Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_1990_AnnualReportWASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 100 WEST WASHINGTON STREET HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND 21740 Telephone/MARCOM: (301) 791-3065 TDD/Hearing Impaired: (301) 791-3383 The Court House SE9VIIVG WASHINGTON COUNTY SINCE 1873 Board of County Commissioners for Washington County 100 West Washington Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 Dear Commissioners: This report, submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 66B of the Annotated Code, summarizes the activities of the Commission from July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990. In addition to the routine review and approval of subdivisions and site plans, the Commission continued to implement the Comprehensive Plan that was adopted in 1981 although at a reduced rate because of the pressing workload imposed by current activities. The various elements of the Plain worked on by the Commission in Fiscal Year 1990 are described in this report along with the numerous other tasks undertaken during this fiscal year. As in the past, the new Work Program that has been formally adopted by the Planning Commission lists all those tasks the Commission plans to address. Sincerely, /JamesP. Brittain Planning Director JPB/jlw TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Planning Organizational Chart .............. i Agency Inter -Relationships ................. ii The Comprehensive Plan ..................... 1 Planning Commission Work Program ........... 4 Agricultural Land Preservation Program ..... 6 Renewed Urban Growth Area Study ............ 13 Solid Waste Management Plan ................ 16 Recycling Planning ......................... 18 Water and Sewerage Plan .................... 20 Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance ....... 23 Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit Ordinance .. 25 Hancock Town Growth Area ................... 26 House Numbering ............................ 28 ParkPlanning .............................. 29 Historic District Commission ............... 31 Significant Developments ................... 34 RezoningCases ............................. 41 Hoard of Zoning Appeals Statistics ......... 44 FY 1990 Subdivision Activity ............... 45 Subdivision Trends ......................... 50 Planning Sector Map ........................ 53 FY 1990 Development Map Appendix FY 1990 Rezoning Map Appendix Agricultural Preservation District Map Appendix Washington County Planning Commission 1990 Annual Report Board of County Commissioners Ronald L. Bowers, President Linda C. Irvin, Vice -President R. Lee Downey Richard E. Roulette John S. Shank Planning Commission Donald E. Zombro, Chairman Bertrand L. Iseminger, Vice -Chairman Carol G. Johnson Richard E. Roulette, Ex -Officio Donald L. Spickler Steven B. West Published, April 1990 Washington County Planning Commission 100 West Washington Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 � � w co O •F ar � C7 as � va �� z O•� '� O 0, ��" vp - e ami F c. a�5 y _ � U 7 c o to .� a`� y F ° � ti a'"i .o C_ ❑ ., pp C a m p �ALzIU] U rz F{j m ca ca rn r. a �c I ! ! d ! k U Q' U � U v q�q •� � �c33 � � F U �� CL C 0 01. os erreo IF t � \ � FF F ot►n� _ 0 t p� c i t _ 6 1 !_ate / 1G o�ao 4i r 6 � 4' �i ji � ti O i � rV ,4 �• .t•� pVp a eY r = 4� iii )� / °0s i C.D ♦♦ $iO�{ v � ?`r p 6� r., R'O Z." a t 3 ri 3 it {p �O ar ` T t O o� x s► F t v �3. zi The Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan and the implementation of policies were effected by heavy demands for review of current development activity. However, many items, which are outlined in greater detail in this report, are directly related to or address some aspect of the ongoing total policy goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Since the Comprehensive Plan's adoption in 1981, the Planning Commission and staff have worked continuously to implement its recommendations. Fiscal year 1990 saw the Planning staff undertake an effort to evaluate those accomplishments to date. During the fiscal year, the Planning staff assembled reports, maps and other information to document all of the projects that have been completed. The final report, to be issued in early 1991, will contain a brief narrative of the projects, how they contribute to achievement of Plan goals, and the products such as, the Agricultural Lands Inventory Map, the Bicycle Route Map, and the Recycling Plan that resulted from these studies. This report will illuminate the items left to be completed and assist in the development of the Planning Department's work program for years to come. 1 In addition, the staff invested substantial time on a proposed Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, an Urban Growth Area Water and Sewer Study and a computerized traffic network program. These efforts, which started in FY 1989 and are still in their development stages, hold great promise as management and assessment tools for growth and the encouragement of development within designated Growth Areas. The following is a list of the Comprehensive Plan policies and their current status since the start of the Plan implementation in 1981. Policy Status Urban Growth Area Study Completed Town Growth Area Studies In work* PUD Completed Mineral Extraction Completed Transportation Completed Educational Facilities/Site Plan Completed Water Supply Study Completed Agricultural. Land Study Mapping Completed Development Strategy In work Rural Development To be done Land Use Plan In work** E The Work Program for fiscal year 1990-1991, shown on the following page, includes Comprehensive Plan elements for implementation along with other tasks that have been adopted for the Work Program by the Planning Commission. The Commission's focus continues to be goals that will increase development within the Urban and Town Growth Areas and preserve the historic and agricultural areas of the County's rural landscape. Boonsboro, Hancock, and Smithsburg Town Growth Area Boundaries have been adopted. Clear Spring effort is awaiting response from the Town. ** Being done in conjunction with the house numbering program. 3 o o 46 h • t pVOjj ••�1 JO��} `� a � � * * * * * * * * * 46* * * * * * * *iF* -s s t 61 211 t ILI) �T U Agricultural Land Preservation Program Washington County's effort to preserve valuable farmland via the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program began in April 1978 and has continued to.date. The Program was established and is regulated by Agricultural Article, Section 2- 501 through 2-515 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. It is administered through a Planning Commission staff member by the Washington County Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Board, the County Commissioners, and the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation of the Maryland Department of Agriculture. The Program encourages landowners to voluntarily enter into an Agricultural Land Preservation District in which it is agreed that the land will not be developed for a period of at least five years. In return for that restriction, the landowner receives protection from nuisance complaints and becomes eligible to sell a Development Rights Easement. A landowner may exercise the option of selling a Development Rights Easement to the Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation provided that his offer to sell is recommended by the County's Advisory Board and the County Commissioners. 