HomeMy WebLinkAboutH_2010_AnnualReport
Washington County Planning Commission
Annual Report on Growth Related Changes
Per SB 280/HB 295 effective June 1, 2009
Prepared by the Washington County Planning Commission for the period
January 2010 through December 2010
Submitted on June 30, 2011
1. Development Patterns – List of all changes in development patterns that have
occurred over the past year, including:
a. New subdivisions created:
i. Total new residential lots – 48
1. New urban lots – 14
2. New rural lots – 34
b. New Building Permits issued - 238
i. Residential Permits inside PFA – 117
ii. Commercial Permits inside PFA – 13
iii. Residential Permits outside PFA – 96
iv. Commercial Permits outside PFA – 12
c. Zoning Map Amendments
i. RZ-10-001 – Map Amendment This map amendment is for
property located at 718 and 728 Antietam Drive, Hagerstown,
applied the HP (Historic Preservation) overlay zone on two parcels
of land that total .99 acres in size and are zoned RS (Residential
Suburban).
ii. RZ-10-004 – Rosewood PUD Increased the level of commercial
uses from 12% to 17.89% (Planning Vision # 4)
d. Zoning Text Amendments that resulted in changes in development
patterns.RZ-10-002 (Text Amendment) – The Board of County
Commissioners approved a text amendment to amend Sections 11.1
Business Local and 12.1 Business General zoning districts to add libraries
as a permitted use. (PV# 4) The proposed text amendment would also
affect the PUD (Planned Unit Development), PB (Planned Business) and
HI-1 (Highway Interchange 1) zones because these districts reference the
uses permitted in the BL and BG districts. This change increases the
potential for the location of a public or private library within walking
distance of residential area.
e. New Comprehensive Plans or plan elements adopted: The revision and/or
creation of zoning classifications in the Growth Areas has been reviewed
by the Planning Commission, with a final proposal delivered to the Board
of County Commissioners for review, comment, and approval. Due to the
changes in the Board after the 2010 elections; and the reorganization of
county staff, final approval is not anticipated until the fall of 2011. When
adopted, new development will continue to be directed into the Urban
Growth Area in a continuation of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
f. New Roads or substantial changes in roads or other transportation
facilities: New roads reflect subdivision roads accepted into County
ownership during 2010. This means that the construction was completed
to County standards. Other roads are currently under design or
construction per subdivision plans. Capital projects are new or widening
road projects that the County will fund.
i. New roads:
Progress Way - 0.173 miles
Shetland Way – 0.017 miles (existing road extension)
Dumbarton Drive – 0.053 miles (existing road extension)
Prestwick Drive - 0.190 miles
Prestwick Terrace – 0.029 miles
Custer Court – 0.113 miles (existing road extension)
Collier Court – 0.035 miles
Day Break Court – 0.034 miles
Sunny Hill Court – 0.047 miles
Sunny View Court – 0.056 miles
Woodbridge Drive – 0.005 miles (existing road extension)
Transportation Circle – 0.153 miles (existing road extension)
Total: 0.905 miles new roads in 2010
j. 2010 Capital Projects:
Edgewood Drive and US 40 Interchange Improvements
(construction near completion)
Marsh Pike and Longmeadow Road Intersection Improvements
(design stage)
Robinwood Corridor Improvements (widening) (design stage)
Southern Blvd Phase 1A (new road) (design stage)
Eastern Blvd Improvements (widening) (design stage)
g. New Schools or additions to schools – Ruth Anne Monroe Primary school
construction commenced during this calendar year. It will provide a
facility for grades K – 2 currently attending Eastern Elementary School
and ease the overcrowding there. The site design and location allows for
some pedestrian access; and coordination of transportation with the
adjacent Elementary School.
h. Other changes in development patterns – none
2. Maps (appendix)
a. New residential lots – inside and outside PFAs
b. Residential Building Activity inside and outside PFAs
c. Map changes
3. Consistency – Changes which occurred during the 2010 calendar year were
minimal and consistent with each other, the recommendations of the last annual
report, the adopted portions of the Comprehensive Plan, and those of adjoining
jurisdictions and those jurisdictions which have responsibility for financing or
constructing the public improvements necessary to implement the local
jurisdiction’s plan.
4. Process Improvements – During the latter part of calendar year 2010, county
leadership developed a new operating format for departments directly involved in
the planning and development process. The resulting reorganization of the
departments of Permits and Inspections, Engineering, and Planning and
Community Development, (effective April 1st, 2011), created three new
departments. The Department of Plan Review and Permitting consolidated and
streamlined all plan review and permitting functions under one department, with
the purpose of facilitating development in the UGA. The Planning and Zoning
Department will handle comprehensive planning and zoning issues. Engineering
and Inspection is responsible for design, instruction, project management, and all
inspections.
5. Ordinances and/or regulations that have been changed or adapted to implement
the planning visions in Article 66B. RZ-10-002 (Text Amendment) – The Board
of County Commissioners approved a text amendment to amend Sections 11.1
Business Local and 12.1 Business General zoning districts to add libraries as a
permitted use. (PV# 4) The proposed text amendment would also affect the PUD
(Planned Unit Development), PB (Planned Business) and HI-1 (Highway
Interchange 1) zones because these districts reference the uses permitted in the BL
and BG districts. This change increases the potential for the location of a public or
private library within walking distance of residential area.
6. Number of acres preserved using local agricultural land preservation funding.
The installment payment program preserves 1100 acres paid out over a 10 yr
period; in 2011 our funding preserved 110 acres. In addition the Maryland
Agricultural Land Preservation Program requests matching funds, which in CY
2011 equated to funding for 5 of the 153 acres preserved for a total using local
funds of 115 acres.
Washington County Planning Commission
Annual Report on Smart Growth Goals, Measures, and Indicators
And Implementation of Planning Visions
Per SB 276/HB 295 effective June 1, 2009
Prepared by the Washington County Planning Commission for the period
January 2010 through December 2010
Submitted on June 30, 2011
Measures and Indicators
Amount and share of growth that is being located inside and outside the Priority Funding
Area
2010 Commercial FAR
Averages 2010 Residential
F.A.R. Density DU's % Lots
Inside PFA 0.027111691 0.7488 128 84.77%
Outside PFA 0.00509853 4.3675 23 15.23%
Development capacity (Building Lots)
Rural Development Capacity 55,610
Urban Development Capacity 42,702
Total Development Capacity 98,312
Number of acres preserved using local agricultural land preservation funding: 1,237.68
Local Land Use Goal: 80% of new development should be located inside the Urban and
Town Growth Areas (usually equivalent to Priority Funding Areas). This is a goal already
established by the Land Use plan (Chapter 12) of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Time frame for achieving the local goal: Since Washington County has achieved this goal
in the past and exceeded it for this reporting period the effort will be to maintain this
level of development in the Urban and Town Growth Areas. No deadline is necessary.
Resources necessary for infrastructure inside the PFA and land preservation outside the
PFA: Continued funding for rural preservation programs to insure alternatives to
development in rural areas.
Implementation of comprehensive rezoning of urban area to facilitate the desired
development in urban areas.
Infrastructure funding in urban areas to accommodate desired development.
Any incremental progress towards achieving that local goal: Goal is to maintain current
ratios of urban/rural development at 80/20%, therefore changes in current rates are not
needed. The goal is set this year and cannot be measured until the next reporting period.