HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_1995_AnnualReport— OT ON oo
WASMNGTON COUNTY
-
PLANNING COMMISSION
3
County Administration Building
t
100 West Washington Street, Room 320
r
Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-4727
Telephone: (301) 791-3065
TDD/Hearing Impaired: (301) 791-3070
�'�RYs rho
FAX: (301) 791-3193
Board of County Commissioners
for Washington County, Maryland
100 West Washington Street
Hagerstown, Maryland 21740
Dear Commissioners:
This report, submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article
66B of the Annotated Code, summarized the activities of the
Commission from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995.
In addition to the routine review and approval of subdivisions
and site plans, the Commission continued to implement the
Comprehensive Plan that was adopted in 1981. The various elements
of the Plan worked on by the Commission in Fiscal Year 1995 are
described in this report along with the numerous other tasks
undertaken during this fiscal year.
As in
adopted by
Commission
BLI/dsk
the past, the new Work Program that has been formally
the Planning Commission lists all those tasks the
plans to address.
Sincerely,
BertrandL. Iseming C airman
Washington County Planning Commission
RECYCLED PAPER
Washington County Planning Commission
1995 Annual Report
Board of County Commissioners
Gregory I. Snook, President
John S. Shank, Vice -President
Ronald L. Bowers
R. Lee Downey
James R. Wade
Planning Commission
Bertrand L. Iseminger, Chairman
Donald L. Spickler, Vice -Chairman
James R. Wade, Ex -Officio
Bernard L. Moser
Robert E. Ernst, II
Andrew J. Bowen, IV
Paula Lampton
Published, December 1995
Washington County Planning Commission
100 West Washington Street
Hagerstown, Maryland 21740
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Planning Organizational Chart ...........................
i
Agency Inter -Relationships ..............................
TheComprehensive Plan ..................................
1
Planning Commission Work Program ........................
3
Agricultural Land Preservation Program ..................
4
Metropolitan Planning Organization ....................
8
Town Planner Assistance Program .........................
9
Forest Conservation Program .............................
11
Waterand Sewerage Plan .................................
14
Highway Interchange Study ...............................
15
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance ....................
16
ParkPlanning ...........................................
17
Recycling - Solid Waste .................................
18
Historic District Commission ............................
19
DevelopmentActivity ....................................
21
RezoningCases ..........................................
22
Board of Zoning Appeals Statistics ......................
24
Agriculturally Significant Land Converted to Development.
25
Agricultural Preservation Districts .....................
25
FY 1994 Subdivision Summary .............................
27
FY 1994 Subidivision Detail .............................
28
Subdivision Trends ......................................
30
PlanningSector Map .....................................
Appendix
FY1995 Development Map .................................
Appendix
FY1995 Rezoning Map ....................................
Appendix
Agricultural Preservation District Map ..................
Appendix
H
0
H
H
H
Q
i
H
�
H
a
F a
p. W
w a
� w
�
�
C4
y� H
W
W
0
�
Ise
� A
H
W
w �
�
H
N m
� a
� x
i/3 W
w
Z +
�
H
H-H
H
fl
x
c
x
w r
4
Q w
W 44
H H
oQw
0
w
w W WH
E�
0.i
S
U2 €J 4 'ice2 m W
H
"�.a m
H
W A^ W H
1342
Z x
w
ua
0004
� "
W
�,
W
a
co
o
w3
Q � h [G
t
IS€
H
wcw0A
f i A -3 W P4 �+
i
H
�
H
a
H
�
�
C4
W
0
H
c
0.
{3
Y¢l wp ��
Ga 4 be�� b M
el. ` S�•T � �t
4, i D
Tfl frfi. �~'T
fl
Nip W-
'-RIP�m w
4 o
r 4r
G ; N r AT
Bw
aMf II�rCse sd.�ya d�F� v �t tal
ah
�� kolrrl f ' dL
1y�c��zs
d"'J Tautsu� f CO
oeP,3+E
0�s
to ti
CD
450A 41� �
� �
COO
- E,fl�C*oto O ` ${ ����
T�, w o ♦Q y�4 fl`
a
.db, es s, -e res
rows C¢ °y 1lp`a
egt
q,O
s x= z s a i v
? a w c a< 4
11
The Comprehensive Plan
Implementation of policies associated with the Comprehensive
Plan continued through FY 1995. Many items which are outlined in
greater detail in other sections of this report are directly
related or reflect some aspect of the implementation of the policy
and goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
During FY 1995 the Planning Commission worked to implement the
polices of the Comprehensive Plan through adoption of amendments to
the Zoning Ordinance and the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance,
and completion of the rezoning process for Group II of the Highway
Interchange Comprehensive Rezoning.
The Planning Commission's focus remains to facilitate
development within the Urban and Town Growth Areas while preserving
agriculture and historic areas within the County's rural landscape.
Direction of the Planning Department Staff to look at creating a
"rural development policy" along with development of amendments to
the Comprehensive Plan for inclusion of the "Seven Visions" and a
"Sensitive Area Element" in accordance with the Planning Act of
1992 reflect this objective.
Work toward updating of the Transportation Element also
continued during this Fiscal Year. The Consultant for this project
Bellomo-McGee, Inc. prepared a draft plan for the Non -Urbanized
areas of the County.
Ordinances and procedures were also reviewed by the Planning
Staff for areas where possible streamlining could occur. It is
I
anticipated that streamlining review, in accordance with the
Planning Act of 1992, will be a high priority during FY 1996.
Since the Comprehensive Plan adoption in 1981, the Planning
Commission and the Planning Staff have worked continuously to
implement its strategies for growth management and improvement of
the quality of life in Washington County. The adopted work program
for FY 1996 is designed to continue that effort along with meeting
the requirements of the Planning Act of 1992.
