Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutW&S Plan_1994 Update,__,_,:;:·""" '¾;{r~\l ,_rrL1 , ·Washington County, Maryland 1994 Update . ,, .· ;PrepJrei:lby>the Washington County Planning Depaf!m~nt . .. t:::: --~: CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Heal th-Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland required the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Department of the Environment, amendments to the existing plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County on March 29, 1994, the Board adopted text and map amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Title 9, Subtitle·S of the Health-Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland for submission to the Maryland Depc!,:;rtment of the Environment for approval. THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County have adopted on May 17, 1994 and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and implement, to the best of its abil_i ty, · all aspects of the amendments as they pertain to the Wash),ngton County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this 7~ Day of .• Al!'TESW t ffiO:-½ , 1994. \ i ~/J'Livtl? ,~ -~~u1eft<~ Board of County Commissioners for Washington County IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION .02 OF THE REGULATIONS FOR PLANNING WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, TITLE 9 OF THE ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND, NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ALL MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY PLAN AND SUCH OFFICALS OR ENTIITIES HAVE BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN. THE WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE COUNTY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON FEBRUARY 17, 1981. ROBERT C. ARCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ii CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION WHEREAS, Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of each County to adopt and submit to the Depart- ment of Health and Mental Hygiene., a plan dealing with water supply systems and sewerage systems, and WHEREAS, following a public hearing by the Washington County Planning and Zoning Commission on September 26, 1974, by the Board of Washington County Commissioners on November 19, 1974, by the Washington County Planning Commis- sion, Hagerstown Planning Commission, ·Board of Washington County Commissioners, and City of Hagerstown Mayor and Council on April 8, 1975, the Board of Washington County Commissioners on May 13, 1975, adopted a Water and Sewerage Plan as required by Article 43, Section 387C of the Annotated Code of Maryland: nus IS TO CERTIFY, that the Washington County Board of County C,~~issioners have adopted and declared their intentions to faithfully execute and "implement, to the best of it's ability, all aspects of the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. Signed this /.!''/Ida~ 1975 .. ATTEST: A -.,·, /,. ~ --Y«@// .:/~ ----rionald L. Charles,Cl.er nook, resident Washington County Board of County Commissioners Washington County Board of County Commissioners iii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GOALS AND ORGANIZATION Purpose Goals Objectives Organization Development Review Procedures II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Physical Features Population Analysis Land Use Growth-Management arid 'Land Preservation Strategy III. EXISTING AND PLANNED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Existing Water Service Areas· Planned Service Areas Projected Demands Water Problem Areas & Water Conservation Program for Correction Policy For Water Line Installation In Areas Where Service Is Not Available Service Area Requirements Priority Area Requirements iv PAGE I -1 I -3 I -4 I -7 I -10 II -1 II -57 II -61 II -69 III -2 III -7 III -25 III -30 III -34 III -47 III -48 III -51 IV. EXISTING AND PLANNED SEWERAGE SYSTEMS Existing Sewerage Facilities and Service Areas -Washington County Sanitary District Planned Sewerage Service Areas - Washington County Sanitary District Existing and Planned Sewerage Service Areas - City of Hagerstown, Other Municipalities and Service Providing Agencies Projected Demands Sewage Flow Allocation Sludge Management Policy For Sewer Line Installation In Areas Where Service Is Not Available Policy On Sewage Disposal Alternatives Policy On Interim· Treatment Plants Service Area Requirements Priority Area Requirements V. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION. Introduction Water Facilities Sewerage Facilities Management Of Connection Allocations County-Wide Water And Sewer Authority APPENDICES A B Definitions Amendment Procedures V PAGE IV -1 IV -16 IV -20 IV -29 IV -43 IV -60 IV -69 IV -71 IV -74 IV -76 IV -79 V -1 V -2 V -3 V -6 V -6 A -1 B -1 C D E F G Listing of Service Agreements Policy On Interim And Permanent Community Water And Sewerage Systems Revised Policy Statement for City of Hagerstown Water Pollution Control Plant Capacity Allocation Resolutions Adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County and. tha Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown Relating to the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area, Water and Sewer Study prepared by BCM Engineers, Inc. Compilation of Financial Management Statistics, "FS" Schedules for Publicly Owned Community Sewerage Systems C -1 D -1 E -1 F -1 G -1 MAP NO. I II III LIST OF MAPS Generalized Topography Ground Cover Soil Drainage Characteristics IV (Deleted) . V VI VII VIII IX Major Watersheds Water Provinces Aquifer Characteristics (Deleted) Washington County Election Districts and Planning Sectors FOLLOWS PAGE II -2 II -2 II -2 II -16 II -40 II -45 II -58 X Generalized Existing Land Use (Out of Print) XI Major Public Institutions XII Smithsburg Town Growth Area XIII Boonsboro Town Growth Area XIV Urban Growth Area XV Hancock Town Growth Area Series of Water Service Priority Area Numbers Maps (l" = 2000') Series of Sewerage Service Priority Area Numbers Maps ( l" = 2000') Water and Sewerage Facilities And Service Areas (l" = 1 mile) Flow Allocation Schematic for Hagerstown and Halfway Sewerage Service Areas vii II -75 II -75 II -75 II -75 II -75 III -55 IV -83 Inside Front Pocket Inside Front Pocket TABLE NO. 1 1-A 2-A 2-B 2-C 2-D 3 4 5 6 9 LIST OF TABLES Washington County Population Patterns Washington County Projections By Election District Historic. Land.Usa Change 1973. -.1990 Land Cover Forecast 1990 -2000 Zoning Classifications 1991 Population Of Major Public Institutions Projected Water Supply Demands And Planned Capacity Inventory Of Existing Community Water Supplies Inventory·of·water Supply Problem Areas Immediate Five And Ten Year Priorities For Water Development Projected Sewerage Demands And. Planned Capacity viii PAGE II -59 II -60 II -66 II -67 II -68 II -75 III -28 III -29 III -38 III -43 IV -31 TABLE NO. 10 10-A 11 12 12-A 12-B 13 14 15 Inventory Of Existing Sewage Treatment Plants Inventory Of Existing Interceptors, Pumping Stations And Force Mains For Large Service Areas Inventory Of Discharge Permits Flow Allocations For Sewage Treatment Plants Flow Allocations For Interceptors Or Pumping Stations For Large Service Areas Flow Allocations For Major Developments Inventory Of Sewage, Drainage, And Water Pollution Problem Areas Immediate Five And Ten Year Priorities For Sewerage Development Inventory of Current Sewerage Sludge Generation and Uti1ization ix PAGE IV -33 IV -36 IV -40 IV -44 IV -45 IV -50 IV -54 IV -55 IV -68 PURPOSE Chapter One GOALS AND ORGANIZATION The State of Maryland's fundamental purpose in establishing regulations which require the governing body of each County to develop an on-going plan for water supply and sewerage systems is to achieve a consistency with the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan for guiding development. Inherent in this purpose is the realization that the planning and implementation of water and sewerage facilities constitute the most physically direct method of guiding development within the County. In virtually every instance growth is contingent upon the availability of the necessary facilities to sustain the higher orders of developme_!l.'\:-., . _ '.!',ll_e .. ),.nl:!~al:l.ation of water distribution lines, sewage collection lines, and adequate transportation networks serve as a magnet for the location of new residential projects, industrial complexes-and.supportive commercial activities. Although the exact timing and magnitude of the higher development forms will be determined in part by much more regional economic conditions, the fact remains that their location will directly manifest the development policies of Washington County and its incorporated municipalities. Consequently, it becomes well apparent that a Water and.Sewerage Plan, in order to be truly comprehensive, must go beyond merely the crisis oriented approach of abating existing problems, and strive to contribute and reinforce the overall planning objectives of the study area. While zoning establishes the developmental guidelines for primarily private sector initiatives, the process of implementing water and sewerage plans is a direct, more immediate public effort to move from plan to reality. This plan provides information in the form of maps, charts, and tables which give a general overall picture of the current and projected status of water and sewerage systems in Washington County. The plan is intended to provide the basis for more detailed planning at the projected level. The general level of information and the scale of mapping within the plan do not reflect such details as the specific location of all water and sewerage lines, or the availability or economic feasibility of service to particular parcels of land. For such information, the applicable agencies and.municipalities.providing.these services must be contacted. Plan maps within this document do not represent a commitment by the Board of County Commissioners or by any agency or municipality to provide water and sewer service by a specified time. Service priority designations shown on the plan maps indicate the general time frame in which it can be reasonably expected that these services will be provided and are based upon the current intentions of service providers and of private land owners and developers to the extent that they are known. The actual construction of facilities and extension of services will depend upon a number of factors such as economic feasibility, availability of funds, and initiative on the part of private land owners and developers. GOALS It is the purpose of the Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan to provide for the continued health and well-being of Washington Countians and our downstream neighbors through extensive, thorough public and private sector cooperation in the formation of long range plans for adequate water supply and effective sewerage disposal and treatment for Washington County. To this end, the following ... goals ... are . ..hereby~ established. 1. To protect the health, safety and welfare of the people of Washington County by providing acceptable and adequate water supply and sanitary sewerage facilities to all areas of the County. 2. To coordinate the policies and plans relative to land use and the provision of water and sewerage facilities to assure a logical growth pattern in Washington County. 3. To identify and analyze all sources of pollution within the County and devise the means by which the adverse impact can be minimized or eliminated. I-3 4. To provide for the qualified management of water resources in the County in cooperation with th ,,1unicipalities of the County, in order to effectively cope with water pollution and to conserve and/or improve the quality of streams and groundwaters within and adjacent to the County. 5. To establish plan priorities which can be directly related to the programming and budgetary processes of Washington County, the City of Hagerstown and other municipalities. 6. To provide for the periodic amendment of the Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan as required by changes in need or conditions within the County. OBJECTIVES In refinement of the overall goals for Washington County, the following itemizes t~e objectives which specifically encompass the policy guidelines relative to water and sewerage planning. 1. Develop a plan. for water.and sewerage facilities which is fiscally responsible and reasonable and at the same time provide facilities which will eliminate the extraordinary problems of groundwater pollution caused by existing development as well as following the implementation policies of the Comprehensive Plan for the County. 2. On-lot septic disposal systems in Washington County have, in many cases, proven inadequate in tenns of implementing the goals of this plan. As a result, a primary objective is to provide to the greatest extent possible, alternatives to these systems without encouraging increases in development density in those areas designated in the Plan for the County. 3. To seek the closest possible cooperation between Washington County and the City of Hagerstown in the implementation, operation and management of applicable existing and planned water and sewerage systems. 4 . To encourage and· ·guide· residentia·l growth to those areas which are served or planned to be served with community water and sewerage systems to provide opportunities for new and adequate housing at reasonable costs for the citizens of Washington County consistent with the plan for the County. 5. To assure a logical development pattern and continued ability of the County and municipalities to provide the other necessary public. facilities.and services (in accordance with existing land use plans and controls) as a result of the availability of new systems in areas outside planned service areas. 6. Encourage development of an organizational framework which will result in "REGIONAL" planning, programming and implementation of the plan. 7. Prepare guidelines which are both permissive and prohibitive with regard to the use of various types of systems and levels of treatment which will be compatible with the planned staging policy and its feasibility for implementation. :r-5. B. Provide for adequate water supply, storage, treatment and distribution on a regional baaj.hc 9. Encourage resource conservation by particularly large water users through cooperative recycling programs. 10. To encourage the extension and expansion of existing water and sewer lines and facilities to ultimately serve all of the land which is considered to be within the designated urban and town growth areas and to streamline the review process for development proposals within designated growth areas. 11. To assure that the Water and Sewerage Plan and any amendments will take into consideration the "six visions" of the Maryland Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Act of 1992. ORGANIZATION The following charts illustrate the existing organizational framework relative to planning and implementing water and sewerage within the County and incorporated municipalities. FIGURE No. l WASHINGTON COUNTY I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION WATER AND SEWER WASHINGTON COUNTY -WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING SANITARY DISTRICT* COMMISSION *Sewerage system responsibilit-y..currently includes the Towns of Sharpsburg and Keedysville (Subdistrict #4-1), Smithsburg (Subdistrict #12), Clear Spring and Sanitary Subdistricts within the County. (Subdistrict #1 Halfway, #5 Potomac (Tammany/Van Lear), #5-1 Cloverton/Greenlawn, #6 Fountainhead, #9-1 Highfield/Cascade/PenMar, #14 Sharpsburg Pike, #15 Maugansville/Orchard Hills, #18 Conococheague and #19 Sandy Hook.) Water systems responsibility currently includes the Town of Sharpsbu and adjacent areas (Subdistrict #4) and Subdistricts within the County (Subdistricts #9 Highfield/Cascade, #15-1 Martins Crossroads/Cearfoss, #17 Elk Ridge, #19-1 Sandy Hook, #18-1 Conococheague and #7 Mt. Aetna). I-8 p FIGURE NO 2. CITY OF HAGERSTOWN I MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I LANNING** !CITY ADMINISTRATOR I IMPLEMENTATION WATER* I SEWER* I I I HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN DEPARTMENT OF WATER PLANNING WATER DEPARTMENT POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING I *Water and Sewer System responsibility includes both city and non-subdistrict, unincorporated areas of the County. **Planning responsibilities (directly) only City. Substantial input to County Planning process. TOWNS. OF. .. HANCOCK, CLEAR SPRING WILLIAMSPORT, KEEDYSVILLE* BOONSBORO, SMITHSBURG AND FUNKSTOWN I MAYOR AND COUNCIL I PLANN ING IMPLEMENTATION WATER AND SEWER TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE OF COUNCILMEN I COMMISSION I TOWN EMPLOYEES I *The Washington County Sanitary District is responsible for the sewer system in Keedysville. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES The following are brief descriptions of development review procedures within Washington County unincorporated areas and within the limits of municipal incorporations. For developments planned for unincorporated areas, the review procedures of the Washington County Planning Commission are applicable. However, where such developments are dependent upon municipal water or sewerage service, the muni-cipal-ities · concerned should be consulted early in the process. The following descriptions are intended to assist citizens and prospective developers in becoming familiar with the organizational and procedural relationships between approving authorities and water and sewer service agencies. Washington County /Unincorporated Areas} Proposals for development ... within unincorporated areas are submitted for review and approval to the Washington County Planning Commission. The Commission meets on the first Monday of each month at 7:00 P.M.· in the County Administration Building. Initial contact may be made with the Washington County Planning Commission staff. At this stage the proposed development is reviewed for conformance with the County Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Water and Sewerage Plan. Upon request, the staff will arrange for a preliminary consultation at which the developer can informally discuss the proposal with representatives from the applicable review agencies I-10 including the Health Department and water and sewer service providers. In lieu of a preliminary consultation, the appropriate water and sewer authorities should be contacted individually. Developments which are proposed for wells and septic systems should be discussed with the Division.of Environmental Health of the Washington County Health Department. Developments which are proposed for service by means of the extension of existing community water and sewerage systems should be discussed with the responsible municipality or with the Washington County Sanitary District.as applicable. Any development proposed for an unincorporated area which is intended for service by a-new-~ommunity water or sewerage system or by the extension of existing Sanitary District facilities should be reviewed by the Washington County Planning Commission staff to determine if the proposal is consistent with the adopted plan for the County. The development proposed should then be brought to the attention of the Washington County Sanitary District. Such developments shall first be included in the Washington County water and Sewerage Plan, then must be located within the boundaries of a Sanitary Subdistrict. Procedures for inclusion of an area within an established Sanitary Subdistrict or for the creation of a new Sanitary Subdistrict are provided for by Sanitary District Law. Formal application for development approval is made to the Washington County Planning Commission or Department of Permits and Inspections in the form of a subdivision plat or site plan respectively. Water and sewerage system construction drawings are submitted along with the application for final plat approval. Copies of submitted plats, site plans, and construction drawings are circulated to the appropriate agencies and municipalities for information;· review and ·approval·.· Approval of water and sewerage construction drawings by the Washington County Sanitary District constitutes a firm commitment to allocate the needed water supply or sewage treatment capacity for the proposed development. The Sanitary District issues an approval letter to the Planning Commission for the final development plat upan .. receipt __ of._an approved construction permit from the Maryland Department of the Environment. The Washington County Health Department issues an approval letter for the final plat after the issuance of approval letters from water and sewer service providers when the development is to be served by a community system. Upon the receipt of correspondence from all applicable review agencies, the plat or site plan is reviewed for approval by the Planning Commission at the regular monthly meeting. I-12 CONTACT: Washington County Planning Commission Washington County Health Department Washington County Sanitary District Town of Boonsboro 791-3065 791-3270 791-3083 223-9416 For developments proposed within the municipal limits, a tentative sketch plan may be submitted to the Town Manager in the Municipal Building. The tentative sketch plan procedure is optional but strongly recommended as an early and informal method of consulting with the Boonsboro Planning Commission. Preliminary and final plat submittals are also made through the Town Manager who circulates plat copies to the appropriate review and approval agencies including the Boonsboro Municipal Utilities Commission for availability of water and sewer services. Upon . . receipt and consideration of the comments of the review and approval agencies, the Boonsboro Planning Commission considers the plat at its regular monthly meeting at the Municipal Building. Developments located outside the Town limits which desire water and sewer service, should contact the Town Manager through the municipal office to discuss annexation procedures. CONTACT: Wayne Winebrenner, Town Manager 432-5141 Barbara Rodenhiser, Clerk Fax 432-4050 I-13 Town of Clear Spring Water and sewer facilities are constructed within a development at the developer's expense and dedicated to the Town of Clear Spring. Initial proposals are made to the Mayor and Council which meets on the first Tuesday of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the Town Hall. CONTACT: Paul Hose, Mayor or Nancy L. Keefer, Clerk Town of Funkstown 842-3344 842-2252 All areas within the corporate limits of Funkstown are considered physically capable of being served by the Town water and sewer systems. For areas outside the Town, Public Works personnel should be contacted. CONTACT: Roger Griffith._ or Timothy Faulder 797-3228 or 791-0948 For proposed developments within the Town limits, application must be made to the Funkstown Zoning Administrator who reviews plans for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. Town water and sewer personnel then review the plans for placement of utilities. The Planning and Zoning Commission considers the application at its regular meeting on the first Tuesday of each month at 6:30 P.M. in the Town Hall. CONTACT: Brenda Haynes, Clerk 791-0948 I-14 City of Hagerstown Proposals for large developments intended to be served by the City of Hagerstown water and sewerage systems should be brought to the attention of the City Planning Department. Developments proposed within the municipal limits will receive guidance from the Planning Department on the City of Hagerstown's development process. Developments proposed for outside the municipal limits will receive guidance on annexation procedures if applicable. A preliminary consultation between the applicant and the Planning Department staff is recommended but not required. For developments within the municipal limits, the staff may recommend a preliminary consultation with the City of Hagerstown Planning Commission. Early discussions with the City Water Department and with Water Pollution Control-are also advisable. Formal application for development approval within the City is made in the form of a site plan or subdivision plat submission to the Planning Department. Copies of the plat or site plan are circulated to various review agencies including the City Water Department, Water Pollution Control, and the County Health Department. Plat or site plan submission must occur on or before the first working day of the month to be reviewed at the regular Planning Commission meeting. The Commission's regular meeting is held on the last Wednesday of the month at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall. I-15 CONTACT: City Planning Department City Water Department · City Water Pollution Control City Engineer Town of Hancock 790-3200, Ext. 138, 139 790-3200, Ext. 171 790-3200, Ext. 165, 166 790-3200, Ext. 125 The Town Manager issues individual water and sewer connection permits from the Town Office. Development proposals are submitted for review to the Town Planning Commission which meets the first Wednesday of· each··month'"at 7:0'0 P.M. in the Town Hall. The proposal must include the proposed water and sewer layout and the number of people to be served. Based upon this proposal, a tentative commitment is made by the Town to serve the proposed development. Water and sewer design is reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer and the M.D.E •. The Town. Planning Commission recommends plat approval to the Mayor and Council. With Mayor and Council approval, the proposed development receives a firm commitment for water and sewer service. CONTACT: Stephen Gyurisin, Town Manager 678-5622 Town of Smithsburg Land development proposals are first discussed in concept with the Smithsburg Planning Commission. The Commission meets on the last Tuesday of each month at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Hall. The Commission then refers the applicant to the Smithsburg Mayor and Council for a determination on the provision of water and sewer I-16 services. The applicant may then submit a preliminary plat to the Smithsburg Planning Commission for developments within the corporate limits, or to the Washington County Planning Commission for developments outside the corporate limits. CONTACT: Harold Boyer, Chairman 824-3851 Smithsburg Planning Commission (after 5:00 P.M.) Town of Williamsport Development proposals should be discussed initially in concept with the Williamsport Planning Commission. The Commission meets on an "as needed" basis. At the time of the initial meeting a tentative agreement will be made on the allocation of sewer capacity for the proposed development. This allocation is subtracted from the total allocation granted to the Town of Williamsport by the Washington County Sanitary District. The developer will then meet to advise the Town Mayor and Council of the proposed development. If the development is located within the Town limits, a development plat is submitted to the Williamsport Planning Commission for approval. Current Town policy requires annexation for any development located outside the corporate limits that will connect the Town of Williamsport sewage collection system or water distribution system. CONTACT: George Stumbaugh, Chairman Williamsport Planning Commission I-17 223-7711 (City Hall) CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND INFORMATION In order to establish parameters for the planning of sewer and water facilities, it is necessary to determine the physical, social, economic and land use factors which, in part, dictate the needs and priorities for such systems. The following discussion of background information attempts to summarize the relevant factors which have been-previously-developed and analyzed through the preparation of the County's Comprehensive Plan, Solid Waste Plan, and prior Water and Sewerage Plan. 1. PHYSICAL FEATURES An analysis of the physical features of Washington County provides a framework whereby planning and future engineering decisions can be made in part based-upon environmental characteristics. TOPOGRAPHY -The Physiographic characteristicsof Washington County are formed largely from the western slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains, the wide Hagerstown Valley which is in turn a portion of the expansive Great Limestone Valley network of the east; and the eastern ridge of the Appalachian Mountain system. Elevations within the County range from a high of 2,145 feet at the crest of Quirack Mountain of the Blue Ridge to a low of approximately 300 feet near the Potomac River. II-1 Topographic features are rather steep at the Blue Ridge, gently rolling within the broad and shallow valley to Fairview Mountain, and with sharp ridges and intervening small valleys or ravines differentiating the westward portion of the County. As illustrated on Map No. 1 -Generalized Topography, slopes are steepest along both the eastern and western boundaries of the County and within.the area between-Licking Creek and the Little Conococheague Creek. Approximately 35% of the County's land area has slopes in excess of 15% while the Hagerstown Valley portion of the County comprising slightly more than half of the land area is essentially level or very gently rolling. GROUND COVER -Natural ground cover patterns in Washington County, as illustrated on Map No. II -Ground Cover, are characterized by woodlands both in the mountainous areas and along the :c-idge. _and valley section west of Fairview Mountain. Also, in these steeply sloping areas very rocky and stony features prevail. The remaining undeveloped portions of the County are largely in open field/ agricultural coverage or floodplains or wetlands. SOIL CHARACTERISTICS -The soils of Washington County have been categorized into four broad groupings based upon the history II-2 I I I I ~I /. ·-. W E S T LEGEND -------Contour (200ft interval) . ._ '·. . ~- ~-' Wil VIRGINIA LJ) ~ ,, ,, -.. ,.. .. .. -. ., WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN WASHINGTON COUNTY GENERALIZED TOPOGRAPHY MAP 1 . 0 1 2 3 4 5 Mi. -------SOURCE: Washington County Comp reh ensive Plan D ~HI NASSAUX. HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED . CONSULTANTS I WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 650 ..... 600 .., c:, 550 W E S T LEGEND Major Forest Cover -Flood Plain WASHINGTON V R G N A WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN WASHINGTON COUNTY GROUND COVER 0 SOURCE: Washington County Comprehensive Plan D ~H I NASSAUX. HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED CONSULTANTS I COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMM I SSION ~~ ~· )~ s;~r·~.p-.. :t~I( ~p?~i ·"·. ,;-;, •. •4, '\:· ; ~ ,, .:.., 650 .... c:, 600 .... 550 :\(i?=::=:== ·~=·===·=::::::: ................. \ .. · ... H .. ~~~.-•···~·· ...... _,,~S?filfC l . ) ··~t::.. .. ~- '· .. ··· ... ~ ... _ " ·· .. .. W E S T · ..... ?==\;;; LEGEND 1:::::::: :1 Well Orained,Stony & Very Stony 1 Dekillb • Leetonia-Edgemont-Laidig 2 Dekalb-Highfield 3 Highfield-Fauquier 4 5 6 7 8 Well to Excessively Orained,Shallow, Medium Textured Berks• Montevallo Hazel• Chiindler Talladega Litz-Tm Calwin ·Berks• Litz-Montevallo 1-:-:-:::m:::::=:=§ Moderately Well to Well Drained, Deep, Medium Textured t Holston · Monongahela• Huntington -lindside 10 11 12 13 14 Well Drained,Deep,Medium Textured Braddock-n1r11011t •E111e■011t •Laidi& Waynesboro FHq11ier-Myemille · Ni&~field Murrill Na1erstow1 • D1ff ield • Frakstow1 WASHINGTON .\I}· .. :.:-;-:•· \ w,1 \ VIRGINIA . 4 1.11~ ,,, .... ..,.~ 11 ---sS;;burl ~\ WASHINGTON COUNTY WAT~;~ ~!l"~N;~~:;;~rtRIS~I~: N ~{ ; Soils Associ:tion:) 2 ' 4 5 .,. l SOURCE: U S Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service D ~HI NASSAUX. HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED . CON_SULTANTS I COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION .., .:,,,. ... 650 600 550 of their formation and position on the landscape. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, the formations stemmed from soils of the uplands, soils of old colluvial deposits, soils of old stream terraces, and soils of the floodplains. A percentage breakdown of the four groupings reveals that the soils of the uplands comprise about 71% of the land area in the County while· the· other-formations comprise 16%, 5%, and 8% respectively. The upland soils have been developed in place from materials weathered from the underlying rock. The remaining soil categories are formed from deposits transported by water. There are 14 general soil .patterns in Washington County referred to as ... soil .. associations •.. These associations have been combined into the following four divisions by the Soil Conservation Service based upon drainage and soil depth, , •· 1. Well drained, stony and very stony soils. 2. Well to excessively drained, shallow, medium textured soils. 3. Moderately well to well drained, deep, medium textured soils. 4. Well drained, deep, medium textured soils. Map No. III -Soil Drainage Characteristics illustrates the generalized location of soil drainage patterns within Washington County. .IJ:-3 V For the purpose of planning water and sewerage facilities an analysis of the soils is fundamental. With both water supply and quality discussed later in this Chapter, attention is directed here to the suitability of the soils to accommodate (properly) on- lot subsurface disposal systems. The most common on- site sewage disposal method used in areas where central sewage systems ·are~·unava-i·lable -is· the septic tank system. Successful operation of the system depends upon the ability of the soil to absorb and filter the liquid or effluent once it passes through the tile field. The presence of a soil characteristic which impairs proper absorption and filtering of the effluent will cause health hazards as well as public nuisance situations. Soil characteristics affecting the operation of the tile disposal field include permeability rates, depth to bedrock, depth to seasonal high water table, slope, stoniness, and flood hazard. SUITABILITY FOR ON-LOT SUB-SURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS -Past and present practices with regard to septic system usage seem to indicate that residents have the attitude that such methods of disposal are a matter of right rather than privilege. Furthermore, many residents believe that, so long as no surface malfunctioning is apparent, their household sewage system is operating properly. Little concern is directed toward the issue of groundwater contamination except when it affects an individual's own property or well. It is important to have a basic understanding of the sewage decomposition processes that take place within a septic system in order to fully appreciate the serious heal th hazards·· which can potentially exist. A septic tank is a watertight receptacle which receives sewage and is designed and constructed to provide for sludge storage, sludge decomposition, and to separate solids from the liquid through a period of detention before allowing the liquid to be discharged to a subsurface absorption area. The sewage is broken down through an oxygen-less process called anaerobic decomposition in which anaerobic bacteria digest suspended solids, ,liquefying much of the material and reducing the rest to inert masses of sludge and scum. This primary treatment stage removes solids so that the effluent or clarified liquid which is discharged from the tank does not clog the distribution system. Septic tanks do not remove pathogenic organisms (harmful bacteria and viruses). The removal of pathogens from the effluent is affected only by percolation through the soil after the effluent is distributed through the tile field. Therefore ... , "septic tank effluents cannot be considered safe. The liquid that is discharged from a tank is, in some respects, more objectionable than .that which goes in, it is septic and malodorous."* The bacteria are removed.from.the.effluent_by_±:iltration.and because the soil presents an unfavorable environment for their existence. In an efficient system, pathogens and other waste products are completely removed from the effluent before it recharges the groundwater table. In an inefficient and unsafe system, the effluent may drain rapidly into solution channels and fractures in the bedrock and may reach the groundwater table before complete purification.oc;:curs .. _ The untreated sewage will then flow with the groundwater to pollute wells and streams with disease causing bacteria. "Studies in the Nittany Valley, Pennsylvania, a hydrogeologic environment similar to that of the study area (the II-6 Hagerstown Valley) show, on the basis of dye tracings, (Jacobson and Langmuir, 1970) that the groundwater moves roughly 4,000 feet in 2 to 6 days."** In another type of malfunctioning system, more obvious to the homeowner, the effluent flows through the drainage bed until it reaches an impermeable layer such as clay or a fragipan"(a·compact, brittle layer of soil) or bedrock in which case it is forced to the surface where it becomes an immediate health hazard. A third type of pollution hazard can develop when too many septic systems are constructed within a given area. Permits issued.for ... the .. repair. of failing systems constitute a large share of the installation process of the Health Department. Approximately 20 percent of the permits issued for the-septic'system·installation are for repairs. These repairs generally require the complete replacement of all parts of the system except the septic tank itself, including the replacement of *Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Manual of Septic Tank Practice, 1969, p. 29. **Nutter, Larry J. Hydrogeology of the Carbonate Rocks, Frederick and Hagerstown Valleys, Maryland, Maryland Geological Survey Department of Natural Resources, 1973. drain tiles and distribution box and the relocation of the drain field or seepage pit to another area. These kinds of repairs become necessary when drain tiles are clogged or drain fields are saturated resulting in the back up of effluent to the house or the appearance of effluent on the surface of the ground. Such problems may be caused by poor initial installation, by inadequate-maintenance by-. the .. homeowner, ... or by overuse resulting in saturation of the absorption area. The map does not reflect those failures in which effluent may drain into fracture in the bedrock and for which . there are no apparent symptoms on the surface. In an effort to minimize the risks of septic system failure and groundwater contamination, the Washington County Health Department has established standards and instituted procedures for the planning and installation of new on-lot .. and . sub-surface disposal systems. Prior to the approval of such systems for use on building lots, percolation tests are conducted to evaluate the renovative capabilities of on-site soils. Trenches are excavated to ensure that a minimum filterable soil cover exists between drain tiles and bedrock or groundwater. A reserve area is set aside to allow for the use of alternate drain fields in the event that the first field becomes saturated. The location of septic II-8 systems and reserve areas are limited to a minimum distance from on-lot and adjacent well water supplies. Where a number of on-lot sub-surface systems are planned for a given area, a geohydrologic study is conducted for the entire area of the proposed development in an effort to evaluate the cumulative effect such systems might have on sub-surface geology and groundwater. The above standards and procedures have their limitations however. Percolation and trench tests are limited to relatively small areas and conclusions drawn from these tests must be generalized to the larger areas of the absorption fields where they may or may not be valid.. Even .. the-.pe:i::colation (absorption) test is seen by some authorities as an incomplete testing procedure: "The principal weaknesses of the absorption test are ·that it is made··in a short time· and with clear water. It should be recognized that two processes take place during the test--infiltration, or entrance of the liquid into the soil, and percolation through the soil. The infiltration rate is largely dependent upon the characteristics of the liquid, while speed or percolation depends upon the soil characteristics. II-9 When clear liquid is applied continuously to a soil, there is first a drop in the infiltration rate for l to several days. As air escapes from the soil, the rate rises to a maximum after a time measured in days, and thereafter it slowly decreases to a small percentage of the original rate. The slow decrease is caused by the following phenomena, which are dependent upon soil characteristics; migration.of fine particles with water movement to accumulate and clog pore spaces; ion exchange, which affects the cohesive force between particles and deflocculates materials, and the continued swelling of colloidal materials. Even with water as the liquid, there will be microbial growths that will clog soil pores and interfere with infiltration and percolation. Obviously, substitution of septic sewage for water will increase the number of fine particles and will encourage microbial growth. Ion exchange.and colloidal swelling will depend upon the chemical activity of the soil. So far, no soil test or examination method has been devised that will indicate the suitability of a soil for absorption of sewage over a long period •.• In the absence of a more effective procedure than the absorption test, precautions should be applied that will prevent disposal-field failures or at least postpone them for a long period. Important is II-10 resting, which permits air penetration, the establishment of aerobic conditions in clogged areas, and digestion of solid accumulations. With food no longer available, the bacteria will also die. This housecleaning requires days, not the hours that will be provided by the usual sewerage-flow variations of a residence ... * *Ehlers, Victor M., C.E., and Steel, Ernest w., C.E., Municipal and Rural Sanitarian, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill Co., 1966, (p.126) As part of the continuing effort to improve on-lot testing reliability and to guard against groundwater contamination by on- lot systems, a County-wide Geohydrologic Study was conducted by the consulting firm of R. E. Wright and Associates. This study was jointly funded by the-Washington County Board of County Commissioners and by a grant from the u. s. Environmental Protection Agency administered through the Maryland Water Resources· Administration~ By means··of ·on-site· ·testing and evaluation within three prototype study areas of the County, three remote sensing techniques were found to be valid in determining shallow bedrock within prospective septic disposal areas. However, the consultant report concluded that the use of these methods "will require the continuation of the conventional site investigation (slit trench evaluation)." II-11 A further product of the study was the development of a comprehensive County sub-surface sewage disposal ordinance in accord with minimum State requirements which includes (a) subsurface sewage disposal planning requirements, (b) site investigatory procedures, (c) system design criteria, (d) comprehensive inspection program, (e) legal enforcement procedures, (f) designated enforcement personnel and training program, (g) monitoring of the functionality of subsurface disposal system, and (h) procedures for modifying design criteria. The On-Site Sewage Disposal Ordinance for Washington County was adopted in September 1983. The Washington County Health Department administers the Ordinance with guidance from the companion Technical Manual. The Ordinance also eni;:ouraged the. use of innovative and alternative sewage disposal methods in light of the County's limestone geology. Pursuant to Health-Environmental Article, Subtitle 9-14 and a Memorandum. of Understanding, Washington County participated in the Innovative and Alternative On-Site Sewage Disposal Grant Program. Subsequent evaluation of this program resulted in the acceptance of certain innovative and alternative systems as being conventional when percolation rates are within specified limits. Even the use of the traditional septic system is seen by some authorities as a viable wastewater treatment alternative to II-12 central treatment processes. A report by the Comptroller General of the United States concludes that, "if properly designed, constructed, operated, and maintained, septic systems -should not fail, -can be as permanent as central treatment facilities, -are often more ecologically sound then sewers and central facilities, and -can provide a high degree of wastewater treatment as good or better than the effluent produced by conventional central treatment processes."* *The Comptroller General of the United States, Report to the Congress, Community-Managed Septic Systems: A Viable Alternative to Sewage Treatment Plants, United States General Accounting Office, November 3, 1978, (p.i.) :LL-13 The report emphasizes, however, that the key to good septic system performance is a system for public supervision and management of septic systems and recommends that the Environmental Protection Agency establish minimum standards for such public management. The report does not address septage disposal. A management system and criteria which are uniquely suited to the Washington County natural-physical environment in the form of the On-Site. Sewage .. Disposal .Ordinance is an important product of the geohydrologic study mentioned above. SURFACE WATER CHARACTERISTICS -Washington County lies totally within the Potomac River Basin and is drained by the Conococheague Creek in the western portion of the Great Valley and by the Antietam Creek in the eastern section as both Creeks flow southward into the Potomac River. The majority of the County lies within the Upper Potomac River Sub-basin. The remainder, a small section in southeastern Washington County, lies within the limits of the middle Potomac River Sub-basin. The tributaries of the Potomac River drain approximately 342 square miles in Washington County. The pattern and intensity of surface water drainage is dictated by the County's location in the Valley and Ridge physiographic province which is characterized by long, ridge-like, parallel mountains and intervening valleys. In the western, more mountainous area of the County, the streams have rather flashy runoff as a result of the steeply sloping terrain and rough topography. Moving eastward into the valleys, the relief is gentle and slightly rolling; hence, the streams are less flashy and meandering. DRAINAGE SHEDS Washington County is divided into rtine major watersheds, as indicated on Map No. V, in addition to those areas draining directly into the Potomac River. The Antietam Watershed, which drains approximately 187 square miles or about 40% of Washington County is by far the largest drainage area. The following table indicates the drainage area of each major watershed in the County. p E V A N I A V CK ING REEK L A H.~. L_ __ .. C O N O C O ~'tu E e.·;'_) ... VIRGINIA V l;J .. • WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN WASHINGTON COUNTY ~ MAJOR WATERSHEDS \ m 1 0 1 -------2 3 4 5 Mi. SOURCE : Washington County Comprehensive Water & Sewer Plan , . I D ~HI NASSAUX. HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED . CON_SULTANTS I COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION 650 ..... c::, 600 .... 550 FIGURE NO. 3 WASHINGTON COUNTY WATERSHED AREAS* WATERSHED DRAINAGE AREA (SQ. MI.) Washington County Antietam Creek 187 Conococheague Creek 65 Israel Creek 14 Licking Creek 27 Little Conococheague Creek 16 Little Tonoloway 16 St. James -Marsh Run 20 Sideling Hill Creek 9 Tonoloway 2 Total 292 563 14 214 18 26 20 104 114 *Source: Washington County, Plan for the County WATER QUALITY Quality of Washington County's surface water has been studied by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Administration, in its 1974 Water Survey. Studies have also been done by the Office of Environmental Programs, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene 1986 Report to EPA According to Section 3.05/b) Clean Water Act /P.L.97-117) and the Water Management Administration,-Maryland Department of the Environment 1988 Report to the EPA According to Section 3.05/b} of the Clean Water Act /P.L.100-4). The 1986 report to the EPA includes basin description and trend analysis of all the watersheds in the County. The 1988 report includes an updated trend analysis of the Potomac mainstem, the Antietam Creek and the Conococheague Creek. The quality of Washington County's surface waters as a source of supply would necessitate considerable treatment prior to consumption. . Even-a generalized-analysis, .. of. the. sampling data compiled by the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin and the Maryland Water Resources Administration indicates a high coliform count. In addition to the high coliform count, most of the watercourses were quite alkaline because of the limestone formation. The predominate cause of the degradation of water quality of the watercourses in Washington County are agricultural and urban runoff, and industrial and sewage treatment discharges. The following dissertation discusses the significant pollution I;I:-17 problems and predominant causes of pollution of each of the watercourses traversing Washington County. The 1988 report summarized that water quality in the Upper Potomac River sub-basin is Good and suited to water contact recreation and aquatic life and, where classified, trout production. Elevated suspended sediment, nutrient and bacterial levels are primarily,due.to.agriculturaJ: runoff and upstream sources. Urban runoff and failing septic systems also contribute to bacterial and nutrient levels observed in the sub-basin. Overall, water quality has degraded slightly in the Upper Potomac River sub-basin between 1976-7 and 1985. Total nitrogen and total phosphorus levels show significant increases throughout much of the basin. Fecal coliform bacteria and total suspended solids levels generally show no trend. POTOMAC RIVER MAINSTEM The mainstem of the.•l'otomac .. River. is 112.3.miles in length. It follows a sinuous course through most of its length. Upstream reaches flow through primarily forested land, while the land draining the lower reaches is principally agricultural. Several small towns are located along the River's banks. In 1974 the river met State water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, Ph and temperature. The water was found to be alkaline having flowed through the limestone areas of the :p:-18 Appalachian Region. Nitrogen averages tended to be high particularly in the section of the river from Shepherdstown to the mouth of the Shenandoah River where the average concentration was above 1 part per million (ppm) nitrogen. Phosphate concentrations were found to be higher both in the upper and lower sections. Algae blooms were indicated by occasionally high values for chlorophyll, recorded during the summer months. Bacteriological values met the water quality standard not exceeding a log mean of 200 for fecal coliform bacteria throughout most of the mainstem. Although the Potomac River has a consistently good water quality, the waste flowing from the North Branch resulted in poor bacteriological quality water, therefore influencing the water quality of the Potomac in Washington County--,-··--Other---seet-ions --of· the Potomac River that did not meet the numerical standard were the portion passing through Hancock, Maryland and a stretch below Shepherdstown, West Virginia. Domestic wastes, agricultural wastes and soil erosion are the primary sources of pollution in the mainstem of the Potomac throughout Washington County. Septic tank seepage enters the river from numerous non-point source locations throughout the County. In the Hancock area, sewage treatment plant wastes from the Town are discharged into Tonoloway Creek a short distance above its mouth. At Williamsport, the Sanitary District's treatment plant serving Halfway, Tammany, Van Lear, Cloverton/Greenlawn and Williamsport has a discharge to the river. Also, at Williamsport, a tannery discharg·es wastes to Conococheague Creek, just above its mouth. The Sanitary District is currently constructing a wastewater treatment plant to serve the Sandy Hook area. This plant will discharge into Martins Run which is in the Israel Creek drainage area. In addition to the Maryland discharges, the West Virginia towns of Shepherdstown~-· Boliv.ar-and Harpers Ferry have domestic waste discharges to the mainstem of the Potomac River. Also, Jellystone Park discharges wastewater to this segment of the river. The 1988 report to the EPA concluded that in the lower mainstem river (Segment 01), total nitrogen and total phosphorus significantly increased between 1976 and 1985 respectively. The ICPRB reported significantly increased nitrate and nitrite levels are between 1974 and 1984 in this segment (Haywood et al., 1987). Fecal coliform bacteria levels significantly declined between 1976 and 1985. II-20 ANTIETAM CREEK The Antietam Creek segment lies east of Hagerstown, Maryland having drainage areas in Maryland of 187.0 square miles. Another 104.9 square miles of Antietam Creek drainage is contained in Pennsylvania. Average stream discharge measured at the U.S. Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) gage four miles upstream from the mouth is 265 cfs. The principal cities in the watershed are Waynesboro, Pennsylvania and·Hagerstown,•Maryland. The 1986 Report to EPA mentioned previously indicates "Unlike most of the sub-basin, land use in this segment is primarily agricultural." Little Antietam Creek, Beaver Creek, and Marsh Run are all classified as Class III (natural) trout waters while the remaining surface waters are classified as Class IV (recreational) trout waters. Water quality in this segment ranges from Fair .. to .Good. ___ Jiigh,.bacterial levels are due to. agricultural runoff and malfunctioning septic systems. Nutrient levels are also high, but there are no eutrophication problems in this segment due· to ·the continual-streamflow.