9 At the local level, the Agricultural Advisory Board will review and rank easement applications, assigning point values to such items as farm size, soil quality and development pressure indicators on its easement checklist. Each farm's total point value will assist the Board in determining which farms to recommend for easement purchase and in what order of priority. The Board of County Commissioners makes the final local decision based on Advisory Board recommendations and data gathered at the required public hearing. If purchased by the State of Maryland, the easement will remain effective in perpetuity. The total acreage of productive farmland in preservation districts approved by the State has increased in fiscal year 1990 from 5344.51 acres to 7291.52 acres with 15 districts approved. An additional 25 districts comprising 3322.79 acres were being processed as of June 30, 1990. The fifteen new districts approved are outlined below. 7 Name & Number Farm Type Acres Herbst AD -89-5 Dairy 357.71 Emswiler AD --90-1 Horses 100.00 Corcoran AD -90-2 Beef 150.14 Keuper AD -90-3 Crop, Sheep, 101.00 Horses Schooley AD --90-5 Crop, Horses, 101.05 Woodland Harp AD -90-6 Crop 124.70 Harp AD -90--7 Crop 150.51 Wiles AD -90-8 Dairy 190.88 Schooley AD -90-9 Crop, Woodland 21.50 Engstrom AD -90-10 Crop, Sheep 38.59 Burtner AD -90.11 Dairy 108.81 Durbin AD -90-12 Beef, Crop 100.38 Weaver AD -90-13 Dairy 174.05 Weaver AD -90-14 Crop, Beef, Hogs 82.34 Cline AD -90-15 Crop, Beef 145.25 As of June 30, 1990, four easement sales totalling 1017 acres were still being finalized. Of the 35 Agricultural Preservation Districts in Washington County, eight owners have sold Easements for a total of 2127.85 acres. Supplemental Programs to the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program were studied by a Committee appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. After considering many alternatives, the County Commissioners approved an Ordinance to provide tax Credits for Agricultural land in Washington County. The tax credit will begin January 1, 1991 and has created a lot FA of interest in the Agricultural community. A landowner who commits his property for a minimum of 10 years for agricultural use only will pay no County tax on Agricultural land or farm buildings and will be given up to 50% of the County tax on his house(s). SUMMARY AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT FY'90 BY PLANNING SECTOR �-Xwofzl;j TOTALS ACRES LOTS Sector I 15.5 14 Sector II 100.0 35 Sector III 65.3 16 Sector IV 7.6 3 Sector V 127.1 33 Sector VI 3.1 1 Total Acreage Converted 318.6 102 Total acreage of land subdivided for development = 1,769 Percentage of development occurring on agriculturally significant land = 18% WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT FOR PERIOD 07/01/89 THROUGH 06/30/90 PLANNING SECTOR 1 ELECTION ACRES NEW USE DISTRICT (AGRI. ACREAGE LOST) LOTS (TYPE OF DEV.) 02 3.9 4 SF 10 10.6 9 SF 27 1.0 1 IL TOTAL 15.5 14 PLANNING SECTOR 2 ELECTION ACRES NEW USE DISTRICT (AGRI. ACREAGE LOST) LOTS (TYPE OF DEV.) 06 6.0 2 SF 12 1.7 1 CM 12 19.5 3 SF 16 42.0 20 SF 19 29.2 8 SF 20 1.6 1 SF TOTAL 100.0 35 PLANNING SECTOR 3 ELECTION ACRES NEW USE DISTRICT (AGRI. ACREAGE LOST) LOTS (TYPE OF DEV.) 08 56.3 15 SF 11 9.0 1 SF OTAL 65.3 16 PLANNING SECTOR 4 ELECTION ACRES NEW USE DISTRICT (AGRI. ACREAGE LOST) LOTS (TYPE OF DEV.) 07 2.9 2 SF 14 4.7 1 SF TOTAL 7.6 3 10 PLANNING SECTOR 5 ELECTION ACRES NEW USE DISTRICT (AGRI. ACREAGE LOST) LOTS (TYPE OF DEV.) 04 21.9 15 SF 15 88.4 14 SF 23 16.8 4 SF TOTAL 127.1 33 PLANNING SECTOR 6 ELECTION ACRES NEW USE DISTRICT (AGRI. ACREAGE LOST) LOTS (TYPE OF DEV.) 05 3.1 1 SF COUNTY TOTAL 318.6 102 Funding is also a variable in determining which farms will enjoy permanent protection. The County Commissioners have agreed to commit locally collected Agricultural Transfer Taxes to the Preservation Program. An exact amount will not be specified until a later date. 11 SUMMARY AGRICULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT LAND CONVERTED TO DEVELOPMENT 1980 TO JUNE 39, 1990 24.2% of the land developed between 1980 and June 30, 1990 has been converted from agriculturally significant land. * Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning Commission's Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal year. 12 Total Developed Total Converted Acreage Lots Acreage Lots % Converted 1980 1,359.6 365 487.8 95 36.0 1981 1,137.1 332 251.3 59 22.0 1982 964.9 150 194.4 33 20.1 1983 895.3 220 305.6 127 34.1 1984 1,092.3 235 409.6 68 37.5 1985 1,144.6 231 439.8 65 38.4 1986 946.9 250 138.8 60 14.6 1987* 2,254.6 995 363.1 94 16.1 1989 1,714.8 770 301.3 86 17.5 1990 1,769.1 820 318.6 102 18.0 Total 13,279.2 4,368 3,210.3 789 24.2 24.2% of the land developed between 1980 and June 30, 1990 has been converted from agriculturally significant land. * Reporting period of 18 months was used to change the Planning Commission's Annual Report from a calendar year to a fiscal year. 12 Renewed Urban Growth Area Study In an effort to address changes in the community since the original adoption of the Urban Growth Area Study (UGA) in 1983, the City of Hagerstown Planning Commission and the Washington County Planning Commission have agreed to continue an on-going review within the UGA. The two Commissions formed a Committee in February 1989 and discussed the subjects of Eastern Boulevard, the development of a new Urban Growth Area Study, the Highway Interchange Study currently underway by the County and the need for the establishment of a UGA data base. The UGA Committee plans on completing in January 1991, the Eastern Boulevard report that addresses land use and the appropriateness of the current zoning along the corridor. The report will then be submitted to the County and City Planning Commissions. Two projects of special interest to the UGA are the Water and Sewer Study and the traffic network computer model. Both projects are also a combined County and City effort to develop these planning tools. The joint staffs of County and City Planning, the City Water and Sewer Departments, and the County's Sanitary District formed a Committee in August 1989 that developed a Request for Proposal and conducted a lengthy consultant selection process for a comprehensive 20 -year water and sewer needs study. The Committee 13 recommended BCM Engineers Inc. which was approved jointly by the Mayor and Council and the Board of County Commissioners. The study will contain 1) analysis of existing system capacities (plant facilities and associated infrastructure), 2) analysis of current loading, 3) load forecasting by population and geographic area, 4) delineation of service area boundaries, 5) planning and scheduling proposals for increased plant capacities, and b) an implementation plan. The Committee, during FY190, served as a resource; insured criteria and assumptions were correct; and evaluated interim progress and draft reports. The results of the study, scheduled to be completed in late FY 1591, will project the UGA infrastructure needs and formulate methods to provide them in the most cost-effective manner. The County and City Planning Departments, serving as staff for the County Commissioners/Metropolitan Planning Organization, have completed a major portion of phase one of a computerized traffic network project. During the first part of the project, a traffic network consisting of the major roadways within the UGA was identified and divided into transportation analysis zones; data relating to population, number of vehicles and commerce were assigned to these zones. 