of defined growth areas as well as addressing pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The second was an amendment to the Transportation Element which was requested by the Town of Boonsboro. This amendment identified a future minor collector road. The third amendment was associated with the State's "Smart Growth" legislation requirement of identifying "Rural Villages" in the Comprehensive Plan. The identified rural villages attained the status of "Priority Funding Areas" if included in the County Comprehensive Plan prior to July 1, 1998. In addition to the amendments, work began on a complete update of the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act of 1992. A series of public information meetings were held in the fail of 1997 to provide an 1 opportunity for public comment prior to starting the rewrite of the plan. Work also began on developing an RFP to retain a consultant to complete a "Fiscal Analysis Study". This study will be used to provide guidance with respect to cost of service versus type of development in the updating of the Comprehensive Plan. Since the Comprehensive Plan adoption in 1981, the Planning Commission and the Planning Staff have worked continuously to implement its strategies for growth management and improvement of the quality of life in Washington County. The attached work program for FY 1999 is designed to continue that effort along with meeting the planning requirements of the "Smart Growth" initiative adopted by the State. 2 r w m pa to pa Idw � a s W 5 w 4 z H VHi u 0 z H�'a o F� la F 7 ft Stat H H M w NW LR H U M. z p, y 0 M. az v w at z at a, H Z Hw pN N FC y �7� o m P: U H 19 ZA O: Ht z kt7 U 7r Ha 4 11.4 9�H 0 000 W 0E..HN zu14 zUN a:rna O m!PNS! Fry' Ala 7. pOH S OHS 6a7� k0i Rai 'ii 4 UF7 vl N m rk ,m H z z a m m H 9414 N 1% C9W °i IU m m zmy yUy�� H z a C9 U p� �F AE amain � -4 ri ik P4 F p ii Lm'J O X47 O rh a 1 R U ED z F K CR N Sn � tl Ek m w m pa to pa Idw � a s W 5 w 4 z H VHi u 0 z H�'a o F� la F 7 ft Stat H H M w NW LR H U M. z p, y 0 M. az v w at z at a, H Z Hw pN N FC y �7� o m P: U H 19 ZA O: Ht z kt7 U 7r Ha 4 11.4 9�H 0 000 W 0E..HN zu14 zUN a:rna O m!PNS! Fry' Ala 7. pOH S OHS 6a7� k0i Rai 'ii 4 UF7 vl N AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM Washington County's efforts to preserve valuable farmland via the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program (MALPP) began in April 1978 and has continued to date. The Program was established and is regulated by Agricultural Article, Sections 2-501 through 2-515 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. It is administered through a Planning Commission staff member, by the Washington County Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board, the County Commissioners, and the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) of the Maryland Department of Agriculture. The program encourages landowners to voluntarily enter into an Agricultural Land Preservation District in which it is agreed that the land will not be developed for a period of at least five years (to receive County tax credits, the landowner is required to commit his property to agricultural use only, for a period of ten years). In return for the restriction, the landowner receives protection from nuisance complaints and becomes eligible to sell a Development Rights Easement. A landowner may exercise the option of selling a Development Rights Easement to the Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation provided that his offer to sell is recommended by the County's Advisory Board and the County Commissioners. At the local level, the Agricultural Advisory Board reviews and ranks easement applications, assigning point value to such items as farm size, soil quality and development pressure indicators on its easement checklist. If purchased by the State of Maryland, the easement will remain effective in perpetuity. During FY 1998, total acreage in the program increased to 25,000 acres with a total of 185 agricultural districts. 4 Under the MALPP easement purchase program, contracts were issued during FY 1998 for 2 additional farms, bringing total easement properties in the program to 25, equaling 5,285 acres. In addition, ongoing Federal, State and private conservation easements around Antietam Battlefield effectively preserve an additional 4,825 acres of agricultural land in perpetuity. 5 AGRICULTURAL SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT 1980 TO JUNE 30, 1998 Total Developed Total Converted 23.30 of the land developed between 1980 and June 30, 1998 has been converted from agriculturally significant land. %CONVERTED 36.0 22.0 20.1 34.1 37.5 38.4 14.6 16.1 17.5 18.0 28.8 16.3 19.8 14.5 34.8 19.3 22.9 20.0 23.3 *Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning Commission's Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal year. G ACREAGE LOTS ACREAGE LOTS 1980 1,359.6 365 487.8 95 1981 1.,137.1 332 251.3 59 1932 964.9 150 194.4 33 1983 895.3 220 305.6 127 1984 1,092.3 235 409.6 68 1985 1,144.6 231 439.8 65 1986 946.9 250 138.8 60 1987* 2,254.6 995 363.1 94 1989 1,714.8 770 301.3 86 1990 1,769.1 820 318.6 102 1991 1,115.4 339 321.6 104 1992 1,246.9 565 203.5 46 1993 793.5 1,005 156.8 45 1994 833.2 31.2 121.0 42 1995 598.6 342 208.6 76 1996 995.9 506 191.8 37 1997 760.8 224 174.0 39 1998 754.8 395 151.0 40 TOTAL 20,378.3 8,056 4,738.6 1,218 23.30 of the land developed between 1980 and June 30, 1998 has been converted from agriculturally significant land. %CONVERTED 36.0 22.0 20.1 34.1 37.5 38.4 14.6 16.1 17.5 18.0 28.8 16.3 19.8 14.5 34.8 19.3 22.9 20.0 23.3 *Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning Commission's Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal year. G METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION During FY 1998, the Hagerstown/Eastern Panhandle Metropolitan Planning Organization continued to evolve. This organization is composed of representatives from Washington County, Maryland; Berkeley