2
I
0
at
p�
3
U
W
A
0
u
0
E
Rr .
w
VJ
b
d ,
ID
rn
U
w�
w
U
W '
A
7
E
U
O
0% F
4. P4
o, w
0
O
rim
U77,,,� FQ-1 0 � -
F
E. 1414
ARA = H E HwE Ow
R W P E S d'M.0 -, �N
A H�p� pW� EE zv,NZ
0 U � OFE�. �VsJ7 QUA PHo uoz
z E H RF W 0 M O RE u 4 N 9+ 1-I z
fk jcn �H1 a� 11 O
OH U' Ow wpf❑❑�}} O N t+ 0 HD W�Ep�Q
Uy w �M CK E N U �y��P5H 0 `�H]]pO�+PPrsS.S' M -
W (ppx��� E ��Tyj ppc6j gf
INI 59
�'1 tVpsi7� � �xwe a�' � xi � L4 QI�fA V]NFrEmi31W6Uj3 .
W04
W W F -F CW9 O E O + O H
nAd H E)
P4
V1 W C4 1R 00
3
Agricultural Land Preservation Program
Washington County's efforts to preserve valuable farmland via
the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program (MALPP) began
in April 1978 and has continued to date. The Program was
established and is regulated by Agricultural Article, Section 2-501
through 2-515 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. It is
administered through a Planning Commission staff member, by the
Washington County Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board,
the County Commissioners, and the Maryland Agricultural Land
Preservation Foundation of the Maryland Department of Agriculture.
The Program encourages landowners to voluntarily enter into an
Agricultural Land Preservation District in which it is agreed that
the land will not be developed for a period of at least five years
(to receive County tax credits, the landowner is required to commit
his property to agricultural use only, for a period of ten years).
In return for that restriction, the landowner receives protection
frog► nuisance complaints and becomes eligible to sell a Development
Rights Basement. A landowner may exercise the option of selling a
Development Rights Easement to the Agricultural Land Preservation
Foundation provided that his offer to sell is recommended by the
County's Advisory Board and the County Commissioners.
At the local level, the Agricultural Advisory Board will
review and rank easement applications, assigning point values to
such items as farm size, soil quality and development pressure
indicators on its easement checklist. Each farm's total point
value will assist the Board in determining which farms to recommend
for easement purchase and in what order of priority. The Board of
4
County Commissioners makes the final local decision based on
Advisory Board recommendations and data gathered at the required
public hearing. If purchased by the State of Maryland, the
easement will remain effective in perpetuity.
During FY 1995, total acreage in the program increased to
22,500 acres with a total of 161 agricultural districts.
In the Easement Purchase Program, contracts were issued during
FY 95 for two more farms, bringing total easement properties in the
program to 18, equalling, 3,934 acres. The Agricultural
Preservation Advisory Board is continuing to work with the Planning
Commission to monitor the success of the easement program and to
consider other options for the long term success of the
Agricultural Land Preservation Program.
So far we have preserved about as much agriculturally
significant acreage through the easement program as we have lost
(enclosed chart). In addition, Federal Transportation/State Open
Space (ISTEA) funds have purchased easements on over 2,400 acres at
Antietam Battlefield. While these easements have been a tremendous
boost to our program, remaining funds will buy easements on less
than 1,000 additional acres.
With the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program
continuing to face chronic funding shortages, the Planning
Commission directed staff to develop options to permanently
preserve agricultural lands. A "Rural Area Development" Plan was
drafted and is currently being reviewed by the Planning Commission,
Advisory Board and Farm Bureau. The Plan would address the one (1)
acre zoning on agricultural lands with provisions to allow greater
5
densities with clustering provisions or the presence of public
services.
Meetings will be held over the next year to evaluate this plan
as well as other options, with recommendations coming from the
above listed organizations.
0
AGRICULTURAL SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT
1980 TO JUNE 30, 1994
Total Developed Total Converted
23.6% of the land developed between 1980 and June 30, 1995 has been
converted from agriculturally significant land.
*Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning
Commission's Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal
year.
7
ACREAGE
LOTS
ACREAGE
LOTS
%CONVERTED
1980
1,359.6
365
487.8
95
36.0
1981
1,137.1
332
251.3
59
22.0
1982
964.9
150
194.4
33
20.1
1983
895.3
22.0
305.6
127
34.1
1984
1,092.3
235
409.6
68
37.5
1985
1,144.6
231
439.8
65
38.4
1986
946.9
250
138.8
60
14.6
1987*
2,254.6
995
363.1
94
16.1
1989
1,714.8
770
301.3
86
17.5
1990
1,769.1
820
318.6
102
18.0
1991
1,115.4
339
321.6
104
28.8
1992
1,246.9
565
203.5
46
16.3
1993
793.5
1,005
156.8
45
19.8
1994
833.2
312
121.0
42
14.5
1995
461.9
202
178.1
53
38.6
TOTAL
17,730.10
6,791
4,191.1
1,079
23.6
23.6% of the land developed between 1980 and June 30, 1995 has been
converted from agriculturally significant land.
*Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning
Commission's Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal
year.
7
Metropolitan Planning Organization
During FY 1995 the County Commissioners sat as the governing
body for the Hagerstown Urbanized .Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization, with Staff being provided by the City and the County.
During this period, the Long Range Transportation Plan for the MPO
has been under development for both the urbanized and non -urbanized
areas of the County. A draft for the non -urbanized area was
submitted for review. This draft along with the plan for the
urbanized area will be synthesized to create the new Transportation
Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Staff spent a great deal of time working with the
consultant to develop traffic zones for transportation modeling
purposes. Projections of residential growth and employment were
completed and assigned to the traffic zones by the Staff. These
projections will become the bases for future land use development
forecasts through the year 2020.
During FY 95 public input was solicited at 5 meetings held in
West Virginia and Maryland prior to the start of development of the
Long Range Transportation Plan. In addition, public comments were
solicited at two meetings on an existing condition report compiled
by the Consultant.
It is anticipated that both the urbanized area plan and the
new transportation element will be completed in FY 95.
During this time the Staff also worked with the City of
Hagerstown, Maryland DOT, District 9 in West Virginia, and West
Virginia DOT on reorganization of the MPO.