14 Douglas and Douglas, the consultant selected by the staff and approved by the MPO, gathered data relating to population and vehicles. The consultant will be responsible for inputting data and the traffic network into the software program known as QRS - II. Also to be completed through consultant services is phase two of the traffic model. in this phase the model is calibrated by performing an analysis between actual traffic counts and projected volumes generated by the model. The project will be financed through a transportation planning grant funded by the State and Federal Departments of Transportation. The program, to be completed in July 1991, will produce a computer model that will simulate traffic flow patterns, volume, speed and intra-UGA travel times. This program has great potential for analysis of both road improvement needs and the impact from proposed developments. 15 Solid Waste Management Plan A significant portion of the required biennial update of the Solid Waste Management Plan for the County was completed during FY190. The biennial update is prepared in accordance with the Code of Maryland Regulations and Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Annotated Code of Maryland. The purposes of the Plan are to establish the County's solid waste management policies and to develop comprehensive goals that are economical and environmentally sound to meet the future needs of the citizens of Washington County. The Plan consists of an introduction and six chapters. The primary information required in the Plan's chapters include: the County's goals and objectives regarding solid waste; County population; existing and projected waste generation entering County landfills; assessment of the County's existing solid waste disposal system; future pians for existing and proposed County landfills; and recommendations for accomplishing future solid waste goals. The updated Plan will be completed and presented to the Board of County Commissioners in the Fall of 1990. 16 In addition, due to increasing disposal cost and difficulties in siting landfills, it has become necessary for the community to investigate alternative methods of solid waste disposal. Frederick, Carroll, Howard and Washington Counties, in association with the Northeast Disposal Authority, have contracted Gershman, Brickner and Bratton, Inc. to perform a solid waste management study for the four -County region. This effort continues through FY 1990, and the results of the comprehensive study are due in early 1991. 17 Recycling Planning The 35 member Recycling Advisory Committee, appointed by the County Commissioners and coordinated by the Planning staff, met during the second quarter of FY 1990. The Committee developed twelve recommendations and policies for recycling in Washington County. Information and advice from the Committee, staff analysis of plans and data from other political jurisdictions and from the County's Model Recycling Program were used to formulate the Draft Recycling Plan. The Draft Plan was reviewed by the County Commissioners in February and submitted to the State in March 1990. After receipt of the Department of the Environment's comments and data from a survey of the County's private sector, the Plan was put into final form. The Recycling Plan addressed all items required by State legislation, including: 1. Description of the methods to reduce the solid waste stream. 2. Recyclable materials that will be separated. 3. The collection, processing and marketing strategy for the recyclable materials. 4. The feasibility of a system for the collection and composting of leaves. 5. Cost estimates and methods of financing the proposed recycling efforts. W The Plan also provides a detailed implementation schedule for the three phase program that should achieve at least a 20.5% recycling rate by 1994, 5.5% above that mandated by State law, and includes a listing of recycling businesses in the County. The Plan was forwarded to the County Commissioners for their review and adoption in July. HE Water and Sewerage Plan The required biennial update of the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan was completed during FY 1990. The draft updated Plan was presented at public hearing on January 16, 1990. The County Commissioners adopted the Plan as presented on January 23, 1990. On June 26, 1990 the Maryland Department of the Environment notified the County that the updated Plat was approved by the MDE as required by Section 9-507 of the Environment Article of State Law. The next Plan review and update must be completed by January 16, 1991. In addition to completing the biennial update, the Planning Commission staff reviewed applications for six amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan during FY 1990. An explanation of those amendments follows. WS -90-1 was submitted by the Horn Property Partnership for a proposed new development called Antietam Valley Overlook, a 402 lot residential subdivision on 354.7 acres located off of MD Route 62 north of Chewsville. The requested amendment was to expand the water service area for Chewsville and to assign a water service priority designation of W-5 to the subject property. It was found that due to the location of the proposed project outside of the Growth Area, the amendment request was not consistent with the Comprehensive plan and was disapproved by the County Commissioners on March 13, 1990. WS -90-2 was submitted by Charles Milburn, developer of a proposed campground called Mt. Roundtop to be located on a 203 acre property located along Seavolt Road. The requested amendment was to create a new multi -use water and sewerage system along with a water and sewerage service area and to assign service priority designations of W-3 and S-3 to the site. Review of this request was proceeding as of the end of FY 1990. WS -90-3 was submitted by Continental Investment Corporation for a proposed 1,095 lot residential subdivision on 577 acres near the intersection of Maryland Route 65 and Route 58 at Lappans Crossroads. The requested amendment was to expand the existing water and sewer service area and to assign appropriate service priority designations to the subject property. On March 22, 1990, the applicant requested that this request be tabled. 21 WS -90-4 was submitted by Lester Mason for the purpose of extending public water service to three, 5 acre lots located off of General Stuart Court near the Town of Sharpsburg. The requested amendment was to expand the existing water service area and to assign a water service priority designation of W-3 to the approved amendment with the condition that no more than one dwelling unit per 5 acre existing lot of record be allowed. It was found that the application approved with those conditions was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. WS -90-5 was submitted by the Washington County Sanitary District for the purpose of providing water and sewer service to approximately 50 acres of property along Highrock Road, southwest of the Village of Pen Mar. The requested amendment was to expand the Pen Mar water and sewer service area and to assign priority designations of W-3 and S-3 to the subject properties. Review of this amendment request was proceeding as of the end of FY 1990. WS -90-6 was submitted by Mansoor Shaool to extend public water and sewerage service to serve a proposed 531 lot residential subdivision on approximately 300 acres located along the north side of Mt. Aetna Road. The requested amendment was to expand the existing water and sewerage service area and to assign appropriate service priority designations to the subject property. Review of this amendment request was proceeding as of the end of FY 1990. 