---Because of intense agricultural use and practices and soil type in this segment, the Antietam Creek drainage is designated a "priority watershed" for the potential release of phosphorus from agricultural sources (State Soil Conservation Committee, 1984). The branches and headwaters of Antietam Creek in Pennsylvania are reportedly "water quality limited" (Department of Environmental Resources, 1984) . II-21 Benthic community structure and diversity from three stations in the mainstem Creek indicate Excellent water quality in the lower portion of the segment (ANT0044), Fair water quality below Hagerstown (ANT0203) and Good water quality just south of the State line (ANT0366). In both 1984 and 1985, 1750 adult rainbow trout were stocked into this segment as a put-and-take fishery (Tidewater Administration, 1984, 1985a). The 1988 report to the EPA stated that in the Antietam Creek basin (Segment 02), total nitrogen and total phosphorus significantly increased throughout the sub-basin between 1977- 1985 and 1976-1985, respectively. The ICPRB reported significantly increased nitrate levels between 1974 and 1984 were reported in this segment. Fecal coliform bacteria levels significantly increased . .at.mid,.,basin(ANT0203) although the upstream and downstream stations (ANT0044, ANT0306) showed no trend. In the 1970's, lower fecal coliform counts could possibly be attributed to the use of chlorine as-a disinfectant at the Hagerstown treatment facility. The use of chlorine is now prohibited by State discharge limitations. The Hagerstown treatment facility currently uses ozone for disinfection. Increased fecal coliform counts may be considered an indication that the City has improved effluent quality by eliminating the potential of toxicity from chlorine. II-22 (The mainstem of Antietam Creek is classified by the State for purposes of water pollution control as Recreational Trout Waters. ) In-stream sampling performed by the Maryland Water Resources Administration during 1974 revealed the following conditions of surface water quality. Bacterial concentrations were found to be in violation of State standards throughout the entire course of Antietam Creek. The mainstem of the stream did not meet the fecal coliform standard; and almost all bacterial counts were greatly in excess of the standard. The highest counts were recorded one mile downstream from the Pennsylvania State line. Significantly lower values were recorded -iilllllediately·-below the sewerage treatment plants serving Hagerstown and Funkstown. Ultimately though, the water supplied to the Potomac River by Antietam Creek was still bacteriologically·poor. Water temperature in the mainstem of Antietam Creek below Hagerstown did not meet the standard for Class IV "Recreational Trout Waters". Temperature elevation downstream from the Hagerstown Municipal Power Plant was pronounced, often 56 degrees F above stream temperatures. Maximum temperatures below the plant reach the high eighties and low nineties on hot summer days. The return to ambient temperature did not occur for miles II-23 downstream. The Hagerstown Sewerage Treatment Plant, 2.0 miles below the power plant, also releases an effluent warmer than the ambient stream temperature. Factors which contributed to maintaining elevated temperatures far below the two effluents were slow stream flow and a lack of cold water springs entering the stream. Any association between the municipal power plant and stream water temperature is no longer valid because the plant is no longer ·being· used·. Any.,current·· increased stream temperature in this area may be partially the result of "Memorial Run" which is a stone and concrete culvert exposed to solar heating. Marsh Run and Beaver Creek, tributaries to Antietam Creek, were found to have water temperatures well above the Natural Trout Water Standards (Class III) for these streams. However, no warm water discharges are known, and these waters may be solar heated, The waters of Antietam Creek and its tributaries are used by several industries and municipalities for cooling purposes and sewerage disposal. Hagerstown and Funkstown sewerage treatment plants are located south of Hagerstown about 1 1/2 miles apart and discharge directly into the stream's mainstem. In July of 1990, the Washington County Sanitary District completed construction of a new waste water treatment plant to serve the Sharpsburg Keedysville area. This treatment plant discharges into the mainstem of the Antietam Creek south of Sharpsburg. II-24 There are eleven other, small sewerage treatment plants in the segment. Little Antietam Creek in the Towns of Boonsboro and Keedysville has exhibited high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as a result of organic wastes utilizing the oxygen in the stream. The BOD in Falls Creek below the Fort Ritchie Military Reservation· was also··above ·normal • .. for this stream. Antietam Creek waters are found to be alkaline, to contain large amounts of dissolved material, and were greatly enriched with nitrogen and phosphorus. Except for bacteriological degradation and temperature elevation, water quality standards were met during 1974. The effects. oJ_ munic:ipal •. dis.charges on the level of dissolved oxygen in Antietam Creek is the subject of a computer modeling exercise being performed by the State Department of Health and Mental-Hygiene, The model-indicates-that some future municipal discharges of secondary effluent would be likely to cause violations of the dissolved oxygen standards (5 mg/1 avg.) in Antietam Creek. Therefore, Antietam Creek has been designated as "Water Quality Limited" with respect to dissolved oxygen. Special effluent limitations will be determined by the State in order to protect the Antietam Creek from oxygen depletion. JI-25 Most of the industries located in the Antietam Creek drainage area are in complianre with the State industrial effluent standards. Those few which are not, are working toward compliance. CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK The Conococheague Creek segment lies to the west of Hagerstown, Maryland~-The.drainage.area.consists of 65.8 square miles with a main stream length of 22.0 miles. The great majority of the stream's drainage, 497.6 square miles, is contained in Pennsylvania. Most of the segment is agricultural or forest, except for the eastern edge which drains the western urban fringe area surrounding Hagerstown. Few small towns are found in the segment, the largest being the greater part of Williamsport. The average discharge measured at the U.S. Geological Survey gage at Fairview, Maryland, 18.7 miles above the stream's mouth, was 572 cubic feet per second. Conococheague Creek water exhibited poor quality from 1966 to 1969. Extremely high bacteriological values were recorded just downstream of the Pennsylvania State line. Bacterial water quality of the remainder of the stream's length did not meet water quality standards. During summer months, dissolved oxygen concentrations were low and occasionally dropped below 4.0 parts per million; the lower limit for Class IV waters. Water temperatures as high as 86.9 degrees F, well above the II-26 temperature standards of 75 degrees F, were recorded, but there is no known source of thermal pollution. High temperatures are probably due to natural conditions. By 1974, water quality had improved. Fecal coliform values still violated the numerical standard but were generally lower throughout the stream. Dissolved oxygen values were generally high and at no time went below the standard. The stream water was found to be alkaline and to contain large amounts of dissolved solids. Nitrate concentration was high and phosphate was unusually high. Computer modeling performed for the Maryland portion of the Conococheague indicated that future planned dischargers from standard secondary treatment.plants are not likely to cause violations of the dissolved oxygen standard of 5 milligrams per . lit (mg/1) daily average. Conococheague Creek upstream of the Maryland/Pennsylvania line receives a large variety of domestic and industrial wastes. The Towns of Chambersburg and Mercersburg, Pennsylvania discharge sewage treatment plant wastes into the stream. In Maryland, the stream is polluted by farm wastes and individual septic system seepage. A waste water treatment plant serving the w.o. Byron tannery discharges into the stream just above its mouth. In February of 1992, the Washington County Sanitary District began II-27 using a newly constructed 2.5 MGD wastewater treatment plant which serves a large portion of the Conococheague drainage basin within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. This plant discharges directly in to the Conococheague Creek at a point near Kemps Mill. The 1986 Report indicates surface waters are all classified as Class I for water contactre9reation and aquatic life. Water quality in the Conococheague Creek segment is generally good. High bacteria and nutrient levels are monitored throughout the segment and are attributed to agricultural runoff. Because of the intensive agricultural use and practices and soil type, this segment was designated as a "priority watershed" for the potential release of nitrogen from agricultural sources (State Soil Conservation Committee 1984). An extreme range of pH conditions (<6.5, >8,5) has been monitored on occasion in this segment and is considered to be naturally occurring. The upper tributaries of Conococheague Creek in Pennsylvania are generally considered to be "water quality limited" (Department of Environmental Resources 1984). Benthic community structure and diversity at two stations near each end of the segment (CON0005, CON0180) indicate Good water quality. LITTLE CONOCOCHEAGUE The 1988 report to the EPA indicates that in the Conococheague Creek basin (Segment 04), total nitrogen II-28 . ' significantly increased throughout the sub-basin between 1977 and 1985. The ICPRB reported significantly increased nitrate levels between 1974 and 1984 in this segment. Total phosphorus significantly increased at the downstream station (CON0005) between 1976 and 1985; at the upstream station (CON0180), no significant trend was found between 1977 and 1985. At the lower station, pH significantly declined but no trend in pH was observed· at the upper·· station· between· 19-77 and 1985. The ICPRB reported significantly decreased pH between 1976 and 1984 at the downstream station. Fecal coliform bacteria showed no trend throughout the sub-basin. Little Conococheague Creek is located just west of Conococheague Creek. Of its total drainage area of 18.0 square miles, 16. 7 square ... miles .. are_contained in Maryland. A large tract of land in the upper segment, the Indian Springs Wildlife Management Area, is forested. The watershed is generally sparsely population with· some· farm·land· in--the lower section. Clear Spring, the only Town in the watershed, is located on Tom's Run, which is the largest tributary. Water quality of the stream was monitored in 1974 in Tom's Run just below Clear Spring and at the mouth of the Little Conococheague Creek. At both points, these streams did not meet the bacteriological numerical standard. Water quality was especially degraded below Clear Spring where fecal coliform II-29 counts were always in the thousands or organisms per 100 milliliter of sample. However, dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature met water quality standards. It is likely that water quality with respect to dissolved oxygen and bacteria improved in Tom's Run and the Little Conococheague due to the construction of a sewage treatment plant serving Clear Spring and disc:harging to ,Tom's Run. No industrial wastes are known to enter the stream. The 1986 Report confirms that water quality has improved. All surface waters in this watershed are classified as Class III (natural) trout waters. Water quality in this segment is Good. High bacterial levels are due to agricultural runoff. Benthic community structure and diversity at a station near the confluence with the Potomac River (LCC000l) indicates Good water quality. LICKING CREEK Licking Creek is located west of Little Conococheague Creek. Its largest drainage area is mostly in Pennsylvania (185.5 square miles), and only 27.6 square miles are included in the Maryland segment. Most of this area is forest. Part of the Indian Springs Wildlife Management Area is located in the western segment of the drainage area. One small town (Pectonville) lies II-30 on the stream's western bank approximately two miles above the stream's mouth. Water quality of Licking Creek has been monitored by the Water Resources Administration at a single station 0.4 miles above the mouth. At this point, stream quality met State standards, except for bacteriological values which were in violation·of the numerical standard· for this parameter; Nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus) concentrations were slightly below the average for streams in the Upper Potomac Basin. There are no known sources of contamination of this stream. Farm animals undoubtedly contribute to the fecal coliform count in the stream. Other possible sources of contamination in Pennsylvania are. not .known .• --The office of Environmental Programs indicates in its 1986 Report to EPA that surface waters in this segment are classified as Class IV (recreational) trout waters. Water quality in this segment· i·s very· Good;· however; some high temperatures are occasionally monitored during the summer months. This is a natural condition, but it probably reflects a lack of stream cover and may stress cold water fishes such as trout. In both 1984 and 1985, 1000 adult rainbow trout were stocked into this creek (Tidewater Administration, 1984, 1985a). Benthic community structure and diversity at a single station near the confluence with the Potomac River (LIC0004) indicates Good water quality. Most of the upper drainage in Pennsylvania is II-31 classified as "water quality limited" (Department Environmental Resources 1984). TONOLOWAY CREEK The Tonoloway Creek drainage segment is located just east and northeast of Hancock, Maryland. This segment is quite small consisting of only 2.1 square miles. The remainder of the watershed is in Pennsylvania-and. is .111.-s square miles in size. Several orchards are found in the segment, but no towns and very few dwellings. Water quality of Tonoloway Creek was determined 0.4 miles above the stream's mouth and 0.4 miles downstream from the point of discharge for the Hancock Sewerage Treatment Plant. Except for fecal coliform values.which exceeded the numerical standard of 200 MPN per 100 ml, water quality met the State standards in 1974. Dissolved oxygen was sufficient for aquatic organisms and nutrient values were generally.low. All surface waters in this segment are classified as Class IV (put-and-take) for recreational trout. Water quality in the Tonoloway Creek segment was considered Good in 1986. High bacteria and nutrient levels from runoff from the limited agricultural land and failing septic systems are the segment's most serious water quality concerns. II-32 The town of Hancock's treatment plant is probably the major cause of high bacteriological values. The nature of wastes entering the stream above the Maryland/Pennsylvania State line is, as yet, undetermined. Benthic community structure and diversity at a single station near the confluence with the Potomac River (TOC0004) indicate Good water quality. In l985, t_he State stocked 500 adult rainbow trout into this stream (Tidewater Administration, 1985a). LITTLE TONOLOWAY "All surface waters in this segment are classified as Class IV (recreational) trout waters. Water quality in this segment is Good. Elevated bacterial levels from agricultural runoff and failing septic systems and high suspended sediments from agricultural runoff are the primary water quality concerns in this segment. In 1984.and l985, 500 adult rainbow trout were stocked each year into this segment as a put-and-take fishery (Tidewater Administration, l984 1985a)." The State of Maryland recently constructed a package sewerage treatment plant to serve the Sideling Hill Interpretive Center located off of I-68 on Sideling Hill Mountain. Discharge from this plant is into Munson Spring Branch, a tributary of the Little Tonoloway. II-33 SIDELING HILL CREEK The Sideling Hill Creek segment includes 23.1 square miles. The total drainage area includes an additional 80.5 square miles in Pennsylvania. Sideling Hill Creek and all tributaries are classified as Class IV waters (to be protected for use as recreational trout waters). Average.stream.discharge .. was.12.4 .. cf·s.measured at the U.S. Geological Survey gage 1.2 miles upstream from the mouth. Land in the watershed is largely forested with some farm land. Included in the drainage area is the Sideling Hill Wildlife Management Area. Water quality of the stream was excellent in 1974, as determined one and one-half miles above the mouth. All water quality standards were met, and fecal coliform values were very low at this point. Measurements of pH, although not very high, were on the alkaline side of neutral. _Dissolved ionic constituents were low, including nitrate which was very low in concentration. Phosphate was below average for many streams in the sub-basin. Few domestic wastes enter the stream and little agricultural pollution is present. A boy scout camp near the mouth of the stream, and above the sampling station, discharges treated wastes into the stream. There are no known industrial discharges. , II,-34 The 1986 Report to EPA indicates that water quality in this segment is Good to Excellent. Elevated bacterial and suspended sediment levels are due to agricultural runoff. Benthis community structure and diversity in the lower portion of the segment (SID0015) indicate Good water quality. In 1984 and 1985, this segment was stocked as a put-and-take fishery with 3000 to 4000 adult rainbow trout, respectively (Tidewater Association, 1984 1985a). · DARGAN AREA DRAINAGE The Dargan Area Drainage is located just above the Town of Harpers Ferry between Antietam Creek and Israel Creek. It consists of 11.1 square miles of drainage, and includes several small unnamed tributaries which enter the Potomac River directly. The watershed is.spars'1!ly_populated and contains forest land and small farms. Accessibility to the river is good and boating, fishing and camping are popular along the river's banks. There is no known quality data for the streams in this segment, but no probable sources of pollution are suspected. DOWNSVILLE AREA DRAINAGE The Downsville area segment lies to the west of Antietam Creek between Williamsport and Shepherdstown, and contains many streams directly tributary to the Potomac River. The area is 52.4 square miles in size. The largest stream in the segment is St. James-Marsh Run whose headwaters originate at St. James, a suburb of Hagerstown. One station was monitored in Marsh Run at stream mile 1.6 in 1974, but no data is available for the other streams. Plans were recently approved for the construction of a package sewerage treatment plant to serve St. James school. The purpose of this plant. is to .. eliminate .. the school's .present failing septic system. Discharge from the plant will be into an unnamed tributary to St. James Run. Marsh Run was found to be polluted by high concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria, but the other parameters met the water quality standards. The stream was found to have hard water due to a high total alkalinity measured as calcium carbonate. The pH was generally a little above 8, but well within the limits of the pH standard. The stream receives wastes from urban and agricultural runoff. Probably the agricultural activities are the major cause of· the ·bacteria counts. , PINESBURG STATION AREA DRAINAGE Pinesburg Station Area Drainage is a small segment (6.3 square miles) being at the southwest of the Conococheague Creek. It consists of a few small unnamed tributaries and is sparsely populated. Water quality of these streams is not known, but there is no reason to. beli.e:11e,.that .. the. streams do not meet water quality standards. GREENSPRING AREA DRAINAGE This segment which drains 20.5 square miles is located between the Conococheague Creek and Licking Creek watersheds. Fort Frederick State Park adjoining Big Pool, a large lake, on the C & O Canal, is found near the Potomac River. No data is available for the small streams of this small segment, but no water quality problems are suspected. II-37 TIMBER RIDGE DRAINAGE AREA The Timber Ridge segment (11.0 square miles) lies to the west of Licking Creek. Ditch Run and several small tributaries drain this area. Water quality of these streams has not been tested, and no wastes are known to enter the stream. TONOLOWAY RIDGE DRAINAGE AREA Tonoloway·Ridge·Area·Drainage-(20.S-square miles) is located west of Tonoloway Creek and east of Sideling Hill Creek. Little Tonoloway Creek contained almost entirely within Maryland is the largest stream in the segment. Plans were recently approved for the construction of a package sewage treatment plant to serve a proposed campground along the Potomac River on the east side of Tonoloway Ridge. Discharge is into an unnamed tributary. The Town of Hancock, Maryland_is.found.within the Little Tonoloway drainage area, although the Town's sewage treatment plant discharges into Tonoloway Creek, another watershed. Sideling Hill Mountain and Tonoloway Ridge, which pass through the area, are forested. Orchards and small farms characterize the cultivated areas. Little Tonoloway, which was sampled in 1974, by the Water Resources Administration, seems to be degraded by farm runoff, although exact sources have not yet been determined. Fecal coliform values did not meet the water quality standard and were extremely high in two samples taken during spring months. Other water quality parameters met the standards. II-38 FIGURE NO. 4 CLASSIFICATION OF THE WATERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY UNIT CODE ,..N"'AM=E~--- Class II Waters NONE Shellfish Harvesting (NONE) Class III Waters- Natural Trout Beaver Creek Waters Class IV Waters- Recreational Trout Waters Marsh Run Sideling Hill Creek and all Tributaries -Tonoloway Creek and all Tributaries Licking Creek and all Tributaries Conococheague Creek and all Tributaries Antietam Creek and Tributaries, Except Classified Above as Natural Trout Waters DESCRIPTION NONE Mainstem only, in Antietam Creek Watershed Mainstem only, in Antietam Creek Watershed Entire Sideling Hill Creek Watershed Entire Tonoloway Watershed Entire Licking Creek Watershed Entire Conococheague Creek Watershed Entire Antietam Creek Watershed Except Those • Designated Natural Trout Waters Source: Water Resources Administration II-39 H H I ... 0 FIGURE NO. 5 -WATER QUALITY STATUS Water Quality Standards Met? Seqnent Tenp pH 0.0 Bact. * Turb. Water** Quality Limited Major Causes of Degradation Potunac River, Hainstem (01) Antietam Cr. (02) Conococheague Creek (03) Yes Yes Yes Utt le Conoco-Yes cheague Cr. (4) licking Creek (05) Tonoloway Creek (06) Sidelln9 Hill Creek (07) Dargan (10) Yes Yes Yes Oownsvll le (Ill Yes Pinesburg (12) Green Spring (13) Tia,er Ridge (14) Tonoloway Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ EL EL EL WQ EL EL EL WQ Bacteria standards not met in four sect ions below Sewer Treatment Plants, otherwise standards are met. Agr1cu ltura 1 and urban/suburban runoff. industry, sewage systems. Tannery wastes, agricultural runoff. Runoff from agriculture and fa 11 ing septic systems. Agricultural activities. Sewer Treatment Plant serving Hancock, located near mouth of Tonoloway Creek. Relatively few possible source.s of pollution. No water quality data. No known sources of pollution. Marsh Run polluted by residential and agricultural runoff. No water qua 1 f ty data. No known sources of pollution. No water quality data. No known sources of pollution. No water quality data. No known sources of pollution. Little Tonoloway Creek polluted by unknown source(s) *"No" indicates that the numerlca 1 aspect of the bacteria standard is exceeded, but water ls not techn1ca lly in violation unless cause ls known to be a health problem. •• WQ • Water Quality Limited (all with respect to bacteria). These segments will require non-point source controls. EL • Effluent Quality Limited, standards are or can be met with point source controls. SOURCE: Water Resources Administration • S 40♦ • LEGEND 1 South Mountain• Elk Ridge 2 3 4 Hagerstown Valley Hancock -Indian Springs Sideling Hill · Town Creek WASHINGTON I A --------- 650 VIRGINIA 600 1 . 0 1 2 3 4 S Mi. 550 -------SOURCE : Md . Dept. of Geology, Mines & Water Resources -Bulletin 24, 1962 D ~HI NASSAUX. HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED . CONSULTANTS I COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS AND AQUIFERS -Washington County is divided generally into four water provinces based upon physiographic formations. As illustrated on accompanying Map No. VI -Water Provinces, the division includes the South Mountain- Elk Ridge province averaging three miles in width along the eastern boundary of the County; the Hagerstown Valley province extending approximately 18 miles in width to the base of Fairview and Powell Mountains;-the·Hancock~Indian• Springs province reaching westward from the Fairview and Powell Mountains nearly 19 miles to the base of Sideling Hill Mountain; and the Sideling Hill-Town Creek province extending to the County line. 1. Within the South Mountain-Elk Ridge water province, only small differences exist in the water-bearing capacities of the geologic formations. According to compiled data, the mean yield from wells is less than .. 10. .. gpm..with .. a range from 1 to 60 gpm. The best yields appear to be located in the Catoctin metabasalt formation in the Cascade-Highfield-Fort Ritchie area. Springs in this water province, although-numerous 1 are-generally small with discharges ranging from less than 10 to 100 gpm. The chemical quality of groundwater is considered suitable for most uses with spring water lower in mineral content, but slightly more acidic than well water. 2. The Hagerstown Valley water province covering an area of approximately 300 square miles is considered hydrogeologically complex because of the broken and folded characteristics of the limestone and similar carbonate rocks such as dolomite. "In :tl;-41 consolidated carbonate rocks, most of the water is stored in in joints, bedding planes, irregular fractures, and solution openings and at many places in the intergranular pores of the residuum (soil derived from weathered rock) ... The nwnber, size and degree of interconnection of the joints, solution cavities and other secondary openings of the carbonate rocks determine their capacity to transmit water."* The major direction of groundwater movement in the Hagerstown Valley province is southward to the Potomac River. Although local variations may exit in rock permeability, the water table contours within the Hagerstown Valley closely·parallel the topographic patterns. Groundwater recharge in. this.province occurs primarily by precipitation filtering through the soil and subsoil. "Streams that flow off South Mountain to the east •.• and Powell and Fairview Mountains to the west are major sources of recharge."** Surface depressions and sags acts as efficient basins to collect rain water and a sinkhole at Jugtown, Washington County is known to have "captured" a perennial stream with a flow of 220 gallons per minute.*** The quantity of groundwater available in the limestone and dolomite aquifers of the Hagerstown Valley is quite large. As Nutter has noted, "Carbonate rocks ••• are often excellent sources II-42 of water because the interstices (fractures and solution cavities) are large and hence yield freely nearly all the water being held against gravity."**** Wells drilled in the Hagerstown Valley yield from 2 to 400 gpm with the Tomstown dolomite, Conococheague limestone, and Stonehenge limestone evidencing respectively the highest yields. Springs also occur throughout the Hagerstown Valley water province and have a discharge range from 25-100 gpm to 2000-3000 gpm. 3. The third major water province in Washington County, the Hancock-Indian Springs province, extends westward from the Fairview~Powell Mountains to the eastern base of Sideling Hill. With shale as the dominant rock type in this province, groundwater recharge is low. Shale soils evidence a low to moderate moisture holding-capacity and a relatively high direct surface runoff results. Hydrogeologic conditions, therefore, are unfavorable for large capacity wells of any sustained yield. Springs occur in all of the formations iri the Hancock-Indian Springs water province, and are for the most part, gravity fed. Although sufficient amounts of water may be available for modest domestic and farm use, test results indicate rather poor aquifers are present. *Nutter, Larry J., Ibid., p. 13 **Ibid., p. 13 ***Ibid., p. 13 ****Ibid., p. 32 II-43 The quality of water in this province is generally satisfactory. However, both a high iron content and a hardness factor prevail. One of the least desirable water supply areas is along the Tonoloway Ridge west of Hancock where hardness and nitrate content were significantly high. 4. The Sideling Hill-Town Creek water province occupies the small portion of Washington County between Sideling Hill and Sideling Hill Creek. The best well in the province yields only 36 gpm which indicates the absence of any significant groundwater supplies. Also in the province hardness and iron content may necessitate treatment of water supplies. Additionally high sulfur and nitrate contents have been found in certain wells in the Jennings formation. The accompanying map generally illustrates the aquifer characteristics in Washington County in terms of the following three Hydrologic Units. Hydrologic Unit I -Contains the most productive aquifers. Average yields and specific capacities fall in the upper 25%. Well yields range from l to 580 gpm. There is approximately a 20% chance of getting a well yielding 50 gpm or more. Hydrologic Unit II -Aquifers are of intermediate productivity. There is approximately a 6% change of II-44 getting a well yield of 50 gpm or more. Hydroloqic Unit III -Contains the poorest aquifers within the County. Well yields range from 1 to 200 gpm with only a 2% chance of getting 50 gpm or more. GROUNDWATER QUALITY -Although ample groundwater quantity is apparent, groundwater quality continues to be a problem. One method of determining the pollution level of groundwater is to count the coliform organisms. Positive .coliform bacteria which are found in the excreta of warm blooded animals are harmless, but their presence indicates the groundwater is likely contaminated by pathogenic organisms. Unfortunately, "there is no easily applicable method of demonstrating the presence or absence of pathogenic micro-organisms in water" as Ehler and Steel note.* Groundwater quality has been monitored in Washington County for • many years pursuant to requirements of various projects and regulatory programs.. One of the most-comprehensive sampling programs conducted was in 1981 when R. E. Wright and Associates of Pennsylvania conducted a countrywide sampling program. This study included a comprehensive water quality sampling and analysis program to determine existing groundwater quality and specific problems within three designated prototype areas. Analyses included total coliform, fecal coliform, fecal streptococci, nitrates, chlorides, and ABS to establish water quality relationships to point and nonpoint pollution sources ~I-45 W E S T LEGEND Hydrologic Unit: ..___ _ __.I 1 2 3 V . A . N I A ------,.-,,----......,.-- )\ VIRGINIA ... 1 . 0 1 2 3 4 5 Mi. -------SOURCE: Washington County Plann ing & Zoning Commission D ~H I NASSAUX. HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED . CO~SULTANTS I WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ill ..... c:., 600 550 such as malfunctioning septic systems, agricultural sources (cattle barns, feed lots, chemical fertilization, and manure application), storm water sources, background water quality, etc. As a result of these analyses, the following conclusions were presented in the consultant's report: *op. cit., p.31. II-46 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS* Conclusions Relative to Coliform Contamination 1. Twenty-four percent of all wells sampled from the three prototype areas exhibited total coliform contamination as measured by the MPN method. However, only thirteen percent of the wells were characterized by the presence of total coliform in three or more tubes of the five- tube MPN method. 2. Seven percent of all wells exhibited fecal coliform contamination as measured by the MPN method; however, only two percent of all wells exhibited fecal contami- nation in three or more of the five-tube MPN tests. 3. The MPN method of total coliform analysis is considerably more sensitive than the MF method to the presence of non-fecal. col.i.form organisms. ( environmental coliforms) and other bacterial organisms which yield positive results by this method. 4. Thehydrogeologic·environment·of·Washington County is quite susceptible in many locations to contamination by naturally occurring shallow bacterial organisms. Such susceptibility, as demonstrated by the results of the MPN test results is undesirable from a public health standpoint as it indicates that potential avenues of bacterial or pathogenic communication exist between the surface and the subsurface groundwater supply. *From Groundwater Quality of Washington County, Maryland, R. E. Wright Associates, Inc., August, 1981 5. Subsurface sewage disposal practices in Washington County appear to b generally providing adequate wastewater renovat,.an before the infiltrate from these systems reaches the groundwater system. Three-fourths of the incidences of contamination are attributed to non-septic system sources. These sources are believed to be naturally occurring environmental coliform organisms associated with soil, plant, insect, and cold-blooded animals. However, twenty-five percent of the incidences of contamination are generally attributed to incomplete renovation of subsurface disposal sewage effluents. Livestock and other warm- blooded animal (non-human) sources are considered to be negligible as sources of fecal contamination of the sampled wells. 6. Many wells contaminated by environmental coliforms, will periodically be free of contamination due to the lack of fluid mechanism for transport. This means that many cases (+75%) of contamination are dependent upon rainfall frequency and intensity, vertical soil permeabilities, and travel time to subject wells. Conclusions Relatives to Well Construction 7. Deeper wells generally have a lower incidence of bacteriological contamination. Conversely, the shorter the well casing length, the more likely a well is to have bacteriological contamination. 8. The closer a well is to the on-site or neighboring septic system, the more likely it is to be contaminated. Conversely, the greater the isolation distance between well and septic system, the less likely the well is to be contaminated. 9. The age of a well is directly related to its probability of being contaminated. Newer wells are more likely to be uncontaminated and older wells are more likely to be contaminated. This is attributed to improved well construction practices as well as improved septic system planning, design, and enforcement procedures in practice in recent years. 10. The greater the depth to the static water level, the less likely a well is to be contaminated. Conversely, the shallower-the-static-water level, the more likely the well is to be contaminated. 11. Well casings extended well below the static water level will provide· anadded'-degree--of·sanitary·protection to the subject well. Conclusions Relative to Planning. Design and Management 12. Certain aquifer units in the County appear to be more sensitive to groundwater contamination. Specifically, the Beekmantown (48%) and the Metamorphic Aquifer (36%) are much more likely to have wells which are contaminated. This conclusion is relative to the average rate of contamination across the three prototype areas (24%). For this reason, special planning and other protective measures may be especially warranted for these aquifer units. 13. Wells (and septic systems) are no more likely to be contaminated when placed on hydrogeologic and soils limitations than are those which are placed upon more ideal sites. This does not, however, refute the fact that sites.characterized.by.bedrock outcroppings or shallow and rocky soils generally provide incomplete renovation of infiltrating sewage effluent. 14. Improvements in planning and design standards for the following criteria will result in improved groundwater quality.* (a) Well depth. (b) Length of well casing. (c) Isolation distances. (d) Soils and hydrogeologic conditions. (e) Depth to static water level. (f) Wells drilled in the Beekmantown and Metamorphic Aquifer Units. 15. Any groundwater.quality management.plan which succeeds in significantly improving groundwater quality must be multi-faceted, designed to address and regulate point and non-point sources of surficial bacteriological contamination and to require appropriate well siting and construction standards. *Editorial Note: Any changes to design standards for wells could only be made by, and with the cooperation of, the Maryland Department of the Environment. Groundwater, and to a limited degree, surface water quality in Washington County has been extensively investigated by the Maryland Geological Survey. In 1962, the Maryland Department of Geology, Mines, and Water Resources published Bulletin 24 titled the Water Resources of Allegheny and Washington County (J.M. Darling). In 1991, the Maryland Geological Survey published Bulletin 36 titled Water ·Resources of Washington County (Duigon and others). This is the most up-to-date, comprehensive water quality document available for the area. This report provides an .· updated assessment of the availability and quality of ground and surface water resources in Washington County and presents an evaluation of the spatial and temporal variations in_ the ,,properties. of .these resources. The report is based on a compilation of data collected over many years; the basic data are published separately in a document titled: Basic·•Data Report No. 18, Ground- water and Surface-Water Data for Washington County, Maryland (Duigon and others, 1989). In summary, these reports found that groundwater and stream flow characteristics show that water volume is adequate and that there is no consequential pesticide or volatile organic chemical contamination of the ground or surface water supply in Washington County. II-,.51 In 1990 and 1991, Washington County Health Department's Division of Environmental Health conducted a survey in an attempt to assess the quality of groundwater, specifically, any change which could be noted from the parameters presented in the 1981 study. In an attempt to do this, a random sampling was conducted of 50 percent of the sites originally used by R. E. Wright and Associates. The conclusions of the Health Department survey are presented in Figure 6 .. Aquifer Unit Metamorphic Lower Cambrian Conococheague Beekmantown Shale FIGURE 6 GROUNDWATER SURVEY STUDY WASHINGTON COUNTY Negative Total Wright 32/47 (68%) 15/47 H.D. 17/24 (71%) 7/24 Wright· 52168 ( 76% J 16/68 H.D. 19/26 (73%) 7/26 Wright 92/114 (84%) 18/114 H.D. 37/48 (77%) 11/48 Wright 11/21 (52%) 10/21 H.D. 10/20 (50%) 10/20 Wright 40/46 (87%) 6/46 H.D. 10/16 (62%) 6/16 II-53 Fecal (32%) 7/47 (15%) (29%) 2/24 ( 8%) (24%) 4/68 ( 6%) (27%) 0/26 ( 0%) (16%) 6/114 (5%) (23%) 4/48 (8%) (48%) 3/21 (14%) (50%) 3/20 ( 15%) . (13%) 0/46 (0%) (38%) 3/16 (19%) The results of the resurvey of the 1981 R. E. Wright and Associates, Inc. report indicate that while there has been a seemingly minor decrease in groundwater quality, especially in the shale aquifer unit, on the whole the overall water quality in the County (within the parameters tested) has remained relatively constant. Rates of contamination for these two studies are also consistent with results of other sampling which has been done by the Washington· County ·Health ·Department: The hope for an increase in groundwater quality due to a more stringent on-site water and sewer regulation has not been seen; however, it should be born in mind that in the ten-year period 1981 through 1991, 3,834 permits for the installation of new septic systems were issued by the Washington County Health Department. This growth has occurred during a period of increased stringency for construction and siting.of .. on,.site .. systems and it may well be that the regulations imposed by the Washington County Commissioners in 1983 has had the effect of stemming ground water contamination at earlier levels. Currently, study continues on the ground water quality within the County with the County Health Department modifying study methods and attempting to assess the effect of external variables, eg, seasonal, agricultural activity, on water quality. It is anticipated that the Washington County Sanitary Commission will soon have the capability of performing a more wide range of laboratory analyses and when that is possible, increased II-54 screening, especially from volatile organic compounds and heavy metals, is planned. WATER QUALITY PLANS -The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1977 made improved water quality a national priority and authorized funding for the planning, design and construction of sewerage facilities. The planning and construction grants programs established.by this Act have provided the means by which the County and municipalities can meet many of the local objectives for the development of sewerage facilities. Under Section 303(e) of the Water Pollution Control Act, the Water Resources Administration of the State of Maryland prepared the Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan in 1976. The Plan evaluates existing water quality, sources of pollution, and recommends management approaches for the Basin, which includes all of Washington County. The scope of the Plan is much broader than the need for sewerage facilities. The Plan classifies streams according to the· degree of water quality to be achieved, and thus determines either directly or indirectly the type of treatment works and operational efficiency required of sewerage facilities. The inventory of existing systems and problem areas is useful in establishing priorities for the construction of improvement sewerage facilities. While the Basin Plan prepared under Section 303(e) deals primarily with pollution which can be traced to point discharges II-55 to surface waters, the Basin Plan prepared pursuant to Section 208 deals with non-point sources. The 208 Plan, completed in 1979, identifies non-point sources of water pollution and current management activities in the areas of stormwater runoff, sediment control, surface mining, residuals management, failing septic systems, forestry operations, agriculture, and snow and ice controls. Section 201 of the Water Pollution Control Act established a construction grants.program for public sewerage facilities. Until 1989 funds were allocated by EPA to local areas on the basis of state-wide priorities in a three step process. In step 1, Facilities Planning, the specific sewerage requirements of a planning area designed by the State are investigated, alternatives evaluated, and a particular solution recommended. The Antietam Basin Facilities Plan for Hagerstown metropolitan area, including the incorporated towns of Funkstown, Williamsport and Smithsburg, was prepared with a Step 1 grant. The 201 Plan for Boonsboro-Keedysville-Sharpsburg was originally prepared in 1981 and updated in 1985. Steps 2 and 3 of the construction grant program funded the preparation of detailed engineering plans and specifications and the construction of facilities respectively. There was a tendency to consolidate steps 2 and 3 into 'step 4' • EPA grants also funded faci•li ties planning for Clear Spring, Highfield-Cascade-PenMar, Hancock, and Sandy Hook. II-56 The Maryland Department of the Environment, State Revolving Loan Fund has served as a replacement source of funding for EPA grants since they were phased out in 1989. The Washington County Sanitary District as well as other service providing agencies are using this source as well as Farmers Home Administration, Community Development Block Grant, Appalachian Regional Commission, and Economic Development Administration funds for facilities planning ·purposes·; Plans· for the· St. James area and the Rte. 64/Jefferson Boulevard corridor are currently in preparation by the Washington County Sanitary District. 2. POPULATION ANALYSIS The 1990 population of Washington County at 121,393 persons represents an increase of 7.3% or some 8,307 residents since 1980. In addition to.total.population changes, the internal County patterns are significant to the planning of water and sewerage facilities. Table No. 1 outlines the 1970-1990 population patterns for·eachPlanning·Sector and-Election District within the County. The table illustrates that the County wide growth rate for the period 1980 to 1990 was 7.3%. This rate of growth was somewhat lower than the growth rate of 8.9% between 1970 and 1980. Planning Sector I (metro) which includes the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area accounted for approximately 65% of the total population of the County in 1990. This percentage remained II-57 virtually unchanged from the 1980 census. Within Planning Sector I, the Chewsville and Cedar Lawn election districts experienced the most significant increases in population, 21.3% and 30.2% respectively. The City of Hagerstown reversed its loss of population reflected in the 1980 census and showed an increase of 1.6% between 1980 and 1990. Planning Sector II (Mid) which· includes 'the Boonsboro Growth Area experienced the highest percentage of growth between 1980 and 1990 with a residential growth rate of 19.8% (this does not include a significant increase in group quarters population at the state prison complex). According to the 1990 census, Planning Sector IV (North East) which includes Smithsburg and Ringgold election districts decreased in population by 6% between 1980 and 1990. PROJECTIONS For purposes of water and sewerage planning, population projections developed by the Department of State Planning for the County as a whole will be used as a base. These total projections are broken down to election district projections in Table 1-A based upon a pattern of distribution developed by the County Planning Commission. II-58 VI WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTION DISTRICTS PLANNING SECTORS 0 2 4 s.... I I I I I V I j I ( 0 23 \ I IV 14 13 27 I 07 \_ 18 16 , 12 , I I I 11 TABLE NO. l WASHINGTON COUNTY 1980 TO 1990 POPULATION PATTERNS SECTOR AND NET PERCENT PERCENT OF ELECTION DISTRICT 1980 1990 CHANGE CHANGE CO. POP.(1990 I METRO 75,708 78,787 3,079 4.1 64.91 2 Williamsport 4,718 4,345 -373 -7.9 3.58 9 Leitersburg 3,070 2,814 -256 -8,3 2.32 10 Funkstown* 7,801 9,034 1,233 15.8 7.44 13 Maugansville 5,030 5,351 321 6.4 4.41 18 Chewsville* 5,532 6,346 814 14,7 5.23 24 Cedar Lawn 867 .. 1,129 .. 262 30.2 0.93 26 Halfway 9,489 9,418 -71 -0.7 7.76 27 Fountainhead* 5,069 4,905 -164 -3.2 4.04 Hagerstown 34,132 35,445 1,313 3.8 29.20 II MID 14,825 19,013 4,188 28.3 15.67 1 Sharpsburg 2,313 2,697 384 16.6 2.22 6 Boonsboro 3,927 4,652 725 18.5 3.83 12 Fairplay 3,089 5,506 2,417 78.2(12.0) 4.54 16 Beaver Creek 2,725 3,141 416 15.3 2.59 19 Keedysville 1,216 1,259 43 3.5 1.04 20 Downsville 1,555 1,758 203 13.1 1,45 III SOUTHEAST 3,451 3,800 349 10.1 3.13 8 Rohrersville 1,901 2,137 236 12.4 1. 76 11 Sandy Hook 1,550 1,663 113 7.3 1.37 IV NORTHEAST .8.,56.8 8,060 -508 -5.9 6.64 7 Smithsburg 4,413 4,297 -116 -2.6 3.54 14 Ringgold 4,155 3,763 -392 -9.4 3.10 V CENTRAL 6,925 7,901 914 14.1 6.51 4 Clear Spring 2,368 2,552 184 7.8 2.10 15 Indian Springs 1,694 1,842 148 8.7 1.52 23 Wilson 2,863 3,507 644 22.5 2.89 VI WESTERN 5 Hancock 3,609 3,832 223 6.2 3.16 TOTALS 113,086 121,393 8,307 7.3 100.00 II-59 TABLE NO. 1-A WASHINGTON COUNTY PROJECTIOµS BY ELECTION DISTRICT ELECTION GROWTH RATE % OF TOTAL COUNTY (2) SECTOR DISTRICT BETWEEN 1980-1990 POPULATION 1990 1995 2000 2010 2020 I 2 Wil 1 iamsport -7 ,9% 3.58% 4345 4511 4622 4786 4901 9 Leitersburg -8.3% 2.32% 2814 2923 2995 3101 3176 10 Funkstown 15.8% 7.44% 9034 9374 9605 9947 10,185 13 Maugansvi lle 6.4% 4.41% 5351 5557 5693 5896 6037 18 Chewsvi lle 14.7% 5.23% 6346 6590 6752 6992 7159 24 Cedar Lawn 30.2% 0.93% 1129 1172 1201 1243 1273 26 Halfway -0.7% 7.76% . 9418 9778 10,018 10,375 10,623 27 Fountainhead -3.2% 4.04% 4905 5090 5216 5401 5530 Hagerstown 3.8% 29.20% 35,445 36,792 37,697 39,040 39,974 II 1 Sharpsburg 16.6% 2.22% 2697 · 2797 2866 2968 3039 6 Boonsboro 18.5% 3.83% (3) 4652 4826 4945 5120 5243 12 Fairplay 78.2% 4.54% 5506 5720 5861 6070 6215 16 Beaver Creek 15.3% 2.59% 3141 3263 3344 3462 3545 19 Keedysvi 1 le 3.5% 1.04% 1259 1310 1343 1390 1423 20 Downsville 13.1% 1.45% 1758 1827 1872 1938 1985 Ill 8 Rohrersv 111 e 12.4% 1.76% 2137 2218 2272 2353 2409 11 Sandy Hook 7.3% 1.37% 1663 1726 1769 1831 1875 IV 7 Smithsburg -2.6% 3.54% 4297 4460 4570 4733 4846 14 Ringgold -9.4% 3.10% 3763 3906 4002 4144 4243 V 4 Clear Spring 7.8% 2.10% 2552 2646 2711 2807 2874 15 Indian Springs 8.7% 1.52% 1842 1915 1962 2032 2080 23 Wilsons 22.5% 2.89% 3507 3641 3731 3863 3956 VI 5 Hancock 6.2% 3.16% 3832 3982 4080 4224 4326 TOTALS 121,393 126,024 129,127 133,716 136,917 CHANGE 3.8% 2.5% 3.6% 2.4% 4631 3103 4589 3201 Total County Growth Rate 1980-1990 • 7.3% !!2!lli (1) Figures are based on Maryland Office of Planning Population Projections (Deceriler 1992). Projections for Election Districts are based on each District's percent of the County's total population in 1990 as a part of the projected total County population. This method does not account for different growth rates in Election Districts but assumes a constant rate of growth throughout the County for each projection period. · (2) 1990 figures from actual Census counts. (3) Election District 12 contains large Group Quarters population. 78.2% increase reflects growth of resident population, as well as Group Quarters. True growth in resident population was 12.0% between 1970-1980. II-60 3. LAND USE A generalized land use analysis of Washington County indicates that the highest orders of development are located in the Hagerstown Valley. In particular, the City of Hagerstown and the surrounding adjacent communities evidence the most intense residential, commercial, and industrial land use activities. With the Hagerstown Metropolitan Area as the virtual hub of the County, small incorporated· towns and communities are situated along almost every primary corridor emanating from the City. Considerable strip development has taken place along those roadways between the Hagerstown Metropolitan Area and the established communities. Outside the Hagerstown Valley, land use patterns are manifested largely by open spacet'.agtlcultural.uses and sporadic residential clusters. Tables 2A and·2B illustrate the·historical·and·projected changes in land use composition of the County from 1973 to 2020. Also shown is the current composition of County land area by Zoning districts (table 2C). Zoning districts are shown on the detailed Water and Sewer Maps at the conclusion of this.document. In order to provide a continuous up-to-date source of data on what type of development is occurring and where it is occurring, the County Planning Department compiles a data base of subdivision and building permit activity as applications are made and approved in order to provide a continuous up-to-date source of data on what type of development is occurring and where it is occurring. An additional source of land use data is nearing completion through a project to assign house numbers to all significant structures in the County, and enter the data into the computer. Summary reports are now produced for subdivision activity. All data files will soon be converted to a PC format from a mainframe computer, allowing quicker access and more flexibility. Planning'has begun in the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) to provide graphic and analysis components. The integration of separate data files into a GIS environment will allow much more detailed and comprehensive analysis of development factors in facilities and infrastructure planning. The Comprehensive Plan for Washington County.separates the County into three specific planning areas: the Urban and Town Growth Areas, the Rural/Agricultural Area and Special Planning Areas. Areas where public facilities and services either exist or can be cost-effectively planned and programmed over the next twenty years are designated as Growth Areas. An area around the City of Hagerstown, Funkstown and Williamsport has been designated as the Urban Growth Area. Town Growth Areas have been designed around II-62 Smithsburg and Boonsboro. A Town Growth Area for Hancock was designated and adopted in January of 1990. The Comprehensive Plan encourages development of all types within the designated growth areas. In order to support this development the Plan also encourages extension of public water and sewer facilities to all of the land considered to be located within the growth area. The entire growth area is considered to be ultimately served in the future. The remainder of the land in the County, outside of the boundaries of the Urban and Town Growth Areas, is designated as the Rural/Agricultural Area. Of highest priority in this area are the goals of preserving agricultural land and conserving open space, water supply sources, mountain and woodland areas and other natural and scenic resources. Development within the Rural/Agricultural Area should be in keeping with the rural character of the environment and should not require public investments in services .. or.facilities_ which would result in increased growth pressures and divert priorities from the Growth Area. In several areas of the County extension of public water and/or sewer facilities exist within the rural-agricultural area. These may be lines which connect a water supply source or treatment plant with service areas in a growth area or rural village. They may also be extensions of lines outside of the Growth area into portions of the rural-agricultural area that have been necessitated by water quality problems with existing .LI-:63 wells documented by the Health Department. The presence of these lines shall not be considered a catalyst for new development above that which normally would be expected to occur in the rural-agricultural area. Within the rural-agricultural area are.small communities called rural villages. These small communities possess characteristics such as small clustered populations, a few small local businesses, a church, and perhaps a fire station. Some of these villages may currently have their own small public water and/or sewerage system. Most however depend on individual private wells and on site septic systems many of which are old, substandard, and possibly failing. This could be resulting in groundwater contamination. New public water and sewer facilities may be necessitated in these villages to alleviate these problems. Residential development policies for rural villages should be generally the same as for the rest of the rural-agricultural area. Residential and.limited commercial uses of a function and scale appropriate to the character of the communities should be permitted. Three areas have been identified as being particularly critical at the present time for natural resource protection. These areas are the Edgemont and Smithsburg Reservoir Watersheds, the Beaver Creek Watershed, including the Albert M. Powell Trout Hatchery, and the Appalachian Trail. They have been designated as Special Planning Areas and are identified on the General Plan map in the Comprehensive Plan. lI-65 H H I °' °' TABLE NO. 2-A LAND USE IN ACRES LAND USE CHANGE WASHINGTON COUNTY 1973 1981 1985 1990 1973-1990 1985-1990 Acres Percent Acres Percent Low Density Residential 7,225 8,479 8,709 15,242 8,0~7 111.0% 6,533 75.0% ' Med/High Density Res. 4,902 5,023 5,177 5,594 692 14.1% 417 8.1% Conunercial/Industrial 3,896 4,395 4,804 5,314 1,418 36.4% 510 10.5% Institutional/Open 1,995 2,046 2,264 2,874 879 44.1% 610 26.9% Bare Ground 95 133 396 524 429 451.6% 128 32.3% ' ' TOTAL DEVELOPMENT 18,113 20,076 21,350 29,548 11,435 63.1% 8,198 38.4% Agriculture 160,468 158,530 157,576 151,166 (9,302) -5.8% (6,410) -4.1% Forest 114,897 114,840 114,417 112,585 (2,312) -2.0% (1,832) -1.6% Extractive/Barren 461 506 609 587 126 27.3% (22) -3.6% Wetland 32 19 19 19 (13) -40.6% 0 0.0% TOTAL RESOURCES 275,858 273,895 272,621 264,357 (11,501) Total Land 293,971 293,971 293,971 293,905. (66) Water 5,921 5,921 5,921 5,987 66 TOTAL AREA 299,892 299,892 299,892 299,892 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. 1973 and 1981 land areas are based on 91.8 acre grid cells which have been adjusted with 1985 and 1990 polygon data. Water area before 1985 was assumed to be constant. Source: Maryland Office of Planning Maryland's Land 1973 -1990 A Changing Resource October 1991 -4.2% (8,264) -3.0% -0.0% (66) -0.0% 1.1% 66 1.1% LAND COVER FORECAST Land Cover in Acres County: WASHINGTON Total Development Residential Very Low Density(!) Low Density(2) Med/High Density(3) Non-residential Commercial and industrial Institutional and open Bare ground(4) Total Resources Agriculture Forest Extractive and barren(4) Wetland(4) Total Land Water(4) Total County TABLE NO. 2-B 1990 40,917 32,205 11,369 15,242 5,594 8,712 5,314 2,874 524 252,988 144,650 107,732 587 19 293,905 5,987 299,892 2000 2010 2020 45,927 49,897 52,998 36,199 39,365 41,837 12,850 14,023 14,940 17,154 18,670 19,854 6,195 6,672 7,044 9,728 10,532 11,161 5,973 6,495 6,903 3,230 3,513 3,734 524 524 524 247,978 244,008 240,907 141,779 139,503 137, 726 105,594 103,899 102,575 587 587 587 19 19 19 293,905 293,905 293,905. 5,987 5,987 5,987 299,892 299,892 299,892 (1) l du/5 acres to 1 du/20 acres, Source: Maryland Department of Assessments end Taxation; compiled by Maryland Office of Planning. The Land Use/Cover Inventory has been determined to be inaccurate for very low density parcels; Assessments and Taxation data is used as a supplement. (2) .2 du/acre to 2 du/acre (3) 2 du/acre to >8 du/acre (4) Assumed constant over forecast period Methodology: Forecast uses 1990 Maryland Office of Planning Land Use /Cover Inventory as a base. To calculate increase in residential land, A and T average parcel sizes are multiplied by OP household projections. Other developed uses are increased proportionally and resource uses are decreased proportionally. See text for complete discussion. Source: Maryland Office of Planning Maryland Land Use/Land Cover 1990 -2020 Forecast September 1992 II-67 Zoning District Conservation Agricultural Residential Rural Residential Suburban Residential Urban, Residential Multi-Family Business Transitional Business Local Business General Airport Industrial Transitional Industrial Restricted Industrial General Industrial Mineral RS -PUD A -PUD Planned Business Planned Industrial Highway Interchange Historic Preservation Hagerstown Other Municipal TOTAL TABLE NO. 2-C ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS (As of December 31, 1991) Total Acreage 105,449 143,944 II-68 7,222 3,933 2, 494- 558 1 641 853 384 0 148 2,196 5,283 484 82 207 1,203 11,442 562 5,587 3.015 295,688 % of County Land Area 35. 7 48. 7 2.4 1.3 .a .2 >.l .2 .1 .1 0 .l .7 1.8 .2 >.1 >.1 .4 3.7 .2 1.9 1.0 100% 4. GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND LAND PRESERVATION STRATEGY In an effort to implement the policies regarding land use in the Comprehensive Plan for the County and to address the "Six Visions" of the Maryland Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Act of 1992, the County has adopted, or is currently working on the following policies: Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance: On October 16, 1990 the Board of County Commissioners adopted an A,P.F,O. which became effective December 1, 1990. The Ordinance follows closely the subdivision and site plan review procedures now in effect. It delegates approval or disapprov1:1l. aut;PPt'.i.:ty __ .:!:g _the. Planning Commission based on the service providing agency's determination of whether the subject facility is adequate or not. The facilities included are-County roads.,. public schools and all forms of water and sewerage systems. There is also a requirement for interim fire protection systems in areas where public water is not yet available. Provisions within the Ordinance allow the developer to make the necessary improvements to bring the facility up to minimum standards in order to gain development approval. Much subjectivity in the determinations of adequacy is removed by specifying the agency which has the responsibility to determine projected II-69 demands on the infrastructure and the standards to be used. The Ordinance tends to direct development toward the Growth Areas where facilities are adequate. This tendency accomplishes a major goal of the Comprehensive Plan. It also shifts much of the new infrastructure costs to the appropriate parties, ie. the developers. Forest Conservation Ordinance: On February 2, 1993, the County Commissioners adopted the Forest Conservation Ordinance. The purpose of this Ordinance is to meet the requirements of Natural Resources Article 5-1601--5-1612, Annotated Code of Maryland. This Ordinance provides the requirements and guidance for the .. preservation or replanting, whichever is applicable, of trees or forests during certain development activities by requiring forest stand delineations, forest-conservation plans, maintenance agreements and sureties. Rural-Agricultural Area: New subdivision regulations have been adopted to restrict the use of panhandle lots and immediate family member conveyances. Subdivisions on sub-standard roads are not permitted unless provisions are made to improve the road based on the County's policy to determine adequacy of II-70 existing roadways for additional development. The Washington County Health Department conducted a water quality study by testing wells in the rural areas. The Health Department continues to monitor ground water quality through ongoing testing of wells. Water and/or sewer facilities which are located outside of a designated growth area and not within a rural village are considered "Restricted Use" facilities. Connections to these facilities are only permitted for existing dwellings or lots of record directly adjacent to the line and for new subdivision lots that can be served by the existing line without extension. The presence of these lines shall not be considered as an enticement for.new-development or for new development at a density greater than what could occur without public facilities. In an effort to encourage agricultural preservation, the Board of County Commissioners in 1990 approved a ten year Agricultural Land Preservation District Tax Credit Program. In exchange for restricting land to agricultural use only, farmers receive a County property tax credit. To date 144 farms totaling 20,236 acres have been enrolled in the Program. Of these 12 II-71 farms totaling 3100 acres have sold development rights easements. Rural Villages: Existing or planned water and sewer facilities located within areas considered as Rural Villages by the comprehensive plan shall be designated as a "Rural Village Service·· Area·". The·· purpose of these systems is to eliminate contaminated wells and correct water quality problems created by failing septic systems within these villages. The service area established around these villages would allow for in-fill development on existing lots and some limited growth in accordance with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan dealing with .. RuraLVillages .