E
Town Planner Assistance Program
The Assistance Program is nearing its fourth year of service
and assistance to municipal governments in Washington County., The
Town of Boonsboro continues to be active in the program and has
found the program to be a viable option to employing a full-time
staff person. The Town Planner organizes the monthly agenda,
analyzes and coordinates the review of development proposals and
assists in long term or comprehensive planning goals of the Town.
In FY 1995, the Boonsboro Planning Commission completed a
comprehensive rewrite of the Zoning Ordinance. The two year plus
project is scheduled for public information meetings and public
hearings in early FY 1995. The ordinance has not been
significantly amended since it was adopted in 1975. The Commission
anticipates minor amendments in the future as a result of the
Comprehensive Plan Update (mandated by the Planning Act of 1992)
which is currently being worked on by staff. The most significant
development approved by the Commission during the fiscal year was
a 24 unit expansion for alzheimers patients at the Reeder's
Memorial Home. Development continued at the Crestview subdivision
as infrastructure for Phases 2 and 3 was completed with staff time
devoted to administrative oversight of inspection services and
construction bonding. The Crestview subdivision with 82 approved
lots represents the first major subdivision to occur since the mid -
19801s. The Town Planner also assisted the Utilities Commission
on water and wastewater planning issues. The Town Planner
continues to provide assistance to the Mayor and Council and Town
Manager on various projects.
�i
The Town of Smithsburg also participated in the Town Planner
Assistance Program for the first time in FY 1995. The focus of the
Smithsburg Planning Commission's efforts this year has been the
updating of the Comprehensive Plan. The staff's responsibilities
were the development of a request for proposal for the Update,
participation in the consultant selection process, and Project Co-
manager with oversight duties on the drafting of the new Plan. The
Town Planner at the direction of the Smithsburg Mayor & Council
developed a fee schedule for various land development activities.
The fee schedule is scheduled for public hearing in -the early part
of FY 1996.
WSJ
Forest Conservation Program
Washington County continues to implement the local version of
Maryland's Forest Conservation law. Through the inventory of
existing forest on development sites and the calculation of minimum
forest cover based on existing forest and proposed development, the
law is designed to slow or stop the loss of valuable forest land in
the State of Maryland. The County's FY 93-94 annual report to the
Maryland legislature indicated a small net gain in forest cover as
a result of the law. That gain was at a very high cost.
The payment of "in lieu of" fees, a frequently used
alternative to planting new forest, resulted in a substantial pool
of funds for reforestation. The fund is currently channeled to
Antietam National Battlefield and the recreation of the West Woods.
To date, the National Park Service has used $8,184.14 from the
reforestation fund to reforest the first 4 acres of the West Woods,
a cost of $2,046.04 per acre. In this case, spending fee in lieu
of funds equivalent to 1.88 acres produced 4 acres of new forest.
It must be noted that the labor was volunteered.
In the past fiscal year Washington County processed 237
subdivision and site plan applications covering 4310.61 acres of
land. 205 or 86% of those applications were exempt from the
requirements of the Forest Conservation Ordinance (FCO). An
additional 23 exemptions were granted for timber harvest activities
which are not considered development activities. The chart below
indicates the number and type of exemptions granted in the past
fiscal year.
11
A.
< 40,000 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL
8
B.
SIMPLIFIED PLAT
59
C.
APPLICATION BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE
10
D.
OWNER/IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER DWELLING
29
E.
EXISTING LOT OF RECORD
13
F.
PUD BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE
5
G.
AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY
0
H.
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER
25
I.
COMMERCIAL LOGGING
23
J.
REPLATS
56
TOTAL EXEMPTIONS
228
32 plans remain that must comply with the Forest Conservation
Ordinance in some other manner. There are several choices such as
no clearing or clearing to a predetermined "break even" point, both
of which require no additional planting. New planting to reach a
minimum level of forest cover (afforestation) and replanting to
compensate for forest removed below a calculated minimum
(reforestation) are also available choices. Payment of the fee in
lieu of planting or placing existing forest on or off site under
permanent easement are also options
Payment of the fee in lieu of planting is chosen most often.
In mid 194 Washington County adopted an amendment to the Forest
Conservation Ordinance to create the Express Procedure which allows
applicants, under certain conditions, to choose the payment in lieu
of rather than pleading for approval by the Planning Commission.
Of the 32 plans not exempt, 16 used the fee in lieu of planting
choice. 14 of those were eligible to use the Express Procedure.
The payments generated an additional $ 35,028.49 for the
12
Reforestation Fund which, at this time, is earmarked for additional
reforestation of the West Woods at Antietam National Battlefield.
The fee is payment for 350,284.90 square feet or 8.04 acres of
forest that was not required to be planted on the development
sites.
14 plans required no fees or planting because there was
sufficient forest on the site to allow some clearing with no
mitigation or no clearing was proposed or necessary.
The final method of compliance is new planting, either to
provide a predetermined minimum or to replace existing forest
removed during development. Three development proposals used
afforestation to satisfy FCO requirements. A total of 8.78 acres
of new forest will result on the sites of these development
proposals.
All methods of compliance generate a pian review fee. There
is no fee when a plan is exempt. The Planning Department collected
$ 4,095.00 in Forest Conservation Plan review fees during the past
fiscal year.
13
Water and Sewerage Plan
The Planning Department did not receive any requests for
individual amendments to the Washington County Water and Sewerage
Plan during FY 1995.
The State mandated update of the Plan that was completed by
the Planning Department and adopted by the County Commissioners in
FY 1994 was approved by the Maryland Department of the Environment
in January 1995. The next update of the Plan will be due in 1997.
14
Highway Interchange Study
During FY 95 the Board of Commissioners took action on Group
II of the Highway Interchange Comprehensive Rezoning Project. Group
II included the I-81 and Mason-Dixon Road (Stateline) Interchange,
I-81 and Showalter Road Interchange, and the 1-81 and Maugansville
Avenue Interchange. It is anticipated that the comprehensive
rezonings for the remaining three interchange groups will be
completed during FY 95.