County, West Virginia; Jefferson County, West Virginia; and Franklin County, Pennsylvania. The organization's home base is in the Washington County Planning Department. During this fiscal year, the Long Range Transportation Plan was adopted. A work program for FY 1999 was also adopted as well as revisions to the FY 1998 - 2000 TIP. RFP's were requested for four special study projects across the region. These included: an impact analysis of the new 1-70 & MD 632 Interchange on Hagerstown intersections, identification of a preliminary alignment for the Funkstown Bypass, development of an alignment for a bicycle trail from Charles Town to Harper's Ferry, and identification of historical routes within the region with particular emphasis on routes which were traversed by Civil War armies. Additional special studies were included in the FY 1999 work program. These included: identification of an alignment for a bicycle trail from Williamsport to Hagerstown, an orphan road inventory in West Virginia and evaluation of the potential for an inland port in Martinsburg. No new studies are anticipated to be started until the FY 1998 studies are completed. It is anticipated that the FY 1998 studies will be completed in FY 1999. 7 TOWN PLANNER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Assistance Program is nearing its seventh year of service and assistance to municipal governments in Washington County. The Town of Boonsboro continues to be the most active participant in the program. The Town has found the program to be a viable option to employing a full-time staff person. The Town Planner organizes the monthly agenda, analyzes and coordinates the review of development proposals and assists in long term or comprehensive planning goals of the Town. In FY 1998, the Mayor and Council and Boonsboro Planning Commission made a formal request to amend the County's Comprehensive Plan - Transportation Element. The amendment involved the addition of a planned future major and a planned future minor collector road to serve the anticipated growth within the Town Growth Area. The Board of County Commissioners and the County Planning Commission conducted a joint public hearing in March 1998 on the proposed amendment with a decision due in FY 99. The amendment was a goal established by the Town's 1997 Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the Town hired an engineering consultant to establish the centerline associated with the future major collector between MD 68 and MD 34. The consultant's report is due in FY 99. The Town of Boonsboro completed the annexation of 146 acre parcel located on the east side of Monroe Road and immediately north of MD 34. The parcel was zoned `Employment Center - EC' with projected long range use to be light manufacturing, recreational and municipal facilities. Staff was responsible for the preparation of the annexation documents, coordination of the governmental and public review and the completion of all legal requirements as set forth in Maryland law. 8 The Commission anticipates minor amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and a comprehensive rewrite of the Subdivision Ordinance in FY 99 as a result of the recent Comprehensive Plan update. The Town Planner also assists the Utilities Commission on water and wastewater planning issues and presents quarterly updates to the Commission on capacities and utilization of the systems. The Town Planner continues to provide assistance to the Mayor and Council and Town Manager on various projects. The Town of Smithsburg also participated in the Town Planner Assistance Program for the fourth year. The focus of the Smithsburg Planning Commission's efforts this year has been to start a complete rewrite the Town's Zoning Ordinance. 9 FOREST CONSERVATION PROGRAM Washington County continues to implement the local version of Maryland's Forest Conservation law. Through the inventory of existing forest on development sites and the calculation of minimum forest cover, based on existing forest and proposed development, the law is designed to slow the loss of valuable forest land in the State of Maryland. Several options for meeting obligations under the Ordinance are available. The first preferences are to prevent the disturbance of existing forest or to plant new forest on the development site. Planting new forest and placing easements on existing forest off site are also available. Payment of a fee in lieu of planting or retention is also allowable. In the past fiscal year the Washington County Planning Department processed 261 subdivision and site plan applications covering 2,042.15 acres of land. 193 or 74% of those applications, a decrease from the previous year's 81%, were exempt from the requirements of the Forest Conservation Ordinance (FCO). The chart below indicates the number and type of exemptions granted in the past fiscal year. A. < 40,000 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL 10 B. SIMPLIFIED PLAT 54 C. APPLICATION BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE 8 D. OWNER/IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER DWELLING 39 E. EXISTING LOT OF RECORD 17 F. PUD BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE 7 G. AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY 10 H. REAL ESTATE TRANSFER 15 I. REPLATS 44 TOTAL SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW EXEMPTIONS 194 67 plans remain that must comply with the Ordinance in some other manner. Payment of the fee in lieu of planting is chosen most often. Of the 67 plans not exempt, 31 used the fee in lieu of planting choice, an 80% increase over the previous fiscal year. The payments generated an additional $ 92,293.11 for the Forest Conservation Fund, averaging $2,977.20 per application. The past year's accumulation of the fee in lieu of is payment for the equivalent of 21.19 acres of forest that was not required to be planted on the development sites. Since adoption of the Forest Conservation Ordinance in February 1993, the fee in lieu of option has generated a total of $ 443,866.65 for the Forest Conservation Fund. A portion of the Forest Conservation Fund is earmarked for reforestation of the West Woods at Antietam National Battlefield, an arrangement that was approved by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners in November 1994. There were no disbursements for planting at the Battlefield in FY 98. The total expenditure to date remains at the level reported last year of $ 24,394.85. The reforested area is now 12 acres in size which equates to a cost of approximately $2,032.00 per acre. The total amount spent is equivalent to the fee in lieu of planting 5.6 acres. The labor was volunteered. 