• Urban and Town Growth Areas: The Urban Growth Area is established around the City of Hagerstown and includes the towns of Funkstown and Williamsport. Town Growth Areas have been established around Smithsburg and Boonsboro. Hancock was completed by early 1990. Maps XII through XV show the adopted Growth Areas. On August 22, 1989, the Hagerstown Mayor and Council and the Board of County Commissioners entered into an agreement with II-72 BCM Potomac, Inc. to perform a 20-year comprehensive water and sewer study for the Hagerstown metropolitan area commonly referred as the adopted Urban Growth Area (UGA). The BCM Study was presented in draft form in August of 1990 with a revised Executive Summary and Technical Memoranda presented in May of 1991, The consultants study contains the following elements: 1. Population and development trends for the Urban Growth Area between 1990 and 2010 and their inter- relationship with current and future land use patterns. 2. -Projected water and sewer system demands to the year 2010. 3. Developed a Hagerstown water system'improvement and expansion master,,plan_.,for..1990. to 2010. 4. Developed an Urban Growth Area sewer system master plan for 1990 to 2010. 5. Developed and evaluated alternatives for the implementation of the recommended water and sewer system improvements. In March and April of 1993, the Mayor and Council and the County Commissioners each adopted resolutions pertaining to the intent and affect of the BCM study. Copies of these resolutions are included in Appendix F. In summary, the governing bodies resolved that the primary use for this study is that it is to be used as a guide and basis for amending the Water and Sewerage Plan where applicable and for assisting the Mayor and Council and the Board of County Commissioners in providing water and sewerage services within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. In order to streamline.the review and approval process for development within designated urban and town growth areas, development proposals which involve the extension of water and sewer lines into these portions of the growth area will be considered to be consistent with the comprehensive Plan. An individual amendment to the Water and Sewerage Plan will not be necessary. II-74 TABLE NO. 2-D POPULATION OF MAJOR INSTITUTIONS (FIGURES FOR WINTER 1991-92) Map Total Hap Total !!tl.:. Educational Institutions Enrollment !!tl.:. Educational Institutions Em, 1111'1!tlt E-1 North Hagerstown High School 1,012 E-31 Sharpsburg Elementary School 311 E-2 South Hagerstown High School 823 E-32 Clear Spring High School 404 E-3 Northern Middle School 626 E-33 Clear Spring Middle School 362 E-4 E. Russell Hicks School 685 E-34 Clear Spring Elementary School 379 E-5 Western Heights Middle School 464 E-35 Smithsburg High School 645 E-6 Bester Elementary School 555 E-36 Smithsburg Middle School 550 , E-8 Conococheague Elementary School 266 E-37 Smithsburg Elementary School 370 E-9 Enma K, Doub Elementary School 228 E-38 Cascade Elementary School 381 E-10 Fountaindale Elementary School 601 E-39 Williamsport High School 685 E-11 Funkstown Elementary School 239 E-40 Springfield Middle School 604 E-12 Lincolnshire Elementary School 507 E-41 Williamsport Elementary School 405 E-13 Maugansville Elementary School 365 E-42 Fountain Rock Elementary School 330 E-14 Old Forge Elementary School 268 E-43 Hancock Middle School 396 E-15 Pangborn Boulevard Elementary School 642 E-44 Hancock Elementary School 317 E-16 Paramount Elementary School 222 E-45 Hickory Elementary School 247 E-17 Potomac Heights Elementary·School 358 Pleasant Valley 248 E-lB Salem Avenue Elementary School 444 Alternative Center 47 E-20 Winter Street Elementary School 337 E-46 Hagerstown Junior College• 5,733 E-22 Marshall Street Education Center 85 • Hagerstown Junior College has enrolled Job Development Center 3,361 Credit Students and 2,372 Continuing E-23 83 Education Students E-24 Boonsboro High School 726 Major Health Centers Ca(l2Citl E-25 Boonsboro Middle School 650 H-1 Washington County Hospital 317 beds E-26 Boonsboro Elementary School 527 H-2 Coffman Health Center 51 beds {Administrative Offices) E-27 Greenbrier Elementary School 293 H-3 Western Maryland Center 175 beds Governmental Establishments G-1 Maryland Correctional Institute Maryland Correctional Training Center and Roxbury Correctional Institute 6,594 G-2 Fort Ritche 1,301 II-75 MAP X GENERALIZED EXISTING LAND USE OUT OF PRINT CURRENTLY BEING REVISED S 40 P E N N S L VAN I A· n1 ?'ff~ ~19 ~ ... ~ / -~ \,,13 W E S T -'• M A R L A N r--....!!.._ L-.. C°'") ... us 40 El ·--~ " ' -. ~ LEGEND El -E46 Educational Institutions H 1 -H3 Major Health Centers Gl -C3 Governmental Establishments Rl -R 13 Recreational Facilities ,LJ Williams rt 41 \ -0 VIRGINIA ~;Gl ., .. ,-9 .p .. • -~;:bur/ .;.\ WASHINGTON COUNTY WAT~;~ AND SEWERAGE PLAN \\ ( WASHINGTON COUNTY MAJOR · PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS ( 13 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Mi. i--I SOURCE: Washington County Planning -Zoning Commission O ~HI NASSAUX -HEMSLEY, INCORPORATED · CON_SULTANTS l ···-;;;z : G2 -~ ; / E (~·. mithsburg f ~-----;,, ~-· ··"--_J I ,,, l ( , I . .' 650 ! ~· ,._ I ,.._ c:::, 600 . 3 ~r~ ~ ...., c:::, ...., 550 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMM I SSION ( 610 ( ( 60 Map No. XIII BOONSBORO Town Growth Area ..... ... MAP SCALE Oac:;a.c::..c:=====-----------2MUS 610 Map No. XIV Urban Growth Area 'ii : ~-') . ~-.\ •:• . • l .. ..::..1 .. , . ,· : . ~J (. ;. i:]1·'., 1/ I ,a 1.,. • I• . . • : .! MAP NO. XV Hancock Growth Area HANCOCK CHAPTER THREE EXISTING AND PLANNED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT: The Washington County Sanitary District operates and maintains several water distribution systems and water treatment plants within Washington· County,---These--s-yst,ems, serve· the communities of Subdistrict No. 4 -Sharpsburg, Subdistrict No. 7 -Mt. Aetna, Subdistrict No. 9 -Highfield/Cascade, Subdistrict No. 17 -Elk Ridge and Subdistrict No. 19-l -Sandy Hook. The District also owns water distribution systems which serve Subdistrict No. 15-l -Martins Crossroads/Cearfoss and Subdistrict No. 18-l -Conococheague. The City of Hagerstown provides operations and maintenance on these systems. The City also provides billing services and collects the fees for these subdistricts and forwards the debt fees-to the District collected from the customers to pay the loans against the project costs. The District is actively preparing for several planned water service area extensions. The Pen Mar community and the Victor Cullen Center are proposed to be incorporated into Subdistrict No. 9 -Highfield/Cascade. Water line extensions on Bower Avenue, Leonard Avenue, Kemps Mill Road, Rock Hill Road and Honeyfield Road, Cedar Lawn and Green Lawn are being planned and III-l are proposed to be incorporated into Subdistrict No. 18-1 - Conococheague. The following information will provide data on each of the existing and planned water service areas. EXISTING WATER SERVICE AREAS: SHARPSBURG AREA -SUBDISTRICT NO. 4: The Town of Sharpsburg is .. situated. 12. miles south of Hagerstown. The District owns, operates and maintains the water filtration plant and water distribution system which extends through the corporate boundaries of the Town of Sharpsburg and to adjacent subdivisions of Forge Hill Estates, Battlefield Knolls, Potomac Crest and Confederate Hills. The water distribution system also serves the Antietam Battlefield Visitors Center and extends west on Maryland Route 34 to the end of the developed area. The water filtration plant is situated along the Potomac River, which is the raw water source... The District. processes and chemically treats the raw water and adds fluoride prior to distribution. The water system also includes a 200,000 gallon elevated storage tank. The capacity of the filtration plant is 230,000 gpd. This water system presently serves approximately 479 residential and 18 commercial units which represents 570 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). This is considered a Rural Village Service area. III-2 MT. AETNA AREA -SUBDISTRICT NO. 7: At the request of the Mt. Aetna Water Association, Inc. the Sanitary District has assumed operations and maintenance of the Mt. Aetna Water System. Transfer of ownership of this community water system to the Sanitary District is to occur by mid-1994. Various improvements to the water system are being planned to bring the -supply -and distribu-tion-system-into .compliance with State regulations. This water system serves approximately 126 residential units and 4 commercial units which represents 201 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). This is considered a Rural Village Service area. HIGHFIELD/CASCADE AREA -SUBDISTRICT NO. 9: The Washington County Sanitary District began operating the Highfield/Cascade Water System (previously known as the Blue Ridge Water Company). October · 1, .. 1978 following revocation of the franchise by the Maryland Public Utilities Commission and a subsequent Washington County Court Order sought by the Maryland State Health Department. The Highfield/Cascade area is located in the northeast portion of Washington County and is considered a Rural Village Service area. Followed by six years of legal entanglements, in July 1984 the Washington County Sanitary District became owners of the water III-3 system. Soon after the District began operation and maintenance of the water system in 1978 it was realized that the deteriorated system would have to be replaced with a new one. Study, planning and subsequent design began shortly thereafter. In October 1987 construction was completed for a new water distribution system with fire protection, a 400,000 gallon storage tank and upgrade of the Cascade and Willard Wells. In 1988 the Sanitary District drilled a third well, known as the "Highfield Well" to supplement the Highfield/Cascade distribution system. The District chemically treats the well water without filtration prior to distribution. In the fall of 1990 a fourth well known as the "Pennersville Well", was drilled to supplement the Highfield/Cascade system plus to provide water supply for the future Pen Mar water system. Together with the Cascade, Willard, Highfield and Pennersville wells, the average maximum capacity is 200,000 gallons per day. This water system presently serves 367 residential and .4. commercial.units which represents 449 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). MARTINS CROSSROADS/CEARFOSS -SUBDISTRICT NO. 15-1: The Washington County Sanitary District managed the water line extension program for the Martins Crossroads/Cearfoss area (Map Nos. 10, 23, 24 and 36). Upon completion of the planning, study, and design phases, construction began July 1987 with completion III-4 one year later (July 1988), The system was an extension of the City of Hagerstown's lines which includes the following areas: Route 40 at Huyetts Crossroads; Maryland Route 63 from Route 40 to Route 58; portions of Mt, Tabor Church Road, Resh Road, Pinecrest Road, Broadfording Church Road, Route 58 and Route 416. Public water is presently being·supplied to approximately 365 residential and 14 commercial units which represents 422 Equivalent Dwel-ling Uni ts , ( EDU.!-,s). ,The ,water distribution system is maintained by the City of Hagerstown. This is considered a Restricted Use Service area and is consistent with a policy adopted by the Planning Commission on July 11, 1983 concerning future development in this area. ELK RIDGE AREA -SUBDISTRICT NO, 17: In November 1987 the Washington County Sanitary District assumed_ the operations and maintenance of the Ridge Water Corporation which was privately owned by the citizens of the community known as Elk Ridge located adjacent to Chestnut Grove Road in South Washington County. In April 1989 the Sanitary District assumed ownership of this water system pursuant to the request of the property owners. This water system supplies 29 residential units which represents 29 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) with the source being three wells. (No. 1, 2, and 3). An average of 2,700 gallons per day is presently being pumped. The District proposes to implement an improvement program for this water III-5 system which includes installation of water meters, additional storage, another well for additional quantity and equipment to improve the water quality. This is considered a Rural Village Service area. CONOCOCHEAGUE AREA -SUBDISTRICT NO.18-1: A 16" water main extension project on Hopewell Road initiated the creation of this .. subdistrict •.. An. interconnection was made to the water main at the intersection of MD Route 144 and Hopewell Road. The water main was extended on Hopewell Road to an approximate point several hundred feet north of the railroad crossing on Hopewell Road south of the Halfway Boulevard intersection. Several 12" and 8" laterals have been installed for future extensions. Approximately 14 residential and 6 commercial units are provided water service which represents 59 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). This subdistrict is located within the Urban Growth Area. SANDY HOOK AREA -SUBDISTRICT NO.19-1: The water supply and distribution system for the Sandy Hook community was completed March 1993. Two wells provide water supply, capable of producing 45 gpm or approximately 65,000 gallons of water per day. The treatment process includes iron and manganese removal with chlorine addition. The distribution system includes fire protection with a 100,000 gallon storage III-6 tank. The system serves 1 commercial and 58 residential units which represents 59 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). This is considered a Rural Village System. PLANNED WATER SERVICE AREAS: PEN MAR: In July 1988 the·wash:ihgebn"Co'Unty·s-oard·of~county Commissioners were petitioned by the property owners of the Pen Mar area to investigate the probability of extending public water service to their area. The petition was presented to the Washington County Sanitary·commission and they directed the Sanitary District to perform a Feasibility Study Report for the Pen Mar area. In March 1989, the Feasibility Report was completed and the Sanitary District held a public .. hearJ.ng.regarding the project on May 22, 1989. The proposed outlay of the project is to extend the Highfield/Cascade water supply system which would require the current subdistrict boundaries to be extended to include the Pen Mar area. This project would include a water supply distribution system with fire protection, above ground water (100,000) gallon storage tank, well and disinfection facilities. This water system would serve approximately 77 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Funding options are currently being investigated to allow the same user rate for Subdistrict No. 9 - Highfield/Cascade to be maintained for the Pen Mar area as it is for Subdistrict No. 9 -Highfield/Cascade. This would be considered a Rural Village Service area. VICTOR CULLEN CENTER: The Maryland Environmental Services and the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services have requested the District to extend the Highfield Water System to serve the state complex known as the Victor Cullen Center which is located in Frederick County. The eight inch water line.extension.with.applicable appurtenances is expected to be completed by mid-1994. CEDAR LAWN: The District has been petitioned by the property owners of Cedar Lawn to provide public water supply. Planning and design of the water line extension project has been completed. This area has been included in Subdistrict No. 18-1 -Conococheague and is located within the Urban Growth Area. Connections will be made to the existing 24" water main in MD Route 144 and extended to the existing development. Public water supply will be provided to 60 residential units and 1 commercial establishment representing a total of 61 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Construction of the water line extension project is proposed to begin by March 1994 and completed by September 1994. KEMPS MILL ROAD, ROCK HILL ROAD AND HONEYFIELD ROAD AREA: The District has been petitioned by several residents of Kemps Mill Road, Rock Hill Road and Honeyfield Road areas for public water supply. The District has completed preliminary engineering and completed the public participation segment for these projects. The funding and design of the water line extension projects are expeeted to-be,-~ompJ.eted.-by,,early 1994 with construction to begin by August 1994 and completed by June 1995. These areas have been incorporated into Subdistrict No. 18-1 - Conococheague Water and is located within the Urban Growth Area. To provide service to existing homes on Kemps Mill Road and Celeste Drive, a connection will be made to an existing 8" water line on Kemps _Mil_l .~oad !IQ~t,h 9f_ the intersection at Kemps Mill Road and Rock Hill Road extending south to the railroad tracks. A second 8" water line connection will be made to an existing water line at the intersection of Kemps Mill Road and MD Route 63. Connection will be made to an existing 8" water line at the intersection of Rock Hill Road and Everly Drive to extend water service to existing homes on Rock Hill Road north of the intersection. To provide water service to existing homes on Honeyfield Road, an 8" water line connection will be made to an existing 24" water line north of the Town of Williamsport's corporate limits. Water service is expected to be provided to 35 residential units which represents 35 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). BOWER AND LEONARD AVENUES: By petition, t_he District is __ planning to, extend public water to 42 existing residential units on Bower and Leonard Avenues (17 units in the Leonard Avenue/Halfway Boulevard area and 25 units on Bower Avenue). The Bower Avenue and Leonard Avenue area has been incorporated into Subdistrict No. 18-1 -Conococheague Water and is located within the Urban Growth Area. A connection to an existing 8" water line at the intersection of Tamarack Drive and Bower Avenue will be made extending an 8" water line south on Bower Avenue to the I-70 overpass. To provide water service to the Leonard Avenue/Halfway Boulevard area, water line extensions consist of an 8" water line on Leonard Avenue, a 2" water line on Halfway Boulevard and a 12" water line on MD Route 632 to serve the 17 existing homes in this area. Construction of these lines are to be completed by late 1994. III-10_ GREEN LAWN: The Green Lawn area is located in the County, southeast of the corporate limits of the Town of Williamsport and is located within the Urban Growth Area. Several property owners in the Green Lawn area have requested the District to upgrade existing water lines and extend public water service to existing homes in the Green· Lawn· area;· · Pl:anrring•·and ·public· participation are anticipated to begin by January 1994. To provide service to the remaining portions of the area that do not have public water, three connections to the existing water main are required. One connection will be made at the intersection of Sunset Avenue and Britner Avenue with a second connection being. made ... .to . .an-existing 8 • water line on South Artizan Street. An 8" connection will be made to an existing 8" water line in MD Route 68 to loop the system. Substandard water lines and water services will be upgraded in the area where water service is being presently provided. It is proposed that meters will be placed on the system, whereas the District will bulk purchase water from the Town of Williamsport. However, the Town of Williamsport and the Sanitary District will have to negotiate a water service agreement. This area is proposed to be incorporated into Subdistrict No. 18- 1 -Conococheague Water. Water service is proposed to be III-11 upgraded and/or provided to 39 residential units and 1 commercial unit representing 40 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). CITY OF HAGERSTOWN The City of Hagerstown Water Department serves more than 75,000 people within the Hagerstown corporate limits, in unincorporated areas, and in. other municipalities . ._. The .Hagerstown system provides the entire water supply for the towns of Funkstown and Williamsport and some of the water for the Town of Smithsburg. These towns purchase their water from Hagerstown but they retain responsibility for the operation and maintenance of their own distribution facilities such as pumps, water lines, and water services. The Hagerstown system also serves large industrial and institutional water users such as Mack Truck, the Maryland Correction Institution, and Washington County Hospital. The Hagerstown system is served by.the R •. c. Willson Filtration Plant on the Potomac River and is listed in Table No. 4. The Potomac River provides a reliable and adequate source of drinking water for the Hagerstown service area. Use of the Edgemont and Smithsburg Reservoirs for public water supply was suspended on July 1, 1987. These facilities remain on standby for emergency supply only. The City continues to maintain the reservoirs and watershed land as public water supply III-12 facilities. Safety improvements to the Edgemont Dam and Spillway were completed in 1993. The addition of filtering facilities at the Smithsburg Reservoir are being considered by the City. PLANNED WATER SERVICE AREAS Using a prioritized program of capital improvements such as major upgrades, future' trunk' mains,;, water-tanks and, pumping facilities, the Hagerstown Water Department will meet the needs of a growing urban area. Planned improvements to the Hagerstown system are listed below. a. Richard c. Willson Water Treatment Plant -Upgrade of the plant .is ... planned,,.to,enable the treatment of up to 20 MGD at future water quality standards. The current maximum treatment flow is 15 MGD. b. Watershed Land Acquisition -Continue program of acquiring watershed property above the reservoir as it becomes available to preserve the integrity of same. c. Pipe Lining Program -The City is in the final stages of a program which has reconditioned.over 476,900 lineal feet of existing lines within the service area. The program is scheduled for completion by the end of fiscal year 1994. III-13 d. Williamsport Transmission Main -A third twenty-four inch (24") or larger water transmission main is needed e. f. g. h. to deliver the future demands from the filter plant to the southern portion of the Hagerstown system. Edgemont Water Filtration Plant -Install filtration facilities to enable the use of the Edgemont Reservoir as a source of potable water supply. Must meet current and future water. quality.. standards .. Western Maryland Parkway -Extend sixteen inch (16") waterline north from the intersection of Underpass Way and Railway Lane to Western Maryland Parkway at the ,' County Detention Center, thus completing a major interconnection between two 24-inch transmission mains. Hopewell Road -To service area bounded by I-70, I-81, MD 144, and MD 63, extend a 16-inch main in Hopewell Road from MD Route 144 to I-70. The interconnection should be made from this line to the existing 16-inch main in Elliott Parkway on the south side of I-70. Zone 2 Storage -To improve service to areas along Hump Road and south of the West End Reservoir to Wesel Boulevard, construct a storage tank in the vicinity of Wesel Boulevard. III-14 i. j • Southern Transmission Main -A sixteen inch (16") transmission main along the southern portion of the water system is needed to carry an increased demand to the east and to a proposed water tank site near I-70 and U.S. Route 40. Eastern Transmission Main -To deliver water to the northeastern portion of the system, a sixteen-inch ( 16") water· mai:n···is-• needed .. ·from· the· Londontowne- Brightwood area to Jefferson Boulevard and Eastern Boulevard to the north. k. West End Reservoir -Install a cover and liner for the 1. m. existing concrete reservoir at Hellane Park to provide for a safer, more secure and leak proof storage facility in anticipation of future regulations dictating. the same. --. Robinwood Drive -Extend twelve inch (12") waterline from Route 64 to the Hagerstown Junior College to complete a major loop to the Dual Highway and proposed elevated storage near same. Oak Ridge Industrial Area -Oakmont Drive -Oakmont Drive area is presently being served by a twelve inch (12") waterline. Provisions should be included to extend the system along East Oak Ridge Drive to Roadway and the former Plwnmer Construction Company site. This line should eventually be interconnected with the mains in the Ravenswood Lutheran Home area. n. o. p. Paramount Loop -The distribution system should be looped with a twelve inch (12") main from West Longmeadow Road to Marsh Pike in the vicinity of Avalon Manor to eliminate a long stretch of single source piping. Paramount Storage -Locate elevated storage tank in the Avalon Manor area for the purpose of increasing supply capabilities. in.the. area. Downsville Pike -Extend twelve inch (12") line along Downsville Pike from West Oak Ridge Drive to the Potomac Edison office building. (Map Nos. 49 and 57) ,· q. 'Potomac Avenue Booster and Transmission Main -Project SMITHSBURG includes installation of a booster pumping station at Northern Avenue and extension of a transmission main from Northern Avenue up Maryland Route 60 to Marsh Pike. This project is necessary to meet additional demands as residential and planned co1lllllercial development is permitted upon the installation of sewerage facilities. (Map Nos. 25 and 38) The Town of Smithsburg has two sources of water supply in the form of springs. One is located south of Town (Map No. 52) near the existing reservoir. The reservoir receives the spring water. Water is then fed by gravity to the Town distribution system. A new spring has been developed northeast of Town (Map No. 27). III-16 Also, a water pumping station and transmission line from the spring to the Town distribution system have been built. In addition, the reservoir storage capacity has been expanded to 360,000 gallons. During the Smithsburg Town Growth Area Study adopted by the County Commissioners on July 22, 1986, Town and County officials recognized the need to investigate and develop new sources of public water supply in order to meet the demands of expected growth· in ·population. -The· s•tudy recommends investigation of new sources including land for a permanent storage facility, continued cooperation in use of water from Hagerstown's Edgemont reservoir and improvements to the existing transmission system. Government officials acknowledge the purpose and effect of Growth Areas establishment .to .. encourage .. development and make use of .. existing public health facilities. The Town purchases water from the City of Hagerstown only in cases of emergency. Water mains have been extended to serve property recently annexed into the Town. This property is located on the west side of Town and includes new residential developments called Meadows of Grove Creek and Whispering Hills. The Town is currently awaiting State approval for the use of two (2) existing wells located west of Town to supplement the existing sources. Future plans also call for the extension of a 12" line through the Whispering Hills development to connect with III-17 the existing line in Cavehill Road in order to form a loop. Also proposed is the replacement of an existing line in E. Water Street and the extension of this line to serve a new residential development called Mountain Shadows. To date, subdivision approval has been granted to Section l which involves 13 lots. The Town is currently exploring additional sources for water such as new production wells"and/or the possibility of bringing existing private wells on line to supplement the existing supply. In January of 1992, a Maryland Department of the Environment study reported that Hauver Spring is directly influenced by a surface water source (Little Antietam Creek) and that the town would have to comply with the Surface Water Treatment Rule regarding meeting standards for the control of certain viruses, bacteria and turbidity. To comply with this report, the Town is currently monitoring the water supply and forwarding information to the MDE in order for them to determine if this supply will continue to be acceptable. Service priority designations for individual properties inside the Growth Area boundaries have not been changed in this plan. It is acknowledged that requests for service and would be considered consistent with the Plan and will complement and coincide with other planning activities and goals. III-18 FT. RITCHIE The Fort Ritchie system provides water service to approximately 1,296 persons residing on post and an additional 1,612 persons who live off post and work on post. In the past, this system also served several off post residential customers however as of the fall of 1992 these customers were taken off this system and connected to the Sanitary District's Highfield/Cascade System (S.D,9), Water for this system is provided by a spring and seven wells that feed two reservoirs having a total capacity of 1,300,000 gallons., As a result of a groundwater study and report made by the Army Environmental Hygiene Administration, well number three was permanently closed in early 1992. At the recommendation of the Maryland Depart111ent~f the Environment, spring number one was disconnected in January 1990 in order to better insure overall water quality based on the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Work on a new well to supplement the existing supply was to be completed by 1992. BOONSBORO-KEEDYSVILLE The Boonsboro-Keedysville water system is supplied by two active springs and one well--Keedysville Spring located outside the Town of Keedysville (map no.73), Warrenfeltz Spring located within the Town of Boonsboro (map no.73), and Well #8 located outside the Town of Boonsboro (map no. 68). An additional new water supply III-19 referred to as the Crestview well is currently under construction. The water is treated with chlorine disinfection by the town of Boonsboro at each location. Excess water is stored in a 1,5 million gallon reservoir located east of Boonsboro (map no. 68) and again treated with chlorine before reentering the system. The Town of Keedysville purchases water from the Town of Boonsboro, but owns and operates its own distribution system. Much of the maintenance of the Keedysville system is performed on a cost reimbursement basis by the Town of Boonsboro. In Boonsboro, an apparent high per capita consumption caused mainly by unaccounted water losses has been significantly reduced by the installation of residential meters, the lining and covering of the storage reservoir (to reduce the need for overflows), and a triennial leak detection program. A serious problem of inadequate fire flows and water pressure in many areas of Boonsboro has been corrected by installing larger mains, completing loops in the distribution system, replacing old and/or defective fire hydrants, and adding new fire hydrants to the system. An equally serious deficit in supply was corrected when well #8 behind Graystone Hills in Boonsboro went on line yielding 100,000 gpd (70 gpm). ~.III-?O :~1 ~ -~-- To address the impact of growth on the water supply, the Utilities Commission adopted a policy requiring each developer (except minor subdivisions of 5 or less units) to provide a minimum new water supply of 100,800 gpd (70 gpm) in the form of a well to be connected to the existing distribution system. Also, to address the impact of growth of the Town, the Mayor and Council has-adopted-a--new .. comprehensiveDevelopment Plan and a new Growth Management Ordinance. The Boonsboro Town Growth Area, adopted in 1986 by the Town and the County, identifies an area surrounding Boonsboro where growth and extension of public utilities is encouraged. Service priority designations for property within the growth area will be assigned once developmept,proposals are reviewed and approved by the County and the Town. The Boonsboro Utilities Commission is willing to make extensions of the water system within the growth area. However, it is clearly the policy of the Town to require that the cost of all such extensions be borne by the developer. III-21 WEVERTON The Pleasant Valley Elementary School and approximately twelve residences in southern Washington County are served by the water system for the Town of Brunswick in Frederick County. Service is provided via the transmission main leading from the Yourtee Springs to the Town of Brunswick. This is considered a restricted use service area. The Town is currently making improvements at the spring to conform with Clean Water Act requirements. These improvements involve enclosing the spring in a building and placing a liner in the clay·slope to divert rainwater away from the spring. CLEAR SPRING The Town of Clear Spring and a few residences outside of Town are supplied by a series of wells and springs feeding a 1.5 million , gallon reservoir at the foot of Fairview Mountain. The Town recently expanded its service area with the construction of a second transmission main from the reservoir to Clear Spring and has recently completed the extension of a water line south of Town to create a loop with the existing line in Martin Road. In the past, the Clear Spring water system has experienced high domestic per capita water use, probably due in part to the lack of residential metering. To correct this, the Town is currently installing meters. Recent water line replacement also found and corrected some significant leakage • . ;I:II-22 The Town recently completed a water study done by a private consultant for the Town. This study found that the existing water recharge area serving the existing water sources (wells and springs) is nearing its maximum and that only a few additional hookups would be available utilizing the existing water sources. The study recommended that the Town explore the possibility of finding additional sources of water and recommended 15 possible well sites. The study also· recommended-·-improvements that need to be made to the water distribution system. The Town is discussing the possibility of constructing a water storage tank at the reservoir site based on a recommendation for the water study. In late 1993, the Town will be extending a new 6" water line from an existing 8" line in Big Spring Road south to the Clear Spring Fire Company carnival ground .. to serve a new building and fire hydrant. The Town will also be replacing an existing 2" water line in South Hawbaker Circle to Houck Avenue with an 8" line and extending the line to the Amber Associates property to serve future development. The Comprehensive Plan for Washington County recognizes Clear Spring as a Town Growth Area, however a growth area study has not been done nor has a growth area boundary been defined. In the near future the Town intends to develop a growth management plan ,J;II-.23 that will address the Town's ability to handle new development. This may affect the existing planned water service area. HANCOCK The Hancock water system provides water for approximately 1926 people who are mostly located within the municipal limits. The principal source is the.Little Tonoloway Creek with two storage tanks and a reservoir providing a total storage capacity of 1.3 million gallons. A new modular water treatment plant was recently constructed with Federal funding assistance from the Economic Development Administration and the Farmer's Home Administration. The volume of water flowing in Little Tonoloway Creek is highly variable, and during many summer months, the flow is insufficien~ to meet the existing water supply demands of the Town. During these times the Town has used water from the Potomac River to supply its water needs. The Town has recently hired an engineering consultant to do a complete water study of Hancock's water system. One of the major concerns that will be addressed in the study will be an alternative water source other than surface water. The existing well located north of I-70 will be one of these alternatives, along with recommendations for changes, improvements and III-24 expansions of the water system. A portable pump has been purchased to supply the Town with water during times of dry weather. The Town recently completed construction of a new eight inch (8") water line east of Town. A Town Growth Area Study for Hancock was initiated in 1988 and was adopted by the County Commissioners and the Mayor and Council in January of 1990. A Growth Area for the Town was delineated and recommendations made in regard to the water system. PROJECTED DEMANDS Projected water supply demands for existing water service areas are shown in Table No. 3. Note that present year per capita water consumption in each service area was used as a factor in determining future supply requirements (See Note #9). As a result, Table No. 3 reflects projected water supply demands for • the future assuming present consumption rates remain the same. It is anticipated that some service area consumption rates will decrease in the future due to system improvements. It is assumed that present water consumption rates will not appreciably increase due to current conservation trends, especially for hot water. III-25 Notes for Table No. 3 1) Water Service Area -That area served, or potentially served, by a single distribution system under control of a single utility, or, in a very large system, sub-areas as delineated by the County. 2) Population Served -From service providing agencies. Projections for 1995, 2000.and 2010 based on projected growth trends for the applicable election district (See Table 1-A). 3) Domestic Corporation -(Million Gallons Per Day) -Water consumed for domestic or residential purposes. 4) Other Consumption -(Million Gallons Per Day) -Water consumed for other than domestic purposes such as industrial, commercial, and institutional uses. 5) Total Consumption -(Million Gallons Per Day) -The sum of Domestic and Other Consumption. Figures provided by agency or municipality concerned. 6) System Capacity -(Million Gallons Per Day) -Based upon 'Design Capacity' from the Drinking Water Supplies System print-out by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene dated 2-8-79 and updated by municipalities. Unless III-26 indicated otherwise, projected SYSTEM CAPACITY for future years will be considered the same as for the present year. 7) Domestic Per Capita Consumption (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) -Determined by dividing DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION (3) by POPULATION SERVED (2), This is a more realistic figure for water use per person than TOTAL PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION (8), but it may include 'unaccounted for' losses. 8) Total Per Capita Consumption -(Gallons Per Capita Per Day) -Determined by dividing TOTAL CONSUMPTION (5), by POPULATION SERVED (2), This is an overall figure for water , use per person which includes water use by businesses, industry, institutions, and 'unaccounted for' losses. 9) Total Consumption -(Million.Gallons Per Day) -A projected figure determined by multiplying the projected POPULATION SERVED (2) by TOTAL PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION (8). III-27 TABLE NO. 3 PROJECTED WATER SUPPLY DEMAIIDS AND PLANNED CAPACITY SERVICE AREA PRESENT YEAR 5 YEAR PLANNING 5-10 YEAR PLANNING 10-20 YEAR PLANNING (1) (1995) (2000) (2010) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Per Capita (2) Consumption (9) (6) (2) (9) (6) (2) (9) (6) I NAME !i !i " 171 ,a, " 6 !i " 0 !l 0 " " 0 ... ... ... ... 0 ... 0 ... ... u .. .. .. t' u ... .. "' , ... .. t' ... .. t' .. ~ g_ .. Y~ MY~ .. ~ ~ .. MY~ .. .. MY~ .. MY~ ..... D"tl-.. 0 -;: t .. ... ii "tl-..... llt-.. .., II "tl-M Cl .. ei M II M" M " " i': J ii~ " .. ~ ~~~ .. -~ J~ " i': "·~ .... ~ [i': :I.~ .... ~ [i: ~-~ .. -~ g-.. " 0. ~ r; !.ii .. " .. 0. .. 0. .. 0. 8~ ~8~ tl8~ Ji'lt-~8-~c'.3~ , .e Jl tl8~ ~c'.3~ 0 " tl8~ Ji'~-... "' 1-1~ ... "' Hagerstown 35,445 36,792 37.697 39,054 Funkstown 1,193 1,238 1,269 1,315 H W11 llamsport 2,095 2,175 2,229 2,309 H Unincorporated 30,765 31,934 32,732 33,910 H IICI/IICTC/RCl ,t:~~~ ,&:3~1 off:~~~ ~ I TOTAL 3.98 5.88 9.86 15.0 52 130 11 20 11.8 20 4 12.5 20 N a, SMITHSBURG 1,554 .250 .300 196 196 1,613 .256 1.653 .259 1,713 .263 HIGHFIELD/CASCADE 1,362 .070 .070 .200 51 51 1,414 .072 · 1,449 .073 1,501 .074 FT. RITCHIE 1,296 0.233 0.250 106 1,326 0.233 1,326 0.233 1,326 0.233 BOONSBORO/ 2,942 0.201 0.500 68 KEEDYSVILLE 3,341 0.227 3,684 0.251 4,361 0.297 SHARPSBURG 1,178 0.091 0.091 0.160 77 77 1,223 .094 1,254 0.097 1,299 .JOO WEVERTON 40 0.350 40 40 40 CLEAR SPRING 660 0.123 0.200 186 685 ' .104 702 .)06 727 .110 HANCOCK 1,926 .JOO .100 .200 0.806 52 104 1,926 .200 1,982 .250 2,042 .275 HT. AETNA 350 0.070 0.110 200 363 372 385 ELK RIDGE 75 .005 .005 0.009 67 67 75 .005 75 .005 75 .005 SANDY HOOK 170 .010 .010 0.03 59 59 174 .010 176 .010 17! .011 - Town Hagerstown Smithsburg Highfield/ Cascade Boonsboro/· Keedysvi 1 le Sharpsburg Brunswick (FR CO) Clear Spring Hancock Mt. Aetna Elk Ridge Ft. Ritchie Source: Table No. 4 Pennitted Water Source Coordinates Appropriation Withdrawals Pennit No. Avg/Max (TIY,Jd) Potomac River N648 E0560 WA28SOD1 (02) 15/18 Hauver Spring N675 E0639 WA76Gl43 (01) .120/.175 Olffendahl Spring N659 E0641 Two wells in N665 E0636 WA76G043 ( 01) .065/ .100 Whispering Hills 4 wells N685 E0666 WA88G032 ( 02) .08/.12 Warrenfeltz Spring· N6ll E06t4· · WA79G01J· (-02) · .13/.15 Ke~dysville Spring N604 E0605 WA79G012 (01) .210/ .215 Well #8 N613 E0613 WA88G006 .103/.147 Crestview Well N600 E0601 WA89G022 .087/.103 Potomac R Iver N588 E0575 WA67S002 (04) .1/.2 Yourtee Spring N562 E0613 WA83G012 (01) .35/.5 4 wells N666 E0530 WA67GOOI (05) .2/.3 2 springs Little Tonoloway Creek N682 E0468 WA75S007 (03) .3/ .5 2 springs N642 E632 WA75S001 (02) .06/.1 4 wells N577 E0605 WA60G005 (04) .0117/ .0195 8 wells N682 N0655 WA82G200 (01) .25/ .34 2 springs File only -no pennit Maryland Department of Natural Resources Water Resources Administration Water Supply Division III-29 Reported Population Pulll)age Served (TIY,Jd) 10 76.092 .180 1,554 N/A 1.362 .062 2,942 .203 .129 .087 .072 1,178 Serves 40 Weverton .116 660 .260 1,926 .062 350 N/A 75 .25 1296 WATER PROBLEM AREAS WATER CONSERVATION Compliance with the Maryland Water Conservation Plumbing Fixtures Act - Investigation of compliance with MWCPFA revealed some shortcomings. Although planning officials were advised of the intention to adopt requirements for documenting compliance in 1984 and subsequent adoption in 1986, bu~lding officials were not advised of the new statute. In an effort to comply, the Washington County Plumbing Board has made an initial attempt by contacting all businesses that sell plumbing fixtures. This method also included contact with ail persons who hold "Master Plumber" licenses. The Board has requested documentation that all fixtures currently available for sale and installation in Washington County comply with MWCPFA. The Board must first determine the degree of non-compliance, if any, prior to formulating a plan of corrective action. The needed action may involve a simple amendment to the Building Code or a large scale program yet to be developed. Other water conservation efforts are noted below. Hagerstown -By far the largest water provided in Washington County, the Hagerstown Water Department does not have a formal program of educating its customers about water conservation. However, the City's ongoing program of water line rehabilitation and leak protection does qualify as a conservation effort. Also, III-30 the Department advises that encouraging the customer to rehabilitate private water lines is accomplished through billing for water used, even when high consumption is the result of leakage. This promotes correction and conservation rather than waste. Washington County Sanitary District -The Sanitary District provides a potable water supply to the incorporated municipality of Sharpsburg (Subdistrict #4), Mt. Aetna (Subdistrict #7), Elk Ridge (Subdistrict #17), Sandy Hook (Subdistrict #19-1), and the Highfield/Cascade area (Subdistrict #9). Presently, the Sanitary District·does not have a formal conservation plan. During low water emergencies, the District employs the news media to advise consumers of a ban on all non-essential water uses such as watering lawns anci washing .. cars •. The District also uses "bill stuffers" during these times if the emergency should coincide with the billing. As with the City of Hagerstown, the Sanitary District also has an ongoing program of water line rehabilitation and leak detection which does qualify as a conservation effort. Also, the Sanitary District encourages customers to rehabilitate private water lines through billing for water used, even when high consumption is the result of leakage. This promotes correction and conservation rather than waste. Boonsboro -The Utilities Commission has adopted a low-flow plumbing fixtures ordinance which requires low-flow toilets and III-31 other water saving devices in all new construction. The Commission has encouraged active conservation through an aggressive public information campaign on water conservation with the help of the University of Maryland Extension Service. Clear Spring. Funkstown. Hancock. Williamsport and Smithsburg - The other small.. towns .. in .Washington .. County have indicated that they do not have formal or continuing programs on water conservation. All have indicated that in the event of a need to conserve or any other need to advise customers regarding water use, they have or would use media campaigns on local radio stations and newspapers. IDENTIFICATION Contamination is present in a large percentage of wells in Washington County, particularly in the Hagerstown Valley. Water samples collected from residential wells by the Washington County Health Department between 1976 and 1991 indicated that approximately 30 percent tested positive for coliform bacteria. The data is based upon samples taken from old existing wells and from new residential wells which had been sited, constructed, and approved by the Health Department. It can be reasonably assumed that the pollution of groundwater is III-32 a direct result of the introduction of contamination from numerous non-point sources in the County. Washington County's topography, underlain by karst limestone, contributes not only to the introduction of contaminants to the groundwater, but also to their rapid and unpredictable dissemination. Extensions to and improvements in public water systems will partially alleviate the problem. The major correction to this situation, however, will be in the form of community or multi-use· sewerage service to replace on-lot disposal and serve new developments, thereby reducing the source of groundwater contamination. Table No.· 5 lists Water Problem Areas in terms of water quality problems and water quantity problems. First, water quality problems have been identified by the Washington County Health Department and listed in priority order according to the degree of seriousness and number of persons affected. The areas listed in Table No. 5 do not represent all water quality problem areas in Washington County, only those judged by the Health Department as being the most serious and in the most need of immediate attention. Secondly, water quantity problems have been identified by municipalities and local fire companies and are also listed in priority order. III-33 PROGRAM FOR CORRECTION A multi-faceted approach is proposed for the solution of water quality problems in Washington County. The approach for water quality problems will follow the headings listed below: 1. Geohydrologic Study -This initial study had been conducted by R. E. Wright Associates and funded jointly by the Washington County Board of County Commissioners and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1981. Specific aquifer units and water problem areas were evaluated by the study and the results published and presented to the County Commissioners. 2. In an effort to supplement and update the R. E. Wright Study, the Washington County Health Department, in conjunction with the Washington County Sanitary District, has initiated a groundwater sampling program that has resulted in the collection of well samples from across the County. The results are available to County and State agencies for consideration in planning and policy formulation. New problem areas may be identified and added to Table 5 in the future as a result of this program. Data Collection -The Washington County Health Department will compile all relevant data including III-34 recent water sample reports for the problem areas listed. Data collection work will be performed on a countywide basis as well as in targeted problem areas. In each case the Health Department will determine the need for conducting a house-to-house water sampling survey for the affected area. When available, data indicates that a listed area is no longer a problem, the area will be removed from ~he list. Where available data indicates a current and potentially hazardous water quality problem, the Health Department will present its findings to the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as.the Board of Health. In an effort to address problems of groundwater quality for individual homeowners, several approaches will be applied. First, and already in effect, is the attempt. to guarantee adequate potable water for new subdivision proposals by the drilling of test wells as the site with the intent of ensuring that water quality meets all applicable requirements. Two other proposals currently being developed by the Washington County Health Department in conjunction with the Maryland Department of Environment and the Washington County Planning Commission are (1) the use of public water supplies as an alternative to individual private wells for developments in the Rural-Agricultural area. Such _, : ·':! ,-: s•= :.•~ -r. ,,' ·:.,;;. 3. 4. systems would be restrictive as to conform with growth and development policies outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and (2) the incorporation of continuous on-site disinfection systems onto individual private supplies. Both of these proposals, offering definite and obvious benefits, also involve considerable coordination between agencies for both development and implementation. Feasibility Study -For each problem area so identified to the Board of County Commissioners by the Health Department, the Board will take such action as it deems appropriate. Such action may include the funding of a feasibility study to determine possible abatement measures and the feasibility of a community water system for the affected area. The Board will be assisted in this effort by the Washington County Sanitary District and by the Washington County Planning Commission. Sanitary District Law -As a long term measure, the Sanitary District Law for Washington.County will be evaluated for possible amendment to facilitate the future management of community water systems by the Washington County Sanitary District. Specifically, the need for establishing a Sanitary Subdistrict prior to the involvement of the Sanitary District in the operation and management of a community water system should be reviewed. Based upon the above program, planned correction measures will be identified in Table No. 5 as they occur. Planned correction measures will be listed, not as intentions·, but when·· specific action has been taken, such as the application for a grant or loan, the actual appropriation of funds for a project, or the undertaking or completion of the project itself. ',_, H H H I w a, . GEOGRAPHIC AREA Mt. Lena and San Mar Leitersburg ·nownsville Wilson-Shady Bower Conococheague Falling Waters and Neck Road Rohrersville COORDINATE LOCATIQH N630-E620 to N610-E620 N675-E620 N620-E570 N665-E555 to N670-E560 N620-E570 N590-E620 TABLE NO 5 INVENTORY OF WATER SUPPLY PROBLEM AREAS POPULATION1 400 400 300 400 150 100 NATURE OF PjO!!LFli (WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS) Inadequate individual supplies (cisterns). Small lot sizes afford no buffer zone between sewage disposal and water supplies. Contamination of groundwater. Cisterns unsafe. Bacteria, unsafe wells. Gas in wells. Bacteriological and nitrate contamination. Wilson-Shady Bower corridor •possessed the poorest groundwater quality of any area• which was sampled by R.E. Wright Associates in 1981. High percentage of homes with bacteriological contamination. Also high chlorides and nitrate-nitrogen. High rate of groundwater contamination High nitrates and bacteria. Gasoline in shallow wells. Small lots and hand-dug wells. R.E. Wright Associates noted nitrate-nitrogen and coliform contamination. PLANNED CORREC'!'JQH Investigations of hookup to public· lines in MD Route 64 or conununity wells. Problem continues but opposition to proposals, H H H I w \D GEOGRAPHIC AREA Tilghman ton Cedar Lawn Antietam Drive Greenlawn Kemps Mill, Rock Hill Area COORDINATE LOCATION N620-E590 N663-E585 N665-E605 TABLE NO 5 INVENTORY OF WATER SUPPLY PROBLEM AREAS POPULATION NATURE OF PROBLEM (WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS) 200 Groundwater contamination. Some lots have inadequate supply. R.E. Wright and Associates found no coliform but did find that 'nitrate-nitrogen• concentrations approach the maximum contamination level in many of these wells. 360 Cisterns and contaminated wells. 200 Contaminated wells from Security to Northern Avenue. 94 Substandard water distribution system, system deteriorating in part of area. Remaining area utilizes unsafe cisterns. Insufficient for fire protection. 85 Contaminated wells, unsafe cisterns . PLANNED CORRECTION Washington County Sanitary District to extend public water lines to area. To be completed 9/94. Washington County Sanitary District I!rOI!OSing water system UI!grade and extension of water lines to remainder of area. To be completed by 3/95. Washington County Sanitary District ~roI!osing water line extension to be completed by 6/95 . H H H I ... 0 GEOGRAPHIC AREA Bower/Leonard Avenue Area Resh, srade, Kaiser idge Road Area Elk Ridge Area H.JC-Youngstoun Pen Har COORDINATE LOCATION N655-E613 N686-E658 TABLE NO 5 INVENTORY OF WATER SUPPLY PROBLEM AREAS POPULATION NATURE OF PROBLEM (WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS) 100 Contaminated wells, unsafe cisterns 76 Contaminated wells, fecal coliform 75 Inadequate production, low quality raw water inadequate finished water storage. 600 Inadequate fire flow. Flow tests in 1991 indicated only eoo gpm available for fire protection. Area served by dead-end water main which is undesirable from hydraulic and reliability standpoint. 221 Inadequate individual supplies. Cisterns and wells. . PLANNED CORRECTION Washington County Sanitary District proposing water line extension to be completed by 12/94. Possible extension of water line from existing Martin• s crossroads system. Washington County Sanitary District proposing to provide additional water source (well l and upgrade storage facility. Looping system within within pressure zone boundary. The Washington County Sanitary District has proposed to extend Sub- district No. 9 boundaries and water distribution from the existing Highfield/Cascade system • H H H I ... .... GEOGRAPHIC AREA Mt. Aetna lloonsboro ' Smithsburg Maryland Correctional Institute COORDINATE LOCATION N611-E616 TABLE NO 5 INVENTORY OF WATER SUPPLY PROBLEM AREAS POPULATION NATURE OF PROBLEM (WATER QUANTITY PROBLEMS) 350 Inadequate fireflow, spring supply subject to surface water contamination. System required chlorination and PB adjustment. Inadequate water system, leakage and pressure problems. N/A Insufficient water volume and fire flows on Rte. 40A south from Reeders Home to Bigh's Store. 1554 Low water pressure in.vicinity of Cave Bill Road Area. 6594 Existing water lines serving the prison complex are inadequate to meet the fire flow requirements established by the State Fire Marshall. . PLANNED CORRECTION Washin~ton County Sanita!:J: District J!rOJ!OSes SJ!ring head im12rovements and u12grade and imQrovements on water distribution system. DeveloI! new storage facilities higher than current reservoir. LOOJ!ing of existing 12' line. No additional hookUJ!S along Cave Bill Road. Maryland Environmental service to construct a new water transmission line from the City of Hagerstown . Notes for Table No. 6 1) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY, OR DEVELOPER - Responsibilities include project initiation and management, but not necessarily financing. 2) WATER SERVICE AREA -That area served, or potentially served, by a single. distrib.ution .. system .. under control of a single utility, or, in a very large system, sub- areas as delineated by the County. 3) LOCATION -In accordance with the Maryland Grid System. 