15
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance
The Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) which became
effective on December 1, 1992, was assessed by the Planning
Commission for need and recommended for continuance. During FY
1995 a series of amendments to the Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance were approved. In essence these amendments provided for:
a. clarification of the standards to be used for the
construction of new public roads;
b. identification of the County policy to be used for
determining adequacy of existing County roads;
c. extension of the APFO to cover State maintained roads; and
d. utilization of the School Districts capacity rating of a
school instead of the IAC rating to determine adequacy.
These amendments were primarily associated with the road
adequacy provisions of the APFO and as a whole were very
significant in clarifying regulatory intent as well as filing the
void associated with the extension of the APFO to State roads. It
is anticipated that amendments in FY 1996 will be oriented toward
the school adequacy provisions.
16
Park Planning
Park Planning for FY 1995 encompassed a variety of projects
and activities. Forest sampling was done at the Washington County
Agricultural Center site, and a detailed Forest Stand Delineation
report prepared to assist the development plan process. Forest
sampling was also done at the Pinesburg Ballfields site and an
industrial park development site.
A concept plan was developed for a new 90 acre soccer/little
league complex on land north of Hagerstown that would be leased
from a local company. Plan revisions were coordinated and
presented to the Parks Board based on comments from the Board,
soccer league representatives and the Engineering Department.
Assistance was provided to the Parks Department by obtaining park
sign setback variances from the Board of Appeals and permits and
exemptions from the Permits office and State Highway
Administration.
Significant effort was directed to development of background
information and draft language for a Sensitive Areas Element
addition to the County Comprehensive Plan. As mandated by the 1992
Maryland Planning Act, the Element requires protection from the
adverse effects of development for streams and their buffers, 100 -
year floodplains, endangered species habitats and steep slopes.
State agencies were contacted to determine availability of specific
sensitive area data layers to aid in plan review.
17
Solid Waste and Recycling Planning
Updating of the Solid Waste Management Plan and the Recycling
Plan was begun. For the first time, both plans will be updated at
the same time, and combined into one document. Benefits will
include a consistent review and update schedule, a more integrated
planning tool and a streamlined preparation and public review and
comment process. Public information meetings were held in Clear
Spring, Smithsburg, Boonsboro and Hagerstown to encourage comments
and input, and a mail survey was sent to EPA registered hazardous
waste generators in the County, to help determine the approximate
amount of hazardous wastes generated in the County. Following
review of comments received, drafting of the new Solid Waste and
Recycling Plan was begun. It is anticipated that the Plan will be
completed and adopted by February or March of 1996.
Historic District Commission
The Commission continued to exercise its assigned duties from
the Zoning Ordinance by reviewing several building permits in the
Historic Preservation overlay zone. Three out of the four
applications were for minor modifications and of small consequence.
However, the Commission conducted an intensive review, leading to
denial, of one application to encase in brick a frame and clapboard
National Register listed property. The decision was not appealed.
Three tax credit applications were received and approved
during the past fiscal year. All three are located within the City
of Hagerstown. $ 6,227.12 worth of property tax credits were
granted to projects which represented over $75,000.00 worth of
restoration. The total credit granted since the program began is
now close to $40,000.00.
Over several years the Commission has loaned staff time to the
volunteer efforts to prevent demolition of Antietam Station, a turn
of the century train station located on the outskirts of
Sharpsburg. This phase of the project was finally completed with
receipt of a check for $8,506.00 as reimbursement from a Maryland
Historical Trust Preservation grant. The funds produced a Reuse
Feasibility Study and connected the structure to the public sewer
system.
Staff was also on loan to a citizen group interested in
establishing a new museum. This effort was completed with the
incorporation of the Heritage Museums Association as a non-profit
organization.
19
The Commission reviewed several large development proposals
for their effects on adjacent historic sites and structures. It
continued its review and comment on demolition permits and is
encouraging disassembly and reuse of materials rather than
demolition and disposal.
The Funkstown Historic Resource Inventory, the Commission's FY
94-95 CLG project was begun during this past fiscal year. The
Commission also received notice that its FY 95-96 CLG project, a
Rural Community Survey would not be approved due to a lack of State
funds.
20
Development Activity
Development proposals were reviewed by the Planning Commission
in both concept and final form. The Commission reviewed and
approved 113 residential, commercial, industrial or institutional
subdivision plats involving 203 lots representing 199 units on
463.4 acres. In addition, the Commission approved 19 site plans and
held 14 preliminary consultations. Some of the conceptual forms
have not resulted in a firm design while others have proceeded
through final approval.
There was only one subdivision of significance ( final approval
of twenty or more lots or units) granted during FY 95 and it was
Potomac Manor, Section G, Phase 2 which contained 36 lots.
Site plans representing significant private investment within
the County were approved for: JRA Executive Hanger at the County
Airport, Burger King along Sharpshurg Pike, Bowman/Trendlines in
the Intra -State Industrial. Park, Allegheny Dental along Virginia
Avenue, ICC along Old Forge Road, Blue Seal Feeds along Hopewell
Road, BFI along MD 63 and Magic Tunnel Car Wash off of Eastern
Blvd.
Site plans were also approved for public projects including
the new Agricultural Center on Sharpsburg Pike, an Amphitheater at
HJC and an addition to Old Forge Elementary School.