22 Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance The Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance continued to be a major effort in the Planning Department in fiscal year 1990 with a lead role taken by the Chief of the Division of Planning and Codes Administration. The Planning staff concentrated on three areas after completing a proposed Draft in fiscal year 1989. These areas included the fine tuning of the Ordinance to address concerns of the County Commissioners and the general public, public review meetings, and preparation for implementation. With the increase in development activity and subsequent burdens on public facilities, the Board of County Commissioners faces increasing pressure to fund capital facility improvements, specifically improvements to existing roads, schools and water and sewerage systems to support new development. The Board has determined that an appropriate alternative would be to require that affected public facilities be adequate prior to further development approval. If not, it would be the developer's responsibility to make the necessary infrastructure improvements. This is the heart of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. 23 The proposed Ordinance follows closely the subdivision and site plan review procedures now in effect. It delegates approval or disapproval authority to the Planning Commission based on the service providing agency's determination of whether the subject facility is adequate or not. The facilities included are County roads, public schools and all forms of water and sewerage systems. There is also a requirement for interim fire protection systems in areas where public water is not yet available. There are provisions to allow the developer to make the necessary improvements to bring the facility up to a minimum standard in order to gain development approval. There are also measures to permit paybacks by future developers who may benefit from or utilize the improved facility. Much subjectivity in the determinations of adequacy is removed by specifying the agency which has the responsibility to determine projected demands on the infrastructure and the standards to be used. The Ordinance is scheduled for consideration during the first half of FY 1991. 24 Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit Ordinance The Planning staff continued to contribute to a multi- departmental effort, development of a Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit Ordinance. The proposed Ordinance is intended to produce a larger volume of affordably priced homes in the community. It is modeled after a successful document already in place in Montgomery County, Maryland. In very general terms, a Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit Ordinance would specify situations where a developer must provide a certain percentage of his new units in a "moderately priced" range. These units would then be made available, possibly through a lottery, to pre -qualified buyers meeting specific income guidelines. Due to the complexity of the task which includes minimum amenity standards, income eligibility guidelines, land use implementation measures and administration on several levels, an acceptable Ordinance was not produced in fiscal year 1990. The project continues. 25 Hancock. Town Growth Area The Hancock Town Growth Area Committee completed its effort in the middle of the fiscal year with adoption of a Draft Committee Report in January 1990. The Committee, comprised of representatives from the Hancock Town Council and Planning Commission and the County Planning Commission and staff, was charged with evaluation of a multitude of factors that effect growth in the community. These include water and sewerage systems, road networks, school systems, potential industrial sites, landfill capacity, existing topographic conditions, and available land. Based on all of these factors, the Committee set a tentative Growth Area Boundary within which the Town and County would intend to encourage growth. The Report documents the Committee's activities and identifies factors which tend to inhibit growth in the identified area. The Report also makes recommendations to overcome these obstacles and suggests agencies and individuals who may be responsible to address the concerns. Following the Committee's adoption of the Report, it was processed through the Hancock and Washington County Planning Commissions, Hancock Mayor and Council and the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County. The Report was approved at all levels with a final approval date of May 1, 1990. 4.1 Clear Spring is the last of the towns originally identified in the Comprehensive Plan to undertake a Growth Area Study. 27 House Numbering The house numbering project being implemented by the Planning Department is a comprehensive effort designed to provide every home and business with a number for quick emergency service and uniform mail delivery. This involves two full-time staff members with office support in a process which assigns addresses to every dwelling, enters data base into a computer, and prints out a notification letter to the property owner. In addition, the staff prepares maps especially designed for the program and distributes them to all fire and rescue companies and central communications. This project continues to be a major time consuming endeavor but worth the effort. The project is approximately sixty percent (60%) completed. The response from the community and the emergency and postal services has been very encouraging. During this fiscal year the Hancock, Big Pool, and Clear Spring Postal Districts were finalized and approximately 40% of the work for the Hagerstown Postal District was completed. Other districts which have already been completed include Boonsboro, Cascade, Knoxville, Keedysville, and Sharpsburg. W. Park Planning As in previous years, park planning in FY11990 encompassed a variety of projects and tasks. Concept plan development for the long proposed County Agricultural Center was a priority task during this period. Concept plans were prepared for two sites located at the University of Maryland Western Maryland's Education and Research Farm located along Maryland Route 65 south of Hagerstown. Following several meetings of the Agricultural Center Development Committee which included on-site visits, the final Ag Center concept plan was presented to the public in September. The concept was then included in the development report proposal submitted to the University of Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station. Initial development on the site is anticipated in 1991. Other park planning assignments included evaluation of a State owned historic site located in the Hancock vicinity as a possible addition to the County Park's system and evaluation of the old Williamsport landfill near Pinesburg. The closed -out landfill is now the location of three league operated softball fields and has been offered as a donation by the Town to the County for a park. It was concluded that due to potential liability, the land offer should be subject to careful and cautious consideration. 29 Assistance was provided to the Mayor and Council of Williamsport by updating and revising a previously prepared concept plan for Byron Park. The new plan showed scale relationships of planned improvements including expanded parking for the swimming pool and little league fields, as well as new entrance roads on the east and west sides of the park. Additional tasks included coordinating installation of water and sewer connections in a new subdivision adjacent to the final development phase of Marty Snook County Park and assisting the management of a moderate income apartment complex in the Halfway area. A site improvement plan and cost estimate for the apartment complex was prepared outlining suggested landscaping, pathways and play equipment to better serve the large number of children residing there. 