4) GRANTS ELIGIBLE -Dollar amounts indicate funds for which the project may be eligible from sources shown in parentheses. Source abbreviation represent agencies and programs as follows: EPA -Environmental Protection Agency EDA -Economic Development Administration UDAG -Urban Development Action Grant CDBG -Community Development Block Grant FmHA -Farmers Home Administration ARC -Appalachian Regional Commission MDE -Maryland Department of the Environment The local cost for any project may be assumed to be the total cost estimate less any amount shown as grants eligible. III,,-42. H H H I .. w RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER ( ll Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District \ a Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department SERVICE AREA LOCATION (21 (31 Pen Mar N-686 E-658 Conococheague/ Cedar Lawn (SO 18-1) Mt. Aetna (SD 7) Elk Ridge (SO 17) Kemps Mill/ Rockhill Rd Area (SO 18-1) Bower and Leonard Ave. (SO 18-1) Hagerstown N-648 E-560 Hagerstown N-650 E-604 Hagerstown N-670 E-650 Hagerstown N-652 E-610 TABLE HO. 6 IHHEOIATE FIVE ANO TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST GRANTS COMPLETION SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ELIGIBLE( 4) PLANNING DESIGN CONST. Installation of 13,100 feet of 4, 6, 2,009,567 FmHA Contingent upon funding and 8 inch line, well and well house COBG booster pumping station, 79 meter HOE services, and 100,000 gallon storage tank. Waterline extension to provide 61 homes 250,000 Soaking Complete Complete 9/94 with public water supply Including fire CDBG and protection HOE funding Sprlnghead Improvement and upgrade of 350,000 Soaking Springhead Improvements water distribution system IIJE funding complete by 10/93.Upgrade contingent upon funding. Distribution/water supply and storage 100,000 Soaking Contingent upon funding Improvements CDBG and HOE funding Waterline extension to provide 35 homes 600,000 Soaking Complete 6/94 6/95 homes with public water COBG, HOE and FmHA Waterline extension to provide 41 homes 386,000 Soaking COBG, 9/93 10/93 12/94 with public water FmHA and HOE funding R.C. Willson Plant -Sedimentation 850,000 Contingent upon 15 mgd equipment when 15 mgd production Is production reached. Pipeline program to recondition 102,000 1,530,000 N/A N/A H/A lineal feet. Watershed land acquisition in vicinity of 200,000 H/A N/A H/A Edgemont Reservoir. Water line extension to Robinwood Drive 350,000 Contingent upon in vicinity of HJC. development H H H I ... ... Kt>euN,10LE Aotm. Y, HUNICIPALJTY OR DEVELOPER Ill Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Oepart..,nt Hagerstown Water Department Hagerstown Water Oepart...nt Town of Hancock Town of Hancock Town of Smithsburg SERVICE AREA LOCATION /2) 131 Hagerstown N-675 E-602 Hagerstown N-670 E-590 Hagerstown N-650 E-590 Hagerstown N-665 E-590 Hagerstown N-680 E-608 Hagerstown N-668 E-604 Hagerstown N-658 E-592 Hagerstown N-642 E-668 to N-642 E-610 Hancock N-683 E-468 Hancock N-683 E-468 Smithsburg N-663 E-630 TABLE NO. 6 IMMEDIATE FIVE ANO TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION . OTAL COST GRANTS CllHPLETION SCHEDULE STJHATE ELIGIBLH4l PLANNING DESIGN CONST. Paramount Loop, Extension of loop system 200,000 Contingent upon frao Lon!JDOadow Road to Harsh Pike. development Extension north between railroad and 1-81 75,000 Contingent upon to Route 40 and Cedar Lawn area. development. Extension along Downsville Pike to Oak 288,000 Contingent upon Ridge area. development. Zone 2 Storage -Elevated storage in 550,000 Contingent upon vicinity of J-81 and U. S. Route 40. development. Paramount Storage 687,000 Contingent upon development. Potcmac Avenue booster and transmission 455,000 Contingent upon main in Route 60 and Harsh Pike vicinity. development. CONRAIL Site -Water distribution 720,000 Contingent upon improvements. development. Installation of an additional 24 inch or Not Not Contingent upon larger transmission main and water storage tank southern portion of service area. Available Available deve 1 opment. New well and storage tank north of 1-70 to N/A N/A Contingent upon increase water supply in east end of town. development. Caoplete studY of water system possible 20,000 N/A Improvements to be detennined water plant upgrade (study) after water study Supplement water supply with 2 new N/A N/A Contingent upon wells. Extend existing 12 inch line development. at Whispering Hills to form loop at Cave Hi 11 Road • . ~ H H H I .... tn RESPON>IBLt AucNLY MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER Ill Town of Smithsburg Town of Funkstown Town of Clear Spring Town of Clear Spring Town of Clear Spring Maryland Environment• 1 Service Town of Boonsboro Town of Boonsboro Town of Boonsboro SERVICE AREA LOCATION 121 Ill Smithsburg N-663 E-630 Funkstown N-648 E-600 Clear Spring N-663 E-537 Clear Spring N-663 E-537 · Clear Spring N-663 E-537 MCI complex and Rt. 65 corridor Boonsboro Boonsboro Boonsboro TABLE NO. 6 IIINEDIATE FIVE AND TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST GRANTS COMPLETION SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ELIGIBLEl4l PLANNING DESIGN CONST. Replace and extend existing line in N/A N/A Contingent upon development E. Water Street to serve Mountain Shadows Subdivision Replace approximately 1.000 ft. of N/A N/A Contingent upon funding water line along Rt. 40A between Cemetery Street to E. Baltimore St. Supplement water supply with new wells, N/A N/A Contingent upon development possible system Improvements including Installation of a water storage tank Extension of new 6" line from Big Spring N/A Road, Sooth to Clear. Spring Fire Company carnival ground N/A Complete Complete 11/93 Replacement of existing 2" line and N/A N/A Complete Complete 11/93 extension with news• line to serve Amber Associates property Construction of a new 16" and 20• N/A H.E.S. Complete Complete starting water line beginning in the vicinity funding date of Halfway County Park and extending 12/93 south eastward to the M.C.I. complex comp let ion with service to the surrounding area by 7 /94 Install 2150 L.F. of 12 Inch waterline on Rt. 34 from square to King Road 238,200 contingent upon funding replacing existing waterline. Abandon 2-lnch main and bore new 118,100 contingent upon funding service lines under Rt. 40A north to the existing water line from Stouffer Avenue to Knode Circle Install 2,000 L.F. of 12-inch waterline on Rt. 40A south from Reeders Home to 200,900 contingent upon funding the Highs Store replacing existing waterline H H H I ... "' .. Abt.ftl,.J MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER Ill Town of Boonsboro Town of Boonsboro Town of Boonsboro Boonsboro West Crestview Developer SERVICE AREA LOCATION (2) (31 Boonsboro Boonsboro Boonsboro/ Keedysville Boonsboro Boonsboro TABLE NO. 6 IMMEDIATE FIVE ANO TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST GRANTS COMPLETION SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ELIGIBLE( 41 PLANNING DESIGN CONST. Install 3,100 L.F. of 12-inch waterlin, 340,BOO Contingent upon funding on Rt. 66 north from Rt. 40A to Kinsey Heights replacing existing waterline Hise. repairs and replacement items for 83,484 Contingent upon funding for springs, distribution and reservoir Filtration system 500,000 -HOE Contingent upon HOE Keedysville Spring 1,500,000 (Partial) requirements Extend waterlines in Boonsboro West unknown N/A Contingent upon developer East of Rt. 40A Extend waterline In Crestview unknown N/A Contingent upon developer Development south of Rt. 34. Construct a we 11 house and connect we 11 to the Town 1s water system POLICY FOR WATER LINE INSTALLATION IN AREAS WHERE SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE All new development shall be served by an adequate water supply and distribution system which provides sufficient water and service pressure for domestic consumption and fire protection pursuant to Article VII of the adopted Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of Washington County. In order to prevent street and other damage encountered in providing public water service to developed areas, and to provide for efficient and effective connection to public water service, the following policy is presented for water line installation in areas where water service is not available at the time of street and residential construction but will be made available at some future time: 1. Requests for such installation will only be accepted where interim systems are permitted by the Water and Sewerage Plan. 2. Each application for a water construction permit must be accompanied by a letter from the County Health Officer requesting that such installation be permitted. 3. Building permits, subdivision plats, and well approvals shall include a provision requiring the connection of the premises to community water within twelve (12) months of announced availability. 4. Water lines shall be designed and installed in III-47 accordance with applicable municipal or Commission specifications. 5. The connection of the "dry" system shall be plugged with a visible and readily inspectable plug at the future point of connection to the existing system. 6. New commercial and industrial development in adopted Urban or Town Growth areas where public water is not currently available shall comply with Article VIII of the adopted Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of Washington County regarding interim fire protection systems. SERVICE AREA REQUIREMENTS The following shall be applicable to each respective designated service area. Criteria for creation and amendment of service areas are outlined in Appendix B. l. Urban and Town Growth Area Service Areas The provision of community water and sewer facilities within the designated Growth Areas of Washington County is encouraged. Development proposals which involve the extension of water and sewer lines within the boundaries of a designated Growth Area will be considered to be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for the County and will therefore not require an individual amendment to the Water and Sewerage Plan in order to proceed with the review and approval process for development. III-48 Specific arrangements between the developer and the appropriate service providing agencies shall be finalized prior to the development receiving an appropriate Service Priority Classification of W-3 and S-3 as part of the bi-annual update of this plan. Determinations as to whether or not a property is considered to be within the influence of a Growth Area will be made by the Washington County Planning Commission. 2. Rural Village Service Areas Existing or planned community water and sewer facilities located within areas considered as Rural Villages by the Comprehensive Plan shall be designated as a Rural Village Service Area. While primarily designed to serve the existing development in the village, a service area established around these villages could allow for in-fill development on existing lots of record and some limited growth. Development proposals for new subdivision lots within existing Rural Village Service Areas wil~ require Planning Commission review and approval to determine if the proposal is consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan dealing with Rural Villages. The Rural Village designation may also be used for development proposals utilizing innovative planning techniques such as clustering which, as the most environmentally sound method, necessitate community water and sewerage facilities. Such development proposals shall be presented as a package in order that the Planning Commission may determine if the proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. III-49 3. Restricted Use Service Area Community Water and/or sewer facilities that are located outside of a designated Growth Area and not within a Rural Village are considered restricted use facilities. These service areas are created to correct documented public health problems generally associated with contaminated.wells or failing septic systems. The use of the facilities within these service areas is limited to the following conditions: a. To provide service to existing uses or new uses on existing lots of record which are directly adjacent to the right-of-way containing the water or sewer line. b. To provide service, where sufficient capacity is available, to new subdivision lots that can be served by the line without extension. Density shall be no greater than what could occur without public facilities. c. To provide service to areas where the Health Department determines that access is necessary to solve an existing Health related problem and the County Commissioners agree to permit access to the line. d. To provide service to properties where a written agreement with the service providing agency, executed prior to the restricted access designation, obligated the service providing III-SO agency to permit access to the particular line to provide service to a specific property or a specific use or provide a specific number of taps. PRIORITY CLASSIFICATION REQUIREMENTS The following requirements shall be applicable to each respective designated priority classification within established service areas: 1. W-1 Priority (Existing Service or Under Construction) a. Individual water systems shall not be permitted, except as follows: If an existing community water facility is inadequate or is not available,* an interim individual water system may be used subject to the following conditions: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations. *The adequacy or availability of community water service to a particular parcel of land is a judgement which must be made in each case through consultation among the responsible agencies and cannot be made on the basis of this Plan alone. (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within 1 year or less after such system becomes available. (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner. b. Extensions of existing community water systems shall be permitted and encouraged. 2. W-3 Priority (Programmed Service) a. Individual water systems may be permitted on an interim basis provided that: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations. (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within l year or less after such system becomes available. (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to III-52 permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner. b. Extensions of existing community water or sewerage systems shall be permitted and encouraged. 3. W-5 Priority (Planned Service) a. Individual water systems shall be permitted. b. Extensions of existing community water systems shall not be permitted, except as provided by Policy for Water Line Installation in Areas Where Service is Not Available. c. New, permanent community water systems shall not be permitted. NPS Designation (No Planned Service) This designation is not applied within established service areas. a. Individual water systems shall be permitted. b. Extensions of existing community water systems shall not be permitted. c. New, permanent community water supply systems shall not be permitted. In all cases where interim or permanent community water systems are permitted, they shall be subject to the standards and regulations of the applicable State and Federal agencies. Adequate documentation that the State and Federal standards can be complied with shall be evidenced prior to County Plan amendment consideration. All interim or permanent community water systems, or multi-use water supply systems in Washington County, excluding municipal systems, shall be approved by and when applicable dedicated to the appropriate agency for ownership, and/or operation, and mainten_ance in accordance with established County and State standards and procedures. WATER SERVICE PRIORITY AREA MAPS (1" = 2000') The maps on the pages that follow show existing and planned facilities and service areas that have priority designations of W-1 or W-3. Letter designations shown on the maps are County zoning districts for which more information may be found in the Zoning Ordinance. Planned service areas having a designation of W-5 are shown on Map No. XII Water Facilities and Service Areas (1" = 1 mile) found in the inside front pocket of this Plan. While every effort was made to insure accuracy in the preparation of these maps, errors may have resulted from the transfer of information from maps at different scales. The classifications of parcels of land as having either existing service or programmed service was based upon the location of existing service lines and upon the best estimates for future service by the service providing agencies. The delineation of the boundary III-54 for the W-5 (Planned Service) classification is based on the land use policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan for Washington County. W-5 priority classifications within the Urban and Town Growth Area service area are based on the established growth area boundaries. Determinations as to whether or not a particular parcel of land is considered to be within the influence of a Growth Area shall be made by the Washington County Planning commission and when applicable, the Planning Commission of the affected incorporated municipality. Because of these inherent accuracy limitations, these maps should be used for general planning purposes only. For certainty as to the exact location of all existing facilities or to the status of particular parcels of land, the Washington County Planning Department and the service providing agencies should be contacted. Changes to these maps which may be required by error~ or inaccuracies may be made in accordance with the administrative procedures set forth in Appendix B (Page B-10) of this Plan. III-55 ' 0 Cj • 4 WATER SYSTEMS INDEX MAP WATER AND SEWERAGE PLAN WASHINGTON COUNTY. MARYLAND IHHAl IIC&HI• " HW• HI CIIIIIPl■IIQ WAHi IHHII blltlftll ••• 11•n11 AU lllffl1111 IIClllll II 111 WAHi IHflMI IHHII If 1111 ti&■ IUII fl WAt■tltfl■ Cllllf fAI ■API I ■l■HH 1 • U I HI 111111111 ■API If HIii Wlllt■r WAIJ,•· IIHlll ........... ,... eotMtY IDIIUUQI ,.., UII @r Pl-tflftf ., • WlNINft■ CIGUIIIY Pl.-CDIIIIIIINNt ..... .: l 1 ,,·,·: I I I I • .. " HIGHFIELD· CASCADE HAOE/f/fTOWN SMtrHSBURO Ill ,.. I" IH ... , ' BOONSBORO ICIIEDYS.VILLE " .. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT ! WATER PUMPING STATION 'i 1. ~ATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I' ! PRING \ RESERVOIR ~RANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A 6 □ -0 0 0 0 -0- D ••• ,. SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· ------. ----. ---. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service • II II II II • II II II II • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • • ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ■ • • • • • • w-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR' I I . 1. "l-. ,. L j •• u ......... WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ~ 6 ■ □ -0 ~ 0 0 -0- -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w · I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . • • If • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR) E . i I s ;; • ,, WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lilt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed .._ I 6 □ -lo ~ 0 ~ -©- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Conslruclion 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • •• • JI ■ ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., -w .. w • • • .. w-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR'I WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES ; . # ... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • 6 ■ □ • 0 0 I 0 0 -0 -D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ·3 Programed Service • • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • •• JI JI JI JI JI II • • • JI • • • • • • • • • • • JI • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR) I -·-···---·--- ' 'U .. , ; • Z: C7 : . J I I I . • • ;; • I ..... I! ... WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I :wATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I :WELL I ' SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed .A I 6 • □ -0 0 $ -0 -0 -I D 1••· SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . Ill ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ,c • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ II . . . . . . . . . • ■ • • • • • • • • . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ___ .. __ ... ... .. .. .. . .. W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR'Y i_ 11·· .i! ~ • I i 1ii I I ~~- I :::J = i .. , I §3! , .... !i \o •,4. '-'-'•· ii' , .. \'· ·~· ~ 0 j~i :: l "' =t:! .. ~ .... !=: u"' ~ ~ _O:u, :f --~ ,·~· ... ::, !!~ ~ .... '" J "' '1:;; z:::::.::! u-. 1a w J ~i I iU I I~ I . ----r-__ _r,..:______ { : (__ /4. 'ii I I 7 "--1 : I ·1----1 /) I -· I 0 . . >- / E -.,.... ___ _ 1-- 1 I i i -=== :::c---' i ' ...... _ • : Q "' ... !:? "' a: (/) 1-=> (/) "' a: WATER ~ATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I •,WATER STORAGE TANK I 1WELL I SPRING I ,RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN 8i TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 • □ -0 i ~ 0 0 -©- -I D , ••• II»' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a Under Construction 1· .. ---.... -------· 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • • • . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • If • • • • • • . . . . ·-·-·-·-·- W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR'I • ~; RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA---....C -- tcMS• t•IOO' BLO<;K NO. I ... . .. 662 ... " . . . ,;_:;,,,~_:R•;/::\·.-:.y. _ _.·_._, - .. ,·17:e,: .\ :\ . . ·.-::-:.-._.._. r··~· ·--~,,, ...... . RURAL VILLAGE . . :_-:•t<-ir . : ':· J.)1/<: :.-::. · ... SERVICE AREA . :. . ~ . ,e...· • .,•. ~,. ,,;-,..·· ,.,.,,.,_.{ .. ., •>-...'-./7 . . ¥.~, ~ V•~ RR RR HIGHFIELD ~•1·•--BJcOCK NO. 2 :(~-~~:t-~~ lit / __ ~ ... '" HT --"" nil i4 WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I ~PRING I RESERVOIR I ·TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlslln9 Proposed ~ I 6 • □ ' • 0 ' 0 I 0 -0 I -©- -I D 1••· SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construction , ................. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service • II • • • • ■ ■ • ■ II II II II II II ■ JI II • II II II II II ■ ■ IC II ll ■ ll ■ II II ■ II II ll ll ■ ■ ll II ll II II ■ ■ II 1" II ■ II ■ II Ill . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. " . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR' • i ;; • ; \! "'i:, • ' l;. u \J, ' . . .. " • ' <[ ~\ _/_ <[ :: .. ;/ . , .. ."' I• .. \ C[ r ' " N " \' 0: -.. • WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 • □ -0 0 0 0 -0 -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing 6 Under Construction 1· ................. , .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • •• . . . . . . .... ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' • : ----·-' ......... ., ... <[ I 1· ', ! ........ I '-I ! ''-.....---i.. ! ' (,; ; .! ,--> ~ ~--. <-;--·' \ ) .. -' . (,) • • • ., 5 WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ~ I 6 -□ ' • 0 ' ~ 0 0 -0- -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W-1 Existing 8 Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service • JI • • • JI • JI •• • • • • • • • • JI • • • • •• JI ••• • • • • • • • • JI JI JI JI Ill ■ JI JI JI II ■ • JI • • • • • • JI • • • • • JI • JI • • · .. ·-·-·-· .. · ...... ·_-_ W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' • ! <( 1• • • ' , / I I \ I I WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT 'WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL ~PRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lilt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I ~ -□ ' -0 ~ 0 0 -0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • •• • W W W W W W W W X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ JI ~ W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' I • i I I ·---t-·-·rl:. I a:: -~ I ' ! -===~--, : • . , ll ( n \ rn ·if' WATER '·WATER TREATMENT PLANT I 'WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I !RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 -□ ~ 0 ~ $ 0 -0 -I D , ••• ll'i' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a Under Construction 1· ---... --........ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·-········ . . . . ·~·-·-·-·- W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY { NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR'I N C ·-• ; ~N ; • ; 2 -. 2 < ! '~ I ,r--.... I < \,_~ . (,~ ~(;,--~-ii , .. •. ,.,•·•·r-· 2/·····--·-.. ·v---.1'· '1 .. ~ ~-. ' . .I ! .. .... WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlslln9 Proposed ,.. I 6 □ ' -0 0 <$ 0 -0- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construction , ................. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service . -. . . . .... . . . . . . . .. • • • • • a ■ • ■ Ill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -.. -- W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' ti we-~~~/ RESTRICTED USE. ,.::::::::.±:: ... ~-. .. , -..... ..1:r--a' ~: I::::::::. . .. · k------1:~ -------- ''•; ~i)~ r. ---------u,"O'>------------ ?'' . c· .. J I • ~:1 \ -t:#1-J ,.. . y ' ~.::, . .... . .. -"- ~.,.o I -"f . .. . .. • I I ~ vu/LAGE E f.REA BLOCK 3 IC.IL( ,1~•l00' . .. r I L ~ . --. . ,.,._ I . ;{:/:;:::· ··/..,,.) . ::}/}:: : ~;-;:>-"" RUR'AL VILLAGE __ ,RVICE AREA . .. / ... ... ... ... <n ....... u4' u WATER " I WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed 4 6 ■ □ • 0 0-0 0 -0 -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w -I Existing a Under Construction 1· .. -.......... -.. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. • • •••••••• • • • • • ■ • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR~ • • : r, ,,-..:;~--1 ,I ' I ~ z:: ::::7 i I. ,..._ -- " l. ~~ -;--...:::'-s.; / -~ -½---✓ / q?'~~ -.-· \ ' .. ;;--... f ~ i ... )r\·it .... ---..,_ Jr Jr ,, Jr ..... ,, . \,r Jr ,, )r J\. )r )r /If" I .__ -..._ l>ir" Jr "'"' Jrlf --r """'" /If " Jir ,.,.,. ... "" Jt ""' er: .,,. " Jr Jr Jr Jr Jr lt _,. I ~;.1r"~,,,,//,~ \,.\,, ,,_,If ......... ~~'--." t '\ • .;: .. ,+: -.!/ • I / : ' ' .. • ~ ' \ . <'. \ '----- ' \ N ~ -- r "?iJ.•cic )Cp~.,,,..JI--- IC >C ,c >( ' ' ' lC I< IC )( ' ' ' ' ' ' X )( -...)C ' ' ' " !i • ~ N • 0 N • • ;; • ii WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # -. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed •IL:, □ elo 0 0 ¢--0- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construct ion 1· .. ---. -. -... ---. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ·3 Programed Service • • • • • • • iii --• • • • • • • • •• . . ....... . • • • • • •••• . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • OIi ■ W ■ II II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • w ~--........... .. w-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR'I . ····· I •~.;;;:.:_~-:,. t::..:,__ 0 ~ (.) ' N " C "' t; -"' a: "' ... =>' i:J a: :::J 22 -c::::r • • • :.,...:....-',-"+:¼---,,rl~~----· -' / . ' .\ .• \ \ \ ' ' \ ) \ .'-- / "•7/ ' - C( \ / ' /' i I./'{ ) ' ( \ I./ . WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # llllt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • I D, □ ' ' -0 0 0 0 -@ D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 6 Under Construction I I .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . " . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••• . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR) p.---= I _; ,_ -;, (.r?\ ·--:_ .. __ _ !> \ • I 1' ··-"-v< --7✓ 171 ~-- ~-"'· ~-- A. \ A ')/\Ch . , I, ~~--~ _, ~ I --r ;r, /.; -;>---·'"¾'11/ A I I' ' j ·- ?,,.., ---\ I . I I ----- / \~' I \, \,, /I >"-v .• \ I C '- J "' ' . -~ -' . \ ' ., '\ / -------- -·~- .. •-' \ "~\ /---; -~ -~ --lA \ ~ , ~-~ Jl -----------~Y- r \--.! BOUNDRY NOT MAPPED .. H, .. zo _ _L_ I /'\ I f I ~ . 7 I ) -NED LAND-~;,5 (PLANNED SERVICE) 7 \ ' ---~---/_~~~ ~ r- I \ \ HI & ; 533 ••• • •• - ... ... -""-1481 H WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I flESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lilt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • I 6 • □ -0 ' . <S> 0 0 -0- -I D 1••· Pf SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w -I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • ■ • • • .. ·----·-"·· . .. .. ... W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR'\' ; 1 /1-----~ " ';, ; , ' -½---------4-_ __ 71A _/ ---,t___ '\ A m -~-\---{/ ·; ( -+ ; . I A -----, / "-/•,\ L/ A Y': ---' . A -__ :__J :-:-. -+-A \J \ ./ ...:...:__-\--rlc°.H..-t---// ... ------· -. . ~----~-;+--- --1 / l.__ I I · J ---- ... _1 ----.... I f J::1:-J,___ I A / ----------A / ' 7--, I A " ' \ / ·17 -/ ILK_J -----------~ ~----J___ • . .u ~,--J.. __ . I Ai~ ~--=- -A ... , , I "-.. ... r ... )I{ Jr --,. "1/ ,c ){ lil' x~ • , •• ,,,,_ Xx I -,c )C • l( ~ .. he ,, ·1 .. l( )I{ )/ # ••. u ~ 1 A ;-• -""-___/) -~----\-r1 \ ' A ... ••• ... ... ... I I~ -/--/ll, 1~' )·-. ... ... ......... IHI Ill WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I tRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES _ .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln9 Proposed 4 6 , ■ □ -0 ' • ~ 0 0 -0- -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W ·I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ---.. .. .. .. W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR' i'!:!-;s:: --u -·· ., ~~ i. ,,-. / ;-·--1~~ ~:.. . -~j .. --;~:.-, -·-,_J ~=::. -I ---f----· / / l;r--~~, --~ I '-..I .,. fC~ . ,_ & ' --" JI .. ~ --" ~ I \ ~ ' ~~iJCJu ESTRI E _,. .. k::z::1-: .. -7· -~"'~ :J/IY'~·• usf A ( -~ ·--/-\ -- )! r .r--1 A -I -- A ." ------~~ , // ... . , rt 111 I 11.....-. / . ~ I :'!fJ A L.. I , '-/.. ·--I ·1: . . . A /,." >< ><" ,. ,. ,IL 1 ,. ., " >< y?I , 7~ -f-:: · ·1 1i'\ r . 'i II I ·n~-r-... ; i. /\ / I ----(/lC ~-=-r:: ·= , ,, __ A ,// f\ ~ ., 1J•\---=-~--J··--.r>-•lsllcl/L_ _: /\. ·· 't:::.fJ-' ·• .. , . · 9 ,.~.".-.r.z~...,-e¥.l:..:ic=-/f:l[I.., ' ---> · . '( 7. 1-1. . / l , ... <>~ ~ . ) / / A -I ..:.;~ .. :'I-,:.· ~H-,/.,-\'"-\'" -\'"+·:··\V 1--- ~H '" .. . . _L __ u-~" -~-\~JLi:LH~/:: ::'.~)if~•· /'" '"... · " ,.,➔::; no "' "' IIAP' NO •• !811 ,. NOTl• nlll HO-,.UIOJII lltlll.ATNI (OfdT~lll:'M "'"''" ti'( .,,_a,o .. COl.l'ffY IH ... &t. &11•ao-t CU&JI !01<1., -,; Ill 11.u> tMtnu .. ·,,11 ,.,., n-... Ga( .. , ,,_.racu·. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A 6 --□ -0 ' ~ 0 0 -0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service • • • ■ • • • • • • JI • • • • • • •• . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ N ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR'I . ,. ·••'• .., . : -= • ·>K········· .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :"~ ... ·, .......... . . . . . . . ' . . .. ' ...... . ' ~-1' -~;+-)C ~?.: 1-1,. ~ )( .a.,... ",r:'c " ;-;. ~ ~)C- ::: • : ,, ... i~ ·t 0 i .. E • ~~ • • ~;i ~ 0 •"• I • ! .. : ~f~ .. ! ii i-' ,.;:: 3~; r~:: ~~; ; i,· 2 c, c, :Ii ~ii·· i ii; n ii ·//i ,:,:-:•ID .. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed •ID, □ 4tlo l ~ 0 0 -0- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . .. . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . • • a • ■ ■ a a Ill • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■a• a •w•~•-•-•~ W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE 'AREA BOUNDAR' =--= / , , ' ,, -c( ~ . ,.__ ____ ,...___ •. . /.... ~ - . . . . . . . . . . .... -4 ............... i'r.. '(/ -I \ '-I..___\ ( -\ I c( WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL §PRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlsllng Proposed .A 6 □ -0 0 0 ¢-@ D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Exisllng 8 Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service • JI • • • • •••• • • ■ • • • • • • . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • .. • .. • .. • .. • .. • .. 1 W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' • E I :::i i2 I ' / --·-/ I ..) : .. • I ) ( L I r I....__ -z_ I . __ , _J "' ·- 0 : J / / i ' ii i= l! • a: a: !I • 0 -·• WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed 4 6 ■ □ -0 0 0 0 -0- -D ••• "" SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Conslructlon 1· ................ · 1 .................. .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service ■ • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -• • -i W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR' 5 I ! i " " ,- c.., ·.<> ·-......,.'7> . ·x . ( ' I ! WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 • □ -0 ~ <$ 0 -0 -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Exisllng a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • ·-········ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . Ill Ill• Ill •-■w ■-•-■ W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR' SI .;-~j,· {_,; , .. ~ \:v-::: I . • '· . i \ A I ' \ ' 7 \ ~ I 1 I A:~ I'\ .~-_J ' A -;;:;~-~-/ A \ :· I ) . i , .. : ·,~! -~;;,,-.... ~~-- ;. • RZ-396 '-.I• "' ,,. l(,,// I _ _j . ( lffl/.-------..r,--_ r ~···~. A···"'·· A A "'7h-..,b--.__, -----4,L----· / 1M '--------./i l(RZ 91-16 ) m •• ~-~---~ ... ___ _r A ;~ .... -.1: ;;_;,~""':;::;;.~: :,.~ ... ~ ~ ~· / ~ 1--::= A I . A ... ... ... NO . , .. GUI 47 WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 -□ -0 i ~ 0 0 -0 -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W-1 Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • -w .. .. .. .. • .. w-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR' r. I .. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I /::, □ elo ' ~ 0 ¢--0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W ·I Exisllng a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service • JI • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . ..... • • • • ••• JI • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR"' .,, .•.. o· . -:/} ~~:}· -.f .. , . ::::::::: :::-· • .. •.···• ·-:+· ... -·~ -11 ... .., ..., -" ··~· -----·)i,··-1-·····z· .. ,.:7 ... ........•..................... ·i~ : : ! : . : :1 ~~; ; '. . ~! i ~ i ~~ . : : i~!"~ ~:--: : : : . . . . •'\• ..... ::::::\:..;_::: : : : : : : : : : :-:---j .......... :-:~ : : : : : : :. :4•il'.~·.:_ ... ~;,--H ••• ~ -..... : :e'.': ,: : : : .. ' )$ .. _::;'.:<•••:\:!• . .. . .. NO J2"· ..... . . . . . . . . <1,,s .., ... ... ........ &Or.I ,.. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # llllt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed •16 □ •lo ~ 0 0--0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 8 Under Construc1ion 1· -..... -....... -. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... Jl II ■ ■ Jl ■ ■ ■ K ■ ■ ■ ■ • a II Jl II M • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. -.. W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR'r I J ;_,- Tn·~-rt:\ . . . . . . . . . . . . # . 12" . I . . .41 " ,:: ::• ... :,({:: •' . ',, 4! -------\· .. -:. -:/,.· •·'. ·. ·. -:-. . . . .\.. . : , ·-...... Ii , . . . ..~·., .. .. . ._.·.· ·.·.•·.· .·/-•' ,• ( / .• .-.•·.· .·.•·.·~J) .. · -· • . . . . . ~-. . .. " ,,..; "."'.,...;, ' I .,::::t' ~•\ ..... /; '.. ,••P ,' , .. ) 1 ;· :::v···[>. ,r \ /: ·:.. .e\Joo•' A ? :::::: :: '\ 16" /2,;••_yi, ·~~~ • • ./ ·········' \ •••r•,• ~_.-/ V. ::···t::.,i .• _ _,,.,,.:#++ •• .r.-..... -, id~,_:..:.,;:.,;-~,t 11~ .... ,.. .. /,'~ + + ••~ \ . ~'.'~:::: • .• I / , . . ,..-."'.• ..... _..-.. <!:.. . . ·". .. . i . )). . l ... .••..• ·:."'• + . • ' "•. /•" •'> ~ -., . , . . . . z·. . . .. ,i . . .,..._• •• • •• • •·«'-.. . ....... ~-· •••• ·.·, ., ~ • I I _._.-.-.:: :/~ •........ , ..... > _i§/ < ;:=::: ,,j " . ·/····· ... I > ~hl"lllll?tl'I~~ .:·_. . .-.---.-·.:·: •>! -f • ' ,If.,· • • : • : • )( ,; . . . ,_)( ;' r::• .... v:-:-• ( ;/U. ?\/!-:-. ·r-:~-<.::: !, . .. i , ..... J .. : ... "'',, .... '"'-' " ,, . . . . . ·1 I ' ( ;-' • i I , L_ /, f' \ ·,. } ~.) -----~ '-. ~-_. I /'-... . ·1• : .... j :_·: :_;:\ 1:: :L '.: {_: • I I I!.-/ ... ... . ... -• ..,. •01 •• ... .IT no WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I 'WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I 'WELL I 'SPRING I 1RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 • □ -0 ~ 0 0 -0 -I D , ••• l)i'" SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing a. Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • •• w. • • W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR'f • .. - - WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ~16 □ -0 ~ 0 0 -©- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· --. --. --..... -.. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Ir • • • • • • ■ ■ 11 II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ., __ ......... W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR~ ii ~ zz WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • I ~ □ -0 ~ 0 0 -0- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construction 1· ----------------· 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... ,. .. . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ ■ • II ■ . . . . . . . . . . -. -" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR' "' a, (.) ' I N a. a: ::i:: rn, "ii'ij I L )!::i:: " • ,, ~ I' /! I ,, ' I • M ' I I i. i -- ! ii .i t .. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ~ ~ --□ • 0 • ~ 0 0 0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a. Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service • It • • • S ■ II • II . . . . . . . .. ■ It ■ • ■ II II II ■ X • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . II II II II • II ■ • ■ 11 N N II II II It N 11 11 II II II II It II II N II W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR'i WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lilt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 -□ -0 . ~ 0 0 -0 -I D , ... SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing a Under Construction 1· --.............. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Progrqmed Service . . . . . . . . . . • • • ■ • • • • • . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ M ■ ■ II ■ ■ • . . . . . ·-·~·M·M W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR'I .... ' ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.' ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 1 ~\_,;7' . \ -. '\ \ \ · ... < I I , f -~----I N c( 8 -----r--c(-,--------;1 =: ' (( - ::::::::::: .. -.-.. -.. -\.-11-~A, ---if:~ ,'' ''' '' .. ~ )< )( "" )( -w. a: Ii; w a: ., . WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT ,WATER PUMPING STATION ·.WATER STORAGE TANK ,WELL SPRING .RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ... URBAN 6 TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed •16 □ -0 ' <St 0 0 -©- D ••• 1 SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 6 Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . 'II ■ ■ If ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ II .. -·-·-· ... " .. .. . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' ~ l 'r-:::. ! i ------ i I v • ::::i :zz '---.: ii I ' ,-·--I / i ____ .. ' I, . ... .... -... , .... "-..... _.,,. ><--I \.. .-,.., ' - . . I I 7i . I C() . I I I WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I ,.WATER PUMPING STATION I ·WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I .RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed .. 6 ■ □ -0 ~ 0 0 -0- -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • •• . . ....... . • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . • ■ •• _.w ■M•-·-·- W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' I t I 1"\ / \ iii -= C22I .. • • = • WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlslln9 Proposed .. I 6 • □ . • 0 . ~ 0 0 -0 -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing e. Under Construclion 1· ----------------· 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..... . • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ■ • • • • W M W .. .. .. .. • W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' ., , , ! ,' J C -\ :c2--::::r 5 ./_,.,-C, • • i \ t_ WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN Bi TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • 6 • □ • 0 ~ 0 0 -0 -I D 1••· • SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w -I Existing a Under Construction 1· -..... ---... -... · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Progrqmed Service ·······-·· II • • II II II II II • II II ■ ■ II II ■ ■ II II ■ II II II II II ■ II II ■ II II II II II II II II ■ II II II II II: II ■ II ■ II II II ■ II II II II ■ ■ 11 II II II Ir ■ ■ II II . . . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR'I i I :: ~-a /:/i:J: ·:/f \}·- . :: : : · ! .,: • WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ~ I 6 □ ' -0 ~ 0 0 -0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· -. -.. -.... --.... · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • • II W W W W a II II Ill Ill II a Ill Ill II II II II 11 11 II II II II II • If 11 II II II ■ a 11 11 II 11 II • N II II II II II II . . . . . . . . . II II II II II II 11 11 II 11 . . . . . . . . . _¥ ·• II >< • W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' ! - ,1 J. i c.> <( " " r ..i I • I I I .. f \.. u I i i iii E I .. I WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lilt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I ~ • □ • 0 ; 0 ~ 0 -0- -I D , ••• ,, SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a Under Conslruclion , ................. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W·3 Programed Service . . ....... . • • • • • • • •• . . ....... . • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • JI • • • • • .. • • • If • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~-.... -.... ,. .. W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR'l' • "· i N '\. • ·--... \ <: < '" • = !i ''1~~!1 ",;-' 7a. ' / ·, :i: .. ·-::,,,...,-~ ',:: / WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I B£SERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lllllt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • 6 ■ □ • 0 0 0 0 -0- -I D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a Under Construction 1· .............. -. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • • • • • • • • • • a X X ■ X II ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 11 ■ ■ ■ II . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • w-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR'I I s /-......_ . \ ! i..-._ \._ i '-l.--~ I " a: a: I .. --.!! /C \_ I ~-\ \ t ► I,...., \...~ -& ff}~ ?, ·-,-, i--.J'-.J--.-.1 I' J I" ~~u. i .. / ---""""; l "r-.5__;-;--· d~ it__ if i I . . . I I Ii .i WATER MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ,J,,j' . )YATER TREATMENT PLANT •16 -\,~I WATER PUMPING STATION □ n;· ti .. ', WATER STORAGE TANK elo ; \Cl'( ·.WELL ~ 0 SPRING 0 -0- RESERVOIR CJ, -!l!"-, ------------+------t--)c;s• TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. W·3 Programed Service . . ....... . • • • • • • • • ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Ill ■ ■ • • • • ••••• . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • ■ • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' . •· .... 0 -0 ~ r t.) i ::I ;z:: ..:::: ' .. • • = " • - IJJ "' "' IJJ "' a:: .,J "' .,J >~ <1. > a:: a:: ::, IJJ 0:: (Fl • in • • r 7 ii WATER 'WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION ·n~WATER STORAGE TANK ,R'WELL 1"1 : t SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed ... I 6 □ elo ! (9) 0 ¢--0 D ••• ' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W-1 Existing a Under Construclion 1· --.............. · 1 .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . ..... • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ···-·-·- W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDAR~ . \r,.I 0\. +e.r .':k ·-.i' . f 1·· .. r I ~ 1·~· / A . ' I -L.. i! \ I I .A j ,' --. 11111Ullllli"I-, r-./. \~ . --.-:-:::,:, _ _-._\-·.:,A· .. ---. -___ --(------< \-----» \ --\:-._---:-:-\-..:,:,; y~ \, . \ (:--t:.-r-. <\.----t -_\~_ \ ---v . ·-· --·-, /---~ -----. ... ..., ... Antietam Ova,Jay Zone IIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIUIIIII A O · 1 if"···"="t==·"•• AO 2 zrrttv~vr'rir\i · ••• •••u• A0··3 I I "-:s: f:--7 ___ .----<. ~ ... . A _,,_r \.._ I . .. !"'-~ . . · V \ A : ;· \ .•· . ._\ AO/J1; I ! I 'Ii ... Al \ \ \ . -=-1 ... I• /! \ -,~ A I ,.,. ---i ~ I✓-\\ il7 I _ JO-Jj ll · \ A i · 1-/ ·.\ . r -0.---· ___ L, -. '---1 ----~ ,0-1 j1 \ A - \ /} ... ' . -1 ----.__; -:::c •-=-----f -:.:_:,s;:-~ , ,,....--/ . ··~ -_ .='I:· ~-/ A,,-~ ~--.:::-... a, --, ~ / ! '1-.... .i . ~ ll . ---<.. ···•'-·_J ~ , }- % V ~ -/ ' . .1 ··· "T""'-1_ t------~."-,\ /. i·. ~-~ ~~;,~~~ . ,----"-. . 1 I . ·-J 1· ·. 1• ______ ] \ i .. 'l --·L . -.. ---...\ .. , ... • •• IW'NO. to21 1, WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING AESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 □ -0 ~ 0 0 © D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· --.. -. ------. --. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . a a • a a a ■ II II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • JI • • • • W-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY { NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDAR" Ant1eta111 VVt.. ,ay LOIi~ 111111111111111111111111111 A O · 1 Ii.Ji -p,h;;; AO· 2 w-+"-,,.. I •••• _... •. Ao=-· _3 __ -i r. /,;\ I ' I . 'u . '.' A -...: RESTRICTED USE-~-,, ..,..___ -----· .-'-) ., .... -, ~ . A ... !~~ C ~ \__~5. I -. · A~-1 : " ~-c-t,~_J ;.--~}'Ao-3/1•\'/ ... -...____/ .} I I . C r;:~\.t ! , Jl .. ·r····f __ }· ~ . -I ,:·/ . / I I . -~ ' z 1· I / j__ --· -L,. -----v >L -. I --~ "' /'--_Ji . · __,, 'fl ~ 7," J~) . 11-~ I .ll ,~,,""'_J ITY ', _ /;(:]/ {' i _JJ --' . -. --J ~ ' ,, 2 . = 1) --JJ ••• I -L n• '87 A -~----- RZ-34 ; \ fz!,., c ••• .., ~--7 ----------------IJ --1·;~-7-----1 __ {, -1 !Jt _ _____,.._______ / c '. --~ /1"1'.J -~ I /" :·_ J .. } ' ..::::::::-----l -- A ,,. ... c I----. -1-----;/·---j --.._ y I---// ·---1 • •• ,,. MAP NO. 6021 IO WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION . ·, WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # -. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed •16 □ -0 0 0 0 -©- D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS w • I Existing a Under Construction 1·. ----------------· 1 .................. .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·-·-·.·.·~ W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE [AREA BOUNDAR~ WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER PUMPING STATION . WATER STORAGE TANK WELL SPRING RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION MAIN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -... URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed •16 □ elo • ~! 0 0 -0 D ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W -I Existing 8 Under Construction , ................. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ . . . . . . . .. 111 ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ II . . . . . . . . . . II II II II II ■ K ■ ■ ■ W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' !I i : .--------------------'---i f ::I = I I • .. WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # lilllt URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed • I 6 -• □ • 0 0 <$ 0 -0 -D 1••· SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W ·1 Existing a Under Construction 1· ----------------· 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • •• . . . . ..... . • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ It II ■ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDAR' ' ;_ -:~tJ ~l, l:,;,"-~ ~ -_-,-. I . . /l .J 71( / f., ,1( C ~'-.-f /!I. / -1~ •\\\ ; ., . ~\,\d ~-\ -!-~! -=<::z-t· . ··,·•.. z . -. -====--~ ,u C ' .. .,___ ----1·-C y --............_ I) --...... , , I ( ·-II . -, l\. ,/ --..... I / I / ~-::; -~---. I • ) I I I I-. I I I I I r ,, J j NAM>t:•t PUlllf ,' '4notlA&. MOIIUlln.J -"-.J I . (HP) I /'/-I :::1::; I f: I C / j. / I / I I . I I C I I I I I 1:--.,~ ,._ RURAL VILLAGE-'-...,_ I ,: SERVICE A~REA · •"---': ....... ll!\\, .:·· ··:t ' ... . . ~ H 087 lf!JIIW!:=ffi~ ----~.Q.:....:_~..,;.;.~:! ~---""'""--'~-.... <.......__y_.,._.1- ... . .. . .. / ~*/ /~t--- --.... _ 1-... ' -- C • •• -'), ·. I c-----------.J\ ·------ 'J-.,______/ .,.._. /' '-./ / --~ ·r ',_ .___, / ... ... .._ ... ... , ... ...... 1oil ,1 WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # .. URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln9 Proposed A I 6 -□ • 0 0 0 0 -0- -I D 1••· ' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing a Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W-3 Programed Service . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • 11 • . . . .. . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' -~ -M Ml W·5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE !AREA BOUNDAR't I i ::I i!2! I .•,·· ~ Uo ~ .. ~o "'~ •. O& .. ; ~ 0 Q. ~ ~ ii WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT I WATER PUMPING STATION . I WATER STORAGE TANK I WELL I SPRING I RESERVOIR I TRANSMISSION MAIN I SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES # ._ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed A I 6 -• □ -0 0 0 0 -0 -D , ••• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS W • I Existing 8 Under Construction 1· ................ · 1 .................. .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W·3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ....... . • • • • • •••• • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ X ■ ■ ■ ■ II ■ JI . . . . . . . . . . ••••• ·-·. ■ w-5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ( NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE :AREA BOUNDAR'I CHAPTER FOUR EXISTING AND PLANNED SEWERAGE SYSTEMS WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT . The Washington County Sanitary District owns, maintains several public wastewater collection treatment plants throughout Washington County. operates and systems and The Sanitary District has jurisdiction to any area serviceable with public wastewater facilities which is not incorporated or is not served by an incorporated.mun.i.cipality._. __ , . A listing of the plants, the service area for which treatment is provided, the treatment plant capacity, the average daily flows and the discharge parameters are described in the following: Wastawatar Trearm.ant: Averag• Daily Discharge Plane Area(a) Served Capacity Plow Parameters * Nicodemu• SD-1 Halfway 1.6 MGD ' ,700 MGD 30 mg/l S,S, SD-5 Potomac (Tammany/Van Lear) 30 mg/l BODS SDS-1 Clovarton/Graanlawn Town of Williamsport Conocochaagua SD-1 Halfway 2,5 MGD ,800 MGD 30 mg/l S,S 20/30 mg/l BODS Antietam SD4-l Sbarpaburg/Kaadyavilla ,163 MGD ,100 MGD 30 mg/l S,S, 30 mg/l BODS Sandy Book SD-19 Sandy Book .030 MGD ,010 MGD 30 mg/l S.S. 30 mg/l BODS Winabrannar 5D9-1 Bighfield/Caacada ,600 MGD ,450 MGD 10 mg/l S.S. Pan Mar., Pt. Ritchie 10 mg/l BODS Smitbabu't'g SD-12 Rolling Billa-Cavatown Aru, Boliday ,180 MGD ,093 MGD 30 mg/l S.S. Acru (future) (Praaent) --------10 mg/l BOD Town of Smithaburg -(prHant) ,333 MGD Upgrade&: (J!'ucura) hpan■ion complete by 12/94 . Conococbeagua (Wasta to ba trucked-in) Potential uaara -,125 MGD Scheduled Pratraat:'111.ane Washington County (W.ndfill luchata) Conatruction Industrial waata ganaratora of Waahington Completion -County 2/94 * Monthly Average of S.S. -Suapandad Solids BOD • Biological Oxygen Demand IV-2 John "Al" Nicodemus Wastewater Treatment Plant The John "Al" Nicodemus Wastewater Treatment Plant ( formerly called Halfway) is located along the Potomac River on Lockwood Road on the outskirts of Williamsport, Maryland. treatment facility and the plant's The plant is a secondary process includes primary clarification, high rate trickling filters, secondary clarification and disinfection. The plant discharges ··effluent into the Potomac River. The Nicodemus plant processes wastewater from various types of collection systems such as conventional gravity, low pressure/grinder pump and small diameter gravity systems. No major expansion .. of. .. this--treatment facility is probable due to the terrain of the land immediately adjacent to the Nicodemus site, A Solids Handling Facility at the Nicodemus Plant receives and processes septic waste from septic haulers of Washington County as well as sewage sludge generated at other treatment facilities throughout Washington County. Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant The Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant is located in the 70/81 Industrial Park off of MD. Route #63 approximately one mile •IV-3 north of Williamsport. The treatment process includes mechanical bar screens, grit removal, activated sludge, tertiary filters, and UV disinfection. The tertiary process is an added "plus" and insures that State discharge limits are far exceeded. Solids handling is by belt filter press with capability of lime addition for bulking or stabilization. The plant also incorporates advanced odor control systems to insure that it remains a "good neighbor". The Conococheague Plant currently .processes waste from conventional gravity and low pressure/grinder pump collectors. Adequate space at the Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant site will allow three additional modules of 2.5 MGD each to be added as needed. A chemical toilet/raw sewage receiving station has been added to the facility to handle trucked in holding tank and ''.Sani-Pot" type waste. Landfill leachate is also received at the facility at a separate truck receiving station. All wastes are .closely monitored to insure continuance of the high quality effluent discharged from the facility. Antietam Wastewater Treatment Plant The Antietam Wastewater Treatment Plant is located south of the town of Sharpsburg along Harpers Ferry Road. Wastewater received in this facility is from a grinder pump pressure sewer collection .IV-4 system. There is no planned expansion for the Antietam Wastewater Treatment Plant. The treatment plant utilizes an activated sludge multi-channel oxidation ditch process and UV disinfection to insure a high quality discharge. Odor control is also incorporated into the plant to insure an odor free facility. Sludge generated at the facility is transported to·, and· processed· by the Nicodemus Solids Handling Facility. Effluent is discharged into the Antietam Creek. Sandy Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant The Sandy Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on Sandy Hook Road in the south Washington County community of Sandy Hook. Wastewater received in.this.facility is from a low pressure/grinder pump collection system. The facility utilizes a clarigester for primary treatment followed by trickling filters, secondary clarifiers and UV disinfection with odor control. The Sandy Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant site is restrictive of any enlargement or expansion because of the terrain of the land. Sludge generated at the facility is transported to and processed by the Nicodemus Solids Handling Facility. Effluent is discharged into Martins Run. c. Wm. Winebrenner Wastewater Treatment Plant The C. William Winebrenner Wastewater Treatment Plant (formerly Ft. Ritchie Wastewater Treatment Plant) is located off MD. Route 550 in the northeast Washington County community of Highfield/Cascade. Wastewater received into this facility.is from gravity and septic tank effluent pump (STEP) collection systems. The treatment plant utilizes primary clarifiers, Rotating Biological Contactors (RBC's) for secondary treatment, secondary clarifiers, and chlorination for disinfection followed by dechlorination to meet strict effluent standards. Sludge generated at the facility is dried in on-site sand drying beds or transported to and processed by the Nicodemus Solids Handling Facility. Effluent is discharged into Falls Creek. No major expansion is planned for the Winebrenner Wastewater Treatment Plant. However, improvements to the plant are planned for the treatment facility to maintain the quality of effluent when additional flows are received upon completion of the Highfield, Cascade and Pen Mar collection systems. Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant The Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant is located at the south side of Leitersburg-Smithsburg Road approximately 200 feet west of Stevenson Road. The plant is currently being upgraded to .333 MGD using Sequencing Batch Reactors ( activated sludge) followed by tertiary filters and UV disinfection. Existing components of the facility currently in use will be converted to sludge holding and flow equalization prior to discharge in order to maximize the cost efficiency of the project. Discharge of effluent is into Little Grove Creek. Wastewater received at this facility at present is primarily from conventional gravity coll·ectors. Conococheague Pretreatment Facility Conococheague Pretreatment Facility is located adjacent to the Conococheague Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant at the 70/81 Industrial Park outside of Williamsport, Maryland off of MD. Route 63. This state-of-the-art-pretreatment facility has been designed to handle .125 MGD of higher strength waste that would be generated by industries located in Washington County. Construction of this facility is to be completed by February 1994. The facility will handle metals bearing, high strength organic waste streams, landfill leachate, waste streams requiring pH adjustment, and oily waste streams requiring oil/water separation. Each waste will be independently analyzed and matched to the design capability of the plant to insure that final treatment by the Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant will not cause pass-through or violation of water quality standards. Waste is received into the plant via computerized truck receiving stations which record the amount of waste discharged by each hauler. Direct flow to the treatment train through which waste are programmed to be processed, and control automatic samplers which sample all discharge into the facility for control purposes. Sludge from the facility is dewatered using a plate-and-frame filter press to dewater to approximately 40% solids for disposal. Existing Sewerage Service Areas The Sanitary District currently provides service in twelve (12) sanitary sewer subdistricts. The following is a description of each. Subdistrict No. 1 -Halfway The Halfway area is situated approximately three (3) miles south of Hagerstown and three (3) miles north of Williamsport. The Halfway area consists of primarily conventional gravity collectors system with a small amount of grinder pumps which serves the following areas: Halfway, Parkview Meadows, Towne Oak Village, Oak Ridge, Wood.moor, Greenberry Hills, Valley Mall, Valley Plaza, Lakeside Trailer Park, the 70/81 Industrial Park and the Virginia Avenue ,IV-,8 corridor from the corporate city limits of Hagerstown south to the I-70 overpass. Within the Halfway sewer service area there are three (3) pumping stations: 1) Potomac Edison Pump Station, 2) Oak Ridge Pump Station/Oak Ridge Ejector Station, and 3) Wright Road Pump Station. Generally the treatment is provided at Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant, however, some· flow is ·treated at the Nicodemus Wastewater Treatment. There is capability of transferring flow to either plant. The Halfway sewer area currently has a total of 2,404 residential and 4 9 commercial uni ts representing 3,949 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). This service area is located within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. A proposed major development project in this subdistrict known as Cross Point is a mix of residential and commercial units. Subdistrict No. 4-1 -Sharpsburg/Keedysville A low pressure/grinder pump sewer collection system serves the Sharpsburg/Keedysville subdistrict and surrounding subdivisions of Forge Hill Estates, Battlefield Knolls, Potomac Crest, Confederate Hills, Trout Run, and the Antietam Battlefield Visitors Center. This is considered a Rural Village Service area. This sewer system presently serves approximately 701 residential and commercial units which represents 843 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Two conventional pumping stations collect the waste generated from the area and transported to the Antietam Wastewater Treatment Plant for treatment. Subdistrict No. 5 -Potomac /Tammany/Van Lear) The Potomac subdistrict is situated south of the Halfway area and north of the town of Williamsport's corporate limits. This area includes subdivisions of Mt. Tammany Manor and Van Lear Manor and the Interstate Industrial Park. This service area is located within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. The collection system is a conventional gravity system which includes four (4) pumping stations. The wastewater flow from the west side of U.S. Route 11 gravity flows to the Wright Road Pumping Station, whereas the wastewater generated from the east side of U.S. Route 11 ultimately collects at the Industrial Park Pumping Station. The wastewater is then transported for treatment to the John "Al" Nicodemus Wastewater Treatment Plant via a 16 inch force main. Sewer service is provided to 476 residential and 16 commercial units representing 866 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). IV-10 Development occurring in this subdistrict includes extensions of the subdivision known as Van Lear Manor. Subdistrict No. 5-1 -Cloverton/Green Lawn The District completed a small diameter gravity sewer system for the communities of Cloverton and Green Lawn adjacent to the town of Williamsport in December 1990. This type· of system utilizes septic tanks for each unit for primary treatment with the liquid waste ultimately being piped to the Nicodemus Wastewater Treatment Plant for treatment. Two pumping stations and modifications at the Nicodemus Treatment Plant consisting of septic receiving tanks and pumps, belt filter press, a sludge dewatering facility are utilized to process the wastewater generated from this subdistrict. Odor control facilities were-also part of the project for this area. The District serves a total of 164 residential units which also represents 164 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) and is located within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. One major development project in this area is a proposed 35 house subdivision known as Cloverton II. Subdistrict No. 6 -Fountainhead The Washington County Sanitary District managed the planning, design and construction projects for providing public sewer service to the Urban Growth Area north of Hagerstown's city limits. The subdistrict encompasses the area bordered by Northern Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue, Longmeadow Road and Marsh Pike. The Fountainhead subdistrict's conventional gravity system and one ( 1) pumping station has been operational since summer 1980 with the City of Hagerstown providing treatment of the wastewater generated from this area. . Currently: .. there. are-914 residential and 34 commercial services in this subdistrict representing 1,126 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Major development has occurred in this subdistrict during the last several years, including the development projects of -Arbor Gate, Fountainhead Estates, and Foxleigh Meadows. Subdistrict No. 9-1 -Highfield/Cascade/Pen Mar Construction of a combination Small. Diameter Gravity Sewer (SDGS) system and a Septic Tank Effluent Pump (STEP) pressure sewer system and three pumping stations is scheduled to be complete by October 1993 to provide sewer service to the communities of Highfield, Cascade, and Pen Mar. These rural village communities are located in the north eastern section of Washington County. The c. Wm. Winebrenner Wastewater Treatment Plant (formerly Ft. Ritchie) will provide treatment of wastewater generated by these IV-12 areas. Approximately 479 units will be served which represents 559 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Subdistrict No. 14 -Sharpsburg Pike At the request of the Board of County Commissioners, in February 1987 the District implemented the planning and design for extending public sewer service south ori Route 65 -(Sharpsburg Pike) to a point approximately 1000 feet beyond the I-70 overpass. The construction consisted of approximately 4,085 feet of 8 inch and 10 irich gravity sewer, 4,556 feet of 8 inch force mains, and 1 pumping station with the City of Hagerstown providing treatment of the wastewater generated from this area. The present design capacity of the pump station is 108,000 gpd. With upgrading the pump motors and impellers of the station, ultimate capacity of the station and collection system can be increased to 350,000 gpd. The District is presently serving 10 commercial and 18 residential units representing 56 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Development activity is ongoing in this subdistrict. The sewer line has been extended approximately 700 feet south on the Sharpsburg Pike to serve new development. A new subdivision known as Cross Creek is also currently being developed. This service area is located within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. Subdistrict No. 15 -Mauqansville/Orchard Hills The Washington County Sanitary District completed the planning, design, and construction of gravity sewer system in 1985 with the City of Hagerstown providing treatment of the wastewater generated from this area. The subdistrict is within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area and includes the areas of Maugansville, Orchard Hills, North Ridge, Fountainhead North, Maugans Meadows, State Line, a portion of Paramount, Citicorp and the Washington County Regional Airport. A significant amount of growth is ongoing in this subdistrict, such as developments of Northbrook, North Village, extension of Garden Spot Apartments, Maple Valley, proposed development of the Horst and Martin properties and expansions at the Washington County Regional Airport. The area serves 1,123 residential and 90 commercial units which represents 2,038 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Subdistrict No. 18 -Conococheaque The Conococheague area consists of the MD. Route 63 corridor from the Town of Williamsport's corporate boundary, bordered to the west by Walnut Point Road, bordered to the east by Interstate 81, bordered to the northeast by the subdivision known as Ceder Lawn IV-14. and bordered northwest and running concurrent with the Urban Growth Area boundary. A collection system, force main, pump station and interceptor sewer make up the infrastructure in this area. Service is currently provided to 204 residential and 8 commercial units which represents 270 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). By mid 1994 sewer service is scheduled to be extended to serve existing units on Honeyfield Road, Kemps Mill Road (to the intersection of Kemps Mill Road and Rock Hill road north from Celeste Drive), and Rock Hill Road (from Kemps Mill Road north to dead end) . Proposed new development in this area includes Hap Park, Highland Manor East and Walnut Road Estates Limited. Subdistrict No. 19 -Sandy Hook The sewer collection system and a wastewater treatment plant for the Sandy Hook rural village was completed in March 1993. The collection system is grinder pump/pressure sewer servicing 58 residential and 1 commercial unit which represents 59 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Treatment is provided at the Sandy Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant. Planned Sewerage Service Areas The District is actively pursuing the task of providing sewerage facilities to various areas throughout Washington County where there is a need. The following is a description of each. Subdistrict No. 12 -Rolling Hills Subdistrict No. 12 encompasses the area from the City of Hagerstown's corporate limits near Pangborn Boulevard to and including the Smithsburg Town Growth Area. The Sanitary District completed a facilities plan for Subdistrict No. 12 in October 1992, which has been approved by the Maryland Department of the Environment. Sewer service will initially be provided to the Pangborn area with construction beginning by December 1993. Approximately 160 residential units will be served by a combination of conventional gravity and grinder pump/pressure sewer collection system extension. Connection to the City of Hagerstown's collection system will transport the wastewater to the City of Hagerstown's treatment plant for treatment. The Cavetown Area is scheduled to be provided sewer service by the end of 1995. A collection system to serve Holiday Acres, a pump station and force main is planned to be constructed by the end of 1996. Treatment of wastewater collected from these areas will be provided at the Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Village Square Shopping Center development required a pump station and force main to provide sewer service. The wastewater ultimately flows through the Town of Smithsburg's collection system with treatment at the Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant. The pumping station that serves the Village Square Shopping Center will also serve the area of Cavetown. Subdistrict No. 16 -St. James The District has completed the study phase of Subdistrict No.16 with the development of wastewater facilities planning document. The subdistrict area to be served initially is the Wolfe Tract (Rockland) and Earley Industrial Park which is located within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. Pump station and force main piping to the Potomac Edison pumping station is scheduled to be built by mid 1994. The collection system to serve Earley Industrial Park is scheduled to be built by early 1996. The Sanitary Commission has been petitioned by residents of Chaplewood Lane, Deanewood Lane, Summerlin Drive, Woodside Drive and portions of Sharpsburg Pike to be included in the proposed project to be provide sewer service. Additional public information meetings and a public hearing will be held before a final decision of the Commission is made. The development known as Rockland is planned to be built on the Wolfe Tract. This development consists of 731 residential units, a golf course and club house which represents approximately 900 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's). Treatment of wastewater collected from the St. James area will be transported to and processed at the Conococheague Wastewater Treatment Plant. The St. James School complex required immediate attention to address the problem of failing septic systems. Therefore, the school procured a package wastewater'treatment plant to process the wastewater generated on main campus. The collection system and the treatment plant became operational in June 1993. Bower Avenue/Leonard Avenue Areas Approximately 42 homes are scheduled to be provided sewer service on a portion of Bower Avenue and Leonard Avenue. The areas are within the boundaries of Subdistrict No. 1 -Halfway and the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. Service will be provided by a combination of conventional gravity and grinder pump/pressure sewer systems. Construction is scheduled to begin by December 1993 and completed by November 1994. Spring Valley Area This area of Spring Valley is within the boundaries of Subdistrict No. 15 -Maugansville/Orchard Hills. The Sanitary Commission was petitioned to provide service. However, additional information is being coordinated for the Sanitary Commission's consideration. Future public information meeting ( s) and/or hearings will be conducted to determine the need for service.· Existing infrastructure "down stream" is planned to be able to accommodate the wastewater flow from the Spring Valley Area. Town of Williamsport Inflow and Infiltration In March 1992, the Washington County Board of County Commissioners requested the Sanitary District to perform a sewer system inflow and infiltration analysis of the Town of Williamsport sewerage. The town's sewer system is hydraulically overloaded, especially during rainfall events. If the study determines cost effective measures to remove the inflow and infiltration, it will be of great benefit for Williamsport' s maintenance costs and in preventing possible sewage backups or spills. The removal of the inflow and infiltration is important to the District because it inhibits the hydraulic capacity and bacteriologic treatment process of the Nicodemus Wastewater Treatment Plant. IV-19· The study will include continuous and instantaneous flow monitoring and manhole inspection and is schedule to be completed by November 1992. Town of Smithsburg Inflow and Infiltration An analysis of Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant flow records by BCM Engineers, January 1992, has indicated approximately 50,000 gpd of infiltration and as much as 250,000 gpd of inflow during rainfall events. The current deficiency of the Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant to perform in accordance with Maryland discharge limitations, as well as washout problems, is partly due to the excess inflow and infiltration. It is expedient for the District, by direction of the County Commissioners, to assist the Town of Smithsburg to identify and remove the inflow and infiltration. The urgency of this study goes hand-in-hand with the State regulated improvements to the Smithsburg Wastewater Treatment Plant that is currently needed. CITY OF HAGERSTOWN EXISTING SEWERAGE SERVICE AREA The City of Hagerstown• s wastewater collection and treatment system serves approximately 35,600 persons and numerous commercial and IV-20 industrial concerns within the city. Outside the corporate limits, approximately 12,600 people are served in Fountainhead, Maugansville/Orchard Hills/Paramount, Colonial Park, Londontowne, Brightwood Acres East, Youngstoun/Robinwood Court, part of Greenberry, Sharpsburg Pike Area and a small area west of Hagerstown. Service is also provided to industrial, commercial and institutional customers in the County such as Mack Truck, Citicorp and Hagerstown Junior College i All of· these service areas are located within the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. The Hagerstown wastewater treatment plant is located in the southern part of the city along the Antietam Creek. It provides secondary treatment of both domestic and industrial wastes by means of grit, oil, and grease removal, bar screen oxygen, activated sludge treatment, secondary clarification, and disinfection. The plant's present capacity is about 8 MGD (million gallons per day) .. Some facilities located within the Hagerstown sewerage service area, outside of the corporate limits of the City are managed and maintained by the Washington County Sanitary District with the city providing treatment only. These areas include the Fountain Head district, Maugansville/Orchard Hills district and the Sharpsburg pike district. A General Service Agreement between the city of Hagerstown and the Washington County Sanitary District was signed on May 1, 1978. A listing of all service agreements is presented in Appendix C. The following Water Pollution Control projects have recently been completed or are currently in progress: Water Pollution Control Plant Improvements: The conversion of the anaerobic sludge management system to Enviro- Gro sludge pellitization was completed and placed on line in 1989. Planning is currently underway-for an expansion of the treatment plant to expand the plant's capacity and provide for an increased level of treatment involving a nutrient removal process. Water Pollution Control Collection System Improvements: In late 1993, the City completed the rehabilitation of the collection system and sewer.mains in the Belview Terrace area to correct inflow and infiltration problems. This project was the first step in addressing the Hamilton Run interceptor problem area. The existing Hamilton Run interceptor has a design capacity of approximately 4 mgd. The capacity of the interceptor was determined to be inadequate based on the sewer modeling performed as part of the UGA-Water and Sewer Study completed in 1992. Future plans are to construct a new Hamilton Run relief interceptor for the purpose of increasing capacity and eliminating inflow and infiltration. IV-2·2 CITY OF HAGERSTOWN SEWER On August 20, 1991 the Mayor and Council adopted a revised policy statement regarding the distribution of remaining Water Pollution Control Plant Capacity allocation among development projects. This policy which applies to developments both inside and outside of the city, basically appropriates sewer allocation on a first come, first serve basis when an owner/developer secures the required development proposals which involve 25 equivalent dwelling units or more must be approved by the City Council following approval of the final site plan. This policy also· allows developers to request "set aside" allocation for projects. Such allocations must be approved by the Mayor and Council and a benefit charge paid to the City of Hagerstown. These "set aside" allocations are good for a period of two years. Water Pollution Control capacity allocatio~ has also been reserved for several "special priority" projects that have a significant influence on the community. These projects do not require a benefit charge or have a time limit. A copy of the revised policy statement is presented in Appendix E. Funkstown The Town of Funkstown operates a wastewater collection and treatment system which serves approximately 1,100 residents and the Funkstown Elementary School east of town. The Town is part of the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area. Treatment is accomplished by utilizing a system of lagoons with effluent chlorinated and dechlorinated by sulfur dioxide before discharge to the Antietam Creek. The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan determined that Funkstown sewerage was subject to excessive infiltration and inflow. The Plan recommended that the Funkstown lagoon system should: ( 1) remain in service, (2) be modified for capacity expansion with more efficient operation from 0.12 MGD to 0.15 MGD and (3) eventually serve certain areas outside the town limits. In 1982 ·the Town completed pursuing a major project of sewage treatment plant modification, system rehabilitation, and pumping station improvements. SMITHSBURG The Town of Smithsburg and its surrounding Growth Area are served by a wastewater treatment system that is owned and operated by the Washington County Sanitary District. Details as to the design of the facility and planned improvements are outlined in the Sanitary District's section of this Plan. MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION The present treatment facility is -operated by the Maryland Environmental Service and has a rated capacity of 0.58 MGD. A major improvement project at the plant has expanded this capacity IV~.24 to 1. 23 MGD to accomodate a population of approximately 6,600 persons. BOONSBORO The Town of Boonsboro provides public sewerage to a population of about 2,445 people residing within town limits. The two-cell lagoon system wastewater treatment plant with chlorination and dechlorination has a design capacity of ,.460 mgd. The Town anticipates replacement of all five aerators with three new aerators and sludge removed from one or both lagoons within the next two years • Also, equipment and structural modifications (existing and new) at the lagoons are anticipated to meet new discharge permit requirements. To address the impact of growth on the town, the Mayor and Counci~ has adopted a new Comprehensive Development Plan and a new Growth Management Ordinance. The Boonsboro Town Growth Area Study, adopted in 1986 by the Town and the County, identifies an area surrounding Boonsboro where growth and extension of public utilities is encouraged. Service priority designations for property within the Growth Area will be assigned once development proposals are reviewed and approved by the County and the Town. The Boonsboro Utilities Commission is willing to make extensions of the sewer system within the Growth ,, -.. rJ r' " " ~ ... a: ,.:J •,,' Area but only_ for annexed properties. that public sewerage will not be boundaries. CLEAR SPRING It remains the Town's policy extended beyond corporate The Town of Clear Spring' s wastewater collection and treatment system serves a population of approximately 663 people mostly located within the town limits. By contractual agreement, the Washington County Sanitary District provides operation and maintenance of the system. The Town ·completed modification in 1988 to it's sewerage treatment plant that was initially constructed in 1976. The Maryland Department of Environment rated capacity of this plant is 0.2 mgd. The present treatment facility consists of an influent channel with flow measurement and recording equipment and a comminutor to reduce the size of the solids entering the plant. The influent flow is directed to an oxidation ditch.equipped with Mannoth Rotor Aerators to transfer oxygen to the mixed liquor. The oxidation mixed liquor is pumped to a single final clarifier where suspended solids are separated for return to the oxidation ditch or wasted to an aerobic sludge digestion tank. The clarifier overflow is routed through sand filters prior to ultra violet light disinfection and discharge to Tom's Run. In 1991 at the request of the Mayor and Council, an engineering study of the Clear Spring waste water treatment plant was completed by a private consultant. The study concluded that: "The Clear Spring treatment plant has been operated at a high level of efficiency during the study period (July 1, 1989 to May 31, 1991). The plant treatment capacity is limited by the low concentration of the waste sludge from the existing settling tank which results in reduced hydraulic detention time··in· the· aerobic sludge digester. The plant is capable of handling up to 200,000 gallons per day from both a hydraulic and organic loading perspective. The plant influent flow cannot be increased to the full 200,000 gallons per day level until the sludge digestion capacity is increased by. addition sludge thickeners or additional digestion capacity." The Town is currently pursuing .. funding for the installation of sludge thickeners in order to increase the plant's solids handling capacity and efficiency. The Town has also taken steps to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration into the system by installing water meters and replacing leaking lines. The 201 Facilities Plan prepared for Clear Spring does not call for any improvements to the treatment plant, however the 201 Plan does not address possible future expansion of sewer service beyond the current Town limits and the possible resultant need for plant improvements. The Town of Clear Spring is identified in the Comprehensive Plant as a "Town Growth Area", however, a Growth Area IV-27 f . boundary has not been established. The Town is currently considering conducting a growth management study to determine how the future growth of the Town will be handled. HANCOCK The Town of Hancock owns and operates a wastewater collection and treatment system which serves a population of about 1,926 people mostly located within the town limits. ~he town has a designated growth area. Treatment is afforded by 12.8 acre aerated lagoon from which the treated effluent is discharged to the Tonoloway Creek. The lagoon was designed to treat an average daily flow of 0.38 MGD, The 201 Facilities Plan which as been prepared for the Town of Hancock states that the existing lagoon system has been unable to attain the degree of treatment required by the current MPDES permi~ for the facility. Infiltration and inflow to the collection system has caused pumping capacity of pumping stations to be exceeded and resulted in periodic discharges of untreated wastes to surface waters through pump station.overflows. The Town has received a grant for system rehabilitation that was outlined in the facilities plan. Since 1988, several improvement projects to the wastewater collection and treatment facility have been completed. Those remaining improvements to be completed are listed below. 1, Complete study of the Town's collection and treatment facilities. IV-28 2, Treatment plant upgrades: Aeration, new out fall, P.T. flow paced chemical feed system. 3. Rehabilitation of pumping stations and ejector stations, replace undersized pumps to eliminate untreated overflow and handle future growth. 4. Installation of a new collection line in Dale Street, FORT RITCHIE The Fort Ritchie military installation which has a population of about 1,300 people is served by the Winebrenner wastewater treatment plant operated by the Washington County Sanitary District. This plant also serves the Highfield, Cascade and Pen Mar Service area. A description of this system can be found outlined in the Sanitary District's section of this Plan. PROJECTED DEMANDS Projected demands for existing service areas are shown in Table No. 9. Future demand projections presented in this table are based upon future population projections for each area and a figure for TOTAL PER CAPITA FLOW in gallons per capita per day. IV-:29 ( 1 ) NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 9 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT -The facility specific service areas within the municipalities. which serves County and (2) POPULATION SERVED From agency or municipality. Interpolated for 1995 -2010 (3) DOMESTIC FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -Sewage flows from domestic or residential sources. Figures provided by the agency or municipality. (4) INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Sewage flows from industrial and commercial uses. Figures provided by the agency or municipality. (5) INFILTRATION/INFLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) Infiltration is groundwater entering a sewer system and service connections through such means as defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or manhole walls. Inflow is water discharged into a sewer system from such sources as roof leaders, drains, cooling water discharges, manhole covers, catch basins, surface runoff, and street washers. Figures provided by the agency or municipality. ( 6) TOTAL FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -Based upon 'Calendar Year 1992 Average Flow' from the Sewerage Flow Allocation Table published by the Maryland Department of the Environment. ( 7) DOMESTIC PER CAPITA FLOW Determined by dividing SERVED. (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) - DOMESTIC FLOW by POPULATION ( 8) TOTAL PER CAPITA FLOW (Gallons Per Capita Per Day) - Determined by dividing TOTAL FLOW by POPULATION SERVED. (9) TOTAL FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -These projected figures are determined by multiplying TOTAL PER CAPITA FLOW for the present year by POPULATION SERVED for the planning year. (10) SYSTEM CAPACITY (Million Gallons Per Day) -Present year system capacity is based upon 'Design Capacity' from the Sewerage Flow Allocation Table published by the Maryland Department of the Environment for Calendar Year 1992. Future system capacity figures are assumed to remain the same as present year unless indicated otherwise. IV-30 SEWAGE TREATMENT ;.,,1< PLANT (1) ;;,, NAME Hagerstown Funkstown j ;~~,: 1 Smithsburg .,., ~ MCI Boonsboro Clear Spring Hancock Nicodenus Conococheagae, · Winebrenner -~--,, Sandy Hook Antietam (2) 6 ... ., .. '0 ,.. " at .frll 48,255 1,141 1,340 6,600 2,445 663 1,926 4,495 10,736 2,967 170 2,143 (3) 0 ... ., .. ~ II!~ .g..,_ 0,600 0.700 (4) --,...,.. !L~ ~ If! ~ -6 i§ " ,.. :,: HO"-i- 0.100 0.100 TABLE NO. 9 PROJECTED SEWERAGE DEMANDS AND PLANNED CAPACITY PRESEN'I YEAR (5) --! ., :! ;: it- :j t:6 " " ~ ...... ~ (6) ,.. ~ ~ iB 0 .... :,: ,.. ... _ 6.647 0.063 0.135 N/A 0.207 0.115 0.270 0.700 0.800 0.450 0.010 0.093 t' 1111-., .. § ~So 8.000 0.150 0.180 1.230 0.470 0.200 0.380 1.600 2.500 0.600 0.030 0.163 • Per Capita Flow (7) u ... ~ >'A ;J fl 8~ (8) ~ A ,.. fl ~f; ,_,_ 138 55 101 N/A 85 173 140 5 YEAR PLANNING (1995) (2) 6 ... ., .. '0 ,.. " at 0 " .. "' (9) ,.. ~ ~ ~ § 0 .... :,: ,.. ... _ 6.900 0.065 (10) ti' aj t,.... ~ aB Ji'~3 50,089 1,184 1,391 0,0941 0.333 6,829 N/A 2,787 0.236 688 0.119 1,999 0.280 4,666 11,144 3,080 111 2,224 0.727 0.830 0.467 0.010 0.097 5-10 YEAR PLANNING (2000) (2) 6 ... ., "''0 .... " at 0 " .. "' (9) ,.. ~ ~~§ 0 ,.. "' ....... _ 51,341 7 .072 1,214 0.068 1,426 0.096 6,829 H/A 3,073 0.260 705 0.122 2,049 0.287 4,783 0.745 11,423 0.851 3,157 0.479 181 0.011 2,280 0.099 (10) t' UTI-.., "§ ~ e-:c "'u - 10-20 YEAR PLANNING (2010) (2) 6 .... ., .. '0 .... " at 0 " p. Ul (9) ,.. ~ i ~§ 0 ,..., f-l~-1 53,189 7 .327 1,25 0.069 1,477 0.097 6,82 N/A 3,64 0.309 0.127 0.298 0.772 0.882 0.496 1 0.011 2,36 0.103 (10) ti' a-.< " u~ ., .. § ~e-., "'u- NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 10 (1) TREATMENT TYPE is described more fully in the text of this Plan. Both TREATMENT TYPE and STP DESIGN CAPACITY information has been extracted from the applicable Facilities Plans. ( 2) RECEIVING WATERS The stream or river into which the treated effluent is discharged. ( 3) GENERATED SLUDGE information is from the MD Department of Environment, Sewage Sludge Division and represents 1992 data. (4) Little sludge generated. IV-32 H <: I w w 1~,1 ti SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT ., STP COORDINATE LOCATION H-651 E-600 H-641 E-567 H-645 E-660 H-667 E-567 H-627 E-600 H-610 E-612 H-661 E-539 H-684 E-475 N-685 E-660 H-676 E-575 H-662 E-637 H-626 E-618 N-685 E-595 H-622 E-628 H-643 E-627 H-641 E-567 TABLE HO. 10 INVENTORY OF EXISTING SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TREATMENT TYPE STP DESIGN (I) CAPACITY (1) HGD Oxygen Activated Sludge 8.00 Trickling Filter 1.60 Lagoons, Chlorination, Aeration 0.15 Extended Aeration 0.18 Trickling Filter 1.23 Lagoons, Chlorination, Dechlorination 0.47 Oxidation, Chlorination, Ditch 0.20 Lagoon, Chlorination, Aeration 0.380 Rotating Biological Contactors 0.60 Aeration, Chlorination 0.010 Aeration, Chlorination 0.006 Septic tank, open sand filter, 0.025 Chlorination • Trickling Filter 0.114 Extended Aeration, Chlorination 0.050 Extended Aeration, Chlorination 0.030 Extended Aeration, Chlorination 0.030 . RECEIVING WATERS GENERATED SLUDGE (2) WET TONS/YEAR (3) Antietam Creek 1429 Potomac River 734 Antietam Creek (Note 4) Grove Creek 109 Tributary Antietam Creek 8444 Tributary Little Antietam (Note 4) Creek Tans Run 627 Tonoloway Creek (Note 4) Falls Creek 535 Tributary Conococheague (Note 4) Beaver Creek little Beaver Creek Harsh Run Tributary little Antietam 42 Tributary Beaver Creek I Tributary Harsh Run H 'f w ... SEWAGE TREATMENT PtANT Roadway Express South Mountain Inn Washington Center Conococheague Brookdane Sandy Hook Antietam St. Jan,s School STP COORDINATE LOCATION N-647 E-595 N-602 E-625 N-675 E-598 H-545 E-600 N-585 E-590 N-635 E-587 TABLE NO. 10 INVENTORY Of EXISTING SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TREATMENT TYPE STP DESIGN RECEIVING WATERS GENERATED SLUDGE (1) CAPACITY (1) (2) WET TONS/YEAR (3) HGD Aeration, drain fields 0.015 Underground Aeration, Chlorination Stream In Frederick County Aeration, drain fields 0.011 Underground Sequencing Batch Reactors 2.50 Conococheague Creek 932 Activated Sludge (Package Plant) 0.010 Grove Creek 8 Trickling filter 0.030 Potomac River lllltl-Channel Oxidation Ditch 0.163 Antietam Creek 493 Activated Sludge (Package Plant) 0.025 St. James Run . ' NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 10-A (l) This table lists only those facilities which are considered critical to the future service of significant land areas for which future development is likely. (2) COORDINATE LOCATION -In accordance with the Maryland Grid System. Grid reference shown for interceptors are the locations of critical points of most restricted flow. References shown for force mains are the same as those for their respective pumping stations. (3) CAPACITY (MGD) -Average daily flow capacity in million gallons per day for which a facility is designed. This figure does not represent the capacity for peak loads. Average daily flow capacity for Sanitary District facilities has been determined by applying peak pumping rates to the Standard Sanitary Sewer Design Peak Flow Curve. For the City of Hagerstown facilities, peak pumping rates have been divided by a peak factor of 2.5 . .. IV-35 , ,. , .,. ,:,:. ~ . ..:, .. ; ~-] ·'-· ::· f," H <: I w "' SERVICE AREA AND SUB-AREA HAGERSTOWN Sub-Basin 38 Sub-Basin 3C · Sub-Basin 3F Sub-Basin 10 Sub-Basin 3F NICOOEHUS Sub-Basin IE IDENTIFICATION Ham! I ton Run Interceptor 15' Interceptor from Valley Hall Area TABLE NO. 10 A INVENTORY OF EXISTING INTERCEPTORS, PUMPING STATIONS, AND FORCE HAINS FOR LARGE SERVICE AREAS(!) INTERCEPTORS PUMPING STATIONS FORCE HAINS COORDINATE DESIGN COORDINATE DESIGN COORDINATE DESIGN LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACITY (HGS) (2) (NGO) (3) (HGS) (2) (HGD) (3) (HGS) (2) (NGO) (3) From N-666 E-604 4 to N-651 E-601 P.S.#10 N-665 E-604 0.076 P. s. # 3 N-657 E-602 0.238 P. S. # 6 N-656 E-603 0.230 P. S. # 4 N-652 E-602 1.036 P. S. # 7 N-651 E-599 1.700 P. s. , e N-654 E-612 0.248 P. S. # 9 N-648 E-606 0.088 P. S. # 13 N-659 E-585 0.600 P.S.#15 N-655 E-590 1.600 P. s. # 2 N-667 E-592 0.048 P. S. # 16 N-583 E-660 0.046 P.S.#17 N-593 E-648 0.068 N-652 E-581 0.375 Van Lear N-648 E-579 0.094 3' F.H. from p. s. P.S. H ~ I w __, SERVICE AREA AND SUB-AREA Sub-Basin If WILLIAMSPORT CONOCOCHEAGUE Sub-Basin 2 TABLE NO, 10 A INVENTORY Of EXISTING INTERCEPTORS, PUMPING STATIONS, ANO FORCE HAINS FOR LARGE SERVICE AREAS (1) INTERCEPTORS PUMPING STATIONS COORDINATE DESIGN COORDINATE DESIGN IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION (MGS) (2) (MGD) (l) (HGS) (2) (MGD) (l) 21" Interceptor N-652 E-579 2.000 Wright Road N-650 E-572 0.800 16" f.H. fran to Wright Road P. S. Wright Road P. S. P.S. to Sewage Treatment Plant Cloverton N-647 E-571 0.103 4" F .H. to P.S. Wright Rd F.H. Industrial N-63g E-571 0,050 4" F .H. fran Park P,S. P.S. I 2 ' 2 Greenlawn N-640 E-569 0.060 4" F.H. to P.S. Wright Rd F.H. ta• Interceptor N-643 E-573 0,900 Industrial N-644 E-573 0.108 8" F .H. fran to P. S, fl Park P. S. fl P, S. II W111 iamsport N-641 E-567 0.500 P.S. Oak Ridge N-648 E-587 0,820 12' F .H. fran P.S. Oak Ridge P.S. Potanac N-645 E-586 0.090 10• F .H. fran P.S. Potanac Edison P.S • . FORCE MAINS COORDINATE DESIGN LOCATION CAPACITY (MGS) (2) (t«DJ (3) N-650 E-572 0.800 N-647 E-571 0.103 N-639 E-571 0.050 N-640 E-56g 0.060 N-644 E-573 0.108 N-648 E-587 0.820 N-645 E-586 0.090 H f w ex, SERVICE AREA AND SUB-AREA Sub-Basin ID SHARPSBURG PIKE c •. .•. FOUNTAIN HEAD CITICORP HAUGANSYILLE/ ORCHARD HILLS IDENTIFICATION 15" Interceptor from oak Ridge Area 48" Interceptor to Conoco. S.T.P. 10" Interceptor south of 1-70 Route 65 area TABLE NO. 10 A INVENTORY Of EXISTING INTERCEPTORS, PUMPING STATIONS, AND FORCE MAINS FOR LARGE SERVICE AREAS (1) INTERCEPTORS PUHPING STATIONS FORCE MAINS COORDINATE DESIGN COORDINATE DESIGN COORDINATE DESIGN LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACITY (HGS) (2) (NGO) (3) (HGS) (2) (MGO) (3) (HGS) (2) (HGO) (3) N-650 E-585 0.900 N-653 E-574 10.000 Ke,rc,s Hill N-653 E-571 0.150 e· F.H. to N-652 E-571 0.150 P. S. Conoco. S.T.P. N-645 E-595 0.108 Sharps bury N-645 E-595 0.108 8" f .H. from N-645 E-595 0.108 Pike Puq, ng Sharpsburg Station Pike Pumping Stat ion Fountain N-665 E-596 .102 6" F .H. from N-665 E-596 .102 Head Pumping Fountain Head Station Station Citicorp N-687 E-593 .072 · 6" F.H. from N-687 E-593 .072 Puq,lng Fountain Head Station PWllj)lng Station Route 11 N-678 E-598 .265 10• F .H. from N-678 E-598 .265 Pumping Route 11 Station Pumping Stat ion Fana lane N-681 E-598 .138 e· F.H. from N-681 E-598 .138 Pumping Fann Lane Station Pumping Stat ion Airport N-683 E-598 .072 6" F.H. from N-683 E-598 .072 Pumping Pumping Station Stat ion . H <: I w \0 SERVICE AREA AND SUB-AREA IDENTIFICATION NORTHBROOK ANTIETAM IIEINBRENNER TABLE NO, 10 A INVENTORY Of EXISTING INTERCEPTORS, PUHPING STATIONS, AND FORCE HAINS FOR LARGE SERVICE AREAS (1) INTERCEPTORS PUHPING STATIONS COORDINATE DESIGN COORDINATE DESIGN LOCATION CAPACITY IDENTIFICATION LOCATION CAPACIH IDENTIFICATION (MGS) (2) (MGD) (3) (HGS) (2) (HGD) (3) Maugansvll le N-676 E-590 .120 10• F .M. frcn Pwoplng Haugansvl Ile Station P.S. Countrys Ide N-680 E-588 .030 4" F.H. from Pwoplng Statlo1 Pumping Station ParillOOUllt H-675 E-602 .030 3" F.M. from P. S. P. S. State line N-688 E-597 .030 4" F .H. from P. S. P. S. Garden Spot N-676 E-587 .014 2.5" F.H. fr0111 P. S. P. S. Maugans N-675 E-590 ,068 4" F.H. from Meadows P. S. p, s. Northbrook N-671 E-606 .135 a• F.H. frcn P. S. P. S. Sharpsburg N-591 E-588 ,135 a· F.H. to P. S. S.T.P. Keedysvl lie N-600 E-600 ,072 6" F.H. from P. S, P. S. Highfield N-684 E-661 .204 a• F.H. from p. s. P. S. Pen Mar N-686 E-657 ,024 4• F .H. from P. S. P. S. Did N-687 E-668 ,003 2 1/2" F.H. Sablllasvl Ile from P. S. "Rd. P. S. FORCE HAINS COORDINATE DESIGN LOCATION CAPACITY (MGS) (2) (IGI) (3) N-676 E-590 .120 N-680 E-588 .030 N-675 E-602 .030 N-688 E-597 .030 N-676 E-587 .014 N-675 E-590 .068 N-670 E-607 .135 N-591 E-588 .135 N-600 E-600 .072 N-684 E-661 .204 N-686 E-657 .024 N-687 E-668 .003 H <: I ... 0 T;. . NO. 11 DISCHARGE PERMITS IN PROCESSING BY COUNTY ~GN t,-L191., -• 7'7 ~ ..• '.·. · . .,; ..• , .:: -:.;•. ·•• ,: ~-• ~ •. :~ ·. ~, '• ', °' -•.• ,;·• •.•. " •~ ••.. .,: ~ ,:."-·.' •• -..:· :: • ·.,:.~-..:,•/ ~-'~;.,. • ... O!:,IC ,. ----------hdustr1,1·ttM11tttciJU11-Otschi1rg.-f'iir-.its ·hr+eo1111ty-1)rder·--·-Acttv• Shtir,--------------------- NAME AEROQUIP CORPORATION ANTIETAM WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 8 TC TRUCKING COAL LOADING FACILITY BOOHSBORO W. H. T. P. BROAOFDROING BIBLE BRETHREN CHURCH ···· BROOk LANE PSYCHIATRIC CENTER CITY NILLIAMSPORT SHARPSBURG HAGERSTOWN BOONSBORO HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN NILLJAMSPORT ZIP .. 21795 21782 21713 217-40 21740 Status Expire SI CNTY PERMIT NPOES Nu11bcr ID STATUS Oate Date G M · -NSHG 86-0f'-2277 -· M00061701 MOP[•f-9862277 ISSUEO/REFILED----v2/2s191-03/01t9.t-S· ·f-··· 91-DP-2277 M00061701 BEING PROCESSED 03/11/91 S I · 'l"' 93-DP-2354 ND0062308 NOPOP9872354 APPLICATION REVIEW 07/09/92 S N • ...:...!. 87-0P-2354 •· HC10062308 ··· ···· · -•-• ISSUED/REFILED -··-·07/09/92 06/30192·5 N - 91-0f'-2324 HOPQP991282-4 ISSUED 02/15/91 02/15/96 G I 93-0f'-0126 M00020231 MC1PC1P9370126 APPLICATION REVIEW 04/20/93 S M 87-0P-0126 ND0020:!31 lSSUED/REFILE[t 03/22/83 · S ,t 79-0P-0126 M00020231 ISSUED/REFILED 02/26/87 06/15/87 S M 88-DP-1006 MD00~1373 HDPOP9831006 ISSUED 06/01/89 05/31/9◄ SH 81-DP-12◄3·-HD00!53198 MOPOF-9311243 ISSUED/REFILED·•~-.. --09/03/92 11/30/92 S H • _J 93-DP-12-43 H00053198 APfLICA:TION REVIEW 09/03/92 S M 89-DP-2630 HOPOP9392630 ISSUED 11/06/89 11/06/94 GI CALDWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY CERTAINTEED· CORPl;)kATIOH -NILLIAMSf'ORT · --,· 21795 2179!5 ·92-0P-1676 -H000575◄1 M00000221275 APPLICATION REVIEW 05/07/92 .. --·-··--5 I ,CLEAR SPRING N. N. T. P. -·-C'ONOCOCHEAGUE N. N. T.:-P. -----·· CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. DANZER METAL NORKS -··DEPT. OF ARMY -USASTRATCON FT.·RITCHIE DUVINAGE CORPORATION ELECTROMET ENGRAVINO I MANUFACTURING CD. ··'-ENVIRONMENTAL AIR CONTROL t INC. FAHAffEV-KEEDV MEMORIAL HOME, INC. FAIRCHILD REPUBLIC CO CLEAR SPRINGS VILLAG HAGERSTOWN ·· --~-· ·••-· --zl7◄0 HAGERSTOWN 21740 HAGERSTOWN 21740 -CASCADE --··------21719 HAGERSTOWN 2i7◄0 86-0P-1676A HD00575◄1 ISSUED/REFILED 05/07/92 11/23/92 SI . : , . 88-DP-125◄ MD0053325 HOF'OP9881254 ISSUED . 09/01/89 08/31/9◄ S H -~ ·88-DP-2563·-MD0063509 MOF'Of'9332563 ISSUE0------·12/01/89 11/30/94 S M ~ 90-0P-0589 M00002321 MDPDf-9850589 ISSUED 03/11/91 03/11/96 SI f 87-DP-1400 MDD003077146 ISSUED 09127/90 09/27/95 GI ·----r 91-0P-2516 ·-M0000322t··MOP[tf'9882516 ISSUED--· ·· ·------11/01/91 10131/96 S M B8-0P-1◄20 MOPDP9S81◄20 ISSUED 07/24/~9 07/24/94 GI 89-0P-2647 MD0071217095 ISSUED _____ 10/16/89 10/16/94 GI -87-DP-0389· -MD0051071 MOD054906201 ISSUED 12/18/87 12/19/92 SI· ~=~:::!~:: -·----.. :g:: ... ~ BOONSBORO 21713 ;-1 89-DP-1229 M00053066 MOF'CIP9891229 ISSUED 09/01/89 08/31/94 S M HAGERSTOWN 21740 :: 81-DP-0295 M00041956194 ISSUED/REFILED 06/20/91 08/01/91 GI 91-0P-0295 --~---.-, ···--·-·-·APPLICATION REVIEW -06/20/91·· -··----G·l 92-0P-02◄6 M00002917 MOD022679377 Af'f'LJCATION REVIEW 04/03/92 S I 87-0P-0246 M00002917 . ISSUED/REFILED 04/03/92 05/12/92 SI FIL-TEC, INC. -·-: SM;;~SBURG 2;;-; 7 . _l ·-FUHkSTOHN S. T. P. GARDEN STATE TANNING GENERAL RECREATION, INC. ··FUNKSTOWN NILLIANSPORT HAGERSTOWN ... 21734 2179!5 21740 85-DP-0169 MD0020362 MOPOP98!50169 ISSUED --•·-·' -----·-06/01/89 05/31/94 S M 88-DP-1267 M00053431 MOD003062114 ISSUED 12/27/88 12/27/93 SI 80-DP-1005 MCI0051365 MOF'DP9801005 ISSUED/REFILED 03/22/88 S M :l ~ . 75-DP-1005 -MD0051365 ..... ---· ISSUED/REFILED ··-· 01/21/90 02/01/80 S M GRANO VIEN COUNTRY INN OREEN8RIER STATE PARK M. N. T• P. KNOXVILLE ---.. BONNESBORO 21753 ,I.' 93-DP-1005 MD0051365 APPLICATION REVIEW 02/23/9~ S H ,.4 8◄-DP-2192 M00061107 MOPOP9842192 ISSUED 06/01/87 05/31/92 S M . 93-DP-0753 M00023868 MOPDf-9880753 APPLICATION REVIEW·-· 06/23/93 · ---·· S M -' ·, 88-DP-0753 M00023868 ISSUED/REFILED 01/01/89 12/31/93 SH HI H STORAGE, LTD. HANCOCK 21750 ··:l 87-DP-0372A HD0020028 MDPOP9870372 ISSUED/REFILED 11/07/90 03/07/93 S I -·--------·--· ·· ··-··-· --------------··-----------·---··-·-···--·---:'7 ···93-DP-0372 -··H00020028 -·------·---Af'f'LICAT-ION REVIEW -01/05193· --·---· --5---i-- HAGERSTOWN FIBER L.P. HAGERSTOWN 21740· .J-93-DP-3077 H0006697-4 HDP0f'9933077 APPLICATION REVIEW 06/14/93 S I HAGERSTOWN N.N.T.P. HAGERSTOWN 217◄0 ~.1· 86-0P-0738A HD0021776 MD0000731323 ISSUED 12/01/89 01/31/92 SN -HANCOCK W.N.T.P. --··-· · -·· ·-···-·----···-HANCOCK -··---··-·---21750--~ ·92-0P-0832 ·-M00024562 MOPOF-9860932 APPLICATION REVIEW ·-·01/17/92 -----SM·· / 86-DP-0832 MD0024562 ISSUED/REFILED 01/17/92 04/30/92 S H HARDEU CORPORATION HAGERSTOWN 21740 · _-., 89-DP-2627 MOPOP989.:?627 ISSUED 10/27/89 10/27/94 G I -·HESCO, INC.------·--·•-------------•-HAGERSTOWN -----21740 --·,: 88-DP-2073 --M00060267 MOD003090016 ISSUED/REFILED· --07/27/88 07/27/93 S-l · HETZER, C. WILLIAM INC. HIGHFIELD/CASCADE w.w.T.P. HIGHLi\Nu MANDR w.w.T.P. HIGHLAND VlEW ACADEMY W.N.T.P. HUNTER HILL APARTMENTS w.w.T.P. JNDEPENDENT CEMENT CORPORATION HAGERSTOWN -·HIGHFIELD -·· HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN_ HAGERSTOWN .. 217-40 21763 21740 21740 21740 • 21740 ·-----· JEFFERSON CHEESE MFG. INC. HANCOCK --·LAKEVIEW FISHERY FAIRPLAY Source: Maryland Department of the 21750 • • 21733 'J' Environmen ~ 93-DP-2073 HD0060267 APPLICATION REVIEW 01/20/93 SI 92-0P-2993 HDPOP9922993 APF'LICATIOH REVIEW 04/10/92 G I 90-0P-2749 · M0006-4718 MOPOP9902749 ISSUED · ···--·----·-·11/01/91 10/31/96 S M 39-DP-0818 M00024376 HOPOP9390313 ISSUED 01/01/90 12/31/94 S M 93-0P-1034 N00024627 MDPDP980103-4 APPLICATION REVIEW 04/21/93 S M 80-DP-103◄ ·· MC•0024627 ISSUE[1/REFILED --· 03/01/89 08/31/93 S ,t 80-0P-0610 M00022926 M0f'[IP9800610 ISSUED 02/01/87 12/31/91 S M 87-DP-0356 HD0002151 MD0003075694 ISSUED/REFILED 05/27192 11/13/92 S I 92-0P-0356 -··MD0002151 APPLICATION REVIEW --Of./27/92 -·---S I 94-DP-2576 HD0063592 MDPDF-9882576 APPLICATION REVIEW 08/23/93 S I 88-0P-2576 M0006359~ ISSUEO/REFILE[t 02/21/89 0::/21/94 S 91-0P-2897 HOPOP9912897 BEING PROCES5ED Vf./01/91 S H <: I .... ..... TABLE NO. 11 DISCHARGE PERMITS IN PROCESSING BY COUNTY .:u, .. ;.o-1.1•1.-4,7,:t -----···------------------·-· -·---·---bdustri1I/Hu.icip1I Discharge P.,..i-ts·h·-Co1n1ty Ord•,..··-Activ• Stitus ------·- •• _,...-....,.a !ii"'"•~~ .. - NAME MACk TRUCKS, IMC. MARTIN MARIETTA AllGR. MARTIN MARIETTA AGGR. (BOONSBORO QUARRY> (PIMESBURG QUARRY> CITY HAGERSTOWN BOONSBORO NILLIAMSPORT ZIP CNTV PERMIT NPOES Numbi:,r Status Er.piri:, SI IO STATUS Oc1ti:, [late, G iii 21742 ·-·----WSHG 87-0P-0390 ---M00003071776 ISSl..iE(I ··· -·----·--··--·-02/15/G.9 02/15/94 G I- 21713 '. 90-0P-0538 M00002623 M0F'0P98◄0538 ISSUE0 05/11/90 05/11/95 S I 21795 r 93-0P-1405 M0005!5026 MOPOF-9871405 APPLICATION REVIEW 09/01/92 S I -----· ------·----87-0P-1405 · M00055026 ··--· --· · · -·--lSSUEC1/REFILED ---09/01/92 11/23192 S 1-- MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE HAGERSTOWN 21740 87-DP-0759 MCt0023957 M0P0P9870759 ISSUED/REFILED 09/01/38 08/31/93 S H 93-DP-07!59 M00023957 APPLICATION REVIEW 02/04/93 S M -· -MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ·INSTITUTION ·---HAGERSTOMN · ·· ·-··-··· 217◄6 ·--~-91-DP-2880 ·-·--·-·----KOPOP9912880 BEING PROCESSED -·---12/28/90-· -·-----G 1- MAUGANSVILLE ELEVATOR I LUMBER co., INC. MAUGANSVllLE 21767 _·., f··: :as-DP-1447 HOPOP9831◄47 ISSUED 04/15/83 04115/93 G I NO STATE MILITARY FACILITY ·;·HAGERSTOWN · · .· 217◄0 \_::·:. .· 91-0P-2876 MOD981938053 ISSUED 11/08/91 11/08/96 G I -MELLOTT ESTATE -BEAVER CREEIC QUARRY --HAGERSTOWN ------·----21740---::-·_ 88-0P-1387 ----MDPDP9881387 ISSUED ----~-\M/03/89 04/03/94 6-!- MELLOTT ESTATE -HANCOCK QUARRY HANCOCK 21750 ., : 88-DP-2086 M00060356 MOPOP9332086 ISSUED 03/16/89 03/16/94 S I MELLOTT ESTATE, INC.. _____ CLEAR SPRING 21722 i 93-0P-3039 M00066711 HOPOP9933039 APPLICATION REVIEW 10/14/92 S I --METAL· FINISHING,· INC.···------HAGERSTOWN -------217◄0.·--·r89-0P-0059-MDQ:056696 -MD0003102753 ISSUED··-·-09/29/89 ·09/29/9◄-S··f.- NEVERS, KEITH SLAUGHTERHOUSE SHARPSBURG 21782 87-DP-1351 . MDPDP9871351 ISSUED 11/01/38 11/01/93 G I ' MILBURN, CHARLES L.. . : NEAR HANCOCK . . . , . 1. -89-0P-2686 MD006◄242 MOPDP9892686 PENDING 05/08/89 S N --·MOUNT ROUND TOP CAMP GROUND N.N .. T .P.---HAGERSTOWN ------•-·--·217◄1 --...'... --{·· · 91-0P-2886 ··-·M00065757 MDPDP-9912036 ISSUED -----· 02/Ql/92 01/31197 S M-·- MT. AETNA NATER ASSOCIATION, INC. HAGERSTOWN · 217◄0 93-0P-02◄0 M00050954 MOPOP9360240 ISSUED 10/29/92 S M NICHOLS, ROBERT N. -PRIVATE RESIDENCE HAGERSTOWN 217◄0 · j-90-0P-2731 M00064572 MOPOP9902731 HEARING HELO 04/26/90 S H NICODEMUS W.N.l-.P. -------tflLLIAMSPORT----21796 ---·~90-0P-0701--M0002021◄ MOPDP9790701 ·ISSUED·--------06/01/91 04/30.190-SM- ~PAHGBORN CORPORATION HAGERSTOWN _217◄0 } :;=~~=g::A :ggg;;~~; M00046282984 ~:~~~g~!:~~L:~VIEW ::~~~;:; lO/Zl/92 : ~ --POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY ·-----:-------NILLIAMSPORT-· -·--2179?; ----+-87-DP-0026A ·M00000582 M00980555783 ISSUEO/REFILEO--·--·· 03/11/91 01/31/9-◄-S I- :· 9◄-DP-0026 M00000532 APF-LICATIOH REVIEW 08/05/93 , S I •·POWELL, ALBERT M. FISH HATCHERY HAGERSTOWN 21701 f 93-DP-1326 M0005405-4 MDPOP9381326 APPLICATION REVIEW 01/2~/93 S I --·--· ·· ----------------·------------·--88-DF'-1326---MD006◄05◄ ----· ·----ISSUED/REFILED ----06/24/86 06/24/93-S I· POWLEN EQUIPMENT CD., INC.. HAGERSTOWN 217◄0 i 87-DP-2◄19 MOPDP9872419 ISSUED 07/2◄/89 0712◄19◄ GI REOLANO BRICK INC. NILLIAMSPORT 21795 ·t 91-DP-1050 M00051527 MOPOP9361050 ISSUED 02/12/92 02112/97 S I ... RESH ROAD LANDFILL ·-----· -·-·--·· NEAR SYLVAN GROVE ·-----·· -----90-0P-276◄ -· MD006◄866 MOPOP9902764. ISSUED ---·--·-· --12/26/91 ·12/26.196--S--I-- RDGER BUHRMAN SA81LLASVILLE 21780 • 91-DP-291◄ MOPOP991:?91◄ APPLICATION REVIEW 05/17/91 G I SAINT JAMES SCHOOL N.N. T .. P. ST. JAMES 91-DP-2855 M00065536 HDPDP9912355 ISSUED 11101/91 10131/96 S N ---SANDY HOOIC N.N .. T.P-. -----·-·---··--·---SANDV HOOIC ---------·--···------·-.-·..:....90-op-272e-MD006◄530 MOF'OP9902728 ISSUED ------09/01.190-08/31.l-9& S-~- SHARPSBURO WATER TREATMENT PLANT SHARPSBURG 21732 .. 86-0P-1361 MDPOP9861361 ISSUED/REFILED 03/13/92 08/20/92 G M SHARRETT DLDSN08ILE/NAZOA . HAGERSTOWN 217◄0 ·,:. 91-DP-2859 MOPOP9912859 BEING PROCESSED 12/28/90 G I ·•• SIOELING HILL REST AREA -.---------··-8l(IELING HILL:-----21401 ·-----~ 93-DP-2◄3◄ ·-MD062821--MDPDF-933243◄ APPLICATION REVIEW --.. 03/2◄/93-----6-M- SMITHSBURG S. T. P. SMITHSBURG -----·-------·---~- STATE HIGHWAY ADNIN •. STATTON FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY ·--SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION _ _:_ ~-· TOP FLIGHT AIRPARK, lNC. 79TH ARCON ASF TROUPE RUN MOBILE HOME PARK w.w.T.P. -UNITED PASi:CEL SERUICE, INC.---·- NEAVERTON DEVELOPMENT TRUST N.N.T.P. -WILLSON, RICHARD C., N. T. P .. HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN NILLIAMSPORT HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN HAGERSTOWN NEAVERTON WILLIAMSPORT Source: Maryland Depa,._nt of the Environment 1. 88-DP-243◄ ND0062821 ISSUED/REFILED 09/01/88 08/31/93 SH 21783 ~ 91-DP-1029 MD0024317 MOPOP9801029 ISSUED 04/01/92 03/31/97 SM ·--c----~O-DP-1029A ·· MD0024317----·--·-·----·-ISSUED/REFILED· ---03/18/91-12/31J9.1-S-M-217◄0 f· 88-DP-2557 MDPOP9882557 ISSUED 03/16/39 03/16/94 GI 217◄0 ,r:· 88-0P-2078 MOPOP9882078 ISSUED 10/27/88 10/27/93 G I 21795 · -···-· Jt.·_ 89-DP-2638 ------· -· MOPC1P9!392633 ISSUED -~ .... -----··-.. 09/06/89 09/06/94 G I·· 217429138 !· 88-0P-2492 MD00632.:?3 M00931940950 ISSUED/REFILED 05/20/38 05/20193 S I 21740 j 88-DP-2469 MD-0063061 MDPOP9:382469 PENL•ING 11/19/37 S M ·-21740 -··--r· -92-DP-1929 ----------MOF'DP9S619~9 APPLICATJON REVIEW -06110/92 -. -. G--I-- 86-DP-1929 ISSUED/REFILED 06/10/92 06/30192 G I 87-0P-0619 MD0023612 MOPOF-9370619 ISSUED 09/01/38 03/31/93 SM ---·21795 ~· 90-DF'-0626 MDf'OP98006~6 APPLICATION REVIEW 12/07192 12/07/91 G JI! H 'f .,. "' TABLE NO. 11 DISCHARGE PERMITS IN PROCESSING BY COUNTY .21l11 s1-uwl.-lTf~ , l''"'.1<> -... ..,-. ··• ---·-·· lndu,stri•llMunicip•I Di,sch,rge P~r-•ih in County Order---·Ac:tive Statu!I ·-·----------- NAJoiE CITY ZIP HONEYWOOO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HEDGESVILLE PAW PAH w.w.r.P. PAM PAW !· CNTY PERNIT --WU · 79-0P-0120 91-0P-0120 83-0P-1261 RIDGELY w.w.T.P. "'"•--·--··---·--------RIDGELY ---··--21660 . _ _:!. • 81-0P-0819 80-0P-0609 92-0P-0609 83-0P--0464 RIVER BEND PARK <FORMERLY YOGI BEAR> FALLING HATERS SHEPHERDSTOWN, CORP. OF STP ---··· SHEPHERDSTOWN .. - _; ... --. -. ·-···•--·· ·----·-----------___ J. ·····-·-· -----•-"'-----· ..• ---·····-·--·--------------·--·--.-.--- NPDES Number ID K00023540 MOPDP97901~0 H0002::5◄0 H00027◄05 HOPOP9831261 -M00050342 H0P0P9810819 MD0024236 MOPOP9800609 1100024236 M00050938 MDPDP9830464 St~tus Expire S I STATUS 0<1te D.ab;, G M --------ISSUED/REFILED ISSUED -•------04/22/91 03/31/91.S H ISSUED ISSUED·----- ISSUED 05/01/92 04/30/97 SM Ot/01/37 12/31/91 S M 10/01/86 06/30/90-S M·-. 01/01/S7 12/31/91 SH ISSUED ISSUED 08/19/91 12/31/91 S M ----11/01/SS 09/30/91 S H --------·----·· -----·· ---·--------··--·-·· -------··-- ····-··--·-· -·· . --·-----------------,-------------------------- , __ -------·---···· Source: Maryland Department of the Enviromient SEWAGE FLOW ALLOCATION The following tables are intended to assist in the long-range planning of sewage flow allocation. This flow data is not intended to represent a commitment by Washington County or by any incorporated municipality to provide service to any particular development. The data is used for planning purposes only. Commitments are made formally with sewer service providers by such means as are described in notes to these tables. The tables provide flow data from the general to the more specific. Table No. 12 compares flow allocations to available flow capacity of sewage treatment plants. Table No. 12 A compares flow allocations to available flow capacity of important collection facilities for the large sewerage service areas of Hagerstown and Halfway. Finally, Table .No. 12 B lists existing and planned developments with flow allocations for each, and indicates th~ collection facilities to which these developments are expected to contribute sewage flow. IV-43 ·H <: I ... ... ,,., Washington County 199l~verage Iii ,.:;:i SEWAGE TREA~ PLAH~h "_F· Ant¥;tam },~ ·= Boorliiboro '._1 ~ Clejir.-spring , .. r~ Conticocheague f'.:l Fun~lltown :; • i· -.,: Hagqrstown •Ii iE Han:H6ck .l -~ ~ Nic:Wemus \:': ;· Smi.!j,hS burg *Win~renner *Sanify_Hook i .1: *Anti.~tam lj\!' . '. Design Capacity K;D 0.163 0.470 0.200 2.500 0.150 8.000 0.380 1.600 0.180 0.600 0.030 0.163 NPDES Permit K;D 0.141 0.290 0.200 2.000 0.150 8.000 0.380 1.371 0.140 0.600 0.015 0.163 TABLE 12 SEVAGE FLOW ALLOCATION TABLE 1992 Allocation Calendar Year Average Flow K;D 0.093 0.207 0.115 0.063 6.647 0.270 1.385 0.129 0.450 0.010 0.100 Gross Capacity K;D 0.048 0.083 0.085 0.500 0.087 1.353 0.110 0.050 0.011 0.150 0.005 0.063 Source: State of MD Department of Environment * Washington County Sanitary District • Comments Initial allocation for new facility. Flow allocation contingent on correction of fecal coliform violations. Consent Order in effect September 16, 1992. Allocation as per letter of October 4, 1988. Allocation contingent on compliance with Consent Order. H <: I ... ·u, ~EWE~· .;o<RVIU AREAS AHO SUB-~AS NICODEMUS Sub-~ln IE Sub-Basin If Sub-Basin IE Sub-Basin If H ii llamsport CONOCOCHEAGUE Sub-Basin 2 Sub-lla,s In ID Sub-Basin 10 SHARPSBURG FOUNTAIN HEAD CITICORP HAUGANSVILLE/ Orchard Hills INltKLEPIUK UK PUMPING STATION '11 Wright Road P.S. Industrial Park P.S. II Industrial Park P.S. 12 Cloverton P.S. Greenlawn P.S. Williamsport P.S. Oak Ridge P.S. Potaaac Edison P.S. 48" Interceptor to Conococheague S.T.P. Keq,s Hill P.S. Sharpsburg Pike P.S. fountain Head P.S. Citicorp P.S. Route 11 P.S. Farm Lane P.S. Haugansvllle P.S. Countryside P.S. Paraioount P. S. State line P .S. Haugans Headows P.S. Garden Spot P.S. -, TABLE HO. 12 A FLO\! ALLOCATIONS FOR INTERCEPTORS OR PUHPING STATIONS FOR LARGE SERVICE AREAS UJUKOINAlt OESl•n LALENOAR ~Ru,, TUTAL NET LOCATION CAPACITY YEAR (2) AVAILABLE ALLOCATED ll AVAILABLE (HGO) AVERAGE FLOW FLOW HGOI I 4 FLOW /JI II I FLOW IHGOl IHGO\ 13\ PENDING FIRM lffGQ\ 151 N-650 E-572 0.800 0.051 0.040 0.071 0 N-644 E-573 0.108 0.086 0.060 0.046 0.041 N-630 E-571 0.050 0.005 0.040 0.050 N-647 E-571 0.103 0.012 0.091 N-640 E-569 0.060 0.003 0.057 N-641 E-567 0.500 0.206 0.294 0.294 N-648 E-587 0.820 0.300 0.520 0.020 0.500 N-645 E-586 0.090 0.005 0.085 0.075 N-653 E-574 10.000 0.800 9.200 9.200 N-653 E-571 0.150 0.030 0.120 N-645 E-595 0.108 0.007 0.101 0.103 0.102 0.035 0.100 0.135 0.072 0.0095 0.0625 0.265 0.1360 0.129 0.250 0.138 0.039 0.099 0.138 0.120 0.100 0.020 0.250 0.030 0.011 0.019 0.028 0.030 0.007 0.023 0.018 0.030 0.007 0.023 0.018 N-675 E-590 0.068 0.002 0.066 0.031 0.035 H-676 E-587 0.014 0.001 0.013 TABLE NO. 12 A FLOW ALLOCATIONS FOR INTERCEPTORS OR PUMPING STATIONS FOR LARGE SERVICE AREAS >t•E~t >tRVILt !N1._n._._, ,vn UI\ cuvnOINATt Ut~ltiN LALENDAR tiRu» TOTAL NET AREAS AND PUMPING STATION LOCATION CAPACITY YEAR (2) AVAILABLE ALLOCATED AVAILABLE S~EAS Ii l (HGD) AVERAGE FLOW FLOW IHGOI 141 FLOW : .... fll Ii l FLOW (HGO) (HGO) (3) PENDING FIRH fHGOl (5l ;i,'. NORTHiipaic Northbrook P.S. N-671 E-606 0.135 0.002 0.133 0.023 0.110 ANTIETAH Sharpsburg P.S. N-591 E-588 0.135 ~Er. Keedysvi 1 le N-600 E-600 0.072 ~p WINEBRENNER Highfield P.S. N-684 E-661 .t5 ~ 0.204 0.204 0.218 f i} Pen Mar P.S. N-686 E-657 0.204 0.024 0.024 ::-;: Old Sabillasville Rd. P.S. N-687 E-668 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 ~-!1: H HAGE~TllWN 1 .... "' Fran sui,llfas in 3B Hamilton Run Interceptor N-666 E 604 i 3{ to l Vi N-651 E-601 4.0 ' 111 P.S. no N-665 E-604 0.076 0.012 0.064 0.064 ,) Ii~ ~ ,, \· ,~~: ., ';, P.S. 13 N-657 E-602 0.238 0 0.238 0.238 Hi P.S. 16 N-656 E-603 JJi 0.230 0 0.230 0.230 -j~ \ P.S. 14 N-652 E-602 1.036 0.140 0.896 0.342 0.896 ~~· P.S. 17 N-651 E-599 1.700 0.460 1.240 0.113 1.240 _; t1: Sub.54.is in 3C P.S. 18 N-654 E-612 0.248 ,::·· 0.018 0.230 0.158 0.230 Subclias in 3F P.S. 19 N-648 E-606 0.088 0.005 0.083 0.083 ..;:,- )if. P.S. 111 N-593 E-648 ~-~-i' 0.069 0.008 0.061 Sub~,s in ID P.S. 12 N-667 E-592 0.048 0.011 0.037 0.027 0.037 ----P.S. 113 N-659 E-585 0.600 0.069 0.531 0.037 0.531 P.S. 116 (planned) N-583 E-660 0.046 0 0.046 '• NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 12 A (1) INTERCEPTOR OR PUMPING STATION, COORDINATE LOCATION, AND DESIGN CAPACITY (Million Gallons Per Day) -Are taken from Table No. 10 A. DESIGN CAPACITY does not represent the capacity for peak loads. Average daily flow capacity for Sanitary District facilities has been determined by applying peak pumping rates to the Standard Sanitary Sewer Design Peak Flow Curve. For City of Hagerstown facilities, peak pumping rates have been divided by a peak factor of 2.5. (2) CALENDAR YEAR AVERAGE FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) - Average flow rates are based upon records of sewer service providers. For the Halfway Sewerage Service Area, flow rates are based upon average daily flows which were measured over the last six months of 1992. For the Hagerstown Sewerage Service Area, flow rates are based upon electric meter readings to determine the length of time pumps are in operation in the course of a 24 hour period. ( 3) GROSS AVAILABLE FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -The numerical difference between DESIGN CAPACITY and CALENDAR YEAR AVERAGE FLOW. Where CALENDAR YEAR FLOW is greater than DESIGN CAPACITY the difference is shown as zero. (4) TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -These figures represent the allocation for planning purposes of excess capacity to existing and planned developments which are itemized in Table 12 B. TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW for each facility in Table 12 A is the summation of the allocated flows tributary to that facility listed in Table 12 B. For the Halfway Sewerage Service Area, allocations are FIRM when sewer construction drawings are approved by the Washington County Sanitary District. For the Hagerstown Sewerage Service area, allocations are FIRM when the Sewer Service Connection Permit is approved by Water Pollution Control. In all other cases, TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW is considered tentative and is listed as PENDING. Allocated flow for a planned development which has received an approval letter from a sewer service provider, for example, would be considered PENDING allocation. ( 5) NET AVAILABLE FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -This figure is the difference between GROSS AVAILABLE FLOW and the total of FIRM allocations. NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 12-B (1) DEVELOPMENTS TO BE SERVED -include both existing and planned developments. (Note that Number of Dwelling Units are listed either EXISTING or PLANNED). Existing developments are existing residential developments which have been proposed for service by a 201 Facilities Plan or existing commercial or industrial developments which have requested additional allocations from the sewer service provider. Planned developments are those which have been submitted for development review to the applicable Planning Commission and have received at least Preliminary Approval and an approval letter from the service provider. (2) NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS -This column shows the number of dwelling units, both existing and planned, which are currently not served by public sewer and are planned to be served. A dwelling unit is one or more rooms in a residential building for use by one or more persons maintaining a common household. A dwelling unit may be an owned or rented apartment, town house, single family residence, mobile home, or any other arrangement which meets this definition. Numbers of dwelling units for existing developments are based upon estimates from facilities plans and design studies for imminent projects and upon County land use maps (1975) for projects to be done in the more distant future. Where known, vacant buildable lots within existing developments are listed under planned dwelling units. The number of dwelling units for planned development are based upon plans which have been submitted for approval to the applicable Planning Commission. ( 3) ALLOCATED FLOW PER DWELLING UNIT (Gallons Per Day) -This is an estimated figure which is used by the sewer service provider for planning purposes only and !!Q.t. for sizing such facilities as sewer lines. These figures are based upon metered water consumption readings for the various types of dwelling units within the two sewerage service areas. (4) TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW (Million Gallons Per Day) -In the case of residential developments, this figure is determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units by the allocated flow per dwelling unit. For commercial and industrial developments, this figure is the total allocated flow as determined by the sewer service provider. For the Halfway Sewerage Service Area, allocations are FIRM when sewer construction drawings are approved by the Washington County Sanitary District. For the Hagerstown Sewerage Service Area, allocations are IV-48 FIRM when the Sewer Service Connection Perrni t is approved by Water Pollution Control. In all other cases, TOTAL ALLOCATED FLOW is considered tentative and is listed as PENDING. Allocated flow for a planned development which has received an approval letter from a sewer service provider, for example, would be considered PENDING allocation. ( 5) TRIBUTARY TO -This column indicates the major facilities listed in Table No. 12-A to which the development will be contributing sewage flow. Proposed facilities which are not listed in Table No. 12-A are shown in parentheses. H 1 U1 0 SEWERAGE SERVICE AREA AltO SUB-AREAS HAGERSTOWN Sub-Basin 38 Sub-Basin 38 and Sub-Basin 3F Sub-Basin 3C Sub-Basin 3E Sub-Basin 3F OEVELUl'HENT, TO BE ,ERVED (1) Antietam Heights Pangborn-Antietam Orlve Area Jefferson Heights-Sunset Acres Brightwood Acres Roblnwood-Sycamore Heights Greenhill Acres Youngstoun. Section 1, Phase 1 Brightwood Acres East, Section A londont0"'1e, Section B Londont0"'1e, Section A U.S. 40 Area Residential Conmerclal/Industrlal TABLE NO. 128 FLOW ALLOCATlONS FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS COORDINATE NUltlER OF -ALLOCATED LOCATION DWELLING UNITS FLOW PER TOTAL ALLOCATED TRIBUTARY TO DWELLING(3) FLOW IHGDl 141 (5) <Al>T!Nb PLANNED UNIT (GPO) PENDINb tlRH N-657 85 230 0.020 Hamilton Run Interceptor E-604 E-660 280 230 0,064 Hamilton Run Interceptor E-603 N-660 416 230 0.096 (Proposed P.S.) E-609 Hamilton Run Interceptor N-650 70 15 230 0,020 Existing P.S. #4 E-607 100 32 230 0.030 (Proposed Interceptor) (Proposed P.S.) Existing P.S. #4 N-658 544 58 230 0.138 (Proposed Interceptor) E-615 Existing P.S. #8 Existing P.S. #4 N-654 108 184 0.020 Existing P.S. #8 E-613 Existing P.S. #4 N-651 54 230 0.012 Undetermined E-612 N-648 122 230 0.028 (Proposed P.S.l E-609 (Proposed P.S. Existing P.S. #4 N-647 232 230 0.053 (Proposed Interceptor) E-607 (Proposed P.S.) Existing P.S. #4 N-646 100 42 230 0.033 !Proposed Interceptor) E-606 0.020 Proposed P.S. #15) Existing P.S. 14 • H 1 U1 I-' SEWERAGE·•SERVJCE AREA.