21
Rezoning Cases and Ordinance Amendments
Between July 1, 1994 and June 30, 1995, the Planning
Commission acted on 10 applications. Joint hearings with the
Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners were held
regularly on a quarterly cycle or special hearings were held as
necessary to provide for efficiency in the hearing process. The
Commission rendered recommendations on 3 Zoning Ordinance text
amendments and 7 map amendments including comprehensive map
amendments for Group II of the Highway Interchange Study. In
addition, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a text
amendment to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. A listing
of the Planning Commission's recommendations and the Board's
actions for the cases heard in FY 1995 are as follows:
CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF
AMENDMENT
ACREAGE
REQUEST COMMISSION
ACTION
BOARD
ACTION
RZ-94-06
Jerry
Map
2 acres
BT to BL
App'd
App'd
Spessard
RZ-94-07
Dharl & Mary
Map
2.86
RS to BT
App'd
App'd
Wilfong
acres
RZ-94-08
Planning
Text
Sections: 11.3, 12.2
App'd
App'd
Commission
120.2,
13.2, 14.1,
15.6,18.1, 19.8,
19A.3,
21.32
RZ-95--01
Truman Martin
Map
83.41
A to RS
App'd
App'd
Acres
RZ-95-02.1 Planning Map HI to App'd App'd
Commission HI --1, HI -2
AP, RR
Wx
CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD
AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION
RZ-95-02.2
Planning
Map
HI to App'd
App'd
Commission
HI -1, HI -2
A, RM, RR,
RS, AP
RZ-95-02.3
Planning
Map
HI to HI -1,
App'd
App'd
Commission
HI -2, AP, A,
RR
RZ-95-03
Planning
Text
Section
13.1, 13.2,
App'd
App'd
Commission
14.2
RZ-95-04
Mansoor
Map
75.458
RS and A
App'd
App'd
Shaool
Acres
to PUD
A-2
Planning
Text
Sections
4.2, 4.2.1,
App'd
App'd
Commission
4.2.2,
4.3, 4.3.1,
4.3.2,
4.3.3, 4.4
5.2
23
Board of Zoning Appeals Statistics
Fiscal Year 1994-1995
24
GRANTED
DENIED
WITHDRAWN
TOTAL
VARIANCES
112
10
4
126
SPECIAL
29
4
0
33
EXCEPTIONS
EXPANSION OF
NON -CONFORMING USE
1
0
0
1
CHANGE OF
NON -CONFORMING USE
1
0
0
1
ADMINISTRATIVE
ERROR
1
0
0
1
APPEAL FROM
PLANNING COMMISSION
0
0
0
0
APPEAL FROM ADEQUATE
PUBLIC FACILITIES
4
0
0
4
APPEAL FOR FLOODPLAIN
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
148
14
4
166
FISCAL YEAR 1993-1.994
149
19
9
177
24
WASHINGTON COUNTY MD
AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT
4.0
FOR PERIOD 07/01/94 THRU 06130195
PLANNING ELECTION
AGRICULTURAL
15.2
NEW USE
SECTOR DISTRICT
ACREAGE LOST
LOTS
(TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT)
1
16
20.0
8
9
14.6
1
LL
9
41.5
13
SF
13
2.5
1
DX
13
3.1
2
SF
TOTAL
61.7
17
2
1
4.0
1
SF
6
15.2
6
SF
12
1.5
1
SF
16
20.0
8
SF
19
1.3
1
SF
TOTAL
42.0
17
SF
3
8
10.8
2
SF
11
6.1
1
SF
TOTAL
16.9
3
4
7
1.0
1
SF
14
16.3
7
SF
TOTAL
17.3
8
5
4
8.7
3
SF
23
15.5
1
LL
TOTAL
24.2
4
6
5
15.9
4
SF
TOTAL
15.9
4
GRAND TOTAL
178.1
53
25
WASHINGTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS
DISTRICT NO
FARM TYPE
ACRES
DISTRICT NO
FARM TYPE
ACRES
AD -80-001
CROP
178.59
AD -80-002
DAIRY
245.64
AD -80-004
CROP
279.14
AD -80-006
CROP
232.44
AD -80-007
CROP
146.00
AD -80-007
CROP
146.00
AD -81-002
CROP
140.00
AD -82-003
CROP
460.00
AD -83-002
BEEF
314.00
AD -83-002
BEEF
314.00
AD -83-003
BEEF
200.55
AD -84-002
BEEF
448.00
AD -85-001
BEEF
149.63
AD -86-001
CROP
127.51
AD -88-001
CROP
142.26
AD -88-002
FOREST
700.04
AD -88-003
CROP
158.42
AD -88-004
DAIRY
237.99
AD -89-001
ORCHARD
457.67
AD -89-002
DAIRY
192.43
AD -89-003
DAIRY
164.61
AD -89-005
DAIRY
183.99
AD -89-005
DAIRY
172.12
AD -90-001
CROP
100.00
A❑ -90-002
CROP
150.14
AD -90-005
FOREST
101.05
AD -90-006
CROP
124.70
AD -90-007
CROP
150.51
AD -90-008
CROP
190.88
AD -90-009
FOREST
21.60
AD -90-010
CROP
38.59
AD -90-011
DAIRY
108.81
AD -90-012
CROP
100.38
AD -90-013
DAIRY
174.05
AD -90-014
BEEF
82.34
AD -90-015
CROP
145.25
AD -90-017
CROP
149.64
AD -90-018
DAIRY
163.88
AD -90-019
DAIRY
140.04
AD -90-020
DAIRY
125.00
AD -90-021
CROP
157.00
AD -90-022
CROP
67.00
AD -90-023
DAIRY
145.00
AD -90-024
FOREST
146.81
AD -90-025
CROP
186.32
AD -90-026
CROP
104.80
AD -90-027
CROP
75:38
AD -90-028
BEEF
17.06
AD -90-031
ORCHARD
70.72
AD -90-032
ORCHARD
115.62
AD -90-033
DAIRY
165.00
AD -90-034