30 Historic District Commission The Washington County Historic District Commission made significant progress in its efforts to further the cause of historic preservation. In fiscal 190, the major accomplishment was approval of an Ordinance to give property tax credits to owners who rehabilitate historic structures according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Ordinance became effective on July 1, 1990. The Commission spent more than one year in development of the Ordinance that also allows tax credits to qualified owners inside the municipalities throughout Washington County. Ten percent of the expense to rehabilitate an historic structure or five percent of the cost of new construction attached to an existing qualified building can be deducted from the property owner's property taxes. A credit can be spread out over as many as five tax years. The Historic District Commission also participated in the expansion of the preliminary consultation process conducted by the Planning Commission. A Network of interested and knowledgeable individuals was identified to review development proposals that contain sites listed on Washington County's Historic Sites Survey. Information on the site from the historic perspective is provided to the developer in an effort to educate and possibly better integrate historic sites into development proposals. 31 The Historic District Commission also completed and submitted in April 1990 a Certified Local Government application to the Maryland Historic Trust. Achieving Certified Local Government status, which must be approved by the Trust, provides State recognition of the expertise of local Commissions and allows participation in the National Register nomination process. It also provides eligibility for additional funds from the State for survey and education projects. Interspersed with these efforts to develop a more comprehensive historic preservation program in Washington County, the Historic District Commission continued several forms of development review. With the authority assigned to it through adoption of the Antietam Overlay in June 1989, the Historic District Commission reviewed several significant development proposals located in the Antietam Overlay Zone in fiscal 190. Antietam Station, located in the AO -2 Zone, along the south side of Maryland Route 34 west of Sharpsburg, is a 20,000 square foot commercial complex. After two workshops and a field trip, the design received Commission approval in January 1990. On the opposite side of Maryland Route 34 from Antietam Station, the Sharpsburg Pharmacy received design approval in April 1990. In FY190 only one new dwelling in the Antietam Overlay Zone was subject to review by the Commission. 32 The Commission also continued its review of demolition permits. A few structures, most notably 'The Store' in the Antietam Ironworks Village, have at least delayed demolition due to the information provided to the owner by the Historic District Commission. Although several structures listed on the Survey have been demolished in spite of the Commission's effort to evaluate and propose alternatives, many have been dismantled rather than demolished, and the parts salvaged for other restoration projects throughout the County. This includes the Shindle farmhouse removed to construct the new terminal at the Washington County Regional Airport. 33 Significant Developments Development proposals were reviewed by the Planning Commission in both concept and final form. The Commission reviewed and approved 176 subdivision plats involving 820 new lots that converted 1,769 acres for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional uses. In addition, the Commission or staff approved 34 site plans, 46 simplified plats and held 44 preliminary consultations concerning proposed future development. Some of those conceptual forms have not resulted in a firm design while others have proceeded through final approval. The following is a summation of those applications of particular significance to the community that achieved final approval status. Residential Development: Brightwood Acres East, Section D On September 15, 1989, Final Plat approval was granted for the subdivision. The development is located along the north side of Mt. Aetna Road adjoining Sections B and C that have previously been approved. The subdivision consists of 52 single-family detached lots approximately .5 acres each. Public water and a low pressure sewer system will serve the new section. New public roads constructed to County standards will provide access to the development. 34 Fairway Meadows On April 11, 1990, Final Plat approval was granted for Section B. Lots 21 through 60. The development is located along the south side of Mt. Aetna Road adjacent to the Blackrock Golf Course and Washington County Regional Park. The subdivision will Create 40 single-family detached lots on 19 acres. The lots will be served by public water and sewer and accessed by new County roads. Fountain Head Meadows Section III On October 26, 1990, Final Plat approval was granted for 32 lots. The development is located along the south side of Longmeadow Road between Sections I and II that have previously been approved. This subdivision will create duplexes with one unit per lot. Public water and sewer will be utilized as well as the construction of new County roads for access. Garden Spot Section H On February 26, 1990, Final Plat approval was granted for the subdivision. The development is located along Bluebell Drive within the existing Garden Spot subdivision. This subdivision will create 25 single-family detached lots with a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. All lots will have access onto Bluebell Drive and be served by public water and sewer. 35 Parkview Meadows On July 29, 1989, Final Plat approval was granted for the subdivision. The site is located along the east side of Bower Avenue just south of Cloverleaf Road. The subdivision, with Residential Urban zoning, will create 100 single-family detached lots with a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The lots will be served by public water and sewer as well as a new public street system. Robins Glen Sections A, B, and C On October 27, 1989, Final Plat approval was granted. The development is located on the east side of Robinwood Drive just south of Hagerstown Junior College. The subdivision will consist of 171 townhouse units at a density of 8.55 dwelling units per acre. The site will be served with public water and sewer. Access will be provided by a road network of both public and private streets. 36 Residential Site Plans: College Heights On June 4, 1990, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located along the east side of Robinwood Drive just north of Sunrise Boulevard. The site, which is a part of the Youngstoun PUD, will create seven 12 unit apartment buildings for a total of 84 units on 8.8 acres. The site will be served by public water and sewer with a private drive and parking areas. Robinwood Section IIx On November 13, 1989, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located at the end of Youngstoun Drive. The development will consist of four buildings with a total of 72 apartment units. The site will be accessed by a single entrance to Youngstoun Drive. Public water and sewer will be provided for this development. Commercial/Industrial Site Plans: Ametek On December 13, 1989, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located along Jamison Court in the Washington County Business Park. This site will contain a 116,000 square foot foam manufacturing plant and will utilize public water and sewer. 