11 In cooperation with the Soil Conservation District, Washington County developed a formal, long term program to expend fee in lieu of funds to create new forest or permanently protect existing forest on private properties. Use of the fund is restricted by Maryland law to these efforts. In Fiscal `97 the program proposal was tested on two small pilot sites to aid in fully evaluating the concept. Fiscal `98 saw the first full implementation of the program which has been determined to be a success. Through a combination of easements on existing forest and planting of new forest the program resulted in 131.79 acres of forest under permanent protection. It cost $ 237,664.35 to complete and involved three private property owners. An average of $1,803.36 per acre was spent to create 50.06 acres of new forest or protect 81.73 acres of existing forest in priority or sensitive areas. At the end of the fiscal year, expenditures from the Forest Conservation Fund total $290,492.20 resulting in a total of 153.28 acres of forest permanently protected. Twenty plans required no fees or planting because there was sufficient forest on the development site or another one under developer control to allow some clearing with no mitigation or no clearing was proposed or necessary. Deferral of obligations to a point in the future was permitted by the Planning Commission for 6 applications, all new lots in various industrial parks. Comprehensive forest conservation plans are under development for these areas and will accommodate forest conservation requirements for all of the parks. The arrangement is permitted because it will produce forest of a size and location more consistent with the intent of the Forest Conservation Ordinance and is more economical for plan design, review and approval. An additional 9 plans met forest conservation obligations in a previous phase of the development or plan review. New planting, a final method of compliance was used only once in the past fiscal year. 12 All methods of compliance generate a plan review fee. There is no fee when a plan is exempt. The Planning Department collected $ 4,397.50 in Forest Conservation Plan review fees during the past fiscal year. An additional 19 exemptions from the Forest Conservation Ordinance were granted for timber harvest activities which are not considered development activities. 13 WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN The Planning Department reviewed one application to amend the Water and Sewerage Plan during FY 1998. WS -97-41 was submitted by the Washington County Water and Sewer Department. The application was to expand the Martins Crossroads Restricted Use water service area with the assignment of a priority designation of W-5, Planned Service. The purpose of the amendment was to allow for the provision of public water service to the Washington County Landfill and several adjacent parcels containing existing dwellings located west of MD Route 63, south of Landfill Road. The application was found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan with particular consideration given to the potential public health problems documented by the Washington County Health Department and was approved by the County Commissioners on October 28, 1997. The Planning Department Staff suspended work on the State mandated update of the Water and Sewerage Plan which began in FY 1997. The Maryland Department of the Environment concurred with the County's decision to not proceed with the update until various water and sewer issues are resolved with the City of Hagerstown. 14 HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE STUDY During FY 1998 only one interchange, 1-70 & MD 68 (Clear Spring) had not been rezoned. The County Commissioners had requested that the Planning Staff develop a proposal that would include additional HI -1 area along US 40 east of the Town as well as additional Agricultural zoned area along Martin Street. A public hearing was held on this proposal in January, 1998. However, by the close of the fiscal year no action had been taken by the Board of Commissioners. Action is anticipated in FY 1999. 15 ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE During FY 1998, the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) was assessed by the Planning Commission for need and recommended for continuance. The Planning Commission also recommended that the Board of Commissioners revisit the issue of impact fees. The Board of Commissioners gave the Planning Staff the charge to have a fiscal analysis study completed including development of an impact fee report. This study is anticipated to be completed during FY 1999. No substantive amendments to the APFO were approved during the fiscal year. 16 PARK AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Park and environmental planning during FY 1998, as in previous years, included a diverse series of projects and activities. The review and approval process for the 5 year Land Preservation and Recreation Plan (LPRP) for Washington County was completed. Three public review meetings were held in January. The Planning Commission found the Plan consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in June. Following a public hearing and comment period, the