CROP
117.42
AD -90-036
CROP
168.83
AD -90-037
CROP
116.00
AD -90-038
DAIRY
124.27
AD -90-039
CROP
144.33
AD -90-041
DAIRY
120.00
AD -90-042
BEEF
129.62
AD -90-043
FOREST
132.63
AD -90-044
FOREST
17.00
AD -90-045
CROP
63.63
AD -90-046
CROP
41.20
AD -90-051
CROP
109.50
AD -90-052
DAIRY
99.50
AD -90-053
DAIRY
104.78
AD -90-054
CROP
93.15
AD -90-055
CROP
129.13
AD -90-055
CROP
129.13
AD -90-056
FOREST
107.21
AD -90-057
CROP
26.00
AD -90-060
CROP
270.91
AD -90-062
CROP
145.04
AD -90-063
DAIRY
100.61
AD -90-064
CROP
118.90
AD -90-065
DAIRY
141.31
AD -90-066
DAIRY
75.75
AD -90-067
DAIRY
53.44
AD -90-069
CROP
185.00
AD -90-070
BEEF
135.00
AD -90-073
BEEF
189.55
AD -90-074
DAIRY
58.90
AD -90-075
DAIRY
34.65
AD -90-077
DAIRY
100.00
AD -90-078
DAIRY
171.65
AD -90-079
BEEF
225.00
AD -90-084
CROP
301.00
AD -90-086
FOREST
182.42
AD -90-087
BEEF
119.00
AD -91-001
CROP
274.00
AD -91-M4
CROP
72.21
AD -91-005
CROP
193.20
AD -91-006
DAIRY
108.51
AD -91-007
DAIRY
156.84
AD -91-008
DAIRY
122.22
AD -91-009
DAIRY
48.25
AD -91-010
CROP
62.98
AD -91-011
HOG
180.46
AD -91-012
BEEF
83.43
AD -91-013
DAIRY
108.92
AD -91-014
DAIRY
113.28
AD -91-015
CROP
21.94
AD -91-016
CROP
72.22
AD -91-016A
CROP
25.76
AD -91-017
DAIRY
55.50
AD -91-019
CROP
78.00
AD -91-019
CROP
78.00
AD -91-020
DAIRY
247.63
AD -91-021
CROP
78.68
AD -91-022
CROP
138.90
AD -91-023
CROP
73.86
AD -91-024
CROP
81.00
AD -01-026
BEEF
65.00
AD -91-027
CROP
145.00
AD -91-028
CROP
130.00
AD -91-029
CROP
118.00
AD -91-030
DAIRY
280.76
AD -91-031
DAIRY
126.25
AD -91-032
CROP
79.30
AD -91-033
HOG
143.68
AD -91-034
CROP
23.00
AD -91-035
FOREST
126.54
AD -91-036
CROP
134.17
AD -91-037
FOREST
160.55
AD -91-037
FOREST
160.55
AD -91-038
CROP
152.66
AD -91-039
DAIRY
227.27
AD -91-040
BEEF
161.95
AD -91-042
CROP
135.15
AD -91-044
DAIRY
175.25
AD -91-046
BEEF
114.33
AD -91-047
DAIRY
309.50
AD -91-048
CROP
145.10
AD -91-048A
CROP
49.73
AD -91-0486
CROP
10.45
AD -91-049
CROP
59.93
AD -91-050
DAIRY
119.59
AD -91-052
CROP
166.77
AD -91-053
DAIRY
167.52
AD -91-054
CROP
114.00
AD -91-055
DAIRY
237.76
AD -91-056
FOREST
30.29
AD -91-057
CROP
39.80
AD -92-001
FOREST
40.00
AD -92-002
DAIRY
175.00
AD -92-003
DAIRY
57.09
AD -92-004
DAIRY
165.00
AD -92-005
CROP
115.90
AD -92-006
CROP
32.10
AD -92-007
CROP
85.00
AD -92-009
DAIRY
100.75
AD -92-010
CROP
178.91
AD -92-011
DAIRY
123.80
AD -93-001
CROP
56.21
AD -94-003
DAIRY
176.00
AD -94-004
FOREST
64.02
AD -94-005
HOG
120.16
AD -94-006
DAIRY
130.00
AD -94-007
CROP
107.09
AD -94-008
DAIRY
145.39
AD -94-008A
DAIRY
96.51
AD -94-009
BEEF
120.41
26
SECTOR/
SUBDIVISIONS BY
PLANNING SECTOR
FOR PERIOD 07/01/94 THRU 06/30/95
DEVELOPMENT PLATS
PLATS
TOTAL URBAN
TYPE
SECTOR
1
0
CM
2
DX
2
LL
2
SF
SECTOR
2
1
CM
0
LL
0
SF
SECTOR
3
27
LL
0
SF
SECTOR
4
5
SF
SECTOR
5
1
LL
1
SF
SECTOR
6
1
LL
1
SF
SUBDIVISIONS BY
PLANNING SECTOR
FOR PERIOD 07/01/94 THRU 06/30/95
DEVELOPMENT PLATS
PLATS
TOTAL URBAN
RURAL
3
3
0
3
2
1
2
0
2
37
17
20
1
1
0
1
0
1
27
0
27
1
0
1
5
0
5
14
3
11
1
0
1
13
0
13
1
0
1
4
0
4
LOTS
TOTAL
URBAN
RURAL
9
9
0
4
3
1
2
0
2
91
58
33
1
1
0
1
0
1
38
0
38
1
0
1
7
0
7
27
5
22
1
0
1
15
0
15
1
0
1
5
0
5
ACREAGE AVERAGE LOT SIZE
TOTAL
URBAN
RURAL
10,7
10.7
0.0
2.9
0.4
2.5
26. B
0.0
26.6
107.6
28.1
79.5
4.4
4.4
0.0
10.9
0.0
10.9
95.8
0.0
95.8
12.1
0.0
12.1
30.1
0.0
30.1
48.4
8.4
39.9
33.3
0.0
33.3
39.1
0.0
39.1
20.6
0.0
20.6
21.1
0.0
21.1
URBAN
RURAL
1.19
DX
0.13
2.50
LARGE LOT
13.31
0.48
2.41
4.40
10.86
2.52
12.05
4.30
1.69
1.81
33.32
2.61
20.60
4.23
TOTALS 113 26 87 203 76 127 463.4 52.0 411.4 0.68 3.24
TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PLATS
CM
COMMERCIAL
DX
DUPLEX
LL
LARGE LOT
SF
SINGLE FAMILY
27
SUBDIVISION FILE BY PLANNING SECTOR
FOR PERIOD 07101!94 THRU 06/30/95
ELEC ZONE TYPE OF URBANI DWELL GROSS APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION NAME DIST DIST DEVELOP RURAL LOTS UNITS ACRES DATE
PLANNING SECTOR 1
BURGESSER ROBERT LOTS 7 & 8
13
A
SF
RA
2
2
3.1
08/30/94
CREEK MITCHELL LOT 1 & PARCEL A
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.8
05/22/95
CUSHWA VICTOR IV ESTATE OF
2
RS
SF
UG
2
3
0.8
12/01/94
DeSHONG RANDOLPH & SUE LOT 1
9
A
LL
RA
1
1
14.6
09/26/94
DILLER IVAN & LYDIA LOT 1