37 Citicorp Building II On October 2, 1990, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located in the southeast quadrant of State Line Road and I-81. Access to the 136,000 square foot office building will be off of State Line Road and Henson Boulevard. Public water and sewer service will be provided by existing lines that serve Citicorp Building I. Citicorp Child Care Center On February 5, 1990, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located at the rear of the existing Citicorp Building I. The site will consist of a 10,000 square foot child daycare center with estimated weekday hours of operation from 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. The site will be served by public water and sewer. Access will be via existing drives serving the Citicorp complex. Foxshire Plaza On October 2, 1989, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located along the west side of the Dual Highway just east of Howell Road. The 3.9 acre site will consist of 45,000 square feet of retail/office space and 2,200 square feet of branch bank space. The site will be served with public water and sewer. Access will be from the Dual Highway only. W] Jefferson Cheese On May 7, 1990, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located between I-70 and Warfordsburg Road near Hancock. The proposal is to renovate the existing structure and construct an additional 2,300 square foot building for a cheese processing plant. The 54.5 acre site will be accessed by an existing private drive off Warfordsburg Road. Maryland Paper Company On July 10, 1989, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located along the south side of Elliott Parkway in the 70/81 Industrial Park. The site will consist of a paper mill open seven days a week, 24 hours per day and will employ approximately 52 persons. The site will be served by public water and sewer. Sealy Mattress Company On November 6, 1989, Site Plan approval was granted. The 136,000 square foot bedding manufacturing plant is located on a 14 acre lot along the north side of Elliott Parkway. Public water and sewer will serve this site with a combined entrance/exit access onto Elliott Parkway. 39 Public/Institutional: Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant On December 14, 1989, Site Plan approval was granted. The site is located in the 70/81 Industrial Park with access onto Elliott Parkway. The new plant, with the Sanitary District's new administrative office, is designed to treat 2.5 mgd. Washington County Regional Airport Terminal On February 4, 1990, Site Plan approval was granted. The new 20,000 square foot terminal will be located on the north side of Showalter Road, 2,000 feet east of 1-81. The access will have a circular pattern with ample parking. The site will be served with public water and sewer. 40 Rezoning Cases Between July 1, 1989 and June 30, 1990, the Planning Commission acted on twenty-six applications. Fourteen of these were map amendments, and twelve were for text amendments. Joint hearings with the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners are being held regularly on a quarterly cycle or special hearings are called in order to provide for efficiency in the hearing process. A listing of the Planning Commission's recommendations and the Board's actions for the cases heard in fiscal year 1990 are as follows: CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION RZ-419 John R. Map 52.0 A to RS App'd App'd Oliver Co. RZ-420 Charles Map 482.0 IM to A App'd App'd Milburn RZ-421 Planning Text Section 6.1(x) App'd App'd Commission RZ-422 Planning Text Section 22.54(b) App'd App'd Commission RZ-423 Planning Text Section 17.7(c) App'd App'd Commission RZ-424 Planning Text Section 17.7(e) App'd App'd Commission RZ-425 Planning Text Section 5.1(k) App'd App'd Commission RZ-426 Planning Text Section 6.1(w) App'd App'd Commission 41 CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION RZ-427 Planning Text Section 28.701, App'd App'd Commission RZ-428 John R. Map Oliver Co. RZ-429 Planning Text Commission RZ-430 Maurice Map Johnson RZ-431 Victor Map Cushwa RZ-432 Hub Labels Map RZ--433 Mid Map Atlantic Properties RZ-434 Mid Map Atlantic Properties RZ-435 Helen Map Bricker RZ-436 Stamper Map Construction RZ-437 Board of Text County Commissioners RZ-438 Board of Text County Commissioners RZ-439 John R. Map Oliver Co. RZ-440 Planning Text Commission 27.1, 28.381, 27.2, and 27.3 8.0 C to A Denied Denied Section 405.11B, App'd App'd 405.11.G and 202.50 .322 RU to BG App'd App'd A to IM App'd App'd A to BT Denied App'd 28.36 A to RS Withdrawn 79.22 A to RS Withdrawn 86.92 A to PUD Withdrawn 50.24 A to RR App'd App'd Section 28.0 App'd App'd Section 5.2 Tied Denied Vote 1.0 A to BL App'd App'd Section 22.21 App'd App'd 42 CASE APPLICANT TYPE OF ACREAGE REQUEST COMMISSION BOARD AMENDMENT ACTION ACTION RZ-441 Board of Text Section 28.23 Denied Denied County Commissioners RZ-442 Hub Labels Map 3.86 BT to BL Denied App'd RZ-443 Cavetown Map 8.044 RR to IG Denied App'd Planning Mill RZ-444 Paul Map 122.78 RS to PUD App'd App'd Crampton 43 Board of Zoning Appeals Statistics Granted Denied Withdrawn Void Total Variances 111 126 Special Exceptions 35 43 Expansion of Non -conforming Use 10 11 Change of Non -conforming use 6 No Show 9 5 1 3 4 1 Administrative Error 2 Planning Commission Ruling 1 1 163 14 9 1 2' Total Number of Appeals: 189 44 45 SUBDIVISICNS 8Y PLANNING SECTOR PROGRAM 4 P1344C =OR PERIOD 07/01/39 THRU 06/3C/90 DELVELO€MENT PLATS SECTOR/TYPE N0, OF T43TAL AVERAGE SIZE NO, OF SU3DI- AVERAGE SIZE LOTS ACREAGE 3F LCT VISION PLATS OF SUBDIVISION SECTOR 0 (A) RESICENTIAL 1 3.3 3.30 1 3.301 SECTOR 1 (A) RESICENTIAL 519 296.3 .57 49 6.05 (8) COMMERCIAL 5 33.4 3.57 4 8.35 (C) INDUSTRIAL 3 25.8 R.60 3 8.67 (0) I,NSTITUTIONAL 2 S.9 2.95 2 2.95 SECTOR 2 (A) RESICENTIAL 145 699.8 4.83 39 17.94 (3) COMMERCIAL 1 1.7 1.77 1 1.70 SECTOR 3 (A) RESICENTIAL 51 266.1 5.22 19 14.01 SECTOR 4 (A) RESIDENTIAL 21 85.9 4.09 13 6.61 SECTOR 5 (A) RESICENTIAL 63 294.8 4.68 38 7.76 SECTOR 6 IA) RESIDENTIAL 3 56.1 7.011 7 3.01 TOTAL 820 1,769.1 2.16 176 17.05 45 -y V> --t .r .-I (T .-n .y .ti N W a .-..-I -r G .-1 N N tl1 N ... .-. cC7 •--1 -+ M --1 ..-1 .-� .-i .-i Tv .r re N ,-+ .-1 N r-+ .. N C) N .-1 .-+ O r'1 .-e .. F- o S M N 0 O J 4 F - Q W ✓1 L7 Z M w 2 Z Z W C L } J Y } Y } } >• Y >- Y } } } } Y Y J } } Y } } } r } Y } } Y } } } } } } J >- a a J 0. J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Q J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a J C] HW H M H H M H W H iii M W i -N H H H W >TI W H W H H W hi H I^I H FK W W W W Z W J f ix J E J S x S f f Y L i S Z i J J Z S x O x J z Z Z Z. 2- Z i x 2 m z m z 2 2, f F J U x W d O a c a a 4 '4 4 4 a a Q c a G 4.m a a a H w 4 Q d 4-z 4 +S 4 G 4 C Q Q a w c a K a W 4 > LL LL tis lar H Ls LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL tL H H LL LL LL LL H LL LL LL W LL LL LL tL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL H r iL W � Lr Ua 7 U U 7 W J H W x r w W W x W W W W W x W W W tr w X W W W r W LX W W W lit W W W W W W W LL' W LW LL' W L 7 r W J Ln J W V) J J J W J J J J J i j J J J .