LPRP was adopted by the Commissioners in August. Other park planning focused on preparation of conceptual plans for softball fields at Kemps Mill Park, adjacent to the County Rubblefill site. A meeting was held in the spring to get comments on the plan from residents of the area, and a preliminary consultation on the final concept was held in August. Several Forest Conservation Ordinance related projects were completed in FY 1998; review of a Forest Stand Delineation (FSD) for a development in Smithsburg; preparation of a detailed FSD and report for the Fort Ritchie Base, and FSDs and reports for two properties where forest conservation easements were purchased by the County using Forest Conservation Fund money. Updating and streamlining of the Forest Conservation Ordinance was started with the objective of including appropriate amendments allowed by State legislation. Any amendments will require a public review process before final adoption. Coordination of a Washington County working group, including Hagerstown, and 17 input for an application to the Maryland Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program was provided early in 1998. The joint application with Frederick and Carroll County for a Civil War Heritage theme Heritage Area recognition is the first step in the process of achieving State certification. 18 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION The Washington County Historic District Commission continues to pursue its responsibilities and concerns regarding historic preservation through a variety of permits, applications and assignments from individuals and agencies. The Commission and the County can influence and encourage preservation through several different levels of review, incentives and education. Property tax credits are available for restoration, preservation or improvements to structures located in the County's Historic Preservation or Antietam Overlay zoning designations. Proposals must be designed according to adopted standards and approved by the Commission. Two tax credit applications were submitted by property owners. Both were approved resulting in approximately $2,000.00 worth of property tax credits for the owners who spent over $27,000.00 on restoration or improvements to their historic homes. Four additional property owners were able to use Historic Preservation property tax credits left over from the previous year. The Commission reviewed only one demolition application during the fiscal year and offered no objection. Three design review applications for additions to buildings in the HP or AO zoning districts were approved. Among the many responsibilities accompanying the Commission's Certified Local Government (CLG) status is participation in the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. The Lantz -Ziegler house, an 1800's stone dwelling, the Beaver Creek School, a 20th century transitional design former public school building,'and the Wilson School, a 19th century Greek Revival style rural schoolhouse were all recommended for 19 listing by the HDC with concurrence from the Board of County Commissioners. Other CLG activities included final billing and reimbursement for Phase I of the Rural Community Survey, a detailed historic sites survey and documentation of the Maugansville and Rohrersville communities. The application for Phase II, similar studies for Pen Mar, Fairplay, Tilghmanton and Highfield/Cascade were submitted for consideration. The Commission's participation in the development review process remained level over this past fiscal year. It reviewed Preliminary Consultations, subdivisions and site plans and occasionally made recommendations to protect existing structures listed in the Historic Sites Survey. As requested by the Board of County Commissioners, the Historic District Commission participated in the development of Washington County's Long Range Strategic Plan. The Commission prepared it's own analysis of needed activities for the coming five year period and submitted a budget proposal to accomplish the goals. It proposed an aggressive plan for education, incentives and regulatory changes and included a suggestion for a full time preservation planner. Another long range planning project, a comprehensive historic preservation plan as part of the update to the Comprehensive Plan for the County came into the first stages of consideration. Staff continues to field a multitude of requests for information and direction throughout the year. 20 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Office of Community Development provides housing and revitalization activities which promote the social and economic growth of the community, support neighborhood revitalization efforts and increase housing opportunities for low and moderate income homeowners. These programs are an effective method of providing essential home repair, stabilizing the housing stock in existing neighborhoods and assisting in the overall community redevelopment efforts. Loans are both interest bearing and deferred with repayment terms very flexible. The loans are primarily used to correct health, safety and over -crowding conditions. Washington County's modest growth rate along with a decline in federal housing allocations and the state's emphasis on controlling development, makes the efforts to preserve and enhance the existing housing stock even more important. Housing Preservation Grant - This program funded through the Rural DevelopmentAdministration, provides deferred loans to eligible single family homeowners. It has proved to be an effective tool in providing essential home repairs to low and very low homeowners. Loan proceeds are made available to help with health and safety relate issues. Maryland Housing Rehabilitation Program - The purpose of this program is to preserve and improve single family properties and one to four unit rental properties. Household income cannot exceed 80% of the statewide median income. These loans carry a