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
06/01/95
DOZIER ED & MARION LOTS 1 & 2
13
RR
SF
UG
2
2
0.3
11/21/94
FERGUSON MICHAEL & LISA LOT 1 A
18
A
SF
RA
2
2
2.7
06/14/95
FORSYTH RONALD LOT 4
13
A
DX
RA
1
2
2.5
08MO/94
GOODE'S HAVEN LOTS 1-5 & PAR A
9
A
SF
RA
4
5
27.9
08/01/94
GOODES HAVEN LOTS 6-9
9
A
SF
RA
4
4
5,3
01/09/95
HADDOCK JAMES W & VIRGINIA
10
RS
SF
UG
2
2
2.4
01/23/95
HAMILL DORIS E LOT 2
27
A
LL
RA
1
1
12.0
10/05/94
HART JEAN M LOTS 1 AND 2
10
RS
SF
UG
2
2
0.5
04/25/95
HARTMAN SUB RESUB LOT C
18
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.4
07/27/94
HOCK PAULINE LOT 1
10
RR
SF
UG
1
1
0.5
12/30/94
HOFFMAN TODD LOT 7
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
01/19/95
HOSE WILLIAM LOT 1
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.3
04/20/95
HOSTETTER JOHN M LT 1 PARCEL A B
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.5
11/22/94
HOWELL RALPH F
18
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.1
04/05/95
HUNTSBERGER GARY A LOT 1
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.2
06/14/95
HUNTZBERRY RICHARD LOTS 1-6
18
A
SF
RA
6
6
15,5
07/11/94
HUYETT BUSINESS PARK LOTS 4-9
2
HI
CM
UG
6
0
8.5
08/01/94
KEEFAUVER ROY A SR LOTS 1 AND 2
10
RU
SF
UG
2
2
0.5
04/11/95
KEUPER N& L LOT 1
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.7
07/20/94
KREPS MARY M LOT 1
27
RS
SF
UG
1
1
2.4
07/19/94
LAYMAN BETTY LOT 1
18
RR
SF
UG
1
1
1.2
06/19/95
LEHMAN'S MILL RD SUBD LOT 4
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.2
01/23/95
LITTLE JOANN V.
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
10/14/94
MARTIN MAURICE S LOT A
27
BG
CM
UG
1
0
0.4
07/06/94
MAUGANS MEADOWS LOTS 127 & 128
13
A
SF
UG
2
2
1.3
10/03/94
MESSLER LOUIS & MARY LOT 1
9
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.4
10/19/94
METGER HOWARD & JENNIGER
26
RU
SF
UG
1
1
0.3
01/18/95
NORTH VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT
27
P/O
CM
UG
2
0
1.8
05/01/95
0DEND'HAL FORUNE IV & MILLER
26
RU
DX
UG
2
2
0.2
06/07/95
POTOMAC MANOR SECT G PHASE 2
18
RU
SF
UG
36
36
11.4
09/12/94
PROSPECT PLACE REPLAT LOTS 70-73
26
RU
SF
UG
1
1
0.3
04/06/95
RAIMONDO SCHIANO-DI-COLA LOT 1
26
RU
SF
UG
1
1
0.2
12/28/94
RASCHKA THEODORE L SR
27
BG
DX
UG
1
2
0.2
04/11/95
RENNER & PITTENGER LOT 1
2
A
SF
RA
1
1
15
08/10/94
SPRECHER BRET
18
A
SF
UG
1
1
4.1
09/27/94
STALEY DAN LOT 1
18
A
SF
UG
1
1
0.5
10/12/94
STRICKLAND RICHARD G JR LOT 1
27
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.5
10/18/94
SUDER JACK LOT 1
2
HI
SF
UG
1
1
0.4
01/25/95
TROUP RUN RESUB OF LOT
13
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.5
09/08/94
WAY OF TRUTH INDUSTRIES INC,
13
HI
SF
UG
1
1
1.0
08/22/94
45 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 1
106
101
147.8
PLANNING SECTOR 2
ATHERLY ELVIN A LOT 1 & TRACT 1
16
A
SF
RA
1
2
1.2
10!14194
BAKER VERA LOT 2
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.1
07/12/94
BLACK ROCK ACRES LOTS 8 AND 8A
16
C
SF
RA
1
1
2.5
02!10195
BOONSBORO BULLPEN LOT 1
6
BG
CM
BO
1
0
4.4
03/21/95
BUCHANAN JOHN LOT 3
20
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.2
09/15/94
DAVIDOV LEONARD
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
6.1
04/25/95
FIELDSTONE ACRES LOTS 27-30
16
A
SF
RA
4
4
8.7
07/08/94
FORD DALE LOTS 1 - 3
6
A
SF
RA
3
3
3.6
05/01/95
GISH STEVEN LOT 1-A
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
4.0
04/18/95
HERMAN JOSEPH & CELIA LOT 2A
19
C
SF
RA
1
1
4.0
08/23/94
HOSE ROBERT LOT 1
12
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.5
07/06194
HUFFER DELBERT LOT 1 REAPPROVAL
19
A
SF
RA
1
1
6.7
04/25/95
JOHNSON FRANK SR LOTS 1-3
12
A
SF
RA
3
3
3.0
06/05/95
KEFAUVER MIKE LOT 3A & PARCEL C
1
C
LL
RA
1
1
10.9
06/21/95
MILLER DONNA LOT 1
1
A
SF
RA
1
1
4.0
02/27/95
MILLER JOHN LOT 10 PARCEL A
12
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.3
07/21/94
NEEDY KARL LOT 1
16
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.4
12/08/94
NULL RYAN LOTS 1 & 2
6
A
SF
RA
2
2
10.7
01/04/95
W
29
ELEC
ZONE
TYPE OF
URBAN/
DWELL
GROSS
APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION NAME
DIST
DIST
DEVELOP
RURAL
LOTS
UNITS
ACRES
DATE
PHILLIPS PAULA LOT 1
12
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.2