<ANO SUB-AljEAS !: ;L ii . .. . ~i' .l 1, Sub-Ba/! In 10 if H !I 'r ;; • !'. i·, :; .. j\··· ,1 li 11 :1 " :i ii . ' ,. ,. .. Sub-Basin 38 ;ir I!! ·:: li:... ;I! ''I ;:: :, I k OEVELOPHENTS TO BE SERVEO (1) Cedar Lawn Cearfoss Pike Area Paradise Homes Spring Valley Hunter Hill Apartments Doub Meadow Washington Gardens TABLE NO. 12B FLOW ALLOCATIONS FOR MAJOR OEVELOPHENTS COOROINATE NUHBER OF ALLOCATED LOCATION DWELLING UNITS FLOW PER TOTAL ALLOCATED TRIBUTARY TO DWELLING(3) FLOW (MGD) (4) (5) EXbTING PLANNED UNIT (GPO) PENDING FIRH N-663 230 (Proposed P.S.) 159 0.037 E-585 Existing P.S. 113 Existing P.S. 115 Existing P.S. 17 N-669 230 (Proposed P.S.) 117 0.027 E-590 Existing P.S. 12 N-677 108 230 0.025 To be determined by E-602 Facilities Plan N-675 265 230 0.061 To be determined by. E-606 Facilities Plan N-674 105 230 0.024 To be determined by E-607 Facilities Plan N-651 95 230 0.022 Existing P.S. 17 E-594 N-663 100 230 0.023 Hamilton Run Interceptor E-604 • w u -.. 1. .. - .., -u ... .. ,. -,~.;-. ... . :~~~:.: --.i~-~ . ·•,-.-: ... · ::: .. "' --.. "' • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -• -• u • • ' -• 0 • • u • ~ • u • .. ' • .. • 0 • -• .. ' ... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • -· . . , .. • ' • • • • .. ·--.. -.... -.... ----.. ., ., ·-u u .. .. .. . u u ~ --... .. .. ---... ... .. --u ' .. = ..,_ ,O-C:,,C,00 ---..-.:.-=--------------_r,.:. - ----.. .. -.. ---- ---- 'So':.~ -◄ -----.. • .!:! ... ''° -.. - -- u ---a• c,i, ~ .... ., --·:= -: -..... 0 --- --- -- -.. -a----..... ---------·-ac• -------• • ... a ------------------------------ooooc,o ... -... QI • r.. .~---·-... -c..1----.-1-·" ; • .. ----·--~--.... ,.,,,_.-: :.!"', -· -- -----c:11 -=:.c::t.=:;oc::rc:a -----.---···-~·- --- ·.o - ---=~:;: ----..... --0 ... ---• .. , .• :·._,r· u -··= --... -.. 0 --.. u --.. ·-·· --• u .... ,e. .. -= ~~,:: ;IC ~ .. .':,~~" .. • --"' u -.. -.. --= 0 ....:. -u -·--~ -.. .. ·-.. ... ""' - -= ... ---- .. ... - ---==,-= -------------_,o cs-~---•--,---,-----; --------• I i : ~-·~ -............... , .:~:~ .... ~ .~. ~ ..,:.:~::: ~ . .:.;, ~ '" IV-52 -. •• -r• - -~ I►.) ,t :krill No~· ·, · E No: l'T-li . . ~ ~ 3' · FLOW ALLOCATIONS FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT · ::;\.,1 l, • WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT ~jj •; ~-;.: !f ·• J.'(' Najor Developaeal No. Rud'l Units Flow per lioi t Tot•I GPll tr,tal GP9 ~uJin( fin , . .. , ).~ ... Total CPD Conne~ted . I ~. ···itj . '.i: Tributorr to -r ••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••• ••••••••••••• ••••.·••-••••••••• •••·•••••••• ••••••·••••••••••••••••••••·•••••••••••• 151 ·' Tone Oak Ylljicej;jeplioa ~1-•.,:; .. J· '• 10 Ii• 161 lopevell Nuo~,J~,~11 :.'. ~.f . !~l lallUa lu •" •~ . • · · '' 12) fovae Oak Yi 111,e, Section I lll A.C.lf, Projecl .... _HI fru-Jo1 Ko■ea : :; 119 ,,, Jerru · · •· -1-,:. · ·"'.,. , . ~ . ,. ·F.t''l. '. It lU ,! Valier lorH/l11b;,eoh1 ·i11:; i. ·-· !~~ . 'r hteutate Cold IUure ,c 5 ll Towne Dal Vi Hare, Section c, nue I : 1) I· S 15 ... Parhieu Neadoua ;: 516 " Lakeside ParktJ!~U~• t, Phu I 1-1 . -~ ., --Sil Nar1l11l Paper ;.~, · 'i ,,.\ 535 Bollhld1 Neadov■,,t· ~fl:,:·' •tf: ;,1 H .HO Tovae Olk llllace, ,hclloa C · n!,e t , 'f 118 VCSD ld1i1i1tr1tio1 Buildiaf 01 iii . Y1lle1 Kill ::· w 1001 '' Bowau Naltren ;o ~II l~ :'111 lu !-!I Sd ISl lo11vood . ; .. ''h: Ill :1 Via Lear Nnor,' Jeo/ I ZU :,-lov111 luiheii' hit'·. ·-Ht Loadoatowne Corp, ' -~--.1 : :~ ;;', . ~·-~·;ft~ ;: l:10 Sterlin, 01h 520 Yan Lear Naaor, Sec, 10 ·--m 531 -__ 51! I.P, lhter Co, .;•. 1!l;: :;1; Yu Lear Nnor, •~•tin ti }fi-l: Pachlia( lenlcn . .,,, . ,} ':1 \\· .,,... 51 .•.J:t· ?~· l · 31 8 ' ··t;Ji ·\.j'/; u 100 II ·•.1:··: ' 55 .' C ",t u :A·.\ :·•1· . f:.-t,:.:,·. !Ii 1J ; ,·t.;1 .. ' _'t ~ '.' 120 35 ,. . , :,., . )\iili. '35 .: . ;, , . r ' II 1:1 Clovertoa/Gree1lav1 •••er allocation (SD Project! Clovertoo II If, S~anll 113 ll ···::,::•_· __ i I ·"t~'.t ! . 1t'& : \H:;tii· ... , ;-;;.. j 1l r,l ! f :-.! . ;m_:i~t, /,1 ·ll!f·• · -··J;:/{' ~J:'.ei: , ·, zoo zoo zoo !00 zoo ·.~: ,. zoo .. •' '; zoo -,';:, 100 ·• - zoo ill_ 100 ,, : : : .' ~f/' !00 zoo .. ,. ·.," .. : sooo UOu IIOO 11000 9600 mo,i 2800 6~1}C 16(10 U35 815 31(1(1 .0000 ROOO !5000 !ODO 3500 too ,lOOO 1000 980 1000 32600 !,'• 10800 5800 1!!1 6800 U[O : lF' .. ~<- ,, · ·1·t''\\r · I . "'1:•·i, . •' '·'.;, 85200 uoo~;· .. . %600 ·. uoo' 3300 . .-t> , .~-:~:, ·t~)- V··, V. :f :;;,, Vri1ht Road Pu■pinl Station Vricht Road Puapinl Station Wright Roi'd PHpin& St&tion Vrirht Road Puapinr Station Vri(hl Road Puapinl Station Vritht Road Pu1pin1 Station Vricht Roiahapia,-sfaO:on Vrilbt Roai Puapinl Shtlon Vri{ht Roal Pu■.e_!n( Station Vri(hl Road Pu■pinl Station Wright Road Pu■piog Station Vrithl Road Pu■pinf Station Vtilht Bo~d Pu1pin( Station Vtilbt.8014,f~apinl Station Vrilht Boid Pllipln.{ St&tlon Vright Road Puoping Statir.n ¥ri1ht Road Puopinc Station Wri(ht Road Pu1pin1 Station lnduatria!•Pa~~ Puapin( St■loo lnduatri~!}.~~fk Puophl Shi•• tnaualrialfPitk Pu1pin1 Staioa Industrial Park Puapinf Staion foapin( Station No. I Industrial Park Puapin{ Station laduatrhr.Park Pu■pinl StatiOD lndualrlal!Pi~k Pu1pin1 Station lndualrlil·Park Paa.Pl!! Statioo Clovertoo l Creenlawn Puapinr Stations Cloverton Puaping Station .. ~ ;~• ; ,: 1,~.~i( ,;it_ ;, J }~?f ~ ~it .:/ i' . . ·.-;/.' H <: I U1 ... SERVICE AREA St. James (Subdistrict 16) Spring Valley Area (Subdistrict 15) Rolling Hills (Subdistrict 12) ,West Oak Ridge Drive area '(Subdistrict 1) Bower/Leonard Avenue (Subdistrict 1) Hagerstown (Subbasln 3B) COORDINATE LOCATION N-638 E-593 N-676 E-606 N-660 E-603 to N-660 E-635 N-648 E-593 N-648 E-582 N-666 E-604 to N-651 E-601 TABLE NO. 13 INVENTORY OF SEWAGE. DRAINAGE.AND WATER POLLUTION PROBLEM AREAS POPULATION NATURE DF PROBLEM 9B0 Falling septic syst ... s Falling septic syst'""5 Falling septic syst'""5 Falling septic syst ... s 108 Falling septic syst ... s Inadequate capacity of existing Interceptor PLANNED CORRECTION Public sewer to be provided Area to be evaluated and studies for possible public sewer. Public sewer to be provided Pangborn area 1994 Cavetown area 1995 Holiday Acres 1996 Area to be evaluated and studies for possible public sewer. Public sewer to be provided by 1994. Construct new Hamilton Run relief interceptor H <: I U1 U1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER (1) Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary District SEWER SERVICE AREA (2) St. J...,s Smithsburg Subdistrict 12 Ro 1 Hng Hills Pangborn Cavetown Holiday Acres Subdistrict 1 Bower & Leonard Avenue Subdistrict 1 W. Oak Ridge Drive - Subdistrict l Greenberry Hills Subdistrict 9-1 Highfield/ Cascade/Pen Har TABLE NO. 14 IMMEDIATE FIVE AND TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR SEWERAGE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL GRANTS COMPLETION SCHEDULE COST ELIGIBLE (3) ESTIMATE (4) PLANNING DESIGN CONST. N-638 Provide sewerage N/A N/A Contingent upon results E-593 facilities for existing from request for Proposal residential cOIJlllJnlty N-664 Sewage treatment plant 2,656,000 500,000 Complete Complete 1993-94 E-639 improvements and (HOE) expansion N-660 4.8 SRL Complete Ongoing E-603 million Extension of sewer 12/94 lines Extension of sewer 12/95 lines Extension of sewer 12/96 lines. force main and pumn stat ion N-648 Extend public sewer to 600,000 None Complete 9/93 12/93 E-582 43 homes N-648 Pump stat ion & 1.3 SRL & 7/95 10/95 5/96 E-593 collection system to mi 11 Ion Reserve service primarily existing coomerclal units N-664 New lntercepter to 300,000 SRL Complete Comp Jete 9/93 E-587 correct Inflow & Infiltration problems N-684 Winebrenner W.W.T.D. 630,000 SRl,EPA, Complete Complete 9/93 E-661 Improvements upgrade HOE plant components H <: I U1 C\ RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER (!) Washington Coonty Sanitary District Washington County Sanitary Oistrict Washington Coonty Sanitary District City of Hagerstown City of Hagerstown Town of Boonsboro Crestview Developer SEWER SERVICE AREA (2) Subdistrict 16 St. James Subdistrict 18 Honevf le ld Road Subdistrict 15 Spring Valley Hagerstown Hagerstown Boonsboro Boonsboro TABLE NO, 14 IMMEDIATE FIVE AND TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR SEWERAGE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST GRANTS COMPLETION SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ELIGIBLE (3) PLANNING DESIGN CONST. (4) N-636 Phase I-Force Main 1,1 million SRL Complete Camplete 9/93 E-595 Phase 11-Puq, Station 500,000 SRL Complete 10/93 12/93 Phase Ill-Collection System/ J.O mil lion SRL Coo,plete 9/94 2/96 Industrial Park N-649 Extension of public sewer to 600,000 SRL Coo,plete Camplete 7/94 E-570 service 41 residential units N-676 Puq, station & collection N/A N/A Contingent upon study E-606 system findings N-652 Sewage treatment plan N/A N/A Coo,plete Camp lete 1997 E-601 expansion and upgrade to add nutrient renoval process Construct new lower Hamilton N/A N/A Coo,plete Camplete !997 Run relief lntercepter to Increase capacity and eliminate I & I N-610 Lagoon Upgrade Pond 120,000 Contingent upon funding E-615 Aerators and Sludge Removal Lagoon Upgrade -Equipment 150,000 Contingent upon funding and Structura 1 Modifications/Additions N-608 Extend sewer lines In unknown N/A Contingent upon funding E-612 Crestview Development sooth of Route 34 construct a gravity main H <: I U1 _, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER (1) Boonsboro West Town of Boonsboro "Town of Clear Spring Town of Clear Spring Town of Funkstown Town of Hancock SEWER SERVICE AREA (2) Boonsboro Boonsboro Clear Spring Clear Spring Funkstown Hancock TABLE NO. 14 IHHEDIATE FIVE AND TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR SEWERAGE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST GRANTS LOCATION ESTIMATE ELIGIBLE (4) (3) N-615 Extend sewer lines in unknown N/A E-615 Boonsboro west east of Rt. 40A. Hay have to construct a sanitary sewer pumping station and force main and gravity mains. N-610 Miscellaneous repairs and 194,400 E-615 replacement items for lagoon, collection system and pumping stations N-665 Sewage treatment plant N/A N/A E-537 improvements. Installation of sludge thickeners N-665 Construct approximately 700,000 N/A E-537 15,000 feet of interceptor sewer. Construct a sanitary sewer pumping station & force main. N-648 Sewage treatment plant N/A N/A E-600 system rehabilitation & maintenance N-683 Sewerage treatment p ]ant & 290,000 NIA E-468 sewer system rehabilitation & improvements COMPLETION SCHEDULE PLANNING DESIGN CONST. Contingent upon developer Contingent upon funding Complete Contingent upon funding Contingent upon development Complete Complete Contingent upon funding Complete Complete Ongoing H 'f U1 00 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY OR DEVELOPER (l) Town of Smithsburg Town of Williamsport Washington County Department of Housing & Conmmlty Development SEWER SERVICE AREA (2) Smithsburg Halfway Halfway (Wll llamsport) TABLE NO. 14 lttMEOIATE FIVE ANO TEN YEAR PRIORITIES FOR SEWERAGE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION PROJECT OESCRIPTION TOTAL COST GRANTS COMPLETION SCHEDULE ·ESTIMATE ELIGIBLE (3) (4) PLANNING DESIGN CONST. N-664 Design and construction of 50,000 42,500 Complete Contingent upon E-639 plant IIIOdlflcatlon to OEet {EPA) funding. disinfection.standards 3,BOO using ultraviolet (DHHH) Irradiation N-644 Sewer system rehabilitation 39,200 29,400 Complete Contingent upon E-568 to correct Inflow and {EPA) funding Infiltration 4,900 {DHHH) N-644 Extend sewerage lines to 150,000 150,000 Contingent upon funding E-568 Fenton Avenue area west of {CDBG) Conococheague Creek. NOTES FOR TABLE NO. 14 (1) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, MUNICIPALITY, OR DEVELOPER Responsibilities may include project initiation and management but no necessarily financing. (2) SEWER SERVICE AREA -That area served, or potentially served, by a system of sanitary sewers connected to a treatment plant, or, in a very large system, sub-areas as delineated by the County. Sub-basins refer to drainage areas shown in the applicable 201 Facilities Plan. Subdistricts refer to Sanitary Subdistricts of the Washington County Sanitary District. (3) LOCATION -In accordance with the Maryland Grid System. (4) GRANTS ELIGIBLE -Dollar amounts indicate funds for which the project may be eligible from sources shown in parentheses, Source abbreviations represent agencies and programs as follows: EPA -Environmental Prote~tion Agency MDE -Department of the Environment EDA -Economic Development Administration UDAG -Urban Development Action Grant CDBG -Community Development Block Grant FmHA -Farmers Home Administration ARC -Appalachian Regional Commission HUD -Housing and Urban Development Grant SRL -State Revolving Loan Fund • The local cost for any project may be assumed to be the total cost estimate less any amount shown for grants eligible. IV-59 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT Sludge is defined as the solid residuals of sewage treatment. Primary or raw sludge is obtained in the primary state of a treatment plant by collecting solids that have settled. Sludge is stabilized after the organic matter has been decomposed into a relatively stable material. A common method of stabilization is anaerobic digestion. Sludge management is an integral part of the sewage treatment and disposal process. The disposal of treatment plant sludge is regulated by the Maryland Department of the Environment in / accordance with the code of maryland Regulations 10.03.48. Sludge disposal sites are approved after an analysis of such factors as the site surface drainage, soil type, depth to bedrock and sludge composition. On November 25, 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted the National Sewerage Sludge Use and Disposl Regulation (Chapter 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503). The rule addresses three general categories of use and disposal practices for sludge that is; 1) land-applied, distributed, or marketed; 2) disposed of at dedicated sites or in sludge-only landfills; and 3) incinerated in sludge-only incinerators. The new rule includes standards that apply to generators, processors, beneficial users, or disposers of sludge or septic wastes. The rule sets standards in two areas • First, it sets standards for 10 heavy metals, pathogens, and total hydrocarbon emissions from incinerators. Second, it sets standards for managing sewage sludge use and disposal. The prescribed management practices have been designed to limit human and ecological exposure to any contaminants and ensure that sewage sludge is used on the land or disposed of in ways that are protective of human health and the environment. Several methods of sludge disposal are described in the Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan. The methods include land spreading, incineration, ocean disposal, sanitary landfilling, and composting. The key methods of sludge disposal in Washington County are land spreading and landfill. Land Spreading Land spreading refers to the process of sludge application to lands used for farming, forestry, or recreational purposes. Sewage • sludge is generally not as easily handled nor as high in nutrient content as commercial fertilizers. However, it does greatly enhance soil physical fertility when applied to marginal lands. Sludges may contain pathogenic bacteria or viral organisms. They may also contain heavy metals which could pose a threat to public heal th through transmission of toxic levels in crops grown on treated land or through leaching into groundwater. For these reasons, sludge must be stabilized prior to land spreading to IV-61 reduce public health hazards and to prevent nuisance odor conditions. In order to ensure that harmful contaminants do not enter the human food chain, sludge application rates are controlled and crops grown on sludge treated land are restricted based upon recommendations by the University of Maryland. The University of Maryland warns that "sewage sludge should not be considered an innocuous or harmless product. The implications of the uptake by plants of heavy metals and persistent organics from sludge, their intake by grazing animals, and their ingestion by humans are not entirely understood. Therefore, the University of Maryland cannot predict the long term effects of sewage sludge on the environment and .does not. accept responsibility for any such effects."* The Upper Potomac River Water Quality Management Plan describes further implications of land spreading. "When contemplating instituting a land spreading program, municipalities must consider the availability of land, the time frame within which that land can be leased or otherwise controlled and potential alternative sites. Should public pressure or public health considerations cause termination of land spreading activities, municipalities must be prepared to undertake interim sludge disposal operations until more acceptable permanent solutions can be devised. Similarly, it must be recognized that land for sludge spreading may have a finite useful lifetime. Thus, additional land should be available nearby. Gaining access to large tracts of land is always difficult near urban areas . Hence, land spreading of s 1 udges may not be a realistic alternative for most large metropolitan areas, especially on a long-term basis. "When land is to be leased, or sludge is to sold to private landowners, municipal officials will have to deal with problems of general acceptance. The extra time and costs associated with transporting and spreading sludges, a natural reluctance to work with sewage sludge, and the limited nutrient value compared to commercial fertilizers may make it difficult to sell sludge to farmers. Where sludge spreading is an attractive sludge disposal alternative, wastewater officials will need to have the flexibility to offer additional incentives, These would be most effective in the form of indirect subsidies such as free delivery of bulk lots of processed sludge and low cost rental of spreading devices. Municipalities should also consider the possibilities for nutrient enrichment of sludges to enhance their value to the farmer. This could be contracted out to a private fertilizer concern."** Sanitary Landfilling Sanitary landfill of sludge containing no free moisture, either separately or along with mixed municipal solid waste, is an environmentally acceptable method for disposal of sludge. The IV-63 sludge must be stabilized as described for land spreading in order to prevent nuisance odors and reduce hazards to those working in the area. The relative benefits of sanitary landfill disposal are discussed in the Upper Potomac River Water Quality Management Plan as follows: "Many of the considerations that must be taken into account in evaluating the land spreading option such as protection of groundwaters are pertinent to the discussion of sanitary landfills. Typically, however, sanitary landfills have less problems with surface runoff, and uptake by crops is generally not a prime consideration. Further, sanitary landfill obviously requires less land than land spreading.,-.... IV-64 The trade-off required to obtain this added protection and decreased land requirement is the loss of most of the advantages of resource recovery realized in land spreading. landfill offers little more than the use of a solid material to fill natural depressions or replace soils or gravel that can be used elsewhere. Areas where landfill has been practiced can be reclaimed for recreational or other purposes."** NOTES: * From Sewage Procedures for Approval. Division of Solid Waste Control, January 25, 1977. ** From Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan, Maryland Water Resources Administration, September 2, 1976 (Section 12). IV-65 Sludge Management Practices in Washington County Table number 15 provides an inventory of current sewerage sludge generation and how it is utilized, All municipal and non-municipal treatment plants that generate sludge and have a sludge utilization permit are listed. Sewerage treatment plants for the Towns of Boonsboro, Hancock and Funkstown utilize lagoons and therefore produce no sludge. The majority of the sludge produced in Washington County is disposed of in the Washington County sanitary landfill. The remainder of the sludge is disposed of by landspreading. Non- municipal treatment facilities which transport sludge to larger plants generally do not have the facilities to adequately de-water the sludge. De-watering is provided at the receiving treatment plant and is either disposed of at the Washington County sanitary landfill or landspread. All sludge transported to the Nicodemu~ (Halfway) treatment plant is disposed of at the landfill. Some non-municipal, package treatment plants produce insignificant amounts of sludge, however, these plants do have permits for disposal. The method for utilizing or disposing of sludge generated by proposed sewerage treatment plants is discussed in the narrative for each new project addressed in this Plan. The City of Hagerstown recently placed on line a sludge IV-66 pellitization plant. This plant completely replaced the previous anaerobic digestion process, The new plant is operated and maintained by Enviro-Gro Technologies Inc. under a lease agreement with the City of Hagerstown. The following is a general explanation of the sludge pellitization process. Sludge produced by the treatment plant is gathered together and thickened in a holding. tank, Specif-ication grade sludge is delivered continuously to the pellitization plant during one shift per day, Once in the plant, the sludge is conditioned with a polymer additive. The conditioned sludge is pressed in a belt press and placed in a rotary kiln where it is heat dried. sludge pellets are produced in the kiln and then deposited in a silo for storage. The pellets are then shipped to a fertilizer manufacture. The City of Hagerstown, Water Pollution control_, waste wate:i: facility currently produces 1429 wet tons per year of sludge which is processed in the pellitization plant. IV-67 H <: I °' CD TABLE NO. 15 1992 SEWAGE SLUDGE UTILIZATION IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND All figures in terms of wet tons of sludge WWTP TOTAL GENERATED Antietam 493 Blue Plains 835 Brooklane Psychiatric B Clear Spring 627 Conococheague 932 Fort Ritchie 535 Greenbriar State Park 42 Hagerstown 1,429 · Highland Manor 136 llaryland Correctional Inst. 8,444 Nlcodenus (Halfway) 734 Sldllno Hill 17 Smithsburg 109 TOTALS 14,341 SOURCE: Maryland Department of the Environment Sewage Sludge Division HAULED TO APPLIED TO ' DISTRIBUTED ANO ANOTHER WlHP AGRICULTURAL LANO MARKETED 335 0 0 0 I 835 0 0 0 0 168 419 0 0 ' 0 0 0 517 0 42 0 0 0 ' 0 1,429 133 0 0 0 8,444 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 695 10,215 1,429 DISPOSED IN LANDFILL !SB 0 8 40 932 18 0 0 3 0 734 0 109 2,002 POLICY FOR SEWER LINE INSTALLATION IN AREAS WHERE SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE All new subdivisions shall be served by adequate sewerage disposal systems pursuant to Article VI of the adopted Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance for Washington County. In order to prevent street and other damage encountered in providing public sewer service to developed areas, and to provide for efficient and effective connection to public sewer service, the following policy is presented for sewer line installation in areas where public sewerage service is not available at the time of street and residential construction, but will be made available at some future time: 1, Requests for such installation will only be accepted where interim systems are permitted and public sewer service is programmed by the Water and Sewerage Plan (S-1, S-3, S-5). 2. Each application for a sewer construction permit must be accompanied by a letter from the county Health Officer requesting that such installation be permitted. 3. Building permits, subdivision plats, and septic tank approvals shall include a provision requiring the connection of the premises to community sewerage within twelve ( 12 ) months of announced availability. 4. Sewer lines shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable municipal or Commission specifications. IV-69 5. The connection of a "dry" system shall be plugged with a visible and readily inspected plug at the future point of connection to the existing system. IV-70 POLICY ON SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVE Individual On-Lot Systems The traditional septic system should not be discounted as a permanent means of individual, on-lot sewage disposal. Such systems must be properly designed, constructed, operated and maintained to ensure permanent, environmentally sound service. A number of alternatives to the standard septic system for on-lot sewage disposal have been identified and shown to be operationally sound under appropriate circumstances. Such systems include improved septic tank-tile field systems, mound systems, and systems with toilet sewage separated from wash water (composting toilets, incinerating toilets, and liquid recycling toilets). The high cost of central sewerage systems and the fact that on-lot systems are currently failing. in some ... areas. is sufficient justification to experiment with alternative techniques.** Alternative on-lot systems should be preferred in rural areas where there are existing sewage disposal problems and where they are found to be economically and environmentally sound methods of correcting such problems . All plans for the correction of wastewater management problems in these areas should incorporate measures to assure adequate maintenance of new facilities and to reduce sewage generation. Community Systems Every effort should be made to investigate the reliability and desirability of community sewerage systems which could serve as appropriate alternatives to conventional central sewerage systems. Such systems may be used as corrective measures to solve existing sewage disposal problems and as interim or permanent measure to serve new development under appropriate circumstances. Within growth areas, pressure sewers and vacuum sewers may be more appropriate and cost-effective than conventional gravity sewers to provide permanent service to a given development. Such measures as ,, dry sewers should be evaluated as a appropriate interim measure until sewer lines are extended to a given development. Within the Rural/Agricultural Area, community sewerage system alternatives acceptable to all approving state and county agencie~ should be considered for development proposals utilizing innovative planning techniques such as clustering of rural housing to preserve agricultural land and the rural character. Some alternative systems which are appropriate for on-lot disposal may lend themselves to the clustering approach. The use of package treatment plants may also be considered to serve cluster developments and rural villages within the Rural/Agricultural area. The appropriateness of such development and it's associated sewerage system shall be determined by the Planning Commission based on the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan for IV-72 Washington County. The use of such facilities shall be approved by all appropriate state and local authorities as well as meeting all applicable health and water quality requirements. NOTES: * See Report to the Congress, Systems: A Viable Alternative to United States General Accounting Community-Managed Septic Sewage Treatment Plants, Office, November, 3, 1978. ** See Upper Potomac River Basin Water Quality Management Plan, Maryland Water Resources Administration, September 2, 1976 (Section 12). POLICY ON INTERIM TREATMENT PLANTS* 1. An interim treatment plant is acceptable as long as it is an interim step in a regional long-range sewerage treatment plant with a specific date by which permanent facilities will be provided. No permit will be granted for an interim treatment plant which is planned to be in operation longer than five years. 2. The State will issue a permit for such a plant only if it has been included by the County as part of an approved 10-year Water and Sewer Plan, and adequate measures have been taken by the County to assure that growth will be limited to the capacity of such treatment plant. The State will approve only a limited number ·of· su<:h plants and only where they are compatible with appropriate regional plans for such sewerage service. 3. Any such plant must meet all applicable health and water quality requirements. 4. Privately finance interim treatment plants must be publicly owned and operated. IV-74 5. When such a plant is proposed for a sewer system from which raw sewerage overflows are presently occurring or threatened, the State may require the capacity of the plant to be enlarged to provide capacity to alleviate or prevent the overflows, where practicable. Financing arrangements for such enlargements must be approved by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. *See also the Washington County Sanitary District's POLICY ON INTERIM AND PERMANENT COMMUNITY WATER AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS in Appendix D of this Plan. Policy on Interim Treatment plants Adopted by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene -2.5.73 Approved by Council on the Environment -2.5.73 IV-75 SERVICE AREA REQUIREMENTS The following shall be applicable to each respective designated service area. Criteria for creation and amendment of service areas are outlined in Appendix B. 1. Urban and Town Growth Area Service Areas The provision of community water and sewer facilities within the designated Growth Areas of Washington County is encouraged. Development proposals . which .. involve .the. extension of water and sewer lines within the boundaries of a designated Growth Area will be considered to be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for the County and will therefore not require an individual amendment to the Water and Sewerage Plan in order to proceed with the review and approval process for development. Specific arrangements between the developer and the appropriate service providing agencies shall be finalized prior to the development receiving an appropriate Service Priorit~ Classification of W-3 and S-3 as part of the bi-annual update of this plan. Determinations as to whether or not a property is considered to be within the influence of a Growth Area will be made by the Washington County Planning Commission. 2. Rural Village Service Areas Existing or planned community water and sewer facilities located within areas considered as Rural Villages by the Comprehensive Plan shall be designated as a Rural Village Service Area. While primarily designed to serve the existing development in the village, a service area established around these villages could allow for in-fill development on existing lots of record and some limited growth. Development proposals for new subdivision lots within existing Rural Village Service Areas will require Planning Commission review and approval to determine if the proposal is consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan dealing with Rural Villages. The Rural Village designation may also be used for development proposals utilizing innovative planning techniques such as clustering which, as the most environmentally sound method, necessitate community water and sewerage facilities. Such development proposals shall be presented as a package in order that the Planning Commission may determine if the proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Restricted Use Service Areas Community Water and/or sewer facilities that are located outside of a designated Growth Area and not within Rural Village are considered restricted use facilities. These service areas are • created to correct documented public health problems generally associated with contaminated wells or failing septic systems. The use of the facilities within these service areas is limited to the following conditions: a. To provide service to existing uses or new uses on existing lots of record which are directly adjacent to the right-of-way containing the water or sewer line. IV-77 b. To provide service, where sufficient capacity is available, to new subdivision lots that can be served by the line without extension. Density shall be no greater than what could occur without public facilities. c. To provide service to areas where the Heal th Department determines that access is necessary to solve an existing Health related problem and the County Commissioners agree to permit access to the line. d. To provide service to properties where a written agreement with the service providing agency, executed prior to the restricted. access designation, obligated, the service providing agency to permit access to the particular line to provide service to a specific property for a specific use or provide a spec-ific number of taps. IV-78 PRIORITY CLASSIFICATION REQUIREMENTS The following requirements shall be applicable to each respective designated priority classification within established service areas: 1. S-1 Priority (Existing Service or Under Construction) a. Individual on-lot disposal systems including approved alternate on-lot sewerage treatment systems shall not be permitted, except as follows: If an existing community sewerage facility is inadequate or is not available*, an interim individual sewerage system may be used subject to the following conditions: (1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local health department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations, including minimum lot ownership as set forth in Regulation 10.03.28.02 and .03; (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within 1 year or less after such system becomes available; IV-79 (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner. b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall be permitted and encouraged. *The adequacy or availability of community sewerage service to a particular parcel of land is a judgement which must be made in each case through consultation among the responsible agencies and cannot be made on the basis of this Plan alone. 2. S-3 Priority (Programmed Service) a. Individual on-lot disposal systems including approved alternate on-lot sewage tre,atment systems may be permitted on an interim basis provided that: ( 1) Such interim systems are adjudged by the local heal th department to be adequate, safe, and in compliance with pertinent State and local regulations, including minimum lot ownership as set forth in Regulation 10.02.28.02 and 0.3; (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature of the permit and stating that connection to a future community system shall be made within one year or less after such system becomes available; (3) Provisions shall be made, whenever possible, to locate such systems so as to permit connection to the public facilities in a most economical and convenient manner; IV-BO b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall be permitted and encouraged. 3. S-5 Priority (Planned Service) a. Individual on-lot disposal systems including approved alternate on-lot sewerage treatment systems shall be permitted. b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall not be permitted, except as provided by Policy for Sewer Line Installation in Areas Where Service is Not Available. c. New, permanent community sewerage systems shall not be permitted. 4. NPS Designation (No Planned Service) This designation is not applied within established service areas. a. Individual on-lot disposal systems including approved alternate on-lot sewerage treatment systems shall be permitted; b. Extensions of existing community sewerage systems shall not be permitted; c. New, permanent community sewerage systems shall not be permitted. In all cases where interim or permanent community sewerage systems are permitted, they shall be subject to the standards and regulations of the applicable State and Federal agencies. Adequate documentation that the State and Federal standards and regulations IV-81 can be compiled with shall be evidenced prior to County Plan amendment consideration. ALL INTERIM OR PERMANENT COMMUNITY SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, OR MULTI-USE SEWERAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE APPROVED BY AND WHEN APPLICABLE DEDICATED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY FOR OWNERSHIP AND/OR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED COUNTY AND STATE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES. SEWERAGE SERVICE PRIORITY AREA MAPS (l"-= 2000') The maps on the pages that follow show existing and planned facilities and service areas that have priority designations of S -1 or S -3. Letter designations shown on the maps are county zoning districts for which more information may be found in the Zoning Ordinance. Planned service areas having a designation of S -5 are shown on Map No. XIII Sewerage Facilities and Service Areas (l" = 1 mile) found in the inside front pocket of this Plan. While every effort was made to insure accuracy in th preparation of these maps, errors may have resulted from the transfer of information from maps at different scales. The classifications of parcels of land as having either existing service or programmed service was based upon the location of existing service lines and upon the best estimates for future service by the service providing agencies. The delineation of the boundary for the S -5 (Planned Service) classification is based on the land use policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan for Washington County. S -5 priority classifications within the Urban and Town Growth Area service area are based on the established growth area boundaries. Determinations as to whether or not a particular parcel of land is considered to be within the influence of a Growth Area shall be made by the Washington County Planning Commission and when applicable, the Planning Commission of the affected incorporated municipality. Because of these inherent accuracy limitations, these maps should be used for general planning purposes only. For certainty as to the exact location of all existing facilities or to the status of particular parcels of land, the Washington County Planning ,· Department and the service providing agencies should be contacted. Changes to these maps which may be required by errors or inaccuracies may be made in accordance with the administrative procedures set forth in Appendix B (Page B-10) of this Plan. IV-83 0 4 CLEAR Sl'RINQ SEWERAGE SYSTEMS INDEX MAP WATER AND SEWERAOE PLAN WASIIINOTDN COUNTY. MARYLAND tllllAl IICAHI■ Ir tlW■ ,Ill HIIIIPl■IIII IIWIIAII ttltlM □ I .. IYIIIAl ■AP tll■HH UI 1111111111 IICIIIII II tll IIWIIAH lflflMI IICtlH If 1111 PUI llfU ti 11111111111 CIHIY 111 ·■AH I H■IIII I • II I Ill AIJtflllll MAPI ti lHAI WHH•f• IIWIIAII IIIYICI ._n••AININltOM COUNTY flNIUUHt UteUflll!P; P, .. e,•t Ir t WAININltOlt CO\MH PUNMNI COINIIIIION ""·'"'t ! ' 'f • 't •t -•; i I I 0 ,~ ,. HAGERSTOWN ,__,, •ooNSIIORO O SHARl'tBURQ 0 • " FT. RtTClltE • .t: SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS ExlstlnJI Proposed S~AGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SE~,AGE PUMPING STATION □ l~f{~RCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• F.Aij,CE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES 1-,, ~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH . I AREA 1,!AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE ' 1.IAS NOTED) . RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service •• -----.------. ••• ii .-•••••••••• • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . -- S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY E i =:::i zz i i I :N I ; I (.) , , f , , .... I SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS ExlstlnJ!. PrOJ>.OSed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 ... SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~~RBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (.AS NOTED l RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA .., SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS 5 -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service . -.-------.--------.. ------.-----------• • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • ,•.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.~ . . . . . . . . . ~ .......... ' ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 5 ' 'u i ' / ---rt-=--:1~: ut\ ~<( .,- . I ---------. :c...___T-:=r-~~nT---+ ----~ ! ~--... -------. <( ,·. i I --.._ \ <( A ,r-, '...i ')--: _yr~ T \ . '-.\. (1 ' <( . 1~~'5\ ~i . . I I / ~-:::-.._ f--- : ~__/\"-..:i _,.) <( <( -------' • I I / I 7 .< •. SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlslln.9. Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • • 6. SEWAGE PUMPING STATION ' □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~~RBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service Ill i: -.---.----• II • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • • ■ Ill • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-~ S -5 Plaooed Service INSIDE SERVICE ,AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY i zz: c::: : !~ Li I j• !'--►• ::, < I ' ' ;t . . . . . ... ... i i I ; I < I J ,C::-J:::-y---. ,..._~~ -----""'-· r -- i/ w --~ . .. ~--.,:: .. ◄·· .... ..... %.z:: fT ' \ I lli .. ii SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT I A 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION ■ □ INl'ERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS --- FORCE MAINS 111111111111111II II 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (As NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing Bi Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . .•.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·., • • • • • • • • • "I ' ■ • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . " •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . .. ...J[_ _ _.1[ ___ }1 _ _.__. llJ •• ____l!_ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ., RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA ... USE ~-t•J/Oft BLOCK NO. I ... 662 ... .. £.:/ ..... ·.· ........ , ,. . I ;::?jf::::::: .· ... · ,~:~-:;~ ·:.'!'.~~~::·:•: . .z. a~~", ... ¢:.·• . _ z,: -"'k,~\ .. '\ .... \•j· ·_.. , .·/.·"S;, ..• · ,. .•. _ .. :,,,,., fl"\ ... . ·_·.r.y.,·.·.·; . . . .. •;-;-,•.•.,f::•·\:<• .. •.'· ;.,,-.. •:.·...-.. ,. ·.· ...... ,:•::y;·· ·.·.·.···y· 1/ . • . ·:•.·. . :-1.-i. ~·•:. ··:•\;, / , :_. ·:-.·~i-·•:::·.·~ RURAL ..::_ ·• . ·-:.·· -,'> VILLAGE -..._ +<>· SERVICE "-,. ·. • · RR "" ... AREA · / .·.-:-:, . . ,;-:, "f• / 1...,.·~:v,r.-_:-:-:,: ... 91 •.,~ RR ~ tflGHA£1.D -~·I"•~ BJJ)C~ 1!0. 2 ····•·· ·:: ".:·•· .. :r-. ., ········· ;+::::::. ;: : ;..;..;..;..;.. RURAL VILUAGE '.:::::: SERVICE A$EA _ ... :..···· 671 "' ... ...,. NO &Jill 14 SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SE'»~GE TREATMENT PLANT I A 6 sltvfAGE PUMPING STATION I ■ □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS I , ..• -~·- FOlfuE MAINS I ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN . a TOWN GROWTH AREA ()I.S NOTED) RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 -----------------.................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service "ii -------.-.~. • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l ■ ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . ' r ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ 11 ■ ■ ·-·-·-·-·.·.·.· . ~ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY i I .. . ··t I I -· ·•.•· 0 ~ • i SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN. a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE IAS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 6 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • 1it. Ii-.-·--.-. . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •I C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• • • • ■ • • • ■ • •I • • • ■ •• ...I. • S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ____ ../ I i<( I ) u <C ····-··· i -:::I :zz E 5 , . . -~--"·~:;, • SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS ExlsllnJ!. PrOJ>OSed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FO~'CE MAINS 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~~RBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA 11AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE \As NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA I>' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service ..... ~ ~ ~-~ ,•.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.1 M II X • X X X X X " • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ ' ••••••••• i • • • • • • • • • • • • I I I ! I I Y S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY _i ' . -.t I '--------------. I• 1-J/ lt~•}JiA,HINilTON!•llO.• ... ('-.____ I I ' fbA ! ,'' --... ~ 1 --:x=__ ~ __ /_/; I ... 007 -✓ V:-/~· -. • •• -~--· •••• ·I.: \,;'._ A / I A .:;·----· . ·: ( u-... ·:: .... : .. : . • •••• I • , ••• .. .. . :f . .. . .. '"{j ·1· .. .. :.:::::,Hi/:::::.·."::: ::.t::::r:: :::.:·. :·:. /:,.... . . ' . : : : : : : : : ~u~m~i::. +;:::::: :[:: . . , : :) : :~} : : : : : : : : : : r~. /----..__-'--__,,.x . -I --r<.. -_,,,.-~ '0 --~ I I I L , .. : : 1: : : : : 1-:-:r: :·: : : ~:: . .. . · ....... 1--r .. · · · · .. jRs-·1• :/:::::: 1:1·::::::::: ... ]. "";t• ......... : ::::.,..:' :: ::: ::: :t .. '""1' ~ ... ·.-,.-., .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . , ....... u1 ....... •··· •····•••i ··•···E ······•1·--·------..... : ~::t.:: ...... :::::::. ::_:fir::--. : ,--s;-~, .-,·.;1:· -,,.-, . i;;.i~ •'"" .. :::·,::: . . . . .. ',,. 1,. ... ", '"'t ·w;, •·••••·. • -x-"it><.,lr\L><ll xx ,'s • • • • • • • : : • : )< ~~ M ?" X X . l< '.'< 1 : Ii: ·-. :· · x "x >< xx "'x 1x '\xx ~. ~ • J •• " • , • . ->,; X X X X )< X X X ' ' . . .. . . ·/.: RS:::' X? XX XX X ...... lfo.-.. ::1::~-=~=•···l•:f:;.; [j~~J] --~E.r :;_ ::::: ::/:::::::; xxx"x:X> +.:--------~-~sJG.cRI G ........ F·.::c .;,, .. :: : 1:z. :I:: :Ii·: r::;. ... L ':: : : : : :.~_ 1 . A'RS' ·JI -,,:..::::_ .t{:::·--~...,::;i:~~ ::~t!t:t ,~ur~; /! 4iG· .. . ..... jJI I) ' l:::·:::... :: ::: 'i .·:. I::: ::::::.. ./. : . l:.}J:. /.............. --...a.t.:. ~~Pi .. ~1 J:::::::: i~::::: mcirmrt;;!~.Jj;r,6~ : ~$: i----....... ..... . .... 1:::: :::::::::: :: -~~:lla=•-·: :: : I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : """"'-'--·• : : : , t""'"C"'""'°"-'-··:·,i , .. "' , .. ... . ., .,, ,,. 07l NOTE• f0I{ l!doP"''-llOJi Jl[li!Jll,tlHQ co .. sT!ruCf!OOI WITl!n,- ,~ W'-S'">KifON c,v .. fY ll[GIOl<IAl. .. ,.Pc•, Q.[~ ZOMt, It[ 111,, [IHllLfO ·,.a.11 ,1.11.t 11-_,AG1'141lf SU!t1.t.CU". SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Pro_!)_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS II II 111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~~RBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED l RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . a JII X ■ 111 II ■ ■ ■ • < ••••••••• • • • • • • ■ • • ~ i• • • • • ••••• • • • • • • • • • • I ■ Y M ■ ! I I X S -5 Plaooed Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY • i -= 23 c::::r l. il N h..: \ ~ i i = ~ \ 2 • l-, g~• .. us• \ •• l l I: \ a.s ir• ' = i .. SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln Pro_1>_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT .. 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS 11ll111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA {AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED l RURAL VI LL AGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . II a a M a a a a a • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ .......... ' • • • • • • • • ■ • • .. .. .. .. ---'l....._A_ S-5 PlaMed Service INSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY -.. : .... . _/ \ -; ,~~/-=-d ! ---- ' 5-~ , r'-i "" ' - ~--I I , -. -"-. iz)-JL .. ""· -: "")· __; 0 w ' / • SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing_ Prop_osed SE:tJAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION ';"·~ i;.,,;, □ INl".~RCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS --- FQ~,:CE MAINS 11ll111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) I!'': (AS NOTED) (~ . RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA • SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • ·1 • • • • • • • • • • ■ ll ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . ~ . . ,, ..... ,. S-5 Plamed Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY I \ I r • -.... · ·'.. . .... • . ... ~i>< >. ·. ~ . . . . . . . . . . . ' ., l-'. ·> > > ..... · ... ·-:!\·'.-'I N,. ·-:-:-:-!> '.'. -; . . . . \ • ~ • ~ • z • iN ~ ., . ii <.> \\ . ·;~. SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing_ Pro~osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 1 .~ ,'. • 6 SE,'(lf'GE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS i;,.. ··- FOfj.CE MAINS . ,,t. 1111111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA ·,. . if5 NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE u_s NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS 5 -I Existing 6 Under Construction r · · · · · -· · -· -· ----· 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 -3 Programed Service ii II ii -ii--.-ii-----.------.-------. ·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·., • • • • • • • • • •I II II II II II II II ■ II • • • • • • • ■ • • ; ......... . • • • • • • • • • • _._ll__.__ •-----------• -• . • • __ ....![_ 5 -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY I . ""' . ::.-:-.;;;::::.«;,~,. 0 N ,.,~ N a: I :::J 2Z ,_,_ ..... ,_, . 't-·':"' • • • SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS 1111111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA r ,(AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE ,,(AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing e. Under Construction 1 · ............... · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service .......... -. . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . • •· • • • • • • • •I • • • • • • • ■ • •••••••••• I• ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • __._____._____.___.__. __ • ■......IL S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 1_.r(\.. _11---1""/ · A __ , .. / l~ ., d,l,c . ~--~ I'\\\ _-:·,--.__r -"- ~,i-:;' '< I ~-/A" I c C ... 't--/ .. ·.·.·.. ,-Y . A '-,! /.·_·\::)~~:·,'.- i··. (·\:\·.\i: ... .,. CLEAR SPRING TOWN GROWTH AREA, SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY NOT MAPPED. HI ZONED LAND. s-5 (PLANNED SERVICE) ... ----··------, .,. --....._____~ f-, I. A '-.......i A / tr---- / _J_i l A - . /V y---,, I ;\ f., \.. \ ~., A '~ 't. . -I , ")\ r; . ,7----.._____ '_>-·"'4-'7 A .. ---I< ... HI [ ----~-<~ LA '\ \ ' ,_,,.._____✓ ' ; ·>-; --" ~f') ~,; ! ----·,f::-!'J_j~_' ... ... ... • •• ........ 5491 S4 SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlsllni Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT A 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS 1111111111111ll1111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN 8. TOWN GROWTH AREA ("S NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE \'AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 6 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. o o o o o o o o O o o IO O • o o 0 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service ... --.--..... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . . . . . . . . . . ~ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS} NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY i :::I £i! f~~,~--T---1111 ~-;;1~~7;=~-*=---~ • \.--.r... • ! i: < '\ I ' ~/-~ ii <( <( SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEYl1'GE TREATMENT PLANT I • I 6 - SEW~GE PUMPING STATION -■ □ INTt'RCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• . ,.-,, FOfftE MAINS llll 111111111111111 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA '' (AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (~S NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Exlsling a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. .................. . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • ii .-• i-----.---------••••••••• ·1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ' ' ........ . . . . . . . . . . ~ ......ll._____J_y __._ ___ _. -... __J[. S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY " E ! ~ 22---C.J ! ...J / 1~ 11 ~tA . i;,;,·- I c( I SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed 1 SEfAGE TREATMENT PLANT I • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION ■ □ ~--. INfERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FottCE MAINS I 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA I' (AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA ' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Exlsllng a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • ii ii •. • ii .• Iii -ii ••••••••• ·1 • • • • • • • • • a a II II II II II II II II' ■ II II II II II II X II II II II II II II II ■ II II I ■ ■ W II II II ■ II ■ II a ■ II II II ■ II ■ II • .. w ••••• S-5 Plamed Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY A \J ...:i.:. -m- ~-c / "' ~, --, I A ---._ ... HI I ' ; JI-.........._____ , - ~:;;;\{;;I;::>-.:: ;-,~~--~--7{!f----l-. . ~r~: .. j:f':ilf' X .. --~-:, .::-··--...---- "'7 HI I . f :::;:::i{:: •,TC·' -·-. ....... •••. --·_;;;?""" ... ... '" .... .. I :_:: ]; : : : : : : : ,,. ' ' ,, ,,. ••• .. . ••• ...... 602 I S1 NOTE• FM "'n;,....,•1.-~ ltEG<A.Atl!iG CO"<\t""-'CT?mMTIIIII -~ totot .. ' = :~t:111~~; ··.;·~~ :;;r-,~~ ~7r.::11/frl ' SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlslln Pro_!>osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (!/IS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (ro\S NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction 1 · .............. · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Progrome d Service • • iii •••• ----. ••••••••• ·1 . . . . . . . . . . II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ • ,; ■ ■ ■ ■ a II ■ ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I •••••••••• ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-~ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY I/.-. I. . ·"-.~ \ J , ""--r- .l~ /" V ,,f;; . ~-'""-rY't.~1~✓ . I I ', ~'"-, • I I I ', ----~-J-. ---,·• A ' ~-\\- \\ -" I A .,. ' ... I / __ ~- I ... ' / ~'",_)/>/ / £<' !'.~) ... ----=, .• I -.,,.,--... 1 A ·uo ,W,IIOI •zol '.! HOT£• ftlfl #Oltl.U.U:l"I IIEGIA.A"4 CONSl~TlOfl WITH'" TIC 11'ASHUj,CJTQIOI '°""'" IIEG10,u,1.. ,..,.,0111, cu:®"'· ~,.Ill ,.t.11t n-... G!HAlll S ~. 38 Kl_,,,., [llfllUO SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing_ Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS I 111111111111111 I II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL. VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8, Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . ~ ■ • Y I I ! I I Y S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY I ' " ./ --~ . . ; __ '; :j~-7 ~ / . · f , /' r· ~·------l //*· -···--?. ·..:.1·. ·:.X ·-~~-. .··c, .••• '),:; • ., .. --; --/I~ .::::······· I '>{_' I ..,__ ., 7/·-y·. I----------✓ T ··-:- / I I '-. , I ·-,_ < A '----A on .. ,. ' . . t l ,. ·'';. ~,_ I ( --~ (__ :11 i . . , ',, . --r ! ~ \ ·~'-.,'r! ! A ,· . .'./ . • ....__,/ I . --k I I --, ~-I_._,, \I l_f I ·. . · i-u-fi1 /i . J;/ • . 1,~• ] I \ I . \ . '--1· . ·,-t,. I L ~· / ·•.;:_.,, (-. I . . ----.::~ ,/ ' I'< ·--. i }',,~---{, -;,,Y; . ·-\ I ·' ·~ "('-"-+---.!.-I L-..t-1 I ... ,,,/'. ~([_ 1. .--_,/ h1----, I ;"-,.*: ' /' I i A,-L__ /Y (J t-I 10 I \\ * . l___j I -~ ',1 .' .;:,...:. rt, r=.,,. I ~~ . I 123 A!\Lj\ I A\ ~ ... ~ ... " ' • A \__ ---·-, l. ... RR .,.. .--· --- \ A . "-+-- ··-· I -· ~ X X - -1• ., ";.:l : \ ~ lf ,JC ')( ,J.•.•:-('.:," I ... It It X )< >< ><"j< X " " )< " " " " ')( )( "'""""'xx~· IMAPNO a,e '' SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Pro_eosed S8WAGE TREATMENT PLANT A 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ IN,l.fRCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS --- FORCE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES ~-~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA 1 ~AS NOTEO l . RESTRICTED USE r (AS NOTED) RURAL VI LL AGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS 5 -I Existing 8 Under Construction I" ................ · 1 .................. .................. .