reduced interest rate and is determined by the owners ability to make loan payments. Funds are made available through the state's office of Housing and Community 21 Development. General and major property repairs are eligible activities. Community Development Revolving Loan Fund - By utilizing the repayment proceeds from previous loans, the department can continue to make available, low interest loans to eligible homeowners. This affords the homeowner the opportunity to make needed repairs while keeping within an affordable repayment arrangement. Funds may be used for qualified business and rental property renovations as well. Technical Assistance - The department is available to assist. individuals, not for profits, private and public agencies who may be interested in gaining access or better understanding of state and federal community development programs. Assistance is offered in examining the feasibility of projects, funding avenues and regulatoryrequirements. Elderly Rental Housing Development - The department promotes the production of affordable rental housing for the elderly. Our development provides coordinatedsupportive services to allow the elderly population to maintain an independent lifestyle and avoid costly alternatives. The department can also assist private developers with state application preparation, project development and project management. 22 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Development proposals were reviewed by the Planning Commission in both concept and final form. The Commission reviewed and approved 131 residential, commercial, industrial or institutional subdivision plats involving 395 lots representing 379 dwelling units on 754.8 acres. In addition, the Planning Commission approved 25 site plans and held 10 preliminary consultations. Some of the conceptual forms have not resulted in a firm design while others have proceeded through final approval. There were several subdivision or development plans of significance (final approval of twenty or more lots or units) approved during FY 1998. They include: Colonial Park East Section D, Pin Oak Terrace, Quail Run Section 2 and Walnut Point Heights Sections 2&3. Site plans representing significant private investment within the County were approved for Rust-Oleum Corporation, Prime Outlets Phases I & 2, Autozone Inc., Emeritus Corporation, Ameri-Clean, The Bowman Group, AC & T, Burgerbusters, and Tru -Sere. Site plans reflecting significant public investment were approved for the Washington County Water and Sewer Department and the new Learning Resources Center at the Hagerstown Community College. 23 REZONING CASES AND ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS Between July 1, 1997 and June 30, 1998, the Planning Commission acted on 17 applications. Joint hearings with the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners were held regularly on a quarterly cycle or special hearings were held as necessary to provide for efficiency in the hearing process. The Commission rendered recommendations on 13 map amendments and 2 text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and 2 text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. A listing of the Planning Commission's recommendations and the Board's actions for the cases heard in FY 1998 are as follows: CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION RZ-96-4.1 Planning Map HI to HI -1, Commission HI -2, RU RZ-96-5.1 Planning Map HI to HI -1, Commission HI -2 and RU RZ-97-04 John Young Map 1.85 acres A to BT RZ-97-05 Ted Shank Map .60 acres RU to BG RZ-97-06 Planning Text Sec. 4.8 Commission RZ-97-07 FMW Ptshp Map 45.119 acres RM to HI -1 and PB RZ-97-08 Ted Shank & Map 1.21 acres RU to BG UP Associates RZ-97-09 Ronnie Koontz Map 7.25 acres A to HI -1 24 App'd Denied App'd App'd App'd Withdrawn Pending App'd App'd App'd App'd App'd App'd CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION RZ-97-10 Sharpsburg Pike Map App'd L.L.C. RS to PUD RZ-98-01 Mansoor & Janet Map Shaool 8.312 acres RZ-98-02 Doris Doub Map RZ-98-03 Cross Creek LLC Map RZ-98-04 632 Joint Venture Map RZ-98-05 Millard Kretzer Map RZ-98-06 Garrett & Smith, Inc. Map RZ-98-07 Vincent Smith Text RZ-98-08 Mansoor Shaool Map RZ-98-09 Reality Properties Text CP -98-01 Town of Boonsboro Text CP -98-02 Planning Text App'd Commission Hl-1/Hl-2 to HI -1 2 acres HI -2 to HI -1 App'd App'd 1.39 acres, RS to PUD App'd App'd 1 acre, 0.4 acre 8.312 acres HI -1 to RR App'd App'd 2.40 acres HI -2 to HI -1 App'd App'd 9.9893 ac. RM to HI -1 Denied Denied .87 acres RS to BL Denied Pending 33.99 acres (.38 ac.) RM to App'd App'd HI -1, (33.61 ac) to BG Sec. 6.1 and 6.2 App'd App'd 12.4 acres Hl-1/Hl-2 to HI -1 Withdrawn Art. 22, Div. VI1 App'd App'd Chapter V, Public App'd Pending Facilities, Transportation Rural Village App'd App'd Designation 25 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS STATISTICS FISCAL YEAR 1997198 GRANTED VARIANCES 113 y%1[off WIN EXCEPTIONS 37 EXPANSION OF 2 NON -CONFORMING USE 5 CHANGE OF 0 NON -CONFORMING USE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE 0 ERROR 1 APPEAL FROM 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 1 APPEAL FROM ADEQUATE 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 APPEAL FOR FLOOD PLAIN 0 APPEAL SPECIAL CONDITION 0 TOTAL 159 FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997 179 DENIED DENIEDWP WITHDRAWN VOID TOTAL 8 3 5 3 132 6 1 4 2 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 4 9 5 195 14 0 3 0 197 26 WASHINGTON COUNTY MD AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT FOR PERIOD 07/01/97 THRU 06/30/98 PLANNING ELECTION AGRICULTURAL NEW USE SECTOR DISTRICT ACREAGE LOST LOTS (TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT) 1 13 4.4 1 SF TOTAL 4.4 1 2 6 21.8 4 SF 16 2.0 2 SF 20 19.9 5 SF TOTAL 43.7 11 3 8 21.9 1 LL 8 58.8 12 SF a TOTAL 80.7 13 4 14 7.0 5 SF TOTAL 7.0 5 5 4 7.1 3 SF 23 8.2 7 SF TOTAL 15.3 10 GRAND TOTAL 151.0 40 27 WASHINGTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS DISTRICT NO � DISTRICT NAME FARM TYPE p ACRES -77M RECORDED TYPE T EASEMENT ESTABLISHED AD -80-002 CARR DAIRY 245.64 I- 07/11/80 5 12121/82 AD -80-004 ST JAMES SCHOOL INC CROP 279.14 04/21/80 5 AD -80-006 HARSHMAN CROP 232.44 08/07/80 1G 04/16/96 AD -80-007 LOHMAN CROP 146.00 08/15/80 10 AD -81-002 MARTIN CROP 140.00 08/28/81 5 05/15/84 AD -82-003 ANKENEY CROP 460.00 05/11/83 10 02/18/86 AD -83-002 WEISENBAUGH BEEF 314.00 06/26183 5 12/19186 AD -83-002 WEISENBAUGH BEEF 314.00 06/28/83 5 12/19/86 AD -83-003 HAYES BEEF 200.55 03/19/84 5 09/06/85 AD -84-002 ROBBINS BEEF 448.00 05/14/85 5 12/31/86 AD -85-001 WOLFINGER BEEF 149.63 04/07/86 10 AD -86-001 ROSENBERRY CROP 127.51 08112186 10 AD -88.001 MAIN CROP 142.26 06/16/88 5 06/30/89 AD -88-002 ROWLAND FOREST 700.04 03/09/89 5 03/07/91 AD -88-003 CORCORAN CROP 158.42 03/22/89 10 05/01/97 AD -88-004 RITCHIE DAIRY 237.99 04/12/89 5 09/24/90 AD -89-001 GOLDEN ORCHARD 457.67 06/20/89 5 AD -89-G02 STRITE DAIRY 192.43 03/18/91 10 AD -89-003 BYERS DAIRY 164.61 09!13189 5 02/15/91 AD -89-005 HERBST DAIRY 183,99 04/16/91 10 AD -89-005A HERBST DAIRY 172.12 04/16/91 10 07/26/95 AD -90-001 EMSWILER CROP 100.00 09/20/90 10 05101/97 AD -90-002 CORCORAN CROP 150.14 09/20/90 10 08/30/93 AD -90-005 SCHOOLEY FOREST 101.05 03120/91 10 AD -90-006 HARP CROP 124.70 09/20/90 5 06129192 AD -90-007 HARP CROP 150.51 09/20/90 5 06/30/92 AD -90-008 WILES CROP 190.88 03/20/91 10 AD -90-009 SCHOOLEY FOREST 21.60 03/20/91 10 AD -90-010 ENGSTROM CROP 38.59 04/16/91 10 AD -90-011 BURTNER DAIRY 108.81 04/16/91 10 AD -90-012 DURBIN CROP 100.38 03120/91 10 01/13/95 AD -90-013 WEAVER DAIRY 174.05 08105/91 10 AD -90-014 WEAVER BEEF 82.34 11/20/90 10 AD -90-015 CLINE CROP 145.25 08/05/91 10 AD -90-017 PRICE CROP 149.64 11/20/90 10 AD -90-018 LONG DAIRY 163.88 04116/91 10 d AD -90-019 STRITE DAIRY 140.04 11/20/90 5 AD -90-020 TRUMPOWER DAIRY 125.00 11/20/90 10 08/16/94 AD -90-021 SHIFLER CROP 157.00 05/29/91 10 04/30/98 ' AD -90-022 HEIMER CROP 67.00 08/05191 10 AD -90-023 LITTON DAIRY 145.00 03/20/91 10 AD -90-024 HOWELL FOREST 146.81 03/20/91 10 AD -90-025 CHURCHEY CROP 186.32 05/29/91 10 05/01/96 AD -90-026 FLETCHER CROP 104.80 03/20/91 10 AD -90-027 NIEMYER CROP 75.38 03/20/91 10 AD -90-028 BAKER BEEF 17.06 03/20/91 10 AD -90-031 BARR ORCHARD 70.72 05/29191 10 AD -90-032 BARR ORCHARD 115.62 05/29/91 10 AD -90-033 STONE DAIRY 165.00 05/29/91 10 AD -90-034 SECREST CROP 117.42 05/29/91 10 AD -90-036 HENDERSHOT CROP 168.83 05/29/91 10 AD -90.037 HENDERSHOT CROP 116.00 08/02/91 10 AD -90-038 ROTH DAIRY 124.27 05/29191 10 AD -90-039 STOCKSLAGER CROP 144.33 03/20/91 10 AD -90-041 MARTIN DAIRY 120.00 03/20/94 10 AD -90-042 FAITH FOREST 132.63 03/20191 10 04/30/98 AD -90-043 FAITH BEEF 129.62 03/20/91 10 04/30/98 AD -90-044 FAITH FOREST 17.00 03/20/91 10 AD -90-045 MANUEL CROP 63.63 03/20/91 10 AD -90-046 MANUEL CROP 41.20 03/20/91 10 AD -90-050 RITONDO FOREST 135.00 05129/91 10 AD -90-051 STONE CROP 109.50 05/29/91 10 AD -90-052 STONE DAIRY 99.50 05/29/91 10 AD -90-053 STONE DAIRY 104.78 05/29/91 10 AD -90-054 STONE CROP 93.15 05/29/91 10 AD -90-055 STONE CROP 129.13 05/29/91 10 AD -90-056 HULL FOREST 107.21 05129191' 10 AD -90-057 HOSE CROP 26.00 07/02/91 10 AD -90-060 LOHMAN CROP 270.91 05/29/91 10 AD -90-062 LOUDENSLAGER CROP 145.04 05/29/91 10 AD -90-063 MARTIN DAIRY 100.61 05/29/91 10 AD -90-064 BOWERS CROP 118.90 08/05191 10 AD -90-055 BOWERS DAIRY 141.31 08/05/91 10 AD -90-066 OSWALD DAIRY 75.75 08105f91 10 AD -90-067 GROSS DAIRY 53.44 09/18/91 10 AD -90-069 GROVE CROP 185.00 10/11191 10 AD -90-070 STIVERS BEEF 135.00 08/05/91 10 AD -90-073 SCHULTZ BEEF 189.55 08/05/91 10 AD -90-074 OSWALD DAIRY 58.90 08/05/91 10 AD -9G-075 OSWALD DAIRY 34.65 08IG5191 10 AD -90-077 SNYDER DAIRY 100.00 08!05/91 10 AD -90-078 KRETZER DAIRY 171.65 08/05/91 10 AD -90-079 WINDERS BEEF 225.00 08!05191 10 AD -90-084 BURGER CROP 301.00 08/05/91 10 AD -90-086 BURGER FOREST 182.42 08/05/91 10 AD -90-087 BURGER BEEF 119.00 08/05/91 10 AD -91-001 PRICE CROP 274.00 09/16/91 10 AD -91-004 SHOCKEY CROP 7221 08105191 10 AD -91-005 BRITNER CROP 193.20 09116/91 10 AD -91-006 PRYOR DAIRY 108.51 09/16/91 10 wt DISTRICT NO DISTRICT NAME FARM TYPE ACRES RECORDED TYPE EASEMENT ESTABLISHED AD-91-007- DAIRY -Iuu d 09/16191 10 AD-91-008 DEBAUCH DAIRY 122.22 09/16/91 10 AD-91-009 DEBAUGH DAIRY 48.25 09/16/91 10 AD-91-010 OATES CROP 62.98 09/16/91 10 AD-91-011 BUHRMAN HOG 180.46 05/05/92 10 AD-91-012 MCALUSTER BEEF 83.43 03/26/92 10 AD-91-013 WORTHINGTON DAIRY 108.92 09/16191 10 AD-91-014 NEWCOMER DAIRY 113.28 10/11/91 10 AD-91-015 NEWCOMER CROP 21.94 10/11/91 10 AD-91-016 NEWCOMER CROP 72.22 10/11/91 10 AD-91-016A NEWCOMER CROP 25.76 10/11/91 10 AD-91-017 NEWCOMER DAIRY 55.50 10111/91 10 AD-91-019 POFFENBERGER CROP 78.00 10/11/91 10 AD-91-020 BELZ DAIRY 247.63 10/11/91 10 AD-91-021 COHILL CROP 78.68 10/11/91 10 AD-91-022 CUSHWA CROP 138.90 12/03/91 10 AD-91-023 TRITAPOE CROP 73.86 12103/91 10 AD-91-024 TRITAPOE CROP 81.00 12/03/91 10 AD-91-026 CLINE BEEF 65.00 12!03!91 10 AD-91-027 DOWNS CROP 145.00 12/03/91 10 AD-91-028 DOWNS CROP 130.00 12/03/91 10 AD-91-029 DOWNS CROP 118.00 12/03/91 10 AD-91-030 FLOOK DAIRY 280.76 12/03/91 10 AD-91-031 FLOOK DAIRY 126.25 12/03/91 10 AD-91-032 WARNER CROP 79.30 12/16191 10 AD-91-033 ERNST HOG 143.68 12/03/91 10 AD-91-034 HALLER CROP 23.00 01/08/92 10 AD-91-035 CONOCOCHEAGUE SPORTSMENS FOREST 126.54 02/03/92 10 AD-91-036 MORGAN CROP 134.17 12!16191 10 AD-91-037 MORGAN FOREST 160.55 12!16!91 10 AD-91-038 MORGAN CROP 152.66 12/16191 10 AD-91-039 SCOTT DAIRY 227.27 12/03/91 10 AD-91-040 MATHESON BEEF 161.95 01/08/92 10 AD-91-042 SELZ CROP 135.15 01/08/92 10 04/30/98 AD-9141" BOWMAN DAIRY 175.25 02/28/92 10 AD-91-046 SHANK BEEF 114.33 01/08/92 10 AD-91-047 MURPHY DAIRY 309.50 02/12192 10 AD-91-048 GREEN CROP 145.10 07/07/92 10 AD-91-048A GREEN CROP 49.73 07/07/92 10 AD-91-0488 GREEN CROP 10.45 07/07/92 10 AD-91-049 CHARLES CROP 59.93 03/26/92 10 AD-91-050 