+.I o W J J J ;-+ J W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J ,_) J Lo W J LL t..7' >- O I_) J z) 0 0 Lp J CO to L, (7 Ll J LO f-') ID S O J t L!) 4D I- LO 7. (-, L_'1 C7 t') u L!7 c, ct 17 t^ LJ t9 C) L-9 L? L m r C, O Z O P Z CL C1 Z Z Z a Z Z Z Z Z a Z Z 2' 'Z Cl a Z Z Z vt Z X Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M 0 Z F -f r Z W D Z H i--1 F m H W H) W n Fr H W O Z a H 1 H Z W o H H H H H W H .-i- H- H H- H �-i H Q Z W W N H Ln o W Vn i./1 V) 0 V) Ln o o o o V) o Vr J H d N In N H V1 U Ln L) Vl V) J7 V) N N Ln In N Vt V. U) VI V) 'n U H N d X Z LL LL LL X LL LL LL t:l_ LL X LL U_ LL Z Z X W L, ia_ J LL Z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL F J L, r Vl W 0 0 H N 0 V) C Y V) N 0 V: Cl V) N N V H C V: V? of H 0 V N V; LA ✓1 Ln In 0 0 N V) V) V� V) Vl V) Vl V: U H Vt w Z LJ V) J +±- J c W •3 -a::, W V) >7 0 W .•. o ff U H U H Q 4 H Q C tY � Q b. Q EY c r C rL W cz V f- tA) ✓' C) S? N 'A F P P Cl c` G C. r- J F-1 .-1 N --I --1 :V {] ""1 (V .-y La U C] --1 :.J N .y .r ry N L. 0 i_. W .-a 04 ^' .-+ C) W r o In U O > N 0 O C Z) F .-, J ti .� 'f L U J Mme' U d: U~ v1 G ^' C) J I •-t L_ 1 L, L::a r J C 7 r- c. .ti ca U c I J U Q I ✓) rX '1 Y ..-I 7 0 O t` iT rj :.1 =7 :J LL -r .� .-+ I "`) J 2 .--1 J H H Ln N x N Z �# J L:, n Q V: S W J .--� L Ls J L' .--1 F- I- 4 cn Z O }^ W N h N 4 N .--' 2 • t r r r U rt H �' T F-- G N C J N til O ut F H L! H V1 J J N .-r G O .r V) N 3 Z h J ?_ ry o G O Vi✓, a .-s C G J I"' Z 7 H a I� ca J J r 7 e ✓) W O E J ..I J " is r N :n S s Ln. r O O U CJ V) C r L .+ LL U C'1 u j. ~ E.L' L --' U L r V! L J r r Q J F .. J c 7 w J �-+ O J C o b LL w V, VI Ln r-- f- S 7 J c., r[ ' ,� L.. O O I_ 7 J a 7 Q Z V) F- .I W J H V) o O -..I w w. ..1 O d' J J S. S H U J _! OV) Q r a �LLr L*1 ✓) x W [-2[�Ja r PPO, Pp p P P p P pP pP 00P+a pP POOO-P p P P 0'PP P M O' p C a P C) T O. O p P P OO =w m w P P m m P m Pw PMP Pm V OaCCCP PmmP P PmP m W P PmMCI, P N J W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a F Nh N U7 r- Qh MU,Z PHP-rC, Nrn 0 P N N -r N b h N h h N ILl O mh aD mh l.- NPNM O O a U C] O N S S h O M T N h m H N Q, - 1 S O N H N N O, -t W W O -• p P M m M M M h N PCD -r 7 N W N M w0. O --- 000-0000 0000000 W OOOHL:lp oo--e W OQOp 000000pp WOOQ L.0 CL w # a c a CL U Ln Q p W h- i aD Z, O P N N .7 W MD .D M= OT P z Q u g p z O r -0, N O t- O O LO 7 M O M P d • r • s r r • • • • a • • • • • r f • • • • r • -+ p N W -+ W M h M m 1+'1 N +D In w- P N " .D M O z H to Z .D 7 Z N 0 N .D N H H M H M M N N W .D .-' M N --1 N N — -+ VI M n O fK Ch VY # W H W H H •D W W M N p_- N W h N (7' N H M N r+ .-a M W H -r .-i W Y1 Q H r N H H 'D In M H Ln Lil H H W N H r -f --i ?r( z h N N W Z) .--i to J J W 7 O Ln- e -i IP H W M N W W W %` P N .--' M N ,-e .--� M— H .�-, r1 M Q W .-t N M W 'D In M Ln H V', H H �-i N ,--' W H Ln F- ey h N In H H -.t ly H kn J Li tx P \ t- r- O U U M w w N Vn O O L7 Lf) z Z H r+ � a•- z z a z z z i w a a t- f r r r r r r r a J r r r r r r r s r r s• r r r r r r r> r r r r r r r} r r r r r r a r J J J J a -J-J..J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Q. O W ri H W M W H WH H H H H H H N s -t W H L --S H 1�1 H H W W H H W M W W W H F{ H H H H H W H ri U J 2 S S i J f L Z a i 1 Z'L 1: i I z f f i f f S L f i Y f i S 2 i Z i z F 1 x z m 2- >, cs w c L,J c a c w¢ a et c a p a¢ c c a c a a a a 4 a a a c a a a a a c a c a a c a a a 4 a a a a a m\ } LL VI LL w w to LL W w LL LL LL LL ti LL L- LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL ILL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 4_ W J 7 U wU L) LJOwx W wO wIM LL) UlLL) J ww W Ll W wwwwwW w uj w w w W LLJ w w L'i w W wwLLlw W wki 41 Ww W 43 J\ J z J w J J S J w J J J <t J J J J J J J -j-iJ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J -j-iJ H 1- LL L,7 Z L'1 J L,D LD z LD 7- LD LD L� F-- Zf L7 L'1 C7 u, LO CO LD LJ LiD CD LD ED L7 U L:7 C-1' 0 a t_D L'-7 U' L L7 L'7 L_9 U' :D t.!) L Lrh to LD LD (✓ Li M O z a Z a Z z 3 z x7Z z z O Z Z Z Z z z z z 7_ Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z z z z Z z z z H O H;�; W 4-L O •-L O M W H F- Yid H W W H W H H W H H W H H W M F -I H M — — W M H F -d W H— H 4 M W F1 1 H ztil N 1- 0 O N InI- N U to ✓1 N ,ll 0 Vl Vn 0 0 'l f 0 VS 0 Ln 0 V) to to 00 V) 'n N 0 to N N V7 VL Ln N VI in 0 t/1 VI O ^: (J_ W O } w x w X LL LL m LL m LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Lk LL LL LL Vf r< N Vl 1- V) n N N F- VI U N N N V' VI N N Vl N Vf N ill V] VI 0 VS N N N N U) Vt V1 LA VI 0 VI 0 VI V/ V, Ln V: N V) Lr V V' ra � � w t -J 2 U I � F- 73 U. Z o S W r,( N C U r Lal VL T �] N M 11 N ID t"'1 :I- N M M C� CK N 'n N nJ ,--I O' U fJ P G N :\i G (T 'D iJ .� -+ ^,,, N �D -tel .H LL; ? CT S J H C1 .ti F3 .--r "'' C.7 N H N C7 f'J L2 LJ N H .--I Li Li L7 I :.J }^ W LO W i CD G J L- 4i r -w 4 M U I- ✓1 CL .p -v a ^', N O s W U .+ z w O LLJ V1 F- J U I w ifl .-+ li Lala .-r LJ - F- F- Z F- =" m 1 J W .--i r<7 ^U F J S w ~ H W W z— Z F- W L7 Y0 CJ U L^ a G w 4 O J V1 J ,--� J UJ O s C' O N m S J J Li H Lr J n d W a cn r O --1 W '�.I L !aJ x0 O h 4 C H V1 LL' J C3 1 tl+ J G L v7 ,,J X {- V) F V J :C r` I C v 41 V J r I J Vl !r O LD M �i - J fl ✓' N W K N O N C' J U w O H J V N Z V F H 5J h C- J 0 a 0 'n G J a J J 2 Awa Jaf-I-,NJ aw ¢t)L+J JC.JG JLL ILJ JF -I -t vsS NE F -J 'r, 0, In +D La JVI J iJ V� W U, J LL F- _-DcT G F- F- C J W L w V w w LK LT L,J w w C7 1 - L'S a z J 2 O O n H Cr a ne 1- K �7 C L.'1 1- w F F- } J 7 T_ F- u w F- LJ J F.Y Ln 7 r 0 :Y z J :D Q S H W u J LL' Ll F- w F- a Z Z Y-� 7. Y O c ^' £- J n K :� ,K. V1 LD Z O r J U Z J a Z U} 3 a C3 Ll Vr a'. C3 LL J r S O r o LJ W 2 ►- a z w J I --t F- L7 W a w z Ln en a zU W w a a Z w J a w 0 U IBJ a O O a Y J m f-- V) 4 C 2 iD w -100 a 3 C w O C w w a Y D J CL !v Y J C'1 .T } L7 's 0 r -C n 7 n m U a J I f_J 7 -5 D M 3-3 G.J Z W Y -1 .-j J r x 7 Cr L7 W C :D st J 1-- O G F� a U w O 4 Ir a C a 0 7 0 H u[ w 7 U H 0 Li w i m r- a O J L- W Z o ,�j p •A O a s r z J a r- 2 z Y 7 w W W LA x Z w J 3; a m r a~f :7 "- w a U J V) +4 J 1- A L m u F- (i U V l'J J}� w a J a a r w VI w w J v) N -, .J Z J¢ U J WL� W Ln w J '.J W J F 2 w V1 w W N W p p a `--I J If V, F_ x I W W Z V> X w ,..J r a a J S W J 3 ul 0: Z a 2 w F- U- W '--i Y LL LD z J H J Y >- L- N a a Ll. H '.1 J 'D T 4 w J F- N J w z z 1- i f V) Lr1 m C G a l i 3 uJ In J z -i H F- t) LL p a r w Y 'w a LL I- LL LL 0.I-- a J Z F- 4 0 } p 0 -j-tU O O C O f CL Y -I 0 S m 1 -0 a a W r -L U z z w O a w O a a g W" w w w a a J � d a w W" o o a M L H F- I- 2 2 0 <.7 n If Ln :A ut to H I- 3 3 3 Z J J 'r Y Z rr Lr Of Z rY V) h LA N 0 V1 1,- z a H P Lw Z >- .-i W --' H W .-e H W --r -+ -r .--I fJ N LN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LV C z U CC a ! 0. J1 3. 47 aOaOT Viol0000a Oa Oao•OOv'0T OOa OolaP(11,a•aaPQOOP 0UQ15-1 mo' m0, m mm CPI a01wc mol w w 01 ol m (31 mmo'mc mmo�mmmmmCo, a•m 0�moam M J W \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Z \ \ \ \ 4N FL' .-NM M F N 0 S N m N IA n 0 ID m N H H M U: w N 0 m N M n 1 .0 .p T IFI F aMHM M. Q M0 M H N -+O Q'+QNN N.+ H H 0 NM. --f O0N Q Ho H.-[ N.r .r .--I .rN H p .-IMI M 0 C; \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a HNNSO H m N Ln? o' N m to O O x x maAN?LR f- NNm mN 000H - LnfT NOSm L.J n. -+0 HO.r .rG C]G p0C3PaHtiQQ OOHQOO OHoO HH.1H.+OOoO O.+0 C7 0 a w # # CL U NOa t - In [n m.s M O N m a• O 10 O.+ Ln m Mme. --i MN LA Ln o, MP 701M 01 CV T N[P)a Lo H M� P M mM m!! 4 N S -10 4 LA .-[N N F L✓1 M C H H M H N .-r N Ln .0 N N H m A F N O IL L7 Ln # # H H o N .-I O .-+ l(1 rL [i7 H H H H N .-� .-� N r --� H H N .M 7 F •+ r• N H H N r1 rI N N H v0 H N rl M H W H H H 7 w Liz N D N C, N - H .