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Progrome d Service . . . . -.--.--------.-----. ••••••••• ·1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• • • • • • • ■ • • ~ --. . . . . -- S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE ,AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY i ~ zz ( . , ' '' i \ \ SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing_ Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT .. 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS I II I 111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • iii ii .-.,. .------.---------.--------. ••••••••• ·1 • • • • • • • • • t. • • • • • • • • •· • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . ~ lll • • ■ I !I I I X S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY r ' I ' "' C> en -N a: (~ N a: I SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln Pro_e_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS --- FORCE MAINS 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA IP.S NOTED I . RESTRICTED USE !P.S NOTED) . RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA ' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • 11·. ~ ~ ~-~ . . . . . . .... • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • ■ ■ 11 ■ ■ ■ •I ' ........ . • • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . • • • • • • • • • • , ....... . S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY " ••,.,11.x _.i A :11-:11 ·••x;.••~6;t1· ,•,{tM•,;:_,.·,· "'··#-. ·x,/' ♦ • ·.•:· xx~'lf xx,/',,/;:it xxx>t X ..: •• :•.•.~ ... • _• •• _ •• x_x .. x '0-'~v~vx ~ · -----~:li· -. : : -. 7'. : . ) : : ~---,,.· . .. --~," ... _,,.,. X ... . ··i. \ '.: . \1::::t ' X ' X X ' ' .... .......... ~::::: . ...•....•.. •• 'I>#' • •. t·-✓, "1'!'•.·1.·! XX xf~,I" .,,,1-"° _.. X/ xn·, ,· . ·"'-· .... l . ·:~:: .... ~ ., . . ~-.. ! ... ... I::: ... ·::: :, : : :: : . ~ . . '½...:. ____ _ -- . .. -.,- . .... . ): "" . . . . X ' . ' . . . J.. X-· X •• • • X . . . . . . . . X X • • X • . . . • X • . . . ... ... ... SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS 11ll111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA : (1115 NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (IAs NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE .SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Conslructlon I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service ••• i-~ •••• •••• 111 •••• ' • • • • • • • • • ········••! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I ■ Ill 111 111 Ill ■ 111 ■ Ill • • • • • • • • • • M M y ■ ■ • L____a____J[_ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY --< • ;; li C, "' SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln-9 Pro_!)_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FQR~E MAINS II II 111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA '1'115 NOTED l RESTRICTED USE (tAS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •.• .. S -3 Progrome d Service ••• ii. • ii ii ii :i ••••••••• ·1 ' . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • >I • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . . . . . . . . . ~ ...1(__________Jt__JL_J[ _ _IL a .!l____1_ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 0 : : = -.. I - • • • a SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT I • SEWAGE PUMPING STATION ■ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS FOffCE MAINS II II 111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA l ('AS NOTED ) 'f'AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA Proposed 6 □ --- 1111111111111111 SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Exlsling a Under Construction 1 · ............... · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • ii ii -----ii-----.-------.--------. ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . .... •' • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . Ir ■ • • • -"-. .11._____.E_ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) ND PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ::::i Z2' Ii SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT I • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION ■ □ ~--,-~ INT~RCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS --- FORCE MAINS I 111111111111111 I II 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN. a TOWN GROWTH AREA lils NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE iils NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS s -I Existing a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • ■ • ■ • ■ • ••••••••• ·1 ,. . . . . . . ... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ •••••••••• • • • • • • ■ • • ~ • • y • • -■ • y S-5 PlaMed Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ' ,Hi i ' ' ' ., I\ a • co a, .., ' \'NOWIA .LSJM N ,~---------=- N ii ' SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT I • I ~ - SEWAGE PUMPING STATION • □ ··-- INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS 11111111111111111II 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN . a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA ' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Exlsling 6 Under Conslrucllon I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Progrome d Service ••• ~-. -~ ■ ~. . . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • ■ Ill ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Ill ■ ■ ,: ........ . • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • ! I I I S-5 Plamed Service INSIDE SERVICE IAREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY J , I ._. .. u E fl ~ -fl SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Proposed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ IN~CEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS II II 111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~~RBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA • I (AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • II. • i. --.---------.--------. ••••••••• ·1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ,. • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ' i••········ • • • • • • ■ • • ~ • • ••• ....!1........1 S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY --~ .. , .. :_~:.r • ········· ········· ·······::I::.::. - ---J~-- 41 1:,q- ! ' i / ll i SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln, Pro_1>.osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEW-AGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS 11ll111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN · a TOWN GROWTH AREA (IAS NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (ills NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • • • ii .•...•• . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . 1:·.•.11·•············ • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • If • • • • • • ■ .'L S -5 Plaooed Service INSIDE SERVICE ,AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY ~· t ...__I"":_ i ~ I _) ' ( I I ,/ • I . \ ,, ... -,, ........ -..... _., ....>("' '\_ ' ,..., -------' , I -----' ~. .1:----~,. n I I• SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing_ Prop_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INl!ERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA i~AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE ilAS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service a ii ii •. a .------.--------111 • • • • • • • • • -1 • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . " • • • • • • • • • • ......... ~ •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . ~ • • .. If •••• ., S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY • .. zz c::r 5 ) I ', • c...J ' •1 . •~·'"'. -. ( 1_ .. ~:·····.·.~·;;.·.✓:<_..-... ·... ....,......;._,__; ..... . ·TP:ft~41-- + +-+ +; + ....,,.._+IL-..,_ •.• ... • . .' . . ' . ' . .' '•:/.• .......... j· .. .-.. •.i· +++++ ++ . .~:-:-1:: :· .. ~ .. ···1t·. ~~n .......... ::1!:•+• =~ ..... .,. · ...... ~ ......... ~-( ... -... ~ .. ++++ ++++++ +++ .... · ........ .. ++++ ++++++ +++ + ·.::::::•:•:· ++++ ++++++ +++ . ·. ·. ·.'· + + + + ;-:----• + + +: + + + + . . . : ++++ + ............ ++~+:++++++ ~~ ;;+++::;;+++++ +++++ ++++ ;++++++:+++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++C+++ +++++ ++ + ·+++ ++ ++f + + + + + +++++ ++++ ++++ ++ +++!++ . + + + ; + + + + + +;+ + + •• , •• r~~~-~----. :~:: + -is.~:..~:'},,, ; I J. . I < ~- • < I ' ( I \ I I § ' \ L.... SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEfiAGE TREATMENT PLANT I • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION I ■ □ INfERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS I 1••· FORCE MAINS I 1111111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN. a TOWN GROWTH AREA \t.S NOTED) t'As NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Progromed Service ... ii-.-.--•• .--ii. I,• •••••••• ·1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • • • S-5 PlaMed Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY i ::JZZ l! 1~.x_=~i'""';'--C(...,,;;_~~~ --. -~~-_7--_ -r: - J , ---r ' " i • ~ • •• •• • 0 N • '' SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Prop_osed SBWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INil\fRCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1■11111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA I (l,,l\S NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE 11As NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA t SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service Ill w-··11------.---• Ji • • • •••••••••• • • • • • • • • • --········ II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II i• II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II ■ • M • -M V M v -- S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 5 e.w-'l.t- . ,,,,,.✓: AZ• . ,, _,,/~- ~ ~-.. ~Ill~ : I I I I 1· A . ··--•-·-· / ------ 1 mhiiny~'f'\ , _ I .. ii! A ' § ,,. ---~---... 001 Antietam Ove y Zone UIIIIIIIIHlffllllllllllllll A O • 1 A0·2 • • • • • •• AQ ~3 I . ~-.:\ ·i --,,;,--~ri----: ~ \ . .,,--. ,, A ''-.,,,..,,.,,,. ,/'ly_\ A! _1_, C A/ / . ------~ ,, . . /____ ~--·. -,, / - ·---., ·, . ,, I .-----../ I\\ J / 1 1'-I'--\ I --......., . ,, A \I -71 · _;.--\ -~ =-, I I ' -s:'"""lllHlrlfllllllllflllllllllHHIHI~ _ -~----/ ~---~-~ . I _ ~-' ·-=---------· ~'r---f . A .. , ' . -~ I .. ~-, ' '. . ~ /A I/ \ "-J 1·f · ""'· I \ t...' I( \ ·1 . \\_1 ~- ,}\---,Y,-I; -1.a-H ~z II . ./ Uy,-,., ,. I J . I ) A , '·, ... ... ... I .. // 10• "" ... ~ SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Pro~osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS 11 II 111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA '(llS NOTED l RESTRICTED USE l(As NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE .SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service • • • •. • JI ...••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ Ill ■ ■ 111 ■ a ■ 1111 •I • • • • • • • • • ......... , •••••••••• • ■ • • • • • • • ~ _L ____ •... Y . ■ Ill II ■ ■ _.1 S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY I / ..... --,---I :z:: i"~ .----...J ii il i SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEW~GE TREATMENT PLANT I • I 6 - SE\\!,AGE PUMPING STATION I -I □ l~l~RCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• ,c,.•--• FQ,(\~E MAINS 1111111111111111 Ill 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES 1,111 ~ ~RBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA ~1_S NOTED) . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA ·• SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Exlsllng a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service •• ■---••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • II ■ ■ • a ■ " • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ •••••••••• • • • • • • • • ■ ~ . .. ____._______.__ .... S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY C: ~ :... .... C\I(') ....... . . . ooo ::,;~~~ 0 • .. • • • • .. ... 0 0 ~ i :::I 22 '-...l ii ·---~--------=•-= --·-~ ·--~~---.:...-.-· • : i i SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing Proposed SEJfGE TREATMENT PLANT I • I 6 - SE\YAGE PUMPING STATION I -I □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS I 1••· •.. F~CE MAINS I I 1111111111111111 II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED) (,-. RESTRICTED USE ,(AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Exlsllng a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service ...... ---.----.. . . . . . . . . . ' • • • • • • • • • 1111••••••••1 ., • • • • • • • • • I . . . . . . . . . ~ i• ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • .....![_ __ _. ____ .., .......... ■ __ _a_____Jl_ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 5e.w~r \ ) ... I 't,· 1 ·-. A I . J . \~, .. ~\ r· ./· .., 1110 J.t11t1eta111 v, ' 111111111m1111mmm1u I '-.----•~1-~\_ . '"' . !(~\ A . \ /, ·- , I i /A/\ . I \. (A} // ""· '-.... J "·----=/ .. 1-~ .... , r·--:I -~-/ A ✓-~ . iiy ,£CJ1Jt1 Ft0 · 1 A0·2 A0·3 I -~ j - LLAG ARE "' IH ., ~ A ' \d >.I I,...... I • _ _j L_ . --... • •• SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Pro_!)_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. S -3 Programed Service II ii ■---.----• la ■ • a ••••••••• ·1 • • • • • • • • • IC • ■ ■ a ■ • ■ ■ • < ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . ·-·-·-·-·.·.·-·-·-~ S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY {NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY 5e..w4..r (i;\-- ! ' ... HP '\ ---------: '-···~--- A i:i-1~ /--A ffl -1 ,- / A - .. , ... ... ✓ -,._} Antieta111 u, iay Zone IIIIIIUIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII; -, • .J · f A0-2 ••••• •••• AO· 3 : "\,_ ---SH -c,_ : ... ~,-),)\o~-:i r--/~ -- J.c_ 1 ~ ;z__;;i. ... , ~ I I v-..... :j' -~ 1' C !; __ J ... , /.__ --/'·{-'li' , -' ( ·r· I I -------L.J...l ---------' I.J.. . ft'' ---------. • I -l... . ·---.. . ._fJ-----. I I · ' 7 ~ ~ / --1 C C I , (-J. 't ~------Jr-_ /--ii - ... ... ITI 971 ... ....... 1011 10 SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ Pro_1>_osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ••• FORCE MAINS ll11111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN 8. TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED l RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE .SERVICE AREA I\ SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Conslructlon I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service -. --. -.... . . . . . . . . . ~ • • • • • • • • • ! ......... ,., . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . • • • • • • • • • • _11_ _ _. __ y __ _)[__ ••••.... i S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS l NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY -I I , I . ., i~J. I' .., ......... __ . --I I U --........ . : .... ___ .... I u I-~/---...,...----!-................ ,~,, • r s 1:.rr-;. ! . ....; .............. '-·1-------i: -,11. i I ! -... .......... ' .............. I I ! I. ... -·· . .... .... ... ·'--·: ...... ; '.;/~ .J > ii ii i SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Existing_ Proposed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS II II 111111111111111 I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~ URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED l RURAL VI LL AGE SERVICE AREA SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing 8 Under Construction r · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Progrome d Service • II ii ii -ii ii------.------.-------. ......... ' • • • • • • • • • II • • • • •••• •I • • • • • • • • • ......... , •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . .. _l!I_ -• •••••• _.._ S-5 Plamed Service INSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY i ::I i?2 ii I SEWERAGE MAP SYMBOLS Exlstln_g_ PrO_!J_Osed SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT • 6 SEWAGE PUMPING STATION □ INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS ··- FORCE MAINS 11111111111111111II I 1111111111111111 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES -~URBAN a TOWN GROWTH AREA (AS NOTED l . RESTRICTED USE (AS NOTED) RURAL VILLAGE SERVICE AREA JJ>' SERVICE PRIORITY DESIGNATIONS S -I Existing a Under Construction I I .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S -3 Programed Service . . . . . . . . . ••••••••• ·1 • • • • ■ • • • • . . . . . ...... • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ........ . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • S -5 Planned Service INSIDE SERVICE iAREA BOUNDARY (NPS) NO PLANNED SERVICE OUTSIDE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY INTRODUCTION CHAPTER FIVE ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION The key to the on-going success of providing adequate water and sewerage facilities in Washington County is the positive, cooperative action between the County and the governmental bodies of the incorporated municipalities--particularly the City of Hagerstown. Because of the significant role planned for the water and sewerage facilities of the City of Hagerstown in the realization of this Plan, it is paramount that an equitable, clearly defined management structure between the City and County be established. At the basis of the eventual management agreement should be the fundamental purpose to adequately and effectively serve those residents and those areas where water and sewerage facilities are needed. In this pursuit, it is important to recognize that we no longer live in an era where governmental responsibilities abruptly terminate at corporate boundaries. Both subtle and overt municipal interrelationships demand a high degree of communication and cooperation between governments in an effort to achieve the best possible communities. To further this objective, it only seems realistic that limitations resulting from either statutory restrictions or long standing precedents must be actively resolved. With this in mind, the following ownership and operational structures are strongly recommended. V-1 WATER FACILITIES As previously discussed, the City of Hagerstown supplies water to approximately 38,000 residents outside its corporate boundaries. Since the majority of these residents reside in the County, the City does not have the necessary voice in terms of plumbing codes, guaranteed users, or comprehensive service area formations. Nevertheless, the City has embarked upon an aggressive program to increase plant capacity to meet the water needs largely brought upon by the growing demands in the County. However, it is rather inequitable for the Water Department to ask the City to bear the total bonded indebtedness for improvements ,, which will proportionately serve more residents outside of the City. Furthermore, the County without having any direct role in the implementation of water facilities other than through zoning and subdivision provisions cannot achieve a thorough coordination of development activities. In an effort to achieve a high level of cooperation between the City and County and proportionate obligations for bonded indebtedness, it is recommended that future distribution systems be financed by the County and constructed, operated, and maintained by the City. Additionally, supply and transmission expenditures should be proprotionately financed by City and County as well as outstanding indebtedness on existing transmission. More specifically, the County's involvement would be essentially for appropriate funding responsibility. Design and construction would be performed by the City with County review and approval. Rates would be jointly established by the City and County to cover bonded indebtedness and operation and maintenance costs. The actual operation, maintenance, billing and collection functions would be performed by the City. Ownership of the system should eventually be under a unified agency so that the system would remain more comprehensive rather than fragmented. To further"the"degree·of cooperation and mutual decision-making the Hagerstown Board of Water Commissioners should have County representation. For those portions of the County outside the Hagerstown service area, and adjacent to the other incorporated municipalities, the County should cooperate with the towns in extending water service based upon adopted plans-and policies. SEWERAGE FACILITIES The City of Hagerstown's sewerage facilities are essential to effective plan implementation. The strategic location of the City's sewerage treatment plant enables the County to achieve most economically a concentrated development pattern around the northern and eastern quadrants of the City while correcting significant environmental concerns and health hazards. Obviously, this achievement requires a high degree of cooperation between the City and County in a manner which equitably addresses the needs of all residents. Furthermore, it should be well v-3 apparent that the Environmental Protection Agency is becoming increasingly more involved not only in establishing design criteria but also in determining rate schedules and operation and maintenance procedures. Consequently, local governments--both the County and the City--should not become too preoccupied with the concern for complete and ultimate control in the sense that it hinders adequate service to its residents. To this end, it is recommended that the County shall be responsible for the feasibility studies, designs, rights-of-way acquisition, construction, and financing of the proposed interceptor and collector systems in those areas planned to be serviced by the Hagerstown sewerage treatment plant. The City shall have the benefit of review, inspection, and approval of all phases of thE!_pl.anning, design, and construction of the proposed systems in order to assure consistency with the engineering and • construction standards of the City. Although the County shall retain ownership of its portion of the system, operation and maintenance responsibilities shall be accomplished by the City through a management agreement mechanism. Obviously such a management agreement must be established in a manner to assure that all portions of the system both in the County as well as in the City receive thorough, efficient, and prompt operation and maintenance service. One method to be considered would be for the County to be responsible for the operation and maintenance of its portion of the system and to perform this function by subcontracting the services of the City's Water Pollution Control Department. Theoretically, in the event the Water Pollution Control Department personal would be unable to respond to a specific service need, because of scheduling or other prior commitments, the County would have the alternative of seeking assistance elsewhere. Regardless of.the final. contractual agreement for operation and maintenance responsibilities, both parties should cooperatively attempt to assure a high degree of service so as to maintain the integrity of the complete system. The County shall be responsible for establishing its rates based upon its financial obligations; conveyance to and treatment by the Hagerstown facility; the City's operation, maintenance, and administrative services; and other equitably related costs. The City's administrative services shall also include billings and collections which would be further refined in the management agreement with the County having auditing privileges. To further the degree of cooperation and mutual decision making, the Hagerstown Sewer Board should have County representation. For those portions of the County outside the Hagerstown service area, and adjacent to other incorporated municipalities, the County should consider similar arrangements in extending sewerage service based upon adopted plans and policies. MANAGEMENT OF CONNECTION ALLOCATIONS This plan proposes an aggressive program of immediately sewering considerably large portions of the County. However, it is not intended that the availability of sewerage facilities be solely a commodity which can be secured and controlled by the private sector. Consequently, efforts shall be made to allocate and assess connections based upon both prevailing zoning and the entire service area. Sanitary Sewerage·Connection Permits, Industrial Waste Permits and any Benefit Charges should be carefully administered to assure equitable development opportunities. Additionally, users should be required to connect to the system within one year from application approval so that permits do not become a speculative resource. COUNTY-WIDE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY Recommendations have been made in this plan to evaluate the feasibility of community water systems in water problem areas throughout the County. Recommendations have also been made to consider the use of alternative on-lot and alternative community sewerage systems to serve areas of failing septic systems and to serve new development utilizing the cluster concept. The key to both recommendations will be the efficient management and operation of such systems by a public agency. Participation by the Washington County Sanitary District in the management and operation of water and sewerage systems is V-6 presently limited to areas within established Sanitary Subdistricts. Under the current practice, a new Sanitary Subdistrict must be established for each new water or sewerage system for which the Sanitary District assumes responsibility. As the number of such systems increase per the recommendations above, so increases the administrative complexity and cost of managing an increased number of relatively small, geographically unrelated, and financially independent Subdistricts. Because Sanitary Subdistricts are established to be financially self-supporting, the costs of providing water and sewerage service to some areas of the County may be prohibitively expensive to consumers in those areas. It is often the case that those areas with the greatest need may also be the most expensive to serve. For this reason a County-wide approach which provides for a wider distribution of costs by means of a uniform rate schedule may facilitate service to many areas of need. The Sanitary Subdistrict law should be evaluated and amended as necessary to allow for a more efficient and cost-effective approach to the management and operation of public water and sewerage systems throughout the County. Ultimately, the creation of a County Public Works Department should be considered as a means to this end. V-7 APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS The terms defined below are used throughout this plan. Definitions are consistent with those in Maryland Agency Regulation 10.17.01 except where indicated(*) as peculiarly applicable to Washington County. 1. "Approving authority" means one or more officials, agents, or agencies of local government designated by the local governing body or specified by other provisions of Article 43, 387C to take certain actions as a part of implementing these regulations. 2. "Board" means The Board of County Commissioners for Washington County. 3. "Community sewerage system" means any system, whether publicly or privately owned, serving two or more individual lots, for the collection and disposal of sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, including various devices for the treatment of the sewage and industrial wastes. 4. "Community water supply system" means a source of water and a distribution system, including treatment and storage facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, serving two or more individual lots. S. "County plan" means a plan for the provision of adequate water supply systems and sewerage systems, whether publicly or privately owned, throughout the County -A-.1 including its incorporated municipalities and all amendments and revisions to it. 6. "Department" means the Maryland Department of the Environment. 7. "Service Area Designation" means a designation of Urban/Town Growth Area, Rural Village, or Restricted Use, assigned to a service area to assure that development associated with the provision of water or sewer facilities is consistent with the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan for Washington County and where applicable, the Comprehensive Plan for the affected municipality. 8. "Sewerage service area" is that area served, or potentially served, by a system of sanitary sewers connected to a treatment plant, or, in a very large system, sub-areas as delineated by the County. 9. "Water service area" means that area served, or potentially served, by a single distribution system under control of a single utility, or, in a very large system, sub-areas as delineated by the County. 10. "Service Priority Classification" is a classification assigned to a service area indicating the current implementation phase for provision of water or sewer service by means of a community system. The first phase being Planned Service, followed by Programmed Service, then Existing/Under construction. A-2 11, "Existing or under construction" means the service priority classification which is assigned within a service area that is currently served or where actual work is progressing or where a notice to proceed with a contract for this work has been let as of the effective date of the plan. The symbol for this classification shall be W-1, S-1. 12. "Programmed Service Priority" is ·a classification assigned to property within a service area indicating that the necessary approvals have been obtained to proceed with the provision of public water and/or sewage service. Such approvals may include where applicable, establishment of a Sanitary Sub-District, approval of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat or Site Plan and inclusion of any capital projects in .the.municipality's Capital Improvements Program. 13, "Planned Service Priority" is a classification assigned to property within a service area indicating that the provision of public water and sewage service is considered to be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for Washington County. 14. "No Planned Service" is a designation assigned to property that is not located within a water or sewer service area indicating that community water and sewer service is not planned for the area. A-3 15. "Marina" means a dock, wharf, or basin providing mooring for boats which contain on-board toilet facilities, operated under public or private ownership, either free or on a fee basis, for the convenience of the public or club membership. 16. "Individual water supply system" means a single system of piping, pumps, tanks, or other facilities utilizing a source of ground or surface water ·to supply only a single lot. 17. "Individual sewerage system" means a single system of sewers and piping, treatment tanks or other facilities serving only a single lot and disposing of sewage or individual wastes of a liquid nature, in whole or in part, on or in the soil of the property, into any waters of this State or by other methods. 18. "Multi-use sewerage system" means a single system serving a. single lot, whether owned or operated by an individual or group of individuals under private or collective ownership and serving a group of individuals for the collection and disposal of sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, including various devices for the treatment of sewage and industrial wastes having a treatment capacity in excess of 5,000 GPO. 19. "Multi-use water supply system" means a single system of piping pumps, tanks, or other facilities utilizing a source of ground or surface water to supply a group of individuals A-4 on a single lot and having a capacity in excess of 1,500 GPO. 20. "Non-point source" means pollution originating from land run-off where no specific outfall can be identified. 21. "Interim Plant" means a sewage or water treatment plant that is designed to temporarily serve all of, or a portion of a designated service area established in the Washington County Water and Sewerage Plan. 22. "Major Facilities" mean the principal components of a community or multi-use water or sewerage system. The characteristics of various systems may differ in size, capacity and method of conveyance and treatment of water or wastewater. However, generally, the term is meant to exclude house connections, smaller water distribution lines, and sewer laterals designed as part of a residential development. Examples of major facilities include: a. Interceptors, trunk and outfall sewer lines; and water transmission, feeder mains and storage facilities. b. Community or multi-use wells or impondments, water storage or treatment facilities. c. Sewage treatment plants (permanent or interim). d. Pumping stations or water filtration plants. A-5 APPENDIX B POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY PLAN FOR WATER AND SEWERAGE I GENERAL POLICIES a. An application for amendment to the Water and Sewerage Plan shall be initiated whenever any person, firm, private agency, public agency, or municipal corporation wishes to: l) Create major new water or sewer facilities. 2) Change the location, type, size or capacity of existing or planned facilities. 3) Establish new water or sewerage service areas or change the boundaries of existing service areas. 4) Change the priority classification of an area for water or sewerage service. B. It shall be the responsibility of the Washington County Planning Department to coordinate the review of amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan in cooperation with the staffs of the service providing agencies, the Washington County Health Department and the effected municipality when applicable. Amendments proposed within a municipality or served by a municipality's system must be proposed by that municipality or be accompanied by a letter from the Mayor or a designated municipal official that the municipality has been notified that the amendment application is being submitted. Criteria for amendment of service area/priority classifications and eligibility for priority classifications are outlined in Section II. Applications for amendments to the County Water and Sewerage Plan B-1 shall be considered via four different methods: 1) Biennial Review and Update. State Law Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Environmental Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the governing body of the County, after reasonable opportunity for public hearing, to review the Water and Sewerage Plan at least once every two years. Requests for Individual amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan may be considered at that time. Procedures for the Biennial ·Review and Update are listed in Section III. 2) Individual Amendment. Applications for individual amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan may be accepted by the Planning Department at any time. Public Hearings to consider individual applications shall be held at least semi-annually (twice a year). Procedures for the review of Individual Amendment applications and requirements for information to be included in the application are listed in Section VIII. Modifications in facilities design by public agencies should be reported at the Biennial Review, rather than by Individual Application. 3) Administrative Amendment. The Water and Sewerage Plan may be amended to correct errors, omissions, or inaccuracies which may be discovered from time to time in the Plan text or Plan maps. Such amendments shall be initiated by the Planning Department based upon a request and presentation of more accurate information by the service providing agency. Procedures for Administrative Amendments are provided in Section V. 4) Special Amendment. The County Commissioners may at their B-2 discretion initiate amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan outside of the semi-annual review sequence when necessary; (1) To allow service to an existing structure when a potential health hazard has been declared by the Health Department, (2) to allow requests submitted by a government agency for capital projects to proceed. Procedures for special amendments are provided in Section VI. II CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT OF SERVICE AREA AND SERVICE PRIORITY CLASSIFICATIONS A. Existing Service Areas The Water and Sewerage Plan shall define the areas planned to be served by community water and sewerage systems within the next twenty years, In order to assure conformance with the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan for the County and if applicable, the effected municipality, one of the following designations shall be assigned to all service areas: Urban and Town Growth Area, Rural Village or Restricted, A description of these designations is given in Chapter Three page 48 for water service areas and Chapter Four page 76 for sewer service areas, Potential service areas established in '201 Facilities Plans' may be taken into consideration, however, the service area designated by the Water and Sewerage Plan shall not be dictated by '201' Plan boundaries and may in fact be larger or smaller. Within the boundaries of defined service areas an assignment of a priority classification of W-5 and S-5 will be given to indicate that extension of water and sewer lines is possible and desirable and that provision of service is considered consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Priority classifications from W-3 and S-3 to W-1 and S-1 will be assigned at such time as plans to provide service are initiated, either in response to a request from private developer or by the service providing agency. The assigned classification will be based upon the project schedule and satisfactory compliance with eligibility requirements described in paragraph C of this section. A designation of NPS (No Planned Service) shall be assigned to all lands located outside of existing service areas. This designation shall mean that these lands are not included within a service area and not planned to be served in the future. B. Planned New Service Areas Proposals by property owners to establish new service areas or to extend collection or transmission facilities beyond the boundaries of existing service areas shall be submitted to the Planning Department in the form of a development proposal. Proposals which involve the establishment of a new Washington County Sanitary District, Sub-District or the enlargement of an existing sub-district shall be included in the Water and Sewerage plan prior to creation of the sub-district. The development proposal shall be submitted with an application for establishment of new service area boundaries and shall be consistent with the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan B-4 for Washington County. The proposal shall describe the facilities proposed and define the drainage area which could potentially be served if the proposed facilities were established. A Preliminary Consultation shall be held and the development project area shall be identified, with a description of the proposed land use, density and location of the development. The application shall contain all of the required information outlined in Section VIII. In the process of considering proposals to establish new service areas or expansions of existing service areas, the County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall also determine / the appropriate designation for the service area in order to assure compatibility with the Policies of the Comprehensive Plan as well as providing for the most environmentally sound method of water supply and sewerage-disposal within all areas of the County. c. Service Priority Classification The criteria listed below shall apply to requests for amendment of priority classifications for water and sewerage service where major water and/or sewerage facilities are proposed by property owners. It is the intent of these procedures that, within service areas established by the Water and Sewerage Plan, satisfactory compliance by developers with the established criteria should result in appropriate changes to the service priority classification. Once a priority classification of S-5 B-5 or W-5 has been obtained, it may not be necessary to initiate an individual amendment request for a higher classification or wait for the Biennial Review of the Plan before proceeding with the development of facilities. A letter of intent to the appropriate State agency issued by the County Commissioners will satisfy interim approval with formal amendment of the classification being made at the Biennial Review, provided all criteria have been satisfied. It is the responsibility of the developer to satisfy the criteria in each step of the process. 1. Eligibility for S-5/W-5 (Planned Service) Classification: a) The provision of service has been determined to be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for the County and if applicable, the appropriate municipality. b) The method of service has been determined satisfactory and has received written acknowledgement by the appropriate public agencies such as the Health Department, Sanitary Commission, and municipalities. Agency acknowledgement will be for the method of service in concept and not in design. c) A Preliminary Consultation has been held with the Planning Commission. d) If necessary, the Planning Commission has determined that the property is located within an Urban or Town Growth Area and has determined an appropriate service area designation, i.e. Urban/Town Growth Area, Rural Village, or Restricted service. 2. Eligibility for S-3/W-3 (Programmed Service) Classification: a) All of the requirements for S-5/W-5 have been met. b) Arrangements have been made with the appropriate agency for acceptance of facilities, operating and maintenance responsibility, allocation of capacity, and/or connections to the public system. c) When the proposed development is located within an area that is under the jurisdiction of the Washington County Sanitary District, the developer shall have obtained approval of the establishment of a new sanitary subdistrict or expansion of an existing subdistrict pursuant to Sanitary District Policy and Procedures. d) Adequate capacity shall be existing or be programmed by the service providing agency responsible for the system that will serve the site. Any capital costs to be incurred by public agencies should be included in the Capital Improvements Program , of the appropriate jurisdiction. e) Preliminary plat and/or site plan approval has been obtained from the Planning Commission and other appropriate public agencies responsible for approval of plans, or future operating maintenance costs of sanitary facilities. f) A discharge permit, where appropriate, has been approved by appropriate State Agencies. g) A hydrogeolic study, where appropriate, supports the establishment of a community water system which will not be detrimental to adjoining wells. B-7 3. Eligibility for S-1/W-l (Service Existing or Under Construction) Classification: a) All requirements for S-3/W-3 have been met and, b) Facilities are under construction or completed. III PROCEDURES FOR THE BIENNIAL REVIEW AND UPDATE In the Biennial review year, the Planning Department shall notify the appropriate service providing agencies and municipalities that the Water and Sewerage Plan is being reviewed and updated. The service providing agencies, municipalities and Health Department will be asked to provide information to be included in the draft updated plan. This may include changes to text, maps, tables, charts, or other information within the Plan to reflect changes that have occurred since the previous update or new proposals expected to occur within the planning period. Applications for individual amendments by property owners will also be considered during the Biennial Update. The Planning Department will prepare a Draft Updated Plan to be submitted to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Copies of the Draft Updated Plan will be made available to the Public and to the Municipalities and service providing agencies. A joint Public Hearing by the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission shall be scheduled. B-8 The principle elected official of each municipal corporation that is effected shall be notified of the Plan Update at least 14 days prior to the public hearing. The Planning Department shall publish notice of the time and place of the public hearing, with a summary of the update in at least one newspaper of general circulation, once each week for two successive weeks with the first notxfication appearing at least 14 days prior to the hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission shall review any testimony presented. The Planning Commission shall certify that the Updated Plan as presented or modified is consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan. Following the Planning Commission's certification, the Board of County Commissioners shall adopt the updated plan. Following the adoption of the updated plan by the County Commissioners, the Plan shall then be sent to the Maryland Department of the Environment for its review and final approval. The State has at least 90 days and may extend its review period. IV PROCEDURE FOR INDIVIDUAL AMENDMENT APPLICATION REVIEW Applications for individual amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan shall be considered at a joint public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission held at least twice a year. Requests for proposed amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan may be submitted to the Washington County Planning Department, County Administration Building, 100 West Washington Street, Hagerstown, Maryland. Requests for proposed amendments will be processed in at least two cycles a year. Closing dates for amendment requests shall be available at the Washington County Planning Department. Requests for amendments must contain all of the applicable information listed in Section VIII. Incomplete applications or applications that do not meet the applicable criteria listed in Section II will not be excepted. V PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS Administrative amendments need not be formally adopted by the Board of County Commissioners via the public hearing process. Such amendments are to correct errors and are for informational purposes. These amendments do not represent changes in policy or future plans. Administrative amendments should generally be limited to existing conditions which fall within the following categories: B-10 1. To correct omitted or inaccurate locations of existing facilities on the Plan maps. 2. To correct erroneous service priority classifications which indicate no service provided when in fact service is being provided to a particular area. 3. To correct erroneous data on existing population served, flow and capacity data on existing facilities, and similar information which is a matter of record,, Once an administrative amendment is made by the Planning Commission, copies of amended maps or text will be forwarded to all applicable agencies to replace maps or text which have been found to be in error. VI PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL AMENDMENTS Special amendments outside of the semi-annual review sequence may only be initiated by the Board of County Commissioners upon the request of the Washington County Health Department or a Municipality or Service providing agency. Special amendments should be limited to: a) allowing service to an existing structure when a potential health hazard has been declared by the Health Department, b) allowing requests submitted by government agency for capital projects to proceed. B-11 Special Amendments shall be considered, following public notification, at a joint public hearing held by the Planning Commission and County Commissioners. VII FEES A fee schedule established by the County Commissioners is to be applied to all applicants, other than municipalities or public agencies, requesting individual amendments to the Water and Sewerage Plan. These fees are not refundable and must be paid at the time application is made. VIII DATA TO BE INCLUDED IN APPLICATIONS FOR AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY PLAN The following data, as applicable, shall be included in an application for amendment of the County Plan for Water and Sewerage for the creation of a new service area, expansion of an existing service and the establishment of a priority classification of 5-5 or W-5 or higher. Applications for amendment shall address the interrelationship of water supply and waste water disposal. B-12 Applications for the establishment of new service areas or the creation of new or improved major facilities must include the following as appropriate to the project: 1. Proposed type, capacity, size and location of facilities (new or proposed for use) and map. 2. Name and location of development or service area (boundary, drainage area, acreage and map). 3. Number of people (existing in drainage or service area, density of development). 4. Number of people to be served in drainage or service area by planned staged development. 5. Design, average and peak flows. 6. Degree and type of treatment given. 7; Sludge disposal plans. 8. Transmission facilities (size of pipe). 9. Effluent disposal plans (spray irrigation, discharge to stream, etc.). 10. Classification of stream receiving discharge. 11. Operation and maintenance costs. 12. Proposed means of financing improvement. 13. Description of ground and surface water resources within the service or development area, including the quantity and quality of these resources. 14. Sources of pollution or contamination of groundwater resources within the development or service area. 15. Source and amount of water to be withdrawn. 16. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan. 17. Relationship to Water and Sewer Plan. 18. Reason for change. 19. Alternatives and the rationale used in determining the means of providing water supply. B-13 20. Rationale for selecting a particular design and alternatives for any proposed treatment facility, pumping station or interceptor. Applications which would extend collection or transmission facilities beyond the boundaries of existing ten-year service areas, should include: 1. Location of the proposed development or service area (boundaries, acreage, map) and relationship to existing service area and facilities. 2. Number of people existing in development or service area. 3. Number of people to be served in development or service area by planned staged development. 4. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan. 5. Relationship to Water and Sewerage Plan. All maps included in applications for amendment which delineate the boundaries of the service area, or show the location of facilities shall be prepared at a scale of 1"=2000' on a base provided by the Planning Commission. B-14 • APPENDIX C LISTING OF SERVICE AGREEMENTS Agreement For Provision of Sanitary Sewer Service For The Maugansville/Orchard Hills Area By And Between The City Of Hagerstown And The Washington County Sanitary District. March 25, 1982 Supplemental Agreement No. 1 To Contract For Sanitary Sewer Service For The Maugansville/Orchard Hills Area By And Between The City Of Hagerstown And The Washington County Sanitary District. June 22, 1982 Agreement For The Provision Of Sanitary Sewer Service For Fountain Head Area By And Between The City Of Hagerstown And The Washington County Sanitary District. December 5, 1977 Revision Of Fountainhead Service Agreement Between The Washington County Sanitary District And The City Of Hagerstown (Water Pollution Control Department) September l, 1983 Agreement For The Provision Of Sewer Service To The Sharpsburg Pike Area Between The City Of Hagerstown And The Washington County Sanitary District. January 11, 1988. Memorandum Of Understanding Regarding Industrial Waste Pretreatment Under The General Sewer Service Agreement Dated May 1, 1978 Between The City Of Hagerstown And The Washington County Sanitary District. November 5, 1984 These service agreements are on file at the Washington County Sanitary District Office. C-1 APPENDIX D Washington County Sanitary District l?OLICY ON INrERIM AND PEP.MANENT CCt-lMUNITY WATER AND SE"t/ERAGE SYSTEMS, Aorll 27, 1976 The District shall oi,m and operate all interim and permanent water and sewerage system facilities within the County, except those within an incorporated area or approved existing system, under the follc,,,,ing conditions: 1. The District shall be the sole judge as to whether a ccmtu.1nity water or sewerage facility can be approved and accepted for oi,mership and operation by the District within the framework of the Sanitary District law, It shall have the sole right to determine the conditions of approval and acceptance necessary to satisfying the provisions of said law. 2. The District shall have the sole right to determine what facilities are interim or permanent; as to when the installed facilities shall be m:xiified, enlarged or abandoned; and who may use said installed facilities. However, in making such determinations, the District shall be governed by all applicable Ccunty and State regulations and requirenents. 3. All applications for camunity water or sewerage facilities shall be filed with the Washington County Planning CoTimi.ssion. All such applications nust include an engineering report prepared by a Maryland registered professional engineer with sufficient experience in sanitary work satisfactory to the District. This report 11UJSt include estimated construction and operation costs, together with all necessary design and technical data required by the State for effluent discharge and/or water appropriation permits. 4. No ccmnunity water or sewerage facility will be approved for ownership, operation or maintenance by the District unless such ownership, operation and maintenance jurisdiction encompasses the entire system, including treatment, collection, distribution, storage, etc., except as may be covered by special arrangement with the applicant at the discretion of the District. s. Construction plans and specifications for all interim and permanent camunity water and sewerage system !!l.lSt be prepared in accordance with State requirements but nust be reviewed and approved by the District prior to submittal to the State for a construction permit. All construction shall be in compliance with applicable Sanitary District standards. 0-1 6. Interim and permanent sewerage and water facilities shall be designed and constructed at no cost to the District. Construction costs to be borne by others include that inspec , during const."'Uction deemed necessary by the District to prot-. its ownership and operational interests in the project. 7. No water or sewerage facility will be accepted by the District Eoi:-ownership, operation and maintenance until a mutually acceptable agreement or cont.-act between the District and the applicant has been consUim11ated and put into effect. 8. The effective date of this poliC'J is April 27, 1976 and it shall apply to all appications submitted consequent to that date. 0-2 i I APPENDIX E REVISED POLICY STATEMENT FOR CITY OF HAGERSTOWN WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT CAPACITY ALLOCATION E-1 August 20, 1991 REVISED POLICY STATEMENT Regarding the Distribution of Remaining Water Pollution Control Plant Capacity Allocation Among Development·Projects Owners and/or developers are hereby advised that limited capacity is presently available at the Water Pollution Control Plant to support development projects. Allocation of'this capacity will be on a "first come, first serve" basis when an owner/developer secures the required approved Application(s) for Sanitary Sewer Service. An Application for Sanitary Sewer Service will not be accepted until such time that an approved final site plan is issued for the development. Should any project require a Sewerage Construction Permit from the State of Maryland, Department of the Environment, no application(s) will be accepted until such permit is secured. When an owner/developer is issued an approved Application for Sanitary Sewer Service for a specified project, construction of said project must commence within six (6) months and be completed within fourteen (14) months. (Commencement of construction will be demonstrated by the first footer building inspection and completion will be demonstrated by the final plumbing inspection.) The Water Pollution Control Manager may grant a short extension to these deadlines if he is satisfied that a hardship exists and that the delay was due to conditions beyond the control of the applicant. Assigned allocation to any development may not exceed 5,000 gallons per day unless approved by the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown. Furthermore, prior to filing an Application(s) for Sanitary Sewer Service, an owner or developer, through the office of the City Administrator, may request that a specific amount of remaining reserve capacity allocation be "set aside" for a project. Any approval of "set aside" allocation must be approved by the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown. "Set aside" allocation will not be considered as such until the corresponding Benefit Charge at the prevailing rate is paid to the City of Hagerstown.