WOLFORD DAIRY 119.59 04/06/92 10 AD-91-052 BARNHART CROP 166.77 02/21/92 10 AD-91-053 KEFAUVER DAIRY 167.52 03/26/92 10 AD-91-054 KEFAUVER CROP 114,00 03/26192 10 AD-91-055 CAVANAUGH DAIRY 237.76 07/03/92 10 AD-91-056 HALL FOREST 30.29 11/16/92 10 AD-91-057 BOWMAN CROP 39.80 07/07/92 10 AD-92-001 LUDLUM FOREST 40,00 12/15/93 10 AD-92-002 WINTERS DAIRY 175.00 09/21/92 10 AD-92-003 WINTERS DAIRY 57.09 09/21/92 10 AD-92-004 SHANK DAIRY 165.00 09/21/92 10 AD-92-005 SHANK CROP 115.90 09/29/92 10 AD-92-006 SHANK CROP 32.10 09/21/92 10 AD-92-007 KENDLE CROP 85.00 12/01/92 10 AD-92-009 WILLIAMS DAIRY 100.75 06/29/93 10 AD-92-010 LEATHER CROP 178.91 03/03/93 10 AD-92-011 ROHRER DAIRY 123.80 06/22/93 10 AD-93-001 CASTLE CROP 56.21 07/12/94 10 AD-94-003 AUSHERMAN DAIRY 176.00 08!10194 10 AD-94-004 BERGER FOREST 64.02 12/19/94 10 AD-94.005 EBY HOG 120.16 12/19/94 10 AD-94-006 TAULTON DAIRY 130.00 12/19/94 10 AD-94-007 HORNBAKER CROP 107.09 12/19/94 10 AD-94-008 RINEHART DAIRY 145.39 05/19/95 10 AD-94-008A RINEHART DAIRY 96.51 06/28/95 10 AD-94-009 RINEHART BEEF 120.41 05119/95 10 AD-95-001 REEDER DAIRY 180.61 12/08/95 10 AD-95-006 CARBAUGH CROP 190.30 07/24/96 10 AD-95-007 CARBAUGH CROP 199.51 07/24/96 10 AD-96-002 HERSHEY CROP 100.95 03/06/97 10 AD-96-003 GARDENHOUR ORCHARD 153.20 01/07/97 10 AD-96-004 MYERS CROP 142.00 03/06/97 10 AD-96-005 YOUNG CROP 43.00 08/19/97 10 AD-96-006 FISHER CROP 57.00 08/19/97 10 AD-97-001 MORGAN FOREST 24.20 08/19/97 10 AD-97-002 MORGAN FOREST 6.04 08119/97 10 AD-97-003 CLARK DAIRY 101.00 08/11/97 10 AD-97.004 ARENA CROP 130.20 08/11/97 10 AD-97-005 NORRIS CROP 46.31 08111/97 10 AD-97-006 MARTIN DAIRY 128.04 12/22/97 10 AD-97-007 SHRIVER DAIRY 100.41- 12/22/97 10 AD-97-008 HARDING CROP 123.56 12122/97 10 AD-97-009 CLINE . BEEF 253.90 02/25/98 10 AD-97-010 HULL FOREST 175.89 02125198 10 AD-97-012 SHRIVER BEEF 177.18 02125/98 10 AD-98-001 KENDLE CROP 129.00 09/28/98 5 AD-98-003 STRITE DAIRY 111.96 07/29/98 10 AD-98-004 MARTIN ORCHARD 75.71 07/29/98 10 AD-98-005 MARTIN ORCHARD 55.66 07/29/98 10 AD-98-006 SHANK CROP 101.00 07/29/98 10 Records printed: 182 12/03/98 TOTAL 24794.99 file: P:1P0LICMGRRAGPREMPAT.DBF 29 SECTOR/ TYPE SECTOR 1 CM DX IL IN SF TH SECTOR 2 IL LL SF SECTOR 3 LL SF SECTOR 4 DX SF SECTOR 5 IL SF SECTOR 6 LL TOTALS SUBDIVISIONS BY PLANNING SECTOR FOR PERIOD 07/01/97 THRU 06/30/98 DEVELOPMENT PLATS PLATS LOTS ACREAG TOTAL URBAN RURAL 6 5 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 4 4 0 30 .15 15 2 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 31 0 31 1 0 1 17 0 17 1 1 0 8 1 7 1 1 0 23 1 22 1 0 1 TOTAL URBAN RURAL 9 8 1 6 o 6 2 1 1 4 4 0 106 86 20 80 80 0 1 0 1 3 0 3 48 0 48 1 0 1 31 0 31 1 1 0 12 2 10 1 1 0 89 52 37 1 0 1. TOTAL URBAN RURAL 51.3 30.5 20.8 1.1 0.0 1.1 4.4 4.4 0.0 161.7 161.7 0.0 89.7 33.8 55.9 10.6 10.6 0.0 4.1 0.0 4.1 37.0 0.0 37.0 151.2 0.0 151.2 21.9 0.0 21.9 92.0 0.0 92.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 18.0 0.8 17.2 3.4 3.4 0.0 91.6 19.2 72.5 15.9 0.0 15.9 AVERAGE LOT SIZE URBAN RURAL 131 31 100 395 235 160 754.8 265.5 489.4 1.13 3.06 TYPE BREAKDOWN CM DX IL IN LL SF TH 6 3.82 20.76 1 0.18 4.36 0.01 40.42 4 0.39 2.80 0.13 0 4 4.06 17 12.33 2 3.15 0 21.85 2.97 1.06 0.41 1.72 3.40 0.37 1.96 15.88 131 31 100 395 235 160 754.8 265.5 489.4 1.13 3.06 TYPE BREAKDOWN CM DX IL IN LL SF TH 6 5 1 2 1 1 4 2 2 4 4 0 4 0 4 109 17 92 2 2 0 9 8 1 7 1 6 4 2 2 4 4 0 5 0 5 286 140 146 80 so 0 51.3 30.5 20.8 2.2 . 1.1 1.1 11.8 7.8 4.1 161.7 161.7 0.0 74.7 0.0 74.7 442.5 53.8 388.7 10.6 10.6 0.0 TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PLATS CM COMMERCIAL DX DUPLEX IN INDUSTRIAL LL LARGE LOT SF SINGLE FAMILY TH TOWNHOUSE 30 3.82 20.76 1.06 0.18 3.88 2.04 40.42 14.95 0.38 2.66 0.13 SUBDIVISION FILE BY PLANNING SECTOR FOR PERIOD 07/01/97 THRU 06/30/98 ELEC ZONE TYPE OF URBAN/ DWELL GROSS APPROVAL SUBDIVISION NAME DIST DIST DEVELOP RURAL LOTS UNITS ACRES DATE PLANNING SECTOR'1 AUSTIN HILLS LOT 3 18 A SF RA 1 1 2.1 10/28/97 BAER RICHARD R LOT 2A 27 RS SF UG 1 1 0.4 08/06/97 BREEDEN JOBE & ELIZABETH L 3 C SF RA 1 1 5.7 05/08/98 BRYSON BILL LOT 11A & 11 B 13 A SF RA 2 2 1.9 02/19/98 CASTANG MELDA LOT 1 13 A SF RA 1 1 6.0 12/17/97 COLONIAL PARK EAST SEC D 10 RS SF UG 31 31 9.6 03/30/98 CREATIVE INVEST-HARTLE FARM 3&4 9 A SF RA 2 2 10.4 08/25/97 DOUG DORIS J LOT 2 2 RR SF UG 1 1 1.6 06/25/98 EBERSOLE ROBERT B LOT 2 2 A SF UG 1 1 1.2 07/11/97 EMERITUS LOT 1 18 RS IL UG 1 0 4.4 12/01/97 GHATTAS ASAD LOTS 1 & 2 13 HI CM UG 2 0 6.2 02/02/98 GHATTAS ENTERPRISES PARCEL B 27 HI CM UG 1 0 1.8 06/01/98 GREENLAWN CEMETERY.CO INC LOT 1 2 HI SF UG 1 1 0.5 06/15/98 HAG WASH CO IND FOUND PARCEL 2 PI IN UG 1 0 20.5 10/06/97 HAGIWC IND FDTN-70181 IND PARK 2 IG IN UG 1 0 5.3 01/05/98 HAGERSTOWN SOCCER CLUB INC LOT 1 13 A CM RA 1 1 20.8 08/12/97 HARRELL CHARLES M SR LOT 1 10 A SF UG 1 1 1.1 11/21/97 HEGE OMAR LOT 1 13 A SF RA 1 1 1.3 08/20/97 HERRERA ARTEH LOT 1 2 RS SF UG 1 1 0.4 10/31/97 HOCKMAN MICHAEL LOT 1 10 A SF RA 1 1 3.4 02/24/98 HORCHNER SHARON LOT 1 26 RU SF UG 1 1 0.2 01/27/98 HUNTER'S GREEN LOT 1 TIGER DEV 2 HI IN UG 1 0 70.3 06/01/98 HUYI TT BUSINESS PARK LOT 9A 2 HI IL RA 1 0 0.0 03/09/98 KLINE FLOYD R ET UX LOT 1 26 RR SF UG 1 1 3.6 07/15/97 MARTIN ALLEN LOT 1 27 RS SF UG 1 1 2.5 08/01/97 MARTIN ALVIN E LOT 1 13 A SF RA 1 1 4.4 05/01/98 MARTIN CLARENCE LOT 1 9 A SF RA 1 1 1.1 10/29/97 MCCLEARY RICHARD E LOT 2B 2 HI CM UG 1 0 14.5 07/11/97 MOYER MARY A ESTATE LOTS 1 & 2 9 A SF RA 2 2 2.1 04/24/98 NEWGATE IND PARK LT 3 BOWMAN 24 IG IN UG 1 0 65.7 01/05/98 PIN OAK TERRACE 32 LOTS 26 RM TH UG 32 32 3.9 01/05/98 PLEASANT VIEW HGTS SEC D LOT 16 2 A SF RA 1 1 1.9 03/18/98 QUAIL RUN SECTION 2 18 RSPD TH UG 48 48 6.7 06/10/98 ROGERS GERALDINE V LOT 1 9 A SF RA 1 1 3.5 09/16/97 SHANK OLIVIA V LOT 1 13 A SF RA 1 1 2.4 01/12/98 SIGLER DON & DENISE REEDY PKWY 26 RU DX RA 6 6 1.1 06/01/98 SOUTH POINTE PUD 10 PD CM UG 1 0 7.5 06/02/98 SOUTH POINTE PUD PHS 2 BLK B3 10 PD SF UG 14 14 1.7 01/14/98 SOWERS DELORES LOT 5 18 A SF UG 1 1 1.0 