-+ J LW LL Lr z a o 0 o \ r H H0 U U U M W w w \ to W n ID G l7 LD L:U Z z H H z 2 z a! z z z L t W 4 a J 0. J J J J CL J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J d CLO H H H H H H H H H H- H H H H H H H H H H H H 2 LX Ji Z 2 L S Z Z T- z 3_ x E >E S i Z f� >-m "J 4 d 4 z 4 O a a 4 4 a C d 4 Q a,x d d d a d d Q Q O m\ LL LL LL H w LL LL Lx LL k LL LL LL LL LL LL. LL Ll LL LL LL L� LL LL LL LL w U w l7 © W W W Lr w J w W W LLJ w W w W [J LLI w W W w w LJ La: LJ w J J\ J J J tJ J 4 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a H f- 1, L� L7 LD Z Ln t- U Lh U) L.7 L7 V) 0 0 [✓ L7 0 L_D L" L7 L, f7 0 0 L^. F - LL G O z L T_ Z p 2 2 z z Z ZH z z z 7 2 z ?_ L 7 z 7 2 Z O �+ H H Q H H H H H H H H H H H r• -L H +-� H H H H H M 1- z J L" V, to U 0 N V1 V) JI Zn 0 0 LA zn [n N L/) Ln Ln O 0 a. h -I V Y l>_ LL L♦_ 1� LL Lr_ LL LL Lr LL LL LL LL LL w LL Z> LL LL L. LL LL U - L/1 L/1 .. H Ln xn Ln U to U1 rn N 0 V: W N m N W N V Vk N r_n V: L') N Or M r H Cl. V I 2' V W H � Lv 2 in U U U 4 U V V U U N Cl- lJ r m m x xf 71 CD T f[- J r✓ N U C] H H t"C) U r; V Ci 0 V CJ H N C M r.3 I J ✓, J ^J ry H V C' N H LL Lr.t C w V V'f H N E`er N wI^- H .n 7- t- _^ H H J J J Cl- U c J LTJ LI 7 H f- J H rn )n = £� H H H s ✓� H C7 :K O H>r.� i.1 H O: F-.0 H r w O N 0 Y} I U J ✓` J O H �- U, J I J L.> LLi W Q3 ✓' ^ JJ J F- 0 H t^ C, J J R N taJ H H � H y >w 2 W z Y J 00 r;r Q H W w Lt J T (Y L_f W H 0 L-, LL� U H ✓� Y J «) d O J= Q C) 0- :D J J J Lnz w-0 Q x iin z ULL'C Y Z n- Ow. it'r V) Q Ul J L z 4 W w H J H H W H - H IA . 'JI Z d 7 N '--! 17 a. J J LL Y J U LL L, 1_7 M S JJ ..J J G z Z 1-i !I,- W `- X 4 s H H LL U H J W CJ 0 z O Q d? ,Y Y Ce C J V d 4 a H ) ,O In 0 O J w :7 d U W d J ^i 0 2 J r H H O O O L� 3 3 3 OnM S Y X 0. ft -'-L CJ zir L,N N✓I 733 J} z s H O Z H N N :\ N {fir M; M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O 2 U C ¢ Lt a J 'l) LL 48 UL C V W ;!1 [a L H z z d } T T Y } } } } } Y } Y > J Y > } } J J J J J J J J J J J J J (L J J J J H H H i -i H W H H H H H H H H H H N g E i S f S 7E i i Z .'L Z LL 1 1 2 i Q4 d C 0 d d 4 C t, LL w LL Lr_ LL LL w w IJ_ Lr.. 1i ti tL LL LL L1 LL w 4 W W w w W W w J W w W J w uJ L.1 L» J J J J J J J J J J J J J d J J J J h U7 U L7 0 [-!) LD 0 M U7 LJ L7 H l^ L n U' U 7_ Z Z z z Z T_ Z z z Z Z v o Z Z Z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H F- L -1 L'7 0 V7 to In r! [n N L7 N LL W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Lt_ L< LL LL [n 1 v? N N VI [n cn L ) 'n N V7 to Ln V! O [J C -Y H H .--r ci .-. Cl C L U, N h N J N .? N H 0- -- .. n Ln M .� M H s ao CJ •. a H n- O H a H!3 OH din LA -J oa Lo 1 V' HH oJ�.ry JHH JUL ��� J O J r C7 C) J 4 CC J J Z t.J C1i ¢ar.J wW J a od w Z J J H W fY a 2 N V O P L'1 m m IY z 4 d a Ll tr J iu J 2 H cL Z �' Cc J 4 J J J J a d w Ln Z 2 ✓> ;r] Ct CG w<V u 7 s[r a} 2tY s wLJ r -a s_r wW �awL.lw u1W zz U 3d ti .-t U _J J 3 x 7 N J d o OW d H H w O a w 0 z d 7� ro a0 U 0 Y i F X Z Z VI 3 3 4 d z JZ:�? S? S 0 7 S 7� Z kn Li, Ln U) 7 a,O P 000001Q P O P O C) 04, 0 P P O` P 0 T O U 0 0 0010,0,01 0 0 a',0, m0,01 P 01 m m to P M P O, C. m P m m mm LT m LT m O, 01 CT mmCID mP P J W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d r 01 ,A m N M N N t- M- N N S N .D m S w VI C` N S _1 z r- N N t- M Ln 4 -O N o U)N N 0 W NON o d \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ s P -N -?Ln m0Om-+-S-NOS mmmN SNS.+?NM a, Q, W r- r^ Q 00-OOCO--00-000-000000_0-C7pOa[ _OOO a w d [t U Mm-Ln!n --NOON NO _M_OM P 1-O NOOOOO Ln N -MOO Ln a . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , •tl ? M "" I ^-I --1 N N N M N N S- M N VI - rx U 01 0 0 01 0 01 0 Ln01 Pm01m 01 N O N N H N O (b S a m- M N M - S .+ 0 ,D M- M O ,D P 01 - - - • to ,D N t- � H thM M tiM-.-+N.•� - N m W N.-1 -- -- N-.-1 *-1 H - - NN Z D - -' J J W O K) N-- N S W N H- -* " N N - -- - N N N N -- .-1 D N O m _J w z w �' rrr>-r r rr rrrrryrr�-rY rrYr�>'ryrrrr r> -S' 4 J -2 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a f a 7- m =x x 2 Y x Z S S S Z x 2 x a r_ m 2 Z z Z x S Z x x x 2 Z W Q 4 Q d Q d d d d d d 4 Q a <I Q 4 4 d Q -a a a a a -C a d a a C Q d a LL LU LL LL W LL U W LL W W LL LL Lr_ LL LL W LL LL LL ly LL LL LL LL LL tL IJ_ LI- LL Lw LL. W U W tJ W W UJ W 41 41 LL! I:J W ::l LLf W W W W W W' to Lw W iai W W W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J J J J J J J. J J J J J J J LL L7. L_l L^• L, L'? to to C7 L^ 0 L La If, /7 U' L7 L3 L7 0 0 to C7 L7 U' to 0 U L7 La 0 to m c7 0 >-t H H H H H H H H H H W M }y H H H H H H Y4 F•f H H H H H H H H H t -r ISS Vti to In Vi L7 to to V7 N '.n v1 ;n A Ln N 0 LI! Ln 0 to N N N rn N N Ln N to V. N L-1 ✓t a LL LL LL W LJ- LL LL LL LL LL W W VY N v 0 V LLL LL Lk LL LL LI. LL LL LL W N LL LL 0 Lc_ LL 3LL LL r N 'T VI N VI Vi M V, V! VI vv7 V` 0V] LR N :n 0 N VT N il ✓) to Vr N LA rn VI V1 F Z v H 4 S 4 G U U d d Q 4 L1 U 'J M u.! 0 M ,7 _-y --I If: In M y S? to in M 7 S J H : V L L' U --- H L`! LJ 0 L'' -ti --r N C U C, rs ('J - - U LS +-1 - rS CJ CL < M N 4 N ^- _7 J 7 - p � .� - •r C r` 7 C C?. 0 J U - J i`v F- J H v3 .--! J J Z C) r rr - I4 u U 1 w. J a J LL: R ✓� W 1^' F Kz d [/� I.R F F J p J ,L, �: :s- O r J C7 (r F - U !Y J J L] L) 7 r J J .c: S .� 0 0 S I J J C J S iu a o- J 7 W L:.J r-+ H Ci h [i J UI a W 1 2 F H J s -a '.J F O. J w o Q O o J -L 0 ✓; c O O LJ Z S J r J 4 L,_ Y VI H .-J !- W C] C w H Y 3 V J to Z J ...� r C. V= G v, tr H H v, rn Z 2 V: c/+ - W W L, J c- O H r r. Q s_ W O :.l y Z tY LJ .� 7 u 1 O Z Z W J Y N W L L. y W W O r V', H¢ J J '7 L: Q f 3 [±' f m H Lj H H -7 H a W 'n !:: W :Y r- E a 2 z c 2 O F+ a CC J _J a d W Y a e : r ^_ :D 4 'W :J 'L' C W Q u "L 70 7 Q Q Q 4 z) o 7 S d 4 2 G Ix J U' W". , Q F t H ;.; O O T 3 U u '-x rr W LJ J 3 Lh o lY tih N ;il O '_ L7 o '� o d J O N V J C3 a J J VI S Y Z C H G t J H J W a LC LC LL w W V V Id CC .,J L)✓ 7 rL i '1.1 EL, C r H , '-1 DEil J J G W '.h %AvI W Y Y L:J to w i- 2 d �A lti� LJ LL) F f d W 7 T .'L' L'1 F './1 I n Y �- D J x J w tY -E7 ' n Cr 7 M Q H H i r LII J IJ w Cr LOW Q uJ 2 of V/ Z Z UH Z 4 LJ J C W W H- 3--I r 7- Cr Cr o�� J Z O J J P w7 0 4 W H H H % U U H H O r r LJ = 2 Z Z 1- I- a z R" 4J W W �n m u U U O C] L, L, S S Y J J Z S Z H O Z F- So Ln L, en Ln in Ln Ln n L1, Jk Ln to in In Lr Ln W Ln :n Ln kf1 ISI m to in Ln Ln EP Ln to Ln J1 Ln Z U � W J11 49 lY O w U W N Lo z H Z a J 11 Lr 0 LL J d O w r r r r r r r H W W H H H M c a d a c a a LL LL LL LL LL LL w W W W W J J J J J J J 0 U L^ to 0 L^ G Z 2 z Z Z Z 2 vi In N rn v, Inv LL LL LL LL LL Li LL L. V7 ✓Y ✓ Vl N V a U - L-; t } 4 C: In tri In r v :n C> LJ Lj L: t✓ U L_' .6 .D 'L .O .D 'D .D i�1111ilhilwPoRg 1982 -- 1990 k IN Number of Approved Lots 1000 M .•• Keel 244 H 1982 1983 1984 1986 1986 1988 1989 1994 M Commercial Indust. & Inst. Simplified Residential 50 1982 -1990 Number of Approved Acres 2000 1500 1000 500 C 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990 Commercial Indust. & Inst. Simplified Residential 51 Number of Approved Plats 200 150 100 50 0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988 1988 1989 1990 Commercial Indust. & last. Simplified Residential 52 Ct A c0 d LLJ \ r Ltt 00 /}10 i LU d rry 1in LU j 01 chti \ e-- % H zF d r ttE Z V li3 t d Q LLJ ` j uj 0i �� LU T-41 N LL) N y r d _ LLJ LLJ o LLJ LJ.J d J tr M uj J Nt m Q > Cq W z mm � O Z #� Q O m w J to aL LZ L!1 z � G �■ LJJ � 3 O J J H 3 o z L'3 0 z u � LLL z m m d LLJ \ !� L, LL H p 0 "J LLI/) z d U d LLL Q LUv CL cn a� y` Ct A c0 d LLJ \ r Ltt 00 /}10 i LU d rry 1in LU j 01 chti \ e-- % H zF d r ttE Z V li3 t d Q LLJ ` j uj 0i �� LU T-41 N LL) N y r d _ LLJ LLJ o LLJ LJ.J d J tr M uj J to z LY ►-t O z L— z c-) d LLI .a i!s Q_ I V) A= LLJ Nt m Q > Cq W z � O Z #� Q O W w J to aL LZ L!1 V11 G LJJ to z LY ►-t O z L— z c-) d LLI .a i!s Q_ I V) A= LLJ 53 H m > Cq W L1 O LL w LL aL Q H J J H 3 53