** From time of payment of the Benefit Charge, the owner/developer will have a period of two (2) years to make Application(s) for Sanitary Sewer Service to use the "set aside" allocation. "Set aside" allocation will be monitored through the receipt of required approved Application(s) for Sanitary Sewer Service for the project. E-2 Failure to comply with these requirements will result in the assigned or "set aside" allocation reverting back to the Water Pollution Control allocation bank and the owner/developer being charged an administrative fee of one-third (1/3) the previously assessed Benefit Charge. The Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown reserve the right to rescind "set aside" capacity allocations before the two year expiration date, if in their absolute discretion they determine that the capacity will not be used as originally intended. If the Mayor-and Council of the City of Hagerstown rescind "set aside" capacity allocations prior to the two year expiration date, then no administrative fee shall be assessed. This revised policy shall become effective immediately and shall apply to all future requests for "set aside" and/or Application(s) for Sanitary Sewer Service. ** Payment of the required Benefit Charge is due and payable to the City of Hagerstown within fourteen (14) days of approval of the "set aside" allocation by the Mayor and Council, If such payment is not made within the required period of time, the Water Pollution Control Department shall request that Mayor and Council action be taken to rescind the previously approved "set aside" allocation for the associated project. E-3 APPENDIX F RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAGERSTOWN RELATING TO THE HAGERSTOWN URBAN GROWTH AREA, WATER AND SEWER STUDY PREPARED BY BCM ENGINEERS, INC. F-1 I 00006 00227 ACTS, ORDINANCES &, =-R" Or rn: cirs•,ir CJtP RESOLUTIOl'!S -COUNIT \'tAS!m::.TO!I ·cc'J:!TY "T RESOLUTION of A ·?7:30NOSL 01793 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND relating to Water and Sewer Study prepared by BCM ENGINEERS, INC. WHEREAS, the master plan entitled 'Washington County Water & Sewerage Plan' was originally prepared in 1975 and updated through January, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Washington, Maryland, and the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown, commissioned BCM Engineers, Inc. to present a final report and master water and sewerage plan to the Washington County Planning Commission with the charge to prepare a master plan to guide development of water and sewerage facilities in the Hagerstown area through the year 201 0; and WHEREAS, BCM Engineers, Inc. has prepared a Water and Sewer Study for Washington County/City of Hagerstown dated November, 1992, and which has been submitted to the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown and the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland. NOW, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland, that the study report prepared by BCM Engineers, Inc. is to be used as a guide and basis for updating the County's Water and Sewer Plan where applicable and for . assisting the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown and the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland, in providing water and sewerage services in the Washington County area. Notwithstanding the aforegoing, acceptance of the BCM Engineer Study Report does not represent a legal commitment by the County to finance or in any manner create an obligation on the part of the County to provide Mure water or sewer improvements or utility service to any presently served or unserved area. Adopted this .2,,7"'aay of --~-r--=-----· 1993. ATTEST: Joni L. Bittner, Clerk Approved as to legal sufficiency: ~ll~err Ralph.France, II County Attorney Mail to, Ralph H. France, II County Attorney 100 W. WA~hinc~n~ ~~rAA~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SHINGTON C NTY, MARYLAND ' le a C. lrvin-C ,,J F-2 OFFICE OF 7He CrN C:..S:1K Clty Hail. Roam 21l0 Barry A. Teach CITY OF H..-'\.GERSTOWN DIL~YLA.!.'ID 21740 April 5, 1993 Washington County Administrator County Administration Building 100 West Washington Street Hagerstown, Ma:yland 2li40 (301) 790-3200 E.<tensian 112 Attached is a copy of the Resolution recently approved by t.~e Mayor and City Council per't:.aining to their intent and effect of the formal acceptance of the water and sewer study for the O'rban Growth Area as prepared by BC.~ Engineers, Inc. Co not hesitate to call i! you have any questions pertaining to this matter. Attachment c: BC.~ Engineers, Inc. s.M. Feller, City Administrator J. Brittain, county Planner R.L. Kaut:, City Planner R.E. Thomas, City WPC Manager Ver"/. truly yours, ~~ ;Georgi.l\nn N. Lucas City Clerk E.V. Wal:l, City Water Department Manager Lynn Palmer, Director, Washington Co. Sanitary District F-3 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the master plan entitled "Washington County Water & Sewerage Plan" was originally prepared in 1975 and updated through January, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Board of County co=issioners of Washington, county, Maryland, and the Mayor and council of the City of Hagerstown, co=issioned BCM Engineers, Inc. to present a final report and master water and sewerage plan to the Washington County/City of Hagerstown Water-Sewer co=ittee with the charge to prepare a master plan to guide development of water and sewerage facilities in the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area through th~ year 2010; and WHE..tt.E..~S, BCM Engineers, Inc. has prepared a Water and Sewer Study for Washington county/City of Hagerstown dated November, 1992, and which has been submitted to the Mayor and Council of the City of Hagerstown and the Board of County Co=issioners of Washington County, Maryland; and WHEREAS, this Resolution is to describe the intent of the Mayor and City Council and the effect of the formal acceptance of the water and sewer study for the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area, hereinafter referred to as the "UGA Water-Sewer Study", prepared by BCM Engineers and dated November 1992. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City council of · the City of Hagerstown that: 1. The Mayor and City Council state that the primary use for the UGA Water-Sewer Study is to provide a basis for updating the County's water and sewer plan where geographically applicable. The UGA Water-sewer Study is intended to support and reinforce .the implementation of the Hagerstown Urban Growth Area concept. 2. For areas in which utility service is planned or provided under service agreements between the City and the County, the UGA Water-Sewer Study should be interpreted as reco=endations for fut=e consideration to redefine utility service areas with the understanding that existing utility service area boundaries shall remain unchanged until formal agreements are executed to alter any utility service area boundary. F-4 3. The Antietam Basin 201 Facilities Plan is recognized as an integral part of the general Sewer Service Agreement dated May 5, 1978 and specific sewer service agreements for Washington County Sanitary Subdistricts #6, #14, and #15. These agreements were made between the City and the county through the agency and representation of the Washington County Sanitary District. Until these agreements are formally amended and mutually accepted, they shall take precedence in matters of legal interpretation and administration under the said agreements. 4. Notwithstanding the recommendations of the UGA Water-sewer Study, acceptance of this study does not represent a legal commitment by either the city or the county to finance or in any manner create an obligation to provide future water or sewer improvements or utility service to any presently served or unserved area. Approved this · ···-§o -ff! day of _;~;._ ______ , 1993. (SEAL} ATTEST: ~ :;:1z,~ -C < _/ ; -. eorgiAnn N. Lucas City Clerk F-5 CITY OF HAGERSTOWN APPENDIX G COMPILATION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STATISTICS, "FS SCHEDULES" FOR PUBLICLY OWNED COMMUNITY SEWERAGE SYSTEMS G-l A B C -D . E F G II I J K· L M N 0 I' () R ,_ samu FS Fil'WCI/ll M"l'l.l'IDflff ST/\TISTICS roJ'ITY WATER & SEl'lffi PlPNS County NalE Washington System Nc\llE Hagerstown WPC Fiscal Year .¥1 FY 90 ------- Fiscal Year #2 FY 91 '-------- FISCAL YEM #1 COLLM'l l FISCAL YEAA #2 COLLM'l 2 ,, 7-1-89 6-30-90 7-1-90 6-30-91 Se-.er charge revenue 3,477,093 Se-.er charge revenue 3,862,409 Ccnnecticn charge revenue 46,630 Connection charge revenue 37,430 Front ft assessm,nt revenue 233,091 Front ft assessment revenue 148,134 Other revenue (carplete schedule Other revenue (carplete schedule 619,722 344,098 on oaoe 2) on oaoe 2) Total revenue 4,376,536 Total revenue 4,392,071 Operation expense 3,854,476 Operation expense 3,860,945 Maintenance expense 149,965 . Maintenance expense !OS A 11 Rep l ace1en t costs -0-Replacerent costs -0-. Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0-Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0- Total CM & R 4,004,441 Total CM & R 3,966,558 Interest e~pense 282,409 Interest expense 261,536 Deprec1ation expense * 737,638 Depreciation expense 412,559 Total expense 5,024,488 Tota 1 e~pense 4,640,653 -Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance (647,952) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (248,582) Debt principal 43,390 Debt principa 1 192,100 Total flo,i volure 1,632,749,300 Total flOM volUIE 1,647,772,700 - E.xtraordinary repairs and maintenance are those \',flid1 are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipate,~ in the annual budget. Exarples of "extraordinary" breakdo,,ns might include a blo,,er breakdo,,n in the aeration syste large purp systen rotor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance prcblen for this se...erage systen. O 2 Compressor SI J\pproximate cost of this potential repair __ $_2_so_,_o_o_o _________________ _ Depreciation on City's contribution of tP,.if,tfl'3ssets value. Excludes value contributed by grants (EFW: ~tate, Developer) G-2 A B C D . E F G II I 1 K L M rt 0 p Q R () County Nooe Washington System Nare Hagerstown WPC ·' SCHmJlE FS Fil'WCIJ!J... f,ffll!GOOff STATISTICS mMY WATffi & SEHER PVllS Fiscal Year #1 ------- Fiscal Year #2 __ ~f~v__,,g""9 ___ _ FISCAL YEM ill CDLLM'-11 FISCAL YEAA #2 CDLLM'-1 2 6/30/89 Se.-.er charge revenue Se.-.er charge revenue 3,512,193 Connection charge revenue Connection charge revenue . 40,330 Front ft assessirent revenue F rent }t assessrrent revenue 351,101 Other revenue ( carp l ete schedule on caae 2) Other revenue (carplete schedule on paae 2) .424_, 923 Tota 1 revenue Total revenue 4.328,547 Operation expense Operation e.xpense 1.SLL 155 ~l1intenmce e.xpense Maintenance e.xpense 113,934 Rep l ace1e11 t costs Replacerent costs -0- Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0- Total a-1 & R Total a-1 & R 3,680-089 Interest e.xpense Interest expense 131,835 Depreciation expense Depreciation expense UL f\OS Tota 1 expense Total expense I, l,n 0"' Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 1149 412' Debt principal Debt principal ,a '"- Total flo,i volure Total flo,i volure 1,650,909,100 _,_ Extraordinary repairs and 1ll'!intenance are those ~1ich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticip, in U1e annual budget. Exa1ples of "extraordinary" breakdo,.ns might include a blo,,er breakdo,.n in the aeration s: large p~ systen 1rotor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify U1e n1Jst costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se.-.erage systen. SI ~1proxh1t1te cost of U1is potential repajr _________________________ _ * Depreciation on City's contribution of tot.slDv~sec value excludes value contributed by GRANTS (EPA, STATE, DEVELOPER). G-3 .<) T u V -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary item (a bond, line of credit, escroM account, 'AOrkin\ capital, etc.) Bond, Working Capital if available Additional ccmrents Total flow volume is billable consumption and excludes ------------------'--------------- inf i l tr at ion -average influent flow is 6.7 to 7 MGD. Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description Ind. Surcharge Interest I/C Misc. Total Year 1 /lirount $298,804 295,320 25,598 619,722 Contact Persa,: Year 2 /lm:Junt $145,286 127,669 71,143 344,098 Capacity: __ _,as ___ M,D'-= Rick Thomas, WPC Manager NP/,£ Users: residential 13,529 (EST) 1 Clean Water Circle POORESS canrercial 913 (EST) -----Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 (301) 791-4528 IB.EP1-0NE # G-4 ' ' , , ) I ,r : I , I I ! -l.. I I I I I I, \J County i'lare Washington Systen Nare Funks town FISCAf. YEJR # l Se,.er charge revenue Connecticn charge revenue Frcnt ft assessm:nt revenue Other revenue (carplete schedule . on oaae 21 Total revenue Operation expense Maintenance e~pense . Rep 1 acenent costs Feo..s paid to other jurisdicticnsi tal IJ.1 & R I Interest expense Oepreci at ion expense I Tota 1 e'(jlense I Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance Debt principal Total flON velum srnELU.E FS Fll'WOAL MW@-fHJ" STATISTICS a:wTY WATER & SEHER PlNlS Fiscal Ye3r #1 6/30/91 Fiscal Year #2'-------- COLLM'I l FISCAf. YEJR #2 COLLM'l 2 (1991) , u 65,911.11 Se-.er ci1arge revenue ------Ccnnecticn charge revenue ----F rcrtt ft assesSill:flt revenue 11,297.50 Other revenue (carplete schedule en aaae 2) Tota I revenue . 77,208.61 44,336.02 Operation expense 12,910.04 Maintenance expense Rep 1 acerent cos"t.S -Feo..s paid to other jurisdictions 57,246.06 Total IJ.1 & R 3,488.54 Interest e'<jl€f1Se • 34,948.56 Depreciation expense 95,683.16 Total expense (18,474.55) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 10,000.00 Debt principa 1 19,588,540.00 Total flON volum E.xtraordinary repairs and maintenance are those llilich are crf such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annua 1 budget. E~arp Jes of "extraordinary" breakda.-.ns might include a b lo.-.er breakdcw, in the aeraticn systeo, large PIJIP systen ll'Otor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the ll'OSt costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se-.erage systen. Rehab of Pond ximate cost of this potern:ial repair __ .2,Sl~O~o~oo~o:!..... __________________ _ (over) G-5 . \ CcuntJ Nare._-"W..,a_.,_.h._.i_.n ... g.._t ... o"'n"--- Funks t own Systen Nara'--------- SCHEru.E FS FI?WC!Pl WWG8'f1ff STATISTICS (ID{TY f/AlcR & san:R FVllS (1989) COL.l.M'l l ) Fiscal Year ifl 6/30/89 Fiscal Year #2 6/30/90 COLLM'l 2 (1990) , I ~e-.er c.ian;e revenue 66,673.36 / Set.er cian;e re'lenue I 64,815.83 I ,::nnecticn charge re'!enue I 1,000.00 Ccnnecti en c:iarge re,,enue I I F.rcnt ft assessm:nt revenue F rart: ft asses$l!B1t re'!enue ' I -----.. ------ '. O'"Jler re'!enue ( CC!l) l ete schedule Other re'!enue (CC!l)lete schedule -, ~, en oc!lle 2) 9,714.31 en pace 2) 10,930.14 i" eta I re'!enue Total revenue 75,745.97 77,387.67 ; I Cperaticn expense I 40,178.72 c,ieraticn axpense 36,909.49 ·' j Maintenance a~pense 6,374.95 / Maintenance axpense 5,798.02 • j ' ! ii '! -I : i . ! ~ ! '! ,e;:i l ac..=rent costs -· / Rep l aceTeTt costs Fess paid to other jurisdicticns ---Fees paid to other jurisdictions! --- Total CM & R I 46,553.67 Total CM & R I 42,707.51 - Interest a'<!)ense I 4,352.49 Interest e:qiense 3,8.68.80 Oe!Jreciaticn a'<J)ense I . 35,196.40 Cepreciaticn axpense I 34,077.28 Tota J axpense 86,102.56 Total a'(jle!lse I 80,653.59 Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance (8,714.89) Increase (Decrease) Fimd Balance (4,907.62) Cebt principal I 10,000.00 Debt principa J 10,000.00 Total flo,, volure 19,588,540.00 / Total flo,, volure I 23 , 641 , 11 O. 00 E::t:-aordinar, reoairs and maintenance are those •.-.nich are af such a nature as to be be'!cnd those 11:!lairs anticipated in the annuai budcet. E~amles af "extraordinart'' bre-..kda,,,s micht include a blo,,er bre:kda,,, in the aeraticn svster :arr;e puro systen.rrotor and· ccntrcl, clarifier s'ludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aeratcr. Please · ide1tify the 1rcst costly poteitial ~air and maintenance prcblen for this se,.erage syst:!11. Rehab of Pond :~crr.:dmate -:~st ,"f ::!,is pot::m:ial rP.pair __ ....,:$..,1,,..0.,.0-'-o_o_o'-----------;-----------,,._. •,; .' ! r:J-teri . G-6 .r. ' ::, .. ;:esc:-ibe the scurca of funds to cover this e.waon:iinary iten (a bend, line of credit, escrcw acccunt, ~.or.<incr c:lllital, etc.) CD's -Balance@ 10/15/92 $252,000 Additiooal cCill!E!Tts_· _____________ -'----------------- Cetai.1 of ot,er revenue on Line E ( if app 1 icab le): Cescrioticn · Interest income Equity Fees iCOUnts Total Year 1 flnomt.1989 $9,100.30 600.00 14.01 9,714.31 Year 2 Pm:unt 1990 $10,930.14 10,930.14 Contact Perscn: Brenda L. Haynes isers: residential 480 P, o. Box 235 ---- canrercial 33 Funkstown, Maryland 21734 ----- (301) 791-0948 G-7 199 $11,297.5 11,297.5 • ?. I 3 I C I !J I I :: i I r I !.G\ '. ~ Ii I J !': t M N 0 l? Q R : i I : s I I .,;,_..,,.., ........ .., l"DIANCIAL IIAHAGEMl::N'r Sll:rISTICS COllN'l'Y WA!J:El!. • SEIIER PI..UlS County Name Washingcon System Name Smichsburg IIWTP FISCAL '!El\!\ ll Sewe=/Wat:e: char;e =evenue I Connec-:icn char;e :evenue F=ont: f'.: assessment: :avenue Other revenue (complet:e scnedule on page 2) Tct:al . . revenue Opera~~·pn ex;:anse Maintenance expense Replac~ment costs Fees paid to ether jurisdic-::ions Tocal OM & R, Fees Interest: ex;,ense Oepreciat:ion expanse Total ex;,ense Increase (Decrease) fund balance Debt principal Total flow volume COX.llMN l I 110,215 I 26,000 I 33·, 624 169,839 63, 745 33,290 --- -- 97,035 I .5,850 15,.378 118,263 51,576 20,000 51,329,800 Fiscal Year #l Fiscal Year #2 FISCAL Y.ll!lLR J.2 Sewer/Wat:ar charge revenue c~nnec~icn e~ar;e :eevenua Fror,t1f~ assessment :avenue Ot!ler revenue (complet:e schedule on page 2) Tot:al revenue Operation expense Maintenance ex;ense Replacement costs Fees paid to other iurisdic-::ions Total' OM & R, Fees Interest expense Oepraciaticns expense Total expense Increase (Dec::ease) fund balance Debt principal Total tlow volume 1991 cox.mr. I I I I • Extraordinar; repairs and maintenance are thoae which are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Examples of •extraordinary" breakdowns might include a blower breakdown in the aeration system, large pump system motor and control, clari!ier sludge scraper 11r.11 and bearings, or a floating aeratcr. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance problem for this sewerage system. . Approximate cost of this potential repair G-8 -== - - - : :. 7 T Oesc=i..be the souree of funds ta cover this ex=:-aordinary item (a band, line of c=edit, esc:ow account, working capital, ate.) .. ... . . . ... ·~· .. . . ~ . .. \ , Additional rJ comments: -'d ' ! ' ' -. i \ -,: · 1 ..... \ V ' Detail of other Line E (if api:,licable) : ! revenue an ' ' Year l Year 2 cesc;-~etion amount i!,m0uot . Interest Income ·33, 624 I ' • . Corl'l:aci: Person: Capacity: mad Ms. Elizabeth Martin (Name) Users: residential ---P. 0. Box 237 commercial (Adc!:ess) -Smithsburg, Maryland 21783 (301) 824-7234 (T~lephone Number) G-9 , , A I 3 I C I I 0 I ::: I ' I ' :' I I I I \G\ H I J K L M I N 0 :;, I Q I . R I s W'ashimtcon SCIIEDCLE l"S l"DIANCIA:c. MANAGEMEll'.r =:l:IS'l:ICS COUN'l:Y WAn:R Ii. SEWER PI..\NS iiscal Year #l 1989 County !fame system !fame Smithsburg wwrF ,, -------l"iscal Year #2 ...;;1~9_9~o ____ _ = FISCL '!:::AR #l COLUMN l I FISc;iI, Yl!!lUl #2 I COLUMN Sewer/Water cha.r;e revenue 88,756 Sewer/Water charge =evenue I 97,283 C~nnec~ion charge revenue I . 14,500 Cannec~ion cha:ge :avenue I 23,500 :'ron~ ft assessmen: reverr~e ~: :'rent f~ assessmen: :evenue I -- Other (ccmpleea Ot!1.er revenue (ccmpleee revenue schedule on page 2) 26,140 schedule on page 2) 33,411 -:ctal :-avenue . 129,396 Total revenue I 154,194 Operaeion expense 22,306 I Operation ex;ense 27,290 Mai:itenance exi?ense 16,992 Maintenance expense 23,464 Re,,lacement . " Replacement . . coses costs Fees paid to other Fees paid to other jurisdictions ----jurisdictions Total OM Ii R, Fees 39,298 I Total OM Ii R, :'ees I 50,754 Interest expense 7,650 Interest expense 6,750 Oapreeiaeion expense 11,794 Depreciations expense I 12,596 ··-Total expense 58.742 Total ex,,ense 70,100 Inc:ease (Decrease) fund 70,654 Increase (Decrease) !U!ld 84,094 balance balance Debt principal 20,000 Debt principal 20,000 Total flow volume 39,350,700 Total flow volume 35,843,700 Ex::aordi~ar1 repairs and maintenance are those which are of such a i:r.ature as to· be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Examples of •ar.:raordina.ry" breakdowns ~ight include a blower breakdown in the aeration system, large pump system motor and control, clarifier sludge scraper a.rm and bearings, or a ~loating aeraccre ?lease identify the most costly potential rep;ur and mai.~tenance problem for this sewerage system. Floodin,z of the sewa~e t::eatmenc olant and damase to ics pumps and electrical control equipment. Approximate cost of this potential repair $200,000 = G-10 ; T Cesc::il:>e t:he S(?urce of funds t:o cover this ext::aordinarf item (a bond, line of • credit, escrow account, worlti.ng capital, etc.) · . . .... .;Q .. .. ·-·--····--··•·- ' Approximacely $375,000 in working capical/fucure expansion reserve is available ' : i for these emergencies. I I I ---. I Additional a I cammen-cs: ! ; ~ , ~ ' ' i I I ' • I . \ ,I ' 'j V i Cetail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable) : I I Year l Year 2 Oesei;:~ ~t ~gn Amount Jl.mOU!Jj; . Incerest Income 26,140 33 ,4ll I I . I I • - . C:Ontact PerSODI Capacity: .2 Ms. Elizabeth Martin Users: residential ---543 (Name) P. o. Box 237 commercial 12 (Address) · Smithsburg, Maryland (301) 824-7234 (Telephone Number) G-11 County Nare l•iashj aero□ SOmJI.£ FS FTIWCIAL Ml.NJlGEM:Nf STATISTICS ClXJfTY WATER & SEWER Pl.MS Fiscal Year #1 89 ------- 90 Systen Nam:! Hancock 1,/a stewar"r Department Fiscal Year #2 ·------- [SCAL YE,lR #1 COLLM'I 1 FISCAL YEAR #2 COLUVN 2 QO ~n =r charge revenue ·~-71:Q Se.-..er charge revenue 1~, "~c innection charge revenue 3,500 Connection charge revenue 2,500 "Otlt ft assessment revenue -0-. Front ft assessirent revenue -0- ther revenue (cCl1l)letl! schedule on □aoe 2) 33,836 Other revenue (clll1)1ete schedule on paoe 2) 9,202 Jta l revenue 173 ,Qq 5 Tot~.I revP.nue 149,138 Jeration expense 91,728 Operation expense 77,772 aintenance expense Maintenance expense eplacenent costs 35,705 Replacenent costs 25,763 ees paid to other jurisdictions -0-Fees paid to other jurisdictions -0- otal CM & R ) 127.433 Total CM & R 103,535 nterest expense 5,730 Interest expense 5, 122 epreciation expense 36 ?3~ Depreciation expense 37,205 otal expense 169,396 Total expense 145,862 ncrease · (Decrease) Fund Ba 1 ance 3,tqg Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 3,276 ebt principal 8,549 · Debt principal 8,548 otal flo,i volure -Total flew volure 89,571 528 81,,520,000 • xtraordinary repairs and maintenance are those v.hich are of such a nature as to be L-eyond those repairs anticipated n the annual budget. Exi111Jles of "extraordinary" breakdC11111s might include a blo,,er breukdClllll in the aeration systan, arge purp systan 11Dtor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please dentify the nost costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se.-.erage systen. ~ ?, • .. h. ,roximate cost of this potential repair _______________ .,;;,5_'_:.::;:·;..· "'---'--..;_ ____ _ G-12 I I -- -- -- I ' I i I . ! . I I • -2 - Describe the soun:e of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bond, line of credit, escl"Ol'I account, l'IOrking capita 1, etc.) U Additional ccmrents ______________________________ _ V Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description Non Operating income Interest Grant Miscellaneous Capacity=-------=-== Users: residential ___ _ camercial ___ _ NA',£ 89 Year 1 Pm:lunt 3,579 30,012 245 33,836 Contact Person: AllOOESS TB.EPOONE II G-13 5,937 3, 109 156 9,202 I A B C D . E F G H I J K L M N 0 p Q R " County Nare Wa <bi ngt on SGlElllE F'S F11WCIAI. t-'PJ'l.l'W1:1if STATISTICS CIWTY WA1ER & SEJ;'ER Pl.ANS F y B ___ 91 __ _ Fiscal Year #1 ------- Systan Nare Hancock \./ast 0 water Department Fiscal Year #2'-------- FISCAL YE-lR #1 3 91 COLLM'l 1 FISCAL YE-lR #2 CCLLM'l 2 Se,-er Charge revenue 137,657 Ser.er charge revenue Connection charge revenue 1,000 Comection charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue -0-Front ft assessment revenue Other revenue ( CCJl1'.l l ete schedu 1 e " Other revenue (cCJl1'.) lete schedule 5,095 on oaae 2) on oaae 2) Total revenue 143,752 Total revenue Operation expense 76,657 Operation expense Maintenance expense Maintenance expense Replacarent costs 94,580 ReplacB1E!lt costs Fees paid to other jurisdicticns -n-Feo..s paid to other jurisdicticns Total CM & R ' T71,237 Total CM & R Interest expense , ana Interest expense . Depreciation expense 38,816 Depreciatioo expense. • Total expense 215,002 Total expense Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance (71,250) . Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Oebt principal 6,689 . Oebt principal Total flo,i volure -· Total flo,i volure 91,940,000 ;I - Extraonlinary repairs and maintenance are those \\hich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipatE in the annual budget. Exclfl)les of "e.'<traonlinary" breakdo,,ns might include a blOi'.er breakdo,,n in the aeration syst large pU!Jl systan motor and cootrol, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the most costly potential repair and maintenance prcblan for this se...erage systan. Removal of laaoon sludae 550.000 Surface aerators at lagoon 31,000 Replacement of pumping & ejector staticns 709,000 s I ~proximate cost of this potential repair __ 1_·_2_90_,_0_0_0 _________ _..;r_;:;_;,:::::..;;·•.:::.: ... .-."'-: _;· ...;_ __ G-14 -2 - ::, T ' Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinarJ iten (a bond, 1 ine of credit, escro,; account, \\Orldng capita 1, etc.) Rate increase MOE Water Quality Financing loan :i MOE Grant for Assistance in the Construction of Sewerage Facilities u Additiooal canrents The Town of Hancock combines water and sewer r?cords forty -oi ae percent (49%) of revenues and exoenses are assianed to sewer, V Detail of other revenue oo Line E ( if app 1 icab le): Descriptioo Non Operating Income Interest Miscellaneous Capacity: 380,000 Users: residential 529 ---- camercial 176 ---- Year 1 Pnount 4,677 418 5,095 Coot act ]'ersoo: ~c."?Jtl.-~ ,,Ja ( ( '2.i-~ TELEPHJNE I G-15 Year 2 ~ ,. A B C D . E F I' ·' II I .J K L M N 0 p 0 R . ' somu FS FIIWCI/ll ~ STATISTICS cruffi' WATER & SB,l:R f'LON5 o County Nooe WASHINGTON Fiscal Year #1._Fe..Y..,8'-"9 ____ _ Systen Naire_!9WN OF CLEAR SPRING Fiscal Year #2._F:..Y:.,9c:,Oc._ ___ _ FISCAL YEAA Ul ;! aJLlHI l FISCAL YEAA i/2 aJUHI 2 7/l/88-6/30/89 7/1/89-6/30/90 Se.-.er charge revenue 80,349 Se,.er charge revenue 81,528 Connection charge revenue 2,530 Coonection charge revenue 4,980 Front ft assessnEnt revenue Front ft assesS!Tent revenue Other revenue (ca,µlete schedule OU1er revenue ( cmµ l ete schedule " 22,978 3,536 on oaoe 2) on oaoe 2) Tota 1 revenue 105,857 Total revenue 90,044 Operation expense 26,624 Cµeration expense 23,082 Maintenance expense 38,644 Maintenance expense 40,844 Replacerent costs Replacerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions Fees paid to other jurisdictions Total CM & R 65,268 Total 0-t & R 63,926 -Interest expense 10,709 Interest expense 8,176 Depreciation expense Depreciation expense • 38,798 38,866 Total expense 114,775 Tota 1 expense 110,968 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (8,918) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (20,924) Debt principal 54,804 Debt principal 7,780 Total fl°" volure 26,397,000 Total flOil.volure 26,817,000 Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those wiich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipate in the annual budget. Exa1µ Jes of "extraordinary" breakdo,.ns might include a b Jo,.er breakdo.-.n in the aeration systE large p111µ systen noter and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please ii.lent i fy the nost costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se-.erage systen. ULTRA VIOLET DISINFECTANT SYSTEM 'i I ilpprox inl1te cost of this potential repuir_.....:.Sl::.;O:..!':...:o:...:o..:;o ___________________ _ · icL; >,~''tdver) G-16 Ii V -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover tl1is extraordinary itan (a bond, line of credit, escro,i account, \\Orking capital, etc.) WORKING CAPITAL Additional canrents ------------------------------------ ., Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description Penalties & Interest On Delinquent Acc'ts Interest Income Year I /!m:Junt Gain From Early Retirement of Long-Term Debt. $ 1,032 1,107 20,839 22,978 Contact Person: Year 2 /lnnunt $1,155 2,381 3,536 • ,~apacity: .2 r,i;o PATRICK E, KLINE rw1c Users: residential 249.8 FY89 KLINE & LIPELLA, CPA 25 2. 3 FY90 .atoREss · comercial 107.S FY89 39 EAST WASHINGTON STREET 108.S FY90 HAGERSTOWN, MD. 21740-5605 TELEPIJJNE g (301) 739-8733 G-17 A 8 C D . E F r ., II I ,J K L ~-1 ti - I) p () R SOIEIU.£ FS Fltw-CIAL ~ STATISTICS UXfflY WATER & SEM:R Pt.PNS County NiJre __ w_A_S_H_IN_G_T_O_N __ Systan Nare TOWN OF CLEAR SPRING Fiscal Year l!J._='_Y9_l ____ _ Fiscal Year #2 -------- FISCAL YEPR #1 COLLM'l 1 FISCAL YfuiR #2 COLU•N 2 7/l/90 -6/30/91 Se,.er charge revenue 114_,,s Set.er charge revenue Connection charge revenue s <an Connection charge revenue Front ft assessrrent revenue Front h asses~rent revenue , Other revenue (ca1plete schedule Other revenue (caiplete schedule on naae 2) 4,721 on oaoe 2) Total revenue Total revenue 124,876 Operation expense ~eration expense 34,314 Maintenance expense M:1 i ntenance expense SQ 4" Replacarent costs Replacarent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictioos Fees paid to other jurisdictions Total 0'1 & R 84,735 Total 0,1 & R Interest expense 7,791 Interest expense . Depreciation expense 38,517 Depreciation expense Total expense 131,043 Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance (6,167) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance ' Debt principal 8,148 Debt pri nci pal Total flo,i volure 29,781,000 Total flo,i _volure - Extracrdina airs and maintenance are those v.h ich are of such a nature as to be be ond those airs antici ated ry rep y rep p in the annual budget. £xa1ples of "extraordinary" breakda-.os might include a blo,.er breakdo.-.o in the aeration syste large p11rp systan nntor and control, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the nnst costly potential repair and maintenance problan for this se...erage systan. OXIDATION DITCH AERATOR MOTOR SI /lpproximate cost of this potential_ repair __ r4P..,u"".'P"\1'1'.G"i-'l/il'i",,_s._,;_.0,..e_._s..,,a ...... awa""o _____________ _ (over) G-18 . ' -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bond, line of credit, escro..i account, 1'.0rking capital, etc.) WORKING CAPITAL :i Additional cmrrents _________________________________ _ V Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description Year l /lrrount PENALTIES & INTEREST ON DELINQUENT ACC'TS INTEREST INCOME S l, 428 3,293 4,721 Contact Person: .'.apacity: ___ .,.. 2.___--'M,O'-= PATRICK E. KLINE NPl-1'. 1Jsers: residential 256. 2 FY9l JIOOii~f & LIPELLn camercia l 111. 3 HAGEdlSIQWN, MD, 2JJ4Q-56DS TELEP! E # < 301) 7399733 G-19 Year 2 illrount 1\ 13 C D . E F G II I J K L M r1 0 p Q R 0 County Nare Washington SOmn..E FS FUWCI/IJ.. ~f STl'iTISTICS CWIIY W/\lffi & S00! P1J'.NS Fiscal Year #11989 ..cc...------ Systen Nare Tcwn of Williamsport Fiscal Year #2 '------- FISCAL YEAA #1 COLl.ffi I FISC/\L YEM #2 ~Ullffl 2 07/01/88 -06/30/89 Se.-..er charge revenue 135,868.14 Se.-..er d1arge revenue Connectioo charge revenue 500.00 Connecti?ll charge revenue Front ft assessment revenue Front ft asses~rent revenue ·' Other revenue ( corp l ete schedule .oo OU1er revenue ( corp l ete schedule · on oaae 2) on oaae 2) Tota 1 revenue 136,368.14 Total revenue Operation expense 35,774.83 Operation expense M:1intenance expense 11,320.89 Maintenance expense Rep l acerent costs Replacerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions 92,238.88 Fees paid to other jurisdictions Total (J,1 & R 139.334.60 Total (J,1 & R Interest expense 9,582.50 Interest expense Depreciatioo expense Depreciation expense • 21,000.00 Tota 1 expense 169,917.10 Total expense Increase· (Decrease) Fund Ba 1 ance (33,548.96) Increase (Decrease) Fund Ba lance Debt principal 30,000.00 Debt principa 1 Total flew volure 82,300,000 Total flew volure I' . - Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those \'J1ich are of such a nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipated in the annual budget. Exarples of "extraordinary" breakdo,,ns 1night include a blo,.er breakdCWI in the aeration systan, large purp systan 1rotor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. · Please identify the nost costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se,,erage systan. SI Approximate cost of this potential repair _________________________ _ G-20 i\ ii C I) E F t, II I ,) ,, L M N 0 . p ., .. () R somn..EFS FirWCIJ!J.. ~ STATISTICS O;wn' WI\TER & SEWER Pl.mi County Nare washi ngton._ Systen Ni'ITE Town of Wi 11 iamsoort FISCAL YEM #1 COL~ 1 FISCAL YEAA #2 Fiscul Year #1 1990 __ _ Fiscal Year #2. __ 1 __ 9_9_1 __ _ COLL.Ml 2 07-01-89 -06-30-90 07-01-90 -06-30-91 . Se.-.er churge revenue 131,475.92 Se.-.er chargu revenue 143,209.50 Connection charge revenue 1,000.00 Connect ion charge revei 1ue .oo Front ft assessm=nt revenue Front ft as:;essuent revenue . .oo .oo Other revenue ( carp lete sd1edu le Other-ruvenue (carplete Sj:hedule on oaoe 2) .oo on paae 2) Tota 1 revenue Total ruvenue 143,209.50 1~?.47~.'l~ Operation expense 36,265.74 Operation expense 61,390.39 Maintenance expense 27.951.58 Mainten,mce expmse 33,956.05 ReplacElTE!lt costs Replace1ent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions 65,034.31 Fees paid to other jurisdictions 133,145.84 Total CJ,1 & R 129,251.63 Total 04 & R 228,492.28 Interest expense 15,745.00 Interest expense 14,377.50 Depreciation expense 22,092.03 Depreciation expense 32,666.03 Total expense 1 h 7 08 A.~ h Total expense 265,535.81 Increase (Oecrease) Fln1d Bala11ce (34,612.74) Increase (Oecrease) Fund Balance (122,326.31) Debt principal s,000.00 Debt principal s,000.00 Total fla,i volute 70,658,083 Total fla,i volu12 . 100,544,800 Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those l'<llich are of such a nature as to be be ond those airs antici ate y rep p in the annual budget. Exa1µles of "extraordinary" breakd01111s might include a blo,,er breakdo,,n in the aeration syst large pufll systen rotor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the mst costly potential repair and maintenance problan for this se...erage systan. Large pump syscem mocor and concrol 1 Approximate cost of this potential repair __ $:..:2:..:5..:.,_oo_o ____________________ _ . I (over) G-21 -2 -•· T Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bo11d, line of credit, escro,i account:, \',Qrking capital, etc.) Working capital and borrowing from the town's general fund. u Additional canrents THE TCWN OF WILLIAMSPORT OPERATES AND MAINTAINS A SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM. THE WASTE IS PUMPED TO AND TREATED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT. V Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description C.,pacity: M,D Users: residential 700 camercial so N/ll•E Year 1 Prrount Contact Persoo: DONNA K. SPICKLER TOWN OF WILLIAMSl'OR:r -mms Year 2 Prrount 1?. O. BOX 307, 2 N. CONOCCCHEAGUE ST. WILLIAMSl'OR:r, MD 21795 TELEP!mE II (30ll 223-7711 G-22 A fl C D . E F G II I K L M N - 0 p () R Coun~7 Nare .wk:l:AfJ Systen Mare R.::" FK-=Di;r:..:c-.<..... FI SCA!. YEilR #1 Se...er cnarge revenue Ccnnect i co charge revenue F rant ft assesS1TB1t revenue Other revenue (cC!Tlllete schedule en oaoe 2) Total revenue ~eratioo expense Maintenance expense Rep lacenent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictiens Total m & R Interest expense Oepreciatico expense I Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Ddit principal Total flOrl volure SOEllE F'S FIIW~ ~ STATISTICS amrY WATER & SEncR PI.PnS • Fiscal Year #2 ------- COLI.Ml 1 FISCAL YEAA #2 COLLM'I 2 Se.-.er charge revenue Ccmecti en charge revenue ' F rent ft assesSlll:!!t revenue Other revenue (carplete schedule ;;l-Q_1 I 71 en oaoe 2) Tota I revenue ~ ,-~ Cperatien e.'<l)61se ; I' ; 11 Jt:"' M3intenance expense Replacerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictioos ~~Ji7 Total CM & R ' Interest expense • G Depreciation e.'<l)61se "'~ -.: .... ~' 1'1 Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Ba lance -o- Debt principal Total flOrJ voluie &traordinary repairs and maintenance are tllose l'.llich are of such a nature as to be beya,d those repairs antici in lhe annual budget. Exaiples of "extraon:linary" breakdo,,ns might include a bla...er breakdo,,n in the aeration lar1Je purµ systan 1TCtor and central, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. e1ease identify the nest costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se,,erage systan. S j'11pproxilMte cost·of'this·potential repair_· _______________________ _ G-23 (over) . ' -2 - Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bald, line of credit, escl'UII account, 1',Qrf<ing capital, etc.) · Additional canrents ______________________________ _ Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Oescriotion Jacity: _____ ....:.;:::::; m;: residential ___ _ CtlllTl:!rcial ___ _ Year 1 /lmlunt Contact Persai: NM mESS G-24 Year 2 /lmlunt A B C D . E F G II l J K L M N - D p 0 R Ccun~y tlare . 'rl As,1 ,,.y;zJ Systan Nare Gi::.,:-~,Jii::;i;-1.:_ FISCAL YE;1R #1 Se,..er cnarge revenue Connection· chal1_le revenue Front ft assessrrent revenue Dther revenue ( carp 1 ete schedu 1 e en oaae 2) Tota I revenue Cµer«tion expense ~~1intenance expense Rep I acerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions Total a., & R Interest expense Depreciatico e.~pense Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Ddil principal Total flON volure sam.lE FS FTtWCIPl. ~ STATISTICS CWflY WATER & SE!n:R PI.NlS Fiscal Year HI t,, /:1°/(;:! Fiscal Year #2 ------- COUMI 1 F1SC."1. '/EAA #2 COLI.Ml 2 Se...er charge revenue Coonectiai charge revenue Fimt ft assesSllBJt revenue Lt-0 s~c. ,, ~ Other revenue ( carp 1 ete schedu 1 e on oaae 2) Tota J revenue ~'"'? =-=;; Cµeration expense -Maintenance expense ~.'-'-''- Replacerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictioos L.t.a o-•· I 11 ._,~', Total (}I & R 1nterest expense • - Depreciation expense '-~ 'r-/ 23~ Total expense -c.-Increase (Decrease) Fund Ba lance Debt principal Total fl ON vo lune Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those \\hich are of such a nature as to be beyaid those repairs antic in lhe annual budget. Exall)les of "e.~traordinary" breakdo,,ns might include a blo,.er breakdo,,n in the aeration large pu~ systen JIOtor and ccntrol, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. e1ease identify the 1oost costly potential repair and maintenance prd:Jlen for this se...erage systen. s'I ~{proximate cost of tliis jiotent.,al repafr ______ .._;.;....;.._-"''---------'-"-.;,,_.~--'-"-- G-25 (over) -2 - " Describe the scurce of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bond, line of credit, escl'U/I account, \\Orking capital, etc.) Additiooal ccmre,ts ______________ :------------------- Detail of other revenue oo Line E (if applicable): Description Jacity: ________ ___ ,rs: residential ---- camercial ___ _ NPl,£ Year 1 - Pimunt Caitact Persm: JE.£PiaiE II c:; : G-26 Year 2 Pimunt A B C D . E F G II I K L M N - 0 p () R Systen Naire FISCAL /EilR #1 Se.-.er cnarge revenue Connecticn charge revenue Front ft assesS1TB1t revenue Other revenue (cCJ11)1ete schedule oo oaae 2) Total revenue Cµeration expense ~\1intenance expense Replace!E!lt costs Fees paid to other jurisdictioos Total 0•1 & R Interest expense Depreciaticn expense Tota 1 expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Dc!Jt principa 1 Total flOtl vollJle · SCIElllE FS FilWCIJll ~ STATISTICS axMY WATER & SEhrR PVNS CCll.lMl 1 ., 573,0-·11 "-~-, ~o-, ...J IV ... ,... i.f ~ :,:.; 7 I ' - S'°7::?. v7, C 'S73' ~7/ "'O.,,, Fiscal Year #1 0/:,/95 Fiscal Year /12 ·--------FISCAL '/EilR #2 ro..l..Ml 2 Set.er charge revenue Coonectioo charge revenue Frmt ft assesS1TB1t revenue Other revenue (cCJ11)1ete schedule on page 2) T eta t revenue Cµeratioo expense Maintenance e.~pense ReplacBlBlt costs Fees paid to other jurisdictions Total (],1 & R Interest expense • Oepreciaticn expense Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Debt principa 1 Total flOtl volune Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those l'.hich are of such a nature as to be beycnd those repairs antici in Lhe annual budget. i:xclqlles of "extraordinary" breakdCll,llS might include a blo.-.er breakdCl/,11 in the aeration large purp systan 11Dtor and cart:rol, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. t;lease identify the nest costly potential repair and maintenance problan for this se.-.erage systen. \ '~'\ ". S j ,1pproximate cost of this potential repair _______________________ _ G-27 (over) .. ,._ ':;- -2 -·o Describe the soun:e of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bond, line of credit, escro-i account, 110rking capital, etc.) · ~-------------------------------------- Addi tiona 1 came,ts ------------------------------- Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description 1acity: _______ = :rs: residential ---- camen:ial ---- Year 1 /lmJunt · Contact Person: t'W,£ TEI..EP!mE IF G-28 Year 2 ~ A B C D . E F G 11 I I ' K L M N - 0 p 0 R Coun_t_y Nare .v-1A5t\,..1G"u'I Systen Nare M ·'.;:I -------=------ SOElllE FS FilWCIJll. ~ STATISTICS crurTY WATER & SEhcR PlNls" ' Fiscal Year #2 ,., -30 -q l '---'-"--'"'----'--- FISCAL ·r~ dl ClJUMl 1 r bCAI. YEAA #2 CllLI.Ml 2 5e...er cnarge revenue Set.er charge revenue Connecticn charge revenue CoonectiCJ1 charge revenue F rcot ft assessm:nt revenue Fn:.nt ft assesSIIE!l1: revenue Other revenue ( carp 1 ete schedu 1 e Other revenue (carplete schedule 55a ~'"-" --ae a a, oaae 2) v I ' "" a, paae 2) .:) '; ,.,G,o Total revenue Tota I revenue Cperation expense ·:·.·: = .. _;_..: ~ c,ieratiai expense S-i..o.;; ~:r.:,.' ·~ ~1aintenance expense ---... Mlintenance expense '32.jc(.; Rep Iacerent costs ReplacE!lEl'lt costs Fees paid to other jurisdictiais Fees paid to other jurisdictiCJlS Total CM & R : :"d .~:-.-:.'! Total CM & R ~-"'a Cr. .. ..J , .... , .... ~\.,/ Interest expense Interest expense , Depreciation expense Oepreci atia, expense Tota 1 expense ---•'.: ..,.:-' 'r Total expense ~-l•c -'~ ':r:.c. Increase (Decrease) Fund Ba lance Increase (Decrease) Fund Ba 1 ance -c--::.- Oc.-!Jt principal Debt principa 1 Total flo,i vol1J12 Total flOH vol1J12 Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those l'llich are of such a nature as to be beyaid those repairs antic in lhe annual budget. Exaiples of "extraordinary" breakdCWIS might include a blo...er breakdo.ln in the aeration large pull) systen 111Jtor and caitrol, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. eiease identify the ll'DSt costly potential repair and maintenance problen for this se.-.erage systen. SI A11proxi111ate cost of this potential rep~ir _____ ,_o_ . .,,_.,·;.., _________________ _ G-29 (over) -2 - Describe the sa.irce of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a bend, line of credit, esCTOH account, \',()rking capital, etc.) Additional ccmrents ----------------------------- Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description Year 1 . ~ Catta.ct Person: pacity: _____ -'-= ;r, ·m H2,, ,, wc10 d ers: residential --- camen:ial ---- G-30 Year 2 Alwnt A fl C D . E F G II I I . K L M N - 0 p 0 R Coun.t_y Nare . i"h <;j.j 1 ,/C.7'rl F!Svl. YEAA ill Se....er cnarge revenue Connection charge revenue I · Front ft assesSllelt revenue -Other revenue (carplete schedule oo oaoe 2\ Total revenue CIJeration expense ~l1intenance expense Replacerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictiais Total 04 & R Interest expense Depreciation expense Tota 1 expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Dcllt 1irincipal Total flON volum SQEl1.E FS FilWCIAI... ~ STATISTICS WJm' WATI:R & SEHER Pl.MS Fiscal Year #2 {,,-;.~-, 1 CDLLMI 1 flSCAI.. YEAA #2 COIJ.MI 2 Set.er charge revenue CCll!lecticn charge revenue Frart: ft assessm:nt revenue Other revenue (cCJll)lete schedule <oo 0..1., 1G. O,;.~ oo pace 2) I ~ , -_, Total revenue ~-=::·.j ~ratiai expense (:; ..... ~ .,;~.? .. - ! 'J , ..... M3inte1ance expense C Replacatart: costs . Fees paid to other jurisdictioos ftJI ~~3 Total iJ,1 & R (,;,-.-.. ·] ., --' .~ Interest expense • Oepreciatioo expense ta,~,w Total expense &.;;;.c.:..:.?. . ·- _,, -Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance -o-- Debt principa 1 Total flo,i voluie Extraordinary repairs and maintelance are those \'Jlich are of such a nature as to be ·beyood those repairs antic- in lhe annual budget. Ex~les of "extraordinary" breakdo,,os might include a blo,,er breakdo,,o in the aeration large purp systen rrotor and ccntrol, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. e1ease identify the ,rest costly potential repair and maintenance prcblen for this set.erage systen. SI /\j1proxi111t1te cost of this potential repair ______ .,,_··----------~------- G-31 (over) -2 - Describe the soun:e of funds to cover this extraon:iinary iten (a bald, 1 ine of credit, esCTUN acccunt, WJrking capital, etc.) Additiooal canrsrt:s ____________________________ _ Cetail of other revenue oo Line E (if applicable): Year 1 · Cescriotioo ~ Cart:act Persoo: .• ~acity: _____ .:.= ✓ i ·m H2,. \, ½tDo d .•... ?rs: residential __ _ canren:ial G-32 Year 2 fmlmt • A if C D . E F G II I ,) L M ll - 0 p 0 R FISCAL YEi-R #1 Se.-.er cnarge revenue Ccnnect i en charge revenue F rent ft assessm:nt revenue Other revenue (carplete schedule oo oaoe 2l Total revenue c,ieraticn expense ~laintenance e.xpense Rep I acerent costs Fees paid to other jurisdictiais Total 01 & R Interest expense Depreciaticn expense Total expense Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Dd.>t principa 1 Total flew volllfe SQEllE F'S FifWClOl ~ STATISTICS CWfTY WATER & SEWER Pl.MS Fiscal Year #1 (.-.?o-<>,, Fiscal Year #2 ( --::a--11 COLI.Ml l FISCAL YEAA .¥2 COLLM'l 2 Set.er charge revenue Coonectia, charge revenue . . . Frart ft asses~.revenue ' .., ' -~: ".)•.:- Other revenue (caq:,lete schedule oo paae 2) ~ ,,,,,.., .....,_..._~L / . --' Tata I reva1ue CIJeratia, expense . ..;_-. ;;: 31 1../ s-4: , . Mainta,ance expense J ~ -··- Replaceie,t costs '. Fees paid to other jurisdictidls Z'-F -~.~:r-Tata! (}1 & R 9-3 '-f ,i..L ' . , Interest expense • Depreci ati a, expense "5'~-::,~_.,. Tatal expense ~; 4-'l'/ Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance -a--..,; . Debt princi pa 1 Tata] flcw volllfe ., Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those l'Alich are of such.a nature. as to be beytm those repairs antici in Lhe annual budget. ExaJl)les of "extraordinary" breakdo...ns might include a blcwer breakdo...n in th1f aeration large purp systan 110tor and ccm:rol, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. e1ease identify the ,rest costly potential repair and maintenance problan for this se,,e~ systan • . ...., .. .,... .. ,,_, . j ,'lj1proximate cost of this potential repa~r _____ _,. .... ..,,.,·::.·-------------------"" (over) G-33 ( • -2 - 0 Describe the source of ftmds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bald, line of credit, escro,i account, 1-.orking capital, etc.) · Additiooal camerts --------~---------------------- Detail of other reverue oo Line E (if applicable): Year l Year 2 Oescriptioo ~ ~ ;:,·J. Ca1tact Persoo: pi!City: ______ ;..;M;);... ers: residential ---IV+£ I I • Ma.r ,, o..nJ r n v 1 r-g o ro~.11 t 2 I cmmm:ial ___ _ MO TEl..EFlmE f 30 I -'9 "( '-{ -'l ~ 7 () ., G-34 I ,. A B C D . E F G H I J I( '- M N 0 p Q R SCIIIDJLE FS FltwCI/ll r,ww.,a.orr STATISTICS CWHY WATffi & SEJ,ER PVNS .F,iscal Year R1 , agg ._,_ -· .. ! ·---=~---- Fiscal Year #2 Systan Nare :saansbara I ae;con -------.. FISCAL Ytm #1 COLI.Ml 1 FISCAL YEM #2 COLI.Ml 2 1989 > .... Se...er d1arge revenue 99,333 Se...er cnarge revenue Connection charge revenue 9,950 Connectioo d1arge revenue ----, . ---"<' ''• ,., Front ft asses:sm:nt revenue .. Front ft assesSllE!lt revenue -------. Othei; revenue (cCJ11)1ete schedule Other ~enue (CCil\'Jiete scliedule 19,177 oo oaae 2) ·,-~ oo oaoe 2) Tota 1 revenue 128,461) Tota, revenue ~ratioo expense ~ratioo expense .,.., '-• a,•• .· 63,592 ' . t ·,·- Maintenance expense ·16,050 Maintenance expense ... Rep 1 acarent costs 5,231 ReplacBTe1t costs ~- Fees paid to other jurisdictioos -------Feo.s P.a~<t tp, 01;m,r jur:j_s~i~ioo.s. Total CM & R '84,873 Total CM & R .. Interest expense 8,641 Interest expense Depreciation expense 44,011 Depreciatioo expense . Total expense 137,525 Total expense Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance (9,065) Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance Debt principa 1 36,022 Debt principa 1 Tota 1 flo.-1 vo 1 ure 75,697,000 Total flo,i volure Extraordinary repairs and maintenance are those 1'.hich are of such a nature as to be beyood those repairs anticipat in the annual budget. Exil!ples of "extraordinary" breakd°"!:1~.Jll.ighj;_ inclucje-31 b)_o,..er breakdo,,n inthe aeration sys large p1Jl1) systannutor and cootrol, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or·a·ffoaffnif·aerator .... P.lease identify the rrost costly potential repair and maintenance problan for this se,,erage systan. Gas detection equipment-Sl.951.25 Repaired pump on chlorinator-S325 .17... /)· Sewer SYStero fJn5hjpg-$5,33?,0Q t,agd~p mnt;gr re2a1r-·sf.daj:T7 ta~oon Gearmotor repair-_$858.78 SI ~prox-imate cost of this potential repair ___ s9_,_5_5_o_.3_7 ________________ -'--- (over) G-35 V ... Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary iten (a bond; line of credit, escrcw account, l',()rking capital, etc.) , i•,J:, Working capital Mditional caments ____________ _;;_ __________________ _ Detail of other revenue on Line E (if applicable): Description Rental and Other Income IntE!rest· Income· i1:'.1,;,:'.'"·l ';•,/"<,' / '-. r . Year 1 ~ $2,357 16,820 ... $.19.,177 ' , .. C Year 2 Arcunt Capacity:_o_. 4_6 ____ ,c.;;IGJ=· 1;:· :·• . •• ... · .. 1".ay, .. l, •. Smit!), Town Manasi;er M-E Town of Boonsboro, 11 St. Paul Street Pim:ss -·-~··· .. ,-.-···· camercfaf ,·, -65 Bbortsboro, MD 21713 '30.l-432-5141 'fB.ffibE # . F.,a,J!; )01-432-4050 G-36 A B C D . E F G II I J K • L M ti 0 p Q R " SO!ElllE FS Fltw«:IJ!l t,WW,;EM:NT STATISTICS U:WrY WAlER & SOOl PI.PllS J ··i :•,. ,·-, . lfashington County Nooe. ______ _ Fi~cai'Year Hl 1991 '-----..;...__;__ Systen Nare Boonsboro Lagoon Fiscal Year #2 1990. '-"""-"-"------ ·•-. FISCAL YEAA #1 COUJvN l FISCAL YEAA #2 COLLM'l2 1001 100n •• i ., ' Set.er charge revenue . ••-•· Se.-er charge revenue l?'\ 1"' 100.930 - ... '' CO!lllectioii 'diaiije revenue Connection charge revenue 5,600 8,110 ",, "'" .. · F'niit ft assessirenCrevenue ... ,. .. Front ft assessnent revenue ---------------- ,. ',., , ... . Other. revenue ·(cC111) lete·"scfiedule Oth:r revenue (cmp~et~~~~ule ., ---127,065 25,216 oo oaae 2) Total revenue Total revenue 155.926 . r·.1•:··, ~---.. 236., 105 Operatioo expense Operatioo expense 7~ 810 . ·•IC·\ 6-1. 344 Maintenance expense Maintenance expense .. :.Q'-_:-~-,~ ,:. "' 11 SM Rep 1 ace rent costs ' .,, ~ Replacerent costs :,. ;, ~ :) "• w. . -~-~)''~~~·'. . ~· \. . ... 1, ns,,; ·'!• ;, .. _, ::-•. ·.' -_, .:r , l--:. , Fees paid to other jurisdictioos ,., ... Fees paid to other jurisdictions --------------- Total (M & R • 103,313 Total CM & R 177,582 -.. Interest expense 6,316 Interest expense 7,483 Depreciation expense 42,339 Depreciation expense 44, 7.84 Total expense 151,968 Tota 1 expense 229,849 Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance 3,958 Increase (Decrease) Fund Ba 1 ance 6,256 Debt principal 42,417 Debt principa 1 36,805 Total flOl'I VO h.rte 71,275,000 Tota 1 flOl'I vol ure 67,615 ,ooo· • • • ,_ • .-----.--,.,,,~~---•-• ., ....... ~• '•""•-'"· =· ,.,.-~, . ._,_ , ... --·-·•, ..... "~•-•··-'-~-~--~--,~--.·,···•·""-'" ,.,.,,,,., Extraordmary repairs and maintenance are those \'.111ch are of such a .nature as to be beyond those repairs anticipate- in the annual budget. Exanples ·of "extraordinary" bfeakdOMJs might include a blo.-.er breakdOMJ in the aeration systE large purp system notor and cootrol, clarifier sludge scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the nnst costly potential repair andmaintenancep~len for this se.-.era9ffei~S.i!3!1, __ ..... ::.:'.: _, ,,ii:'ii;,J 1990-Aerator renairs-S864.45 ~•~ · · ········Lagoon motor renair-$1,335.45 :: '·'""·-'·· ':, · iti:'·,,,J: ,, ... ,;--,ti Mi.'ter motor renair-$ 1 1 030. 26 )._:' :1-• · ·· 1991-Lagoon repair-$2,685.85 'M.otor.~ri!!pair-$297 .28 ---... -::: ... -..... ,; ~'-'"",,,: Lagoon motor renair-s1;845.63 .South end numn station renair-$ 1,710.00 ··--·filters & Scale-~1,029.50 Lago.on.,£Jow,:;ineter repair-$272.00 Time indicator-$396.00 Lagoon chlorine heads-$1,690.95 ~ I Approximate cost of this potential repair 1990-:-, $3,.230.16 1991-$9,927.21 · (over) G-37 .. '·'\ I • ! . ·!' ', -2 - 0 T Describe the source of funds to cover this extraordinary itan (a bond, 1 ine of credit, escro· :oc ., .. capi_tal.1i,etc,)·,' , Working ca-oital U Additional CamE!\ts___;.;__...:;....;_'---------------,------,----- V · Detail of other .revenue oo . Line E ( if app 1 i<:ab le): ..... j~scriptioo Rintal and other:inciotiie "''i:nt:erest income .. ,. El'A:·Gtant ·rr: Year 1 Prrount S4,344 18,032 2,840 ... , , . .$ 25,216 Cootact Person: Fav t. Smith, Town "lanager Year 2 /llroont ·-- . 0$.2,564 ··•1a,775 10:s ;126 ?_t27 ,065 ' .,,.,,,n~•~~ --, •-" •~• ~ ,.,.,~ ~ WI/,£ Users: residential_..:.7.::.B;::.5_ Town of Boonsboro, H St,· 'l'aul Street P006S cmmercial __ ::.,65::._._ Boonsboro, MO 21713 • 432-5141 TEI.EPHM # Fax-301-432-4050 G-38 } A B C D -E F G H I 1 ,, ' N 0 p Q R SOlEJllE FS FlrWCIAL ~ STATISTICS (ru{TY WATffi & SB,l:R PU'NS County Nare Washington Fist;a·lJ~eai-t#l ·. 19$9/90 System Nare_ See "U" Washinoton County Sanitary District . FiscafYear #2 .. 1990/91 ",_ ,. FlSCAL YEAA ,H CDLIJ'III 1 FISCAL YEAA #2 CDLlM-1 2 1 -. -~-, . Se-.er cilarge revenue 1,710,496 Se-.er charge re'lenue 1,716,347 • ' ..... ff, ., ..... , ....• Connection charge revenue 717,561 Connectior1 cilarge revenue 269,617 . . . . ' ,,._ F rent tt assessirerif revenue ·· Frc11t ft assessirent revenue ---- ,. ·--~ ,._,.~V Other revenue (COllJlete schedule 122,321 Other reverr.ie \c:c;ii?fete··saieoli le 212,700 •••,c on oaoe 2) en oaoe 2) ... . Total revenue Tota I revenue --, ""·. --2,550,378 ~ .,. ) ' 2,198,664 Cperaticn expense Cperation expense . 1 . 881,205 1,573,403 fl'aintenance expense 18,379 fl'aintenance expense ,.,.,,. ·. i''.'li 28,667 Replacerent costs Rep lac6T/:!1~, costs:: c , ~ :~ . .s .. ,.; . --·· _, .. Fees paid to othe; jurisct(d:icns .•· Fees paid to other jurisdictions ,,., Total TM & R 1 899,584 Total 0'1 & R 1,602,070 Interest expense 418,753 Interest expense 508,687 Depreciation expense 301,969 Depreciation expense ,413,203 Total expense 1,620,306 Tota 1 expense 2,523,960 Increase· (Cecrease) Fund Balance 930,072 Increase (Cecrease) Fund Ba lance (325,296) Debt principal 1,577,250 Debt principal 2,481,582 . Total fl°'4 volure 455,120,369 . Total flOtl VO llll!! 633,573,300 Extraordinary repairs and lll3intenance are those \\hich are ofsirlf a nafilre as tote·berml those , airs antici a J . rep p in the annual budget. Exaiµles of "extraordinary" breakdo,.ns might include a blo...er breakdcwJ in the aeration sy lar1]e plJI!) systan 11otor and control, clarifier sludge scraper ann and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please identify the 1TOSt costly potential repair and lll3intenance problSTI.'.for this se..erage ~tan, .. "., . '•'~-,~,.,.,,,,~, ..... , ,,,.. ••H•-•~• .,_,, ,, ",.cl,J,L~• "" Generator - SI J1pproxi11ute cost of this potential repair ______ 7_7.;.., o_o_o ________________ _ \{over) c V (· G-39 T V -2 - Describe the soorce of funds to.cover this extraordinary iten (a bend, capital, etc.) "-'··<>--~,-·-.,,.:'Y. . . ..; .... ·=· .. ,.,_ petail:of other revenue on .Line E(;{:applicabTe): "'~••.•• ·••• ""~•••••>"-•-••:•~"'"•~•>"-,, ' _.,,< ( "~•· • •<, ·--~---··-Yeal''l' · Plrount, .~-.~---,., _____ " , .. -~-~ ..... ,,, •. ,;:.', I ... ! ····· 6,206 109 ,424'"'"" 6,691 122,321 -:;•.f"',f"1 ·, ,,,-' ·· ··eapactty:·_··~· ..::;;.;;=·'-'-l~.• 7,...1.:.0.:.::M;O:::::.. · ·Users: resideritiaL .. 5995 --.. · •· · crllll1i!~i.aL .. 17 99 G-40 line crf credit, escl"Q\' account, 'I\Orldng 5 ,594.:: 184,040- 23,066, 212,700· SOIID.ll.E FS i . FIIWOftl~ STATISTICS <IDITY WATER & SEWER Pl.PllS ,:, /1 !1::·" ,· ' County Nare Washinaton . ,, ... , ... ·1s'l!i:scai ,Xiift n 88/89 .. -. '""·"'~""'-... , Washinaton ;''r:, Systen ttare See nun County Sanitary District •.. fiscal Year #2 69l9Q' -.. , ... , . . .,, .. ~~--.,-,, .. " . ""···--. ~ ~-, >•,~ .. ~ .. ..... , -·-· . "···-····=', "' A FISCAL YEAA #1 COLLM'l 1 f:iSCALYE/1B #2 -COLLM'l 2 ri .... _,,.., ,_,, ... -. .. ,, .,.._ -~ ; -'•••c•, . -•" . ~-., .• "'·•~••ec- B se--er charge revenue 1, 162,003 "•-n .. .,,., . Set.ei:. ... qJ<!J'9l! revenue .. ' .. .... •--~ '" ,-,•~-~--''""·• ' . ., ___ ~ .. , .... 1 .710.496 ' ... .. · CilhliE!t±too : i;lj~rg(;!• mv!'l!l~ ,. C Connection charge revenue 499.215 . , .. . .: .,i:,· . . · ''f'7'1'7•,.,.;f;,1 c, ' •' ,,, . . , .. . .,,,-; 1'1 ~-" D Front ft assessirent revenue .·., ,;, -,.,. •··" ,., ____ .:;. J;'r:ent ft. ~~~~}_l;_~f.:it'enlle . -_,.-; --. ·-••<•·--~.,. . -~---..... .. .. " E . Other (COJPlete schedule . ,,•-,~., ..... .,a --••= • Other ... me:r,;g_!.,carp l ete sche:iu 1 e revenue 716,960 . ,--~----) ····~-'-~-....... an oaae 2) on oaae·zr--.... ..... .,. ___ . .,122, 321 F Total revenue 2,378, 178 · -Tot.at.re~~----... ., ..... ., ... ., .... .. . ., .. 2,55.0:.J78 G Operation expense 959,842 : '()petaf1cx1,~se ,., • · -' ' '" .~ . f :'"i i·~~,{,t!•."·T ·,:,tr::.'' ·9a1 ;2.05 H Maintenance .. ':£; 0 ; Mlintenance expense 32 174! " expense 1A ~70 t "' n~,~-'-'',\ ''! I Rep l acerent costs Rep laceren t costs !..'.::: .. ,1,·:·.:;:::•(• b:·~. ,;~ ,,[;•.• •u ·····. \)_?),. J Fees paid to othtir jurisdictions ., Fe=..s paid to other jurisdictions :·:,1; .. ,.' . ~-,: ·;: -·-, . .1+ ,., .. ,,,, :: :,_ r Total (J,1 & R i,·. 992 oi£f ,:;: Total (J,1 & R £ ~, ._::,::, ,, ::,;,_~:._ ~~--:';-I;.;; ,',-1 ... ' 899,584 t ' . .. . . •, ... " -~~ ... ~ Interest expense 448,965 Interest expense 418,753 M Depreciation expense 386,490 Depreciatia, expense .301,969 N Total expense 1,827,471 Total e.'<jlE!!lSe 1,620,306 0 Increase· (Decrease) Fund Balance 550,707 Increase (Decrease) Fund Balance 930,072 D Debt principal 3,721,172 Debt principal 1,577,250 g Total flo,i volure 463,982,700 . Total flo,i vo lure . ... • . ... .,.,, 455,120,369 R E.-<traordinary repairs and maintenance are those wich·areof-sucil .. a .. nature as.to"'be beyond those repairs anticipat in the annual budget. E-'<aTl)les of "extraerdina~r br;eakdo,.os might irclude a bla,i,ir-oreal{d'Oiifl•in-the--aer-.ition sy, large PlJlll systen noter and control, clarifier s udge'scraper arm and bearings, or a floating aerator. Please 1cent1•fy·the"100St costly potential repaj!'.;_~c\1il)at11te1iance pr"Oblsn for this se,.erage systen. · ~~··"'·"-•-~,--'~-._-,_.,,i_.~:;~·;"· v~.:',,,:,) ;·_ --'"""""·., ·-· ., . ., ~·-· -.. , .. --~----, .. ,~ --· ' ~ ·-•~ ... ,· . -.. ;. ·:· '' ' ·-· .,, "'-""'" ,, .......... ,,tj-,¥ ., ~ ... ., .. '~~µ--;:~--,"' '•·'•••A •'• ·;,_ ,,.·., .. ;.·:'0;/ ~· ., ---~., .. --..... ___ .,, '"" i . . "'~ •.-w.,.,,. ..... ,, :; .''.".'1~ ,,--. ~ .:, i_ ' _. _; \,; .,. , .. ,._.,._,._.. ,. ,. ~-,~, •. ' •,,,•tt,,°,>,-.,, Generator ;:;,o·: . •,7 ,..,_ .. ··-....... ... ,,,,, .. ~-~-•., ~. __ ,, ., . .. .,, .. ~ . . . ---~---• '< -,: ' r . -' , , ·~-·-.... ..._,. . .. ,.,_ ~ 'J:,:.;;.>~~;"'"•.,:-··' s I Approximate cost of this potential repair 75;000 ,·"• "· --(at_er) ~ C :,,.~, 2 ' .. :'!c -~, ~ ;,_ '-..! .. rt~::;; t ,,, ~--" F, -;:; t"'/ -"' ,, -•·i. . G-41+· . . -2 - T •·. Describe the S<l!Jn::11 9f t\indS w ~•Tuis extrnirdinary item (a bond,'Htie ·of credit, es= ilCCount, "1lrking ~pij:al, etc;,) . > •· . · ' · · ·· · · ,aesmi;y,ect Enncts .,., · Oescriptico . Debt• Service Fees Inspection Fees P11nalty Interest Other Users~ resicienti11l • 5QOJ CWiiel ,;ial . 17Q4 · Year l ~- 532,246 64,387 2.95· 83,492 · 36,540 .· 71 s,19o<>•; •. _ ~ Ftrsan -•·. M ... ~'->-_ - -·." .,.,., ,,._,_, __ , 77 Rt: 2; _ Box .1075 , ..... _ .. ..; .,_iji.ij#:,$5,_ ' ' ·• -· ' . ·· °'"'•----WHlJamspor;t,. MQ-· ··-. 2JZ9S ... ;_ '[''•)·'.-' • , 30t-223-94T6 · G-42 -Year 2 /lm:lunt 6,206 109,424 6,69F 122,32(