02102/95
PRYOR EDGAR LOT 4 REPLT LOT 2&3
16
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.2
02/09/95
ROHRER CHAUNCEY & FRANCES
1
C
SF
RA
1
1
1.1
06122x95
SHANK WLM B & JEAN C LOT 1
12
A
SF
RA
1
2
1.3
12/14/94
SLIFER VERLE V LOT 1 & PARCEL A
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.7
11/01/94
STANSBURY FLORENCE C LOT 2
16
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.6
11/01/94
STOTLER/DETROW 1-2 & A
16
A
SF
RA
2
2
3.1
03/27/95
TOMS LEHMAN H LOTS 2 & 3
16
A
SF
RA
2
2
8.8
07/21/94
WATKINS MARJORIE E LOTS 1 & 2
12
A
SF
RA
2
2
9.0
02/23/95
WINDERS RANDY & MISTY LOT 1
16
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.0
11/09/94
YOMMER BRUCE W
6
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
04/27/95
29 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 2
40
41
111.0
PLANNING SECTOR 3
AMBROSIA ACRES LOTS 1 AND 2
8
C
SF
RA
2
2
10.8
12/05/94
COBLENTZ THOMAS G LOT 1
11
C
SF
RA
1
1
6.1
08/09/94
ELIAS ALIX LOT 1
8
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.1
06/01/95
KIDWELLICLEM LOT 1
11
C
SF
RA
1
1
4.1
11/17/94
MILLS ORTENCE
11
C
LL
RA
1
1
12.1
10/04/94
MULLENDORE DENTON LOTS 1 & 2
8
C
SF
RA
2
2
6.0
07/22/94
6 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 3
8
8
42.1
PLANNING SECTOR 4
COPPER SUSANNE ET AL LOTS 2 & 3
7
A
SF
RA
2
2
2.4
11/08/94
JCB PROPERTIES LOT 1A
14
A
SF
RA
1
1
4.7
09/08/94
KLINE ROY LOT A-1
7
A
SF
RA
1
1
2.0
06/14/95
LEACH STEVEN R LOTS 1 AND 2
7
RR
SF
SM
2
2
2.1
04/28/95
MISS SUSAN & DOUG LOT 1
14
A
SF
RA
1
1
3.1
04/25/95
NEWCOMER FRANK & MARGUERITE LOTS
14
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.6
03/15/95
ROWLAND RIDGE LOTS 1 - 4
14
RR
SF
RA
4
4
7.5
05/01/95
RUDOLPH JOHN V & ALICE H LOT 1
7
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
04/25/95
SEESE EDWARD LOT 1
7
A
SF
SM
1
1
1.4
10/31/94
SLY FOX WOODS LOTS 1 & 2
7
A
SF
SM
2
2
5.0
03/17/95
SMITH IVAN L LOT 1
7
C
SF
RA
1
1
2.0
02/21/95
STERLING RALPH LOTS 1-3
14
A
SF
RA
3
3
6.9
09/12/94
STOUFFER J MICHAEL LOTS 2 - 5
14
A
SF
RA
4
4
7.0
07/06/94
WEAVER DANNY A
14
RR
SF
RA
3
3
1.8
11/07/94
14 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 4
27
27
48.4
PLANNING SECTOR 5
ARTZ FRANK LOT 6A
20
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.1
07/06/94
BROWN KURTIS & KIM
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
8.1
07/01/94
DOBBS DONALD LOT 1
23
A
LL
RA
1
1
33.3
12/14/94
FAITH KENNETH & BERTHA LOT 1 & 2
4
A
SF
RA
2
2
2.1
05/15/95
FARROW GARY LOT 7 AND PARCEL A
23
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.4
12/23/94
FIERY ROBERT LOT 1
23
A
SF
RA
1
1
5.8
02/06/95
MICHAEL DENNIS AND JO ANNE
15
C
SF
RA
1
1
1.3
02114/95
MILLYVILLE LOTS 8& 9
4
A
SF
RA
2
2
2.0
05/22/95
OVERLOOK FARM LOT 1
4
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.5
08/22/94
ROWLAND LOUISE ANNA
4
C
SF
RA
1
1
6.7
06/21/95
SYLVESTER ROY LOT 1
23
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.0
08/22/94
TEMPLON'S TERRACE
23
A
SF
RA
1
1
1.8
12/27/94
WEST.MD.SPORTSMEN'S CLUB LOT 1
15
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.2
01/12/95
YOUNKER EARNEST C LOT 1
15
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.2
07/25/94
14 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 5
16
16
72.4
PLANNING SECTOR 6
CREEK THOMAS R JR ET UX LOT 1
5
C
SF
RA
1
1
3.1
05/09/95
FINNEYZANE LOT 1
5
C
SF
RA
1
1
5.2
08/31/94
JOHNSON VIRGINIA L LOT 3 PAR A
5
C
SF
RA
2
2
7.9
05/10/95
STOTLER JANICE LOT 1
5
C
LL
RA
1
1
20.6
12/28/94
WELLER GLADYS LOT 2
5
A
SF
RA
1
1
5.0
11/16/94
5 TOTAL FOR PLANNING SECTOR 6
6
6
41.7
113 GRAND TOTAL
203
199
463.4
29
9 00,
� -WO go,
FISCAL YEAR JULY ® JUNE
Number of approved Plats
200
150
100
50
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
® ,
Commercial Indust. & last, Simplified
30
I jr-111 III
FISCAL YEAR JULY - JUNE
Number of Approved Acres
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Commercial Indust. & Inst. SimplifiedResidential
31
L 1901 OATI 61 U. I
V T
1988
- 1995
IO"TAL NO. 0*4 F LOTS BY YEAR
FISCAL YEAR JULY ® JUNE
Number of Approved Lots
1200
1000
M
600
400
200
0
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1903 1994 1995
Commercial Indust. & hist. Simplified
32