08/21/97 ST JAMES VILLAGE NORTH PH 3 BK A 10 RR SF UG 18 18 6.1 02/02/98 ST JAMES VILLAGE NORTH PH 4 BK A 10 RR SF UG 12 12 3.5 02/02/98 STERLING WILBUR & CARRIE LOT 3 2 A SF UG 1 1 0.5 08/12/97 THE PINES 10 A SF RA 2 2 5.5 09/03/97 WEBB DIVISION LTS 1, 2 & REM 13 A SF RA 2 2 4.2 07/08/97 WHETZEL MICHAEL LOTS 1-3 13 BG CM UG 3 1 0.6 04/06/98 45 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 1 207 194 318.8 - PLANNING SECTOR 2 ANSARI MAUDOOD LOT 3A 6 A SF RA 1 1 1.2 12/09/97 BRAEBURN WEST LOT 5(STEINER) 16 A SF RA 1 1 1.4 05/13/98 BURKHOLDER/KALBFLESH 1 C LL RA 2 2 21.6 02/12/98 BURTNER JOHN & CINDY LOTS 1 & 2 19 P/0 SF RA 2 2 3.8 05/01/98 BYERS MEADOWS OF DOWNSVILLE L-22 20 A SF RA 1 1 1.2 08/18/97 CHURCH OF CHRIST AT HAGERSTOWN 16 A IL RA 1 0 4.1 12/04/97 COOK GARDNER LOTS 2,3&4 12 A SF RA 3 3 3.9 11/21/97 DICKMAN WILLIAM LOT 1,2 & 3 19 C SF RA 3 3 15.5 06/12/98 DOYLE FLOYD LOTS 1-4 6 C SF RA 4 4 12.8 11/03/97 FULK DENNIS & BELINDA LOT 4 & A 12 A SF RA 1 1 7.2 04/15/98 31 PLANNING SECTOR 3 AMBROSIA ACRES LOT 3 ELEC ZONE TYPE OF URBAN/ 1 DWELL GROSS APPROVAL SUBDIVISION NAME DIST DIST DEVELOP RURAL LOTS UNITS ACRES DATE GOWER PEGGY THE ESTATE OF 12 A SF RA 1 1 7.7 10/09/97 GRIFFITH BRENDA LOT 1 6 A SF RA 1 1 1.9 08/06/97 GRIFFITH BRENDA LOTS 2 & 3 6 A SF RA 2 2 5.1 09/18/97 GRIFFITH BRENDA LOTS 4 & 5 6 A SF RA _ 2 2 7.0 05/19/98 GROVES JIM LOT 1 20 A SF RA 1 1 3.2 10/22/97 HARSH JAMES & TRACY LOT 2 20 C SF RA 1 1 3.0 02/19/98 HOFFMAN PAUL W LOT C 6 A SF RA 1 1 1.5 03/25/98 KENDLE LYNN & PAULA LOTS 1 & 2 16 A SF RA 2 2 2.0 04/08/98 LONGVIEW ESTATES LOTS 17 & 37 16 A SF RA 2 2 7.8 04124/98 MCCARDELL CHRISTINE A LOT 1 6 A SF RA 1 1 1.8 08/21/97 MOBLEY JR LEISTER LOT 3 6 A SF RA 1 1 3.4 02/11/98 MOSE GIL LOTS 1 &2 16 A SF RA 2 2 2.6 11/12/97 PEMBERTON SEC C SWM PARCEL FINAL 16 A SF RA 1 0 1.9 08/27/97 PIERCE KAREN LOT 1 12 A SF RA 1 1 1.0 01/23198 REAMS GAIL L & WILLIAM H LOT 1 19 A SF RA 1 1 9.5 09/03/97 RHODERICK PAULA & PAUL LOT 1 16 A SF RA 1 1 2.9 03/20/98 RHODES WILLIAM H LOTS 1 & 2 20 A SF RA 2 2 3.4 02/09/98 ROSEMONT ESTATES 20 C SF RA 4 4 18.8 09/08/97 SHAW TOM & JUDITH LOT 1 12 A SF RA 1 1 6.0 06/12/98 STALEY TAMMY & EDWIN K LOT 1 16 A SF RA 1 1 1.0 09/22/97 SUZY RUN ESTATES LOT 5 16 A SF RA 1 1 8.2 09/29/97 SWOPE GARY THOMAS & PEGGY S LOT3 16 A SF RA 1 1 1.3 08/20/97 WEICHT DONALD R ET UX LOT 5 20 C SF RA 1 1 3.4 05/08/98 WRIGHT KAREN A LOT 1 20 A LL RA 1 1 15.4 03/06/98 34 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 2 52 50 192.2 PLANNING SECTOR 3 AMBROSIA ACRES LOT 3 8 C SF RA 1 1 7.5 011071U BOWERS LEON LOTS 1 & 2 8 C SF RA 2 2 6.1 11/18/97 FAWLEY BEATRICE LOT 2 8 C SF RA 1 1 3.4 02//11/98 MADSEN ERIC LOT 1 8 C SF RA 1 1 7.5 02/19/98 MILLARD ROBERT L LOTS 15-24 8 C SF RA 10 10 34.1 10/06/97 REEDER JAMES H LOT 1 REV #2 8 A LL RA 1 1 21.9 10/10/97 RENO HEIGHTS 8 A SF RA 5 5 10.9 04/06/98 SAUSER WILLIAM & LEONA LOT 1 8 C SF RA 1 1 4.5 02/20198 SAVILLE HUBERT & LEONA LOT 1 8 C SF RA 1 1 3.2 08/15/97 SMITH MICHAEL W & CATHERINE 8 C SF RA 1 1 1.4 06/02/98 THOMPSON JAMES G LOT 1 8 C SF RA 1 1 1.2 03/05/98 WHITE OAKS LOT EIGHT 11 C SF RA 1 1 1.2 12/12/97 WHITE OAKS LOT FOUR 11 C SF RA 1 1 1.6 03/16/98 WHITE OAKS LOT FOURTEEN 11 C SF RA 1 1 2.1 10/29/97 WHITE OAKS LOT SEVEN 11 C SF RA 1 1 1.8 04/14/98 WHITE OAKS LOT SIXTEEN 11 C SF RA 1 1 2.5 09/05/97 WHITE OAKS LOT TWENTY TWO 11 C SF RA 1 1 1.2 02/25/98 WHITE OAKS LOT TWO 11 C SF RA 1 1 1.7 06/03/98 18 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 3 32 32 113.8 PLANNING SECTOR 4 BACHTELL GLENN S & JOANN L LOT 1 14 A SF RA 1 1 1.2 12/02/97 HESS JANE M LOT 1 & 1A 14 A SF RA 2 2 4.0 07/30/97 HESS JANE M LOTS 2,3 & 4 14 A SF RA 3 3 5.7 10/06/97 HUNTZBERRY RICHARD C ET UX LOT 4 7 A DX SP 1 1 1.1 08/20/97 JACQUES WALTER C LOT 1 14 A SF RA 1 1 1.4 08/13/97 LEWIS DIVISION LOTS 1 & 2 7 RR SF SM 2 2 0.8 04/06/98 REDMOND PAUL LOT 1 7 A SF RA 1 1 1.7 10/21/97 RIDENOUR WALTER E 14 A SF RA 1 1 1.0 05/15/98 ROWE ROGER E LOT 2 14 A SF RA 1 1 2.2 04/09/98 9 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 4 13 13 19.1 32 SUBDIVISION NAME PLANNING SECTOR 5 ALBERT BRIAN & SUSAN LOTS 1 & 2 BELZ DONALD & MICHAEL LOTS 1 & 2 BLACK DOUGLAS W & MARY F LOT 2 COMMER DIVISION CORWELL MAX LOT 1 DIVELBISS RAYMOND LOTS 4 & 5 DUNAHUGH NELSON LOT 1 DUNN PRESTON LOTS 2 & 3 GOLDEN TERRY L LOT 1 HAYNES ANNA M & DALE MILES LOT 7 HOLLIS TONY & CYNTHIA LOT 1A KEEFER MEMORIAL ESTATES LOT 5A INT VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH PARCEL A POTOMAC HALL FARMS INC POWERS JAMES H LOT 2 REID DONALD SUBDIVISON LOT 1 RIVERWOOD LOTS 5-9 SHIRK CHARLES & WENDY DEV. PLAT SPRECHER MICHAEL STEVENS EVELYN J LOT 1 TEDRICK ROGER D ESTATE LOTS 1-5 TRUMPOWER CHARLOTTE M LOT 4 WALNUT POINT HEIGHTS SEC 2 & 3 WILDFLOWER MEADOWS LOTS 12 & 13 24 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 5 PLANNING SECTOR 6 REEDER TED & JANICE LOT 1 1 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 6 131 GRAND TOTAL ELEC ZONE TYPE OF URBAN/ DWELL GROSS APPROVAL DIST DIST DEVELOP RURAL LOTS UNITS ACRES DATE 4 A SF RA 2 2 7.2 10/01/97 4 A SF RA 2 2 4.1 03/06/98 4 A SF RA 1 1 1.9 03/06/98 23 A SF RA 2 2 2.9 12/17/97 4 A SF RA 1 1 1.9 08/06/97 4 A SF RA 2 2 2.0 12/16/97 4 A SF RA 1 1 1.9 08/01197 4 C SF RA 2 2 8.2 03/06/98 23 A SF RA 1 1 1.2 11/24/97 23 A SF RA 1 1 1.5 02/19/98 23 A SF RA 1 1 5.0 01/29/98 15 C SF RA 1 1 3.1 07/09/97 23 HI IL UG 1 0 3.4 07/30/97 4 A SF RA 2 2 2.2 03/17/98 15 C SF RA 1 1 3.6 08/21/97 4 A SF RA 1 1 4.5 06/16/98 23 A SF RA 5 5 6.1 12/18/97 4 A SF RA 1 1 3.0 09117/97 23 A SF RA 1 1 0.9 02/03/98 4 HI SF RA 1 1 1.8 06/08/98 15 C SF RA 5 5 5.7 10/13/97 4 A SF RA 1 1 2.0 04/06/98 23 HI SF UG 52 52 19.2 12/01/97 23 A SF RA 2 2 2.1 06/16/98 90 89 95.0 5 C LL RA 1 1 15.9 10/02/97 1 1 15.9 395 379 754.8 33 34 co i rn r 11 I m 'O U3 N CD T v/ jl Cl) iw .> CLO, r Q 70 f 7 � 10 U) �© Q I t*? Q1 r L I � I� ir N I rn rn CD 0 o 'o N r r Wid 34 35 36 § CD � ; { I� $ > �m _ » f 7 \ �� � - - 'k co �f �CD E !\ Q � § 8 4 / R § o R o c @ o to ^ z ..sajov 36